1
|
Wu CY, Yeh CM, Tsai CK, Liu CJ. The influence of hospital volume and physician volume on early mortality in acute promyelocytic leukemia patients. Ann Hematol 2024; 103:1577-1586. [PMID: 38532122 PMCID: PMC11009737 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-05616-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a highly curable hematologic malignancy in the era of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) combination treatment. However, only a modest change in early mortality rate has been observed despite the wide availability of ATRA. In addition to the clinical characteristics of APL patients, studies on the hospital volume-outcome relationship and the physician volume-outcome relationship remained limited. We aim to evaluate the association between hospital and physician volume and the early mortality rate among APL patients. The patients were collected from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Early mortality is defined as death within 30 days of diagnosis. Patients were categorized into four groups according to individual cumulative hospital and physician volume. The risk of all-cause mortality in APL patients with different cumulative volume groups was compared using a Cox proportional hazard model. The probability of overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. All 741 patients were divided into four quartile volume groups. In the multivariate analysis, only physician volume was significantly associated with early mortality rate. The physician volume of the highest quartile was a protective factor for early mortality compared with the physician volume of the lowest quartile (HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.02-0.65). Hospital characteristics were not associated with early mortality. In the sensitivity analyses, the results remained consistent using two other different definitions of early mortality. Higher physician volume was independently associated with lower early mortality, while hospital volume was not. Enhancing the clinical expertise of low-volume physicians may ensure better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Ying Wu
- Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chiu-Mei Yeh
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Kuang Tsai
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Division of Hematology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Chia-Jen Liu
- Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Division of Hematology, Institute of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hongaiah D, Kattepur AK, George EV, Mahadev M A, Kenkere D, Dasappa A. Free flap reconstruction at a rural-based tertiary medical college hospital: Barriers and outcomes. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:1159-1164. [PMID: 38414222 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES In a rural-based setting, providing optimal treatment is often difficult owing to the limited resources and financial constraints being rampant in cancer care delivery. Oncological resections often result in large, complex defects requiring free flap reconstruction to achieve cosmetic and/or functional goals. This article focuses on our experience of starting and promoting microvascular reconstruction in a rural tertiary medical college hospital. METHODS Retrospective observational study of patients undergoing free flap reconstruction for oncological indications was included. Standard oncological principles were followed for cancer extirpation. Free flap reconstruction was done using loupes of 4× magnification. Flap-related outcomes and barriers in doing free flap reconstruction were analysed. RESULTS A total of 56 patients were included. The most common free flap undertaken was free anterolateral thigh flap in 21 (37.5%) patients. The mean duration of reconstruction was 438 min. Re-exploration was undertaken in 17 patients (30.4%). Nonsalvageable flap loss was 19.64%. Adjuvant treatment was administered in all patients as per oncological indications, albeit with some delay in 12.5%. Barriers to reconstruction were noted in the pre-, intra- and postoperative periods. CONCLUSION Reconstruction with free flaps is feasible in a resource-constrained setup with careful planning and a multidisciplinary team approach to overcome the barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak Hongaiah
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India
| | - Abhay K Kattepur
- Department of Surgical Oncology, R.L. Jalappa Institute of Oncology, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India
| | - Eldo V George
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India
| | - Abhishek Mahadev M
- Department of Surgical Oncology, R.L. Jalappa Institute of Oncology, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India
| | - Deepika Kenkere
- Department of Dental and Oro-Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India
| | - Aswathappa Dasappa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, R.L. Jalappa Institute of Oncology, Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research, Tamaka, Kolar, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Inchai P, Tsai WC, Chiu LT, Kung PT. Cancer stages and mortality risk of breast cancer between women with and without disabilities: A national population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Disabil Health J 2024:101632. [PMID: 38658214 DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The second-most common cause of cancer-related death for women worldwide is breast cancer. However, there is little information about breast cancer among women with disabilities in Taiwan. OBJECTIVES This study investigated differences between women with and without disabilities regarding breast cancer stages and evaluated the probability of developing an advanced stage and the mortality risk of breast cancer. METHODS This study conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database and other nationwide databases. Our participants were newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, including women with and without disabilities, between 2004 and 2010. We matched both of them with propensity score matching methods (1:5), and all were followed up until the end of 2016. RESULTS This study included 50,683 participants with breast cancer. After matching, women with disabilities who did not receive breast cancer screening had a more significant proportion of advanced-stage breast cancer (19.95 %) than those without disabilities who did not receive breast cancer screening (16.87 %). After adjusting for related variables, women with disabilities were 1.27 times more likely to have advanced-stage breast cancer than those without disabilities. Additionally, after suffering from breast cancer, individuals with disabilities had a 1.23 times greater mortality risk compared to those without disabilities. CONCLUSIONS Although cancer stages were controlled, women with disabilities still had a higher mortality risk of breast cancer. Hence, policymakers should pay more attention to women with disabilities to treat them at an early stage, which can reduce the mortality risk attributable to advanced stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puchong Inchai
- Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Wen-Chen Tsai
- Department of Health Services Administration, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Li-Ting Chiu
- Department of Health Services Administration, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Tseng Kung
- Department of Healthcare Administration, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cheraghlou S, Pahalyants V, Jairath NK, Doudican NA, Carucci JA. High-volume facilities are significantly more likely to use guideline-adherent systemic immunotherapy for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: implications for cancer care regionalization. Arch Dermatol Res 2024; 316:86. [PMID: 38349538 DOI: 10.1007/s00403-024-02817-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a neuroendocrine skin cancer with a high rate of mortality. While still relatively rare, the incidence of MCC has been rapidly rising in the US and around the world. Since 2017, two immunotherapeutic drugs, avelumab and pembrolizumab, have been FDA-approved for the treatment of metastatic MCC and have revolutionized outcomes for MCC. However, real-world outcomes can differ from clinical trial data, and the adoption of novel therapeutics can be gradual. We aimed to characterize the treatment practices and outcomes of patients with metastatic MCC across the US. A retrospective cohort study of adult cases of MCC in the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2004 to 2019 was performed. Multivariable logistic regressions to determine the association of a variety of patient, tumor, and system factors with likelihood of receipt of systemic therapies were performed. Univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox survival regressions were performed. We identified 1017 cases of metastatic MCC. From 2017 to 2019, 54.2% of patients received immunotherapy. This increased from 45.1% in 2017 to 63.0% in 2019. High-volume centers were significantly more likely to use immunotherapy (odds ratio 3.235, p = 0.002). On univariate analysis, patients receiving systemic immunotherapy had significantly improved overall survival (p < 0.001). One-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 47.2% (standard error [SE] 1.8%), 21.8% (SE 1.5%), and 16.5% (SE 1.4%), respectively, for patients who did not receive immunotherapy versus 62.7% (SE 3.5%), 34.4% (SE 3.9%), and 23.6% (SE 4.4%), respectively, for those who did (Fig. 1). In our multivariable survival regression, receipt of immunotherapy was associated with an approximately 35% reduction in hazard of death (hazard ratio 0.665, p < 0.001; 95% CI 0.548-0.808). Our results demonstrate that the real-world survival advantage of immunotherapy for metastatic MCC is similar to clinical trial data. However, many patients with metastatic disease did not receive this guideline-recommended therapy in our most recent study year, and use of immunotherapy is higher at high-volume centers. This suggests that regionalization of care to high-volume centers or dissemination of their practices, may ultimately improve patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayan Cheraghlou
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vartan Pahalyants
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neil K Jairath
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicole A Doudican
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - John A Carucci
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
- NYU Dermatologic Surgical Associates, 222 East 41st Street, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mittra ES, Wong RKS, Winters C, Brown A, Murley S, Kennecke H. Establishing a robust radioligand therapy program: A practical approach for North American centers. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e6780. [PMID: 38214130 PMCID: PMC10905220 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Radioligand therapy (RLT) is a targeted approach to treating cancer that has been shown to be safe and effective in a variety of disease states, including gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, lymphoma, and most recently, advanced prostate cancer. In the United States, patient access to this therapy is currently variable. Implementation of new RLT programs and expansion of existing programs are needed to broaden patient access to and standardize the delivery of RLT, especially as new therapies are introduced into clinical practice. Drawing from experience in establishing RLT programs in different settings, we have developed practical recommendations for building and implementing a robust RLT program. In this review, we present our recommendations for minimal requirements and optimal requirements, as well as system considerations, and special issues associated with implementing an RLT program in North American centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik S. Mittra
- Department of Diagnostic RadiologyOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Rebecca K. S. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Celeste Winters
- Department of Diagnostic RadiologyOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Adam Brown
- Department of Diagnostic RadiologyOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Shondra Murley
- Department of Nuclear MedicineWest Tennessee HealthcareJacksonTennesseeUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Teixeira RMP, Oliveira JC, de Andrade MAB, Pinheiro FGDMS, Vieira RDCA, Santana-Santos E. Are patient volume and care level in teaching hospitals variables affecting clinical outcomes in adult intensive care units? EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO 2023; 21:eAO0406. [PMID: 37820201 PMCID: PMC10519666 DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2023ao0406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Teixeira et al. showed that patients admitted to the intensive care unit of a teaching hospital in a non-metropolitan region needed more support, had worse prognostic indices, and had a higher nursing workload in the first 24 hours of admission. In addition, worse outcomes, including mortality, need for dialysis, pressure injury, infection, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and prolonged hospital stay, were observed in the teaching hospital. Worse outcomes were more prevalent in the teaching hospital. Understanding the importance of teaching hospitals to implement well-established care protocols is critical. OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit of teaching (HI) and nonteaching (without an academic affiliation; H2) hospitals. METHODS In this prospective cohort study, adult patients hospitalized between August 2018 and July 2019, with a minimum length of stay of 24 hours in the intensive care unit, were included. Patients with no essential information in their medical records to evaluate the study outcomes were excluded. Resuslts: Overall, 219 patients participated in this study. The clinical and demographic characteristics of patients in H1 and H2 were similar. The most prevalent clinical outcomes were death, need for dialysis, pressure injury, length of hospital stay, mechanical ventilation >48 hours, and infection, all of which were more prevalent in the teaching hospital. CONCLUSION Worse outcomes were more prevalent in the teaching hospital. There was no difference between the institutions concerning the survival rate of patients as a function of length of hospital stay; however, a difference was observed in intensive care unit admissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jussiely Cunha Oliveira
- Universidade Federal de SergipeSão CristovãoSEBrazil Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristovão, SE, Brazil.
