Randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus bortezomib compared with bortezomib alone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: combination therapy improves time to progression

Bortezomib, Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride Liposome, and Dexamethasone for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Multi-Center, Open-Label Phase I Trial

BACKGROUNDS

Mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome (Lipo-MIT) has shown clinical benefits in various tumors. However, there is no prospective study evaluating its effectiveness and safety in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). A phase I trial of bortezomib, Lipo-MIT, and dexamethasone (VMitD) with the primary endpoints being safety and efficacy was performed.

METHODS

Twenty subjects were enrolled this study, and the dose of Lipo-MIT was designed to be 12, 16, and 20 mg/m2 at Day 1 combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone.

RESULTS

The most common grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse event was pneumonia (20%). The most frequently observed grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity included thrombocytopenia (70%), neutropenia (55%), lymphopenia (30%), and anemia (10%). Fifteen subjects received at least one efficacy evaluation, including 60% (9/15) with a very good partial response (VGPR) or better, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 86.7% (13/15).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report about the novel triplet regimen VMitD, including Lipo-MIT for RRMM, which was well tolerated and demonstrated efficacy. Further studies are required to assess the outcomes more accurately and to evaluate its effectiveness in comparison to other salvage regimens containing proteasome inhibitors and anthracyclines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05052970.

Transforming Medicine: Cutting-Edge Applications of Nanoscale Materials in Drug Delivery

Since their inception in the early 1960s, the development and use of nanoscale materials have progressed tremendously, and their roles in diverse fields ranging from human health to energy and electronics are undeniable. The application of nanotechnology inventions has revolutionized many aspects of everyday life including various medical applications and specifically drug delivery systems, maximizing the therapeutic efficacy of the contained drugs by means of bioavailability enhancement or minimization of adverse effects. In this review, we utilize the CAS Content Collection, a vast repository of scientific information extracted from journal and patent publications, to analyze trends in nanoscience research relevant to drug delivery in an effort to provide a comprehensive and detailed picture of the use of nanotechnology in this field. We examine the publication landscape in the area to provide insights into current knowledge advances and developments. We review the major classes of nanosized drug delivery systems, their delivery routes, and targeted diseases. We outline the most discussed concepts and assess the advantages of various nanocarriers. The objective of this review is to provide a broad overview of the evolving landscape of current knowledge regarding nanosized drug delivery systems, to outline challenges, and to evaluate growth opportunities. The merit of the review stems from the extensive, wide-ranging coverage of the most up-to-date scientific information, allowing unmatched breadth of landscape analysis and in-depth insights.

Talquetamab Versus Real-World Physician's Choice Treatment: Comparative Effectiveness in Patients With Triple-Class Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Talquetamab is approved for treatment of triple-class exposed (TCE) patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of talquetamab in the MonumenTAL-1 study versus real-world physician's choice (RW) treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An external control arm for MonumenTAL-1 was created from patients in the Flatiron Health database who satisfied MonumenTAL-1 eligibility criteria (n = 629 with 1169 eligible lines of therapy). Patient-level data from MonumenTAL-1 were included for patients who received subcutaneous talquetamab 0.4 mg/kg QW (n = 143) and 0.8 mg/kg Q2W (n = 145). After adjusting for baseline covariate imbalances, comparative effectiveness was assessed for progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Baseline covariates were comparable across cohorts after adjustment. Talquetamab 0.4 mg/kg QW and 0.8 mg/kg Q2W cohorts, respectively, showed significant improvement in PFS (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.44-0.69; P < .0001; median, 7.5 vs. 4.0 months] and 0.40 [95% CI, 0.31-0.53; P < .0001; median, 14.2 vs. 4.0 months]), TTNT (HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.47-0.74; P < .0001; median, 9.1 vs. 5.1 months] and 0.45 [95% CI, 0.35-0.59; P < .0001; median, 13.3 vs. 5.1 months]), and OS (HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.40-0.78; P = .0007; median, NR vs. 16.5 months] and 0.48 [95% CI, 0.33-0.70; P = 0.0002; median NR vs. 15.9 months]) versus RW treatment.

CONCLUSION

Both talquetamab schedules demonstrated superior effectiveness over RW treatment for all outcomes assessed. These data suggest talquetamab as an effective immunotherapy option in patients with TCE RRMM.

Efficacy and safety of a modified DVD regimen followed by lenalidomide for the treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

The common drugs used for the treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) include bortezomib and lenalidomide, but the adverse effects of lenalidomide cannot be ignored, especially when it is used in the initial therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a modified DVD regimen (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone) followed by lenalidomide in the treatment of NDMM. A total of 40 NDMM patients were treated with a reduced dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (20 mg/m2) on day 1, subcutaneous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, and dexamethasone (20 mg) on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, and 12 (20 days for each course). When patients failed to achieve partial or better response after 2 courses of treatment, a regimen containing lenalidomide was administered. After the induction therapy, 15 eligible patients received Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) mobilization and transplantation followed by maintenance therapy with lenalidomide.

RESULTS

The response rate (≥ very good partial response) was 55% and 80% after 2 and 4 courses, respectively. The 18-month Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were 78.6% and 83.4%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity occurred in less than 10% of patients. In addition, all 15 transplant-eligible patients successfully mobilized PBSC (median CD34+cells = 4.59 × 106/kg) and underwent autologous PSBC transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the modified DVD regimen followed by lenalidomide is an effective and well-tolerated regimen, and has little influence on the PBSC collection and transplantation for patients with NDMM.

Thirty years from FDA approval of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil/Caelyx): an updated analysis and future perspective

In 2025, it will be 30 years since the initial clinical approval of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) by the Food and Drug Administration. PLD predated the field of nanomedicine and became a model nanomedicine setting key pharmacological principles (prolonged circulation, slow drug release and the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect) for clinical application of other nano-drugs in cancer therapy. The impressive reduction of cardiotoxicity conferred by PLD is the most valuable clinical asset. While PLD has gained a strong foothold in relapsed ovarian cancer and metastatic breast cancer, it has not been extensively tested in primary (neoadjuvant) and adjuvant therapy and has not fulfilled the expectations from the results in animal models efficacy-wise. This discrepancy may be due to the large dose gap between mice and humans and the apparent variability of the EPR effect in human cancer. PLD is a complex product and we are still in a learning curve regarding a number of factors such as its interaction with the complement system and its immune modulatory properties, as well as its integration in multimodality therapy that may potentiate its value and role in cancer therapy.

Doxorubicin synergizes bortezomib-induced multiple myeloma cell death by inhibiting aggresome formation and augmenting endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi stress and apoptosis

BACKGROUND

Bortezomib is a standard treatment for multiple myeloma (MM), working by the accumulation of toxic misfolded proteins in cancer cells. However, a significant clinical challenge arises from the development of resistance to bortezomib in MM treatment. Aggresome, a subcellular structure enclosed within Vimentin, forms in response to proteasome inhibitors and sequesters misfolded proteins that are transported by histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) and Dynein for degradation via autophagy, thereby reducing bortezomib's cytotoxic effects. Therefore, in this study, we screened several anticancer agents to identify those that could synergize with bortezomib to enhance cell death and block aggresome formation in the MM cell line U266B1.

METHODS

To enhance bortezomib's efficacy, we screened a range of anticancer compounds for their potential to promote cell death and inhibit aggresome formation in U266B1 MM cells. We utilized the trypan blue exclusion assay and immunofluorescence for evaluation, and explored the underlying mechanisms through Western blot analysis.

