Effects of pemafibrate on glucose metabolism markers and liver function tests in patients with hypertriglyceridemia: a pooled analysis of six phase 2 and phase 3 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials

Managing hypertriglyceridemia for cardiovascular disease prevention: Lessons from the PROMINENT trial

BACKGROUND

Numerous epidemiological studies have shown that hypertriglyceridemia is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). However, large clinical studies on triglyceride-lowering therapy have yielded inconsistent results. In the current review, we reassess the importance of triglyceride-lowering therapy in preventing CVD based on previous literature and the recently published findings of the PROMINENT trial.

METHODS

This narrative review is based on literature and public documents published up to November 2023.

RESULTS

Meta-analyses of trials on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α agonists and triglyceride-lowering therapy, including the PROMINENT trial, have indicated that triglyceride-lowering therapy can reduce CVD events. Mendelian randomization studies have also indicated that triglyceride is indeed a true risk factor for coronary artery disease, leaving no doubt about its relationship to CVD. Meanwhile, the negative results from the PROMINENT trial were likely due to the insufficient triglyceride-lowering effect, slight increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B, and the inclusion of mostly high-intensity statin users as target patients. It is unlikely that adverse events counteracted the effectiveness of pemafibrate on outcomes. Additionally, pemafibrate has shown positive effects on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and peripheral artery disease.

CONCLUSION

Although the PROMINENT trial did not demonstrate the significance of pemafibrate as a triglyceride-lowering therapy in a specific population, it does not necessarily negate the potential benefits of treating hypertriglyceridemia in reducing CVD events. It is necessary to explore appropriate populations that could benefit from this therapy, utilize data from the PROMINENT trial and other databases, and validate findings in real-world settings.

Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate, a Novel Selective PPARα Modulator in Chinese Patients with Dyslipidemia: A Double-Masked, Randomized, Placebo- and Active-Controlled Comparison Trial

AIMS

Pemafibrate substantially lowers serum triglyceride (TG) levels and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels primarily in Japan, but it has not been evaluated in China. We aimed to confirm the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate in Chinese patients with hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL-C levels by comparing placebo and fenofibrate.

METHODS

A multicenter, double-masked trial was conducted in China involving 344 patients with high TG and low HDL-C levels randomly assigned to one of four groups: pemafibrate 0.2 mg/d, pemafibrate 0.4 mg/d, fenofibrate 200 mg/d, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage change in fasting TG levels.

RESULTS

The percentage change in TG levels from baseline was -34.1%, -44.0%, -30.5%, and 6.5% in the pemafibrate 0.2 mg/d, pemafibrate 0.4 mg/d, fenofibrate 200 mg/d, and placebo groups, respectively. Pemafibrate 0.4 mg/d significantly reduced TG levels compared with that in both placebo (p＜0.0001) and fenofibrate groups (p=0.0083). Significant improvements in HDL-C, remnant cholesterol, and apolipoprotein A1 levels were also observed with both doses of pemafibrate than with the placebo. Pemafibrate showed significantly smaller changes in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and serum creatinine levels than those with fenofibrate.

CONCLUSIONS

In Chinese patients, pemafibrate exhibited superior efficacy in improving TG levels and enhanced hepatic and renal safety compared to fenofibrate. Thus, pemafibrate may represent a promising therapeutic option for dyslipidemia in Chinese patients.

Lessons from PROMINENT and prospects for pemafibrate

The neutral result of the PROMINENT trial has led to questions about the future for pemafibrate. This commentary discusses possible reasons for the lack of benefit observed in the trial. There were, however, indicators suggesting therapeutic potential in microvascular ischaemic complications associated with peripheral artery disease, with subsequent analysis showing reduction in the incidence of lower extremity ischaemic ulceration or gangrene. Reassurance about the safety of pemafibrate, together with emerging data from PROMINENT and experimental studies, also suggest benefit with pemafibrate in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (alternatively referred to as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease) and microangiopathy associated with diabetes, which merit further study.

