COVID-19 and risk of subsequent life-threatening secondary infections: a matched cohort study in UK Biobank

Ruptured Aortic Valve Aneurysm Caused by Infective Endocarditis in a SARS-CoV-2-Positive Autopsy Case

ABSTRACT

Aortic valve aneurysm, an extremely rare complication secondary to infective endocarditis (IE), may cause heart failure due to rupture of the aneurysm. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been reported to cause cardiovascular complications and alter susceptibility to secondary infections such as IE. Herein, we report a case of IE with a fatal outcome caused by rupture of an aortic valve aneurysm in a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-positive autopsy case. The patient was a 67-year-old male diagnosed with heart failure after presenting with edema and weight gain. He was found dead in bed 2 weeks after initial symptom presentation. Autopsy revealed an aneurysmal sac in the center of the noncoronary cusp of the aortic valve with an opening of approximately 1 cm in the center of the aneurysmal wall. Histologically, aortic valve vegetation, destruction of the aortic valve cusp, rupture of the aneurysmal wall, and an abscess under the aortic intima were observed. Gram staining of the aneurysmal wall showed a gram-positive coccus. The reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay was positive for SARS-CoV-2. Because no defined risk factors for IE other than SARS-CoV-2 infection were observed, the association between IE and COVID-19 was highly likely.

Psychiatric disorders and following risk of chronic kidney disease: a prospective cohort study from UK Biobank

BACKGROUND

Psychiatric disorders have been reported to influence many health outcomes, but evidence about their impact on chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not been fully explored, as well as possible mechanisms implicated are still unclear.

METHODS

Four hundred forty-one thousand eight hundred ninety-three participants from UK Biobank were included in this study. To assess the association between psychiatric disorders mainly including depression, anxiety, stress-related disorders, substance misuse as well as psychotic disorder, and CKD, a Cox regression model using age as the underlying time scale was employed. This approach considers the age progression of participants from the beginning to the end of the study as the elapsed time. Flexible nonparametric smoothing model was conducted to illustrate the temporal patterns. Subgroup analyses were performed by stratification of gender, genetic susceptibility to CKD, age at entry or exit the cohort, follow-up duration, and the number of psychiatric disorders at baseline. Mediation analysis was implemented to evaluate the roles of body mass index (BMI), hypertension, and diabetes.

RESULTS

Compared with individuals without psychiatric disorders, an increased risk of CKD was observed in patients with psychiatric disorders (hazard ratios (HR) = 1.52, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.40-1.65, p-value < 0.001). The hazard ratio among psychiatric patients gradually increased, and became significant after about 10 years follow-ups. The HR for patients followed up for 10-12 years was 1.60 (95% CI: 1.34-1.91, p-value < 0.001), and the HR was 1.66 (95% CI: 1.29-2.13, p-value < 0.001) for patients followed up for 12-13 years. Five distinct psychiatric disorders were found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of developing CKD. The highest HR was observed between stress-related disorder and CKD (HR = 1.95, 95%CI: 1.28-2.97, p-value = 0.002). When adjusting genetic susceptibility to CKD, the HR for the association between stress-related disorders and CKD became 1.86 (95%CI: 1.14-3.04, p-value = 0.013). Although these associations were nominally significant, they did not reach statistical significance after applying the Bonferroni multiple corrections, potentially due to the limited sample size. Subgroup analysis revealed that psychiatric patients who are under age 60, with multiple psychiatric morbidities or having been diagnosed with psychiatric disorders for over 10 years may be high-risk populations. Hypertension, BMI and diabetes mediated 49.13% (95% CI: 37.60%-67.08%), 12.11% (95% CI: 8.49%-17.24%) and 3.78% (95% CI: 1.58%-6.52%) of the total effect, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychiatric disorders were associated with a delayed onset of an elevated risk for CKD, this association was only observed in patients with psychiatric disorders for more than 10 years. Our study highlights the significance of lifestyle interventions, routine monitoring of kidney function, early screening for CKD, and personalized management strategies for psychiatric patients as potential approaches to the precise prevention of CKD.

