Time between the first day of chemotherapy and the last day of chest radiation is the most important predictor of survival in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer

Breaking barriers: harnessing hypofractionated radiotherapy to transform outcomes in low tumor mutation burden stage III non-small cell lung cancer - a retrospective study

Background

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with low tumor mutational burden (TMB) showed low sensitive to conventional fractionated radiotherapy in our previous study. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in locally advanced NSCLC patients with low-TMB compared to conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes of 74 locally advanced NSCLC patients with low-TMB undergoing definitive radiotherapy from January 2017 to July 2023, with 31 patients received HFRT (received radiation doses of >2Gy and ≤5 Gy per fraction) and 43 received CFRT (received radiation doses of 1.8-2 Gy per fraction). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) to radiotherapy was analyzed in the two groups. Univariate analysis was performed to assess the impact of clinical characteristics on PFS. We also analyzed PFS in subgroups receiving HFRT or CFRT combined with immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Results

Survival analysis revealed the median PFS of 13 months in the HFRT group was significantly better than the 10 months in the CFRT group (p = 0.024). The 6-month and 12-month PFS rates were 80.6% and 61.3% for the HFRT group, versus 81.4% and 39.5% for the CFRT group, respectively. Median OS was 27 months in the HFRT group and 20 months in the CFRT group (p = 0.079). There were no statistically significant differences in major adverse events between the HFRT and CFRT groups (all p>0.05). In the subgroup receiving combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy, the median PFS was 10 months in the HFRT group and 9 months in the CFRT group (p = 0.092).

Conclusion

HFRT was superior to CFRT in prolonging PFS for patients with low-TMB locally advanced NSCLC. It was a safely and effective approach for these patients and was worth further prospective studies with larger sample sizes.

Breathing new insights into the role of mutant p53 in lung cancer

The tumour suppressor gene p53 is one of the most frequently mutated genes in lung cancer and these defects are associated with poor prognosis, albeit some debate exists in the lung cancer field. Despite extensive research, the exact mechanisms by which mutant p53 proteins promote the development and sustained expansion of cancer remain unclear. This review will discuss the cellular responses controlled by p53 that contribute to tumour suppression, p53 mutant lung cancer mouse models and characterisation of p53 mutant lung cancer. Furthermore, we discuss potential approaches of targeting mutant p53 for the treatment of lung cancer.

Effect of waiting time for radiotherapy after last induction chemotherapy on prognosis of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The effect of radiotherapy waiting time after last induction chemotherapy (IC-RT) on prognosis of patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) needs further discussion.

METHODS

Three hundred and six patients with LANPC diagnosed pathologically by induction chemotherapy (IC) and radiotherapy (RT) from 2013 to 2018 were selected for this study.

RESULTS

The IC-RT was a risk factor for the post-treatment progression of LANPC (OR = 1.017 95%CI: 1.003-1.031), For patients with LANPC, the IC-RT > 40 days significantly reduced 5-year PFS (70% vs. 55%; p = 0.0012), 5-year OS (84% vs. 73%; p = 0.028), 5-year DMFS (80% vs. 66%; p = 0.003), 5-year LRFS (77% vs. 67%; p = 0.012). Indicating that patients with stage IVa who IC-RT > 40 days were found to be a significant predictor of aggravated PFS (HR = 2.69; 95%CI: 1.57-4.6), OS (HR = 2.55; 95%CI: 1.29-5.03), DMFS (HR = 3.07; 95%CI: 1.64-5.76) and LRFS (HR = 2.26; 95%CI: 1.21-4.21).

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of patients will be adversely affected if the IC-RT exceeds 40 days, especially for stage IVa patients.

Effect of Segmental Abutting Esophagus-Sparing Technique to Reduce Severe Esophagitis in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Concurrent Hypofractionated Thoracic Radiation and Chemotherapy

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effect of segmental abutting esophagus-sparing (SAES) radiotherapy on reducing severe acute esophagitis in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Thirty patients were enrolled from the experimental arm (45 Gy in 3 Gy daily fractions in 3 weeks) of an ongoing phase III trial (NCT02688036). The whole esophagus was divided into the involved esophagus and the abutting esophagus (AE) according to the distance from the edge of the clinical target volume. All dosimetric parameters were significantly reduced for the whole esophagus and AE. The maximal and mean doses of the esophagus (47.4 ± 1.9 Gy and 13.5 ± 5.8 Gy, respectively) and AE (42.9 ± 2.3 Gy and 8.6 ± 3.6 Gy, respectively) in the SAES plan were significantly lower than those (esophagus 48.0 ± 1.9 Gy and 14.7± 6.1 Gy, AE 45.1 ± 2.4 Gy and 9.8 ± 4.2 Gy, respectively) in the non-SAES plan. With a median follow-up of 12.5 months, only one patient (3.3%) developed grade 3 acute esophagitis, and no grade 4-5 events happened. SAES radiotherapy has significant dosimetric advantages, which are successfully translated into clinical benefits and provide good feasibility for dose escalation to improve local control and prognosis in the future.

Radiotherapy Fraction in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Modern Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 8006 Reconstructed Individual Patient Data

The optimal thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) dose and fractionation for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) using modern techniques remain unclear. We conducted systematic review and meta-analyses of the efficacy and safety differences between definitive hypofractionated TRT (HypoTRT), conventional TRT (ConvTRT) and hyperfractionated TRT (HyperTRT), especially in the modern era. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs), real-world cohorts, and single-arm trials published between 1990 and 2021 were identified. Two meta-analyses of overall survival (OS) were conducted: (i) a random-effects meta-analysis based on reconstructed individual-patient data (IPD) of all studies; and (ii) a Bayesian network meta-analysis based on study-level aggregated data (AD) of RCTs. The incidences of severe radiation-related toxicities were compared using the random-effects meta-regression model. Overall, 53 of the 30,031 publications met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 8006 IPD were reconstructed. After adjusting for key treatment variables and stratification by study type, there were no significant differences in the OS rates between the altered fractionation regimens (HypoTRT vs. HyperTRT, aHR [adjusted HR] = 1.05, 95% CI 0.93-1.19; ConvTRT vs. HyperTRT, aHR = 1.00, 95% CI 0·90-1.11; HypoTRT vs. ConvTRT, aHR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.91-1.20). In the modern era, the survival outcomes of all three schedules, while remaining comparable, have improved significantly. Results of the AD-based network meta-analysis were consistent with those of IPD analysis, and HypoTRT was ranked as the best regimen (SUCRA = 81%). There were no significant differences in toxicities between groups when using modern radiation techniques. In the modern era, no significant differences in OS or severe radiation-related toxicities were observed between altered schedules in LS-SCLC. HypoTRT may be associated with moderate and non-significant OS improvements, which should be further confirmed in prospective randomized phase III trials.

Comparative effectiveness and toxicity of radiotherapy regimens in limited stage small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this Network Meta-analysis was to compare the current radiotherapy regimens of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC), in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the incidence of acute radioactive esophagitis and radioactive pneumonia.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched until January 2022. The studies were included, comparing radiotherapy regimens in LS-SCLC patients. We compared hypofractionated radiotherapy (HypoTRT), hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HyperTRT), and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (ConvTRT1(<60 Gy), ConvTRT2(≥60 Gy)).