Washed Microbiota Transplantation Is Associated With Improved Lipid Profiles: Long-Term Efficacy and Safety in an Observational Cohort From South China

INTRODUCTION

Dyslipidemia is one of the main risk factors of chronic metabolic diseases. Our previous studies have shown that washed microbiota transplantation (WMT) has a significant improvement effect on patients with hyperlipidemia and hypolipemia in the Chinese population. The purpose of this study was to further explore the long-term efficacy and safety of WMT in patients with hyperlipidemia.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients who received WMT for multicourse were collected. Changes of blood lipid indexes before and after WMT, including triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), lipoprotein A, and Apolipoprotein B.

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients were enrolled, including 56 cases in the hyperlipidemia group and 68 cases with normal lipids. The mean observation time was 787.80 ± 371.45 days, and the longest follow-up time was 1,534 days. TC and non-HDL-C in the hyperlipidemia group with 1-4 courses of WMT were significantly reduced ( P < 0.05); TG decreased significantly after the second course ( P < 0.05); low-density lipoprotein cholesterol also significantly decreased after the fourth course of treatment ( P < 0.05); TG, TC, and non-HDL-C significantly decreased in single course, double course, and multiple course, respectively ( P < 0.05). In terms of time period, over 1 year, the improvement in multicourse treatment was more significant than the single and double-course ones. In terms of comprehensive efficacy, WMT restored 32.14% of patients in the hyperlipidemia group to the normal lipid group ( P < 0.001), of which 30.00% recovered to the normal lipid group within 1 year ( P = 0.004) and 65.38% were reassigned to the normal lipid group over 1 year ( P = 0.003). In addition, over the 1-year treatment period, WMT significantly degraded the high-risk and medium-risk groups of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk stratification in hyperlipidemia cases. There were no serious adverse events.

DISCUSSION

WMT had a long-term improvement effect on patients with hyperlipidemia. The effect of multiple courses over 1 year was more significant than that of single/double courses and also had a significant destratification effect on the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with high safety. Therefore, WMT provides a safe and long-term effective clinical treatment for patients with dyslipidemia.

Impact of pemafibrate on lipid profile and insulin resistance in hypertriglyceridemic patients with coronary artery disease and metabolic syndrome

This study examined the effects of pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α agonist, on the serum biochemical parameters of male patients with coronary artery disease and metabolic syndrome (MetS). This was a post hoc analysis of a randomized, crossover study that treated hypertriglyceridemia with pemafibrate or bezafibrate for 24 weeks, followed by a crossover of another 24 weeks. Of the 60 patients enrolled in the study, 55 were male. Forty-one of 55 male patients were found to have MetS. In this sub-analysis, male patients with MetS (MetS group, n = 41) and those without MetS (non-MetS group, n = 14) were compared. The primary endpoint was a change in fasting serum triglyceride (TG) levels during pemafibrate therapy, and the secondary endpoints were changes in insulin resistance-related markers and liver function parameters. Serum TG levels significantly decreased (MetS group, from 266.6 to 148.0 mg/dL, p < 0.001; non-MetS group, from 203.9 to 97.6 mg/dL, p < 0.001); however, a percent change (%Change) was not significantly different between the groups (- 44.1% vs. - 51.6%, p = 0.084). Serum insulin levels and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance significantly decreased in the MetS group but not in the non-MetS group. %Change in liver enzyme levels was markedly decreased in the MetS group compared with that in the non-MetS group (alanine aminotransferase, - 25.1% vs. - 11.3%, p = 0.027; gamma-glutamyl transferase, - 45.8% vs. - 36.2%, p = 0.020). In conclusion, pemafibrate can effectively decrease TG levels in patients with MetS, and it may be a more efficient drug for improving insulin resistance and liver function in such patients.

