1
|
Schoenthaler A, De La Calle F, De Leon E, Garcia M, Colella D, Nay J, Dapkins I. Application of the FRAME-IS to a multifaceted implementation strategy. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:695. [PMID: 38822342 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11139-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research demonstrates the importance of documenting adaptations to implementation strategies that support integration of evidence-based interventions into practice. While studies have utilized the FRAME-IS [Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications for Implementation Strategies] to collect structured adaptation data, they are limited by a focus on discrete implementation strategies (e.g., training), which do not reflect the complexity of multifaceted strategies like practice facilitation. In this paper, we apply the FRAME-IS to our trial evaluating the effectiveness of PF on implementation fidelity of an evidence-based technology-facilitated team care model for improved hypertension control within a federally qualified health center (FQHC). METHODS Three data sources are used to document adaptations: (1) implementation committee meeting minutes, (2) narrative reports completed by practice facilitators, and (3) structured notes captured on root cause analysis and Plan-Do-Study-Act worksheets. Text was extracted from the data sources according to the FRAME-IS modules and inputted into a master matrix for content analysis by two authors; a third author conducted member checking and code validation. RESULTS We modified the FRAME-IS to include part 2 of module 2 (what is modified) to add greater detail of the modified strategy, and a numbering system to track adaptations across the modules. This resulted in identification of 27 adaptations, of which 88.9% focused on supporting practices in identifying eligible patients and referring them to the intervention. About half (52.9%) of the adaptations were made to modify the context of the PF strategy to include a group-based format, add community health workers to the strategy, and to shift the implementation target to nurses. The adaptations were often widespread (83.9%), affecting all practices within the FQHC. While most adaptations were reactive (84.6%), they resulted from a systematic process of reviewing data captured by multiple sources. All adaptations included the FQHC in the decision-making process. CONCLUSION With modifications, we demonstrate the ability to document our adaptation data across the FRAME-IS modules, attesting to its applicability and value for a range of implementation strategies. Based on our experiences, we recommend refinement of tracking systems to support more nimble and practical documentation of iterative, ongoing, and multifaceted adaptations. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03713515, Registration date: October 19, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette Schoenthaler
- Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, NYU Langone Health, 180 Madison Avenue, 752, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| | - Franze De La Calle
- Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, NYU Langone Health, 180 Madison Avenue, 752, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Elaine De Leon
- Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, NYU Langone Health, 180 Madison Avenue, 752, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Masiel Garcia
- Family Health Centers at NYU Langone Health, Brooklyn, NY, 11209, USA
| | - Doreen Colella
- Family Health Centers at NYU Langone Health, Brooklyn, NY, 11209, USA
| | - Jacalyn Nay
- Family Health Centers at NYU Langone Health, Brooklyn, NY, 11209, USA
| | - Isaac Dapkins
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Family Health Centers at NYU Langone Health, Brooklyn, NY, 11209, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Starr LT, Washington KT, Jabbari J, Benson JJ, Oliver DP, Demiris G, Cagle JG. Pain Management Education for Rural Hospice Family Caregivers: A Pilot Study With Embedded Implementation Evaluation. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2024; 41:619-633. [PMID: 37491002 PMCID: PMC11032627 DOI: 10.1177/10499091231191114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessing and managing hospice patients' pain is a common source of anxiety among hospice family caregivers (HFCGs), especially caregivers in rural communities who face special challenges including distance, limited access, and concerns about opioid misuse. OBJECTIVE To pilot test Ready2Care, a pain management education intervention for rural HFCGs. We sought to determine whether there was a signal of benefit for clinically-relevant outcomes and to identify contextual factors pertinent to conducting a future randomized clinical trial of Ready2Care. METHODS We conducted a multi-method, single-arm study, enabling completion of paired t-tests comparing pre- and post-intervention measures of caregiver anxiety, pain management self-efficacy, barriers to pain management, and reports of patient pain intensity and corresponding patient and caregiver distress. We concurrently conducted an embedded implementation evaluation via calculation of descriptive statistics (recruitment and retention data) and directed content analysis of brief caregiver interviews. RESULTS Twenty-seven (n = 27) HFCGs participated; 15 completed the study. Among completers, significant improvement was observed in patient pain intensity (average 1.4 points decrease on 0-10 scale) and in overall pain experience. No statistically significant changes were detected in caregiver anxiety, barriers to pain management, or pain management self-efficacy. Facilitators to successful conduct of a future clinical trial included high acceptability of Ready2Care, driven by its perceived clarity and relevance to caregivers' concerns. Barriers included lower-than-anticipated accrual and an attrition rate of nearly 44%. CONCLUSION A multisite clinical trial of Ready2Care is warranted; however, its success may require more effective recruitment and retention strategies for rural caregiver participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren T. Starr
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - JoAnn Jabbari
- Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
- Barnes-Jewish College, Goldfarb School of Nursing, St Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Debra Parker Oliver
- Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
- Barnes-Jewish College, Goldfarb School of Nursing, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - George Demiris
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John G. Cagle
- Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland, School of Social Work, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thys T, Bogaert L, Dankaerts W, Depreitere B, Van Wambeke P, Brumangne S, Bultheel M, Vanden Abeele V, Moke L, Spriet A, Schelfaut S, Janssens L, Swinnen TW. Qualitative study exploring the views of patients and healthcare providers on current rehabilitation practices after lumbar fusion surgery. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e077786. [PMID: 38816040 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the views of patients and healthcare providers on current rehabilitation after lumbar fusion surgery (LFS) to fuel the development of a novel rehabilitation care pathway. DESIGN A cross-sectional, qualitative study with an interpretive descriptive design. SETTING Academic and non-academic hospital setting in Belgium. PARTICIPANTS 31 caregivers from (non)-academic settings and 5 patients with LFS were purposefully sampled and in-depth interviewed. RESULTS Out of the data of all interviews, participants reported opinions on 23 thematic clusters that were expressed in a time-contingent manner from the preoperative, perioperative to postoperative phase. Afterwards, themes were mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, with a larger role for concepts related to the innovation, inner and individual domain. As an overarching theme, the importance of an 'individualised, patient-centred rehabilitation built on a strong therapeutic alliance with an accessible interprofessional team' was stressed for patients undergoing LFS. Specifically, participants stated that a biopsychosocial approach to rehabilitation should start in the preoperative phase and immediately be continued postoperatively. No consensus was observed for movement restrictions postoperatively. Uniform communication between the involved caregivers was considered essential for optimal therapeutic alliance and clinical outcome. The precise role and competence of each member of the interprofessional team needs, therefore, to be clearly defined, respected and discussed. An accessible case manager to guide the patient trajectory and tackle problems could further support this. Interestingly, only patients, psychologists and physiotherapists addressed return to work as an important outcome after LFS. CONCLUSIONS This qualitative study identified key experiences and points to consider in the current and future rehabilitation pathway for LFS. Future research should incorporate these findings to build a novel rehabilitation pathway for LFS and evaluate its feasibility and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03427294).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tinne Thys
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liedewij Bogaert
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wim Dankaerts
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Depreitere
- Division of Neurosurgery, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Van Wambeke
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Simon Brumangne
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michael Bultheel
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vero Vanden Abeele
- Department of Computer Science, E-media Research Lab, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lieven Moke
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Spriet
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sebastiaan Schelfaut
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lotte Janssens
- Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Thijs Willem Swinnen
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Division of Rheumatology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Merle JL, Zapata JP, Quieroz A, Zamantakis A, Sanuade O, Mustanski B, Smith JD. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among people who use drugs: a qualitative scoping review of implementation determinants and change methods. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2024; 19:46. [PMID: 38816889 PMCID: PMC11138081 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-024-00478-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Implementation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV transmission is suboptimal in the United States, particularly among people who use drugs (PWUD). PrEP research among PWUD is scarce, and the factors that impact implementation are largely unknown. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review of implementation determinants (i.e., barriers and facilitators), as well as the change methods (implementation strategies and adjunctive interventions) that have been evaluated to increase PrEP implementation and use among PWUD. We identified 32 peer-reviewed articles assessing determinants and five that evaluated change methods. Determinants were coded using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), which is an established framework to understand the multilevel barriers and facilitators associated with implementation. Findings indicate that most research was conducted among PrEP recipients (i.e., patients), focusing on awareness and willingness to use PrEP, with less focus on factors impacting clinicians and service delivery systems. Moreover, very few change methods have been evaluated to improve clinician adoption and adherence to CDC guidelines for PrEP provision and/or recipient uptake and adherence to PrEP. Future research is needed that focuses on factors impacting implementation from a clinician standpoint as well as innovative change methods to increase PrEP awareness, reach, adoption, and sustained adherence to guidelines. Implementation Science offers a wealth of knowledge to speed up the effort to end the HIV epidemic in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Merle
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | - Juan P Zapata
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Artur Quieroz
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alithia Zamantakis
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Olutobi Sanuade
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Brian Mustanski
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Medical Social Sciences Department, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Justin D Smith
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xiao J, Huang S, Wang Q, Tan S, Chen L, Yuan H, Xiang D, Zhang B, Li X, Guo Y, Huang H, Li Q, Liao Y, Tan Y, Cheng Y, Lu H, Xu P. Sustainable Implementation of Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Clinics for Diabetes Management in Primary Healthcare Centers: A Qualitative Study. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2024:10.1007/s44197-024-00244-2. [PMID: 38780894 DOI: 10.1007/s44197-024-00244-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although physician-pharmacist collaborative clinics for diabetes management have been shown to be effective and cost-effective worldwide, there is limited understanding of the factors that influence their sustainable implementation. This study aims to identify the associated factors and provide sustainability strategy to better implement physician-pharmacist collaborative clinics for diabetes management in primary healthcare centers in China. METHODS A sample of 43 participants were participated in face-to-face, in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to identify facilitators and barriers to implementing physician-pharmacist collaborative clinics for diabetes management in primary healthcare centers, and to explore discriminating factors between low and high implementation units. A sustainable strategy repository based on dynamic sustainability framework was established to inform further implementation. RESULTS This study demonstrated that clear recognition of intervention benefits, urgent needs of patients, adaptive and tailored plan, highly collaborative teamwork and leadership support were the major facilitators, while the major barriers included process complexity, large number and poor health literacy of patients in primary areas, inappropriate staffing arrangements, weak financial incentives and inadequate staff competencies. Six constructs were identified to distinguish between high and low implementation units. Sixteen strategies were developed to foster the implementation of physician-pharmacist collaborative clinics, targeting Intervention, Practice setting, and Ecological system. CONCLUSION This qualitative study demonstrated facilitators and barriers to implementing physician-pharmacist collaborative clinics for diabetes management in primary healthcare centers and developed theory-based strategies for further promotion, which has the potential to improve the management of diabetes and other chronic diseases in under-resourced areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Xiao
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
| | - Shuting Huang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
| | - Qing Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
| | - Shenglan Tan
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
| | - Haiyan Yuan
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
| | - Daxiong Xiang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
| | - Bikui Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
| | - Xia Li
- Department of Endocrine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
| | - Yan Guo
- Department of Pharmacy, Taoyuan People's Hospital, Changde, CN, China
| | - Haiying Huang
- Department of Pharmacy, The People's Hospital of Liuyang, Changsha, CN, China
| | - Qun Li
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second People's Hospital of Huaihua, Huaihua, CN, China
| | - Yaqi Liao
- Department of Pharmacy, Taoyuan People's Hospital, Changde, CN, China
| | - Yuhan Tan
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
| | - Yining Cheng
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China
| | - Hao Lu
- Intemed Hospital Management & Development (Beijing) Centre, Beijing, CN, China
| | - Ping Xu
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China.
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, CN, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ray J, Finn EB, Tyrrell H, Aloe CF, Perrin EM, Wood CT, Miner DS, Grout R, Michel JJ, Damschroder LJ, Sharifi M. User-Centered Framework for Implementation of Technology (UFIT): Development of an Integrated Framework for Designing Clinical Decision Support Tools Packaged With Tailored Implementation Strategies. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e51952. [PMID: 38771622 DOI: 10.2196/51952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic health record-based clinical decision support (CDS) tools can facilitate the adoption of evidence into practice. Yet, the impact of CDS beyond single-site implementation is often limited by dissemination and implementation barriers related to site- and user-specific variation in workflows and behaviors. The translation of evidence-based CDS from initial development to implementation in heterogeneous environments requires a framework that assures careful balancing of fidelity to core functional elements with adaptations to ensure compatibility with new contexts. OBJECTIVE This study aims to develop and apply a framework to guide tailoring and implementing CDS across diverse clinical settings. METHODS In preparation for a multisite trial implementing CDS for pediatric overweight or obesity in primary care, we developed the User-Centered Framework for Implementation of Technology (UFIT), a framework that integrates principles from user-centered design (UCD), human factors/ergonomics theories, and implementation science to guide both CDS adaptation and tailoring of related implementation strategies. Our transdisciplinary study team conducted semistructured interviews with pediatric primary care clinicians and a diverse group of stakeholders from 3 health systems in the northeastern, midwestern, and southeastern United States to inform and apply the framework for our formative evaluation. RESULTS We conducted 41 qualitative interviews with primary care clinicians (n=21) and other stakeholders (n=20). Our workflow analysis found 3 primary ways in which clinicians interact with the electronic health record during primary care well-child visits identifying opportunities for decision support. Additionally, we identified differences in practice patterns across contexts necessitating a multiprong design approach to support a variety of workflows, user needs, preferences, and implementation strategies. CONCLUSIONS UFIT integrates theories and guidance from UCD, human factors/ergonomics, and implementation science to promote fit with local contexts for optimal outcomes. The components of UFIT were used to guide the development of Improving Pediatric Obesity Practice Using Prompts, an integrated package comprising CDS for obesity or overweight treatment with tailored implementation strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05627011; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05627011.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ray
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Emily Benjamin Finn
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | | | - Carlin F Aloe
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Eliana M Perrin
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Charles T Wood
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Dean S Miner
- Departments of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
| | - Randall Grout
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine and Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Jeremy J Michel
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Laura J Damschroder
- Implementation Pathways, LLC and Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Mona Sharifi
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Agudelo-Hernández F, Rojas-Andrade R, Giraldo Alvarez AB. Building an implementation strategy for community-based rehabilitation for mental health in Colombia. JBI Evid Implement 2024:02205615-990000000-00100. [PMID: 38742444 DOI: 10.1097/xeb.0000000000000431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Scientific evidence indicates that the community-based rehabilitation (CBR) model is recommended for recovery from mental disorders. However, this approach encounters barriers and often lacks implementation strategies. AIM The aim of this study is to create a strategy for the implementation of CBR for mental health in Colombia through the identification of barriers and facilitators, together with the expected outcomes, from the perspective of mental health decision-makers in Colombia. METHODS This study adopts a qualitative descriptive approach, using focus group data collection methods and thematic analysis to code and analyze the data. RESULTS A total of 208 individuals participated in the study, including mental health decision-makers and health care professionals. Intersectoral collaboration, contextualization, financial resources, and community commitment and autonomy were identified as barriers and facilitators. The element that was considered a priority for successful implementation was the contextualization of strategies. CONCLUSIONS CBR needs to be strengthened through implementation science if these strategies are to be successfully developed and implemented in various contexts. SPANISH ABSTRACT http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A210.
