Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in the Management of High-Risk, High-Grade, Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities and Body Wall: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 9514

Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor in Children and Adolescents: Local Treatment in a Retrospective Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a rare and aggressive sarcoma often associated with neurofibromatosis type 1, whose clinical management remains complex and challenging. Few publications exist on pediatric MPNST, and limited data are available on the best treatment approach, in particular regarding local therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis concerned 45 patients less than 18 years old with MPNST, treated at a referral center for pediatric sarcomas from 1983 to 2023. Patients were treated using a multimodal approach, based on the protocols adopted at the time of their diagnosis.

RESULTS

For the series as a whole, the median event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16 and 26 months, respectively, and 5-year EFS and OS were 28.8% and 40.1%. The first event was local failure in 18 cases, local failure plus metastases in nine cases, and metastases-only in four cases. At univariable analysis, survival was better for males and patients younger than 15 years, and was influenced by tumor invasiveness and tumor size. With regard to treatment modalities, survival rates were significantly better for patients who responded to chemotherapy; EFS, local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and OS were better for patients who had a surgical resection; EFS and LRFS were better for patients who received radiotherapy combined with surgery, while OS was better for patients who had R0 resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed the unsatisfactory outcome of MPNST pediatric patients. Our series would suggest that a combined local treatment that included both surgical resection and radiotherapy could improve local control.

Systemic Treatment in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Are We Making a Difference?

Soft tissue sarcomas [STSs] are rare tumors of mesodermal origin that arise in diverse tissues such as muscles, fat, and nerves. There are over 100 subtypes of STS, each with distinct clinical behaviors and responses to treatment. Recent advances in treatment have moved towards histology-specific approaches, emphasizing the integration of pathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features to guide treatment. Localized STS is primarily treated with surgery, often supplemented by neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy. However, about half of patients with localized disease will progress to an advanced stage, which is typically managed with systemic therapies including anthracycline-based chemotherapy such as doxorubicin or epirubicin. Despite these treatments, the survival rates for most subtypes of advanced metastatic STS remain relatively low. While anthracycline-based chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment, ongoing research into the biology of STSs is enhancing our understanding and approach to these complex tumors with an expansion beyond chemotherapy to include targeted therapy and immunotherapy to improve response rates and survival outcomes. This review focuses on STS other than gastrointestinal stromal tumors [GISTs], examines the current systemic treatment strategies, highlights recent advances, and explores future directions in the systemic therapy of sarcoma patients.

Hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) improves outcomes in unresected soft-tissue sarcoma

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are radioresistant with a low α/β, which may have a biologic benefit with hypofractionation. For unresectable STS, the dose escalation required to achieve durable control is often limited by long-term toxicity risk. We sought to compare an isotoxic approach utilizing hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) versus standard fractionated radiation therapy (SFT) in patients with unresected STS. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with unresected STS who received either HARD (n = 49) or SFT (n = 43) with photon-based therapy between 1990 and 2022. The 2 HARD regimens each use 3 dose levels based on risk of disease burden. The gross disease, intermediate risk, and low-risk clinical target volumes were treated with either 20-22 fractions of 3/2.5/2-2.2 Gy or 28 fractions of 2.5/2.2/1.8 Gy. SFT included patients treated with definitive intent, receiving ≥ 50 Gy in 1.8-2 Gy per fraction. Clinical endpoints included 3-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS), along with treatment-related toxicity. With a median age of 67 and tumor size of 7 cm, most patients were stage IV (37 %), grade 3 (67 %), had no concurrent systemic therapy (70 %), and were lower extremity tumors (24 %). HARD cohort consisted of higher age, stage, recurrent disease, and median BED4 (p < 0.05), when compared to SFT. With a median follow-up of 35.9 months, HARD demonstrated significant improvement in 3-year LC (96.4 % vs. 48.4 %, p < 0.001), compared to SFT overall, with a median PFS benefit (16 vs. 10 months, p = 0.037) for non-distantly metastatic patients at baseline. On multivariate analysis, HARD was significantly associated with improved LC (HR 0.058, 95 % CI 0.005-0.682, p = 0.024). The HARD regimen found no significant increase in toxicity, with limited acute grade 3 (24 %, all dermatitis) and late grade 3 toxicity (6 %) observed, with no grade 4 or 5 events. HARD regimen significantly improves LC for unresectable STS without a significant increase in toxicity, when compared to a standard fractionated approach, supporting further prospective investigation of this treatment approach.

Pathologic complete response in patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma treated with neoadjuvant therapy and its correlation with clinical outcomes: A systematic review

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS), comprising approximately 1% of adult solid malignancies, are primarily treated with surgery, with the choice of perioperative treatment being a challenging and highly individualized decision. Clinical trials assessing neoadjuvant modalities in STS predominantly use clinical outcomes or radiologic response as endpoints, with pathologic complete response (pCR) not being employed as a designated study endpoint. Our systematic review aimed to assess the rates of pCR in clinical trials of different neoadjuvant modalities for STS and its correlation with patient clinical outcomes. 23 phase I, II and III studies were included, from which data regarding rates of pCR with each treatment, as well as correlation of pCR with clinical outcomes were retrieved. In 16 trials that assessed pCR, the percentage of patients who achieved a pCR ranged from 8 to 58%. Most of these trials did not aim to establish an association between pCR and clinical outcomes. However, among those that did investigate this correlation, a positive association was identified between pCR and both 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and 5-year overall survival (OS). While pCR serves as a crucial marker guiding treatment decisions in other neoplasms like triple negative breast cancer and urothelial cancer, it is not yet used in a similar setting for STS. Our findings indicate variability in patients achieving pCR across different neoadjuvant treatments for STS and a possible positive correlation with patient outcomes. Consequently, we propose considering pCR as a surrogate endpoint in future prospective trials for STS.

Comprehensive treatment of primary pelvic synovial sarcoma: A 28-month follow-up case report and review of the literature

Background

Primary synovial sarcoma originating in the pelvis is an extremely rare malignancy, and only a few cases have been reported. Usually, the tumor is detected at an advanced stage, making treatment more difficult. Lacking high-quality research, there are no consensus guidelines for the systemic treatment of the disease.

Case presentation

We admitted a 32-year-old male patient with an MRI suggestive of an 8.2 × 7.7 x 8.9 cm mass in the pelvis with bleeding. After a comprehensive evaluation, the patient underwent surgery, and postoperative pathology suggested biphasic synovial sarcoma. Once the diagnosis was clear, the patient was treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy. Unfortunately, the patient died due to a recurrence of pelvic synovial sarcoma with multiple metastases throughout the body, with a survival period of 28 months.

Conclusion

Synovial sarcoma, a highly malignant soft tissue tumor, and primary intrapelvic synovial sarcoma are even rarer, with a poor prognosis. Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and MRI can help doctors detect the tumor at an early stage and treat it aggressively, especially with surgical treatment, which can effectively improve the survival rate. Combined with the course of diagnosis and treatment of this case, it is possible to deepen the understanding of primary pelvic synovial sarcoma and discuss appropriate treatment strategies for this rare disease.

Preoperative Ultrahypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Low Rate of Wound Complications

Purpose

Normofractionated preoperative radiation therapy (nRT) with 50 Gy applied in 25 fractions represents the most widely used radiation therapy (RT) regimen in combined local treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). STSs are characterized by a low α/β ratio of 4 to 5 Gy, which may translate into a higher sensitivity for hypofractionation. Increasing data from cohorts and phase 2 trials on ultrahypofractionated RT (uhRT) regimens are available. We prospectively assessed our preoperative uhRT sarcoma patient cohort with a focus on short-term wound complications (WCs).

Methods and Materials

This is a prospective registry analysis of a single-center patient cohort, treated from 03.2020 to 10.2023 with uhRT (25 Gy in 5 fractions in 1 week). The same radiation oncologists (G.S./C.G.) and surgeon (B.F.) performed the treatment (61/61 and 58/60), as well as the same reference pathologist (B.B.) confirmed all histopathologic diagnoses. WC (according to CAN-NCIC-SR2 trial) and intermediate local control (LC) rates were assessed and compared with outcome data of a previously published cohort of 67 extremity/trunk sarcoma patients treated with nRT by the same authors (7% WC, 98% LC at 3 years).

