Good correlation between changes in objective and subjective signs of inflammation in patients with short- but not long duration of axial spondyloarthritis treated with tumor necrosis factor-blockers

Assessment of axial spondyloarthritis activity using a magnetic resonance imaging-based multi-region-of-interest fusion model

BACKGROUND

Identifying axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) activity early and accurately is essential for treating physicians to adjust treatment plans and guide clinical decisions promptly. The current literature is mostly focused on axSpA diagnosis, and there has been thus far, no study that reported the use of a radiomics approach for differentiating axSpA disease activity. In this study, the aim was to develop a radiomics model for differentiating active from non-active axSpA based on fat-suppressed (FS) T2-weighted (T2w) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of sacroiliac joints.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 109 patients diagnosed with non-active axSpA (n = 68) and active axSpA (n = 41); patients were divided into training and testing cohorts at a ratio of 8:2. Radiomics features were extracted from 3.0 T sacroiliac MRI using two different heterogeneous regions of interest (ROIs, Circle and Facet). Various methods were used to select relevant and robust features, and different classifiers were used to build Circle-based, Facet-based, and a fusion prediction model. Their performance was compared using various statistical parameters. p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

For both Circle- and Facet-based models, 2284 radiomics features were extracted. The combined fusion ROI model accurately differentiated between active and non-active axSpA, with high accuracy (0.90 vs.0.81), sensitivity (0.90 vs. 0.75), and specificity (0.90 vs. 0.85) in both training and testing cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The multi-ROI fusion radiomics model developed in this study differentiated between active and non-active axSpA using sacroiliac FS T2w-MRI. The results suggest MRI-based radiomics of the SIJ can distinguish axSpA activity, which can improve the therapeutic result and patient prognosis. To our knowledge, this is the only study in the literature that used a radiomics approach to determine axSpA activity.

The correlations between C-reactive protein and MRI-detected inflammation in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

C-reactive protein (CRP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are widely used to monitor inflammation in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but the relationship between CRP and MRI-detected inflammation is incompletely understood. The present study was undertaken to assess correlations between CRP and MRI-detected inflammation in axSpA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed (Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library) to identify relevant studies concerning CRP and MRI-detected inflammation in axSpA patients. The MRI-detected inflammation was evaluated by MRI-based disease activity score (DAS). The correlation between CRP and MRI-based DAS was integrated by random-effect models.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies reported a total of 1392 axSpA patients which were included in this meta-analysis. CRP was significantly associated with spinal MR DAS (r=0.226, 95%CI [0.149, 0.291], p<0.001, I2=23%). We also found a moderate correlation between CRP change and spinal MR DAS change (r[ASspiMRI-a]=0.354, 95%CI [0.282, 0.422], p<0.001, I2=48%; r[SPARCC]=0.544, 95%CI [0.345, 0.701], p<0.001, I2=19%). CRP at baseline was negatively associated with improvement in spinal MR DAS (r= - 0.327, 95%CI [-0.397, -0.264], p<0.001, I2=0%). However, no significant association was found between CRP and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) MR DAS.

CONCLUSIONS

In axSpA patients, CRP is associated with MRI-detected inflammation in the spine but not in SIJ. We speculate that CRP could be a reasonable index to reflect spinal inflammation. Therefore, we suggest it is not essential to repeat spinal MRI in a short term, while SIJ MRI may be necessary to provide additional information on inflammation. Key Points • CRP is associated with MRI-detected inflammation in the spine but not in sacroiliac joints. • CRP at baseline was negatively associated with improvement in spinal MR DAS. • It was not essential to repeat spinal MRI frequently, while SIJ MRI may be necessary to provide additional information on inflammation.

Ixekizumab in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis with and without elevated C-reactive protein or positive magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate response rates at week 16 with ixekizumab in patients with radiographic axial SpA (r-axSpA) and elevated or normal/low baseline inflammation measured by serum CRP or spinal MRI using data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase III trials.

METHODS

Biologic-naïve (COAST-V) or TNF inhibitor-experienced (COAST-W) adults with active r-axSpA received 80 mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks (IXEQ2W) or 4 weeks (IXEQ4W) or PBO or active reference [40 mg adalimumab every 2 weeks (ADAQ2W) in COAST-V. At week 16, patients receiving ixekizumab continued as assigned and patients receiving PBO or ADA were rerandomized 1:1 to IXEQ2W or IXEQ4W through week 52. Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40% (ASAS40) response rates were examined by baseline CRP (≤5 or >5 mg/l) and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI spine inflammation score (<2 or ≥2).