Collapse
|
8
|
Wagstaff D, Arfin S, Korver A, Chappel P, Rashan A, Haniffa R, Beane A. Interventions for improving critical care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2024:10.1007/s00134-024-07377-9. [PMID: 38748264 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07377-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically review the typology, impact, quality of evidence, barriers, and facilitators to implementation of Quality Improvement (QI) interventions for adult critical care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on 1st September 2022. The studies were included if they described the implementation of QI interventions for adult critical care in LMICs, available as full text, in English and published after 2000. The risks of bias were assessed using the ROB 2.0/ROBINS-I tools. Intervention strategies were categorised according to a Knowledge Translation framework. Interventions' effectiveness were synthesised by vote counting and assessed with a binomial test. Barriers and facilitators to implementation were narratively synthesised using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS 78 studies were included. Risk of bias was high. The most common intervention strategies were Education, Audit & Feedback (A&F) and Protocols/Guidelines/Bundles/Checklists (PGBC). Two multifaceted strategies improved both process and outcome measures: Education and A&F (p = 0.008); and PGBC with Education and A&F (p = 0.001, p < 0.001). Facilitators to implementation were stakeholder engagement, organisational readiness for implementation, and adaptability of interventions. Barriers were lack of resources and incompatibility with clinical workflows. CONCLUSIONS The evidence for QI in critical care in LMICs is sparse and at high risk of bias but suggests that multifaceted interventions are most effective. Co-designing interventions with and engaging stakeholders, communicating relative advantages, employing local champions and adapting to feedback can improve implementation. Hybrid study designs, process evaluations and adherence to reporting guidelines would improve the evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sumaiya Arfin
- The George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.
| | - Alba Korver
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Rashan Haniffa
- Pandemic Sciences Hub and Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- NICS-MORU, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Abi Beane
- Pandemic Sciences Hub and Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- NICS-MORU, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Norton A, Tappis H. Sexual and reproductive health implementation research in humanitarian contexts: a scoping review. Reprod Health 2024; 21:64. [PMID: 38741184 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01793-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meeting the health needs of crisis-affected populations is a growing challenge, with 339 million people globally in need of humanitarian assistance in 2023. Given one in four people living in humanitarian contexts are women and girls of reproductive age, sexual and reproductive health care is considered as essential health service and minimum standard for humanitarian response. Despite growing calls for increased investment in implementation research in humanitarian settings, guidance on appropriate methods and analytical frameworks is limited. METHODS A scoping review was conducted to examine the extent to which implementation research frameworks have been used to evaluate sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian settings. Peer-reviewed papers published from 2013 to 2022 were identified through relevant systematic reviews and a literature search of Pubmed, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL and Global Health databases. Papers that presented primary quantitative or qualitative data pertaining to a sexual and reproductive health intervention in a humanitarian setting were included. RESULTS Seven thousand thirty-six unique records were screened for inclusion, and 69 papers met inclusion criteria. Of these, six papers explicitly described the use of an implementation research framework, three citing use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Three additional papers referenced other types of frameworks used in their evaluation. Factors cited across all included studies as helping the intervention in their presence or hindering in their absence were synthesized into the following Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains: Characteristics of Systems, Outer Setting, Inner Setting, Characteristics of Individuals, Intervention Characteristics, and Process. CONCLUSION This review found a wide range of methodologies and only six of 69 studies using an implementation research framework, highlighting an opportunity for standardization to better inform the evidence for and delivery of sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian settings. Increased use of implementation research frameworks such as a modified Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research could work toward both expanding the evidence base and increasing standardization. Three hundred thirty-nine million people globally were in need of humanitarian assistance in 2023, and meeting the health needs of crisis-affected populations is a growing challenge. One in four people living in humanitarian contexts are women and girls of reproductive age, and provision of sexual and reproductive health care is considered to be essential within a humanitarian response. Implementation research can help to better understand how real-world contexts affect health improvement efforts. Despite growing calls for increased investment in implementation research in humanitarian settings, guidance on how best to do so is limited. This scoping review was conducted to examine the extent to which implementation research frameworks have been used to evaluate sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian settings. Of 69 papers that met inclusion criteria for the review, six of them explicitly described the use of an implementation research framework. Three used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, a theory-based framework that can guide implementation research. Three additional papers referenced other types of frameworks used in their evaluation. This review summarizes how factors relevant to different aspects of implementation within the included papers could have been organized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. The findings from this review highlight an opportunity for standardization to better inform the evidence for and delivery of sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian settings. Increased use of implementation research frameworks such as a modified Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research could work toward both expanding the evidence base and increasing standardization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Norton
- Duke University School of Medicine, 40 Duke Medicine Circle, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| | - Hannah Tappis
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nevedal AL, Widerquist MAO, Reardon CM, Arasim M, Jackson GL, White B, Burns M, Fix GM, DeLaughter K, Cutrona SL, Gifford AL, Jasuja GK, Hogan TP, King HA, Henderson B, Damschroder LJ. Understanding pathways from implementation to sustainment: a longitudinal, mixed methods analysis of promising practices implemented in the Veterans Health Administration. Implement Sci 2024; 19:34. [PMID: 38715094 PMCID: PMC11075255 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01361-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is the United States largest learning health system. The Diffusion of Excellence (DoE) program is a large-scale model of diffusion that identifies and diffuses evidence-informed practices across VHA. During the period of 2016-2021, 57 evidence-informed practices were implemented across 82 VHA facilities. This setting provides a unique opportunity to understand sustainment determinants and pathways. Our objective was to characterize the longitudinal pathways of practices as they transition from initial implementation to long-term sustainment at each facility. METHODS A longitudinal, mixed-methods evaluation of 82 VHA facilities. Eighty-two facility representatives, chosen by leadership as points-of-contact for 57 DoE practices, were eligible for post-implementation interviews and annual sustainment surveys. Primary outcomes (implementation, sustainment), and secondary outcomes (institutionalization, effectiveness, anticipated sustainment) at four time-points were collected. We performed descriptive statistics and directed content analysis using Hailemariam et al.'s factors influencing sustainment. RESULTS After approximately five years post-implementation (e.g., 2021 sustainment outcomes), of the 82 facilities, about one-third fully sustained their practice compared to one-third that did not fully sustain their practice because it was in a "liminal" stage (neither sustained nor discontinued) or permanently discontinued. The remaining one-third of facilities had missing 2021 sustainment outcomes. A higher percentage of facilities (70%) had inconsistent primary outcomes (changing over time) compared to facilities (30%) with consistent primary outcomes (same over time). Thirty-four percent of facilities with sustained practices reported resilience since they overcame implementation and sustainment barriers. Facilities with sustained practices reported more positive secondary outcomes compared to those that did not sustain their practice. Key factors facilitating practice sustainment included: demonstrating practice effectiveness/benefit, sufficient organizational leadership, sufficient workforce, and adaptation/alignment with local context. Key factors hindering practice sustainment included: insufficient workforce, not able to maintain practice fidelity/integrity, critical incidents related to the COVID-19 pandemic, organizational leadership did not support sustainment of practice, and no ongoing support. CONCLUSIONS We identified diverse pathways from implementation to sustainment, and our data underscore that initial implementation outcomes may not determine long-term sustainment outcomes. This longitudinal evaluation contributes to understanding impacts of the DoE program, including return on investment, achieving learning health system goals, and insights into achieving high-quality healthcare in VHA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea L Nevedal
- Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Rd, Mail Stop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
| | - Marilla A Opra Widerquist
- Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Rd, Mail Stop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | - Caitlin M Reardon
- Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Rd, Mail Stop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | - Maria Arasim
- Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Rd, Mail Stop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | - George L Jackson
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Brandolyn White
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Madison Burns
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gemmae M Fix
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research (CHOIR), Bedford & Boston Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Bedford & Boston, MA, USA
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kathryn DeLaughter
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research (CHOIR), Bedford & Boston Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Bedford & Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah L Cutrona
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research (CHOIR), Bedford & Boston Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Bedford & Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Allen L Gifford
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research (CHOIR), Bedford & Boston Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Bedford & Boston, MA, USA
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Guneet K Jasuja
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research (CHOIR), Bedford & Boston Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Bedford & Boston, MA, USA
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Timothy P Hogan
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research (CHOIR), Bedford & Boston Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Bedford & Boston, MA, USA
| | - Heather A King
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Blake Henderson
- Innovation Ecosystem, United States Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Laura J Damschroder
- Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Rd, Mail Stop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stout NL, Alfano CM, Liu R, Dixit N, Jefford M. Implementing a Clinical Pathway for Needs Assessment and Supportive Care Interventions. JCO Oncol Pract 2024:OP2300482. [PMID: 38709984 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite advances in clinical cancer care, cancer survivors frequently report a range of persisting issues, unmet needs, and concerns that limit their ability to participate in life roles and reduce quality of life. Needs assessment is recognized as an important component of cancer care delivery, ideally beginning during active treatment to connect patients with supportive services that address these issues in a timely manner. Despite the recognized importance of this process, many health care systems have struggled to implement a feasible and sustainable needs assessment and management system. This article uses an implementation science framework to guide pragmatic implementation of a needs assessment clinical system in cancer care. According to this framework, successful implementation requires four steps including (1) choosing a needs assessment tool; (2) carefully considering the provider level, clinic level, and health care system-level strengths and barriers to implementation and creating a pilot system that addresses these factors; (3) making the assessment system actionable by matching needs with clinical workflow; and (4) demonstrating the value of the system to support sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole L Stout
- Department of Hematology Oncology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, WV
- Department of Health Policy, Management, and Leadership, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
| | - Catherine M Alfano
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, New Hyde Park, NY
- Institute of Health System Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY
- Department of Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY
| | - Raymond Liu
- Department of Hematology Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, CA
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Niharika Dixit
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA
| | - Michael Jefford
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wende ME, Umstattd Meyer MR, Perry C, Prochnow T, Hamilton CNB, Abildso CG, Porter KMP. Implementation characteristics that may promote sustainability of a rural physical activity initiative: examination of Play Streets through the lens of community implementers. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:48. [PMID: 38698464 PMCID: PMC11064337 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00571-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Play Streets, which are community-based environmental initiatives where public spaces/streets are temporarily closed to create safe, low-cost physical activity opportunities, have demonstrated feasibility and physical activity benefit in rural US areas. Yet, information is needed to identify implementation characteristics that may promote sustainability. This study examined rural Play Streets implementation characteristics that could impact sustainability from local partners' perspectives. METHODS Sixteen Play Streets implementation team members in rural Maryland, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Texas, USA, participated in interviews. Semi-structured in-person individual and group interviews were conducted in the fall of 2018 (after Play Streets implementation in 2017 and 2018), recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed using iterative, content analyses. Coding frameworks were based on the Public Health Program Capacity for Sustainability Framework, and emergent themes were also identified. RESULTS Interviewees' perceived characteristics for facilitating Play Streets implementation aligned with the Public Health Program Capacity for Sustainability Framework: funding stability, political support, partnerships, organizational capacity, program adaption, and communication. Interviewees also noted the importance of cultural alignment/support and the reciprocal impact of community connectedness/engagement. CONCLUSIONS Future research should examine the reciprocal role of public health impacts, as both outcomes and factors which may influence sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyn E Wende
- Department of Health Education and Behavior, College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
| | - M Renée Umstattd Meyer
- Department of Public Health, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, USA.