RESULTS

Doxorubicin enhanced bortezomib-induced cytotoxicity while inhibiting aggresome formation. Mechanistic studies revealed that doxorubicin downregulated key aggresome components, including Vimentin, HDAC6, and Dynein, leading to accumulation of misfolded proteins and augmentation of proapoptotic and necroptotic pathways by intensifying endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi stress responses. Notably, doxorubicin did not enhance cell death triggered by proteasome inhibitors that do not induce aggresome formation. Furthermore, the combination of bortezomib and doxorubicin failed to produce synergy in the killing of MM cell lines that lacked aggresome-forming ability.

CONCLUSIONS

Doxorubicin enhances bortezomib-induced cell death in MM by inhibiting aggresome formation and amplifying ER/Golgi stress and apoptosis. This study highlights the potential therapeutic benefits of combining bortezomib with doxorubicin for MM treatment.

Recent advances in targeted drug delivery systems for multiple myeloma

Despite significant therapeutic advances, multiple myeloma (MM) remains a challenging, incurable, hematological malignancy. The efficacy of traditional chemotherapy and currently available anti-MM agents is in part limited by their adverse effects, which restrict their therapeutic potential. Nanotherapeutics is an emerging field of cancer therapy that can overcome the biological and chemical barriers of existing anticancer drugs. This review presents an overview of recent advancements in nanoparticle- and immunotherapy-based drug delivery systems for MM treatment. It further delves into the targeting strategies, mechanism of controlled drug release, and challenges associated with the development of drug delivery systems for the treatment of MM.

A Short Course of Standard Velcade/Dexamethasone Followed by Unlimited Weekly Maintenance Therapy Is an Effective Treatment in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Bortezomib (B), known as Velcade, is a reversible proteasome inhibitor approved for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients (pts). The standard of care protocol includes eight cycles of intravenous push (IVP) injections of B and oral dexamethasone (D), which increases the toxicity. Here, we describe the results of an open-label, phase II clinical trial employing only four cycles of B/D.

METHODS

RRMM pts treated with at least one previous therapy qualified for the trial. Pts were treated with B 1.3 mg/m2 IVP or subcutaneous (SC) on day 1, 4, 8, and 11, followed by a 10-day rest, Q21 days for four cycles; followed by maintenance therapy with once weekly B 1.6 mg/m2 IVP or SC on day 1, 8, 15, and 22, followed by 13 days' rest, repeated Q36 day. Pts received D 20 mg on the days of and days after B. Pts with a complete response (CR) were removed. Those with a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) were placed on maintenance therapy until progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity, or pts' decision to stop.

RESULTS

A total of 24 pts were enrolled. CR was observed in six pts (25%), PR in eight pts (33%), and SD in nine pts (37.5%). Moreover, 14 of the 24 pts (58.3%) had PR or better. Four pts had PD during induction. The grade 3 toxicities included fatigue (58%), sensory neuropathy (54%), and thrombocytopenia (50%); the grade 4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (12.5%), fatigue (12.5%), and sensory neuropathy (12.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

A short course of B/D, plus maintenance with B, is well tolerated in RRMM pts. Long-term maintenance with B/D could become an alternative to new agents.

Exploring the anti-myeloma potential of composite nanoparticles As4S4/Fe3O4: Insights from in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo studies

Given the profound multiple myeloma (MM) heterogeneity in clonal proliferation of malignant plasma cells (PCs) and anti-MM therapeutic potential of nanotherapies, it is inevitable to develop treatment plan for patients with MM. Two composite nanoparticles (NPs), As4S4/Fe3O4 (4:1) and As4S4/Fe3O4 (1:1) demonstrated effective anti-MM activity in in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo in xenograft mouse model. Composite NPs triggered activation of p-ERK1/2/p-JNK, and downregulation of c-Myc, p-PI3K, p-4E-BP1; G2/M cell cycle arrest with increase in cyclin B1, histones H2AX/H3, activation of p-ATR, p-Chk1/p-Chk2, p-H2AX/p-H3; and caspase- and mitochondria-dependent apoptosis induction. NPs attenuated the stem cell-like side population in MM cells, both alone and in the presence of stroma. For a higher clinical response rate, As4S4/Fe3O4 (4:1) observed synergism with dexamethasone and melphalan, while As4S4/Fe3O4 (1:1) showed synergistic effects in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide and pomalidomide anti-MM agents, providing the framework for further clinical evaluation of composite NPs in MM.

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of talquetamab vs selinexor-dexamethasone and vs belantamab mafodotin in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE

Talquetamab is the first GPRC5D-targeting bispecific antibody approved for the treatment of triple-class exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of talquetamab vs selinexor-dexamethasone (sel-dex) and vs belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) in patients with TCE RRMM.

METHODS

An unanchored MAIC was performed using individual patient-level data from patients treated with subcutaneous talquetamab 0.4 mg/kg weekly (QW) and 0.8 mg/kg every other week (Q2W) from MonumenTAL-1 (NCT03399799/NCT04636552) and published summary data for sel-dex from STORM (NCT02336815) and belamaf from DREAMM-2 (NCT0325678). Patients from MonumenTAL-1 who met key eligibility criteria for STORM and DREAMM-2 were included. Outcomes of interest were overall response rate (ORR), complete response or better (≥CR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

After adjustment for cross-trial differences, patients treated with both dosing schedules of talquetamab showed significantly better ORR, ≥CR, and DOR vs sel-dex and significantly higher ORR and ≥ CR vs belamaf; DOR was relatively similar to belamaf. PFS was significantly improved with talquetamab Q2W and numerically in favor of talquetamab QW vs sel-dex and significantly improved with both dosing schedules of talquetamab vs belamaf. OS was significantly improved with both dosing schedules of talquetamab vs sel-dex and was numerically in favor of both dosing schedules of talquetamab vs belamaf.

CONCLUSION

These analyses show superior effectiveness of both talquetamab dosing schedules vs sel-dex and vs belamaf for most outcomes and highlight talquetamab as an effective treatment option for patients with TCE RRMM.

Correlation of immune fitness with response to teclistamab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the MajesTEC-1 study

ABSTRACT

Teclistamab, an off-the-shelf B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) × CD3 bispecific antibody that mediates T-cell activation and subsequent lysis of BCMA-expressing myeloma cells, is approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM). As a T-cell redirection therapy, clinical outcomes with teclistamab may be influenced by patient immune fitness and tumor antigen expression. We correlated tumor characteristics and baseline immune profiles with clinical response and disease burden in patients with R/RMM from the pivotal phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 study, focusing on patients treated with 1.5 mg/kg of teclistamab (N = 165). Peripheral blood samples were collected at screening, and bone marrow samples were collected at screening and cycle 3. Better clinical outcomes to teclistamab correlated with higher baseline total T-cell counts in the periphery. In addition, responders (partial response or better) had a lower proportion of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs), T cells expressing coinhibitory receptors (CD38, PD-1, and PD-1/TIM-3), and soluble BCMA and a T-cell profile suggestive of a more cytolytic potential, compared with nonresponders. Neither frequency of baseline bone marrow BCMA expression nor BCMA-receptor density was associated with clinical response to teclistamab. Improved progression-free survival was observed in patients with a lower frequency of T cells expressing exhaustion markers and immunosuppressive Tregs. Overall, response to teclistamab was associated with baseline immune fitness; nonresponders had immune profiles suggestive of immune suppression and T-cell dysfunction. These findings illustrate the importance of the contribution of the immune landscape to T-cell redirection therapy response. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03145181/NCT04557098.

