Long-term results of the international adjuvant lung cancer trial evaluating adjuvant Cisplatin-based chemotherapy in resected lung cancer

T-cell subsets and cytokines are indicative of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy responses in NSCLC

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade combined with chemotherapy is a promising treatment for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet the immunological mechanisms contributing to tumor regression and biomarkers corresponding to different pathological responses remain unclear.

METHODS

Using dynamic and paired blood samples from NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, we analyzed the frequencies of CD8 + T-cell and Treg subsets and their dynamic changes during neoadjuvant treatment through flow cytometry. Cytokine profiles and function-related gene expression of CD8 + T cells and Tregs were analyzed through flow cytometry and mRNA-seq. Infiltrating T-cell subsets in resected tissues from patients with different pathological responses were analyzed through multiplex immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

Forty-two NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy were enrolled and then underwent surgical resection and pathological evaluation. Nineteen patients had pCR (45%), 7 patients had MPR (17%), and 16 patients had non-MPR (38%). In patients with pCR, the frequencies of CD137 + CD8 + T cells (P = 0.0475), PD-1 + Ki-67 + CD8 + T cells (P = 0.0261) and Tregs (P = 0.0317) were significantly different from those of non-pCR patients before treatment. pCR patients usually had low frequencies of CD137 + CD8 + T cells, PD-1 + Ki-67 + CD8 + T cells and Tregs, and their AUCs were higher than that of tissue PD-L1 expression. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy markedly improved CD8 + T-cell proliferation and activation, especially in pCR patients, as the frequencies of CD137 + CD8 + (P = 0.0136) and Ki-67 + CD8 + (P = 0.0391) T cells were significantly increased. The blood levels of cytokines such as IL-2 (P = 0.0391) and CXCL10 (P = 0.0195) were also significantly increased in the pCR group, which is consistent with the high density of activated cytotoxic T cells at the tumor site (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy drives CD8 + T cells toward a proliferative and active profile. The frequencies of CD137 + CD8 + T cells, PD-1 + Ki-67 + CD8 + T cells and Tregs at baseline might predict the response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC patients. The increase in IL-2 and CXCL10 might reflect the chemotaxis and enrichment of cytotoxic T cells at the tumor site and a better response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

Population Survival Kinetics Derived from Clinical Trials of Potentially Curable Lung Cancers

Using digitized data from progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival Kaplan-Meier curves, one can assess population survival kinetics through exponential decay nonlinear regression analyses. To demonstrate their utility, we analyzed PFS curves from published curative-intent trials of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant osimertinib in resected EGFR-mutant NSCLC (ADAURA trial), chemoradiotherapy for inoperable NSCLC, and limited small cell lung cancer (SCLC). These analyses permit assessment of log-linear curve shape and estimation of the proportion of patients cured, PFS half-lives for subpopulations destined to eventually relapse, and probability of eventual relapse in patients remaining progression-free at different time points. The proportion of patients potentially cured was 41% for adjuvant controls, 58% with adjuvant chemotherapy, 17% for ADAURA controls, not assessable with adjuvant osimertinib, 15% with chemoradiotherapy, and 12% for SCLC. Median PFS half-life for relapsing subpopulations was 11.9 months for adjuvant controls, 17.4 months with adjuvant chemotherapy, 24.4 months for ADAURA controls, not assessable with osimertinib, 9.3 months with chemoradiotherapy, and 10.7 months for SCLC. For those remaining relapse-free at 2 and 5 years, the cure probability was 74%/96% for adjuvant controls, 77%/93% with adjuvant chemotherapy, 51%/94% with chemoradiation, and 39%/87% with limited SCLC. Relatively easy population kinetic analyses add useful information.

The Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy before Osimertinib in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutant Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Communicating It to Patients

Patients with radically resected stage II and III NSCLC are exposed to a high risk of disease recurrence. Thus, adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is routinely offered to this patient population, although it results in an absolute increase in 5-year survival rate of only 4%. This modest improvement in survival rate makes it challenging to communicate to our patients about the decision to be treated with adjuvant chemotherapy or not. Nowadays, the decision to administer adjuvant chemotherapy or not in resected NSCLC is almost never completely shared with patients because its role is very difficult to explain. The risk-benefit ratio becomes clearly unfavourable in elderly and unfit patients. Recently, the phase III ADAURA trial demonstrated a clinically significant disease-free survival and overall survival benefit with adjuvant osimertinib (with or without adjuvant chemotherapy) versus a placebo in EGFR-mutated stage IB-IIIA resected NSCLC. In this patient population, the decision to administer chemotherapy or not is much more challenging given the great benefit offered by osimertinib alone. Thus, it is time now to improve our communication tools to explain the role of adjuvant chemotherapy to our patients, especially in the EGFR-mutated population, in order to undertake real shared decision making in a clinical context in which the opportunity to administer toxic chemotherapy is debatable and subjective.

Mechanism of PWAR6 regulating cisplatin drug sensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer through miR-577/PHACTR1

lncRNA Prader Willi/Angelman Region RNA 6 (PWAR6) is considered to play a protective lncRNA in glioma, but, the role of PWAR6 in the occurrence and cisplatin resistance of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is elusive. In the study, we aimed to assess the role of PWAR6 in the cisplatin resistance of NSCLC. Based on the oebiotech and TargetScanHuman database, we predicted the interaction between PWAR6, miR-577 and PHACTR1. We then used small interfering RNA (siRNA), miRNA mimics and dual-luciferase reporter assay to explore the regulatory role of PWAR6/miR-577PHACTR1. Based on the online database, miR-577 can interact with PWAR6 and PHACTR1. Soon afterwards, we observed that the expression of PWAR6 and PHACTR1 was increased, while miR-577 expression was decreased in A549/DDP cells. And the cell viability was decreased, while cell apoptosis was increased in A549/DDP cells. What's more, PWAR6 knockdown can promote the expression of miR-577 and inhibit the expression of PHACTR1. PWAR6 knockdown elevated cell proliferation and reduced cell apoptosis of A549/DDP cells. Interestingly, we found that miR-577 can interact with PHACTR1 to regulate the proliferation and apoptosis of A549/DDP cells. To conclude, we speculated that PWAR6 knockdown elevated cell proliferation and reduced cell apoptosis of A549/DDP cells via miR-577/PHACTR1, providing the theoretical basis for the clinical treatment of NSCLC patients.

Canakinumab as Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Completely Resected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From the CANOPY-A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

Effective treatments for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited and relapse rates are high. The interleukin (IL)-1β pathway has been linked with tumor development and progression, including in the Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes cardiovascular study in which IL-1β pathway inhibition with canakinumab reduced lung cancer incidence and mortality in an exploratory analysis.

METHODS

CANOPY-A (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03447769) is a phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of canakinumab versus placebo for adult patients with stage II-IIIA or IIIB (T >5 cm, N2-positives II-IIIB; American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control version 8), completely resected NSCLC who had received adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) and the key secondary end point was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 1,382 patients were randomized to 200 mg canakinumab (n = 693) or placebo (n = 689) once every 3 weeks for 18 cycles. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 20.8% and 19.6% of patients receiving canakinumab and placebo, respectively; AEs led to discontinuation in 4.3% and 4.1% of patients in these groups, respectively. This study did not meet its primary end point. Median DFS was 35.0 months (canakinumab arm) and 29.7 months (placebo arm; hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.14; one-sided P = .258). DFS subgroup analyses did not show any meaningful differences between arms. As expected, because of canakinumab-driven IL-1β pathway inhibition, C-reactive protein and IL-6 levels decreased in the canakinumab arm versus placebo arm, but had no correlation with differential clinical outcomes. OS was not formally tested as DFS was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

CANOPY-A did not show a DFS benefit of adding canakinumab after surgery and adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with resected, stage II-III NSCLC. No new safety signals were identified with canakinumab.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors as adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected nonsmall cell lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of the review is to summarize the current status of immune checkpoint inhibitors as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

RECENT FINDINGS

The IMpower010 phase 3 trial demonstrated improved disease-free survival and, in case of PD-L1 at least 50%, also improved overall survival for atezolizumab compared to best supportive care among patients with completely resected stage II-IIIA NSCLC. The PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091 trial showed increased disease-free survival for pembrolizumab among patients with stage IB-IIIA NSCLC. Trials with nivolumab and durvalumab are ongoing.