RESULTS

There was similar efficacy among the contemporary radiotherapy regimens for PFS of LS-SCLC. HypoTRT and HyperTRT significantly improved the OS of LS-SCLC compared with ConvTRT1 (<60 Gy), while not improving the OS of LS-SCLC compared with ConvTRT2 (≥60 Gy). There was no significant difference between HypoTRT and HyperTRT, between ConvTRT1(<60 Gy) and ConvTRT2(≥60 Gy), respectively. HyperTRT developed the highest odds of acute radioactive esophagitis compared to ConvTRT1(<60 Gy) and ConvTRT2(≥60 Gy). There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute radioactive esophagitis between HypoTRT and HyperTRT, ConvTRT1(<60 Gy), ConvTRT2(≥60 Gy), respectively and between ConvTRT1 and ConvTRT2. There was no statistically significant difference among radiotherapy regimens for the incidence of acute radioactive pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

The current radiotherapy regimens are similar in efficacy and toxicity for LS-SCLC, except for ConvTRT1(<60 Gy). Given the lower costs and convenient logistics management of HypoTRT comparatively, it is an acceptable alternative for LS-SCLC.

An Overview of the Role of Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer - A Mainstay of Treatment or a Modality in Decline?

AIMS

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for about 15% of all lung cancers. Chemotherapy, immunotherapy and radiotherapy all play important roles in the management of SCLC. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the role and evidence of radiotherapy in the cure and palliation of SCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The search strategy included a search of the PubMed database, hand searches, reference lists of relevant review articles and relevant published abstracts.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov was also queried for relevant trials.

RESULTS

Thoracic radiotherapy improves overall survival in limited stage SCLC, but the timing and dose remain controversial. The role of thoracic radiotherapy in extensive stage SCLC with immunotherapy is the subject of several ongoing trials. Current evidence supports the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for limited stage SCLC but the evidence is equivocal in extensive stage SCLC. Whole brain radiotherapy is well established for the treatment of brain metastases but evidence is rapidly accumulating for the use of stereotactic radiosurgery. Further studies will define the role of PCI, whole brain radiotherapy and hippocampal avoidant PCI in the immunotherapy era.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy is an essential component in the multimodality management of SCLC. Technological advances have allowed safer delivery of radiotherapy with reduced toxicities. Discussion at multidisciplinary team meetings is important to ensure radiotherapy is considered and offered in appropriate patients.

Sequential Hypofractionated versus Concurrent Twice-Daily Radiotherapy for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Background: As there are no randomized trials comparing twice-daily with sequential hypofractionated (sequential hypo) radiotherapy regimens for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). This study aimed to compare these two regimens for LS-SCLC by propensity score-matched analysis (PSM). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 108 LS-SCLC patients between January 2015 and July 2019. All patients received concurrent twice-daily or sequential hypo radiotherapy. The survival, failure patterns, and toxicities were evaluated before and after PSM. Results: Before PSM, multivariate analysis showed that patients treated with sequential hypo had a significantly better overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (HR = 0.353, p = 0.009; HR = 0.483, p = 0.039, respectively). Total radiotherapy time ≥ 24 days and stage III (HR = 2.454, p = 0.004; HR = 2.310, p = 0.004, respectively) were poor prognostic indicators for OS. Patients with a total radiotherapy time ≥ 24 days and N2−3 were more likely to recur than others (HR = 1.774, p = 0.048; HR = 2.369, p = 0.047, respectively). N2−3 (HR = 3.032, p = 0.011) was a poor prognostic indicator for DMFS. After PSM, being aged ≥65 years was associated with poorer OS, relapse-free survival (RFS) and DMFS (p < 0.05). A total radiotherapy time of ≥24 days was a poor prognostic indicator for OS and RFS (HR = 2.671, p = 0.046; HR = 2.370, p = 0.054, respectively). Although there was no significant difference, the patients in the sequential hypo group had a trend towards a better OS. The failure pattern between the two groups showed no difference. More patients had grade 1−2 esophagitis in the twice-daily group (p = 0.001). Conclusions: After propensity matching, no difference was shown in survival and failure. The sequential hypo schedule was associated with comparable survival and less toxicity and may be used as an alternative to concurrent twice-daily regimens.

Once daily (OD) versus twice-daily (BID) chemoradiation for limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC): A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

Assess Once daily (OD) chemoradiation effectiveness for LS-SCLC compared with twice daily (BID) chemoradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, eligible randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing OD and BID were identified on electronic databases. A meta-analysis was performed to compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. A metaregression analysis was conducted to explore the influence of fractionation, biological effective dose (BED), the proportion of patients treated with prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), elective nodal irradiation (ENI), and the start of radiotherapy (week 1 or week 4).

RESULTS

Five RCTs with a total of 1941 patients (OD vs. BID) were included. The relative risk (RR) for OS and PFS was 0.97 (CI95% 0.8-1.1, p = 0.731) and 0.90 (CI95% 0.7-1.1, p = 0.20) at 3-years. In the metaregression analysis, hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules were associated with an improvement in overall survival (p = 0.03). The start of radiotherapy (W1 or W4), BED, and ENI had no significant effect on OS and PFS. The complete response rate partial response and overall response rate for BID vs OD were 40% vs. 33% (p = 0.97), 50% vs. 57% (p = 0.94), and 89% vs. 93% (p = 0.99). The rate of completed planned RT 96% vs. 94% (p = 0.66), and the % of ≥4 chemotherapy cycles received 74% vs. 74% (p = 0.99), did not differ between OD and BID. The local and distant failure rates were not significantly different between OD and BID 40% vs. 33% (p = 0.88) and 36% vs. 36% (p = 0.99). No difference in grade 2 or grade 3 pneumonitis and esophagitis was observed among the groups (p = NS).

CONCLUSION

For LS-SCLC, OD conventional chemoradiation results in similar outcomes to BID chemoradiation. In contrast, hypofractionated radiotherapy was associated with a better OS and PFS than BID. Additional randomized phase III trials exploring hypofractionation with systemic therapy are warranted to validate our findings.

Radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer in current clinical practice guidelines

Several guidelines including radiotherapy recommendations exist worldwide for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). To evaluate the differences in radiotherapy recommendations we conducted a systematic review. PubMed and the sites of medical societies were searched for SCLC guidelines published in either English, Chinese, or Dutch. This was limited to January 2018 till February 2021 to only include up-to-date recommendations. Data was extracted and compared regarding the guideline's development method and radiotherapy recommendations. Eleven guidelines were identified (PubMed n=4, societies n=7) from Spain (n=1), Canada (n=1), America (n=3), United Kingdom (n=1), the Netherlands (n=1), and China (n=3), respectively. Nine guidelines assessed the strength of evidence (SOE) and specified the strength of recommendation (SOR), although methods were different. The major radiotherapy recommendations are similar although differences exist in thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) dose, time, and volume. Controversial areas are TRT in resected stage I-IIA (pN1), prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in resected as well as unresected stage I-IIA, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in unresected stage I-IIA, PCI time, and PCI versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance in stage IV. The existence of several overlapping guidelines for SCLC treatment indicates that guideline development is (unnecessarily) repeated by different organizations or societies. Improvement could be made by better international collaboration to avoid duplicating unnecessary work, which would spare a lot of time and resources. Efforts should be made to work together on controversial or unknown fields.

Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Proton Plus Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the tolerance and effect of proton plus carbon-ion radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer using the pencil beam scanning technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 2017 to April 2020, 25 patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer treated with combined proton and carbon-ion radiotherapy were analyzed. The primary lesions and involved lymph nodes were irradiated using 2-4 portals. Proton and sequential carbon-ion beams were delivered with a median dose of 67.1 (range, 63-74.8) GyE as fraction doses of 2.0-2.2 GyE with proton beams in 20-23 fractions and 3.0-3.8 GyE with carbon ions in 5-8 fractions. Chemotherapy was delivered concurrently with radiotherapy in all patients.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up, the 2-year overall and locoregional progression-free survival rates were 81.7% and 66.7%, respectively. Radiochemotherapy was well tolerated, with grade 1, 2, and 3 acute toxicities occurring in 12.0%, 68.0%, and 20.0% of patients, respectively. All grade 3 acute toxicities were hematologically related changes. One patient experienced grade 3 acute non-hematological toxicity in the esophagus, and one other patient had grade 3 bronchial obstruction accompanied by obstructive atelectasis as a late side effect.

CONCLUSION

Proton plus carbon-ion radiotherapy using pencil beam scanning yielded promising survival rates and tolerability in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer. A prospective clinical study is warranted to validate the therapeutic efficacy of particle radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer.

Recent developments in the treatment of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) comprises about 15% of all lung cancers. It is an aggressive disease, with early metastasis and a poor prognosis. Until recently, SCLC treatment remained relatively unchanged, with chemotherapy remaining the cornerstone of treatment. In this overview we will highlight the recent advances in the field of staging, surgery, radiotherapy and systemic treatment. Nevertheless, the prognosis remains dismal and there is a pressing need for new treatment options. We describe the progress that has been made in systemic treatment by repurposing existing drugs and the addition of targeted treatment. In recent years, immunotherapy entered the clinic with high expectations of its role in the treatment of SCLC. Unravelling of the genomic sequence revealed new possible targets that may act as biomarkers in future treatment of patients with SCLC. Hopefully, in the near future, we will be able to identify patients who may benefit from targeted therapy or immunotherapy to improve prognoses.

A Comparison of Hypofractionated and Twice-Daily Thoracic Irradiation in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Overlap-Weighted Analysis

Despite evidence for the superiority of twice-daily (BID) radiotherapy schedules, their utilization in practice remains logistically challenging. Hypofractionation (HFRT) is a commonly implemented alternative. We aim to compare the outcomes and toxicities in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) patients treated with hypofractionated versus BID schedules. A bi-institutional retrospective cohort review was conducted of LS-SCLC patients treated with BID (45 Gy/30 fractions) or HFRT (40 Gy/15 fractions) schedules from 2007 to 2019. Overlap weighting using propensity scores was performed to balance observed covariates between the two radiotherapy schedule groups. Effect estimates of radiotherapy schedule on overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence (LRR) risk, thoracic response, any ≥grade 3 (including lung, and esophageal) toxicity were determined using multivariable regression modelling. A total of 173 patients were included in the overlap-weighted analysis, with 110 patients having received BID treatment, and 63 treated by HFRT. The median follow-up was 20.4 months. Multivariable regression modelling did not reveal any significant differences in OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.67, p = 0.38), LRR risk (HR 1.48, p = 0.38), thoracic response (odds ratio [OR] 0.23, p = 0.21), any ≥grade 3+ toxicity (OR 1.67, p = 0.33), ≥grade 3 pneumonitis (OR 1.14, p = 0.84), or ≥grade 3 esophagitis (OR 1.41, p = 0.62). HFRT, in comparison to BID radiotherapy schedules, does not appear to result in significantly different survival, locoregional control, or toxicity outcomes.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in small-cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review

Background

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 12-15% of lung cancers and is associated with poor survival outcomes and high symptom burden. This study employed a broad, systematic search strategy and timeframe to identify evidence on real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for SCLC outside the USA, including understanding sub-populations such as extensive-stage (ES) or limited-stage (LS) disease.

Methods

Databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and EBM reviews) were searched for journal articles published in the English language between 1 January 2000-1 March 2020 and supplemented by hand searching of conference abstracts and posters presented at conferences between 1 January 2016-1 March 2020 reporting real-world treatment outcomes in patients with SCLC. A targeted clinical guideline review was also completed.

Results

One-hundred studies provided quantitative data; 57 were available as full-text articles, whilst the remaining 43 were presented as abstracts or posters. The majority (80 studies, 80%) of included studies reported treatment in the first-line setting, where platinum-based chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy was the most commonly used treatment strategy, in line with current treatment guidelines in SCLC. First-line treatments were found to have a high response rate; however, most patients relapsed early. No studies reported treatment or outcomes with immune-oncology therapies. Second-line treatment options were very limited, and primarily consisted of either re-treatment with first-line regimen or topotecan, but the prognosis for these patients remained poor. Outcomes were particularly poor amongst those with ES or relapsed disease vs. LS disease.

Conclusions

SCLC treatment patterns and short survival outcomes have remained constant over the previous 20 years. Due to the search timeframe, none of the studies identified reported on the impact of recently approved immune-oncology therapies in SCLC. Further data is needed on the impact of immunotherapies on treatment patterns and real-world outcomes in SCLC.

Moderately Hypofractionated Once-Daily Compared With Twice-Daily Thoracic Radiation Therapy Concurrently With Etoposide and Cisplatin in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Phase II, Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy and concurrent thoracic radiation therapy (CCTRT) followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is the standard of care for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). We aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of moderately hypofractionated once-daily CCTRT with that of a standard twice-daily regimen.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This multicenter, phase 2, randomized study enrolled patients aged 18 to 75 years old who had pathologically confirmed LS-SCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Eligible patients received 4 to 6 cycles of etoposide-cisplatin chemotherapy and were randomized to receive twice-daily CCTRT at 45 Gray (Gy) in 30 fractions or once-daily CCTRT at 65 Gy in 26 fractions, commencing with cycles 1 to 3 of chemotherapy. PCI was given to good responders. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The analyses included 182 patients, with 94 in the twice-daily group and 88 in the once-daily group. CCTRT started with cycle 3 of chemotherapy for most patients (80.2%). At a median follow-up of 24.3 months, the median PFS was 13.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.8-16.0) in the twice-daily group versus 17.2 months (95% CI, 11.8-22.6) in the once-daily group (P = .031), with 2-year PFS rates of 28.4% (95% CI, 18.2-38.6) and 42.3% (95% CI, 31.1-53.5), respectively. The estimated overall survival was 33.6 months in the twice-daily group versus 39.3 months in the once-daily group (P = .137). The median locoregional PFS was 23.9 months in the twice-daily group and was not reached in the once-daily group (P = .017). The incidences of most toxicities were similar in both groups, except for a higher incidence of ≥grade 3 acute lymphopenia in the once-daily group (71.7% vs 40.2% in the twice-daily group; P < .001). There was no difference in the incidences of ≥grade 3 esophagitis (17.4% vs 15.3%, respectively), pneumonitis (3.3% vs 2.4%, respectively) or treatment-related death (2.2% vs 1.2%, respectively) between the once-daily and twice-daily groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderately hypofractionated, once-daily CCTRT showed improved PFS and similar toxicities compared with twice-daily CCTRT in LS-SCLC. This regimen should be evaluated for comparison in a phase 3 randomized trial.

