1
|
Hintermair S, Iser S, Varga A, Biesinger M, Bohanes T, Celik A, Sayan M, Kankoç A, Akyurek N, Öğüt B, Stubenberger E, Ghanim B. Ki67 Tumor Expression Predicts Treatment Benefit Achieved by Macroscopic Radical Lung-Preserving Surgery in Pleural Mesothelioma-A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1817. [PMID: 38791896 PMCID: PMC11119444 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Pleural mesothelioma (PM), linked to asbestos-induced inflammation, carries a poor prognosis. Therapy ranges from therapy limitation to aggressive multimodality treatment. Given the uncertainty about treatment benefits for patients, this study aimed to assess the role of Ki67 as a prognostic and predictive parameter in PM. Ki67 was measured in the specimens of 70 PM patients (17 female, 53 male) from two centers and correlated to overall survival (OS) and therapy outcome. The median OS was 16.1 months. The level of Ki67 expression was divided into low (≤15%) and high (>15%). A low value of Ki67 expression was associated with a longer OS (Ki67 ≤ 15%: 31.2 (95% CI 6.5-55.8) months vs. Ki67 > 15%: 11.1 (95% CI 7.7-14.6) months, p = 0.012). The 5-year survival represents 22% in the low Ki67 expression group, in contrast to 5% in the high Ki67 expression group. We found a significant interaction term of Ki67 with multimodality treatment (p = 0.031) translating to an OS of 48.1 months in the low expression Ki67 group compared to 24.3 months in the high Ki67 expression group when receiving surgery within multimodality therapy. Therefore, Ki67 stands out as a validated prognostic and, most importantly, novel predictive biomarker for treatment benefits, particularly regarding surgery within multimodality therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Hintermair
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems, Austria; (S.H.); (S.I.); (M.B.); (T.B.); (E.S.)
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Krems, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Mitterweg 10, 3500 Krems, Austria
| | - Stephanie Iser
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems, Austria; (S.H.); (S.I.); (M.B.); (T.B.); (E.S.)
| | - Alexander Varga
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Krems, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Mitterweg 10, 3500 Krems, Austria;
| | - Melanie Biesinger
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems, Austria; (S.H.); (S.I.); (M.B.); (T.B.); (E.S.)
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Krems, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Mitterweg 10, 3500 Krems, Austria
| | - Tomas Bohanes
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems, Austria; (S.H.); (S.I.); (M.B.); (T.B.); (E.S.)
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Krems, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Mitterweg 10, 3500 Krems, Austria
| | - Ali Celik
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Besevler, Ankara 06500, Turkey; (A.C.); (M.S.); (A.K.)
| | - Muhammet Sayan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Besevler, Ankara 06500, Turkey; (A.C.); (M.S.); (A.K.)
| | - Aykut Kankoç
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Besevler, Ankara 06500, Turkey; (A.C.); (M.S.); (A.K.)
| | - Nalan Akyurek
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Besevler, Ankara 06500, Turkey; (N.A.); (B.Ö.)
| | - Betul Öğüt
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Besevler, Ankara 06500, Turkey; (N.A.); (B.Ö.)
| | - Elisabeth Stubenberger
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems, Austria; (S.H.); (S.I.); (M.B.); (T.B.); (E.S.)
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Krems, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Mitterweg 10, 3500 Krems, Austria
| | - Bahil Ghanim
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems, Austria; (S.H.); (S.I.); (M.B.); (T.B.); (E.S.)
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Krems, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Mitterweg 10, 3500 Krems, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shin JY, Offin M, Simone CB, Zhang Z, Shepherd AF, Wu AJ, Shaverdian N, Gelblum DY, Gomez DR, Sauter JL, Ginsberg MS, Adusumilli PS, Rusch VW, Zauderer MG, Rimner A. Clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Radiother Oncol 2024; 191:110057. [PMID: 38104783 PMCID: PMC10923065 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study is to determine the outcomes and toxicities of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were extracted from an institutional tumor registry for patients diagnosed with mesothelioma and treated with SBRT. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were employed to determine local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Forty-four patients with 59 total treated tumors from December 2006 to April 2022 were identified. Fifty-one (86.4 %) cases had oligoprogressive disease (five sites or less). The median prescription dose delivered was 3000 cGy in 5 fractions (range: 2700-6000 cGy in 3-8 fractions). Fifty-one (86.4 %) tumors were in the pleura, 4 (6.8 %) spine, 2 (3.4 %) bone, 1 (1.7 %) brain, and 1 (1.7 %) pancreas. The median follow-up from SBRT completion for those alive at last follow-up was 28 months (range: 14-52 months). The most common toxicities were fatigue (50.8 %), nausea (22.0 %), pain flare (15.3 %), esophagitis (6.8 %), dermatitis (6.8 %), and pneumonitis (5.1 %). There were no grade ≥ 3 acute or late toxicities. There were 2 (3.4 %) local failures, one of the pleura and another of the spine. One-year LC was 92.9 % (95 % CI: 74.6-98.2 %) for all lesions and 96.3 % (95 % CI: 76.5-99.5 %) for pleural tumors. One-year LC was 90.9 % (95 % CI: 68.1-97.6 %) for epithelioid tumors and 92.1 % (95 % CI: 72.1-98.0 %) for oligoprogressive tumors. One-year OS from time of SBRT completion was 36.4 % (95 % CI: 22.6-50.3 %). On multivariable analysis, KPS was the lone significant predictor for OS (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS Our single-institutional experience on patients with MPM suggests that SBRT is safe with a low toxicity profile and potentially achieve good local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Y Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States.
| | - Michael Offin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Annemarie F Shepherd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Abraham J Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Narek Shaverdian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Daphna Y Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Jennifer L Sauter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Michelle S Ginsberg
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Marjorie G Zauderer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Iser S, Hintermair S, Varga A, Çelik A, Sayan M, Kankoç A, Akyürek N, Öğüt B, Bertoglio P, Capozzi E, Solli P, Ventura L, Waller D, Weber M, Stubenberger E, Ghanim B. Validation of Inflammatory Prognostic Biomarkers in Pleural Mesothelioma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:93. [PMID: 38201520 PMCID: PMC10778470 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Evoked from asbestos-induced inflammation, pleural mesothelioma represents a fatal diagnosis. Therapy ranges from nihilism to aggressive multimodality regimens. However, it is still unclear who ultimately benefits from which treatment. We aimed to re-challenge inflammatory-related biomarkers' prognostic value in times of modern immune-oncology and lung-sparing surgery. The biomarkers (leukocytes, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein (CRP)) and clinical characteristics (age, sex, histology, therapy) of 98 PM patients were correlated to overall survival (OS). The median OS was 19.4 months. Significant OS advantages (Log-Rank) were observed in multimodal treatment vs. others (26.1 vs. 7.2 months, p < 0.001), surgery (pleurectomy/decortication) vs. no surgery (25.5 vs. 3.8 months, p < 0.001), a high hemoglobin level (cut-off 12 g/dL, 15 vs. 24.2 months, p = 0.021), a low platelet count (cut-off 280 G/L, 26.1 vs. 11.7 months, p < 0.001), and a low PLR (cut-off 194.5, 25.5 vs. 12.3 months, p = 0.023). Histology (epithelioid vs. non-epithelioid, p = 0.002), surgery (p = 0.004), CRP (cut-off 1 mg/dL, p = 0.039), and platelets (p = 0.025) were identified as independent prognostic variables for this cohort in multivariate analysis (Cox regression, covariates: age, sex, histology, stage, CRP, platelets). Our data verified the previously shown prognostic role of systemic inflammatory parameters in patients treated with lung-sparing surgery within multimodality therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Iser
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems, Austria
| | - Sarah Hintermair
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Krems, Mitterweg 10, 3500 Krems, Austria
| | - Alexander Varga
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria
| | - Ali Çelik
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Besevler, 06500 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Muhammet Sayan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Besevler, 06500 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aykut Kankoç
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Besevler, 06500 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Nalan Akyürek
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Besevler, 06500 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Betül Öğüt
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Besevler, 06500 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Pietro Bertoglio
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Enrico Capozzi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Solli
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Luigi Ventura
- Barts Thorax Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London EC1A 7BS, UK
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK
| | - David Waller
- Barts Thorax Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London EC1A 7BS, UK
| | - Michael Weber
- Division of Biostatistics and Data Science, Department of General Health Studies, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Stubenberger
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Krems, Mitterweg 10, 3500 Krems, Austria
| | - Bahil Ghanim
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems, Austria
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Krems, Mitterweg 10, 3500 Krems, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Layer JP, Fischer P, Dejonckheere CS, Sarria GR, Mispelbaum R, Hattenhauer T, Wiegreffe S, Glasmacher AR, Layer K, Nour Y, Caglayan L, Grau F, Müdder T, Köksal M, Scafa D, Giordano FA, Lopez-Pastorini A, Stoelben E, Schmeel LC, Leitzen C. Safety and efficacy of helical tomotherapy following lung-sparing surgery in locally advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma. Strahlenther Onkol 2023:10.1007/s00066-023-02174-7. [PMID: 37993554 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02174-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the value of radiation therapy (RT) with helical tomotherapy (HT) in the management of locally advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) receiving no or lung-sparing surgery. METHODS Consecutive MPM cases not undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy and receiving intensity-modulated (IM) HT were retrospectively evaluated for local control, distant control, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Impact of age, systemic treatment, RT dose, and recurrence patterns was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. As a secondary endpoint, reported toxicity was assessed. RESULTS A total of 34 localized MPM cases undergoing IMHT were identified, of which follow-up data were available for 31 patients. Grade 3 side effects were experienced by 26.7% of patients and there were no grade 4 or 5 events observed. Median PFS was 19 months. Median OS was 20 months and the rates for 1‑ and 2‑year OS were 86.2 and 41.4%, respectively. OS was significantly superior for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION IMHT of locally advanced MPM after lung-sparing surgery is safe and feasible, resulting in satisfactory local control and survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improves OS. Randomized clinical trials incorporating modern RT techniques as a component of trimodal treatment are warranted to establish an evidence-based standard of care pattern for locally advanced MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian P Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
- Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Pascal Fischer
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. Hildegardis Hospital, Augustinerinnen Krankenhäuser gGmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - Cas S Dejonckheere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Rebekka Mispelbaum
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Immune-Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tessa Hattenhauer
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, Rheumatology and Immune-Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Shari Wiegreffe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Andrea R Glasmacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Katharina Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Youness Nour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Lara Caglayan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Franziska Grau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Müdder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Mümtaz Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- DKFZ-Hector Cancer Institute of the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Alberto Lopez-Pastorini
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. Hildegardis Hospital, Augustinerinnen Krankenhäuser gGmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - Erich Stoelben
