US Intergroup Trial of Response-Adapted Therapy for Stage III to IV Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Early Interim Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography Imaging: Southwest Oncology Group S0816

Integrative Analysis of 18F-FDG PET Radiomics and mRNA Expression in Recurrent/Metastatic Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

This study explored the relationship between mRNA expression profiles obtained through next-generation sequencing (NGS) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) texture analysis in patients with treatment-resistant oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) who were treated with molecular-targeted drugs. We analyzed the correlation between 18F-FDG PET texture features and NGS data in a small cohort of five patients with recurrent or metastatic OSCC who received molecular-targeted drugs after surgery. Patients were categorized into two groups based on treatment response: responders (n = 3) and non-responders (n = 2). To validate our findings, we examined transcriptomic data from 292 OSCC patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database.

RESULTS

The gene ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing two (ASB2) was significantly overexpressed in non-responders and strongly correlated with specific PET radiomic features, including GLRLM_GLNU, GLRLM_RLNU, and GLZLM_GLNU (p < 0.05). High ASB2 expression was also associated with poor prognosis in OSCC patients (p < 0.05) and decreased overall survival, as shown by Kaplan-Meier analysis of the TCGA database (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating ASB2 expression data with 18F-FDG PET texture features could potentially improve the prediction of treatment outcomes in treatment-resistant OSCC patients undergoing molecular-targeted therapy.

Positron emission tomography-adapted therapy for first-line treatment in adults with Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is one of the most curable cancers worldwide. Treatment options comprise more- or less-intensified regimens of chemotherapy plus radiotherapy depending on the disease stage. An interim-[18F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET), a procedure to illustrate a tumour's metabolic activity, stage and progression, could be used during treatment to distinguish between individuals who are good or poor early responders to therapy. Subsequent therapy could be de-escalated in PET-negative individuals (good responders) or escalated in those who are PET-positive (poor responders).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interim [18F]-FDG-PET-imaging treatment modification in previously untreated individuals with HL.

SEARCH METHODS

For this review update, we searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP up to 17 November 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing interim-FDG-PET-adapted therapy with non-adapted standard treatment in adults with untreated HL of all stages.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened results for inclusion, extracted data into a standardised data extraction sheet and assessed the risk of bias according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We collected (modified) intention-to-treat effect estimates for the predefined outcomes: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), treatment-related mortality (TRM), adverse events (AE) including secondary malignancies and quality of life (QoL), where available, and used random-effects models for meta-analysis. We analysed early, intermediate and advanced stage HL and PET-negative versus PET-positive participants separately. We used the GRADE approach to rate our certainty in the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 studies covering early (1 RCT, 667 participants), intermediate (1 RCT, 651 participants), early-to-intermediate (3 RCTs, 1639 participants) and advanced-stage HL (5 RCTs; 3629 participants). We did not identify eligible ongoing studies. Generally, the risk of bias was low or, sometimes, unclear except for detection bias, which was rated as high for all studies for subjective outcomes such as PFS, TRM and AE due to the lack of blinding. PET-based adaptation in early-stage PET-negative participants The effect of treatment adaptation (omission of radiotherapy with or without additional chemotherapy) on OS and PFS is uncertain (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.13 to 5.32; and HR 4.52, 95% CI 0.72 to 28.41, 1034 participants). Adaptation may have little to no effect on the incidence of secondary malignancies (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.50; 984 participants; low-certainty). No studies reported on TRM, serious adverse events (SAE) or QoL. PET-based adaptation in intermediate-stage PET-negative participants Treatment adaptation by omission of radiotherapy (with or without additional chemotherapy) may have little effect on OS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.96; 1073 participants; low-certainty) and PFS (HR 1.59, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.67; 1073 participants; low-certainty) compared to standard therapy. The effect on TRM is very uncertain. De-escalation may have little effect on the incidence of SAE (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.21; 1096 participants, low-certainty) and secondary malignancies (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.82; 1515 participants; low-certainty). No studies reported on QoL. PET-based de-escalation in advanced-stage PET-negative participants Three RCTs examined interim-PET-based de-intensification of chemotherapy compared with standard in advanced-stage PET-negative participants; this probably increases OS (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.07; 2633 participants, moderate-certainty), although the confidence interval included the possibility of no effect, while it has probably little effect on PFS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.25; 2633 participants, moderate-certainty). Treatment de-escalation may reduce TRM (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.73; 2761 participants, low-certainty) and the incidence of secondary malignancy (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.26; 2757 participants; low-certainty), although for this latter finding, the CI included the possibility of no effect. No studies reported SAE and QoL. Two RCTs considered combined modality treatment as standard for advanced stages and de-escalated by omitting radiotherapy. De-escalation may increase OS (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.69; 296 participants; low-certainty), PFS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.43; 412 participants; low-certainty), and may reduce the incidence of secondary malignancy (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.09; 349 participants; low-certainty), although for all these findings, the CI included the possibility of no effect. No studies reported TRM, SAE and QoL. PET-based escalation in mixed early-and-intermediate-stage, PET-positive participants One study compared intensified chemotherapy (BEACOPPescalated) and radiotherapy with standard chemotherapy (ABVD) and radiotherapy based on positive interim-PET after two cycles in early-to-intermediate-stage HL. Treatment escalation may increase OS (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.97; 260 participants; low-certainty) and PFS (0.67, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.20; 260 participants; low-certainty), although the CI included the possibility of no effect. The effect on secondary malignancies is very uncertain (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.43 to 3.55; 234 participants, very low-certainty). No studies reported TRM, SAE and QoL. PET-based escalation in advanced-stage, PET-positive participants Two studies examined interim-PET-based escalation of PET-positive participants with rituximab in addition to chemotherapy in advanced-stage HL, which likely does not increase OS (HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.63; 795 participants; moderate-certainty) or PFS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.54; 582 participants; moderate-certainty). It may increase TRM (RR 4.00, 95% CI 0.45 to 35.5; 434 participants; very low-certainty), although the CI included the possibility of no effect. Escalation probably increases the number of participants with SAE (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.60; 148 participants, moderate-certainty), and may reduce the number of participants with secondary malignancy (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.60; 582 participants; low-certainty), although for this latter finding, the CI included the possibility of no effect. No study reported QoL.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In early-stage HL, the effect of interim-PET-based treatment adaptation by omission of radiotherapy is uncertain. No effect was seen on long-term adverse events, although the follow-up of around five years may be too short to see an effect. In intermediate-stage HL, omission of radiotherapy may have little effect on both overall and progression-free survival, serious adverse events and secondary malignancies. In advanced-stage HL, reducing chemotherapy upon negative interim-PET has the potential to increase overall survival while not negatively affecting progression-free survival and long-term adverse events. If combined modality treatment is opted for, omitting radiotherapy may increase both overall and progression-free survival, while reducing the negative effect of radiotherapy on secondary malignancies. Interim-PET-positive treatment intensification by providing more chemotherapy in early-to-intermediate stage HL may be beneficial, while adding rituximab to standard chemotherapy in advanced-stage HL does not result in the expected improvement, but increases adverse events.

Exclusion of People Living with HIV in Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Studies: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Clinical Trials from 2014 to 2024

BACKGROUND

Human immunodeficiency virus is associated with the development of various aggressive non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas (NHL). Despite this, people living with HIV (PLWH) are often excluded from clinical trials. Here we analyze the change in clinical trial exclusion among PLWH resulting from multilateral advocacy efforts since 2017.

METHODS

We identified all US-based clinical trials with the keyword "lymphoma" with start dates between January 01, 2014 and January 04, 2025 using the publicly available NIH Clinical Trial Database (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/). All studies with aggressive B-cell NHL subtypes were included. Regression models were performed to analyze descriptive factors.

RESULTS

1,973 US-based clinical trials were captured, of which 945 met criteria for further analysis. PLWH were excluded from 59% pre-2018 versus 48% post-2018. After multivariate adjustment, NIH-funded trials (24% exclusion rate, p < 0.001), other funders (64% exclusion rate), and studies initiated post-2018 (48% exclusion rate, p < 0.001) were associated with inclusion, while CAR-T-related studies (62% exclusion rate, p < 0.05) were associated with exclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Likely partly due to advocacy from ASCO, NCI, and NCCN, there was a significant decrease in exclusion among PLWH in US-based NHL clinical trials. Future research should analyze the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy in PLWH to foster inclusion and reduce stigma among physicians and researchers.

