Efficacy and Safety of EGFR Inhibitors in the Treatment of EGFRPositive NSCLC Patients: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

We compared the response rates, survival rates, and safety profile of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors with non-targeted chemotherapy and older EGFR inhibitors when used to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating EGFR mutations.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and clinicaltrial.- gov for randomized controlled trials published until 11-Feb-2020. Treatment outcomes were compared between EGFR inhibitor and pooled comparator; a subgroup analysis compared outcomes between EGFR inhibitor and non-targeted chemotherapy, and between newer and older EGFR inhibitors.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies with 4,250 unique patients were included. Significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) (odds ratio (OR) 2.28; 95% CI 2.00-2.61), higher disease control rate (DCR) (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.88-3.06), and longer progression-free survival (PFS) (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.56; 95% CI 0.52-0.60) were observed in the EGFR inhibitor group compared to the pooled comparator group. Subgroup analysis revealed that the ORR, DCR, and PFS were significantly higher with EGFR inhibitors than non-targeted chemotherapy, and only PFS (and not ORR and DCR) was significantly longer with newer EGFR inhibitors than the older EGFR inhibitors. Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between EGFR inhibitors and pooled comparator (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.83-1.00) as well as in either of the subgroup analyses. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 and treatment discontinuation were significantly higher with non-targeted chemotherapy compared to the EGFR inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

The benefits of prolongation of ORR, DCR, and PFS might not imply significantly improved OS after therapy with EGFR inhibitors when compared with non-targeted chemotherapy or older EGFR inhibitors.

EGFR: The Paradigm of an Oncogene-Driven Lung Cancer

Somatic, activating mutations in EGFR identify a significant minority of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although these mutations are associated with an approximately 70% response rate to some EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib), patients develop resistance (i.e., "acquired resistance") after a median of 9 to 12 months. In patients with clinical acquired resistance, repeat biopsy of tumors has identified a number of relevant mechanisms of resistance, but by far the most frequent event is the acquisition of EGFR T790M, a mutation in the "gatekeeper" residue that confers resistance to gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib. This emphasizes the critical dependence upon EGFR signaling for some tumors, a property that has been exploited therapeutically. Dual EGFR blockade using afatinib and cetuximab led to a 29% radiographic response rate. More recently, drugs that target EGFR T790M (e.g., rociletinib, AZD9291, and others) have entered clinical trials, with impressive results observed in phase I clinical trials. The development of these newer drugs, with efficacy after resistance to first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has led to exploration of these strategies in multiple disease settings: at resistance, in the first line, and in adjuvant treatment of those with completely resected early-stage disease who would otherwise die of recurrent/metastatic disease. This example of translational research that identifies mechanisms of resistance to first-generation drugs, and then targets those mechanisms yielding clinical benefit, is a paradigm for how targeted therapies can be developed.

Chemotherapy with cetuximab versus chemotherapy alone for chemotherapy-naive advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the effectiveness of standard cytotoxic chemotherapy seems to have reached a 'plateau', and there is a continuous need for new treatments to further improve the prognosis. Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody targeted at the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling pathway. Basically, it is designed to inhibit the growth and metastasis among other biological processes of cancer. In combination with chemotherapy, it has been evaluated as a first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC in some randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with inconsistent results.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy plus cetuximab, compared with chemotherapy alone, for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously untreated with chemotherapy or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted drugs.

