A taste alteration-related scale assesses megestrol to improve chemotherapy-induced anorexia

PURPOSE

We evaluated the efficacy of megestrol in improving chemotherapy-related anorexia by analyzing the related scales of taste alteration.

METHODS

We conducted the current study on a group of advanced patients with cancer with two or more chemotherapy cycles. The chemotherapy-induced taste alteration scale (CiTAs) scale helped assess the megestrol effects on basic taste perception, aversive taste changes, unpleasant symptoms, and associated concerns. Furthermore, the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire scale (SNAQ) helped measure the impact of megestrol on malnutrition likelihood in patients experiencing chemotherapy-induced anorexia. The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF Scale was used to evaluate the quality of life of participants, producing scores related to physical health, psychological well-being, environmental factors, and social relationships.

RESULTS

The CiTAs scale assessment indicated that administering megestrol significantly enhanced taste perception among advanced patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Notably, the megestrol group patients showed significantly higher Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ) scores than the control group. The megestrol group patients also exhibited higher physiological (PHYS) scores than their control group counterparts. However, this distinction was not statistically significant. The study findings indicate that patients who received megestrol demonstrated significantly higher scores in psychological (PSYCH) and environmental(ENVIR) domains than the control group. Furthermore, megestrol administration was associated with significantly elevated SOCIL and ENVIR levels in patients.

CONCLUSION

The proficient efficacy evaluation of megestrol in enhancing appetite, mitigating malnutrition likelihood, and improving the quality of life of chemotherapy-induced anorexic patients can be achieved through taste-related scales.

Clinical implication of megestrol acetate in metastatic gastric cancer: a big data analysis from Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) database

OBJECTIVE

Megestrol acetate (MA) is used to manage anorexia and cachexia in patients with advanced cancer. This study investigated the prescription patterns of MA in patients with metastatic gastric cancer, as well as evaluated its impact on survival outcomes and the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

METHODS

A Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) service database was used to investigate differences in baseline characteristics, survival, and the incidence of VTE according to MA prescription patterns (i.e., prescription vs. no prescription) in patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer from July 2014 to December 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 1938 patients were included in this study. In total, 65% of the patients were prescribed MA. Older age, treatment in tertiary hospitals, and palliative chemotherapy were statistically significant predictive factors for MA prescription. Continuous prescription of MA was observed in 37% of patients. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between the MA and non-MA prescription groups on multivariate analysis. Among the 1427 patients included in the analysis for VTE incidence, 4.3% and 2.9% were diagnosed with VTE during the follow-up period in the MA and non-MA prescription groups, respectively. However, there was no statistically significant difference in VTE diagnosis between the groups on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

MA is commonly prescribed for metastatic gastric cancer, especially in elderly patients and those undergoing palliative chemotherapy, without significantly affecting survival or VTE risk.

[The long-term efficacy of metformin in megestrol acetate-based fertility-sparing treatment for patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia and endometrioid endometrial cancer]

Objective: To assess the long-term efficacy of metformin in megestrol acetate (MA)-based fertility-sparing treatment for patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH) and endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). Methods: The randomized controlled trail study was conducted from October 2013 to October 2017 in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Patients with EAH or EEC were firstly stratified according to pathology, and randomized to receive MA (160 mg orally, daily) plus metformin (500 mg orally, three times a day) or MA (160 mg orally, daily). Baseline data between two groups of patients were compared. Estimates of time to complete remission (CR) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of related factors for recurrence-free survival. Quantitative data were represented by M (Q1, Q3). Results: A total of 150 patients were included, and 76 patients were allocated to receive MA plus metformin with the age of 32.5 (28.0, 36.0), while 74 patients received MA alone with the age of 32.0 (28.0, 36.0). By the end of follow-up period, 96.7% (n=145) of patients achieved complete remission, with a median follow-up time of 57.7 (26.7, 70.5) months. The median CR time for the MA plus metformin group and the MA alone group were 6.3 (3.5, 8.3) months and 6.8 (4.0, 9.3) months, respectively (P=0.193), with 2-year cumulative CR rate of 98.6% and 98.5%, respectively (P=0.879). The median time of RFS was 28.1 (12.5, 57.3) months for the MA plus metformin group and 33.3 (14.1, 62.5) months for the MA alone group (P=0.213), with a cumulative RFS rate of 61.9% and 65.8%, respectively (P=0.560). In the subgroup of non-obese (body mass index<28 kg/m2) patients with EAH, the median RFS times were 25.7 (7.6, 60.3) months and 47.3 (17.5, 64.8) months for the MA plus metformin group and the MA alone group, respectively (P=0.033), with a cumulative RFS rate of 57.5% and 80.6%, respectively (P=0.029). According to Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, undergoing assisted reproductive treatment (HR=2.358, 95%CI: 1.069-5.204, P=0.034) was identified as an independent risk factor for recurrence-free survival after complete remission of endometrial lesions. Conclusion: The long-term follow-up outcome indicates that there is no significant difference in CR time and RFS time between MA plus metformin therapy and MA alone therapy for patients with EAH or EEC.

Addressing cancer anorexia-cachexia in older patients: Potential therapeutic strategies and molecular pathways

Cancer cachexia (CC) syndrome, a feature of cancer-associated muscle wasting, is particularly pronounced in older patients, and is characterised by decreased energy intake and upregulated skeletal muscle catabolic pathways. To address CC, appetite stimulants, anabolic drugs, cytokine mediators, essential amino acid supplementation, nutritional counselling, cognitive behavioural therapy, and enteral nutrition have been utilised. However, pharmacological treatments that have also shown promising results, such as megestrol acetate, anamorelin, thalidomide, and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, have been associated with gastrointestinal and cardiovascular complications. Emerging evidence on the efficacy of probiotics in modulating gut microbiota also presents a promising adjunct to traditional therapies, potentially enhancing nutritional absorption and systemic inflammation control. Additionally, low-dose olanzapine has demonstrated improved appetite and weight management in older patients undergoing chemotherapy, offering a potential refinement to current therapeutic approaches. This review aims to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underpinning CC, with a particular focus on the role of anorexia in exacerbating muscle wasting, and to propose pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies to mitigate this syndrome, particularly emphasising the needs of an older demographic. Future research targeting CC should focus on refining appetite-stimulating drugs with fewer side-effects, specifically catering to the needs of older patients, and investigating nutritional factors that can either enhance appetite or minimise suppression of appetite in individuals with CC, especially within this vulnerable group.

Should we abandon hormonal therapy in endometrial cancer? Outcomes of recurrent and metastatic endometrial cancer treated with systemic progestins

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to determine primary survival endpoints in women with recurrent and metastatic endometrial carcinoma (RMEC) treated with progestins.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted at The Ottawa Hospital using electronic medical records. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of RMEC between 2000 and 2019, endometrioid histology, and ≥one line of progestin treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of 2342 cases reviewed, 74 met inclusion criteria. Sixty-six (88.0%) patients received megestrol acetate and 9 (12.0%) received a progestin alternative. The distribution of tumors by grade was: 1: 25 (33.3%), 2: 30 (40.0%), and 3: 20 (26.7%). The PFS and OS for the entire study sample was 14.3 months (95% CI 6.2-17.9) and 23.3 months (14.8-36.8), respectively. The PFS for patients with Grade 1-2 RMEC was 15.7 months (8.0, 19.5), compared to 5.0 months (3.0, 23.0) with Grade 3 disease. The OS for patients with Grade 1-2 versus Grade 3, was 25.9 months (15.3, 40.3) versus 12.5 months (5.7, 35.9), respectively. Thirty-four (45.9%) and 40 (54.1%) patients were treated with 0 and ≥1 line of chemotherapy. The PFS for chemotherapy-naïve patients was 17.9 months (14.3, 27.0), versus 6.2 months (3.9, 14.8) following ≥1 line of treatment. The OS was 29.1 months (17.9, 61.1) for chemotherapy-naïve patients versus 23.0 months (10.5, 37.6) for patients previously exposed.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world data on RMEC suggests there is a role for progestins in select subgroups of women. The PFS for chemotherapy-naïve patients was 17.9 months (14.3, 27.0), versus 6.2 months (3.9, 14.8) following ≥1 line of treatment. The OS was 29.1 months (17.9, 61.1) for chemotherapy-OS was 29.1 months (17.9, 61.1) for chemotherapy-naïve patients versus 23.0 months (10.5, 37.6) for patients previously exposed.

