CNS Response to Osimertinib Versus Standard Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The Effectiveness of Afatinib as First-Line Treatment in Vietnamese Patients With EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases

INTRODUCTION

The role of afatinib in the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has been proven through clinical trials and real-world studies. However, additional data on the effectiveness of afatinib in patients with brain metastases are lacking.

METHODS

EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases were retrospectively reviewed across nine cancer centers in Vietnam from April 1, 2018 to June 1, 2022. The primary endpoints included central nervous system progression-free survival (CNS-PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and CNS-ORR.

RESULTS

Among 87 enrolled patients, 21.8%, 17.2%, and 60.9% received whole-brain radiation, gamma knife, and no locoregional therapy, respectively. With a median follow-up of 32.2 months for CNS-PFS and 35.3 months for OS, the median CNS-PFS and OS were 17.9 and 29.9 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, patients receiving whole-brain radiation had significantly shorter CNS-PFS than those untreated with local therapy (16.1 vs. 22.6 months, p = 0.019), but not translating to an inferior OS. Furthermore, both the CNS-PFS and OS of patients with uncommon mutations were significantly worse than those of patients with Del19 (11.3 vs. 24.2 months, p = 0.013 and 17.7 vs. 34.0 months, p = 0.003, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that a lower afatinib starting dose did not significantly affect CNS-PFS or OS. The CNS-ORR and ORR were 77.4% and 71.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In our real-world study, afatinib showed encouraging effectiveness in Vietnamese patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and brain metastases at baseline.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Osimertinib in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Population pharmacokinetics (popPK) modeling for osimertinib, a third-generation, irreversible, oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that potently and selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI sensitizing mutations and EGFR T790M, was previously reported utilizing AURA and AURA2 data (advanced non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC]). We report updated popPK modeling incorporating AURA3 and FLAURA data (advanced NSCLC); model validation used ADAURA data (resected stage IB-IIIA NSCLC). Updated popPK analyses were based on patients from AURA (n = 599), AURA2 (n = 210), AURA3 (n = 277), and FLAURA (n = 278) using a linear one-compartmental disposition model for osimertinib and its metabolite, AZ5104, with first-order oral absorption. A full covariate model, using Monte Carlo simulations, was developed to assess the effects of covariates on osimertinib and AZ5104 clearance. External validation was conducted using ADAURA study data (n = 325). In the final popPK model, the apparent clearance and volume of distribution of osimertinib (14.3 L/h; 918 L) and AZ5104 (31.3 L/h; 143 L) were comparable to previous analyses. Albumin levels and body weight influenced osimertinib PK, but the effects were not considered clinically meaningful; other covariates had no impact on PK. Goodness-of-fit plots indicated that the model adequately described all data. Visual predictive checks showed that the final model validated osimertinib steady-state PK for adjuvant treatment. PopPK modeling indicated that osimertinib dose adjustment is not required for patients' age, sex, body weight, race, smoking status, or line of therapy, confirming that a fixed 80 mg once-daily dose is optimal for osimertinib.

Efficacy and safety of dacomitinib in treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC and brain metastasis: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

The data for dacomitinib, a second-generation EGFR-TKI, treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastasis was lacking. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of dacomitinib in treating EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC with brain metastasis in first-line settings.

METHODS

Eligible patients were treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients with ≥1 brain metastasis no less than 5 mm treated with dacomitinib. The primary endpoint was intracranial objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included intracranial and extracranial progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), intracranial and extracranial ORR, disease control rate (DCR), and safety. The response was evaluated per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and RANO-BM (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases) criteria.

RESULT

Between July 2nd, 2019, and September 30th, 2022, a total of 87 treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC and brain metastasis treated with dacomitinib from four hospitals were included. The data cutoff date was March 24th, 2023, and the median duration of follow-up time was 17.5 months (range 1.6-34.7 months). Based on mRECIST criteria, for all the 87 patients with evaluable brain metastasis, the iORR was 89.7% (95%CI, 81.3%-95.2%) and iDCR was 97.7% (95%CI, 91.9-99.7%), with 42 patients achieving CR, 36 patients achieving PR, and 7 patients maintaining SD. Based on RANO-BM criteria, the iORR was 71.3% (62/87, 95%CI 60.6%-80.5%) and iDCR was 97.7% (85/87, 95%CI, 91.9%-99.7%), with 42 patients achieving CR, 20 patients achieving PR, and 23 patients maintaining SD (Table). Median iPFS was 26.0 (95%CI, 20.7-31.4) months, and the 1-year and 2-year iPFS rate were 68.9% and 51.5%, respectively. Of 75 patients with evaluable extracranial lesions, 2 patients achieved CR (2.7%), the systemic ORR was 73.8% (95%CI 63.1%-82.8%) and DCR was 96.4% (89.9%-99.3%) (Table). Systemic median PFS was 14.0 (95%CI 11.1-16.9) months and median OS was 34.0 (95%CI 28.0-39.9) months. Overall, 86 of 87 (98.9%) patients experienced adverse events (AEs) of any grade. The most common (≥20%) AEs including rash (89.7%), oral ulcer (74.2%), diarrhea (67.8%), and paronychia (59.8%). Most of the AEs were grade 1 or grade 2 and no patients died due to severe AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Dacomitinib showed promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile for advanced NSCLC with brain metastasis harboring EGFR mutation in the first-line treatment.

