Body mass index as a predictive factor for efficacy of adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer patients: A pooled analysis from adjuvant GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group and TRIO Translational Research in Oncology Group studies

Adjuvant anthracyclines and taxanes reduce recurrence and death in early-stage breast cancer (EBC) patients, but toxicity is a concern. Studies show conflicting results on the correlation between body mass index (BMI) and outcomes. Limited data exist on the efficacy of adjuvant taxanes among BMI categories and the impact of different taxane-based chemotherapies (paclitaxel vs. docetaxel) on disease recurrence. Here, we present a pooled analysis of 13,486 EBC patients treated with adjuvant anthracyclines ± taxanes from seven GEICAM and TRIO trials (1996-2008) conducted. Patients were classified into four BMI categories: normal (<25.0), overweight (25.0-29.9), obese (30.0-34.9), and severely obese (≥35.0). BMI was evaluated as a predictive factor for the efficacy and toxicity of taxane-based chemotherapy. Our results show the following findings: patients' distribution by BMI was 44% normal, 33% overweight, 16% obese, and 8% severely obese. Seventy-nine percent received taxane-based chemotherapy. Ten-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) was 71%, 70%, 68%, and 64% for normal, overweight, obese, and severely obese patients, respectively. Obese and severely obese patients had significantly worse outcomes (HR 1.15 and 1.29, respectively). Invasive disease-free survival with docetaxel vs. non-docetaxel was significant in the normal BMI group, while iDFS with paclitaxel was significant in the obese group. Relevant toxicity was observed in 5%, 5.5%, 5.9%, and 9.3% of normal, overweight, obese, and severely obese patients who received docetaxel. In conclusion, heavier EBC patients had a worse prognosis with adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy. Normal BMI patients benefited more from docetaxel, while obese patients benefited more from paclitaxel.

Synergy of Body Composition, Exercise Oncology, and Pharmacokinetics: A Narrative Review of Personalizing Paclitaxel Treatment for Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Paclitaxel is a type of small molecule chemotherapy widely used for breast cancer, but its clinical efficacy is often hindered by dose-limiting toxicities such as chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and neutropenia. Traditional dosing based on body surface area does not account for variations in body composition, which may influence paclitaxel metabolism, toxicity, and treatment outcomes. This review explores the interplay between body composition, physical activity, and paclitaxel pharmacokinetics, emphasizing the potential for personalized dosing strategies.

METHODS

A comprehensive narrative review was conducted by analyzing the literature on body composition, small molecule chemotherapy-related toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and exercise oncology. Studies examining the role of skeletal muscle mass, adipose tissue, and physical activity in modulating paclitaxel metabolism and side effects were included.

RESULTS

Evidence suggests that patients with low skeletal muscle mass are at a higher risk of paclitaxel-induced toxicities due to altered drug distribution and clearance. Sarcopenic obesity, characterized by low muscle and high-fat levels, further exacerbates these risks. Exercise, particularly resistance and aerobic training, has been shown to improve muscle mass, mitigate toxicities, and enhance chemotherapy tolerance. However, the precise mechanisms by which exercise influences paclitaxel pharmacokinetics remain underexplored.

CONCLUSIONS

Personalized chemotherapy dosing, considering body composition and physical activity, may optimize paclitaxel treatment outcomes. Future research should focus on integrating exercise interventions into oncology care and refining dosing models that account for interindividual differences in drug metabolism. These advancements could improve treatment efficacy while minimizing toxicities in breast cancer patients.

Impact of obesity on doxorubicin pharmacokinetics in women with breast cancer

IntroductionExperts suggest doxorubicin clearance is decreased in women with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥35 kg/m2. However, few data support this recommendation.MethodsWomen receiving doxorubicin for breast cancer in three BMI groups were recruited (n = 15). Doxorubicin dosing was determined by body surface area and was administered by 30-min intravenous infusion. Blood samples were obtained at 0 h (pre-dose) and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12-24, and 24-72 h following the beginning of infusion. Concentrations of doxorubicin and its metabolite, doxorubicinol, were assayed by LC-MS/MS. Non-compartment analysis was done using PKanalix2021R2 for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses.ResultsThe median [range] BMI and age were 30.3 [23.5-57] kg/m2 and 53 [31-69] years. Thirteen of the 15 women had samples available for analysis. Four of the 13 had a BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m2. PK parameters ranged from 37.8% (AUC0-inf) to 91.0% (Vd). Doxorubicinol PK parameters ranged from 37.8% (Cmax) to 67.6% (AUC0-inf). The average doxorubicinol:doxorubicin AUClasts ratio was 0.26 (range: 0.04-0.88). A t-test didn't suggest a significant difference in individual PK parameters (BMI < 35 kg/m2 vs. ≥35.0 kg/m2). The two highest clearances (380 L/h and 250 L/h) had a BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m2; also, the highest clearance (1114 L/h) for doxorubicinol was ≥35.0 kg/m2.ConclusionsLarge interindividual variabilities in doxorubicin PK were observed in women up to a BMI of 57 kg/m2 and a total body weight of 141.5 kg. Women with a BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m2 and breast cancer did not appear to have lower clearances of doxorubicin.ClinicalTrials.gov IDNCT01537029.

Unraveling molecular interconnections and identifying potential therapeutic targets of significance in obesity-cancer link

Obesity, a global health concern, is associated with severe health issues like type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and respiratory complications. It also increases the risk of various cancers, including melanoma, endometrial, prostate, pancreatic, esophageal adenocarcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, renal adenocarcinoma, and pre-and post-menopausal breast cancer. Obesity-induced cellular changes, such as impaired CD8+ T cell function, dyslipidemia, hypercholesterolemia, insulin resistance, mild hyperglycemia, and fluctuating levels of leptin, resistin, adiponectin, and IL-6, contribute to cancer development by promoting inflammation and creating a tumor-promoting microenvironment rich in adipocytes. Adipocytes release leptin, a pro-inflammatory substance that stimulates cancer cell proliferation, inflammation, and invasion, altering the tumor cell metabolic pathway. Adiponectin, an insulin-sensitizing adipokine, is typically downregulated in obese individuals. It has antiproliferative, proapoptotic, and antiangiogenic properties, making it a potential cancer treatment. This narrative review offers a comprehensive examination of the molecular interconnections between obesity and cancer, drawing on an extensive, though non-systematic, survey of the recent literature. This approach allows us to integrate and synthesize findings from various studies, offering a cohesive perspective on emerging themes and potential therapeutic targets. The review explores the metabolic disturbances, cellular alterations, inflammatory responses, and shifts in the tumor microenvironment that contribute to the obesity-cancer link. Finally, it discusses potential therapeutic strategies aimed at disrupting these connections, offering valuable insights into future research directions and the development of targeted interventions.

Heterogeneous treatment effect of dose-dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin therapy for advanced ovarian cancer

A Japanese clinical trial (JGOG3016) showed that dose-dense weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin extensively prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. However, in other clinical trials, dose-dense paclitaxel regimens were not superior to triweekly paclitaxel regimens. In this study, causal tree analysis was applied to explore subpopulations with different treatment effects of dose-dense paclitaxel in a data-driven approach. The 587 participants with stage II-IV ovarian cancer in the JGOG3016 trial were used for model development. The primary endpoint was treatment effect in terms of 3-year OS in patients receiving dose-dense vs. conventional paclitaxel therapies. In patients <50 years, the 3-year OS was similar in both groups; however, it was higher in the dose-dense group in patients ≥50 years. Dose-dense paclitaxel showed strong positive treatment effects in patients ≥50 years with stage II/III disease, BMI <23 kg/m2, non-CC/MC, and residual tumor ≥1 cm. In contrast, although there was no significant difference in OS; the 3-year OS rate was 23% lower in dose-dense paclitaxel than conventional paclitaxel in patients ≥60 years with stage IV cancer. Patients in this group had a particularly lower performance status than other groups. Our causal tree analysis suggested that poor prognosis groups represented by residual tumor tissue ≥1 cm benefit from dose-dense paclitaxel, whereas elderly patients with advanced disease and low-performance status are negatively impacted by dose-dense paclitaxel. These subpopulations will be of interest to future validation studies. Personalized treatments based on clinical features are expected to improve advanced ovarian cancer prognosis.