First Iranian guidelines for the diagnosis, management, and treatment of hyperlipidemia in adults

This guideline is the first Iranian guideline developed for the diagnosis, management, and treatment of hyperlipidemia in adults. The members of the guideline developing group (GDG) selected 9 relevant clinical questions and provided recommendations or suggestions to answer them based on the latest scientific evidence. Recommendations include the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) threshold for starting drug treatment in adults lacking comorbidities was determined to be over 190 mg/dL and the triglyceride (TG) threshold had to be >500 mg/dl. In addition to perform fasting lipid profile tests at the beginning and continuation of treatment, while it was suggested to perform cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) risk assessment using valid Iranian models. Some recommendations were also provided on lifestyle modification as the first therapeutic intervention. Statins were recommended as the first line of drug treatment to reduce LDL-C, and if its level was high despite the maximum allowed or maximum tolerated drug treatment, combined treatment with ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, or bile acid sequestrants was suggested. In adults with hypertriglyceridemia, pharmacotherapy with statin or fibrate was recommended. The target of drug therapy in adults with increased LDL-C without comorbidities and risk factors was considered an LDL-C level of <130 mg/dl, and in adults with increased TG without comorbidities and risk factors, TG levels of <200 mg/dl. In this guideline, specific recommendations and suggestions were provided for the subgroups of the general population, such as those with CVD, stroke, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, elderly, and women.

Prospective randomized comparative study of the effect of pemafibrate add-on or double statin dose on small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertriglyceridemia on statin therapy

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Small dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL) is a more potent atherogenic lipoprotein than LDL. As sdLDL-cholesterol (C) levels are determined by triglyceride and LDL-C levels, pemafibrate and statins can reduce sdLDL-C levels. However, it remains unclear whether adding pemafibrate or increasing statin doses would more effectively reduce sdLDL-C levels in patients receiving statin therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 97 patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertriglyceridemia who were treated with statins were randomly assigned to the pemafibrate 0.2 mg/day addition or statin dose doubled, and followed for 12 weeks. sdLDL-C was measured by our established homogenous assay.

RESULTS

The percentage and absolute reductions of sdLDL-C levels were significantly greater in the pemafibrate add-on group than the statin doubling group (-32.8 vs -8.1%; -16 vs -3 mg/dL, respectively). Triglyceride levels were reduced only in the pemafibrate add-on group (-44%), and LDL-C levels were reduced only in the statin doubling group (-8%), whereas levels of non-high-density lipoprotein-C and apolipoprotein B were similarly decreased (7-9%) in both groups. The absolute reductions of sdLDL-C levels were closely associated with decreased triglyceride, LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein-C and apolipoprotein B. In the subgroup analysis, the effect of pemafibrate add-on on sdLDL-C reductions was observed irrespective of baseline lipid parameters or statin type. No serious adverse effects were observed in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertriglyceridemia, the addition of pemafibrate to a statin is superior to doubling a statin in reducing sdLDL-C without increasing adverse effects.

Diabetes and diabesity in the view of proteomics, drug, and plant-derived remedies

Diabetes and obesity are highly prevalent in the world. Proteomics is a promising approach to better understanding enzymes, proteins, and signaling molecules involved in diabetes processes which help recognize the basis of the disease better and find suitable new treatments. This study aimed to summarize the molecular mechanisms from the beginning of insulin secretion in response to stimuli to the pathology of the insulin signaling pathway and, finally, the mechanisms of drugs/chemicals remedies that affect this process. The titles and subtitles of this process were determined, and then for each of them, the articles searched in PubMed and ScienceDirect were used. This review article starts the discussion with the molecular basis of insulin biosynthesis, secretion, insulin's mechanism of action, and molecular aspect of diabetes and diabesity (a new term showing the relation between diabetes and obesity) and ends with the drug and plant-derived intervention for hyperglycemia.

Preferable effects of pemafibrate on liver function and fibrosis in subjects with type 2 diabetes complicated with liver damage

BACKGROUND

Pemafibrate has been reported to ameliorate lipid profiles and liver dysfunction. However, which patients derive benefit from the hepatoprotective effects of pemafibrate is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a sub-analysis of the PARM-T2D study where subjects with type 2 diabetes complicated by hypertriglyceridemia were prospectively treated with pemafibrate or conventional therapies for 52 weeks. From the original cohort, subjects who had metabolic-associated fatty liver disease without changing their treatment regimens for comorbidities were analyzed. Eligible subjects (n = 293) (average age 61.2 ± 11.7 years, 37.5% female) treated with pemafibrate (pemafibrate, n = 152) or controls who did not change their treatment regimens (controls, n = 141) were divided into three groups based on their alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels: ALT ≤ upper normal limit (UNL) (pemafibrate, n = 65; controls, n = 50), UNL < ALT ≤ 2×UNL (pemafibrate, n = 58; controls, n = 54), and 2×UNL < ALT (pemafibrate, n = 29; controls, n = 27).