| | | | | | | | - Eduesley Santana-Santos
- Universidade Federal de SergipeSão CristovãoSEBrazil Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristovão, SE, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Peeters NWL, Vreman RA, Cirkel GA, Kersten MJ, van Laarhoven HWM, Timmers L. Systemic anticancer treatment in the Netherlands: Few hospitals treat many patients, many hospitals treat few patients. Health Policy 2023; 135:104865. [PMID: 37459745 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The correlation between patient volume and clinical outcomes is well known for various oncological treatments, especially in the surgical field. The current level of centralisation of systemic treatment of (hemato-)oncology indications in Dutch hospitals is unknown. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to gain insight in patient volumes per hospital of patients treated with systemic anticancer treatment in the Netherlands. METHODS National claims data (Vektis) of all 73 Dutch hospitals that provide systemic anticancer medication in the Netherlands for the time period 2019 were used. The distribution of volumes of patients treated with anticancer medication for 38 different haematological or oncological indications was analysed. Hospitals were categorized into academic/specialised, general, and top clinical. Two volume cut off points (10 and 30 patients) were used to identify hospitals treating relatively few patients with anticancer medication. Four indications were investigated in more detail. RESULTS A wide distribution in patient volumes within hospitals was observed. Top clinical hospitals generally treated the most patients per hospital, followed by general and academic/specialised oncology hospitals. The volume cut off points showed that in 19 indications (50%) the majority (>50%) of all hospitals treated less than 10 patients and in 25 indications (66%) the majority of all hospitals treated less than 30 patients with anticancer medication. Four case studies demonstrated that relatively few hospitals treat many patients while many hospitals treat few patients with anticancer medication. CONCLUSION In the majority of oncology indications, a large proportion of Dutch hospitals treat small numbers of unique patients with anticancer medication. The high level of fragmentation gives ground for further exploration and discussion on how the organisation of care can support optimization of the efficiency and quality of care. Professional groups, policy makers, patients, and healthcare insurers should consider per indication whether centralisation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rick A Vreman
- Zorginstituut Nederland (ZIN), Diemen, the Netherlands; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Geert A Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Marie José Kersten
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yoshida H, Machida H, Matsuo K, Terai Y, Fujii T, Mandai M, Kawana K, Kobayashi H, Mikami M, Nagase S. Trend and characteristics of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial cancer in Japan. J Gynecol Oncol 2023; 34:e56. [PMID: 36929580 PMCID: PMC10157347 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e56] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Owing to the potential benefits of minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer, the practice pattern has recently shifted in Japan. This study examined the trends in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in patients with endometrial cancer in Japan. METHODS This retrospective observational study examined the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Tumor Registry database between 2015-2019. This study examined the time-specific proportion change and predictors of MIS use in initial endometrial cancer treatment in Japan, and compared it with the use of abdominal surgery. Additionally, the association between hospital surgical treatment volume and MIS use was examined. RESULTS A total of 14,059 patients (26.5%) underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy, and 39,070 patients (73.5%) underwent abdominal hysterectomy in the study period. Patients who underwent MIS were more likely to be treated at high-volume centers, younger, central, or western Japan residents, registered in recent years, and had a tumor with stage I disease, type 1 histology, and less myometrial invasion (all adjusted p<0.05). The proportion of MIS treatments increased from 19.1% in 2015 to 34.3% in 2019 (p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, treatment at high-volume centers was a contributing factor for MIS (adjusted odds ratio=3.85; 95% confidence interval=3.44-4.30). MIS at high-volume centers increased significantly from 24.8% to 41.0% (p<0.001) during the study period, whereas MIS at low-volume centers remained at median 8.8%. CONCLUSION MIS has increased significantly in recent years, accounting for nearly 34% of surgical management of endometrial cancer in Japan. High-volume treatment centers take the lead in performing MIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
| | - Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yoshito Terai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kobe University School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Takuma Fujii
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Masaki Mandai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kei Kawana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kobayashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kagoshima University School of Medicine, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Mikio Mikami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Satoru Nagase
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Azadnajafabad S, Saeedi Moghaddam S, Mohammadi E, Delazar S, Rashedi S, Baradaran HR, Mansourian M. Patterns of better breast cancer care in countries with higher human development index and healthcare expenditure: Insights from GLOBOCAN 2020. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1137286. [PMID: 37124828 PMCID: PMC10130425 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1137286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The huge burden of breast cancer (BC) necessitates the profound and accurate knowledge of the most recent cancer epidemiology and quality of care provided. We aimed to evaluate BC epidemiology and quality of care and examine the effects of socioeconomic development and healthcare expenditure on disparities in BC care. Methods The results from the GLOBOCAN 2020 study were utilized to extract data on female BC, including incidence and mortality numbers, crude rates, and age-standardized rates [age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) and age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs)]. The mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) was calculated for different locations and socioeconomic stratifications to examine disparities in BC care, with higher values reflecting poor quality of care and vice versa. In both descriptive and analytic approaches, the human development index (HDI) and the proportion of current healthcare expenditure (CHE) to gross domestic product (CHE/GDP%) were used to evaluate the values of MIR. Results Globally, 2,261,419 (95% uncertainty interval (UI): 2,244,260-2,278,710) new cases of female BC were diagnosed in 2020, with a crude rate of 58.5/100,000 population, and caused 684,996 (675,493-694,633) deaths, with a crude rate of 17.7. The WHO region with the highest BC ASIR (69.7) was Europe, and the WHO region with the highest ASMR (19.1) was Africa. The very high HDI category had the highest BC ASIR (75.6), and low HDI areas had the highest ASMR (20.1). The overall calculated value of female BC MIR in 2020 was 0.30, with Africa having the highest value (0.48) and the low HDI category (0.53). A strong statistically significant inverse correlation was observed between the MIR and HDI values for countries/territories (Pearson's coefficient = -0.850, p-value < 0.001). A significant moderate inverse correlation was observed between the MIR and CHE/GDP values (Pearson's coefficient = -0.431, p-value < 0.001). Conclusions This study highlighted that MIR of BC was higher in less developed areas and less wealthy countries. MIR as an indicator of the quality of care showed that locations with higher healthcare expenditure had better BC care. More focused interventions in developing regions and in those with limited resources are needed to alleviate the burden of BC and resolve disparities in BC care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Azadnajafabad
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sahar Saeedi Moghaddam
- Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, Germany
| | - Esmaeil Mohammadi
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (OUHSC), Oklahoma, OK, United States
| | - Sina Delazar
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sina Rashedi
- Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Rajai Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hamid Reza Baradaran
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Ageing Clinical and Experimental Research Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Morteza Mansourian
- Health Promotion Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- *Correspondence: Morteza Mansourian
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Udelsman BV, Chang DC, Boffa DJ, Gaissert HA. Association of Lymph Node Sampling and Clinical Volume in Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2023; 115:166-173. [PMID: 35752354 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.05.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sampling of ≥10 lymph nodes during lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was a previous surveillance metric and potential quality metric of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. We sought to determine guideline adherence and its relationship to hospital lobectomy volume within The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database. METHODS Participant centers providing elective lobectomy for NSCLC within The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (2012-2019) were divided into tertiles according to annual volume. Average hospital nodal harvest of ≥10 nodes per lobectomy defined the primary outcome. Univariable analysis compared average patient and operative characteristics between the participant centers. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine independent factors associated with average clinical center nodal harvest of ≥10 nodes. RESULTS Median annual lobectomy volume was 6.2, 19.9, and 42.7 for low-, medium-, and high-volume participant centers. Among 305 centers and 43 597 patients, 5.6% of lobectomies occurred in low-volume centers, 24.0% in medium-volume centers, and 70.4% in high-volume centers. Average rates of ≥10 nodes per lobectomy were excised in 44.0% of low-volume centers, 70.6% of medium-volume centers, and 75.2% of high-volume centers (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, average nodal excision of ≥10 nodes was strongly associated with medium-volume (odds ratio, 2.94; CI, 1.57-5.50, P < .01) and high-volume (odds ratio, 3.82; CI, 1.95-7.46; P < .001) participant centers. CONCLUSIONS Although higher center volume and increased nodal harvest are associated, 25% of high-volume centers average a rate of <10 lymph nodes per lobectomy for NSCLC. Low nodal yield may underestimate stage, with implications for adjuvant therapy and long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooks V Udelsman
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
| | - David C Chang
- Codman Center for Clinical Effectiveness, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel J Boffa
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Henning A Gaissert
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bizzarri N, Dostálek L, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW, Giannarelli D, Lopez A, Falconer H, Querleu D, Ayhan A, Kim SH, Ortiz DI, Klat J, Landoni F, Rodriguez J, Manchanda R, Kosťun J, Ramirez PT, Meydanli MM, Odetto D, Laky R, Zapardiel I, Weinberger V, Reis RD, Anchora LP, Amaro K, Salehi S, Akilli H, Abu-Rustum NR, Salcedo-Hernández RA, Javůrková V, Mom CH, Scambia G, Cibula D. Association of Hospital Surgical Volume With Survival in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Treated With Radical Hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 141:207-214. [PMID: 36701621 PMCID: PMC10445691 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of number of radical hysterectomies performed per year in each center with disease-free survival and overall survival. METHODS We conducted an international, multicenter, retrospective study of patients previously included in the Surveillance in Cervical Cancer collaborative studies. Individuals with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IB1-IIA1 cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and had negative lymph nodes at final histology were included. Patients were treated at referral centers for gynecologic oncology according to updated national and international guidelines. Optimal cutoffs for surgical volume were identified using an unadjusted Cox proportional hazard model, with disease-free survival as the outcome and defined as the value that minimizes the P-value of the split in groups in terms of disease-free survival. Propensity score matching was used to create statistically similar cohorts at baseline. RESULTS A total of 2,157 patients were initially included. The two most significant cutoffs for surgical volume were identified at seven and 17 surgical procedures, dividing the entire cohort into low-volume, middle-volume, and high-volume centers. After propensity score matching, 1,238 patients were analyzed-619 (50.0%) in the high-volume group, 523 (42.2%) in the middle-volume group, and 96 (7.8%) in the low-volume group. Patients who underwent surgery in higher-volume institutions had progressively better 5-year disease-free survival than those who underwent surgery in lower-volume centers (92.3% vs 88.9% vs 83.8%, P=.029). No difference was noted in 5-year overall survival (95.9% vs 97.2% vs 95.2%, P=.70). Cox multivariable regression analysis showed that FIGO stage greater than IB1, presence of lymphovascular space invasion, grade greater than 1, tumor diameter greater than 20 mm, minimally invasive surgical approach, nonsquamous cell carcinoma histology, and lower-volume centers represented independent risk factors for recurrence. CONCLUSION Surgical volume of centers represented an independent prognostic factor affecting disease-free survival. Increasing number of radical hysterectomies performed in each center every year was associated with improved disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Lukáš Dostálek
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen
- Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Biostatistics Unit, Scientific Directorate, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Aldo Lopez
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru
| | - Henrik Falconer
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Denis Querleu
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ali Ayhan
- Baskent University School of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sarah H Kim
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - David Isla Ortiz
- Gynecology Oncology Center, National Institute of Cancerology Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Jaroslav Klat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Fabio Landoni
- University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynaecologic Oncology Surgical Unit, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Juliana Rodriguez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, & Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jan Kosťun
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mehmet M Meydanli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Diego Odetto
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rene Laky
- Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vit Weinberger
- University Hospital Brno, Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Czech
| | - Ricardo Dos Reis
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luigi Pedone Anchora
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Karina Amaro
- Department of Gynecological Surgery, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru
| | - Sahar Salehi
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Huseyin Akilli
- Baskent University School of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | - Veronika Javůrková
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Constantijne H Mom
- Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Institutional factors associated with early mortality of newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood Cancer J 2022; 12:167. [PMID: 36522307 PMCID: PMC9755312 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00767-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
|
13
|
Bosserman LD, Mambetsariev I, Ladbury C, Barzi A, Johnson D, Morse D, Deaville D, Smith W, Rajurkar S, Merla A, Hajjar G, Kim D, Fricke J, Trisal V, Salgia R. Pyramidal Decision Support Framework Leverages Subspecialty Expertise across Enterprise to Achieve Superior Cancer Outcomes and Personalized, Precision Care Plans. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11226738. [PMID: 36431215 PMCID: PMC9697355 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The complexity of cancer care requires integrated and continuous support to deliver appropriate care. An expert network with complementary expertise and the capability of multidisciplinary care is an integral part of contemporary oncology care. Appropriate infrastructure is necessary to empower this network to deliver personalized precision care to their patients. Providing decision support as cancer care becomes exponentially more complex with new diagnostic and therapeutic choices remains challenging. City of Hope has developed a Pyramidal Decision Support Framework to address these challenges, which were exacerbated by the COVID pandemic, health plan restrictions, and growing geographic site diversity. Optimizing efficient and targeted decision support backed by multidisciplinary cancer expertise can improve individual patient treatment plans to achieve improved care and survival wherever patients are treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda D. Bosserman
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Irwindale, CA 91706, USA
| | - Isa Mambetsariev
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Colton Ladbury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Afsaneh Barzi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Irwindale, CA 91706, USA
| | - Deron Johnson
- Department of Clinical Informatics, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Denise Morse
- Department of Quality, Risk and Regulatory Management, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Debbie Deaville
- Department of Enterprise Business Intelligence, City of Hope, Irwindale, CA 91706, USA
| | - Wade Smith
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Newport Beach, CA 92660, USA
| | - Swapnil Rajurkar
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Upland, CA 91784, USA
| | - Amartej Merla
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Antelope Valley, CA 93534, USA
| | - George Hajjar
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Mission Hills, CA 91345, USA
| | - Daniel Kim
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Jeremy Fricke
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Vijay Trisal
- Department of Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Ravi Salgia
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Patterns of First-Line Systemic Therapy Delivery and Outcomes in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Ontario. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:5988-6009. [PMID: 36005210 PMCID: PMC9406672 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29080472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: First-line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) consists of a combination of cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Recently, targeted therapies such as bevacizumab have been shown to improve oncologic outcomes in a subset of a high-risk population. The objective of this study is to evaluate the patterns of practice and outcomes of first-line systemic treatment of advanced EOC, focusing on the adoption of bevacizumab. Methods: A population cohort study was conducted using administrative data in Ontario, Canada. Patients diagnosed with advanced stage non-mucinous EOC between 2014 and 2018 were identified. Datasets were linked to obtaining information on first-line treatment including surgery, systemic therapy, providers of care, systemic therapy facilities, and acute care utilization (emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations) during systemic treatment. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with systemic therapy utilization. Results: Among 3726 patients with advanced EOC, 2838 (76%) received chemotherapy: 1316 (47%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 1060 (37%) underwent primary cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy, and 462 (16%) received chemotherapy only. The median age was 67 (range: 20–100). Most chemotherapies were prescribed by gynecologic oncologists (60%) and in level 1 academic cancer centres (58%). Only 54 patients (3.1%) received bevacizumab in the first-line setting after its approval in Ontario in 2016. Bevacizumab was more likely to be administered by medical oncologists compared to gynecologic oncologists (OR 3.95, 95% CI 2.11–7.14). In total, 1561 (55%) and 1594 (56%) patients had at least one ED visit and/or hospitalization during systemic treatment, respectively. The most common reasons for ED visits were fever and bowel obstruction. Conclusion: Patterns of care for EOC in Ontario differed between care providers. The uptake of bevacizumab for first-line treatment of EOC was low. Acute care utilization related to EOC was high.