Results

After a mean/median follow-up of 19/19 months (range, 0-46), LC at 1.5 years was 94%. Surgery was performed at a mean/median of 20/16 days (range, 4-60) after uhRT completion. WC were observed in 7/60 operated patients (12%), and in 5/51 (10%) extremity/trunk lesions. Early tolerance was excellent, limited to G0 to G1, even in 3 patients with prior RT to the same region. Clear resection margins were achieved in 55/60 patients (92%). Pathologic necrosis of ≥95% was reported in 5% and 75% achieved less than 50% necrosis.

Conclusions

These results show low rates of WC and high LC for uhRT and are comparable with our previously published nRT data. This study supports the routine use of preoperative uhRT for STS.

-AI-assisted diagnostic potential of CT in bone oncology and its impact on clinical decision-making for intensive care

Objective

This study evaluates the AI-assisted diagnostic potential of computed tomography (CT) for bone cancer and its influence on patient care during the pre- and post-treatment phases. It compares patient management approaches based on CT severity levels and identifies distinct CT phenotypes linked to disease severity.

Methodology

We retrospectively examined 50 patients diagnosed with bone cancer between December 2022 and June 2023. The CT scans were analyzed according to the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) guidelines. This study was performed using the deep convolutional neutral network (DCNN) model to assist doctors in diagnosing bone tumors through CT scanning. Patients' management approaches were compared based on the severity levels indicated by CT scans.

Results

Fifty patients participated in this study, with a median age of 67.2 years, ranging from 32 to 89 years. Of them, 38 % were female and 62 % were male. In 2022, 19 individuals (13 males and 6 females, ages 32 to 84) were assessed, with a mean age of 59.9 years. In 2023, 31 individuals, aged 54 to 89 with a mean age of 71.6 years, were assessed; among them were 18 men and 13 women. SPECT scans revealed the following key diagnostic features: 85.9 % of patients exhibited bone lesions with ground-glass opacities, 88 % had multipolar involvement, 92.8 % had bilateral involvement, and 92.8 % showed peripheral involvement. The severity scores based on CT scans were significantly higher in patients requiring intensive care, with scores above 14 being more common in this group.

Conclusion

Distinct CT findings during the AI-assisted diagnosis and treatment of bone cancer provided prompt and sensitive examination capabilities. Notably, two CT phenotypes emerged, associated with large consolidation patterns and high severity scores, offering crucial insights into disease severity and aiding in clinical decision-making for intensive care requirements. The study underscores the importance of CT in the effective monitoring and management of bone cancer pre- and post-treatment.

Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma of the vagina: A case report

BACKGROUND

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) of the vagina in postmenopausal women is an extremely rare malignant tumor that was originally described as a unique group of soft tissue sarcomas originating from primitive mesenchymal cells. It was first reported in postmenopausal women in 1970, and fewer than 50 postmenopausal patients have been reported to date.

CASE SUMMARY

A 68-year-old multiparous female was admitted to the hospital on October 11, 2023, with the chief complaint of a mass causing vaginal prolapse with incomplete urination that had persisted for 4 months. The vaginal mass was approximately the size of a pigeon egg; after lying down, the vaginal mass retracted. Complete resection was performed, and vaginal pleomorphic RMS was diagnosed based on pathology and immunohistochemical staining features. The patient is currently undergoing chemotherapy. The present study also reviewed the clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical features and latest treatment recommendations for vaginal RMS. Any abnormal vaginal mass should be promptly investigated through pelvic examination and appropriate imaging. The current initial treatment for vaginal RMS is biopsy and primary chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

When surgery is planned for vaginal RMS, an organ-preserving approach should be considered.

Prospective phase II trial of preoperative hypofractionated proton therapy for extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma: the PRONTO study rationale and design

BACKGROUND

Oncologic surgical resection is the standard of care for extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma (STS), often accompanied by the addition of pre- or postoperative radiation therapy (RT). Preoperative RT may decrease the risk of joint stiffness and fibrosis at the cost of higher rates of wound complications. Hypofractionated, preoperative RT has been shown to provide acceptable outcomes in prospective trials. Proton beam therapy (PBT) provides the means to decrease dose to surrounding organs at risk, such as the skin, bone, soft tissues, and adjacent joint(s), and has not yet been studied in patients with extremity and truncal sarcoma.

METHODS

Our study titled "PROspective phase II trial of preoperative hypofractionated protoN therapy for extremity and Truncal soft tissue sarcOma (PRONTO)" is a non-randomized, prospective phase II trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of preoperative, hypofractionated PBT for patients with STS of the extremity and trunk planned for surgical resection. Adult patients with Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status ≤ 2 with resectable extremity and truncal STS will be included, with the aim to accrue 40 patients. Treatment will consist of 30 Gy radiobiological equivalent of PBT in 5 fractions delivered every other day, followed by surgical resection 2-12 weeks later. The primary outcome is rate of major wound complications as defined according to the National Cancer Institute of Canada Sarcoma2 (NCIC-SR2) Multicenter Trial. Secondary objectives include rate of late grade ≥ 2 toxicity, local recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival at 1- and 2-years, functional outcomes, quality of life, and pathologic response.

DISCUSSION

PRONTO represents the first trial evaluating the use of hypofractionated PBT for STS. We aim to prove the safety and efficacy of this approach and to compare our results to historical outcomes established by previous trials. Given the low number of proton centers and limited availability, the short course of PBT may provide the opportunity to treat patients who would otherwise be limited when treating with daily RT over several weeks. We hope that this trial will lead to increased referral patterns, offer benefits towards patient convenience and clinic workflow efficiency, and provide evidence supporting the use of PBT in this setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05917301 (registered 23/6/2023).

Proton Therapy in Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas of Children and Adolescents

This paper provides insights into the use of Proton Beam Therapy (PBT) in pediatric patients with non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS). NRSTS are a heterogeneous group of rare and aggressive mesenchymal extraskeletal tumors, presenting complex and challenging clinical management scenarios. The overall survival rate for patients with NRSTS is around 70%, but the outcome is strictly related to the presence of various variables, such as the histological subtype, grade of malignancy and tumor stage at diagnosis. Multimodal therapy is typically considered the preferred treatment for high-grade NRSTS. Radiotherapy plays a key role in the treatment of children and adolescents with NRSTS. However, the potential for radiation-induced side effects partially limits its use. Therefore, PBT represents a very suitable therapeutic option for these patients. The unique depth-dose characteristics of protons can be leveraged to minimize doses to healthy tissue significantly, potentially allowing for increased tumor doses and enhanced preservation of surrounding tissues. These benefits suggest that PBT may improve local control while reducing toxicity and improving quality of life. While clear evidence of therapeutic superiority of PBT over other modern photon techniques in NRSTS is still lacking-partly due to the limited data available-PBT can be an excellent treatment option for young patients with these tumors. A dedicated international comprehensive collaborative approach is essential to better define its role within the multidisciplinary management of NRSTS. Shared guidelines for PBT indications-based on the patient's age, estimated outcome, and tumor location-and centralization in high-level referral centers are needed to optimize the use of resources, since access to PBT remains a challenge due to the limited number of available proton therapy facilities.

Well-differentiated liposarcomas and dedifferentiated liposarcomas: Systemic treatment options for two sibling neoplasms

Well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS) account for 60 % of all liposarcomas, reflecting the heterogeneity of this type of sarcoma. Genetically, both types of liposarcomas are characterized by the amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 genes, which indicates an important molecular event with diagnostic and therapeutic relevance. In both localized WDLPS and DDLPS of the retroperitoneum and the extremities, between 25 % and 30 % of patients have local or distant recurrence, even when perioperatively treated, with clear margins present. The systemic treatment of WDLPS and DDLPS remains a challenge, with anthracyclines as the gold standard for first-line treatment. Several regimens have been tested with modest results regarding their efficacy. Herein we discuss the systemic treatment options for WDLPS and DDLPS and review their reported clinical efficacy results.

Local treatment in initially unresected non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas of children and adolescents: A retrospective single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Pediatric non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) are a heterogeneous group of aggressive tumors. Patients with locally advanced/initially unresected disease represent a subset of patients with unsatisfactory outcome: limited data are available on the best treatment approach, in particular regarding local therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis concerned 71 patients < 21 years old with nonmetastatic, initially unresected adult-type NRSTS, treated at a referral center for pediatric sarcomas from 1990 to 2021. Patients were treated using a multimodal approach, based on the protocols adopted at the time of their diagnosis.