RESULTS

In the COAST-V/W integrated dataset (N = 567), significantly more patients treated with ixekizumab achieved ASAS40 response at week 16 by CRP ≤5 mg/l (27% IXEQ4W, P < 0.05; 35% IXEQ2W, P < 0.01 vs 12% PBO), CRP >5 mg/l (39% IXEQ4W, P < 0.001; 43% IXEQ2W, P < 0.001 vs 17% PBO), SPARCC MRI spine score <2 (40% IXEQ4W P < 0.01, 52% IXEQ2W P < 0.001 vs 16% PBO), and SPARCC MRI spine score ≥2 (44% IXEQ4W P < 0.001, 47% IXEQ2W P < 0.001 vs 19% PBO). ASAS40 response was observed with CRP ≤5 mg/l and SPARCC MRI spine score <2 with IXEQ4W (29%) and was significant with IXEQ2W (48%; P < 0.05) vs PBO (13%).

CONCLUSION

Ixekizumab demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of AS/r-axSpA in patients with and without elevated CRP or evidence of spinal inflammation on MRI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov): NCT02696785, NCT02696798.

Use of Imaging in Axial Spondyloarthritis for Diagnosis and Assessment of Disease Remission in the Year 2022

Medical imaging remains the cornerstone of diagnostics and follow-up of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients. With the lack of specific biomarkers allowing monitoring of disease activity and progression, clinicians refer to imaging modalities for accurate evaluation of the axSpA burden. Technological advances and increasing availability of modern imaging techniques such as MRI have enabled faster diagnosis of the disease, hence dramatically changed the diagnostic delay and improved the prognosis and functional outcomes for axSpA patients.Active sacroiliitis as visualized by MRI has been widely accepted as a diagnostic tool, and definitions of inflammatory and structural lesions within the axial skeleton have been developed. Recently, it has been acknowledged that bone marrow edema, suggestive of sacroiliitis, is a common finding among non-SpA patients, and could be attributed to mechanical loading or accumulate with age in healthy individuals. Therefore, it is crucial to distinguish between true pathological and concealing imaging findings, not only for diagnostic but also for disease remission purposes. New imaging modalities, aimed for in vivo visualization of specific molecular processes, could be employed to cross-validate findings from techniques used in daily clinical practice. This review critically evaluates the use of different imaging modalities for diagnosis and assessment of disease remission in axSpA in the year 2022.

Association of health care utilization and costs with patient-reported outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

BACKGROUND: Interventions for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical studies. However, limited data exist associating these improvements with health care resource utilization (HCRU) or cost savings. Few studies have evaluated the economic impact of patient-reported physical status and related disease burden in patients with AS in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of PRO measures with HCRU and health care costs in patients with AS from a national US registry. METHODS: This cohort study included adults with a diagnosis of AS enrolled in the FORWARD registry from July 2009 to June 2019 who completed at least 1 questionnaire from January 2010 to December 2019 and completed the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (0-3) and/or Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (0-10). Patient-reported data for demographics, clinical characteristics, and PROs were collected through questionnaires administered biannually and reported from the most recent questionnaire. Patient-reported HCRU and total health care costs (2019 US dollars) for hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, outpatient visits, diagnostic tests, and procedures were captured during the 6 months prior to the most recent survey completion. The relationship between HAQ-DI or BASDAI and HCRU outcomes was assessed using negative binomial regression models, and the relationship between HAQ-DI or BASDAI and the cost outcomes was evaluated using generalized linear models with γ distribution and log-link function. RESULTS: Overall, 334 patients with AS who completed the HAQ-DI (n = 253) or BASDAI (n = 81) were included. The mean (SD) HAQ-DI and BASDAI scores at the time of patients' most recent surveys were 0.9 (0.7) and 3.7 (2.3), respectively. HAQ-DI score was positively associated with number of hospitalizations, ED visits, outpatient visits, and diagnostic tests, whereas BASDAI was not associated with HCRU outcomes. Overall annualized mean (SD) total health care, medical, and pharmacy costs for patients with AS were $44,783 ($40,595); $6,521 ($12,733); and $38,263 ($40,595), respectively. Annualized total health care, medical, and pharmacy costs adjusted for confounders increased by 35%, 76%, and 26%, respectively, for each 1.0-unit increase in HAQ-DI score (coefficient [95% CI]: 1.35 [1.15-1.58], 1.76 [1.22-2.55]; both P < 0.01 and 1.26 [1.04-1.52]; P < 0.05, respectively); BASDAI score was not significantly associated with cost outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Higher HAQ-DI scores were associated with higher HCRU and total health care costs among patients with AS in FORWARD, but BASDAI scores were not. These findings indicate that greater functional impairment may impose an increased economic burden compared with other patient-reported measures of AS. DISCLOSURES: A. Ogdie has received consulting fees from Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, CorEvitas (formerly Corrona), Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB and has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Rheumatology Research Foundation, National Psoriasis Foundation, Pfizer (University of Pennsylvania), Amgen (FORWARD), and Novartis (FORWARD). M. Hwang has received consulting fees from Novartis and UCB and has received grant support (5KL2TR003168-03) from the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Center of Clinical and Translational Sciences KL2 program. P. Veeranki and J. Shafrin were employees of PRECISION-heor at the time of this analysis. A. Portelli and S. Sison are employees of PRECISION-heor. S. Pedro does not have anything to disclose. N. Kim was a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Texas at Austin and Baylor Scott and White Health, providing services to Novartis at the time of this study. E. Yi is an employee of Novartis. K. Michaud received grant funding from the Rheumatology Research Foundation at the time of this analysis. This study was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ.

