Outcome of deferred initial therapy in mantle-cell lymphoma

Ibrutinib combined with immunochemotherapy with or without autologous stem-cell transplantation versus immunochemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in previously untreated patients with mantle cell lymphoma (TRIANGLE): a three-arm, randomised, open-label, phase 3 superiority trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network

BACKGROUND

Adding ibrutinib to standard immunochemotherapy might improve outcomes and challenge autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in younger (aged 65 years or younger) mantle cell lymphoma patients. This trial aimed to investigate whether the addition of ibrutinib results in a superior clinical outcome compared with the pre-trial immunochemotherapy standard with ASCT or an ibrutinib-containing treatment without ASCT. We also investigated whether standard treatment with ASCT is superior to a treatment adding ibrutinib but without ASCT.

METHODS

The open-label, randomised, three-arm, parallel-group, superiority TRIANGLE trial was performed in 165 secondary or tertiary clinical centres in 13 European countries and Israel. Patients with previously untreated, stage II-IV mantle cell lymphoma, aged 18-65 years and suitable for ASCT were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to control group A or experimental groups A+I or I, stratified by study group and mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index risk groups. Treatment in group A consisted of six alternating cycles of R-CHOP (intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 0 or 1, intravenous cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 on day 1, intravenous doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, intravenous vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 on day 1, and oral prednisone 100 mg on days 1-5) and R-DHAP (or R-DHAOx, intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 0 or 1, intravenous or oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, intravenous cytarabine 2 × 2 g/m2 for 3 h every 12 h on day 2, and intravenous cisplatin 100 mg/m2 over 24 h on day 1 or alternatively intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1) followed by ASCT. In group A+I, ibrutinib (560 mg orally each day) was added on days 1-19 of R-CHOP cycles and as fixed-duration maintenance (560 mg orally each day for 2 years) after ASCT. In group I, ibrutinib was given the same way as in group A+I, but ASCT was omitted. Three pairwise one-sided log-rank tests for the primary outcome of failure-free survival were statistically monitored. The primary analysis was done by intention-to-treat. Adverse events were evaluated by treatment period among patients who started the respective treatment. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02858258.

FINDINGS

Between July 29, 2016 and Dec 28, 2020, 870 patients (662 men, 208 women) were randomly assigned to group A (n=288), group A+I (n=292), and group I (n=290). After 31 months median follow-up, group A+I was superior to group A with 3-year failure-free survival of 88% (95% CI 84-92) versus 72% (67-79; hazard ratio 0·52 [one-sided 98·3% CI 0-0·86]; one-sided p=0·0008). Superiority of group A over group I was not shown with 3-year failure-free survival 72% (67-79) versus 86% (82-91; hazard ratio 1·77 [one-sided 98·3% CI 0-3·76]; one-sided p=0·9979). The comparison of group A+I versus group I is ongoing. There were no relevant differences in grade 3-5 adverse events during induction or ASCT between patients treated with R-CHOP/R-DHAP or ibrutinib combined with R-CHOP/R-DHAP. During maintenance or follow-up, substantially more grade 3-5 haematological adverse events and infections were reported after ASCT plus ibrutinib (group A+I; haematological: 114 [50%] of 231 patients; infections: 58 [25%] of 231; fatal infections: two [1%] of 231) compared with ibrutinib only (group I; haematological: 74 [28%] of 269; infections: 52 [19%] of 269; fatal infections: two [1%] of 269) or after ASCT (group A; haematological: 51 [21%] of 238; infections: 32 [13%] of 238; fatal infections: three [1%] of 238).

INTERPRETATION

Adding ibrutinib to first-line treatment resulted in superior efficacy in younger mantle cell lymphoma patients with increased toxicity when given after ASCT. Adding ibrutinib during induction and as maintenance should be part of first-line treatment of younger mantle cell lymphoma patients. Whether ASCT adds to an ibrutinib-containing regimen is not yet determined.

FUNDING

Janssen and Leukemia & Lymphoma Society.

Adequacy of clinical guideline recommendations for patients with low-risk cancer managed with monitoring: systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to summarize national and international guidelines that made recommendations for monitoring patients diagnosed with low-risk cancer. It appraised the quality of guidelines and determined whether the guidelines adequately identified patients for monitoring, specified which tests to use, defined monitoring intervals, and stated triggers for further intervention. It then assessed the evidence to support each recommendation.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses, we searched PubMed and Turning Research into Practice databases for national and international guidelines' that were written in English and developed or updated between 2012 and 2023. Quality of individual guidelines was assessed using the AGREE II tool.

RESULTS

Across the 41 published guidelines, 48 different recommendations were identified: 15 (31%) for prostate cancer, 11 (23%) for renal cancer, 6 (12.5%) for thyroid cancer, and 10 (21%) for blood cancer. The remaining 6 (12.5%) were for brain, gastrointestinal, oral cavity, bone and pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma cancer. When combining all guidelines, 48 (100%) stated which patients qualify for monitoring, 31 (65%) specified which tests to use, 25 (52%) provided recommendations for surveillance intervals, and 23 (48%) outlined triggers to initiate intervention. Across all cancer sites, there was a strong positive trend with higher levels of evidence being associated with an increased likelihood of a recommendation being specific (P = 0.001) and the evidence for intervals was based on expert opinion or other guidance.

CONCLUSION

With the exception of prostate cancer, the evidence base for monitoring low-risk cancer is weak and consequently recommendations in clinical guidelines are inconsistent. There is a lack of direct evidence to support monitoring recommendations in the literature making guideline developers reliant on expert opinion, alternative guidelines, or indirect or nonspecific evidence.

Epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic profiles of mantle cell lymphoma cared for in a Moroccan center: a review of 14 cases

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) accounts for 3-10% of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). We identified 14 patients with mantle cell lymphoma, with an average number of 3.5 new cases/year. A male predominance was observed with a sex ratio equal to 6. The average age of our patients was 64.4±14.1 years, with an average diagnostic delay of 6.57 months. Regarding the clinical presentation, adenopathy was the most reported physical sign (78.6%) followed by B symptoms (57.1%). Disseminated stages were the most frequent in our series: stages IV (78.5%) and III (7.1%) versus stages I (0%) and II (7.1%). The extra-ganglionic localizations observed were hepatic 5 cases (31.1%), pulmonary 04 cases (25%), medullary 4 cases (25%), pleural 2 cases (12.5%) and prostate 1 case (6.2%). All diagnosed cases are mantle cell lymphomas, of which 12 cases (85.7%) are classical and 2 cases (14.3%) indolent. The high-risk group is, according to international prognostic index (MIPI) MCL prognostic score, the most represented in our series: 0-3 = 6 cases (42.9%), 6-11 = 8 cases (57.1%). The therapeutic protocol chosen 1st line: 9 patients treated with R-DHAP, three with R-CHOP, one with DHAOX and one with R-CVP. Second line: two patients treated with R-DHAP, one after R-CHOP and the other after R-CVP. Two patients received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant at the end of the treatment. The evolution was marked by the death of 7 patients, 3 lost to follow-up and 4 still followed. Additionally, the study highlights characteristics and treatment patterns of mantle cell lymphoma, emphasizing its predominance in males, delayed diagnosis, frequent dissemination, and high-risk classification, with chemotherapy as the primary treatment modality and a challenging prognosis contributing to a comprehensive understanding of mantle cell lymphoma presentation and management.