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. Hildegardis Hospital, Augustinerinnen Krankenhäuser gGmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn/Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen-Yost HIH, Tjota MY, Gao G, Mitchell O, Kindler H, Segal J, Husain AN, Mueller J, Schulte JJ. Characterizing the distribution of alterations in mesothelioma and their correlation to morphology. Am J Clin Pathol 2023; 160:238-246. [PMID: 37141416 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqad041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mesothelioma is a lethal disease that arises from the serosal lining of organ cavities. Several recurrent alterations have been observed in pleural and peritoneal -mesotheliomas, including in BAP1, NF2, and CDKN2A. Although specific histopathologic parameters have been correlated with prognosis, it is not as well known whether genetic alterations correlate with histologic findings. METHODS We reviewed 131 mesotheliomas that had undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS) at our institutions after pathologic diagnosis. There were 109 epithelioid mesotheliomas, 18 biphasic mesotheliomas, and 4 sarcomatoid mesotheliomas. All our biphasic and sarcomatoid cases arose in the pleura. Of the epithelioid mesotheliomas, 73 were from the pleura and 36 were from the peritoneum. On average, patients were 66 years of age (range, 26-90 years) and predominantly male (92 men, 39 women). RESULTS The most common alterations identified were in BAP1, CDKN2A, NF2, and TP53. Twelve mesotheliomas did not show a pathogenic alteration on NGS. For epithelioid mesotheliomas in the pleura, the presence of an alteration in BAP1 correlated with low nuclear grade (P = .04), but no correlation was found in the peritoneum (P = .62). Similarly, there was no correlation between the amount of solid architecture in epithelioid mesotheliomas and any alterations in the pleura (P = .55) or peritoneum (P = .13). For biphasic mesotheliomas, cases with either no alteration detected or with an alteration in BAP1 were more likely to be epithelioid predominant (>50% of the tumor, P = .0001), and biphasic mesotheliomas with other alterations detected and no alteration in BAP1 were more likely to be sarcomatoid predominant (>50% of the tumor, P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates a significant association between morphologic features associated with a better prognosis and an alteration in BAP1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melissa Y Tjota
- Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL, US
| | - Guimin Gao
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Biostatistics Laboratory & Research Computing Group, The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL, US
| | - Owen Mitchell
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL, US
| | - Hedy Kindler
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL, US
| | - Jeremy Segal
- Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL, US
| | - Aliya N Husain
- Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL, US
| | - Jeffrey Mueller
- Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL, US
| | - Jefree J Schulte
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, US
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Söyler Y, Özmen Ö, Kabalak PA, Ertürk H, Uğurman F, Yılmaz Ü. The efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in monitoring disease progression in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2023; 42:3-9. [PMID: 36152987 DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2022.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the event of suspicion of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) progression, imaging plays an important role. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in monitoring disease progression by comparing it with CT, and estimate median overall survival (OS) according to progression status with CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was an observational, retrospective, single-institution study with MPM patients who had both 18F-FDG PET/CT and CT for monitoring disease progression from March 2009 to February 2020. Clinical features, radiological findings, and progression status according to CT [radiologic progression negative (RPN), radiologic progression positive (RPP)] and 18F-FDG PET/CT [metabolic progression negative (MPN), metabolic progression positive (MPP)] were recorded. The discrepancies and concordance between two methods were evaluated. The OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS A total of 56 patients were included. There were thirty-one (55.3%) RPN and 25 (44.7%) RPP, while there were 26 (46.5%) MPN and 30 (53.5%) MPP. All RPP patients were also found to be MPP, however, among RPN, 5 patients (8.9% of all patients) were evaluated as MPP. The concordance between two methods in monitoring disease progression was very good (K = 0.423; p < 0.01). The OS was 26 ± 2.6 months in all patients. Kaplan-Meier curves between RPN and RPP, and between MPN and MPP did not show statistically significant differences (p = 0.56 and p = 0.25, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Both methods are equally acceptable in monitoring disease progression in MPM, even though 18F-FDG PET/CT detected more progression than CT did.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasemin Söyler
- Department of Chest Diseases, Ankara Kecioren Sanatorium Ataturk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Özlem Özmen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara Kecioren Sanatorium Ataturk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Pınar Akın Kabalak
- Department of Chest Diseases, Ankara Kecioren Sanatorium Ataturk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Hakan Ertürk
- Department of Radiology, Ankara Kecioren Sanatorium Ataturk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Feza Uğurman
- Department of Chest Diseases, Ankara Kecioren Sanatorium Ataturk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Ülkü Yılmaz
- Department of Chest Diseases, Ankara Kecioren Sanatorium Ataturk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Söyler Y, Özmen Ö, Kabalak P, Ertürk H, Uğurman F, Yılmaz Ü. La eficacia de [18F]FDG PET/TC en el seguimiento de la progresión de la enfermedad en el mesotelioma pleural maligno. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
8
|
Klotz LV, Hoffmann H, Shah R, Eichhorn F, Gruenewald C, Bulut EL, Griffo R, Muley T, Christopoulos P, Baum P, Huber P, Safi S, Kriegsmann M, Thomas M, Bischoff H, Winter H, Eichhorn ME. Multimodal therapy of epithelioid pleural mesothelioma: improved survival by changing the surgical treatment approach. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2022; 11:2230-2242. [PMID: 36519024 PMCID: PMC9742626 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-22-199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background The exact role and type of surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains controversial. This study aimed at analyzing a 20-year single center perioperative experience in MPM surgery at our high-volume thoracic surgery center and comparing the overall survival after trimodal extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and extended pleurectomy and decortication combined with hyperthermic intrathoracic chemoperfusion (EPD/HITOC) and adjuvant chemotherapy with that after chemotherapy (CTx) alone. Methods Patients with epithelioid MPM treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, EPP and adjuvant radiotherapy within a trimodal concept or EPD/HITOC in combination with adjuvant chemotherapy between 2001 and 2018 were included in this retrospective analysis. Surgical cohorts were compared to patients treated with standard chemotherapy. Results Overall, 182 patients (69 EPP, 57 EPD/HITOC, 56 CTx) were analyzed. Due to occupational exposure to asbestos for most of the patients, 154 patients (84.6%) were male. The patients in the surgical cohorts were significantly younger than those in the CTx cohort. There was no significant difference between the proportion of patient age and side. The median overall survival of the EPD/HITOC cohort with 38.1 months was significantly longer than that of the EPP and CTx cohorts (24.0 and 15.8 months). Better survival was significantly associated with an ECOG 0 performance status, age below 70 years, and negative lymph node status. In the multivariate analysis, EPD/HITOC was significantly associated with improved overall survival. Perioperative morbidity was lower in the EPD/HITOC group than in the EPP cohort. Conclusions EPD/HITOC is feasible and safe for localized epithelioid pleural mesothelioma. Changing the surgical approach to a less radical lung-sparing technique may improve overall survival compared to trimodal EPP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura V Klotz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans Hoffmann
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rajiv Shah
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Eichhorn
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christiane Gruenewald
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elena L Bulut
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Raffaella Griffo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Muley
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Research Unit, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Petros Christopoulos
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philip Baum
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Huber
- Department of Molecular and Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center and University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Seyer Safi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc Kriegsmann
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Thomas
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Helge Bischoff
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hauke Winter
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin E Eichhorn
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cimen F, Agackiran Y, Düzgün S, Aloglu M, Senturk A, Atikcan S. Factors affecting the life expectancy in malignant pleural mesothelioma: Our 10 years of studies and experience. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30711. [PMID: 36181042 PMCID: PMC9524951 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive tumor with a poor prognosis. In our study, we aimed to investigate the specific clinical, laboratory, and radiological features of the tumor and the prognostic effect of SUVmax (maximum standardized uptake values) according to PET/CT (positron emission tomography). Demographic, therapeutic, clinical, and survival information of patients diagnosed with histologically-validated pleural mesothelioma in our hospital between January 2010 to December 2019 will be retrospectively scanned from the hospital records. A total of 116 patients, 61 men (52.6%), and 55 women (47.4%), were analyzed. Thirty five patients (30.2%) were over the age of 65. Percentage of patients over 65 years of age, neutrophil count, and PET SUV Max values, asbestos exposure and pleural thickening rate were significantly higher in the deceased patients' group than in the living patients' group (P = .042, P = .039, P = .002, P = .004, P = .037). T stage (tumor stage), N stage (lymph nodes stage), metastasis stage, and Grade distribution were significantly higher in the deceased patients' group than in the living patients' group (P < .000, P < .000, P = .003, P < .000). The rates of chemotherapy and surgical treatment, right lung location, and epithelioid pathology were significantly lower in the deceased patients' group compared to the living patients' group (P = .016, P = .030, P = .018, P = .008). The mean follow-up time was 13 months. Key determinants of survival in MPM include age, male gender, neutrophil increase, pleural thickening, high PET SUV max values, stage, histological type, asbestos exposure, and treatment regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filiz Cimen
- University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Department of Pulmonology, Ankara, Turkey
- *Correspondence: Filiz Cimen, University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Department of Pulmonology, 06290, Ankara, Turkey (e-mail: )
| | - Yetkin Agackiran
- University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Department of Pathology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sevim Düzgün
- University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Department of Pulmonology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Melike Aloglu
- University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Department of Pulmonology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aysegül Senturk
- University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Department of Pulmonology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sükran Atikcan
- University of Health Sciences, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Department of Pulmonology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
[Analysis of the Efficacy of Pemetrexed Maintenance Therapy in Patients with
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma]. ZHONGGUO FEI AI ZA ZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF LUNG CANCER 2022; 25:7-13. [PMID: 35078279 PMCID: PMC8796129 DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.101.48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive disease arising from pleural mesothelial cells. Advanced pleural mesothelioma has a poor prognosis, with a median survival of no more than 15 months. First line standard chemotherapy regimen recommended is Pemetrexed based chemotherapy regimen, with or without bevacizumab. There is no consensus on whether patients who have received first-line standard chemotherapy can benefit from pemetrexed maintenance chemotherapy. The study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed maintenance therapy (PMT) after treatment with a pemetrexed and platinum regimen for patients with MPM. METHODS A total of 40 MPM patients were collected from Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2013 to January 2018, eligible patients were unresectable MPM, without disease progression following 4 to 6 cycles of pemetrexed and platinum, including pemetrexed maintenance therapy group (22 cases) and observation group (18 cases). The last follow-up was conducted in January 2020. The primary endpoint were progression free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points were overall survival (OS), the efficacy, adverse reactions of PMT. RESULTS The median PFS in the PMT arm was longer than that in the observation arm (8.5 mon vs 3 mon, P=0.008), but there was no significant difference in median OS (26.4 mon vs 15.7 mon, P=0.177). Objective response rate (ORR) of two group were 22.7% and 0%, respectively. The grade 3-4 toxicity in PMT group included grade 4 neutropenia in 1 patient (4.5%), grade 3 neutropenia in 1 patient (4.5%), grade 4 anemia in 1 patient (4.5%) and grade 3 nausea and anorexia in 1 patient (4.5%). CONCLUSIONS Pemetrexed maintenance therapy following initial pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy improve PFS in patients with MPM, and is well tolerated.