Population pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal irinotecan and SN-38 in patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal origin

Peritoneal metastases (PM) are common in patients with colorectal cancer. Patients with PM have a poor prognosis, and for those who are not eligible for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), palliative chemotherapy is currently the only option. Recently, we conducted a phase I trial (INTERACT) in which irinotecan was administered intraperitoneally (IP) to 18 patients ineligible for CRS-HIPEC. The primary objective was to evaluate covariates influencing the PK profile of irinotecan and SN-38 after IP administration. Secondly, a population PK model was developed to support the further development of IP irinotecan by improving dosing in patients with PM. Patients were treated with IP irinotecan every 2 weeks in combination with systemic FOLFOX-bevacizumab. Irinotecan and SN-38 were measured in plasma (588 samples) and SN-38 was measured in peritoneal fluid (267 samples). Concentration-Time data were log-transformed and analyzed using NONMEM version 7.5 using FOCE+I estimation. An additive error model described the residual error, with inter-individual variability in PK parameters modeled exponentially. The final structural model consisted of five compartments. Weight was identified as a covariate influencing the SN-38 plasma volume of distribution and GGT was found to influence the SN-38 plasma clearance. This population PK model adequately described the irinotecan and SN-38 in plasma after IP administration, with weight and GGT as predictive factors. Irinotecan is converted intraperitoneal to SN-38 by carboxylesterases and the plasma bioavailability of irinotecan is low. This model will be used for the further clinical development of IP irinotecan by providing dosing strategies.

Analysis of overweight/obese pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group AML-05 study

The dosage of chemotherapy drugs for overweight/obese children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been empirically reduced based on ideal body weight (BW) in Japan to reduce the risk of adverse events. We investigated the associations between pre-therapeutic body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes among children with AML. A total of 280 children were divided into two groups based on the World Health Organization Child Growth Standards: a healthy-weight group (n = 254), and an overweight/obese group (n = 26). If BW exceeded 1.2 times the standard BW of Japanese children, the dosage of chemotherapy drugs was calculated using 1.2 times the standard BW. The dosage of chemotherapy drugs was reduced during at least one chemotherapy cycle in 24 of 26 patients (92.3%) in the overweight/obese group, compared with zero patients in the healthy-weight group. Overall/event-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, and treatment-related mortality (TRM) did not differ between the overweight/obese and healthy weight groups. However, the frequency of bacteremia was higher in the overweight/obese group (80.8 vs. 52.4%, P = 0.006). This indicates that TRM may increase when chemotherapy drug dosage is not corrected in overweight/obese patients. Drug reduction is a potential treatment strategy.

Using maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) to personalize taxane treatment and reduce toxicity

Taxanes are a widely used class of anticancer agents that play a vital role in the treatment of a variety of cancers. However, toxicity remains a major concern of using taxane drugs as some toxicities are highly prevalent, they can not only adversely affect patient prognosis but also compromise the overall treatment plan. Among all kinds of factors that associated with taxane toxicity, taxane exposure has been extensively studied, with different pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters being used as toxicity predictors. Compared to other widely used predictors such as the area under the drug plasma concentration curve versus time (AUC) and time above threshold plasma drug concentration, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) is easier to collect and shows promise for use in clinical practice. In this article, we review the previous research on using Cmax to predict taxane treatment outcomes. While Cmax and toxicity have been extensively studied, research on the relationship between Cmax and efficacy is lacking. Most of the articles find a positive relationship between Cmax and toxicity but several articles have contradictory findings. Future clinical trials are needed to validate the relationship between Cmax and treatment outcome and determine whether Cmax can serve as a useful surrogate endpoint of taxane treatment efficacy.

DNA base oxidation in relation to TNM stages and chemotherapy treatment in colorectal cancer patients 2-9 months post-surgery

Accumulation of DNA damage is a critical feature of genomic instability, which is a hallmark of various cancers. The enzyme-modified comet assay is a recognized method to detect specific DNA lesions at the level of individual cells. In this cross-sectional investigation, we explore possible links between clinicopathological and treatment related factors, nutritional status, physical activity and function, and DNA damage in a cohort of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with non-metastatic disease. Levels of DNA damage in peripheral mononuclear blood cells (PBMCs) assessed 2-9 months post-surgery, were compared across tumour stage (localized (stage I-II) vs. regional (stage III) disease), localization (colon vs. rectosigmoid/rectum cancer), and adjuvant chemotherapy usage, with the last dosage administrated 2-191 days prior to sampling. Associations between DNA damage and indicators of nutritional status, physical activity and function were also explored. In PBMCs, DNA base oxidation was higher in patients diagnosed with regional compared with localized tumours (P = 0.03), but no difference was seen for DNA strand breaks (P > 0.05). Number of days since last chemotherapy dosage was negatively associated with DNA base oxidation (P < 0.01), and patients recently receiving chemotherapy (<15 days before blood collection) had higher levels of DNA base oxidation than those not receiving chemotherapy (P = 0.03). In the chemotherapy group, higher fat mass (in kg and %) as well as lower physical activity were associated with greater DNA base oxidation (P < 0.05). In conclusion, DNA base oxidation measured with the enzyme-modified comet assay varies according to tumour and lifestyle related factors in CRC patients treated for non-metastatic disease.

Effect of Obesity on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Anticancer Agents

An objective of the Precision Medicine Initiative, launched in 2015 by the US Food and Drug Administration and National Institutes of Health, is to optimize and individualize dosing of drugs, especially anticancer agents, with high pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability. The American Society of Clinical Oncology recently reported that 40% of obese patients receive insufficient chemotherapy doses and exposures, which may lead to reduced efficacy, and recommended pharmacokinetic studies to guide appropriate dosing in these patients. These issues will only increase in importance as the incidence of obesity in the population increases. This publication reviews the effects of obesity on (1) tumor biology, development of cancer, and antitumor response; (2) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of small-molecule anticancer drugs; and (3) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of complex anticancer drugs, such as carrier-mediated agents and biologics. These topics are not only important from a scientific research perspective but also from a drug development and regulator perspective. Thus, it is important to evaluate the effects of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer agents in all categories of body habitus and especially in patients who are obese and morbidly obese. As the effects of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer agents may be highly variable across drug types, the optimal dosing metric and algorithm for difference classes of drugs may be widely different. Thus, studies are needed to evaluate current and novel metrics and methods for measuring body habitus as related to optimizing the dose and reducing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability of anticancer agents in patients who are obese and morbidly obese.

Impact of body mass index and its change on survival outcomes in patients with early breast cancer: A pooled analysis of individual-level data from BCIRG-001 and BCIRG-005 trials

INTRODUCTION

The relationships between body mass index (BMI) and survival rates are complex, and have not been thoroughly investigated in breast cancer patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

We collected data on 2394 patients from two randomized, phase III clinical trials that investigated adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer identified in Project Data Sphere. The objective was to examine the effect of baseline BMI, BMI after adjuvant chemotherapy, and BMI change from baseline to post-adjuvant chemotherapy on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Restricted cubic splines were used to examine potential non-linear associations between continuous BMI value and survival. Stratified analyses involved chemotherapy regimens.

RESULTS

Severe obesity (BMI≥40.0 kg/m2) at baseline was independently associated with worse DFS (hazard ration [HR] = 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.16, P = 0.04) and OS (HR = 1.79, 95%CI 1.17-2.74, P = 0.007) compared with underweight/normal weight (BMI≤24.9 kg/m2). A BMI loss >10% was also an independent prognostic factor for adverse OS (HR = 2.14, 95%CI 1.17-3.93, P = 0.014). Stratified analyses revealed that severe obesity adversely affected DFS (HR = 2.38, 95%CI 1.26-4.34, P = 0.007) and OS (HR = 2.90, 95%CI 1.46-5.76, P = 0.002) in the docetaxel-based group, but not in the non-docetaxel-based group. Restricted cubic splines revealed a "J-shaped" association of baseline BMI with risk of recurrence or all-cause death, and this relationship was more pronounced in the docetaxel-based group.

CONCLUSIONS

In early breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, baseline severe obesity was significantly linked to worse DFS and OS, and a BMI loss over 10% from baseline to post-adjuvant chemotherapy also negatively affected OS. Moreover, the prognostic role of BMI might differ between docetaxel-based and non-docetaxel-based groups.