Exploring the Role of ADCs in Brain Metastases and Primary Brain Tumors: Insight and Future Directions

Primary and secondary brain tumors have always been a challenge due to their high morbidity and poor prognosis. The incidence of brain metastasis is also increasing with the advent of effective new treatments. Traditional systemic treatments have historically had limited success, partly due to poor central nervous system (CNS) penetration. However, the advent in recent decades of new therapies that have shown high encephalic response rates are challenging this paradigm. ADCs represent a new class of compounds revolutionizing cancer treatment with high systemic response rates and lower toxicities. The continuing evolution of ADCs has shown that certain structural features such as payload, linker, and drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) are essential in determining their efficacy at the encephalic level, and some ADCs have started to exhibit promising efficacy in treating primary and secondary brain tumors. Unfortunately, most patients with untreated encephalic metastases are excluded from clinical trials, with data primarily from retrospective studies or post hoc analyses. This review describes the early signs of ADC efficacy in brain tumors, the role of complementary treatments like radiation therapy, and critical points to improve ADC efficacy in brain malignancies.

A Prospective Phase II Trial of First-Line Osimertinib for Patients With EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC and Poor Performance Status (OPEN/TORG2040)

INTRODUCTION

Osimertinib is the first-line treatment for patients with NSCLC who have EGFR mutations and favorable performance status (PS). Despite the increasing clinical data on osimertinib, evidence for its use in patients with impaired PS remains limited. Therefore, a multicenter phase II trial (OPEN/TORG2040) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line osimertinib treatment in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and a poor PS.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations and PS of 2 to 4 were enrolled. Osimertinib (80 mg once daily) was orally administered to eligible patients. The primary end point was objective response rate. The secondary end points were disease control rate, PS improvement rate, patient-reported outcomes, and safety.

RESULTS

Between February 2021 and February 2022, 30 patients with poor PS (22 with a PS of 2, six with a PS of 3, and two with a PS of 4) were enrolled. The median age was 75 (range, 41-92) years, and 18 patients had brain metastases. The objective response rate was 63.3% (90% confidence interval, 46.7%-77.9%; one-sided, p = 0.033). Disease control and PS improvement rates were 93.3% and 63.3%, respectively. Global health status/QoL also improved. Median progression-free and overall survival were 8.0 and 25.4 months, respectively. Eight patients (26.7%) experienced serious adverse events leading to discontinuation, and six (20.0%) experienced interstitial lung disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study confirmed the efficacy of first-line osimertinib treatment in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and poor PS, highlighting the need for interstitial lung disease risk management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCTs041200100.

The role of upfront radiation therapy for brain metastases in the era of CNS-active systemic therapies: a narrative review of clinical trial design and lessons learned

PURPOSE

Systemic therapies are increasingly being considered as primary treatments for brain metastases (BM), deferring the upfront use of local treatment modalities. However, evidence to support this paradigm shift is difficult to interpret given the volume of data published and the intricacies of the outcomes reported. The objective of this narrative review is to evaluate the current evidence guiding treatment selection for BM patients by assembling and analyzing a detailed dataset of clinical trials, completed and published during the last two decades.

METHODS

Obstacles in interpreting the results of prospective systemic therapy clinical trials are detailed, including non-standardized study cohorts, inconsistent use of response assessment criteria, insufficient endpoint definition for central nervous system (CNS) efficacy, and under-reporting of previous radiotherapy. The paucity of prospective data to guide radiation therapy options is also addressed, and caveats of the available published evidence are detailed.

RESULTS

Proposed treatment and follow-up recommendations for patient with newly diagnosed BM are provided based on currently available evidence.

CONCLUSION

Prospective trials evaluating contemporary treatment paradigms and defining the respective roles of systemic and local therapies are eagerly awaited.