Thoracic radiotherapy in small cell lung cancer-a narrative review

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents 10–15% of all lung cancers and has a poor prognosis. Thoracic radiotherapy plays a central role in current SCLC management. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) is the standard of care for localised disease (stage I−III, limited-stage, LS). Definitive thoracic radiotherapy may be offered in metastatic patients (stage IV, extensive stage, ES-SCLC) after chemotherapy. For LS-SCLC, the gold standard is early accelerated hyperfractionated twice-daily CTRT (4 cycles of cisplatin etoposide, starting with the first or second chemotherapy cycle). Modern radiation techniques should be used with involved-field radiotherapy based on baseline CT and PET/CT scans. In ES-SCLC, thoracic radiotherapy should be discussed in cases of initial bulky mediastinal disease/residual thoracic disease not progressing after induction chemotherapy. This strategy was however not assessed in recent trials establishing chemo-immunotherapy as the standard first line treatment in ES-SCLC. Future developments include technical radiotherapy advances and the incorporation of new drugs. Thoracic irradiation is delivered more precisely given technical developments (IMRT, image-guided radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy), reducing the risks of severe adverse events. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy may be discussed in rare early stage (T1 to 2, N0) inoperable patients. A number of current clinical trials are investigating immunoradiotherapy. In this review, we highlight the current role of thoracic radiotherapy and describe ongoing research in the integration of biological surrogate markers, advanced radiotherapy technologies and novel drugs in SCLC patients.

GOECP/SEOR radiotherapy guidelines for small-cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of all lung cancers. The main treatment is chemotherapy (Ch). However, the addition of radiotherapy significantly improves overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic SCLC and in those with metastatic SCLC who respond to Ch. Prophylactic cranial irradiation reduces the risk of brain metastases and improves OS in both metastatic and non-metastatic patients. The 5-year OS rate in patients with limited-stage disease (non-metastatic) is slightly higher than 30%, but less than 5% in patients with extensive-stage disease (metastatic). The present clinical guidelines were developed by Spanish radiation oncologists on behalf of the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer/Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology to provide a current review of the diagnosis, planning, and treatment of SCLC. These guidelines emphasise treatment fields, radiation techniques, fractionation, concomitant treatment, and the optimal timing of Ch and radiotherapy. Finally, we discuss the main indications for reirradiation in local recurrence.

High-dose versus standard-dose twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy for patients with limited stage small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is standard treatment for limited stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 30 fractions is considered to be the most effective schedule. The aim of this study was to investigate whether high-dose, twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy of 60 Gy in 40 fractions improves survival.

METHODS

This open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial was done at 22 public hospitals in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden. Patients aged 18 years and older with treatment-naive confirmed limited stage SCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2, and measurable disease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 were eligible. All participants received four courses of intravenous cisplatin 75 mg/m² or carboplatin (area under the curve 5-6 mg/mL × min, Calvert's formula) on day 1 and intravenous etoposide 100 mg/m² on days 1-3 every 3 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) in permuted blocks (sized between 4 and 10) stratifying for ECOG performance status, disease stage, and presence of pleural effusion to receive thoracic radiotherapy of 45 Gy in 30 fractions or 60 Gy in 40 fractions to the primary lung tumour and PET-CT positive lymph node metastases starting 20-28 days after the first chemotherapy course. Patients in both groups received two fractions per day, ten fractions per week. Responders were offered prophylactic cranial irradiation of 25-30 Gy. The primary endpoint, 2-year overall survival, was assessed after all patients had been followed up for a minimum of 2 years. All randomly assigned patients were included in the efficacy analyses, patients commencing thoracic radiotherapy were included in the safety analyses. Follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02041845.

FINDINGS

Between July 8, 2014, and June 6, 2018, 176 patients were enrolled, 170 of whom were randomly assigned to 60 Gy (n=89) or 45 Gy (n=81). Median follow-up for the primary analysis was 49 months (IQR 38-56). At 2 years, 66 (74·2% [95% CI 63·8-82·9]) patients in the 60 Gy group were alive, compared with 39 (48·1% [36·9-59·5]) patients in the 45 Gy group (odds ratio 3·09 [95% CI 1·62-5·89]; p=0·0005). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (72 [81%] of 89 patients in the 60 Gy group vs 62 [81%] of 77 patients in the 45 Gy group), neutropenic infections (24 [27%] vs 30 [39%]), thrombocytopenia (21 [24%] vs 19 [25%]), anaemia (14 [16%] vs 15 [20%]), and oesophagitis (19 [21%] vs 14 [18%]). There were 55 serious adverse events in 38 patients in the 60 Gy group and 56 serious adverse events in 44 patients in the 45 Gy group. There were three treatment-related deaths in each group (one neutropenic fever, one aortic dissection, and one pneumonitis in the 60 Gy group; one thrombocytic bleeding, one cerebral infarction, and one myocardial infarction in the 45 Gy group).

INTERPRETATION

The higher radiotherapy dose of 60 Gy resulted in a substantial survival improvement compared with 45 Gy, without increased toxicity, suggesting that twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy of 60 Gy is an alternative to existing schedules.

FUNDING

The Norwegian Cancer Society, The Liaison Committee for Education, Research and Innovation in Central Norway, the Nordic Cancer Union, and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

New Therapies and Biomarkers: Are We Ready for Personalized Treatment in Small Cell Lung Cancer?

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive form of lung cancer with a 5-year survival rate of less than 7%. In contrast to non-small cell lung cancer, SCLC has long been treated as a homogeneous disease without personalized treatment options. In recent years, the incorporation of immunotherapy into the treatment paradigm has brought moderate benefit to patients with SCLC; however, more effective therapies are urgently needed. In this article, we describe the current treatment standards and emerging therapeutic approaches for the treatment of SCLC. We also discuss promising biomarkers in SCLC and the recently discovered four subtypes of SCLC, each with its unique therapeutic vulnerability. Lastly, we discuss the advances in radiation therapy for the treatment of SCLC.

Delay to surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma affects oncologic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is used in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) for downstaging advanced disease and decreasing distant metastasis (DM). To the authors' knowledge, no study has specifically examined the impact of a delayed time to surgery (TTS) after NAC on oncologic outcomes. They thus aimed to identify a cutoff for TTS after NAC and its effect on survival indices.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of all patients with HNSCC receiving NAC followed by surgery with curative intent between March 2016 and March 2019 at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to identify a cutoff for TTS, and this cutoff was used to analyze the overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence rate, DM-free rate, and disease-free survival (DFS). A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

One hundred one patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 24.7 months. The 3-year OS and locoregional recurrence rates did not differ with a TTS ≥ 34 days. However, the 3-year DM-free rate was significantly worse (56% vs 90%; P = .001) in the group with a TTS ≥ 34 days, and the 3-year DFS was significantly lower (26% vs 64%; P = .006). In a multivariate analysis, a TTS ≥ 34 days (hazard ratio [HR], 4.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84-13.13) and extracapsular extension (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.13-8.00) were significant independent predictors of a poorer DM-free rate. Weight loss > 10% (HR, 5.53; 95% CI, 1.02-30.24) was the only independent predictor for a TTS ≥ 34 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Emphasis should be placed on early definitive locoregional treatment after NAC, particularly in patients who do not respond to NAC. There is a need to validate these findings and establish new benchmarks for the interval between NAC and surgery.

Systemic therapy for limited stage small cell lung carcinoma

Systemic treatment in small cell lung carcinoma has been a challenge for oncologists for decades. The high propensity for recurrence is usually due to distant metastasis, which makes systemic treatment an essential component of treatment in small cell lung carcinoma. The regimen of cisplatin and etoposide (established in the mid-1980’s) concurrently with thoracic radiotherapy followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) remains the standard of care in limited stage disease. Despite numerous trials, this regimen has not been improved upon. The standard combination regimen of cisplatin and etoposide has been compared to alternative platinum-containing regimens with drugs like epirubicin, irinotecan, paclitaxel, topotecan, pemetrexed, amrubicin and belotecan. Non-platinum containing regimens like ifosfamide and etoposide have also been tested. Attempts to intensify therapy have included the addition of a third drug like paclitaxel, ifosfamide, tirapazamine, tamoxifen, and thalidomide. Maintenance therapy following induction with chemotherapy, vandetanib and interferon-alpha have also been attempted. Molecularly directed targeted therapies and immunotherapeutic agents are areas of active research. In this review, we discuss the various systemic therapy options in limited stage small cell lung carcinoma, from the historical regimens to the modern-day therapy and promising areas of research. We also discuss the role of growth factors, the optimal number of chemotherapy cycles, the use of prognostic and predictive factors, the optimal timing of chemotherapy and the treatment of special populations of patients including older patients, and patients with comorbidities.