Filgotinib decreases both vertebral body and posterolateral spine inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis: results from the TORTUGA trial

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of filgotinib on inflammatory and structural changes at various spinal locations, based on MRI measures in patients with active AS in the TORTUGA trial.

METHODS

In the TORTUGA trial, patients with AS received filgotinib 200 mg (n = 58) or placebo (n = 58) once daily for 12 weeks. In this post hoc analysis, spine MRIs were evaluated using the Canada-Denmark (CANDEN) MRI scoring system to assess changes from baseline to week 12 in total spine and subscores for inflammation, fat, erosion and new bone formation (NBF) at various anatomical locations. Correlations were assessed between CANDEN inflammation and clinical outcomes and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI scores and between baseline CANDEN NBF and baseline BASFI and BASMI scores.

RESULTS

MRIs from 47 filgotinib- and 41 placebo-treated patients were evaluated. There were significantly larger reductions with filgotinib vs placebo in total spine inflammation score and most inflammation subscores, including posterolateral elements (costovertebral joints, transverse/spinous processes, soft tissues), facet joints and vertebral bodies. No significant differences were observed for corner or non-corner vertebral body inflammation subscores, spine fat lesion, bone erosion or NBF scores. In the filgotinib group, the change from baseline in the total inflammation score correlated positively with the SPARCC spine score. Baseline NBF scores correlated with baseline BASMI but not BASFI scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with placebo, filgotinib treatment was associated with significant reductions in MRI measures of spinal inflammation, including in vertebral bodies, facet joints and posterolateral elements.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), NCT03117270.

Is There a Correlation Between Patient-Reported Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Score and MRI Findings in Axial Spondyloarthropathy in Routine Clinical Practice?

Background

The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) is the patient-reported outcome (PRO) that is routinely used in clinical practice to monitor and measure disease activity in axial spondyloarthropathy (axSpA). BASDAI scores greater than four are thought to indicate active disease and require better control. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most objective measure of disease activity in axSpA with its ability to pick up active inflammation both in the spine and sacroiliac joints. Previous studies have shown conflicting correlations between BASDAI and MRI, and therefore, there is the question of whether BASDAI is the best tool to monitor disease activity when it is subjective and potentially influenced by other patient factors. We, therefore, conducted a retrospective study to investigate the correlation between BASDAI and MRI in axSpA patients.

Methodology

Data were collected by retrospective analysis of axSpA patients attending University of Leicester (UHL) axSpA services. BASDAI scores were done within a year and closest to the time of MRI spine + sacroiliac joints were collected. The results prior to the initiation of biologic therapy were used. Data of one hundred and forty-nine patients were collected on their MRI results and BASDAI scores. Data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software and Pearson’s chi-squared applied to assess the correlation between BASDAI and MRI findings.

Results

Out of one hundred and forty-nine patients, 61.7% had active sacroiliitis on their MRI, 57.7% had chronic sacroiliitis, 53% had active spinal inflammation, and 17.4% had other MRI findings of active disease. There was a significant correlation between active sacroiliitis and BASDAI (p=0.014), but similar results were not found with other radiological features. A significant correlation was also found with males having higher BASDAI scores compared to females (p=0.027).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a statistically significant correlation between BASDAI and active sacroiliitis with those having higher scores more likely to have active disease on their MRI. 