Impact of obesity, lifestyle factors and health interventions on breast cancer survivors

The incidences of both breast cancer and obesity are rising in the UK. Obesity increases the risk of developing breast cancer in the postmenopausal population and leads to worse outcomes in those of all ages treated for early-stage breast cancer. In this review we explore the multifactorial reasons behind this association and the clinical trial evidence for the benefits of physical activity and dietary interventions in the early and metastatic patient groups. As more people with breast cancer are cured, and those with metastatic disease are living longer, cancer survivorship is becoming increasingly important. Therefore, ensuring the long-term implications of cancer and cancer treatment are addressed is vital. Although there remains a lack of definitive evidence that deliberate weight loss after a diagnosis of breast cancer reduces disease recurrence, a number of studies have reported benefits of weight loss and of physical activity. However, the limited data currently available mean that clinicians remain unclear on the optimal lifestyle advice to give their patients. Further high-quality research is needed to provide this evidence base, which will be required to optimise clinical care and for the commissioning of lifestyle interventions in the UK in breast cancer survivors.

Chemotherapy and Anticancer Drugs Adjustment in Obesity: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Obese individuals have higher rates of cancer incidence and cancer- related mortality. The worse chemotherapy outcomes observed in this subset of patients are multifactorial, including the altered physiology in obesity and its impact on pharmacokinetics, the possible increased risk of underdosing, and treatment-related toxicity.

AIMS

The present review aimed to discuss recent data on physiology, providing just an overall perspective and pharmacokinetic alterations in obesity concerning chemotherapy. We also reviewed the controversies of dosing adjustment strategies in adult and pediatric patients, mainly addressing the use of actual total body weight and ideal body weight.

METHODS

This narrative review tried to provide the best evidence to support antineoplastic drug dosing strategies in children, adolescents, and adults.

RESULTS

Cardiovascular, hepatic, and renal alterations of obesity can affect the distribution, metabolism, and clearance of drugs. Anticancer drugs have a narrow therapeutic range, and variations in dosing may result in either toxicity or underdosing. Obese patients are underrepresented in clinical trials that focus on determining recommendations for chemotherapy dosing and administration in clinical practice. After considering associated comorbidities, the guidelines recommend that chemotherapy should be dosed according to body surface area (BSA) calculated with actual total body weight, not an estimate or ideal weight, especially when the intention of therapy is the cure.

CONCLUSION

The actual total body weight dosing appears to be a better approach to dosing anticancer drugs in both adults and children when aiming for curative results, showing no difference in toxicity and no limitation in treatment outcomes compared to adjusted doses.

Comparison of Dose Adjustment Strategies for Obesity in High-dose Cyclophosphamide Among Adult Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients: Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Cyclophosphamide (CY) is an alkylating agent widely used in the field of oncology and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). It is recommended to use an adjusted body weight with an adjustment factor of 0.25 (ABW25) for dosing of CY in obese patients undergoing HCT. However, evidence based on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of CY to support this recommendation is lacking. We aimed to identify a dosing strategy of CY that achieves equivalent exposures among obese and nonobese patients. The present study is a secondary analysis of a previously conducted observational PK study of phosphoramide mustard (PM), the final cytotoxic metabolite of CY. Data were collected from 85 adults with hematologic malignancy who received a single infusion of CY 50 mg/kg, fludarabine, ± anti-thymocyte globulin, and a single fraction of total body irradiation as HCT conditioning therapy. A previously developed population PK model in these patients was used for simulations. Using individualized PK parameters from that analysis, simulations were performed to assess cumulative exposures of PM (i.e., area-under-the-curve [AUC]) resulting from 8 different dosing strategies according to various measures of body size: (1) "mg/kg" by total body weight (TBW); (2) "mg/kg" by ideal body weight (IBW); (3) "mg/kg" by fat free mass; (4) "mg/m²" by body surface area (BSA); (5) "mg/kg" by TBW combined with ABW25 (TBW-ABW25); (6) "mg/kg" by IBW combined with ABW25 (IBW-ABW25); (7) "mg/kg" by TBW combined with ABW by adjustment factor of 0.50 (TBW-ABW50); and (8) "mg" by fixed-dose. We defined equivalent exposure as the effect of obesity on PM AUC within ±20% from the PM AUC in the nonobese group, where obesity is defined based on TBW/IBW ratio (i.e., nonobese, <1.2; mildly obese, 1.2-1.5; and moderately/severely obese, >1.5). Primary and secondary outcomes were PM AUC_0-8hours and PM AUC_0-infinity, respectively. In the 85 patients, with the median age of 63 years (range 21-75), 46% were classified as mildly and 25% were moderately/severely obese based on the TBW/IBW ratio. Negative correlations (i.e., higher the extent of obesity, lower the PM AUC) were shown when dosing simulations were based on IBW, TBW-ABW25, and fixed dosing (P < .05). Positive correlations were shown when dosing was simulated by TBW (P < .05). None of the 8 dosing strategies attained equivalent PM AUC_0-8hours between patients with versus without obesity, whereas dosing by BSA and TBW-ABW50 attained equivalent PM AUC_0-infinity (P < .05). Our study predicted that the recommended ABW25 dose adjustment may result in lower exposure of CY therapy in obese patients than in nonobese. A CY dosing strategy that would result in similar PM concentrations between obese and nonobese was not identified for early exposure (i.e., PM AUC_0-8hours). The data suggest though that CY dosing based on "mg/m²" by BSA or "mg/kg" by TBW-ABW50 would result in similar total exposure (i.e., PM AUC_0-infinity) and may minimize exposure differences in obese and nonobese patients.

Lean Body Mass and Total Body Weight Versus Body Surface Area as a Determinant of Docetaxel Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity

AIM

This study examined whether anthropometric and body composition parameters such as body surface area (BSA), lean body mass (LBM), and total body weight (TBW) are correlated with docetaxel clearance and exposure by analyzing area under the curve. In addition, LBM, TBW, and a fixed dose were compared with BSA as dosing parameters for dose individualization of docetaxel.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients receiving docetaxel chemotherapy for breast or metastatic castration-resistant prostate carcinoma were included. Before treatment, LBM was measured using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanner. Blood samples were collected up to 180 minutes after dosing to analyze docetaxel concentrations and determine individual pharmacokinetic parameters.

RESULTS

No significant correlations were found between docetaxel clearance and the anthropometric and body composition variables (BSA, LBM, and TBW). The area under the curve was significantly but poorly correlated with BSA [r = 0.452 ( P = 0.016)] and TBW [r = 0.476 ( P = 0.011)]. The mean absolute percentage error and mean error of simulated dosing based on LBM and fixed dosing were not significantly different from those of BSA. For TBW, only mean absolute percentage error was significantly higher compared with dosing based on BSA (24.1 versus 17.1, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no clinically relevant correlation between docetaxel pharmacokinetics and the anthropometric and body composition variables BSA, LBM, and TBW. Therefore, dose individualization of docetaxel based on LBM, TBW, or fixed dosing cannot be recommended over BSA-based dosing.

Body Mass Index and Overall Survival of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Obesity is associated with survival in several solid tumors and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, but its impact on multiple myeloma (MM) survival is unclear. We examined the associations between body mass index (BMI) at different periods of life up to the time of diagnosis and overall survival (OS) among 563 patients newly diagnosed with MM in 2010–2019. BMI at diagnosis was calculated using measured height and weight from electronic medical records (EMR). BMIs at age 20, maximum during adulthood, and 5 years before diagnosis were calculated using self-reported weights and measured height from EMR. Over a median follow-up of 49.3 months, 191 (33.93%) deaths were identified. We used multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models to examine the associations between BMIs and OS. Height as well as BMI before and at diagnosis was not associated with OS, but there is a U-shape association between weight and OS. Higher BMIs at diagnosis were associated with better OS among females (HR = 0.39 [0.22–0.71]), irrespective of race. In conclusion, our results suggest that BMI at different periods of life up to the time of diagnosis may not be associated with OS in MM, except that a higher BMI at diagnosis was associated with superior OS for females.

Drug pharmacokinetics in the obese population: challenging common assumptions on predictors of obesity-related parameter changes

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is associated with many physiological changes. We review available evidence regarding five commonly accepted assumptions to a priori predict the impact of obesity on drug pharmacokinetics (PK).