CNS Outcomes of Osimertinib Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With EGFR Mutation Positive Lung Cancer Beyond Osimertinib Progression

BACKGROUND

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are common among patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Osimertinib in combination with chemotherapy beyond osimertinib progression may minimize CNS progression.

METHOD

In this retrospective analysis, patients with advanced EGFR mutation positive NSCLC and brain metastases who received platinum-based chemotherapy (PbChT) after disease progression on osimertinib were enrolled. The primary endpoint was real-world CNS progression-free survival (rwCNS-PFS) between patients who received PbChT with and without osimertinib continuation. Secondary endpoints included competing risk analysis of CNS progression and incidence of salvage radiotherapy to brain.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients were analyzed, out of which, 39 (39%) continued osimertinib with chemotherapy (OSI+ cohort) and 62 (61%) received chemotherapy alone (OSI- cohort). Median rwCNS-PFS was significantly longer in the OSI+ cohort (9.0 months, 95% CI 6.6-11.4) than the OSI- cohort (5.7 months, 95% CI 4.6-6.9) (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18-0.76, P = .007). This remained significant after adjustment for EGFR mutation, line of osimertinib treatment, prior radiotherapy to brain, and CNS progression on osimertinib monotherapy. Estimated probability of CNS progression at 6 months was 5.6% in OSI+ cohort versus 20.9% in OSI- cohort. Incidence of salvage radiotherapy to brain was lower in the OSI+ cohort (15%) compared to OSI- cohort (24%).

CONCLUSION

In patients with EGFR mutation positive NSCLC and brain metastases, continuing osimertinib with chemotherapy after progression on osimertinib significantly reduced risk of CNS progression. Prospective studies are warranted to define the optimal treatment strategy for this patient population.

Elucidating the Role of EGFRL858R in Brain Metastasis Among Patients With Advanced NSCLC Undergoing TKI Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Brain metastases (BM) are a prevalent and severe complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that significantly affects quality of life. Although several predictive factors for BM have been identified, the influence of EGFR mutation subtypes remains under-explored.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined patients with advanced NSCLC and EGFR mutations treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs. Our primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (icPFS), defined as the time from the initiation of upfront treatment to the development of BM, the progression of existing brain lesions, or death. Additionally, we evaluated intracranial objective response rates (icORR) and disease control rates (icDCR) for patients with baseline BM. Subgroup and multivariate analyses were performed to adjust for relevant factors.

RESULTS

Of the 324 patients analyzed, 40.7% had baseline BM. Overall, the EGFRL858R mutation was linked to a significantly shorter median icPFS of 13.9 months, compared to 23.4 months for those with EGFRΔ19 (HR 1.60, P < .0001) For patients without baseline BM, icPFS was 14.3 months for EGFRL858R versus 26.2 months (HR 1.65, P = .007), while with baseline BM, it was 13.9 versus 18.5 months (HR 1.59, P = .035); icORR was lower for EGFRL858R (31.2% vs. 58.8%). Multivariate analysis showed EGFRL858R was independently linked to worse icPFS in patients with (HR 1.634, P = .031) and without BM (HR 1.606, P = .008), and lower icORR (OR 3.511, P = .007) and icDCR (OR 4.443, P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

EGFRL858R mutation significantly impacts BM development, intracranial progression, and response, emphasizing its critical role in therapy selection.

Furmonertinib in uncommon EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with central nervous system metastases: A retrospective cohort study

Uncommon EGFR mutations constitute 10%-20% of all EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), forming a molecularly distinct and clinically heterogeneous subgroup. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the efficacy and safety of furmonertinib in managing central nervous system (CNS) metastases among NSCLC patients with uncommon EGFR mutations (excluding exon 20 insertion variants). Thirty-one eligible patients treated at the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between March 2022 and August 2024 were enrolled. Serial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were subjected to next-generation sequencing for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling. Clinical endpoints included CNS objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), overall survival (OS), and safety parameters. The cohort demonstrated a CNS ORR of 38.7% (95% CI, 21.8%-57.8%) and DCR of 64.5% (95% CI, 45.4%-80.8%), with a median iPFS of 6.97 months. Median OS remained immature at data cutoff. A total of 21 patients with leptomeningeal metastases had baseline EGFR-mutant ctDNA detected in their CSF, with ctDNA analysis indicating intracranial responses corresponded to decreased or cleared ctDNA abundance. Longitudinal CSF ctDNA monitoring in a representative case demonstrated significant temporal correlation between molecular response and radiographic/clinical improvement. The safety profile was favorable, with no grade ≥4 adverse events or treatment-related mortality. These findings suggest that furmonertinib provides clinically meaningful CNS activity with acceptable toxicity in uncommon EGFR-mutant NSCLC, particularly when integrated with CSF ctDNA dynamics as a potential pharmacodynamic biomarker. This study highlights the therapeutic implications of third-generation EGFR-TKIs in molecularly defined NSCLC subpopulations.