SEARCH METHODS

We systematically searched the Cochrane Lung Cancer Review Group's Specialized Register (from inception to 17 December 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 12), MEDLINE (accessed through PubMed, 1966 to 17 December 2013), EMBASE (1980 to 17 December 2013), ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception to 17 December 2013), and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (from inception to 17 December 2013). We also handsearched the proceedings related to lung cancer from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology (2000 to 17 December 2013). We checked the reference lists of all eligible primary studies and review articles for additional potentially eligible studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible studies were RCTs that compared chemotherapy plus cetuximab with the same chemotherapy alone, in advanced NSCLC, previously untreated with chemotherapy or EGFR-targeted drugs, and measured at least one of the following: overall survival, progression-free survival, one-year survival rate, objective response rate, quality of life, or serious adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. We extracted the following data from each study: publication details, participant characteristics, regimens for intervention and control arms, outcome measures and effect size, and information related to the methodological quality of the study. We measured the treatment effects on dichotomous and time-to-event outcomes by risk ratio (RR) and hazard ratio (HR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. We conducted meta-analyses with Review Manager 5 using the random-effects model. We employed the Mantel-Haenszel method to combine RRs and the inverse-variance method to combine HRs.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four trials, containing 2018 patients. The subjects were mostly white people (female: 26% to 56%), with a median age of 58 to 66 years. About half of them had histologically proven adenocarcinoma. Of the 2018 patients, 83% to 99% had their status measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and had a score of 0 to 1 (which is usually considered as physically "fit").All four studies provided data on overall survival, progression-free survival, one-year survival rate, objective response rate, and serious adverse events, with two studies (1901 patients) investigating the effect of cetuximab on quality of life as well. The risk of bias was low for the data on overall survival and one-year survival rate, and high for the data on all other outcomes, mainly due to lack of blinding. Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus cetuximab improved overall survival (10.5 months versus 8.9 months; HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.96), one-year survival rate (45% versus 40%; RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.25), and objective response rate (30% versus 23%; RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.51). The difference in progression-free survival was at the limit of the statistical significance (4.9 months versus 4.4 months; HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.00). No significant difference in quality of life between the two treatment arms was reported by the two relevant studies. Patients in the cetuximab group experienced more acneiform rash (11.2% versus 0.3%; RR 37.36, 95% CI 10.66 to 130.95), hypomagnesemia (5.3% versus 0.8%; RR 6.57, 95% CI 1.13 to 38.12), infusion reaction (3.9% versus 1.1%; RR 3.50, 95% CI 1.76 to 6.94), diarrhoea (4.8% versus 2.3%; RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.48), hypokalaemia (6.3% versus 3.6%; RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.99), febrile neutropenia (10.6% versus 7.6%; RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.77), and leukopenia (58.1% versus 42.7%; RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.58) than did those in the control group. The difference in other adverse events did not reach statistical significance. According to the reports of original studies, the adverse events were generally manageable. There were no cetuximab-related deaths.The quality of the evidence is high for overall survival and one-year survival rate, but low for most secondary outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The combination of chemotherapy plus cetuximab is better than chemotherapy alone as the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC in improving overall survival, while inducing higher rates of some reportedly manageable adverse events.

Proposal for a novel methodology to screen and score cost versus survival for anticancer drugs in metastatic disease: could cost weigh in evaluation?

PURPOSE

Rising costs of anticancer drugs prompt concerns about their approval, use, and affordability. A methodology was developed to evaluate cost versus survival for anticancer drugs in metastatic breast cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Costs of evaluated drugs were calculated by using average wholesale prices in US dollars. Ratios of cost to day of survival (cost/survival/d) were obtained by dividing costs of the entire treatment by reported median survival gain in days. A crude score of 100% was assigned to a cost/survival/d of less than $25, and 0% to a cost/survival/d of more than $750. A strategy was designed to correct for overall survival (OS) versus progression-free survival (PFS), adverse effects, and quality of life.

RESULTS

In breast cancer, PFS scores of bevacizumab varied between 0% and 60%. In NSCLC, OS scores of bevacizumab improved from 0% to 50%, as a result of histology, lower prices, and extended therapy. Gefitinib and erlotinib PFS scores were 80% and 70%, respectively. Correction for longer survival with erlotinib resulted in similar scores. In maintenance therapy, the OS score for pemetrexed was 70% as compared with 25% for erlotinib. Generic drugs scored 70% to 90%.

CONCLUSION

Cost/survival varied with the number of cycles. In breast cancer, bevacizumab scores failed to justify its use. In NSCLC, 10 cycles of bevacizumab scored 0%. Scores improved with extended treatment and lower prices. Scores for gefitinib and erlotinib would support their approval. Erlotinib was preferred because of longer PFS. Results tended to endorse maintenance pemetrexed but not erlotinib. Generic drugs demonstrated high scores. Cost/survival could weigh in drug evaluation.

A phase I study of larotaxel (XRP9881) administered in combination with carboplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

This primary objective of this phase I dose-escalation study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of larotaxel administered in combination with carboplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Eighteen patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, in cohorts of three to six evaluable patients, were to receive every 3 weeks: larotaxel beginning at 45 mg/m(2) administered as a 1-h infusion, followed after 30 min by carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) = 6 mg/mL × min, later AUC = 5) as a 1-h infusion. Dose escalation of larotaxel up to 90 mg/m(2) was permitted according to DLT occurrence. Patients received ondansetron as prophylactic anti-emetic premedication.

RESULTS

In view of the toxicity encountered, the carboplatin dose was decreased for the later part of the study to AUC = 5 mg/mL × min. Eight of 18 treated patients experienced DLTs in the first cycle, including neutropenia and associated complications, diarrhea and fatigue. The MTD of the combination was defined as larotaxel 60 mg/m(2) with a carboplatin AUC of 6 mg/mL × min. Neutropenia, reported at grade 3/4 in 15/18 patients (83%), was the most common severe adverse event, reaching grade 4 in 14 patients (78%). Eleven patients (61%) experienced grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity, predominantly dehydration, fatigue, infection, nausea and vomiting. One patient (6%) achieved a partial response and 11 (61%) had stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of larotaxel and carboplatin is feasible and shows modest activity in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC. The principal toxicity was grade 3/4 neutropenia.

Biologically targeted cancer therapy and marginal benefits: are we making too much of too little or are we achieving too little by giving too much?

