Peak value of serum KL-6 may be useful for predicting poor prognosis of severe COVID-19 patients

Initial and peak serum levels of Krebs von den Lungen-6 for predicting the prognosis of patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is associated with prognosis in patients with COVID-19. However, there is limited data on the correlation between the prognosis of COVID-19 and varying KL-6 levels at different time points. We investigated the optimal cutoff values of the initial and peak serum KL-6 levels to predict mortality and evaluated their correlation with mortality.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study collected data on serially collected serum KL-6 levels in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between October 2020 and January 2022 at a single tertiary hospital in South Korea. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden index were used to determine the cutoff points for the initial and peak KL-6 levels that best predicted 30-day mortality. The association between the initial and peak KL-6 values was assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 349 patients were included in this study. The mean initial and peak KL-6 levels were significantly higher in the non-survivor group than in the survivor group. The initial and peak KL-6 values that best predicted 30-day mortality were 491.85 U/mL and 660.05 U/mL, respectively. An initial KL-6 level greater than 491.85 U/mL and a peak KL-6 level greater than 660.05 U/mL were significantly associated with 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

The initial and peak levels of KL-6 were significantly associated with 30-day mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. These findings suggest that serially monitoring blood KL-6 levels could be a valuable prognostic indicator for COVID-19.

90-Day outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia treated with invasive mechanical ventilation

BACKGROUND

There are few reports detailing the prognostic factors of severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring invasive ventilation. We investigated the long-term prognosis and evaluated which factors influenced outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

Data was reviewed from severe adult COVID-19 cases admitted to our hospital and treated with mechanical ventilation between February 1, 2020, and October 30, 2021. On admission to our hospital, comorbidities and laboratory findings were collected from clinical records. Prognostic information for 90 days after diagnosis was also obtained from hospitals where patients were transferred after their conditions stabilized.

RESULTS

Prognostic information was obtained in 133 patients, of which 106 were males (79.7 %). Of the 133 patients, 67 were discharged (51.5 %), 21 continued inpatient care (15.8 %), and 45 died (33.8 %). Age, Charlson Risk Index, and the number of patients on hemodialysis were significantly higher in the deceased group. There were no differences in therapeutic interventions between survivors and those who died except for a higher rate of muscle relaxant and vasopressor usage in the deceased group. Laboratory findings on admission showed significantly higher levels of BUN, creatinine, and serum Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6), and significantly lower platelet counts, hemoglobin, and alanine aminotransferase in those who died. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, hemodialysis, lower platelet counts, and higher KL-6 were independent predictors for 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Older age, hemodialysis, lower platelet counts and high KL-6 on admission were identified as independent predictors of 90-day mortality in patients with respiratory failure due to severe COVID-19 under invasive mechanical ventilation.

Comparative accuracy of CA-153 and KL-6 as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUNDS

To discern the potential of KL-6 and CA-153 as diagnostic tools for interstitial lung disease (ILD), understand their relationship with GAP (Gender, Age, and Physiology) stage, and analyze their predictive capacities alongside CT features. This research aims to enhance ILD detection and management in autoimmune patients, emphasizing the diagnostic utility of these biomarkers.

METHODS

From Mar 2017 to Mar 2024, 398 patients from Taichung Veterans General Hospital's Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology with autoimmune diseases were prospectively enrolled. ILD diagnoses were confirmed using High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) or lung biopsy and characterized by radiologists. GAP scores were calculated for IPF prognosis. 583 serum samples were collected and tested for KL-6, CA-153, CA-199, and CA-125 using specific assays. Statistical analyses compared patients, assessed variables, determined missingness, and predicted ILD, with tools like ROC analysis and logistic regressions. Analyses were performed with IBM SPSS and MedCalc.

RESULTS

ILD patients were older, predominantly male, and had more smokers compared to non-ILD. Both KL-6 and CA-153 were higher in ILD and showed a significant, but non-interchangeable correlation. Age, BMI, smoking, and biomarker levels influenced ILD odds, with KL-6 and CA-153 being the strongest predictors. HRCT imaging highlighted these markers' roles, especially in detecting specific features. Both markers also strongly associated with GAP stages. Stratified analyses emphasized KL-6's significance in predicting ILD across both AD and non-AD groups. Complete data sensitivity analysis reinforced KL-6 and CA-153 as key ILD predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

This research emphasizes CA-153 as a feasible, cost-effective alternative to KL-6 in diagnosing and monitoring ILD. Both CA-153 and KL-6 levels were notably elevated in ILD patients, displaying a strong correlation, especially at CA-153 levels of ≤100 U/ml. They both also have significant associations with CT characteristics and GAP stages. The study reinforces the potential of CA-153, particularly in settings where KL-6 testing might be inaccessible or expensive.

Evaluation of characteristics and prognosis of COVID-19 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation during dominance of nonvariant, alpha, delta, and omicron variants in tertiary hospitals of Japan

BACKGROUND

In November 2021, the B.1.1.529 (omicron) variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was detected in South Africa and subsequently rapidly spread around the world. Despite the reduced severity of the omicron variants, many patients become severely ill after infection and undergo invasive mechanical ventilation, but there are few reports on their background and prognosis throughout all variant periods. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors affecting patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation with each variant of COVID-19 pandemic in Japan from nonvariants to omicron variants.