Appetite stimulants for people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Chronic loss of appetite in cystic fibrosis concerns both individuals and families. Appetite stimulants have been used to help cystic fibrosis patients with chronic anorexia attain optimal body mass index (BMI) and nutritional status. However, these may have adverse effects on clinical status. This is an updated version of the original review.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically search for and evaluate the evidence on the beneficial effects of appetite stimulants in the management of cystic fibrosis-related anorexia and synthesise reports of any side effects.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register and online trials registries; handsearched reference lists; and contacted local and international experts to identify relevant trials. Last search of the Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 23 May 2022. Last search of online trial registries: 10 May 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of appetite stimulants compared to placebo, control, no treatment or different appetite stimulants, or to the same appetite stimulants at different doses or regimens for at least one month in adults and children with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias of the included trials. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence and performed meta-analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four trials (70 participants) comparing appetite stimulants (cyproheptadine hydrochloride and megestrol acetate) to placebo; the numbers of adults or children within each trial were not always reported. We assessed the certainty of evidence as low due to the small number of participants, incomplete or selective outcome reporting, and unclear risk of selection bias.  Regarding our primary outcomes, a meta-analysis of two trials (42 participants) showed that appetite stimulants may produce a larger increase in weight (kg) at three months (mean difference (MD) 1.25 kg, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 0.45 to 2.05), and one trial (17 participants) showed a similar result at six months (MD 3.80 kg, 95% CI 1.27 to 6.33) (both low-certainty evidence). Results also showed that weight z score may increase with appetite stimulants compared to placebo at three months (MD 0.61, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.93; 3 studies; 40 participants; P < 0.001) and at six months (MD 0.74, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.22; 1 trial; 17 participants). There was no evidence of a difference in effect between cyproheptadine hydrochloride and megestrol acetate for either outcome.   Only one trial (25 participants) reported analysable data for body composition (BMI), with results favouring cyproheptadine hydrochloride compared to placebo; a further trial (16 participants) narratively agreed with this result. All four trials reported on lung function at durations ranging from two to nine months. Considering analysable data, two trials (42 participants) found that appetite stimulants may make little or no difference in forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) % predicted at three months, and one trial (17 participants) found similar results at six months. Two further three-month trials narratively agreed with these results. Limited information was reported for secondary outcomes. Two trials (23 participants) reported results showing that appetite stimulants may increase appetite compared to placebo at three months (odds ratio 45.25, 95% CI 3.57 to 573.33; low-certainty evidence).  Only one study reported on quality of life, finding that cyproheptadine reduced fatigue in two participants compared with none with placebo. One study (25 participants) found no difference in energy intake between appetite stimulant or placebo at three months. Insufficient reporting of adverse effects prevented a full determination of their impact. Two studies (33 participants) narratively reported similar requirements for additional antibiotics between appetite stimulants and placebo at three months.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: At six months in adults and children, appetite stimulants improved only two of the outcomes of this review: weight (or weight z score) and subjectively reported appetite. Insufficient reporting of side effects prevented a full determination of their impact. Whilst the data may suggest the potential use of appetite stimulants in treating anorexia in adults and children with cystic fibrosis, this is based upon low-certainty evidence from a small number of trials, therefore firm conclusions cannot be drawn. Clinicians need to be aware of the potential adverse effects of appetite stimulants and actively monitor any individuals prescribed these medications accordingly. Research is required to determine meaningful surrogate measures for appetite and to define what constitutes quality weight gain. Future trials of appetite stimulants should use a validated measure of symptoms including a disease-specific instrument for measuring poor appetite. This review highlights the need for multicentred, adequately powered, and well-designed trials to evaluate agents to safely increase appetite in people with cystic fibrosis and to establish the optimal mode of treatment.

Clinical Features and Risk Factors of Adrenal Insufficiency in Patients With Cancer Admitted to the Hospitalist-Managed Medical Unit

BACKGROUND

The symptoms of adrenal insufficiency (AI) overlap with the common effects of advanced cancer and chemotherapy. Considering that AI may negatively affect the overall prognosis of cancer patients if not diagnosed in a timely manner, we analyzed the incidence, risk factors, and predictive methods of AI in cancer patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 184 adult patients with malignancy who underwent a rapid adrenocorticotrophic hormone stimulation test in the medical hospitalist units of a tertiary hospital. Their baseline characteristics and clinical features were evaluated, and the risk factors for AI were identified using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the study patients, 65 (35%) were diagnosed with AI, in whom general weakness (63%) was the most common symptom. Multivariate logistic regression showed that eosinophilia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-16.63; P = 0.036), history of steroid use (aOR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.10-5.15; P = 0.028), and history of megestrol acetate use (aOR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.38-5.33; P = 0.004) were associated with AI. Baseline cortisol levels of 6.2 μg/dL and 12.85 μg/dL showed a specificity of 95.0% and 95.4% for AI diagnosis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

AI was found in about one-third of patients with cancer who showed general symptoms that may be easily masked by cancer or chemotherapy, suggesting that clinical suspicion of AI is important while treating cancer patients. History of corticosteroids or megestrol acetate were risk factors for AI and eosinophilia was a pre-test predictor of AI. Baseline cortisol level appears to be a useful adjunct marker for AI.

Curative effects of hysteroscopic resection combined with progesterone on early-stage endometrial cancer and its prognosis

PURPOSE

To explore the clinical efficacy of hysteroscopic resection combined with megestrol acetate in the treatment of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) and its prognosis.

METHODS

130 patients with early-stage EC were divided into two groups: MA group (hysteroscopic resection combined with megestrol acetate, n=65) and Control group (hysteroscopic resection alone, n=65). The clinical efficacy, serum carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) level and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups, and the patients' pregnancy status, pregnancy outcome, survival status and tumor recurrence were recorded through follow-up.

RESULTS

The curative effect was assessed in all patients after treatment. The overall response rate was 83.1% (54/65) and 65.2% (43/65), respectively, in MA group and Control group, which was significant better in MA group than that in Control group. After treatment, the serum CA125 levels markedly declined in both groups. The pregnancy rate in MA group was obviously higher than in Control group. The follow-up results revealed that the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 83.1% (54/65) and 81.5% (53/65) and the progression-free survival (PFS) was 76.9% (50/65) and 73.8% (48/65), respectively, in MA group and Control group.

CONCLUSION

Hysteroscopic resection combined with megestrol acetate has superior clinical efficacy to hysteroscopic resection alone in the treatment of patients with early-stage EC, which can greatly increase the success rate of pregnancy and reduce the serum CA125 level. However, thelong-term survival and PFS of patients had no significant differencesbetween the two treatment methods. Key words: hysteroscopic resection, megestrol acetate, endometrial cancer, early stage, curative effect.

Conservatively treated endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia/cancer: Risk of intrauterine synechiae

INTRODUCTION

To determine whether progestin type or number of dilation and curettage procedures (D&Cs) were associated with intrauterine synechiae (IS) or pregnancy outcomes in patients conservatively treated for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) or endometrial cancer (EC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated patients conservatively treated for EIN or EC from 2000 to 2017 at an academic center. IS were identified hysteroscopically. We calculated proportions for categorical variables and tested associations between D&C number, progestin, and pregnancy outcomes using Pearson chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. A post-hoc power analysis indicated sufficient power to detect livebirth.

