High- versus standard-dose megestrol acetate in women with advanced breast cancer: a phase III trial of the Piedmont Oncology Association

Antiprogestins for breast cancer treatment: We are almost ready

The development of antiprogestins was initially a gynecological purpose. However, since mifepristone was developed, its application for breast cancer treatment was immediately proposed. Later, new compounds with lower antiglucocorticoid and antiandrogenic effects were developed to be applied to different pathologies, including breast cancer. We describe herein the studies performed in the breast cancer field with special focus on those reported in recent years, ranging from preclinical biological models to those carried out in patients. We highlight the potential use of antiprogestins in breast cancer prevention in women with BRCA1 mutations, and their use for breast cancer treatment, emphasizing the need to elucidate which patients will respond. In this sense, the PR isoform ratio has emerged as a possible tool to predict antiprogestin responsiveness. The effects of combined treatments of antiprogestins together with other drugs currently used in the clinic, such as tamoxifen, CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors or pembrolizumab in preclinical models is discussed since it is in this scenario that antiprogestins will be probably introduced. Finally, we explain how transcriptomic or proteomic studies, that were carried out in different luminal breast cancer models and in breast cancer samples that responded or were predicted to respond to the antiprogestin therapy, show a decrease in proliferative pathways. Deregulated pathways intrinsic of each model are discussed, as well as how these analyses may contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms involved.

Budget Impact of Microbial Cell-Free DNA Testing Using the Karius® Test as an Alternative to Invasive Procedures in Immunocompromised Patients with Suspected Invasive Fungal Infections

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infection is a major source of morbidity and mortality. The usage of microbial cell-free DNA for the detection and identification of invasive fungal infection has been considered as a potential alternative to invasive procedures allowing for rapid results.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis aimed to assess the budget implications of using the Karius^® Test in patients suspected of invasive fungal infection in an average state in the USA from a healthcare payer perspective.

METHODS

The analysis used a decision tree to capture key stages of the patient pathway, from suspected invasive fungal infection to either receiving treatment for invasive fungal infection or being confirmed as having no invasive fungal infection. The analysis used published costs and resource use from a targeted review of the literature. Because of the paucity of published evidence on the reduction of diagnostic tests displaced by the Karius Test, the analysis used a 50% reduction in the use of bronchoscopy and/or bronchoalveolar lavage. The impact of this reduction was tested in a scenario analysis.

RESULTS

The results of the analysis show that the introduction of the Karius Test is associated with a cost saving of US$2277 per patient; when multiplied by the estimated number of cases per year, the cost saving is US$17,039,666. The scenario analysis showed that the Karius Test only had an incremental cost of US$87 per patient when there was no reduction in bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage.

CONCLUSIONS

The Karius Test may offer a valuable and timely option for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infection through its non-invasive approach and subsequent cost savings.

Should Loss of Appetite Be Palliated in Patients with Advanced Cancer?

Loss of appetite is common among patients with advanced cancer. However, it remains controversial how, when, and if to palliate this symptom. Here, we provide an update on recent as well as past literature to address the question of whether loss of appetite should be palliated in patients with advanced cancer. In our opinion—and as discussed here—we believe that this symptom should be palliated, although perhaps not always with pharmacologic interventions.

Pushing estrogen receptor around in breast cancer

The estrogen receptor-α (herein called ER) is a nuclear sex steroid receptor (SSR) that is expressed in approximately 75% of breast cancers. Therapies that modulate ER action have substantially improved the survival of patients with ER-positive breast cancer, but resistance to treatment still remains a major clinical problem. Treating resistant breast cancer requires co-targeting of ER and alternate signalling pathways that contribute to resistance to improve the efficacy and benefit of currently available treatments. Emerging data have shown that other SSRs may regulate the sites at which ER binds to DNA in ways that can powerfully suppress the oncogenic activity of ER in breast cancer. This includes the progesterone receptor (PR) that was recently shown to reprogram the ER DNA binding landscape towards genes associated with a favourable outcome. Another attractive candidate is the androgen receptor (AR), which is expressed in the majority of breast cancers and inhibits growth of the normal breast and ER-positive tumours when activated by ligand. These findings have led to the initiation of breast cancer clinical trials evaluating therapies that selectively harness the ability of SSRs to 'push' ER towards anti-tumorigenic activity. Our review will focus on the established and emerging clinical evidence for activating PR or AR in ER-positive breast cancer to inhibit the tumour growth-promoting functions of ER.