AREAS COVERED

The investigated assumptions are: 1) lean body weight is the preferred descriptor of clearance and dose adjustments; 2) volume of distribution increases for lipophilic, but not for hydrophilic drugs; 3) CYP-3A4 activity is suppressed and UGT activity is increased, implying decreased and increased dose requirements for substrates of these enzyme systems, respectively; 4) glomerular filtration rate is enhanced, necessitating higher doses for drugs cleared through glomerular filtration; 5) drug dosing information from obese adults can be extrapolated to obese adolescents.

EXPERT OPINION

Available literature contradicts, or at least limits the generalizability, of all five assumptions. Clinical studies should focus on quantifying the impact of duration and severity of obesity on drug PK in adults and adolescents, and also include oral bioavailability and pharmacodynamics in these studies. Physiologically-based PK approaches can be used to predict PK changes for individual drugs, but can also be used to define in general terms based on patient characteristics and drug properties, when certain assumptions can or cannot be expected to be systematically accurate.

Association between Energy Balance-Related Factors and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized evidence in patients with ovarian cancer at diagnosis and/or during first-line treatment on; (i) the association of body weight, body composition, diet, exercise, sedentary behavior, or physical fitness with clinical outcomes; and (ii) the effect of exercise and/or dietary interventions. Methods: Risk of bias assessments and best-evidence syntheses were completed. Meta-analyses were performed when ≥3 papers presented point estimates and variability measures of associations or effects. Results: Body mass index (BMI) at diagnosis was not significantly associated with survival. Although the following trends were not supported by the best-evidence syntheses, the meta-analyses revealed that a higher BMI was associated with a higher risk of post-surgical complications (n = 5, HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.06−2.51, p = 0.030), a higher muscle mass was associated with a better progression-free survival (n = 3, HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.04−1.91, p = 0.030) and a higher muscle density was associated with a better overall survival (n = 3, HR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.62−2.79, p < 0.001). Muscle measures were not significantly associated with surgical or chemotherapy-related outcomes. Conclusions: The prognostic value of baseline BMI for clinical outcomes is limited, but muscle mass and density may have more prognostic potential. High-quality studies with comprehensive reporting of results are required to improve our understanding of the prognostic value of body composition measures for clinical outcomes. Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO identifier CRD42020163058.

The influence of body mass index on the tolerability and effectiveness of full-weight-based paclitaxel chemotherapy in women with early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of body mass index (BMI) on the tolerability and effectiveness of full-weight-based paclitaxel chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Early-stage breast cancer patients who received (neo)adjuvant weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m² chemotherapy were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into three groups based on their BMI: lean, overweight, and obese. Logistic regression was used to assess for association between BMI with administered relative dose intensity (RDI) < 85%. The occurrence of treatment modifications and the pathological response on neoadjuvant chemotherapy were compared between BMI categories.

RESULTS

Four hundred (400) patients were included in this study; 200 (50%) lean, 125 (31%) overweight, and 75 (19%) obese patients. The adjusted odds ratio to receive RDI < 85% for BMI was 1.02 (p value, .263). Treatment modifications occurred in 115 (58%), 82 (66%), and 52 (69%) patients in the respective BMI categories (p value = .132). Peripheral neuropathy was observed in 79 (40%), 58 (46%), and 41 (55%) patients in the lean, overweight, and obese group (p value = .069), whereas hematologic toxicity was observed in 31 (16%), 10 (8%), and 4 (5%) patients (p value = .025). Pathological complete response was observed in 22 (17%), 11 (14%), and 6 (13%) patients in the respective BMI categories (p value = .799).

CONCLUSION

BMI did not significantly influence the tolerability and effectiveness of full-weight-based paclitaxel chemotherapy. Therefore, the results of this study align with current guideline recommendations of using full-weight-based paclitaxel chemotherapy in obese patients.

Obesity-related genomic instability and altered xenobiotic metabolism: possible consequences for cancer risk and chemotherapy

The increase in the prevalence of obesity has led to an elevated risk for several associated diseases including cancer. Several studies have investigated the DNA damage in human blood samples and showed a clear trend towards increased DNA damage in obesity. Reduced genomic stability is thus one of the consequences of obesity, which may contribute to the related cancer risk. Whether this is influenced by compromised DNA repair has not been elucidated sufficiently yet. On the other hand, obesity has also been linked to reduced therapy survival and increased adverse effects during chemotherapy, although the available data are controversial. Despite some indications that obesity might alter hepatic metabolism, current literature in humans is insufficient, and results from animal studies are inconclusive. Here we have summarised published data on hepatic drug metabolism to understand the impact of obesity on cancer therapy better. Furthermore, we highlight knowledge gaps in the interrelationship between obesity and drug metabolism from a toxicological perspective.

Changes in Body Adiposity in Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Treatment: A Scoping Review

Antineoplastic treatments can negatively affect body composition, leading to metabolic derangements and worse clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients. This scoping review assesses body adiposity changes during breast cancer therapy. We included clinical and observational studies, published until the last search date in any language, with women aged >18 years, after breast cancer diagnosis, at any clinical stage and with any history of breast cancer treatment, who had body adiposity quantified by imaging tools at least twice during follow-up. In total, 17 studies were included (n = 1,009 individuals), six of which found a significant increase in body adiposity during treatment, two found a significant decrease, one presented divergent findings according to the imaging method and the analyzed body adiposity depots, and eight studies found no significant change in the outcome. Selective estrogen receptor modulators were associated with increased body adiposity, whereas aromatase inhibitors were associated with its decrease (n = 3). Chemotherapy was associated with increased body adiposity (n = 1), and monoclonal antibody with reduced brown adipose tissue activity (n = 1). Breast cancer treatment may have different effects on body adiposity, according to its mechanisms and protocols. Further studies are necessary to better elucidate this scenario.

High Visceral Fat in Female Breast Cancer Patients Correlates with the Risk of Progression after Adjuvant Chemotherapy

RATIONALE

Clinical and epidemiological evidence indicate that obesity is associated with the risk and progression of breast cancer. Body mass index (BMI) as a measure of adiposity does not precisely describe individual body composition and adipose tissue distribution. We aimed to investigate the association between body composition and the efficiency of adjuvant chemotherapy as well as post-treatment progress among female breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Participants included 199 females with stage I-III breast cancer. Body composition, including body fat mass, visceral fat level, and skeletal muscle mass, was assessed based on the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank test, and Cox proportional-hazards model were used to estimate the effects of body composition as prognostic factors on survival.

RESULTS

Postmenopausal women had a higher proportion of visceral fat compared to premenopausal women (64% vs. 33.87%, P < 0.001). Compared with those with normal visceral fat level, patients with high visceral fat level were older (P < 0.001), had higher body fat mass (p < 0.001), skeletal muscle mass (P = 0.013), minerals (P = 0.011), protein (P = 0.036), triglycerides (P = 0.038), cholesterol (P = 0.022), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (P = 0.015). A more prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) was noted in patients with a normal visceral fat level as compared to patients with a high visceral fat level (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9, 95% CI 1-3.5; adjusted HR 1.77, 95% CI 0.932-3.36).

CONCLUSIONS

A high visceral fat level in female patients with breast cancer is associated with a shorter DFS after adjuvant chemotherapy. Body composition alongside BIA provides a quick and noninvasive approach to identify breast cancer patients with a higher risk of cancer progression.

Differential effect of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes of patients treated with docetaxel in prostate cancer - An exploratory analysis

OBJECTIVE

There are contradictory data on differential effect of docetaxel based on BMI in patients with breast and prostate cancer. We performed an exploratory analysis to determine if the benefit of docetaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is modified by BMI.

METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis of the data retrieved from the ENTHUSE M1C study. BMI (kg/m²) was categorized as: 18.5 to <25 as lean; 25 to <30 as overweight; and ≥30 as obese. Cox regression models were constructed to determine the impact of BMI on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 466 patients were eligible for the current analysis. The median PFS was 7.3, 7.7 and 8.4 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.06; P = 0.261) in lean, overweight and obese patients. The median OS was 16.6, 20.1 and 21.4 months (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89; P = 0.002) for lean, overweight and obese patients. After adjusting for baseline and tumor characteristics, there was no association of BMI with PFS (overweight, HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.13; P = 0.353; obese, HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.13; P = 0.277) while overweight (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.89; P = 0.006) and obese (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.83; P = 0.003) patients had significantly better OS compared with lean patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no effect of BMI on PFS in patients with mCRPC receiving docetaxel. Interestingly, overweight and obese patients had a longer OS compared with lean patients, which is in contradiction to a recent study in breast cancer; and warrants further investigation.