Collapse
|
15
|
Cawich SO, Pearce NW, Naraynsingh V, Shukla P, Deshpande RR. Whipple’s operation with a modified centralization concept: A model in low-volume Caribbean centers. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:7620-7630. [PMID: 36158490 PMCID: PMC9372853 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Conventional data suggest that complex operations, such as a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), should be limited to high volume centers. However, this is not practical in small, resource-poor countries in the Caribbean. In these settings, patients have no option but to have their PDs performed locally at low volumes, occasionally by general surgeons. In this paper, we review the evolution of the concept of the high-volume center and discuss the feasibility of applying this concept to low and middle-income nations. Specifically, we discuss a modification of this concept that may be considered when incorporating PD into low-volume and resource-poor countries, such as those in the Caribbean. This paper has two parts. First, we performed a literature review evaluating studies published on outcomes after PD in high volume centers. The data in the Caribbean is then examined and we discuss the incorporation of this operation into resource-poor hospitals with modifications of the centralization concept. In the authors’ opinions, most patients who require PD in the Caribbean do not have realistic opportunities to have surgery in high-volume centers in developed countries. In these settings, their only options are to have their operations in the resource-poor, low-volume settings in the Caribbean. However, post-operative outcomes may be improved, despite low-volumes, if a modified centralization concept is encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamir O Cawich
- Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St Augustine 000000, Trinidad and Tobago
| | - Neil W Pearce
- University Surgical Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
| | - Vijay Naraynsingh
- Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St Augustine 000000, Trinidad and Tobago
| | - Parul Shukla
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Rahul R Deshpande
- Department of Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
McDaniels-Davidson C, Feng CH, Martinez ME, Canchola AJ, Gomez SL, Nodora JN, Patel SP, Mundt AJ, Mayadev JS. Improved survival in cervical cancer patients receiving care at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers. Cancer 2022; 128:3479-3486. [PMID: 35917201 PMCID: PMC9544648 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background Locally advanced cervical cancer (CC) remains lethal in the United States. We investigate the effect of receiving care at an National Cancer Institute–designated cancer center (NCICC) on survival. Methods Data for women diagnosed with CC from 2004 to 2016 who received radiation treatment were extracted from the California Cancer Registry (n = 4250). Cox proportional hazards regression models assessed whether (1) receiving care at NCICCs was associated with risk of CC‐specific death, (2) this association remained after multivariable adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, and insurance status, and (3) this association was explained by receipt of guideline‐concordant treatment. Results Median age was 50 years (interquartile range [IQR] 41–61 years), with median follow‐up of 2.7 years (IQR 1.3–6.0 years). One‐third of patients were seen at an NCICC, and 29% died of CC. The hazard of CC‐specific death was reduced by 20% for those receiving care at NCICCs compared with patients receiving care elsewhere (HR = .80; 95% CI, 0.70–0.90). Adjustment for guideline‐concordant treatment and other covariates minimally attenuated the association to 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74–0.95), suggesting that the survival advantage associated with care at NCICCs may not be due to receipt of guideline‐concordant treatment. Conclusions This study demonstrates survival benefit for patients receiving care at NCICCs compared with those receiving care elsewhere that is not explained by differences in guideline‐concordant care. Structural, organizational, or provider characteristics and differences in patients receiving care at centers with and without NCI designation could explain observed associations. Further understanding of these factors will promote equality across oncology care facilities and survival equity for patients with CC. This study demonstrates survival benefit for patients receiving care for cervical cancer at National Cancer Institute–designated cancer centers that is not explained by receipt of guideline‐concordant treatment. Further understanding of these factors will promote equality across oncology care facilities resulting in survival equity for patients with cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christine H Feng
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Maria Elena Martinez
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Alison J Canchola
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Scarlett Lin Gomez
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jesse N Nodora
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Sandip P Patel
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Arno J Mundt
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Jyoti S Mayadev
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Millert-Kalińska S, Pruski D, Przybylski M, Stawicka-Niełacna M, Mądry E, Mądry R. High-Volume Hospitals’ Ovarian Cancer Care—Less Individual Approach or Better Treatment Results? Curr Oncol 2022; 29:5278-5294. [PMID: 35892988 PMCID: PMC9394356 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29080419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the eighth most common cancer worldwide and is usually diagnosed in advanced stages. The relationship between treatment in high-volume hospitals (HVHs) and survival in OC has been documented by multiple studies, which showed that superior treatment and survival outcomes are associated with surgical expertise and multidisciplinary resources. To our study, 135 first-time patients treated in the years 2019–2020 in the Department of Oncology of Poznań University of Medical Sciences were enrolled. Th analysis showed a significant dependency between being treated in a HVH from the beginning of one’s diagnosis and the scope of the first intervention. Additionally, among patients treated in our centre, a significant portion of patients underwent laparoscopy, and from one year to another the number of laparoscopies performed increased. This may indicate that more patients began to qualify for neoadjuvant treatment. Patients benefit the most from surgery in a centre with more experience in treating ovarian cancer. In the future, we will be able to expand this study by using data from patients treated before 2019 and analysing larger cohorts of patients. This might enable us to update the rates of overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Millert-Kalińska
- Doctoral School, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznań, Poland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, District Public Hospital in Poznan, 60-479 Poznań, Poland; (D.P.); (M.P.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-513-220-288
| | - Dominik Pruski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, District Public Hospital in Poznan, 60-479 Poznań, Poland; (D.P.); (M.P.)
| | - Marcin Przybylski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, District Public Hospital in Poznan, 60-479 Poznań, Poland; (D.P.); (M.P.)
| | | | - Edyta Mądry
- Department of Physiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznań, Poland;
| | - Radosław Mądry
- Department of Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-569 Poznań, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Leech MM, Weiss JE, Markey C, Loehrer AP. Influence of Race, Insurance, Rurality, and Socioeconomic Status on Equity of Lung and Colorectal Cancer Care. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3630-3639. [PMID: 34997420 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11160-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated the influence that social determinants of health had on stage at diagnosis and receipt of cancer-directed surgery for patients with lung and colorectal cancer in the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry (2010-2015). METHODS This study examined non-Hispanic uninsured or privately-insured patients 18 to 64 years of age. Multivariable logistic regression models, including two-way interaction terms, assessed the influence of race, insurance status, rurality, and Social Deprivation Index on stage at diagnosis and receipt of surgery. RESULTS 6574 lung cancer patients and 5355 colorectal cancer patients were included. Among the lung cancer patients, the uninsured patients had higher odds of having stage IV disease (odds ratio [OR] = 1.46; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.22-1.76) and lower odds of receiving surgery (OR = 0.48; 95 % CI = 0.34-0.69) than the privately-insured patients. Among the colorectal cancer patients, uninsured status was associated with higher odds of stage IV disease (OR = 1.53; 95 % CI = 1.17-2.00) than privately-insured status. A significant insurance status and rurality interaction (p = 0.03) was found in the colorectal model for receipt of surgery. In the privately-insured group, non-Hispanic Black and rural patients had lower odds of receiving colorectal surgery (OR = 0.69; 95 % CI = 0.50-0.94 and OR = 0.68; 95 % CI = 0.52-0.89; respectively) than their non-Hispanic White and urban counterparts. CONCLUSIONS After controlling for confounding and evaluation of interactions between patient-, community-, and geographic-level factors, uninsured status remained the strongest driver of patients' presentation with late-stage lung and colorectal cancer. As policy and care delivery transformation targets uninsured and vulnerable populations, explicit recognition, and measurement of intersectionality should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary M Leech
- The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
| | | | - Chad Markey
- The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Andrew P Loehrer
- The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.,Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.,The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Survival after minimally invasive vs. open radical nephrectomy for stage I and II renal cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol 2022; 27:1068-1076. [PMID: 35319076 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02153-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A recently reported phase III randomized trial comparing open and minimally invasive hysterectomy showed significantly higher rates of local recurrence after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for cervical cancer. This raised concerns regarding patterns of recurrences and survival after MIS in general. This study aims to determine the effect of MIS on all-cause mortality among patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for Stage I and II renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS We utilized the National Cancer Database to identify patients diagnosed with clinical stage I-II RCCs between 2010 and 2013. Patients for whom a laparoscopic or robotic radical nephrectomy was attempted were compared to patients who underwent open radical nephrectomy (ORN). Adjusted regression models with inverse probability propensity score weighting (IPW) were utilized to identify independent predictors of receiving MIS. All-cause mortality rates were compared using IPW survival functions and log-rank tests. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were fitted to determine independent predictors of OS. RESULTS 27,642 patients were identified; 11,524 (41.7%) had MIS, while 16,118 (58.3%) had ORN. Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the IPW cohort showed significant OS advantage for patients who underwent MIS (p < 0.001). Furthermore, length of hospital stays (3 vs. 4 days), 30 day readmission rates (2.4 vs. 2.87%), 30 day (0.53 vs. 0.96%) and 90 day mortality rates (1.04 vs. 1.77%) were significantly higher in the ORN group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS MIS was associated with better OS outcomes compared to ORN for stage I and II RCC. In addition, MIS had lower post-operative readmission, 30- and 90 day mortality rates.