Recommendations for detection, prioritization, and treatment of thoracic oncology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: the THOCOoP cooperative group

The world currently faces a pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2. Relevant information has emerged regarding the higher risk of poor outcomes in lung cancer patients. As such, lung cancer patients must be prioritized in terms of prevention, detection and treatment. On May 7th, 45 experts in thoracic cancers from 11 different countries were invited to participate. A core panel of experts regarding thoracic oncology care amidst the pandemic gathered virtually, and a total of 60 initial recommendations were drafted based on available evidence, 2 questions were deleted due to conflicting evidence. By May 16th, 44 experts had agreed to participate, and voted on each of the 58 recommendation using a Delphi panel on a live voting event. Consensus was reached regarding the recommendations (>66 % strongly agree/agree) for 56 questions. Strong consensus (>80 % strongly agree/agree) was reached for 44 questions. Patients with lung cancer represent a particularly vulnerable population during this time. Special care must be taken to maintain treatment while avoiding exposure.

GOECP/SEOR clinical recommendations for lung cancer radiotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic

The coronavirus disease 2019 crisis has had a major and highly complex impact on the clinical practice of radiation oncology worldwide. Spain is one of the countries hardest hit by the virus, with devastating consequences. There is an urgent need to share experiences and offer guidance on decision-making with regard to the indications and standards for radiation therapy in the treatment of lung cancer. In the present article, the Oncological Group for the Study of Lung Cancer of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology reviews the literature and establishes a series of consensus-based recommendations for the treatment of patients with lung cancer in different clinical scenarios during the present pandemic.

Current Management and Progress in Radiotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer

Radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy continue to be widely utilized in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) management. In most limited stage (LS)-SCLC cases, the standard initial therapy remains concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), typically with an etoposide and platinum-based regimen. Hyperfractionated twice daily (BID) RT remains the standard of care, though conventional daily (QD) RT is now a viable alternative supported by randomized evidence. In LS-SCLC patients who experienced good response to CRT, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) remains the standard of care. Brain imaging, ideally with MRI, should be performed prior to PCI to screen for clinically apparent brain metastases that may require a higher dose of cranial irradiation. Platinum doublet chemotherapy alone is the historic standard initial therapy in extensive stage (ES)-SCLC. Addition of immunotherapy such as atezolizumab and durvalumab to chemotherapy is now recommended after their benefits were demonstrated in recent trials. In patients with response to chemotherapy, consolidation thoracic RT and PCI could be considered, though with caveats. Emergence of hippocampal avoidance cranial irradiation and SRS in SCLC patients may supplant whole cranial irradiation as future standards of care. Incorporation of novel systemic therapies such as immunotherapies has changed the treatment paradigm and overall outlook of patients with SCLC. This narrative review summarizes the current state, ongoing trials, and future directions of radiotherapy in management of SCLC.

Twice-daily vs higher-dose once-daily thoracic radiotherapy for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The optimal dose and fractionation of thoracic radiotherapy (RT) for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) remain controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and RT toxicity between twice-daily thoracic RT (45 Gy with 1.5 Gy twice daily) and higher-dose once-daily RT (60-72 Gy with 1.8 Gy/2 Gy once daily) administered with chemotherapy in LD-SCLC patients.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to March 19, 2020 for studies that compared twice-daily thoracic RT (45 Gy with 1.5 Gy twice daily over 3 weeks) with higher-dose once-daily RT (60-72 Gy with 1.8 Gy/2 Gy once daily over 6-8 weeks) in LD-SCLC patients.

RESULTS

Five studies involving 13,726 patients were included in this analysis. Compared with the once-daily thoracic RT group, the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate (P < .001), the 2-year OS rate (P < .001), the 5-year OS rate (P < .001), the mOS (P < .001), and the 1-year LRFS rate (P = .048) were significantly improved in the twice-daily RT group. The toxic effects of RT (esophagitis: P = .293; pneumonitis: P = .103) were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the higher-dose once-daily regimen, the twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy regimen improved efficacy but did not increase RT toxicity in LD-SCLC patients.

Surgical Compliance and Survival Outcomes for Patients with Stage T1-2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction

Our aim was to determine the relationship between surgical compliance and survival outcomes in patients with stage T1-2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients with T1-2 NSCLC who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were identified from the SEER database. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse factors associated with surgical compliance. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to analyse the effects of surgical compliance on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

Of the 221,704 eligible T1-2 NSCLC patients, 106,668 patients recommended surgery. Among them, 99,672 (93.4%) patients were surgical compliance group, and 6996 (6.6%) were surgical noncompliance group. Poor surgical compliance was associated with earlier diagnosis time, old age, male, black race, unmarried status, main bronchus site, poor grade/stage, and lower household income. Patients' compliance was an independent prognostic factor for OS and CSS of T1-2 NSCLC patients. Multivariate Cox regression showed that surgical noncompliance individuals showed lower OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.494; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.423-2.566, p < 0.001) and lower CSS (HR 2.877; 95% CI 2.782-2.974, p < 0.001) compared with surgical compliance patients. In addition, results in the non-surgical group were observed to be similar to those of the surgical noncompliance group.

Conclusion

We found that patients' compliance was an independent prognostic factor for survival in T1-2 NSCLC patients. Poor surgical compliance was associated with earlier diagnosis time, old age, male, black race, unmarried status, main bronchus site, poor grade/stage, and lower household income.

Is There a Role for Hypofractionated Thoracic Radiation Therapy in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer? A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Purpose

Various radiation schedules are used in concurrent chemoradiation therapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Since there is currently no randomized evidence comparing hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) and conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT), the aim of this study was to compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity of HFRT and CFRT in LS-SCLC.

Methods and Materials

Patients with LS-SCLC treated between 2000 and 2013 with HFRT (40 Gy/15 fractions, 45 Gy/15 fractions, 45 Gy/20 fractions) or CFRT (60 Gy/30 or 66 Gy/33 fractions) were included. Propensity scores were generated using a multivariable logistic regression model. Patients were matched on a 1:1 ratio with a caliper distance of 0.20. OS and PFS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. As a sensitivity analysis, univariable and multivariable Cox regression was performed including all patients without matching. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of pulmonary and esophageal adverse events.

Results

In the overall group of 117 patients, there were significant baseline differences between the HFRT and CFRT cohorts. Patients who received CFRT were older, more often smoked concurrently with treatment, had higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, different T and N stage patterns, and more commonly received concurrent chemoradiation therapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation. After propensity score matching for these differences, 72 patients were included, 36 in the HFRT and CFRT cohorts, respectively. There was no difference in OS (P = .724), PFS (P = .862), or any pulmonary (P = .350) or esophageal (P = .097) adverse events between cohorts. Skin adverse events were significantly higher for CFRT (41.7%) compared with HFRT (16.7%, P = .020). Multivariable Cox regression also revealed no differences in OS (P = .886) or PFS (P = .717) between all HFRT and CFRT patients, without matching. No grade 5 adverse events were observed.