Novel treatment for mantle cell lymphoma - impact of BTK inhibitors and beyond

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) primarily affects older adults, accounting for 3-10% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in western countries. The disease course of MCL is heterogenous; driven by clinical, cytogenetics, and molecular features that shape differences in outcomes, including proliferation index, MIPI scores, and mutational profile such as TP53 aberration. The advent of novel agents has fundamentally evolved the treatment landscape for MCL with treatment strategies that can now be more effectively tailored based on both patient- and disease-specific factors. In this review, we discuss the major classes of novel agents used for the treatment of MCL, focusing on efficacy and notable toxicities of BTK inhibitors. We further examine effective novel combination regimens and, lastly, discuss future directions for the evolution of targeted approaches for the treatment of MCL.

Recent advances in genomics and therapeutics in mantle cell lymphoma

Over the past decades, significant strides have been made in understanding the pathobiology, prognosis, and treatment options for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The heterogeneity observed in MCL's biology, genomics, and clinical manifestations, including indolent and aggressive forms, is intricately linked to factors such as the mutational status of the variable region of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene, epigenetic profiling, and Sox11 expression. Several intriguing subtypes of MCL, such as Cyclin D1-negative MCL, in situ mantle cell neoplasm, CCND1/IGH FISH-negative MCL, and the impact of karyotypic complexity on prognosis, have been explored. Notably, recent immunochemotherapy regimens have yielded long-lasting remissions in select patients. The therapeutic landscape for MCL is continuously evolving, with a shift towards nonchemotherapeutic agents like ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and venetoclax. The introduction of BTK inhibitors has brought about a transformative change in MCL treatment. Nevertheless, the challenge of resistance to BTK inhibitors persists, prompting ongoing efforts to discover strategies for overcoming this resistance. These strategies encompass non-covalent BTK inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, BCL2 inhibitors, and CAR-T cell therapy, either as standalone treatments or in combination regimens. Furthermore, developing novel drugs holds promise for further improving the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. In this comprehensive review, we methodically encapsulate MCL's clinical and pathological attributes and the factors influencing prognosis. We also undertake an in-depth examination of stratified treatment alternatives. We investigate conceivable resistance mechanisms in MCL from a genetic standpoint and offer precise insights into various therapeutic approaches for relapsed or refractory MCL.

Assessing unmet need among elderly Medicare Beneficiaries with Mantle cell lymphoma: an analysis of treatment patterns, survival, healthcare resource utilization, and costs

Studies evaluating real-world outcomes and health care utilization for mantle cell lymphoma are limited. We utilized national Medicare claims (2009-2019) to examine treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, costs, and survival in 3664 elderly patients receiving 1 L treatment for MCL. Over a median follow-up of 2.8 years, 40.3% received at least 2 L treatment. The most common 1 L regimen was bendamustine-rituximab (50.1%), with increased use of BTKi-based regimens observed in 2 L (39.4%). Half (51.8%) of patients had an all-cause hospitalization within 12 months of initiating 1 L; hospitalization rates were higher in later lines. Healthcare costs were substantial and most costs (>80%) were MCL-related. Overall survival was poorer among later lines of treatment (median OS from initiation of 1 L: 53.5 months; 2 L: 22.0 months; 3 L: 11.8 months; 4 L: 7.8 months). These results suggest a large unmet need and future work should evaluate whether novel therapies have improved outcomes among elderly patients with MCL.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Tailoring Upfront Therapy in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

In this article, we will review current strategies for the front-line management of mantle cell lymphoma, an uncommon and biologically and clinically heterogeneous subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that remains incurable with current therapies. Patients invariably relapse with time, and as a result, treatment strategies involve persistent therapy over the course of months to years, including induction, consolidation, and maintenance. Topics discussed include the historical development of various chemoimmunotherapy backbones with continued modifications to maintain and improve efficacy while limiting off-target, off-tumor effects. Chemotherapy-free induction regimens were developed initially for elderly or less fit patients though are now being utilized for younger, transplant-eligible patients due to deeper, more prolonged remission durations with fewer toxicities. The historic paradigm of recommending autologous hematopoietic cell transplant for fit patients in complete or partial remission is now being challenged based in part on ongoing clinical trials in which minimal residual disease directed approaches influence the consolidation strategy for any particular individual. The addition of novel agents, namely first and second generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors as well as immunomodulatory drugs, BH3 mimetics, and type II glycoengineered anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have been tested in various combinations with or without immunochemotherapy. We will attempt to help the reader by systematically explaining and simplifying the various approaches for treating this complicated group of disorders.

Treatment of older patients with mantle cell lymphoma in the era of novel agents

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with a highly heterogeneous presentation that ranges from an indolent disease to an extremely aggressive one. Several clinical and biological prognostic markers can assist in determining the aggressiveness of the disease. Such as MIPI, Ki-67, and TP53, NOTCH1, and CDKN2A mutations. While aggressive chemoimmunotherapy regimens combining rituximab and cytarabine, followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation yield the most promising results, this treatment is too toxic for older patients. Several lower-intensity regimens have shown efficacy in older patients with reduced toxicity profiles. However, older relapsed/refractory patients have an extremely poor outcome. In the last several years, there is a major trend toward chemotherapy-free regimens, targeted therapies such as BTK, BCL-2 and PI3K inhibitors, and immunotherapies such as lenalidomide and CAR-T, which can provide a promising strategy for older patients. Herein we review the current therapies for older MCL patients, chemotherapy regimens, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies.