| | - Cynthia Perry
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - Tyler Prochnow
- Department of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA
| | | | - Christiaan G Abildso
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
| | - Keshia M Pollack Porter
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gago C, De Leon E, Mandal S, de la Calle F, Garcia M, Colella D, Dapkins I, Schoenthaler A. "Hypertension is such a difficult disease to manage": federally qualified health center staff- and leadership-perceived readiness to implement a technology-facilitated team-based hypertension model. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:49. [PMID: 38698497 PMCID: PMC11067286 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00587-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite decades of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of hypertension care delivery in reducing morbidity and mortality, a majority of hypertension cases remain uncontrolled. There is an urgent need to elucidate and address multilevel facilitators and barriers clinical staff face in delivering evidence-based hypertension care, patients face in accessing it, and clinical systems face in sustaining it. Through a rigorous pre-implementation evaluation, we aimed to identify facilitators and barriers bearing the potential to affect the planned implementation of a multilevel technology-facilitated hypertension management trial across six primary care sites in a large federally qualified health center (FQHC) in New York City. METHODS During a dedicated pre-implementation period (3-9 months/site, 2021-2022), a capacity assessment was conducted by trained practice facilitators, including (1) online anonymous surveys (n = 124; 70.5% of eligible), (2) hypertension training analytics (n = 69; 94.5% of assigned), and (3) audio-recorded semi-structured interviews (n = 67; 48.6% of eligible) with FQHC leadership and staff. Surveys measured staff sociodemographic characteristics, adaptive reserve, evidence-based practice attitudes, and implementation leadership scores via validated scales. Training analytics, derived from end-of-course quizzes, included mean score and number attempts needed to pass. Interviews assessed staff-reported facilitators and barriers to current hypertension care delivery and uptake; following audio transcription, trained qualitative researchers employed a deductive coding approach, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS Most survey respondents reported moderate adaptive reserve (mean = 0.7, range = 0-1), evidence-based practice attitudes (mean = 2.7, range = 0-4), and implementation leadership (mean = 2.5, range = 0-4). Most staff passed training courses on first attempt and demonstrated high scores (means > 80%). Findings from interviews identified potential facilitators and barriers to implementation; specifically, staff reported that complex barriers to hypertension care, control, and clinical communication exist; there is a recognized need to improve hypertension care; in-clinic challenges with digital tool access imposes workflow delays; and despite high patient loads, staff are motivated to provide high-quality cares. CONCLUSIONS This study serves as one of the first to apply the CFIR to a rigorous pre-implementation evaluation within the understudied context of a FQHC and can serve as a model for similar trials seeking to identify and address contextual factors known to impact implementation success. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03713515 , date of registration: October 19, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Gago
- Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, NYU Langone Health, 180 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| | - Elaine De Leon
- Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, NYU Langone Health, 180 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Soumik Mandal
- Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, NYU Langone Health, 180 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Franze de la Calle
- Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, NYU Langone Health, 180 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Masiel Garcia
- Family Health Centers at NYU Langone, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | | | - Isaac Dapkins
- Family Health Centers at NYU Langone, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Antoinette Schoenthaler
- Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, NYU Langone Health, 180 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Youn SJ, Boswell JF, Douglas S, Harris BA, Aajmain S, Arnold KT, Creed TA, Gutner CA, Orengo-Aguayo R, Oswald JM, Stirman SW. Implementation Science and Practice-Oriented Research: Convergence and Complementarity. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2024; 51:336-347. [PMID: 37646966 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-023-01296-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Implementation science is the scientific study of methods to promote the uptake of research findings and other evidence-based practices in routine care, with the goal of improving the quality and effectiveness of health services (Bauer et al., 2015). In addition to this common goal, practice-oriented psychotherapy research (and researchers) and implementation science (and scientists) share a common focus on the people and the places where treatment happens. Thus, there exists strong potential for combining these two approaches. In this article, we provide a primer on implementation science for psychotherapy researchers and highlight important areas and examples of convergence and complementarity between implementation science and practice-oriented psychotherapy research. Specifically, we (a) define and describe the core features of implementation science; (b) discuss similarities and areas of complementarity between implementation science and practice-oriented psychotherapy research; (c) discuss a case example that exemplifies the integration of implementation science and practice-oriented research; and (d) propose directions for future research and collaborations that leverage both implementation science and practice-oriented research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Jeong Youn
- Reliant Medical Group, OptumCare, Harvard Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
| | - James F Boswell
- Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Susan Douglas
- Department of Leadership, Policy and Organizations, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Bethany A Harris
- Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Syed Aajmain
- Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly T Arnold
- Whole Health Equity Lab, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Torrey A Creed
- Penn Collaborative for CBT and Implementation Science, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Cassidy A Gutner
- Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rosaura Orengo-Aguayo
- Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), National Crime Victims Research & Treatment Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | - Shannon Wiltsey Stirman
- Dissemination and Training Division, National Center for PTSD, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Maiga AW, Snyder RA, Kao LS, Raval MV, Patel MB, Blakely ML. Advancing Randomized Clinical Trials in Surgery: Role of Exception From Informed Consent, Central Institutional Review Board, and Bayesian Approaches. J Surg Res 2024:S0022-4804(24)00167-7. [PMID: 38670847 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.03.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia W Maiga
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Critical Illness, Brain dysfunction, and Survivorship Center, Vanderbilt Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lillian S Kao
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Mehul V Raval
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mayur B Patel
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Critical Illness, Brain dysfunction, and Survivorship Center, Vanderbilt Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Surgical Services, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Martin L Blakely
- Department of Surgery, Institute for Clinical Research and Learning Health Care, Institute for Implementation Science, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Oche O, Murry LT, Keller MS, Pevnick JM, Schnipper JL, Nguyen AT, Ko EM, Kennelty KA. Pharmacist, nurse, and physician perspectives on the implementation of the pharmacist discharge care (pharm-dc) intervention: A qualitative study. Res Social Adm Pharm 2024:S1551-7411(24)00123-2. [PMID: 38744561 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PHARMacist Discharge Care (PHARM-DC) intervention is a pharmacist-led Transitions of Care (TOC) program intended to reduce 30-day hospital readmissions and emergency department visits which has been implemented at two hospitals in the United States. The objectives of this study were to: 1) explore perspectives surrounding the PHARM-DC program from healthcare providers, leaders, and administrators at both institutions, and 2) identify factors which may contribute to intervention success and sustainability. METHODS Focus groups and interviews were conducted with pharmacists, physicians, nurses, hospital leaders, and pharmacy administrators at two institutions in the Northeastern and Western United States. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed, with transcriptions imported into NVivo for qualitative analysis. Thematic analysis was performed using an iterative process, with two study authors independently coding transcripts to identify themes. RESULTS Overall, 37 individuals participated in ten focus groups and seven interviews. The themes identified included: 1) Organizational, Pharmacist, and Patient Factors Contributing to Transitions of Care, 2) Medication Challenges in Transitions of Care at Admission and Discharge, 3) Transitions of Care Communication and Discharge Follow-up, and 4) Opportunities for Improvement and Sustainability. The four themes were mapped to the constructs of the CFIR and RE-AIM frameworks. Some factors facilitating intervention success and sustainability were accurate medication histories collected on admission, addressing medication barriers before discharge, coordinating discharge using electronic health record discharge features, and having a structured process for intervention training and delivery. Barriers to intervention implementation and sustainability included gaps in communication with other care team members, and variable pharmacist skills for delivering the intervention. This study identified that using educational resources to standardize the TOC process addressed the issue of variations in pharmacists' skills for delivering TOC interventions. CONCLUSIONS Nurses, physicians, pharmacists, pharmacist leaders, and hospital administrators were in agreement regarding the usefulness of the PHARM-DC intervention, while acknowledging challenges in its implementation and opportunities for improvement. Future research should focus on developing training materials to standardize and scale the intervention, eliminating barriers to medication access pre-discharge, coordinating discharge across care team members, and communicating medication changes to primary care providers post-discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onyeche Oche
- The University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, 180 Grand Ave Iowa City, IA 52246, United States.
| | - Logan T Murry
- The University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, 180 Grand Ave Iowa City, IA 52246, United States.
| | - Michelle S Keller
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Division of Informatics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Joshua M Pevnick
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Division of Informatics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - Jeffrey L Schnipper
- Medicine Unit, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
| | - An T Nguyen
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| | - EunJi Michelle Ko
- Department of Quality and Safety, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
| | - Korey A Kennelty
- The University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, 180 Grand Ave Iowa City, IA 52246, United States; The University of Iowa College of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kamran R, Jackman L, Goodwin C, Laws A, Stepney M, Harrison C, Jain A, Rodrigues J. Implementing strategies to improve uptake of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in gender-affirming care: a mixed-methods implementation study. BMJ Open Qual 2024; 13:e002777. [PMID: 38649199 PMCID: PMC11043758 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The Practical Guide to Implementing PROMs in Gender-Affirming Care (PG-PROM-GAC) is an evidence-based resource, which was developed in response to international calls for improved patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) implementation in gender-affirming care. The PG-PROM-GAC has the potential to improve PROM implementation; however, its real-world effectiveness has not yet been investigated. OBJECTIVE Investigate effectiveness and fidelity of three implementation strategies from the PG-PROM-GAC in a real-world gender clinic setting. DESIGN Interrupted time series mixed-methods study investigating response rates to a PROM deployed alongside implementation strategies from the PG-PROM-GAC; and open-ended feedback on the fidelity and effectiveness of implementation strategies. SETTING Participants were recruited from a National Health Service (NHS) gender clinic. PARTICIPANTS Eligible participants were being seen at an NHS gender clinic for an appointment during the study period, and were invited to participate in this study via email. INTERVENTION Three implementation strategies from the PG-PROM-GAC deployed alongside a PROM. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Response rates were calculated at 2-week intervals, in line with the deployment of each implementation strategy. Open-ended responses were thematically analysed by two researchers following guidance from implementation science and interpretation from Normalisation Process Theory. RESULTS A total of 28 participants were included in this study with a mean (SD) age of 39 (17) years. In general, participants rated education material for PROMs as the most important for PROM implementation, and accessibility options for PROMs as the second most important. Response rates to PROM completion dropped as the study progressed, as the burden of reviewing implementation strategies increased. Results were used to construct recommendations for future PROM implementation efforts. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The PG-PROM-GAC and implementation strategy materials developed from this study (ie, educational video on PROMs co-developed with key stakeholders) can be used by clinicians, researchers and policymakers to lead PROM implementation efforts in gender-affirming care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhshan Kamran
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Liam Jackman
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charlie Goodwin
- Northern Region Gender Dysphoria Service, Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Anna Laws
- Northern Region Gender Dysphoria Service, Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Conrad Harrison
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Abhilash Jain
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jeremy Rodrigues
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire NHS Trust, UK
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Scantlebury A, Sivey P, Anteneh Z, Ayres B, Bloor K, Castelli A, Castro-Avila AC, Davies F, Davies S, Glerum-Brooks K, Gutacker N, Lampard P, Rangan A, Saad A, Street A, Wen J, Adamson J. Mixed Methods EvAluation of the high-volume low-complexity Surgical hUb pRogrammE (MEASURE): a mixed methods study protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e086338. [PMID: 38643003 PMCID: PMC11033628 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The waiting list for elective surgery in England recently reached over 7.8 million people and waiting time targets have been missed since 2010. The high-volume low complexity (HVLC) surgical hubs programme aims to tackle the backlog of patients awaiting elective surgery treatment in England. This study will evaluate the impact of HVLC surgical hubs on productivity, patient care and the workforce. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This 4-year project consists of six interlinked work packages (WPs) and is informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. WP1: Mapping current and future HVLC provision in England through document analysis, quantitative data sets (eg, Hospital Episodes Statistics) and interviews with national service leaders. WP2: Exploring the effects of HVLC hubs on key performance outcomes, primarily the volume of low-complexity patients treated, using quasi-experimental methods. WP3: Exploring the impact and implementation of HVLC hubs on patients, health professionals and the local NHS through approximately nine longitudinal, multimethod qualitative case studies. WP4: Assessing the productivity of HVLC surgical hubs using the Centre for Health Economics NHS productivity measure and Lord Carter's operational productivity measure. WP5: Conducting a mixed-methods appraisal will assess the influence of HVLC surgical hubs on the workforce using: qualitative data (WP3) and quantitative data (eg, National Health Service (NHS) England's workforce statistics and intelligence from WP2). WP6: Analysing the costs and consequences of HVLC surgical hubs will assess their achievements in relation to their resource use to establish value for money. A patient and public involvement group will contribute to the study design and materials. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the East Midlands-Nottingham Research Ethics Committee 23/EM/0231. Participants will provide informed consent for qualitative study components. Dissemination plans include multiple academic and non-academic outputs (eg, Peer-reviewed journals, conferences, social media) and a continuous, feedback-loop of findings to key stakeholders (eg, NHS England) to influence policy development. TRIAL REGISTRATION Research registry: Researchregistry9364 (https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry%23home/registrationdetails/64cb6c795cbef8002a46f115/).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Sivey
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, Yorkshire, UK
| | - Zecharias Anteneh
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, Yorkshire, UK
| | - Ben Ayres
- St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Karen Bloor
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, Yorkshire, UK
| | - Adriana Castelli
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, Yorkshire, UK
| | | | - Firoza Davies
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Simon Davies
- Centre for Health and Population Sciences, Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK
| | - Karen Glerum-Brooks
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Nils Gutacker
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, Yorkshire, UK
| | - Pete Lampard
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, Yorkshire, UK
| | - Amar Rangan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, Yorkshire, UK
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Ahmed Saad
- Opthamology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
- Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK
| | | | - Jinglin Wen
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, Yorkshire, UK
| | - Joy Adamson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Smith JL, Ritchie MJ, Kim B, Miller CJ, Chinman MJ, Kelly PA, Landes SJ, Kirchner JE. Getting to Fidelity: Consensus Development Process to Identify Core Activities of Implementation Facilitation. GLOBAL IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS 2024; 2024:10.1007/s43477-024-00119-5. [PMID: 38765294 PMCID: PMC11100021 DOI: 10.1007/s43477-024-00119-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Transferring successful implementation strategies from research to practice requires approaches for assessing fidelity to the strategy's core components. Implementation facilitation (IF) is a strategy involving an interactive process of problem-solving, enabling, and supporting individuals in efforts to implement clinical innovations that occurs in the context of a recognized need for improvement and supportive interpersonal relationships. Because IF is a dynamic strategy involving numerous activities, our objective was to conduct a rigorous consensus development process to identify core activities for monitoring fidelity to IF when applied in clinical settings. We first conducted a scoping literature review to identify the range of activities used when IF has been applied in clinical settings, searching multiple citation databases for English-language articles including "facilitation" or other commonly-used terms for the strategy published from 1996-2015. Through multi-stage screening, 135 articles (from 94 studies) were identified for data extraction on IF activities, frequency with which IF activities were identified as 'core' by study authors, and study outcomes. From the literature review, we identified 32 distinct IF activities and developed definitions/examples for each. Next, we conducted a 3-stage, modified-Delphi expert panel consensus development process to identify core IF activities across three implementation phases (i.e., Pre-Implementation, Implementation, Sustainment). The expert panel identified 8 core activities for the Pre-Implementation Phase, 8 core activities for the Implementation Phase, and 4 core activities for the Sustainment Phase. This work provides an important foundation for developing measures/tools to assess use of core IF activities to ensure the strategy is delivered with fidelity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L. Smith