Modified Endothelial Activation and Stress Index: A New Predictor for Survival Outcomes in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated with Doxorubicin-Bleomycin-Vinblastine-Dacarbazine-Based Therapy

Background: Although the cure rates of classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) are as high as 90% using the current treatment protocols, the prognosis is poor for primary refractory patients. Thus, a biomarker that can predict patients with early progression at the time of diagnosis is an unmet clinical need. Endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) and its variant modified EASIX (mEASIX) is a scoring system currently used for the prediction of prognosis in hematologic malignancies. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the mEASIX score in newly diagnosed cHL patients. Methods: Data from 206 patients who underwent positron emission tomography (PET)-guided doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) therapy for cHL between January 2007 and November 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic value of the mEASIX score was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, Cox regression analysis, and the Kaplan-Meier method, and then compared with standard risk assessment methods. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 33 years, and the rate of patients in the advanced stage was 67%. ROC analysis determined an optimal mEASIX score cut-off of 17.28, categorizing patients into mEASIXhigh (47%) and mEASIXlow (53%) groups. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (60% vs. 84.3%) and overall survival (OS) (79.6% vs. 95.8%) were significantly lower in the mEASIXhigh group (p < 0.001). Additionally, multivariate analysis showed that the independent variables affecting PFS included the nodular sclerosing subtype (HR: 0.4), bone marrow involvement (HR: 2.6), and elevated mEASIX (HR: 3.1). Independent variables, which had an effect on OS included elevated mEASIX (HR:3.8) and higher IPS-3 scores (HR:1.9). Furthermore, a higher mEASIX score (≥17.28) was identified as an independent variable indicating primary refractory disease (OR: 6.5). Conclusions: mEASIX is a powerful and easy-to-access marker for the detection of primary refractory disease and prognosis in newly diagnosed cHL cases.

Advanced Stage Hodgkin and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas: Is There Still a Role for Consolidation Radiotherapy in the PET Era?

The role of radiotherapy in the treatment of lymphoma is rapidly evolving. The development of modern systemic therapies and the adoption of FDG-PET-scanning as metabolic prognosticators are leading to a process of refinement of the treatment regimens. In this scenario, radiotherapy utilization is decreasing in several settings, including lower risk patients, to prevent the risk of long-term complications. Over the last decade, the most relevant changes in the treatment landscape are evident for advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The main purpose of this paper is to review radiotherapy indications in these settings, to highlight pros and cons of a PET-guided strategy for radiotherapy recommendations, and to introduce future perspectives on the combination of radiotherapy and modern systemic therapies in both frontline and relapsed setting of advanced stage Hodgkin and diffuse large B cell lymphomas.

Nivolumab+AVD in Advanced-Stage Classic Hodgkin's Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Incorporating brentuximab vedotin into the treatment of advanced-stage classic Hodgkin's lymphoma improves outcomes in adult and pediatric patients. However, brentuximab vedotin increases the toxic effects of treatment in adults, more than half of pediatric patients who receive the drug undergo consolidative radiation, and relapse remains a challenge. Programmed death 1 blockade is effective in Hodgkin's lymphoma, including in preliminary studies involving previously untreated patients.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial involving patients at least 12 years of age with stage III or IV newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive brentuximab vedotin with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (BV+AVD) or nivolumab with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (N+AVD). Prespecified patients could receive radiation therapy directed to residual metabolically active lesions. The primary end point was progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of progressive disease or death from any cause.

RESULTS

Of 994 patients who underwent randomization, 970 were included in the intention-to-treat population for efficacy analyses. At the second planned interim analysis, with a median follow-up of 12.1 months, the threshold for efficacy was crossed, indicating that N+AVD significantly improved progression-free survival as compared with BV+AVD (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.48; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.87; two-sided P = 0.001). Owing to the short follow-up time, we repeated the analysis with longer follow-up; with a median follow-up of 2.1 years (range, 0 to 4.2 years), the 2-year progression-free survival was 92% (95% CI, 89 to 94) with N+AVD, as compared with 83% (95% CI, 79 to 86) with BV+AVD (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.65). Overall, 7 patients received radiation therapy. Immune-related adverse events were infrequent with nivolumab; brentuximab vedotin was associated with more treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

N+AVD resulted in longer progression-free survival than BV+AVD in adolescents and adults with stage III or IV advanced-stage classic Hodgkin's lymphoma and had a better side-effect profile. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health and others; S1826 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03907488.).

Interim PET-guided ABVD or ABVD/escalated BEACOPP for newly diagnosed advanced-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (JCOG1305)

This single-arm confirmatory study (JCOG1305) aimed to evaluate the utility of interim positron emission tomography (iPET)-guided therapy for newly diagnosed advanced-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Patients aged 16-60 years with cHL received two cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) and then underwent an iPET scan (PET2), which was centrally reviewed using a five-point Deauville scale. PET2-negative patients continued an additional four cycles of ABVD, whereas PET2-positive patients switched to six cycles of escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (eBEACOPP). The co-primary endpoints were 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) among all eligible and PET2-positive patients. Ninety-three patients were enrolled between January 2016 and December 2019. One patient was ineligible because of a diagnostic error. The median age of the 92 eligible patients was 35 (interquartile range, 28-48) years. Forty (43%) patients had stage III disease, and 43 (47%) had stage IV disease. The remaining nine (10%) patients had stage IIB disease with risk factors. Nineteen PET2-positive (21%) patients received eBEACOPP, 18 completed six cycles of eBEACOPP, 73 PET2-negative (79%) patients continued ABVD, and 70 completed an additional four cycles of ABVD. With a median follow-up period of 41.1 months, the 2-year PFS of 92 eligible patients and 19 PET2-positive patients were 84.8% (80% confidence interval [CI], 79.2-88.9) and 84.2% (80% CI, 69.7-92.1), respectively. Both primary endpoints were met at the prespecified threshold. This study demonstrates that iPET-guided therapy is a useful treatment option for younger patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage cHL. Registration number: jRCTs031180218.

2-deoxy-2-[18F]FDG PET Imaging for Therapy Assessment in Hodgkin's and Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

The 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) has contributed to outcome improvement of patients with lymphoma. The use of [18F]FDG PET/CT for staging and response assessment is successfully applied both in routine clinical practice and in clinical trials. The challenges lie in enhancing the outcomes of lymphoma patients, particularly those with advanced or refractory/relapsed disease, and to minimize the long-term toxicity associated with treatments, including radiation therapy. The objective of this review article is to present contemporary data on the use of [18F]FDG PET/CT for treatment assessment of aggressive lymphomas.

Efficacy of escalating therapy with brentuximab vedotin-AVD in advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma patients with positive interim positron emission tomography after ABVD

Patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated with ABVD who have a positive interim FDG-PET (iPET) have a poor prognosis. Escalation to BEACOPP has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS). However, randomized trials are lacking to determine the best strategy for intensification. We report on A-AVD escalation treatment outcomes for 15 iPET-positive patients post-ABVD. Overall response and complete response rates were 80% and 60%, respectively. Four patients underwent salvage therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. At a median 17-month follow-up, all patients are alive, 87% in complete remission, and 1-year PFS was 57.8%. For patients ineligible for BEACOPP due to age, comorbidities, or preference, A-AVD escalation may be a viable alternative.