Application of EGFR-TKIs in brain tumors, a breakthrough in future?

Brain tumors, both primary and secondary, represent a significant clinical challenge due to their high mortality and limited treatment options. Primary brain tumors, such as gliomas and meningiomas, and brain metastases from cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer require innovative therapeutic strategies. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR -TKIs) have emerged as a promising treatment option, particularly for tumors harboring EGFR mutations. This review examines the use of EGFR-TKIs in brain tumors, highlighting both laboratory and clinical research findings. In primary brain tumors and brain metastases, EGFR-TKIs have shown potential in controlling tumor growth and improving patient outcomes. Advanced applications, such as nano-formulated EGFR-TKIs and combination therapies with other pathway inhibitors, are being investigated to improve efficacy and overcome resistance. Challenges such as treatment-related events, resistance mechanisms and blood-brain barrier penetration remain significant hurdles. Addressing tumor heterogeneity through personalized medicine approaches is critical to optimizing EGFR-TKI therapies. This review highlights the need for continued research to refine these therapies and improve survival for patients with brain tumors.

Rezivertinib versus gefitinib as first-line therapy for patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (REZOR): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of rezivertinib (BPI-7711) and gefitinib as first-line therapies in patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study (REZOR) included eligible patients from 50 hospitals across China. Those who had been histologically or cytologically confirmed as having NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 Leu858Arg mutation by central laboratory were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive once daily either rezivertinib 180 mg or gefitinib 250 mg, until unacceptable toxicity occurred, disease progression, or other treatment discontinuation criteria were met. Each cycle lasted for 21 days. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival evaluated by masked independent central review (MICR) in the intention-to-treat set. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03866499 and follow-up is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between July 15, 2019, and Feb 14, 2022, 695 patients were screened. Among them, 369 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either rezivertinib 180 mg/day plus placebo (n=184) or gefitinib 250 mg/day plus placebo (n=185) in a 1:1 ratio; all of eligible participants were included in the intention-to-treat set. Median MICR-assessed progression-free survival was 19·3 months (95% CI 13·8-22·1) in the rezivertinib group and 9·6 months (8·4-11·3) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·48, 95% CI 0·36-0·63; p<0·0001) and the prespecified subgroup efficacy analysis showed consistent results. Median duration of exposure was 16·0 months (95% CI 0·0-29·7) in the rezivertinib group and 11·0 months (0·0-28·9) in the gefitinib group. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (82 [45%] of 184 in the rezivertinib group; 80 [43%] of 185 in the gefitinib group) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; 43 [23%] of 184 in the rezivertinib group; 43 [23%] of 185 in the gefitinib group) were similar in both groups. One patient died from a TRAE in the rezivertinib group, due to pneumonia and interstitial lung disease.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggested that rezivertinib is a potential choice for patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC as first-line therapy, owing to the superior overall efficacy and subgroup progression-free survival compared with gefitinib in targeted patients. No new safety signals were identified.

FUNDING

Beta Pharma (Shanghai) and the China National Science and Technology Major Project for Key New Drug Development.

Osimertinib long-term tolerability in patients with EGFRm NSCLC enrolled in the AURA program or FLAURA study

INTRODUCTION

This post-hoc analysis of the registrational FLAURA study and AURA program reports long-term safety data in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm), advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with osimertinib for ≥ 36 months.

METHODS

Patients from FLAURA who received first-line osimertinib and from the AURA program (AURA, AURA2, AURA3) who received ≥ second-line osimertinib were included. Patients received osimertinib 80 mg once daily. Safety data were analyzed in patients who remained on treatment for ≥ 36 months. The post-study global safety database captured investigator-reported serious adverse events (SAEs) in patients who continued osimertinib beyond final data cut-off (DCO) of the studies. Best response data were analyzed in patients on treatment for ≥ 54 months (FLAURA) or ≥ 36 months (AURA program).