RESULTS

The series included a selected group of patients with unfavorable clinical characteristics, i.e., most cases had high-grade and large tumors, arising from axial sites in 61% of cases. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 58 (82%) had delayed surgery (R0 in 45 cases), and 50 (70%) had radiotherapy. Partial response to chemotherapy was observed in 46% of cases. With a median follow-up of 152 months (range, 18-233), 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 39.9% and 56.5%, respectively. Survival was significantly better for patients who responded to chemotherapy, and those who had a delayed R0 resection. Local relapse at 5 years was 7.7% for patients who did not undergo delayed surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our series underscores the unsatisfactory outcome of initially unresected NRSTS patients. Improving the outcome of this patient category requires therapeutic strategies able to combine novel effective systemic therapies with a better-defined local treatment approach to offer patients the best chances to have R0 surgery.

Soft Tissue Sarcomas in Adolescents and Young Adults

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a heterogeneous group of extraskeletal mesenchymal tumors that affect individuals throughout the entire age continuum. Despite this pervasive influence, key differences exist in the presentation of these sarcomas across varying age groups that have prevented a more uniform approach to management. Notably, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is more common in children, while most nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) subtypes are more prevalent in adults. Older patients with NRSTS appear to have more molecularly complex biology and often present with more advanced disease compared with children. Poorer outcome disparities are observed in older patients with RMS despite receiving similar treatment as younger patients. In this review, we highlight differences in epidemiology, biology, and management paradigms for pediatric and adult patients with STS and explore opportunities for a unified approach to enhance the care and outcomes within the AYA population.

Trimodality Treatment of Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Where Do We Go Now?

OPINION STATEMENT

Extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) constitutes the majority of patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Patients with localized high-grade ESTS > 5 cm in size carry a substantial risk of developing distant metastasis on follow-up. A neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy approach can enhance local control by facilitating resection of the large and deep locally advanced tumors while trying to address distant spread by treating the micrometastasis for these high-risk ESTS. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy are often used for children with intermediate- or high-risk non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue tumors in North America and Europe. In adults, the cumulative evidence supporting preoperative chemoradiotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial. However, some studies support a possible benefit of 10% in overall survival (OS) for high-risk localized ESTS, especially for those with a probability of 10-year OS < 60% using validated nomograms. Opponents of neoadjuvant chemotherapy argue that it delays curative surgery, compromises local control, and increases the rate of wound complications and treatment-related mortality; however, the published trials do not support these arguments. Most treatment-related side effects can be managed with adequate supportive care. A coordinated multidisciplinary approach involving sarcoma expertise in surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy is required to achieve better outcomes for ESTS. The next generation of clinical trials will shed light on how comprehensive molecular characterization, targeted agents and/or immunotherapy can be integrated into the upfront trimodality treatment to improve outcomes. To that end, every effort should be made to enroll these patients on clinical trials, when available.

Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy with Interdigitated High-Dose LRT for Voluminous High-Grade Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

Purpose

To report a case of large extremity soft tissue sarcoma (2933 cc), safely treated with a novel approach of interdigitating high-dose LATTICE radiation therapy (LRT) with standard radiation therapy as a neoadjuvant treatment to surgery.

Patients and Methods

Four sessions of high-dose LRT were delivered in a weekly interval, interdigitated with standard radiation therapy. The LRT plan consisted of 15 high-dose vertices receiving a dose >12 Gy per session, with 2-3 Gy to the peripheral margin of the tumor. The patient underwent surgical excision 2 months after the new regimen of induction radiation therapy.

Results and Discussion

The patient tolerated the radiation therapy regimen well. The post-operative assessment revealed a negative surgical margin and over 95% necrosis of the total tumor volume. The post-surgical wound complication was mitigated by outpatient wound care. Interdigitating multiple sessions of high-dose LATTICE radiation treatments with standard neoadjuvant radiation therapy as a neoadjuvant therapy for soft tissue sarcoma was feasible and did not incur additional toxicity in this clinical case. A phase-I/II trial will be conducted to further evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of the new treatment strategy with the intent to increase the rate of pathologic necrosis, which has been shown to positively correlate with the overall survival.

Preoperative radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy in extremity soft tissue sarcomas: long-term results of a single center

PURPOSE

To assess oncological outcomes of patients receiving neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities.

METHODS

Patients who were treated with preoperative radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy-3 cycles of mitomycin/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MAP) or 2-4 cycles of doxorubicin/cisplatin (AP)-followed by surgery were analyzed retrospectively. Survival rates were estimated, and prognostic factors were identified.

RESULTS

Between 1994 and 2017, a total of 108 patients were included. Median ages were 43 years and 51 years for patients receiving MAP and AP, respectively. The 5‑year local relapse-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were 94.1, 63.6, 75.3, and 71.9%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, significant predictors were identified as follows: de novo or R1/R2 resected tumor on admission before RCT (p = 0.017; hazard ratio [HR] 0.112, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.019-0.675) and R0 resection after RCT (p = 0.010; HR 0.121, 95% CI 0.024-0.598) for LRFS; female gender (p = 0.042; HR 0.569, 95% CI 0.330-0.979) and liposarcoma histology (p = 0.014; HR 0.436, 95% CI 0.224-0.845) for DFS; liposarcoma histology (p = 0.003; HR 0.114, 95% CI 0.027-0.478) and AP regimen (p = 0.017; HR 0.371, 95% CI 0.165-0.836) for DSS; age ≤ 45 years (p = 0.043; HR 0.537, 95% CI 0.294-0.980) and liposarcoma histology (p = 0.006; HR 0.318, 95% CI 0.141-0.716) for OS, respectively.

CONCLUSION

An increased risk for local failure seems to exist for patients with relapsed tumor on admission and having positive surgical margins after neoadjuvant RCT. Intensity of chemotherapy influenced DSS but not OS, which could be due to younger patients receiving MAP.

Effect of Favorable Pathologic Response After Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy Alone in Soft-tissue Sarcoma

Purpose

Whether the therapeutic response of soft-tissue sarcoma to neoadjuvant treatment is predictive for clinical outcomes is unclear. Given the rarity of this disease and the confounding effects of chemotherapy, this study analyzes whether a favorable pathologic response (fPR) after neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT) alone is associated with clinical benefits.

Methods and Materials

An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was conducted on a database of patients with primary soft-tissue sarcoma treated at our institution between 1987 and 2015 with neoadjuvant RT alone followed by surgical resection. Time-to-event outcomes estimated with a Kaplan-Meier analysis included overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control, and distant control (DC). Cox regression analyses were performed to determine prognostic variables associated with clinical outcomes.

Results

Of the overall cohort of 315 patients, 181 patients (57%) were included in the primary analysis with documented pathologic necrosis (PN) rates (mean: 59%) and a median follow up from diagnosis of 48 months (range, 4-170 months). The median neoadjuvant RT dose was 50 Gy (range, 40-60 Gy), and the majority of patients had negative surgical margins (79%). Only 35 patients (19%) achieved a fPR (PN ≥95%), which was associated with a higher R0 resection rate (94% vs. 75%; P = .013), a significant 5-year PFS benefit (74% vs. 43%; P = .014), and a nonsignificant 5-year DC benefit (76% vs. 62%; P = .12) compared with PN <95%. On multivariable analysis, fPR was an independent predictor for PFS (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.90; P = .022).

Conclusions

Achieving fPR with neoadjuvant RT alone is associated with a higher R0 resection rate and possible DC benefit, translating into a significant improvement in PFS. Further studies to improve pathologic response rates and prospectively validate this endpoint are warranted.

Chemoradiotherapy plus hyperthermia (CRTH) versus chemoradiotherapy (CRT) alone in neoadjuvant treatment of soft tissue sarcoma: tumor response, treatment toxicity and disease control

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for the management of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are still preferably delivered sequentially, with or without concurrent hyperthermia. Concurrent delivery of chemo-, radio- and thermotherapy may produce synergistic effects and reduce chemotherapy-free intervals. The few available studies suggest that concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) has a greater local effect. Data on the efficacy and toxicity of adding hyperthermia to CRT (CRTH) are sparse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 101 patients with STS of the extremities and trunk who received CRT (n = 33) or CRTH (n = 68) before resection of macroscopic tumor (CRT: n = 19, CRTH: n = 49) or re-resection following a non-oncological resection, so called 'whoops procedure', (CRT: n = 14, CRTH: n = 19) were included in this retrospective study. CRT consisted of two cycles of doxorubicine (50 mg/m2 on d2) plus ifosfamide (1500 mg/m2 on d1-5, q28) plus radiation doses of up to 60 Gy. Hyperthermia was delivered in two sessions per week.