The Time-Varying Impact of COVID-19 on the Acute Kidney Disorders: A Historical Matched Cohort Study and Mendelian Randomization Analysis

Background: This study aimed to explore the time-varying impact of COVID-19 on acute kidney disorders, including acute kidney injury and other acute kidney diseases. Methods: From the UK Biobank, 10,121 participants with COVID-19 were matched with up to 3 historically unexposed controls by age, sex, Townsend deprivation index, and the status of hospitalization or receiving critical care. We investigated the association between COVID-19 and incidence of acute kidney disorders, within the first 4 weeks after infection, using conditional and time-varying Cox proportional hazard regression. In addition, one-sample Mendelian randomization, utilizing the polygenic risk score for COVID-19 as an instrumental variable, was conducted to explore the potential causality of the association. Results: In the matched cohort study, we observed a significant association between COVID-19 and acute kidney disorders predominantly within the first 3 weeks. The impact of COVID-19 was time dependent, peaking in the second week (hazard ratio, 12.77; 95% confidence interval, 5.93 to 27.70) and decreasing by the fourth week (hazard ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 6.93). In subgroup analyses, only moderate to severe COVID-19 cases were associated with acute worsening of renal function in a time-dependent pattern. One-sample Mendelian randomization analyses further showed that COVID-19 might exert a "short-term" causal effect on the risk of acute kidney disorders, primarily confined to the first week after infection. Conclusions: The risk of acute kidney disorders following COVID-19 demonstrates a time-varying pattern. Hazard effects were observed only in patients with moderate or severe but not mild COVID-19.

Factors affecting clinical outcome in COVID-associated rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis (CAROM) patients-An ambispective, single-arm, observational study

BACKGROUND

COVID-associated Rhino-Orbito-Cerebral Mucormycosis (CAROM) appeared as an epidemic in India during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic during the months of March to May 2021. Though many reports have highlighted cross sectional and short-term attributes related to CAROM, long term follow up data is sparse.

OBJECTIVE

This report aims to analyze the follow-up outcomes in consecutive patients presenting to us during the epidemic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an ambispective observational analytical study, recruiting the consecutive patients admitted to our tertiary care centre during the period of the CAROM epidemic. The mortality rate during the follow-up and various factors affecting survival were studied using univariable and multivariable statistics with the Stata 14.0 software.

RESULTS

Of the 189 patients studied, eight were lost to follow-up. The outcome analysis was performed for the 181 patients. 93.6 % (162/173) of the patients had diabetes. The All-cause mortality was 45 % (81/181), while the ROCM-specific mortality was found to be 24 % (46/181) at a median follow-up of 176 days (IQR: 21-217 days). With univariable analysis, increasing age, higher serum IL-6 levels, presence of additional comorbidities (in addition to Diabetes and hypertension), bilateral disease, skin necrosis, palatal involvement, infratemporal fossa involvement, and impaired vision/ocular movements were found to be associated with increased mortality. However, on multivariable analysis, only 1) increasing age, 2) raised serum IL-6 levels, and 3) bilateral disease were predictive of increased mortality. Surgical debridement (endoscopic, palatal removal, orbital exenteration, neurosurgical intervention) was associated with significantly reduced mortality on both univariable and multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our intermediate-term follow-up data showed advanced age at presentation, raised IL-6 levels, and bilateral sinonasal involvement to be predictive of increased mortality, while surgical debridement is significantly protective from mortality in CAROM patients.

Pandemic Phase-Adjusted Analysis of COVID-19 Outcomes Reveals Reduced Intrinsic Vulnerability and Substantial Vaccine Protection From Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Patients With Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Although representing the majority of newly diagnosed cancers, patients with breast cancer appear less vulnerable to COVID-19 mortality compared with other malignancies. In the absence of patients on active cancer therapy included in vaccination trials, a contemporary real-world evaluation of outcomes during the various pandemic phases, as well as of the impact of vaccination, is needed to better inform clinical practice.

METHODS

We compared COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among patients with breast cancer across prevaccination (February 27, 2020-November 30, 2020), Alpha-Delta (December 1, 2020-December 14, 2021), and Omicron (December 15, 2021-January 31, 2022) phases using OnCovid registry participants (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04393974). Twenty-eight-day case fatality rate (CFR28) and COVID-19 severity were compared in unvaccinated versus double-dosed/boosted patients (vaccinated) with inverse probability of treatment weighting models adjusted for country of origin, age, number of comorbidities, tumor stage, and receipt of systemic anticancer therapy within 1 month of COVID-19 diagnosis.