RESULTS

We analyzed 54 patients, 15 with EIN (28 %) and 39 with EC (72 %), with a mean age of 34 ± 1.2 years. Progestin treatment types included megestrol acetate (MA) (n = 24), MA with levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LngIUD) (n = 10), MA followed by LngIUD (n = 3), and LngIUD alone (n = 6). Mean number of D&Cs was 3.9 ± 0.9. Overall, 53 subjects underwent hysteroscopy; 10 (19 %) had IS. When D&Cs were grouped into 0-2, 3-4 and ≥5, each increase in D&C group had a 2.9 higher odds of IS (OR: 2.91, p = 0.04, CI: 1.05-10.02). LngIUD was associated with a nonsignificant 46 % decrease in the odds of IS (OR: 0.54, p = 0.66, CI: 0.08-2.87). Twenty-two women attempted pregnancy; 14 women achieved a total of 20 pregnancies and 9 women had total of 15 livebirths (41 % livebirth rate). The number of D&Cs and progestin treatment type were not associated with pregnancy outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Among 54 patients conservatively treated for EC/EIN, nearly 20 % developed IS. However, hysteroscopic and/or fertility treatments may improve pregnancy outcomes.

Hormone therapy following surgery in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: Is it related to a decrease in recurrence rate?

BACKGROUND

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS) is, in most cases, a slow-growing malignancy; however, it is related with high recurrence rates. The aim of this study is to determine which factors may be associated with the recurrence rate of LGESS.

METHODS

The clinicopathological features and treatment options in 37 patients with LGESS were evaluated.

RESULTS

All patients underwent the hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Additionally, lymphadenectomy was performed in 56.8% (n = 21) of the patients. Among the patients who underwent lymphadenectomy, 14.3% (n = 3) had lymph node metastasis. The disease was limited to the uterus in 75.7% of patients. Treatment following surgery was radiotherapy in three patients, chemotherapy in seven patients, hormone therapy in 12 patients, and chemotherapy plus hormone therapy in one patient. Megestrol acetate was used in all patients who received hormone therapy. Median follow-up time was 96 months. The 5-year disease-free survival and disease-specific survival were 72% and 97%, respectively. The recurrence rate was 27%. Only hormone therapy following surgery was significantly associated with a lower recurrence rate, even in patients with stage 1 disease. None of the patients treated with hormone therapy following surgery had recurrence, whereas recurrence occurred in 38.5% of the patients who underwent surgery only (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Hormone therapy after surgery should be considered a viable option for decreasing the LGESS recurrence rate, regardless of the disease stage.

Megestrol acetate for cachexia-anorexia syndrome. A systematic review

In 1993, megestrol acetate (MA) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of anorexia, cachexia, or unexplained weight loss in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. The mechanism by which MA increases appetite is unknown, and its effectiveness for anorexia and cachexia in neoplastic, elderly, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients is under investigation. This is an updated version of a Cochrane systematic review first published in 2005 and later updated in 2013 entitled 'Megestrol acetate for the treatment of anorexia-cachexia syndrome'. MA vs. placebo: in studies where MA was compared with placebo, the overall results showed that MA patients gained weight (mean difference, MD 2.25 kg, 95% CI [1.19, 3.3]) but did not gain quality of life (QOL) (standarized mean difference, SMD 0.5, 95% CI [-0.13, 1.13]), with more adverse events (relative risk, RR 1.46, 95% CI [1.05, 2.04]), but no difference in deaths (RR 1.26, 95% CI [0.70, 2.27]). MA vs. no treatment: MA patients gained weight (MD 1.45 kg, 95% CI [0.15, 2.75]) but did not gain QOL (standardized mean difference 3.89 95% CI [-14, 6.28]). There was no increase in adverse events (RR 0.90, 95% CI [0.39, 2.08]) or deaths (RR 1.01, 95% CI [0.42, 2.45]). MA vs. active drugs: MA patients gained weight (MD 2.5 kg, 95% CI [0.37, 4.64]) but did not gain QOL (MD 0.20 95% CI [-0.02, 0.43]) and did not report an increase in adverse events (RR 1.05 95% CI [0.95, 1.16]) or in deaths (RR 1.53, 95% CI [1.02, 2.29]) Different doses of MA: in studies where lower doses of MA were compared with higher doses of MA, we did not find differences either in weight gain (MD -0.94 kg, 95% CI [-3.33, 1.45]), QOL (MD 0.31 95% CI [-0.19, 0.81]), or adverse events (RR 1.34, 95% CI [0.65, 2.76]). Thus, we cannot reach a conclusion for an optimal dose of MA.

The role of hormonal therapy in patients with uterine carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to describe the role of hormonal therapy in the treatment of malignant uterine tumors, indications, the effect of the treatment and to verify its safety in our study cohort. We also present an overview of recent studies on that topic.

DESIGN

Unicentric retrospective observational study and review of recent literature.

SETTING

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Masaryk University, University Hospital Brno.

METHODS

The results of recent relevant studies and reviews published in English until December 2017 were used for the review. The publications were searched using the PubMed server. All patients diagnosed in our oncogynecological center between 2010 and 2016 and who were treated hormonally - either in primary therapy or in relapse settings, were included in our study. We were interested in age, BMI, stage of disease, histological type and grade of tumor, occurrence of adverse effects, duration of survival, reasons for choosing hormonal therapy. Medroxyprogesterone-acetate or megestrol-acetate was used in the treatment.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2016, 415 malignant tumors of the uterus were diagnosed in our oncology center. Recurrence of the disease occurred in 31 patients (8%), on average 16 months after primary treatment. Primary hormonal therapy was used in only 19 patients (5%), mostly because of contraindications of another treatment due to high age, comorbidities or obesity. Median age of patients was 83 years, mean BMI 41, median survival of patients who died was 8 months. Five patients (16%) were treated hormonally for the recurrence. Median survival from diagnosis of recurrence was 20 months. One patient (4%) experienced partial pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSION

Hormonal therapy plays an irreplaceable role in uterine cancer patients, especially in primary non-operable patients, in treatment of a relapse, or in a fertility-sparing procedure. This treatment option is safe, with minimal adverse effects.