Megestrol acetate for treatment of anorexia-cachexia syndrome

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of a previously published review in The Cochrane Library (2005, Issue 2) on 'Megestrol acetate for the treatment of anorexia-cachexia syndrome'. Megestrol acetate (MA) is currently used to improve appetite and to increase weight in cancer-associated anorexia. In 1993, MA was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of anorexia, cachexia or unexplained weight loss in patients with AIDS. The mechanism by which MA increases appetite is unknown and its effectiveness for anorexia and cachexia in neoplastic and AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) patients is under investigation.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of MA in palliating anorexia-cachexia syndrome in patients with cancer, AIDS and other underlying pathologies.

SEARCH METHODS

We sought studies through an extensive search of electronic databases, journals, reference lists, contact with investigators and other search strategies outlined in the methods. The most recent search for this update was carried out in May 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included in the review if they assessed MA compared to placebo or other drug treatments in randomised controlled trials of patients with a clinical diagnosis of anorexia-cachexia syndrome related to cancer, AIDS or any other underlying pathology.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent review authors conducted data extraction and evaluated methodological quality. We performed quantitative analyses using appetite and quality of life as a dichotomous variable, and analysed weight gain as continuous and dichotomous variables.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 35 trials in this update, the same number but not the same trials as in the previous version of the review. The trials comprised 3963 patients for effectiveness and 3180 for safety. Sixteen trials compared MA at different doses with placebo, seven trials compared different doses of MA with other drug treatments and 10 trials compared different doses of MA. Meta-analysis showed a benefit of MA compared with placebo, particularly with regard to appetite improvement and weight gain in cancer, AIDS and other underlying conditions, and lack of benefit in the same patients when MA was compared to other drugs. There was insufficient information to define the optimal dose of MA, but higher doses were more related to weight improvement than lower doses. Quality of life improvement in patients was seen only when comparing MA versus placebo but not other drugs in both subcategories: cancer and AIDS. Oedema, thromboembolic phenomena and deaths were more frequent in the patients treated with MA. More than 40 side effects were studied.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review shows that MA improves appetite and is associated with slight weight gain in cancer, AIDS and in patients with other underlying pathology. Despite the fact that these patients are receiving palliative care they should be informed of the risks involved in taking MA.

Adjuvant high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate for early breast cancer: 13 years update in a multicentre randomized trial

The authors updated their report on a randomized trial initiated in 1982 comparing, in early breast cancer, high-dose IM Medroxyprogesterone acetate (HD-MPA) adjuvant hormonotherapy during 6 months with no hormonotherapy; node-positive patients also received 6 courses of IV CMF (day 1, day 8; q.4 weeks). 246 node-negative (NN) and 270 node-positive (NP) patients had been followed for a median duration of 13 years. Previous results were confirmed in this analysis on mature data. In NN patients, relapse-free survival (RFS) was improved in the adjuvant hormonotherapy arm, regardless of age while overall survival (OAS) was also increased in younger (less then 50 years) patients. In the whole group of NP patients, no difference was seen regarding RFS or OAS. However, an age-dependant opposite effect was observed: younger patients (< 50) experienced a worse and significant outcome of relapse-free and overall survivals when receiving adjuvant HD-MPA while older patients (> or = 50) enjoyed a significant improvement of their relapse-free survival. For both NN and NP patients, differences in overall survivals observed in older women with a shorter follow-up, were no longer detected.

Cost-utility analysis of second-line hormonal therapy in advanced breast cancer: a comparison of two aromatase inhibitors to megestrol acetate

Randomized trials comparing the aromatase inhibitors, anastrozole and letrozole, to megestrol acetate (MA) in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer demonstrated that both agents are better tolerated than MA with comparable efficacy. In addition, one trial revealed that tumor response and time to treatment failure were significantly better with letrozole. Since oncologists are faced with a choice between three agents with at least comparable efficacy but different toxicity profiles and cost, a cost-utility analysis was conducted to quantify these differences and to determine if the new agents are more cost-effective than MA. In the absence of a randomized three-arm trial, a decision model was developed to simulate the most common therapeutic outcomes. The clinical data were obtained from an overview analysis of randomized trials. Total hospital resource consumption was collected from 87 patients with advanced disease that had failed second-line hormonal therapy. Utility estimates were obtained from interviewing a random sample of 25 women from the general public and 25 female health care professionals using the Time Trade-Off technique. The model suggested a similar duration of quality-adjusted progression-free survival between drugs (letrozole 150 days, anastrozole 153 days and MA 146 days). Letrozole had an overall cost of Can$2949 per patient which was comparable to MA at Can$2966 per patient. In contrast, anastrozole was slightly more costly than MA at $Can3149 per patient, respectively. The analysis revealed that letrozole has comparable overall costs relative to MA while providing at least equivalent quality-adjusted progression-free survival. These outcomes were largely related to its higher tumor response rate, which translated to a lower proportion of patients requiring chemotherapy. Anastrozole was slightly more costly than MA and did not demonstrate superiority in quality-adjusted progression-free survival in this palliative setting.