RESULTS

In FLAURA, 76 (28 %) and 36 (13 %) of 267 patients received first-line osimertinib for ≥ 36 and ≥ 54 months, respectively; median exposure: 52.5 and 64.5 months, respectively. Across the AURA program,124 (16 %) of 799 patients received ≥ second-line osimertinib for ≥ 36 months; median exposure: 44.7 months. Investigators reported on-study SAEs in 17 % (FLAURA) and 35 % (AURA program) of patients who continued treatment for ≥ 36 months. Post-study incidences of SAEs were 11 % (FLAURA) and 21 % (AURA program). On-study, adverse events (AEs) of cardiac effects (indicative of cardiac failure; grouped term) occurred in 7 % (FLAURA) and 5 % (AURA program) of patients; AEs of interstitial lung disease (ILD; grouped term) occurred in 0 (FLAURA) and 1 (AURA program) patient. No post-study SAEs were reported for the grouped terms cardiac effects and ILD. Most patients treated for ≥ 54 months (FLAURA) and ≥ 36 months (AURA program) had a best on-study response of partial response.

CONCLUSION

This analysis demonstrated that long-term treatment with osimertinib of ≥ 36 months was well tolerated in patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC.

Safety and efficacy of osimertinib 160 mg daily given concurrently with a strong CYP3A4 inducer

Introduction

Osimertinib remains the standard first-line therapy for patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC, at least in part due to its improved CNS penetrance compared to earlier generation EGFR TKIs. Strong CYP3A4-inducing medications are known to reduce the effective concentration of osimertinib, prompting the recommendation to double the standard osimertinib dose from 80 to 160 mg daily. However, little is known about the real-world safety and efficacy of osimertinib given in combination with long term CYP3A4 inducer use. We detail, to our knowledge, the first reported case of a patient receiving an escalated osimertinib dosage concurrent with a potent CYP3A4 inducer.

Case presentation

A 69-year-old-female with a long-standing history of a seizure disorder was diagnosed with stage IV EGFR exon 19 deletion positive lung adenocarcinoma. After a failed trial to wean the patient off phenytoin, osimertinib at a dose of 160 mg in combination with phenytoin was recommended based on existing clinical guidelines. She achieved a partial response and continues with stable disease for more than 32 months from initiation of osimertinib. Additionally, she tolerated osimertinib well with minimal side effects although with persistent dyspnea of unclear etiology.

Conclusion

Our case illustrates that 160 mg of osimertinib administered concurrently with a strong CYP3A4 inducer can be given safely and with retained efficacy in treating CNS metastatic EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Anti-EGFR therapy can overcome acquired resistance to the third-generation ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitor lorlatinib mediated by activation of EGFR

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard treatments for EML4-ALK-positive NSCLC, but resistance to these agents remains a challenge. This study aimed to determine the mechanisms of acquired resistance to the third-generation ALK-TKI lorlatinib. Lorlatinib-resistant cell lines were established by prolonged exposure to a high concentration of lorlatinib. Activation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) caused by a decrease in endocytosis and degradation of protein was demonstrated to play an essential role in acquired resistance to lorlatinib. The interaction between the EGFR and ALK was investigated to identify binding sites and conformational changes in ALK. We performed high-throughput compound screening using a small-molecule drugs library comprising 510 antitumor agents in an effort to discover small-molecule compounds that target EGFR in lorlatinib-resistant cells. Combination treatment with ALK-TKI and anti-EGFR agents suppressed acquired resistance to ALK-TKIs caused by activation of EGFR in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that the combination of lorlatinib and an anti-EGFR agent could be effective in patients with lorlatinib-resistant NSCLC. This research provides insights into the mechanism of resistance to lorlatinib and suggests that it can be overcome by anti-EGFR treatment, offering a promising approach for treating resistance to lorlatinib mediated by EGFR activation in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.

Molecular residual disease analysis of adjuvant osimertinib in resected EGFR-mutated stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer

Osimertinib-a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor-is recommended as adjuvant therapy for resected stage IB-IIIA epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer, based on significant disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival improvement shown in the previously reported phase 3 ADAURA trial. A trend toward an increased DFS event rate after completion of 3 years adjuvant treatment in ADAURA suggests that some patients may benefit from longer adjuvant osimertinib treatment. We therefore explored whether tumor-informed, circulating tumor DNA-based, molecular residual disease (MRD) could predict recurrence in an exploratory post hoc analysis of 220 patients (n = 112 osimertinib; n = 108 placebo) from ADAURA. MRD preceded imaging DFS events in this study by a median of 4.7 (95% confidence interval, 2.2-5.6) months. DFS and MRD event-free rate at 36 months was 86% versus 36% for patients in the osimertinib versus placebo groups (hazard ratio, 0.23 (95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.36)). In the osimertinib group, DFS or MRD events were detected in 28 (25%) patients; most events occurred following osimertinib cessation (19 of 28, 68%) and within 12 months of stopping osimertinib (11 of 19, 58%). At 24 months after osimertinib, the DFS and MRD event-free rate was 66%. In this study, MRD preceded DFS events in most patients across both arms. DFS and MRD event-free status was maintained for most patients during adjuvant osimertinib treatment and posttreatment follow-up, with most MRD or DFS events occurring after osimertinib treatment discontinuation or completion. MRD detection could potentially identify patients who may benefit from longer adjuvant osimertinib, although this requires clinical confirmation. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02511106 .