RESULTS

All patients received the minimum dose of 50 Gy. Median doses of ifosfamide and doxorubicin were comparable between CRT (75%/95%) and CRTH (78%/97%). The median number of hyperthermia sessions was seven. There were no differences in acute toxicities. Major wound complications occurred in 15% (CRT) vs. 25% (CRTH) (p = 0.19). In patients with macroscopic disease, the addition of hyperthermia resulted in a tendency toward improved remission: regression ≥90% occurred in 21/48 (CRTH) vs. 4/18 (CRT) patients (p = 0.197). With a median postoperative follow-up of 72 months, 6-year local control and overall survival rates for CRTH vs. CRT alone were 85 vs. 78% (p = 0.938) and 79 vs. 71% (p = 0.215).

CONCLUSIONS

Both CRT and CRTH are well tolerated with an expected rate of wound complications. The results suggest that adding hyperthermia may improve tumor response.

Preoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a diverse group of rare malignant tumors. Currently, five to six weeks of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) combined with surgery constitute the mainstay of therapy for localized high-grade sarcomas (G2-G3). Growing evidence suggests that shortening preoperative RT courses by hypofractionation neither increases toxicity rates nor impairs oncological outcomes. Instead, shortening RT courses may improve therapy adherence, raise cost-effectiveness, and provide more treatment opportunities for a wider range of patients. Presumed higher rates of adverse effects and worse outcomes are concerns about hypofractionated RT (HFRT) for STS. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence on preoperative HFRT for the treatment of STS and discusses toxicity and oncological outcomes compared to normofractionated RT.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials describing outcomes for preoperative HFRT in the management of STS using PubMed, the Cochrane library, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, and Ovid Medline. We followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Trials on retroperitoneal sarcomas, postoperative RT, and hyperthermia were excluded. Articles published until November 30th, 2021, were included.

RESULTS

Initial search yielded 94 articles. After removal of duplicate and ineligible articles, 13 articles qualified for analysis. Eight phase II trials and five retrospective analyses were reviewed. Most trials applied 5 × 5 Gy preoperatively in patients with high-grade STS. HFRT courses did not show increased rates of adverse events compared to historical trials of normofractionated RT. Toxicity rates were mostly comparable or lower than in trials of normofractionated RT. Moreover, HFRT achieved comparable local control rates with shorter duration of therapy. Currently, more than 15 prospective studies on HFRT + / - chemotherapy are ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS

Retrospective data and phase II trials suggest preoperative HFRT to be a reasonable treatment modality for STS. Oncological outcomes and toxicity profiles were favorable. To date, our knowledge is mostly derived from phase II data. No randomized phase III trial comparing normofractionated and HFRT in STS has been published yet. Multiple ongoing phase II trials applying HFRT to investigate acute and late toxicity will hopefully bring forth valuable findings.

Clinical outcomes of brain metastasectomy from soft tissue and bone sarcomas: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis in sarcomas is associated with a poor prognosis. Data regarding prognostic factors and clinical outcomes of surgical resection of brain metastasis from sarcomas are limited. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate survival outcomes post-brain metastasectomy for patients with soft tissue and bone sarcomas.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted examining survival outcomes among adults and children with soft tissue and bone sarcoma undergoing brain metastasectomy, in the English language from inception up to May 31, 2021. Two reviewers independently evaluated and screened the literature, extracted the data, and graded the included studies. The body of evidence was evaluated and graded according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series. Results were synthesized using descriptive methods. A meta-analysis was not possible due to the low quality and heterogeneity of studies.

RESULTS

Ten studies published between 1994 and 2020 were included: three were retrospective cohort studies and seven were case series. 507 patients were included, of whom 269 underwent brain metastasectomy. The median follow-up period ranged between 14 and 29 months. The median survival period after metastasectomy ranged from 7 to 25 months. The most common prognostic factors associated with survival included presenting performance status, age, number of brain metastases, presence of lung metastases, and peri-operative radiation therapy administration.

DISCUSSION

Although the level of evidence is low, retrospective studies support that brain metastasectomy can be performed with reasonable post-operative survival in selected individuals.

The role of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in the management of localized high-grade soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities includes limb-sparing surgery combined with pre- or postoperative radiotherapy (RT). The role of perioperative chemotherapy (CTX) remains uncertain. STS patients with high-risk features for local recurrence, distant metastases, and increased mortality may require additional systemic therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate predictors of outcome regarding local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM) in a large single-center cohort of patients suffering from localized high-grade STS (grade 2/3, G2/G3). Special emphasis was put on a subgroup of patients who received combined neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT).

METHODS

Overall, 115 adult STS patients were included in this retrospective study. The median follow-up was 34 months. Twenty-three patients (20.0%) were treated with neoadjuvant RCT, 92 (80.0%) received other therapies (adjuvant RT alone (n = 58); neoadjuvant CTX + adjuvant RT (n = 17); adjuvant RCT (n = 10), neoadjuvant RT alone (n = 7)). To assess potential prognostic factors on LC, OS, and FFDM, univariate (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazards models were applied.

RESULTS

UVA showed significantly better LC rates in the neoadjuvant RCT group (p = 0.025), with trends in MVA (p = 0.057). The 3-year LC rate was 89.7% in the neoadjuvant RCT group vs. 75.6% in the "other therapies" group. UVA also showed significantly better OS rates in the neoadjuvant RCT group (p = 0.049), however, this was not confirmed in MVA (p = 0.205), the 3-year OS rate was 85.8% for patients treated with neoadjuvant RCT compared to 73.5% in the "other therapies" group. UVA showed significantly better FFDM rates in (p = 0.018) and a trend towards better FFDM rates in MVA (p = 0.059). The 3-year FFDM rate was 89.7% for patients treated with neoadjuvant RCT compared to 65.9% in the "other therapies" group. In the subgroup of patients with G3 STS, neoadjuvant RCT was a significant positive predictor of LC and FFDM in MVA (p = 0.047, p = 0.027) but not for OS. Overall grade 3 and 4 toxicities were significantly higher (p = 0.019) in the neoadjuvant RCT group and occurred in 73.9% vs. 38.0% in patients receiving other therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that neoadjuvant RCT might improve LC and FFDM in patients with localized G3 STS while also being associated with increased acute complication rates. Further prospective research is warranted to confirm these findings.

Relevant Trials Update in Sarcomas and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: What Surgeons Should Know

In the past few years, the sarcoma community has successfully completed several trials in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) or gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). The current review summarizes recently reported relevant trials or trial updates investigating radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy in patients with localized extremity or superficial trunk STS, retroperitoneal sarcoma, and GIST.

Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies of mesenchymal cell origin that display a heterogenous mix of clinical and pathologic characteristics. STS can develop from fat, muscle, nerves, blood vessels, and other connective tissues. The evaluation and treatment of patients with STS requires a multidisciplinary team with demonstrated expertise in the management of these tumors. The complete NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Soft Tissue Sarcoma provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of extremity/superficial trunk/head and neck STS, as well as retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal STS, desmoid tumors, and rhabdomyosarcoma. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines discusses general principles for the diagnosis and treatment of retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal STS, outlines treatment recommendations, and reviews the evidence to support the guidelines recommendations.

An International Consensus on the Design of Prospective Clinical-Translational Trials in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT), which delivers highly nonuniform dose distributions instead of conventionally practiced homogeneous tumor dose, has shown high rates of clinical response with minimal toxicities in large-volume primary or metastatic malignancies. However, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials in SFRT are lacking, and SFRT techniques and dose parameters remain variable. Agreement on dose prescription, technical administration, and clinical and translational design parameters for SFRT trials is essential to enable broad participation and successful accrual to rigorously test the SFRT approach. We aimed to develop a consensus for the design of multi-institutional clinical trials in SFRT, tailored to specific primary tumor sites, to help facilitate development and enhance the feasibility of such trials.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Primary tumor sites with sufficient pilot experience in SFRT were identified, and fundamental trial design questions were determined. For each tumor site, a comprehensive consensus effort was established through disease-specific expert panels. Clinical trial design criteria included eligibility, SFRT technology and technique, dose and fractionation, target- and normal-tissue dose parameters, systemic therapies, clinical trial endpoints, and translational science considerations. Iterative appropriateness rank voting, expert panel consensus reviews and discussions, and public comment posting were used for consensus development.