Harnessing multi-source data for individualized care in Hodgkin Lymphoma

Hodgkin lymphoma is a rare, but highly curative form of cancer, primarily afflicting adolescents and young adults. Despite multiple seminal trials over the past twenty years, there is no single consensus-based treatment approach beyond use of multi-agency chemotherapy with curative intent. The use of radiation continues to be debated in early-stage disease, as part of combined modality treatment, as well as in salvage, as an important form of consolidation. While short-term disease outcomes have varied little across these different approaches across both early and advanced stage disease, the potential risk of severe, longer-term risk has varied considerably. Over the past decade novel therapeutics have been employed in the retrieval setting in preparation to and as consolidation after autologous stem cell transplant. More recently, these novel therapeutics have moved to the frontline setting, initially compared to standard-of-care treatment and later in a direct head-to-head comparison combined with multi-agent chemotherapy. In 2018, we established the HoLISTIC Consortium, bringing together disease and methods experts to develop clinical decision models based on individual patient data to guide providers, patients, and caregivers in decision-making. In this review, we detail the steps we followed to create the master database of individual patient data from patients treated over the past 20 years, using principles of data science. We then describe different methodological approaches we are taking to clinical decision making, beginning with clinical prediction tools at the time of diagnosis, to multi-state models, incorporating treatments and their response. Finally, we describe how simulation modeling can be used to estimate risks of late effects, based on cumulative exposure from frontline and salvage treatment. The resultant database and tools employed are dynamic with the expectation that they will be updated as better and more complete information becomes available.

Real-life study on the use of response adapted therapy in patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma: Results from a multicenter experience

Few data are known regarding the use of interim positron emission tomography (iPET) after the first two cycles (iPET2) of chemotherapy in treatment-naïve classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) in routine clinical practice, and about the real-life adoption of intensification strategies for iPET positive patients. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study on cHL to investigate the use of iPET in the real-life setting, its prognostic role and outcomes of patients early shifted to intensification. Six hundreds and forty-one patients were enrolled (62% had advanced stage). iPET2 was positive in 89 patients (14%) including 8.7% and 17% early and advanced stage patients, respectively (p = 0.003). Among iPET 2 positive cases treatment was immediately modified in 19 cases; in 14 cases treatment was modified after an additional positive iPET4. Overall 56 iPET2 positive patients never received intensified therapies. Most frequently used intensified therapy was autologous stem cell transplantation followed by BEACOPP. After a median follow-up of 72 months, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 82% with iPET2 positive patients showing a worse PFS compared with iPET2 negative cases: 31% versus 85%. Focusing on advanced stage patients with a positive iPET2, the 5-year PFS was 59% for patients shifted to intensified therapy at any time point versus 61% for patients who never received intensified therapy. Our study confirmed the higher curability of naïve cHL patients in a real-world setting, and the prognostic role of iPET2 in this setting. A poor adherence to response-adapted strategy which however did not translate into a difference in patient outcomes.

Recent advancements in 18F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment management of HIV-related lymphoma

Infection with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is one of the most pressing issues facing public health on a worldwide scale. Currently, HIV-related lymphoma is the most common cause of death among people living with HIV, and warrants more attention. The unique challenges associated with HIV-related lymphoma management derive from the underlying HIV infection and its immunosuppressive effects. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) has gained significant prominence in the past few years as a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic instrument for the treatment of HIV-related lymphoma. This review will start with an overview of the subtypes, risk factors, and therapeutic choices for individuals with HIV-related lymphoma. We will then briefly discuss the current application of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the medical management of HIV-related lymphoma patients, followed by the initial staging of the disease, the evaluation of therapeutic response, the prediction of prognostic outcomes, the decision-making process for radiotherapy guided by PET findings, and the distinguishing of various diagnoses.

Quarter-Century PET/CT Transformation of Oncology: Lymphoma

The clinical landscape of lymphomas has changed dramatically over the last 2 decades, including significant progress made in the understanding and utilization of imaging modalities and the available treatment options for both indolent and aggressive lymphomas. Since the introduction of hybrid PET/CT scanners in 2001, the indications of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in the management of lymphomas have grown rapidly. In today's clinical practice, FDG PET/CT is used in successful management of the vast majority patients with lymphomas.

Physician frontline treatment preferences for stage III/IV classic Hodgkin lymphoma: the real-world US CONNECT study

Aim: To understand US physicians' frontline (1L) treatment preferences/decision-making for stage III/IV classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Materials & methods: Medical oncologists and/or hematologists (≥2 years' practice experience) who treat adults with stage III/IV cHL were surveyed online (October-November 2020). Results: Participants (n = 301) most commonly considered trial efficacy/safety data and national guidelines when selecting 1L cHL treatments. Most physicians (91%) rated overall survival (OS) as the most essential attribute when selecting 1L treatment. Variability was seen among regimen selection for hypothetical newly diagnosed patients, with OS cited as the most common reason for regimen selection. Conclusion: While treatment selection varied based on patient characteristics, US physicians consistently cited OS as the top factor considered when selecting a 1L treatment for cHL.

Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma in Adolescents and Young Adults

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) represents one of the more common cancers occurring in adolescent and young adults (AYAs) age 15-39 years. Despite a generally high cure rate, age-related differences in HL biology and the optimal therapeutic approaches including supportive care and risks for long-term adverse effects in the AYA population remain understudied. After an overview of HL epidemiology and biology in the AYA population, this review will cover frontline pediatric and adult treatment approaches. Recently completed and ongoing studies will foster harmonization of risk group definition and trial eligibility criteria across the AYA spectrum, enabling more rapid progress. In addition to treatment approaches, an evolving holistic care approach to AYA HL will result in enhanced understanding of unique challenges, and continued improved short- and long-term outcome for these patients.

How I Follow Hodgkin Lymphoma in First Complete (Metabolic) Remission?

Hodgkin lymphoma is characterized by a high cure rate in the modern era of medicine regardless of stage, but patients suffer from a high risk of comorbidity associated with the administered therapy. The main aim of this review article is to assess and analyze the various comorbidities associated with Hodgkin lymphoma and address the survivorship of patients, including fertility, secondary cancers due to cardiovascular toxicity, and quality of life. Furthermore, this review explores the optimal strategy for detecting relapse. The treatment paradigm of Hodgkin lymphoma has shifted, with a paradigm shift toward achieving a high cure rate and low toxicity as a standard of care in this patient population. Checkpoint inhibitors, especially nivolumab, in combination with chemotherapy are increasingly being studied in the first line of therapy. However, their long-term toxicity remains to be assessed in longer follow-up. In conclusion, Hodgkin lymphoma survivors, regardless of their treatment, should be followed up individually by a multidisciplinary survivorship team in order to detect and properly treat the long-term side effects of therapy.

Long-term clinical outcomes of combined modality therapy for advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma in the PET era: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES

The role of consolidation radiation therapy (CRT) after complete metabolic response to chemotherapy in advanced-stage (stage III and IV) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is controversial. This study was undertaken to assess the clinical outcomes in terms of event free survival, local failure free survival and overall survival in individuals with advanced HL treated with chemotherapy and CRT.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted to study the long-term clinical outcomes in individuals diagnosed with HL and treated with chemotherapy and CRT from 2012 to 2016 at a tertiary cancer care hospital in India.

RESULTS

Data from 203 study participants with advanced-stage HL were analyzed. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) was done at baseline and after 2 cycles for response assessment. The median age at presentation was 32 yr [interquartile range (IQR): 26-46]. Early metabolic response (after 2 cycles) and delayed metabolic response (after 4 or 6 cycles) were observed in 74.4 and 25.6 per cent of individuals, respectively. With a median follow up of 52 months (IQR: 40-67), the five-year event-free survival (EFS), local failure-free survival (LFFS) and overall survival (OS) were 83.2, 95.1 and 94.6 per cent, respectively. On univariate analysis, extranodal disease was associated with inferior EFS (P=0.043). Haemoglobin <10.5 g/dl (P=0.002) and Hasenclever index >3 (P=0.00047) were associated with poorer OS. Relapses were observed in 28/203 (13.8%) study participants with predominance at central nodal stations. The median time to relapse was 19.4 months (IQR: 13-33). Local relapse alone (at the irradiated site) was observed in 5/28 study participants, systemic (distant) relapse in 14/28 individuals, while both systemic and local relapse was observed in 9/28 participants. Extranodal disease (P=0.05), bulky disease (P=0.005) and haemoglobin concentration ≤10.5 g/dl (P=0.036) were significant predictors for disease relapse.

INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with advanced-stage HL treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy (anthracycline-based chemotherapy with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine regimen) and CRT had excellent long-term outcomes. As isolated infield failures are uncommon, selective consolidation with conformal RT to high-risk sites improves final disease outcomes.