RESULTS

By the data lock of February 4, 2022, the registry counted 613 eligible patients with breast cancer: 60.1% (n = 312) hormone receptor-positive, 25.2% (n = 131) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, and 14.6% (n = 76) triple-negative. The majority (61%; n = 374) had localized/locally advanced disease. Median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 51-74 years). A total of 193 patients (31.5%) presented ≥ 2 comorbidities and 69% (n = 330) were never smokers. In total, 392 (63.9%), 164 (26.8%), and 57 (9.3%) were diagnosed during the prevaccination, Alpha-Delta, and Omicron phases, respectively. Analysis of CFR28 demonstrates comparable estimates of mortality across the three pandemic phases (13.9%, 12.2%, 5.3%, respectively; P = .182). Nevertheless, a significant improvement in outcome measures of COVID-19 severity across the three pandemic time periods was observed. Importantly, when reported separately, unvaccinated patients from the Alpha-Delta and Omicron phases achieved comparable outcomes to those from the prevaccination phase. Of 566 patients eligible for the vaccination analysis, 72 (12.7%) were fully vaccinated and 494 (87.3%) were unvaccinated. We confirmed with inverse probability of treatment weighting multivariable analysis and following a clustered robust correction for participating center that vaccinated patients achieved improved CFR28 (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.40), hospitalization (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.69), COVID-19 complications (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.45), and reduced requirement of COVID-19-specific therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.63) and oxygen therapy (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.67) compared with unvaccinated controls.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight a consistent reduction of COVID-19 severity in patients with breast cancer during the Omicron outbreak in Europe. We also demonstrate that even in this population, a complete severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination course is a strong determinant of improved morbidity and mortality from COVID-19.

The Dynamics of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios Predict Progression to Septic Shock and Death in Patients with Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay

Background and objectives: The prognoses of patients experiencing a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) are often significantly altered by hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), the early detection of which might be cumbersome. The aim of this study was to investigate the roles of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), derived-NRL (d-NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein (LCR) ratios in predicting the progression to septic shock and death. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of ninety COVID-19 patients with prolonged hospitalization (exceeding 15 days) admitted to the ICU was conducted. The prevalence of culture-proven HAIs throughout their hospital stays was documented. NLR, dNLR, PLR, and LCR were recorded on admission, day 7, and day 14 to assess their discriminative prowess for detecting further progression to septic shock or death. Results: The prevalence of HAIs was 76.6%, 50% of patients met the criteria for septic shock, and 50% died. The median time to the first positive culture was 13.5 days and 20.5 days for developing septic shock. Mechanical ventilation was a key contributing factor to HAI, septic shock, and mortality. On admission and day 7 NLR, dNLR, PLR, and LCR values had no prognostic relevance for events occurring late during hospitalization. However, day-14 NLR, dNLR, and PLR were independent predictors for progression to septic shock and mortality and have shown good discriminative capabilities. The AUCs for septic shock were 0.762, 0.764, and 0.716, while the values for predicting in-hospital death were 0.782, 0.778, and 0.758, respectively. Conclusions: NLR, dNLR, and PLR are quick, easy-to-use, cheap, effective biomarkers for the detection of a more severe disease course, of the late development of HAIs, and of the risk of death in critically ill patients requiring a prolonged ICU stay.

Cerebrovascular Complications of COVID-19 and COVID-19 Vaccination

The risk of stroke and cerebrovascular disease complicating infection with SARS-CoV-2 has been extensively reported since the onset of the pandemic. The striking efforts of many scientists in cooperation with regulators and governments worldwide have rapidly brought the development of a large landscape of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. The novel DNA and mRNA vaccines have offered great flexibility in terms of antigen production and led to an unprecedented rapidity in effective and safe vaccine production. However, as mass vaccination has progressed, rare but catastrophic cases of thrombosis have occurred in association with thrombocytopenia and antibodies against PF4 (platelet factor 4). This catastrophic syndrome has been named vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Rarely, ischemic stroke can be the symptom onset of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia or can complicate the course of the disease. In this review, we provide an overview of stroke and cerebrovascular disease as a complication of the SARS-CoV-2 infection and outline the main clinical and radiological characteristics of cerebrovascular complications of vaccinations, with a focus on vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Based on the available data from the literature and from our experience, we propose a therapeutic protocol to manage this challenging condition. Finally, we highlight the overlapping pathophysiologic mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination leading to thrombosis.