Immunotherapy and the Tumor Microenvironment in Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Challenges and Future Directions

Brain metastases (BMs) are a relatively common and severe complication in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), significantly affecting patient prognosis. Metastatic tumor cells can alter the brain tumor microenvironment (TME) to promote an immunosuppressive state, characterized by reduced infiltration of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), diminished expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and changes in other proinflammatory factors and immune cell populations. Microglia, the resident macrophages of the brain, play a pivotal role in modulating the central nervous system (CNS) microenvironment through interactions with metastatic cancer cells, astrocytes, and infiltrating T cells. The M2 phenotype of microglia contributes to immunosuppression in BM via the activation of signaling pathways such as STAT3 and PI3K-AKT-mTOR. Recent advances have enhanced our understanding of the immune landscape of BMs in NSCLC, particularly regarding immune evasion within the CNS. Current immunotherapeutic strategies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, have shown promise for NSCLC patients with BM, demonstrating intracranial activity and manageable safety profiles. Future research is warranted to further explore the molecular and immune mechanisms underlying BM, aiming to develop more effective treatments.

Updates on the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer

This review provides a comprehensive update on the evolving landscape of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, particularly focusing on advances in precision medicine and overcoming acquired resistance. Initial success with first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-mutated NSCLC has paved the way for precision oncology and subsequent development of third-generation EGFR TKIs, the current standard of care as first-line therapy in advanced stage NSCLC. Furthermore, a combinational approach of third-generation EGFR TKI with chemotherapy or amivantamab was associated with prolonged progression-free survival. The role of EGFR TKIs also has been investigated in locally advanced and early stage NSCLC, including perioperative and neoadjuvant settings. However, most patients experience acquired resistance, and the resistance mechanism is quite complex and heterogeneous, highlighting the importance of tailored subsequent therapeutic approaches. Overall, this review underscores the dynamic landscape of EGFR-mutated NSCLC treatment, emphasizing the need for personalized strategies to optimize patient outcomes.

Bridging the gap: unlocking the potential of emerging drug therapies for brain metastasis

Brain metastasis remains an unmet clinical need in advanced cancers with an increasing incidence and poor prognosis. The limited response to various treatments is mainly derived from the presence of the substantive barrier, blood-brain barrier (BBB) and brain-tumour barrier (BTB), which hinders the access of potentially effective therapeutics to the metastatic tumour of the brain. Recently, the understanding of the structural and molecular features of the BBB/BTB has led to the development of efficient strategies to enhance BBB/BTB permeability and deliver drugs across the BBB/BTB to elicit the anti-tumour response against brain metastasis. Meanwhile, novel agents capable of penetrating the BBB have rapidly developed and been evaluated in preclinical studies and clinical trials, with both targeted therapies and immunotherapies demonstrating impressive intracranial activity against brain metastasis. In this review, we summarize the recent advances in the biological properties of the BBB/BTB and the emerging strategies for BBB/BTB permeabilization and drug delivery across the BBB/BTB. We also discuss the emerging targeted therapies and immunotherapies against brain metastasis tested in clinical trials. Additionally, we provide our viewpoints on accelerating clinical translation of novel drugs into clinic for patients of brain metastasis. Although still challenging, we expect this review to benefit the future development of novel therapeutics, specifically from a clinical perspective.

Outcome of osimertinib-treated patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer requiring dose reduction: a secondary analysis of the Reiwa study

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is effective in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, some patients require osimertinib dose reduction because of adverse events. This study assessed the characteristics of osimertinib dose reduction and compared the efficacies of reduced-dose and regular-dose osimertinib.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC who started first-line osimertinib treatment between September 2018 and August 2020. We categorized the patients into two groups: those who required dose reduction during osimertinib treatment (reduction group) and those who continued osimertinib treatment at a dose of 80 mg/day without dose reduction (nonreduction group). The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and pattern of progression, whereas the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and reasons for osimertinib dose reduction.