Systematic reviews of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer

Metastatic breast cancer is incurable but often responsive to treatment. There is little evidence-based consenus on when to use which treatments, in what combination and for how long. Systematic reviews were performed on 12 prospectively defined, clinically relevant research questions to support the development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. A comprehensive search of Medline from 1966 to 1996 identified over 1800 controlled trials. Eligibility and data extraction were performed independently by two blinded reviewers. Trial results were summarised by ratios of median survivals (RMS) and P -values for survival curve comparisons with meta-analysis by weighted combination of these statistics. Sixty-five publications reporting 97 treatment comparisons were included. There was moderate evidence that more rather than fewer cycles of chemotherapy improved survival (RMS:1.23, P -0.01). The evidence did not support: higher rather than lower doses of chemotherapy (or of endocrine therapy); any one class of endocrine agent over all others; multiple endocrine agents over a single agent; or, combined chemotherapy and endocrine therapy over either single modality. Only six trials assessed quality of life revealing better quality of life with more rather than fewer cycles of chemotherapy and with standard rather than lower doses of chemotherapy. These systematic reviews reveal counterintuitive evidence useful to everyday practice, in particular that more rather than fewer cycles of chemotherapy lead to better quality of life and longer survival.

Improvement in quality-of-life measures and stimulation of weight gain after treatment with megestrol acetate oral suspension in geriatric cachexia: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Weight loss among older patients is a severe problem, associated with an increased incidence of infections, decubiti, and death. Megestrol acetate (MA) causes weight gain in cachectic cancer and AIDS patients, but its effects in older cachectic patients are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of MA oral suspension (O.S.), 800 mg/day, versus placebo on weight in geriatric nursing home patients with weight loss or low body weight.

DESIGN

Twelve-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a 13-week follow-up period.

SETTING

Veterans Administration Medical Center (VMAC) nursing home.

PATIENTS

Nursing home patients with weight loss of > or =5% of usual body weight over the past 3 months, or body weight 20% below their ideal body weight.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or MA 800 mg/day for 12 weeks and were then followed for 13 weeks off treatment.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcome was measured by weight and appetite change. Secondary outcome measures included sense of well-being, enjoyment of life, change in depression scale, laboratory nutrition parameters, energy intake counts, body composition, and adverse events.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks there were no significant differences in weight gain between treatment groups, whereas MA-treated patients reported significantly greater improvement in appetite, enjoyment of life, and well-being. Body composition was not statistically different between the two groups. At Week 25 (3 months after treatment), 61.9% of MA-treated patients had gained > or =1.82 kg (4 lbs) compared to 21.7% of placebo patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In geriatric patients with weight loss or low body weight MA improves appetite and well-being after 12 weeks of treatment. During the 3 months of MA treatment, there was no statistically significant weight gain (> or =4 lbs). Three months after treatment, weight gain (> or =4 lbs) was significantly increased in MA-treated patients.

Geriatric cachexia: the role of cytokines

Weight loss in elderly patients is a common clinical problem. Wasting and cachexia are associated with severe physiologic, psychologic, and immunologic consequences, regardless of the underlying causes. Cachexia has been associated with infections, decubitus ulcers, and even death. Multivariate analyses of risk and prognostic factors in community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly have found that age by itself is not a significant factor related to prognosis. Among the significant risk factors, only nutritional status is amenable to medical intervention. Cachexia in the elderly may have profound consequences: medical, cognitive, and psychiatric disorders may diminish self-reliance in activities of daily living, thus reducing quality of life and increasing the frequency of secondary procedures, hospitalizations, and the need for skilled care. Cachexia is associated with higher-than-normal concentrations of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin (IL) 1, IL-6, serotonin, and interferon gamma. The role of these proinflammatory cytokines has been established in the cachexia seen in cancer and AIDS patients. Reduction in the concentrations of these cytokines is associated with weight gain. Drugs that promote appetite stimulation and weight gain, such as progestational agents, cyproheptadines, pentoxifylline, and thalidomide may work by down-regulating these proinflammatory cytokines. An understanding of the relation between cachexia and negative regulatory cytokines may point to effective treatment of geriatric cachexia as well.