We describe the development and approval of biologically targeted agents in the clinic through examples chosen from the experience with inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) and VEGF pathways. Despite extensive biological rationale for the use of these classes of molecules, marginal clinical benefits have been observed in broad patient populations, and the agents have entered into general clinical practice. We discuss why this situation is unsatisfactory because marginal general benefit may often be at the expense of toxicity to nonbenefiting or even harmed patients. Finally, we point out that emerging technologies bring the promise of allowing the identification of patients who might potentially benefit from a therapy. However, development of this technology will not move forward without broader recognition of its need by the range of stakeholders, including patients, advocates, academic and private oncologists, drug sponsors, and those who develop drugs and diagnostic tests.

New trends in epidermal growth factor receptor-directed monoclonal antibodies

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been the focus of much attention in the age of targeted cancer therapeutics. In addition to its role in signal transduction under physiological conditions, it has been of interest because it is highly expressed in many tumor types and influences growth and survival in malignant states. Advances in the understanding of the EGFR and in genetic engineering have led to the development of monoclonal antibodies targeting the extracellular domain of the membrane-bound receptor. Cetuximab and panitumumab are the two most advanced such compounds. Thus far, cetuximab has achieved regulatory approval in metastatic colorectal cancer, and locally advanced and metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck; panitumumab has been approved for metastatic colorectal cancer. This review will focus on the EGFR signaling network, monoclonal antibodies against EGFR and the pertinent clinical trials in this field of oncology using such agents.

Second-line therapy for NSCLC in clinical practice: baseline results of the European SELECTTION observational study

OBJECTIVE

Although the efficacy of a number of drugs for the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been demonstrated in Phase III trials, very limited evidence exists on optimal duration of second-line treatment or the reasons why this treatment is stopped in standard clinical practice. SELECTTION (Survey in European Lung Cancer Evaluating Choice of Treatment and Tolerability In Observed NSCLC) was designed to assess the time from initiation of second-line treatment for NSCLC to treatment discontinuation for any reason, the reasons for discontinuation, and the impact of discontinuation on outcomes.

METHODS

From October 2006 to January 2008, 1012 patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC who completed or discontinued first-line treatment were enrolled in a multi-national, prospective observational cohort study (SELECTTION). Treatment cohorts were constructed based on the patients' distribution across second-line treatments that were assigned by physician decision (pemetrexed, docetaxel, erlotinib, other treatments). This report presents a descriptive analysis of the baseline data collected, including patient/disease characteristics, treatment history and planned second-line treatments. Factors that may have affected treatment choice, selected by physicians from a range of options, were also identified.

RESULTS

Overall, 468 patients (46.2%) were enrolled in the pemetrexed cohort, 232 (22.9%) in docetaxel cohort, 206 (20.4%) in erlotinib cohort and 106 (10.5%) received other treatments. The profile of patients enrolled in the erlotinib cohort differed from those of patients enrolled in the pemetrexed or docetaxel cohorts in that erlotinib was more frequently planned for women, never-smokers and patients with adenocarcinomas. The primary reasons physicians gave for selection of the second-line treatment were tolerance and efficacy for pemetrexed, and preferred regimen for the particular patient and efficacy for the other treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study, pemetrexed, then docetaxel and erlotinib were the most frequently prescribed second-line treatments, which is in line with international guidelines. Erlotinib was most commonly prescribed to that subset of patients expected to gain the greatest benefit (those with adenocarcinoma, never-smokers and females). Pemetrexed was more frequently prescribed than docetaxel, with physicians most commonly choosing to prescribe the former agent because of its tolerability profile.

Radiolabeled cetuximab plus whole-brain irradiation (WBI) for the treatment of brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The addition of systemic drugs to whole-brain irradiation has not improved the survival of patients with multiple brain metastases, most likely because the agents did not readily cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Radiolabeling of cetuximab was performed to investigate whether this antibody crosses the BBB.

CASE REPORT

A patient with multiple brain lesions from non-small cell lung cancer was investigated. The largest metastasis (40 x 33 x 27 mm) was selected the reference lesion. On day 1, 200 mg/m(2) cetuximab (0.25% hot and 99.75% cold antibody) were given. On day 3, 200 mg/m(2) cetuximab (cold antibody) were given. Weekly doses of 250 mg/m(2) cetuximab were administered for 3 months.

RESULTS

The reference lesion showed enhancement of radiolabeled cetuximab ((123)I-Erbi) on scintigraphy; (123)I-Erbi crossed the BBB and accumulated in the lesion. The reference lesion measured 31 x 22 x 21 mm at 4 months. Enhancement of contrast medium was less pronounced.

CONCLUSION

This is the first demonstration of cetuximab crossing the BBB and accumulating in brain metastasis.

Targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer: an evolving landscape

Over the past decade, a multitude of targeted agents have been explored in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thus far, two broad classes of agents have been implemented in clinical practice: (a) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-directed therapies and (b) antagonists of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In the former category, the agent bevacizumab (a monoclonal antibody) has shown landmark improvements in survival when added to cytotoxic therapy. Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) targeting the VEGF receptor (i.e., sunitinib, sorafenib, and vandetanib) show activity in phase II clinical studies. With respect to EGFR-directed therapies, the TKIs gefitinib and erlotinib have shown significant benefit, and have uncovered valuable information about the biology of lung cancer. Outside of therapies directed specifically at VEGF- and EGFR-mediated signaling, trials evaluating insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-IR)-targeting agents, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, c-met inhibitors, irreversible pan-HER inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are ongoing. Inhibitors of ALK show great promise in patients with the relevant gene translocation. Herein, the clinical development of novel therapies for NSCLC is described, including some discussion of relevant biomarkers and determination of synergy with both cytotoxic therapy and other targeted agents.

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition in lung cancer: the evolving role of individualized therapy

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the major cause of cancer-related deaths in the USA and worldwide. Most patients present with advanced disease, and treatment options for these patients are generally limited to platinum-based chemotherapy and a few targeted therapies. Targeted agents currently in use for NSCLC inhibit oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinase pathways, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway. While current EGFR-targeted agents, including erlotinib and gefitinib, may result in dramatic responses, they demonstrate efficacy in only a fraction of patients, and resistance to these agents frequently develops. In order to select patients most likely to benefit from blockade of EGFR pathways, investigators have focused on identifying molecular correlates of response to anti-EGFR therapy. New strategies to minimize the risk of resistance to EGFR inhibition have been employed in the development of next-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as PF00299804 and BIBW 2992; these include irreversibility of target binding, inhibition of multiple EGFR family receptors, and/or simultaneous inhibition of EGFR and other oncogenic pathways.

Cetuximab and gemcitabine in elderly or adult PS2 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: The cetuximab in advanced lung cancer (CALC1-E and CALC1-PS2) randomized phase II trials

BACKGROUND

Two parallel randomized phase 2 trials were performed to choose the optimal way of combining cetuximab with gemcitabine in the first-line treatment of elderly (CALC1-E) and adult PS2 (CALC1-PS2) patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Stage IV or IIIB NSCLC patients, aged > or =70 years with PS 0-2 for CALC1-E or aged <70 with PS2 for CALC1-PS2, not selected for EGFR expression, were eligible. Patients were randomized to concomitant (gemcitabine, for a maximum of 6 cycles, plus cetuximab until progression) or sequential (gemcitabine, for a maximum of 6 cycles, followed by cetuximab) strategy. A selection design, with 1-year survival rate as the primary endpoint, was applied, requiring 58 elderly and 42 PS2 patients.

RESULTS

All planned patients were randomized. In sequential arms, 34.5% and 60.0% patients were not able to receive cetuximab after gemcitabine in CALC1-E and CALC1-PS2, respectively. Survival rates (95% CI) at 1-year for concomitant and sequential arms were 41.4% (23.5-61.1) and 31.0% (15.3-50.8) in CALC1-E and 27.3% (10.7-50.2) and 35.0% (15.4-59.2) in CALC1-PS2. In both studies, survival curves crossed at about 10 months and the worse arm until that time became the better one at 1-year. Toxicity was similar across treatment groups. In concomitant arm of CALC1-E (but not of CALC1-PS2), survival was longer for patients who developed skin toxicity within the first two cycles of treatment.

CONCLUSION

In both groups of patients, sequential strategy cannot be proposed for future trials because of low compliance. Inconsistency of survival outcomes makes also concomitant treatment not a candidate for further testing in unselected elderly and PS2 NSCLC patients.

New strategies to overcome limitations of reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in non-small cell lung cancer

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a member of the HER family of receptors, has become a well-established target for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several EGFR-targeted agents produce objective responses in a minority of unselected patients, but a majority of those with EGFR-activating mutations; however, all responders eventually develop resistance. The modest activity of agents that target only EGFR may be due, in part, to the complexity and interdependency of HER family signaling. The interdependent signaling that occurs between EGFR and HER2 provides a rationale for the simultaneous inhibition of these receptors with reversible and irreversible inhibitors. Several agents with activity against both EGFR and HER2 are currently under development. Irreversible EGFR/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (e.g., BIBW 2992, HKI-272) and pan-HER TKIs (e.g., PF00299804) comprise a novel class of agents in clinical development that may prevent and overcome inherent and acquired resistance to first-generation reversible EGFR TKIs. Other agents in development include the monoclonal antibody pertuzumab, and XL-647, which inhibits EGFR and HER2, as well as multiple vascular endothelial growth factor receptor family members. Here we briefly review the currently available EGFR-targeted agents, discuss the rationale for extending inhibition to other HER family members, weigh the merits of irreversible HER family inhibition, and summarize preclinical and clinical data with EGFR/HER2 and pan-HER inhibitors under clinical development.