Body mass index and survival of patients with lymphoma

The impact of body mass index (BMI) on survival in lymphoma remains controversial. We leveraged a prospective cohort of lymphoma patients enrolled to SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource between 2002 and 2015 to assess the association of BMI before diagnosis, BMI at diagnosis, and BMI change over time with lymphoma-specific survival (LSS). A total of 4009 lymphoma patients (670 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 689 follicular lymphoma (FL), 1018 chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), and 1632 other subtypes) were included. Significantly shorter LSS after diagnosis was observed for FL patients who were obese before diagnosis (HR: 3.02, 95%CI: 1.43-6.41, p=.004) and for those with a ≥ 5% increase in BMI from diagnosis to 3-year follow-up (HR: 3.53, 95%CI: 1.22-10.2, p=.020). In contrast, obesity prior to or at the time of diagnosis was not associated with LSS in DLBCL and CLL/SLL. The impact of weight control after diagnosis in FL patient warrants investigation.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis from First-in-Human Data for HDAC Inhibitor, REC-2282 (AR-42), in Patients with Solid Tumors and Hematologic Malignancies: A Case Study for Evaluating Flat vs. Body Size Normalized Dosing

Background and Objectives

REC-2282 is a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor that has shown antitumor activity in in vitro and in vivo models of malignancy.  The aims of this study were to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of REC-2282 (AR-42) from the first-in-human (NCT01129193) and phase I acute myeloid leukemia trials (NCT01798901) and to evaluate potential sources of variability. Additionally, we sought to understand alternate body size descriptors as sources of inter-individual variability (IIV), which was significant for dose-normalized maximum observed concentration and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC).

Methods

Datasets from two clinical trials were combined, and population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM and R softwares; patient demographics were tested as covariates.

Results

A successful population pharmacokinetic model was constructed. The pharmacokinetics of REC-2282 were best described by a two-compartment model with one transit compartment for absorption, first-order elimination and a proportional error model. Fat-free mass (FFM) was retained as a single covariate on clearance (CL), though it explained < 3% of the observed variability on CL. Tumor type and formulation were retained as covariates on lag time, and a majority of variability, attributed to absorption, remained unexplained. Computed tomography (CT)-derived lean body weight estimates were lower than estimated lean body weight and fat-free mass measures in most patients. Analysis of dose-normalized AUC vs. body size descriptors suggests flat dosing is most appropriate for REC-2282.

Conclusions

FFM was identified as a significant covariate on CL; however, it explained only a very small portion of the IIV; major factors contributing significantly to REC-2282 pharmacokinetic variability remain unidentified.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13318-021-00722-z.

Antineoplastic dosing in overweight and obese cancer patients: an Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica (AIOM)/Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD)/Società Italiana Endocrinologia (SIE)/Società Italiana Farmacologia (SIF) multidisciplinary consensus position paper

Most anticancer molecules are administered in body-size-based dosing schedules, bringing up unsolved issues regarding pharmacokinetic data in heavy patients. The worldwide spread of obesity has not been matched by improved methods and strategies for tailored drug dosage in this population. The weight or body surface area (BSA)-based approaches may fail to fully reflect the complexity of the anthropometric features besides obesity in cancer patients suffering from sarcopenia. Likewise, there is a lack of pharmacokinetic data on obese patients for the majority of chemotherapeutic agents as well as for new target drugs and immunotherapy. Therefore, although the available findings point to the role of dose intensity in cancer treatment, and support full weight-based dosing, empirical dose capping often occurs in clinical practice in order to avoid toxicity. Thus a panel of experts of the Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica (AIOM), Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD), Società Italiana Endocrinologia (SIE), and Società Italiana Farmacologia (SIF), provides here a consensus statement for appropriate cytotoxic chemotherapy and new biological cancer drug dosing in obese patients.

•

The worldwide spread of obesity is an emerging challenge also in cancer patients

•

Weight or BSA-based approaches do not adequately address the critical issue of optimal dosing for cancer drugs under obesity

•

Empirical dose capping is often employed in clinical practice to avoid toxicities among overweight and obese patients

•

There is a lack of clinical and pharmacokinetic studies in this population

•

Clinical practice recommendations should guide suitable dosing of cytotoxic and biological cancer drugs in obese patients

Effect of body mass index on pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients with early breast cancer

Background

Paclitaxel is dosed according to body surface area (BSA) but there is scant information on actual drug exposure in overweight and obese patients.

Methods

Early breast cancer patients receiving paclitaxel at 175 mg/m² every 3 weeks, in two BMI groups (normal, 18–24.9 kg/m² and overweight/obese, ≥25 kg/m², respectively), matched for age, serum albumin and bilirubin levels using minimization technique, were included. Sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was performed at 7 time points from 0 h until 24 h of starting paclitaxel in cycle 1. Paclitaxel concentration was measured using a validated LCMS/MS method. Covariate effect on paclitaxel PK was evaluated by population PK analysis using NONMEM software.

Results

Eighteen female patients each were enrolled in normal and overweight groups with mean BMI of 21.62 ± 2.06 and 28.16 ± 2.31 kg/m², mean BSA of 1.44 ± 0.11 and 1.69 ± 0.14 m² and mean paclitaxel dose of 250 ± 18 and 293 ± 21 mg, respectively. Model predicted AUC and dose normalized AUC (mean ±SD) in the normal BMI versus overweight obese groups were 23 ± 11.0 µmol*h/L versus 25.7 ± 13.7 µmol*h/L (two‐sample t‐test p > 0.05) and 0.08 ± 0.04 (µmol*h/L)/ µmol versus 0.08 ± 0.04 (µmol*h/L)/ µmol (2‐sample t‐test p > 0.05), respectively. No significant correlation was observed between BMI and standardized dose normalized AUC (Pearson's correlation coefficient, −0.009; p > 0.05).

Conclusion

When dosed according to BSA calculated using actual body weight there is no significant difference in paclitaxel exposure between normal and overweight women. Using alternative descriptors of weight to calculate BSA could lead to under‐dosing of this drug.

Trial registration

This study is registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of India CTRI/2015/09/006193.

The Role of Obesity in the Development and Management of Gynecologic Cancer

Importance

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy, with an estimated 54,000 new cases and 10,000 deaths in the United States in 2015. The obesity epidemic directly contributes to the escalating prevalence of chronic diseases, including obesity-related cancers. Patient body weight and nutritional status markedly impact perioperative oncologic care, chemotherapy administration, recurrence risk, and survivorship goals.

Objectives

The objective of this review is to explore the association between obesity and the development, treatment, and survival outcomes of gynecologic cancers.

Evidence Acquisition

A systematic literature review was performed utilizing PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov.

Conclusions and Relevance

Caring for obese women with gynecologic cancers presents unique challenges. A coordinated multidisciplinary and system effort is required to address the prevention and treatment of obesity, as the sequela of this disease is a clear risk factor for the development of gynecologic malignancy and other comorbidities. Health care providers must be ready to address this worldwide health problem.

The Impact of Obesity on the Outcomes of Adult Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia - A Single Center Retrospective Study

Introduction

Obesity is a worldwide problem that is related to cardiac disease, thrombosis and cancer. However, little is known about the impact of obesity on the outcomes of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated a cohort of 154 newly diagnosed adult ALL patients between 1994 and 2011 at Mayo Clinic (Rochester). According to the World Health Organization (WHO) international BMI classification, patients were stratified as underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese. For some analyses, patients were also stratified according to a two-sided non-obese or obese classification.

Results

The median follow-up time was 8.37 years. Obese patients were more likely to be women (p=0.024) and ≥60 years old (p=0.003). Five-year mortality rates were higher in obese patients than non-obese [HR 95% CI: 1.60 (1.03-2.50) p=0.035]. This was also the case in subgroup analysis among T-cell patients although the number of patients was small [HR 95% CI: 5.42 (1.84-15.98) p<0.001]. There was no difference in mortality among the B-cell patients. After adjusting for baseline variables, the difference in mortality remained in several models. There was no difference in EFS or cumulative incidence of relapse rates between obese and non-obese patients among the overall population.

Discussion

In conclusion, our study suggests that adult ALL patients with obesity have lower survival rates, especially in T-cell ALL.