Hormonal therapy for breast cancer. An update

The use of endocrine manipulation for the treatment of breast cancer has been available for 100 years, but in recent years the number of therapeutic options available to patients has increased dramatically. This article considers new developments in the use of hormonal agents for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.

Megestrol acetate in advanced, progressive, hormone-insensitive cancer. Effects on the quality of life: a placebo-controlled, randomised, multicentre trial

A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre trial was performed to investigate the effects of megestrol acetate (MA) on the quality of life (QoL), appetite, weight and survival of patients with advanced, incurable, hormone-insensitive cancer. QoL was assessed at the start of treatment and at 4, 8 and 12 weeks, using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 instrument. 255 patients were randomised to 320 mg of MA daily or placebo for 12 weeks. 244 patients were assessable at baseline, 190 at 4 weeks (placebo 94; MA 96), 150 at 8 weeks (placebo 69; MA 81) and 112 at 12 weeks (placebo 55; MA 57). A beneficial effect of MA on appetite loss was observed at week 4 (P < 0.0001) and possibly at week 8 (P = 0.058). Further weight loss during treatment was significant only in the placebo group. In the first 8 weeks, changes in mean global QoL were small and similar in both groups. By 12 weeks the decrease in mean global QoL was more pronounced in the MA group (P = 0.028), which was related to a deterioration in physical function, while psychosocial function was not affected. Survival was not affected by MA, and side-effects were mild. The results show that MA has a beneficial effect on appetite and that it may retard weight loss with no adverse impact on survival and with mild toxicity. However, MA does not appear to improve global QoL as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30.

Dose-response trial of megestrol acetate in advanced breast cancer: cancer and leukemia group B phase III study 8741

PURPOSE

To investigate whether dose escalation of megestrol acetate (MA) improves response rate and survival in comparison with standard doses of MA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred sixty-eight patients with metastatic breast cancer, positive and/or unknown estrogen and progesterone receptors, zero or one prior trial of hormonal therapy, and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were prospectively randomized into three groups. The groups of patients received either MA 160 mg/d (one tablet per day), MA 800 mg/d (five tablets per day), or MA 1,600 mg/d (10 tablets per day).

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were well balanced in the three treatment groups. Three hundred sixty-six patients received treatment and were included in the analyses. The response rates were 23%, 27%, and 27% for the 160-mg, 800-mg, and 1,600-mg arms, respectively. Response duration correlated inversely with dose. Median durations of response were 17 months, 14 months, and 8 months for the 160-mg, 800-mg, and 1,600-mg arms, respectively. No significant differences in the treatment arms were noted for time to disease progression or for survival; survival medians were 28 months (low dose), 24 months (mid dose) and 29 months (high dose). The most frequent and troublesome toxicity, weight gain, was dose-related, with approximately 20% of patients on the two higher-dose arms reporting weight gain of more than 20% of their prestudy weight, compared with only 2% in the 160-mg dose arm.

CONCLUSION

With a median follow-up of 8 years, these results demonstrate no advantage for dose escalation of MA in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Randomized phase III trial comparing the new potent and selective third-generation aromatase inhibitor vorozole with megestrol acetate in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients. North American Vorozole Study Group

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of vorozole (VOR) 2.5 mg once daily with that of megestrol acetate (MA) 40 mg four times per day as second-line therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer whose disease progressed after tamoxifen treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 452 patients were enrolled onto an open, multicenter, randomized phase III trial comparing VOR to MA for tumor response, safety, and quality of life (as indicated by the Functional Living Index-Cancer score).

RESULTS

Vorozole produced a response rate of 9.7%, compared with 6.8% for MA (P = .24). Clinical benefit (complete response + partial response + no change in > 6 months) was demonstrated in 23.5% and 27.2% of patients treated with VOR and MA, respectively (P = .42). Median duration of response was 18.2 months for VOR versus 12.5 months for MA (P = .074). There was no significant difference in time to progression or survival between the treatment groups. Discontinuation of treatment because of adverse events occurred less frequently in the VOR-treated group (3.1% v 6.2%; P = .18). Patients on the VOR arm reported significantly more nausea, hot flushes, arthralgia, upper respiratory tract infection, anorexia, and paresthesia, whereas those treated with MA had significantly more dyspnea, increased appetite, and weight increase. There was no difference between the two treatment groups in Functional Living Index-Cancer scores (total or subscales). However, when analyzed by objective response, patients with complete or partial responses (P = .032) or no change (P = .033) who were receiving VOR had significant improvement in the psychologic well-being subscale, compared with patients given MA.

