Thrombotic anti-PF4 immune disorders: HIT, VITT, and beyond

Antibodies against the chemokine platelet factor 4 (PF4) occur often, but only those that activate platelets induce severe prothrombotic disorders with associated thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the prototypic anti-PF4 disorder, mediated by strong activation of platelets through their FcγIIa (immunoglobulin G [IgG]) receptors (FcγRIIa). Concomitant pancellular activation (monocytes, neutrophils, endothelium) triggers thromboinflammation with a high risk for venous and arterial thrombosis. The classic concept of HIT is that anti-PF4/heparin IgG, recognizing antigen sites on (cationic) PF4 that form in the presence of (anionic) heparin, constitute the heparin-dependent antibodies that cause HIT. Accordingly, HIT is managed by anticoagulation with a nonheparin anticoagulant. In 2021, adenovirus vector COVID-19 vaccines triggered the rare adverse effect "vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia" (VITT), also caused by anti-PF4 IgG. VITT is a predominantly heparin-independent platelet-activating disorder that requires both therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and inhibition of FcγRIIa-mediated platelet activation by high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). HIT and VITT antibodies bind to different epitopes on PF4; new immunoassays can differentiate between these distinct HIT-like and VITT-like antibodies. These studies indicate that (1) severe, atypical presentations of HIT ("autoimmune HIT") are associated with both HIT-like (heparin-dependent) and VITT-like (heparin-independent) anti-PF4 antibodies; (2) in some patients with severe acute (and sometimes chronic, recurrent) thrombosis, VITT-like antibodies can be identified independent of proximate heparin exposure or vaccination. We propose to classify anti-PF4 antibodies as type 1 (nonpathogenic, non- platelet activating), type 2 (heparin dependent, platelet activating), and type 3 (heparin independent, platelet activating). A key concept is that type 3 antibodies (autoimmune HIT, VITT) require anticoagulation plus an adjunct treatment, namely high-dose IVIG, to deescalate the severe anti-PF4 IgG-mediated hypercoagulability state.

Platelet phosphatidylserine is the critical mediator of thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe immune-mediated prothrombotic disorder caused by antibodies (Ab) reactive to complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Platelets (PLT) and their interaction with different immune cells contribute to prothrombotic conditions in HIT. However, the exact mechanisms and the role of different PLT subpopulations in this prothrombotic environment remain poorly understood. In this study, we observed that HIT patient Ab induce a new PLT population that is characterized by increased P-selectin expression and phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization. Formation of this procoagulant PLT subpopulation was dependent on engagement of PLT Fc-γ-RIIA by HIT Ab and resulted in a significant increase of thrombin generation on the PLT surface. Using an ex vivo thrombosis model and multi-parameter assessment of thrombus formation, we observed that HIT Ab-induced procoagulant PLT propagated formation of large PLT aggregates, leukocyte recruitment and most importantly, fibrin network generation. These prothrombotic conditions were prevented via the upregulation of PLT intracellular cAMP with Iloprost, a clinically approved prostacyclin analogue. Additionally, the functional relevance of P-selectin and PS was dissected. While inhibition of P-selectin did not affect thrombus formation, the specific blockade of PS prevented HIT Ab-mediated thrombin generation and most importantly procoagulant PLT-mediated thrombus formation ex vivo. Taken together, our findings indicate that procoagulant PLT are critical mediators of prothrombotic conditions in HIT. Specific PS targeting could be a promising therapeutic approach to prevent thromboembolic events in HIT patients.

Association of trauma severity with antibody seroconversion in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A multicenter, prospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

Heparin administration can induce the production of anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies with platelet-activating properties, causing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Previous studies have suggested that trauma severity influences HIT immune responses, but their relationship has not been fully explained. This study aimed to clarify this association by multicenter prospective observational study.