Twenty years of clinical trials in axial spondyloarthritis: what can we learn for the future?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We have now about 20 years of experience with the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis with biologics, which raises the question what we can learn from past experience, and which open questions should be addressed in future investigations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many studies have shown that axSpA patients - both patients in their nonradiological and radiological stage - respond similarly well to biologic treatment and these patients should be seen as having the same disease at different stages. AxSpA respond best to TNF-blocker - and probably also to other biologics - if the disease duration is short and if objective parameters of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein or MRI are positive. Primary aim of treatment is to reach and maintain clinical remission. Once remission is achieved, it can be maintained by continuing treatment, and in a proportion of yet not well defined patients the drug dose can be reduced without inducing a flare. The recent demonstration of a good efficacy, in addition to TNF blockers, also of IL-17 inhibitors and JAK-inhibitors in axSpA patients raises the question how to select the best patients for the best treatment. Radiographic progression can best be stopped by effectively suppressing inflammation, whether different drugs have here a different effect has still to be defined. More sensitive measurements of radiographic progression are urgently needed.

SUMMARY

Reaching and maintaining clinical remission and preventing structural bony damage is the primary treatment target in patients with axSpA. How to reach this aim best has to be further explored in the future.

Efficacy and safety of brodalumab, an anti-IL17RA monoclonal antibody, in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: 16-week results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of brodalumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-17 receptor A monoclonal antibody, in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

Methods

In a multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 study (NCT02985983) conducted at 48 sites across Japan, Korea and Taiwan, patients with axSpA were randomised 1:1 to receive subcutaneous brodalumab 210 mg (n=80) or placebo (n=79) at baseline, weeks 1 and 2 and every 2 weeks thereafter, during the 16-week double-blind period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 40 response at week 16. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with ASAS 20 response and change in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) at week 16 and safety.

Results

ASAS 40 response rate (n/N; 95% CI) was 43.8% (35/80; 32.7, 55.3) with brodalumab vs 24.1% (19/79; 15.1, 35.0) with placebo (rate difference, 19.7% (5.3, 34.1); p=0.018 by stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test). ASAS 20 response rate (n/N; 95% CI) was 67.5% (54/80; 56.1, 77.6) vs 41.8% (33/79; 30.8, 53.4) and least squares mean change (95% CI) from baseline (brodalumab, 2.660; placebo, 2.716) in ASDAS-CRP was –1.127 (–1.322, –0.931) with brodalumab vs –0.672 (–0.872, –0.473) with placebo at week 16. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 44 (55%) and 45 (57%) patients in the brodalumab and placebo groups, respectively.

Conclusion

Brodalumab demonstrated a significant improvement at week 16 in patients with active axSpA. Safety of brodalumab was consistent with that reported in previous global/Japanese psoriasis studies.

Predicting functional disability in patients with spondyloarthritis using a CRP-based algorithm: A 3-year prospective study

This prospective study explored the link between values of C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with SpA (ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, reactive arthritis, or arthritis-related inflammatory bowel disease) and functional disability in order to derive an algorithm that may predict functional disability based on disease activity. Patients diagnosed with Spa were classified into five groups based on the type of therapy and they were followed up for 3 years. Group 1: Symptomatic medication alone; Group 2: Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs); Group 3: DMARDs and 30 rehabilitation sessions twice a year; Group 4: Group 3 therapy and biologic anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) drugs; and Group 5: Group 4 therapy and, in addition, a daily home-adapted kinesiotherapy program. CRP, modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ-S), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and T-score of the patients were recorded. Correlation and multivariate regression analyses were conducted using demographic data, CRP, and mHAQ-S scores to derive the CRP-mHAQ-S correlation algorithm. Statistical analysis included the chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and multiple regression tests and repeated measures analysis of variance. A total of 144 patients were enrolled, all of whom completed the study. The best predictive model (P<0.001) provided the algorithm mHAQ-S₃₆=17.14+0.12xCRP₀-0.24xCRP₁₂-0.15xCRP₃₆ (CRP₀, CRP₁₂, and CRP₃₆ correspond to CRP levels at baseline, 12, and 36 months, respectively, and mHAQ-S₃₆ to mHAQ-S score at 36 months). This derived algorithm based on objective CRP assessment may have implications in the prediction of functional disability evolution in patients with SpA.

Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis: What Does the Future Hold?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a summary of the recent and expected developments related to the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis.

RECENT FINDINGS

An increasing number of interleukin-17 blocking agents show efficacy in axial spondyloarthritis including both non-radiographic and radiographic forms. Janus kinase inhibitors showed promising results in phase II studies in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and have, therefore, a potential to become a therapeutic option in this indication in the future. Inhibition of structural damage progression in axial spondyloarthritis seems to be possible in the case of effective and early anti-inflammatory treatment, although there are still open questions related to particular drug classes. Despite major advances in the field and growing therapeutic options, there are still many open questions related to the optimized treatment strategies and to the individual choice of a drug in axial spondyloarthritis.