Long-Term Follow-Up of the Response-Adjusted Therapy for Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma Trial

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.We analyzed long-term results of the response-adapted trial for adult patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. The aim was to confirm noninferiority of treatment de-escalation by omission of bleomycin from doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) for interim fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (iPET)-negative patients and assess efficacy and long-term safety for iPET-positive patients who underwent treatment intensification with escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisolone (BEACOPP/BEACOPP14). The median follow-up is 7.3 years. For all patients, the 7-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are 78.2% (95% CI, 75.6 to 80.5) and 91.6% (95% CI, 89.7 to 93.2), respectively. The 1.3% difference in 3-year PFS (95% CI, -3.0 to 4.7) between ABVD and doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD) now falls within the predefined noninferiority margin. Among 172 patients with positive iPET, the 7-year PFS was 65.9% (95% CI, 58.1 to 72.6) and the 7-year OS was 83.2% (95% CI, 76.2 to 88.3). The cumulative incidence of second malignancies at 7 years was 5.5% (95% CI, 4.0 to 7.5) for those receiving ABVD/AVD and 2.5% (95% CI, 0.8 to 7.7) for those escalated to BEACOPP. With extended follow-up, these results confirm noninferiority of treatment de-escalation after a negative iPET. Escalation with BEACOPP for iPET-positive patients is effective and safe, with no increase in second malignancies.

Hodgkin lymphoma: Focus on evolving treatment paradigms

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable B-cell malignancy of germinal center origin. Biologically it is a hematologic malignancy that is highly dependent on the immune microenvironment and utilizes immune escape through upregulation of the programmed-death ligands on the neoplastic cells. Despite being highly curable, consensus is lacking nationally and internationally about the optimal approach to management, particularly in limited-stage disease. The addition of brentuximab vedotin and checkpoint inhibitors for the management of HL has led to a rapidly changing treatment landscape. Further studies should be done to include these novel agents at all stages of disease to determine improvements in frontline cure rates and long-term toxicity.

Application of interim PET-CT in first-line treatment decision-making for lymphoma

Recent advances in lymphoma treatment have significantly improved the survival of patients; however, the current approaches also have varying side effects. To overcome these, it is critical to implement individualized treatment according to the patient's condition. Therefore, the early identification of high-risk groups and targeted treatment are important strategies for prolonging the survival time and improving the quality of life of patients. Interim positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) has a high prognostic value, which can reflect chemosensitivity and identify patients for whom treatment may fail under this regimen. To date, many prospective clinical studies on interim PET (iPET)‍-adapted therapy have been conducted. In this review, we focus on the treatment strategies entailed in these studies, as well as the means and timing of iPET assessment, with the aim of exploring the efficacy and existing issues regarding iPET-adapted treatment. It is expected that the improved use of PET-CT examination can facilitate treatment decision-making to identify precise treatment options.

Incorporating Monoclonal Antibodies into the First-Line Treatment of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

The long-term survival of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients treated according to the current standard of care is excellent. Combined-modality schedules (ABVD plus radiotherapy) in early-stage disease, along with treatment intensity adaptation to early metabolic response assessed by PET/CT in advanced stage HL, have been the cornerstones of risk stratification and treatment decision-making, minimizing treatment-related complications while keeping efficacy. Nevertheless, a non-negligible number of patients are primary refractory or relapse after front-line treatment. Novel immunotherapeutic agents, namely Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), have already shown outstanding efficacy in a relapsed/refractory setting in recent landmark studies. Several phase 2 single-arm studies suggest that the addition of these agents in the frontline setting could further improve long-term disease control permitting one to reduce the exposure to cytotoxic drugs. However, a longer follow-up is needed. At the time of this writing, the only randomized phase 3 trial so far published is the ECHELON-1, which compares 1 to 1 BV-AVD (Bleomycin is replaced by BV) with standard ABVD in untreated advanced-stage III and IV HL. The ECHELON-1 trial has proven that BV-AVD is safe and more effective both in terms of long-term disease control and overall survival. Just recently, the results of the S1826 SWOG trial demonstrated that the combination nivolumab-AVD (N-AVD) is better than BV-AVD, while preliminary results of other randomized ongoing phase 3 trials incorporating anti-PD-1 in this setting will be soon available. The aim of this review is to present the recent data regarding these novel agents in first-line treatment of HL and to highlight current and future trends which will hopefully reshape the overall management of this disease.

Predictive value on advance hodgkin lymphoma treatment outcome of end-of treatment FDG PET/CT in the HD0607 clinical trial

The Lugano classification for response assessment in lymphoma recommends the use of the 5-point-scale Deauville Score (DS) to assess response evaluation of end-of-treatment FDG-PET/CT (eotPET) in Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL); nevertheless, there is a paucity of data on its accuracy and reproducibility. We focus here on the cohort of advanced stage IIb-IV HL patients enrolled in the HD0607 clinical trial (NCT identifier 00795613) that having had a negative interim PET performed 6 cycles of ABVD (Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, Vincristine and Dacarbazine) and then performed an eotPET. Negative patients were randomized to radiotherapy and no further treatment while positive patients were treated based on local policies. eotPET was re-evaluated independently by two readers evaluated and progression free survival was analysed (PFS). eotPET of 254 patients were analysed. The median follow-up was 43 months. The best receiver operator characteristics cut-off values to distinguish positive and negative patients was 4. The area-under-the-curve was 0.81 (95%CI, 0.70-0.91). Three-years PFS was 0.95 (95% CI 0.90-0.97) in eotPET negative and 0.22 (95% CI 0.11-0.43) in eotPET positive. DS demonstrated a good reproducibility of positivity/negativity between the readers consensus and local site evaluation where the agreement occurred on 95.0% of patients. The present study demonstrates that eotPET is an accurate tool to predict treatment outcome in HL and confirms the appropriateness of the Lugano classification for eotPET evaluation.

Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: From Past to Future-A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Advances

Hodgkin lymphoma, a hematological malignancy of lymphoid origin that typically arises from germinal-center B cells, has an excellent overall prognosis. However, the treatment of patients who relapse or develop resistant disease still poses a substantial clinical and research challenge, even though current risk-adapted and response-based treatment techniques produce overall survival rates of over 95%. The appearance of late malignancies after the successful cure of primary or relapsed disease continues to be a major concern, mostly because of high survival rates. Particularly in pediatric HL patients, the chance of developing secondary leukemia is manifold compared to that in the general pediatric population, and the prognosis for patients with secondary leukemia is much worse than that for patients with other hematological malignancies. Therefore, it is crucial to develop clinically useful biomarkers to stratify patients according to their risk of late malignancies and determine which require intense treatment regimens to maintain the ideal balance between maximizing survival rates and avoiding late consequences. In this article, we review HL's epidemiology, risk factors, staging, molecular and genetic biomarkers, and treatments for children and adults, as well as treatment-related adverse events and the late development of secondary malignancies in patients with the disease.

Observations of Oncologists on Treatment Selection With Interim Positron Emission Tomography-Adapted Approaches in Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma: The Real-World CONNECT Study

PURPOSE

We surveyed oncologists who treat classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) as part of the CONNECT study to understand the treatment decision-making process, including the impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging.

METHODS

US physicians self-identifying as oncologists, hematologists, or hematologists/oncologists with ≥2 years of practice experience who treated ≥1 adult with stage III/IV cHL in the frontline setting in the last year were surveyed (October 19-November 16, 2020). Physician demographics, guideline adherence, and PET/CT utilization, interpretation, and access barriers were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 301 physicians participated in the survey. Eighty-eight percent of physicians gave somewhat-to-significant consideration to NCCN guidelines. Most physicians (94%; n = 284) reported obtaining a PET/CT scan at diagnosis; of these physicians, 97% reported obtaining an interim PET/CT scan for stage III/IV cHL, with 65% typically obtaining an interim PET/CT scan after cycle 2. The Deauville 5-point scale (5PS) was the primary scoring system used to review PET/CT results by 62% of physicians, with a positive score defined as ≥3 by 44%, ≥4 by 37%, and ≥2 by 12% of physicians. Fifty-five percent of physicians reported difficulty in obtaining PET/CT scans.

