1
|
Chen R, Yu Y, Zhang J, Song C, Wang C. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy for HR-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2024:1-13. [PMID: 38693054 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2350105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant treatment for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer is controversial and requires a comprehensive analysis for optimal therapy assessment. Therefore, a two-step Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of different neoadjuvant regimens. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Phase II/III randomized clinical trials comparing various neoadjuvant therapies for HR+/HER2- breast cancer were included. NMA and pairwise meta-analyses were conducted using Stata (version 14), R (version 4.2.3), and Review Manager 5.4. RESULTS Twenty-eight studies (5,625 patients) were eligible. NMA of objective response rate (ORR) indicated the highest SUCRA for chemotherapy (CT) and chemotherapy with anthracycline (CT(A)). Pathologic complete response (PCR) NMA demonstrated significant PCR improvement with chemotherapy regimens containing programmed cell death protein-1 and programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors (PD-1i/PD-L1i) and poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Combined analysis considering both the ORR and safety highlighted CT(A)'s efficacy and toxicity balance. CONCLUSIONS CT(A) and CT showed improved ORR compared with alternative regimens. CT(A) combined with PD-1/PD-L1 or PARP inhibitors significantly increased PCR rates. Comprehensive assessment of both ORR and safety indicated that CT(A) represents an optimal neoadjuvant therapy for HR+/HER2- breast cancer, whereas AI + CDK4/6 inhibitors rank solely behind chemotherapy. REGISTRATION PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024538948. International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY) registration number INPLASY202440092.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruiliang Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yushuai Yu
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Department of Breast Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Chuangui Song
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Department of Breast Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Chuan Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
- Breast Cancer Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van de Loo ME, Andour L, van Heesewijk AE, Oosterkamp HM, Liefers GJ, Straver ME. Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: Does it result in more breast-conserving surgery? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 205:5-16. [PMID: 38265568 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07222-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with locally advanced endocrine positive tumors who will not benefit from chemotherapy can be treated by either primary surgery or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). How often does NET result in breast-conserving surgery (BCS)? METHODS We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Embase, to identify articles on surgical treatment after NET. RESULTS In 19 studies the pathological complete response (pCR) rate was reported after NET; an overall pCR rate of 1% was found. Compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), the BCS rate was significantly higher after NET (OR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51-0.69; P < 0.00001). The surgical conversion rate was reported in eight studies [4-75.9%], with a mean of 30.2%. CONCLUSION This review found that one out of three patients becomes eligible for BCS after treatment with NET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel E van de Loo
- Department of Surgery, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Layla Andour
- Department of Surgery, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Gerrit-Jan Liefers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke E Straver
- Department of Surgery, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roudini K, Mirzania M, Yavari T, Seyyedsalehi MS, Nahvijou A, Zebardast J, Saadat M, Khajeh-Mehrizi A. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: A Report from Clinical Breast Cancer Registry of Iran. Arch Iran Med 2024; 27:206-215. [PMID: 38685847 PMCID: PMC11097303 DOI: 10.34172/aim.2024.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) has become an increasingly popular approach in management of breast cancer (BC). This study was conducted to evaluate the pathologic response and 36-month recurrence and survival rates of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative BC treated with different NCT regimens. METHODS A total of 163 female patients with HER2-negative BC who received NCT during 2017-2020 were identified from the Clinical Breast Cancer Registry of Iran and entered the study. The prescribed NCT regimens included 4 cycles of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide, 4 cycles of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel, 4 cycles of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel or 6 cycles of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide plus docetaxel (TAC). RESULTS Thirty-two patients (19.6%) experienced pathologic complete response (pCR). TAC regimen, triple negative-BC and ki67>10% were significantly associated with increased pCR. The recurrence, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rate at 36 months for all patients were 16.6%, 84.7% and 79.8%, respectively. Type of neoadjuvant regimen as well as age, hormone receptor status, Ki67, grade, clinical stage, type of surgery and pathologic response to chemotherapy did not significantly influence the survival and recurrence; however, TAC results in improved recurrence, OS and DFS rates. CONCLUSION This study provides further evidence that NCT is a viable treatment option for patients with HER2-negative BC. The TAC regimen resulted in a significantly higher pCR rate compared to other regimens, but did not result in a significant improvement in recurrence, OS and DFS and rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamran Roudini
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mehrzad Mirzania
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Tahereh Yavari
- Department of Internal Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Monireh Sadat Seyyedsalehi
- Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Azin Nahvijou
- Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jayran Zebardast
- Department of Cognitive Linguistics, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies (ICSS), Tehran, Iran
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mina Saadat
- Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Science, Shahroud, Iran
| | - Ahmad Khajeh-Mehrizi
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stravodimou A, Voutsadakis IA. Neo-adjuvant therapies for ER positive/HER2 negative breast cancers: from chemotherapy to hormonal therapy, CDK inhibitors, and beyond. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2024; 24:117-135. [PMID: 38475990 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2330601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chemotherapy has been traditionally used as neo-adjuvant therapy in breast cancer for down-staging of locally advanced disease in all sub-types. In the adjuvant setting, genomic assays have shown that a significant proportion of ER positive/HER2 negative patients do not derive benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to adjuvant endocrine therapy. An interest in hormonal treatments as neo-adjuvant therapies in ER positive/HER2 negative cancers has been borne by their documented success in the adjuvant setting. Moreover, cytotoxic chemotherapy is less effective in ER positive/HER2 negative disease compared with other breast cancer subtypes in obtaining pathologic complete responses. AREAS COVERED Neo-adjuvant therapies for ER positive/HER2 negative breast cancers and associated biomarkers are reviewed, using a Medline survey. A focus of discussion is the prediction of patients that are unlikely to derive extra benefit from chemotherapy and have the highest probabilities of benefiting from hormonal and other targeted therapies. EXPERT OPINION Predictive biomarkers of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapies are instrumental for selecting ER positive/HER2 negative breast cancer patients for each treatment. Chemotherapy remains the standard of care for many of those patients requiring neo-adjuvant treatment, but other neo-adjuvant therapies are increasingly used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athina Stravodimou
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ioannis A Voutsadakis
- Algoma District Cancer Program, Sault Area Hospital, Sault Ste Marie, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Clinical Sciences, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cantini L, Trapani D, Guidi L, Boscolo Bielo L, Scafetta R, Koziej M, Vidal L, Saini KS, Curigliano G. Neoadjuvant therapy in hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 123:102669. [PMID: 38141462 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy is commonly used in patients with locally advanced or inoperable breast cancer (BC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) represents an established treatment modality able to downstage tumours, facilitate breast-conserving surgery, yet also achieve considerable pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in HER2-positive and triple-negative BC. For patients with HR+/HER2- BC, the choice between NACT and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is still based on clinical and pathological features and not guided by biomarkers of defined clinical utility, differently from the adjuvant setting where gene-expression signatures have been widely adopted to drive decision-making. In this review, we summarize the evidence supporting the choice of NACT vs NET in HR+/HER2- BC, discussing the issues surrounding clinical trial design and proper selection of patients for every treatment. It is time to question the binary paradigm of responder vs non-responders as well as the "one size fits all" approach in luminal BC, supporting the utilization of continuous endpoints and the adoption of tissue and plasma-based biomarkers at multiple timepoints. This will eventually unleash the full potential of neoadjuvant therapy which is to modulate patient treatment based on treatment sensitivity and surgical outcomes. We also reviewed the current landscape of neoadjuvant studies for HR+/HER2- BC, focusing on antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and immunotherapy combinations. Finally, we proposed a roadmap for future neoadjuvant approaches in HR+/HER2- BC, which should be based on a staggered biomarker-driven treatment selection aiming at impacting long-term relevant endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dario Trapani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Guidi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boscolo Bielo