The Influence of Body Composition on the Systemic Exposure of Paclitaxel in Esophageal Cancer Patients

Changes in body composition are associated with chemotherapy-related toxicities and effectiveness of treatment. It is hypothesized that the pharmacokinetics (PK) of chemotherapeutics may depend on body composition. The effects of body composition on the variability of paclitaxel PK were studied in patients with esophageal cancer. Skeletal muscle index (SMI), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and skeletal muscle density (SMD) were measured at the third lumbar vertebra on computed tomography (CT) scans performed before treatment. Paclitaxel PK data were collected from a prospective study performed between May 2004 and January 2014. Non-linear mixed-effects modeling was used to fit paclitaxel PK profiles and evaluate the covariates body surface area (BSA), SMI, VAT, and SMD using a significance threshold of p < 0.001. Paclitaxel was administered to 184 patients in a dose range of 50 to 175 mg/m². Median BSA was 1.98 m² (range of 1.4 to 2.8 m²). SMI, VAT, and SMD were not superior to BSA in predicting paclitaxel PK. The additive value of SMI, VAT, and SMD to BSA was also negligible. We did not find evidence that paclitaxel dosing could be further optimized by correcting for SMI, VAT, or SMD.

Impact of body mass index on pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The impact of an increased body mass index (BMI) on outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of BMI on pathological complete response (pCR) rates for operable breast cancer after NACT.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science database for observational studies and randomized controlled trials that reported the association of BMI with pCR after NACT. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the impact of BMI on pCR rate.

RESULTS

We identified 13 studies including a total of 18,702 women with operable breast cancer who underwent NACT. Two studies were pooled analyses of prospective clinical trials (10,669 patients); the rest were case-control studies (8033 patients). All studies provided data of two BMI groups (BMI < 25 vs. BMI ≥ 25). Pooled analyses demonstrated that overweight/obese women were less likely to achieve pCR after NACT as compared to under-/normal weight women (odds ratio (OR) = 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.93). Eleven studies provided data of three BMI groups (BMI < 25, 25 ≤ BMI < 30, BMI ≥ 30). Based on pooled analyses, both overweight and obese groups were less likely to achieve pCR with NACT as compared to under-/normal weight group, (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.93 and OR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.61-0.77, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Overweight and obese breast cancer patients had a lower pCR rate with NACT compared to patients with under-/normal weight. Further prospective studies may help confirm this finding and investigate possible mechanisms.

Body Composition, Adherence to Anthracycline and Taxane-Based Chemotherapy, and Survival After Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer

Importance

Although most chemotherapies are dosed on body surface area or weight, body composition (ie, the amount and distribution of muscle and adipose tissues) is thought to be associated with chemotherapy tolerance and adherence.

Objectives

To evaluate whether body composition is associated with relative dose intensity (RDI) on anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy or hematologic toxic effects and whether lower RDI mediates the association of adiposity with mortality.

Design, Setting, and Participants

An observational cohort study with prospectively collected electronic medical record data was conducted at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a multicenter, community oncology setting within an integrated health care delivery system. Participants included 1395 patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer diagnosed between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2013, and treated with anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy. Data analysis was performed between February 25 and September 4, 2019.

Exposures

Intramuscular, visceral, and subcutaneous adiposity as well as skeletal muscle were evaluated from clinically acquired computed tomographic scans at diagnosis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was low RDI (<0.85), which is the ratio of delivered to planned chemotherapy dose, derived from infusion records; in addition, hematologic toxic effects were defined based on laboratory test values. To evaluate associations with overall and breast cancer-specific mortality, logistic regression models adjusted for age and body surface area were fit as well as Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, adiposity, Charlson comorbidity index score, and tumor stage and subtype. The mediation proportion was computed using the difference method.

Results

The mean (SD) age at diagnosis of the 1395 women included in the study was 52.8 (10.2) years. Greater visceral (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.39 per SD) and intramuscular (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.34 per SD) adiposity were associated with increased odds of RDI less than 0.85. Greater muscle mass was associated with a decreased odds of hematologic toxic effects (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98 per SD). Relative dose intensity less than 0.85 was associated with a 30% increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.02-1.65). Lower RDI partially explained the association of adiposity with breast cancer-specific mortality (mediation proportion, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05-0.55).

Conclusions and Relevance

Excess adiposity, presenting as larger visceral or intramuscular adiposity, was associated with lower RDI. Lower RDI partially mediated the association of adiposity with worse breast cancer-specific survival. Body composition may help to identify patients likely to experience toxic effects and subsequent dose delays or reductions, which could compromise chemotherapeutic efficacy.

The Prognostic Impact of Body Mass Index in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Some studies on the relation between body mass index (BMI) and outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remain controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of DLBCL in overweight (≥25 to <30 kg/m²), obese (≥30 kg/m²) and underweight (<18.5 kg/m²) individuals compared with normal weight patients (≥18.5 to <25 kg/m²).

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify relevant studies before February 20, 2020. The summary hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for analyzing survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles involving 8,753 subjects were included. The pooled analysis indicated that OS of overweight group (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78-0.95, P = 0.002) was better than of normal weight group, but no association was found in obese patients (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.81-1.53, P = 0.501). Similarly, obese and overweight status had no significant impact on PFS in DLBCL. Underweight patients had poorer OS (HR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.45-2.74, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.12-2.83, P = 0.014) compared with normal weight group.

CONCLUSION

Overweight patients have a better survival than normal weight patients, while underweight patients have a poorer survival in DLBCL.

Differential Benefit of Adjuvant Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Early Breast Cancer According to Baseline Body Mass Index

PURPOSE

Lipophilic drugs, such as taxanes, have a high affinity for adipose tissue and a resulting higher volume of distribution. Here, we reanalyzed clinical trial data to investigate whether the efficacy of docetaxel-based chemotherapy differs from non-docetaxel-based chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer according to their baseline body mass index (BMI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from all of the patients in the adjuvant BIG 2-98 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00174655; N = 2,887) comparing non-docetaxel- to docetaxel-containing chemotherapy. BMI (kg/m²) was categorized as follows: 18.5 to < 25, lean; 25 to < 30, overweight; and ≥ 30, obese. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary endpoint, and overall survival (OS) was the secondary endpoint. A second-order interaction was assessed among treatment, BMI, and estrogen receptor (ER) status.

RESULTS

There was no difference in DFS or OS according to BMI in the non-docetaxel group, while reduced DFS and OS were observed with increasing BMI category in the docetaxel group. Adjusted hazard ratios for DFS and OS were, respectively, 1.12 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.50; P = .21) and 1.27 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.60; P = .04) for overweight versus lean groups and were 1.32 (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.62; P = .007) and 1.63 (95% CI, 1.27 to 2.09; P < .001), respectively, for obese versus lean groups. Similar results were obtained when considering ER-negative and ER-positive tumors separately and when considering only patients who received a relative dose intensity ≥ 85% for docetaxel. A joint modifying role of BMI and ER status on treatment effect was evident for DFS (adjusted P = .06) and OS (adjusted P = .04).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective analysis of a large adjuvant trial highlights a differential response to docetaxel according to BMI, which calls for a body composition-based re-evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio of the use of taxanes in breast cancer. These results now must be confirmed in additional series.