CONCLUSION

Vorozole is well tolerated and as effective as MA in the treatment of postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients with disease progression after tamoxifen treatment.

Endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer

Endocrine therapy represents a mainstay of effective, minimally toxic, palliative treatment for metastatic breast cancer. Research focusing on the mechanism of action of endocrine agents will provide new insights leading to new hormonal approaches in breast cancer treatment. Development of new agents, especially the 'pure' antiestrogens, is of great interest. Combining endocrine therapy with biologic agents, especially antiproliferative compounds, may lead to more effective treatment in the adjuvant as well as the advanced setting. Tables 4 and 5 summarize response rates to the different groups of endocrine agents used in metastatic breast cancer and doses of commonly used agents, respectively. At present, tamoxifen is the drug of choice as first-line endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer with no or minimal symptoms in premenopausal or postmenopausal women. Second-line therapy usually consists of megace. Aromatase inhibitors may be used as second- or third-line therapy in postmenopausal women. In premenopausal women, LHRH analogues are a reasonable choice. The other hormonal agents may be beneficial as salvage therapy. More effective endocrine approaches are under development.

Anastrozole: a new addition to the armamentarium against advanced breast cancer

Estrogen manipulation represents an effective treatment for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women with estrogen-receptor positive disease. The antiestrogen agent, tamoxifen, is the first choice for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women due to its efficacy and lack of significant side effects. As with all cancer treatments, however, cancer may recur after initial treatment with tamoxifen, and the limitations of currently available alternative hormonal therapies in terms of tolerability and convenience of administration underscore the need for new agents. Anastrozole is a new, highly selective, nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor capable of maximal estrogen depletion with fewer side effects than other hormonal therapies. Anastrozole is administered in a convenient, once-daily oral dosing regimen and does not require steroid replacement therapy. In two multicenter clinical trials, anastrozole was as effective as megestrol acetate for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women who progressed after tamoxifen therapy, based on objective response rates and time to objective progression of disease. In addition, the drug did not produce the weight gain observed with megestrol acetate therapy. Anastrozole is an effective endocrine agent in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Toremifene. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of advanced breast cancer

The triphenylethylene antiestrogen toremifene is a chlorinated derivative of the antiestrogen tamoxifen, an agent which has been widely and successfully used in the treatment of breast cancer. Clinical trials investigating the efficacy of toremifene as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer (estrogen receptor status positive or unknown) have shown this drug to have similar antitumour activity to that of tamoxifen. In multicentre comparative trials, objective responses (complete and partial) occurred in 20 to 29% of patients treated with toremifene (60 to 240 mg/day) and in 19 to 37.5% of tamoxifen (20 or 40 mg/day) recipients. The duration of response, time to disease progression and median overall survival time were generally similar in both treatment groups. Toremifene is well tolerated. Most drug-related adverse effects are mild or moderate in severity and rarely necessitate discontinuation of therapy. The tolerability profile of toremifene is similar to that reported for tamoxifen, the most common adverse effects being hot flushes, sweating, nausea and/or vomiting, dizziness, oedema, and vaginal discharge and/or bleeding. Thus, toremifene provides an equally effective and well tolerated alternative to tamoxifen for the first-line endocrine therapy of postmenopausal advanced breast cancer. Preclinical studies showing toremifene to have a lower carcinogenic potential than tamoxifen indicate that toremifene may be a preferable agent for long term treatment regimens; however, these findings require confirmation in the clinical setting.

Weight gain in women diagnosed with breast cancer

This review of the literature indicates that weight gain is a common observation among women after the diagnosis of breast cancer. Gains in weight range from 0 to 50 lb and are influenced by menopausal status; nodal status; and the type, duration, and intensity of treatment. Weight gain appears to be greater among premenopausal women; among those who are node positive; and among those receiving higher dose, longer duration, and multiagent regimens. Psychosocial research suggests that weight gain has a profoundly negative impact on quality of life in patients with breast cancer. Recent findings also suggest that weight gain during therapy may increase the risk of recurrence and decrease survival. Although weight gain in patients with breast cancer is clinically well appreciated, little research has been conducted to investigate the underlying mechanisms of energy imbalance. Changes in rates of metabolism, physical activity, and dietary intake are all plausible mechanisms and call for more research. Further study will provide valuable insight into the problem of weight gain and encourage effective interventions to improve the quality and quantity of life for the woman with breast cancer. Until more is known, however, dietetics practitioners will have to monitor and work individually with patients with breast cancer and use empirical approaches to achieve the important goal of weight management.