Metformin for endometrial hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynaecological cancers in the world. Rates of endometrial cancer are rising, in part because of rising obesity rates. Endometrial hyperplasia is a precancerous condition in women that can lead to endometrial cancer if left untreated. Endometrial hyperplasia occurs more commonly than endometrial cancer. Progesterone tablets currently used to treat women with endometrial hyperplasia are associated with adverse effects in up to 84% of women. The levonorgestrel intrauterine device (Mirena Coil, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Whippany, NJ, USA) may improve compliance, but it is invasive, is not acceptable to all women, and is associated with irregular vaginal bleeding in 82% of cases. Therefore, an alternative treatment for women with endometrial hyperplasia is needed. Metformin, a drug that is often used to treat people with diabetes, has been shown in some human studies to reverse endometrial hyperplasia. However, the effectiveness and safety of metformin for treatment of endometrial hyperplasia remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety of metformin in treating women with endometrial hyperplasia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Google Scholar, OpenGrey, Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), and two trials registers from inception to 10 January 2017. We searched the bibliographies of all included studies and reviews on this topic. We also handsearched the conference abstracts of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) 2015 and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cross-over trials comparing metformin (used alone or in combination with other medical therapies) versus placebo or no treatment, any conventional medical treatment, or any other active intervention for women with histologically confirmed endometrial hyperplasia of any type.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for eligibility, extracted data from included studies, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. We resolved disagreements by discussion or by deferment to a third review author. When study details were missing, review authors contacted study authors. The primary outcome of this review was regression of endometrial hyperplasia histology (with or without atypia) towards normal histology. Secondary outcome measures included recurrence of endometrial hyperplasia, progression of endometrial hyperplasia to endometrial cancer, hysterectomy rate, abnormal uterine bleeding, health-related quality of life, and adverse effects during treatment.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three RCTs in which a total of 77 women took part. We rated the quality of the evidence as very low for all outcomes owing to very serious risk of bias (associated with poor reporting, attrition, and limitations in study design) and imprecision.We performed a meta-analysis of two trials with 59 participants. When metformin was compared with megestrol acetate in women with endometrial hyperplasia, we found insufficient evidence to determine whether there were differences between groups for the following outcomes: regression of endometrial hyperplasia histology towards normal histology (odds ratio (OR) 3.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 11.57, two RCTs, n = 59, very low-quality evidence), hysterectomy rates (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.05 to 15.52, two RCTs, n = 59, very low-quality evidence), and rates of abnormal uterine bleeding (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.05 to 15.52, two RCTs, n = 44 , very low-quality evidence). We found no data for recurrence of endometrial hyperplasia or health-related quality of life. Both studies (n = 59) provided data on progression of endometrial hyperplasia to endometrial cancer as well as one (n = 16) reporting some adverse effects in the metformin arm, notably nausea, thrombosis, lactic acidosis, abnormal liver and renal function among others.Another trial including 16 participants compared metformin plus megestrol acetate versus megestrol acetate alone in women with endometrial hyperplasia. We found insufficient evidence to determine whether there were differences between groups for the following outcomes: regression of endometrial hyperplasia histology towards normal histology (OR 9.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 86.52, one RCT, n = 16, very low-quality evidence), recurrence of endometrial hyperplasia among women who achieve regression (OR not estimable, no events recorded, one RCT, n = 8, very low-quality evidence), progression of endometrial hyperplasia to endometrial cancer (OR not estimable, no events recorded, one RCT, n = 13, very low-quality evidence), or hysterectomy rates (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.37, one RCT, n = 16, very low-quality evidence). Investigators provided no data on abnormal uterine bleeding or health-related quality of life. In terms of adverse effects, three of eight participants (37.5%) in the metformin plus megestrol acetate study arm reported nausea.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

At present, evidence is insufficient to support or refute the use of metformin alone or in combination with standard therapy - specifically, megestrol acetate - versus megestrol acetate alone, for treatment of endometrial hyperplasia. Robustly designed and adequately powered randomised controlled trials yielding long-term outcome data are needed to address this clinical question.

Comparing the Administration of Letrozole and Megestrol Acetate in the Treatment of Women with Simple Endometrial Hyperplasia without Atypia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

The present study was conducted as a pilot to compare the therapeutic effects and the potential side effects of oral Megestrol acetate and Letrozole in the treatment of simple hyperplasia in perimenopausal women.

METHODS

The participants of this randomized clinical trial consisted of two groups of 25 women aged 44-50 presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding diagnosed with simple endometrial hyperplasia without cytologic atypia confirmed by transvaginal ultrasonography and biopsy. The first group received 40-mg doses of Megestrol acetate for 2 weeks per month for a total period of 2 months. The second group received 2.5-mg daily doses of Letrozole for a total period of 2 months. The differences in terms of quantitative measurements were analyzed using the independent two-sample t test and the paired t test. To compare the two groups in terms of the distribution of the categorical variables, Pearson's Chi square and Fisher's Exact tests were used at the significance level of 0.05 by Stata-9.2.

RESULTS

Although the intervention led to significant improvements in both groups (P < .001), there was no difference between the groups in terms of accomplishing resolution (P = .74) [seven (28%) patients in the Letrozole group and five (20%) in the Megestrol group], while two patients in the Letrozole group and nine in the Megestrol group suffered from side effects, suggesting significantly lower side effects in the Letrozole group (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Letrozole and Megestrol acetate seem to have similar effects on the treatment of simple endometrial hyperplasia, the only difference being that Letrozole presents fewer side effects than Megestrol acetate in patients with this condition.

FUNDING

Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Research Center of Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IRCT2015031011504N5.

Treatment With Nandrolone Decanoate and Megestrol Acetate in HIV-Infected Men

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition, especially loss of lean body mass, is a frequent complication of people living with HIV that may increase their mortality and morbidity.

METHODS

Nine HIV-infected men with unexplained loss of >10% of their usual weight were selected. They received megestrol acetate (MA) (400 mg/day by mouth) and nandrolone decanoate (ND) (100 mg/15 days intermuscular injection) over 16 weeks. Anthropometric evaluations, bioelectrical impedance, grip strength dynamometry, hematologic, biochemical, immunological and hormonal analysis before, during, and after the treatment were performed. Quality of life was evaluated by the Karnofsky index.

RESULTS

In the 7 men that finished the treatment, there were significant increases in weight (11.9 +/- 9.1 kg, p < .05), 4-site skinfold measurements (p < .05), midarm circumference (p < .005), and fat-free mass (FFM) (5.1 +/- 4.1 kg, p < .05). The increase in fat mass was not statistically significant (6.9 +/- 6.4 kg, NS). Muscle strength increased significantly (p < .005). The Karnofsky index values increased from 59% to 73% (p < .05). One patient developed mild hyperglycemia and another one had an increase in aspartate transaminase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase that reversed after the treatment. Four patients developed asymptomatic adrenal suppression. Testosterone serum levels decreased significantly during the study (p < .05), and 4 patients had serum values below the normal range at week 16. One patient developed gynecomastia.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined treatment with MA and ND led to a significant increase in body weight and FFM. Muscle strength and quality of life improved during the study. The treatment was well tolerated with mild side effects.

Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in female breast cancer patients treated with morphine: A retrospective population-based time-dependent cohort study

AIMS

We aimed to examine whether morphine treatment is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in female breast cancer patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database for Catastrophic Illness Patients in Taiwan. A total of 31,112 women with breast cancer without T2DM history during the period 2000-2005 were identified, divided into morphine and non-morphine users (8071 and 23,041 patients, respectively), and the hazard ratios of newly diagnosed T2DM during the period 2005-2010 were calculated. We used a Cox proportional hazard model with time-dependent exposure covariates to estimate the risk of T2DM. The dosage of morphine was counted as defined daily dose and its effect was assessed by multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression controlling age, Charlson comorbidity index, outpatient department visits, antipsychotics, and breast cancer drugs.

RESULTS

Morphine users were 1.24 times more likely to suffer from T2DM than non-morphine users (95% CI=1.04-1.49). Risk increased slightly with the morphine dosage, in patients aged 35-49 years, and with tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, and antipsychotics treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of T2DM is associated with morphine treatment in female breast cancer patients. A higher risk was observed in patients aged 35-49 years using higher dose of morphine, and may be increased by tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors.

Efficacy of IVF following conservative management of endometrial cancer

Five cases of conservative management of early stage uterine carcinoma were reported. All patients successfully underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF). Role of conservative treatment, IVF and prophylactic surgery followed competition of parity was discussed.

Fertility-sparing therapy for young women with endometrial cancer

Approximately 1600 women under the age of 40 will be diagnosed with endometrial cancer this year. For these women, preservation of fertility may be one of the most important factors when seeking treatment options. The objective of this article is to review the available literature on fertility-sparing therapy for young women with endometrial cancer. Patient selection, pretreatment testing, treatment regimens, response rates and pregnancy outcomes will be explored. Recommendations regarding this approach for the treatment of endometrial cancer in young women will also be made.

[Pregnant rate and pregnancy-relating factors of patients with early endometrial carcinoma and severe atypical hyperplasia of endometrium after fertility-preserving treatment by progestin]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the pregnant rate of patients with early endometrial carcinoma and severe atypical hyperplasia after fertility-preserving treatment and analyze their pregnancy-relating factors.