Leukocyte nadir as a predictive factor for efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Results from the prospective trial SBG 2000-1

Background: Retrospective studies have suggested that chemotherapy-induced leukopenia is associated with improved recurrence-free or overall survival. The SBG 2000-1 trial was designed to verify the favorable prognosis associated with chemotherapy-induced leukopenia in early breast cancer. Patients not experiencing chemotherapy-induced leukopenia were randomized into standard dosed or individually escalated chemotherapy doses based on the grade of leukopenia after a first standard dose.Patients and methods: 1452 women in Sweden and Denmark with operable node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer aged 18-60 years were recruited to participate in this trial. Participants received a first FEC cycle at standard doses (600/60/600 mg/m²). Patients (n = 1052) with nadir leukopenia grade 0-2 after the first cycle were randomized between either 6 standard FEC or 6 tailored FEC courses with doses of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide escalated during courses 2 and 3 and thereafter aimed at achieving grade 3 leukopenia. Patients with nadir leukopenia grade 3-4 after the first course continued treatment with standard FEC. Results of the randomized comparison has been published previously. The present study focuses on chemotherapy-induced leukopenia as a covariable with outcome in randomized and non-randomized patients. The prognostic value of leukopenia after course 3, was studied in a Cox model adjusted for cumulative doses of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. The association of chemotherapy-induced leukopenia with prognosis was a preplanned secondary endpoint for this trial.Results: The eight-year distant disease-free survival was 73%, 77%, 78% and 83% for patients with leucocyte nadir grade 0, 1, 2 and 3-4, respectively. Higher degree of leukopenia was highly significantly associated to improved distant disease-free survival (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.96, p = .008) and overall survival (HR 0.87 (0.76-0.99, p = .032).Conclusion: This prospective study confirms that chemotherapy-induced leukopenia is a covariable with outcome in primary breast cancer, even after adjustment for chemotherapy doses.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Drugs in Obese Pediatric Patients: How to Map Uncharted Clinical Territories

Clinicians are increasingly faced with challenges regarding the pharmacological treatment of obese pediatric patients. To provide guidance for these treatments, a better understanding of the impact of obesity on pharmacological processes in children is needed. Results on pharmacological studies in adults show however ambiguous patterns regarding the impact of obesity on ADME processes or on drug pharmacodynamics. Additionally, based on the limited research performed in obese pediatric patients, it becomes clear that findings from obese adults cannot be expected to always translate directly to similar findings in obese children. To improve knowledge on drug pharmacology in obese pediatric patients, studies should focus on quantifying the impact of maturation, obesity, and other relevant variables on primary pharmacological parameters and on disentangling systemic (renal and/or hepatic) and presystemic (gut and/or first-pass hepatic) clearance. For this, data is required from well-designed clinical trials that include patients with not only a wide range in age but also a range in excess body weight, upon oral and intravenous dosing. Population modelling approaches are ideally suitable for this purpose and can also be used to link the pharmacokinetics to pharmacodynamics and to derive drug dosing regimens. Generalizability of research findings can be achieved by including mechanistic aspects in the data analysis, for instance, using either extrapolation approaches in population modelling or by applying physiologically based modelling principles. It is imperative that more and smarter studies are performed in obese pediatric patients to provide safe and effective treatment for this special patient population.

Individualization of Irinotecan Treatment: A Review of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics

Since its clinical introduction in 1998, the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan has been widely used in the treatment of solid tumors, including colorectal, pancreatic, and lung cancer. Irinotecan therapy is characterized by several dose-limiting toxicities and large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. Irinotecan has a highly complex metabolism, including hydrolyzation by carboxylesterases to its active metabolite SN-38, which is 100- to 1000-fold more active compared with irinotecan itself. Several phase I and II enzymes, including cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A, are involved in the formation of inactive metabolites, making its metabolism prone to environmental and genetic influences. Genetic variants in the DNA of these enzymes and transporters could predict a part of the drug-related toxicity and efficacy of treatment, which has been shown in retrospective and prospective trials and meta-analyses. Patient characteristics, lifestyle and comedication also influence irinotecan pharmacokinetics. Other factors, including dietary restriction, are currently being studied. Meanwhile, a more tailored approach to prevent excessive toxicity and optimize efficacy is warranted. This review provides an updated overview on today’s literature on irinotecan pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics.

Pemetrexed exposure predicts toxicity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We explored whether total exposure to pemetrexed predicts effectiveness and toxicity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Furthermore, we investigated alternative dosing schedules.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, patients with advanced NSCLC receiving first- or second-line pemetrexed(/platinum) were enrolled. Plasma sampling was performed weekly (cyclePK) and within 24 h (24hPK) after pemetrexed administration. With population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling, total exposure to pemetrexed during cycle 1 (area under the curve during chemotherapy cycle 1 [AUC₁]) was estimated and related to progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS). We compared mean AUC₁ (mg·h/L) in patients with and without severe chemotherapy-related adverse events (AEs) during total treatment. Second, different dosing schedules were simulated to minimise the estimated variability (coefficient of variation [CV]) of AUC.

RESULTS

For 106 of 165 patients, concentrations of pemetrexed were quantified (24hPK, n = 15; cyclePK, n = 106). After adjusting for prognostic factors, sex, disease stage and World Health Organisation performance score, AUC₁ did not predict PFS/OS in treatment-naive patients (n = 95) (OS, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.11; PFS, HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.98-1.08). Patients with severe chemotherapy-related AEs (n = 55) had significantly higher AUC₁ values than patients without them (n = 51) (226 ± 53 vs 190 ± 31, p < 0.001). Compared with body surface area-based dosing (CV: 22.5%), simulation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)-based dosing (CV 18.5%) and fixed dose of 900 mg with 25% dose reduction, if the eGFR<60 mL/min (CV: 19.1%), resulted in less interindividual variability of AUC.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher exposure to pemetrexed does not increase PFS/OS but is significantly associated with increased occurrence of severe toxicity. Our findings suggest that fixed dosing reduces interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and thereby might prevent toxicity, while preserving effectiveness.

Glucocorticoids dosing in obese subjects: A systematic review

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are amongst the most widely used and effective treatments to control inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. In obese subjects, drug dosing adjusted by body weight is problematic, all the more so as patients are at higher risk of GC metabolic side effects. We propose here to describe the determinants of drug pharmacokinetics (PK) in obese subjects and GC pharmacology, and to identify the existing PK studies that may help discussing the best size descriptor for GC dosing in obese subjects. A clinician and a pharmacist screened PubMed using the MeSH Terms: "glucocorticoids" OR "steroidal agents" AND "pharmacokinetics" AND "obesity" OR "overweight". The search was limited to the publications written in English language and to those performed in humans. A systematic search using the MeSH terms was performed until August 31st, 2017. Only three such PK studies have been published so far that compare dexamethasone, prednisolone and methylprednisolone in obese and normal weight subjects. The studies concur that GC partially distribute in the excess of body weight and that adjustment by total body weight (TBW) or by body weight (BW) excess would increase the initial plasma GC concentration after a loading dose and would thus be inappropriate. Contradictory results are observed regarding GC exposure or clearance according to the GC studied. Behind this overwhelming lack of conclusive evidence for adjusting GC by body weight, further PK studies are clearly needed for guiding their dosing. Furthermore, studies demonstrated an increased sensibility to GC, even when GC exposure was reduced, suggesting that adjustment by body weight may not only be unnecessary but also dangerous.

Toxicity and effectiveness of carboplatin in obese or overweight patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficiency and toxicity of carboplatin using actual body weight in obese/overweight patients using the Calvert formula with Cockcroft-Gault for CrCl estimation.

METHODS

We evaluated the association of BMI in regards to efficiency and toxicity in a retrospective cohort study of patients who started treatment with carboplatin between 2012 and 2013. Cohorts included obese/overweight patients and normal-weight patients. Efficiency was measured by overall survival, progression-free survival and response rate. Toxicity was measured by the proportion of dose reductions and delays of chemotherapy cycles. We utilized a bivariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were included in the study (50% obese/overweight). There was not a statistically significant difference in effectiveness and toxicity between the two groups in BMI. In the multivariate analysis, BMI not was associated with overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.54-1.66, p = 0.849), progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.54-1.54; p = 0.732), cycle delays (odds ratio (OR): 1.47, 95% CI: 0.80-2.69, p = 0.218) or carboplatin dose reductions (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.35-2.15, p = 0.760). Response rate was 53.5% in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, obese and overweight cancer patients did not show a statistically significant difference in terms of effectiveness and toxicity compared to normal-weight cancer patients who were treated with carboplatin using their actual body weight with the Calvert formula and Cockcroft-Gault for CrCl estimation. Therefore, it was appropriate to use the actual body weight for our patients.

Predictors for doxorubicin-induced hematological toxicity and its association with outcome in advanced soft tissue sarcoma patients; a retrospective analysis of the EORTC-soft tissue and bone sarcoma group database

INTRODUCTION

As both anti-tumour effects and toxicity are thought to be dose-dependent, patients with the greatest toxicity may also have the best outcome. We assessed whether severity of doxorubicin-induced hematological toxicity is associated with outcome in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients. In addition, risk factors for hematological toxicity were explored.

METHODS

Worst haematological toxicities (anaemia, leukopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) seen during treatment were scored according to CTCAE toxicity score. Differences in overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR) between patients with or without high haematological toxicity (grades 0-2 vs. 3-4) were assessed using conventional statistical tests. Associations between baseline characteristics and hematological toxicity were established using logistic multivariate regression.