Treat to Target in Axial Spondyloarthritis

This article discusses treat-to-target strategies in axial spondyloarthritis and current status. Treatment ranging from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to biologic and other disease-modifying drugs is discussed in the context of treat-to-target. The article explores evidence from landmark randomized, controlled trials and observational studies focusing on both radiographic and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis. The feasibility of treat-to-target, as well as predictors of remission are addressed in line with existing evidence. Finally, issues around management principles and challenges, as well as unmet need in the field, are highlighted.

The effect of anti-IL-6 receptor antibody for the treatment of McH-lpr/lpr-RA1 mice that spontaneously developed destructive arthritis and enthesitis

Background

McH-lpr/lpr-RA1 mice are a new strain of mice which spontaneously develop destructive arthritis and enthesitis in the ankle. There is no published data that drug treatment has been trialed on these mice. This study examined the effect of the mouse anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, MR16–1, for the treatment of arthritis and enthesitis in McH-lpr/lpr-RA1 mice.

Methods

Male McH-lpr/lpr-RA1 mice were randomly divided into control and treatment groups. MR16–1 was administered from 10 weeks of age for the treatment group. Saline was applied for the control group. The drug was administered once a week, at an initial dose of 2 mg, then maintained at 0.5 mg once per week thereafter. The effects were evaluated by the histopathological synovitis score, in vivo imaging using indocyanine green liposomes, and analysis of the gene expression of inflammatory cytokines.

Results

Tissue analyses were carried out at 14, 17 and 20 weeks of age. The synovitis scores of treated groups were significantly lower compared with those of the control group at 14 and 17 weeks of age. The kappa coefficient was 0.77. However, progression of entheseal ossification persisted in the MR16–1 treated group. In vivo imaging using indocyanine green liposomes showed significant decreases in signal intensities of treated groups at week 14, but no significant differences were observed at week 18. Blood serum amyloid A levels in treated groups were significantly lower at 17 weeks of age. The gene expression levels of Tnf and Il17 were also significantly lower in MR16–1 treated groups.

Conclusions

Administration of the anti-IL-6 receptor antibody is effective for the treatment of synovitis and bone destruction of McH-lpr/lpr-RA1 mice. McH-lpr/lpr-RA1 mice may be a suitable experimental model for the development of new treatments for destructive arthritis and enthesitis. IL-6 signal blockade could contribute to the treatment of destructive arthritis, and further studies should be carried out to confirm its potential in the prevention of enthesopathy developed to ossification.

A Review on the Effect of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors on Structural Progression in Early Axial Spondyloarthritis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

INTRODUCTION

Considering the progressive nature of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), it is important to determine whether tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitors have an effect on early inflammatory and structural lesions detected using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE/PubMed for full-text, English-language articles on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, or infliximab published since January 2007 was conducted in February 2018 and again in December 2018. The collected articles reported on inflammatory or fatty lesion progression in the spine or sacroiliac joint (SIJ), determined using MRI, in a population that included at least 40% of patients with early axSpA, defined as non-radiographic axSpA.

RESULTS

Of the 105 articles retrieved, 19 were included in this review, of which the majority were on etanercept (n = 11). A majority of selected articles included information on inflammatory lesions (SIJ 15/19; spine 12/19). All five TNFα inhibitors showed benefits on inflammation, assessed by MRI, in patients with early axSpA for up to 204 weeks of treatment. Structural progression in SIJ and the spine was assessed in 6/19 and 3/19 articles, respectively, with mixed evidence on benefits of TNF-inhibitor treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, treatment with TNFα inhibitors reduces MRI-evident inflammatory lesions in the SIJ and spine of patients with early axSpA for up to 4 years. There is less evidence of benefits on structural lesions. Additional studies are required to determine whether TNFα-inhibitor therapy can limit or delay radiological progression in patients with early axSpA.

FUNDING

Pfizer.

Tofacitinib is associated with attainment of the minimally important reduction in axial magnetic resonance imaging inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis patients

Objectives

Minimally important changes (MICs) for SPondyloArthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI scores are ⩾2.5 for SI joint and ⩾5 for spine. This post hoc analysis assessed achievement of MIC in SPARCC scores in biologic-naïve patients with AS treated with tofacitinib or placebo, and correlation with clinical responses.

Methods

Adult AS patients in a 12-week phase 2 study (n = 207) were randomized 1: 1: 1: 1 to tofacitinib 2, 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) or placebo. MIC in SPARCC SI joint and spine scores were assessed for patients with available MRI data (N = 164; 79%). Clinical endpoints at week 12, including Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 20% improvement (ASAS20), were compared between patients achieving/not achieving MIC.