Adding venetoclax to lenalidomide and rituximab is safe and effective in patients with untreated mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, incurable hematological malignancy with a heterogeneous presentation and clinical course. A wide variety of chemotherapy-based regimens are currently used in patients who are untreated. Over the last several years, several targeted or small-molecule therapies have shown efficacy in the relapsed/refractory setting and have since been explored in the frontline setting. Lenalidomide plus rituximab was explored in a phase 2 study of 38 patients with MCL who were untreated and ineligible to receive transplantation, in which the combination produced durable remissions. We looked to build upon this regimen by adding venetoclax to the combination. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, single-arm study to evaluate this combination. We enrolled 28 unselected patients with untreated disease irrespective of age, fitness, or risk factors. Lenalidomide was dosed at 20 mg daily from days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle. The dose of venetoclax was determined using the time-to-event continual reassessment method. Rituximab was dosed at 375 mg/m2 weekly, starting on cycle 1, day 1 until cycle 2, day 1. No dose-limiting toxicities were noted. All patients were treated with venetoclax at the maximum tolerated dose of 400 mg daily. The most common adverse events were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The overall and complete response rates were 96% and 86%, respectively. In total, 86% of patients achieved minimal residual disease undetectability via next-generation sequencing. The median overall and progression-free survivals were not reached. The combination of lenalidomide, rituximab, and venetoclax is a safe and effective regimen in patients with untreated MCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03523975.

Impact of diagnosis to treatment interval in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma

The prognostic relevance of diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is unknown. Hence, we sought to evaluate the impact of DTI on outcomes in MCL using 3 large datasets (1) the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Specialized Program of Research Excellence Molecular Epidemiology Resource, (2) patients enrolled in the ALL Age Asthma Cohort/CALGB 50403, and (3) a multisitecohort of patients with MCL. Patients were a priori divided into 2 groups, 0 to 14 days (short DTI) and 15 to 60 days (long DTI). The patients in whom observation was deemed appropriate were excluded. One thousand ninety-seven patients newly diagnosed with MCL and available DTI were included in the study. The majority (73%) had long DTI (n=797). Patients with short DTI had worse eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS ≥2), higher lactate dehydrogenase, bone marrow involvement, more frequent B symptoms, higher MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI ≥6.2), and were less likely to receive intensive induction therapy than long DTI group. The median progression-free survival (2.5 years vs 4.8 years, p<0.0001) and overall survival (7.8 years vs. 11.8 years, p<0.0001) were significantly inferior in the short DTI group than the long DTI cohort and remained significant for progression-free survival and overall survival in multivariable analysis. We show that the DTI is an important prognostic factor in patients newly diagnosed with MCL and is strongly associated with adverse clinical factors and poor outcomes. DTI should be reported in all the patients newly diagnosed with MCL who are enrolling in clinical trials and steps must be taken to ensure selection bias is avoided.

Estimating the Associated Burden of Illness and Healthcare Utilization of Newly Diagnosed Patients Aged ≥65 with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) in Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND

With the emergence of therapies for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), understanding the treatment patterns and burden of illness among older patients with MCL in Canada is essential to inform decision making.

METHODS

A retrospective study using administrative data matched individuals aged ≥65 who were newly diagnosed with MCL between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2016 with general population controls. Cases were followed for up to 3 years in order to assess healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), healthcare costs, time to next treatment or death (TTNTD), and overall survival (OS); all were stratified according to first-line treatment.

RESULTS

This study matched 159 MCL patients to 636 controls. Direct healthcare costs were highest among MCL patients in the first year following diagnosis (Y1: CAD 77,555 ± 40,789), decreased subsequently (Y2: CAD 40,093 ± 28,720; Y3: CAD 36,059 ± 36,303), and were consistently higher than the costs for controls. The 3-year OS after MCL diagnosis was 68.6%, with patients receiving bendamustine + rituximab (BR) experiencing a significantly higher OS compared to patients treated with other regimens (72.4% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.041). Approximately 40.9% of MCL patients initiated a second-line therapy or died within 3 years.

CONCLUSION

Newly diagnosed MCL presents a substantial burden to the healthcare system, with almost half of all patients progressing to a second-line therapy or death within 3 years.

Mantle cell lymphoma-Update on molecular biology, prognostication and treatment approaches

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is clinically characterized by its heterogenous behavior with courses ranging from indolent cases that do not require therapy for years to highly aggressive MCL with very limited prognosis. The development and implementation of new targeted and immunotherapeutic approaches have already improved therapeutic options especially for refractory or relapsed disease. Nevertheless, to further optimize MCL treatment, early identification of individual risk profile and risk-adapted, patient-tailored choice of therapeutic strategy needs to be prospectively incorporated in clinical patient management. This review summarizes the current knowledge and standard of care regarding biology and clinical management of MCL, highlighting the implementation of new therapeutic approaches especially targeting the immune system.

How I manage mantle cell lymphoma: indolent versus aggressive disease

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a mature B-cell lymphoma with a variable clinical course and historically poor prognosis. Management is challenging in part due to the heterogeneity of the disease course, with indolent and aggressive subtypes now well recognised. Indolent MCL is often characterised by a leukaemic presentation, SOX11 negativity and low proliferation index (Ki-67). Aggressive MCL is characterised by rapid onset widespread lymphadenopathy, extra-nodal involvement, blastoid or pleomorphic histology and high Ki-67. Tumour protein p53 (TP53) aberrations in aggressive MCL are recognised with clear negative impact on survival. Until recently, trials have not addressed these specific subtypes separately. With the increasing availability of targeted novel agents and cellular therapies, the treatment landscape is constantly evolving. In this review, we describe the clinical presentation, biological factors, and specific management considerations of both indolent and aggressive MCL and discuss current and potential future evidence which may help move to a more personalised approach.

Personalized approaches for treatment-naïve mantle cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) can have diverse disease presentations, which vary in aggressiveness and prognosis, and can occur in patients with varying ability to tolerate therapy. Additionally, the options for treatment of MCL have expanded rapidly in the last decade, translating to improved outcome for patients.

AREAS COVERED

We review the initial evaluation of patients with MCL, identifying disease- and patient-specific prognostic factors, along with personalized therapies for patients with MCL. Specific scenarios include indolent and limited-stage MCL, advanced-stage disease in transplant-eligible and ineligible patients, and high-risk TP53 mutant disease. Ongoing trials and future directions in MCL treatment are also highlighted.

EXPERT OPINION

Given the wide array of disease and patient presentations with MCL, a personalized therapeutic approach is needed to optimize outcomes. The best therapeutic strategy should incorporate disease prognostic factors, patient status and comorbidities, goals of care, and response to treatment.

Molecular Monitoring of Lymphomas

Molecular monitoring of tumor-derived alterations has an established role in the surveillance of leukemias, and emerging nucleic acid sequencing technologies are likely to similarly transform the clinical management of lymphomas. Lymphomas are well suited for molecular surveillance due to relatively high cell-free DNA and circulating tumor DNA concentrations, high somatic mutational burden, and the existence of stereotyped variants enabling focused interrogation of recurrently altered regions. Here, we review the clinical scenarios and key technologies applicable for the molecular monitoring of lymphomas, summarizing current evidence in the literature regarding molecular subtyping and classification, evaluation of treatment response, the surveillance of active cellular therapies, and emerging clinical trial strategies.

