When timing and dose of nutrition support were examined, the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score did not differentiate high-risk patients who would derive the most benefit from nutrition support: a prospective cohort study

Ability of the modified NUTRIC score to predict all-cause mortality among ICU patients with acute pancreatitis: A retrospective analysis using the MIMIC-IV database

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common acute abdominal condition that can lead to severe complications. Malnutrition significantly impacts the prognosis of patients with AP, so effective tools are needed to identify those at high nutritional risk. This study validated the ability of the modified NUTRIC score to predict all-cause mortality and identify nutritional risk in patients with acute pancreatitis in the ICU.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data from the MIMIC-IV (v2.2) database, which included patients admitted to the ICU with AP between 2008 and 2019. Patients were categorized into high (mNUTRIC score ≥ 5) and low (mNUTRIC score < 5) nutritional risk groups. The findings were analyzed using Cox regression, ROC curve, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 670 AP patients were included in the study. Patients at high nutritional risk had significantly worse clinical outcomes, including higher 28-day (30.0 % vs. 5.4 %) and 90-day (39.41 % vs. 10.2 %) mortality rates, compared to patients with low nutritional risk. The mNUTRIC score demonstrated stronger predictive ability for the 28-day (AUC: 0.797) and 90-day (AUC: 0.772) mortality compared to other nutritional risk tools used in the ICU, including the SOFA, APACHE II, and OASIS scores. A Cox regression analysis revealed that higher mNUTRIC scores were independently associated with increased mortality risk. Kaplan-Meier analyses confirmed that patients at high nutritional risk had significantly lower survival probabilities than those at low risk (P < 0.001). Patients with high nutritional risk who received nutrition intervention had a higher survival probability compared to those who did not (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The mNUTRIC score is an effective tool for predicting the mortality in patients with AP. The mNUTRIC score stratifies patients with AP into different risk groups and predicts their all-cause mortality, highlighting the importance of nutritional interventions in improving survival outcomes, especially for patients at high risk.

Nutrition adequacy in the late period of the acute phase is associated with a lower risk of 30-day mortality in critically ill patients: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The provision of nutrition support for critically ill patients in the early phase of intensive care unit (ICU) admission plays a vital role in their recovery. However, there is still debate regarding the impact of nutrition adequacy of critical illness phases. We aimed to investigate whether nutrition adequacy in the acute phase (early and late periods) is associated with 30-day mortality in critically ill patients.

METHODS

We prospectively collected nutrition and clinical data from critically ill patients receiving exclusive enteral nutrition (EN) within the first 10 days of ICU admission. EN was classified as adequate when ≥80% of the prescribed EN was administered. Directed acyclic graphs were constructed to identify the minimum set of adjustment variables required to control for confounding factors. The relationships between energy and protein intake and 30-day mortality were assessed using the Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients were evaluated (70 years old, 56.3% male, and 68.1% with medical admission). The 30-day mortality rate was 23%. After adjusting for confounders, in the late period (days 5-10), energy adequacy (hazard ratio [HR] =  0.960; 95% CI, 0.937-0.984) and protein adequacy (HR = 0.960; 95% CI, 0.937-0.982) were predictors of 30-day mortality. No associations were observed in the early period (days 1-4) of the acute phase.

CONCLUSION

In critically ill patients, nutrition adequacy (≥80% EN) during days 5-10 in the ICU was associated with a lower risk of 30-day mortality.

Comparative efficacy of peptide-based versus standard polymeric enteral nutrition in ICU patients at high nutritional risk: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Within intensive care units (ICU), the administration of peptide-based formulas (PBF) may confer nutritional advantages for critically ill patients identified with heightened nutritional risk. This investigation aimed to ascertain the efficacy of PBF in comparison to standard polymeric formulas (SPF) among this patient cohort. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted across three ICUs, encompassing 63 adult patients characterized by elevated modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) scores. Enrollment occurred promptly subsequent to ICU admission, with participants allocated to receive either PBF or SPF. Primary outcome was the duration to achieve caloric targets. Secondary outcomes involved the evaluation of mean daily gastric residual volume, mechanical ventilation period, infection rates within the ICU, length of hospitalization, mortality rates, nutritional status and inflammatory markers, specifically serum albumin and interleukin-6 levels. Patients in the PBF group reached their caloric targets more expeditiously compared to the SPF group (2.06 ± 0.43 days versus 2.39 ± 0.79 days; p = 0.03). No significant differences were discernible between the groups regarding gastric residual volume, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, mortality, or infection rates. Both cohorts exhibited minimal adverse effects and were devoid of any instances of abdominal distension. While not reaching statistical significance, the observed trends in albumin and interleukin-6 levels suggest a potential advantage of PBF utilization. The implementation of PBF enabled swifter attainment of caloric goals in ICU patients at high nutritional risk without adversely impacting other clinical parameters. Given its favorable tolerance profile and potential immunomodulatory properties, PBF may be considered a valuable nutritional intervention in this setting.Thai Clinical Trials Registry TCTR20220221006. Registered 21 February 2022, https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20220221006 .