RESULTS

Clinical trial criteria were developed for head and neck cancer and soft-tissue sarcoma. Final consensus among the 22 trial design categories each (a total of 163 criteria) was high to moderate overall. Uniform patient cohorts of advanced bulky disease, standardization of SFRT technologies and dosimetry and physics parameters, and collection of translational correlates were considered essential to trial design. Final guideline recommendations and the degree of agreement are presented and discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus provides design guidelines for the development of prospective multi-institutional clinical trials testing SFRT in advanced head and neck cancer and soft-tissue sarcoma through in-advance harmonization of the fundamental clinical trial design among SFRT experts, potential investigators, and the SFRT community.

Preoperative Radiation for Soft Tissue Sarcomas: How Much Is Needed?

OPINION STATEMENT

Preoperative radiation therapy is an important component of curative treatment for extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas. It has traditionally been delivered to a dose of 50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions over 5 weeks. With significant advances in the multidisciplinary approach to soft tissue sarcomas, preoperative radiation therapy may be omitted for certain cases, delivered over a shortened period of time (1-3 weeks), deintensified for myxoid liposarcomas, or combined with systemic therapy to improve the therapeutic ratio. This article reviews the innovative preoperative radiation therapy strategies currently used to treat extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas.

Could Five Be the New Twenty-Five? Long-term Oncologic Outcomes from a Phase II, Prospective, 5-Fraction Pre-operative Radiation Therapy Trial in Patients with Localized Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Purpose

Management of adult soft tissue sarcomas entails a multidisciplinary approach with surgery and radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. The use of preoperative irradiation has been well established, and although conventional fractionation involves daily treatments over the course of 5 weeks, higher doses per fraction may be beneficial due to the radiobiologic profile of sarcoma. In this study we report long-term oncologic outcomes from a single-institution, phase II study evaluating a 5-fraction hypofractionated course of preoperative radiation.

Methods and materials

Preoperative hypofractionated radiation therapy was administered to 35 Gy in 5 fractions every other day followed by resection 4 to 6 weeks later. If given, chemotherapy consisted of a doxorubicin-ifosfamide-based regimen delivered neoadjuvantly. The primary endpoint was local control. Additional survival and pathologic outcomes, including overall and distant metastasis-free survival, tumor, and treatment-related pathology, as well as acute and late toxicity were examined.

Results

Thirty-two patients were enrolled in this prospective, single-arm phase II trial. At a median follow-up of 36.4 months (range, 3-56), no patient developed a local recurrence, and the 3-year overall and distant metastasis-free survival was 82.2% and 69%, respectively. Major acute postoperative wound complications occurred in 25% of patients. Grade 2 and 3 fibrosis occurred in 21.7% and 13% of patients, respectively. The 2-year median and mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score for all patients was 28 and 27.4, respectively.

Conclusions

A condensed course of preoperative hypofractionated radiation therapy leads to excellent rates of local control and survival with acceptable toxicity profiles. Potential studies ideally with phase II or III randomized trials would help corroborate these findings and other preoperative hypofractionated results in soft tissue sarcomas.

The evolution of adjuvant/neoadjuvant trials for resectable localized sarcoma

Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare tumors arising from mesenchymal tissues. As a heterogeneous group comprising more than 50 types, the development of clinical trials remains challenging. Decision-making for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy is based on the available evidence of contemporary trials and multidisciplinary clinical judgment.

Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy with and without hyperthermia in retroperitoneal sarcomas: feasibility, efficacy, toxicity, and long-term outcome

Purpose

Retroperitoneal (RPS) sarcomas are associated with poor local and abdominal tumor control. However, the benefit of preoperative radio- or chemotherapy alone for these entities is currently unclear. Moreover, as intermediate- and high-grade sarcomas have a tendency toward early metastasis, exploration of neoadjuvant strategies is of high importance. This analysis reports the results of our 20-year single-institution experience with preoperative neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation.

Methods

From 2000–2019, 27 patients with intermediate- or high-grade RPS (12 dedifferentiated liposarcoma, 10 leiomyosarcoma, 5 others) were treated with radiotherapy (median dose: 50.4 Gy; range 45–75 Gy) and two cycles of chemotherapy (doxorubicin 50 mg/m² BSA/d3 q28 and ifosfamide 1.5 g/m² BSA/d1‑5 q28) in neoadjuvant intent. Chemotherapy consisted of doxorubicin alone in two cases and ifosfamide alone in one case. Fifteen patients (56%) additionally received deep regional hyperthermia.

Results

The median follow-up time was 53 months (±56.7 months). 92% of patients received two cycles of chemotherapy as planned and 92% underwent surgery. At 5 and 10 years, abdominal-recurrence-free survival was 74.6% (±10.1%) and 66.3% (±11.9%), distant metastasis-free survival was 67.2% (±9.7%) and 59.7% (±11.1%), and overall survival was 60.3% (±10.5%) and 60.3% (±10.5%), respectively. CTC grade III and IV toxicities were leukocytopenia (85%), thrombocytopenia (33%), and anemia (11%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with and without hyperthermia for retroperitoneal sarcomas is feasible and provided high local control of intermediate- and high-grade sarcoma.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Treatment Modalties for Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant treatment modalities in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities have become more popular in recent years, but because of the rarity and heterogeneity of STS, there are yet few studies on the long-term impact of neoadjuvant treatment modalities, especially in terms of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.

METHODS

The study enrolled 136 patients with primary STS of the extremities who underwent surgery with curative intent or neoadjuvant therapy, followed by surgery in a 15-year period. Neoadjuvant treatment consisted of radiotherapy (RT) with 60 Gy and in most cases simultaneous chemotherapy (CTx) with ifosfamide (1.5 g/m²/d, d1-5, q28) and doxorubicine (50 mg/m²/d, d3, q28). We investigated the clinical, (post)-operative and histopathological data and the oncological follow-up as well. The median follow-up period was 82 months (range 6-202).

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients (M:F = 73:63) with a mean age of 62 years (range; 21-93) was observed. Seventy-four patients (54.4%) received neoadjuvant therapy (NT), 62 patients (45.6%) received primary surgery (PS). When receiving NT, patients with high-risk STS had a lower risk to develop distant metastasis (p = 0.025). Age, histological type, tumor size and surgical margins (R0 vs. R1) had no influence on any survival rates. There was an association between NT and the occurrence of postoperative complications (p = 0.001). The 5-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS), metastasis free survival (MFS), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rate of the whole cohort was 89.9%, 77.0%, 70.6% and 72.6%; whereas the 5-year LRFS, MFS, DFS and OS rate was 90.5%, 67.2%, 64.1% and 62.8% for the NT group and 89.5%, 88.3%. 78.4% and 83.8% for the PS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal treatment strategies in patients with STS of extremities lead to excellent oncological outcomes. Patients with high-risk STS had a significantly better MFS when receiving NT than patients with low-risk STS. NT was associated with a higher probability of postoperative but well-manageable complications.

Impact of Metastasectomy and Aggressive Local Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma: An Analysis of the NCDB

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of patients with stage IV soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity (STSE) with distant metastases at diagnosis is unclear due to limited evidence and heterogeneity of current practice patterns. National guidelines have recommended surgical management of the primary site (SP) with or without radiotherapy (R), chemotherapy (C), and metastasectomy (M).

METHODS

In the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients with initially metastatic STSE who received definitive SP from 2004 to 2014 were identified. Survival distributions were estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests, and covariates were compared using Chi-square tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Propensity score analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting was used.

RESULTS

Overall, 1124 patients were included, with a median age of 55 years (range 18-90). Utilization of SP+M increased over time from 18.8% in 2004-2006, to 33.3% in 2007-2009, to 47.9% in 2010-2014 (p = 0.024). The addition of M to SP was associated with superior 5-year overall survival (OS) at 30.8% (SP+M+/-C+/-R) compared with 18.2% for those treated with non-surgical adjuvant therapies (SP+/-C+/-R) and 12.6% for SP alone (p < 0.0001). Positive surgical margins were noted in 24.1% of patients and was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio 1.44, p < 0.001) on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first known study utilizing a large database to explore practice patterns and outcomes for patients with metastatic STSE receiving definitive SP. Utilization of metastasectomy increased in the study period and was associated with longer survival compared with SP alone. These hypothesis-generating data warrant additional study.