SUMMARY

Atezolizumab or pembrolizumab have become options for adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected NSCLC.

Comparison of radiological and pathological tumor sizes in resected non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), T factor plays an important role in determining staging. The present study aimed to determine the validity of preoperative evaluation of clinical T (cT) factor by comparing radiological and pathological tumor sizes.

METHODS

Data for 1,799 patients with primary NSCLC who underwent curative surgery were investigated. The concordance between cT and pathological T (pT) factors was analyzed. Furthermore, we compared groups with an increase or decrease of ≥ 20% and groups with an increase or decrease of < 20% in the size change between preoperative radiological and pathological diameters.

RESULTS

The mean sizes of the radiological solid components and the pathological invasive tumors were 1.90 cm and 1.99 cm, respectively, correlation degree = 0.782. The group with increased pathological invasive tumor size (≥ 20%) compared with the radiologic solid component was significantly more likely female, consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) ≤ 0.5, and within cT1. Multivariate logistic analysis identified CTR < 1, cT ≤ T1, and adenocarcinoma as independent risk factors for increased pT factor.

CONCLUSION

The radiological invasive area of tumors with cT1, CTR < 1, or adenocarcinoma on preoperative CT may be underestimated compared with pathological invasive diameter.

Clinical management of stage III non-small cell lung cancer in India: An expert consensus statement

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is considered the most common type of lung cancer (>80% of all lung cancers); patients are often diagnosed at advanced stages of the disease. The management of NSCLC is considered challenging owing to variations in size, an extension of the tumors, involvement patterns, and classification. Although adequate literature and guidelines are available on the management of NSCLC in several countries, an Indian perspective on stage III NSCLC management is lacking. We used the modified Delphi approach to form consensus statements. A thorough literature search was done. The authors then convened and deliberated over published literature, available guidelines, and clinical judgment. Recommendation statements were formed for different clinical scenarios. These statements were sent as a form of survey to other oncologists, and their responses were recorded and mentioned. Evidence-based statements were formed for diagnosing and managing stage III NSCLC. These recommendation statements cover various aspects-surgical, radiation, and medical treatment in various clinical scenarios including adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and consolidation therapies.

Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II/III Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy improves the survival of patients with resected pathological stage II/III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations remains controversial.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 353 patients with resected pathological N1/N2 stage II/III NSCLC between 2010 and 2016. Mutant EGFR (mEGFR) was detected in 76 patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) was administered to 151 patients. We compared cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between AC and surgery-alone (SA) groups, including patients with wild-type EGFR (wEGFR) and mEGFR. Using multivariate analysis, we evaluated the prognostic factors in patients with wEGFR and mEGFR.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 4.7 years. In patients with wEGFR, the differences in CSS and RFS between the AC (n = 114) and SA (n = 163) groups were significant (CSS: 66.8% [5 years] vs. 49.4% [5 years], p = 0.001; RFS: 54.2% [5 years] vs. 39.2% [5 years], p = 0.013). The significant prognostic factors were AC (vs. SA; p < 0.0001), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide  > 60% (p = 0.028), tumor size (p < 0.001), lymphatic permeation (p = 0.041), and pN1 (vs. pN2; p < 0.001). However, the differences in CSS and RFS between the AC (n = 37) and SA (n = 39) groups were not significant (CSS: 64.0% [5 years] vs. 58.1% [5 years], p = 0.065; RFS: 45.0% [5 years] vs. 33.8% [5 years], p = 0.302). Multivariate analysis identified no significant prognostic factors in patients with mEGFR.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated the efficacy of AC in patients with mEGFR and wEGFR. The efficacy of AC may be lower in patients with mEGFR than in those with wEGFR.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in pathological node-negative non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with a poor survival rate, even for patients with early-stage cancer. Identifying patients with pathological N0 NSCLC who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy treatment after surgery is essential. We conducted a retrospective cohort study used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and included 26,380 patients with pathological N0 NSCLC after surgery between January 2018, and December 2019. Among 26,380 patients, 24,273 patients received surgery alone and the other 2107 patients received surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy. After 1:1 propensity score matching, both groups contained 2107 patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not show significantly better 24-month survival in T2aN0 NSCLC patients (83.41% vs. 82.91%, p = 0.067), although it did for T2bN0 patients (86.36% vs. 81.70%, p = 0.028). Poorly-differentiated NSCLC remained a high-risk factor for pT2N0, and adjuvant chemotherapy provided better 24-month survival after matching (86.36% vs. 81.70%, p = 0.029). In conclusion, when treating pN0 NSCLC, adjuvant chemotherapy had a beneficial effect when the tumor size was larger than 4 cm. The effect when the tumor size was between 3 and 4 cm was not remarkable. Poorly-differentiated NSCLC was a high-risk factor in the pT2N0 stage.

Phenotypic and molecular characterization of novel pulmonary adenocarcinoma cell lines established from a dog

Canine pulmonary adenocarcinoma (PAC) resembles human lung tumors in never-smokers, but it is rarer than human pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Therefore, research on canine PAC is challenging. In the present study, we successfully established various novel canine PAC cell lines from a single lesion in a dog, including two parent cell lines and fourteen cloned cell lines, and characterized their cellular properties in vitro. Several of these cell lines showed epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like and/or cancer stem cell (CSCs)-like phenotypes. We additionally assessed the sensitivity of the cells to vinorelbine in vitro. Three clonal lines, two of which showed EMT- and CSC-like phenotypes, were resistant to vinorelbine. Furthermore, we evaluated the expression and activation status of EGFR, HER2, and Ras signaling factors. The findings indicated that the cell lines we established preserved the expression and activation of these factors to varying extents. These novel canine PAC cell lines can be utilized in future research for understanding the pathogenesis and development of treatments for canine PAC.

[Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer - Interdisciplinary Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Cancer Society - Abridged Version]

The current S3 Lung Cancer Guidelines are edited with fundamental changes to the previous edition based on the dynamic influx of information to this field:The recommendations include de novo a mandatory case presentation for all patients with lung cancer in a multidisciplinary tumor board before initiation of treatment, furthermore CT-Screening for asymptomatic patients at risk (after federal approval), recommendations for incidental lung nodule management , molecular testing of all NSCLC independent of subtypes, EGFR-mutations in resectable early stage lung cancer in relapsed or recurrent disease, adjuvant TKI-therapy in the presence of common EGFR-mutations, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in resected lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, obligatory evaluation of PD-L1-status, consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-pos. tumor, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition in patients withPD-L1 ≥ 50% stage IIIA and treatment options in PD-L1 ≥ 50% tumors independent of PD-L1status and targeted therapy and treatment option immune chemotherapy in first line SCLC patients.Based on the current dynamic status of information in this field and the turnaround time required to implement new options, a transformation to a "living guideline" was proposed.