Results

A greater proportion of patients achieved MIC with tofacitinib 2, 5 and 10 mg BID vs placebo for SI joint (28.6, 38.6, 29.6 vs 11.8%) and spine scores (29.3, 36.4, 40.9 vs 11.8%). Generally, a greater proportion of patients treated with tofacitinib 2, 5 and 10 mg BID or placebo, respectively, who achieved MIC for SI joint and spine scores achieved ASAS20 (SI joint: 75.0, 88.2, 69.2, 75.0%; spine: 91.7, 85.7, 72.2, 75.0%) vs patients who did not achieve MIC (SI joint: 51.7, 84.0, 58.1, 48.3%; spine: 46.4, 85.7, 53.8, 48.3%). Numerically greater responses were seen in those patients achieving vs not achieving MIC across a range of other efficacy assessments.

Conclusion

Approximately one-third of tofacitinib-treated AS patients experienced clinically meaningful reductions in spinal MRI inflammation at week 12. Patients achieving MIC for MRI inflammation had greater clinical response.

Diffusion-weighted Imaging Is a Sensitive and Specific Magnetic Resonance Sequence in the Diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

We tested the discriminatory capacity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) and its potential as an objective measure of treatment response to tumor necrosis factor inhibition in ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

Three cohorts were studied prospectively: (1) 18 AS patients with Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index > 4, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate > 25 and/or C-reactive protein > 10 meeting the modified New York criteria for AS; (2) 20 cases of nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) as defined by the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria; and (3) 20 non-AS patients with chronic low back pain, aged between 18 and 45 years, who did not meet the imaging arm of the ASAS criteria for axSpA. Group 1 patients were studied prior to and following adalimumab treatment. Patients were assessed by DWI and conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and standard nonimaging measures.

RESULTS

At baseline, in contrast to standard nonimaging measures, DWI apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values showed good discriminatory performance [area under the curve (AUC) > 80% for Group 1 or 2 compared with Group 3]. DWI ADC values were significantly lower posttreatment (0.45 ± 0.433 before, 0.154 ± 0.23 after, p = 0.0017), but had modest discriminating capacity comparing pre- and posttreatment measures (AUC = 68%). This performance was similar to the manual Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) scoring system.

CONCLUSION

DWI is informative for diagnosis of AS and nr-axSpA, and has moderate utility in assessment of disease activity or treatment response, with performance similar to that of the SPARCC MRI score.

Modification of structural lesions on MRI of the sacroiliac joints by etanercept in the EMBARK trial: a 12-week randomised placebo-controlled trial in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis

Objective

To evaluate the impact on structural lesions observed on MRI in the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) at 12 weeks in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) receiving etanercept or placebo in EMBARK (Effect of Etanercept on Symptoms and Objective Inflammation in nr-axSpA, a 104 week study).

Methods

Patients were randomised to double-blind etanercept 50 mg/week or placebo for 12 weeks. Structural lesions at baseline and 12 weeks were scored by two independent readers using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) SIJ structural score (SSS) on T1-weighted MRI. Change in SPARCC SSS and correlation with improvement in clinical outcomes was evaluated.

Results

MRI scans from 185 patients (etanercept, n=88; placebo, n=97) were reviewed. At baseline, there were no significant differences in mean SPARCC SSS between etanercept and placebo. From baseline to 12 weeks, change in mean SPARCC SSS was significantly greater for etanercept than placebo for erosion (–0.57 vs –0.08, respectively, adjusted p value=0.017) and backfill (0.36 vs 0.06, adjusted p value=0.022). A treatment difference was also present for the subgroup of patients with SIJ inflammation on MRI (SPARCC bone marrow oedema ≥2): erosion: –0.81 versus –0.13 for etanercept versus placebo, respectively, p=0.007; backfill: 0.48 versus 0.08, respectively, p=0.032. Decrease in erosion and increase in backfill correlated with improvement in more clinical outcomes for etanercept than placebo.

Conclusion

Treatment with etanercept was associated with significantly greater reduction in erosions and increase in backfill at 12 weeks compared with placebo, consistent with a very early reparative response to antitumour necrosis factor therapy. The impact on disease progression in spondyloarthritis should be studied further.

Trial registration number

NCT01258738; Post-results.