Collapse
|
20
|
Okawa S, Tabuchi T, Nakata K, Morishima T, Koyama S, Odani S, Miyashiro I. Surgical volume threshold to improve 3-year survival in designated cancer care hospitals in 2004-2012 in Japan. Cancer Sci 2022; 113:1047-1056. [PMID: 34985172 PMCID: PMC8898718 DOI: 10.1111/cas.15264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In Japan, cancer care hospitals designated by the national government have a surgical volume requirement of 400 annually, which is not necessarily defined based on patient outcomes. This study aimed to estimate surgical volume thresholds that ensure optimal 3‐year survival for three periods. In total, 186 965 patients who had undergone surgery for solid cancers in 66 designated cancer care hospitals in Osaka between 2004 and 2012 were examined using data from a population‐based cancer registry. These hospitals were categorized by the annual surgical volume of each 50 surgeries (eg, 0‐49, 50‐99, and so on). Using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, we estimated the adjusted 3‐year survival probability per surgical volume category for 2004‐2006, 2007‐2009, and 2010‐2012. Using the joinpoint regression model that computes inflection points in a linear relationship, we estimated the points at which the trend of the association between surgical volume and survival probability changes, defining them as surgical volume thresholds. The adjusted 3‐year survival ranges were 71.7%‐90.0%, 68.2%‐90.0%, and 79.2%‐90.3% in 2004‐2006, 2007‐2009, and 2010‐2012, respectively. The surgical volume thresholds were identified at 100‐149 in 2004‐2006 and 2007‐2009 and 200‐249 in 2010‐2012. The extents of change in the adjusted 3‐year survival probability per increase of 50 surgical volumes were +4.00%, +6.88%, and +1.79% points until the threshold and +0.41%, +0.30%, and +0.11% points after the threshold in 2004‐2006, 2007‐2009, and 2010‐2012, respectively. The existing surgical volume requirements met our estimated thresholds. Surgical volume thresholds based on the association with patient survival may be used as a reference to validate the surgical volume requirement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumiyo Okawa
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.,Institute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tabuchi
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kayo Nakata
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Shihoko Koyama
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Satomi Odani
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Isao Miyashiro
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shim JE, Kim MK, Kim YH, Kim SC. Effect of Quality Control Program in Surgical Management of Early Cervical Cancer. J Korean Med Sci 2021; 36:e316. [PMID: 34811979 PMCID: PMC8608925 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regular assessments of clinical performance in gynecologic cancer surgery is important for the safety of patients. We evaluated the effects of quality control (QC) program on the treatment pattern and clinical outcomes of early cervical cancer. METHODS Medical records of cervical cancer patients who received operation in our institution from January 2007 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were divided into 2 groups, before and after the initiation of QC program, group 1 (2007-2013) and group 2 (2014-2018), based on the operation date. Two groups were compared in clinicopathologic variables, surgical methods, operative details, adjuvant treatments, recurrence and survival. RESULTS A total of 305 cervical cancer patients were included in the analysis, 210 in group 1 and 95 in group 2. In group 2, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was more frequently performed (60.0% vs. 76.8%, P = 0.004), especially in earlier stages (stage IA, 72.6% vs. 100.0%; stage IB, 52.2% vs. 69.5%). However, the median tumor size treated by MIS was decreased in stage IB (20 mm vs. 17 mm, P = 0.015). Frequency of adjuvant treatment was also reduced in stage IB (56.5% vs. 37.3%, P = 0.016). Recurrence within 3 years, 3-year disease free survival and overall survival did not show significant difference; however, 3-year recurrence after MIS was significantly reduced in stage IB. CONCLUSION QC program enforced stricter patient selection criteria for MIS and positively affected clinical outcomes in cervical cancer patients who underwent surgery. Systemic monitoring should be considered for patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Eun Shim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi-Kyung Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yun Hwan Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Seung Cheol Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Concin N, Planchamp F, Abu-Rustum NR, Ataseven B, Cibula D, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Knapp P, Marth C, Morice P, Querleu D, Sehouli J, Stepanyan A, Taskiran C, Vergote I, Wimberger P, Zapardiel I, Persson J. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1508-1529. [PMID: 34795020 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of surgical care as a crucial component of a comprehensive multi-disciplinary management improves outcomes in patients with endometrial carcinoma, notably helping to avoid suboptimal surgical treatment. Quality indicators (QIs) enable healthcare professionals to measure their clinical management with regard to ideal standards of care. OBJECTIVE In order to complete its set of QIs for the surgical management of gynecological cancers, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) initiated the development of QIs for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma. METHODS QIs were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for the identification of potential QIs and documentation of the scientific evidence, two consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians and patient representatives. QIs were defined using a structured format comprising metrics specifications, and targets. A scoring system was then developed to ensure applicability and feasibility of a future ESGO accreditation process based on these QIs for endometrial carcinoma surgery and support any institutional or governmental quality assurance programs. RESULTS Twenty-nine structural, process and outcome indicators were defined. QIs 1-5 are general indicators related to center case load, training, experience of the surgeon, structured multi-disciplinarity of the team and active participation in clinical research. QIs 6 and 7 are related to the adequate pre-operative investigations. QIs 8-22 are related to peri-operative standards of care. QI 23 is related to molecular markers for endometrial carcinoma diagnosis and as determinants for treatment decisions. QI 24 addresses the compliance of management of patients after primary surgical treatment with the standards of care. QIs 25-29 highlight the need for a systematic assessment of surgical morbidity and oncologic outcome as well as standardized and comprehensive documentation of surgical and pathological elements. Each QI was associated with a score. An assessment form including a scoring system was built as basis for ESGO accreditation of centers for endometrial cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Innsbruck Medical Univeristy, Innsbruck, Austria .,Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial Sloann Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Evangelische Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Pawel Knapp
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Oncology Center of Bialystok, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Christian Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Denis Querleu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospitals Strasbourg, Strasbourg, Alsace, France
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universitätzu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Artem Stepanyan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Nairi Medical Center, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, VKV American Hospital, Istambul, Turkey
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jan Persson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yu WS, Bae MK, Choi JK, Hong YK, Park IK. Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Korean National Health Insurance Database. Cancer Res Treat 2021; 53:1104-1112. [PMID: 33494126 PMCID: PMC8524016 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2020.1213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The study aimed to investigate the current status and prognostic factors for overall survival in patients who had undergone pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS The data of 2,573 patients who had undergone pulmonary metastasectomy after surgery for colorectal cancer between January 2009 and December 2014 were extracted from the Korean National Health Insurance Service claims database. Patient-, colorectal cancer-, pulmonary metastasis-, and hospital-related factors were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards analysis to identify prognostic factors for overall survival after pulmonary metastasectomy. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 60.9±10.5 years; 66.2% and 79.1% of the participants were male and had distally located colorectal cancer, respectively. Wedge resection (71.7%) was the most frequent extent of pulmonary resection; 21.8% of the patients underwent repeated pulmonary metastasectomies; 73% of pulmonary metastasectomy cases were performed in tertiary hospitals; 53.9% of patients were treated in Seoul area; 82% of patients received chemotherapy in conjunction with pulmonary metastasectomy. The median survival duration was 51.8 months. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 67.7% and 39.4%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, female sex, distally located colorectal cancer, pulmonary metastasectomy-only treatment, and high hospital volume (> 10 pulmonary metastasectomy cases/yr) were positive prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSION Pulmonary metastasectomy seemed to provide long-term survival of patients with colorectal cancer. The female sex, presence of distally located colorectal cancer, and performance of pulmonary metastasectomy in high-volume centers were positive prognostic factors for survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Sik Yu
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine,
Suwon
| | - Mi Kyung Bae
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital,
Goyang
| | - Jung Kyu Choi
- Institute of Health Insurance and Clinical Research, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital,
Goyang
| | - Young Ki Hong
- Department of General Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital,
Goyang
| | - In Kyu Park
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Papaleontiou M, Chen DW, Banerjee M, Reyes-Gastelum D, Hamilton AS, Ward KC, Haymart MR. Thyrotropin Suppression for Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Physician Survey Study. Thyroid 2021; 31:1383-1390. [PMID: 33779292 PMCID: PMC8558057 DOI: 10.1089/thy.2021.0033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background: Current guidelines recommend against thyrotropin (TSH) suppression in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients; however, physician practices remain underexplored. Our objective was to understand treating physicians' approach to TSH suppression in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Methods: Endocrinologists and surgeons identified by thyroid cancer patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries of Georgia and Los Angeles were surveyed in 2018-2019. Physicians were asked to report how likely they were to recommend TSH suppression (i.e., TSH <0.5 mIU/L) in three clinical scenarios: patients with intermediate-risk, low-risk, and very low-risk papillary thyroid cancer. Responses were measured on a 4-point Likert scale (extremely unlikely to extremely likely). Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine physician characteristics associated with recommending TSH suppression in each of the aforementioned scenarios. Results: Response rate was 69% (448/654). Overall, 80.4% of physicians were likely/extremely likely to recommend TSH suppression for a patient with an intermediate-risk papillary thyroid cancer, 48.8% for a patient with low-risk papillary thyroid cancer, and 29.7% for a patient with very low-risk papillary thyroid cancer. Surgeons were less likely to recommend TSH suppression for an intermediate-risk papillary thyroid cancer patient (odds ratio [OR] = 0.36 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.19-0.69]) compared with endocrinologists. Physicians with higher thyroid cancer patient volume were less likely to suppress TSH in low-risk and very low-risk papillary thyroid cancer patients (i.e., >40 patients per year, OR = 0.53 [CI 0.30-0.96]; OR = 0.49 [CI 0.24-0.99], respectively, compared with 0-20 patients per year). Physicians who estimated higher likelihood of recurrence were more likely to suppress TSH in a patient with very low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (OR = 2.34 [CI 1.91-4.59]). Conclusions: Many patients with low-risk thyroid cancer continue to be treated with suppressive doses of thyroid hormone, emphasizing the need for more high-quality research to guide thyroid cancer management, as well as better understanding of barriers that hinder guideline adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Papaleontiou
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Debbie W. Chen
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Mousumi Banerjee
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - David Reyes-Gastelum
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ann S. Hamilton
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kevin C. Ward
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Megan R. Haymart