Combined Preoperative Hypofractionated Radiotherapy With Doxorubicin-Ifosfamide Chemotherapy in Marginally Resectable Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Results of a Phase 2 Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

There is no standard treatment for marginally resectable soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) of the extremities and trunk wall, and current approaches produce unsatisfactory results. We hypothesized that the combination of doxorubicin-ifosfamide (AI) chemotherapy and 5 × 5 Gy hypofractionated radiotherapy can generate a higher ratio of limb-sparing or conservative surgeries with negative microscopic margins (R0) and acceptable treatment toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a single-arm prospective clinical trial. Treatment combined 1 cycle of AI with subsequent 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy within 1 week, followed by 2 cycles of AI and surgery. The primary endpoint was to assess the number of patients in whom en bloc R0 resection was achieved.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients met the eligibility criteria. Three patients had resectable lung metastases at baseline. Forty-two received the planned protocol treatment. In 2 patients, the treatment was prematurely stopped because of the toxicity of chemotherapy. One patient died of septic shock because of severe bone marrow suppression after the second AI cycle; a second death was not related to treatment for STS. Three patients underwent amputation. In 72% of patients in the intention-to-treat analysis, we achieved en bloc R0 resections. Grade 3+ Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.03 chemotherapy toxicity requiring dose reduction or treatment interruption occurred in 15 patients. Wound complications occurred in 18 patients, but they were severe in only 6 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative AI combined with 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy is a promising method for the management of marginally resectable STS. This protocol enables a high ratio of R0 limb-sparing or conservative surgeries. Further evaluation of this strategy is warranted.

Efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for synovial sarcoma: a retrospective analysis of a Nationwide database in Japan

BACKGROUND

Synovial sarcoma is an aggressive but chemosensitive soft-tissue tumor. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for synovial sarcoma with data from the nationwide database, Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry in Japan.

METHODS

This study included 316 patients diagnosed with synovial sarcoma between 2006 and 2012. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed using a Cox-hazard regression model. Moreover, the effects of perioperative chemotherapy on outcomes were evaluated using a matched-pair analysis. The oncologic outcomes of patients who did or did not receive chemotherapy were compared (cx + and cx-).

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed significant correlations of age (over 40, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, p = 0.043), margin status (marginal resection, HR = 0.18, p < 0.001 and intralesional resection, HR = 0.30, p = 0.013 versus wide resection) with overall survival; surgical margin type (marginal resection, HR = 0.14, p = 0.001 and intralesional resection, HR = 0.09, p = 0.035 versus wide resection) with local recurrence; and postoperative local recurrence (HR = 0.30, p = 0.027) and surgical margin (marginal resection, HR = 0.31, p = 0.023 versus wide resection) with distant relapse-free survival. Before propensity score matching, perioperative chemotherapy was mainly administered for young patients and patients with deeper tumor locations, larger tumors, more advanced-stage disease, and trunk location. The 3-year overall survival, local control, and distant relapse-free survival rates were 79.8%/89.3% (HR = 0.64, p = 0.114), 89.6%/93.0% (HR = 0.37, p = 0.171) and 71.4%/84.5% (HR = 0.60, p = 0.089) in the cx+/cx- groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, 152 patients were selected such that the patient demographics were nearly identical in both groups. The 3-year overall survival, local control, and distant relapse-free survival rates were 71.5%/86.0% (HR = 0.48, p = 0.055), 92.5%/93.3% (HR = 0.51, p = 0.436) and 68.4%/83.9% (HR = 0.47, p = 0.046) in the cx+/cx- groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This large-sample study indicated that the margin status and postoperative disease control were associated directly or indirectly with improved oncologic outcomes. However, the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for survival outcomes in synovial sarcoma patients was not proven in this Japanese database analysis.

Paediatric non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas: the prospective NRSTS 2005 study by the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG)

BACKGROUND

A standardised approach to treatment of paediatric non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS), which account for about 4% of childhood cancers, is still lacking. We report the results of the NRSTS 2005 protocol developed specifically by the European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) to determine a risk-adapted multimodal standard of care for this group of tumours.

METHODS

The EpSSG NRSTS 2005 study included two prospective, non-randomised, historically controlled trials (one on localised adult-type NRSTS and the other on localised synovial sarcoma) done at 100 academic centres and hospitals in 14 countries. Patients younger than 21 years with a pathologically proven diagnosis of synovial sarcoma or an adult-type NRSTS, no evidence of metastatic disease, no previous treatment other than primary surgery, and diagnostic specimens available for pathological review were included. Patients were stratified by surgical stage, tumour size, nodal involvement, tumour grade (for adult-type NRSTS), and tumour site (for synovial sarcoma). Patients were then divided into four treatment groups: surgery alone, adjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy), or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (with or without radiotherapy). The main chemotherapy regimen was ifosfamide (3·0 g/m² intravenously per day for 3 days) plus doxorubicin (37·5 mg/m² intravenously per day for 2 days); only ifosfamide (3·0 g/m² intravenously per day for 2 days) was given concomitantly with radiotherapy (delivered with three-dimensional conformal external beam technique, using conventional fractionation [1·8 daily fractions, 5 days per week] at a dose of 50·4 Gy or 54·0 Gy, to a maximum of 59·4 Gy). The number of chemotherapy cycles ranged from three to seven depending on the stage of the disease. The primary outcomes were event-free survival and overall survival. This study has been completed, and is registered under EudraCT, 2005-001139-31.

FINDINGS

Between May 31, 2005, and Dec 31, 2016, 1321 patients were enrolled, of whom 569 (206 with synovial sarcoma and 363 with adult-type NRSTS), with a median age of 12·6 years (IQR 8·2-14·9), were included in this analysis. With a median follow-up of 80·0 months (IQR 54·3-111·3) for the 467 patients alive, 5-year event-free survival was 73·7% (95% CI 69·7-77·2) and 5-year overall survival was 83·8% (95% CI 80·3-86·7). 5-year event-free survival was 91·4% (95% CI 87·0-94·4) and 5-year overall survival was 98·1% (95% CI 95·0-99·3) in the surgery alone group (n=250); 75·5% (46·9-90·1) and 88·2% (60·6-96·9) in the adjuvant radiotherapy group (n=17); 65·6% (54·8-74·5) and 75·8% (65·3-83·5) in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (n=93); and 56·4% (49·3-63·0) and 70·4% (63·3-76·4) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (n=209). Reported severe adverse events included one case of generalised seizures (probably related to ifosfamide) and six cases of secondary tumours.

INTERPRETATION

Findings from the EpSSG NRSTS 2005 study help to define the risk-adapted standard of care for this patient population. Adjuvant treatment can be safely omitted in the low-risk population (classified here as the surgery alone group). Improving the outcome for patients with high-risk, initially resected adult-type NRSTS and those with initially unresectable disease remains a major clinical challenge.

FUNDING

Fondazione Città della Speranza.

The role of radiotherapy in adult soft tissues sarcoma of the extremities

Local management of adult soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities has evolved over the past decades. Until the 1970s, radical surgery (amputations) was the standard therapeutic procedure resulting in significant physical and psychological morbidity for the patients. In the present era, limb sparing surgery combined with radiotherapy represents the current standard of care for high grade and > 5 cm STSs. This approach guarantees high local control rate and function preservation. The aim of this paper is to summarize the current evidence for RT in STSs of the extremities. Outcomes, technical details (techniques, timing, dose, volumes of treatment) and the emerging role of RT in the management of oligometastatic disease will be analysed. Finally, results of the recent clinical trials testing new scenarios in RT of STSs will be described.

Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy (GRID) Prior to Standard Neoadjuvant Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy for Bulky, High-Risk Soft Tissue and Osteosarcomas: Feasibility, Safety, and Promising Pathologic Response Rates

Spatially fractionated radiotherapy (GRID) has been utilized primarily in the palliative and definitive treatment of bulky tumors. Delivered in the modern era primarily with megavoltage photon therapy, this technique offers the promise of safe dose escalation with potential immunogenic, bystander and microvasculature effects that can augment a conventionally fractionated course of radiotherapy. At the University of Maryland, an institutional standard has arisen to incorporate a single fraction of GRID radiation in large (>8 cm), high-risk soft tissue and osteosarcomas prior to a standard fractionated course. Herein, we report on the excellent pathologic responses and apparent safety of this regimen in 26 consecutive patients.