Collapse
|
11
|
Hajj GNM, Cavarson CH, Pinto CAL, Venturi G, Navarro JR, Lima VCCD. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: an update. J Bras Pneumol 2021; 47:e20210129. [PMID: 34909922 PMCID: PMC8836658 DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant mesotheliomas are rare types of cancers that affect the mesothelial surfaces, usually the pleura and peritoneum. They are associated with asbestos exposure, but due to a latency period of more than 30 years and difficult diagnosis, most cases are not detected until they reach advanced stages. Treatment options for this tumor type are very limited and survival ranges from 12 to 36 months. This review discusses the molecular physiopathology, current diagnosis, and latest therapeutic options for this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glaucia N M Hajj
- Instituto International de Pesquisa, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.,Instituto Nacional de Oncogenômica e Inovação Terapêutica, São Paulo (SP), Brasil
| | - Carolina H Cavarson
- Instituto International de Pesquisa, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.,Instituto Nacional de Oncogenômica e Inovação Terapêutica, São Paulo (SP), Brasil
| | | | - Gabriela Venturi
- Instituto International de Pesquisa, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.,BP Mirante, São Paulo (SP), Brasil
| | | | - Vladmir C Cordeiro de Lima
- Instituto Nacional de Oncogenômica e Inovação Terapêutica, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.,Rede D'Or, São Paulo (SP), Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Luna J, Bobo A, Cabrera-Rodriguez JJ, Pagola M, Martín-Martín M, Ruiz MÁG, Montijano M, Rodríguez A, Pelari-Mici L, Corbacho A, Moreno M, Couñago F. GOECP/SEOR clinical guidelines on radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12:581-608. [PMID: 34513595 PMCID: PMC8394157 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i8.581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare tumor with poor prognosis and rising incidence. Palliative care is common in MPM as radical treatment with curative intent is often not possible due to metastasis or extensive locoregional involvement. Numerous therapeutic advances have been made in recent years, including the use of less aggressive surgical techniques associated with lower morbidity and mortality (e.g., pleurectomy/decortication), technological advancements in the field of radiotherapy (intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy, proton therapy), and developments in systemic therapies (chemotherapy and immunotherapy). These improvements have had as yet only a modest effect on local control and survival. Advances in the management of MPM and standardization of care are hampered by the evidence to date, limited by high heterogeneity among studies and small sample sizes. In this clinical guideline prepared by the oncological group for the study of lung cancer of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology, we review clinical, histologic, and therapeutic aspects of MPM, with a particular focus on all aspects relating to radiotherapy, including the current evidence base, associations with chemotherapy and surgery, treatment volumes and planning, technological advances, and reradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Luna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncohealth, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Andrea Bobo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Ruber Internacional Hospital, Madrid 28034, Spain
| | | | - María Pagola
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Onkologikoa/Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián 20014, Spain
| | - Margarita Martín-Martín
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain
| | - María Ángeles González Ruiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Macarena, Sevilla 41009, Spain
| | - Miguel Montijano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Genesis care Spain, Madrid 28005, Spain
| | - Aurora Rodríguez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Ruber Internacional Hospital, Madrid 28034, Spain
| | - Lira Pelari-Mici
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain
| | - Almudena Corbacho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Hospital de Mérida, Mérida 06800, Spain
| | - Marta Moreno
- Department of Oncology, Institution of University Navarra, Clinical University, Pamplona 31008, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institution of Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud and Hospital LaLuz, European University of Madrid, Madrid 28028, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Müdder T, Sarria GR, Henkenberens C, Holz J, Garbe S, Röhner F, Stumpf S, Buchstab T, Giordano FA, Leitzen C. Dosimetric Comparison Between Helical Tomotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 34:164-171. [PMID: 34429236 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To carry out a dosimetric comparison and constraints feasibility proof of adjuvant radiotherapy through helical tomotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma patients after pleurectomy/decortication. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective calculations were carried out on previously acquired simulations. A whole-pleura volume with 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions was prescribed, simulating a no residual tumour situation. Calculations were carried out using an anisotropic analytical algorithm with a 2.0 mm grid. Beam-on time, planning target volume (PTV) coverage, homogeneity index and organ at risk exposure were compared. RESULTS Sixteen patient plans were calculated per device. Constraints were met overall by both modalities. For helical tomotherapy and VMAT plans, median beam-on times were 13.8 (11.6-16.1) min and 6.4 (6.1-7.0) min; P = 0.006. The median left-sided radiotherapy PTV D98 were 48.1 (48.0-48.8) Gy and 47.6 (46.5-48.3) Gy; P = 0.023. No significant difference for right-sided radiotherapy was found. PTV D2 for left-sided radiotherapy was higher with VMAT (P = 0.014). For right-sided radiotherapy, helical tomotherapy showed higher doses (P = 0.039). No homogeneity index differences for left-sided radiotherapy (P = 1.00) and right-sided radiotherapy (P = 0.598) were seen. Significant organ at risk exposure differences were found on left-sided radiotherapy whole-lung V20, as well as D50 (both P = 0.008). Higher contralateral lung and ipsilateral kidney exposures were found with VMAT plans for both treatment sides. CONCLUSION Adjuvant radiotherapy after pleurectomy/decortication in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients, with a VMAT- or helical tomotherapy-based platform, is dosimetrically feasible. Lung sparing was mostly improved with helical tomotherapy. Technique selection must be carried out according to availability and clinical criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Müdder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - G R Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| | - C Henkenberens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - J Holz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - S Garbe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - F Röhner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - S Stumpf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - T Buchstab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - F A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - C Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schumann SO, Kocher G, Minervini F. Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of the malignant pleural mesothelioma, a narrative review of literature. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:2510-2523. [PMID: 34012597 PMCID: PMC8107529 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-2761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The malignant pleural mesothelioma is a very aggressive tumor which is arising from mesothelial cells and is associated with asbestos exposure. It is a heterogeneous cancer that shows a complex pattern of molecular changes, including genetic, chromosomic, and epigenetic abnormalities. The malignant pleural mesothelioma is characterized by a silent and slow clinical progression with an average period of 20–40 years from the asbestos exposure phase to the start of the symptoms. Unfortunately, to date, the therapeutic options are very limited, especially if the tumor is detected late. This narrative review provides an extended overview of the present evidence in the literature regarding the epidemiology, diagnostic pathways and treatment approaches of the malignant pleural mesothelioma. The treatment of mesothelioma has evolved slowly over the last 20 years not only from a surgical point of view but also radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy play nowadays a key role. Several surgical strategies are available ranging from extrapleural pneumonectomy to cytoreductive surgery but a multidisciplinary approach seems to be mandatory because a single approach has not proved to date to be resolutive. New non-surgical treatment options appear to be promising but the results have to be taken in account with caution because clear evidence with high-quality studies is still lacking
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gregor Kocher
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Fabrizio Minervini
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kantor T, Wakeam E. Landmark Trials in the Surgical Management of Mesothelioma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:2037-2047. [PMID: 33521898 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09589-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of mesothelioma has evolved slowly over the last 20 years. While surgery as a standalone treatment has fallen out of favor, the importance of multimodality treatment consisting of combinations of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery have become more common in operable, fit patients. In this review, we discuss trials in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation that have shaped contemporary multimodality treatment of this difficult malignancy, and we touch on the new and emerging immunotherapeutic and targeted agents that may change the future treatment of this disease. We also review the multimodality treatment regimens, with particular attention to trimodality therapy and neoadjuvant hemithoracic radiation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor Kantor
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Elliot Wakeam
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jagirdar RM, Papazoglou ED, Pitaraki E, Kouliou OA, Rouka E, Giannakou L, Giannopoulos S, Sinis SI, Hatzoglou C, Gourgoulianis KI, Zarogiannis SG. Cell and extracellular matrix interaction models in benign mesothelial and malignant pleural mesothelioma cells in 2D and 3D in-vitro. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2020; 48:543-552. [PMID: 33336399 DOI: 10.1111/1440-1681.13446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive tumour that grows in the pleural cavity. MPM spheroids released in the pleural fluid can form new tumour foci. Cell-cell, cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions in 2D and 3D impact malignant cell behaviour during cell adhesion, migration, proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). In this study, epithelioid, biphasic and sarcomatoid MPM cell types as well as benign mesothelial cells were tested with regards to the above phenotypes. Fibronectin (FN) and homologous cell-derived extracellular matrix (hcd-ECM) treated substratum differentially affected the above phenotypes. 3D MPM spheroid invasion was higher in FN-collagen matrices in the epithelioid and biphasic cells, while 3D cell cultures of epithelioid and sarcomatoid MPM cells in FN-collagen showed a higher contractility compared to hcd-ECM-collagen. Cell aggregates demonstrated invasive behaviour in hcd-ECM matrices alone. Our results suggest that ECM and the dimensionality affect malignant cell behaviour during cell culture studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajesh M Jagirdar
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, Larissa, Greece
| | - Eleftherios D Papazoglou
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, Larissa, Greece
| | - Eleanna Pitaraki
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, Larissa, Greece
| | - Olympia A Kouliou
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, Larissa, Greece
| | - Erasmia Rouka
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, Larissa, Greece.,Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, Larissa, Greece
| | - Lydia Giannakou
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, Larissa, Greece
| | - Stefanos Giannopoulos
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, Larissa, Greece
| | - Sotirios I Sinis
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, Larissa, Greece
| | - Chrissi Hatzoglou
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, Larissa, Greece.,Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Sotirios G Zarogiannis