METHODS

Endometrial curettage was used to evaluate the therapy response of endometrium after every 3 months of administration of high-dose progestin as fertility-sparing treatment for 51 patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma or severe endometrial atypical hyperplasia from Jun. 1996 to Jan. 2010. Individualized maintained treatment was given to patients after achieving complete remission of the endometrium. Pregnant results and pregnancy-relating factors were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median age of all the 51 patients was 29 years old. Forty-five (88%, 45/51) achieved complete response. Of the 34 cases who desired to conceive after complete response, 16 of them had 22 pregnancies, the pregnant rate was 47% (16/34); and 12 women obtained healthy live birth baby, the fertility rate was 35% (12/34). The pregnant rate of patients at age >35 or ≤ 35 was 0/2 and 50% (16/32) respectively (P > 0.05). The pregnant rate of patients with or without infertility was 40% (8/20) and 8/14, with endometrial cancer or severe atypical hyperplasia was 40% (10/25) and 6/9, respectively (all P > 0.05). The pregnant rate of patients who received in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer, ovulation promotion, or no treatment was 7/7, 6/16 and 3/11 respectively (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Fertility-preserving treatment for early endometrial cancer and severe atypical hyperplasia with high-dose progestin could achieve higher response rate. Assisted reproductive technologies could significantly increase the chance of conception.

Safety of megestrol acetate in palliating anorexia-cachexia syndrome in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer

There are concerns whether megestrol acetate (MA) stimulates the growth of prostate cancer in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We evaluated the effect of cumulative doses of MA on the disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with CRPC who were receiving Docetaxel-based chemotherapy. From July 2003 through June 2009, we identified 109 consecutive patients with CRPC and who had received docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Of these patients, 68 (62.4%) have not received MA, whereas 21 patients (19.3%) and 20 patients (18.3%) had received low dose MA (total ≤ 18,400 mg) and high dose MA (total > 18,400 mg), respectively. We assessed the effect of several variables on DSS. None of the clinicopathological variables differed among the three groups. When comparing DSS using Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no statistically significant survival differences among the three groups (P = 0.546). Using multivariate Cox proportional analyses with backward elimination, the number of docetaxel cycles was only significant factor predicting DSS (HR: 0.578, 95% CI: 0.318-0.923, P = 0.016). Cumulative doses of MA as adjuvant treatment for patients with CRPC and who are receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy, did not affect their DSS. Therefore, MA can be safely administered in cachexic patients with CRPC.

Megestrol acetate for treatment of anorexia-cachexia syndrome

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of a previously published review in The Cochrane Library (2005, Issue 2) on 'Megestrol acetate for the treatment of anorexia-cachexia syndrome'. Megestrol acetate (MA) is currently used to improve appetite and to increase weight in cancer-associated anorexia. In 1993, MA was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of anorexia, cachexia or unexplained weight loss in patients with AIDS. The mechanism by which MA increases appetite is unknown and its effectiveness for anorexia and cachexia in neoplastic and AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) patients is under investigation.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of MA in palliating anorexia-cachexia syndrome in patients with cancer, AIDS and other underlying pathologies.

SEARCH METHODS

We sought studies through an extensive search of electronic databases, journals, reference lists, contact with investigators and other search strategies outlined in the methods. The most recent search for this update was carried out in May 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included in the review if they assessed MA compared to placebo or other drug treatments in randomised controlled trials of patients with a clinical diagnosis of anorexia-cachexia syndrome related to cancer, AIDS or any other underlying pathology.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent review authors conducted data extraction and evaluated methodological quality. We performed quantitative analyses using appetite and quality of life as a dichotomous variable, and analysed weight gain as continuous and dichotomous variables.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 35 trials in this update, the same number but not the same trials as in the previous version of the review. The trials comprised 3963 patients for effectiveness and 3180 for safety. Sixteen trials compared MA at different doses with placebo, seven trials compared different doses of MA with other drug treatments and 10 trials compared different doses of MA. Meta-analysis showed a benefit of MA compared with placebo, particularly with regard to appetite improvement and weight gain in cancer, AIDS and other underlying conditions, and lack of benefit in the same patients when MA was compared to other drugs. There was insufficient information to define the optimal dose of MA, but higher doses were more related to weight improvement than lower doses. Quality of life improvement in patients was seen only when comparing MA versus placebo but not other drugs in both subcategories: cancer and AIDS. Oedema, thromboembolic phenomena and deaths were more frequent in the patients treated with MA. More than 40 side effects were studied.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review shows that MA improves appetite and is associated with slight weight gain in cancer, AIDS and in patients with other underlying pathology. Despite the fact that these patients are receiving palliative care they should be informed of the risks involved in taking MA.

Pharmacological interventions for geriatric cachexia: a narrative review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to investigate the range of pharmacological interventions that have been studied for treatment of geriatric cachexia, and to evaluate their effect on selected clinical outcomes in this population.

METHODS

Databases including Medline and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to March 2010 with search terms including "cache*", "intervention", "megestrol acetate" and "cytokine inhibitors". Studies investigating subjects with mean age <60y or disease-related cachexia were excluded. Outcomes assessed were weight or BMI, body composition, appetite and laboratory parameters indicative of cachexia.

RESULTS

Fifteen publications met the selection criteria, reporting on ten studies. Seven studies investigated use of megestrol acetate (MA): two randomised controlled trials, one case control study, two pre-test/post-test studies and two retrospective chart reviews. Weight/BMI was common amongst outcomes and these studies showed an improvement in weight compared with baseline. MA studies which investigated body composition, appetite and/or laboratory parameters provided some evidence for improvement in these outcomes. Three randomised controlled trials investigated the use of other interventions: ghrelin, growth hormone and vitamin supplementations. All demonstrated a significant increase in lean body mass. The only other outcome of interest in these three trials was weight in one study with a significant increase demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

Little investigation has been conducted in this population and the diagnosis of cachexia is problematic however these trials provide preliminary evidence for beneficial outcomes in older adults likely to have cachexia. Further high quality adequately powered prospective studies are necessary to provide effective treatment for geriatric cachexia.

[Malnutrition in patients with cancer]

Malnutrition is a condition characterized by a shortage or imbalance of energy and proteins and/or other nutrients. Malnutrition leads to measurable undesirable effects on body size and composition, functioning and clinical results. Criteria for malnutrition are eight loss, low BMI and loss of muscle mass. Patients with cancer should be repeatedly screened for malnutrition and its risk factors during the diagnostic and therapeutic treatment trajectory. Patients with cancer who are malnourished or are at risk of becoming so should be referred to a dietician for individualized dietary advice if they are undergoing curative treatment or before they do so. At the start of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy treatment, tube feeding or parenteral feeding is given to all cancer patients who are malnourished or are at high risk of becoming malnourished. If the gastrointestinal tract is functioning well then tube feeding is preferable to parenteral feeding. Patients who are at an advanced stage of cancer and cancer patients who are anorexic or lose weight can be treated with megastrol acetate.

Influence of megestrol acetate on nutrition, inflammation and quality of life in dialysis patients

AIM

Malnutrition is a common clinical problem in dialysis patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of megestrol acetate in malnourished dialysis patients. Thirty-two hypoalbuminemic dialysis patients took 160 mg of megestrol acetate daily for up to 6 months.

METHODS

We measured height, dry weight, BMI, modified Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) score, and serum albumin, triglycerides, total cholesterol, hsCRP, IL-1β and IL-6 concentrations. We used validated questionnaires to evaluate selected dimensions of the quality of life.

RESULTS

Only 12 patients completed the study. All patients reported improved appetite, and there were concurrent statistically significant increases in weight, BMI, SGA and albumin concentration (P < 0.05). For the 12 patients who completed 6 months of treatment the increase in these parameters was from 63.26 ± 13.04 to 65.58 ± 12.53 kg, from 23.5 ± 3.8 to 24.66 ± 4.23 kg/m(2), from 5.16 ± 0.94 to 6.16 ± 0.72 points, and from 36.45 ± 1.82 to 40.33 ± 2.71 g/l, respectively. However, there were no significant changes in the levels of inflammatory markers and in quality of life. Side effects included overhydration, excessive weight gain and hyperglycaemia.