Surgical Treatment of Osteosarcoma Induced Distant Pre-Metastatic Niche in Lung to Facilitate the Colonization of Circulating Tumor Cells

Recently, the major challenge in treating osteosarcoma patients is the metastatic disease, most commonly in the lungs. However, the underlying mechanism of recurrence and metastasis of osteosarcoma after surgical resection of primary tumor remains unclear. This study aims to investigate whether the pulmonary metastases characteristic of osteosarcoma is associated with surgical treatment and whether surgery contributes to the formation of pre-metastatic niche in the distant lung tissue. In the current study, the authors observe the presence of circulating tumor cells in patients undergoing surgical resection of osteosarcoma which is correlated to tumor recurrence. The pulmonary infiltrations of neutrophils and Gr-1+ myeloid cells are characterized to form a pre-metastatic niche upon the exposure of circulating tumor cells after surgical resection. It is found that mitochondrial damage-associated molecular patterns released from surgical resection contribute to the formation of pre-metastatic niche in lung through IL-1β secretion. This study reveals that surgical management for osteosarcoma, irrespective of the primary tumor, might promote the formation of postoperative pre-metastatic niche in lung which is with important implications for developing rational therapies during peri-operative period.

Combined morphologic-metabolic biomarkers from [18F]FDG-PET/CT stratify prognostic groups in low-risk NSCLC

AIM

The aim of this study was to derive prognostic parameters from 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG-PET/CT) in patients with low-risk NSCLC and determine their prognostic value.

METHODS

81 (21 female, mean age 66 a) therapy-naive patients that underwent [18F]FDG-PET/CT before histologic confirmation of NSCLC with stadium I and II between 2008-2016 were included. A mean follow-up time of 58 months (13-176), overall and progression free survival (OS, PFS) were registered. A volume of interest for the primary tumor was defined on PET and CT images. Parameters SUVmax, PET-solidity, PET-circularity, and CT-volume were analyzed. To evaluate the prognostic value of each parameter for OS, a minimum p-value approach was used to define cutoff values, survival analysis, and log-rank tests were performed, including subgroup analysis for combinations of parameters.

RESULTS

Mean OS was 58±28 months. Poor OS was associated with a tumor CT-volume >14.3 cm3 (p=0.02, HR=7.0, CI 2.7-17.7), higher SUVmax values >12.2 (p=0.003; HR=3.0, CI 1.3-6.7) and PET-solidity >0.919 (p=0.004; HR=3.0, CI 1.0-8.9). Combined parameter analysis revealed worse prognosis in larger volume/high SUVmax tumors compared to larger volume/lower SUVmax (p=0.028; HR=2.5, CI 1.1-5.5), high PET-solidity/low volume (p=0.01; HR=2.4, CI 0.8-6.6) and low SUVmax/high PET-solidity (p=0.02, HR=4.0, CI 0.8-19.0).

CONCLUSION

Even in this group of low-risk NSCLC patients, we identified a subgroup with a significantly worse prognosis by combining morphologic-metabolic biomarkers from [18F]FDG-PET/CT. The combination of SUVmax and CT-volume performed best. Based on these preliminary data, future prospective studies to validate this combined morphologic-metabolic imaging biomarker for potential therapeutic decisions seem promising.

The Antitumour Activity of a Curcumin and Piperine Loaded iRGD-Modified Liposome: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation

Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers around the world, with a high mortality rate. Despite substantial advancements in diagnoses and therapies, the outlook and survival of patients with lung cancer remains dismal due to drug tolerance and malignant reactions. New interventional treatments urgently need to be explored if natural compounds are to be used to reduce toxicity and adverse effects to meet the needs of lung cancer clinical treatment. An internalizing arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (iRGD) modified by a tumour-piercing peptide liposome (iRGD-LP-CUR-PIP) was developed via co-delivery of curcumin (CUR) and piperine (PIP). Its antitumour efficacy was evaluated and validated via in vivo and in vitro experiments. iRGD-LP-CUR-PIP enhanced tumour targeting and cellular internalisation effectively. In vitro, iRGD-LP-CUR-PIP exhibited enhanced cellular uptake, suppression of tumour cell multiplication and invasion and energy-independent cellular uptake. In vivo, iRGD-LP-CUR-PIP showed high antitumour efficacy, mainly in terms of significant tumour volume reduction and increased weight and spleen index. Data showed that iRGD peptide has active tumour targeting and it significantly improves the penetration and cellular internalisation of tumours in the liposomal system. The use of CUR in combination with PIP can exert synergistic antitumour activity. This study provides a targeted therapeutic system based on natural components to improve antitumour efficacy in lung cancer.

Postoperative pathological complete response in a patient with PD‑L1‑negative stage IIIB lung squamous cell carcinoma following neoadjuvant tislelizumab treatment combined with chemotherapy: A case report and literature review

The utilization of immune checkpoint inhibitors in oncological treatment has increased in recent years. The therapeutic strategy of targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway has altered the management of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Tislelizumab, a novel anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody developed in China, has demonstrated efficacy in treating advanced NSCLC. However, its potential role as a neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced NSCLC has not been definitively established. Current guidelines do not specify which patient populations may gain the most benefit from neoadjuvant immunotherapy coupled with chemotherapy, nor do they indicate the optimal timing, dose or duration of adjuvant maintenance therapy post-NSCLC surgery. Similarly, data concerning the safety and practicability of surgical resection following neoadjuvant tislelizumab treatment for NSCLC remain limited. The present study describes the case of a patient diagnosed with stage IIIB NSCLC, which was initially deemed unresectable. A preoperative biopsy of the tumor mass revealed squamous cell carcinoma and a negative PD-L1 gene test. Notably, after two cycles of neoadjuvant tislelizumab treatment coupled with chemotherapy, the tumor exhibited marked shrinkage. This permitted the patient to undergo thoracoscopic radical lung cancer resection, which resulted in a pathological complete response. Postoperative pathology identified a large infiltration of lymphoplasmacytic cells and foamy histiocytes. The patient experienced grade 2 myelosuppression, a condition that was successfully addressed with the administration of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The present case indicates the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant immunotherapy integrated with chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced, PD-L1-negative NSCLC prior to surgical intervention. Moreover, the case suggests the potential of this therapeutic combination to alter the tumor microenvironment. However, the generalization of these findings necessitates further validation through randomized multicenter trials.

Deep learning-enhanced radiomics for histologic classification and grade stratification of stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study

Background

Preoperative prediction models for histologic subtype and grade of stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) according to the update of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Lung in 2021 and the 2020 new grade system are yet to be explored. We aim to develop the noninvasive pathology and grade evaluation approach for patients with stage IA LUAD via CT-based radiomics approach and evaluate their performance in clinical practice.

Methods

Chest CT scans were retrospectively collected from patients who were diagnosed with stage IA LUAD and underwent complete resection at two hospitals. A deep learning segmentation algorithm was first applied to assist lesion delineation. Expansion strategies such as bounding-box annotations were further applied. Radiomics features were then extracted and selected followed by radiomics modeling based on four classic machine learning algorithms for histologic subtype classification and grade stratification. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate model performance.

Results

The study included 294 and 145 patients with stage IA LUAD from two hospitals for radiomics analysis, respectively. For classification of four histological subtypes, multilayer perceptron (MLP) algorithm presented no annotation strategy preference and achieved the average AUC of 0.855, 0.922, and 0.720 on internal, independent, and external test sets with 1-pixel expansion annotation. Bounding-box annotation strategy also enabled MLP an acceptable and stable accuracy among test sets. Meanwhile, logistic regression was selected for grade stratification and achieved the average AUC of 0.928, 0.837, and 0.748 on internal, independent, and external test sets with optimal annotation strategies.

Conclusions

DL-enhanced radiomics models had great potential to predict the fine histological subtypes and grades of early-stage LUADs based on CT images, which might serve as a promising noninvasive approach for the diagnosis and management of early LUADs.