Bendamustine in combination with ofatumumab as first line treatment for elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma: a phase II risk-adapted design

This study evaluated ofatumumab (Ofa), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, alone or with bendamustine (Benda), in transplant-ineligible patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Low-risk patients received Ofa monotherapy. Non-responders received subsequent treatment with Benda-Ofa. Six patients received Ofa monotherapy and 3 patients crossed over to Bend-Ofa. Twenty-four high-risk patients were initially treated with Benda-Ofa. The overall response rate for patients treated with Ofa monotherapy was 1/6 (17%) and 23/25 (92%) for patients treated with Benda-Ofa. With a median follow-up of 8.6 years, all Ofa patients progressed with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 0.6 years (95% CI 0.31-NR) and remain alive. With a median follow-up of 6.3 years, Bend-Ofa treated patients had median PFS 2.5 years (95% CI 1.8-NR) and a median overall survival of 7.4 years (95% CI 5.8-NR). Benda-Ofa had a favorable adverse event profile and efficacy similar, but not clearly superior, to those reported for Benda-Rituximab.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Managing Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma i.e., incurable with current therapies. While some patients experience prolonged remissions following initial therapy, most will have a relapsing-remitting course requiring several lines of treatment over the course of their disease. Several targeted therapies are now available to treat patients with relapsed MCL. The Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, including ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib, are highly active in MCL and currently approved for treating patients with relapsed disease. Bortezomib and lenalidomide are available as monotherapy or in combination with other agents. Venetoclax is active and can be considered for use in relapsed MCL, although it is not currently approved by regulatory agencies. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy with brexucabtagene autoleucel yields high response rates and is now approved for patients with relapsed MCL. Allogeneic stem cell transplant remains an option for a small subset of medically fit and motivated patients who have progressed through multiple lines of therapy, although its use is limited by substantial toxicity. There is currently no standard approach to sequencing therapies for patients with relapsed MCL, and the ability to utilize disease biologic and clinical characteristics to guide treatment decisions in this setting remains limited. In this review, we summarize the current evidence to guide the management of patients with relapsed MCL, review emerging agents and combination therapies that are under investigation, and outline our current treatment approach for these patients.

Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma in the Frontline Setting: Are We Ready for a Risk-Adapted Approach?

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), a type of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by the t(11;14)(q13q32) translocation, is a clinically heterogenous disease which can range from indolent to highly aggressive. Numerous prognostic factors have been identified, including blastoid histology, the Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) score, high proliferation index, p53 deletions and/or mutations, complex karyotype, minimal residual disease, and several others. However, using these prognostic factors to guide treatment selection has largely remained elusive. Given the heterogeneous behavior of this disease and varying patient characteristics, we suggest that the time has come for a more risk-adapted approach to this disease. In this article, we review the numerous prognostic factors that have been described for MCL, both at the time of diagnosis and following first-line treatment. We then propose a risk-adapted approach to first-line therapy for MCL, which would reserve intensive therapy for the highest risk patients and spare others excessive toxicity.

New Directions for Mantle Cell Lymphoma in 2022

Mantle cell lymphoma is a rare B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is clinically and biologically heterogeneous. Risk stratification at the time of diagnosis is critical. One of the most powerful prognostic indices is the Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index-Combined, which integrates an estimate of proliferation (Ki67 index) with the standard Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index clinical factors. In addition, the presence of TP53 mutation is associated with suboptimal response to intensive chemoimmunotherapy and particularly dismal survival outcomes. Given their excellent activity in the relapsed/refractory setting, increasingly, biologically targeted therapeutics-such as covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, lenalidomide, and venetoclax-are being incorporated into "chemotherapy-free" regimens and in combination with established chemoimmunotherapy backbones for treatment-naïve mantle cell lymphoma. In addition, risk-adapted treatment programs are increasingly being studied. These programs tailor treatment according to baseline prognostic factors (e.g., presence of TP53 mutation) and may incorporate biomarkers of response such as minimal residual disease assessment. Although still investigational, these studies present an opportunity to move beyond the biology-agnostic, historical fitness-based treatment selection paradigm and toward a more personalized, tailored treatment approach in mantle cell lymphoma. After Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor failure, many promising standard or investigational therapies exist, including CAR T-cell therapy (including brexucabtagene autoleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel), bispecific antibody therapy targeting CD20-CD3, zilovertamab vedotin (an antibody-drug conjugate that targets ROR1), and the noncovalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor pirtobrutinib. These new therapies show promising efficacy, even among high-risk patients, and will likely translate to improvements in survival outcomes for patients with progressive mantle cell lymphoma following treatment with a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Mantle cell lymphoma in 2022-A comprehensive update on molecular pathogenesis, risk stratification, clinical approach, and current and novel treatments

The field of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has witnessed remarkable progress due to relentless advances in molecular pathogenesis, prognostication, and newer treatments. MCL consists of a spectrum of clinical subtypes. Rarely, atypical cyclin D1-negative MCL and in situ MCL neoplasia are identified. Prognostication of MCL is further refined by identifying somatic mutations (such as TP53, NSD2, KMT2D), methylation status, chromatin organization pattern, SOX-11 expression, minimal residual disease (MRD), and genomic clusters. Lymphoid tissue microenvironment studies demonstrated the role of B-cell receptor signaling, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB), colony-stimulating factor (CSF)-1, the CD70-SOX-11 axis. Molecular mechanism of resistance, mutation dynamics, and pathogenic pathways (B-cell receptor (BCR), oxidative phosphorylation, and MYC) were identified in mediating resistance to various treatments (bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors [ibrutinib, acalabrutinib]. Treatment options range from conventional chemoimmunotherapy and stem cell transplantation (SCT) to targeted therapies against BTK (covalent and noncovalent), Bcl2, ROR1, cellular therapy such as anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor therapy (CAR-T), and most recently bispecific antibodies against CD19 and CD20. MCL patients frequently relapse. Complex pathogenesis and the management of patients with progression after treatment with BTK/Bcl2 inhibitors and CAR-T (triple-resistant MCL) remain a challenge. Next-generation clinical trials incorporating newer agents and concurrent translational and molecular investigations are ongoing.

Deep Neural Networks and Machine Learning Radiomics Modelling for Prediction of Relapse in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Simple Summary

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive lymphoid tumour with a poor prognosis. There exist no routine biomarkers for the early prediction of relapse. Our study compared the potential of radiomics-based machine learning and 3D deep learning models as non-invasive biomarkers to risk-stratify MCL patients, thus promoting precision imaging in clinical oncology.