CONCLUSION

Although most physicians considered NCCN guidelines when treating patients with stage III/IV cHL, interim PET/CT scans after cycle 2 were not universally obtained. When PET/CT scans were obtained, Deauville 5PS scores were not always provided, and variability existed on what defined a positive score. These findings suggest that opportunities exist for education and improved PET-adapted treatment approaches.

Concurrent pembrolizumab with AVD for untreated classic Hodgkin lymphoma

Concurrent administration of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy in untreated classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) has not been studied previously. To investigate this combination, we conducted a single-arm study of concurrent pembrolizumab with AVD (doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine; APVD) for untreated CHL. We enrolled 30 patients and met the primary safety end point with no observed significant treatment delays in the first 2 cycles. Twelve patients experienced grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic adverse events (AEs), most commonly febrile neutropenia and infection/sepsis. Grade 3 or 4 immune-related AEs, including alanine aminotransferase elevation and aspartate aminotransferase elevation were observed in 3 patients. One patient experienced an episode of grade 2 colitis and arthritis. Six patients missed at least 1 dose of pembrolizumab because of AEs, primarily grade 2 or higher transaminitis. Among 29 response-evaluable patients, the best overall response rate was 100% and the complete response rate was 90%. With a median follow-up of 2.1 years, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 97% and 100%, respectively. To date, no patient who has withheld or discontinued pembrolizumab because of toxicity has progressed. Clearance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was associated with superior PFS when measured after cycle 2 and at the end of treatment (EOT). None of the 4 patients with persistent uptake by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) at EOT yet negative ctDNA have relapsed to date. Concurrent APVD shows promising safety and efficacy but may yield spurious PET findings in some patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03331341.

PET/CT in Hodgkin Lymphoma: An Update

¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT is now an integral part of the workup and management of patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). PET/CT is currently routinely performed for staging and for response assessment at the end of treatment. Interim PET/CT is typically performed after 1-4 of 6-8 chemo/chemoimmunotherapy cycles ± radiation for prognostication and potential treatment escalation or de-escalation early in the course of therapy, a concept known as response-or risk-adapted treatment. Quantitative PET is an area of growing interest. Metrics such as the standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume, total lesion glycolysis, and their changes with treatment are being investigated as more reproducible and, potentially, more accurate predictors of response and prognosis. Despite the progress made in standardizing the use of PET/CT in lymphoma, challenges remain, particularly with respect to its limited positive predictive value. This review highlights the most relevant applications of PET/CT in HL, its strengths and limitations, as well as recent efforts to implement PET/CT-based metrics as promising tools for precision medicine. Finally, the value of PET/CT for response assessment to immunotherapy is discussed.

Interim FDG-PET/CT for Response Assessment of Lymphoma

The clinical use and prognostic value of interim FDG-PET/CT (iPET/CT), which is performed after treatment initiation but prior to its completion, varies by lymphoma subtype. Evidence supporting the prognostic value of iPET/CT is more robust for classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), and in this lymphoma subtype, response-adapted treatment approaches guided by iPET/CT are a widely used standard of care for first-line therapy. The data supporting use of iPET/CT among patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is less well-established, but failure to achieve complete metabolic response on iPET/CT is generally considered a poor prognostic factor with likely consequences for progression free survival. This review will present the available evidence supporting use of iPET/CT in lymphoma patients, particularly as it relates to prognostication and the ability to inform response-adapted treatment strategies. The latter will be addressed through a discussion on the major iPET-response adapted clinical trials with mention of ongoing trials. Special attention will be given to cHL and a few subtypes of NHL, including diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL).

The Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma International Prognostic Index: Development and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model From the HoLISTIC Consortium

PURPOSE

The International Prognostic Score (IPS) has been used in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) for 25 years. However, analyses have documented suboptimal performance of the IPS among contemporarily treated patients. Harnessing multisource individual patient data from the Hodgkin Lymphoma International Study for Individual Care consortium, we developed and validated a modern clinical prediction model.

METHODS

Model development via Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis guidelines was performed on 4,022 patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage adult cHL from eight international phase III clinical trials, conducted from 1996 to 2014. External validation was performed on 1,431 contemporaneously treated patients from four real-world cHL registries. To consider association over a full range of continuous variables, we evaluated piecewise linear splines for potential nonlinear relationships. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

The median age in the development cohort was 33 (18-65) years; nodular sclerosis was the most common histology. Kaplan-Meier estimators were 0.77 for 5-year PFS and 0.92 for 5-year OS. Significant predictor variables included age, sex, stage, bulk, absolute lymphocyte count, hemoglobin, and albumin, with slight variation for PFS versus OS. Moreover, age and absolute lymphocyte count yielded nonlinear relationships with outcomes. Optimism-corrected c-statistics in the development model for 5-year PFS and OS were 0.590 and 0.720, respectively. There was good discrimination and calibration in external validation and consistent performance in internal-external validation. Compared with the IPS, there was superior discrimination for OS and enhanced calibration for PFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

We rigorously developed and externally validated a clinical prediction model in > 5,000 patients with advanced-stage cHL. Furthermore, we identified several novel nonlinear relationships and improved the prediction of patient outcomes. An online calculator was created for individualized point-of-care use.

Quality improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials

Clinical trials have become the primary mechanism to validate process improvements in oncology clinical practice. Over the past two decades there have been considerable process improvements in the practice of radiation oncology within the structure of a modern department using advanced technology for patient care. Treatment planning is accomplished with volume definition including fusion of multiple series of diagnostic images into volumetric planning studies to optimize the definition of tumor and define the relationship of tumor to normal tissue. Daily treatment is validated by multiple tools of image guidance. Computer planning has been optimized and supported by the increasing use of artificial intelligence in treatment planning. Informatics technology has improved, and departments have become geographically transparent integrated through informatics bridges creating an economy of scale for the planning and execution of advanced technology radiation therapy. This serves to provide consistency in department habits and improve quality of patient care. Improvements in normal tissue sparing have further improved tolerance of treatment and allowed radiation oncologists to increase both daily and total dose to target. Radiation oncologists need to define a priori dose volume constraints to normal tissue as well as define how image guidance will be applied to each radiation treatment. These process improvements have enhanced the utility of radiation therapy in patient care and have made radiation therapy an attractive option for care in multiple primary disease settings. In this chapter we review how these changes have been applied to clinical practice and incorporated into clinical trials. We will discuss how the changes in clinical practice have improved the quality of clinical trials in radiation therapy. We will also identify what gaps remain and need to be addressed to offer further improvements in radiation oncology clinical trials and patient care.

Clinical value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the management of HIV-associated lymphoma

HIV is still a major public health problem. At present, HIV-associated lymphoma remains the leading cause of deaths among people living with HIV, which should be paid more attention to. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxglucose (FDG) PET/CT has been recommended in the initial staging, restaging, response assessment and prognostic prediction of lymphomas in general population. HIV-associated lymphoma is, however, a different entity from lymphoma in HIV-negative with a poorer prognosis. The ability to accurately risk-stratify HIV-infected patients with lymphoma will help guide treatment strategy and improve the prognosis. In the review, the current clinical applications of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in HIV-associated lymphoma will be discussed, such as diagnosis, initial staging, response evaluation, prognostic prediction, PET-guided radiotherapy decision, and surveillance for recurrence. Moreover, future perspectives will also be presented.

An update on molecular features and therapeutic perspectives of pediatric classical Hodgkin Lymphoma. What the clinician needs to know?

Our understanding of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) molecular biology has been radically transformed over recent years due to the advent and the spreading of the new generation sequencing approaches. These advances offer new insights about genetic predisposition to HL in children and are currently being translated into promising and more selective drugs (brentuximab and checkpoint inhibitors) offering the perspective to reduce treatment-related toxicity. Thus, as more than 90% of pediatric patients are cured after the first line treatment, a major emphasis is placed on survivorship by reducing treatment intensity, in particular, the use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy associated with long-term toxicities. The purposes of this review are to summarize the recent advances performed in the field of molecular biology of HL, in particular the promising development of liquid biopsies. We also provide an update review of immunodeficiencies associated to HL in children recently identified. Finally, we report the recent studies supporting the efficacy of new targeted therapeutics in adult and pediatric cHL (anti-CD30 and anti-PD1).