Pathologic Response Rates after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Sarcoma: A Single Institution Study

(1) Background: Pathologic necrosis of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) has been used to determine treatment response, but its relationship to neoadjuvant treatments remains indeterminate. In this retrospective, single institution study, we hypothesized that neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NA-CRT) yields higher rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) than neoadjuvant radiation (NA-XRT) or chemotherapy (NA-CT) alone. (2) Methods: Patients with extremity STS between 2011-2020 who received neoadjuvant treatment were included. pCR was defined as percent necrosis of the surgical specimen greater than or equal to 90%. (3) Results: 79 patients were analyzed. 51.9% of the population were male with a mean age of 58.4 years. 49.4% identified as Non-Hispanic White. Twenty-six (32.9%) patients achieved pCR while 53 (67.1%) did not. NA-CT (OR 15.82, 95% CI = 2.58-96.9, p = 0.003 in univariate (UVA) and OR 24.7, 95% CI = 2.88-211.2, p = 0.003 in multivariate (MVA), respectively) and NA-XRT (OR 5.73, 95% CI = 1.51-21.8, p = 0.010 in UVA and OR 7.95, 95% CI = 1.87-33.7, p = 0.005 in MVA, respectively) was significantly associated with non- pCR when compared to NA-CRT. The analysis also demonstrated that grade 3 tumors, when using grade 2 as reference, also had significantly higher odds of achieving pCR (OR 0.23, 95% CI = 0.06-0.80, p = 0.022 in UVA and OR 0.16, 95% CI = 0.04-0.70, p = 0.015 in MVA, respectively). (4) Conclusion: NA-CRT yields superior pCR compared to other neoadjuvant regimens. This extends to higher grade tumors.

Preoperative accelerated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy in a defined cohort of patients with high risk soft tissue sarcoma: a Scandinavian Sarcoma Group study

Background

We recently reported outcomes from a Scandinavian Sarcoma Group adjuvant study (SSG XX group A) conducted on localized and operable high risk soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities and trunk wall. SSG XX, group B, comprised of patients in a defined cohort with locally advanced STS considered at high risk for intralesional surgery. These patients received preoperative accelerated radiotherapy, together with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Herein we report the results of this group B.

Methods

Twenty patients with high-grade, locally advanced and deep STS located in lower extremities (n = 12), upper extremities (5) or trunk wall (3) were included. The median age was 59 years and 14 patients were males. The treatment regimen consisted of 6 cycles of doxorubicin (60 mg/m²) and ifosfamide (6 g/m²), with three cycles given neoadjuvantly, and preoperative radiotherapy (1, 8 Gyx2/daily to 36 Gy) between cycles 2 and 3. After a repeated MRI surgery was then conducted, and the remaining 3 chemotherapy cycles were given postoperatively at 3 weeks intervals. Survival data, local control, toxicity of chemotherapy and postoperative complications are presented.

Results

Median follow-up time for metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 2.8 years (range 0.3–10.4). The 5-year MFS was 49.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31.7–77.4). The median follow-up time was 5.4 years (range 0.3–10.4) for overall survival (OS). The 5-year OS was 64.0% (95% CI 45.8–89.4). The median tumour size was 13 cm, with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 10) and synovial sarcoma (n = 6) diagnosed most frequently. All patients completed surgery. Resection margins were R0 in 19 patients and R1 in 1 patient. No patients had evidence of disease progression preoperatively. Three patients experienced a local recurrence, in 2 after lung metastases had already been diagnosed. Eleven patients (55%) had postoperative wound problems (temporary in 8 and persistent in 3).

Conclusions

Preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy were associated with temporary wound-healing problems. Survival outcomes, local control and toxicities were deemed satisfactory when considering the locally advanced sarcoma disease status at primary diagnosis.

Trial registration This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00790244 and with European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials No. EUDRACT 2007-001152-39

Radiation Therapy in Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma-Current Knowledge and Future Directions: A Review and Expert Opinion

Simple Summary

Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral part of the treatment of adult soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). Although mainly used as perioperative therapy to increase local control in resectable STS with high risk features, it also plays an increasing role in the treatment of non-resectable primary tumors, oligometastatic situations, or for palliation. This review summarizes the current evidence for RT in adult STS including typical indications, outcomes, side effects, dose and fractionation regimens, and target volume definitions based on tumor localization and risk factors. It covers the different overall treatment approaches including RT either as part of a multimodal treatment strategy or as a sole treatment and is accompanied by a summary on ongoing clinical research pointing at future directions of RT in STS.

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral part of the treatment of adult soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). Although mainly used as perioperative therapy to increase local control in resectable STS with high risk features, it also plays an increasing role in the treatment of non-resectable primary tumors, oligometastatic situations, or for palliation. Modern radiation techniques, like intensity-modulated, image-guided, or stereotactic body RT, as well as special applications like intraoperative RT, brachytherapy, or particle therapy, have widened the therapeutic window allowing either dose escalation with improved efficacy or reduction of side effects with improved functional outcome. This review summarizes the current evidence for RT in adult STS including typical indications, outcomes, side effects, dose and fractionation regimens, and target volume definitions based on tumor localization and risk factors. It covers the different overall treatment approaches including RT either as part of a multimodal treatment strategy or as a sole treatment, namely its use as an adjunct to surgery in resectable STS (perioperative RT), as a primary treatment in non-resectable tumors (definitive RT), as a local treatment modality in oligometastatic disease or as palliative therapy. Due to the known differences in clinical course, general treatment options and, consequently, outcome depending on lesion localization, the main part of perioperative RT is divided into three sections according to body site (extremity/trunk wall, retroperitoneal, and head and neck STS) including the discussion of special applications of radiation techniques specifically amenable to this region. The review of the current evidence is accompanied by a summary on ongoing clinical research pointing at future directions of RT in STS.

Clinical outcomes of non-osteogenic, non-Ewing soft-tissue sarcoma of bone--experience of the Toronto Sarcoma Program

Non‐osteogenic, non‐Ewing soft‐tissue sarcoma (NONE‐STS) of bone is a rare presentation of primary bone cancers. Optimal treatments and outcomes for this heterogenous group are poorly described. We evaluated the factors associated with long‐term outcomes in patients with this disease. Patients with localized NONE‐STS of bone treated at the Toronto Sarcoma Program from 1987 to 2017 were identified. Clinical characteristics, treatment, and survival information were collected. Kaplan‐Meier (log‐rank) survival estimates from the time of definitive surgery, with uni‐/multivariate analyses (Cox) of sarcoma‐specific survival were performed. A total of 106 patients (60.4% male; median age 46 years) with NONE‐STS of bone were identified. Common histologies included undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma [UPS]/malignant fibrous histiocytoma [MFH] (UPS/MFH, 41.5%), leiomyosarcoma (LMS, 20.8%), and fibrosarcoma (FS, 11.3%). Tumors were often high grade (59.4%) and involved the extremities (88.7%), with most receiving chemotherapy (67.9%) with cisplatin/doxorubicin‐based regimens (73.6%). In the full cohort, 10‐year DFS (45.7%, [95%CI: 35.7‐55.8%]), OS (53.4%, [95%CI: 41.7‐62.2%]), and SSS (63.9%, [95%CI: 53.9‐72.5%]) were moderate. Histology specific, 10‐year SSS was 70.7% [95%CI: 56.1‐85.5%] for UPS/MFH, 51.8% [95%CI: 29.8‐73.8%] for LMS, and 72.2% [95%CI: 45.1‐99.2%] for FS. Only UPS/MFH (n = 4) showed sarcoma‐related death >10 years. Multivariate analysis identified axial location (HR = 35.5, [95%CI: 3.4‐369.6]), high grade (HR = 16.9, [95%CI: 1.6‐185.1]), and disease relapse (HR = 485.1, [95%CI: 36.3‐6482.6]) as risk factors for death (p < 0.05). Treatment with chemotherapy (HR = 0.1, [95%CI: 0.01‐0.86]) and necrosis ≥85% (HR = 0.2, [95%CI: 0.04‐0.99]) showed improved survival (p < 0.05). NONE‐STS of bone has favorable long‐term survival similar to osteosarcoma. Patients receiving chemotherapy derive benefit in retrospective analyses. UPS/MFH histologies show sarcoma‐related death beyond 10 years. Further data on histologic subgroups are needed.