Clinical practice guidelines for nutritional assessment and monitoring of adult ICU patients in China

The Chinese Society of Critical Care Medicine (CSCCM) has developed clinical practice guidelines for nutrition assessment and monitoring for patients in adult intensive care units (ICUs) in China. This guideline focuses on nutrition evaluation and metabolic monitoring to achieve optimal and personalized nutrition therapy for critically ill patients. This guideline was developed by experts in critical care medicine and evidence-based medicine methodology and was developed after a thorough review of the system and a summary of relevant trials or studies published from 2000 to July 2023. A total of 18 recommendations were formed and consensus was reached through discussions and reviews by expert groups in critical care medicine, parenteral and enteral nutrition, and surgery. The recommendations are based on currently available evidence and cover several key fields, including screening and assessment, evaluation and assessment of enteral feeding intolerance, metabolic and nutritional measurement and monitoring during nutrition therapy, and organ function evaluation related to nutrition supply. Each question was analyzed according to the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) principle. In addition, interpretations were provided for four questions that did not reach a consensus but may have potential clinical and research value. The plan is to update this nutrition assessment and monitoring guideline using the international guideline update method within 3-5 years.

Identifying critically ill patients with cirrhosis who benefit from nutrition therapy: the mNUTRIC score study

Background and Aim

Malnutrition increases risk of mortality in critically ill patients with cirrhosis. Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically ill (mNUTRIC) score is a validated tool to identify at risk patients who may benefit from goal-directed nutrition therapy. We aimed to study the association between mNUTRIC score and 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with cirrhosis.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted in the liver intensive care unit of a quaternary teaching institute. Baseline and follow-up data pertaining to mNUTRIC score, clinical, hemodynamic, biochemical, nutritional parameters, mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, and development of sepsis were collected. Correlation between mNUTRIC score and its modulation by nutritional adequacy was determined.

Results

One hundred and fifty patients were enrolled. Out of these, 116 (77%) had a high NUTRIC score (HNS) and 34 (23%) had a low NUTRIC score (LNS). Patients with HNS had higher mortality (54% vs. 10%; P = 0.008), longer mechanical ventilation (P = 0.02), and high incidence of sepsis (32% vs. 2.6%; P = 0.002) compared to LNS. The probability of survival increased with increase in nutritional adequacy (P < 0.01) in patients with HNS.

Conclusion

mNUTRIC score is a useful tool for identifying nutrition risk in critically ill patients with cirrhosis. Goal-directed nutrition therapy in patients with HNS can significantly improve survival.

Relevance for Patients

Critically ill patients with cirrhosis who are at a higher nutritional risk as identified by the mNUTRIC score may have a better survival benefit if higher calorie and protein adequacy are achieved in the ICU.

Adult malnutrition, nutritional interventions and outcomes in Singapore: a scoping review of local studies for the past 20 years

Background:

There is currently no review published on the prevalence and incidence of malnutrition in Singapore across various populations, or what interventions or policies are in place for preventing/treating malnutrition.

Objectives:

This review aims to determine the: (a) incidence and prevalence of malnutrition in the community, and in acute, intermediate and long-term care facilities; (b) interventions implemented for screening, assessing and treating/preventing malnutrition; (c) specific clinical populations investigated for malnutrition or nutritional therapy; and (d) implications of malnutrition and effectiveness of treating malnutrition or using nutritional therapy in Singapore.

Methods:

A structured search strategy was applied to available electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar) using selected search terms, with additional reports and grey literature identified using iterative searches.

Results:

Forty-two articles were found, with the majority of research performed in the community and acute care settings. Malnutrition screening and assessment is the most common nutritional research performed in Singapore. Approximately 14.7% to 65.0% of acute care and 2.8% to 31.5% of community populations are found to be malnourished. Limited interventional and economic-related studies are available.