Conclusions

In LS-SCLC patients, HFRT was associated with comparable survival and toxicity outcomes and may be considered as an alternative to CFRT, should its efficacy be confirmed in prospective studies.

Breaking the Impasse: Advances in Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy and carries a poor prognosis with limited effective treatments in the advanced setting. SCLC is characterized by a high tumor mutation burden and alterations in Notch signaling and DNA damage repair pathways, providing rationale for the use of immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Immunotherapies have led to the most significant advances in treating SCLC in decades, and several promising targeted approaches have emerged from the increased understanding of the biology of SCLC. However, responses to these novel approaches are far from universal, and efforts to refine these therapies are ongoing.

[Practical update of total dose compensation in case of temporary interruption of external radiotherapy in the COVID-19 pandemic context]

L’étalement est un facteur important de récidive locale et indirectement d’évolution à distance, notamment, en cas de durée de traitement allongée. La pandémie actuelle a un impact sur les patients en cours de radiothérapie qui doivent interrompre leur traitement de manière parfois prolongée du fait de la nécessité de soins respiratoires induits par le COVID-19. Les modèles utilisés de compensation de la dose totale en cas d’interruption prolongée de la radiothérapie sont connus, mais il nous a semblé important de synthétiser afin que chaque oncologue radiothérapeute puisse proposer un traitement le plus optimal possible tant en termes de risque de récidive locale que de protection des tissus sains. L’objectif de ce type de recommandation est d’homogénéiser les pratiques de l’ensemble de la discipline.

A systematic review of survival following anti-cancer treatment for small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival following treatment recommended by the European Society of Medical Oncology for SCLC in order to determine a benchmark for novel therapies to be compared with.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting overall survival following chemotherapy for SCLC were included. We calculated survival at 30 and 90-days along with 1-year, 2-year and median.

RESULTS

We identified 160 for inclusion. There were minimal 30-day deaths. Survival was 99 % (95 %CI 98.0-99.0 %, I²33.9 %, n = 77) and 90 % (95 %CI 89.0-92.0 %, I²79.5 %, n = 73) at 90 days for limited (LD-SCLC) and extensive stage (ED-SCLC) respectively. The median survival for LD-SCLC was 18.1 months (95 %CI 17.0-19.1 %, I²77.3 %, n = 110) and early thoracic radiotherapy (thoracic radiotherapy 18.4 months (95 %CI 17.3-19.5, I²78.4 %, n = 100)) vs no radiotherapy 11.7 months (95 %CI 9.1-14.3, n = 10), prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI 19.7 months vs No PCI 13.0 months (95 %CI 18.5-21.0, I²75.7 %, n = 78 and 95 %CI 10.5-16.6, I²81.1 %, n = 15 respectively)) and better performance status (PS0-1 22.5 months vs PS0-4 15.3 months (95 %CI 18.7-26.1, I²72.4 %, n = 11 and 95 %CI 11.5-19.1 I²77.9 %, n = 13)) augmented this. For ED-SCLC the median survival was 9.6 months (95 %CI 8.9-10.3 %, I²95.2 %, n = 103) and this improved when irinotecan + cisplatin was used, however studies that used this combination were mostly conducted in Asian populations where survival was better. Survival was not improved with the addition of thoracic radiotherapy or PCI. Survival for both stages of cancer was better in modern studies and Asian cohorts. It was poorer for studies administering carboplatin + etoposide but this regimen was used in studies that had fewer patient selection criteria.

CONCLUSION

Early thoracic radiotherapy and PCI should be offered to people with LD-SCLC in accordance with guideline recommendations. The benefit of the aforementioned therapies to treat ED-SCLC and the use of chemotherapy in people with poor PS is less clear.

Treatment time to the end of thoracic radiotherapy has more predictive power for survival than radiation dose intensity in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiation of more than 45 Gy

The optimal protocol for thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in combination with chemotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) remains elusive. The present study aimed to evaluate radiation parameters in association with survival outcomes. A total of 101 patients with LS-SCLC who completed TRT at ≥45 Gy and concurrent chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. The median dose and duration of TRT were 50 Gy and 38 days, respectively. The median duration from the start of either therapy to the end of TRT (SER) was 60 days. The median survival for all patients was 26.9 months. The 3-year local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 52.0, 29.5 and 37.6%, respectively, and the 5-year LC, PFS and OS rates were 50.1, 28.3 and 26.7%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that patient age, tumor stage, timing and dose of TRT, SER, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), and tumor response were significantly associated with treatment outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed that stage was the only significant prognostic factor for LC (P=0.011), PFS (P<0.001) and OS (P<0.001). Tumor response (P=0.014), PCI (P=0.007) and SER (P=0.005) were significant predictors of OS. OS was improved in patients who achieved complete response, and their SER was ≤70 days (P<0.001). Short treatment duration (SER ≤70 days) was a significant predictor of OS in patients with LS-SCLC who completed planned TRT at ≥45 Gy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

High dose radiation therapy based on normal tissue constraints with concurrent chemotherapy achieves promising survival of patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the potential of individual isotoxic dose escalation based on normal tissue constraints (NTC), hypothesizing that high dose radiation therapy would be superior to standard-dose in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Individually prescribed radiation doses were calculated based on NTC. Patients with total tumour radiation doses ≥66 Gy were assigned to the high dose (HD, ≥66 Gy) group, and all other patients were assigned to the standard-dose (SD, <66 Gy) group. Each patient was retrospectively assigned an Eighth edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer disease stage based on the imaging data of initial diagnosis to avoid over- and under-staging. Intensity modulated radiation therapy plans were optimized to minimize the volumes of organs at risk exposed to radiation. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS

From March 2006 to September 2012, 140 patients were enrolled and assigned to two groups: 71 patients into the HD group and 69 patients into the SD group. The median survival time (MST) was significantly higher in the HD group (33.5 months) than in the SD group (21 months), (p < 0.0001). Overall 5-year survival rates were significantly higher in the HD group than in the SD group (37.8% vs 16.7%). Median progression-free survival was 19 months in the HD group and 11 months in the SD group (p < 0.0001). No difference in severe (grade 3-5) toxic effects was noted between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant positive association observed between prescribed dose and survival suggests that individualized isotoxic dose-escalated radiation based on NTC might improve survival in this cohort of stage III NSCLC Chinese patients.

Timing of thoracic radiotherapy is more important than dose intensification in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a parallel comparison of two prospective studies

PURPOSE

The optimal radiotherapy dose/fraction for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is undefined. Our objectives were to compare efficacy between hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (TRT; 1.5 Gy 2 times per day [bid] in 30 fractions) and hypofractionated TRT (2.5 Gy once per day [qd] in 22 fractions), and to explore prognostic factors influencing the prognosis, such as the timing of TRT.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in two independent prospective studies were combined and analyzed. The primary endpoint was local/regional control (LRC). The prognosis was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Ninety-two and 96 patients were treated with hyperfractionated TRT and hypofractionated TRT, respectively. The 1‑ and 2‑year LRC rates of the two arms were 82.1 and 60.7%, and 84.9 and 68.8% (P = 0.27), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) times (months) were 28.3 (95% confidence interval, CI 16.4-40.1) and 22.0 (95% CI 16.4-27.5), while the 1‑year, 3‑year, and 5‑year OS rates were 85.2, 40.8, and 27.1%, and 76.9, 34.3, and 26.8% (P = 0.37), respectively. Using a multivariate Cox regression study, time (days) from the initiation of chemotherapy to TRT (TCT) ≤43 was associated with improved LRC (hazard radio, HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.76; P = 0.005). Time (days) from the start of chemotherapy to the end of TRT (SER) ≤63 (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.80; P = 0.003) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.29-0.63; P = 0.000) were favorably related to OS. Grade 2/3 acute radiation esophagitis was observed in 37.0 and 17.7% of patients in the hyperfractionated and hypofractionated arms, respectively (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Both hyperfractionated and hypofractionated TRT schedules achieved good LRC and OS for patients with limited-stage SCLC in this study. Keeping TCT ≤43 and SER ≤63 resulted in a better prognosis. The incidence of acute esophagitis was significantly higher in the hyperfractionated arm.