RESULTS

Of the included 575 patients, 175 (30.4%) and 400 (69.6%) were classified into the reduction and nonreduction groups, respectively. PFS was significantly better in the reduction group than in the nonreduction group [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.54-0.84; P <0.001]. Meanwhile, the pattern of progression and OS (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.62-1.08; P = 0.15 ) did not differ significantly between the two groups. Osimertinib was reduced due to physician's decision or adverse events and the main reasons were rash and gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea and diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients require osimertinib dose reduction due to adverse events, but this process does not adversely affect the drug efficacy.

Short-term survivors with brain metastases have modest benefits from focal and systemic therapies and remain frequent despite improving treatment landscape

Purpose

Therapeutic options for patients with brain metastases (BM) increase. While these lead to considerable survival effects in subgroups, there is limited knowledge about characteristics, prognosticators and treatment effects in patients with BM and short survival.

Methods

Patients with a survival time of ≤ 6 months (short-term survivors, STS), diagnosed with BM between 2009-2021 at a large tertiary cancer center were analysed. Clinical and treatment characteristics, pathological data and causes of death were documented. Descriptive statistics, treatment-specific univariate Kaplan-Meier estimator analyses and multivariate Cox regression were performed.

Results

Among 1248 patients with BM, 480 (38 %) were STS. 256 STS with detailed clinical records were included in this analysis. In univariate and multivariate analysis, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (p < 0.001) and number of BM (p = 0.004) were prognostic. In 75 % of patients, the ds-GPA score predicted short-term survival. Use of resection with focal radiotherapy (p < 0.001) and systemic treatment (p < 0.001) appeared prognostically favourable compared to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone. However, survival benefits were very modest, with a median gain of 6 weeks following resection and focal radiotherapy compared to whole-brain radiotherapy, and 3 weeks from systemic treatment. Systemic tumor progression was documented as the cause of death in the majority of patients. Over the examined time period, the ratio between STS and other patients remained without significant change.

Conclusion

Within STS, KPS and number of BM are of prognostic relevance. There is benefit from local and systemic therapy to a limited extent. Shared and carefully discussed individual therapy decisions are necessary.

EGFR testing practices, treatment choice and clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC in a real-world setting: A retrospective analysis of a US-based electronic health records database

OBJECTIVES

Guidelines recommend epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and initiation of first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) for EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm) NSCLC. We analyzed a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database to describe EGFR testing practices, treatment choice, and outcomes in patients from the United States (US) with advanced NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults diagnosed with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC January 2015-January 2020, who received first-line treatment from a network of ∼280 US cancer clinics were included. Demographics/characteristics, EGFR status, time from advanced diagnosis to EGFR test result, first-line treatment, time from treatment initiation to discontinuation/death (TTD), next treatment/death (TTNTD), and overall survival (OS) were extracted.

RESULTS

12,577/16,309 (77 %) eligible patients had an EGFR test recorded; 1,914/12,577 (15 %) patients had EGFRm NSCLC. Of 1,778 patients with confirmed EGFRm NSCLC before first-line treatment, 75 % received first-line EGFR-TKIs, 11 % chemotherapy, 9 % immunotherapy, and 4 % other treatment. Of 136 patients with an EGFRm result after initiating first-line treatment, 13 % received EGFR-TKIs, 50 % chemotherapy, 19 % immunotherapy, and 18 % other treatment in first-line. Among patients with EGFRm NSCLC, median time from advanced diagnosis to EGFR test result was shorter in patients who received first-line EGFR-TKIs versus first-line chemotherapy/immunotherapy/other treatment. Patients treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs had significantly improved TTD/TTNTD versus those who received first-line chemotherapy/immunotherapy/other treatment (p < 0.001). OS was significantly longer in patients receiving treatment ≥21 versus <21 days after index (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly one-quarter of patients with advanced NSCLC in a US health network were not tested for EGFR mutations. Of patients who received a EGFRm result after initiating first-line treatment, 13 % received first-line EGFR-TKIs. These real-world data support the need to improve EGFR testing implementation and time to result to optimize first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC.