Abstract

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare lymphoid malignancy with a poor prognosis characterised by frequent relapse and short durations of treatment response. Most patients present with aggressive disease, but there exist indolent subtypes without the need for immediate intervention. The very heterogeneous behaviour of MCL is genetically characterised by the translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32), leading to Cyclin D1 overexpression with distinct clinical and biological characteristics and outcomes. There is still an unfulfilled need for precise MCL prognostication in real-time. Machine learning and deep learning neural networks are rapidly advancing technologies with promising results in numerous fields of application. This study develops and compares the performance of deep learning (DL) algorithms and radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models to predict MCL relapse on baseline CT scans. Five classification algorithms were used, including three deep learning models (3D SEResNet50, 3D DenseNet, and an optimised 3D CNN) and two machine learning models based on K-nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Random Forest (RF). The best performing method, our optimised 3D CNN, predicted MCL relapse with a 70% accuracy, better than the 3D SEResNet50 (62%) and the 3D DenseNet (59%). The second-best performing method was the KNN-based machine learning model (64%) after principal component analysis for improved accuracy. Our optimised CNN developed by ourselves correctly predicted MCL relapse in 70% of the patients on baseline CT imaging. Once prospectively tested in clinical trials with a larger sample size, our proposed 3D deep learning model could facilitate clinical management by precision imaging in MCL.

Evolving frontline immunochemotherapy for mantle cell lymphoma and the impact on survival outcomes

Because there have been a dvances in frontline treatment for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) over the last 2 decades, we sought to characterize the changes in frontline treatment patterns and their association with outcomes. Patients with newly diagnosed MCL from September 2002 through June 2015 were enrolled in a prospective cohort study, and clinical characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes were compared between patients diagnosed from 2002 to 2009 (Era 1) compared with 2010 to 2015 (Era 2). Patient age, sex, and simplified MCL International Prognostic Index (sMIPI) score were similar between the 2 groups. In patients age 65 years or younger, there was less use of rituximab plus hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (R-Hyper-CVAD) (16.1% vs 8.8%) but more use of rituximab plus maximum-strength cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-maxi-CHOP) alternating with rituximab plus high-dose cytarabine (R-HiDAC), also known as the Nordic regimen, and R-CHOP alternating with rituximab plus dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin (R-DHAP) (1.1% vs 26.4%) and less use of R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens (64.5% vs 35.2%) but more use of R-bendamustine (0% vs 12.1%) in Era 2 (P < .001). These changes were associated with improved event-free survival (EFS; 5-year EFS, 34.3% vs 50.0%; P = .010) and overall survival (OS; 5-year OS, 68.8% vs 81.6%; P = .017) in Era 2. In patients older than age 65 years, there was less use of R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like therapy (39.0% vs 14.3%) and nonstandard systemic therapy (36.6% vs 13.0%) but more use of R-bendamustine (0% vs 49.4%). These changes were associated with a trend for improved EFS (5-year EFS, 25.4% vs 37.5%; P = .051) in Era 2. The shift from R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens to R-bendamustine was associated with improved EFS (5-year EFS, 25.0% vs 44.6%; P = .008) in Era 2. Results from this prospective cohort study provide critical real-world evidence for improved outcomes with evolving frontline patterns of care in patients with MCL.

Circulating Tumor DNA Predicts Therapeutic Outcome in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Early changes in ctDNA dynamics are prognostic in untreated MCL.

Bortezomib maintenance after bortezomib-based induction therapy does not improve outcome in untreated MCL.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is biologically and clinically heterogeneous and would benefit from prognostic biomarkers to guide management. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a novel prognostic biomarker in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that may have applicability in MCL. We analyzed ctDNA dynamics in previously untreated patients with MCL who received induction therapy with bortezomib and DA-EPOCH-R for 6 cycles followed by random assignment to observation or bortezomib maintenance in responding patients in a prospective phase 2 study. Most patients also underwent initial treatment window of bortezomib alone prior to induction. Serum was collected pretreatment, after the window, after cycles 1 and 2, at the end of induction, and at each follow-up visit along with restaging computed tomography scans. Next-generation sequencing was used to identify and quantify ctDNA encoding the immunoglobulin receptor sequences in serum as markers of minimal residual disease. Fifty-three patients were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 12.7 years. Patients without detectable ctDNA after 2 cycles of induction had longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those with detectable ctDNA (median PFS, 2.7 vs 1.8 years; overall P = .005; median OS, 13.8 vs 7.4 years; overall P = .03). Notably, in vivo assessment of ctDNA dynamics during the bortezomib window was not prognostic, and there was no difference in PFS or OS with bortezomib maintenance. ctDNA monitoring after induction showed that molecular relapse preceded clinical relapse in some cases. In conclusion, interim ctDNA negativity strongly correlates with improved survival and supports the investigation of response-adapted strategies. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00114738.

Genomic and transcriptomic profiling reveals distinct molecular subsets associated with outcomes in mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a phenotypically and genetically heterogeneous malignancy in which the genetic alterations determining clinical indications are not fully understood. Here, we performed a comprehensive whole-exome sequencing analysis of 152 primary samples derived from 134 MCL patients, including longitudinal samples from 16 patients and matched RNA-Seq data from 48 samples. We classified MCL into 4 robust clusters (C1-C4). C1 featured mutated immunoglobulin heavy variable (IGHV), CCND1 mutation, amp(11q13), and active B cell receptor (BCR) signaling. C2 was enriched with del(11q)/ATM mutations and upregulation of NF-κB and DNA repair pathways. C3 was characterized by mutations in SP140, NOTCH1, and NSD2, with downregulation of BCR signaling and MYC targets. C4 harbored del(17p)/TP53 mutations, del(13q), and del(9p), and active MYC pathway and hyperproliferation signatures. Patients in these 4 clusters had distinct outcomes (5-year overall survival [OS] rates for C1-C4 were 100%, 56.7%, 48.7%, and 14.2%, respectively). We also inferred the temporal order of genetic events and studied clonal evolution of 16 patients before treatment and at progression/relapse. Eleven of these samples showed drastic clonal evolution that was associated with inferior survival, while the other samples showed modest or no evolution. Our study thus identifies genetic subsets that clinically define this malignancy and delineates clonal evolution patterns and their impact on clinical outcomes.

Ibrutinib in Combination With Rituximab for Indolent Clinical Forms of Mantle Cell Lymphoma (IMCL-2015): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial

The need for an individualized management of indolent clinical forms in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is increasingly recognized. We hypothesized that a tailored treatment with ibrutinib in combination with rituximab (IR) could obtain significant responses in these patients.