RESULTS

Pemafibrate treatment significantly ameliorated ALT levels (from 29 to 22 U/L, p < 0.001 by Wilcoxon's signed-rank test) in the total cohort and subjects with high ALT levels (2×ULN < ALT), and improved liver fibrosis as assessed by the Fibrosis-4 index (mean change - 0.05 (95% confidence interval: -0.22 to - 0.02), p < 0.05 versus baseline by the Mann-Whitney U-test and p < 0.05 versus the ALT ≤ UNL group by the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's post-hoc analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

The hepatoprotective effects of pemafibrate were dominant in subjects with type 2 diabetes complicated with liver dysfunction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Center Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000037385).

Efficacy and safety of pemafibrate in patients with hypertriglyceridemia in clinical settings: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recently, pemafibrate, a selective PPARα modulator, has been developed as a treatment for hypertriglyceridemia and has attracted much attention. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate in hypertriglyceridemia patients under clinical settings.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated changes in lipid profiles and various parameters before and after 24-week pemafibrate administration in patients with hypertriglyceridemia who had not previously taken fibrate medications. There were 79 cases included in the analysis. 24 weeks after the treatment with pemafibrate, TG was significantly reduced from 312 ± 226 to 167 ± 94 mg/dL. In addition, lipoprotein fractionation tests using PAGE method showed a significant decrease in the ratio of VLDL and remnant fractionations, which are TG-rich lipoproteins. After pemafibrate administration, body weight, HbA1c, eGFR, and CK levels were not changed, but liver injury indices such as ALT, AST, and γ-GTP were significantly improved.

CONCLUSION

In this study, pemafibrate improved the metabolism of atherosclerosis-induced lipoproteins in hypertriglyceridemia patients. In addition, it showed no off-target effects such as hepatic and renal damage or rhabdomyolysis.

Favorable Effect of Pemafibrate on Insulin Resistance and β-Cell Function in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertriglyceridemia: A Subanalysis of the PARM-T2D Study

Pemafibrate, a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor modulator, has beneficial effects on lipid metabolism. However, its effects on glucose metabolism in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) remain to be fully clarified. This was a subanalysis of the PARM-T2D study, a multicenter prospective observational study on the use of pemafibrate versus conventional therapy for 52 weeks in subjects with T2DM complicated with hypertriglyceridemia. The subanalysis included participants who did not change their treatment for diabetes and did not receive insulin or insulin secretagogues during the study period. Changes in glucose metabolism markers, including homeostatic model assessment (HOMA2) scores and disposition index, were assessed. A total of 279 participants (141 in the pemafibrate group; 138 in the control group) met the criteria for the subanalysis. There were no significant changes in HbA1c during the 52-week study period in both groups. However, the pemafibrate group showed significant improvements versus the control group for insulin resistance assessed by HOMA2-R (-0.15 versus 0.08; estimated treatment difference -0.23 (95% confidence interval -0.44, -0.02); p = 0.03) and maintenance of β-cell function assessed by disposition index (0.015 versus -0.023; estimated treatment difference 0.037 (95% confidence interval 0.005, 0.069); p = 0.02). Correlation analyses showed that improvements in HOMA2-R and disposition index were significantly associated with improvements in lipid abnormalities and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase. In conclusion, pemafibrate reduced insulin resistance and maintained β-cell function in subjects with T2DM and hypertriglyceridemia, presumably by improving lipid profiles and lipid-related hepatocyte stress.