A randomised trial comparing two doses of the new selective aromatase inhibitor anastrozole (Arimidex) with megestrol acetate in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the new aromatase inhibitor 'ARIMIDEX' (anastrozole) with megestrol acetate in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Anastrozole is a new potent and highly selective non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor. We conducted a prospective randomised trial comparing two doses of anastrozole (1 and 10 mg orally once daily) with megestrol acetate (40 mg orally four times daily) in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer who progressed after prior tamoxifen therapy. All patients were analysed for efficacy as randomised (intention to treat) and for tolerability as per treatment received. Of the 378 patients who entered the study, 135 were randomised to anastrozole 1 mg, 118 to anastrozole 10 mg, and 125 patients to megestrol acetate. After a median follow-up of 192 days, response rate which included complete response, partial response and patients who had disease stabilisation for 6 months or more was 34% for anastrozole 1 mg, 33.9% for anastrozole 10 mg and 32.8% for megestrol acetate. There were no statistically significant differences between either dose of anastrozole and megestrol acetate in terms of objective response rate, time to objective progression of disease or time to treatment failure. The three treatments were generally well tolerated, but more patients on megestrol acetate reported weight gain, oedema and dyspnoea as adverse events while more patients on anastrozole reported gastro-intestinal disorders, usually in the form of mild transient nausea. Patients on anastrozole did not report higher incidences of oestrogen withdrawal symptoms. Anastrozole is an effective and well tolerated treatment for postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. The higher 10 mg dose did not result in additional clinical benefit, but was well tolerated reflecting the good therapeutic margin with anastrozole. Based on this data, anastrozole 1 mg should be the recommended therapeutic dose.

Novel endocrine therapies in breast cancer

Endocrine therapy of breast cancer consists of a variety of both medical and surgical ablative treatment modalities, but ablative therapy is increasingly replaced by medical treatment. Most endocrine therapies have more than one endocrine effect, frequently together with direct growth inhibitory actions via receptors. Endocrine therapy can be effective in all phases of the disease, but curative only in early disease while in advanced cancer it can only prolong survival. In the past decade the number of available endocrine agents has been drastically increased. Novel approaches in the endocrine therapy of breast cancer are application of new antiestrogens, antiprogestins, new potent aromatase inhibitors, analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH-A) and somatostatin, inhibitors of prolactin secretion, vitamin A and D analogues, bisphosphonates, growth factor antagonists, tyrosine protein kinase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, inhibitors of angiogenesis, radiolabeled hormones and monoclonal antibodies. New cell biological factors such as oncogenes and suppressorgenes, secretory proteins and membrane receptors can be used not only as prognostic factors but also for prediction of type of response to endocrine and chemotherapy. Thus, these cell biological parameters can be used to select high and low risk patients, type of systemic treatment, and can also be used as targets for new treatment modalities. Future studies on treatment of all stages of disease will increasingly focus on promising combined treatment modalities.

Megestrol acetate in neoplastic anorexia/cachexia: clinical evaluation and comparison with cytokine levels in patients with head and neck carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

The aim of our study (clinical phase II open pilot study) was to evaluate the toxicity of megestrol acetate and its ability to increase appetite and body weight in patients with advanced-stage (III-IV) primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant (primary) chemotherapy. Serum levels of interleukin-1 alpha and beta, interleukin-2 and 6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and the soluble receptor for interleukin-2 were evaluated before and after megestrol acetate treatment. The same cytokines and soluble interleukin-2 receptor were also measured in culture medium of peripheral blood lymphocytes from the same patients after stimulation with phytohemagglutinin. From April 1993 to February 1994, 11 male patients were enrolled in our study: their mean age was 57.8 years (range 43-69 years). Megestrol acetate was administered at a dose of 320 mg/day in the interval between chemotherapeutic cycles for a total of three consecutive cycles; 9 of the 11 patients could be evaluated (81.8%). Except for the performance status according to Karnofsky, all parameters were increased after megestrol acetate treatment. The average weight increased by 6.3 kg (13.2%), appetite by a score of 2.4 (38.6%) and the Spitzer's quality of life index by a score of 2.4 (36.2%). The performance status according to Karnofsky decreased in only 1 patient, remained the same in most patients, and in 2 patients was slightly improved. No significant side effects were observed during treatment. Serum levels of interleukin-1 alpha and beta, interleukin-2 and 6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and soluble interleukin-2 receptor were significantly higher than in normal subjects, prior to treatment with megestrol acetate. These levels dropped after megestrol acetate treatment with a statistically significant decrease for interleukin-1 alpha and beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. There were no significant differences in the production of cytokines by peripheral blood lymphocytes stimulated with phytohemagglutinin from patients before megestrol acetate treatment and normal subjects, with the exception of interleukin-6 (higher in patients) and of soluble interleukin-2 receptor (lower in patients). There was no significant difference in the cytokines and soluble interleukin-2 receptor produced in culture before and after megestrol acetate treatment, except for interleukin-6 which decreased after treatment.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of two different formulations of megestrol acetate in patients with advanced malignancies