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Address correspondence to: Megan R. Haymart, MD, Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, Room 408E, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Harzstark AL, Altschuler A, Amsden LB, Alavi M, Liu L, Presti JC, Brenman LM, Walker LC, Ryken RR, De Mucha Flores AC, Nichols C, Herrinton LJ. Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Expert Testicular Cancer Tumor Board Across a Large Integrated Healthcare Delivery System Via Early Case Ascertainment. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2021; 5:187-193. [PMID: 33571000 DOI: 10.1200/cci.20.00114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In 2016, Kaiser Permanente Northern California began regionalizing testicular cancer care using population-based tumor board review. This mixed methods evaluation describes implementation outcomes and learnings. METHODS We conducted in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, administered surveys to local oncologists and urologists, and used clinical data to evaluate changes in care delivery during 2015-2018. RESULTS An average of 135 patients with testicular cancer were diagnosed each year. Interviews with 16 key stakeholders provided several insights. Implementation resulted in high levels of satisfaction, was dependent on leadership and staff at various levels, and required technology and consulting solutions aligned to user agreements and clinical workflows. Of 123 local oncologists and urologists who completed surveys, 97% understood why care was regionalized and 89% agreed that tumor board review improved treatment decisions. Among 177 patients with stage I seminoma, the percentage appropriately observed rather than treated with adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy increased from 48% (95% CI, 35 to 62) in 2015 to 87% (75 to 99) in 2018. Review altered care based on pathology and radiology re-review in 14.5 % of cases. CONCLUSION Regionalization was feasible and effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea L Harzstark
- Department of Urology, Oakland Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Andrea Altschuler
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Laura B Amsden
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Mubarika Alavi
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Liyan Liu
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Joseph C Presti
- Department of Urology, Oakland Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.,Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Leslie Manace Brenman
- Department of Precision Tracking, Regional Offices, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Lauren C Walker
- Department of Urology, Oakland Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Rene R Ryken
- Department of Precision Tracking, Regional Offices, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Aileen C De Mucha Flores
- Department of Precision Tracking, Regional Offices, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| | - Craig Nichols
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Lisa J Herrinton
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
de Cássio Zequi S, Franca Silva ILA, Duprat JP, Coimbra FJF, Gross JL, Vartanian JG, Makdissi FBA, Leite FPM, da Costa WH, Yazbek G, Joaquim EHG, Bussolotti RM, Caruso P, de Ávila Lima MC, Nakagawa SA, Aguiar S, Baiocchi G, Lopes A, Kowalski LP. Informed consent and a risk-based approach to oncologic surgery in a cancer center during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Surg Oncol 2021; 123:1659-1668. [PMID: 33684245 PMCID: PMC8251048 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients configure a risk group for complications or death by COVID-19. For many of them, postponing or replacing their surgical treatments is not recommended. During this pandemic, surgeons must discuss the risks and benefits of treatment, and patients should sign a specific comprehensive Informed consent (IC). OBJECTIVES To report an IC and an algorithm developed for oncologic surgery during the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS We developed an IC and a process flowchart containing a preoperative symptoms questionnaire and a PCR SARS-CoV-2 test and described all perioperative steps of this program. RESULTS Patients with negative questionnaires and tests go to surgery, those with positive ones must wait 21 days and undergo a second test before surgery is scheduled. The IC focused both on risks and benefits inherent each surgery and on the risks of perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infections or related complications. Also, the IC discusses the possibility of sudden replacement of medical staff member(s) due to the pandemic; the possibility of unexpected complications demanding emergency procedures that cannot be specifically discussed in advance is addressed. CONCLUSIONS During the pandemic, specific tools must be developed to ensure safe experiences for surgical patients and prevent them from having misunderstandings concerning their care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ivan Leonardo Avelino Franca Silva
- Department of Infectious DiseasesAC Camargo Cancer CenterSão PauloSão PauloBrazil,Department of Skin CancerAC Camargo Cancer CenterSão PauloSão PauloBrazil
| | | | | | - Jefferson L. Gross
- Department of Thoracic SurgeryAC Camargo Cancer CenterSão PauloSão PauloBrazil
| | | | | | | | | | - Guilherme Yazbek
- Department of Vascular SurgeryAC Camargo Cancer CenterSão PauloSão PauloBrazil
| | | | | | - Pedro Caruso
- Department of Intensive Care UnitAC Camargo Cancer CenterSão PauloSão PauloBrazil
| | | | | | - Samuel Aguiar
- Department of Pelvic SurgeryAC Camargo Cancer CenterSão PauloSão PauloBrazil
| | - Glauco Baiocchi
- Department of Gynecology OncologyAC Camargo Cancer CenterSão PauloSão PauloBrazil
| | - Ademar Lopes
- Department of SarcomaAC Camargo Cancer CenterSão PauloSão PauloBrazil
| | - Luiz Paulo Kowalski
- Department of Head and NeckAC Camargo Cancer CenterSão PauloSão PauloBrazil,Department of Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of São Paulo Medical SchoolSão PauloSão PauloBrazil
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wallner LP, Banerjee M, Reyes-Gastelum D, Hamilton AS, Ward KC, Lubitz C, Hawley ST, Haymart MR. Multilevel Factors Associated With More Intensive Use of Radioactive Iodine for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021; 106:e2402-e2412. [PMID: 33687063 PMCID: PMC8118575 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgab139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The use of radioactive iodine (RAI) for low-risk thyroid cancer is common, and variation in its use exists, despite the lack of benefit for low-risk disease and potential harms and costs. OBJECTIVE To simultaneously assess patient- and physician-level factors associated with patient-reported receipt of RAI for low-risk thyroid cancer. METHODS This population-based survey study of patients with newly diagnosed differentiated thyroid cancer identified via the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries of Georgia and Los Angeles County included 989 patients with low-risk thyroid cancer, linked to 345 of their treating general surgeons, otolaryngologists, and endocrinologists. We assessed the association of physician- and patient-level factors with patient-reported receipt of RAI for low-risk thyroid cancer. RESULTS Among this sample, 48% of patients reported receiving RAI, and 23% of their physicians reported they would use RAI for low-risk thyroid cancer. Patients were more likely to report receiving RAI if they were treated by a physician who reported they would use RAI for low-risk thyroid cancer compared with those whose physician reported they would not use RAI (adjusted OR: 1.84; 95% CI, 1.29-2.61). The odds of patients reporting they received RAI was 55% lower among patients whose physicians reported they saw a higher volume of patients with thyroid cancer (40+ vs 0-20) (adjusted OR: 0.45; 0.30-0.67). CONCLUSIONS Physician perspectives and attitudes about using RAI, as well as patient volume, influence RAI use for low-risk thyroid cancer. Efforts to reduce overuse of RAI in low-risk thyroid cancer should include interventions targeted toward physicians, in addition to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren P Wallner
- University of Michigan, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Department of Epidemiology, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mousumi Banerjee
- University of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Department of Biostatistics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Ann S Hamilton
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Department of Preventive Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kevin C Ward
- Emory University, Department of Epidemiology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Carrie Lubitz
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Surgery, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah T Hawley
- University of Michigan, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Departments of Health Management and Policy and Health Behavior and Education, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Megan R Haymart
- University of Michigan, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Oh C, Lee S, Chang HK, Ahn SM, Chae K, Kim S, Kim S, Seo JM. Analysis of Pediatric Surgery Using the National Healthcare Insurance Service Database in Korea: How Many Pediatric Surgeons Do We Need in Korea? J Korean Med Sci 2021; 36:e116. [PMID: 33975393 PMCID: PMC8111040 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the past, general surgeons (GSs) without a pediatric surgical subspecialty often performed surgery on children and, even now, GSs are performing many pediatric surgeries. We aimed to investigate the involvement of pediatric surgeons (PSs) and GSs in pediatric surgery, compare the outcomes of surgery in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and estimate the appropriate PS workforce in Korea. METHODS We used surgical data from the National Health Insurance Service database that was collected from patients under the age of 19 years in hospitals nationwide from January 2002 to December 2017. In this database, we found 37 hospitals where PSs worked by using the index operation (congenital diaphragmatic hernia, esophageal atresia, hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, Hirschsprung's disease, abdominal wall defect, jejunoileal atresia, malrotation, anorectal malformation, and biliary atresia). It was assumed that the surgery in the 37 hospitals was performed by PS and that the surgery in other hospitals was performed by GS. Mortality was analyzed to compare the outcomes of acute abdominal surgery in the NICU. We estimated the number of PS currently needed in Korea for each situation under the assumption that PS would perform all operations for the index operation, main pediatric diseases (index operation + gastroesophageal reflux disease, choledochal cyst, inguinal hernia, and appendicitis), acute abdominal surgery in the NICU, and all pediatric surgeries. Additionally, we estimated the appropriate number of PS required for more advanced pediatric surgery in the future. RESULTS The number of pediatric surgeries from 2002 to 2017 increased by 124%. Approximately 10.25% of the total pediatric surgeries were performed by PSs, and the percentage of the surgery performed by PSs increased from 8.32% in 2002 to 15.92% in 2017. The percentage of index operations performed by PSs annually was 62.44% in average. It was only 47.81% in 2002, and increased to 88.79% in 2017. During the last 5 years of the study period, the average annual number of surgeries for main pediatric diseases was approximately 33,228. The ratio of the number of surgeries performed by PS vs. GS steadily increased in main pediatric diseases, however, the ratio of the number of surgery performed by PS for inguinal hernia and appendicitis remained low in the most recent years. The percentage of the number of acute abdominal surgery performed by PS in the NICU was 44% in 2002, but it had recently risen to 89.7%. After 30 days of birth, mortality was significantly lower in all groups that were operated on by PS, rather than GS, during the last 5 years. In 2019, 49 PSs who were under the age of 65 years were actively working in Korea. Assuming that all pediatric surgeries of the patients under the age of 19 years should be performed by PS, the minimum number of PS currently required was about 63 if they perform all of the index operations, the main pediatric surgery was about 209, the NICU operation was about 63, and the all pediatric surgeries was about 366. Additionally, it was determined that approximately 165 to 206 PS will be appropriate for Korea to implement more advanced pediatric surgery in the future. CONCLUSION The proportion of the pediatric surgery performed by PS rather than GS is increasing in Korea, but it is still widely performed by GS. PSs have better operative outcomes for acute abdominal surgery in the NICU than GSs. We believe that at least the index operation or the NICU operation should be performed by PS for better outcome, and that a minimum of 63 PSs are needed in Korea to do so. In addition, approximately 200 PSs will be required in Korea in order to manage main pediatric diseases and to achieve more advanced pediatric surgery in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaeyoun Oh
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sanghoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Kyung Chang
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo Min Ahn
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyunghee Chae
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sujeong Kim
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sukil Kim
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Meen Seo
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Benefits of Local Treatment Including External Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Invasion. BIOLOGY 2021; 10:biology10040326. [PMID: 33919745 PMCID: PMC8070697 DOI: 10.3390/biology10040326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to identify the oncologic benefits of local treatment including radiotherapy (LRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) invading the portal vein. We used clinical data of patients with HCC invading the portal vein from 2008 to 2014 provided by 50 hospitals nationwide. A total of 1163 patients were included in the analysis. The LRT group was younger than the best supportive care (BSC) group (p < 0.001). The mean Child-Pugh score of the LRT group (6.1) was significantly lower than that of the BSC group (7.7) (p < 0.001). Propensity score-matched analysis generated 222 pairs. The median survival of all patients, LRT, and BSC groups were 5.0, 8.0, and 2.0 months, respectively. The overall survival (OS) rates in the LRT and BSC groups were 34.2% and 16.2% at one year, and 12.6% and 6.8% at two years, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that LRT (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.32-0.52), age >60 years, extrahepatic metastases, tumor size ≥10 cm, and Child-Pugh class (CPC) B or C were independent predictors of higher mortality (all p < 0.05). Statistical differences in survival were maintained in all CPC-albumin-bilirubin classes (all p < 0.05). LRT was significant in patients with HCC with portal invasion, valid for patients with CPC A and B.