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, Larissa, Greece.,Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, BIOPOLIS, Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Arrieta O, Cardona AF, Lara-Mejía L, Heredia D, Barrón F, Zatarain-Barrón ZL, Lozano F, de Lima VC, Maldonado F, Corona-Cruz F, Ramos M, Cabrera L, Martin C, Corrales L, Cuello M, Arroyo-Hernández M, Aman E, Bacon L, Baez R, Benitez S, Botero A, Burotto M, Caglevic C, Ferraris G, Freitas H, Kaen DL, Lamot S, Lyons G, Mas L, Mata A, Mathias C, Muñoz A, Patane AK, Oblitas G, Pino L, Raez LE, Remon J, Rojas L, Rolfo C, Ruiz-Patiño A, Samtani S, Viola L, Viteri S, Rosell R. Recommendations for detection, prioritization, and treatment of thoracic oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: the THOCOoP cooperative group. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 153:103033. [PMID: 32650215 PMCID: PMC7305738 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The world currently faces a pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2. Relevant information has emerged regarding the higher risk of poor outcomes in lung cancer patients. As such, lung cancer patients must be prioritized in terms of prevention, detection and treatment. On May 7th, 45 experts in thoracic cancers from 11 different countries were invited to participate. A core panel of experts regarding thoracic oncology care amidst the pandemic gathered virtually, and a total of 60 initial recommendations were drafted based on available evidence, 2 questions were deleted due to conflicting evidence. By May 16th, 44 experts had agreed to participate, and voted on each of the 58 recommendation using a Delphi panel on a live voting event. Consensus was reached regarding the recommendations (>66 % strongly agree/agree) for 56 questions. Strong consensus (>80 % strongly agree/agree) was reached for 44 questions. Patients with lung cancer represent a particularly vulnerable population during this time. Special care must be taken to maintain treatment while avoiding exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Arrieta
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
| | - Andrés F Cardona
- Thoracic Oncology Clinic, Clínica del Country, Bogotá, Colombia; Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - David Heredia
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Maritza Ramos
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Luis Cabrera
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Claudio Martin
- Thoracic Oncology Unit, Alexander Fleming Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Hospital Maria Ferrer, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Luis Corrales
- Oncology Department, Hospital San Juan de Dios, San José Costa Rica, Costa Rica; Oncología Médica, Centro de Investigación y Manejo del Cáncer (CIMCA), San José, Costa Rica
| | - Mauricio Cuello
- Department of Oncology, Hospital de Clínicas, Universidad de la República - UDELAR, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | | | - Enrique Aman
- Clinical Oncology Unit, Swiss Medical Group, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ludwing Bacon
- Centro de Oncología, Hospital Vivián Pellas, Nicaragua
| | - Renata Baez
- National Institute for Respiratory Diseases, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Sergio Benitez
- Coordinador de la sección Oncología, asociación Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria, Argentina
| | | | - Mauricio Burotto
- Clínica Universidad de los Andes, Centro de Estudios Clínicos Bradford Hill, Chile
| | - Christian Caglevic
- Departamento de Investigación del Cáncer- Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile
| | - Gustavo Ferraris
- Centro Médico Dean Funes, Radioterapia Oncológica, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Helano Freitas
- Departamento de Oncologia Clínica - A C Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Sebastián Lamot
- CONCIENCIA, Instituto Oncohematológico de la Patagonia, Chile
| | - Gustavo Lyons
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Británico, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Luis Mas
- Medical Oncology Department, National Institute for Neoplastic Diseases - INEN, Lima, Peru
| | - Andrea Mata
- Hospital La Católica Goicoechea, San José, Costa Rica
| | | | | | - Ana Karina Patane
- Hospital de Rehabilitacion Respiratoria María Ferrer, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Luis Pino
- Medical Oncology Group, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Luis E Raez
- Thoracic Oncology Program Memorial Cancer Institute, Memorial Healthcare System, Pembroke Pines, FL, United States
| | - Jordi Remon
- Medical Oncology Department, Centro Integral Oncología Clara Campal Bacelona, HM-Delfos, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Leonardo Rojas
- Medical Oncology Department, Clínica Colsanitas, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Christian Rolfo
- Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | | | - Suraj Samtani
- Medical Oncology Department, Clínica Bradford Hill, Santiago, Chile
| | - Lucia Viola
- Fundación neumológica colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Santiago Viteri
- Instituto Oncológico Dr. Rosell. Centro Médico Teknon. Grupo QuironSalud. Barcelona, España
| | - Rafael Rosell
- Cancer Biology and Precision Medicine Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
He J, Xu S, Pan H, Li S, He J. Does size matter? -a population-based analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2020; 9:1041-1052. [PMID: 32953483 PMCID: PMC7481612 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-19-488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Background The 8th edition staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has been proposed. The size of tumor is not taken into consideration. We intend to elucidate the prognostic value of the size of MPM and evaluate the current staging system via the data of SEER database. Methods All cases of primary MPM were identified and extracted from the SEER database during the period of 2004–2016. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) which were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test and Cox regression were utilized to identify the prognostic factors. Results A total of 2,138 patients were included in the primary cohort. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of MPM were 39.4%, 11.8% and 3.8%. Older, male and advanced stage patients accounted for larger proportion of the cohort. Besides tumor extension, lymph node involvement and metastatic status, tumor size, pathological type and differentiation grade were significant prognostic factors. In the stratified analysis of tumor extension, size is a significant prognostic factor in T2 patients and indicates inferior survival outcomes. Surgery, chemotherapy and radiation can increase both OS and CSS in MPM patients. Triple combination treatments showed a superiority to other treatments. Conclusions Tumor size matters in the prognosis of MPM especially in the early stage of MPM patients. The adjusted TNM staging system incorporating tumor size has better accuracy than the 8th edition IMIG system. However, some stages had not been fully identified. More cases of early stages are warranted for essential revision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaxi He
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease & China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China
| | - Songhui Xu
- Department of Pathology, University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hui Pan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease & China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuben Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease & China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianxing He
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease & China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pavic M, Bogowicz M, Kraft J, Vuong D, Mayinger M, Kroeze SGC, Friess M, Frauenfelder T, Andratschke N, Huellner M, Weder W, Guckenberger M, Tanadini-Lang S, Opitz I. FDG PET versus CT radiomics to predict outcome in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10:81. [PMID: 32661672 PMCID: PMC7359199 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00669-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Careful selection of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients for curative treatment is of highest importance, as the multimodal treatment regimen is challenging for patients and harbors a high risk of substantial toxicity. Radiomics-a quantitative method for image analysis-has shown its prognostic ability in different tumor entities and could therefore play an important role in optimizing patient selection for radical cancer treatment. So far, radiomics as a prognostic tool in MPM was not investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study is based on 72 MPM patients treated with surgery in a curative intent at our institution between 2009 and 2017. Pre-treatment Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET and CT scans were used for radiomics outcome modeling. After extraction of 1404 CT and 1410 FDG PET features from each image, a preselection by principal component analysis was performed to include only robust, non-redundant features for the cox regression to predict the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS). Results were validated on a separate cohort. Additionally, SUVmax and SUVmean, and volume were tested for their prognostic ability for PFS and OS. RESULTS For the PFS a concordance index (c-index) of 0.67 (95% CI 0.52-0.82) and 0.66 (95% CI 0.57-0.78) for the training cohort (n = 36) and internal validation cohort (n = 36), respectively, were obtained for the PET radiomics model. The PFS advantage of the low-risk group translated also into an OS advantage. On CT images, no radiomics model could be trained. SUV max and SUV mean were also not prognostic in terms of PFS and OS. CONCLUSION We were able to build a successful FDG PET radiomics model for the prediction of PFS in MPM. Radiomics could serve as a tool to aid clinical decision support systems for treatment of MPM in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Pavic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - M Bogowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - J Kraft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - D Vuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - S G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Friess
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - T Frauenfelder
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - N Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Huellner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - W Weder
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - S Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - I Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Thompson AB, Quinn TJ, Siddiqui ZA, Almahariq MF, Grills IS, Stevens CW. Addition of radiotherapy to surgery and chemotherapy improves survival in localized malignant pleural mesothelioma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) study. Lung Cancer 2020; 146:120-126. [PMID: 32531717 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.05.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a devastating disease with poor survival outcomes for most patients. Optimizing therapeutic approaches is thus vital, but has been hampered by a dearth of randomized trials to guide decision making. We used a population-level database to evaluate the impact of radiotherapy as a component of trimodality therapy on overall survival (OS) in MPM. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the SEER Radiation/Chemotherapy database for patients with MPM who received surgery and chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy. A propensity score-matched analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed. Weight-adjusted univariate KM analysis was performed and doubly robust, IPTW-adjusted multivariable cox proportional hazards regression modeling was also performed to quantify the effect of radiotherapy on OS in trimodality therapy for MPM. RESULTS 1015 patients were identified. 678 patients received surgery and chemotherapy, and 337 patients received trimodality therapy. For patients with localized disease, OS was significantly improved with trimodality therapy (HR 0.56, CI 0.4 - 0.8, p = 0.001), which persisted with IPTW adjustment (HR 0.65, CI 0.49 - 0.95, p = 0.0248). No significant benefit was seen for patients with regional or distant disease. On multivariate analysis, positive predictors of survival after IPTW adjustment were female sex, diagnosis after 2005, and left-sided disease. CONCLUSIONS These findings support a significant benefit to OS by incorporating radiotherapy as a component of trimodality therapy for patients with localized MPM compared to only surgery and chemotherapy. It does not provide a significant overall survival benefit for patients with regional or metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Thompson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073, United States