- VA Behavioral Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) & HSR&D Center for Mental Healthcare & Outcomes Research (CeMHOR), Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, 900 S. Shackelford Road, Fifth Floor, Little Rock, AR 72211, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street, #755, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Mona J. Ritchie
- VA Behavioral Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) & HSR&D Center for Mental Healthcare & Outcomes Research (CeMHOR), Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, 900 S. Shackelford Road, Fifth Floor, Little Rock, AR 72211, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street, #755, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Bo Kim
- VA Behavioral Health QUERI & HSR&D Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Christopher J. Miller
- VA Behavioral Health QUERI & HSR&D Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Matthew J. Chinman
- VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building (151R), University Drive C, Pittsburgh, PA 15240, USA
| | - P. Adam Kelly
- Southeast Louisiana Veterans Healthcare System, 2400 Canal Street (11F), New Orleans, LA 70119, USA
| | - Sara J. Landes
- VA Behavioral Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) & HSR&D Center for Mental Healthcare & Outcomes Research (CeMHOR), Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, 900 S. Shackelford Road, Fifth Floor, Little Rock, AR 72211, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street, #755, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - JoAnn E. Kirchner
- VA Behavioral Health Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) & HSR&D Center for Mental Healthcare & Outcomes Research (CeMHOR), Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, 900 S. Shackelford Road, Fifth Floor, Little Rock, AR 72211, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham Street, #755, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gamarel KE, Rodriguez-Bañuelos A, Ubong IA, Best JN, Jadwin-Cakmak L, Mitchell JW. Understanding the potential implementation determinants of Our Plan: a couples-based digital human immunodeficiency virus prevention intervention for same-gender male couples. Mhealth 2024; 10:16. [PMID: 38689615 PMCID: PMC11058597 DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-23-57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background There has been a proliferation of digital health interventions (DHIs) focused on addressing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention and treatment outcomes, including couples-based interventions with same-gender male couples. However, the barriers and facilitators of implementing couples-based HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention interventions using digital platforms in community-based organizations remains largely unknown. The goal of this study was to explore the implementation determinants of Our Plan, a couples-based DHI designed for new relationships of same-gender male couples and dyadic, sexual partnerships. Methods Qualitative interviews were conducted with 40 organization leaders, healthcare providers, and staff at acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-service and community-based organizations in 13 states serving populations in Ending the HIV Epidemic jurisdictions. Interview items and follow-up questions were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to inquire about implementation determinants of Our Plan. Results Most participants highlighted several relative advantages of Our Plan: increasing capacity to support couples, potential synergy with existing programs, and opportunities to increase patient engagement. Participants also discussed relative disadvantages: misalignment with organizational values in the provision of patient-centered models of care and low interest from some priority populations. Participants emphasized the need for adaptability of Our Plan to fit within their local contexts, which encompassed support for both implementers and end-users, cultural tailoring, and privacy and security features. The desired evidence needed to implement Our Plan focused on data on impact, acceptability, and usability and functionality from communities most heavily impacted by the HIV epidemic. The majority of participants described how Our Plan could be integrated within service delivery and aligned with their organization's aspirational values; however, some noted that their organizational culture valued in-person interactions, particularly among patients experiencing structural vulnerabilities. Finally, participants discussed how the implementation of Our Plan would require additional training and funding for staff to support end-users and a relationship with the developers so that they could demonstrate their investment in the communities that their organizations served. Conclusions Our Plan was deemed a promising tool among potential implementers. To ensure optimal implementation and organizational fit, Our Plan refinement and evaluation must include implementers and end-users most impacted by the HIV epidemic throughout the entire process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristi E. Gamarel
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Adrian Rodriguez-Bañuelos
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ini-Abasi Ubong
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Janae N. Best
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Laura Jadwin-Cakmak
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jason W. Mitchell
- Department of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Florida International University Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zettergren L, Larsson EC, Hellsten L, Kosidou K, Nielsen AM. Implementing digital sexual and reproductive health care services in youth clinics: a qualitative study on perceived barriers and facilitators among midwives in Stockholm, Sweden. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:411. [PMID: 38566080 PMCID: PMC10988956 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10932-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital health care services have the potential to improve access to sexual and reproductive health care for youth but require substantial implementation efforts to translate into individual and public health gains. Health care providers are influential both regarding implementation and utilization of the services, and hence, their perceptions of digital health care services and the implementation process are essential to identify and address. The aim of this study was to explore midwives' perception of digital sexual and reproductive health care services for youth, and to identify perceived barriers and facilitators of the implementation of digital health care provision in youth clinics. METHODS We performed semi-structured interviews with midwives (n = 16) working at youth clinics providing both on-site and digital sexual and reproductive health care services to youth in Stockholm, Sweden. Interview data were analyzed using a content analysis approach guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS Midwives acknowledged that the implementation of digital health care improved the overall access and timeliness of the services at youth clinics. The ability to accommodate the needs of youth regarding their preferred meeting environment (digital or on-site) and easy access to follow-up consultations were identified as benefits of digital health care. Challenges to provide digital health care included communication barriers, privacy and confidentiality concerns, time constraints, inability to offer digital appointments for social counselling, and midwives' preference for in person consultations. Experiencing organizational support during the implementation was appreciated but varied between the respondents. CONCLUSION Digital sexual and reproductive health care services could increase access and are valuable complements to on-site services in youth clinics. Sufficient training for midwives and organizational support are crucial to ensure high quality health care. Privacy and safety concerns for the youth might aggravate implementation of digital health care. Future research could focus on equitable access and youth' perceptions of digital health care services for sexual and reproductive health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linn Zettergren
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18a, Widerströmska Huset 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
- Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Region Stockholm, SE-104 31, Stockholm, Box 45436, Sweden
| | - Elin C Larsson
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18a, Widerströmska Huset 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Womens and Childrens Health, Tomtebodavägen 18a, Widerströmska Huset, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lovisa Hellsten
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18a, Widerströmska Huset 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
- Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Region Stockholm, SE-104 31, Stockholm, Box 45436, Sweden
| | - Kyriaki Kosidou
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18a, Widerströmska Huset 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
- Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Region Stockholm, SE-104 31, Stockholm, Box 45436, Sweden
| | - Anna Maria Nielsen
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18a, Widerströmska Huset 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Region Stockholm, SE-104 31, Stockholm, Box 45436, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Merle JL, Benbow N, Li DH, Zapata JP, Queiroz A, Zamantakis A, McKay V, Keiser B, Villamar JA, Mustanski B, Smith JD. Improving Delivery and Use of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in the US: A Systematic Review of Implementation Strategies and Adjunctive Interventions. AIDS Behav 2024:10.1007/s10461-024-04331-0. [PMID: 38564136 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-024-04331-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Implementation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV transmission is suboptimal in the United States. To date, the literature has focused on identifying determinants of PrEP use, with a lesser focus on developing and testing change methods to improve PrEP implementation. Moreover, the change methods available for improving the uptake and sustained use of PrEP have not been systematically categorized. To summarize the state of the literature, we conducted a systematic review of the implementation strategies used to improve PrEP implementation among delivery systems and providers, as well as the adjunctive interventions used to improve the uptake and persistent adherence to PrEP among patients. Between November 2020 and January 2021, we searched Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for peer reviewed articles. We identified 44 change methods (18 implementation strategies and 26 adjunctive interventions) across a variety of clinical and community-based service settings. We coded implementation strategies and adjunctive interventions in accordance with established taxonomies and reporting guidelines. Most studies focused on improving patient adherence to PrEP and most conducted pilot trials. Just over one-third of included studies demonstrated a positive effect on outcomes. In order to end the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic in the U.S., future, large scale HIV prevention research is needed that develops and evaluates implementation strategies and adjunctive interventions for target populations disproportionately affected by HIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Merle
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | - Nanette Benbow
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Dennis H Li
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Juan P Zapata
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Artur Queiroz
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alithia Zamantakis
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Virginia McKay
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Brennan Keiser
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Juan A Villamar
- Public Health and Epidemiology Unit, Westat, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Brian Mustanski
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Northwestern University, Seattle, WA, USA
- Medical Social Sciences Department, Northwestern University, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Justin D Smith
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Graves E, Brooks HL, De Schacht C, Emílio A, Matino A, Aboobacar A, Audet CM. Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on a Novel Couple-Based HIV Treatment Intervention: A Qualitative Assessment of the Facilitators, Barriers, and Proposed Improvements to Implementation in Zambézia Province, Mozambique. AIDS Behav 2024; 28:1370-1383. [PMID: 38151664 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-023-04224-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Mozambique has one of the world's highest HIV/AIDS burdens. Despite significant investment in HIV care and treatment, pregnant and lactating women's retention in care remains suboptimal. One reason for poor maternal retention is lack of male partner support. We tested an interventional couple-based HIV care and treatment, including joint clinical appointments and couple-based educational and support sessions provided by a health counselor and peer educators, respectively. Healthcare providers delivering care for seroconcordant individuals were interviewed regarding their perspectives on facilitators and barriers to the couple-based intervention implementation. Analysis of interview responses was done using MAXQDA. Results pertaining to providers' perspectives on implementation and intervention characteristics were organized, interpreted, and contextualized using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0), while providers' suggestions for improvements were coded and organized apart from CFIR. Providers felt the intervention was largely compatible with the local culture, and offered a significant advantage over standard individual-based care by facilitating patient follow-up and reducing wait times by prioritizing couples for services. They also believed it facilitated HIV treatment access through the provision of couple-based counseling that encouraged supportive behaviors towards retention. However, providers reported insufficient privacy to deliver couple-based care at some health facilities and concerns that women in difficult relationships may struggle to meaningfully participate. They suggested providing sessions in alternate clinic settings and offering a limited number of women-only visits. The facilitators and barriers described here contribute to informing the design and implementation of future couple-based interventions to improve HIV care for seroconcordant expectant couples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Graves
- Vanderbilt Institute for Global Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave, Suite 750, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
| | - Hannah L Brooks
- Vanderbilt Institute for Global Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave, Suite 750, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA
| | | | | | | | - Arifo Aboobacar
- Provincial Health Directorate of Zambézia, Quelimane, Mozambique
| | - Carolyn M Audet
- Vanderbilt Institute for Global Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave, Suite 750, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bell SA, Inloes JB, Donnelly J, Wasserman M, Wyte-Lake T. Improving Nursing Home Disaster Readiness Through Implementation Science. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2024; 25:617-622. [PMID: 36931322 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023]
Abstract
As large-scale disasters continue to become increasingly common worldwide, nursing homes, whose residents are more vulnerable to disaster-related health and psychosocial shocks, and their staff, are carrying progressively more responsibility for health care readiness practices. Implementation science is a research discipline that seeks to improve uptake of evidence-based practices, such as health care readiness planning, and thus has potential to improve nursing home care delivery during and after disasters. We describe the limited field of existing evidence-based strategies in the peer-reviewed literature that seek to advance health care readiness in the nursing home setting and illustrate how implementation science can better support health care readiness planning for nursing homes. We rest on 3 main themes: (1) implementation science frameworks can strengthen nursing home staff engagement around health care readiness; (2) implementation science can support tailoring of emergency preparedness plans to individual nursing homes' unique needs; and (3) implementation science can advance the integration of nursing homes into local, state, and federal health care readiness planning initiatives. Finally, research is urgently needed to both generate and disseminate implementation strategies that increase uptake of evidence-based health care readiness practices in the nursing home setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Anne Bell
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Jennifer B Inloes
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - John Donnelly
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Learning Health Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; VA QUERI Center for Evaluation and Implementation Resources and HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael Wasserman
- California Association of Long Term Care Medicine, Newbury Park, CA, USA
| | - Tamar Wyte-Lake
- Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, Office of Patient Care Services, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
O'Sullivan S, McEnery C, Cagliarini D, Hinton JDX, Valentine L, Nicholas J, Chen NA, Castagnini E, Lester J, Kanellopoulos E, D'Alfonso S, Gleeson JF, Alvarez-Jimenez M. A Novel Blended Transdiagnostic Intervention (eOrygen) for Youth Psychosis and Borderline Personality Disorder: Uncontrolled Single-Group Pilot Study. JMIR Ment Health 2024; 11:e49217. [PMID: 38557432 PMCID: PMC11019426 DOI: 10.2196/49217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integrating innovative digital mental health interventions within specialist services is a promising strategy to address the shortcomings of both face-to-face and web-based mental health services. However, despite young people's preferences and calls for integration of these services, current mental health services rarely offer blended models of care. OBJECTIVE This pilot study tested an integrated digital and face-to-face transdiagnostic intervention (eOrygen) as a blended model of care for youth psychosis and borderline personality disorder. The primary aim was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of eOrygen. The secondary aim was to assess pre-post changes in key clinical and psychosocial outcomes. An exploratory aim was to explore the barriers and facilitators identified by young people and clinicians in implementing a blended model of care into practice. METHODS A total of 33 young people (aged 15-25 years) and 18 clinicians were recruited over 4 months from two youth mental health services in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: (1) the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre, an early intervention service for first-episode psychosis; and (2) the Helping Young People Early Clinic, an early intervention service for borderline personality disorder. The feasibility, acceptability, and safety of eOrygen were evaluated via an uncontrolled single-group study. Repeated measures 2-tailed t tests assessed changes in clinical and psychosocial outcomes between before and after the intervention (3 months). Eight semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with the young people, and 3 focus groups, attended by 15 (83%) of the 18 clinicians, were conducted after the intervention. RESULTS eOrygen was found to be feasible, acceptable, and safe. Feasibility was established owing to a low refusal rate of 25% (15/59) and by exceeding our goal of young people recruited to the study per clinician. Acceptability was established because 93% (22/24) of the young people reported that they would recommend eOrygen to others, and safety was established because no adverse events or unlawful entries were recorded and there were no worsening of clinical and social outcome measures. Interviews with the young people identified facilitators to engagement such as peer support and personalized therapy content, as well as barriers such as low motivation, social anxiety, and privacy concerns. The clinician focus groups identified evidence-based content as an implementation facilitator, whereas a lack of familiarity with the platform was identified as a barrier owing to clinicians' competing priorities, such as concerns related to risk and handling acute presentations, as well as the challenge of being understaffed. CONCLUSIONS eOrygen as a blended transdiagnostic intervention has the potential to increase therapeutic continuity, engagement, alliance, and intensity. Future research will need to establish the effectiveness of blended models of care for young people with complex mental health conditions and determine how to optimize the implementation of such models into specialized services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaunagh O'Sullivan
- Orygen, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Carla McEnery
- Orygen, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Daniela Cagliarini
- Orygen, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jordan D X Hinton