Collapse
|
30
|
Meazza C, Luksch R, Luzzati A. Managing axial bone sarcomas in childhood. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2021; 21:747-764. [PMID: 33593222 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1891886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Axial osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma are rare, aggressive neoplasms with a worse prognosis than with tumors involving the extremities because they are more likely to be associated with larger tumor volumes, older age, primary metastases, and a poor histological response to chemotherapy. The 5-year OS rates are reportedly in the range of 18-41% for axial osteosarcoma, and 46-64% for Ewing sarcoma.Area covered: The treatment of axial bone tumors is the same as for extremity bone tumors, and includes chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiotherapy.Expert opinion: Local treatment of axial tumors is particularly difficult due to their proximity to neurological and vascular structures, which often makes extensive and en bloc resections impossible without causing significant morbidity. The incidence of local relapse is consequently high, and this is the main issue in the treatment of these tumors. Radiotherapy is an option in the case of surgical resections with close or positive margins, as well as for inoperable tumors. Delivering high doses of RT to the spinal cord can be dangerous. Given the complexity and rarity of these tumors, it is essential for this subset of patients to be treated at selected reference institutions with specific expertise and multidisciplinary skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Meazza
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Medical Oncology and Emathology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Roberto Luksch
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Medical Oncology and Emathology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Luzzati
- Orthopedic Oncology and Spinal Reconstruction Surgery, Orthopedic Oncology Department, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Baeg K, Harris C, Naparst MS, Ahn E, Thapi S, Martin J, Rustgi S, Mhango G, Wisnivesky J, Kim MK. Effect of treatment center volume on outcomes in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:146. [PMID: 33563241 PMCID: PMC7871611 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-07868-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Medical centers with varying levels of expertise treat gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), which are relatively rare tumors. This study assesses the impact of center volume on GEP-NET treatment outcomes. Methods We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry linked to Medicare claims data. The data includes patients diagnosed between 1995 and 2010 who had no health maintenance organization (HMO) coverage, participated in Medicare parts A and B, were older than 65 at diagnosis, had tumor differentiation information, and had no secondary cancer. We identified medical centers at which patients received GEP-NET treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, somatostatin analogues, or radiation therapy) using Medicare claims data. Center volume was divided into 3 tiers – low, medium, and high – based on the number of unique GEP-NET patients treated by a medical center over 2 years. We used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression to assess the association between volume and disease-specific survival. Results We identified 899 GEP-NET patients, of whom 37, 45, and 18% received treatment at low, medium volume, and high-volume centers, respectively. Median disease-specific survival for patients at low and medium tiers were 1.4 years and 5.3 years, respectively, but was not reached for patients at high volume centers. Results showed that patients treated at high volume centers had better survival than those treated in low volume centers (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.4–0.9), but showed no difference in outcomes between medium and high-volume centers. Conclusions Our results suggest that for these increasingly common tumors, referral to a tertiary care center may be indicated. Physicians caring for GEP-NET patients should consider early referral to high volume centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiwoon Baeg
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Cynthia Harris
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Monica S Naparst
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Eugene Ahn
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Sahityasri Thapi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Jacob Martin
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sheila Rustgi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Grace Mhango
- Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juan Wisnivesky
- Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michelle Kang Kim
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chandrasekar T, Boorjian SA, Capitanio U, Gershman B, Mir MC, Kutikov A. Collaborative Review: Factors Influencing Treatment Decisions for Patients with a Localized Solid Renal Mass. Eur Urol 2021; 80:575-588. [PMID: 33558091 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT With the addition of active surveillance and thermal ablation (TA) to the urologist's established repertoire of partial (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) as first-line management options for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC), appropriate treatment decision-making has become increasingly nuanced. OBJECTIVE To critically review the treatment options for localized, nonrecurrent RCC; to highlight the patient, renal function, tumor, and provider factors that influence treatment decisions; and to provide a framework to conceptualize that decision-making process. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A collaborative critical review of the medical literature was conducted. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We identify three key decision points when managing localized RCC: (1) decision for surveillance versus treatment, (2) decision regarding treatment modality (TA, PN, or RN), and (3) decision on surgical approach (open vs minimally invasive). In evaluating factors that influence these treatment decisions, we elaborate on patient, renal function, tumor, and provider factors that either directly or indirectly impact each decision point. As current nomograms, based on preselected patient datasets, perform poorly in prospective settings, these tools should be used with caution. Patient decision aids are an underutilized tool in decision-making. CONCLUSIONS Localized RCC requires highly nuanced treatment decision-making, balancing patient- and tumor-specific clinical variables against indirect structural influences to provide optimal patient care. PATIENT SUMMARY With expanding treatment options for localized kidney cancer, treatment decision is highly nuanced and requires shared decision-making. Patient decision aids may be helpful in the treatment discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thenappan Chandrasekar
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | | | - Umberto Capitanio
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Boris Gershman
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maria Carmen Mir
- Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Torres L, Ramos JG, Varela R, Cabrera M, Orrego PA, Mosquera AV, Vecino SVP. Complicaciones de la linfadenectomía retroperitoneal postquimioterapia en pacientes con tumor germinal de origen testicular: Experiencia de 12 años en un centro de referencia en Colombia. Rev Urol 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
Resumen
Objetivo El objetivo de este estudio, fue describir las complicaciones intraoperatorias y postoperatorias, así como la necesidad de cirugías concomitantes en la linfadenectomía retroperitoneal postquimioterapia en un centro de referencia de manejo de cáncer.
Métodos Se recolectaron datos de una cohorte retrospectiva de pacientes con diagnóstico de tumor germinal de origen testicular que hubiesen recibido quimioterapia y en quienes se documentó tumor residual retroperitoneal y fueron sometidos a LRP-PC durante 12 años en un centro de referencia de manejo de cáncer.
Resultados Se practicó LRP-PC a 64 pacientes. La edad promedio al momento de la cirugía fue 28,1 años (18-47 años). El tamaño promedio de la masa retroperitoneal post quimioterapia fue 6,7 (1–28 cm). La estancia hospitalaria promedio fue 7,9 días (rango 1-99 días), la tasa de cirugías adicionales fue del 20%. La tasa de complicaciones mayores fue de 7,8%. Tener seminoma en la histología testicular inicial se asoció con un mayor sangrado y el tamaño de la masa retroperitoneal residual se asoció con la necesidad de cirugías concomitantes.
Conclusiones La LRP-PC es una cirugía de alto nivel de complejidad que se asocia a complicaciones mayores y a la necesidad de cirugías concomitantes. Esta cohorte de pacientes muestra desenlaces similares a los descritos en la literatura, recalcando el hecho de que esta cirugía, debería ser realizada en centros de referencia de manejo del cáncer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynda Torres
- Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Centro Policlínico Olaya, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Vaughan L, Bardsley M, Bell D, Davies M, Goddard A, Imison C, Melnychuk M, Morris S, Rafferty AM. Models of generalist and specialist care in smaller hospitals in England: a mixed-methods study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr09040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
The increasing number of older, complex patients who require emergency admission to hospital has prompted calls for better models of medical generalist care, especially for smaller hospitals, whose size constrains resources and staffing.
Objective
To investigate the strengths and weaknesses of the current models of medical generalism used in smaller hospitals from patient, professional and service perspectives.
Methods
The design was a mixed-methods study. Phase 1 was a scoping and mapping exercise to create a typology of models of care, which was then explored further through 11 case studies. Phase 2 created a classification using the Hospital Episode Statistics of acute medical ‘generalist’ and ‘specialist’ work and described differences in workload and explored the links between case mix, typology and length of stay and between case mix and skill mix. Phase 3 analysed the relationships between models of care and patient-level costs. Phase 4 examined the strengths and weaknesses of the models of care through focus groups, a discrete choice experiment and an exploration of the impact of typology on other outcomes.
Results
In total, 50 models of care were explored through 48 interviews. A typology was constructed around generalist versus specialist patterns of consultant working. Twenty-five models were deployed by 48 hospitals, and no more than four hospitals used any one model of care. From the patient perspective, analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics data of 1.9 million care episodes found that the differences in case mix between hospitals were relatively small, with 65–70% of episodes accounted for by 20 case types. The skill mix of hospital staff varied widely; there were no relationships with case mix. Patients exhibited a preference for specialist care in the discrete choice experiment but indicated in focus groups that overall hospital quality was more important. From a service perspective, qualitative work found that models of care were contingent on complex constellations of factors, including staffing, the local hospital environment and policy imperatives. Neither the model of care nor the case mix accounted for variability in the length of stay (no associations were significant at p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the costs of the models. Professionally, the preferences of doctors for specialist versus generalist work depended on their experiences of providing care and were associated with a healthy organisational culture and a co-operative approach to managing emergency work. Concepts of medical generalism were found to be complex and difficult to define, with theoretical models differing markedly from models in action.
Limitations
Smaller hospitals in multisite trusts were excluded, potentially leading to sample bias. The rapidly changing nature of the models limited the analysis of typology against outcomes.
Conclusions
The case mix of smaller hospitals was dominated by patients with presentations amenable to generalist approaches to care; however, there was no evidence to support any particular pattern of consultant working. Matching hospital staff to better meet local need and the creation of more collaborative working environments appear more likely to improve care in smaller hospitals than changing models.
Future work
The exploration of the relationships between workforce, measures of hospital culture, models of care, costs and outcomes in both smaller and larger hospitals is urgently required to underpin service reforms.
Study registration
This study is registered as Integrated Research Application System project ID 191393.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 4. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anne Marie Rafferty
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fong ZV, Lim PW, Hendrix R, Castillo CFD, Nipp RD, Lindberg JM, Whalen GF, Kastrinakis W, Qadan M, Ferrone CR, Warshaw AL, Lillemoe KD, Chang DC, Traeger LN. Patient and Caregiver Considerations and Priorities When Selecting Hospitals for Complex Cancer Care. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:4183-4192. [PMID: 33415563 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09506-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare policies have focused on centralizing care to high-volume centers in an effort to optimize patient outcomes; however, little is known about patients' and caregivers' considerations and selection process when selecting hospitals for care. We aim to explore how patients and caregivers select hospitals for complex cancer care and to develop a taxonomy for their selection considerations. METHODS This was a qualitative study in which data were gathered from in-depth interviews conducted from March to November 2019 among patients with hepatopancreatobiliary cancers who were scheduled to undergo a pancreatectomy (n = 20) at a metropolitan, urban regional, or suburban medical center and their caregivers (n = 10). RESULTS The interviews revealed six broad domains that characterized hospital selection considerations: hospital factors, team characteristics, travel distance to hospital, referral or recommendation, continuity of care, and insurance considerations. The identified domains were similar between participants seen at the metropolitan center and urban/suburban medical centers, with the following exceptions: participants receiving care specifically at the metropolitan center noted operative volume and access to specific services such as clinical trials in their hospital selection; participants receiving care at urban/suburban centers noted health insurance considerations and having access to existing medical records in their hospital selection. CONCLUSIONS This study delineates the many considerations of patients and caregivers when selecting hospitals for complex cancer care. These identified domains should be incorporated into the development and implementation of centralization policies to help increase patient access to high-quality cancer care that is consistent with their priorities and needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi Ven Fong
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Pei-Wen Lim
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ryan Hendrix
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | - Ryan D Nipp
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James M Lindberg
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Giles F Whalen
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | - Motaz Qadan
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Andrew L Warshaw
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Keith D Lillemoe
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David C Chang
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lara N Traeger
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Integrating Academic and Community Cancer Care and Research through Multidisciplinary Oncology Pathways for Value-Based Care: A Review and the City of Hope Experience. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10020188. [PMID: 33430334 PMCID: PMC7825796 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
As the US transitions from volume- to value-based cancer care, many cancer centers and community groups have joined to share resources to deliver measurable, high-quality cancer care and clinical research with the associated high patient satisfaction, provider satisfaction, and practice health at optimal costs that are the hallmarks of value-based care. Multidisciplinary oncology care pathways are essential components of value-based care and their payment metrics. Oncology pathways are evidence-based, standardized but personalizable care plans to guide cancer care. Pathways have been developed and studied for the major medical, surgical, radiation, and supportive oncology disciplines to support decision-making, streamline care, and optimize outcomes. Implementing multidisciplinary oncology pathways can facilitate comprehensive care plans for each cancer patient throughout their cancer journey and across large multisite delivery systems. Outcomes from the delivered pathway-based care can then be evaluated against individual and population benchmarks. The complexity of adoption, implementation, and assessment of multidisciplinary oncology pathways, however, presents many challenges. We review the development and components of value-based cancer care and detail City of Hope’s (COH) academic and community-team-based approaches for implementing multidisciplinary pathways. We also describe supportive components with available results towards enterprise-wide value-based care delivery.