Novel Selective PPARα Modulator Pemafibrate for Dyslipidemia, Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), and Atherosclerosis

Statins, the intestinal cholesterol transporter inhibitor (ezetimibe), and PCSK9 inhibitors can reduce serum LDL-C levels, leading to a significant reduction in cardiovascular events. However, these events cannot be fully prevented even when maintaining very low LDL-C levels. Hypertriglyceridemia and reduced HDL-C are known as residual risk factors for ASCVD. Hypertriglyceridemia and/or low HDL-C can be treated with fibrates, nicotinic acids, and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Fibrates were demonstrated to be PPARα agonists and can markedly lower serum TG levels, yet were reported to cause some adverse effects, including an increase in the liver enzyme and creatinine levels. Recent megatrials of fibrates have shown negative findings on the prevention of ASCVD, which were supposed to be due to their low selectivity and potency for binding to PPAR α. To overcome the off-target effects of fibrates, the concept of a selective PPARα modulator (SPPARMα) was proposed. Kowa Company, Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan), has developed pemafibrate (K-877). Compared with fenofibrate, pemafibrate showed more favorable effects on the reduction of TG and an increase in HDL-C. Fibrates worsened liver and kidney function test values, although pemafibrate showed a favorable effect on liver function test values and little effect on serum creatinine levels and eGFR. Minimal drug-drug interactions of pemafibrate with statins were observed. While most of the fibrates are mainly excreted from the kidney, pemafibrate is metabolized in the liver and excreted into the bile. It can be used safely even in patients with CKD, without a significant increase in blood concentration. In the megatrial of pemafibrate, PROMINENT, for dyslipidemic patients with type 2 diabetes, mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridemia, and low HDL-C and LDL-C levels, the incidence of cardiovascular events did not decrease among those receiving pemafibrate compared to those receiving the placebo; however, the incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease was lower. Pemafibrate may be superior to conventional fibrates and applicable to CKD patients. This current review summarizes the recent findings on pemafibrate.

Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Bezafibrate to Treat Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: A Randomized Crossover Study

AIM

Pemafibrate is a highly selective agonist for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α, a key regulator of lipid and glucose metabolism. We compared the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate with those of bezafibrate, a nonselective PPAR-α agonist.

METHODS

In this randomized crossover study, 60 patients with hypertriglyceridemia (fasting triglyceride [TG] ≥ 150 mg/dL) were treated with pemafibrate of 0.2 mg/day or bezafibrate of 400 mg/day for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was percent change (%Change) from baseline in TG levels, while the secondary endpoints were %Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I) levels.

RESULTS

The %Change in TG and Apo A-I levels was significantly greater with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (-46.1% vs. -34.7%, p＜0.001; 9.2% vs. 5.7%, p =0.018, respectively). %Change in HDL-C levels was not significantly different between the two treatments. %Change in liver enzyme levels was markedly decreased with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate. Creatinine levels significantly increased in both treatments; however, its %Change was significantly lower with pemafibrate than with bezafibrate (5.72% vs. 15.5%, p＜0.001). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs did not differ between the two treatments; however, the number of patients with elevated creatinine levels (≥ 0.5 mg/dL and/or 25% from baseline) was significantly higher in the bezafibrate group than in the pemafibrate group (14/60 vs. 3/60, p =0.004) [corrected].

CONCLUSION

Compared with bezafibrate, pemafibrate is more effective in decreasing TG levels and increasing Apo A-I levels and is safer regarding liver and renal function.

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agents in chronic liver diseases: Molecular mechanisms and therapy

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a continuous process that causes a reduction of liver function lasting more than six months. CLD includes alcoholic liver disease (ALD), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), chronic viral infection, and autoimmune hepatitis, which can lead to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and cancer. Liver inflammation and oxidative stress are commonly associated with the development and progression of CLD. Molecular signaling pathways such as AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), C-Jun N-terminal kinase, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are implicated in the pathogenesis of CLD. Therefore, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agents from natural products are new potent therapies for ALD, NAFLD, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this review, we summarize some powerful products that can be potential applied in all the stages of CLD, from ALD/NAFLD to HCC. The selected agents such as β-sitosterol, curcumin, genistein, and silymarin can regulate the activation of several important molecules, including AMPK, Farnesoid X receptor, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor-2, PPARs, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase, and lysyl oxidase-like proteins. In addition, clinical trials are undergoing to evaluate their efficacy and safety.