The bioequivalence of two megestrol acetate formulations, 160-mg "tablets" and 160-mg "sachets," was investigated in a single-dose, open-label, balanced-for-sequence cross-over study involving 12 advanced-cancer patients. The observed plasma megestrol-acetate time course obtained with both formulations was consistent with the literature data. The main source of variability in the pharmacokinetic parameters was intersubject variability; drug formulation played only a minor (and nonsignificant) role. The width of the 90% confidence interval of the area-under-the-curve (AUC) ratio (sachets: tablets) computed according to Schuirmann (0.9-1.4) was mainly due to the presence of a single outlier, showing an AUC ratio of 2.7. The trend to higher bioavailability of the new formulation was not significant, especially as compared with the dose-response data reported in the literature.

Randomized comparison of the effects of tamoxifen, megestrol acetate, or tamoxifen plus megestrol acetate on treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The antioestrogen tamoxifen and progestins act via different receptors and may therefore have complementary effects against human breast cancer. This possibility was tested in a randomized study which compared the effects of tamoxifen, standard-dose megestrol acetate, and these two agents in combination, in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

184 post-menopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to initial treatment with either tamoxifen (TAM) 40 mg daily, megestrol acetate (MA) 160 mgm daily, or the combination of the two administered simultaneously. Patients crossed over to the alternative single agent on relapse or disease progression. Patients were evaluated for response, time to initial and ultimate treatment failure, and survival.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the three groups with respect to response rates, nor the other parameters. Patient survival was significantly associated with age > 60 years, ER positive status, and the absence of visceral metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

TAM and MA are both equally effective in response induction as initial treatments and the combination has no advantage. Sequential treatment is still optimal, TAM being the preferred initial agent in view of the reported side effects with MA.

Adjuvant chemohormonal therapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate for node-positive breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The Comprehensive Cancer Center trial 82-01 is a prospective randomized study to investigate the value of the addition of high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) to chemotherapy in patients with node-positive operable breast cancer. MPA may be of advantage in this setting because of its activity in estrogen receptor ER-positive as well as ER-negative tumors and since it may protect against chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and thus enable maintenance of the appropriate chemotherapeutic scheduling.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred eight evaluable patients with node-positive (N+) operable breast cancer (T1-3, N1) were entered in a multicenter randomized trial. Two hundred nine patients were randomized in the MPA- arm and 199 in the MPA+ arm. CAF chemotherapy was given as a short i.v. bolus infusion: cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, and 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, q 4 wks x 6. MPA was given intramuscularly (i.m.) 500 mg q d x 28 days, followed by 500 mg i.m. twice weekly during 5 months.

RESULTS

The main side effects of MPA were weight gain with a mean of 5.5 kg as opposed to 1.8 kg in the control group (p = 0.01) and vaginal bleeding in 30/199 in the MPA+ group and 0 in the MPA- group. MPA ameliorated vomiting grade III, IV (45% vs. 28%, p < 0.001), nausea grade III, IV (50% vs. 34%, p < 0.001) and leucocyte nadir grade III, IV (20% vs. 11%, p = 0.003). Disease-free survival (DFS) after 5 years was 59% in the MPA+ and 49% in the MPA- group (p = 0.12). Patients > or = 60 years benefitted most from MPA treatment, in particular if freedom from distant metastases was taken as the endpoint (p = 0.02). Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between the two treatment groups (p = 0.18), but within subgroups analysed there was an advantage for MPA+ in patients > or = 55 years (p = 0.002) and in pT1 patients (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose MPA ameliorates CAF side effects and reduces the risk of metastatic disease, especially in elderly breast cancer patients.