Targeted Nanocarrier-Based Drug Delivery Strategies for Improving the Therapeutic Efficacy of PARP Inhibitors against Ovarian Cancer

The current focus of ovarian cancer (OC) research is the improvement of treatment options through maximising drug effectiveness. OC remains the fifth leading cause of cancer-induced mortality in women worldwide. In recent years, nanotechnology has revolutionised drug delivery systems. Nanoparticles may be utilised as carriers in gene therapy or to overcome the problem of drug resistance in tumours by limiting the number of free drugs in circulation and thereby minimising undesired adverse effects. Cell surface receptors, such as human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), folic acid (FA) receptors, CD44 (also referred to as homing cell adhesion molecule, HCAM), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are highly expressed in ovarian cancer cells. Generation of active targeting nanoparticles involves modification with ligands that recognise cell surface receptors and thereby promote internalisation by cancer cells. Several poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) are currently used for the treatment of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOC) or platinum-sensitive relapsed OC. However, PARP resistance and poor drug bioavailability are common challenges, highlighting the urgent need to develop novel, effective strategies for ovarian cancer treatment. This review evaluates the utility of nanoparticles in ovarian cancer therapy, with a specific focus on targeted approaches and the use of PARPi nanocarriers to optimise treatment outcomes.

Therapeutic induction of antigen-specific immune tolerance

The development of therapeutic approaches for the induction of robust, long-lasting and antigen-specific immune tolerance remains an important unmet clinical need for the management of autoimmunity, allergy, organ transplantation and gene therapy. Recent breakthroughs in our understanding of immune tolerance mechanisms have opened new research avenues and therapeutic opportunities in this area. Here, we review mechanisms of immune tolerance and novel methods for its therapeutic induction.

Exploring cellular immunotherapy platforms in multiple myeloma

Despite major advances in therapeutic platforms, most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) eventually relapse and succumb to the disease. Among the novel therapeutic options developed over the past decade, genetically engineered T cells have a great deal of potential. Cellular immunotherapies, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, are rapidly becoming an effective therapeutic modality for MM. Marrow-infiltrating lymphocytes (MILs) derived from the bone marrow of patients with MM are a novel source of T cells for adoptive T-cell therapy, which robustly and specifically target myeloma cells. In this review, we examine the recent innovations in cellular immunotherapies, including the use of dendritic cells, and cellular tools based on MILs, natural killer (NK) cells, and CAR T cells, which hold promise for improving the efficacy and/or reducing the toxicity of treatment in patients with MM.

Harnessing Nanotechnology: Emerging Strategies for Multiple Myeloma Therapy

Advances in nanotechnology have provided novel avenues for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), a hematological malignancy characterized by the clonal proliferation of plasma cells in the bone marrow. This review elucidates the potential of nanotechnology to revolutionize myeloma therapy, focusing on nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems, nanoscale imaging techniques, and nano-immunotherapy. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems offer enhanced drug targeting, reduced systemic toxicity, and improved therapeutic efficacy. We discuss the latest developments in nanocarriers, such as liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, and inorganic nanoparticles, used for the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents, siRNA, and miRNA in MM treatment. We delve into nanoscale imaging techniques which provide spatial multi-omic data, offering a holistic view of the tumor microenvironment. This spatial resolution can help decipher the complex interplay between cancer cells and their surrounding environment, facilitating the development of highly targeted therapies. Lastly, we explore the burgeoning field of nano-immunotherapy, which employs nanoparticles to modulate the immune system for myeloma treatment. Specifically, we consider how nanoparticles can be used to deliver tumor antigens to antigen-presenting cells, thus enhancing the body's immune response against myeloma cells. In conclusion, nanotechnology holds great promise for improving the prognosis and quality of life of MM patients. However, several challenges remain, including the need for further preclinical and clinical trials to assess the safety and efficacy of these emerging strategies. Future research should also focus on developing personalized nanomedicine approaches, which could tailor treatments to individual patients based on their genetic and molecular profiles.

Progression-Free Survival Efficacy in Refractory/Relapsed Multiple Myeloma among Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade, many studies have assessed the efficacy of treatments for refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (R/R MM). While combination therapies show greater efficacy than traditional methods, limited research has targeted elderly patients who might be less resilient to treatments. Our study aimed to evaluate treatment efficacy for these elderly patients.

METHODS

We carried out a comprehensive review of the literature using a systematic approach. Initially, 4966 citations were retrieved and subsequently narrowed down to 13 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through our systematic review process from databases like Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2022. Evidence was collated through a frequentist network meta-analysis, using the hazard ratio (HR) for evaluation.

RESULTS

Combined therapy of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DaraLenDex) was the preferred treatment for R/R MM elderly patients. Its strengths included an HR for progression-free survival (0.15; 95% CI: 0.09-0.25) and a 96% P-score.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests that, pending more comprehensive RCTs, DaraLenDex is the treatment with the highest efficacy for R/R MM in elderly patients.

Effect modification in network meta-analyses for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review and meta-analyse the evidence for effect modification by refractory status and number of treatment lines in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM); and to assess whether effect modification is likely to invalidate network meta-analyses (NMA) that assume negligible modification.

DESIGN

Systematic review, meta-analysis and simulation.

DATA SOURCES

We systematically searched the literature (e.g., OVID Medline) to identify eligible publications in February 2020 and regularly updated the search until January 2022. We also contacted project stakeholders (including industry) ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Phase 2 and 3 randomised controlled trials reporting stratified estimates for comparisons with at least one of a prespecified set of treatments relevant for use in Norwegian RRMM patients.

OUTCOMES

We used meta-analysis to estimate relative HRs (RHRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with respect to refractory status and number of treatment lines. We used the estimated RHRs in simulations to estimate the percentage of NMA results expected to differ significantly in the presence versus absence of effect modification.

RESULTS

Among the 42 included publications, stratified estimates were published by and extracted from up to 18 (43%) publications and on as many as 8364 patients. Within-study evidence for effect modification is very weak (p>0.05 for 47 of 49 sets of stratified estimates). The largest RHR estimated was 1.32 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.49) for the modifying effect of refractory status on HR for PFS. Simulations suggest that, in the worst case, this would result in only 4.48% (95% CI 4.42% to 4.54%) of NMA estimates differing statistically significantly in the presence versus absence of effect modification.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, effect modification appears to be sufficiently small that it can be neglected in adequately performed NMAs. NMAs can probably be relied on to provide estimates of HRs for OS and PFS in RRMM, subject to caveats discussed herein.

Efficacy and Safety Analysis of VRD-PDCE in Treatment-Native Patients with Multiple Extramedullary Plasmacytomas or Plasma Cell Leukemia

The prognosis of multiple extramedullary plasmacytomas (MEP) and plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is extremely poor, with the median overall survival (OS) of only 8 months with standard chemotherapy. Innovative treatment approaches incorporating various strategies are required to improve outcome. From November 2019 to September 2021, a total of 12 newly diagnosed MEP or PCL patients were enrolled in our department. An intensive chemotherapy treatment as VRD-PDCE consisted of bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone plus cisplatin, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide was first proposed. Disease activity and toxicity were evaluated after each cycle. Of the patients receiving therapy achieved a rapid and sustained response, and the overall response rate (ORR) was up to 75%. Nine patients achieved partial response (PR) or better, the response was the best response and the median time to best response was 4 cycles. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 24 (5-30) months and 18 (2-23) months. The toxicities were acceptable and there was no treatment related mortality. Our intensive treatment showed encouraging results in terms of disease control and improving survival, VRD-PDCE may be a novel regimen which is feasible and generally well-tolerated in MEP or PCL patients.

Commonly prescribed medications associated with alopecia

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and treatment of medication-associated alopecia often challenges patients and physicians. While numerous studies on the topic exist, limited information on the strength and magnitude of these studies exists.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the most commonly prescribed medications with high levels of evidence to support associations with alopecia.

METHODS

A list of most commonly prescribed medications was compiled using the "Top 100 Prescriptions, Sales" (Intercontinental Marketing Services) and "Top 200 Names Searched" (RxList.com). PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for "generic drug name" AND "alopecia" and "generic drug name" AND "hair loss." Two reviewers independently reviewed articles for drug, study type and level of evidence, and number of alopecia cases.