METHODS

Trauma patients who met the criteria of age 18 years or older and Injury Severity Scores (ISSs) of ≥9 from March 2018 to February 2019 were included. Patients who did not receive any heparin and those who received it as flushes or for treatment were also included. Patients were divided into three groups based on trauma severity (to mild [ISS 9-15], moderate [ISS 16-24], and severe injury groups [ISS ≥25]) and were compared by the seroconversion time and rate, as well as the disappearance rate of antibodies on day 30.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients were included: 55, 62, and 67 patients were classified into the mild, moderate, and severe injury groups, respectively. Overall, the seroconversion rates of anti-PF4/heparin immunoglobulin G (IgG) and HIT antibodies by washed platelet activation assay were 26.6% and 16.3%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the seroconversion rates of anti-PF4/heparin IgG ( p = 0.016) and HIT antibodies ( p = 0.046) among the groups. Seroconversion rates in both assays increased with increasing trauma severity. The time required to achieve seroconversion was similar (between 5 and 10 days of trauma onset) regardless of heparin administration. Anti-PF4/heparin IgG and HIT antibodies were no longer detected on day 30 in 28.6% and 60.9% of seroconverted patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Development of HIT antibodies was observed commonly in severely injured trauma patients. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibody development may be related to trauma severity, with a high disappearance frequency on day 30.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Complexes of heparin and platelet factor 4 specifically stimulate T cells from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombosis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT) is associated with antibodies specific for complexes consisting of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4). Studies in individual patients with HITT have demonstrated immunoglobulin (Ig) class switching from IgM to the IgG or IgA isotypes. This transition is thought to require helper T cells, but no studies of the cellular or molecular basis of this process have yet been reported. To characterize T-cell involvement in HITT, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from two patients with classical HITT obtained shortly after the acute episode were restimulated with heparin:PF4 complexes, PF4 alone, heparin alone, and medium alone in the presence of autologous antigen-presenting cells (APC). Responding T cells were then examined using the technique of "spectratyping," in which sequences encoding CDR3 domains of individual V beta (BV) families are amplified and separated by gel electrophoresis. After 14 days in culture with antigen (heparin:PF4 complexes), but not after culture with PF4, heparin, or medium alone, patient cells, but not cells from normal subjects, preferentially expressed T-cell receptor (TCR)-containing beta chains of the BV 5.1 family. Nucleotide sequencing of BV 5.1 TCR CDR3 showed that each patient had a personal repertoire, but also shared a tetrapeptide motif (PGTG). These findings provide evidence that the humoral immune response associated with HITT is driven by helper T cells that presumably recognize peptides derived from PF4. Identification of a common beta-chain CDR3 motif in responding T cells from each of two patients suggests that a limited number of helper TCRs may be used to mount an antibody response to heparin:PF4 complexes. TCR spectratyping appears to offer a new way to examine the molecular basis of pathologic immune responses and may be useful in further studies of HITT and other immune-mediated hematologic disorders.

Randomized trial of recombinant platelet factor 4 versus protamine for the reversal of heparin anticoagulation in humans

BACKGROUND

Protamine reverses heparin anticoagulation, but it can have important side effects. We compared the safety and effectiveness of intravenous recombinant platelet factor 4 (rPF4) as an alternative to protamine in a randomized blinded trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 81 patients having diagnostic cardiac catheterization, baseline hemodynamics were measured after a 5000-U bolus of heparin. Repeat measurements were obtained at the end of the procedure, and the anticoagulation status was determined by an activated coagulation time (ACT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Patients then received either protamine (50 mg IV over 10 minutes) or rPF4 (1.0 mg/kg IV over 2 minutes) in a blinded fashion. Serial measurements of hemodynamic and clotting functions were performed 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes after drug administration. Follow-up measurements and clinical assessments were made at 1, 4, 6, and 24 hours later and after 7 days. Before drug administration, ACTs, aPTTs, and hemodynamics were similar among the groups. After drug infusion, there was no difference in ACT between the protamine and rPF4 patients. At 20 and 30 minutes after drug infusion, ACT and aPTT were slightly higher in those receiving rPF4, but these changes were small and of no clinical significance. There were no clinically meaningful differences in any of the hemodynamic variables between the groups, and there were no serious side effects in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

At the dose used in this study, rPF4 was well tolerated and reversed the anticoagulant effect of heparin. These data support its continued evaluation as an alternative to protamine after cardiac surgery.