Reinforcement learning design for cancer clinical trials

We develop reinforcement learning trials for discovering individualized treatment regimens for life-threatening diseases such as cancer. A temporal-difference learning method called Q-learning is utilized that involves learning an optimal policy from a single training set of finite longitudinal patient trajectories. Approximating the Q-function with time-indexed parameters can be achieved by using support vector regression or extremely randomized trees. Within this framework, we demonstrate that the procedure can extract optimal strategies directly from clinical data without relying on the identification of any accurate mathematical models, unlike approaches based on adaptive design. We show that reinforcement learning has tremendous potential in clinical research because it can select actions that improve outcomes by taking into account delayed effects even when the relationship between actions and outcomes is not fully known. To support our claims, the methodology's practical utility is illustrated in a simulation analysis. In the immediate future, we will apply this general strategy to studying and identifying new treatments for advanced metastatic stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer, which usually includes multiple lines of chemotherapy treatment. Moreover, there is significant potential of the proposed methodology for developing personalized treatment strategies in other cancers, in cystic fibrosis, and in other life-threatening diseases.

The role of cetuximab in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer

Inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway has emerged as a proven strategy for the treatment of advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cetuximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that inhibits EGFR by binding to the extracellular domain of the receptor. The relatively modest anticancer activity as monotherapy in NSCLC has prompted the evaluation of cetuximab as part of novel combination regimens. The safety of cetuximab in combination with the commonly used platinum-based 2-drug regimens in NSCLC has been established in several phase II studies. Recently, the addition of cetuximab to the regimen of cisplatin and vinorelbine resulted in improved overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR-expressing tumors. In contrast, a study in unselected advanced NSCLC patients failed to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in overall survival with cetuximab in combination with a carboplatin and taxane regimen. It is hoped that identification of predictive biomarkers would lead to the optimal utilization of cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy. The combination of cetuximab with radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced NSCLC has demonstrated promising results in a phase II study and is now being evaluated in a confirmatory trial. This article reviews the clinical data with cetuximab in NSCLC.

[First-line chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell carcinoma: what are the options]

Until recently, first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was based on ASCO guidelines. Since several years, first-line chemotherapy is a platin-based doublet for patients with a good performans status. For elderly or unfit patients, a single-drug chemotherapy or a combination without cisplatin was recommended. The association of an anti-angiogenic therapy, bevacizumab, with carboplatin-paclitaxel or cisplatin-gemcitabine regimens improves progression-free survival for patients with non-epidermoid tumors. The combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed is better in terms of survival than cisplatine-gemcitabine in these tumors. The choice of treatment according to histology is becoming a new concept. Another is maintenance therapy. The main objective is to reduce duration of platin-based chemotherapy while improving quality of life and progression-free survival. This concept is ongoing validation. The combination of cetuximab with platin-chemotherapy improves survival for all histologic types. We should integrate this new approach among other available treatments. First-line therapy for advanced NSCLC is changing. In the future, first-line therapy will be chosen according to clinical features and biomarkers such as gene mutations of EGFR.

[Towards a histologically guided management for NSCLC]

Currently the management of non-small cell lung cancer with first line chemotherapy is dependent on the histology. The growth of morbid anatomy laboratories and molecular biology, alongside the rapid expansion of new therapies, is necessary for the selection of patients according to predictive criteria of efficacy and tolerance, allowing definition of a made to measure treatment.

The role of EGFR inhibition in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

The identification of certain molecular mechanisms underlying lung carcinogenesis and progression has led to the development of targeted agents against different families of growth factors and receptors. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one such target for therapeutic exploitation. Inhibition of EGFR downstream signaling can be accomplished through two primary mechanisms: (a) the direct blocking of intracellular kinase activity with small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (e.g., gefitinib, erlotinib) and (b) the blocking of EGFR ligand binding using antibodies directed against the extracellular domain of the receptor (e.g., cetuximab). Resistance to available EGFR-targeted treatments has emerged as a substantial clinical issue in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several novel agents with the potential to overcome such resistance are currently in clinical development, including irreversible EGFR TKIs, monoclonal antibodies, and TKIs directed against multiple signaling pathways. Here we discuss the clinical application of the currently available EGFR-targeted agents in NSCLC, the underlying mechanisms of resistance, and the novel agents in clinical development that may overcome resistance.

Treatment outcomes of different prognostic groups of patients on cancer and leukemia group B trial 39801: induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy alone for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In Cancer and Leukemia Group B 39801, we evaluated whether induction chemotherapy before concurrent chemoradiotherapy would result in improved survival and demonstrated no significant benefit from the addition of induction chemotherapy. The primary objective of this analysis was to dichotomize patients into prognostic groups using factors predictive of survival and to investigate whether induction chemotherapy was beneficial in either prognostic group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the impact on survival of the following factors: (>or=70 versus <70 years), gender, race, stage (IIIB versus IIIA), hemoglobin (hgb) (<13 versus >or=13 g/dl), performance status (PS) (1 versus 0), weight loss (>or=5% versus <5%), treatment arm, and the interaction between weight loss and hgb.