CAR T-cell therapy for B-cell lymphoma

Chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting CD19 has revolutionized the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas. Based on unprecedented response rates and durability of response in high risk B-cell lymphoma patients, anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy was rapidly approved by the FDA for a variety of lymphoma subtypes. Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy is now considered standard of care for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) aggressive non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) after 2 or more lines of therapy. Three second-generation anti-CD19 CAR T-cell products have been FDA approved for R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma and FDA approval has been obtained for Mantle Cell Lymphoma and Follicular lymphoma as well. This has ensured broad access to CAR T-cell therapy for patients with NHL and new real-world trials have helped confirm feasibility of CAR T-cell therapy for a broad patient population. The emergence of CAR T-cell therapy will likely provide a new patient population who is status post anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy. Investigation of mechanisms of failure of CAR T-cell therapy and clinical trials to study strategies to address this are thus required. Here we provide a thorough review on the use of the FDA approved anti-CD19 CAR T-cell products axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel in patients with indolent or aggressive B-cell lymphoma, and touch on mechanisms of failure of CAR T-cell therapy and potential approaches which are currently under investigation to address this.

Sequencing of Novel Therapies for Mantle Cell Lymphoma

OPINION STATEMENT

There is no standard approach to sequencing novel therapies in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). For initial treatment, intensive induction chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant and rituximab maintenance remains our preferred approach in young, fit patients. We consider bendamustine plus rituximab or lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy-based approaches. Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors are our preferred class of agents to use in the second-line setting. When patients inevitably relapse on one of these agents, we proceed with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy in eligible patients, often with the use of bridging therapy with corticosteroids, lenalidomide, or venetoclax. We treat patients who are ineligible for CAR T or clinic trial with venetoclax, lenalidomide, or proteosome inhibitor-based regimens, although efficacy is expected to be limited in this setting with a shortened duration of response to each subsequent line of therapy. Allogeneic stem cell transplant remains an option for carefully selected patients who progress after autologous stem cell transplant and CAR T. Clinical trials involving combinations of novel agents in early lines of therapy are ongoing, and new compounds with unique mechanisms of action are in development. The results of ongoing clinical trials with novel agents will further change the treatment landscape for patients with MCL in the coming years.

CD5-negative mantle cell lymphoma: clinicopathologic features of an indolent variant that confers a survival advantage

Conventionally, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive CD5-positive B-cell malignancy with poor prognosis and limited survival. However, a small subset of patients presents with indolent disease and can be managed on a 'watch and wait' approach. CD5-negative MCL has recently been recognized as a more favorable variant of MCL, but its clinical and biological implications remain ill-defined. We performed the most extensive review to-date of all reported cases of CD5-negative MCL and included unpublished cases diagnosed at our institutions to further characterize this disease subset. Based on our analysis of 356 cases of CD5-negative MCL, we conclude that median overall survival exceeds 14 years and is independent of favorable prognostic markers such as leukemic non-nodal disease, absence of SOX11, and low Ki-67.

American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Center of International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, and European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Clinical Practice Recommendations for Transplantation and Cellular Therapies in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Autologous (auto-) and allogeneic (allo-) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are accepted treatment modalities in contemporary treatment algorithms for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy recently received approval for MCL; however, its exact place and sequence in relation to HCT remain unclear. The American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, Center of International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation jointly convened an expert panel to formulate consensus recommendations for role, timing, and sequencing of auto-HCT, allo-HCT, and CAR T cell therapy for patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL. The RAND-modified Delphi method was used to generate consensus statements. Seventeen consensus statements were generated, with a few key statements as follows: in the first line setting, auto-HCT consolidation represents standard of care in eligible patients, whereas there is no clear role of allo-HCT or CAR T cell therapy outside of clinical trials. In the R/R setting, the preferential option is CAR T cell therapy, especially in patients with MCL failing or intolerant to at least one Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, while allo-HCT is recommended if CAR T cell therapy fails or is infeasible. Several recommendations were based on expert opinion, where the panel developed consensus statements for important real-world clinical scenarios to guide clinical practice. In the absence of contemporary evidence-based data, the panel found RAND-modified Delphi methodology effective in providing a formal framework for developing consensus recommendations for the timing and sequence of cellular therapies for MCL.

ASTCT, CIBMTR, and EBMT clinical practice recommendations for transplant and cellular therapies in mantle cell lymphoma

Autologous (auto-) or allogeneic (allo-) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are accepted treatment modalities for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Recently, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy received approval for MCL; however, its exact place and sequence in relation to HCT is unclear. The ASTCT, CIBMTR, and the EBMT, jointly convened an expert panel to formulate consensus recommendations for role, timing, and sequencing of auto-, allo-HCT, and CAR T-cell therapy for patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL. The RAND-modified Delphi method was used to generate consensus statements. Seventeen consensus statements were generated; in the first-line setting auto-HCT consolidation represents standard-of-care in eligible patients, whereas there is no clear role of allo-HCT or CAR T-cell therapy, outside of a clinical trial. In the R/R setting, the preferential option is CAR T-cell therapy especially in MCL failing or intolerant to at least one Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, while allo-HCT is recommended if CAR T-cell therapy has failed or is not feasible. In the absence of contemporary evidence-based data, the panel found RAND-modified Delphi methodology effective in providing a formal framework for developing consensus recommendations for the timing and sequence of cellular therapies for MCL.

Advances in Classification and Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Mantle Cell

Mantle cell lymphoma is a rare, aggressive, and largely incurable form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. There are a number of well-characterized prognostic features but nothing that can help guide therapy. Treatment with chemotherapy is generally effective in the short term, but relapse is inevitable and subsequent treatment is challenging. The use of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, however, has transformed practice. These agents are highly active in relapsed disease and are very well-tolerated drugs. Chemotherapy-free combinations using Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors look very exciting and will likely evolve to be part of frontline care in the future.

Exploiting gene mutations and biomarkers to guide treatment recommendations in mantle cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

While there has been an improvement in the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in both median progression-free survival (PFS; >7-8 years) and overall survival (OS; >10-12 years), patients with high-risk features such as high risk MIPI (mantle cell international prognostic index), high Ki-67 (≥30%), or blastoid variants still carry poor outcome with a median OS of 3 years. Furthermore, patients with high-risk molecular features, such as TP53 mutations, show dismal outcome, with a median OS of 1.8 years, regardless of therapy used. Further studies have led to the development of six novel drugs approved for the treatment of relapse/refractory (R/R) MCL, leading to improved survival even in refractory or high-risk patients.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers clinical biological and molecular features that impact MCL outcome with current standards. Beyond the recognition of separate subentities, we review how high-risk molecular features have paved the way towards a new paradigm away from chemoimmunotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Progress in novel therapies and in routine diagnostics, particularly next-generation sequencing (NGS), support the development of new treatment strategies, not based on the dose intensity/age dichotomy, which may prevent the need for chemotherapy and improve outcome across MCL including in high-risk subsets.

Intensive induction regimens after deferring initial therapy for mantle cell lymphoma are not associated with improved survival

INTRODUCTION

While most patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) receive therapy shortly after diagnosis, a subset of patients with indolent-behaving disease can safely defer treatment. In this subgroup, we evaluated the importance of treatment intensity in patients with MCL who defer initial therapy.