| | - Thomas J Quinn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073, United States
| | - Zaid A Siddiqui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073, United States
| | - Muayad F Almahariq
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073, United States
| | - Inga S Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073, United States
| | - Craig W Stevens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lim JH, Choi JY, Im Y, Yoo H, Jhun BW, Jeong BH, Park HY, Lee K, Kim H, Kwon OJ, Han J, Ahn MJ, Kim J, Um SW. Prognostic value of SUVmax on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT scan in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0229299. [PMID: 32069313 PMCID: PMC7028266 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) may be of prognostic significance for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). This retrospective study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the SUVmax in patients with MPM. Materials and methods Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for the patients who were diagnosed with histopathologically proven MPM between 2009 and 2018 at Samsung Medical Center. For each patient, SUVmax was calculated for the primary lesion on PET/CT. To determine optimal cutoff values for predicting mortality, receiver operating characteristic curves were used. Results Among the 54 study patients, 34 (63.0%) had epithelioid subtype, 13 (24.1%) had sarcomatoid or biphasic subtype, and 7 (13.0%) had mesothelioma, not otherwise specified (NOS). The median overall survival (OS) was 8.7 months, and the median SUVmax was 9.9. The median values of SUVmax were 5.5 in patients with epithelioid subtype, 11.7 in those with sarcomatoid/biphasic subtype, and 13.3 in those with NOS subtype (P = 0.003). The optimal cutoff values of SUVmax to predict mortality were 10.1 in all patients, and 8.5 in patients with epithelioid subtype. In multivariate analysis, SUVmax was significantly associated with overall survival in all patients (P = 0.003) and in patients with epithelioid subtype (P = 0.012), but not in those with non-epithelioid subtype. Conclusions SUVmax in PET/CT is an independent prognostic factor in patients with MPM, especially those with epithelioid subtype. The histologic subtype of MPM should be considered when evaluating the prognostic significance of SUVmax.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Hyeok Lim
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Joon Young Choi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yunjoo Im
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hongseok Yoo
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Byung Woo Jhun
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Byeong-Ho Jeong
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hye Yun Park
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyungjong Lee
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hojoong Kim
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - O Jung Kwon
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Joungho Han
- Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Myung-Ju Ahn
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jhingook Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sang-Won Um
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Faccioli E, Bellini A, Mammana M, Monaci N, Schiavon M, Rea F. Extrapleural pneumonectomies for pleural mesothelioma. Expert Rev Respir Med 2019; 14:67-79. [PMID: 31674841 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2020.1688147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a fatal malignancy for which there is no definitive cure. The most effective multimodality treatment in prolonging survival is still matter of debate. Surgery remains one of the cornerstones in the multimodality therapy for MPM. Extra-pleural pneumonectomy and pleurectomy/decortication are the two main curative-intent procedures; however, the superiority of one technique over the other is still debated. This review aims to assess short- and long-term results of extrapleural pneumonectomy for MPM.Areas covered: This article focuses on the role of extrapleural pneumonectomy in MPM. A systematic review was performed by using electronic databases to identify studies that included patients treated by this procedure for MPM. Endpoints included overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence rate, perioperative mortality, and morbidity.Expert commentary: This paper offers an overview of the results that are currently obtained in patients undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy for MPM. The benefit of surgical treatments in MPM is still debated and its primary goal should be the achievement of a macroscopic complete resection. Several alternative multimodality protocols exist, with specific advantages and drawbacks; therefore, individualization of care for each patient is fundamental. The complexity of the surgical treatment mandates that patients be referred to specialized centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Faccioli
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Alice Bellini
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Marco Mammana
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Nicola Monaci
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Marco Schiavon
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Federico Rea
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Along with chemotherapy, surgery and immunotherapy, radiotherapy is a mainstay of cancer treatment. Considering the improving survival rates for various malignancies during the past decades, the importance of radiation-induced late normal tissue response is increasing. Quality of life is becoming an important issue in modern cancer treatment and is correlated with acute and late normal tissue response after radiotherapy. A profound understanding of radiation-induced normal tissue response is necessary to sufficiently diagnose and treat radiation-induced side effects and thereby increase the patients' quality of life. Here, the various normal tissue responses in consideration of the radiation biology are specified and prospective options to attenuate radiation-induced side effects are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rühle
- Abteilung für RadioOnkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.,KKE Molekulare und RadioOnkologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (dkfz), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - P E Huber
- Abteilung für RadioOnkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. .,KKE Molekulare und RadioOnkologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (dkfz), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gomez DR, Rimner A, Simone CB, Cho BCJ, de Perrot M, Adjei AA, Bueno R, Gill RR, Harpole DH, Hesdorffer M, Hirsch FR, Jackson AA, Pass HI, Rice DC, Rusch VW, Tsao AS, Yorke E, Rosenzweig K. The Use of Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Expert Opinion from the National Cancer Institute Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. J Thorac Oncol 2019; 14:1172-1183. [PMID: 31125736 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Revised: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Detailed guidelines regarding the use of radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) are currently lacking because of the rarity of the disease, the wide spectrum of clinical presentations, and the paucity of high-level data on individual treatment approaches. METHODS In March 2017, a multidisciplinary meeting of mesothelioma experts was cosponsored by the U.S. National Cancer Institute, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Research, and Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. Among the outcomes of this conference was the foundation of detailed, multidisciplinary consensus guidelines. RESULTS Here we present consensus recommendations on the use of radiation therapy for MPM in three discrete scenarios: (1) hemithoracic radiation therapy to be used before or after extrapleural pneumonectomy; (2) hemithoracic radiation to be used as an adjuvant to lung-sparing procedures (i.e., without pneumonectomy); and (3) palliative radiation therapy for focal symptoms caused by the disease. We discuss appropriate simulation techniques, treatment volumes, dose fractionation regimens, and normal tissue constraints. We also assess the role of particle beam therapy, specifically, proton beam therapy, for MPM. CONCLUSION The recommendations provided in this consensus statement should serve as important guidelines for developing future clinical trials of treatment approaches for MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - B C John Cho
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc de Perrot
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alex A Adjei
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Raphael Bueno
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ritu R Gill
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David H Harpole
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Fred R Hirsch
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado; Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Harvey I Pass
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - David C Rice
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anne S Tsao
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth Rosenzweig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Trovo M, Franceschini D, Furlan C, Pietrobon F, Vagge S, Farina E, Revelant A, Visani L, Maragna V, Parisi G, Scotti V. Extra-pleural pneumonectomy in the era of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Radiol Med 2019; 124:854-859. [PMID: 30963379 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-019-01030-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the outcome of malignant pleural mesothelioma patients treated with extra-pleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), using the most advanced radiotherapeutic techniques, namely image-guided intensity-modulated RT (IG-IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Fifty-four patients were analyzed. Minimum radiation dose was 50 Gy (2 Gy/fr). Planning target volume encompassed the entire hemithorax, including the ipsilateral mediastinum if interested by disease, the pericardium and diaphragm, and any drain sites. The study endpoints included loco-regional control (LRC), distant metastases free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS), as well as radiation-related toxicity. RESULTS Major patients and treatment characteristics were the following: median age 62 years, epithelioid histology in 51 (94%) cases, locally advanced disease in 41 (90%) cases, and metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes in 27 patients (50%). Only 7 patients (13%) had gross residual disease after surgery. Chemotherapy was administered in 38 patients (70%). Median follow-up was 16 months (range 0-73 months). Median and 2-year OS were 21 months and was 43.8%, respectively. The predominant pattern of failure was distant: 34 patients (62.9%) developed some component of distant failure, and only 5 patients (9.2%) developed an isolated loco-regional recurrence. The estimates of LRC and DMFS at 2 years were 63.4% and 43.4%, respectively. Three fatal pneumonitis were documented. Other major toxicities included: Grade 2 and 3 pneumonitis in 1 and 2 cases, respectively, 1 case of bronchial fistula, pleural empyema, and Grade 3 esophagitis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although executed in the era of high-technology radiotherapy (IG-IMRT), EPP should not be routinely performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Trovo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata Udine, P.le Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100, Udine, Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Furlan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale San Martino di Belluno, Viale Europa 22, 32100, Belluno, Italy
| | - Francesca Pietrobon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale San Martino di Belluno, Viale Europa 22, 32100, Belluno, Italy
| | - Stefano Vagge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino di Genova - IST, Istituto Nazionale Ricerca sul Cancro, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Eleonora Farina
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, CRO IRCCS, Via Franco Gallini, 2, 33081, Aviano, PN, Italy
| | - Alberto Revelant
- Radiation Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, CRO IRCCS, Via Franco Gallini, 2, 33081, Aviano, PN, Italy
| | - Luca Visani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla, 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Virginia Maragna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla, 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Parisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata Udine, P.le Santa Maria della Misericordia 15, 33100, Udine, Italy.