Prediction of disease-free survival of N1/2 non-small cell lung cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy by the biomarker RPMB

No molecular biomarkers have been proven applicable in clinical practice to identify patients who can benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we established a biomarker, RPMB, short for promotor methylation burden of DNA repair genes (DRGs), to identify the subgroup of patients who might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC. Methylation profiles of 828 NSCLC primary tumors and their clinical information were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The RPMB for each patient after radical resection was calculated and its correlation with the prognosis of NSCLC was extensively investigated. DRGs of NSCLC were much more hypomethylated than the other genes (all p＜0.001). RPMB was defined as the ratio of methylated DRGs to the total number of all the DRGs. Patients with higher RPMB values tended to be nonsmokers, had adenocarcinoma, were female and had peripheral tumors. Subgroup analysis of forest plot among different clinical factors showed that high RPMB was significantly correlated to better disease-free survival (DFS) in pathologic N-positive patients after adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 0.404, n = 62, p = 0.034). Notably, more superior DFS was exhibited in high RPMB NSCLCs with N1 nodal stage compared with those with low RPMB values (HR = 0.348, n = 47, p = 0.043). High RPMB might be used as a potential predictor to identify suitable N-positive NSCLC patients who can benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after radical surgery.

Role of circulating-tumor DNA in the early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma as a predictive biomarker

Lung cancer is one of the most common solid malignancies. Tissue biopsy is the standard method for accurately diagnosing lung and many other malignancies over decades. However, molecular profiling of tumors leads to establishing a new horizon in the field of precision medicine, which has now entered the mainstream in clinical practice. In this context, a minimally invasive complementary method has been proposed as a liquid biopsy (LB) which is a blood-based test that is gaining popularity as it provides the opportunity to test genotypes in a unique, less invasive manner. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) captivating the Circulating-tumor DNA (Ct-DNA) are often present in the blood of lung cancer patients and are the fundamental concept behind LB. There are multiple clinical uses of Ct-DNA, including its role in prognostic and therapeutic purposes. The treatment of lung cancer has drastically evolved over time. Therefore, this review article mainly focuses on the current literature on circulating tumor DNA and its clinical implications and future goals in non-small cell lung cancer.

Integrative bioinformatics approaches to establish potential prognostic immune-related genes signature and drugs in the non-small cell lung cancer microenvironment

Introduction: Research has revealed that the tumor microenvironment (TME) is associated with the progression of malignancy. The combination of meaningful prognostic biomarkers related to the TME is expected to be a reliable direction for improving the diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Method and Result: Therefore, to better understand the connection between the TME and survival outcomes of NSCLC, we used the “DESeq2” R package to mine the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of two groups of NSCLC samples according to the optimal cutoff value of the immune score through the ESTIMATE algorithm. A total of 978 up-DEGs and 828 down-DEGs were eventually identified. A fifteen-gene prognostic signature was established via LASSO and Cox regression analysis and further divided the patients into two risk sets. The survival outcome of high-risk patients was significantly worse than that of low-risk patients in both the TCGA and two external validation sets (p-value &lt; 0.05). The gene signature showed high predictive accuracy in TCGA (1-year area under the time-dependent ROC curve (AUC) = 0.722, 2-year AUC = 0.708, 3-year AUC = 0.686). The nomogram comprised of the risk score and related clinicopathological information was constructed, and calibration plots and ROC curves were applied, KEGG and GSEA analyses showed that the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway, E2F target pathway and immune-associated pathway were mainly involved in the high-risk group. Further somatic mutation and immune analyses were conducted to compare the differences between the two groups. Drug sensitivity provides a potential treatment basis for clinical treatment. Finally, EREG and ADH1C were selected as the key prognostic genes of the two overlapping results from PPI and multiple Cox analyses. They were verified by comparing the mRNA expression in cell lines and protein expression in the HPA database, and clinical validation further confirmed the effectiveness of key genes.

Conclusion: In conclusion, we obtained an immune-related fifteen-gene prognostic signature and potential mechanism and sensitive drugs underling the prognosis model, which may provide accurate prognosis prediction and available strategies for NSCLC.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Solid Tumors in the Adjuvant Setting: Current Progress, Future Directions, and Role in Transplant Oncology

The rationale for administering immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the adjuvant setting is to eradicate micro-metastases and, ultimately, prolong survival. Thus far, clinical trials have demonstrated that 1-year adjuvant courses of ICIs reduce the risk of recurrence in melanoma, urothelial cancer, renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers. Overall survival benefit has been shown in melanoma while survival data are still not mature in other malignancies. Emerging data also show the feasibility of utilizing ICIs in the peri-transplant setting for hepatobiliary malignancies. While ICIs are generally well-tolerated, the development of chronic immune-related adverse events, typically endocrinopathies or neurotoxicities, as well as delayed immune-related adverse events, warrants further scrutiny regarding the optimal duration of adjuvant therapy and requires a thorough risk-benefit determination. The advent of blood-based, dynamic biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can help detect minimal residual disease and identify the subset of patients who would likely benefit from adjuvant treatment. In addition, the characterization of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and ctDNA-adjusted blood tumor mutation burden (bTMB) has also shown promise in predicting response to immunotherapy. Until additional, prospective studies delineate the magnitude of overall survival benefit and validate the use of predictive biomarkers, a tailored, patient-centered approach to adjuvant ICIs that includes extensive patient counseling on potentially irreversible adverse effects should be routinely incorporated into clinical practice.

Different pathological response and histological features following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy in resected non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy has led to clinical benefits in resectable NSCLC in comparison to chemo-therapy alone. Major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR) have been used as surrogates of neoadjuvant therapy response and clinical outcomes. However, the factors affecting the pathological response are still controversial. Therefore, in this study we retrospectively examined MPR and pCR in two different cohorts of NSCLC patients, 14 treated by chemotherapy and 12 by chemo-immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.

Methods

In resected tumor specimens, different histological characteristics were evaluated: necrosis, fibrosis, inflammation, presence of organizing pneumonia, granuloma, cholesterol cleft, and reactive epithelial alterations. In addition, we evaluated how MPR impacts on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). In a small group of patients treated by chemo-immunotherapy, a gene expression analysis of the Hippo pathway was performed both in preoperative biopsies and matched post-surgical specimens.

Results

We observed a better pathological response in the chemo-immunotherapy treated cohort: 6/12 patients (50.0%) achieved a MPR ≤10% and 1/12 (8.3%) achieved pCR both on primary tumor and on lymph nodes. On the contrary, no patient treated with chemotherapy alone achieved pCR or MPR ≤10%. A higher amount of stroma in the neoplastic bed was observed in patients treated with immuno-chemotherapy. Moreover, patients achieving better MPR (including pCR) had significantly improved overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). After neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, residual tumors showed a remarkable upregulation of genes consistent with the activation of YAP/TAZ. Also, alternative checkpoint, such as CTLA-4, were enhanced.

Discussion

Our findings showed that neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy treatment improves MPR and pCR thus resulting in better EFS and OS. Moreover, a combined treatment could induce different morphological and molecular changes in comparison to chemotherapy alone, thus giving new insights in the assessment of pathological response.

Treatment patterns and long-term survival outcomes for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

AIM

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Australia with poor long-term survival outcomes. Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a highly heterogenous group with diverse tumor characteristics and multiple, possible treatment options. We present retrospective data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and long-term outcomes in stage III NSCLC patients treated at a single cancer center in New South Wales, Australia.

METHODS

Stage III NSCLC patients were identified from the 'Nepean Cancer Research Biobank'. Patient demographics, cancer-related information, and long-term follow-up data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients were eligible for analysis with 61% of them diagnosed as stage IIIA, 35% IIIB, and 4% IIIC. Induction chemotherapy was administered in 20% of the patients. Overall, 48% of the study population underwent surgery, and 38% underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Both median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were superior in stage IIIA patients in comparison to stage IIIB (and IIIC) patients (22 vs. 11 months, p = .018; and 58 vs. 19 months, p = .048, respectively). Patients who were younger (<65 years old), good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS <2), and females had better prognosis on univariate analysis. There was a nonstatistically significant trend toward better median OS with CCRT in comparison to surgery (58 vs. 37 months, p = .87).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes remain poor, and hence better treatment strategies are urgently needed in stage III NSCLC. Equally, more robust, prospective studies would help delineate the optimal treatment modality in these patients.