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Scafetta
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of medical oncology, Campus Bio-Medico, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jeong H, Kim SB. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in ER-positive breast cancer: evolution, indication, and tailored treatment strategy. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231200457. [PMID: 37786536 PMCID: PMC10541763 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231200457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, endocrine therapy (ET), an effective systemic treatment for the management of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers, has regained interest as a neoadjuvant therapy based on evidence that ET can fulfill the aim of neoadjuvant systemic treatment for tumor shrinkage as well as elucidate important clinical information on endocrine sensitivity that enables the prognostication of patients. Moreover, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) potentially provides an opportunity for early assessment of the clinical efficacy of novel agents. Furthermore, recently reported trials have generated evidence for a more tailored approach for perioperative management of ER-positive breast cancer using clinical and molecular biomarkers, and this has provided a rationale that enables the broadening of clinical indications for NET. This review discusses the current evidence for NET, the evolution of NET trials, clinical indications, and NET-based treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyehyun Jeong
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Bae Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ergun Y, Ucar G, Akagündüz B. Efficacy and safety of concomitant chemo-endocrine therapy in neoadjuvant treatment of hormone-positive HER2-negative breast cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2023; 22:313-322. [PMID: 37057733 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2203485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rate of pathological complete response (pCR) with both chemotherapy alone (CT) and endocrine therapy (ET) in the neoadjuvant (Na) treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) is unsatisfactory. Limited data on neoadjuvant concomitant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy (NaCET) are available. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this meta-analysis analyzed the efficacy and safety of randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the use of NaCET in HR-positive/HER2-negative BC. A comprehensive search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases, and congress paper lists for studies published/presented until 1 December 2022. RESULTS Five RCTs involving a total of 630 patients were included. A pooled analysis of the five studies demonstrated that the pCR ratio was numerically higher in the NaCET arm than in the NaCT arm, but the difference was not statistically significant (6.5% vs. 3.8%; OR:1.72, 95% CI 0.82-3.62). Nonetheless, the NaCET arm exhibited a significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) (82% vs. 72.7%; OR:1.77, 95% CI 1.20-2.62). There was no difference between the arms in terms of grade 3-5 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS In HR-positive/HER2-negative BC, NaCET significantly increases ORR without an increase in serious adverse events. Although the pCR rate increased numerically, it was not statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yakup Ergun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Batman World Hospital, Batman, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Ucar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Baran Akagündüz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Binali Yıldırım University Mengücek Gazi Training and Research Hospital, Erzincan, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liebscher SC, Kilgore LJ, Winblad O, Gloyeske N, Larson K, Balanoff C, Nye L, O’Dea A, Sharma P, Kimler B, Khan Q, Wagner J. Use of Ultrasound and Ki-67 Proliferation Index to Predict Breast Cancer Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11030417. [PMID: 36766992 PMCID: PMC9913996 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11030417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prediction of tumor shrinkage and pattern of treatment response following neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) for estrogen receptor positive (ER+), Her2 negative (Her2-) breast cancers have had limited assessment. We examined if ultrasound (US) and Ki-67 could predict the pathologic response to treatment with NET and how the pattern of response may impact surgical planning. METHODS A total of 103 postmenopausal women with ER+, HER2- breast cancer enrolled on the FELINE trial had Ki-67 obtained at baseline, day 14, and surgical pathology. A total of 70 patients had an US at baseline and at the end of treatment (EOT). A total of 48 patients had residual tumor bed cellularity (RTBC) assessed. The US response was defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). CR or PR on imaging and ≤70% residual tumor bed cellularity (RTBC) defined a contracted response pattern. RESULTS A decrease in Ki-67 at day 14 was not predictive of EOT US response or RTBC. A contracted response pattern was identified in one patient with CR and in sixteen patients (33%) with PR on US. Although 26 patients (54%) had SD on imaging, 22 (85%) had RTBC ≤70%, suggesting a non-contracted response pattern of the tumor bed. The remaining four (15%) with SD and five with PD had no response. CONCLUSION Ki-67 does not predict a change in tumor size or RTBC. NET does not uniformly result in a contracted response pattern of the tumor bed. Caution should be taken when using NET for the purpose of downstaging tumor size or converting borderline mastectomy/lumpectomy patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean C. Liebscher
- Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Lyndsey J. Kilgore
- Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Onalisa Winblad
- Department of Radiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Nika Gloyeske
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Kelsey Larson
- Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Christa Balanoff
- Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Lauren Nye
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Anne O’Dea
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Priyanka Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Bruce Kimler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Qamar Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Jamie Wagner
- Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Martínez-Pérez C, Turnbull AK, Kay C, Dixon JM. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:67-86. [PMID: 36633402 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2162043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While endocrine therapy is the standard-of-care adjuvant treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancers, there is also extensive evidence for the role of pre-operative (or neoadjuvant) endocrine therapy (NET) in HR+ postmenopausal women. AREAS COVERED We conducted a thorough review of the published literature, to summarize the evidence to date, including studies of how NET compares to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which NET agents are preferable, and the optimal duration of NET. We describe the importance of on-treatment assessment of response, the different predictors available (including Ki67, PEPI score, and molecular signatures) and the research opportunities the pre-operative setting offers. We also summarize recent combination trials and discuss how the COVID-19 pandemic led to increases in NET use for safe management of cases with deferred surgery and adjuvant treatments. EXPERT OPINION NET represents a safe and effective tool for the management of postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- breast cancer, enabling disease downstaging and a wider range of surgical options. Aromatase inhibitors are the preferred NET, with evidence suggesting that longer regimens might yield optimal results. However, NET remains currently underutilised in many territories and institutions. Further validation of predictors for treatment response and benefit is needed to help standardise and fully exploit the potential of NET in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Martínez-Pérez
- Translational Oncology Research Group, MRC Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
- Edinburgh Breast Cancer Now Research Team, MRC Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Arran K Turnbull
- Translational Oncology Research Group, MRC Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
- Edinburgh Breast Cancer Now Research Team, MRC Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Charlene Kay
- Translational Oncology Research Group, MRC Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
- Edinburgh Breast Cancer Now Research Team, MRC Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - J Michael Dixon
- Translational Oncology Research Group, MRC Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
- Edinburgh Breast Cancer Now Research Team, MRC Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