The outcome of older adults with classic Hodgkin lymphoma in British Columbia

Outcomes in older adults with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have traditionally been poor, in part, related to poor tolerance to standard chemotherapy. Herein, we evaluated the survival of patients with cHL aged ≥60 years in British Columbia in a population-based analysis. From 1961 to 2019, 744 patients with newly diagnosed cHL were identified. With a median follow-up of 9 years, 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) have improved by decade comparison (both P < .001), remaining stable in the past 20 years (DSS, P = .35; OS, P = .26). In the modern management era (2000-present), 361 of 401 patients (90%) received active therapy for cHL and had a 5-year OS of 60%. For those who received curative-intent therapy (n = 327), the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and DSS were 60%, 65%, and 76%, respectively, and estimates were superior in those who were 60 to 69 years of age (72%, 77%, and 83%, respectively) compared with those who were 70 to 79 years of age (54%, 57%, and 70%, respectively) and ≥80 years of age (28%, 39%, and 63%, respectively) (P < .05 for all). Overall, pulmonary toxicity occurred in 58 of 279 patients (21%) treated with bleomycin, with 22 of 58 (38%) occurring after cycles 1 or 2, accounting for 8 of 20 (40%) treatment-related deaths. Outcomes in older adults with cHL have improved in recent decades; however, they remain poor for those aged ≥70 years, even in the modern treatment era. Furthermore, treatment-related toxicity remains a significant concern and use of bleomycin should be avoided in most patients.

Outcomes Among Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients After an Interim PET Scan: A Real-World Experience

INTRODUCTION

The utility of dose escalation after positive positron emission tomography following 2 cycles of ABVD (PET2) for Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) remains controversial. We describe the United States real-world practice patterns for PET2 positive patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data was collected from 15 sites on PET2 positive HL patients after receiving frontline treatment between January, 2015 and June, 2019. Descriptive analyses between those with therapy change and those continuing initial therapy were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients were identified; 111 (86%) were treated with ABVD therapy and 18 (14%) with an alternate regimen. At PET2 assessment, 74.4% (96/129) had Deauville score (DS) 4 and 25.6% (33/129) had DS 5. Of the 66 limited stage (LS) patients with PET2 DS score of 4/5, 77.3% (51/66) continued initial therapy and 22.7% (15/66) changed to escalated therapy. The 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) for DS 4/5 LS patients was 67.0% (95% CI; 54.9-81.7) for patients without escalation compared with 51.4% (95% CI; 30.8-85.8) for those who escalated. Of the 63 DS 4/5 patients with advanced stage (AS) disease, 76.2% (48/63) continued initial therapy and 23.8% (15/63) changed to escalated therapy. The 12-month PFS for DS 4/5 AS patients was 38.3% (95% CI: 26.3%-55.7%) for patients without escalation compared with 57.1% (95% CI: 36.3-89.9) for those with escalation.

CONCLUSION

A minority of PET2 positive HL patients undergo therapy escalation and outcomes remain overall suboptimal. Improved prognostics markers and better therapeutics are required to improve outcomes for high-risk PET2 positive HL patients.

Retrospective Multicenter Real-Life Study on the First-Line Treatment of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma in Argentina

There are no data in Argentina on the response rates to first-line treatment of classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) outside clinical trials. A total of 498 patients from 7 public and private hospitals in Argentina were retrospectively examined. The median follow-up was 37.4 months (CI 95% 17.7–63.5). The median time from diagnosis to treatment was 22 days (IQR 14–42), which was significantly longer in public hospitals (49.3 (IC 95% 38.5–60.2) versus 32.5 (IC 95% 27–38); p = 0.0027). A total of 96.8% of patients were treated with ABVD.:84.3% achieved complete remission (CR) and 6.02% partial remission (PR), being the CR rate higher in private hospitals. End-of-treatment metabolic CR was achieved in 85.4% (n = 373). The interim PET scan was widely used in our cohort (70.5%; n = 351), but in only 23.3% (n = 116) was the treatment strategy response-adapted. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 76% (CI 95% 70–81). The 2 and 5-years-OS rates were 91% (CI 95% 88–94%) and 85% (CI 95% 80–89%), respectively. No differences in OS were found between public and private institutions (p = 0.27). This is one of the largest retrospective cHL cohorts reported. In Argentina ABVD is the chemotherapy regimen of choice and, although it is well tolerated, it is not exempt from toxicity. We showed that early initiation of treatment impacts the induction results. Although the use of PET scan is widespread, only a minority of patients was treated with respons- adapted strategies. The use of PET-guided treatment is strongly encouraged.

High-risk stage IIB Hodgkin lymphoma treated in the H10 and AHL2011 trials: total metabolic tumor volume is a useful risk factor to stratify patients at baseline

Stage IIB Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients, with a mediastinum-to-thorax (M/T) ratio of ≥0.33 or extranodal localization have a poor prognosis and are treated either as limited or advanced stage. We compared these two approaches in patients included in two randomized phase III trials enrolling previously untreated early (H10) or advanced stage HL (AHL2011). We included HL patients with Ann-Arbor stage IIB with M/T ≥0.33 or extranodal involvement enrolled in the H10 or AHL2011 trials with available positron emission tomography at baseline (PET0) and after two cycles of chemotherapy (PET2). Baseline total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) was calculated using the 41% SUVmax method. PET2 response assessment used the Deauville score. One hundred and fourty-eight patients were eligible, including 83 enrolled in the AHL2011 trial and 65 in the H10 trial. The median TMTV value was 155.5 mL (range, 8.3-782.9 mL), 165.6 mL in AHL2011 and 147 mL in H10. PET2 positivity rates were 16.9% (n=14) and 9.2% (n=6) in AHL2011 and H10 patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 4.1 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9-4.4), overall 4-year PFS was 88.0%, 87.0% in AHL2011 and 89.2% in H10. In univariate and mutivariate analyses, baseline TMTV and PET2 response influenced significantly progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]=4.94, HR=3.49 respectively). Notably, among the 16 patients who relapsed, 13 (81%) had a baseline TMTV baseline ≥155 mL. Upfront ABVD plus radiation therapy or upfront escBEACOPP without radiotherapy provide similar patient's outcome in high-risk stage IIB HL. TMTV is useful to stratify these patients at baseline.

First-line treatment of stage IIB to stage IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma in Italy, Israel, and Spain: Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is curable in 90% of cases, but advanced stage patients who do not respond well to first-line (1L) therapy have poorer outcomes. This retrospective study examines patient characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and safety management of 1L cHL therapies in common clinical practice in Italy (IT), Israel (IL), and Spain (SP). The overall sample (n = 256) included patients with stage IIb to IV cHL, of which 86.3% received ABVD as 1L therapy (n = 221). Clinical outcomes were similar for the overall population and ABVD subsample: complete response (CR) in 75% and 76.5%; 30-month (30-mo) survival (OS) of 92.5% and 93.6%; and 30-mo progression-free survival (PFS) of 70.7% and 72.6%. Thirty-month PFS was significantly lower for patients ≥ 60 years and/or with high (4-7) IPS. Treatment-induced pulmonary and cardiac toxicities, and febrile neutropenia occurred, respectively, in 10%, 2.3%, and 6.8% of ABVD-treated patients. Interim PET or PET-CT scans were performed after two cycles of 1L therapy (PET2) for 70.3% and 66.6% of the overall and ABVD cohorts, respectively. PET2 positive rates were nearly 30% (49/173), yet PET-adapted strategy of dose modification only occurred in a small fraction of patients.

Positron Emission Tomography-Driven Strategy in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma: Prolonged Follow-Up of the AHL2011 Phase III Lymphoma Study Association Study

PURPOSE

The AHL2011 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01358747) demonstrated that a positron emission tomography (PET)-driven de-escalation strategy after two cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) provides similar progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and reduces early toxicity compared with a nonmonitored standard treatment. Here, we report, with a prolonged follow-up, the final study results.

METHODS

Patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (stage III, IV, or IIB with mediastinum/thorax ratio > 0.33 or extranodal involvement) age 16-60 years were prospectively randomly assigned between 6 × BEACOPP and a PET-driven arm after 2 × BEACOPP delivering 4 × ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) in PET2- and 4 × BEACOPP in PET2+ patients. PET performed after four cycles of chemotherapy had to be negative to complete the planned treatment.