The role of MRI in the evaluation of spondyloarthritis: a clinician's guide

Plain radiography remains the benchmark for diagnostic evaluation of spondyloarthritis although MRI has much great sensitivity because it can detect a variety of inflammatory lesions as well as fat metaplasia. So, it is the imaging modality of choice when pelvic radiographs are equivocal and especially when important treatment decisions have to be made. Appropriate imaging includes the use of T1-weighted and short tau inversion recovery sequences of the sacroiliac joint in the tilted coronal plane. If there is localized spinal symptomatology, sagittal scans of the spine may also be helpful. However, routine spinal imaging is not recommended. Current consensus designates a positive MRI for classification purposes as requiring the presence of two definite subchondral inflammatory lesions on a single coronal slice or the presence of one such lesion on two consecutive coronal slices. However, such inflammatory lesions can occur in healthy individuals and in those with nonspecific back pain. Erosions are more specific, and their presence can enhance confidence in the diagnosis. MRI, together with CRP, can be helpful in selecting which patients without radiographic sacroiliitis are most likely to respond to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy. The role of MRI in monitoring of patients with SpA remains unclear although it may be helpful in excluding other sources of back pain. A major unanswered question is whether MRI may be useful in predicting relapse following withdrawal of TNFi in patients who have achieved sustained remission.

Biomarkers in axial spondyloarthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To assess the literature for biomarker validation studies that address key unmet needs related to the evaluation and management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). This review focused on biomarkers facilitating early diagnosis and reflecting disease activity, structural damage on radiography, and clinical response to major therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early diagnosis may be facilitated by measurement of antibodies to the human leukocyte antigen class II-associated invariant chain peptide (anti-CD74) but sensitivity declines with increasing duration of disease. No disease activity biomarkers have demonstrated consistent superiority over standard C-reactive protein (CRP), and future validation should employ multivariate analysis aimed at demonstrating the added value of any associated biomarkers beyond available clinical parameters of disease activity and the use of magnetic resonance imaging inflammation as the primary endpoint. Several biomarkers reflecting inflammation (CRP and calprotectin), angiogenesis (vasoactive endothelial growth factor), and connective tissue turnover (C2 M, C3 M, and citrullinated metalloproteinase degraded fragment of vimentin ) have recently been shown to reflect radiographic progression in multivariate studies adjusted for baseline severity. Future studies should be prospective and demonstrate that predictive capacity adds to the information provided by known predictors such as CRP and baseline modified Stoke AS Spine Score. Calprotectin is a promising predictor of response to major therapies for axial SpA.

SUMMARY

Several promising biomarkers addressing major unmet clinical needs require further validation in prospective studies.

Effect of golimumab and pamidronate on clinical efficacy and MRI inflammation in axial spondyloarthritis: a 48-week open randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of golimumab (GLM) and pamidronate (PAM) on clinical efficacy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) inflammation in axial spondyloarthritis (aSpA).

METHOD

Patients who fulfilled the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis Society (ASAS) criteria for aSpA and had active disease [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score ≥ 4] were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either GLM (50 mg) or PAM (60 mg) 4 weekly for 48 weeks. Clinical efficacy was assessed at intervals. Inflammation of the spine and sacroiliac joints (SIJs) on MRI was graded by the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) scoring system.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were assigned to GLM and 10 to PAM (83% men; age 33.4 ± 10.9 years; disease duration 4.4 ± 3.4 years). The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. At week 48, the proportions of patients who achieved an ASAS20 response were not significantly different between the GLM and PAM groups (65% vs. 56%; p = 0.69). Although there were no differences in BASDAI, spinal pain, and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores between the two groups at week 48, the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels were significantly lower in GLM-treated patients. The SPARCC scores of the spine and SIJs decreased significantly in GLM- but not in PAM-treated patients. The differences in SPARCC scores between the two groups at week 48 were statistically significant. The frequency of adverse events (AEs) was similar in both arms.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with aSpA, the clinical response rate and improvement in pain and quality of life (QoL) were similar between GLM and PAM groups after 48 weeks. However, significant reduction in inflammatory markers and MRI inflammation was only observed with GLM treatment.

Predictors of Clinical Remission under Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Treatment in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: Pooled Analysis from Large Randomized Clinical Trials

Objective.

Investigate the role and relation of disease duration of different factors for achieving clinical remission with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods.

Data pooled from 4 large (n = 1281) clinical trials were used to compare disease duration subgroups for placebo or sulfasalazine (SSZ) versus etanercept (ETN), which, in turn, were analyzed by age of diagnosis ≤ 40 versus > 40 years, HLA-B27 status, and baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN) versus > ULN using chi-square tests, and ANCOVA. The primary efficacy measure was Assessments of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) partial remission (PR) after 12 weeks of treatment. Also analyzed were Bath AS Disease Activity Index and Functional Index, AS Disease Activity Scores, and ASAS response rates.