Conclusion:

Malnutrition rates in Singapore appear to be similar to other developed countries. Future studies will need to focus on nutritional intervention, cost-effectiveness analyses and specific populations such as the underprivileged, chronically ill and those dependent on nutritional support.

Nomogram to predict survival outcome of patients with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after refractory cardiogenic shock

Objective: This study aims to develop a nomogram model to predict the survival of refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS) patients that received veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).Methods: A total of 235 and 209 RCS patients were supported with VA-ECMO from January 2018 to December 2019 in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, and from January 2020 to December 2020 in four third-grade and class-A hospitals were a development cohort (DC) and validation cohort (VC), respectively. Finally, 137 and 98 patients were included in the DC and VC. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify variables, and only these independent risk factors were used to establish the nomogram model. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration plot, decision curve, and clinical impact curves were used to evaluate the nomogram's discriminative ability, predictive accuracy, and clinical application value.Results: Pre-ECMO cardiogenic arrest (pre-ECA), lactate (Lac), inotropic score (IS), and modified nutrition risk in the critically ill score (mNUTRIC score) were incorporated into the nomogram. This showed good discrimination in the DC, with an area under ROC (AUROC) and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.959 (0.911-0.986). The AUROC (95% CI) of the VC was 0.928 (0.858-0.971). The calibration plots of the DC and VC presented good calibration results. The decision curve and clinical impact curve of the nomogram provided improved benefits for RCS patients.Conclusions: This study established a prediction nomogram composed of pre-ECA, Lac, IS, and mNUTRIC scores that could help clinicians to predict the survival probability at hospital discharge precisely and rapidly for RCS patients that received VA-ECMO.

Nutritional risk in critically ill patients: how it is assessed, its prevalence and prognostic value: a systematic review

CONTEXT

Nutritional risk (NR) screening is the first step of nutrition care process. Few data are available in literature about its prevalence, nor, to our knowledge, is a universally accepted reference method for the intensive care unit (ICU).

OBJECTIVE

The aim for this systematic review was to summarize evidence regarding the prevalence of NR and the predictive validity of different tools applied for NR screening of critically ill patients.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched up to December 2019 using the subject headings related to critically ill patients and NR screening. The current systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (identifier: CRD42019129668).

DATA EXTRACTION

Data on NR prevalence, predictive validity of nutritional screening tools, and interaction between caloric-protein balance and NR in outcome prediction were collected.

DATA ANALYSIS

Results were summarized qualitatively in text and tables, considering the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

From 15 669 articles initially identified, 36 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, providing data from 8 nutritional screening tools: modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (mNUTRIC; n = 26 studies) and Nutritional Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002; n = 7 studies) were the most frequent; the NR prevalence was 55.9% (range, 16.0% to 99.5%). Nutritional risk was a predictor of 28-day and ICU mortality in 8 studies. Interactions between caloric-protein balance and NR on outcome prediction presented were scarcely tested and presented heterogeneous results (n = 8).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of NR in patients in the ICU varies widely; a satisfactory predictive validity was observed, especially when mNUTRIC or NRS-2002 were applied.

Full Versus Trophic Feeds in Critically Ill Adults with High and Low Nutritional Risk Scores: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Although energy intake might be associated with clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, it remains unclear whether full or trophic feeding is suitable for critically ill patients with high or low nutrition risk. We conducted a prospective study to determine which feeding energy intakes were associated with clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with high or low nutrition risk. This was an investigator-initiated, single center, single blind, randomized controlled trial. Critically ill patients were allocated to either high or low nutrition risk based on their Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill score, and then randomized to receive either the full or the trophic feeding. The feeding procedure was administered for six days. No significant differences were observed in hospital, 14-day and 28-day mortalities, the length of ventilator dependency, or ICU and hospital stay among the four groups. There were no associations between energy and protein intakes and hospital, 14-day and 28-day mortalities in any of the four groups. However, protein intake was positively associated with the length of hospital stay and ventilator dependency in patients with low nutrition risk receiving trophic feeding. Full or trophic feeding in critically ill patients showed no associations with clinical outcomes, regardless of nutrition risk.