RESULTS

In total, 823 patients were enrolled including 413 in the standard arm and 410 in the PET-driven arm. With a 67.2-month median follow-up, 5-year PFS (87.5% v 86.7%; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.57; P = .67) and OS (97.7% in both arms; HR = 1.012; 95% CI, 0.50 to 2.10; P = .53) were similar in both randomization arms. In the whole cohort, full interim PET assessment predicted patients' 5-year PFS (92.3% in PET2-/PET4-, 75.4% [HR = 3.26; 95% CI, 18.3 to 5.77] in PET2+/PET4- and 46.5% [HR = 12.4; 95% CI, 7.31 to 19.51] in PET4+ patients, respectively; P < .0001) independent of international prognosis score. Five-year OS was also affected by interim PET results, and PET2+/PET4- patients (93.5%; HR = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.07 to 10.1; P = .036) and PET4+ patients (91.9%; HR = 3.756; 95% CI, 1.07 to 13.18; P = .038) had a significant lower OS than PET2-/PET4- patients (98.2%). Twenty-two patients (2.7%) developed a second primary malignancy, 13 (3.2%) and 9 (2.2%) in the standard and experimental arms, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The extended follow-up confirms the continued efficacy and favorable safety of AHL2011 PET-driven strategy, which is noninferior to standard six cycles of BEACOPP. PET4 provides additional prognostic information to PET2 and allows identifying patients with particularly poor prognosis.

Response-adapted anti-PD1 based salvage therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma with nivolumab +/- ICE (NICE)

This phase 2 trial evaluated PET-adapted nivolumab (Nivo) alone or in combination with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (NICE) as first salvage therapy and bridge to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) in relapsed/refractory (RR) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Patients with RR cHL received 240mg Nivo every 2 weeks for up to 6 cycles (C). Patients in complete response (CR) after C6 proceeded to AHCT, while patients with progressive disease (PD) at any point or not in CR after C6 received NICE for 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was CR rate per the 2014 Lugano classification at completion of protocol therapy. 43 patients were evaluable for toxicity; 42 were evaluable for response. 34 patients received Nivo alone and 9 patients received Nivo+NICE. No unexpected toxicities were observed after Nivo or NICE. After Nivo, the overall response rate (ORR) was 81% and the CR rate was 71%. Among the 9 patients who received NICE, all responded with 8 (89%) achieving CR. At the end of all protocol therapy, the ORR and CR rates were 93% and 91%. Thirty-three patients were bridged directly to AHCT, including 26 after Nivo alone. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in all treated patients (n=43) were 72% (95%CI:56-83) and 95% (95%CI:82-99), respectively. Among the 33 patients who bridged directly to AHCT after protocol therapy, the 2-year PFS was 94% (95%CI:78-98). PET-adapted sequential salvage therapy with Nivo or Nivo+NICE was well-tolerated and effective, resulting in a high CR rate and bridging most patients to AHCT without chemotherapy. This Clinical Trial is registered under NCT03016871.

Advances in Hodgkin Lymphoma: Including the Patient's Voice

Since the initial treatment with radiation therapy in the 1950s, the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma has continued to evolve, balancing cure and toxicity. This approach has resulted in low rates of relapse and death and fewer short and late toxicities from the treatments used in pursuit of cure. To achieve this balance, the field has continued to progress into an exciting era where the advent of more targeted therapies such as brentuximab vedotin, immunotherapies such as PD-1 inhibitors, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) targeted at CD30 are changing the landscape. As in the past, cooperative group and international collaborations are key to continuing to drive the science forward. Increased focus on patient-reported outcomes can further contribute to the goal of improved outcomes by examining the impact on the individual patient in the acute phase of therapy and on long-term implications for survivors. The goals of this review are to summarize recent and current clinical trials including reduction or elimination of radiation, immunotherapies and biologically-targeted agents, and discuss the use of patient-reported outcomes to help discern directions for new therapeutic regimens and more individualized evaluation of the balance of cure and toxicity.

Brentuximab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab Combination in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Single-Centre Retrospective Analysis

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients presenting a relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease are currently managed with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, almost 25-30% of these patients fail to achieve a complete response (CR) with standard salvage regimens. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy of a combination of brentuximab vedotin (BV) and pembrolizumab in a series of HL patients presenting with a high-risk, multi-refractory disease. Patients achieving a Deauville score ≤4 proceeded to ASCT consolidation. After ASCT, patients received BV as maintenance for a total of 16 administrations. We collected data from 10 patients with a median age of 30.7 years. At a median follow-up of 16.5 months, we reported a complete metabolic remission (CMR) in eight patients (80%), with seven patients (70%) directly proceeding to ASCT (the other two patients in CMR are still undergoing treatment). BV consolidation was started in six patients and completed by three patients (one ongoing, two interruption). Two patients (20%) presented a progressive disease (PD) and subsequently died, while the others are still in CMR. The BV and pembrolizumab combination is a very effective bridge treatment to ASCT for high-risk R/R HL patients.

Reduction of the Vertebral Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma Correlates with Their Age and the Treatment Regimen They Received

Simple Summary

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is considered a largely curable disease (~80%). The young patient age at diagnosis and their long life expectancy make quality-of-life issues, including osteopenia, exceedingly important. This study aimed to assess treatment-related bone mineral density (BMD) changes that are overlooked in this young population. BMD was measured using PET/CT scans. Among 213 patients (median age 29 years), post-treatment BMD reduction of >15% was significantly more common in those aged ≥30 years and was also associated with a cumulative dose of steroids used. At 6 months post-therapy, BMD recovery was observed in ABVD (adriamycin/bleomycin/vinblastine/dacarbazine) treated patients, while individuals receiving EB (bleomycin/etoposide/adriamycin/cyclophosphamide/oncovin/procarbazine/prednisone) regimens demonstrated persistent BMD loss and higher rates of osteopenia. Our findings suggest that steroid use should be minimized and highly gonadotoxic drugs like procarbazine should be substituted with less toxic ones, due to their deleterious effect on BMD. Adequate vitamin D levels should be maintained.

Abstract

Nowadays, Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has become highly curable. The young age at diagnosis and long life expectancy emphasize the importance of preventing long-term treatment side effects, including bone mineral density (BMD) loss, in these patients. We aimed to evaluate the effects of first-line therapeutic modalities on BMD dynamics in HL patients, intending to identify individuals at risk for osteopenia. Demographics, HL risk factors, treatment, including cumulative steroid doses, and BMD of 213 newly-diagnosed HL patients (median age 29 years), treated at Rambam between 2008–2016, were analyzed. The main chemotherapy regimens applied were: ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) and escalated BEACOPP (EB; bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, oncovin, procarbazine, prednisone). BMD was measured using PET/CT scans. BMD loss >15% was revealed in 48% of patients at therapy completion, with osteopenia prevalence of 4% and 14% at baseline and post-therapy, respectively. Cumulative hydrocortisone equivalent doses >3400 mg/m² correlated with significant BMD reduction. Multivariate analysis at 6 months post-therapy identified age ≥30 years and EB-regimens as significant risk factors for BMD decrease >15%. Therapy-related BMD loss is common in HL patients. Its persistence is associated with age ≥30 years and EB treatment. Reduction of cumulative steroid doses and switch to non-gonadotoxic drugs should be considered.

Real-world outcomes of autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma in the era of novel therapies: a Canadian perspective

BACKGROUND

Despite high cure rates with frontline therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), about 30% of patients will relapse or have primary refractory disease (R/r). Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is the standard of care for R/r disease and alloHSCT is a curative option for patients in second relapse. Novel agents are being incorporated for the treatment of R/r HL, such that the optimal timing of transplant is currently being challenged. Additionally, because access to these new agents varies amongst transplant centers, we sought to offer a Canadian perspective to the treatment of R/r HL and demonstrate the utility and effectiveness of both AHSCT and alloHSCT for the treatment of R/r HL.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study examined outcomes in 89 consecutive patients with R/r HL treated with AHSCT between January 2007 and December 2019. A total of 17 patients underwent alloHSCT either as a tandem auto-allo approach or as salvage therapy.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 5.0 years, the estimated 5-year PFS and OS for patients undergoing AHSCT were 57.5% (95% CI 45.2-68.0) and 81.3% (95% CI 70.0-88.8), respectively. Corresponding figures for patients who underwent alloHSCT were 76.5% (95% CI 48.8-90.4) and 82.4% (95% CI 54.7-93.9). NRM at 100 days and 5 years was 0% and 9.4% post AHSCT and 0% and 5.9% post alloHSCT. Cumulative incidence (CI) of acute GVHD at day +100 was 35.3% (95% CI 17.7 - 62.3) and CI of chronic GVHD at 1 year was 23.5% (95% CI 6.9 - 45.8).