RESULTS

A total of 192 unique drugs were investigated, with 110 yielding positive search results. Of these, 13 were associated with alopecia in studies with strong levels of evidence (adalimumab, infliximab, budesonide, interferon β-1α, tacrolimus, enoxaparin, zoster vaccine, lamotrigine, docetaxel, capecitabine, erlotinib, imatinib, and bortezomib).

LIMITATIONS

Only full-length articles available in the English language were included. The methodology used relied on lists of drugs based on their sales rather than number of prescriptions, which likely overrepresented expensive drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Few studies with high levels of evidence have been conducted on the topic of medication-associated alopecia. The mechanisms of hair loss must be further identified to provide effective management.

Comparative Efficacy of Teclistamab Versus Current Treatments in Real-World Clinical Practice in the Prospective LocoMMotion Study in Patients with Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Patients with triple-class-exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (TCE-RRMM) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen × CD3 bispecific antibody, was studied in patients with TCE-RRMM in the single-arm MajesTEC-1 study. To assess the relative effectiveness of teclistamab versus real-world physician's choice of therapy (RWPC), adjusted comparisons were performed using individual patient data from MajesTEC-1 and LocoMMotion, a prospective study of patients with TCE-RRMM.

METHODS

An external control arm for MajesTEC-1 was created from patients in LocoMMotion (n = 248; clinical cut-off: November 2, 2021) and compared with treated patients (n = 165) from MajesTEC-1 (teclistamab 1.5 mg/kg weekly; clinical cut-off: March 16, 2022). Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for imbalances in baseline covariates. For binary endpoints [overall response rate (ORR), very good partial response or better (≥ VGPR) rate, complete response or better (≥ CR)], relative effect of teclistamab versus RWPC was estimated with an odds ratio and relative response rate and 95% confidence interval (CI), derived from weighted logistic regression. Weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs for time-to-event endpoints [duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)].

RESULTS

After weighting, baseline characteristics were balanced across cohorts. In adjusted comparisons, teclistamab-treated patients were 2.3-fold, 5.2-fold and 148.3-fold, more likely to reach ORR [response-rate ratio (RR) = 2.31, 95% CI 1.77-2.85, p < 0.0001], ≥ VGPR (RR = 5.19, 95% CI 3.26-7.12, p < 0.0001) and ≥ CR (RR = 148.25, 95% CI 20.63-1065.40, p < 0.0001), respectively, versus patients receiving RWPC. Following adjustment, DOR (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19-0.54, p < 0.0001) and PFS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.35-0.65, p < 0.0001) were significantly longer with teclistamab versus RWPC. OS was numerically better with teclistamab versus RWPC [HR 0.77 (0.55-1.09), p = 0.1419].

CONCLUSION

Teclistamab demonstrated improved effectiveness versus RWPC, highlighting its clinical benefit as a novel and effective treatment for patients with TCE-RRMM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Majest TEC-1, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04557098; LocoMMotion, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04035226.

Past, Present, and a Glance into the Future of Multiple Myeloma Treatment

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a challenging hematological cancer which typically grows in bone marrow. MM accounts for 10% of hematological malignancies and 1.8% of cancers. The recent treatment strategies have significantly improved progression-free survival for MM patients in the last decade; however, a relapse for most MM patients is inevitable. In this review we discuss current treatment, important pathways for proliferation, survival, immune suppression, and resistance that could be targeted for future treatments.

Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the efficacy of novel therapies

The prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) has dramatically improved with the development of new drugs, and it has become important to determine the appropriate combinations of these novel agents. This study was a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized trials in patients with relapsed and/or refractory (RR) MM. The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched for randomized trials from 1 January 2002 to 28 February 2022 of patients treated for MM. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS), evaluated as a hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) compared to dexamethasone (DEX). The p-score was used to rank treatments. Of a total of 1136 abstracts screened, 37 studies were selected, including 34 treatment options for RRMM. Daratumumab, lenalidomide and DEX was found to be the best treatment for RRMM, with the best HR compared to DEX (HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08-0.20; p-score 0.9796). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity (I² , 41.3%; p = 0.146). The current NMA confirmed the excellent efficacy of three-drug regimens including anti-CD38 antibodies to treat RRMM and provides background data to evaluate the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell treatments and bispecific T-cell engager therapies.

Hydroxyl-Rich Hydrophilic Endocytosis-Promoting Peptide with No Positive Charge

Delivering cargo molecules across the plasma membrane is critical for biomedical research, and the need to develop molecularly well-defined tags that enable cargo transportation is ever-increasing. We report here a hydrophilic endocytosis-promoting peptide (EPP6) rich in hydroxyl groups with no positive charge. EPP6 can transport a wide array of small-molecule cargos into a diverse panel of animal cells. Mechanistic studies revealed that it entered the cells through a caveolin- and dynamin-dependent endocytosis pathway, mediated by the surface receptor fibrinogen C domain-containing protein 1. After endocytosis, EPP6 trafficked through early and late endosomes within 30 min. Over time, EPP6 partitioned among cytosol, lysosomes, and some long-lived compartments. It also demonstrated prominent transcytosis abilities in both in vitro and in vivo models. Our study proves that positive charge is not an indispensable feature for hydrophilic cell-penetrating peptides and provides a new category of molecularly well-defined delivery tags for biomedical applications.

Challenging the fundamental conjectures in nanoparticle drug delivery for chemotherapy treatment of solid cancers

Nanomedicines for cancer treatment have been studied extensively over the last few decades. Yet, only five anticancer nanomedicines have received approvals from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating solid tumors. This drastic mismatch between effort and return calls into question the basic understanding of this field. Various viewpoints on nanomedicines have been presented regarding their potentials and inefficiencies. However, the underlying logics of nanomedicine research and its inadequate translation to the successful use in the clinic have not been thoroughly examined. Tumor-targeted drug delivery was used to understand the shortfalls of the nanomedicine field in general. The concept of tumor-targeted drug delivery by nanomedicine has been based on two conjectures: (i) increased drug delivery to tumors provides better efficacy, and (ii) decreased drug delivery to healthy organs results in fewer side effects. The clinical evidence gathered from the literature indicates that nanomedicines bearing classic chemotherapeutic drugs, such as Dox, cis-Pt, CPT and PTX, have already reached the maximum drug delivery limit to solid tumors in humans. Still, the anticancer efficacy and safety remain unchanged despite the increased tumor accumulation. Thus, it is understandable to see few nanomedicine-based formulations approved by the FDA. The examination of FDA-approved nanomedicine formulations indicates that their approvals were not based on the improved delivery to tumors but mostly on changes in dose-limiting toxicity unique to each drug. This comprehensive analysis of the fundamentals of anticancer nanomedicines is designed to provide an accurate picture of the field's underlying false conjectures, hopefully, thereby accelerating the future clinical translations of many formulations under research.