Phase I trial of recombinant platelet factor 4 (rPF4) in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recombinant platelet factor 4 (rPF4) is a naturally occurring protein found in platelet alpha granules that can inhibit angiogenesis.

METHODS

In this Phase I trial, 9 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had failed 5-FU treatment received rPF4 at doses ranging from 0.3 to 3.0 mg/kg via 30-minute infusion. Three additional patients were treated with the 3 mg/kg dose over a 6-hour period of infusion.

RESULTS

The only toxicity encountered was mild leg twitching in 2/3 patients treated with the 6-hour infusion. One patient with a history of phlebitis developed a lower extremity deep venous thrombosis after the first dose of rPF4. A mild rise in fibrinogen level was noted in several patients. Of the 11 evaluable patients, there were no clinical responses to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

rPF4 is well tolerated at the doses and schedules tested. No clinical responses were observed. Prolonged infusion schedules should be investigated.

Hepatic arterial infusion of recombinant platelet factor-4 suppresses metastases to the lungs from tumors implanted into the livers of rabbits

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the toxicity (Part I) and antitumor effects (Part II) associated with hepatic arterial infusion of recombinant platelet factor-4 (rPF4), an antiangiogenic protein.

METHODS

Healthy rabbits (Part I) and rabbits with tumors implanted in their livers (Part II) received saline or rPF4 via hepatic arterial infusion. Three saline-receiving and four rPF4-receiving animals died 2-3 days postinfusion from gastroduodenal thromboembolism. The remaining animals were necropsied 3, 7, 10, or 14 days postinfusion. Blood analyses and hepatic angiography were performed before infusion and at the time of sacrifice.

RESULTS

In Part I, focal coagulation necrosis of the hepatic parenchyma was observed in 1 of 11 rabbits that received saline and in 6 of 10 that received rPF4. In Part II, hepatic arterial infusion of rPF4 had no effect on growth of the implanted liver tumors. However, the protein significantly reduced the incidence of lung metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraarterial infusion of rPF4 significantly reduced the incidence of lung metastasis. Nonheparin systemic anticoagulation may be needed during catheterization and infusion procedures to prevent thromboemboli.

Reversal of heparin anticoagulation by recombinant platelet factor 4 in humans

BACKGROUND

Protamine is used to reverse the anticoagulant effects of heparin, but it can have important side effects. Platelet factor 4 (PF4) is a protein found in platelet alpha granules that binds to and thereby neutralizes heparin. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of intravenous recombinant PF4 to neutralize heparin anticoagulation after cardiac catheterization in a phase 1, open-label trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study group consisted of 18 patients having diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Heparin (5000 U) was given after vascular access was obtained. In the first 12 patients, additional heparin was given at the conclusion of the procedure so that all patients had activated coagulation times > 300 seconds before rPF4 was given. Three patients each received 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, or 5.0 mg/kg rPF4 over a period of 3 minutes at the conclusion of the catheterization procedure. In 6 additional patients, extra heparin was not given at the conclusion of the procedure, and 1.0 mg/kg rPF4 was given. Hemodynamic measurements, cardiac output, and serial blood tests were performed 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes after rPF4 and then into the next 24 hours. There were no serious side effects in any patient, despite transient rPF4 levels as high as 14,870 ng/mL in the patients receiving 5.0 mg/kg. One patient receiving 2.5 mg/kg had a slight transient rise in liver enzymes possibly related to the rPF4. There were no important hemodynamic effects of rPF4 administration at any dose used. Doses of 2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg were uniformly effective in reversing the anticoagulant effect of heparin. At lower doses, rPF4 neutralized the effects of heparin in most but not all patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis suggested a monophasic and one-compartment clearance of the PF4-heparin complex. No neutralizing factors to rPF4 were detected in the samples collected 7 days after dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

rPF4, in doses ranging from 0.5 to 5.0 mg/kg over 3 minutes, had no serious side effects. Given in sufficient amounts, rPF4 can completely and rapidly reverse the anticoagulant effects of heparin.