| | - Vieri Scotti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla, 3, 50134, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Leitzen C, Wilhelm-Buchstab T, Stumpf S, Heimann M, Koch D, Schmeel C, Simon B, Vornholt S, Garbe S, Röhner F, Schoroth F, Schild HH, Schüller H, Müdder T. Tomotherapy in malignant mesothelioma: a planning study to establish dose constraints. Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 195:668-676. [PMID: 30915490 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01458-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A planning study was performed for helical tomotherapy treatment. We evaluated the maximum achievable protection of organs at risk (OARs) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma after pleurectomy with simultaneous optimal target coverage. MATERIALS AND METHODS The datasets of 13 patients were included. The applied dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was 50.4 Gy with single doses of 1.8 Gy per fraction. Presuming optimal target coverage, we evaluated the applied dose to the OARs with special regard to the contralateral lung. RESULTS For left-(lsRT)/right(rsRT)-sided radiotherapy, target coverage for the PTV showed a D98 (mean) of 49.37/49.71 Gy (98.0%/98.6%) and a D2 (mean) of 54.19/54.61 Gy (107.5%/108.3%). The beam-on time was kept below 15 min. The achieved mean dose (D50) to the contralateral lung was kept below 4 Gy for lsRT and rsRT. With regard to the other organs at risk the applied doses were as follows: mean dose (lsRT): ipsilateral kidney (Dmean) 13.03 (5.32-22.18) Gy, contralateral kidney (Dmean) <2.0 Gy, heart (Dmean) 22.23 (13.57-27.72) Gy, spinal cord D1 <Gy; mean dose (rsRT): ipsilateral kidney (Dmean) 10.22 (6.30-18.04) Gy, contralateral kidney (Dmean) <2.1 Gy, heart (Dmean) 8.02 (6.0-10.38) Gy, spinal cord D1 <35.5 Gy. CONCLUSION With helical tomotherapy, postoperative treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma after pleurectomy achieves good target coverage combined with simultaneous dose sparing to the (especially contralateral) OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Leitzen
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Timo Wilhelm-Buchstab
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - Sabina Stumpf
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - Martina Heimann
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - David Koch
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christopher Schmeel
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - Birgit Simon
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - Susanne Vornholt
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - Stephan Garbe
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - Fred Röhner
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - Felix Schoroth
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hans Heinz Schild
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - Heinrich Schüller
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Müdder
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sayan M, Eren MF, Gupta A, Ohri N, Kotek A, Babalioglu I, Oskeroglu Kaplan S, Duran O, Derinalp Or O, Cukurcayir F, Kurtul N, Ceylaner Bicakci B, Kutuk T, Senyurek S, Turk A, Jabbour SK, Atalar B. Current treatment strategies in malignant pleural mesothelioma with a treatment algorithm. Adv Respir Med 2019; 87:289-297. [PMID: 31680229 PMCID: PMC10865992 DOI: 10.5603/arm.2019.0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is arare disease with apoor prognosis. The main therapeutic options for MPM include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (RT). Although multimodality therapy has been reported to improve survival, not every medically operable patient is able to undergo all recommended therapy. With improvements in surgical techniques and systemic therapies, as well as advancements in RT, there has been apotential new paradigm in the management of this disease. In this review, we discuss the current literature on MPM management and propose afunctional treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mutlay Sayan
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
| | - Mehmet Fuat Eren
- Radiation Oncology Clinic, Marmara University Istanbul Pendik Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Apar Gupta
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Nisha Ohri
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ayse Kotek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Ersin Arslan Education and Research Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Ibrahim Babalioglu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Konya Education and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey
| | - Sedenay Oskeroglu Kaplan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mehmet Akif Inan Education and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey
| | - Ozge Duran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mehmet Akif Inan Education and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey
| | - Ozlem Derinalp Or
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Adana City Education and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey
| | - Funda Cukurcayir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Balikesir Government Hospital, Balikesir, Turkey
| | - Neslihan Kurtul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey
| | - Beyhan Ceylaner Bicakci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saglik Bilimleri University, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tugce Kutuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Malatya Education and Research Hospital, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Sukran Senyurek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kahramanmaras Necip Fazil City Hospital, Kahramanmaras, Turkey
| | - Ali Turk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kahramanmaras Necip Fazil City Hospital, Kahramanmaras, Turkey
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Banu Atalar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Acıbadem University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wu L, Dell'Anno I, Lapidot M, Sekido Y, Chan ML, Kohno M, Serre-Beinier V, Felley-Bosco E, de Perrot M. Progress of malignant mesothelioma research in basic science: A review of the 14th international conference of the international mesothelioma interest group (iMig2018). Lung Cancer 2018; 127:138-145. [PMID: 30642542 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.11.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Here we summarize the most recent update of mesothelioma research in basic science presented at the 14th iMig2018 international conference. The symposium of basic science track mainly focused on the drivers of mesothelioma initiation and progression, molecular pathogenesis, and perspectives on potential therapeutic approaches. This review covers several promising fields including strategies efficiently inhibiting YAP/TAZ functions or their critical downstream targets, heparanase inhibitors, RAN depletion, and MIF/CD74 inhibitors that may be developed as novel therapeutic approaches. In addition, targeting mesothelioma stem cells by depleting M2-polarized macrophages in tumor microenvironment or blocking Tnfsf18 (GITRL)-GITR signalling might be translated into therapeutic modalities in mesothelioma treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Licun Wu
- Latner Thoracic Surgery Laboratories, Division of Thoracic Surgery and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Irene Dell'Anno
- Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Via Derna 1, Pisa, Italy
| | - Moshe Lapidot
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Lung Center and International Mesothelioma Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yoshitaka Sekido
- Division of Cancer Biology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Kanokoden 1-1, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan
| | - Mei-Lin Chan
- Latner Thoracic Surgery Laboratories, Division of Thoracic Surgery and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mikihiro Kohno
- Latner Thoracic Surgery Laboratories, Division of Thoracic Surgery and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Veronique Serre-Beinier
- Department of Thoracic and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospitals and University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
| | - Emanuela Felley-Bosco
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8044, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Marc de Perrot
- Latner Thoracic Surgery Laboratories, Division of Thoracic Surgery and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Harling L, Kolokotroni SM, Nair A, Smelt J, King J, Routledge T, Spicer J, Ng W, Bille A. Differential Survival Characteristics of Sarcomatoid Subtype in Biphasic Pleural Mesothelioma. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 107:929-935. [PMID: 30389446 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Revised: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biphasic pleural mesothelioma (BPM) accounts for approximately 10% of all pleural mesothelioma. Our aim was to assess the clinical, radiologic, and pathologic factors impacting survival in BPM and to better identify patients most likely to benefit from active treatment. METHODS A 10-year retrospective review was made of 214 biopsy-proven BPM cases with minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients with insufficient tissue for analysis were excluded (n = 96). Clinical and pathologic factors were evaluated along with radiologic assessment of pleural thickness. Survival was measured from time of diagnosis. Univariable and multivariable predictors of survival were evaluated. RESULTS In all, 118 patients were included; 28 underwent pleurectomy/decortication, with 27 receiving additional modalities. Ninety patients underwent chemotherapy (n = 18) or radiotherapy alone (n = 9), 63 received combination therapy, and 27 received best supportive care. Median overall survival was 11.2 months (range, 0.3 to 36.2). At univariable analysis, pleurectomy/decortication (p = 0.0061), radiotherapy (p < 0.0001), and chemotherapy (p < 0.0001) were associated with superior survival when compared with best supportive care alone. Pleurectomy/decortication demonstrated 40% survival improvement compared with no surgery (p = 0.122). In a multivariable model, necrosis was negatively prognostic (hazard ratio 2.1, SE 0.76). Furthermore, increased sarcomatoid component was associated with worse survival without radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS BPM prognosis remains poor despite multimodality treatment. Anticancer treatment is associated with superior outcome in this nonrandomized retrospective series. Our findings suggest superior survival for patients with a lower proportion of sarcomatoid disease, with selective benefit of radiotherapy in higher proportions of sarcomatoid disease. When planning active treatment, the potential survival benefits require balancing against associated morbidity and recovery period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leanne Harling
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Arjun Nair
- Department of Radiology, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy Smelt
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Juliet King
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Routledge
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - James Spicer
- School of Cancer Studies, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wen Ng
- Department of Pathology, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Bille
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
De Bondt C, Psallidas I, Van Schil PEY, van Meerbeeck JP. Combined modality treatment in mesothelioma: a systemic literature review with treatment recommendations. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2018; 7:562-573. [PMID: 30450295 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.10.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
In spite of recent progress, malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains synonymous with poor prognosis. A selected minority (<10%) of patients is eligible for a radical treatment with a combination of systemic chemotherapy (CT) and/or surgery and/or radiotherapy (RT), in an effort to maintain locoregional tumor control after achieving a macroscopically complete resection (MCR). However, as of yet there is no standard of care for this so-called multimodality treatment. As its potential gain is still limited (approximately one year added to overall survival), we must balance its efficacy with its cumulative toxicity. Several combined modality treatment trials are currently ongoing using novel techniques in surgery, RT and/or CT in an attempt to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with older multimodality treatment protocols. Guidelines are following suit and are now including or mentioning this treatment option. In this systematic review, we analyze the available data in order to address the following questions: Is combined modality better than single modality? What is the optimal regimen within each modality? What is the optimal sequence of combined modality?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte De Bondt
- Department Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ioannis Psallidas
- Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul E Y Van Schil
- Department Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jan P van Meerbeeck
- Department Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Die Radiotherapie des Pleuramesothelioms – Klinische Praxisleitlinie der American Society of Clinical Oncology. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 194:953-957. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1354-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
32
|
Süveg K, Putora PM, Berghmans T, Glatzer M, Kovac V, Cihoric N. Current efforts in research of pleural mesothelioma—An analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. Lung Cancer 2018; 124:12-18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
33
|
Cramer G, Simone CB, Busch TM, Cengel KA. Adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and definitive radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:S2565-S2573. [PMID: 30206500 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.07.65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
While ionizing radiotherapy (RT) can provide durable local control, the relative radiosensitivity of surrounding organs such as the lungs and heart and the distributed nature of the pleura limit the ability to safely deliver RT for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Recent advances in the technological sophistication of RT planning and delivery devices have resulted in increased spatial control of irradiation dose that has extended the palliative and definitive applications of RT for patients with MPM. This review will outline the logistical, mechanistic and clinical basics of RT and the clinical trials supporting the use of RT in the multidisciplinary care of patients with MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwendolyn Cramer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Theresa M Busch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Casiraghi M, Maisonneuve P, Brambilla D, Solli P, Galetta D, Petrella F, Piperno G, De Marinis F, Spaggiari L. Induction chemotherapy, extrapleural pneumonectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 52:975-981. [PMID: 28482086 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES While the best approach to malignant pleural mesothelioma has yet to be demonstrated, surgery remains the mainstay of treatment. We analysed a group of candidates for trimodality treatment, aiming to identify prognostic factors guiding patient selection. METHODS Between 2003 and 2015, 83 (31.6%) of the 283 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma were considered for trimodality treatment to perform induction chemotherapy, extrapleural pneumonectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. All patients underwent cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Radiotherapy was administered at a mean dose of 50.4 Gy. RESULTS Thirty-six patients (43.4%) had 3 cycles of chemotherapy, whereas 21 (25.3%) had more than 3. Progression to chemotherapy was observed in 10.9% (9 of 83) of patients, partial response in 30.1% (25 of 83) and stable disease in 59% (49 of 83). Sixty-three patients underwent extrapleural pneumonectomy. Fifty-five patients (87.3%) had epithelial tumour. Forty-two patients (66.7%) were in pathological Stage 3. Major complications after extrapleural pneumonectomy were observed in 28 patients (44.4%), whereas 30-day postoperative mortality was 11.1% (7/63). Radiotherapy was not administered in 24 patients (38.1%) due to major complications after surgery or patient intolerance. Two patients (3.2%) died within 90 days after the end of radiotherapy. The trimodality treatment was completed in 37 (44.6%) patients. Median overall survival was 35.6 months, with 1- and 3-year overall survival of 82% and 48% for patients who completed the trimodality treatment compared with 32% and 14% for patients who did not undergo radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Only 45% of patients completed the planned trimodality treatment, and morbidity/mortality remained high. Nonetheless, the patients who completed treatment showed good loco-regional disease control and better overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Casiraghi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrick Maisonneuve