CONCLUSIONS

AHSCT and alloHSCT can both provide robust and prolonged disease control and new agents should be used as a bridge to improve the curative potential of these definitive cellular therapies.

Improved post-ASCT survival of relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients in the era of novel agents

Utilization of novel agents such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and check-point inhibitors (CI) has increased in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL). We conducted a retrospective study of 209 patients who had ASCT for r/r cHL at our institution and compared outcomes of those who had ASCT from 2010-2018 (cohort 2, n = 110) with those who had ASCT between 2000 and 2009 (cohort 1, n = 99). The median OS was 7.6 years for cohort 1 [HR 2.08; 95% CI 1.14-3.80; p = 0.017] and not reached for cohort 2; with 4-year improved OS difference of 15% (80% vs 65%) in cohort 2 vs cohort 1. The median PFS of cohort 1 was 30 months vs 39 months for cohort 2[HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.82-1.88; p = 0.3]. This study highlights improved OS of r/r cHL patients who have received ASCT in the novel agent era due to the exposure to agents such as BV and CIs.

Role of radiotherapy to bulky sites of advanced Hodgkin lymphoma treated with ABVD: final results of FIL HD0801 trial

The role of consolidation radiotherapy (RT) for bulky lesions is controversial in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma who achieve complete metabolic response (CMR) after doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD)-based chemotherapy. We present the final results of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi HD0801 trial, which investigated the potential benefit of RT in that setting. In this phase 3 randomized study, patients with a bulky lesion at baseline (a mass with largest diameter ≥5 cm) who have CMR after 2 and 6 ABVD cycles were randomly assigned 1:1 to RT vs observation (OBS) with a primary endpoint of event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years. The sample size was calculated estimating an EFS improvement for RT of 20% (from 60% to 80%). The secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). One hundred sixteen patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to RT or OBS. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed a 2-year EFS of 87.8% vs 85.8% for RT vs OBS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-3.5; P = .34). At 2 years, ITT-PFS was 91.3% vs 85.8% (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-3; P = .7). Patients in CMR randomly assigned to OBS had a good outcome, and the primary end point of a 20% benefit in EFS for RT was not met. However, the sample size was underpowered to detect a benefit of 10% or less, keeping open the question of a potential, more limited role of RT in this setting. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00784537.

Current Role of Functional Imaging in the Management of Lymphoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Functional imaging with 18FDG-PET-CT has transformed the staging and response assessment of patients with Hodgkin (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Herein, we review the current role and future directions for functional imaging in the management of patients with lymphoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Because of its increased sensitivity, PET-CT is the preferred modality for staging of FDG-avid lymphomas. It appears to have a role for interim assessment in patients with HL with adaptive strategies that reduce toxicity in lower risk patients and increase efficacy in those at high risk. Such a role has yet to be demonstrated in other histologies. FDG-PET-CT is also the gold standard for response assessment posttreatment. Newer uses include assessment of total metabolic tumor volume and radiomics in pretreatment prognosis. Whereas PET-CT is more sensitive than other current modalities for staging and response assessment, the future of PET-CT will be in conjunction with other modalities, notably assessment of minimal residual disease and microenvironmental markers to develop risk adaptive strategies to improve the outcome of patients with lymphoma.

Optimizing First-Line Therapy for Advanced-Stage Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma

Goals of first-line therapy in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) should focus on balancing risk versus benefit to the individual while increasing efficacy and decreasing toxicity. Overall, the ABVD regimen is well tolerated but slightly less effective, with a better safety profile compared with escalated BEACOPP. BV-AVD is somewhere in between ABVD and escalated BEACOPP on the cure/morbidity scale. Interim PET is predictive, but new prognostic biomarkers are emerging that may better identify patients at high risk for treatment failure. In patients with interim PET-negative cHL, de-escalating therapy does not impact overall survival along 1) with no proven role for radiotherapy. cHL is largely a disease of young people, and the choice of treatment should always take into account the potential for both short- and long-term toxicity with the goal of optimizing survivorship.

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma is one of the more frequent lymphomas and is generally considered a highly curable disease with standard first-line chemotherapy and radiotherapy in some cases. Despite these outstanding results, major problems remain unresolved. First, there are still patients who will not be cured with front-line regimens and, second, many patients who are cured of classical Hodgkin lymphoma continue to die prematurely due to the late toxic effects of their therapy. Because the median age of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma is in the mid-30s, the disease's impact on the number of years lost from productive life is remarkable. In recent years, the gold standard of chemotherapy (often combined with radiotherapy) has changed, with the approval of immunotherapy mostly in relapse settings.

Perceptions of Role in Treatment Decision Making and Understanding of Late Effects Among Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors: Results From a National Survey HL Decision Making and Late Effects

BACKGROUND

Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) survivors are at risk of treatment-related late effects (LEs). With these potential risks and increasing numbers of treatment options for newly diagnosed patients, communication and shared decision making are essential to supporting patients throughout the cancer care continuum. We aimed to gather perspectives of HL survivors about their actual role in treatment decision making and their understanding of LEs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After initial pilot testing at a cancer survivor conference, we disseminated a 23-question survey in a single-wave e-mail through the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's national listserv. We focused on 4 constructs: (1) patient's understanding of HL at diagnosis; (2) initial discussions with an oncologist; (3) factors in decision making of treatment, and (4) current health status.

RESULTS

A total of 135 participants responded to the survey. While 73% of survey respondents perceived some involvement in decision making, one-half of respondents felt the treatment plan was a shared decision with their provider. Among patient-level factors, side effects/LEs were most frequently endorsed as important to treatment decisions. Eighty-four percent of respondents had been educated about risk for potential LEs. Thirty-six percent had been diagnosed with a LE at the time of survey completion with 3% reporting a second cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Survey respondents described their role in treatment decision making for newly diagnosed HL. Nearly half of patients did not endorse participating in shared decision making. A substantial number had experienced LEs. Future work should focus on improving patient-provider communication in decision processes for newly diagnosed HL.

Review of Treatment Options for the Management of Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma

Simple Summary

The cure rate of Hodgkin lymphoma is currently higher than 80% for almost all stages at diagnosis. Despite the particularly good efficacy of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, some late complications such as cardiovascular disease and second malignancies can occur in a small proportion of patients. A major concern nowadays is, therefore, to find the balance between remission and toxicity in the development of new treatments for classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This review focuses on how to best treat first-line advanced Hodgkin lymphomas, considering the acute and long-term consequences of chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatments. New drugs such as brentuximab vedotin and checkpoint inhibitors are also a field of interest.

Abstract

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a lymphoid-type hematologic disease that is derived from B cells. The incidence of this lymphoid malignancy is around 2–3/100,000/year in the western world. Long-term remission rates are linked to a risk-adapted approach, which allows remission rates higher than 80%. The first-line treatment for advanced stage classical HL (cHL) widely used today is doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) or escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP_esc) chemotherapy. Randomized studies comparing these two regimens and a recently performed meta-analysis have demonstrated consistently better disease control with BEACOPP_esc. However, this treatment is not the standard of care, as there is an excess of acute hematological toxicities and therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Moreover, there is a recurrent controversy concerning the impact on overall survival with this regimen. More recently, new drugs such as brentuximab vedotin and checkpoint inhibitors have become available and have been evaluated in combination with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD) for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced cHL with the objective of tumor control improvement. There are still major debates with respect to first-line treatment of advanced cHL. The use of positron emission tomography-adapted strategies has allowed a reduction in the toxicity of chemotherapy regimens. Incorporation of new drugs into the treatment algorithms requires confirmation.