CONCLUSION

Megestrol acetate may be effective in reversing poor appetite in carefully selected maintenance dialysis patients, but it might not reduce inflammation or improve the quality of life. Because of the potential side effects, close monitoring is essential.

Nutritional interventions for cancer-induced cachexia

Cancer-induced cachexia remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer treatment. Cancer research and development continues at an aggressive pace and yet a degree of cancer-induced cachexia is experienced by up to 80% of advanced stage cancer patients. Unfortunately, there are no established treatment regimens for this condition. Weight loss and fatigue consistently appear in patient oncologic histories and progress notes. However, few oncologists fully understand the pathologic mechanisms causing cachexia resulting in well-meaning advice to increase caloric intake with minimal results. Our goal is to describe the pathologic basis of cancer-induced cachexia and to detail accompanying metabolic derangements. Understanding the causes of cachexia sheds light on the subsequent need for multi-modality therapy including clinical intervention with specialized nutrition support, drug therapy, lifestyle and diet changes. In addition to nutrition support modalities, practicing oncologists may prescribe medical therapies designed to increase body weight and lean body mass, including megestrol acetate, tetrahydrocannibinol, oxandrolone, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A variety of experimental therapies are also being investigated for cancer-induced cachexia including tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors and ghrelin infusions. We review the available data to support nutrition-oriented interventions in cancer-induced cachexia, including omega-3 fatty acids, amino-acid loading/protein supplementation, parenteral and enteral nutrition support, and food-derived compounds such as curcumin, reservatrol, and pomegranate.

Randomized phase III clinical trial of five different arms of treatment in 332 patients with cancer cachexia

PURPOSE

A phase III, randomized study was carried out to establish the most effective and safest treatment to improve the primary endpoints of cancer cachexia-lean body mass (LBM), resting energy expenditure (REE), and fatigue-and relevant secondary endpoints: appetite, quality of life, grip strength, Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and proinflammatory cytokines.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred thirty-two assessable patients with cancer-related anorexia/cachexia syndrome were randomly assigned to one of five treatment arms: arm 1, medroxyprogesterone (500 mg/day) or megestrol acetate (320 mg/day); arm 2, oral supplementation with eicosapentaenoic acid; arm 3, L-carnitine (4 g/day); arm 4, thalidomide (200 mg/day); and arm 5, a combination of the above. Treatment duration was 4 months.

RESULTS

Analysis of variance showed a significant difference between treatment arms. A post hoc analysis showed the superiority of arm 5 over the others for all primary endpoints. An analysis of changes from baseline showed that LBM (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and by L3 computed tomography) significantly increased in arm 5. REE decreased significantly and fatigue improved significantly in arm 5. Appetite increased significantly in arm 5; interleukin (IL)-6 decreased significantly in arm 5 and arm 4; GPS and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score decreased significantly in arm 5, arm 4, and arm 3. Toxicity was quite negligible, and was comparable between arms.

CONCLUSION

The most effective treatment in terms of all three primary efficacy endpoints and the secondary endpoints appetite, IL-6, GPS, and ECOG PS score was the combination regimen that included all selected agents.

Influence of megestrol acetate on nutrition and inflammation in dialysis patients - preliminary results

Malnutrition is a common clinical problem in dialysis patients. So far the management of malnutrition in this population has not been fully successful. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of use of megestrol acetate suspension in malnourished dialysis patients. Twenty-six hypoalbuminemic (albumin < or = 3.8 g/dl) dialysis patients took 160 mg of megestrol acetate daily for a period of two months. Anthropometry (dry weight, body mass index) and biochemical measurements of nutrition (serum albumin, triglycerides, total cholesterol) and inflammation (hsCRP, IL-1beta, IL-6) were performed on a monthly basis. The treatment led to a statistically significant increase (P < 0.05) in anthropometry and albumin concentration, with no statistically significant changes in total cholesterol, triglycerides and indices of inflammation. Side effects included overhydration, diarrhoea and hyperglycaemia. Thus, megestrol acetate may be an effective therapeutic agent in improving the nutritional status of carefully selected dialysis patients, while it might not mitigate inflammation. Because of the prevalent side effects it must be monitored closely.

Additive endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer - back to the future

While novel endocrine treatment options have been implemented in the advanced - as well as adjuvant setting, recent results suggest a place for "old-fashioned" additive treatment with estrogens in advanced breast cancer. This paper reviews the biological rationale for endocrine therapy in general and additive treatment with estrogens in particular. The finding that patients becoming resistant to treatment with aromatase inhibitors may subsequently respond to estrogen therapy adds important information to our understanding of therapy resistance in general. Moreover, the return of a therapeutic option abandoned more than 20 years ago, now to be used in a different sequential setting, suggests a critical examination whether there may be other conventional treatment options still earning a place as treatment in advanced disease as well. While ablative therapies including surgical oophorectomy, hypophysectomy and adrenalectomy are not candidate treatment options due to morbidity, there are additive treatment options apart from estrogen therapy that may be considered. Androgens administered at therapeutic doses are not feasible for toxicity reasons; yet, the potential of adding androgens in small doses as adjuvant to aromatase inhibitors should be further explored. Whether patients become resistant to other treatment options may still benefit from megestrol acetate, remains to be explored.

Treatment of cancer-related anorexia with olanzapine and megestrol acetate: a randomized trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of megestrol acetate (MA) and olanzapine (OLN) for the treatment of cancer-related anorexia (CRA).

METHODS

Eighty adult patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer or lung cancer (stages III and IV) with CRA (loss of appetite and greater than or equal to 5% loss of preillness stable weight) were randomized to receive daily MA or MA plus OLN for a period of 8 weeks. Patients were assessed weekly using the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory with specific measurement of weight, appetite, nausea, and quality of life (QOL) measures.

RESULTS

For the 37 patients receiving MA, 15 patients had a greater than or equal to 5% weight gain, 2 patients had an appetite improvement, 3 patients had an improvement in nausea, and 5 patients had an improvement in QOL at both 4 and 8 weeks. For the 39 patients receiving MA plus OLN, 33 patients had a greater than or equal to 5% weight gain, 25 patients had an appetite improvement, 21 patients had an improvement in nausea, and 23 patients had an improvement in QOL at both 4 and 8 weeks, and there was an improvement in general activity, mood, work, walking, and enjoyment at 8 weeks. There were no grade III or IV treatment-related toxicities in patients receiving MA or the combination of MA plus OLN.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of MA and OLN appears to be an effective intervention for patients with CRA.

Usage of megestrol acetate in the treatment of anorexia-cachexia syndrome in the elderly

The aim of this review is to assess the efficacy and safety of megestrol acetate (MA) in geriatric cachexia. The paper presented here reviews a previously published study of MA use in 69 patients in a randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial. This paper will also address the underlying pathogenesis of cachexia (specifically, the role of cytokines) along with the use of MA, its mechanism of action and its side effects.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of MA oral suspension (O.S.), 800 mg/day, versus placebo on weight in geriatric nursing home patients with weight loss or low body weight.

DESIGN

Twelve weeks, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a 13-week follow-up period.

PATIENTS

Northport VAMC Nursing home patients with weight loss of * 5% of usual body weight over the past 3 months, or body weight 20% below their ideal body weight.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or MA 800 mg/d for 12 weeks and were then followed for 13 weeks off treatment and mortality 4 years post treatment.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcome- weight and appetite change. Secondary outcome-sense of well being, enjoyment of life, change in depression scale, laboratory nutrition parameters, energy intake counts, body composition, and adverse events.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks there were no significant differences in weight gain between treatment groups, while MA-treated patients reported significantly greater improvement in appetite, enjoyment of life, and well being. At week 25 (3 months after treatment), 61.9% of MA-treated patients had gained * 1.82 kg (4 lbs) compared to 21.7% of placebo patients. There was no difference in survival between MA and placebo groups. Considering possible confounders, higher initial IL-6, initial TNFR-p75 levels, and final neutrophil percentage were associated with elevated mortality, whereas higher initial pre-albumin, initial albumin, final pre-albumin, final albumin and final weight gain were associated with decreased death.