Personalized management of dyslipidemias in patients with diabetes-it is time for a new approach (2022)

Dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (DMT2) is one of the worst controlled worldwide, with only about 1/4 of patients being on the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target. There are many reasons of this, including physicians' inertia, including diabetologists and cardiologists, therapy nonadherence, but also underusage and underdosing of lipid lowering drugs due to unsuitable cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification. In the last several years there is a big debate on the risk stratification of DMT2 patients, with the strong indications that all patients with diabetes should be at least at high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Moreover, we have finally lipid lowering drugs, that not only allow for the effective reduction of LDL-C and do not increase the risk of new onset diabetes (NOD), and/or glucose impairment; in the opposite, some of them might effectively improve glucose control. One of the most interesting is pitavastatin, which is now available in Europe, with the best metabolic profile within statins (no risk of NOD, improvement of fasting blood glucose, HOMA-IR, HbA1c), bempedoic acid (with the potential for the reduction of NOD risk), innovative therapies-PCSK9 inhibitors and inclisiran with no DMT2 risk increase, and new forthcoming therapies, including apabetalone and obicetrapib-for the latter one with the possibility of even decreasing the number of patients diagnosed with prediabetes and DMT2. Altogether, nowadays we have possibility to individualize lipid lowering therapy in DMT2 patients and increase the number of patients on LDL-C goal without any risk of new onset diabetes and/or diabetes control worsening, and in consequence to reduce the risk of CVD complications due to progression of atherosclerosis in this patients' group.

Effects of pemafibrate on lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertriglyceridemia: A multi-center prospective observational study, the PARM-T2D study

AIMS

Pemafibrate, a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor modulator, was shown to ameliorate lipid abnormalities in a phase III clinical trial of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, its efficacy has not been demonstrated in real-world clinical practice in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

We performed a multi-center prospective observational study of the use of pemafibrate in patients with T2DM and hypertriglyceridemia versus conventional therapy, with or without a fibrate. The primary outcomes were the changes from baseline in fasting serum triglyceride (TG) and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations at week 52.

RESULTS

We recruited 650 patients, and data from 504 (252 per group) were analyzed after propensity score matching. In the pemafibrate group, both TG and HDL-C showed significant improvements (p < 0.001), and several indices reflecting TG-rich lipoproteins, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol particle size, and liver enzyme elevations were significantly ameliorated compared with the control group, but there was no difference in glycemic control markers. One of the key secondary endpoints showed that switching from conventional fibrates to pemafibrate improved eGFR but increased uric acid concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with T2DM, pemafibrate has superior effects on lipid profile as well as liver and renal dysfunction to conventional fibrates.

Efficacy of lower doses of pioglitazone after stroke or transient ischaemic attack in patients with insulin resistance

AIMS

Pioglitazone is a potent insulin-sensitizing drug with anti-atherosclerotic properties, but adverse effects have limited its use. We assessed the benefits and risks of lower versus higher doses of pioglitazone taken by participants in the Insulin Resistance Intervention in Stroke Trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Efficacy [myocardial infarction (MI) or recurrent stroke] new-onset diabetes) and adverse outcomes (oedema, weight gain, heart failure and bone fracture) were examined for subjects assigned to pioglitazone or placebo within strata defined by mode dose of study drug taken (i.e. the dose taken on most days in the study).