In vitro and ex vivo anti-myeloma effects of nanocomposite As4S4/ZnS/Fe3O4

Nanoparticles in medicine can integrate actively targeted imaging agents and drug delivery vehicles, and combining multiple types of therapeutics in a single particle has numerous advantages, especially in multiple myeloma. MM is an incurable hematological disorder characterized by clonal proliferation of plasma cells in the bone marrow. In this study, we evaluated the anti-myeloma activity of 3 nanocomposites (3NPs): As₄S₄/ZnS/Fe₃O₄ (1:4:1), As₄S₄/ZnS/Fe₃O₄ with folic acid (FA), and As₄S₄/ZnS/Fe₃O₄ with FA and albumin with reduced survival MM cell lines and primary MM samples by each of 3NP. Cytotoxic effects of 3NPs were associated with caspase- and mitochondria-dependent apoptosis induction and reduced c-Myc expression. Modulation of cell cycle regulators, such as p-ATM/ATM and p-ATR/ATR, and increases in p-Chk2, cyclin B1, and histones were accompanied by G₂/M arrest triggered by 3NPs. In addition, 3NPs activated several myeloma-related signaling, including JNK1/2/3, ERK1/2 and mTOR. To overcome BM microenvironment-mediated drug resistance, nanocomposites retained its anti-MM activity in the presence of stroma. 3NPs significantly decreased the stem cell-like side population in MM cells, even in the context of stroma. We observed strong synergistic effects of 3NPs combined with lenalidomide, pomalidomide, or melphalan, suggesting the potential of these combinations for future clinical studies.

Multiple myeloma: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Multiple myeloma accounts for approximately 10% of hematologic malignancies.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis requires ≥10% clonal bone marrow plasma cells or a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma plus evidence of one or more multiple myeloma defining events (MDE): CRAB (hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, or lytic bone lesions) attributable to the plasma cell disorder, bone marrow clonal plasmacytosis ≥60%, serum involved/uninvolved free light chain (FLC) ratio ≥ 100 (provided involved FLC is ≥100 mg/L), or >1 focal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging.

RISK STRATIFICATION

The presence of del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain 1q, or p53 mutation is considered high-risk multiple myeloma. The presence of any two high risk factors is considered double-hit myeloma, and three or more high risk factors is triple-hit myeloma.

RISK-ADAPTED INITIAL THERAPY

In patients who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation, induction therapy consists of bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (VRd) given for approximately 3-4 cycles followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In high-risk patients, daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (Dara-VRd) is an alternative to VRd. Selected standard-risk patients can collect stem cells, get additional cycles of induction therapy, and delay transplant until first relapse. Patients who are not candidates for transplant are treated with VRd for approximately 8-12 cycles followed by maintenance or alternatively with daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (DRd) until progression.

MAINTENANCE THERAPY

Standard-risk patients need lenalidomide maintenance, while bortezomib plus lenalidomide maintenance is needed for high-risk myeloma.

MANAGEMENT OF RELAPSED DISEASE

A triplet regimen is usually needed at relapse, with the choice of regimen varying with each successive relapse.

Pathogenesis and treatment of multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second‐ranking malignancy in hematological tumors. The pathogenesis of MM is complex with high heterogeneity, and the development of the disease is a multistep process. Chromosomal translocations, aneuploidy, genetic mutations, and epigenetic aberrations are essential in disease initiation and progression. The correlation between MM cells and the bone marrow microenvironment is associated with the survival, progression, migration, and drug resistance of MM cells. In recent decades, there has been a significant change in the paradigm for the management of MM. With the development of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, monoclonal antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapies, and novel agents, the survival of MM patients has been significantly improved. In addition, nanotechnology acts as both a nanocarrier and a treatment tool for MM. The properties and responsive conditions of nanomedicine can be tailored to reach different goals. Nanomedicine with a precise targeting property has offered great potential for drug delivery and assisted in tumor immunotherapy. In this review, we summarize the pathogenesis and current treatment options of MM, then overview recent advances in nanomedicine‐based systems, aiming to provide more insights into the treatment of MM.

Oleanolic acid-conjugated human serum albumin nanoparticles encapsulating doxorubicin as synergistic combination chemotherapy in oropharyngeal carcinoma and melanoma

Combination chemotherapy produces a superior therapeutic response than monotherapy in cancer. Human serum albumin and a naturally occurring cancer prophylactic/anticancer triterpenoid, oleanolic acid, were conjugated to form self-assembled nanoparticles that entrapped doxorubicin. Dox@HSA-OA NPs were physicochemically characterized for particle size, zeta potential, drug loading, entrapment efficiency, stability, release, and hemocompatibility. The Dox@HSA-OA NPs (particle size. ∼ 140 nm) showed commendable loading (14.6 %), entrapment (59.01%) of Dox. The in vitro cell uptake study using human oral squamous carcinoma (FaDu-HTB-43) and murine melanoma (B16F10) cells indicated a higher cellular association of Dox@HSA-OA NPs than free Dox. The lowest IC₅₀ of Dox@HSA-OA NPs than Dox against both the cell lines at various time points proved the Dox/HSA-OA-mediated combination chemotherapeutic effect. Dox@HSA-OA NPs demonstrated higher apoptosis and cell cycle arrest (G2/M phase). The Dox@HSA-OA NPs-mediated Dox penetration, cell death/shrinkage were significant in FaDu-HTB-43 spheroids. Dox@HSA-OA NPs showed a better pharmacokinetic profile with increased t_1/2 and Cmax than Dox. The in vivo experiment using B16F10 tumor-bearing mice showed tumor regression, DNA damage, oxidative stress, and apoptosis-induction via the intrinsic pathway to a greater extent following Dox@HSA-OA NPs treatment than Dox. Therefore, the Dox@HSA-OA NPs-mediated combination therapy could be a powerful treatment strategy for solid tumors.

Adjusted Comparison of Outcomes between Patients from CARTITUDE-1 versus Multiple Myeloma Patients with Prior Exposure to PI, Imid and Anti-CD-38 from a German Registry

Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy with the potential for long-term disease control in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). As cilta-cel was assessed in the single-arm CARTITUDE-1 clinical trial, we used an external cohort of patients from the Therapie Monitor registry fulfilling the CARTITUDE-1 inclusion criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of cilta-cel for overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) vs. real-world clinical practice. Individual patient data allowed us to adjust the comparisons between both cohorts, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPW; average treatment effect in the treated population (ATT) and overlap population (ATO) weights) and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Outcomes were compared in intention-to-treat (HR, IPW-ATT: TTNT: 0.13 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.24); OS: 0.14 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.25); IPW-ATO: TTNT: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.49); OS: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.54)) and modified intention-to-treat (HR, IPW-ATT: TTNT: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.09, 0.67); OS: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.84); IPW-ATO: TTNT: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.59); OS: 0.31 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.79)) populations. All the comparisons were statistically significant in favor of cilta-cel. These results highlight cilta-cel's potential as a novel, effective treatment to address unmet needs in patients with RRMM.

Research progress in strategies to improve the efficacy and safety of doxorubicin for cancer chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

DOX exerts strong anticancer activity and is commonly used to treat different cancers, including bone sarcomas, soft tissues, bladder, ovary, stomach, thyroid, breast, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, lung cancer, and myeloblastic leukemia. However, the cumulative doses of DOX above 550mg/m2 cause irreversible cardiotoxicity and other severe adverse effects. In this context, concerning DOX, several patents have been published in the last two decades. This activity highlights various aspects of DOX, such as registered patent analysis, pharmacological action, toxicityminimization, formulation development such as those approved by FDA, under clinical trials, and newly developed nano-delivery systems.

AREAS COVERED

This review analyzes the different aspects of DOX-based chemotherapeutics and the development of drug delivery systems in theliterature published from 2000 to early 2020.

EXPERT OPINION

DOX-based chemotherapy is still few steps away from being "perfect and safe" therapy. Certain severe systemic side effects are associated with DOX therapy. It is expected that, in the near future, DOX therapy can be much effective by selecting an ideal nanocarrier system, DOX conjugates, proper structural modifications, DOX-immunotherapy, and combination therapy. The advanced formulationsof DOX from the registered patents and recent research articles need clinical trials to bring safe treatment for cancer patients.