- Orygen, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Health Brain and Mind Research Centre, School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lee Valentine
- Orygen, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennifer Nicholas
- Orygen, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicola A Chen
- Orygen, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Emily Castagnini
- Orygen, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Simon D'Alfonso
- School of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - John F Gleeson
- Health Brain and Mind Research Centre, School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mario Alvarez-Jimenez
- Orygen, Parkville, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Drew N, McAllister M, Coffin J, Robinson M, Katzenellenbogen J, Armstrong E. Healing Right Way randomised control trial enhancing rehabilitation services for Aboriginal people with brain injury in Western Australia: translation principles and activities. BRAIN IMPAIR 2024; 25:IB23109. [PMID: 38640359 DOI: 10.1071/ib23109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Background This report provides the theory, method and practice of culturally secure translation and knowledge exchange in the Healing Right Way Clinical Trial (2017-2022), outlining activities to date. Healing Right Way was a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial conducted in Western Australia, aimed at enhancing rehabilitation services and quality of life for Aboriginal Australians following acquired brain injury. The trial translation plan was aspirational and action-oriented, with its implementation iterative and ongoing. Translational activities aimed to inform service and research planning for Aboriginal people with brain injury. Situated in the intercultural space, the work guards against undertaking activities that are monocultural, colonial and appropriating in favour of work that is authentically viewed through the dual lens of whiteness and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ways of knowing, being and doing, and is strengths-based. Methods Three translational and knowledge exchange components were identified, relating to the role of Aboriginal Brain Injury Coordinators, cultural training of hospital staff and the research process itself. Knowledge plans were developed for key audiences, with potential translation products to be monitored for ongoing impact. Results Results demonstrate that translational and knowledge exchange were iteratively embedded throughout the trial life cycle. Data sources included community engagement, partnership meetings and interviews. Activities involved presentations to diverse audiences including bureaucrats, community and participants. Conclusions This report provides a snapshot of the first translation knowledge exchange plan and activities constructed in relation to brain injury rehabilitation services for Aboriginal people. Challenges encountered, as well as successes to date, are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Drew
- Kurongkurl Katitjin, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Meaghan McAllister
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Juli Coffin
- Ngangk Yira Institute for Change, Murdoch University, Broome, WA, Australia
| | - Melanie Robinson
- Ngangk Yira Institute for Change, Murdoch University, Broome, WA, Australia
| | - Judith Katzenellenbogen
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Armstrong
- University Department of Rural Health South West, Edith Cowan University, Bunbury, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Howe CJ, Lewis B, Edmondson S. Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Health Literacy Practices in a Pediatric ENT Clinic: A Mixed-Methods Study. J Nurs Care Qual 2024; 39:106-113. [PMID: 37729004 DOI: 10.1097/ncq.0000000000000744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite strong evidence of improved patient outcomes, clinicians have been slow to adopt health literacy practices. PURPOSE To identify facilitators and barriers to implementing health literacy practices into clinical care. METHODS Stakeholders (N = 40) completed surveys of acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, conviction, and confidence with teach-back practices. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), interviews (n = 12) were conducted and analyzed. RESULTS Most reported high acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility, but low confidence in using teach-back. Facilitators included leadership engagement and relative advantage. Barriers were related to compatibility due to time and workflow constraints. The CFIR-ERIC (Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change) Implementation Strategy Matching Tool was applied to select implementation strategies. CONCLUSIONS The CFIR framework along with the CFIR-ERIC Matching Strategy Tool helped the research team select strategies likely to yield successful implementation and sustained use of health literacy practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol J Howe
- Author Affiliations: Harris College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth (Dr Howe); Department of Nursing, Children's Health, Dallas, Texas (Dr Lewis); and Medical School, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (Ms Edmondson)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mazariego CG, McKay S, Tyedmers E, Kelada L, McGill BC, Daly R, Wakefield CE, Ziegler DS, Taylor N. Co-design of a paediatric oncology medicines database (ProCure) to support complex care provision for children with a hard-to-treat cancer. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1332434. [PMID: 38606155 PMCID: PMC11007026 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1332434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Paediatric oncologists often encounter challenges when seeking compassionate access to off-label therapies for their patients. This study employed implementation science and co-design techniques to develop the ProCure medicines database, with the goal of streamlining the application process and addressing identified barriers in paediatric oncology. Methods This study utilised an exploratory qualitative research design. Seventeen healthcare providers, including oncologists, nurse consultants, and allied health professionals, participated in semi-structured interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and a visual process map aid. Deductive qualitative data analysis, according to the CFIR constructs, identified key barriers and facilitators. Collaborative design sessions engaged multidisciplinary teams to develop the ProCure beta version. Results Barriers to off-label therapy access included resource-intensive applications, time sensitive decision-making, and complex pharmaceutical information. Facilitators included Drug Access Navigators, Molecular Tumour Boards, and a multi-disciplinary approach. ProCure addressed end-user needs by centralising medicines information. Additional features suggested by healthcare providers included blood-brain-barrier penetrability data and successful application examples. Conclusion ProCure represents a promising solution to the challenges paediatric oncologists face in accessing off-label therapies. By centralising information, it simplifies the application process, aids decision-making, and promotes a collaborative approach to patient care. The potential of the database to stream and enhance off-label therapy access underscores its relevance in improving paediatric oncology practise. Further research and implementation efforts are warranted to assess ProCure's real-world impact and refine its features based on user feedback.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn G. Mazariego
- School of Population Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Skye McKay
- School of Population Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elijah Tyedmers
- School of Population Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lauren Kelada
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brittany C. McGill
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca Daly
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Claire E. Wakefield
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David S. Ziegler
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Children’s Cancer Institute Australia, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- School of Population Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bourke JA, Jerram KAS, Arora M, Craig A, Middleton JW. Using the consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to integrate innovation recipients' perspectives into the implementation of a digital version of the spinal cord injury health maintenance tool: a qualitative analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:390. [PMID: 38549148 PMCID: PMC10976821 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10847-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advances in managing secondary health complications after spinal cord injury (SCI), challenges remain in developing targeted community health strategies. In response, the SCI Health Maintenance Tool (SCI-HMT) was developed between 2018 and 2023 in NSW, Australia to support people with SCI and their general practitioners (GPs) to promote better community self-management. Successful implementation of innovations such as the SCI-HMT are determined by a range of contextual factors, including the perspectives of the innovation recipients for whom the innovation is intended to benefit, who are rarely included in the implementation process. During the digitizing of the booklet version of the SCI-HMT into a website and App, we used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as a tool to guide collection and analysis of qualitative data from a range of innovation recipients to promote equity and to inform actionable findings designed to improve the implementation of the SCI-HMT. METHODS Data from twenty-three innovation recipients in the development phase of the SCI-HMT were coded to the five CFIR domains to inform a semi-structured interview guide. This interview guide was used to prospectively explore the barriers and facilitators to planned implementation of the digital SCI-HMT with six health professionals and four people with SCI. A team including researchers and innovation recipients then interpreted these data to produce a reflective statement matched to each domain. Each reflective statement prefaced an actionable finding, defined as alterations that can be made to a program to improve its adoption into practice. RESULTS Five reflective statements synthesizing all participant data and linked to an actionable finding to improve the implementation plan were created. Using the CFIR to guide our research emphasized how partnership is the key theme connecting all implementation facilitators, for example ensuring that the tone, scope, content and presentation of the SCI-HMT balanced the needs of innovation recipients alongside the provision of evidence-based clinical information. CONCLUSIONS Understanding recipient perspectives is an essential contextual factor to consider when developing implementation strategies for healthcare innovations. The revised CFIR provided an effective, systematic method to understand, integrate and value recipient perspectives in the development of an implementation strategy for the SCI-HMT. TRIAL REGISTRATION N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Bourke
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
- The Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Burwood Academy Trust, Burwood Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
| | - K Anne Sinnott Jerram
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- The Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mohit Arora
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- The Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ashley Craig
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- The Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James W Middleton
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- The Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal Rehab, Ryde, NSW, Australia
- State Spinal Cord Injury Service, NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Frank HE, Guzman LE, Ayalasomayajula S, Albanese A, Dunklee B, Harvey M, Bouchard K, Vadiveloo M, Yaroch AL, Scott K, Tovar A. Developing and testing a produce prescription implementation blueprint to improve food security in a clinical setting: a pilot study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2024; 10:51. [PMID: 38521931 PMCID: PMC10960480 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01467-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food insecurity is common in the United States, especially in Rhode Island, where it affects up to 33% of residents. Food insecurity is associated with adverse health outcomes and disproportionally affects people from minoritized backgrounds. Produce prescription programs, in which healthcare providers write "prescriptions" for free or reduced cost vegetables, have been used to address food insecurity and diet-related chronic disease. Although there is growing evidence for the effectiveness of produce prescription programs in improving food security and diet quality, there have been few efforts to use implementation science methods to improve the adoption of these programs. METHODS This two-phase pilot study will examine determinants and preliminary implementation and effectiveness outcomes for an existing produce prescription program. The existing program is funded by an Accountable Care Organization in Rhode Island and delivered in primary care practices. For the first phase, we conducted a formative evaluation, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0, to assess barriers, facilitators, and existing implementation strategies for the produce prescription program. Responses from the formative evaluation were analyzed using a rapid qualitative analytic approach to yield a summary of existing barriers and facilitators. In the second phase, we presented our formative evaluation findings to a community advisory board consisting of primary care staff, Accountable Care Organization staff, and staff who source and deliver the vegetables. The community advisory board used this information to identify and refine a set of implementation strategies to support the adoption of the program via an implementation blueprint. Guided by the implementation blueprint, we will conduct a single-arm pilot study to assess implementation antecedents (i.e., feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, implementation climate, implementation readiness), implementation outcomes (i.e., adoption), and preliminary program effectiveness (i.e., food and nutrition security). The first phase is complete, and the second phase is ongoing. DISCUSSION This study will advance the existing literature on produce prescription programs by formally assessing implementation determinants and developing a tailored set of implementation strategies to address identified barriers. Results from this study will inform a future fully powered hybrid type 3 study that will use the tailored implementation strategies and assess implementation and effectiveness outcomes for a produce prescription program. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trials: NCT05941403 , Registered June 9, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah E Frank
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - Linda E Guzman
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Shivani Ayalasomayajula
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Ariana Albanese
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Brady Dunklee
- Integra Community Care Network, Providence, RI, USA
- Care New England Health System, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Matthew Harvey
- Integra Community Care Network, Providence, RI, USA
- Care New England Health System, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Kelly Bouchard
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Maya Vadiveloo
- Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| | - Amy L Yaroch
- Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Kelli Scott
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alison Tovar
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rosenberg J, McDonough Ryan P, Brown C, Schaffer R, O’Brien C, Ganjavi F, Sharifi M. Exploring the determinants of successful implementation of a preventive mental health and wellness intervention for Afghan refugee families: a qualitative analysis. HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH 2024; 39:119-130. [PMID: 37534755 PMCID: PMC10952411 DOI: 10.1093/her/cyad034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
Many refugee children experience trauma in early childhood. Effective, tailored interventions are needed to improve refugee children's access to preventive mental health. We interviewed refugee-serving stakeholders and parents participating in an evidence-based preventive mental health and wellness intervention adapted for Afghan refugee children and families who may have experienced trauma. Interview guide development was informed by two implementation science frameworks: the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Model for Adaptation Design and Impact. A three-person team coded transcripts via rapid qualitative analysis, and the study team reached consensus on themes. Six refugee-serving facilitators and five refugee parents discussed key determinants of successful implementation. Themes included: (i) modeling cultural humility to promote communication about emotions; (ii) needed linguistic support and referral networks to avoid miscommunications and missed communications; (iii) bridging connections between children, families and schools; (iv) different takeaways, or differing goals and expectations between facilitators and participants; and (v) timely, specific cultural considerations to overcome participation barriers. Overall, we found key determinants of successful implementation of a preventive mental health and wellness intervention for refugee children and families included adaptations to enhance cultural humility and sensitivity to cultural context while strengthening communication among facilitators, children and families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Rosenberg
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Patricia McDonough Ryan
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, 1 University Pl, Stamford, CT 06901, USA
| | - Camille Brown
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Rachel Schaffer
- Health Coordination, Elena’s Light, 58 Foundain St Apt J2, New Haven, CT 06515, USA
| | - Caroline O’Brien
- Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Building EP-04 3970 Reservoir Rd, NW Washington, DC 20057, USA
| | - Fereshteh Ganjavi
- Founder and Director, Elena’s Light, 58 Foundain St Apt J2, New Haven, CT 06515, USA
| | - Mona Sharifi
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
MacKenzie NE, Chambers CT, Cassidy CE, Corkum PV, McGrady ME, Parker JA, Birnie KA. Understanding the unique and common perspectives of partners engaged in knowledge mobilization activities within pediatric pain management: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:337. [PMID: 38486223 PMCID: PMC10938714 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10782-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge mobilization (KM) is essential to close the longstanding evidence to practice gap in pediatric pain management. Engaging various partners (i.e., those with expertise in a given topic area) in KM is best practice; however, little is known about how different partners engage and collaborate on KM activities. This mixed-methods study aimed to understand what different KM partner groups (i.e., health professionals, researchers, and patient/caregiver partners) perceive as supporting KM activities within pediatric pain management. METHODS This study used a convergent mixed-methods design. Ten partners from each of the three groups participated in interviews informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, where they discussed what impacted KM activities within pediatric pain. Participants then rated and ranked select factors discussed in the interview. Transcripts were analyzed within each group using reflexive thematic analysis. Group-specific themes were then triangulated to identify convergence and divergence among groups. A matrix analysis was then conducted to generate meta-themes to describe overarching concepts. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Unique themes were developed within each partner group and further analysis generated four meta-themes: (1) team dynamics; (2) role of leadership; (3) policy influence; (4) social influence. There was full agreement among groups on the meaning of team dynamics. While there was partial agreement on the role of leadership, groups differed on who they described as taking on leadership positions. There was also partial agreement on policy influence, where health professionals and researchers described different institutions as being responsible for providing funding support. Finally, there was partial agreement on social influence, where the role of networks was seen as serving distinct purposes to support KM. Quantitative analyses indicated that partner groups shared similar priorities (e.g., team relationships, communication quality) when it came to supporting KM in pediatric pain. CONCLUSIONS While partners share many needs in common, there is also nuance in how they wish to be engaged in KM activities as well as the contexts in which they work. Strategies must be introduced to address these nuances to promote effective engagement in KM to increase the impact of evidence in pediatric pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole E MacKenzie
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Life Sciences Centre, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, NS, B3H4J1, Canada.