- Edinburgh Breast Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gouveia MC, Amorim de Araújo Lima Santos C, Impieri Souza A. Study protocol: Randomized, open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial for evaluating the clinical and pathological response rates to neoadjuvant hormone therapy and chemotherapy in patients with luminal-subtype breast tumors. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2022; 30:101013. [PMID: 36262803 PMCID: PMC9574413 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.101013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) is being underused, it is an effective treatment for luminal tumors at a lower cost and with fewer side effects compared to those associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). The lack of robust comparative data between NHT and NCT is a factor that limits its use in clinical practice. Methods This study will be a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients diagnosed with HER2-negative luminal-subtype breast cancer will be identified at the time of diagnosis. Menopausal patients randomized for NHT should receive anastrozole for at least six months. Premenopausal women should receive anastrozole associated with subcutaneous goserelin acetate every 12 weeks for at least six months. Patients randomized for NCT will receive a standard institutional regimen based on anthracyclines and taxanes. Sample size was calculated considering the CPS + EG as a method for evaluating response and prognosis, where a score <3 was defined as good. The non-inferiority margin for NHT was set at 15%. The study considered a power of 80%, a significance level of 5%, and an outcome proportion in each group of 69%, resulting in 118 patients in each group. We estimated at 10% of losses, resulting in a sample of 130 patients in each group. Conclusion The non-inferiority of NHT in relation to NCT will provide further evidence that replacing NCT with NHT is safe and effective in eligible patients, which is particularly relevant for populations with limited access to health services and for institutions with few available resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Carolina Gouveia
- Corresponding author.. Research department, Rua do Coelhos, 300, Boa Vista, Recife, PE, 50070-550, Brazil.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Song IH, Kim YA, Heo SH, Bang WS, Park HS, Choi YH, Lee H, Seo JH, Cho Y, Jung SW, Kim HJ, Ahn SH, Lee HJ, Gong G. The Association of Estrogen Receptor Activity, Interferon Signaling, and MHC Class I Expression in Breast Cancer. Cancer Res Treat 2022; 54:1111-1120. [PMID: 34942685 PMCID: PMC9582481 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.1017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The expression of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) has previously been reported to be negatively associated with estrogen receptor (ER) expression. Furthermore, MHC I expression, level of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and expression of interferon (IFN) mediator MxA are positively associated with one another in human breast cancers. This study aimed to investigate the mechanisms of association of MHC I with ER and IFN signaling. MATERIALS AND METHODS The human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-ABC protein expression was analyzed in breast cancer cell lines. The expressions of HLA-A and MxA mRNAs were analyzed in MCF-7 cells in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data. ER and HLA-ABC expressions, Ki-67 labeling index and TIL levels in tumor tissue were also analyzed in ER+/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- breast cancer patients who randomly received either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or estrogen modulator treatment followed by resection. RESULTS HLA-ABC protein expression was decreased after β-estradiol treatment or hESR-GFP transfection and increased after fulvestrant or IFN-γ treatment in cell lines. In GEO data, HLA-A and MxA expression was increased after ESR1 shRNA transfection. In patients, ER Allred score was significantly lower and the HLA-ABC expression, TIL levels, and Ki-67 were significantly higher in the estrogen modulator treated group than the chemotherapy treated group. CONCLUSION MHC I expression and TIL levels might be affected by ER pathway modulation and IFN treatment. Further studies elucidating the mechanism of MHC I regulation could suggest a way to boost TIL influx in cancer in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- In Hye Song
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | | | - Sun-Hee Heo
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Won Seon Bang
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | | | | | | | | | - Youngjin Cho
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Sung Wook Jung
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hee Jeong Kim
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Sei Hyun Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hee Jin Lee
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- NeogenTC Corp., Seoul,
Korea
| | - Gyungyub Gong
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
There is growing interest in neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 -negative (HR + HER2-) breast cancer. Expanding the use of genomic assays demonstrates that many patients with HR + HER2-breast cancer do not benefit from chemotherapy, leading to growing interest in NET as a less toxic alternative. Although NET's ability to downsize breast tumors and achieve breast conservation is well-known, axillary surgery algorithms are not well-defined. Here we review primary endocrine therapy, the landmark NET clinical trials, and management of residual nodal disease following NET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Weiss
- Division of Breast Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber/Brigham Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Avenue, YC 1220, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tari A King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber/Brigham Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Avenue, YC 1220, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Singer L, Weiss A, Bellon JR, King TA. Regional Nodal Management After Preoperative Systemic Therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:228-236. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
14
|
Spring LM, Bar Y, Isakoff SJ. The Evolving Role of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:723-734. [PMID: 35714678 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The role of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for localized breast cancer has evolved tremendously over the past several years. Currently, NAT is the preferred option for high-risk early triple-negative (TN) and HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers and is indicated for some estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers. In addition to traditional absolute indications for NAT, relative indications such as the assessment of outcomes at the time of surgery and guidance of treatment escalation and de-escalation have greatly evolved in recent years. Pathologic complete response (pCR) and the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) index are highly prognostic for disease recurrence and survival, mainly in patients with TN or HER2+ disease. Furthermore, post-NAT escalation strategies have been shown to improve long-term outcomes of patients who do not achieve pCR. Additionally, by allowing the direct assessment of drug effect on the tumor, the neoadjuvant setting has become an attractive setting for the exploration of novel agents and the identification of predictive biomarkers. Neoadjuvant trial design has also evolved, using adaptive treatment approaches that enable treatment de-escalation or escalation based on response. However, despite multiple practice-changing neoadjuvant trials and the addition of various new agents to the neoadjuvant setting for early breast cancer, many key questions remain. For example, patient selection for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in TN breast cancer, de-escalation methods in HER2+ breast cancer, and the use of gene expression profiles to guide NAT recommendations in ER+ breast cancer. This article reviews the current approach for NAT in localized breast cancer as well as evolving NAT strategies, the key remaining challenges, and the ongoing work in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, and.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yael Bar
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, and
| | - Steven J Isakoff
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, and.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tesch ME, Partridge AH. Treatment of Breast Cancer in Young Adults. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-12. [PMID: 35580291 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_360970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Although breast cancer is rare and understudied in adults age 40 and younger, recent epidemiologic data show an increasing incidence of breast cancer among young women in the United States and ongoing inferior long-term outcomes. Given breast cancers arising at a young age are more likely to present at advanced stages and to have aggressive biology, multimodal treatments are often indicated. Elevated local recurrence risks and greater propensity for germline cancer predisposition mutations can impact local therapy choices. Recently, escalated systemic therapy regimens for triple-negative breast cancer incorporating immunotherapy, de-escalated anti-HER2 therapy, and emerging targeted agents, including CDK4/6 inhibitors and PARP inhibitors, for early-stage disease may be employed in younger and older patients alike, with some special considerations. Prognostic genomic signatures can spare low-risk young women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy, but management of intermediate-risk patients remains controversial. Ovarian function suppression and extended endocrine therapy are improving outcomes in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, but treatment adherence is a particular problem for young patients. Young women may also face greater challenges in long-term survivorship, including impaired fertility, difficulties in psychosocial adjustment, and other treatment-related comorbidities. Consideration of these age-specific issues through dedicated multidisciplinary strategies is necessary for optimal care of young women with breast cancer.