Relevance of quality of life assessment to the evaluation of combined-modality therapy

Quality of life (QOL) assessment is a research tool which is incorporated into clinical trials to provide information about the ways in which the treatment affects the individuals sense of well-being and his physical, psychologic, and social functions. In the appropriate setting QOL assessment offers additional endpoints, beyond the traditional response rates and survival durations, to evaluate cancer treatments in ways which can be particularly meaningful to patients. Selected aspects of QOL methodology and the application of QOL assessment to the evaluation of combined-modality therapies for gastrointestinal cancers are discussed.

High-dose progestin therapy for metastatic breast cancer

Progestin therapy has become an established endocrine modality for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, with medroxyprogesterone acetate and megestrol acetate being the most widely used agents. Both drugs display similar effectiveness as initial and secondary therapy for patients with advanced disease, with combined complete and partial response rates of approximately 30% to 40%. Uncontrolled trials have suggested that high doses of medroxyprogesterone may be more effective than lower doses, but randomized trials have yielded conflicting results. Clinical trials of megestrol acetate have demonstrated it to be an affective, well-tolerated oral progestin, and a recent randomized trial has suggested that higher megestrol acetate doses may be associated with not only improved response but also improved time to disease progression and survival. Further trials of high-dose megestrol acetate for both initial and secondary therapy are under way, and their results will provide valuable information concerning the role of such treatment.

Endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer: a review

More than 45,000 women will die of metastatic breast cancer in the United States in 1991. Endocrine therapy remains a major option for treatment of such patients, and results in complete plus partial response rates of 30% with a median duration of approximately one year. Postmenopausal status, increased age, a prolonged disease-free interval, bone and soft tissue metastases, and positive estrogen and progesterone receptors are all associated with an increased response to endocrine therapy. The use of additive hormonal therapy, specifically antiestrogens, progestins, and aromatase inhibitors, have replaced surgical ablative procedures in the majority of patients; response rates to antiestrogen therapy, progestin therapy, and aromatase inhibitors are similar, but antiestrogens have generally been associated with the most favorable therapeutic index. At present, there is no convincing evidence that either combinations of endocrine therapies or endocrine therapy combined with chemotherapy are associated with an improvement in survival for patients with metastatic disease. Future research efforts directed at defining the molecular mechanisms of endocrine activity should facilitate clinical trials of newer and potentially more effective agents. All patients with metastatic breast cancer should be considered for at least one trial of endocrine therapy provided their metastatic disease is not rapidly progressive or life-threatening.

Progestins in breast cancer treatment. A review

The two most widely used synthetic progestins in breast cancer treatment, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and megestrol acetate (MA), are reviewed with regard to pharmacological, endocrinological and clinical aspects. In high oral doses as second- or first-line endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer, they give a similar response rate as tamoxifen (TAM) and aminoglutethimide (AG). The mechanism of action is probably complex. Considerable changes in serum levels of different hormones are induced by progestin treatment. The decrease of serum estrone sulfate (E1S) may be part of the therapeutic mechanism. Some studies suggest that the two drugs, MPA and MA, have a different mode of action, and possibly a low cross resistance. Randomized studies using the two progestins with a cross-over design may answer these questions. Further studies on the influence of progestin on different receptors and growth factors are warranted. To determine the most effective clinical dose of the two progestins, studies with increasing therapeutic doses are needed.

Systemic therapy of advanced breast cancer

Many cytotoxic agents have demonstrated activity in advanced breast cancer, the more active agents being cyclophosphamide and the anthracyclines doxorubicin and epirubicin. Combinations of drugs are generally superior to single agents in terms of response rate, duration of response and survival. The treatment of advanced breast cancer can be continued either until treatment failure, or for a limited time from either initiation of therapy or from the observation of complete response. Although these are issues of significant concern, data from randomised trials are limited, and so the question of optimal treatment duration remains open. Randomised trials comparing regimens that differ by a dose intensity factor of less than 2 have failed to demonstrate significant differences in efficacy between the dose levels. With higher doses, as applied in combination with colony-stimulating factors and bone marrow transplantation, response rates seem to increase, but whether this translates into improved survival has not yet been answered by the results of randomised trials. Approximately 30% of patients respond to endocrine therapy. From the results of randomised trials, which have compared the efficacies and toxicities of different endocrine modalities including combined endocrine therapy, single-agent tamoxifen is generally considered as the preferred first-line treatment, leaving progestins and aromatase inhibitors as alternatives for second-line endocrine therapy in responders. In the majority of trials, chemotherapy combined with endocrine therapy has given improved response rates compared with chemotherapy alone, but the differences have not generally been translated into prolonged survival with combined modalities. This gives rise to the question of the optimal sequence of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, a subject needing further evaluation in future trials.