Elevated plasma endoglin (CD105) predicts decreased response and survival in a metastatic breast cancer trial of hormone therapy

Background Endoglin (CD105) is a co-receptor for TGF-beta, is expressed by human vascular endothelial cells, and plays a major role in angiogenesis. Materials and methods Pretreatment EDTA plasma from 224 metastatic breast cancer patients enrolled in a phase III 2nd-line hormone therapy trial and 50 control subjects were assayed for endoglin using an ELISA. Results The female control group (n = 50) plasma endoglin upper limit of normal was defined as the mean + 2 SD (8.7 ng/ml). The breast cancer patient plasma endoglin was 6.40 +/- 2.23 ng/ml (range 3.00-19.79 ng/ml). Elevated plasma endoglin levels were detected in 26 of 224 patients (11.6%). Patients with elevated plasma endoglin had a reduced clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + Stable) (15 vs. 42%) (P = 0.01) to hormone therapy. TTP was shorter for patients with elevated plasma endoglin, but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.2). Patients with elevated plasma endoglin had decreased overall survival (median 645 vs. 947 days) (P = 0.005). Conclusion Elevated pretreatment plasma endoglin levels predicted for decreased clinical benefit and a shorter overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with 2nd-line hormone therapy.

The effect of cyproheptadine hydrochloride (periactin) and megestrol acetate (megace) on weight in children with cancer/treatment-related cachexia

BACKGROUND

Children with cancer frequently have associated cachexia and malnutrition. Failure to thrive affects nearly 40% of oncology patients with advanced or progressive disease. Malnutrition can erode quality of life and adversely impact disease prognosis. Appetite stimulation and increased food intake is 1 approach to combat cancer-related cachexia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cyproheptadine hydrochloride (CH), an appetite stimulant, was administered to children with cancer-associated cachexia to prevent further weight loss. All participants started CH and were evaluated for response after 4 weeks. Efficacy of megestrol acetate (MA) was evaluated in patients who did not respond to CH. Medical evaluation, weight measurements, prealbumin, and serum leptin levels were preformed at follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were enrolled. Of the 66 evaluable patients, 50 demonstrated a response to CH (average weight gain 2.6 kg and mean weight-for-age z-score change of 0.35, P=0.001). Seven of the 16 nonresponders received MA. Six patients completed 4 weeks of MA, 5 responded (average weight gain of 2.5 kg). The most commonly reported side effect of CH was drowsiness. One patient on MA developed low cortisol levels and hyperlipidemia.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that CH is a safe and effective way to promote weight gain in children with cancer/treatment-related cachexia.

Progression of conservatively treated endometrial complex atypical hyperplasia in a young woman: a case report

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of progression of endometrial complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) to extrauterine endometrioid adenocarcinoma in a patient who had requested fertility-sparing management.

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute "Regina Elena," Rome, Italy.

PATIENT(S)

A nulliparous 36-year-old woman with endometrial CAH who decided on a conservative approach.

INTERVENTION(S)

Conservative hysteroscopic resection of the lesion, the surrounding endometrium, and underlying myometrium plus hormone therapy regimen of megestrol acetate (160 mg) daily for 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Failure of the conservative therapy and progression of disease.

RESULT(S)

Eighteen months after fertility-sparing management, a laparoscopic operation revealed grade 2 endometrium adenocarcinoma with superficial myometrial invasion and a microscopic metastasis of the left ovary and Douglas peritoneum. The patient underwent adjuvant chemotherapy followed by external beam radiation of the pelvis and brachytherapy. Twenty-five months after, she was free of disease.

CONCLUSION(S)

Conservative therapy is feasible in carefully selected young women with endometrial CAH. However, close follow-up is required because of possible progression to endometrial cancer.

Nutritional and pharmacologic support in patients with pancreatic cancer

The aim of our study was to assess whether the influence of nutritional support, consisting of counseling, enteral liquids support and pharmacologic support, can slow down weight loss and whether the change in weight has the impact on the performance status in our patients. In our study 44 patients with pancreatic cancer were included--26 males (mean age 69 years +/- 2.4 years) and 18 females (mean age 63 +/- 3.2 years). Metastatic disease was found in 21 patients, 15 patients had liver metastasis. Locally advanced disease was found in 24 patients and metastatic and locally advanced disease in 17 patients. Surgery was performed in 34 patients. Forty four (100%) patients underwent nutritional counseling, 33 of them (75%) took supplemental enteral feeding and 44 (100%) took megestrol acetate 400 mg per a day. The patients were followed up during 8 weeks during 5 visits. At first visit we took initial nutritional status of patients. Appetite loss, weight gain and Karnofsky performance status were monitored at every visit. All patients were treated with gemcitabin for a 7 week period.

RESULTS

NTS score at initial visit in 44 patients (100%) was > or = 5. Using nutritional counseling, enteral food substitution and pharmacological support, weight gain was observed in 61.1% patients and appetite improved. Average KPS mostly improved after first month of therapy while after two months was again at the basal level. With nutritional counseling, supplemental feeding and pharmacologic support weight loss in our patients slowed down and appetite improved. Despite of that, Karnofsky Performance Status didn't change significantly, reflecting the impact of the disease itself and chemotherapy procedures to the patient's condition. We can conclude that nutritional and pharmacological support can temporarily stop weight loss and improve appetite, social life and quality of life in those groups of patients but have no implications on patients KPS and course of their disease.

Occult myometrial recurrence after progesterone therapy to preserve fertility in a young patient with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

We report a case of endometrial cancer treated by fertility-preserving P therapy, who subsequently presented with an abnormal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the myometrium despite normal endometrial biopsies.

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING

Tertiary referral university hospital.

PATIENT(S)

A 31-year-old patient with grade 1, stage I endometrial cancer presented for treatment with fertility-preserving P therapy. Multiple endometrial samples were all normal. Four years later, she presented with an abnormal pelvic MRI in the absence of any other signs or symptoms. Hysterectomy and oophoropexy confirmed normal endometrium with deeply invasive cancer. She remains cancer-free 2 years later with two normal children from surrogacy.

INTERVENTION(S)

Progestogen therapy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, oophoropexy, and assisted reproductive techniques (ART) and surrogate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Cancer disease status and fertility preservation.

RESULT(S)

Eight years after initial diagnosis, the patient remains cancer free and has conceived by surrogate reproductive techniques.

CONCLUSION(S)

Reproductive options remains a meaningful quality of life goal even for patients with cancer. Routine pelvic MRI should be considered for follow-up of endometrial cancer patients who retain their uterus. Hysteroscopy and dilation and curettage may not be sufficient.

Conservative management of a patient with endometrial carcinoma desiring fertility: how to inform?

Conservative management of patients with endometrial cancer who desire fertility is becoming widespread in certain circumstances. A 36-year-old women desiring fertility with early-stage endometroid type adenocarcinoma of the endometrium was treated with 160 mg/d megestrol acetate for six months. After confirmation of a normal endometrial biopsy she became pregnant spontaneously. Following an uneventful pregnancy a healthy baby at term was delivered by cesarean section. Definitive surgery was performed. The risks and benefits of this thereupeutic approach are discussed and informing style of the patients emphasized.