Collapse
|
16
|
Friedman-Eldar O, Ozmen T, El Haddi SJ, Goel N, Tjendra Y, Kesmodel SB, Moller MG, Franceschi D, Layton C, Avisar E. Axillary Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Node-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: Predictors and Oncologic Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:10.1245/s10434-022-11473-9. [PMID: 35303178 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11473-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One potential benefit of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) patients is axillary downstaging to avoid axillary dissection. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate axillary response to NAT with chemotherapy (NCT) or endocrine therapy (NET) and identify potential predictors of response. METHODS A prospectively collected database was queried for node-positive, ER+, HER2- breast cancer patients treated with NAT and surgery from January 2011 to September 2020. Axillary response was categorized into pathologic complete response (pCR) versus no pCR, and was correlated to demographic and clinicopathologic parameters in a logistic regression model. RESULTS A cohort of 176 eligible patients was identified and 178 breast cancers were included in the study. The overall axillary pCR rate was 12.3% (22/178). NCT and NET achieved response rates of 13.9% (19/137) and 7.3% (3/41), respectively (p = 0.232). A significantly higher axillary pCR rate was identified in patients with clinical stage II at diagnosis (12/60, 20%) compared with stage III (10/118, 8.4%; p = 0.03). NET patients with ypN0 were younger and were treated for a longer period of time (>6 months). Completion axillary dissection was omitted in the majority (73.7%) of NCT patients achieving axillary pCR. CONCLUSIONS For patients with node-positive, ER+, HER2- breast cancer, a lower burden of disease at the time of diagnosis (stage II) is associated with a significantly higher axillary pCR, enabling those patients to be spared axillary dissection. Further studies are necessary to define the role of genomic profiling in predicting axillary response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orli Friedman-Eldar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA.
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Tolga Ozmen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Salah James El Haddi
- Department of Surgery, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Neha Goel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Youley Tjendra
- Division of Surgical Pathology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Susan B Kesmodel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Mecker G Moller
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Dido Franceschi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Christina Layton
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Eli Avisar
- Division of Surgical Oncology, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gandhi S, Brackstone M, Hong NJL, Grenier D, Donovan E, Lu FI, Skarpathiotakis M, Lee J, Boileau JF, Perera F, Simmons C, Joy AA, Tran WT, Tyono I, Van Massop A, Khalfan S. A Canadian national guideline on the neoadjuvant treatment of invasive breast cancer, including patient assessment, systemic therapy, and local management principles. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 193:1-20. [PMID: 35224713 PMCID: PMC8993711 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06522-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer (NABC) is a rapidly changing area that benefits from guidelines integrating evidence with expert consensus to help direct practice. This can optimize patient outcomes by ensuring the appropriate use of evolving neoadjuvant principles. Methods An expert panel formulated evidence-based practice recommendations spanning the entire neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment journey. These were sent for practice-based consensus across Canada using the modified Delphi methodology, through a secure online survey. Final recommendations were graded using the GRADE criteria for guidelines. The evidence was reviewed over the course of guideline development to ensure recommendations remained aligned with current relevant data. Results Response rate to the online survey was almost 30%; representation was achieved from various medical specialties from both community and academic centres in various Canadian provinces. Two rounds of consensus were required to achieve 80% or higher consensus on 59 final statements. Five additional statements were added to reflect updated evidence but not sent for consensus. Conclusions Key highlights of this comprehensive Canadian guideline on NABC include the use of neoadjuvant therapy for early stage triple negative and HER2 positive breast cancer, with subsequent adjuvant treatments for patients with residual disease. The use of molecular signatures, other targeted adjuvant therapies, and optimal response-based local regional management remain actively evolving areas. Many statements had evolving or limited data but still achieved high consensus, demonstrating the utility of such a guideline in helping to unify practice while further evidence evolves in this important area of breast cancer management.
Collapse
|
18
|
Alhesa A, Awad H, Bloukh S, Al-Balas M, El-Sadoni M, Qattan D, Azab B, Saleh T. PD-L1 expression in breast invasive ductal carcinoma with incomplete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2022; 36:3946320221078433. [PMID: 35225058 PMCID: PMC8891930 DOI: 10.1177/03946320221078433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in breast cancer in association with incomplete pathological response (PR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods PD-L1 expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry in post-operative, post-NAC samples of 60 patients (n = 60) diagnosed with breast invasive ductal carcinoma with incomplete PR to NAC, including 31 matched pre-NAC and post-NAC samples (n = 31). PD-L1 protein expression was assessed using three scoring approaches, including the tumor proportion score (TPS), the immune cell score (ICS), and the combined tumor and immune cell score (combined positive score, CPS) with a 1% cut-off. Results In the post-operative, post-NAC samples (n = 60), positive expression rate of PD-L1 was observed in 18.3% (11/60) of cases by TPS, 31.7% (19/60) by ICS, and 25% (15/60) by CPS. In matched samples, positive expression rate of PD-L1 was observed in 19.3% (6/31) of patients by TPS, 51.6% (16/31) by ICS, and 19.3% (6/31) by CPS in pre-NAC specimens, while it was observed in 22.6% (7/31) of matched post-NAC samples by TPS, 22.6% (7/31) by ICS, and 19.3% (6/31) by CPS. In the matched samples, there was a significant decrease in PD-L1 immunoexpression using ICS in post-NAC specimens (McNemar’s, p = 0.020), while no significant differences were found using TPS and CPS between pre- and post-NAC samples (p = 1.000, p = 0.617; respectively). PD-L1 immunoexpression determined by TPS or CPS was only significantly associated with ER status (p = 0.022, p = 0.021; respectively), but not with other clinicopathological variables. We could not establish a correlation between PD-L1 expression and the overall survival rate (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the tumor infiltrating lymphocytes count between the paired pre- and post-NAC samples (t = 0.581, p = 0.563 or Wilcoxon’s Signed Rank test; z = -0.625, p = 0.529). Conclusion Our findings indicate that PD-L1 protein expression in infiltrating immune cells was significantly reduced in breast tumors that developed incomplete PR following the exposure to NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Alhesa
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Heyam Awad
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Sarah Bloukh
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Mahmoud Al-Balas
- Department of General and Specialized Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
| | - Mohammed El-Sadoni
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Duaa Qattan
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Bilal Azab
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tareq Saleh
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sella T, Weiss A, Mittendorf EA, King TA, Pilewskie M, Giuliano AE, Metzger-Filho O. Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Clinical Practice: A Review. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:1700-1708. [PMID: 34499101 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance In clinical practice, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is rarely used despite being an effective treatment modality able to downstage tumors and facilitate breast-conserving surgery. Observations Using data from studies conducted since 2000, we provide readers with a critical in-depth review on clinical aspects related to the application of NET in the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive/ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative breast cancer. This includes an overview of patient-selection criteria, regimen choice, treatment duration, evaluation of response by imaging, interpretation of pathology after treatment, and surgical considerations. Areas of controversy include the use of gene-expression tests for patient selection, treatment of premenopausal women, surgical management of the axilla after NET, and adjuvant systemic therapy decision-making, including the use of chemotherapy. Conclusions and Relevance NET is an optimal treatment modality for a considerable proportion of postmenopausal women diagnosed with HR-positive tumors. The treatment landscape for HR-positive breast cancer is evolving, with novel agents and the growing use of gene expression profiling to define treatment selection. As such, it is likely that NET use will increase and the practical considerations outlined here will become more important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tal Sella