METHODS

Out of 1134 patients with MCL from 12 academic centers, we analyzed 219 patients who initiated therapy at least 90 days after diagnosis. Patients who received induction with high-dose cytarabine and/or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first remission were considered to have received intensive therapy (n = 88) while all other approaches were non-intensive (n = 131).

RESULTS

There was no difference in progression-free (PFS; P = .224) or overall survival (OS; P = .167) in deferred patients who received non-intensive vs. intensive therapy. Additionally, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were performed for PFS and OS. Treatment at an academic center (HR 0.43, P = .015) was associated with improved OS in both univariate and multivariate models, while intensity of treatment was not associated with improved OS in either model.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that intensified initial treatment is not associated with improved survival after deferring initial therapy, although prospective studies are needed to determine which of these patients with MCL may benefit from intensive therapy.

Real World Treatment Practices for Mantle Cell Lymphoma in Japan: An Observational Database Research Study (CLIMBER-DBR)

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) accounts for approximately 3% of all cases of malignant lymphoma in Japan. The CLIMBER-DBR (Treatment practices and patient burden in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and mantle cell lymphoma patients in the real world: An observational database research in Japan) study examined the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and healthcare resource utilization of MCL in a real-world clinical setting in Japan. Using the Japanese Medical Data Vision database, we extracted data for 1130 patients with MCL (ICD-10 code C83.1) registered between March 1, 2013 and February 28, 2018. The date of first MCL diagnosis was taken as the index date. The mean (standard deviation) age, body weight, and modified Charlson Comorbidity Index were 71.4 (10.9) years, 58.3 (11.7) kg, and 1.9 (1.6), respectively, and 24.6% were ≤65 years old. The median follow-up period was 654 days (first–third quartile 290.5–1049 days). A total of 802 patients (71.0%) underwent first-line treatment. The most common first-line treatment was bendamustine/rituximab (BR; 27.8%), followed by rituximab/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisolone (R-CHOP; 15.6%) and rituximab/tetrahydropyranyl-adriamycin/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisolone (R-THP-COP; 6.5%). The median (95% confidence interval) times to initial (first-line), second-line, and third-line treatments were 45 (36–62), 687 (624–734), and 1188 (1099–1444) days, respectively. Treatment practices for MCL in Japan are consistent with trends observed in Western countries. Our study can serve as a benchmark to assess future MCL treatments in Japan.

Extremely Rare Primary Spinal Epidural Indolent Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report With Literature Review

Lymphomas are malignant tumors arising from lymphoid tissues and can spread to other organs. Primary extra-nodal locations such as the spinal epidural space are less common. Primary spinal epidural lymphoma (PSEL), which can be either Hodgkin’s or non-Hodgkin’s type, is rare. There are different cell types of Non-Hodgkin’s PSEL, among which mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is extremely rare. MCL can have an aggressive or indolent course. Indolent MCL in the epidural space is not yet reported. We report a case of 20-year-old male who presented with radiating low back pain for six weeks followed by a progressive neurological deficit in both lower limbs for nine days. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed spinal epidural tumor extending from L2 to L3. Decompression and subtotal excision biopsy were performed. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry identified indolent MCL. His neurological status improved to normal postoperatively, and he was referred to an oncologist. He is under observation and planned for radiotherapy. At one-year follow-up, he is asymptomatic and doing his regular job abroad.

Mantle cell lymphoma - advances in molecular biology, prognostication and treatment approaches

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is clinically characterised by its heterogenous behaviour with courses ranging from indolent cases that do not require therapy for years to highly aggressive MCL with a very limited prognosis. A better understanding of the complex biology of MCL has already led to the approval of several innovative agents, expanding the landscape of MCL therapies and improving therapeutic options especially for refractory/relapsed (R/R) disease. Nevertheless, to further optimise MCL treatment, early identification of individual risk profile and risk-adapted, patient-tailored choice of therapeutic strategy needs to be prospectively incorporated into clinical patient management. The present review highlights recent advances in deciphering the molecular background of MCL, the definition of prognostically relevant factors and the identification of potential druggable targets and summarises current treatment recommendations for primary and R/R MCL including novel targeted therapies.

Cellular Therapies for Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a subtype of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by a heterogeneous clinical presentation. Patients who demonstrate an objective response to induction therapy(ies) and are eligible for intensive therapies are offered an autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) as front-line consolidation followed by rituximab maintenance. Allogeneic HCT is an option for younger and fit patients with high-risk disease or in patients who have relapsed after autologous HCT. Recent advances in T cell engineering brought chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) therapy from the bench to the bedside, with brexucabtagene autoleucel being the first CAR T product approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in relapsed/refractory MCL. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the literature on available cellular therapies for MCL and present a treatment algorithm that incorporates HCT, autologous or allogeneic, and CAR T therapies.

A medicare database analysis of practice patterns in patients with mantle cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Although treatment approaches to younger fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are well-described, the optimal treatment of older or less fit patients with varying comorbidities is less clear. The objectives of this study were to examine first-line treatment patterns, and the impact of comorbidities and age on treatment choices and overall survival (OS) in a large, predominantly older, Medicare population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In Medicare data from 1/1/2007-8/31/2015, 3,008 patients with MCL were identified. Data on age, gender, race, Charlson comorbidities, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), timing of injectable MCL therapies, and OS were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Median age of the study population was 75.5 (range, 33-107; 25th, 75th: 69.9, 81.5) years. Over half of the individuals had ≥two comorbidities. The CCI was 1-2 in 45%, and 3-4 in 26.6% of patients. Rituximab was the most commonly used agent, regardless of age or comorbidity, in the first 60 days following diagnosis, being administered to 40.2% of patients. In contrast, administration of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, or bendamustine in the first 60 days after diagnosis was less common (17.9%, 13.1%, 17.2%, and 12%, respectively). Overall survival was 3.23 (range, 0.003-7.668) years, and decreased with increasing number of comorbidities.

DISCUSSION

Our analysis of a real-world patient population with MCL found that older patients have a high rate of comorbidities which impact administered treatment and subsequent OS. Our findings can be used to prospectively guide treatment decisions in these older, frailer, non-transplant-eligible patients, considering the impact of age and comorbidities on such choices.