Collapse
|
37
|
Halpern AB, Walter RB. Practice patterns and outcomes for adults with acute myeloid leukemia receiving care in community vs academic settings. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2020; 2020:129-134. [PMID: 33275691 PMCID: PMC7727552 DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2020000097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Consistent with observations in other disease settings, retrospective studies have indicated that treatment outcomes for adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are better in higher- vs lower-volume hospitals and academic vs nonacademic centers, with greatest benefits noted in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Younger age, more frequent receipt of chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation, and differences in comorbidities and socioeconomic factors may partially account for these differences. With new therapeutic options including oral small molecule inhibitors and parenteral drugs suitable for outpatient administration, there is increasing interest from patients and physicians in treating AML in the community setting and avoiding referral to academic centers. This may be particularly true for older adults, for whom treatment rates in the community have historically been low, and for those with comorbidities, because treatment benefits are estimated to be low, and thus travel to academic centers is perceived as especially burdensome. How the volume-outcome relationship is affected by the shift of the treatment landscape in AML over the last few years is unknown. Additionally, improvements in supportive care (transfusion support, broad-spectrum oral antimicrobials), resulting in gradually decreasing early death rates over time, and the growing focus on the impact of AML therapy on quality of life and treatment cost concerns further fuel the larger trend toward an increasing proportion of care delivered in the outpatient setting. Here, we examine whether the current shift of administering chemotherapy and supportive care to the outpatient setting can be translated to the community setting without compromising patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna B. Halpern
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and
| | - Roland B. Walter
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and
- Department of Pathology and
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mortini P, Nocera G, Roncelli F, Losa M, Formenti AM, Giustina A. The optimal numerosity of the referral population of pituitary tumors centers of excellence (PTCOE): A surgical perspective. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2020; 21:527-536. [PMID: 32488741 DOI: 10.1007/s11154-020-09564-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Surgical experience is of paramount importance to reach therapeutic success and minimize operative complications. In the field of pituitary surgery, this led to the concept of Pituitary Center of Excellence (PTCOE) defined as a center where an interdisciplinary team works in collaboration and where surgeons can be trained appropriately to reach and keep excellence in daily practice. To review the literature to define the optimal referral population size to establish a PTCOE to optimize both training and specific field research. A review of the literature was performed about epidemiology. The time needed to observe 200 cases of PAs in a single PTCOE and to reach the minimal surgical experience threshold (MSET) was calculated for different referral population groups. The time needed to reach MSET decreased as population size increased. We defined a population as the optimal one to be served by a single PTCOE with a single dedicated neurosurgeon. PTCOEs should be established after an analysis of the referral population, number of cases suitable for surgical treatment and number of dedicated neurosurgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Mortini
- Division of Neurosurgery and Gamma-Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Insitute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Gianluca Nocera
- Division of Neurosurgery and Gamma-Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Insitute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Roncelli
- Division of Neurosurgery and Gamma-Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Insitute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Losa
- Division of Neurosurgery and Gamma-Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Insitute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Formenti
- Division of Endocrinology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Giustina
- Division of Endocrinology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Luo Q, Dor A, Pittman P. Optimal staffing in community health centers to improve quality of care. Health Serv Res 2020; 56:112-122. [PMID: 33090467 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore optimal workforce configurations in the production of care quality in community health centers (CHCs), accounting for interactions among occupational categories, as well as contributions to the volume of services. DATA SOURCES We linked the Uniform Data System from 2014 to 2016 with Internal Revenue Service nonprofit tax return data. The final database contained 3139 center-year observations from 1178 CHCs. STUDY DESIGN We estimated a system of two generalized linear production functions, with quality of care and volume of services as outputs, using the average percent of diabetic patients with controlled A1C level and hypertensive patients with controlled blood pressure as quality measures. To explore the substitutability and complementarity between staffing categories, we estimated a revenue function. FINDINGS Primary care physicians and advanced practice clinicians achieve similar quality outcomes (3.2 percent and 3.0 percent improvement in chronic condition management per full-time equivalent (FTE), respectively). Advanced practice clinicians generate less revenue per FTE but are generally less costly to employ. CONCLUSION As quality incentives are further integrated into payment systems, CHCs will need to optimize their workforce configuration to improve quality. Given the relative efficiency of advanced practice clinicians in producing quality, further hiring of these professionals is a cost-effective investment for CHCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Luo
- The Fitzhugh Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Avi Dor
- Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.,National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patricia Pittman
- The Fitzhugh Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ryskina KL, Song W, Sharma V, Yuan Y, Intrator O. Characterizing Physician Practice in Nursing Homes Using Claims-Based Measures: Correlation With Nursing Home Administrators' Perceptions. Med Care Res Rev 2020; 78:806-815. [PMID: 32985350 DOI: 10.1177/1077558720960900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Heterogeneity in physician practice within nursing homes (NHs) may explain variations in quality. However, data on physician practice organization in NHs are hard to obtain. We characterized NH physician practice using two claims-based measures: (a) concentration of NH care among physicians (measured by Herfindahl-Hirschman index of visits); and (b) physician NH practice specialization (measured by the proportion of a physician's visits to NHs). We examined the relationship between the measures and NH administrator perceptions of physician practice reported in the Shaping Long-Term Care in America (SLTCA) Survey. All 2011 Part B claims from 13,718 physicians who treated Medicare fee-for-service patients in 2,095 NHs in the SLTCA survey were analyzed. The median Herfindahl-Hirschman index was 0.44 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.28-0.70), and the median specialization was 38.1% (IQR 19.9% to 60.9%). NHs with higher physician specialization reported more frequent physician participation in care coordination activities. Claims-based measures could inform the study of NH physician practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wei Song
- University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.,Canandaigua VAMC, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Yihao Yuan
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Orna Intrator
- University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.,Canandaigua VAMC, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fardal Ø, Skau I, Rongen G, Heasman P, Grytten J. Provision of treatment for periodontitis in Norway in 2013 – a national profile. Int Dent J 2020; 70:266-276. [DOI: 10.1111/idj.12565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
|
42
|
Clark PR, Dambrino RJ, Himel SM, Smalley ZS, Yimer WK, Washington CW. The impact of craniotomy for brain tumor case volume on patient safety indicators and in-hospital mortality. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020; 196:106043. [PMID: 32653799 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The relationship between outcomes, patient safety indicators and volume has been well established in patient's undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor. However, the determination of "high" and "low" volume centers have been subjectively derived. We present a paper with a novel method of objectively determining "high" volume centers for craniotomy for brain tumor. METHODS Patients from 2002 to 2011 were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database using ICD-9 codes related to craniotomy for brain tumor. Primary endpoints of interest were hospital PSI event rate, in-hospital mortality rate, observed-to-expected PSI event ratio, and O/E in-hospital mortality ratio. Using a zero-inflated gamma model analysis and a cutpoint analysis we determined the volume threshold between and "high" and "low" volume hospitals. We then completed an analysis using this determined threshold to look at PSI events and mortality as they relate to "high" volume and "low" volume hospitals. RESULTS 12.4 % of hospitals were categorized as good performers using O/E ratios. Regarding in-hospital mortality, 16.8 % were good performers. Using the above statistical analysis the threshold to define high vs. low volume centers was determined to be 27 craniotomies. High volume centers had significantly lower O/E ratios for both PSI and mortality events. The PSI O/E ratio was reduced 55 % and mortality O/E ratio reduced 73 % at high volume centers as defined by our analysis. CONCLUSIONS Patients treated at institutions performing >27 craniotomies per year for brain tumors have a lower likelihood of PSI events and decreased in-hospital morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul R Clark
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Jackson, MS, United States.