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anna Weiss
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth A Mittendorf
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tari A King
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Melissa Pilewskie
- Breast Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Armando E Giuliano
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Health System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Otto Metzger-Filho
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gwark S, Noh WC, Ahn SH, Lee ES, Jung Y, Kim LS, Han W, Nam SJ, Gong G, Kim SO, Kim HJ. Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Rates and Prognosis From Phase III Neoadjuvant Systemic Trial Comparing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Pre-Menopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive and HER2-Negative, Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:741120. [PMID: 34660302 PMCID: PMC8515848 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.741120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to evaluate axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) rates and prognosis in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) compare with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), lymph node (LN)-positive, premenopausal breast cancer patients (NCT01622361). The multicenter, phase 3, randomized clinical trial enrolled 187 women from July 5, 2012, to May 30, 2017. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 24 weeks of NCT including adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide followed by intravenous docetaxel, or NET involving goserelin acetate and daily tamoxifen. ALND was performed based on the surgeon’s decision. The primary endpoint was ALND rate and surgical outcome after preoperative treatment. The secondary endpoint was long-term survival. Among the 187 randomized patients, pre- and post- neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) assessments were available for 170 patients. After NST, 49.4% of NCT patients and 55.4% of NET patients underwent mastectomy after treatment completion. The rate of ALND was significantly lower in the NCT group than in the NET group (55.2% vs. 69.9%, P=.046). Following surgery, the NET group showed a significantly higher mean number of removed LNs (14.96 vs. 11.74, P=.003) and positive LNs (4.84 vs. 2.92, P=.000) than the NCT group. The axillary pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was significantly higher in the NCT group (13.8% vs. 4.8%, P=.045) than in the NET group. During a median follow-up of 67.3 months, 19 patients in the NCT group and 12 patients in the NET group reported recurrence. The 5-year ARFS (97.5%vs. 100%, P=.077), DFS (77.2% vs. 84.8%, P=.166), and OS (97.5% vs. 94.7%, P=.304) rates did not differ significantly between the groups. In conclusion, although survival did not differ significantly, more NCT patients might able to avoid ALND, with fewer LNs removed with lower LN positivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungchan Gwark
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Woo Chul Noh
- Department of Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sei Hyun Ahn
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eun Sook Lee
- Department of Surgery, Center for Breast Cancer, Research and Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Yongsik Jung
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Ajou University, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Lee Su Kim
- Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, College of Medicine, Hallym Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Anyang, South Korea
| | - Wonshik Han
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seok Jin Nam
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Gyungyub Gong
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seon-Ok Kim
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hee Jeong Kim
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Burstein H, Curigliano G, Thürlimann B, Weber W, Poortmans P, Regan M, Senn H, Winer E, Gnant M. Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1216-1235. [PMID: 34242744 PMCID: PMC9906308 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 327] [Impact Index Per Article: 109.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The 17th St Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference in 2021 was held virtually, owing to the global COVID-19 pandemic. More than 3300 participants took part in this important bi-annual critical review of the 'state of the art' in the multidisciplinary care of early-stage breast cancer. Seventy-four expert panelists (see Appendix 1) from all continents discussed and commented on the previously elaborated consensus questions, as well as many key questions on early breast cancer diagnosis and treatment asked by the audience. The theme of this year's conference was 'Customizing local and systemic therapies.' A well-organized program of pre-recorded symposia, live panel discussions and real-time panel voting results drew a worldwide audience of thousands, reflecting the far-reaching impact of breast cancer on every continent. The interactive technology platform allowed, for the first time, audience members to ask direct questions to panelists, and to weigh in with their own vote on several key panel questions. A hallmark of this meeting was to focus on customized recommendations for treatment of early-stage breast cancer. There is increasing recognition that the care of a breast cancer patient depends on highly individualized clinical features, including the stage at presentation, the biological subset of breast cancer, the genetic factors that may underlie breast cancer risk, the genomic signatures that inform treatment recommendations, the extent of response before surgery in patients who receive neoadjuvant therapy, and patient preferences. This customized approach to treatment requires integration of clinical care between patients and radiology, pathology, genetics, and surgical, medical and radiation oncology providers. It also requires a dynamic response from clinicians as they encounter accumulating clinical information at the time of diagnosis and then serially with each step in the treatment plan and follow-up, reflecting patient experiences and treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H.J. Burstein
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA,Correspondence to: Dr Harold J. Burstein, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - G. Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy,Giuseppe Prof. Giuseppe Curigliano, European Institute for Oncology, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, Milano 20141, Italy
| | | | | | | | - M.M. Regan
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - H.J. Senn
- St. Gallen Oncology Conferences (Foundation SONK), St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - E.P. Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - M. Gnant
- Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hong K, Yao L, Sheng X, Ye D, Guo Y. Neoadjuvant Therapy of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors Combined with Endocrine Therapy in HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oncol Res Treat 2021; 44:557-567. [PMID: 34515204 DOI: 10.1159/000518573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have been advocated for adjuvant therapy of metastatic hormone receptor (HR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- breast cancer (BC). However, the efficiency of adding CDK 4/6 inhibitors to neoadjuvant therapy was not unequivocal. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency and toxicity of neoadjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitors + endocrine therapy (ET) versus neoadjuvant endocrine monotherapy or standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HR+/HER2- BC. METHOD We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase online databases for randomized controlled trials and single-arm studies written in English until April 2021. RESULTS Five studies comparing CDK 4/6 inhibitors + ET as neoadjuvant treatments to ET alone and 2 studies comparing neoadjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitors + ET to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were analysed. Neoadjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitors + ET improved the rate of complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA: central Ki67 < 2.7%, odds ratio [OR] = 7.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.81-13.03, p < 0.001), increased the risk of adverse events (AEs; especially ≥3 AEs; AEs of all grades: OR = 9.10, 95% CI = 2.39-34.58, p = 0.001; AEs ≥3: OR = 12.24, 95% CI = 4.17-35.88, p < 0.001), led to no significant differences in pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with BC (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.04-2.85, p = 0.318) compared to endocrine monotherapy. Moreover, subgroup analysis showed that the 3 types of CDK 4/6 inhibitors all improved the rate of CCCA (ribociclib: OR = 10.31, 95% CI = 3.59-29.61, p < 0.001; palbociclib: OR = 7.39, 95% CI = 1.26-43.40, p = 0.027, and abemaciclib: OR = 8.28, 95% CI = 3.41-20.11, p < 0.001). Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus ET decreased the risk of AEs ≥3 (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.29-0.87, p = 0.015) and showed similar ability to reach pCR (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.12-2.07, p = 0.342) and reduce the residual cancer burden (RCB, RCB 0-1: OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.18-1.22, p = 0.121; RCB 2-3: OR = 2.30, 95% CI = 0.89-5.91, p = 0.084). CONCLUSIONS The results suggested that combination therapy had increased efficacy and toxicity compared to endocrine monotherapy and showed similar efficacy to and better safety than neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Hong