Construction of a mortality risk prediction model for elderly people at risk of lobectomy for NSCLC

Background

An increasing number of lung cancer patients are opting for lobectomy for oncological treatment. However, due to the unique organismal condition of elderly patients, their short-term postoperative mortality is significantly higher than that of non-elderly patients. Therefore, there is a need to develop a personalised predictive tool to assess the risk of postoperative mortality in elderly patients.

Methods

Information on the diagnosis and survival of 35,411 older patients with confirmed lobectomy NSCLC from 2009 to 2019 was screened from the SEER database. The surgical group was divided into a high-risk mortality population group (≤90 days) and a non-high-risk mortality population group using a 90-day criterion. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method to compare the differences in overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) between the two groups. The data set was split into modelling and validation groups in a ratio of 7.5:2.5, and model risk predictors of postoperative death in elderly patients with NSCLC were screened using univariate and multifactorial logistic regression. Columnar plots were constructed for model visualisation, and the area under the subject operating characteristic curve (AUC), DCA decision curve and clinical impact curve were used to assess model predictiveness and clinical utility.

Results

Multi-factor logistic regression results showed that sex, age, race, histology and grade were independent predictors of the risk of postoperative death in elderly patients with NSCLC. The above factors were imported into R software to construct a line graph model for predicting the risk of postoperative death in elderly patients with NSCLC. The AUCs of the modelling and validation groups were 0.711 and 0.713 respectively, indicating that the model performed well in terms of predictive performance. The DCA decision curve and clinical impact curve showed that the model had a high net clinical benefit and was of clinical application.

Conclusion

The construction and validation of a predictive model for death within 90 days of lobectomy in elderly patients with lung cancer will help the clinic to identify high-risk groups and give timely intervention or adjust treatment decisions.

A Delphi consensus panel about clinical management of early-stage EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Spain: a Delphi consensus panel study

PURPOSE

This Delphi panel study assessed the level of consensus between medical oncologists on the clinical management of patients with early-stage EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A modified two-round Delphi approach was used. A scientific committee comprised of medical oncologists developed an online questionnaire. Delphi panel experts rated their level of agreement with each questionnaire statement on a 9-point Likert scale. The questionnaire included 36 statements from 3 domains (clinical management of early-stage NSCLC: 15 statements; role of adjuvant therapy in early-stage NSCLC: 9 statements; and role of adjuvant therapy in early-stage NSCLC with sensitizing EGFR mutation: 12 statements).

RESULTS

In round 1, consensus was reached for 24/36 statements (66.7%). Nine statements that did not achieve consensus after the first round were evaluated in round 2, and none of them reached consensus. Overall, 84.4% of the panelists agreed that EGFR mutation testing should be done after surgery. Consensus was not achieved on whether the implementation of EGFR mutation testing in resected early-stage NSCLC could limit the use of adjuvant osimertinib. The panelists recognized the rationale for the use of osimertinib in the adjuvant scenario (88%) and 72% agreed that it may change the treatment paradigm in stage IB-IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Consensus was not reached on the inconvenience of prolonged duration of osimertinib.

CONCLUSIONS

This Delphi study provides valuable insights into relevant questions in the management of early-stage EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, specific issues remain unresolved. The expert consensus emphasizes the role of adjuvant treatment with osimertinib in this scenario.

Adjuvant atezolizumab in Japanese patients with resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (IMpower010)

The global phase 3 IMpower010 study evaluated adjuvant atezolizumab versus best supportive care (BSC) following platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report a subgroup analysis in patients enrolled in Japan. Eligible patients had complete resection of histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IB (tumors ≥4 cm)-IIIA NSCLC. Upon completing 1-4 cycles of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive atezolizumab (fixed dose of 1200 mg every 21 days; 16 cycles or 1 year) or BSC. The primary endpoint of the global IMpower010 study was investigator-assessed disease-free survival, tested hierarchically first in patients with stage II-IIIA NSCLC whose tumors expressed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on ≥1% of tumor cells, then in all randomized patients with stage II-IIIA NSCLC, and finally in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (stage IB-IIIA NSCLC). Safety was evaluated in all patients who received atezolizumab or BSC. The study comprised 149 enrolled patients in three populations: ITT (n = 117; atezolizumab, n = 59; BSC, n = 58), all-randomized stage II-IIIA (n = 113; atezolizumab, n = 56; BSC, n = 57), and PD-L1 tumor cells ≥1% stage II-IIIA (n = 74; atezolizumab, n = 41; BSC, n = 33). At the data cutoff date (January 21, 2021), a trend toward disease-free survival improvement with atezolizumab vs BSC was observed in the PD-L1 tumor cells ≥1% stage II-IIIA (unstratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-1.08), all-randomized stage II-IIIA (unstratified HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.35-1.11), and ITT (unstratified HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.34-1.10) populations. Atezolizumab-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 16% of patients; no treatment-related grade 5 events occurred. Adjuvant atezolizumab showed disease-free survival improvement and a tolerable toxicity profile in Japanese patients in IMpower010, consistent with the global study results.

Malignant neoplasm of the bronchi and lung: Russian clinical guidelines

удалить

Comparison of Carboplatin With Cisplatin in Small Cell Lung Cancer in US Veterans

IMPORTANCE

The current standard of care for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is concurrent chemoradiation for patients with limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC) and chemoimmunotherapy for extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). The backbone of chemotherapy regimens in both is a platinum-etoposide doublet: cisplatin is traditionally the preferred platinum agent in the curative intent setting, whereas carboplatin is preferred in ES-SCLC because of its favorable toxicity profile.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether cisplatin is associated with better survival outcomes than carboplatin in treating LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this cohort study, data were compiled from the National Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry for patients with SCLC who received platinum-based multiagent chemotherapy between 2000 and 2020 for ES-SCLC and 2000 and 2021 for LS-SCLC. Only patients with pathologically confirmed cases of LS-SCLC who received concurrent chemoradiation and ES-SCLC who received chemotherapy were included.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The secondary end points included OS by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, age, and laterality. Interval-censored Weibull and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate median OS and hazard ratios (HRs), respectively. Survival curves were compared by a Wald test.

RESULTS

A total of 4408 SCLC cases were studied. Most patients were White (3589 patients [81.4%]), male (4252 [96.5%]), and non-Hispanic (4142 [94.0%]); 2262 patients (51.3%) were 60 to 69 years old, followed by 1476 patients (33.5%) aged 70 years or older, 631 patients (14.3%) aged 50 to 59 years, and 39 patients (0.9%) aged 30 to 49 years. Among 2652 patients with ES-SCLC, 2032 were treated with carboplatin-based therapy and 660 received cisplatin; the median OS was 8.45 months (95% CI, 7.75-9.20 months) for cisplatin and 8.51 months (95% CI, 8.07-8.97 months) for carboplatin (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.91-1.12; P = .90). Subset analysis showed no survival difference between the 2 agents in different age or performance status groups except for patients aged 70 years and older, for whom the median OS was 6.36 months (95% CI, 5.31-7.56 months) for cisplatin and 8.47 months (95% CI, 7.79-9.19 months) for carboplatin (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.96; P = .02). Multivariable analysis of performance status and age did not show a significant difference in survival between the 2 groups (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.83-1.10; P = .54). Of 1756 patients with LS-SCLC, 801 received carboplatin, and 1018 received cisplatin. The median OS was 26.92 months (95% CI, 25.03-28.81 months) for cisplatin and 25.58 months (95% CI, 23.64-27.72 months) for carboplatin (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.94-1.16; P = .46). The median OS was not significantly different between 2 agents according to cancer stage (I-III), performance status, and age groups. A multivariable analysis of factors associated with OS accounting for stage (I-III), performance status, and age did not demonstrate a significant difference in survival between carboplatin and cisplatin in patients with LS-SCLC (HR, 0.995; 95% CI, 0.86-1.15; P = .95).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Cisplatin is not associated with a survival advantage over carboplatin among patients with either ES-SCLC or LS-SCLC, irrespective of performance status and age. The favorable toxicity profile of carboplatin and comparable OS support its use in both LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC in clinical practice and may allow more room for combination with novel treatment strategies in clinical trials.