Impact of the National Health Insurance Coverage Policy on the Utilisation and Accessibility of Innovative Anti-cancer Medicines in China: An Interrupted Time-Series Study

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the impact of the National Health Insurance Coverage (NHIC) policy on the utilisation and accessibility of innovative anti-cancer medicines in Nanjing, China. Methods: We used the adjusted World Health Organisation and Health Action International methodology to calculate the price and availability of 15 innovative anti-cancer medicines included in the National Health Insurance drug list in 20 tertiary hospitals and six secondary hospitals in Nanjing before and after NHIC policy implementation. Interrupted time-series regression was used to analyse the changes in the utilisation of the study medicines. Results: The price reduction rates of innovative anti-cancer medicines ranged between 34 and 65%. The mean availability rate was 27.44% before policy implementation and increased to 47.33% after policy implementation. The utilisation of anti-cancer medicines suddenly increased with a slope of 33.19-2,628.39 when the policy was implemented. Moreover, the usage rate of bevacizumab, bortezomib, and apatinib significantly increased (p < 0.001, p = 0.009, and p < 0.001, respectively) after policy implementation. With regard to price reduction and medical insurance reimbursement, the medicines became more affordable after policy implementation (0.06-1.90 times the per capita annual disposable income for urban patients and 0.13-4.46 times the per capita annual disposable income for rural patients). Conclusion: The NHIC policy, which was released by the central government, effectively improved the utilisation and affordability of innovative anti-cancer medicines. However, the availability of innovative anti-cancer medicines in hospitals remained low and the utilisation of innovative anti-cancer medicines was affected by some factors, including the incidence of cancer, limitation of indications within the insurance program, and the rational use of innovative anti-cancer medicines. It is necessary to improve relevant supporting policies to promote the affordability of patients. The government should speed up the process of price negotiation to include more innovative anti-cancer medicines in the medical insurance coverage, consider including both medical examinations and adjuvant chemotherapy in the medical insurance, and increase investment in health care.

Reappraisal of anticancer nanomedicine design criteria in three types of preclinical cancer models for better clinical translation

Anticancer nanomedicines are designed to improve anticancer efficacy by increasing drug accumulation in tumors through enhanced permeability retention (EPR) effect, and to reduce toxicity by decreasing drug accumulation in normal organs through long systemic circulation. However, the inconsistent efficacy/safety of nanomedicines in cancer patients versus preclinical cancer models have provoked debate for nanomedicine design criteria. In this study, we investigate nanomedicine design criteria in three types of preclinical cancer models using five clinically used nanomedicines, which identifies the factors for better clinical translations of their observed clinical efficacy/safety compared to free drug or clinical micelle formulation. When those nanomedicines were compared with drug solution or clinical micelle formulation in breast tumors, long and short-circulating nanomedicines did not enhance tumor accumulation by EPR effect in transgenic spontaneous breast cancer model regardless of their size or composition, although they improved tumor accumulations in subcutaneous and orthotopic breast cancer models. However, when tumors were compared to normal breast tissue, nanomedicines, drug solution and clinical micelle formulation showed enhanced tumor accumulation regardless of the breast cancer models. In addition, long-circulating nanomedicines did not further increase tumor accumulation in transgenic mouse spontaneous breast cancer nor universally decrease drug accumulations in normal organs; they decreased or increased accumulation in different organs, potentially changing the clinical efficacy/safety. In contrast, short-circulating nanomedicines decreased blood concentration and altered drug distribution in normal organs, which are correlated with their clinical efficacy/safety. A reappraisal of current nanomedicine design criteria is needed to ensure consistent clinical translation for improvement of their clinical efficacy/safety in cancer patients.

Mechanisms and Potential Treatment Options of Heart Failure in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma is a pathology of plasma cells, with one of the most common side effects of its treatment is heart failure. In addition, cardiac amyloidosis could cause heart failure by itself. Even though mechanisms of cardiac amyloidosis are known, and they involve lysosomal dysfunction, reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, and infiltrative effect by fibrils, there is no specific agent that could protect from these effects. While the molecular mechanism of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity via topoisomerase II β is established, the only FDA-approved agent for treatment is dexrazoxane. Liposomal doxorubicin can potentially improve response and decrease the development of heart failure due to microscopic liposomes that can accumulate and penetrate only tumor vasculature. Supplements that enhance mitochondrial biogenesis are also shown to improve doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Other agents, such as JR-311, ICRF-193, and ursolic acid, could potentially become new treatment options. Proteasome inhibitors, novel agents, have significantly improved survival rates among multiple myeloma patients. They act on a proteasome system that is highly active in cardiomyocytes and activates various molecular cascades in malignant cells, as well as in the heart, through nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB), endoplasmic reticulum (ER), calcineurin-nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT), and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPKa)/autophagy pathways. Metformin, apremilast, and rutin have shown positive results in animal studies and may become a promising therapy as cardioprotective agents. This article aims to highlight the main molecular mechanisms of heart failure among patients with multiple myeloma and potential treatment options to facilitate the development and research of new preventive strategies. Hence, this will have a positive impact on life expectancy in patients with multiple myeloma.

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Vindesine-Based and Bortezomib-Based Regimens for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Study of Efficacy and Safety

Purpose

Although pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has been approved in combination with bortezomib for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), the antitumor efficacy and tolerability of PLD in different regimens for patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) have not been fully defined.

Methods

A total of 249 NDMM patients diagnosed between January 2008 and October 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 112 patients received vindesine-based chemotherapy (35 vDD and 77 vAD) and 137 received bortezomib-based chemotherapy (58 VDD and 79 VD).

Results

In bortezomib-containing regimens, the complete response rate (48.3 vs. 30.4%, p = 0.033) and very good partial response or better rate (74.1 vs. 57.0%, p = 0.038) of VDD were significantly higher than those of VD subgroup. While no superior survival was found between VDD and VD subgroup. In vindesine-containing regimens, no statistical significance was identified between vDD and vAD in terms of response rate and survival. The occurrence rates of all cardiac AEs were similar between VDD and VD.

Conclusions

The vDD regimen was similar with vAD in the aspect of response rate, survival, and toxicity in NDMM patients. The addition of PLD to VD brought deeper response without increased toxicity, while no superior survival was found.

Treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the bortezomib and lenalidomide era: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease, and patients usually receive multiple lines of therapy. Due to the abundance of novel treatments for MM, we conducted a network meta-analysis to identify combinations that could fare better than others in relapsed/refractory MM, in the setting of novel drugs. We searched PubMed and Cochrane databases for phase III trials in previously treated MM that had lenalidomide or bortezomib in the control arm. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), extracted as hazard-ratio. We used the P score to rank treatments. Thirteen studies were included. All but two studies compared one novel agent against two, with or without dexamethasone. Based on the P score, daratumumab and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin had a higher probability of achieving better PFS, followed by isatuximab, carfilzomib, pomalidomide, and panobinostat. Although most overall survival data were not mature enough, the addition of a second or third novel agent to either immunomodulatory (IMID) or proteasome inhibitor (PI) backbone seemed to improve survival (HR = 0.84, 95CI 0.77-0.92). Severe adverse events were more frequent with isatuximab, panobinostat, and pomalidomide. In summary, in the absence of trials directly comparing two novel agents-based therapies, we provide a tool that indirectly compares these newer therapies and that can help physicians to prioritize some regimens over others.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma treated with proteasome inhibitors in real-world clinical practice in Germany

AIMS

To assess the real-world healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with different proteasome inhibitors (PIs) for the treatment of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in Germany.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective medical chart review of treatment patterns, outcomes, and HRU for patients with RRMM treated with bortezomib, carfilzomib, or ixazomib in second- or third-line (2L or 3L) therapy in Germany. Data were collected between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2017. Costs were calculated based on drug prices and unit costs in Germany.