RESULTS

Factors predictive of decreased survival were weight loss >or=5%, age >or=70 years, PS of 1, and hgb <13 g/dl (p < 0.05). Patients were classified as having >or=2 poor prognostic factors (n = 165) or <or=1 factor (n = 166). The hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival for the patients with >or=2 versus patients with <or=1 was 1.88 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.49-2.37; p = <0.0001]; median survival times observed were 9 (95% CI, 8-11) and 18 (95% CI, 16-24) months, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival between treatment arms in patients with >or=2 factors (HR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.63-1.17; p = 0.34) or <or=1 factor (HR = 0.97, 95% CI, 0.70-1.35; p = 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that induction chemotherapy is beneficial in either prognostic group.

Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown the efficacy, tolerability, and ease of administration of pemetrexed-an antifolate antineoplastic agent-in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. We assessed pemetrexed as maintenance therapy in patients with this disease.

METHODS

This randomised double-blind study was undertaken in 83 centres in 20 countries. 663 patients with stage IIIB or IV disease who had not progressed on four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2), day 1) plus best supportive care (n=441) or placebo plus best supportive care (n=222) in 21-day cycles until disease progression. Treatment was randomised with the Simon and Pocock minimisation method. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment. All patients received vitamin B(12), folic acid, and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival and the secondary endpoint of overall survival were analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00102804.

FINDINGS

All randomly assigned participants were analysed. Pemetrexed significantly improved progression-free survival (4.3 months [95% CI 4.1-4.7] vs 2.6 months [1.7-2.8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.50, 95% CI 0.42-0.61, p<0.0001) and overall survival (13.4 months [11.9-15.9] vs 10.6 months [8.7-12.0]; HR 0.79, 0.65-0.95, p=0.012) compared with placebo. Treatment discontinuations due to drug-related toxic effects were higher in the pemetrexed group than in the placebo group (21 [5%] vs three [1%]). Drug-related grade three or higher toxic effects were higher with pemetrexed than with placebo (70 [16%] vs nine [4%]; p<0.0001), specifically fatigue (22 [5%] vs one [1%], p=0.001) and neutropenia (13 [3%] vs 0, p=0.006). No pemetrexed-related deaths occurred. Relatively fewer patients in the pemetrexed group than in the placebo group received systemic post-discontinuation therapy (227 [51%] vs 149 [67%]; p=0.0001).

INTERPRETATION

Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed is well tolerated and offers improved progression-free and overall survival compared with placebo in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of cetuximab and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors: a study of the pediatric oncology experimental therapeutic investigators' consortium

PURPOSE

To determine the dose of cetuximab that can be safely combined with irinotecan for treatment of pediatric and adolescent patients with refractory solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This open-label, phase I study enrolled patients ages 1 to 18 years with advanced refractory solid tumors, including tumors of the CNS. Patient cohorts by age group (children, ages 1 to 12 years; adolescents, ages 13 to 18 years) received escalating weekly doses of cetuximab (75, 150, 250 mg/m(2)) in a 3 + 3 design, plus irinotecan (16 or 20 mg/m(2)/d) for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks every 21 days. The primary end points were establishing the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RPIID), and pharmacokinetics of the combination. Preliminary safety and efficacy data were also collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven children and 19 adolescents received a median of 7.1 and 6.0 weeks of cetuximab therapy, respectively. Cetuximab 250 mg/m(2) weekly plus irinotecan 16 mg/m(2)/d (pediatric) or 20 mg/m(2)/d (adolescent) have been established as the MTD/RPIID. Dose-limiting toxicities included diarrhea and neutropenia. Mild to moderate (grade 1 to 2) acneiform rash occurred in a majority of patients; no grade 3 to 4 rashes were observed. Cetuximab demonstrated dose-dependent clearance in both children and adolescents, similar to that in adults. There were two confirmed partial responses, both in patients with CNS tumors. Stable disease was achieved in 18 patients overall, including 10 patients with CNS tumors (38.5%).

CONCLUSION

The cetuximab/irinotecan combination can be given safely to children and adolescents with cancer. Promising activity, particularly in CNS tumors, warrants phase II evaluation of this regimen.

Randomized phase II trial of docetaxel plus cetuximab or docetaxel plus bortezomib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2: CALGB 30402

PURPOSE

A randomized phase II trial of two novel treatment strategies in the first-line management of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with performance status (PS) 2.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were assigned to docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days in combination with either cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) loading dose followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly (D + C) or bortezomib 1.6 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days (D + B) for up to 4 cycles. Patients with responding or stable disease continued cetuximab or bortezomib until progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were enrolled and 59 were included in this analysis. Complete or partial response rates were 13.3% and 10.3% for D + C and D + B, respectively. Median PFS was 3.4 months in the D + C arm and 1.9 months in the D + B arm. Corresponding figures for 6-month PFS were 27.8% and 13.8% and 5.0 and 3.9 months for median survival, respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was 16% for D + C and 21% for D + B, whereas nonhematologic toxicities were observed in 63% and 44% of patients, respectively. There was one treatment-related death in each arm.