Non-small cell lung cancer in China

In China, lung cancer is a primary cancer type with high incidence and mortality. Risk factors for lung cancer include tobacco use, family history, radiation exposure, and the presence of chronic lung diseases. Most early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients miss the optimal timing for treatment due to the lack of clinical presentations. Population-based nationwide screening programs are of significant help in increasing the early detection and survival rates of NSCLC in China. The understanding of molecular carcinogenesis and the identification of oncogenic drivers dramatically facilitate the development of targeted therapy for NSCLC, thus prolonging survival in patients with positive drivers. In the exploration of immune escape mechanisms, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor monotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy have become a standard of care for advanced NSCLC in China. In the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology's guidelines for NSCLC, maintenance immunotherapy is recommended for locally advanced NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy. Adjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy will be approved for resectable NSCLC. In this review, we summarized recent advances in NSCLC in China in terms of epidemiology, biology, molecular pathology, pathogenesis, screening, diagnosis, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy.

Transcriptomics in Tumor and Normal Lung Tissues Identify Patients With Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With High Risk of Postsurgery Recurrence Who May Benefit From Adjuvant Therapies

PURPOSE

The prognosis of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), traditionally determined by anatomic histology and TNM staging, neglects the biological features of the tumor that may be important in determining patient outcome and guiding therapeutic interventions. Identifying patients with NSCLC at increased risk of recurrence after curative-intent surgery remains an important unmet need so that known effective adjuvant treatments can be offered to those at highest risk of recurrence.

METHODS

Relative gene expression level in the primary tumor and normal bronchial tissues was used to retrospectively assess their association with disease-free survival (DFS) in a cohort of 120 patients with NSCLC who underwent curative-intent surgery.

RESULTS

Low versus high Digital Display Precision Predictor (DDPP) score (a measure of relative gene expression) was significantly associated with shorter DFS (highest recurrence risk; P = .006) in all patients and in patients with TNM stages 1-2 (P = .00051; n = 83). For patients with stages 1-2 and low DDPP score (n = 29), adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved DFS (P = .0041). High co-overexpression of CTLA-4, PD-L1, and ICOS in normal lung (28 of 120 patients) was also significantly associated with decreased DFS (P = .0013), suggesting an immune tolerance to tumor neoantigens in some patients. Patients with DDPP low and immunotolerant normal tissue had the shortest DFS (P = 2.12E-11).

CONCLUSION

TNM stage, DDPP score, and immune competence status of normal lung are independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. Our findings open new avenues for prospective prognostic assessment and treatment assignment on the basis of transcriptomic profiling of tumor and normal lung tissue in patients with NSCLC.

Targeted Therapy in Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically improved tumor response rates and survival benefits in advanced oncogenic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the impressive success, a renewed interest has been raised in the study of these agents in the perioperative setting. Preliminary data have shown dramatic effectiveness compared to conventional chemotherapy. Given the explicit need to induce durable responses and raise cure rates, we summarize the current progression, identify key challenges, and raise potential opportunities for perioperative targeted therapy that range from precise biomarkers to optimal adjuvant regimens for individual patients. As perioperative treatment indeed provides researchers with a unique platform to address the challenges mentioned above, investigators could obtain a comprehensive analysis of genomic profiling and trace resistance mechanisms. Multidisciplinary collaboration and adaptive clinical trial designs are warranted to integrate translational research into personalized perioperative TKI treatment paradigms.

The effect of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy on survival after R0 resection for stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy is still the standard treatment for stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer after R0 resection, and it is still controversial whether conventional adjuvant radiotherapy is needed. We used meta-analysis to try to answer whether adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) can bring survival benefits to patients with stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer after R0 resection.

METHODS

Up to June 25, 2021, the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched, and clinical studies on POCRT for stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer were included. RevMan5.4 software was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 8959 patients were included in 5 randomized controlled trials and 17 retrospective studies. The results of the meta-analysis showed that POCRT could improve 3 and 5 years overall survival (OS) rate (OR = 1.52, 95%CI: 1.05-2.20; OR = 1.30, 95%CI: 1.16-1.46), 3 and 5 years disease-free survival (DFS) rate (OR = 1.34, 95%CI: 1.01-1.76; OR = 1.74, 95%CI: 1.43-2.12), and 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rate (OR = 2.69, 95%CI: 1.76-4.11) in patients with stage III-N2 nonsmall cell lung cancer compared with adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) alone. But could not improve 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rate (OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.52-2.52). The results of subgroup analysis showed that postoperative sequential chemoradiotherapy could improve the 3 and 5 years OS rate (OR = 2.06, 95%CI: 1.22-3.46; OR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.21-1.59). Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can improve the 3 and 5 years OS rate (OR = 1.80, 95%CI: 1.09-2.99; OR = 1.31, 95%CI: 1.04-1.66). In addition, POCRT could improve the 3-year OS rate (OR = 1.88, 95%CI: 1.21-2.92) in patients with N2 single-station lymph node metastasis compared with POCT alone.

CONCLUSION

Compared with POCT alone, adjuvant POCRT can significantly improve the overall survival rate of patients with NSCLC after R0 resection of stage III-N2, especially in patients with N2 single-station lymph node metastasis. Accurate radiotherapy techniques such as 3DCRT or IMRT are recommended, and postoperative sequential chemoradiotherapy is the best treatment mode.

Rationale for Combing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Medically Inoperable Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

The rate of recurrence remains high for lymph node negative early-stage non-small cell lung cancer that are over 2–3 cm in size following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This is due to the increased incidence of out-of-field failures, which warrants the addition of systemic therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), a class of immunotherapy, may induce a strong distant therapeutic effect known as the “abscopal” effect. This makes them a very suitable class of drugs to be combined with SBRT when treating early lung cancer with high-risk features, such as larger tumor size. In this review, we discuss the rationale and evidence for doing so.

Abstract

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been widely adopted as an alternative to lobar resection in medically inoperable patients with lymph-node negative (N0) early-stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Excellent in-field local control has been consistently achieved with SBRT in ES NSCLC ≤ 3 cm in size. However, the out-of-field control following SBRT remains suboptimal. The rate of recurrence, especially distant recurrence remains high for larger tumors. Additional systemic therapy is warranted in N0 ES NSCLC that is larger in size. Radiation has been shown to have immunomodulatory effects on cancer, which is most prominent with higher fractional doses. Strong synergistic effects are observed when immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are combined with radiation doses in SBRT’s dose range. Unlike chemotherapy, ICIs can potentiate a strong systemic response outside of the irradiated field when combined with SBRT. Together with their less toxic nature, ICIs represent a very suitable class of systemic agents to be combined with SBRT when treating ES NSCLC with high-risk features, such as larger tumor size. In this review, we describe the rationale and emerging evidence, as well as ongoing investigations in this area.