- Medicine School, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
| | - Lingli Yao
- Medicine School, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
| | - Xianneng Sheng
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Ningbo City First Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Dan Ye
- Medicine School, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
| | - Yu Guo
- Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Ningbo City First Hospital, Ningbo, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hammond JB, Scott DW, Kosiorek HE, Parnall TH, Gray RJ, Ernst BJ, Northfelt DW, McCullough AE, Ocal IT, Pockaj BA, Cronin PA. Characterizing Occult Nodal Disease Within a Clinically Node-Negative, Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Population. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 22:186-190. [PMID: 34462208 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy aims to preoperatively downstage breast cancer patients. We evaluated nodal upstaging in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). METHODS cN0 patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy from 2009 to 2018 were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated rates of nodal upstaging. RESULTS A total of 228 cN0 patients with a mean age of 55 years underwent neoadjuvant therapy for Stage I-III invasive carcinoma. Subtypes included ER+/HER2- = 93 (40%), HER2+ = 61 (27%), and triple negative (TNBC) = 74 (33%). Among ER+/HER2- patients, 65 (70%) underwent NET. Overall, 49 patients (21%) were upstaged due to occult nodal disease. Factors associated with higher rates of occult nodal disease included advanced stage on initial presentation (P = .008), larger presenting tumor size (P = .009), low/intermediate tumor grade (P = .025), and ER+/HER2- subtype (P < .001); incidence of occult nodal disease by subtype included: ER+/HER2- = 37%, HER2+ = 15%, TNBC = 8%. Patients experiencing a breast pCR had a significantly lower rate of nodal upstaging compared to those with residual tumor (4% vs. 96%, P < .001). On multivariate analysis, ER+/HER- patients exhibited higher risk of occult nodal disease when compared to patients with HER2+ (odds ratio [OR] = 3.4, 95% CI, 1.2-9.8, P = .003) and TNBC (OR = 5.7, 95% CI, 1.7-19.6, P = .003). Comparing NAC vs. NET in ER+/HER2- patients showed no difference in rates of occult nodal disease (39% vs. 35%, P = .13). CONCLUSIONS ER+/HER2- subtype carries higher risk for occult nodal disease after neoadjuvant therapy; NAC versus NET in these patients does not affect nodal upstaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Richard J Gray
- Division of Surgical Oncology & Endocrine Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Brenda J Ernst
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - Ann E McCullough
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Idris Tolgay Ocal
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Barbara A Pockaj
- Division of Surgical Oncology & Endocrine Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Patricia A Cronin
- Division of Surgical Oncology & Endocrine Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Murphy BM, Hoskin TL, Degnim AC, Boughey JC, Hieken TJ. Surgical Management of Axilla Following Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8729-8739. [PMID: 34275042 PMCID: PMC8286162 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10385-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized clinical trials support deescalation of axillary surgery in breast cancer patients with low-volume axillary disease treated with a surgery-first approach. However, few data exist to guide axillary surgery following neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). Therefore, we evaluated the extent and outcomes of axillary surgery in a contemporary cohort of NET patients, a treatment approach that has become particularly relevant during the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified invasive breast cancer patients treated with NET between October 2008 and November 2019. Patients presenting with stage IV disease or recurrent disease were excluded. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS 194 invasive breast cancers in 186 patients (median age 66 years) were evaluated; 81 patients had breast-conserving surgery (BCS), while 113 underwent mastectomy. Eighty-four patients (43.3%) were biopsy-proven cN+ with 4/84 (4.8%) ypN0 following NET. Among cN+ patients, 14 (16.7%) had sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) only, 27 (32.1%) had SLNB + axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), and 43 (51.2%) had ALND. Among 110 cN0 patients, 99 had axillary surgery with 28/99 (28.3%) ypN+: SLNB in 83 (75.5%), SLNB+ALND in 14 (12.7%), and ALND in 2 (1.8%). Among all ypN+ patients, 23/108 (21.3%) had SLNB alone: 18/43 (41.9%) of BCS and 5/65 (7.7%) mastectomy patients (p < 0.001). After median follow-up of 35 months, no regional recurrences were observed. CONCLUSIONS Among biopsy-proven cN+ NET patients, we observed deescalation of axillary surgery in selected patients, despite a low nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, without nodal recurrences. These data suggest that patients with low-volume axillary disease treated with NET may be managed similarly to patients treated with a surgery-first approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenna M Murphy
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy C Degnim
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gomez Marti JL, Nasrazadani A, Brufsky AM. Ovarian function suppression as a potential mechanism of chemotherapy. EBioMedicine 2021; 70:103489. [PMID: 34280778 PMCID: PMC8318981 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Luis Gomez Marti
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Azadeh Nasrazadani
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Women's Hospital, Suite 4628, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Adam M Brufsky
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Magee Women's Hospital, Suite 4628, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gwark S, Ahn SH, Noh WC, Lee ES, Jung Y, Kim LS, Han W, Nam SJ, Gong G, Kim SO, Kim HJ. Patient-Reported Outcomes From Phase III Neoadjuvant Systemic Trial Comparing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Pre-Menopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive and HER2-Negative, Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:608207. [PMID: 34277393 PMCID: PMC8284076 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.608207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a prospective phase III clinical trial, comparing neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) with conventional neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in patients with hormone status positive, lymph node-positive premenopausal breast cancer (NCT01622361). The patients were randomized prospectively to either 24 weeks of NCT with adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide followed by taxane or NET with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and tamoxifen. The patients were examined at the surgery unit of a large tertiary care hospital with a comprehensive cancer center. PROs were assessed on the first day of the trial (day 1, baseline) and at the end of treatment, using the breast cancer module of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 23 (EORTC QLQ BR23). One hundred and eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned to chemotherapy (n=95) or endocrine therapy (n=92), and 174 patients completed 24 weeks of the neoadjuvant treatment period (n=87, in each group). Baseline scores were similar between the groups. After treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in the function scales, including body image, sexual functioning, and sexual enjoyment between the groups, although the endocrine treatment group showed a significant improvement in the future perspective (hazard ratio, 8.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-18.38; P = 0.021). Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in the symptom scales between the groups, including adverse effects of systemic therapy, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, and upset about hair loss. In conclusion, overall PROs were similar in both treatment groups, except for "future perspective," which was significantly better in the NET group than in the NCT group. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.Gov, identifier NCT01622361.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungchan Gwark
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sei Hyun Ahn
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Woo Chul Noh
- Department of Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eun Sook Lee
- Department of Surgery, Center for Breast Cancer, Research and Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Yongsik Jung
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Ajou University, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Lee Su Kim
- Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Anyang, South Korea
| | - Wonshik Han
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seok Jin Nam
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Gyungyub Gong
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seon-Ok Kim
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hee Jeong Kim
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Citgez B, Yigit B, Yetkin SG. Management of the Axilla and the Breast After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul 2021; 55:156-61. [PMID: 34349589 DOI: 10.14744/SEMB.2021.77010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Breast cancer is traditionally treated with surgery, plus adjuvant systemic therapy and radiotherapy as required. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for the treatment of breast cancer is used for locally advanced operable breast cancer to reduce the tumor size, to perform breast conserving surgery, and to perform a limited axillary approach. Adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of inflammatory breast cancer and even in inoperable breast cancer is used to increase overall survival time and to delay disease progression while relieving symptoms. NACT for breast cancer is a new strategy that was introduced toward the end of the 20th century and is increasingly used in the treatment of breast cancer. At present, NACT is increasingly being used to reduce the need for axillary dissection and to convert patients with large tumors to candidates for breast conservation therapy in both locally advanced and operable breast cancers. Breast conserving procedures are currently more preferred by surgeons and axillary dissection is being replaced by sentinel lymph node biopsy after chemotherapy. One of the targets of neoadjuvant systemic therapy is to try to perform a less aggressive surgery by breast conservation, mainly for cosmetic reasons and avoiding axillary dissection mainly for arm mobility, pain, and lymphedema risk. The other target of neoadjuvant systemic therapy is to see the response of the tumor to chemotherapy and determine the treatment accordingly. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy increases the rate of complete pathological response by clearing the breast and axilla from tumor cells before surgery. In this review, we examine the key points of using the NACT in breast cancer, considering radiological imaging methods, surgical management, and reconstruction after NACT.
Collapse
|
28
|
Chic N, Schettini F, Brasó-Maristany F, Sanfeliu E, Adamo B, Vidal M, Martínez D, Galván P, González-Farré B, Cortés J, Gavilá J, Saura C, Oliveira M, Pernas S, Martínez-Sáez O, Soberino J, Ciruelos E, Carey LA, Muñoz M, Perou CM, Pascual T, Bellet M, Prat A. Oestrogen receptor activity in hormone-dependent breast cancer during chemotherapy. EBioMedicine 2021; 69:103451. [PMID: 34161883 PMCID: PMC8233691 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chemotherapy efficacy in early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) according to menopausal status needs a biological explanation. Methods We compared early-stage HR+ BC biological features before and after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy (ET), and assessed oestrogen receptor (ER) pathway activity in both pre- and post-menopausal patients. The nCounter platform was used to detect gene expression levels. Findings In 106 post-menopausal patients with HR+/HER2-negative BC randomized to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or ET (letrozole+ribociclib), a total of 19 oestrogen-regulated genes, including progesterone receptor (PGR), were found downregulated in the ET-based arm-only. We confirmed this finding in an independent dataset of 20 letrozole-treated post-menopausal patients and found, conversely, an up-regulation of the same signature in HR+/HER2-negative MCF7 cell line treated with estradiol. PGR was found down-regulated by 2 weeks of ET+anti-HER2 therapy in pre-/post-menopausal patients with HR+/HER2-positive (HER2+) BC, while anti-HER2 therapy alone increased PGR expression in HR-negative/HER2+ BC. In 88 pre- and post-menopausal patients with newly diagnosed HR+/HER2-negative BC treated with chemotherapy, the 19 oestrogen-regulated genes were found significantly downregulated only in pre-menopausal patients. In progesterone receptor (PR)+/HER2-negative BC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n=40), tumours became PR-negative in 69.2% of pre-menopausal patients and 14.8% of post-menopausal patients (p=0.001). Finally, a mean decrease in PGR levels was only observed in pre-menopausal patients undergoing anti-HER2-based multi-agent chemotherapy. Interpretation Chemotherapy reduces the expression of ER-regulated genes in pre-menopausal women suffering from hormone-dependent BC by supressing ovarian function. Further studies should test the value of chemotherapy in this patient population when ovarian function is suppressed by other methods. Funding Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Breast Cancer Now, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, the American Association for Cancer Research, Fundació La Marató TV3, the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, Pas a Pas, Save the Mama, Fundación Científica Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer, PhD4MDgrant of “Departament de Salut”, exp SLT008/18/00122, Fundación SEOM and ESMO. Any views, opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those solely of the author(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuria Chic
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain; SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesco Schettini
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain; SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fara Brasó-Maristany
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain; SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Esther Sanfeliu
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Barbara Adamo
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain; SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Vidal
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain; SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Débora Martínez
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain; SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Galván
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain; SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Blanca González-Farré
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Pathology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Cortés
- Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology (IOB)-Quiron, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joaquín Gavilá
- SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Cristina Saura
- SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain; Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mafalda Oliveira
- SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain; Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sònia Pernas
- SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Català Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olga Martínez-Sáez
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain; SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jesús Soberino
- Institute of Oncology (IOB)-Hospital Quirónsalud, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva Ciruelos
- SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lisa A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Montserrat Muñoz
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain; SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Charles M Perou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Tomás Pascual
- SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Meritxell Bellet
- SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain; Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aleix Prat
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain; SOLTI cooperative group, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology (IOB)-Hospital Quirónsalud, Barcelona, Spain; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Iwamoto M, Takei H, Ninomiya J, Asakawa H, Kurita T, Yanagihara K, Iida S, Sakatani T, Ohashi R. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in women with operable breast cancer: A retrospective analysis of real-world use. J NIPPON MED SCH 2021; 88:448-460. [PMID: 33692294 DOI: 10.1272/jnms.jnms.2021_88-603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A retrospective study of the real-world use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is important for standardizing its role in breast cancer care. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a consecutive series of women with operable breast cancer who received NET for ≥28 days, NET objectives, NET outcomes, adjuvant chemotherapy use after NET, and survivals, were examined for the correlation with clinicopathological factors. RESULTS NET objectives were for surgery extent reduction in 49 patients, surgery avoidance in 31, and treatment until scheduled surgery in 8. The mean duration of NET was 349.5 (range, 34-1923), 869.8 (range, 36-4859), and 55.8 (range, 39-113) days in the above cohorts (success: 79.6%, 64.5%, and 100%), respectively, with significant difference. In patients of the former two cohorts, better progression-free survival was significantly correlated with stage 0 or I, ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive ductal carcinoma, ≥71% estrogen receptor (ER) positivity, and the surgery extent reduction cohort than the other counterparts. Postoperative chemotherapy use was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis, a high Ki67 labeling index, lymphovascular invasion, and a high Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index, at surgery after NET. Better recurrence-free survival after surgery was significantly correlated with high ER expression after NET and high PgR expression before and after NET. CONCLUSIONS NET can help to reduce the surgery extent or to avoid surgery in women with breast cancer of early-stage, ductal carcinoma, or high ER expression. NET may also contribute to appropriate decision of postoperative systemic therapy to improve survivals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miki Iwamoto