METHOD

This retrospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kansai Medical University Hospital and Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Osaka, Japan, from March 2020 to March 2023. Eligible patients were those who underwent invasive ventilation for COVID-19 pneumonia. We set the primary endpoint as in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for clinically important variables was performed to evaluate the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 377 patients: 118 in the Nonvariant group, 154 in the Alpha group, 42 in the Delta group, and 63 patients in the Omicron group. Mortality rates for each group were 23.7% for the Nonvariant group, 12.3% for the Alpha group, 7.1% for the Delta group, and 30.5% for the Omicron group. Patient age was significantly associated with increased mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.097; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.057-0.138, P < 0.001). Immunodeficiency (AOR: 3.388, 95% CI: 1.377-8.333, P = 0.008), initial SOFA score (AOR: 1.190, 95% CI: 1.056-1.341, P = 0.004), dialysis prior to COVID-19 (AOR: 3.695, 95% CI: 1.117-11.663, P = 0.026), and smoking history (AOR: 2.548, 95% CI: 1.153-5.628, P = 0.021) were significantly associated with increased mortality. Differences in variants were not significant factors associated with high mortality.

CONCLUSION

We compared the background and prognosis of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring invasive mechanical ventilation between SARS-CoV-2 variants. In these patients, differences in variants did not affect prognosis. Hospital mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients was significantly higher in the older patients with bacterial coinfection, or patients with immunodeficiency, COPD, and chronic renal failure on dialysis.

Clinical experience of treatment of immunocompromised individuals with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection based on drug resistance mutations determined by genomic analysis: a descriptive study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of antiviral drugs that neutralize antibody drugs and fight against SARS-COV-2 is reported to be attenuated by genetic mutations of the virus in vitro. When B-cell immunocompromised patients are infected with SARS-COV-2, the infection can be prolonged, and genetic mutations can occur during the course of treatment. Therefore, for refractory patients with persistent COVID-19 infection, genomic analysis was performed to obtain data on drug resistance mutations as a reference to determine which antiviral drugs and antibody therapies might be effective in their treatment.

METHODS

This was a descriptive analysis with no controls. Patients were diagnosed as having COVID-19, examined, and treated in the Kansai Medical University General Medical Center between January 2022 and January 2023. The subjects of the study were B-cell immunocompromised patients in whom genome analysis of SARS-CoV-2 was performed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 984 patients with COVID-19 were treated at our hospital. Of those, 17 refractory cases underwent genomic analysis. All 17 patients had factors related to immunodeficiency, such as malignant lymphoma or post-organ transplantation. Eleven patients started initial treatment for COVID-19 at our hospital, developed persistent infection, and underwent genomic analysis. Six patients who were initially treated for COVID-19 at other hospitals became persistently infected and were transferred to our hospital. Before COVID-19 treatment, genomic analysis showed no intrahost mutations in the NSP5, the NSP12, and the RBD regions. After COVID-19 treatment, mutations in these regions were found in 12 of 17 cases (71%). Sixteen patients survived the quarantine, but one died of sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

In genomic analysis, more mutations were found to be drug-resistant after COVID-19 treatment than before COVID-19 treatment. Although it was not possible to demonstrate the usefulness of genome analysis for clinical application, the change of the treatment drug with reference to drug resistance indicated by genomic analysis may lead to good outcome of immunocompromised COVID-19 patients.

Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) Levels in Post-COVID Follow-Up: Differences According to the Severity of COVID-19

To evaluate KL-6 levels in medium-term post-COVID and to compare them in three groups categorised by the severity of COVID-19, we conducted a real-world, retrospective, cohort study. Data from the COVID-19 episode and follow-up during the post-COVID phase were extracted from the COVID@HULP and POSTCOVID@HULP databases, respectively. For the post-COVID period we included demographics, medical history, symptoms, quality of life, physical activity, anxiety and depression status and laboratory results. Patients were categorised into three groups based on the severity of COVID-19: Group 1 (inpatient critical), Group 2 (inpatient non-critical) and Group 3 (hospitalised at home). KL-6 was measured during the follow-up of the three groups. In all, 802 patients were included (Group 1 = 59; Group 2 = 296; Group 3 = 447 patients). The median age was 59 years (48-70), and 362 (45.2%) were males. At admission, fibrinogen and ferritin levels were lower in Group 3 than in the other groups (p < 0.001). Follow-up data were obtained 124 days (97-149) after the diagnosis of COVID-19. The median levels of fibrinogen, ferritin and KL-6 at follow-up were 336 mg/dL (276-413), 80.5 ng/mL (36-174.3) and 326 U/mL (240.3-440.3), respectively. KL-6 levels were lower in Group 3 than in the other groups (298 U/mL (231.5-398) vs. 381.5 U/mL (304-511.8) (Group 1) and 372 U/mL (249-483) (Group 2) (p < 0.001)). KL-6 was associated with ferritin (p < 0.001), fibrinogen (p < 0.001), D-dimer (p < 0.001) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (p < 0.001). KL-6 levels are less elevated at medium-term post-COVID follow-up in patients with mild COVID-19 than in those with moderate or severe disease. KL-6 is associated with systemic inflammatory, hepatic enzyme and thrombosis biomarkers.

Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 is associated with in-Hospital mortality of patients with severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Currently, no ideal biomarker can accurately stratify the risk of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP). This study aimed to evaluate the role of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (sKL-6) in predicting in-hospital mortality in adults with SCAP.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 249 severe pneumonia adult patients were recruited between 6 May 2021 to 30 April 2023 in Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. The sKL-6 level within 48 h of admission was measured, and the primary outcome assessed was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Survival curves were plotted and subgroup analyses were conducted, stratified by relevant covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 249 patients were included in the study,with 124 patients having normal sKL-6 levels, and 125 patients having abnormal sKL-6 levels. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 28.9% (72 out of 249 patients). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the patients with abnormal sKL-6 levels had a higher risk of in-hospital mortality compared to those with normal sKL-6 levels, both in the total SCAP patient population (OR: 5.38, 95%CI: 2.41-12.01, P < 0.001) and the non-COVID-19 SCAP patients subgroup (OR: 8.12, 95%CI: 3.16-20.84, P < 0.001). Subgroup and interaction analyses confirmed the stability of the relationship between sKL-6 levels and in-hospital mortality(P for interaction > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that patients with abnormal sKL-6 levels had a higher in-hospital mortality rate than those with normal sKL-6 levels (P < 0.05). However, the results of restricted cubic spline plots(RCS) analysis demonstrated a nonlinear association between sKL-6 levels (as a continuous variable) and in-hospital mortality in patients with SCAP. Similar results were observed in non-COVID-19 SCAP patients. Furthermore, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis revealed that sKL-6 had superior predictive performance compared to existing biomarkers (e.g., APACHE-II, SOFA, BUN/Cr, PCT, and D-dimer) for in-hospital mortality in non-COVID-19 SCAP patients.

CONCLUSION

sKL-6 is a practical and useful biomarker for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with SCAP.

Serum KL-6 levels predict clinical outcomes and are associated with MUC1 polymorphism in Japanese patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is a known biomarker for diagnosis and monitoring of interstitial lung diseases. However, the role of serum KL-6 and the mucin 1 (MUC1) variant (rs4072037) in COVID-19 outcomes remains to be elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the relationships among serum KL-6 levels, critical outcomes and the MUC1 variant in Japanese patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a multicentre retrospective study using data from the Japan COVID-19 Task Force collected from February 2020 to November 2021, including 2226 patients with COVID-19 whose serum KL-6 levels were measured. An optimal serum KL-6 level cut-off to predict critical outcomes was determined and used for multivariable logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, the relationship among the allele dosage of the MUC1 variant, calculated from single nucleotide polymorphism typing data of genome-wide association studies using the imputation method, serum KL-6 levels and COVID-19 critical outcomes was evaluated.

RESULTS

Serum KL-6 levels were significantly higher in patients with COVID-19 with critical outcomes (511±442 U/mL) than those without (279±204 U/mL) (p<0.001). Serum KL-6 levels ≥304 U/mL independently predicted critical outcomes (adjusted OR (aOR) 3.47, 95% CI 2.44 to 4.95). Moreover, multivariable logistic regression analysis with age and sex indicated that the MUC1 variant was independently associated with increased serum KL-6 levels (aOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.32) but not significantly associated with critical outcomes (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.54).

CONCLUSION

Serum KL-6 levels predicted critical outcomes in Japanese patients with COVID-19 and were associated with the MUC1 variant. Therefore, serum KL-6 level is a potentially useful biomarker of critical COVID-19 outcomes.

Usefulness of KL-6 for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients

Background: Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) is a novel biomarker for interstitial lung disease, and it reflects acute lung injury. We explored the usefulness of KL-6 to predict clinical outcomes in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Methods: In a total of 48 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, KL-6 levels were measured using the HISCL KL-6 assay (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) with the HISCL 5000 automated analyzer (Sysmex). Clinical outcomes (intensive care unit [ICU] admission, ventilator use, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO] use, and 30-day mortality) were analyzed according to KL-6 percentiles. Age, initial KL-6 level, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and critical disease were compared using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Kaplan-Meier methods for clinical outcomes. Results: KL-6 quartiles were associated with ICU admission, ventilator use, and ECMO use (all p < 0.05), except 30-day mortality (p = 0.187). On ROC curve analysis, initial KL-6 level predicted ICU admission, ventilator use, and ECMO use significantly better than age, CCI, and critical disease (all p < 0.05); age, initial KL-6 level, CCI, and critical disease predicted 30-day mortality comparably. On Kaplan−Meier survival analysis, hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 4.8 (1.2−19.3) for age, 4.7 (1.1−21.6) for initial KL-6 level, 3.9 (0.9−16.2) for CCI, and 2.1 (0.5−10.3) for critical disease. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that KL-6 could be a useful biomarker to predict clinical outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. KL-6 may contribute to identifying COVID-19 patients requiring critical care, including ICU admission and ventilator and/or ECMO use.