RESULTS

Among the 1938 patients randomized to pioglitazone, the mode dose was <15 mg/day in 546 participants, 15 mg/day in 128, 30 mg/day in 89, and 45 mg/day in 1175. There was no significant effect on stroke/MI or new-onset diabetes with <15 mg/day. For 15 mg/30 mg/day pooled, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) for stroke/MI were 0.48 (0.30, 0.76; p = .002) and 0.74 (0.69, 0.94) for 45 mg/day. For new-onset diabetes, the adjusted hazard ratios were 0.34 (0.15, 0.81; p = .001) and 0.31 (0.59, 0.94; p = .001) respectively. For oedema, weight gain and heart failure, the risk estimates for pioglitazone were lower for subjects taking <45 mg daily. For fractures, the increased risk with pioglitazone was similar across all dose strata.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower doses of pioglitazone appear to confer much of the benefit with less adverse effects than the full dose. Further study is needed to confirm these findings so that clinicians may optimize dosing of this secondary prevention strategy in patients with stroke.

New therapeutic approaches for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia

Patients with hypertriglyceridemia (> 150 mg/dl) have an increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and those with severe hypertriglyceridemia (> 880 mg/dl) also for pancreatitis. The currently available medications to decrease triglyceride levels, such as fibrates, statins, and omega‑3 fatty acids, are in many cases not able to achieve normal triglyceride levels. Therefore, new drugs are in development to address this unmet need. Recently, icosapent ethyl, a purified formulation of the omega-3-fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid, was approved in Germany for the reduction of cardiovascular events in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and established cardiovascular disease or with diabetes and other risk factors on top of statins. Other new drugs in development are the more selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) modulator, pemafibrate, already approved for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia in Japan, and inhibitors of ApoC-III and angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) in the form of antisense oligonucleotides or siRNAs or fully human monoclonal binding antibodies. Apolipoprotein C-III and ANGPTL3 protein seem to be quite promising targets based on solid genetic data. Larger studies of long duration, many of them currently ongoing, are needed to establish the role these medications will play in the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia in clinical practice.

Effect of Washed Microbiota Transplantation on Patients With Dyslipidemia in South China

Background and Aims

Although the manual crude fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) reduces blood lipids in animal models of hyperlipidemia, its clinical effect on blood lipid metabolism in patients with hyperlipidemia and hypolipidemia remains unclear, especially in the Chinese population. It was reported that washed microbiota transplantation (WMT) was safer, more precise, and more quality-controllable than the crude FMT by manual. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of WMT on lipid metabolism in the Chinese population.

Methods

Clinical data of patients with various indications who received WMT for 1-3 treatment procedures were collected. Changes in blood lipids before and after WMT, namely, total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), liver fat attenuation, and liver stiffness measurement, were compared.

Results

A total of 177 patients (40 cases of hyperlipidemia, 87 cases with normal blood lipids, and 50 cases of hypolipidemia) were enrolled in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University. WMT has a significant therapeutic effect in reducing blood lipid levels (TC and TG) in the short- and medium term in patients with hyperlipidemia (p <0.05). Hyper blood lipid decreased to normal in the short-term (35.14%; p <0.001), and LDL-C changed to normal in the medium term (33.33%; p = 0.013). In the hypolipidemia group, 36.36% and 47.06% changed to normal in the short-term (p = 0.006) and medium term (p = 0.005) of therapeutic effects based on blood lipid levels. In the normal blood lipid group and the low-risk group of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), the change was not statistically significant, indicating that WMT does not increase the risk of blood lipid and ASCVD in the long-term.

Conclusions

WMT treatment changes blood lipids in patients with hyperlipidemia and hypolipidemia without serious adverse events, with no risk for increasing blood lipids and ASCVD in the long-term. There were significant decreased TC, TG, and LDL-C levels in the medium term of WMT treatment for hyperlipidemia. Therefore, the regulation of gut microbiota by WMT may indicate a new clinical method for the treatment of dyslipidemia.

PPAR-Targeted Therapies in the Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Diabetic Patients

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR), ligand-activated transcription factors of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, have been identified as key metabolic regulators in the liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue, among others. As a leading cause of liver disease worldwide, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cause a significant burden worldwide and therapeutic strategies are needed. This review provides an overview of the evidence on PPAR-targeted treatment of NAFLD and NASH in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We considered current evidence from clinical trials and observational studies as well as the impact of treatment on comorbid metabolic conditions such as obesity, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease. Future areas of research, such as possible sexually dimorphic effects of PPAR-targeted therapies, are briefly reviewed.