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Brambilla
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Solli
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Domenico Galetta
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Petrella
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaia Piperno
- Division of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo De Marinis
- Division of Clinical Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Spaggiari
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), School of Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Shaaban SG, Verma V, Choi JI, Shabason J, Sharma S, Glass E, Grover S, Badiyan SN, Simone CB. Utilization of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in the United States. Clin Lung Cancer 2018; 19:e685-e692. [PMID: 29803576 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2018] [Revised: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has historically been delivered using 3-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT) techniques, multiple reports show noteworthy safety and efficacy of the more advanced intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). To our knowledge, this is the only known study to evaluate national practice patterns of IMRT utilization for MPM. MATERIALS AND METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was queried for newly-diagnosed MPM patients who underwent definitive surgery (extrapleural pneumonectomy [EPP] or extended pleurectomy/decortication [P/D]) followed by adjuvant RT. Patients with metastatic disease, non-EPP or P/D surgical techniques, and lack of RT receipt (or without specified RT technique) were excluded. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) analysis, and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS Overall, 286 patients met criteria (181 [63%] IMRT and 105 [37%] 3DCRT). Temporal trends revealed that although 3DCRT was more common at initial time periods, IMRT utilization rose from 2004 to 2007 and stayed as a relatively constant majority thereafter. This was also present when substratifying the cohort according to EPP versus P/D approaches. IMRT was more often delivered at academic centers, along with institutions in the Southern United States, whereas 3DCRT was more frequently utilized in community facilities and in the Northeast (P ≤ .05 for all). RT technique did not affect OS (P > .05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION In the United States, IMRT is now the most commonly utilized adjuvant RT technique for MPM. Facility and regional differences might associate with IMRT delivery. The findings of this investigation have implications for insurance coverage, clinical referral patterns, and ongoing and future prospective trial design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherif G Shaaban
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - J Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jacob Shabason
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sonam Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Erica Glass
- California Protons Cancer Therapy Center, San Diego, CA
| | - Surbhi Grover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wu L, Blum W, Zhu CQ, Yun Z, Pecze L, Kohno M, Chan ML, Zhao Y, Felley-Bosco E, Schwaller B, de Perrot M. Putative cancer stem cells may be the key target to inhibit cancer cell repopulation between the intervals of chemoradiation in murine mesothelioma. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:471. [PMID: 29699510 PMCID: PMC5921988 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4354-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2017] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer cell repopulation during chemotherapy or radiotherapy is a major factor limiting the efficacy of treatment. Cancer stem cells (CSC) may play critical roles during this process. We aim to demonstrate the role of mesothelioma stem cells (MSC) in treatment failure and eventually to design specific target therapies against MSC to improve the efficacy of treatment in malignant mesothelioma. Methods Murine mesothelioma AB12 and RN5 cells were used to compare tumorigenicity in mice. The expression of CSC-associated genes was evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR in both cell lines treated with chemo-radiation. Stemness properties of MSC-enriched RN5-EOS-Puro2 cells were characterized with flow cytometry and immunostaining. A MSC-specific gene profile was screened by microarray assay and confirmed thereafter. Gene Ontology analysis of the selected genes was performed by GOMiner. Results Tumor growth delay of murine mesothelioma AB12 cells was achieved after each cycle of cisplatin treatment, however, tumors grew back rapidly due to cancer cell repopulation between courses of chemotherapy. Strikingly, a 10-times lower number of irradiated cells in both cell lines led to a similar tumor incidence and growth rate as with untreated cells. The expression of CSC-associated genes such as CD24, CD133, CD90 and uPAR was dramatically up-regulated, while others did not change significantly after chemoradiation. Highly enriched MSC after selection with puromycin displayed an increasing GFP-positive population and showed typical properties of stemness. Comparatively, the proportion of MSC significantly increased after RN5-EOS parental cells were treated with either chemotherapy, γ-ray radiation, or a combination of the two, while MSC showed more resistance to the above treatments. A group of identified genes are most likely MSC-specific, and major pathways related to regulation of cell growth or apoptosis are involved. Upregulation of the gene transcripts Tnfsf18, Serpinb9b, Ly6a, and Nppb were confirmed. Conclusion Putative MSC possess the property of stemness showing more resistance to chemoradiation, suggesting that MSC may play critical roles in cancer cell repopulation. Further identification of selected genes may be used to design novel target therapies against MSC, so as to eliminate cancer cell repopulation in mesothelioma. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4354-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Licun Wu
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Latner Thoracic Surgery Laboratories, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Walter Blum
- Department of Medicine, Unit of Anatomy, University of Fribourg, CH-1700, Fribourg, Switzerland.,INSERM, U1162, Génomique Fonctionnelle des Tumeurs Solides, 27 rue Juliette Dodu, 75010, Paris, France
| | - Chang-Qi Zhu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zhihong Yun
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Latner Thoracic Surgery Laboratories, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laszlo Pecze
- Department of Medicine, Unit of Anatomy, University of Fribourg, CH-1700, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Mikihiro Kohno
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Latner Thoracic Surgery Laboratories, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mei-Lin Chan
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Latner Thoracic Surgery Laboratories, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yidan Zhao
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Latner Thoracic Surgery Laboratories, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Emanuela Felley-Bosco
- Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8044, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Beat Schwaller
- Department of Medicine, Unit of Anatomy, University of Fribourg, CH-1700, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Marc de Perrot
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Latner Thoracic Surgery Laboratories, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto Mesothelioma Research Program, Toronto General Hospital, 9N-961, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kindler HL, Ismaila N, Armato SG, Bueno R, Hesdorffer M, Jahan T, Jones CM, Miettinen M, Pass H, Rimner A, Rusch V, Sterman D, Thomas A, Hassan R. Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:1343-1373. [PMID: 29346042 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.6394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 258] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary, pathology, imaging, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2017. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations. Results The literature search identified 222 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Recommendations Evidence-based recommendations were developed for diagnosis, staging, chemotherapy, surgical cytoreduction, radiation therapy, and multimodality therapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedy L Kindler
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Samuel G Armato
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Raphael Bueno
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Mary Hesdorffer
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Thierry Jahan
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Clyde Michael Jones
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Markku Miettinen
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Harvey Pass
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Valerie Rusch
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel Sterman
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Anish Thomas
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Raffit Hassan
- Hedy L. Kindler and Samuel G. Armato III, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Alexandria, VA; Raphael Bueno, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Thierry Jahan, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Clyde Michael Jones, Baptist Cancer Center Physicians Foundation, Memphis, TN; Markku Miettinen, Anish Thomas and Raffit Hassan, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Harvey Pass and Daniel Sterman, New York University Langone Medical Center; and Andreas Rimner and Valerie Rusch, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
de Perrot M, Wu L, Wu M, Cho BCJ. Radiotherapy for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:e532-e542. [PMID: 28884702 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30459-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2017] [Revised: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive disease that continues to be associated with poor outcomes. Although, traditionally this disease is considered to be resistant to radiotherapy, more recent evidence suggests that radiotherapy can produce positive outcomes. Over the past 15 years, the development of new, highly conformal radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), has enabled investigators to optimise the delivery of high-dose radiotherapy to the whole of the hemithorax. Prospective single-arm trials have shown that the median survival of patients who have completed high-dose hemithoracic radiotherapy after extrapleural pneumonectomy could reach 23·9-39·4 months independent of the chemotherapeutic response, suggesting that IMRT could potentially have an intrinsic benefit to this subset of patients. These observations have led to a change in practice, with the introduction of adjuvant pleural IMRT after pleurectomy-decortication and the development of induction-accelerated hemithoracic IMRT followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy. This Review focuses on recent observations on the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma, with particular emphasis on the results of clinical trials that evaluate the role of high-dose hemithoracic radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc de Perrot
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Licun Wu
- Latner Thoracic Surgery Laboratories, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew Wu
- Latner Thoracic Surgery Laboratories, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - B C John Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lee H, Zeng J, Bowen SR, Rengan R. Proton Therapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Three Case Series Describing the Clinical and Dosimetric Advantages of Proton-Based Therapy. Cureus 2017; 9:e1705. [PMID: 29159011 PMCID: PMC5690429 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a malignancy of the pleural cavity that typically presents at an advanced stage. Due to its large, circumferential clinical target volume (CTV) and proximity to major structures, including the heart and contralateral lung, delivering hemithoracic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with photon therapy to achieve loco-regional control following macroscopic complete resection is challenging. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) has been shown to be a method for achieving higher therapeutic doses while limiting exposure to organs at risk (OARs), but patient outcomes after treatment have yet to be reported. We present three patients who received IMPT to 54 Gy after extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), with two patients receiving boosts to 66 and 60 Gy. All three tolerated treatment well and received doses to OARs markedly lower than those seen in comparison volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) IMRT photon plans. Radiation pneumonitis, a highly morbid and potentially fatal toxicity in patients receiving thoracic radiotherapy, was not observed even with boost treatments. In practice, IMPT appears to match dosimetric predictions as a feasible and safer alternative to photon IMRT-based radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard Lee
- School of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - Jing Zeng
- Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine
| | - Stephen R Bowen
- Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine
| | - Ramesh Rengan
- Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Yamauchi Y, Safi S, Orschiedt L, Gardyan A, Brons S, Rieber J, Nicolay NH, Huber PE, Eichhorn M, Dienemann H, Herth FJF, Weber KJ, Debus J, Hoffmann H, Rieken S. Low-dose photon irradiation induces invasiveness through the SDF-1α/CXCR4 pathway in malignant mesothelioma cells. Oncotarget 2017; 8:68001-68011. [PMID: 28978091 PMCID: PMC5620231 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2016] [Accepted: 06/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Low-dose photon irradiation has repeatedly been suspected to increase a risk of promoting local recurrence of disease or even systemic dissemination. The purpose of this study was to investigate the motility of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) cell lines after low-doses of photon irradiation and to elucidate the mechanism of the detected phenotype. Methods H28 and H226 MPM cells were examined in clonogenic survival experiments and migration assays with and without various doses of photon and carbon ion irradiation. C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4), SDF-1α, β1 integrin, α3 integrin, and α5 integrin expressions were analyzed by quantitative FACS analysis, ELISA and western blots. Apoptosis was assessed via Annexin-V-staining. Results The migration of MPM cells was stimulated by both fetal bovine serum and by stromal cell-derived factor 1α (SDF-1α). Low doses of photon irradiation (1 Gy and 2 Gy) suppressed clonogenicity, but promoted migration of both H28 and H226 cells through the SDF-1α/CXCR4 pathway. Hypermigration was inhibited by the administration of CXCR4 antagonist, AMD3100. In contrast, corresponding doses of carbon ion irradiation (0.3 Gy and 1 Gy) suppressed clonogenicity, but did not promote MPM cell migration. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the co-administration of photon irradiation and the CXCR4-antagonist AMD3100 or the use of carbon ions instead of photons may be possible solutions to reduce the risk of locoregional tumor recurrence after radiotherapy for MPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshikane Yamauchi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thorax Clinic, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Seyer Safi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thorax Clinic, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lena Orschiedt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Adriane Gardyan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Molecular and Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Ion Treatment Facility (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Treatment Facility (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Treatment Facility (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Molecular and Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter E Huber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Molecular and Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Eichhorn
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thorax Clinic, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hendrik Dienemann
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thorax Clinic, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix J F Herth
- Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thorax Clinic, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRCH), Heidelberg, Germany, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL)
| | - Klaus-Josef Weber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Treatment Facility (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Treatment Facility (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans Hoffmann
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thorax Clinic, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Treatment Facility (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Matsuo Y, Shibuya K, Okubo K, Ueki N, Aoyama A, Sonobe M, Nakamura M, Mizowaki T, Date H, Hiraoka M. Long-term outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy following extra-pleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:957-962. [PMID: 28117611 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1279749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose was to evaluate safety and efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) following extra-pleural pneumonectomy (EPP) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with MPM of clinical stage I-III, which were macroscopic completely resected with EPP were eligible for this prospective study. The ipsilateral hemithorax was irradiated with a prescribed dose of 50.4 Gy. When the high-risk surgical margins or FDG-avid regions were identified, simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with 56.0 Gy or 61.6 Gy was applied. RESULTS Twenty-one patients were enrolled. SIB was applied to five patients. The planned IMRT fractions were completed in all, but four patients who suffered from severe fatigue or radiation pneumonitis. With a potential median follow-up of 6.3 years, overall survival was 37.5% at 3 years since the IMRT. The median survival time was 17.5 and 27.0 months since the IMRT and the initial treatment, respectively. Three patients have survived for more than 5 years. Distant metastasis was observed in 15 patients. Local recurrence was also observed in 2 of the 15 patients. Acute toxicities of Grade 3 or worse were observed in 15 patients, including 9 with hematological, 3 with pneumonitis and 6 with fatigue, nausea or vomiting. Five patients developed Grade 3 or worse late toxicities associated with IMRT, consisting of one with persistent Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, one with brain infarction and congestive liver dysfunction, and three with elevation of serum transaminase or biliary enzyme. No Grade 5 toxicity was observed. Patients with N2 showed significantly worse survival than those with N0-1 (18.2% vs. 60.0% at 3 years, p = .014). CONCLUSION IMRT following EPP achieved excellent local control for MPM, that might lead to the long-term survival in selected patients. However, treatment burden including acute and late toxicities should be considered in this treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukinori Matsuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Keiko Shibuya
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan
| | - Kenichi Okubo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nami Ueki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Akihiro Aoyama
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Makoto Sonobe
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Date
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masahiro Hiraoka
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Marulli G, Faccioli E, Bellini A, Mammana M, Rea F. Induction chemotherapy vs post-operative adjuvant therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Expert Rev Respir Med 2017; 11:649-660. [PMID: 28580813 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2017.1338951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive neoplasia. Multidisciplinary treatments, including the association of induction and/or adjuvant therapeutic regimens with surgery, have been reported to give encouraging results. Current therapeutic options are not well standardized yet, especially regarding the best association between surgery and medical treatments. The present review aims to assess safety, efficacy and outcomes of different therapies for MPM. Areas covered: This article focuses on the multimodality treatment of mesothelioma. A systematic review was performed by using electronic databases to identify studies that considered induction and adjuvant approaches in MPM therapy in a multidisciplinary setting, including surgery. Endpoints included overall survival, disease free survival, disease recurrence, and complications. Expert commentary: This systematic review offers a comprehensive view of current multidisciplinary therapeutic strategies for MPM, suggesting that multimodality therapy offers acceptable outcomes with better results reported for trimodality approaches. Individualization of care for each patient is fundamental in choosing the most appropriate treatment. The growing complexity of treatment protocols mandates that MPM patients be referred to specialized Centers, in which every component of the interdisciplinary team can provide the necessary expertise and quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Marulli
- a Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiologic, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences , University of Padova , Padova , Italy
| | - Eleonora Faccioli
- a Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiologic, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences , University of Padova , Padova , Italy
| | - Alice Bellini
- a Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiologic, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences , University of Padova , Padova , Italy
| | - Marco Mammana
- a Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiologic, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences , University of Padova , Padova , Italy
| | - Federico Rea
- a Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiologic, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences , University of Padova , Padova , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Murphy DJ, Gill RR. Overview of treatment related complications in malignant pleural mesothelioma. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2017; 5:235. [PMID: 28706903 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.97] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignant neoplasm of the pleura related to asbestos exposure. Despite recent advances in therapy for MPM, the prognosis remains poor, with considerable treatment associated morbidity. Radiological assessment plays a central role in the timely identification and subsequent management of treatment related complications in MPM. This review highlights common and uncommon complications associated with and encountered in the post treatment phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Murphy
- Division of Thoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ritu R Gill
- Division of Thoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wu L, de Perrot M. Radio-immunotherapy and chemo-immunotherapy as a novel treatment paradigm in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2017; 6:325-334. [PMID: 28713677 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2017.06.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive neoplasm with poor outcome. Novel radical radiation techniques using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) have become an important component of therapy in mesothelioma. Immunotherapy also provides new therapeutic options. However, how best to integrate immunotherapy with standard therapy such as radiation, chemotherapy and surgery remains unknown. A change of paradigm from adjuvant normofractionation to induction accelerated hypofractionated hemithoracic radiation could provide a platform to combine immunotherapy due to the potential benefit of short course high dose radiation on the immune system. Immunotherapy can also be combined with chemotherapy. Although chemotherapy is generally considered immunosuppressive, some chemotherapeutic agents do induce cell death that can be immunogenic and stimulate a specific immune response against the tumor. Immunotherapy could also be used in between cycles of chemotherapy to limit tumor cell repopulation and optimize the results of both treatments. The integration of immunotherapy into a multimodality approach is opening new avenue of treatment for mesothelioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Licun Wu
- Toronto Mesothelioma Research Program, Toronto General Hospital and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marc de Perrot
- Toronto Mesothelioma Research Program, Toronto General Hospital and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Shaikh F, Zauderer MG, von Reibnitz D, Wu AJ, Yorke ED, Foster A, Shi W, Zhang Z, Adusumilli PS, Rosenzweig KE, Krug LM, Rusch VW, Rimner A. Improved Outcomes with Modern Lung-Sparing Trimodality Therapy in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. J Thorac Oncol 2017; 12:993-1000. [PMID: 28341225 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2016] [Revised: 02/03/2017] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Higher target conformity and better sparing of organs at risk with modern radiotherapy (RT) may result in higher tumor control and less toxicity. In this study, we compare our institutional multimodality therapy experience of adjuvant chemotherapy and hemithoracic intensity-modulated pleural RT (IMPRINT) with previously used adjuvant conventional RT (CONV) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) treated with lung-sparing pleurectomy/decortication (P/D). METHODS We analyzed 209 patients who underwent P/D and adjuvant RT (131 who received CONV and 78 who received IMPRINT) for MPM between 1974 and 2015. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to calculate OS; competing risks analysis was performed for local failure-free survival and progression-free survival. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed with relevant clinical and treatment factors. RESULTS The median age was 64 years, and 80% of the patients were male. Patients receiving IMPRINT had significantly higher rates of the epithelial histological type, advanced pathological stage, and chemotherapy treatment. OS was significantly higher after IMPRINT (median 20.2 versus 12.3 months, p = 0.001). Higher Karnofsky performance score, epithelioid histological type, macroscopically complete resection, and use of chemotherapy/IMPRINT were found to be significant factors for longer OS in multivariate analysis. No significant predictive factors were identified for local failure or progression. Grade 2 or higher esophagitis developed in fewer patients after IMPRINT than after CONV (23% versus 47%). CONCLUSIONS Trimodality therapy including adjuvant hemithoracic IMPRINT, chemotherapy, and P/D is associated with promising OS rates and decreased toxicity in patients with MPM. Dose constraints should be applied vigilantly to minimize serious adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fauzia Shaikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marjorie G Zauderer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Donata von Reibnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Abraham J Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ellen D Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amanda Foster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Weiji Shi
- Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Prasad S Adusumilli
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kenneth E Rosenzweig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Lee M Krug
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Valerie W Rusch
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abdel-Rahman O. Role of postoperative radiotherapy in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma : A propensity score matching of the SEER database. Strahlenther Onkol 2017; 193:276-284. [PMID: 28044200 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-016-1092-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2016] [Accepted: 11/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study assessed the prognostic impact of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with surgically resected malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). METHODS MPM patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2013 were identified from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database. A propensity-matched analysis was performed considering baseline characteristics (age, gender, race, histology, TNM stage, and type of surgery). RESULTS A total of 2166 patients were identified. The median age was 60 years (range 25-85 years), and 469 patients received postoperative radiotherapy. Both before and after propensity score matching, overall survival (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.012, respectively) was better in the postoperative radiotherapy group. When the overall survival was stratified by histology, postoperative radiotherapy did not improve the survival in sarcomatoid histology patients both before and after matching (P = 0.424 and P = 0.281, respectively). In multivariate analysis of the matched population, not receiving postoperative radiotherapy did not correlate with worse survival (hazard ratio: 1.175; P = 0.12). Factors associated with worse survival include sarcomatoid histology, nodal positivity, and age ≥70. CONCLUSION Evidence from this analysis is insufficient on its own to routinely recommend postoperative radiotherapy for surgically resected MPM. However, large-scale prospective clinical trials are warranted to further evaluate this intervention in nonsarcomatoid histology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Abdel-Rahman
- Clinical Oncology department, Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Simone CB, Busch TM, Cengel KA. Radiotherapy and Photodynamic Therapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. ASBESTOS AND MESOTHELIOMA 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-53560-9_14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|