Is slower advancement of enteral feeding superior to aggressive full feeding regimens in the early phase of critical illness

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

An excessive caloric intake during the acute phase of critical illness is associated with adverse effects, presumably related to overfeeding, inhibition of autophagy and refeeding syndrome. The purpose of this review is to summarize recently published clinical evidence in this area.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several observational studies, a few interventional trials, and systematic reviews/metaanalyses were published in 2017-2019. Most observational studies reported an association between caloric intakes below 70% of energy expenditure and a better vital outcome. In interventional trials, or systematic reviews, neither a benefit nor a harm was related to increases or decreases in caloric intake. Gastrointestinal dysfunction can be worsened by forced enteral feeding, whereas the absorption of nutrients can be impaired.

SUMMARY

Owing to the risks of the delivery of an excessive caloric intake, a strategy of permissive underfeeding implying a caloric intake matching a maximum of 70% of energy expenditure provides the best risk-to-benefit ratio during the acute phase of critical illness.

Protein intake and outcome in critically ill patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The objective of this review is to describe the impact of protein intake on the outcomes of critically ill patients in the literature published in the preceding 2 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Observational studies showed inconsistent results regarding the association of higher protein intake and outcomes of critically ill patients. Randomized controlled trials that directly compared higher versus lower protein intake in ICU patients are scarce, varied considerably in their designs and primary outcomes, and generally had relatively small differences in the amount of delivered protein between the study arms. Systematic reviews of existing studies showed no difference in mortality with higher protein intake. In addition, there is uncertainty regarding high protein provision in the early phase of critical illness.

SUMMARY

The optimal amount of protein intake in critically ill patients remains largely unclear and is considered a high priority for research. Ongoing clinical trials are likely to provide additional evidence on several important questions including the dose, timing, type of protein and the interaction with caloric intake and exercise.

The association between nutritional adequacy and 28-day mortality in the critically ill is not modified by their baseline nutritional status and disease severity

Background

During the initial phase of critical illness, the association between the dose of nutrition support and mortality risk may vary among patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) because the prevalence of malnutrition varies widely (28 to 78%), and not all ICU patients are severely ill. Therefore, we hypothesized that a prognostic model that integrates nutritional status and disease severity could accurately predict mortality risk and classify critically ill patients into low- and high-risk groups. Additionally, in critically ill patients placed on exclusive nutritional support (ENS), we hypothesized that their risk categories could modify the association between dose of nutrition support and mortality risk.

Methods

A prognostic model that predicts 28-day mortality was built from a prospective cohort study of 440 patients. The association between dose of nutrition support and mortality risk was evaluated in a subgroup of 252 mechanically ventilated patients via logistic regressions, stratified by low- and high-risk groups, and days of exclusive nutritional support (ENS) [short-term (≤ 6 days) vs. longer-term (≥ 7 days)]. Only the first 6 days of ENS was evaluated for a fair comparison.

Results

The prognostic model demonstrated good discrimination [AUC 0.78 (95% CI 0.73–0.82), and a bias-corrected calibration curve suggested fair accuracy. In high-risk patients with short-term ENS (≤ 6 days), each 10% increase in goal energy and protein intake was associated with an increased adjusted odds (95% CI) of 28-day mortality [1.60 (1.19–2.15) and 1.47 (1.12–1.86), respectively]. In contrast, each 10% increase in goal protein intake during the first 6 days of ENS in high-risk patients with longer-term ENS (≥ 7 days) was associated with a lower adjusted odds of 28-day mortality [0.75 (0.57–0.99)]. Despite the opposing associations, the mean predicted mortality risks and prevalence of malnutrition between short- and longer-term ENS patients were similar.

Conclusions

Combining baseline nutritional status and disease severity in a prognostic model could accurately predict 28-day mortality. However, the association between the dose of nutrition support during the first 6 days of ENS and 28-day mortality was independent of baseline disease severity and nutritional status.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2500-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Nutrition risk screening in the ICU

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent studies that may help to identify patients in the ICU who benefit from nutrition support.

RECENT FINDINGS

One recent controlled trial did not show any clinical benefit of nutrition support among a sample of ICU patients who were hitherto believed to benefit from nutrition support. Several recent observational studies suggest benefit of nutrition support among patients who have a high nutric score, in itself derived from an observational study.

SUMMARY

Regrettably, the decision about nutrition support in ICU patients still depends on physiological reasoning: a high degree of inflammation/stress metabolism, which will last for a considerable time, especially among those who are fragile (already malnourished, elderly, those with chronic diseases and/or other comorbidities).