Treatment and outcomes for synovial sarcoma patients in Western Australia: the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Background

This is a retrospective review of synovial sarcoma (SS) patients treated over the last 12 years in Western Australia (WA). SS is both chemo and radiotherapy sensitive. Results of trials in adjuvant chemotherapy are conflicting and there is limited support for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The use of combined chemoradiotherapy is based on institutional preferences.

Aim

We reviewed the outcomes for SS patients treated in WA over a 12 year period focusing on patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT).

Methods

Patient details including demographics, histopathology, treatment details, were obtained from the WA sarcoma database (2006‐2018). Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were derived for whole cohort.

Results

Twenty seven patients were identified with SS with equal gender incidence. Median age of the cohort was 36 (14‐76) years. The most common primary site of disease was extremity (81.5%). 22/27 patients presented with only localized disease and 59.2% of these received neo‐adjuvant treatment. Of those who received neoadjuvant treatment, 56.2% had NACRT, while 25.0% and 18.7% of patients had chemotherapy and radiotherapy respectively. Mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, dacarbazine (MAID) was the most commonly used chemotherapy regimen as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment while ifosfamide (93.7%) was the most commonly used chemotherapy drug in any setting. There was no reported case of disease progression in group of patients who received NACRT apart from one patient who had oligometastatic disease at diagnosis. Median OS of the whole cohort was 38 months while median PFS was 24 months. Bone marrow toxicity was the most commonly reported high grade toxicity in NACRT group (55.5%) but there were no treatment related deaths.

Conclusion

NACRT is not widely adopted and treatment is based on institutional preferences, however our data shows that NACRT is a feasible therapy option. NACRT should be evaluated prospectively in a randomized trial.

Pre- or postoperative radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas

Sarcomas are rare tumours arising from mesenchymal tissue. A multimodal management in an expert centre combining surgery and radiotherapy is the current standard of care for localized soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities, to enable limb-sparing strategies. The delivery of pre- radiotherapy or postoperative radiotherapy offers similar local control and survival rates but the toxicity profile is quite different: preoperative radiotherapy increases the risk of wound complications and postoperative radiotherapy affects long-term functional outcomes. While postoperative radiotherapy has long been the rule, especially in Europe, technical improvements with image-guided- and intensity-modulated radiotherapy associated with a better management of postoperative wounds has tended to change practices with more frequent preoperative radiotherapy. More recently the possibilities of a hypofractionated regimen or potentiation by nanoparticles to increase the therapeutic index plead in favour of a preoperative delivery of radiotherapy. The aim of this paper is to report pros and cons of pre- and post-operative radiotherapy for soft-tissue sarcomas.

The Landmark Series: Multimodality Treatment of Extremity Sarcoma

Multimodality treatment of primary soft tissue sarcoma has evolved over the last 50 years, including seminal studies in amputation versus limb-sparing surgery, incorporation of radiation therapy (XRT), and the continuing controversy over the utilization and efficacy of systemic chemotherapy. We review the landmark studies in the multimodality management of primary extremity and trunk soft tissue sarcoma.

Neoadjuvant Treatment Options in Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Due to the heterogeneity of soft tissue sarcomas (STS), the choice of the proper perioperative treatment regimen is challenging. Neoadjuvant therapy has attracted increasing attention due to several advantages, particularly in patients with locally advanced disease. The number of available neoadjuvant modalities is growing continuously. We may consider radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiosensitizers, hyperthermia, and their combinations. This review discusses possible neoadjuvant treatment options in STS with an emphasis on available evidence, indications for each treatment type, and related risks. Finally, we summarize current recommendations of the STS neoadjuvant therapy response assessment.

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) for soft tissue sarcoma - ESTRO IORT Task Force/ACROP recommendations

PURPOSE

To describe guidelines for the use of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in the treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas (STS).

METHODS

A panel of experts in the field performed a systematic literature review, supplemented their clinical experience and developed recommendations for the use of IORT in the treatment of STS.

RESULTS

Based on the evidence from the systematic literature review and the clinical experience of the panel members, recommendations regarding patient selection, incorporation into multimodal treatment concepts and the IORT procedure itself are made. The rationale for IORT in extremity and retroperitoneal STS is summarized and results of the major series in terms of patient and treatment characteristics, oncological outcome and toxicity are presented. We define surgical factors, volumes for irradiation, technical requirements, dose prescription, recording and reporting, treatment delivery and care during the course of IORT covering the main IORT techniques used for the treatment of STS. In extremity STS, evidence originates from a few small prospective and mainly from retrospective single centre studies. Based on those reports, IORT containing-approaches result in very high local control rates with low rates of acute and late toxicity. In retroperitoneal sarcomas, evidence is derived from one prospective randomized trial, a few prospective and a large number of retrospective studies. The randomized trial compared IORT combined with moderate doses of postoperative external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to high-dose postoperative EBRT alone after gross total resection, clearly favouring the IORT-containing approach. These results have been confirmed by the prospective and retrospective studies, which similarly showed high local control rates with acceptable toxicity, mainly favouring combinations of preoperative EBRT and IORT.

CONCLUSIONS

IORT-containing approaches result in high rates of local control with low to acceptable toxicity rates. Based on the available evidence, we made recommendations for the use of IORT in STS. Clinicians and researchers are encouraged to use these guidelines in clinical routine as well as in the design of future trials.

Chemotherapy improves distant control in localized high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity/trunk

Background

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare and heterogeneous tumors making chemotherapy use controversial. Our goal was to identify a subset of patients with primary STS that benefit with the addition of chemotherapy.

Methods

A retrospective chart review included intermediate to high-grade localized primary STS of the extremity/trunk, and tumor size > 5 cm. The effect of chemotherapy was evaluated for local control (LC), distant control (DC), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

In this cohort (n = 273), patients were treated with surgery (98%), radiation (81%), and chemotherapy (24.5%). With a median follow-up of 51 months, the entire cohort’s 5-year LC, DC, PFS, and OS are 79.1%, 59.9%, 43.8%, and 68.7%, respectively. The addition of chemotherapy did not provide a DC benefit (p = 0.238) for the entire cohort. High-grade disease (n = 210) experienced a 5-year benefit in DC (68% vs. 54.4%, p = 0.04), which was more pronounced with MAI (Mesna, Adriamycin, Ifosfamide) based regimens (74.2%, p = 0.016), and a 5-year PFS (50.8% vs 45%, p = 0.025) and OS benefit (76.2% vs 70%, p = 0.067) vs. no chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis of the high-grade subset, chemotherapy independently predicted for a DC benefit (HR 0.48 95% CI 0.26–89, p = 0.019). The benefit of chemotherapy was more pronounced with MAI, showing a significant benefit in DC (HR 0.333 95% CI 0.145–0.767, p = 0.01) and PFS (HR 0.52 95% CI 0.28–0.99, p = 0.047).

Conclusion

In patients with localized STS > 5 cm, the high-grade subset had a distant control benefit with the addition of chemotherapy, leading to improved progression free survival. This is more pronounced with the use of MAI and should be considered in patients eligible for this regimen.

Radiotherapy is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Synovial Sarcoma Undergoing Surgery: A National Cancer Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated an association of perioperative radiotherapy (RT) with improved survival in patients with synovial sarcoma (SS) undergoing surgery, but the mechanism for this is unknown. In this study, we sought to further analyze this association using a hospital-based data set where data on chemotherapy administration and surgical margin status are available.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 1216 patients with SS (aged ≥18 y) from 2004-2012 undergoing surgery. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to study the effect of clinicopathologic variables on overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Mean age at diagnosis was 41.5 y (range 18-90), and 71.3% of tumors were high grade; 22.9% underwent surgery alone, 59.6% received RT with surgery, 44.2% received chemotherapy with surgery, and 26.3% received trimodality therapy. Age, sex, grade, Charlson-Deyo score, and RT (hazard ratio, 0.676; 95% confidence interval, 0.519-0.880; P = 0.004) were associated with improved OS, whereas chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.899-1.60; P = 0.217) and surgical margin status were not. Trimodality therapy with surgery, RT, and chemotherapy was associated with improved OS when compared with therapy with surgery and chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with SS undergoing surgery, we observed a significant improved association of OS with the addition of RT when adjusting for comorbidity score, margin status, and receipt of chemotherapy. These data further support routine implementation of RT in the treatment of patients with SS, including those receiving aggressive multimodality and trimodality care.