RESULTS

Physicians provided data on 302 patients. Mean monthly total direct costs per patient receiving PI-based therapy were €7,925 and €10,693 for 2L and 3L, respectively, of which approximately 90% was anti-myeloma drug costs. Overall, the highest costs were associated with patients receiving 3L therapy. Regardless of treatment line, costs were higher for patients who had received a stem cell transplant (SCT) in a previous treatment line than for those who had not; the data suggest that this reflects the use of triplet regimens following a SCT. Patients with a complete response (CR) experienced no unplanned hospitalizations during the study period, whereas patients with progressive disease experienced the highest number of unplanned and planned hospitalizations. In 2L therapy, the highest proportion of patients with a CR was observed in those receiving carfilzomib (12% carfilzomib; 4% bortezomib; 0% ixazomib).

LIMITATIONS

Patients with missing or incomplete follow-up data were included in the study and were accounted for using monthly cost estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-myeloma drugs were the main contributor to total HRU costs associated with RRMM in Germany. Improved treatment response was associated with lower costs and reduced hospitalizations.

The effect of rat nerve growth factor combined with vitamin B on peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma patients

Background: Peripheral neuropathy can induce marked disability and negative effects on quality of life and is the most common therapy-related complication in multiple myeloma patients treated with bortezomib. Currently, there is no useful method to prevent or treat it. So, it is necessary to study the clinical efficacy of rat nerve growth factor combined with vitamin B for the treatment of peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma patients. Methods: Sixty multiple myeloma patients who developed peripheral neuropathy after bortezomib-based chemotherapy in Jiaxing First Hospital from October 2015 to May 2018 were randomly divided into treatment and control groups. Changes in serum NGF level and electromyograms before and after treatment were analyzed, and the effects were evaluated via a FACT/GOG-Ntx questionnaire score. Results: After treatment, the NGF level in the treatment group (13.2 ± 3.73 pg/ml) was higher than that in the control group (9.22 ± 2.93 pg/ml, P < 0.05). Improvements in the electromyograms were more pronounced in treatment group than those in the control group, with statistical significance. The FACT/GOG-Ntx questionnaire scores, both in the treatment group and the control group, were decreased (4.00 ± 1.58 vs. 5.20 ± 2.33; P < 0.05), and the alleviation of the symptoms in the treatment group were more obvious. Conclusion: Rat nerve growth factor combined with vitamin B is a safe and effective method for treating peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma patients.

What Went Wrong with Anticancer Nanomedicine Design and How to Make It Right

The three design criteria of anticancer nanomedicines to improve anticancer efficacy and to reduce toxicity have been debated for decades: (1) Nanomedicines increase drug accumulation through enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) in tumors to improve anticancer efficacy. (2) Long systemic circulation of nanomedicines with high plasma concentration reduces reticuloendothelial system (RES) clearance and decreases drug accumulation in the normal organs to reduce toxicity, and to enhance the EPR effect. (3) A universal nanodelivery platform based on EPR and long systemic circulation can be developed to deliver different anticancer drugs. Although these criteria have repeatedly been confirmed in preclinical xenograft cancers, the majority of anticancer nanomedicines have failed to improve clinical efficacy, while the clinical efficacies/safety of successful nanomedicines are inconsistent with these design criteria. First, the debate over tumor EPR may have mixed two different questions and missed more clinically relevant comparisons for nanomedicines versus free drugs. When tumors are compared with normal tissues, tumor EPR has been confirmed in both mouse xenograft tumors and human cancers. However, nanomedicines may not enhance drug accumulation in human tumors compared with free drugs, despite outstanding improvement in preclinical cancers. Heterogeneity of enhanced permeability and retention in human cancers occurs for small/large molecules and nanomedicines, which cannot fully explain the poor translation of nanomedicines' efficacy from preclinical cancer models to cancer patients. Second, long-circulation nanomedicine should not be used as a universal design criterion because it does not further improve tumor accumulation by tumor EPR in human patients nor universally reduce distribution in normal organs. In contrast, nanomedicines change the drug tissue distribution to alter anticancer efficacy/safety. Third, a universal nanodelivery platform that uses the same design criteria for different drugs is not feasible. Rather, drug-specific nanodelivery systems are required to overcome the intrinsic shortcomings of delivered drugs, which are determined by the physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties of the delivered drugs and nanocarriers to improve their efficacy/safety.

Outcomes of VD-PACE With Immunomodulatory Agent as a Salvage Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Aggressive relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) often requires salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of VD-PACE (bortezomib, dexamethasone, cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide) with an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD) in RRMM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the effectiveness and tolerability among 30 patients with RRMM receiving ≥ 1 cycle of VD-PACE + IMiD between January 2012 to April 2019.

RESULTS

Of 30 patients, 26 (86%) had myeloma double refractory to protease inhibitors and IMiDs, and had received a median of 3 lines prior of therapy. The overall response rate was 67.7%, 13% patients experienced complete remission or better, and 13% experienced very good partial response. Median progression-free and median overall survival were 11 and 26 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were hematologic events, which were manageable.

CONCLUSION

VD-PACE + IMiD is an effective and tolerable salvage treatment for RRMM, with an impressive response rate in pretreated RRMM.

Chemotherapy-based regimens in multiple myeloma in 2020

Multiple myeloma (MM) represents the second-most common hematologic malignancy. In the 1980s, induction therapy with alkylating agents, such as anthracyclines and steroids, as well as high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation were the main therapeutic approaches for MM. Since the introduction of more effective drugs, such as proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, monoclonal antibodies and histone deacetylase inhibitor, the new therapeutic algorithm allows of achieving a significantly improvement of prognosis. Numerous regimens, which differently combine these new agents, have been developed and tested in clinical trials. The results of these new regimens are reported each year. In this variegated new contest, old chemotherapeutic drugs still maintain an overriding weight, especially when beneficially combined with new drugs. Also, this is particular true in specific situations, such as extramedullary manifestations, in which tumor mass reduction becomes an urgent clinical need, or in case of chemotherapy-induced stem-cell mobilization. Moreover, melphalan represents the gold standard conditioning regimen since 2002, either alone or, possibly in the next future, in combination with busulfan. Finally, new chemotherapeutic agents with new mechanisms of action, such as melflufen, are in early experimental phase.

The proteasome as a druggable target with multiple therapeutic potentialities: Cutting and non-cutting edges

Ubiquitin Proteasome System (UPS) is an adaptable and finely tuned system that sustains proteostasis network under a large variety of physiopathological conditions. Its dysregulation is often associated with the onset and progression of human diseases; hence, UPS modulation has emerged as a promising new avenue for the development of treatments of several relevant pathologies, such as cancer and neurodegeneration. The clinical interest in proteasome inhibition has considerably increased after the FDA approval in 2003 of bortezomib for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, which is now used in the front-line setting. Thereafter, two other proteasome inhibitors (carfilzomib and ixazomib), designed to overcome resistance to bortezomib, have been approved for treatment-experienced patients, and a variety of novel inhibitors are currently under preclinical and clinical investigation not only for haematological malignancies but also for solid tumours. However, since UPS collapse leads to toxic misfolded proteins accumulation, proteasome is attracting even more interest as a target for the care of neurodegenerative diseases, which are sustained by UPS impairment. Thus, conceptually, proteasome activation represents an innovative and largely unexplored target for drug development. According to a multidisciplinary approach, spanning from chemistry, biochemistry, molecular biology to pharmacology, this review will summarize the most recent available literature regarding different aspects of proteasome biology, focusing on structure, function and regulation of proteasome in physiological and pathological processes, mostly cancer and neurodegenerative diseases, connecting biochemical features and clinical studies of proteasome targeting drugs.

Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

The therapeutic strategy for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) integrates a holistic approach regarding patient, disease, and drug-related factors. Patient-related factors include age, frailty status, and underlying comorbidities, especially cardiovascular and renal diseases and peripheral neuropathies that affect tolerability to multiple drug combinations or transplantations. Disease-related factors encompass these multiple patient-related factors, particularly the aggressiveness of the disease and cytogenetics. Regarding drug-related factors, the approval of novel proteasome inhibitors (such as carfilzomib and ixazomib), immunomodulatory agents (such as pomalidomide), monoclonal antibodies (such as daratumumab and elotuzumab), and new classes of drugs increasingly makes the choice treatment more complex and necessitates a comprehensive summary and an update of the efficacy and toxicities of each antimyeloma drug and its combinations. Further, careful monitoring of the side effects and supportive care throughout the course of treatment are important to achieve better outcomes for patients with RRMM.

Evolving role of biomaterials in diagnostic and therapeutic radiation oncology

Radiation therapy to treat cancer has evolved significantly since the discovery of x-rays. Yet, radiation therapy still has room for improvement in reducing side effects and improving control of cancer. Safer and more effective delivery of radiation has led us to novel techniques and use of biomaterials. Biomaterials in combination with radiation and chemotherapy have started to appear in pre-clinical explorations and clinical applications, with many more on the horizon. Biomaterials have revolutionized the field of diagnostic imaging, and now are being cultivated into the field of theranostics, combination therapy, and tissue protection. This review summarizes recent development of biomaterials in radiation therapy in several application areas.

Multiple myeloma: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Multiple myeloma accounts for approximately 10% of hematologic malignancies.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis requires ≥10% clonal bone marrow plasma cells or a biopsy proven plasmacytoma plus evidence of one or more multiple myeloma defining events (MDE) namely CRAB (hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, or lytic bone lesions) features felt related to the plasma cell disorder, bone marrow clonal plasmacytosis ≥60%, serum involved/uninvolved free light chain (FLC) ratio ≥100 (provided involved FLC is ≥100 mg/L), or >1 focal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RISK STRATIFICATION

The presence of del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain 1q, or p53 mutation is considered high-risk multiple myeloma. Presence of any two high risk factors is considered double-hit myeloma; three or more high risk factors is triple-hit myeloma.

RISK-ADAPTED INITIAL THERAPY

In transplant eligible patients, induction therapy consists of bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (VRd) given for approximately 3-4 cycles followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In high-risk patients, daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (Dara-VRd) is an alternative to VRd. Selected standard risk patients can get additional cycles of induction, and delay transplant until first relapse. Patients not candidates for transplant are typically treated with VRd for approximately 8-12 cycles followed by lenalidomide; alternatively these patients can be treated with daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (DRd).

MAINTENANCE THERAPY

After ASCT, standard risk patients need lenalidomide maintenance, while bortezomib-based maintenance is needed for patients with high-risk myeloma.

MANAGEMENT OF REFRACTORY DISEASE

Most patients require a triplet regimen at relapse, with the choice of regimen varying with each successive relapse.

Critical Appraisal of Published Indirect Comparisons and Network Meta-Analyses of Competing Interventions for Multiple Myeloma

OBJECTIVES

In the field of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), between-trial or indirect comparisons are required to estimate relative treatment effects between competing interventions based on the available evidence. Two approaches are frequently used in RRMM: network meta-analysis (NMA) and unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). The objective of the current study was to evaluate the relevance and credibility of published NMA and unanchored MAIC studies aiming to estimate the comparative efficacy of treatment options for RRMM.

METHODS

Twelve relevant studies were identified in the published literature (n = 7) and from health technology assessment agencies (n = 5). Data from trials were extracted to identify between-trial differences that may have biased results. Credibility of the performed analyses and relevance of the research questions were critically appraised using the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) checklist and feedback based on consultations with clinical experts.

RESULTS

The identified studies concerned NMAs of randomized controlled trials (RCTs; n = 7), unanchored MAICs (n = 4), or both types of analyses (n = 1). According to clinical expert consultation, the majority of the identified NMAs did not consider differences in prior therapies or treatment duration across the RCTs included in the analyses, thereby compromising the relevance.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results and feedback from clinicians, the majority of NMAs did not consider prior treatment history or treatment duration, which resulted in nonrelevant comparisons. Furthermore, it may have compromised the credibility of the estimates owing to differences in effect-modifiers between the different trials. Pairwise comparisons by means of unanchored MAICs require clear justification given the reliance on non-randomized comparisons.

Population-based meta-analysis of bortezomib exposure-response relationships in multiple myeloma patients

Bortezomib (Velcade®) is a reversible proteasome inhibitor that shows potent antineoplastic activity, by inhibiting the constitutively increased proteasome activity in myeloma cells, and is approved as a first-line therapy for multiple myeloma (MM). Although clinically successful, bortezomib exhibits a relatively narrow therapeutic index and can induce dose-limiting toxicities such as thrombocytopenia. This study aims to develop a quantitative and predictive pharmacodynamic model to investigate bortezomib dosing-regimens in a rational and efficient manner. Mean temporal profiles of bortezomib pharmacokinetics, proteasome activity, M-protein concentrations, and platelet counts following bortezomib monotherapy were extracted from published clinical studies. A population-based meta-analysis of bortezomib anti-myeloma activity and thrombocytopenia was conducted sequentially with a Stochastic Approximation Expectation Maximization algorithm in Monolix. The final pharmacodynamic model integrates drug-target interactions and cell signaling dynamics with temporal biomarkers of clinical efficacy and toxicity. Bortezomib pharmacokinetics, disease progression, and platelet dynamic profiles were well characterized in MM patients, and a local sensitivity analysis of the final model suggests that increased proteasome concentration could ultimately attenuate bortezomib antineoplastic activity in MM patients. In addition, model simulations confirm that a once-weekly dosing schedule represents an optimal therapeutic regimen with comparable antineoplastic activity but significantly reduced risk of thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, a pharmacodynamic model was successfully developed, which provides a quantitative, mechanism-based platform for probing bortezomib dosing-regimens. Further research is needed to determine whether this model could be used to individualize bortezomib regimens to maximize antineoplastic efficacy and minimize thrombocytopenia during MM treatment.

A glance over doxorubicin based-nanotherapeutics: From proof-of-concept studies to solutions in the market

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide and, as such, efforts are being done to find new chemotherapeutic drugs or, alternatively, novel approaches for the delivery of old ones. In this scope, when used as vehicles for drugs, nanomaterials may potentially maximize the efficacy of the treatment and reduce its side effects, for example by a change in drug's pharmacokinetics, cell targeting and/or specific stimuli-responsiveness. This is the case of doxorubicin (DOX) that presents a broad spectrum of activity and is one of the most widely used chemotherapeutic drugs as first-line treatment. Indeed, DOX is a very interesting example of a drug for which several nanosized delivery systems have been developed over the years. While it is true that some of these systems are already in the market, it is also true that research on this subject remains very active and that there is a continuing search for new solutions. In this sense, this review takes the example of doxorubicin, not so much with the focus on the drug itself, but rather as a case study around which very diverse and imaginative nanotechnology approaches have emerged.

Massive pleural effusion due to IgG-Kappa subtype multiple myeloma: A case report

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy of plasma cell origin. Incidence of pleural effusion in multiple myeloma patients is approximately 6%. Myelomatous pleural effusions (MPE) are rare and occur in less than 1% of all MM cases. MPE is associated with advanced diseases, decreased survival time, and poor treatment response. In our case report, we describe a 59-year old man who presented with MPE at the initial diagnosis of MM. A diagnosis of MPE was reach through pleural fluid cytology and pleural tissue histology. The MPE had good response to initial dexamethasone without local therapy.