CONCLUSION

These results confirm the poor prognosis associated with a PS of 2 and the difficulty in translating recent advances in targeted therapy to this subset of patients. While the results in the D + C arm are numerically superior, neither combination met the prespecified PFS end point to justify further research in this setting.

Insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF1R) expression and survival in surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic role of insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF1R) expression in surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient characteristics and methods: This retrospective study was conducted in 369 stage I-II-IIIA, surgically resected, NSCLC patients. Patients exposed to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents were excluded. IGF1R expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in tissue microarray sections.

RESULTS

A positive IGF1R expression (score > or = 100) was observed in 282 cases (76.4%) and was significantly associated with squamous cell histology (P = 0.04) and with grade III differentiation (P = 0.02). No difference in survival was observed between the positive and negative group when score 100 was used as cut-off for discriminating a positive versus a negative IGF1R result (52 versus 48 months, P = 0.99) or when median value of IGF1R expression was used (45 versus 55 months, P = 0.36). No difference in survival was observed between IGF1R-positive and -negative patients in a subgroup of stage I-II adenocarcinoma (n = 137) with known EGFR mutation and copy number status.

CONCLUSIONS

IGF1R expression does not represent a prognostic factor in resected NSCLC patients. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma overexpress IGF1R more frequently than patients with nonsquamous histology, justifying the different sensitivity to anti-IGF1R agents observed in clinical trials.

Shortcomings of current therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer: unmet medical needs

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major global health problem and is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Current treatment involves nonspecific, nonselective cytotoxic chemotherapy, which results in only a modest increase in survival and causes significant toxicity to the patient. Targeted agents are initially effective in certain small subpopulations of patients, but eventually nearly all patients become resistant to further treatment. The limitations in efficacy and safety associated with available treatments for NSCLC underscore the need for novel agents with improved efficacy and safety profiles. This review discusses the limitations of currently recommended therapies for patients with advanced NSCLC and discusses new agents in clinical development for this disease.

MYC and EIF3H Coamplification significantly improve response and survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) treated with gefitinib

BACKGROUND

We investigated the incidence of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit H (EIF3H) and MYC amplification in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, and whether MYC/EIF3H increased gene copy number affected response to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

METHODS

Metastatic NSCLC patients (n = 54) treated with gefitinib were analyzed for the genomic content of EIF3H and MYC genes by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a custom-designed 3-color DNA probe set.

RESULT

Amplification of EIF3H (ratio EIF3H/CEP8 >2), was observed in 10 cases (18.5%), and MYC was coamplified in all. MYC amplification without coamplification of EIF3H was observed in 2 cases (3.7%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to identify the cutoff for MYC and EIF3H copy number best discriminating sensitive and resistant populations. MYC FISH positive patients (MYC+, mean > or =2.8) had a significantly higher response rate (p = 0.003), longer time to progression (p = 0.01) and overall survival (OS: p = 0.02) than MYC- (mean <2.8). Similarly, EIF3H FISH positive patients (EIF3H+, mean > or =2.75) had a significantly higher response rate (p = 0.002), longer time to progression (p = 0.01) and OS (p = 0.01) than EIF3H- (mean <2.75).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that MYC and EIF3H are frequently coamplified in NSCLC and that a high copy number correlates with increased epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sensitivity.

A phase 2 study of cetuximab in combination with docetaxel in chemotherapy-refractory/resistant patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Cetuximab in combination with docetaxel was examined in chemotherapy-refractory/resistant patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine response rate, survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK).

METHODS

Patients had evidence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression (> or =1 +) and tumor progression during or disease recurrence within 3 months after chemotherapy. Cetuximab was administered weekly (400 mg/m(2) initial; 250 mg/m(2) thereafter). Docetaxel was administered every 3 weeks (75 mg/m(2)). A response in 3 of the first 21 patients was required to continue accrual to the target sample size of 50 patients.

RESULTS

Confirmed responses included 1 complete response (1.8%), 10 partial responses (18.2%), and 20 with stable disease (36.4%). The response rate was 20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.4% to 33.0%) and median time to disease progression was 104 days. There were no differences in PK parameters of docetaxel alone or with cetuximab. The most common grade 3 of 4 adverse events were leukopenia (27.3%) and acne (21.8%). Four patients (7.3%) discontinued due to allergic reaction. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months with a 1-year survival of 35%.

CONCLUSIONS

Cetuximab in combination with docetaxel was well tolerated. The response rate supports more definitive evaluation of this combination in the second-line setting.