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Nippon Medical School.,Department of Breast Surgery, Gyotoku General Hospital
| | - Hiroyuki Takei
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Nippon Medical School
| | - Jun Ninomiya
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Nippon Medical School.,Ninomiya Hospital
| | - Hideki Asakawa
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Nippon Medical School.,Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Tokyo Kyosai Hospital
| | - Tomoko Kurita
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Nippon Medical School
| | - Keiko Yanagihara
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Nippon Medical School.,Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Tamanagayama Hospital
| | - Shinya Iida
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Nippon Medical School.,Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Nippon Medical School Chibahokusoh Hospital
| | - Takashi Sakatani
- Department of Integrated Diagnostic Pathology, Nippon Medical School
| | - Ryuji Ohashi
- Department of Integrated Diagnostic Pathology, Nippon Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Obeng-Gyasi S, Coles CE, Jones J, Sacks R, Lightowlers S, Bliss JM, Brunt AM, Haviland JS, Kirby AM, Kalinsky K. When the World Throws You a Curve Ball: Lessons Learned in Breast Cancer Management. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 41:1-11. [PMID: 33956493 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_320691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
In the care of patients with operable breast cancer, there has been a shift toward increasing use of neoadjuvant therapy. There are benefits to neoadjuvant therapy, such as monitoring for response, as well as an increased rate of breast conservation and reduction of potential morbidity associated with breast surgery, including axillary management. Among patients with highly proliferative tumors, such as HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer, those with residual disease are at higher risk of recurrence, which informs the recommended systemic therapy in the adjuvant setting. For instance, in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy, there is a role for adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine for those with residual disease at the time of surgery. The same holds true regarding the role of adjuvant capecitabine in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. With the added complexities of treating patients in the era of the COVID-19 outbreak, additional considerations are critical, including initiation of surgery within an appropriate time from completion of neoadjuvant therapy. National consensus guidelines on time to surgery must be developed to improve measurement and comparison across systems. In addition, there is emerging radiation treatment management research addressing a number of factors, including hypofractionation, role of proton beam therapy, safe omission of radiotherapy, and preoperative radiotherapy with or without drug combination. In this article, the multidisciplinary approach of treating patients with operable breast cancer is highlighted, with updates and future considerations described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Charlotte E Coles
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jade Jones
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ruth Sacks
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Sara Lightowlers
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Judith M Bliss
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Murray Brunt
- School of Medicine, University of Keele, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Joanne S Haviland
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna M Kirby
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin Kalinsky
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lerebours F, Cabel L, Pierga JY. Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer Management: State of the Art. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040902. [PMID: 33670042 PMCID: PMC7926493 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Over the last ten years, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) has been increasingly investigated and has gained recognition. NET should not only be used to allow surgery or to improve breast-conserving surgery rates in patients not eligible for NCT, but also as a research tool for the search for endocrine sensitivity biomarkers and targeted therapies, and for prognostic information in ER+/HER2-. Abstract Endocrine therapy is the mainstay of treatment in HR+/HER2- breast cancers, which represent about 70% of all breast cancers. Neoadjuvant therapy has been developed since the 1990s to address several issues, including breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and improvement of survival rates. For a long time, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) was confined to frail patients in order to improve surgery outcome. Since the 2000s, NET now plays a central role as a research tool for predictive endocrine sensitivity biomarkers and targeted therapies. One of the major issues in early HR+/HER2- breast cancer is to identify patients in whom chemotherapy can be safely withheld. In vivo assessment of response to NET might be the best treatment strategy to address this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Lerebours
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France; (L.C.); (J.-Y.P.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Luc Cabel
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France; (L.C.); (J.-Y.P.)
| | - Jean-Yves Pierga
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France; (L.C.); (J.-Y.P.)
- Department of Medicine, University of Paris, 75006 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Korde LA, Somerfield MR, Carey LA, Crews JR, Denduluri N, Hwang ES, Khan SA, Loibl S, Morris EA, Perez A, Regan MM, Spears PA, Sudheendra PK, Symmans WF, Yung RL, Harvey BE, Hershman DL. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Endocrine Therapy, and Targeted Therapy for Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:1485-1505. [PMID: 33507815 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.03399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 361] [Impact Index Per Article: 120.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop guideline recommendations concerning optimal neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature on neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer and provide recommended care options. RESULTS A total of 41 articles met eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the guideline recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy should be managed by a multidisciplinary care team. Appropriate candidates for neoadjuvant therapy include patients with inflammatory breast cancer and those in whom residual disease may prompt a change in therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy can also be used to reduce the extent of local therapy or reduce delays in initiating therapy. Although tumor histology, grade, stage, and estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression should routinely be used to guide clinical decisions, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of other markers or genomic profiles. Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have clinically node-positive and/or at least T1c disease should be offered an anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimen; those with cT1a or cT1bN0 TNBC should not routinely be offered neoadjuvant therapy. Carboplatin may be offered to patients with TNBC to increase pathologic complete response. There is currently insufficient evidence to support adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard chemotherapy. In patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be used when a treatment decision can be made without surgical information. Among postmenopausal patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative disease, hormone therapy can be used to downstage disease. Patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative, HER2-positive disease should be offered neoadjuvant therapy in combination with anti-HER2-positive therapy. Patients with T1aN0 and T1bN0, HER2-positive disease should not be routinely offered neoadjuvant therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa A Korde
- Clinical Investigations Branch, CTEP, DCTD, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Lisa A Carey
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alejandra Perez
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Plantation, FL
| | | | - Patricia A Spears
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | | | - Dawn L Hershman
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center at Columbia University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|