Deconstructing ADAURA. It is Not Yet Time to Forgo Platinum-based Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected Early Stage (IB-IIIA) EGFR-mutant NSCLC

Recently, the ADAURA study demonstrated statistically significant improved disease-free survival (DFS) with adjuvant osimertinib in patients with resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. A consistent improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) was shown, regardless of whether or not patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Given benefit seen with and without adjuvant chemotherapy, some clinicians may be tempted to forgo chemotherapy and only offer osimertinib post surgical resection. Would this approach be appropriate? Here we carefully dissect data from the ADAURA trial and review how this may fit into the existing evidence on the treatment of early stage NSCLC by discussing five themes, the study design of ADAURA, attempts on adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors, prior studies to support adjuvant chemotherapy, how adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in ADAURA and consideration of toxicities.

Treatment Sequencing in Resectable Lung Cancer: The Good and the Bad of Adjuvant Versus Neoadjuvant Therapy

The treatment scenario for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer has changed dramatically with the incorporation of immunotherapy. The introduction of immunotherapy into treatment algorithms has yielded improved clinical outcomes in several phase II and III trials in both adjuvant (Impower010 and PEARLS) and neoadjuvant settings (JHU/MSK, LCMC3, NEOSTAR, Columbia/MGH, NADIM, and CheckMate-816), leading to new U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals in this sense. Different treatment options are now available for patients, making the optimal treatment scenario a matter of intense debate. In this review, we summarize the main results concerning treatment sequencing in resectable non-small cell lung cancer from the past 30 years in the preimmunotherapy era, focusing on recent advances after incorporation of immunotherapy. Finally, the utility of several parameters (PD-L1, tumor mutational burden, radiomics, circulating tumor DNA, T-cell receptor, and immune populations) as predictive biomarkers for therapy personalization is discussed.

Deconstructing ADAURA: It is Time to Forgo Adjuvant Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Resected IB-IIIA EGFR+ NSCLC (Except with RB Alterations?) When Adopting Adjuvant Osimertinib

Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is considered the standard of care for resected stage IB (tumor ≥ 4m)-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The ADAURA trial is a randomized placebo-controlled Phase III trial that demonstrated statistically significant improved disease-free survival (DFS) with the use of 3-years of adjuvant osimertinib in resected stage IB-IIIA NSCLC harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) del 19 or L858R mutations. Subgroup analysis revealed that the DFS improvement with adjuvant osimertinib is independent of adjuvant chemotherapy in the primary analysis. A recent follow-up report suggested that adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy provided no additional 2-year DFS improvement on top of adjuvant osimertinib regardless of stage (IB, II, or IIIA) and minimal numerical DFS benefit in stage II or IIIA resected EGFR+ NSCLC for those patients who did not receive adjuvant osimertinib. Here, we argue that if clinicians adopt the use of 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib in resected early-stage EGFR+ NSCLC, there is no role for adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy was balanced between the osimertinib and the placebo arms by stage even though adjuvant chemotherapy was not one of the three stratification factors (del 19 vs L858R; Stage IA vs II vs III; Asians versus non-Asian) in ADAURA. There may be a potential role of adjuvant cisplatin/vinorelbine in a small subgroup of EGFR+ NSCLC patients whose tumor harbors retinoblastoma (RB) gene alterations but requires further investigation.

Immortal Time Bias-Corrected Effectiveness of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (C-EVID): A Prospective Cohort Study

Background

Relatively little is known about the effect of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) on prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

In this nationwide, multicenter, prospective, cohort study, eligible patients aged 18-75 years with radical resection, and histologically confirmed stage II-IIIA NSCLC were enrolled. All patients received 4 cycles of standard adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients who received Chinese herbal decoction and (or) oral Chinese patent medicine for a cumulative period of not less than 6 months were defined as TCM group, otherwise they were considered as control group. The primary endpoint was DFS calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. A time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model was used to correct immortal time bias. The secondary endpoints included DFS in patients of different characteristics, and safety analyses. This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800015776).

Results

A total of 507 patients were included (230 patients in the TCM group; 277 patients in the control group). The median follow-up was 32.1 months. 101 (44%) in the TCM group and 186 (67%) in the control group had disease relapse. The median DFS was not reached in the TCM group and was 19.4 months (95% CI, 14.2 to 24.6) in the control group. The adjusted time-dependent HR was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.78), equalling to a 39% reduction in the risk of disease recurrence with TCM. the number needed to treat to prevent one patient from relapsing was 4.29 (95% CI, 3.15 to 6.73) at 5 years. Similar results were observed in most of subgroups. Patients had a significant improvement in white blood cell decrease, nausea, decreased appetite, diarrhea, pain, and fatigue in the TCM group.

Conclusion

TCM may improves DFS and has a better tolerability profile in patients with stage II-IIIA NSCLC receiving standard chemotherapy after complete resection compared with those receiving standard chemotherapy alone. Further studies are warranted.

Comparative survival analysis of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung

Background and Purpose

Although cytotoxic platinum‐based adjuvant chemotherapy (pACT) has been recommended for patients with completely resected early‐stage (ES) non–small‐cell lung cancer (ES‐NSCLC), therapeutic regimens for NSCLC have evolved in the past two decades. The study was aimed to examine the effectiveness of postoperative pACT for resected ES‐NSCLC patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma (ADC) according to real‐world data.

Methods and Patients

Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust baseline characteristics between the group receiving pACT and those not receiving any treatment (observation, OBS) within 3 months after curative surgery. Cox regression models were used to compare overall survival (OS) and treatment failure‐free survival (TFS) between the groups.

Results

Of 31,208 patients with ES‐NSCLC, 4700 undergoing complete tumor resection were eligible, with a mean follow‐up period of 4.5 years. The pACT (n = 2347) and OBS (n = 2353) groups were well‐balanced after IPTW. The median OS differed between the pACT and OBS groups (77.2 vs. 75.5 months, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79–0.95, p = 0.003), and the 5‐year survival rates were 58.2% and 55.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the SCC group, pACT was superior to OBS in OS (75.0 vs. 57.4 months, aHR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.62–0.88, p = 0.001) and TFS (32.7 vs. 21.8 months, aHR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.63–0.86, p < 0.001). Both OS and TFS did not differ between two groups in those with ADC.

Conclusion

Real‐world data indicated that pACT confers a survival benefit for resected ES‐NSCLC patients with SCC but not ADC, which needs to be verified by a large sample of randomized controlled studies.

Initial experience of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus toripalimab in a patient with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a case report

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors were used for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) more and more frequently and the effects were thrilling. Toripalimab as a new immune checkpoint inhibitor has been shown to be effective in patients with advanced NSCLC. However, data regarding the safety and feasibility of surgical resection after treatment with toripalimab for NSCLC remain scarce. Here, we present a case with locally advanced NSCLC that received video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy after treatment with toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy.

Case presentation

A 62-year-old male patient with a history of coronary artery stenting operation for two times was found a 3.4 × 3.2 cm cavity mass in the upper lobe of the left lung and enlarged left hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. Pathological results identified squamous cell carcinoma. The patient was diagnosed with a locally advanced NSCLC and received VATS left upper lobectomy and lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus toripalimab for 3 cycles. The postoperative pathological results showed complete tumor remission. Short-term follow-up results were excellent, and long-term results remain to be revealed.

Conclusions

Our preliminary results showed that the use of neoadjuvant toripalimab and chemotherapy for the locally advanced NSCLC before surgical resection is safe and feasible.