- Centre for Pediatric Pain Research, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada.
| | - Christine T Chambers
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Life Sciences Centre, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, NS, B3H4J1, Canada
- Centre for Pediatric Pain Research, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Solutions for Kids in Pain, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | - Penny V Corkum
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Life Sciences Centre, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, NS, B3H4J1, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Meghan E McGrady
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | - Kathryn A Birnie
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Life Sciences Centre, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, NS, B3H4J1, Canada
- Solutions for Kids in Pain, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ladak Z, Grewal N, Kim MO, Small S, Leber A, Hemani M, Sun Q, Hamza DM, Laur C, Ivers NM, Falenchuk O, Volpe R. Equity in prenatal healthcare services globally: an umbrella review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:191. [PMID: 38468220 PMCID: PMC10926563 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06388-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timely, appropriate, and equitable access to quality healthcare during pregnancy is proven to contribute to better health outcomes of birthing individuals and infants following birth. Equity is conceptualized as the absence of differences in healthcare access and quality among population groups. Healthcare policies are guides for front-line practices, and despite merits of contemporary policies striving to foster equitable healthcare, inequities persist. The purpose of this umbrella review is to identify prenatal healthcare practices, summarize how equities/inequities are reported in relation to patient experiences or health outcomes when accessing or using services, and collate equity reporting characteristics. METHODS For this umbrella review, six electronic databases were searched (Medline, EMBASE, APA PsychInfo, CINAHL, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, and Cochrane Library). Included studies were extracted for publication and study characteristics, equity reporting, primary outcomes (prenatal care influenced by equity/inequity) and secondary outcomes (infant health influenced by equity/inequity during pregnancy). Data was analyzed deductively using the PROGRESS-Plus equity framework and by summative content analysis for equity reporting characteristics. The included articles were assessed for quality using the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews. RESULTS The search identified 8065 articles and 236 underwent full-text screening. Of the 236, 68 systematic reviews were included with first authors representing 20 different countries. The population focus of included studies ranged across prenatal only (n = 14), perinatal (n = 25), maternal (n = 2), maternal and child (n = 19), and a general population (n = 8). Barriers to equity in prenatal care included travel and financial burden, culturally insensitive practices that deterred care engagement and continuity, and discriminatory behaviour that reduced care access and satisfaction. Facilitators to achieve equity included innovations such as community health workers, home visitation programs, conditional cash transfer programs, virtual care, and cross-cultural training, to enhance patient experiences and increase their access to, and use of health services. There was overlap across PROGRESS-Plus factors. CONCLUSIONS This umbrella review collated inequities present in prenatal healthcare services, globally. Further, this synthesis contributes to future solution and action-oriented research and practice by assembling evidence-informed opportunities, innovations, and approaches that may foster equitable prenatal health services to all members of diverse communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeenat Ladak
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions & Virtual Care, Toronto, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Qiuyu Sun
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Celia Laur
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions & Virtual Care, Toronto, Canada
| | - Noah M Ivers
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions & Virtual Care, Toronto, Canada
- Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nilsing Strid E, Wallin L, Nilsagård Y. Exploring expectations and readiness for healthy lifestyle promotion in Swedish primary health care: a qualitative analysis of managers, facilitators, and professionals. Scand J Prim Health Care 2024; 42:201-213. [PMID: 38241166 PMCID: PMC10851800 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2301556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Prior to a multifaceted implementation strategy for a healthy lifestyle-promoting practice the expectations of primary health care managers, appointed internal facilitators and health care professionals on supporting change was explored. DESIGN This study had an explorative qualitative design using data gathered from individual interviews and focus groups. Qualitative content analysis with a deductive category development was applied using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS The study was conducted in a primary care setting in central Sweden as a part of the Act in Time research project. Prior to a multifaceted implementation strategy, we held 16 individual interviews with managers and appointed facilitators and five focus groups with 26 health care professionals. RESULTS Managers, facilitators, and professionals held similar expectations, where their expressed need for support corresponded to three constructs: Readiness for implementation, Implementation climate, and Engaging. Our findings indicate the need for strong leadership engagement to focus on how the healthy lifestyle-promoting practice can be anchored among the professionals. Managers at all levels should communicate the vision and goals, enable facilitators and professionals to improve their competencies, build inter-professional teams, and jointly plan the new practice. CONCLUSION To change to a healthy lifestyle promoting practice professionals request support from their managers, who in turn need support from the middle and top managers. The requested support includes helping to prioritise health promotion and enabling the primary care centres to build competence and take ownership of the implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04799860.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Nilsing Strid
- University Health Care Research Center, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Lars Wallin
- School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
| | - Ylva Nilsagård
- University Health Care Research Center, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Morley KI, Hocking L, Saunders CL, Bousfield JW, Bostock J, Brimicombe J, Burgoine T, Dawney J, Hofman J, Lee D, Mackett R, Phillips W, Sussex J, Morris S. Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298701. [PMID: 38422089 PMCID: PMC10903902 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Although research has demonstrated that transport infrastructure development can have positive and negative health-related impacts, most of this research has not considered mental health and wellbeing separately from physical health. There is also limited understanding of whether and how any effects might be experienced differently across population groups, whether this differs according to the stage of development (e.g. planning, construction), and how changes to planned infrastructure may affect mental health and wellbeing. This paper presents a protocol for the Wellbeing Impact Study of HS2 (WISH2), which seeks to address these questions using a high-speed rail development in the UK as an applied example. WISH2 is a 10-year, integrated, longitudinal, mixed-methods project using general practices (primary medical care providers in the UK) as an avenue for participant recruitment and for providing a geographically defined population for which aggregated data on mental health indicators are available. The research comprises: (i) a combined longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cohort study involving multiple waves of survey data collection and data from medical records; (ii) longitudinal, semi-structured interviews and focus groups with residents and community stakeholders from exposed areas; (iii) analysis of administrative data aggregated at the general practice population level; and (iv) health economic analysis of mental health and wellbeing impacts. The study findings will support the development of strategies to reduce negative impacts and/or enhance positive mental health and wellbeing impacts of high-speed rail developments and other large-scale infrastructure projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lucy Hocking
- Health and Wellbeing Research Group, RAND Europe, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine L. Saunders
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - James Brimicombe
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Burgoine
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica Dawney
- Health and Wellbeing Research Group, RAND Europe, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Joanna Hofman
- Home Affairs and Social Policy Research Group, RAND Europe, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Lee
- Health and Wellbeing Research Group, RAND Europe, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Roger Mackett
- Centre for Transport Studies, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - William Phillips
- Health and Wellbeing Research Group, RAND Europe, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jon Sussex
- Health and Wellbeing Research Group, RAND Europe, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Morris
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Middleton JW, Arora M, Jerram KAS, Bourke J, McCormick M, O’Leary D, Weber G, Lembke T, Craig A. Co-design of the Spinal Cord Injury Health Maintenance Tool to Support Self-Management: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2024; 30:59-73. [PMID: 38433736 PMCID: PMC10906369 DOI: 10.46292/sci23-00042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Background There is a lack of consumer-friendly tools to empower and support people living with spinal cord injury (SCI) to self-manage complex health needs in community. This article describes the co-design process of the new SCI Health Maintenance Tool (SCI-HMT). Methods Co-design of the SCI-HMT using a mixed-methods approach included a rapid review, e-Delphi surveys with range of multidisciplinary health care professionals (n = 62), interviews of participants with SCI (n = 18) and general practitioners (n = 4), focus groups (n = 3 with 7, 4, and 4 participants with SCI, respectively), design workshops with stakeholders (n = 11, 8), and end-user testing (n = 41). Results The SCI-HMT (healthmaintenancetool.com) was developed based on participatory research with data synthesis from multiple sources. Five priority health maintenance issues for bladder, bowel, skin, pain, and autonomic dysreflexia were originally covered. Best practice recommendations, red flag conditions, referrals, and clinical pathways were agreed on through an e-Delphi technique. Qualitative analysis identified six broad key concepts for self-management, including early symptom recognition, role of SCI peers, knowledge sharing with primary care, general practitioners as gatekeepers, and shared decision-making and highlighted a need to place much stronger emphasis on mental health and well-being. Design workshops and end-user testing provided key insights about user experience, functionality, and content for the SCI-HMT. Conclusion The co-design process engaging end users, including people with SCI and general practitioners, enabled a shared understanding of the problem and identification of important needs and how to meet them. Informed by this process, the SCI-HMT is a freely accessible resource supporting SCI self-management, shared decision-making, and early problem identification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W. Middleton
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW Australia
- The Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Royal Rehab, Ryde NSW Australia
- State Spinal Cord Injury Service, NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation, St Leonards, NSW Australia
| | - Mohit Arora
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW Australia
- The Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - K. Anne Sinnott Jerram
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW Australia
- The Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - John Bourke
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW Australia
- The Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Burwood Academy Trust, Burwood Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | | | | | - Tony Lembke
- The Alstonville Clinic, Alstonville, NSW Australia
| | - Ashley Craig
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW Australia
- The Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sunguya BF, Ngowi JE, Njiro BJ, Munishi C, Ndumwa HP, Kengia J, Kapologwe NA, Deng L, Timbrell A, Kitinya WJ, Mlunde LB. Lessons learnt and best practices in scaling up an emergency transportation system to tackle maternal and neonatal mortality: a qualitative study of key stakeholders in Shinyanga, Tanzania. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e073859. [PMID: 38373858 PMCID: PMC10882369 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to document lessons learnt and best practices for scaling up an innovative emergency transportation system, drawing insights from the m-mama programme implemented in Shinyanga, Tanzania. The m-mama pilot programme was implemented in phases from 2014 to 2016 in two districts and later scaled up to include all districts in Shinyanga region in 2017. The programme employed an emergency transportation system and technical and operational support of the health system to address the three delays leading to maternal and neonatal mortality. DESIGN Cross-sectional, qualitative research with key healthcare system stakeholders from the national, regional and district levels. SETTING The study was conducted in Kahama and Kishapu districts in Shinyanga, Tanzania. The two districts were selected purposefully to represent the programme implementation districts' rural and urban or semiurban settings. PARTICIPANTS District, regional and national stakeholders involved in implementing the m-mama pilot programme in Shinyanga were interviewed between February and March 2022. RESULTS Lessons learnt from implementing the m-mama programme were grouped into four key themes: community engagement, emergency transportation system, government engagement, and challenges and constraints in technical implementation. Stakeholder engagement and collaboration at all levels, community involvement in implementation, adherence to local contexts and effective government partnerships were identified as key drivers for programme success. Coordination, supervision and infrastructure enhancement were crucial in implementing the emergency transportation system. CONCLUSIONS Facilitating community involvement, understanding the local context and adapting to existing structures can enhance programme ownership and utilisation. The government serves as the central coordinator, overseeing resource mobilisation and distribution. A well-executed and coordinated emergency transportation system holds promise in addressing delays and curbing maternal and neonatal mortality. Collaborative knowledge-sharing among implementers is essential for identifying best practices and gaining insights into practical strategies for addressing anticipated challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno F Sunguya
- School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Jackline E Ngowi
- School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Belinda J Njiro
- School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Castory Munishi
- School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Harrieth Peter Ndumwa
- School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - James Kengia
- United Republic of Tanzania President's Office, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Ntuli A Kapologwe
- United Republic of Tanzania President's Office, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | | | | | | | - Linda B Mlunde
- School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Butscher F, Ellinger J, Singer M, Mall C. Influencing factors for the implementation of school-based interventions promoting obesity prevention behaviors in children with low socioeconomic status: a systematic review. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:12. [PMID: 38347649 PMCID: PMC10860312 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00548-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health inequity (HI) remains a major challenge in public health. Improving the health of children with low socioeconomic status (SES) can help to reduce overall HI in children. Childhood obesity is a global problem, entailing several adverse health effects. It is crucial to assess the influencing factors for adoption, implementation, and sustainment of interventions. This review aims to identify articles reporting about influencing factors for the implementation of school-based interventions promoting obesity prevention behaviors in children with low SES. It aims to critically appraise the articles' quality, assess influencing factors, categorize and evaluate them, and to discuss possible implications. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in 7 databases with the following main inclusion criteria: (1) school-based interventions and (2) target group aged 5-14 years. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, its five domains (intervention characteristics, inner setting, outer setting, characteristics of individuals, process) along with 39 categories within these domains were used as deductive category system for data analysis. We grouped the articles with regard to the characteristics of the interventions in simple and complex interventions. For each domain, and for the groups of simple and complex interventions, the most commonly reported influencing factors are identified. RESULTS In total, 8111 articles were screened, and 17 met all eligibility criteria. Included articles applied mixed methods (n=11), qualitative (n=5), and quantitative design (n=1). Of these, six were considered to report simple interventions and eleven were considered to report complex interventions. In total, 301 influencing factors were assessed. Aspects of the inner setting were reported in every study, aspects of the outer setting were the least reported domain. In the inner setting, most reported influencing factors were time (n=8), scheduling (n=6), and communication (n=6). CONCLUSION This review found a wide range of influencing factors for implementation and contributes to existing literature regarding health equity as well as implementation science. Including all stakeholders involved in the implementation process and assessing the most important influencing factors in the specific setting, could enhance implementation and intervention effectiveness. More empirical research and practical guidance are needed to promote obesity prevention behaviors among children with low SES. REGISTRATION CRD42021281209 (PROSPERO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friederike Butscher
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, Munich, Germany.