Final report of a prospective randomized study on thoracic radiotherapy target volume for limited-stage small cell lung cancer with radiation dosimetric analyses

BACKGROUND

The thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) target volume for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been controversial for decades. In this report, the final results of a prospective randomized trial on the TRT target volume before and after induction chemotherapy are presented.

METHODS

After 2 cycles of etoposide and cisplatin, patients arm were randomized to receive TRT to the postchemotherapy or prechemotherapy tumor volume in a study arm and a control arm. Involved-field radiotherapy was received in both arms. TRT consisted of 1.5 grays (Gy) twice daily in 30 fractions to up to a total dose of 45 Gy. Lymph node regions were contoured, and intentional and incidental radiation doses were recorded.

RESULTS

The study was halted early because of slow accrual. Between 2002 and 2017, 159 and 150 patients were randomized to the study arm or the control arm, respectively; and 21.4% and 19.1% of patients, respectively, were staged using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (P = .31). With a median follow-up of 54.1 months (range, 19.9-165.0 months) in survivors, the 3-year local/regional progression-free probability was 58.2% and 65.5% in the study and control arms, respectively (P = .44), and the absolute difference was -7.3% (95% CI, -18.2%, 3.7%). In the study and control arms, the median overall survival was 21.9 months and 26.6 months, respectively, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 22.8% and 28.1%, respectively (P = .26). Grade 3 esophagitis was observed in 5.9% of patients in the study arm versus 15.5% of those in the control arm (P = .01). The isolated out-of-field failure rate was 2.6% in the study arm versus 4.1% in the control arm (P = .46), and all such failures were located in the supraclavicular fossa or contralateral hilum. The regions 7, 3P, 4L, 6, 4R, 5, and 2L received incidental radiation doses >30 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

TRT could be limited to the postchemotherapy tumor volume, and involved-field radiotherapy could be routinely applied for limited-stage SCLC.

Patterns of brain metastasis immediately before prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI): implications for PCI optimization in limited-stage small cell lung cancer

Background

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is indicated for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) with good response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT). However, brain metastasis (BM) developed in LS-SCLC before PCI is not rare. In this study, we comprehensively investigated the features of pre-PCI BMs, aiming to explore the potential of PCI optimization for LS-SCLC.

Methods

One-hundred-ten LS-SCLC patients achieving clinical complete remission after definitive CRT with contrast-enhanced cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and immediately before PCI were included. The time trend and risk factors for pre-PCI BM were evaluated. Several radiological features, including numbers, sizes, and locations of pre-PCI BMs, were investigated to explore the technical feasibility of stereotactic radiotherapy and hippocampal-avoidance (HA) PCI.

Results

Twenty-four (21.8%) of the LS-SCLC patients harbored pre-PCI BM, all except one were asymptomatic. CRT duration (CRT-D) was the only independent risk factor for pre-PCI BM. The pre-PCI BM rate gradually increased in line with a growing time interval between treatment initiation and pre-PCI MRI. Pre-PCI BM and prolonged CRT-D were both correlated with worse overall survival. Of 129 pre-PCI intracranial lesions, 2 (1.5%) were in the HA region. Eight of the 24 (33.3%) pre-PCI BM patients were ineligible for stereotactic radiotherapy.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that PCI is still of importance in LS-SCLC, and MRI evaluation before PCI is indispensable. Investigations are warranted to explore the possibility of moving PCI up to before CRT completion in LS-SCLC patients with prolonged CRT-D. HA-PCI could be considered to reduce neurotoxicity.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1371-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Significance of overall concurrent chemoradiotherapy duration on survival outcomes of stage IIIB/C non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients: Analysis of 956 patients

BACKGROUND

To investigate the detrimental effects of prolonged overall radiotherapy duration (ORTD) on survival outcomes of stage IIIB/C NSCLC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT).

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 956 patients who underwent C-CRT for stage IIIB/C NSCLC. Primary endpoint was the association between the ORTD and overall survival (OS) with locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and PFS comprising the secondary endpoints. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was utilized for accessibility of the cut-off that interacts with survival outcomes. Multivariate Cox model was utilized to identify the independent associates of survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The ROC curve analysis exhibited significance at 49 days of ORTD cut-off that dichotomized patients into ORTD<50 versus ORTD≥50 days groups for OS [area under the curve (AUC): 82.8%; sensitivity: 81.1%; specificity: 74.8%], LRPFS (AUC: 91.9%; sensitivity: 90.6%; specificity: 76.3%), and PFS (AUC: 76.1%; sensitivity: 72.4%; specificity: 68.2%), respectively. Accordingly, ORTD≥50 days group had significantly shorter median OS (P<0.001), LRPFS (P<0.001), and PFS (P<0.001); and 10-year actuarial locoregional control (P<0.001) and distant metastases-free (P<0.011) rates than the ORTD<50 days group. The ORTD retained its significant association with survival outcomes at multivariate analyses independent of the other favorable covariates (p<0.001, for OS, LRPFS, and PFS): Stage IIIB disease (versus IIIC), lymph node bulk <2 cm (versus ≥2 cm), and 2-3 chemotherapy cycles (versus 1). The higher sensitivity for LRPFS (90.6%) than PFS (72.4%) on ROC curve analysis suggested the prolonged ORTD-induced decrements in locoregional control rates as the major cause of the poor survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer ORTD beyond ≥50 days was associated with significantly poorer OS, LRPFS and PFS outcomes, where reduced locoregional control rates appeared to be the main causative.

Determination of Risk Factors Related to Supraclavicular Recurrence for Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Patients

BACKGROUND This research aimed to determine high-risk factors of supraclavicular recurrence for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) patients to discover a potential subpopulation that can benefit from prophylactic supraclavicular irradiation (PSCI). MATERIAL AND METHODS Between July 2006 and July 2011, LS-SCLC patients without supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) involvement consecutively treated with concurrent chemo-radiation but without PSCI in the Radiotherapy Department of the Cancer Institute and Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, were retrospectively analyzed. SCLN recurrence rate, overall survival (OS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed. Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to discover the high-risk factors related to the SCLN recurrence. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate logistic regression model prediction performance. RESULTS Eighty-eight LS-SCLC patients were analyzed in this study. During 99 months (ranging from 72 months to 124 months) for survivors, 28 (31.8%) had SCLN recurrence. There were significant differences for median DMFS and OS between LS-SCLC patients with and without SCLN recurrence. The logistic regression model revealed that lymphadenopathy at mediastinal level 2 and level 3 prior to chemotherapy were significantly associated with SCLN recurrence, which was validated by ROC. CONCLUSIONS Lymphadenopathy at mediastinal level 2 and level 3 prior to chemotherapy were the high-risk factors associated with SCLN recurrence for patients with LS-SCLC. Further work is needed to determine whether patients with these factors can benefit from PSCI.