A successful live twin birth by in vitro fertilization after conservative treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is predominately a postmenopausal disease. Endometrial cancer in women of childbearing age is relatively unusual. Endometrial cancer is typically treated with hysterectomy. After the development of endometrial cancer, successful pregnancy is rare. We present a case of recurrent stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma in a 35-year-old woman. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed endometrial lesions without myometrium invasion and no pelvic lymph node enlargement. The patient refused surgical intervention with abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy because of her essential desire for children. Fertility-preserving medical therapy with megestrol acetate for 1 year and subsequent assisted reproductive treatment (ART) were performed. Successful pregnancy occurred after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). On the basis of these observations and the low malignant potential of well-differentiated endometrial carcinoma, fertility-preserving treatment using Megace therapy was suggested. In this case, recurrence occurred after the completion of Megace therapy and three failed attempts at artificial insemination by the husband (AIH). Recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma was documented using hysteroscopy and direct endometrial biopsy. Another course of Megace therapy was administered due to her desire for children. A successful pregnancy occurred after long-term medical treatment and IVF-ET.

Adjuvant cyclic Tamoxifen and Megestrol acetate treatment in postmenopausal breast cancer patients – Longterm follow-up

AIMS

To evaluate possible differences in effect on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in node positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving Tamoxifen or cyclic Tam and Megestrol acetate as adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

Between 1989 and 1994, 489 patients with pT(1-2)pN+ hormone receptor positive or unknown tumours were included in a randomized national multicenter study to receive either Tam alone or cyclic Tam (8 weeks) and MA (8 weeks) for 2 years. Final follow-up was completed as of June 2002. Time from start of treatment to first recurrence and novel primary breast tumour, overall survival and cancer specific survival were estimated.

RESULTS

No differences in RFS, OS or cancer specific survival were observed between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant treatment used as standard Tam alone, compared to Tam and MA, as employed in this group of patients gave similar outcomes. Side effects that led to cessation of study medication were observed in both arms.

[Croatian guidelines for use of eicosapentaenoic acid and megestrol acetate in cancer cachexia syndrome]

Among many oncological patients we can notice a substantial loss of body weight, fat and proteins with significant proinflammatory activity at the time of diagnosis. This wasting condition is well known as cancer cachexia syndrome. Anorexia is important part of this syndrome. Because cancer cachexia reduces tumor response to treatment and it is an indicator of poor prognosis, we need to start correcting these nutritional deficits at once. In the presence of cancer cachexia it is extremely difficult to achieve protein anabolism and stop the body wasting by standard nutritional formulas only. During the last few years, the use of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and megestrol acetate (MA) as anticahectic agents has been tested. These guidelines are intended to give evidence-based recommendations for the use of eicosapentaenoic acid and megestrol acetate in cancer cachexia syndrome. These guidelines have been developed by interdisciplinary expert group of Croatian clinicians. Based on relevant literature, we have concluded that the use of metabolic modulators such as eicosapentaenoic acid and megestrol acetate for 8 weeks may help to improve nutritional status in cachectic patients.

Managing hot flashes in men being treated for prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men. Treatment with hormonal ablation is often accompanied by disabling hot flashes. This article reviews the pathophysiology of hot flashes and treatment options for this common side effect of treatment.

Megestrol acetate in cachexia and anorexia

The aim is to review major clinical trials that have used megestrol acetate (MA) in the treatment of cachexia across several disease states. A review of general usage and potential side-effects are discussed. A theory that the newly approved nanocrystal formation of MA can better deliver this potent medication for treatment will also be reviewed.

Pharmacological Treatment of Geriatric Cachexia: Evidence and Safety in Perspective

Anticachexic or antisarcopenic medications are prescribed worldwide for geriatric patients with poor appetite and associated weight loss. They represent a valuable treatment option for managing cachexia. However, the well-publicized adverse reports about these medications in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and in the cancer population has led to some concern and much subsequent discussion over the safety of these medications being used in geriatric population. This review looks at the evidence in relation to the benefits and risks of these medications and discusses what we know about their use in the geriatric population.

Elevated plasma tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 level predicts decreased response and survival in metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase (TIMPs) have at least 2 different functions. They inhibit the catalytic activity of matrix metalloproteinases, and they act as growth factors.

METHODS

Pretreatment ethylenediamine tetracetic acid plasma TIMP-1 was assayed from 251 patients who were enrolled in a Phase III, second-line, hormone therapy trial, and from a control group of 50 healthy, postmenopausal women by using the TIMP-1 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

The plasma TIMP-1 levels from the postmenopausal control group (n = 50 women) were 201 +/- 86 ng/mL mean +/- standard deviation (range, 49-455 ng/mL). The upper limit of normal was defined as the mean +/- 2 standard deviations of the control group (373 ng/mL). Patient pretreatment plasma TIMP-1 levels ranged from 70 ng/mL to 982 ng/mL. Plasma TIMP-1 was elevated above the mean + 2 standard deviations of the control group (373 ng/mL) in 19 patients (7.6%). In univariate analysis, patients who had elevated versus normal plasma TIMP-1 levels had a reduced clinical benefit rate (CBR) (16% vs 42%; P = .03). The time to progression (TTP) (84 days vs 174 days; P < .0001) and overall survival (141 days vs 860 days; P = .0001) also were significantly shorter in patients who had elevated TIMP-1 levels. TTP and overall survival also were significantly shorter in patients who had higher TIMP-1 plasma levels when it was analyzed as a continuous variable. In multivariate analysis, elevated plasma TIMP-1 level remained a prognostic factor for reduced overall survival (P < .0001) along with elevated serum HER-2/neu (P < .0001) and the presence of visceral metastases (P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated pretreatment plasma levels of TIMP-1 predicted a decreased response to second-line hormone therapy and reduced survival in women with metastatic breast cancer.

Stage III endometrial cancer: preoperative predictability, prognostic factors, and treatment outcome

OBJECTIVE

The survival rate for the most common gynecologic cancer, endometrial cancer, has fallen significantly in the last 25 years. Stage III (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) disease accounts for most of the deaths. We evaluated prognostic factors, treatment-related survival, and routinely used assessments for identifying stage III disease before the operation.

STUDY DESIGN

The data for patients with endometrial cancer stage III (n = 101) who had been treated at the McGill University Health Center between 1989 and 2003 were analyzed.

RESULTS

Stage IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC tumors accounted for 63%, 4%, and 33% of the data, respectively. The cause-specific survival at 2, 3, and 5 years was 82%, 77%, and 67%, respectively. In multivariate analysis with an adjustment for the standard prognostic variables, the final tumor grade, adnexal involvement, and lymph node dissection were significant predictors of cause-specific survival (P = .001, .028, and .017, respectively). Of the preoperative investigations, an elevated CA-125 level was a significant predictor of cause-specific survival in multivariate analysis (P = .029).

CONCLUSION

An elevated CA-125 level, adnexal involvement, the final tumor grade, and lymph node dissection were independent predictors for cause-specific survival.

Mechanisms of skeletal muscle degradation and its therapy in cancer cachexia

Severe or chronic disease can lead to cachexia which involves weight loss and muscle wasting. Cancer cachexia contributes significantly to disease morbidity and mortality. Multiple studies have shown that the metabolic changes that occur with cancer cachexia are unique compared to that of starvation. Specifically, cancer patients seem to lose a larger proportion of skeletal muscle mass. There are three pathways that contribute to muscle protein degradation: the lysosomal system, cytosolic proteases and the ubiquitin (Ub)-proteasome pathway. The Ub-proteasome pathway seems to account for the majority of skeletal muscle degradation in cancer cachexia and is stimulated by several cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, interferon-gamma and proteolysis-inducing factor. Cachexia is particularly severe in pancreatic cancer and contributes significantly to the quality of life and mortality of these patients. Several factors contribute to weight loss in these patients, including alimentary obstruction, pain, depression, side effects of therapy and a high catabolic state. Although no single agent has proven to halt cachexia in these patients there has been some progress in the areas of nutrition with supplementation and pharmacological agents such as megesterol acetate, steroids and experimental trials targeting cytokines that stimulate the Ub-proteasome pathway.