| | - Jan Ellinger
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, Munich, Germany
| | - Monika Singer
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Mall
- TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Schoenthaler A, De La Calle F, Leon E, Garcia M, Colella D, Nay J, Dapkins I. Application of the FRAME-IS to a Multifaceted Implementation Strategy. RESEARCH SQUARE 2024:rs.3.rs-3931349. [PMID: 38410454 PMCID: PMC10896377 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3931349/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
Background Research demonstrates the importance of documenting adaptations to implementation strategies that support integration of evidence-based interventions into practice. While studies have utilized the FRAME-IS [Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications for Implementation Strategies] to collect structured adaptation data, they are limited by a focus on discrete implementation strategies (e.g., training), which do not reflect the complexity of multifaceted strategies like practice facilitation (PF). In this paper, we apply the FRAME-IS to our trial evaluating the effectiveness of PF on implementation fidelity of an evidence-based technology-facilitated team care model for improved hypertension control within a federally qualified health center (FQHC). Methods Three data sources are used to document adaptations: (1) implementation committee meeting minutes, (2) narrative reports completed by practice facilitators, and (3) structured notes captured on root cause analysis and Plan-Do-Study-Act worksheets. Text was extracted from the data sources according to the FRAME-IS modules and inputted into a master matrix for content analysis by two authors; a third author conducted member checking and code validation. Results We modified the FRAME-IS to include part 2 of module 2 (what is modified) to add greater detail of the modified strategy, and a numbering system to track adaptations across the modules. This resulted in identification of 27 adaptations, of which 88.9% focused on supporting practices in identifying eligible patients and referring them to the intervention. About half (52.9%) of the adaptations were made to modify the context of the PF strategy to include a group-based format, add community health workers to the strategy, and to shift the implementation target to nurses. The adaptations were often widespread (83.9%), affecting all practices within the FQHC. While most adaptations were reactive (84.6%), they resulted from a systematic process of reviewing data captured by multiple sources. All adaptations included the FQHC in the decision-making process. Conclusion With modifications, we demonstrate the ability to document our adaptation data across the FRAME-IS modules, attesting to its applicability and value for a range of implementation strategies. Based on our experiences, we recommend refinement of tracking systems to support more nimble and practical documentation of iterative, ongoing, and multifaceted adaptations. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT03713515, Registration date: October 19, 2018.
Collapse
|
40
|
Smith JD, Li DH, Merle JL, Keiser B, Mustanski B, Benbow ND. Adjunctive interventions: change methods directed at recipients that support uptake and use of health innovations. Implement Sci 2024; 19:10. [PMID: 38331832 PMCID: PMC10854146 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01345-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation science groups change methods into two categories: (1) clinical, behavioral, or biomedical intervention targeting recipient's health outcomes and (2) implementation strategies targeting the delivery system. Differentiating interventions from strategies based on their intended functions is critical to accurately attributing their effects to health or implementation outcomes. However, in coordinating 200+ HIV implementation research projects and conducting systematic reviews, we identified change methods that had characteristics of both interventions and strategies that were inconsistently categorized. To alleviate confusion and improve change method specification, we propose that implementation science should adopt an extant but rarely used term-adjunctive interventions-to classify change methods that are distinct from the common intervention/strategy taxonomy. MAIN TEXT Adjunctive interventions as change methods that target recipients (e.g., patients, participants) of a health intervention but are designed to increase recipients' motivation, self-efficacy, or capacity for initiating, adhering to, complying with, or engaging with the health intervention over time. In two of our published reviews on implementation of HIV interventions, 25 out of 45 coded change methods fell into this gray area between strategy and intervention. We also noted instances in which the same change method was labelled as the intervention ("the thing"), as an adjunctive intervention, or an implementation strategy in different studies-further muddying the waters. Adjunctive interventions are distinguished from other change methods by their intended targets, desired outcomes, and theory of action and causal processes. Whereas health interventions target recipients and have a direct, causal effect on the health outcome, adjunctive interventions enhance recipients' attitudes and behaviors to engage with the intervention and have an indirect causal link to the health outcome via increasing the probability of recipients' utilization and adherence to the intervention. Adjunctive interventions are incapable of directly producing the health outcome and will themselves require implementation strategies to effectively impact sustained uptake, utilization, and adherence. Case examples, logic modeling, and considerations (e.g., relationship to consumer engagement strategies) for adjunctive intervention research are provided. CONCLUSION Conceptualizing adjunctive interventions as a separate type of change method will advance implementation research by improving tests of effectiveness, and the specification of mechanisms and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin D Smith
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | - Dennis H Li
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - James L Merle
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Brennan Keiser
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brian Mustanski
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Third Coast Center for AIDS Research, Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nanette D Benbow
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rouleau G, Wu K, Ramamoorthi K, Boxall C, Liu RH, Maloney S, Zelmer J, Scott T, Larsen D, Wijeysundera HC, Ziegler D, Bhatia S, Kishimoto V, Steele Gray C, Desveaux L. Mapping Theories, Models, and Frameworks to Evaluate Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e51098. [PMID: 38315515 PMCID: PMC10877497 DOI: 10.2196/51098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital health interventions (DHIs) are a central focus of health care transformation efforts, yet their uptake in practice continues to fall short of their potential. In order to achieve their desired outcomes and impact, DHIs need to reach their target population and need to be used. Many factors can rapidly intersect between this dynamic of users and interventions. The application of theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) can facilitate the systematic understanding and explanation of the complex interactions between users, practices, technology, and health system factors that underpin research questions. There remains a gap in our understanding of how TMFs have been applied to guide the evaluation of DHIs with real-world health system operations. OBJECTIVE This study aims to map TMFs used in studies to guide the evaluation of DHIs. The objectives are to (1) describe the TMFs and the constructs they target, (2) identify how TMFs have been prospectively used (ie, their roles) in primary studies to evaluate DHIs, and (3) to reflect on the relevance and utility of our findings for knowledge users. METHODS This scoping review was conducted in partnership with knowledge users using an integrated knowledge translation approach. We included papers (eg, reports; empirical quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies; conference proceedings; and dissertations) if primary insights resulting from the application of TMFs were presented. Any type of DHI was eligible. Papers published from 2000 and onward were mainly identified from the following databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (Ovid), EBM Reviews (Ovid), and Embase (Ovid). RESULTS A total of 156 studies published between 2000 and 2022 were included. A total of 68 distinct TMFs were identified across 85 individual studies. In more than half (85/156, 55%) of the included studies, 1 of following 6 prevailing TMFs were reported: Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (n=39); the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance Framework (n=17); the Technology of Acceptance Model (n=16); the Unified Theory on Acceptance and Use of Technology (n=12); the Diffusion of Innovation Theory (n=10); and Normalization Process Theory (n=9). The most common intended roles of the 6 TMFs were to inform data collection (n=86), to inform data analysis (n=69), and to identify key constructs that may serve as barriers and facilitators (n=52). CONCLUSIONS As TMFs are most often reported to be applied to support data collection and analysis, researchers should consider more clearly synthesizing key insights as practical use cases to both increase the relevance and digestibility of their findings. There is also a need to adapt or develop guidelines for better reporting DHIs and the use of TMFs to guide evaluation. Hence, it would contribute to ensuring ongoing technology transformation efforts are evidence and theory informed rather than anecdotally driven.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geneviève Rouleau
- Nursing department, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Saint-Jérôme, QC, Canada
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institut du Savoir Montfort, Montfort Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kelly Wu
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karishini Ramamoorthi
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Cherish Boxall
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca H Liu
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Ted Scott
- School of Nursing, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Darren Larsen
- Telus Healthcare Delivery, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Women's College Hospital Family Health Team, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Daniela Ziegler
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sacha Bhatia
- Ontario Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vanessa Kishimoto
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carolyn Steele Gray
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laura Desveaux
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Zia Y, Etyang L, Nyerere B, Nyamwaro C, Mogaka F, Mwangi M, June L, Njiru R, Mokoyo J, Kimani S, Thomas KK, Ngure K, Wanyama I, Bukusi E, Mugo N, Heffron R. Structural influences on delivery and use of oral HIV PrEP among adolescent girls and young women seeking post abortion care in Kenya. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 68:102416. [PMID: 38292038 PMCID: PMC10825648 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in East and southern Africa experience a disproportionate burden of HIV incidence. Integrating HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) within existing programs is a key component of addressing this disparity. Methods We evaluated an oral PrEP program integrated into post-abortion care (PAC) in Kenya from March 2021 to November 2022. Technical advisors trained staff at PAC clinics on PrEP delivery, abstracted program data from each clinic, and collected data on structural characteristics. Utilizing a modified Poisson regression, we estimated the effect of structural factors on the probability of PrEP offer and uptake. Findings We abstracted data on 6877 AGYW, aged 15-30 years, across 14 PAC clinics. PrEP offers were made to 57.4% of PAC clients and 14.1% initiated PrEP. Offers were associated with an increased probability at clinics that had consistent supply of PrEP (relative risk (RR):1.81, 95% CI: 1.1-2.95), inconsistent HIV testing commodities (RR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.29-2.78), had all providers trained (RR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.68), and were public (RR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.29-2.78). These same factors were associated with PrEP uptake: consistent supply of PrEP (RR: 2.71, 95% CI: 1.44-5.09), inconsistent HIV testing commodities (RR: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.39-4.67), all providers trained (RR: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.38-4.92), and were public (RR: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.39-4.67). Interpretation Greater success with integration of HIV prevention into reproductive health services will likely require investments in systems, such as human resources and PrEP and HIV testing commodities, to create stable availability and ensure consistent access. Funding PrEDIRA 2 was supported by funding from Children's Investment Fund Foundation (R-2001-04433). Ms. Zia was funded by the NIH Ruth L. Kirchstein pre-doctoral award (5F31HD105494-02) and Dr. Heffron was funded by National Institute of Mental Health (K24MH123371).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasaman Zia
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, USA
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, USA
| | - Lydia Etyang
- Center for Clinical Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kenya
| | - Bernard Nyerere
- Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kenya
| | | | - Felix Mogaka
- Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kenya
| | - Margaret Mwangi
- Center for Clinical Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kenya
| | - Lavender June
- Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kenya
| | - Roy Njiru
- Center for Clinical Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kenya
| | | | | | | | - Kenneth Ngure
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, USA
- School of Public Health, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya
| | | | - Elizabeth Bukusi
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, USA
- Center for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kenya
| | - Nelly Mugo
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, USA
- Center for Clinical Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kenya
| | - Renee Heffron
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, USA
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
McCrimmon T, Collins LF, Perez-Brumer A, Bazzi AR, Shaffer VA, Kerrigan D, Alcaide ML, Philbin MM. Long-Acting Injectable Antiretrovirals for HIV Treatment: A Multi-Site Qualitative Study of Clinic-Level Barriers to Implementation in the United States. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2024; 38:61-69. [PMID: 38381949 DOI: 10.1089/apc.2023.0248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI ART) has the potential to address adherence obstacles associated with daily oral ART, leading to enhanced treatment uptake, adherence, and viral suppression among people living with HIV (PLWH). Yet, its potential may be limited due to ongoing disparities in availability and accessibility. We need a better understanding of the organizational context surrounding the implementation of LAI ART, and to inform its widespread rollout, we conducted 38 in-depth interviews with medical and social service providers who offer HIV care at private and hospital-based clinics across six US cities. Our findings highlight real-world implementation barriers outside of clinical trial settings. Providers described ongoing and anticipated barriers across three stages of LAI ART implementation: (1) Patient enrollment (challenges registering patients and limited insurance coverage), (2) medication delivery (insufficient personnel and resources), and (3) leadership and management (lack of interprofessional coordination and a lack of programming guidelines). Providers described how these barriers would have a disproportionate impact on under-resourced clinics, potentially exacerbating existing disparities in LAI ART access and adherence. Our findings suggest strategies that clinic leadership, policymakers, and other stakeholders can pursue to promote rapid and equitable LAI ART implementation in clinics across the United States. Resource and staffing investments could support clinics to begin, sustain, and scale up LAI ART delivery; additionally, the establishment of guidelines and tools could facilitate wider adoption of LAI ART across clinical settings. These efforts are crucial to promote resourced, standardized, and equitable implementation of LAI ART and maximize its potential to help end the HIV epidemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara McCrimmon
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lauren F Collins
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Amaya Perez-Brumer
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela R Bazzi
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Victoria A Shaffer
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Deanna Kerrigan
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Maria L Alcaide
- Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Morgan M Philbin
- Division of Vulnerable Populations, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Haun M, Adler Ben-Dor I, Hall C, Kalha J, Korde P, Moran G, Müller-Stierlin AS, Niwemuhwezi J, Nixdorf R, Puschner B, Ramesh M, Charles A, Krumm S. Perspectives of key informants before and after implementing UPSIDES peer support in mental health services: qualitative findings from an international multi-site study. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:159. [PMID: 38302955 PMCID: PMC10835950 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10543-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peer support is an essential part of recovery-oriented care worldwide. Contextual factors have an impact on the implementation of peer support work. However, research has paid little attention to similarities and differences of implementation factors in settings varying by income-level and cultural values. The aim of this study is to assess the factors influencing the implementation of a peer support intervention across study sites in low-, middle- and high-income countries in line with the Consolidation Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). METHOD 6 focus groups with a total of 54 key informants with relevant contextual (organisational) knowledge regarding implementation facilitators and barriers were conducted at six study sites Ulm and Hamburg (Germany), Butabika (Uganda), Dar es Salaam (Tanzania), Be'er Sheva (Israel), and Pune (India) before and 1.5 years after the start of UPSIDES peer support. Transcripts were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Across study sites key informants reported benefits of peer support for service users and peer support workers as implementation facilitators. At study sites with lower resources, reduced workload for mental health workers and improved access to mental health services through peer support were perceived as implementation facilitators (CFIR Domain 1: Intervention characteristics). The degree of engagement of mental health workers (CFIR Domain 3: Inner Setting/Domain 4: Individuals involved) varied across study sites and was seen either as a barrier (low engagement) or a facilitator (high engagement). Across study sites, adequate training of peer support workers (CFIR Domain 5: Implementation process) was seen as animplementation facilitator, while COVID-19 as well as low resource availability were reported as implementation barriers (CFIR Domain 2: Outer setting). CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the importance of considering contextual factors when implementing peer support, including previous experience and perceived benefits. Particular attention should be given to organisational benefits such as workload reduction and the allocation of sufficient resources as key drivers in LMICs. In HICs, the potential of organisational benefits for successful implementation should be further investigated and promoted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Haun
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Inbar Adler Ben-Dor
- Department of Social Work, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel
| | - Cerdic Hall
- East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jasmine Kalha
- Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | - Palak Korde
- Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | - Galia Moran
- Department of Social Work, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel
| | | | | | - Rebecca Nixdorf
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Puschner
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Mary Ramesh
- Department of Health Systems, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Ashleigh Charles
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Silvia Krumm
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hurlocker MC, Kirouac M, Gillezeau C, Hijaz D, Moniz-Lewis DIK, Carlon HA, Coleman GC, Ilgen MA, Pearson MR, Vowles KE, Witkiewitz K. Study Protocol for the Healing Opioid Misuse and Pain Through Engagement Trial: Integrated Treatment for Individuals With Co-occurring Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder. SUBSTANCE USE & ADDICTION JOURNAL 2024:29767342241228126. [PMID: 38294429 DOI: 10.1177/29767342241228126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Chronic pain and opioid use disorder (OUD) are public health crises and their co-occurrence has led to further complications and public health impacts. Provision of treatments for comorbid chronic pain and OUD is paramount to address these public health crises. Medications for OUD (MOUD) are gold standard treatments for OUD that have also demonstrated benefit in pain management. However, clinics that provide MOUD for chronic pain or OUD often lack behavioral treatments to address the challenges experienced by individuals with both conditions. Developing and implementing a behavioral treatment that complements MOUD may better equip clinics to provide comprehensive care to the growing proportion of clients who present with comorbid chronic pain and OUD. In the Healing Opioid misuse and Pain through Engagement (HOPE) Trial, we are using an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design to examine the benefits of an integrated behavioral treatment and to determine the feasibility of implementing the integrated treatment into clinics that provide MOUD. The treatment integrated 2 evidence-based treatments-Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention-to target the emotional, behavioral, and physiological sequelae of OUD and chronic pain. Implementation feasibility will include assessing changes in implementation readiness and identifying facilitators and barriers to implementing the integrated treatment among all personnel employed in clinics that provide MOUD. This commentary offers an overview of the study and design and details adaptations we made to our study protocol, based largely on clinic personnel time constraints and variable clinic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margo C Hurlocker
- Department of Psychology, Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA
| | - Megan Kirouac
- Department of Psychology, Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA
| | - Christina Gillezeau
- Department of Psychology, Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA
| | - Donia Hijaz
- Department of Psychology, Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA
| | - David I K Moniz-Lewis
- Department of Psychology, Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA
| | - Hannah A Carlon
- Department of Psychology, Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA
| | - George Cameron Coleman
- Department of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine Addiction Treatment Services, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mark A Ilgen
- Department of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine Addiction Treatment Services, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Matthew R Pearson
- Department of Psychology, Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA
| | - Kevin E Vowles
- School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast and Belfast Centre for Pain Rehabilitation, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Katie Witkiewitz
- Department of Psychology, Center on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Langley J, Urquhart R, Tschupruk C, Christian E, Warner G. Barriers to and facilitators of successful implementation of a palliative approach to care in primary care practices: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079234. [PMID: 38296276 PMCID: PMC10831432 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Integrating a palliative approach to care into primary care is an emerging evidence-based practice. Despite the evidence, this type of care has not been widely adopted into primary care settings. The objective of this study was to examine the barriers to and facilitators of successful implementation of a palliative approach to care in primary care practices by applying an implementation science framework. DESIGN This convergent mixed methods study analysed semistructured interviews and expression of interest forms to evaluate the implementation of a protocol, linked to implementation strategies, for a palliative approach to care called Early Palliation through Integrated Care (EPIC) in three primary care practices. This study assessed barriers to and facilitators of implementation of EPIC and was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). A framework analysis approach was used during the study to determine the applicability of CFIR constructs and domains. SETTING Primary care practices in Canada. Interviews were conducted between September 2020 and November 2021. PARTICIPANTS 10 individuals were interviewed, who were involved in implementing EPIC. Three individuals from each practice were reinterviewed to clarify emerging themes. RESULTS Overall, there were implementation barriers at multiple levels that caused some practices to struggle. However, barriers were mitigated when practices had the following facilitators: (1) a high level of intra-practice collaboration, (2) established practices with organisational structures that enhanced communications, (3) effective leveraging of EPIC project supports to transition care, (4) perceptions that EPIC was an opportunity to make a long-term change in their approach to care as opposed to a limited term project and (5) strong practice champions. CONCLUSIONS Future implementation work should consider assessing facilitators identified in our results to better gauge primary care pre-implementation readiness. In addition, providing primary care practices with support to help offset the additional work of implementing innovations and networking opportunities where they can share strategies may improve implementation success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodi Langley
- Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Robin Urquhart
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Cheryl Tschupruk
- Palliative Health Network, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Erin Christian
- Primary Health Care and Chronic Disease Management Network, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Grace Warner
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Minian N, Gayapersad A, Coroiu A, Dragonetti R, Zawertailo L, Zaheer J, O’Neill B, Lange S, Thomson N, Crawford A, Kennedy SH, Selby P. Prototyping the implementation of a suicide prevention protocol in primary care settings using PDSA cycles: a mixed method study. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1286078. [PMID: 38333892 PMCID: PMC10850298 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1286078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction In Canada, approximately 4,500 individuals die by suicide annually. Approximately 45% of suicide decedents had contact with their primary care provider within the month prior to their death. Current versus never smokers have an 81% increased risk of death by suicide. Those who smoke have additional risks for suicide such as depression, chronic pain, alcohol, and other substance use. They are more likely to experience adverse social determinants of health. Taken together, this suggests that smoking cessation programs in primary care could be facilitators of suicide prevention, but this has not been studied. Study objectives The objectives of the study are to understand barriers/facilitators to implementing a suicide prevention protocol within a smoking cessation program (STOP program), which is deployed by an academic mental health and addiction treatment hospital in primary care clinics and to develop and test implementation strategies to facilitate the uptake of suicide screening and assessment in primary care clinics across Ontario. Methods The study employed a three-phase sequential mixed-method design. Phase 1: Conducted interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research exploring barriers to implementing a suicide prevention protocol. Phase 2: Performed consensus discussions to map barriers to implementation strategies using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change tool and rank barriers by relevance. Phase 3: Evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of implementation strategies using Plan Do Study Act cycles. Results Eleven healthcare providers and four research assistants identified lack of training and the need of better educational materials as implementation barriers. Participants endorsed and tested the top three ranked implementation strategies, namely, a webinar, adding a preamble before depression survey questions, and an infographic. After participating in the webinar and reviewing the educational materials, all participants endorsed the three strategies as acceptable/very acceptable and feasible/very feasible. Conclusion Although there are barriers to implementing a suicide prevention protocol within primary care, it is possible to overcome them with strategies deemed both acceptable and feasible. These results offer promising practice solutions to implement a suicide prevention protocol in smoking cessation programs delivered in primary care settings. Future efforts should track implementation of these strategies and measure outcomes, including provider confidence, self-efficacy, and knowledge, and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Minian
- INTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Allison Gayapersad
- INTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Adina Coroiu
- INTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rosa Dragonetti
- INTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laurie Zawertailo
- INTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Juveria Zaheer
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Braden O’Neill
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shannon Lange
- Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole Thomson
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Allison Crawford
- INTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sidney H. Kennedy
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Arthur Sommer Rotenberg Program in Suicide Studies, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Selby
- INTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bjerk M, Flottorp SA, Pripp AH, Øien H, Hansen TM, Foy R, Close J, Linnerud S, Brovold T, Solli R, Olsen NR, Skelton DA, Rydwik E, Helbostad JL, Idland G, Kvæl L, Vieira E, Taraldsen K. Tailored implementation of national recommendations on fall prevention among older adults in municipalities in Norway (FALLPREVENT trial): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial. Implement Sci 2024; 19:5. [PMID: 38273325 PMCID: PMC10811923 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01334-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite substantial research evidence indicating the effectiveness of a range of interventions to prevent falls, uptake into routine clinical practice has been limited by several implementation challenges. The complexity of fall prevention in municipality health care underlines the importance of flexible implementation strategies tailored both to general determinants of fall prevention and to local contexts. This cluster-randomised trial (RCT) investigates the effectiveness of a tailored intervention to implement national recommendations on fall prevention among older home-dwelling adults compared to usual practice on adherence to the recommendations in health professionals. METHODS Twenty-five municipalities from four regions in Norway will be randomised to intervention or control arms. Each municipality cluster will recruit up to 30 health professionals to participate in the study as responders. The tailored implementation intervention comprises four components: (1) identifying local structures for implementation, (2) establishing a resource team from different professions and levels, (3) promoting knowledge on implementation and fall prevention and (4) supporting the implementation process. Each of these components includes several implementation activities. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be used to categorise determinants of the implementation process and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) will guide the matching of barriers to implementation strategies. The primary outcome measure for the study will be health professionals' adherence to the national recommendations on fall prevention measured by a questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include injurious falls, the feasibility of the intervention, the experiences of the implementation process and intervention costs. Measurements will be carried out at baseline in August 2023, post-intervention in May 2024 and at a follow-up in November 2024. DISCUSSION This study will provide evidence on the effectiveness, intervention costs and underlying processes of change of tailored implementation of evidence-based fall prevention recommendations. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial is registered in the Open Science Registry: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JQ9T5 . Registered: March 03, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Bjerk
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University (OsloMet), Oslo, Norway.
- Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Signe A Flottorp
- Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Are Hugo Pripp
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University (OsloMet), Oslo, Norway
- Oslo Centre of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Henning Øien
- Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tonya Moen Hansen
- Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Jacqueline Close
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia
- Prince of Wales Hospital, SESLHD, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Siv Linnerud
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University (OsloMet), Oslo, Norway
| | - Therese Brovold
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University (OsloMet), Oslo, Norway
| | - Rune Solli
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University (OsloMet), Oslo, Norway
| | - Nina Rydland Olsen
- Department of Health and Functioning, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
| | - Dawn A Skelton
- Research Centre for Health (ReaCH), Department of Physiotherapy and Paramedicine, School of Health & Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Elisabeth Rydwik
- Women's Health and Allied Health Professionals Theme, Medical Unit Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Jorunn L Helbostad
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Gro Idland
- Agency for Health, Municipality of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Linda Kvæl
- Department of Housing and Ageing Research, Norwegian Social Research - NOVA, Oslo Metropolitan University (OsloMet), Oslo, Norway
| | - Edgar Vieira
- Department of Physical Therapy, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Kristin Taraldsen
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University (OsloMet), Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Odhus CO, Kapanga RR, Oele E. Barriers to and enablers of quality improvement in primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 4:e0002756. [PMID: 38236832 PMCID: PMC10796071 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
The quality of health care remains generally poor across primary health care settings, especially in low- and middle-income countries where tertiary care tends to take up much of the limited resources despite primary health care being the first (and often the only) point of contact with the health system for nearly 80 per cent of people in these countries. Evidence is needed on barriers and enablers of quality improvement initiatives. This systematic review sought to answer the question: What are the enablers of and barriers to quality improvement in primary health care in low- and middle-income countries? It adopted an integrative review approach with narrative evidence synthesis, which combined qualitative and mixed methods research studies systematically. Using a customized geographic search filter for LMICs developed by the Cochrane Collaboration, Scopus, Academic Search Ultimate, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PSYCHINFO, EMBASE, ProQuest Dissertations and Overton.io (a new database for LMIC literature) were searched in January and February 2023, as were selected websites and journals. 7,077 reports were retrieved. After removing duplicates, reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts, performed quality appraisal and data extraction, followed by analysis and synthesis. 50 reports from 47 studies were included, covering 52 LMIC settings. Six themes related to barriers and enablers of quality improvement were identified and organized using the model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ) and the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). These were: microsystem of quality improvement, intervention attributes, implementing organization and team, health systems support and capacity, external environment and structural factors, and execution. Decision makers, practitioners, funders, implementers, and other stakeholders can use the evidence from this systematic review to minimize barriers and amplify enablers to better the chances that quality improvement initiatives will be successful in resource-limited settings. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023395166.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camlus Otieno Odhus
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | | | - Elizabeth Oele
- County Department of Health, County Government of Kisumu, Kisumu, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mustanski B, Queiroz A, Merle JL, Zamantakis A, Zapata JP, Li DH, Benbow N, Pyra M, Smith JD. A Systematic Review of Implementation Research on Determinants and Strategies of Effective HIV Interventions for Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States. Annu Rev Psychol 2024; 75:55-85. [PMID: 37722749 PMCID: PMC10872355 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-032620-035725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV, accounting for two-thirds of HIV cases in the United States despite representing ∼5% of the adult population. Delivery and use of existing and highly effective HIV prevention and treatment strategies remain suboptimal among MSM. To summarize the state of the science, we systematically review implementation determinants and strategies of HIV-related health interventions using implementation science frameworks. Research on implementation barriers has focused predominantly on characteristics of individual recipients (e.g., ethnicity, age, drug use) and less so on deliverers (e.g., nurses, physicians), with little focus on system-level factors. Similarly, most strategies target recipients to influence their uptake and adherence, rather than improving and supporting implementation systems. HIV implementation research is burgeoning; future research is needed to broaden the examination of barriers at the provider and system levels, as well as expand knowledge on how to match strategies to barriers-particularly to address stigma. Collaboration and coordination among federal, state, and local public health agencies; community-based organizations; health care providers; and scientists are important for successful implementation of HIV-related health innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Mustanski
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA;
- Third Coast Center for AIDS Research, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Artur Queiroz
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA;
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - James L Merle
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Alithia Zamantakis
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA;
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Juan Pablo Zapata
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA;
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Dennis H Li
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA;
- Third Coast Center for AIDS Research, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nanette Benbow
- Third Coast Center for AIDS Research, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Maria Pyra
- Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA;
| | - Justin D Smith
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|