| | - Robert J Dambrino
- Vanderbilt University, Department of Neurosurgery, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Sean M Himel
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Jackson, MS, United States
| | - Zachary S Smalley
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Jackson, MS, United States
| | - Wondwosen K Yimer
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, Department of Data Science, Jackson, MS, United States
| | - Chad W Washington
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Jackson, MS, United States
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hsu A, Matera R, Vieira K, Reagan JL, Farmakiotis D. Antifungal prophylaxis during 7 + 3 induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia is associated with improved survival, in a setting with low incidence of invasive mold infections. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:707-712. [PMID: 32435969 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05535-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this patient population, antifungal prophylaxis (AP) has been associated with decreased incidence of IFIs and better survival. However, some centers have not adopted AP during induction chemotherapy for AML, as it is unclear whether AP improves outcomes in settings where the incidence of invasive mold infections is low. We retrospectively assessed the differences in clinical outcomes and resource utilization in patients undergoing 7 + 3 induction chemotherapy for AML, after implementing a policy of AP as part of a dedicated inpatient malignant hematology service (HS) at Rhode Island Hospital. Between January 1, 2007 and April 1, 2019, 56 patients with AML received AP during 7 + 3 induction chemotherapy and 52 patients did not, without significant differences in their baseline characteristics. Use of AP was associated with less proven or probable IFI (0% vs. 6%, P = 0.1) and lower all-cause in-hospital mortality (7% vs. 21%, P < 0.05), without significant increases in resource utilization or toxicities. Empiric and targeted antifungal therapies were more frequently started in the non-AP group (69%) than changed in the AP group (41%, P < 0.005). Having a dedicated inpatient malignant hematology service was also associated with improved outcomes. However, use of AP was associated with better survival (30-day post-induction survival log-rank P < 0.05), prior to the implementation of this clinical service as well, which is suggestive of an independent benefit from AP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Hsu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - Robert Matera
- Department of Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Kendra Vieira
- Division of Infectious Diseases, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - John L Reagan
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Dimitrios Farmakiotis
- Division of Infectious Diseases, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tan MY, Fisher R, Ball D. Does institutional patient accrual volume impact overall survival in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer receiving radical (chemo)radiation? A secondary analysis of TROG 99.05. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 64:556-562. [PMID: 32394626 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Increased hospital patient volume, reflecting greater experience, has been shown to be associated with improved survival for some cancers. However, there is no evidence to support the volume-outcome hypothesis for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients within the Australasian setting. We examined the relationship between overall survival (OS) and institutional patient accrual volume (IPAV) in a large prospective Australasian NSCLC database (TROG 99.05). METHODS TROG 99.05 was an observational study which accrued patients from 1999 to 2007 to examine the relationship between primary lung cancer volume and survival. To be eligible for inclusion, patients had to have inoperable, biopsy-proven NSCLC planned for radiotherapy to a minimum dose of 50Gy in 20 fractions, with or without chemotherapy. Participating institutions were de-identified and grouped according to whether accrual was low, medium or high. OS was compared between groups and adjusted for prognostic factors using Cox regression. RESULTS About 509 patients were accrued from 16 centres. Median potential follow-up time was 60 months. Median survival for all groups was 20 months (95% CI 18.3-21.8 months). There were no statistically significant differences in OS with increasing patient accrual across the three groups after adjustment for prognostic factors (P = 0.84, 2 df). The hazard ratios (HR) for group accrual volumes, relative to that for high-accrual volume, were as follows: low, 1.18; medium, 1.14. Test for trend: HR = 0.91 per group (95% CI 0.76-1.09, P = 0.31). CONCLUSION In the setting of a clinical trial with rigorous quality assurance, we found no evidence for an association between institutional accrual and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mun Yee Tan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard Fisher
- Cancer Research Division, Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Ball
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Anakwenze CP, McGovern S, Taku N, Liao K, Boyce-Fappiano DR, Kamiya-Matsuoka C, Ghia A, Chung C, Trifiletti D, Ferguson SD, Li J, Yeboa DN. Association Between Facility Volume and Overall Survival for Patients with Grade II Meningioma after Gross Total Resection. World Neurosurg 2020; 141:e133-e144. [PMID: 32407910 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2019] [Revised: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of adjuvant radiation after gross total resection (GTR) for grade II meningioma is evolving, prompting further evaluation in NRG-BN003, a phase 3 national trial. Furthermore, the relationship between facility volume and outcomes in patients with grade II meningioma after GTR has not been examined at a national level. We aim to assess overall survival (OS) of patients with grade II meningioma after GTR by surgical case volume and OS by receipt of adjuvant radiation. METHODS We used the National Cancer Database to identity 2823 patients diagnosed with grade II meningioma who underwent GTR. Propensity score matching was applied to balance covariates in patients with grade II meningioma after GTR stratified by adjuvant radiation status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with radiation receipt. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to assess OS by facility volume. RESULTS As facility volume increased, OS increased, with a 5-year OS of 72.8% for facilities with GTR grade II meningioma volumes of ≤8 cases per decade and 87.5% for >8 cases per decade (P < 0.0001). There was no difference in 5-year OS between GTR alone and GTR with adjuvant radiation (84.8% vs. 86.4%; P = 0.151). Covariates significantly associated with radiation receipt included facility location, facility volume, distance, and tumor size. CONCLUSIONS Treatment at higher surgical case volume facilities is associated with improved OS for GTR grade II meningioma. These facilities also have more patients receiving adjuvant radiation. However, we observed no difference in OS between adjuvant radiation and surgery alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chidinma P Anakwenze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
| | - Susan McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nicolette Taku
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kaiping Liao
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David R Boyce-Fappiano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amol Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Sherise D Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Debra Nana Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Cibula D, Planchamp F, Fischerova D, Fotopoulou C, Kohler C, Landoni F, Mathevet P, Naik R, Ponce J, Raspagliesi F, Rodolakis A, Tamussino K, Taskiran C, Vergote I, Wimberger P, Zahl Eriksson AG, Querleu D. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:3-14. [PMID: 31900285 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimizing and ensuring the quality of surgical care is essential to improve the management and outcome of patients with cervical cancer.To develop a list of quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice. METHODS Quality indicators were developed using a four-step evaluation process that included a systematic literature search to identify potential quality indicators, in-person meetings of an ad hoc group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large panel of European clinicians and patient representatives. RESULTS Fifteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were selected. Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are also detailed to define how the indicator will be measured in practice. Each indicator has a target which gives practitioners and health administrators a quantitative basis for improving care and organizational processes. DISCUSSION Implementation of institutional quality assurance programs can improve quality of care, even in high-volume centers. This set of quality indicators from the European Society of Gynaecological Cancer may be a major instrument to improve the quality of surgical treatment of cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Center First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Daniela Fischerova
- Gynecologic Oncology Center First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Christhardt Kohler
- Asklepios Hambourg Altona and Department of Gynecology, University of Cologne, Koln, Germany
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Gynaecology, Universita degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Patrice Mathevet
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois Departement de gynecologie-obstetrique et genetique medicale, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raj Naik
- Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, UK
| | - Jordi Ponce
- University Hospital of Bellvitge (IDIBELL), LHospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | | | - Alexandros Rodolakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athinon, Greece
| | | | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Clinical Research Unit, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Zhu P, Du XL, Zhu JJ, Esquenazi Y. Improved survival of glioblastoma patients treated at academic and high-volume facilities: a hospital-based study from the National Cancer Database. J Neurosurg 2020; 132:491-502. [PMID: 30771780 DOI: 10.3171/2018.10.jns182247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The present study was designed to explore the association between facility type (academic center [AC] vs non-AC), facility volume (high-volume facility [HVF] vs low-volume facility [LVF]), and outcomes of glioblastoma (GBM) treatment. METHODS Based on the National Cancer Database (NCDB), GBM patients were categorized by treatment facility type (non-AC vs AC) and volume [4 categories (G1-G4): < 5.0, 5.0-14.9, 15.0-24.9, and ≥ 25.0, cases/year]. HVF was defined based on the 90th percentile of annual GBM cases (≥ 15.0 cases/year). Outcomes include overall survival (OS), the receipt of surgery and adjuvant therapies, 30-day readmission/mortality, 90-day mortality, and prolonged length of inpatient hospital stay (LOS). Kaplan-Meier methods and accelerated failure time (AFT) models were applied for survival analysis, and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to compare differences in the receipt of treatment and related short-term outcomes by facility type and volume. RESULTS A total of 40,256 GBM patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 were included. Patients treated at an AC & HVF experienced the longest survival (median OS: 13.3, 11.8, 11.1, and 10.3 months; time ratio [TR]: 1.00 [Ref.], 0.96, 0.92, and 0.89; for AC & HVF, AC & LVF, non-AC & HVF, and non-AC & LVF, respectively), regardless of care transition/treatment referral. Tumor resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were most frequently utilized in AC & HVF. Prolonged LOS, 30-day readmission, and 90-day mortality were decreased by 20%, 22%, and 16% (p ≤ 0.001), respectively, at AC & HVF. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence of superior outcomes when GBM patients are treated at AC and HVF. Standardization of health care across facility type and/or volume and comprehensive neuro-oncological care should be a potential goal in the management of GBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Zhu
- 1The Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School.,2Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, UTHealth School of Public Health; and
| | - Xianglin L Du
- 2Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, UTHealth School of Public Health; and
| | - Jay-Jiguang Zhu
- 1The Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School
| | - Yoshua Esquenazi
- 1The Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School.,3Center for Precision Health, School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yoshida EJ, Luu M, Freeman M, Essner R, Gharavi NM, Shiao SL, Mallen-St Clair J, Hamid O, Ho AS, Zumsteg ZS. The association between facility volume and overall survival in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:254-262. [PMID: 32297324 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Merkel cell carcinoma is an uncommon malignancy often requiring multidisciplinary management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether high-volume facilities have improved outcomes in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma relative to lower-volume facilities. METHODS A total of 5304 patients from the National Cancer Database with stage I-III Merkel cell carcinoma undergoing surgery were analyzed. High-volume facilities were the top 1% by case volume. Multivariable Cox regression and propensity score-matching were performed to account for imbalances between groups. RESULTS Treatment at high-volume facilities (hazard ratio: 0.74; 95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.84, P < .001) was independently associated with improved overall survival (OS) in multivariable analyses. In propensity score-matched cohorts, 5-year OS was 62.3% at high-volume facilities vs 56.8% at lower-volume facilities (P < .001). Median OS was 111 months at high-volume facilities vs 79 months at lower-volume facilities. CONCLUSION Treatment at high-volume facilities is associated with improved OS in Merkel cell carcinoma. Given the impracticality of referring all elderly patients with Merkel cell carcinoma to a small number of facilities, methods to mitigate this disparity should be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emi J Yoshida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Michael Luu
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Morganna Freeman
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Richard Essner
- John Wayne Cancer Institute, Providence St. John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California
| | - Nima M Gharavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Dermatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Stephen L Shiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jon Mallen-St Clair
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Omid Hamid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Medical Oncology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, California
| | - Allen S Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Zachary S Zumsteg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Knisely A, Huang Y, Melamed A, Tergas AI, St. Clair CM, Hou JY, Khoury-Collado F, Ananth CV, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Wright JD. Effect of regionalization of endometrial cancer care on site of care and patient travel. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222:58.e1-58.e10. [PMID: 31344350 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complex oncologic surgeries, including those for endometrial cancer, increasingly have been concentrated to greater-volume centers, owing to previous research that has demonstrated associations between greater surgical volume and improved outcomes. There is a potential for concentration of care to have unwanted consequences, including cost burden, delayed treatment, patient dissatisfaction, and possibly worse clinical outcomes, especially for more vulnerable populations. OBJECTIVE To describe changes in site of care for patients with endometrial cancer in New York State and to determine whether the distance women traveled for hysterectomy has changed over time. STUDY DESIGN We used the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System to identify women with endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy from 2000 to 2014. Demographic and clinical data as well as hospital data were collected. Trends in travel distance (straight-line distance) were analyzed within all hospital referral regions and differences in travel distance over times and across sociodemographic characteristics analyzed. RESULTS We identified 41,179 subjects. The number of hospitals and surgeons performing hysterectomy decreased across all hospital referral regions over time. The decline in the number of hospitals caring for women with endometrial cancer ranged from -16.7% in Syracuse (12 to 10 hospitals) to -76.5% in Rochester (17 to 4 hospitals). Similarly, the percentage of surgeons within a given hospital referral region operating on women declined from -45.2% in Buffalo (84-46 surgeons) to -77.8% in Albany (72 to 16 surgeons). The median distance to the index hospital for patients increased in all Hospital Referral Regions. For residents in Binghamton, median travel distance increased by 46.9 miles (95% confidence interval, 33.8-60.0) whereas distance increased in Elmira by 19.7 miles (95% confidence interval, 7.3-32.1) and by 12.4 miles (95% confidence interval, 6.4-18.4) in Albany. For residents of Binghamton and Albany, there was a greater than 100% increase in distance traveled over the 15-year time period, with increases of 551.8% (46.9 miles; 95% confidence interval, 33.8-60.0 miles) and 102.5% (12.4 miles; 95% confidence interval, 6.4-18.4 miles), respectively. Travel distance increased for all races and regardless of insurance status but was greatest for white patients and those with private insurance (P<.0001 for both). CONCLUSION The number of surgeons and hospitals caring for women with endometrial cancer in New York State has decreased, whereas the distance that patients travel to receive care has increased over time.
Collapse
|
50
|
Osborn M, Johnson R, Thompson K, Anazodo A, Albritton K, Ferrari A, Stark D. Models of care for adolescent and young adult cancer programs. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27991. [PMID: 31524328 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This review draws on the experience of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer clinicians from Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom to summarize common aspects of models of care implemented in their countries. The principles underpinning these models include patient- and family-focused care informed by an understanding of normal AYA development, enhancing existing adult or pediatric cancer services to meet the needs of AYA, and promoting collaboration between pediatric and adult oncologists. Common elements of AYA cancer care include establishing an AYA multidisciplinary team that integrates medical and psychosocial care, efforts to centralize complex care, providing access and equity for all AYA, promoting clinical trials, and helping facilitate transition to healthy survivorship. Several organizational approaches are described, noting that local program development depends on resources, infrastructure, and assessment of unmet needs within the region. The development of national networks provides opportunities for shared learning and approaches to evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Osborn
- Youth Cancer Service SA/NT, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Department of Haematology and Oncology, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rebecca Johnson
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Program, Mary Bridge Children's Health Center/MultiCare Health System, Tacoma, Washington
| | - Kate Thompson
- OnTrac at Peter Mac Victorian Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.,Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Albritton
- Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology, Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - Andrea Ferrari
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Daniel Stark
- The Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, Leeds Institute of Oncology and St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|