Results.

Overall, a larger percentage of patients achieved ASAS-PR with ETN versus SSZ or placebo. More patients with ≤ 2-year disease duration treated with ETN experienced partial remission (34%) versus longer disease duration (30%, 27%, and 22% for > 2–5, > 5–10, and > 10 yrs, respectively; all p < 0.05). In the subgroup of patients with both disease duration ≤ 2 years and aged ≤ 40 years at diagnosis, the treatment response was even more pronounced. Similar results were seen in HLA-B27–positive patients in the disease duration ≤ 2-year subgroup. Overall, patients with high CRP at baseline had better treatment responses compared with patients with normal CRP.

Conclusion.

Treatment response under anti-TNF treatment with ETN at 12 weeks was greatest among patients with disease duration ≤ 2 years and even more pronounced in subgroups of patients ≤ 40 years old or HLA-B27–positive at diagnosis.

Circulating levels of inflammatory cytokines and cytokine receptors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a cross-sectional comparative study

OBJECTIVES

Insight into the most important inflammatory pathways in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) could be of importance in risk stratification and the development of treatment strategies. Therefore, we aimed to compare circulating levels of inflammatory biomarkers between AS patients and controls, and explore associations between these biomarkers and clinical measures of disease activity.

METHOD

In a cross-sectional study, 143 AS patients were compared with 124 population controls. Blood samples were analysed by immunoassays for interleukin (IL)-6, IL-17a, IL-23, soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNF-R1) and 2 (sTNF-R2), and osteoprotegerin (OPG). Disease activity was measured by the AS Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).

RESULTS

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) demonstrated elevated plasma levels of sTNF-R1 [geometrical mean 0.94 (95% CI 0.88-1.00) vs. 0.83 (95% CI 0.78-0.89) ng/mL, p < 0.01] and OPG (2.3, 95% CI 2.1-2.4 vs. 2.0, 95% CI 1.9-2.2 ng/mL, p = 0.02) and, although not significant, of IL-23 (122, 95% CI 108-139 vs. 106, 95% CI 93-120 pg/mL, p = 0.07) in AS patients vs.

CONTROLS

More AS patients had a high level of sTNF-R2 than controls (22 vs. 1, p < 0.01). No differences between the groups were seen for IL-6 and IL-17a. In patients, no significant associations were seen between inflammatory markers and disease activity measures after adjusting for personal characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Significantly higher plasma levels of sTNF-R1, sTNF-R2, and OPG and numerically but non-significantly higher levels of IL-23 were found in AS patients compared to controls, indicating that these cytokines and cytokine receptors are important inflammatory pathways. Clinical measures of disease activity were not significantly correlated with circulating inflammatory markers.

Clinical characteristics of Japanese patients with axial spondyloarthritis, and short-term efficacy of adalimumab

BACKGROUND

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is rarer in Japan than in Europe, probably because the European criteria, not well known by Japanese general physicians, regard AS as a progressive stage of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). HLA-B27 is an important diagnostic marker of SpA; however, the incidence of the HLA-B27 allele is as low as 0.4 % in Japan. For Japanese SpA patients, other HLA alleles and clinical findings are required for earlier definitive diagnosis, for determining appropriate treatment timing, and for disease monitoring.

METHODS

We investigated the HLA-B alleles of 36 patients clinically diagnosed with SpA. For 8 axial SpA patients we evaluated the short-term efficacy of subcutaneous adalimumab injections (40 mg every other week for ≥11 months). Treatment efficacy was evaluated by use of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Index (BASDAI) score, and serum TNF-α and IL-6 levels were measured pre and post-treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 36 Japanese SpA patients, the HLA-B27 allele occurred infrequently (5.6 %) whereas the HLA-B44 and 61 alleles were the most frequently detected (25.0 %). We also detected severe bamboo spine on radiography in the absence of the HLA-B27 allele. All 8 patients with axial SpA experienced significant symptom improvement after adalimumab treatment; the HLA-B27 allele was absent from these patients. Serum TNF-α and IL-6 levels were elevated in cases with remarkable inflammatory pain and high disease activity. These cytokines decreased after therapy, however. Most patients with normal cytokine levels at baseline retained these low levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings reveal the short-term efficacy of adalimumab. The remarkably low incidence of HLA-B27 among our patients indicates that HLA-B distribution is different from that in other countries. Serum TNF-α and IL-6 levels were not effective as biomarkers for cases without high disease activity, and further research with larger samples is needed. The efficacy of TNF blockers, however, suggested a potential localized TNF effect was present among SpA patients.