RESULTS

In 557 patients eligible for this analysis, 47.2% of the patients received at least six cycles of treatment; 45% stopped treatment early due to progression, 3% because of toxicity. Relative dose intensity (RDI) was constant over the cycles. OS, PFS, and RR did not differ between patients with grade 3/4 toxicity during treatment versus those with grade 1/2. Risk factors for grade 3/4 haematological toxicity, in particular neutropenia, were age above 60 years, low BMI, and female gender.

CONCLUSION

In this large series, risk factors for haematological toxicity in STS patients receiving doxorubicin monotherapy were revealed. The finding that there was no association between outcome and haematological toxicity during doxorubicin treatment may be useful to reassure advanced STS patients that failure to experience haematological toxicity during treatment does not equate to under-treatment.

Early breast cancer: why does obesity affect prognosis?

High BMI is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in post-menopausal women but poorer outcomes in all age groups. The underlying mechanism is likely to be multi-factorial. Patients with a high BMI may present later due to body habitus. Some studies have also indicated an increased incidence of biologically adverse features, including a higher frequency of oestrogen receptor (ER negative) tumours, in obese patients. Obese patients have a higher frequency of surgical complications, potentially delaying systemic therapies, and reports suggest that chemotherapy and endocrine therapy are less effective in patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2.High BMI is generally interpreted as excess adiposity and a World Cancer Research Fund report judged that the associations between BMI and incidence of breast cancer were due to body fatness. However, BMI cannot distinguish lean mass from fat mass, or characterise body fat distribution. Most chemotherapy drugs are dosed according to calculated body surface area (BSA). Patients with a similar BSA or BMI may have wide variations in their distribution of adipose tissue and skeletal muscle (body composition); however, few studies have looked at the effect of this on chemotherapy tolerance or effectiveness. Finally, adjuvant treatments for breast cancer can themselves result in body composition changes.Research is required to fully understand the biological mechanisms by which obesity influences cancer behaviour and the impact of obesity on treatment effectiveness and tolerance so that specific management strategies can be developed to improve the prognosis of this patient group.

Prognostic significance of leukopenia during the induction phase in adult B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The association between chemotherapy-induced leukopenia and clinical outcome has been reported for several types of cancer. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the association of chemotherapy-induced leukopenia during the induction phase with the clinical outcome of adult B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Fifty-one cases of B-ALL, age ≥14 years, were reviewed. The variables under consideration included age, sex, the initial white blood cell (WBC) count (WBC-0), as well as the WBC counts on days 8 (WBC-8), 15 (WBC-15), and 22 (WBC-22) during induction therapy, early bone marrow responses on day 15 during induction therapy, immunophenotype, and cytogenetics. Univariate analysis revealed that WBC-15 ≥0.40×10⁹/L was significantly associated with inferior event-free survival (EFS) (hazard ratio [HR]=2.95, P=0.004) and overall survival (OS) (HR=2.92, P=0.015). On multivariate analysis, high WBC-15 (≥0.40×10⁹/L) remained an independent prognostic factor for EFS (HR=3.29, P=0.014) and OS (HR=3.29, P=0.038). Our results suggested that WBC-15 may contribute to refinements in the current risk stratification algorithms for adult B-ALL.

Increased body mass index is associated with improved overall survival in extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type

OBJECTIVES

The role of body mass index (BMI) in lymphoma survival outcomes is controversial. The prognostic significance of BMI in extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is unclear. We evaluated the prognostic role of BMI in patients with ENKTL.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 742 patients with newly diagnosed ENKTL. The prognostic value of BMI was compared between patients with low BMIs (< 20.0 kg/m2) and patients with high BMIs (≥ 20.0 kg/m2). The prognostic value of the International Prognostic Index (IPI) and the Korean Prognostic Index (KPI) was also evaluated and compared with that of the BMI classification.

RESULTS

Patients with low BMIs tended to exhibit higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) scores (≥ 2) (P = 0.001), more frequent B symptoms (P < 0.001), lower albumin levels (P < 0.001), higher KPI scores (P = 0.03), and lower rates of complete remission (P < 0.001) than patients with high BMIs, as well as inferior progression-free survival (PFS, P = 0.003), and inferior overall survival (OS, P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age > 60 years, mass > 5 cm, stage III/IV, elevated LDH levels, albumin levels < 35 g/L and low BMIs were independent adverse predictors of OS. The BMI classification was found to be superior to the IPI with respect to predicting patient outcomes among low-risk patients and the KPI with respect to distinguishing between intermediate-low- and high-intermediate-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher BMI at the time of diagnosis is associated with improved overall survival in ENKTL. Using the BMI classification may improve the IPI and KPI prognostic models.

Subcutaneous Fat Distribution is a Prognostic Biomarker for Men with Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

The relationship between body fat distribution and survival remains unclear in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer treated with docetaxel and androgen receptor axis targeted agents. We investigated whether body composition parameters could predict radiographic progression-free and cancer specific survival in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective study we evaluated data on 282 consecutive patients diagnosed with castration resistant prostate cancer between September 2009 and March 2017. The subcutaneous fat index, the visceral fat index and the skeletal muscle index at the diagnosis of castration resistant prostate cancer were determined by computerized tomography data. Survival analyses were performed using the subcutaneous fat, visceral fat and skeletal muscle indexes dichotomized at 39.9, 58 and 52.4 cm²/m², respectively.

RESULTS

At the diagnosis of castration resistant prostate cancer, cancer specific survival was independently predicted using prostate specific antigen levels, Gleason score 8 or greater, performance status, a shorter interval from androgen deprivation therapy to castration resistant prostate cancer and a subcutaneous fat index of less than 39.9 cm²/m². During the median followup of 16.0 months patients with a subcutaneous fat index of 39.9 cm²/m² or greater received more docetaxel cycles than patients with a subcutaneous fat index of less than 39.9 cm²/m². Compared to patients with a subcutaneous fat index of less than 39.9 cm²/m² those with an index of 39.9 cm²/m² or greater had better 1-year progression-free and 2-year cancer specific survival (p = 0.009 and 0.021, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a subcutaneous fat index of 39.9 cm²/m² or greater at the diagnosis of castration resistant prostate cancer showed higher progression-free and cancer specific survival rates than those with a subcutaneous fat index of less 39.9 cm²/m² at diagnosis. The subcutaneous fat index determined by computerized tomography data could serve as a useful objective prognostic factor to discuss patient therapeutic options. Further studies are needed to define the roles of each body composition parameter in relation to pharmacokinetics and oncologic outcome.

The impact of actual body weight-based chemotherapy dosing and body size on adverse events and outcome in older patients with breast cancer: Results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trial 49907 (Alliance A151436)

OBJECTIVE

Actual weight-based (AWB) chemotherapy dosing is recommended for obese patients in the 2012 ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline. CALGB 49907, which utilized ABW-based adjuvant chemotherapy dosing, was a phase 3 trial in women age≥65years with early stage breast cancer, providing the opportunity to examine impact of such dosing on toxicities and outcome in older patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adverse event data were available for 615 of 633 enrolled patients. Objectives were to assess grade≥3 hematologic/non-hematologic toxicities by treatment arm, age, study entry BSA/BMI, and relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) by BSA/BMI.

RESULTS

The 615 patients were sub-grouped by BSA (quartiles) and standard BMI categories, with BMI underweight/normal weight categories combined. Overall, grade≥3 non-hematologic and hematologic toxicities occurred in 39.8% and 28.3% of patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in grade≥3 toxicities among BSA quartiles. However, more grade≥3 hematologic toxicities occurred in the underweight/normal weight BMI subgroup compared to overweight/obese subgroups (p=0.048). Type of chemotherapy and age had no impact on toxicity occurrence by BSA/BMI categories. RFS was superior in the 25th-50th BSA percentile patients in univariate analysis (p=0.042), as was OS in both univariate and multivariate analyses (p=0.007, p=0.009, respectively). No differences in RFS or OS were found by BMI categories.

CONCLUSION

Obesity was not correlated with adverse relapse or survival outcome, and grade≥3 toxicities were not greater with ABW-based dosing. This supports safety and efficacy of ABW-based dosing as per the 2012 ASCO clinical practice guideline. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00024102 (49907).