Salvage surgery for small cell lung cancer after chemoradiotherapy

There are few reports on the use of salvage surgery for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Five patients who underwent resection of post-chemoradiotherapy residual lesion/local reprogression of SCLC between 2005 and 2017 were included in the study. We retrospectively reviewed their surgical outcomes and prognosis to assess the feasibility and potential efficacy of salvage surgery. Indications for salvage surgery were local reprogression (four patients) and residual lesion (one patient) with ycN0 disease. Complete pathological resection was achieved in four patients; however, malignant pleural effusion was diagnosed in one patient after the surgery. Morbidity and mortality rates were 0%. Estimated 5-year survival rate was 67%. Recurrence and death after surgery occurred only in the patient with malignant pleural effusion. We demonstrate the feasibility of salvage surgery in SCLC. In carefully-selected patients, especially those without lymph node involvement, salvage surgery may provide effective local control and favorable survival outcomes.

Association of Twice-Daily Radiotherapy With Subsequent Brain Metastases in Adults With Small Cell Lung Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Although thoracic twice-daily radiotherapy (TDRT) is one of the standards of care for small cell lung cancer, its association with brain metastases remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of TDRT vs once-daily radiotherapy (ODRT) with brain metastases after prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with small cell lung cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this multicenter cohort study, data on 778 consecutive patients with small cell lung cancer who had undergone thoracic radiotherapy (609 received ODRT and 169 received TDRT), chemotherapy, and prophylactic cranial irradiation were retrieved from the databases of 8 hospitals in China between July 1, 2003, and June 30, 2016. A 1:1 propensity score matching approach was used to control for confounding between the ODRT and TDRT groups. Confounding covariates included 8 demographic variables and 8 treatment-related covariates. Data analysis was conducted from November 1, 2017, to May 31, 2018, and reanalyzed for revision.

EXPOSURES

The ODRT group received 50 to 66 Gy given in 25 to 33 fractions. The TDRT group received 45 Gy given in 30 fractions.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was brain metastases. Secondary end points included progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the 778 patients (median age, 55 years [interquartile range, 48-61 years]), 204 were women and 574 were men. At a median follow-up of 23.6 months (interquartile range, 14.2-38.2 months), 131 patients (16.8%) experienced brain metastases. The rate of brain metastasis at 3 years in the TDRT group was significantly higher than in the ODRT group (26.0% vs 16.9%; hazard ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.06-2.26; P = .03). Of the 338 matched patients (169 in the ODRT group vs 169 in the TDRT group), 60 (17.8%) experienced brain metastases, with a rate at 3 years of 14.9% in the ODRT group vs 26.0% in the TDRT group (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.02-2.88; P = .04). Progression-free survival was similar in both the whole cohort and the matched cohort. Median overall survival in the ODRT group tended to be significantly longer than in the TDRT group after matching (47.2 vs 32.8 months; hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.99-2.01; P = .06).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, patients with small cell lung cancer who received thoracic TDRT appeared to have a higher risk of brain metastases than those who received ODRT, which supports the need for further prospective randomized clinical trials, especially in China and other parts of Asia.

Optimal timing of thoracic radiotherapy in limited stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with daily fractionation: A brief report

Survival in limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) improves with faster initiation of hyper-fractionated thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) following chemotherapy, however, it is unknown if this association exists for more commonly employed daily fractionated regimens. Our results suggest that this association is present even with daily fractionation.

Small-Cell Lung Cancer Comorbid with Pulmonary Mycobacterium avium Infection: A Case Report

Background: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) rarely coexists with pulmonary Mycobacterium avium intracellular complex (MAC) infection. The key drug for SCLC treatment is etoposide, which is metabolized by cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4. Meanwhile, the key drugs for pulmonary MAC infection are clarithromycin (CAM) and rifampicin (RFP), and their metabolism influences CYP3A4. Therefore, treatment of concurrent SCLC and pulmonary MAC infection is difficult, and to the best of our knowledge, no report of treatments for concurrent SCLC and pulmonary MAC infection has been published. Patient Concerns and Diagnoses: A 65-year-old man presented to our hospital with abnormal findings of chest computed tomography: (1) a hilar region nodule in the left lung and mediastinal lymphadenopathy and (2) a thick-walled cavity lesion in the right upper lobe of the lung. After further examinations, the former lesions were diagnosed as SCLC, cT4N3M0, stage IIIC and the latter as pulmonary MAC infection, fibrocavitary disease. Interventions and Outcomes: Concurrent treatment was conducted with discontinuation of CAM and RFP before and after etoposide administration. Specifically, intravenous cisplatin and etoposide were administered on day 1 and days 1–3, respectively, and CAM, RFP, and ethambutol (EB) were administered orally on days 6–22 every 4 weeks. Concurrent radiotherapy was added to the drug administration on days 1–27 of the first cycle. The chemotherapy was continued for 4 cycles, followed by continuation of CAM and RFP administration. EB was discontinued because of optic nerve disorder. The treatments were conducted completely and safely, and both of the SCLC lesions and the MAC lesion were improved. Conclusions: Treatments for concurrent SCLC and pulmonary MAC infection may be successfully conducted with discontinuation of CAM and RFP before and after etoposide administration.

Prognostic significance of the 8th edition of the TNM classification for patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is typically categorized according to disease extent as limited or extensive, and utility of the 8th TNM classification, recommended for lung cancer staging, which demonstrates a strong association with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management, remains unclear.

Methods

This retrospective study included 277 consecutive SCLC patients treated at a single institution between 2008 and 2016.

Results

According to the currently used two-stage system, 186 (65.7%) of the patients were classified as having extensive disease (ED)-SCLC. Among the ED-SCLC patients, ten (5.3%), 38 (20.4%), 32 (17.2%), and 106 (57.0%) were categorized into stages M0, M1a, M1b, and M1c, respectively, according to the 8th TNM classification. There was a significant difference in overall survival based on the M descriptors: 15.8 (95% CI 9.4–22.2) months in the M1b group vs 7.3 (95% CI 5.7–8.9) months in the M1c group (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that in addition to the known prognostic factors such as performance status, serum albumin, and lactate dehydrogenase, M descriptor was a prognostic factor (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.38–2.77; P<0.001).

Conclusion

The 8th TNM classification has a prognostic value in SCLC. Similarly to NSCLC, treatment approaches should be considered on the basis of the 8th TNM classification, especially stage IVA separate from stage IVB in ED-SCLC patients.

Optimizing multi-modal cancer treatment under 3D spatio-temporal tumor growth

In this paper we introduce a new mixed-integer linear programming (MIP) model that explicitly integrates the spread of cancer cells into a spatio-temporal reaction-diffusion (RD) model of cancer growth, while taking into account treatment effects. This linear but non-convex model appears to be the first of its kind by determining the optimal sequence of the typically prescribed cancer treatment methods-surgery (S), chemotherapy (C), and radiotherapy (R)-while minimizing the newly generated tumor cells for early-stage breast cancer in a unique three-dimensional (3D) spatio-temporal system. The quadratically-constrained cancer growth dynamics and treatment impact formulations are linearized by using linearization as well as approximation techniques. Under the supervision of medical oncologists and utilizing several literature resources for the parameter values, the effectiveness of treatment combinations for breast cancer specified with different sequences (i.e., SRC, SCR, CR, RC) are compared by tracking the number of cancer cells at the end of each treatment modality. Our results provide the optimal dosages for chemotherapy and radiation treatments, while minimizing the growth of new cancer cells.