An overlapping case of in situ mantle cell neoplasia and leukemic non-nodal mantle cell lymphoma

In situ mantle cell neoplasia (isMCN) and leukemic non-nodal mantle cell lymphoma (nnMCL) are classified as an indolent subtype of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The tumor cells of isMCN are restricted to the inner layer of the lymphoid tissue mantle zone, exhibiting an in situ pattern histologically. On the other hand, nnMCL is distributed in the peripheral blood, bone marrow and sometimes the spleen, but lymphadenopathy or systemic organ involvement is rare. We report a case of isMCN in a submandibular lymph node resected from a 65-year-old Japanese male. The tumor cells were positive for cyclin D1 (CCND1) and SOX11 expression, and were restricted to the mantle zone area of the lymph node. However, tumor cells were also detected in the stomach mucosa, bone marrow tissue and peripheral blood, suggesting nnMCL. isMCN and nnMCL may have a partly overlapping disease spectrum, although the correlation between these two subtypes has not been well described. This present case demonstrated characteristics overlapping between isMCN and nnMCL.

Understanding Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a unique lymphoma that is heterogeneous in its clinical course, and lacks consensus treatment approaches. It is often treated with immunochemotherapy at diagnosis and chronic therapies in relapse. Despite significant advances in therapy, MCL remains incurable. Maintaining patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important treatment goal. Assessment of HRQOL elucidates the impact of an illness and its treatment on patients' lives. This review highlights the relevance of HRQOL assessment in MCL, evaluates existing evidence, current knowledge gaps and challenges in HRQOL assessment, and defines future directions for improving HRQOL evaluation in MCL patients.

Genomic and epigenomic insights into the origin, pathogenesis, and clinical behavior of mantle cell lymphoma subtypes

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a mature B-cell neoplasm initially driven by CCND1 rearrangement with 2 molecular subtypes, conventional MCL (cMCL) and leukemic non-nodal MCL (nnMCL), that differ in their clinicobiological behavior. To identify the genetic and epigenetic alterations determining this diversity, we used whole-genome (n = 61) and exome (n = 21) sequencing (74% cMCL, 26% nnMCL) combined with transcriptome and DNA methylation profiles in the context of 5 MCL reference epigenomes. We identified that open and active chromatin at the major translocation cluster locus might facilitate the t(11;14)(q13;32), which modifies the 3-dimensional structure of the involved regions. This translocation is mainly acquired in precursor B cells mediated by recombination-activating genes in both MCL subtypes, whereas in 8% of cases the translocation occurs in mature B cells mediated by activation-induced cytidine deaminase. We identified novel recurrent MCL drivers, including CDKN1B, SAMHD1, BCOR, SYNE1, HNRNPH1, SMARCB1, and DAZAP1. Complex structural alterations emerge as a relevant early oncogenic mechanism in MCL, targeting key driver genes. Breakage-fusion-bridge cycles and translocations activated oncogenes (BMI1, MIR17HG, TERT, MYC, and MYCN), generating gene amplifications and remodeling regulatory regions. cMCL carried significant higher numbers of structural variants, copy number alterations, and driver changes than nnMCL, with exclusive alterations of ATM in cMCL, whereas TP53 and TERT alterations were slightly enriched in nnMCL. Several drivers had prognostic impact, but only TP53 and MYC aberrations added value independently of genomic complexity. An increasing genomic complexity, together with the presence of breakage-fusion-bridge cycles and high DNA methylation changes related to the proliferative cell history, defines patients with different clinical evolution.

Using the primary site as a prognostic tool for nodal mantle cell lymphoma: a SEER-based study

Background: Nodal mantle cell lymphoma (NMCL) has a worse survival than extra-nodal mantle cell lymphoma. Materials & methods: A cohort study was conducted to evaluate the primary site role as a mortality predictor using data from 1983 to 2011 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results: Most patients had NMCL in multiple regions (71.9%). There was a significantly increased incidence of NMCL cases over years with 83.2% of them occurred between 1998 and 2011. The mean survival was 52.9 months with overall survival/cancer-specific survival rate of 29.2/42.9%, respectively. Lymph nodes of intrathoracic and multiple regions had a worse overall survival while the head, face and neck, intra-abdominal, pelvic, inguinal region and leg as well as multiple regions had worse cancer-specific survival. Conclusion: NMCL primary site can serve as a prognostic factor. We encourage adding it to MCL International Prognostic Index.

Saudi Lymphoma Group's Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Management and Follow-up of Patients with Various Types of Lymphoma during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

The Saudi Lymphoma Group had previously published recommendations on the management of the major subtypes of lymphoma. However, the effect the currently ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has on the management of patients with lymphoma has been paramount. Therefore, the Saudi Lymphoma Group has decided to provide clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis, management and follow-up of patients with various types of lymphoma during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Key Clinical and Translational Research Questions to Address Unmet Needs in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Survival for patients with mantle cell lymphoma has improved dramatically over the last 2 decades owing to a better understanding of disease biology and the development of more effective treatment regimens for patients with untreated and relapsed disease. With these advancements, we are now poised to ask questions that challenge old treatment strategies, use new technologies, and improve our understanding of disease heterogeneity. This article focuses on questions that we believe will drive the future of mantle cell lymphoma treatment. Although not an exhaustive list, we review current literature, ongoing studies, and provide expert opinion on future trial design.

Is Limited-Stage Mantle Cell Lymphoma Curable and How Is It Best Managed?

Limited-stage (stage I-II) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is rarely encountered. There is no standard approach to treatment and available data to guide management decisions mainly are retrospective studies. A thorough staging evaluation, including positron emission tomography/computed tomography, bone marrow biopsy, and gastrointestinal evaluation, should be completed because disseminated disease is common. Radiation therapy is effective for local control, and, although prolonged remission can be achieved, distant relapses are common and there are insufficient data to say that patients can be cured using this treatment. This article reviews literature pertaining to management of patients with limited-stage MCL and discusses approach to treatment.

Watch and Wait in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a biologically heterogeneous disease, and patients may experience a clinical course ranging from indolent to very aggressive. Observational studies suggest that a subset of patients can be safely observed for a period of months to years from initial diagnosis without adversely impacting their outcomes. However, identification of candidates for the "watch and wait" approach remains challenging because selection criteria are not well-defined. Studies that prospectively stratify patients on the basis of MCL biology and disease risk will be informative, and patients with indolent MCL may be ideal candidates for frontline clinical trials exploring novel therapies.

Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Which Patients Should We Transplant?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mantle cell lymphoma is a CD5+ non-Hodgkin lymphoma associated with suboptimal outcome. Young, fit patients are generally offered intensive induction followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) in first remission. Some patients may not benefit from this strategy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have investigated the role of AHCT in the modern era. First, an analysis of the National Cancer Database demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) for consolidative AHCT. Second, a multi-center study associated consolidative AHCT with improved PFS even after propensity-weighted analysis. Improved overall survival (OS) for certain subgroups was suggested. Third, patients with p53 mutations derive little benefit from AHCT. Finally, retrospective series suggest certain high-risk patients may be considered for allogenic HCT. AHCT consolidation in first remission is associated with improved PFS even after adjustment for disease severity. An overall survival benefit has not been definitively shown. Patients with p53 mutations should be treated with novel agents.