Phase II study of the anti-insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor antibody CP-751,871 in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in previously untreated, locally advanced, or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase II study of combination of the anti-insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor antibody CP-751,871 with paclitaxel and carboplatin (PCI) in advanced treatment-naïve non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2), carboplatin (area under the plasma concentration-time curve of 6), and CP-751,871 10 to 20 mg/kg (PCI(10), PCI(20)) or paclitaxel and carboplatin alone (PC) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. PCI(10-20) patients could continue CP-751,871 (figitumumab) treatment after chemotherapy discontinuation. Patients treated with PC experiencing disease progression were eligible to receive CP-751,871 at investigator's discretion. An additional nonrandomized single-arm cohort of 30 patients with nonadenocarcinoma tumor histology receiving PCI(20) was enrolled on completion of the randomized study.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients were enrolled onto the randomized portion of the study. Safety and efficacy information are available for 151 patients (98 patients treated with PCI and 53 patients treated with PC). Forty-eight patients treated with PCI received PCI(10) and 50 patients received PCI(20) in two sequential stages. Twenty of 53 patients treated with PC received CP-751,871 after disease progression. PCI was well tolerated. Fifty-four percent of patients treated with PCI and 42% of patients treated with PC had objective responses. Sixteen of 23 patients assessable for efficacy in the nonrandomized single-arm extension cohort also responded to treatment. Of note, 14 of 18 randomly assigned and 11 of 14 nonrandomly assigned patients treated with PCI with squamous cell carcinoma histology had response to treatment, including nine objective responses in bulky disease. Responses were also observed in two patients with squamous histology receiving CP-751,871 on PC discontinuation. PCI(20)/PC hazard ratio for progression-free survival was 0.8 to 0.56, according to censorship.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that PCI(20) is safe and effective in patients with NSCLC.

Combined inhibition of the VEGFR and EGFR signaling pathways in the treatment of NSCLC

Multitargeted agents represent the next generation of targeted therapies in solid tumors. The benefits of individually targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathways have been clinically validated in recent years in a number of solid tumor types including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the heterogeneity of this tumor type and potential crosstalk between these key signaling pathways (which are known to play a critical role in tumor growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis), dual inhibition of the VEGFR and EGFR signaling pathways has the potential to offer additional clinical benefits in NSCLC. A number of approaches to inhibiting both VEGFR and EGFR signaling are currently under investigation, including monotherapy with a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (e.g., vandetanib, AEE788, XL647, BMS-690514) or a combination of single-targeted therapies (e.g., bevacizumab, cetuximab, erlotinib, gefitinib). Preclinical and early clinical data (phase I and II trials) support combined inhibition of the VEGFR and EGFR pathways in NSCLC. Overall, combined inhibition strategies are well tolerated and have shown promise in early clinical studies. Ongoing phase II and phase III trials will determine the clinical potential of a number of dual inhibition strategies in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Increased MET gene copy number negatively affects survival of surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the prognostic role of genomic gain for MET and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genes in surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 447 NSCLC patients with available tumor tissue from primary lung tumor and survival data. EGFR and MET status was evaluated by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in tissue microarray sections.

RESULTS

EGFR FISH results were obtained in 376 cases. EGFR gene amplification and high polysomy (EGFR FISH+) were observed in 10.4% and 32.4% of cases, respectively. EGFR FISH-positive patients had a nonsignificant shorter survival than EGFR FISH-negative patients (P = .4). Activating EGFR mutations were detected in 9.7% of 144 stage I-II disease with no impact on survival. MET FISH analysis was performed in 435 cases. High MET gene copy number (mean > or = 5 copies/cell) was observed in 48 cases (MET+, 11.1%), including 18 cases with true gene amplification (4.1%). MET+ status was associated with advanced stage (P = .01), with grade 3 (P = .016) and with EGFR FISH+ result (P < .0001). No patient with activating EGFR mutation resulted MET+. In the whole population, MET-positive patients had shorter survival than MET-negative patients (P = .005). Multivariable model confirmed that MET-negative patients had a significant reduction in the risk of death than MET-positive patients (hazard ratio, 0.66; P = .04).

CONCLUSION

MET increased gene copy number is an independent negative prognostic factor in surgically resected NSCLC. EGFR gene gain does not impact survival after resection.

Mutations and response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors

Novel therapeutic agents targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have improved outcomes for a subgroup of patients with colorectal, lung, head and neck, and pancreatic cancers. In these tumors, the EGFR activation turns on at least five different signaling pathways (RAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase, phospholipase C, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT, signal transducer and activator of transcription, and SRC/FAK pathways), which are intimately interconnected, and frequent mutations involving either the receptor itself or downstream effectors have been found. Up to now, it seems that alterations at the EGFR level has major importance in EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor response, whereas modifications of downstream effectors could lead to treatment resistance. Furthermore, our understanding of the mechanism of the EGFR network activation provides new hypotheses on potential new anticancer drugs that may be effective.