A review on the role of epidermal growth factor signaling in the development, progression and treatment of cervical cancer

The sub-committee constituted by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) for the management of cervical cancer (CC) detailed in the consensus document (2016) reported CC as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in women. The incidence of an increase in CC and associated mortality in women is a major cause of cancer. To date, human papilloma viral (HPV) infection accounts for more than 99% of CC. However, there are individuals infected with HPV do not develop CC. There is a greater correlation between HPV infection and upregulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling cascade during the initiation, sustenance, and progression of CC. Therefore, EGFR is often targeted to treat CC using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and monoclonal antibodies (mAB). The current review analyzed the existing clinical/pre-clinical studies and the significance of EGFR abundance using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival plot analysis for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). We performed a series of bioinformatics analyses to screen the crucial role of the EGFR gene in CC. Further, different transcription factors that are dysregulated due to EGFR abundance and their relevance were determined using computational tools in this review. Endogenous microRNAs (miRNA) that undergo changes due to alterations in EGFR during CC were identified using computational database and consolidated the information obtained with the published in the area of miRNA and EGFR with special reference to the initiation, sustenance and progression of CC. The current review aims to consolidate contemporary approaches for targeting CC using EGFR and highlight the current role of miRNA and genes that are differently regulated during CC involving EGFR mutations. Potential resistance to the available EGFR therapies such as TKIs and mABs and the need for better therapies are also extensively reviewed for the development of newer therapeutic molecules with better efficacy.

Management of Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing clinicians on management of patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

An Expert Panel of medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology, pulmonary oncology, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts was convened to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2021. Outcomes of interest included survival, disease-free or recurrence-free survival, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 127 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were developed to address evaluation and staging workup of patients with suspected stage III NSCLC, surgical management, neoadjuvant and adjuvant approaches, and management of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/thoracic-cancer-guidelines.

Update on adjuvant therapy in completely resected NSCLC patients

In patients with completely resected non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy has been associated with improvement in survival by minimizing the risk of recurrence. For years, systemic chemotherapy including platinum based regimen has been a mainstay treatment modality of adjuvant treatment after complete resection. ADAURA study showed that among completely resected IB to IIIA NSCLC, disease‐free survival was significantly better in patients under adjuvant osimertinib than a placebo group. After the advent of a variety of new treatment regimens, such as third generation TKI and immunotherapy, the landscape of postoperative adjuvant treatment has been changing. In this review, we discuss some key issues regarding choice of adjuvant treatment after complete resection in NSCLC, and provide further updates on recent advances in treatment modalities.

The Role of Whole Exome Sequencing in Distinguishing Primary and Secondary Lung Cancers

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that presents with multiple lung tumors (MLTs) poses a challenge to accurate staging and prognosis. MLTs that arise as clonally related secondary metastases from a common primary are higher stage and often require adjuvant chemotherapy or may in fact be incurable stage IV lesions. Conversely, MLTs that represent distinct primaries have a better prognosis and may be overtreated if inappropriately classified as related secondaries. Historically, pathologic and radiographic criteria were used to distinguish between primary and secondary MLTs; however, the advent of genomic profiling has demonstrated limitations to these historic classification systems. In this review, we discuss the use of molecular profiling to distinguish between primary and secondary lung cancers, with a focus on the insights gleaned from whole exome sequencing (WES) analyses. While WES is not yet feasible in routine clinical practice, WES studies have helped elucidate the clonal relationship between primary and secondary lung cancers and provide important context for the application of targeted sequencing panel-based analyses.

Genomic signatures define three subtypes of EGFR-mutant stage II-III non-small-cell lung cancer with distinct adjuvant therapy outcomes

The ADJUVANT study reported the comparative superiority of adjuvant gefitinib over chemotherapy in disease-free survival of resected EGFR-mutant stage II–IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, not all patients experienced favorable clinical outcomes with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), raising the necessity for further biomarker assessment. In this work, by comprehensive genomic profiling of 171 tumor tissues from the ADJUVANT trial, five predictive biomarkers are identified (TP53 exon4/5 mutations, RB1 alterations, and copy number gains of NKX2-1, CDK4, and MYC). Then we integrate them into the Multiple-gene INdex to Evaluate the Relative benefit of Various Adjuvant therapies (MINERVA) score, which categorizes patients into three subgroups with relative disease-free survival and overall survival benefits from either adjuvant gefitinib or chemotherapy (Highly TKI-Preferable, TKI-Preferable, and Chemotherapy-Preferable groups). This study demonstrates that predictive genomic signatures could potentially stratify resected EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients and provide precise guidance towards future personalized adjuvant therapy.

Adjuvant gefitinib improves outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients compared to chemotherapy, but not in all cases. Here, the authors find genomic biomarkers of response to gefitinib in NSCLC patients from the ADJUVANT trial, and propose a score to stratify them by potential benefit from the treatment.

Improved outcomes and staging in non-small-cell lung cancer guided by a molecular assay

There remains a critical need for improved staging of non-small-cell lung cancer, as recurrence and mortality due to undetectable metastases at the time of surgery remain high even after complete resection of tumors currently categorized as ‘early stage.’ A 14-gene quantitative PCR-based expression profile has been extensively validated to better identify patients at high-risk of 5-year mortality after surgical resection than conventional staging – mortality that almost always results from previously undetectable metastases. Furthermore, prospective studies now suggest a predictive benefit in disease-free survival when the assay is used to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

There is a need for improvement in the way early-stage non-small-cell lung cancers are staged and treated because many patients with ‘early-stage’ disease suffer high rates of cancer recurrence after surgery. In recent years, a specialized test has been developed to allow better characterization of a tumor's risk of recurrence based on the genes being expressed by tumor cells. Use of this test, in conjunction with standard staging methods, is better able to identify patients at high risk of cancer recurrence after surgery. Evidence suggests that giving chemotherapy to patients at high risk of recurrence after surgery reduces recurrence rates and improves long-term patient survival.

Targeted therapy moves to earlier stages of non-small-cell lung cancer: emerging evidence, controversies and future challenges

Lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer mortality and a serious health problem despite the numerous advances made in the last decade and the rapid advance of research in this field. In recent years, there has been a decrease in mortality from lung cancer coinciding with the approval times of targeted therapy. To date, targeted therapy has been used in the context of advanced disease in clinical practice, with great benefits in survival and quality of life. The next step will be to incorporate targeted therapy into the treatment of earlier stages of non-small-cell lung cancer, and there is already a randomized trial showing a disease-free survival benefit. However, there are many questions that need to be resolved first. In the present review, the authors discuss the findings of published reports and ongoing clinical trials assessing the role of targeted therapies in nonmetastatic disease.

Surgical perspective on neoadjuvant immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

With a 5% improvement in 5-year overall survival achieved with current neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, new treatments for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are urgently needed. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is established in metastatic NSCLC and is being evaluated in resectable NSCLC.

METHODS

Publications and conference databases and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for reports on clinical studies of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with early resectable NSCLC.

RESULTS

Potential advantages of neoadjuvant ICI include earlier treatment of micrometastatic disease; activation of a broader, potentially durable immune response by the whole tumor and associated lymph nodes; and pathologic assessment of neoadjuvant treatment response, which may guide adjuvant therapy. Surgical considerations include delays to surgery, potential disease progression preventing curative resection, and perioperative morbidity and mortality. Surrogate endpoints of efficacy (pathologic complete response, major pathologic response) and biomarkers predictive of outcome (programmed death ligand 1 expression, tumor mutational burden and circulating tumor DNA) can accelerate clinical trial completion and early-stage treatment development; their application in neoadjuvant ICI studies in NSCLC is reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Phase 2 trials of neoadjuvant ICI alone or with chemotherapy showed encouraging safety and efficacy in patients with resectable NSCLC, warranting the ongoing phase 3 studies of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. Preoperative and intraoperative unresectability following neoadjuvant ICI appear comparable to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. To help thoracic surgeons and medical oncologists to distinguish amongst ICI beyond efficacy as phase 3 data emerge, surgery-related endpoints for perioperative morbidity, mortality, and complexity should be defined, standardized, incorporated into trial designs, and reported.