[Standard of care of EGFR mutated metastatic NSCLC in first treatment and beyond progression]

Among the oncogenic alterations of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the EGFR gene mutation is observed in 15% of patients in France, particularly among non-smokers and women. Treatment mainly relies on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting EGFR. In first-line metastatic treatment, osimertinib, a third-generation TKI, has become the standard, improving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to first- or second-generation TKIs. The combination of TKI/chemotherapy (osimertinib/carboplatine-pemetrexed) and TKI/bispecific antibodies (e.g., amivantamab/lazertinib) are alternatives under evaluation, with benefits in PFS but increased toxicity. In case of progression under first- or second-generation TKIs, the most common resistance is the T790M mutation, which can be targeted by osimertinib. For other resistances, platinum-based chemotherapy remains an option. Amivantamab combined with chemotherapy has shown an improvement in PFS in the second line and has early access in France. Other emerging approaches include conjugated antibodies (patritumab deruxtecan, datopotamab deruxtecan) and next-generation TKIs. In the future, personalized treatment based on the molecular profile and early response to TKIs could optimize management, particularly by integrating predictive markers such as EGFR clearance under treatment.

A Podcast Discussion on the Intracranial Efficacy of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Patients with EGFR-Mutated NSCLC with Brain Metastases

The incidence of brain metastases is higher in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than in patients with most other cancers, and the development of brain metastases is associated with poor prognosis. The objective of the podcast is to provide information about current and future treatments for brain metastases that develop in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The panel discusses surveillance and management of patients with brain metastases, different types of currently used treatments, and recent data on the intracranial efficacy of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). The panel also discusses current and future studies of ADCs in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC with brain metastases. This podcast discussion, among four oncologists (two thoracic oncologists, one radiation oncologist, and one neurologist/neuro-oncologist), is for healthcare professionals (HCPs) at community practices and research institutions.

Evolution of first versus next-line targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

The expanding armamentarium of targeted therapies has revolutionized treatment for metastatic oncogene-addicted lung cancers. For multiple subsets, such as those harboring EGFR mutations and fusions in ALK or ROS1, successive generation of increasingly potent, selective, and brain-penetrating targeted therapies have shifted the treatment paradigm towards preferential first-line use of next-generation drugs. This evolution in clinical practice provides a lens through which to review the lessons learned from drug development in oncogene-addicted lung cancers, guided by translational insights into tumor biology and mechanisms of therapeutic resistance. For oncogenic drivers that are less sensitive to single-agent targeted therapies, rationally designed combination strategies will be needed to enable first-line use of targeted agents.

Investigating osimertinib plus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, 15-40% of advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) have an activating EGFR mutation, treatable with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as osimertinib, recommended as front-line therapy. Despite the efficacy of first-line osimertinib, most patients will experience disease progression. Therefore, combining it with chemotherapy has become an area of interest.

AREAS COVERED

Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-TKI that has extended survival in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. However, resistance eventually leads to treatment failure. This has driven the advancement of strategies to overcome resistance to osimertinib. In this setting, the FLAURA2 trial yielded positive results by combining osimertinib with chemotherapy. Additionally, a range of other approaches, including the use of bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates alongside third-generation EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy, support the development of novel therapeutic combinations, some of which have already been approved for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.

EXPERT OPINION

Next to osimertinib monotherapy, expanded upfront treatment options for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC require patient selection considering disease extent, toxicity and tolerability, dosing schedule and what the patient can expect through shared decision-making. Further studies are needed to identify the patients who will benefit the most from combination therapies and to sequence the new drugs into the treatment algorithm.

Deceptive Pseudotuberculous Presentation of a Pulmonary Lepidic Adenocarcinoma

Misleading presentations of lepidic adenocarcinomas (ADC) often lead to diagnostic delays, potentially reducing the chances of curative treatment. We report a case of mucinous lepidic ADC that mimicked pulmonary tuberculosis and was diagnosed at a late stage. The tumor showed no epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement and was characterized by bilateral pulmonary involvement without distant metastases. Through this case, the authors emphasize the need to consider lepidic ADC in cases of chronic pulmonary consolidation, despite atypical radio-clinical presentations that may be encountered in routine practice.

Precision radiotherapy with molecular-profiling of CNS tumours

Diagnoses of CNS malignancies in the primary and metastatic setting have significantly advanced in the last decade with the advent of molecular pathology. Using a combination of immunohistochemistry, next-generation sequencing, and methylation profiling integrated with traditional histopathology, patient prognosis and disease characteristics can be understood to a much greater extent. This has recently manifested in predicting response to targeted drug therapies that are redefining management practices of CNS tumours. Radiotherapy, along with surgery, still remains an integral part of treating the majority of CNS tumours. However, the rapid advances in CNS molecular diagnostics have not yet been effectively translated into improving CNS radiotherapy. We explore several promising strategies under development to integrate molecular oncology into radiotherapy, and explore future directions that can serve to use molecular diagnostics to personalize radiotherapy. Evolving the management of CNS tumours with molecular profiling will be integral to supporting the future of precision radiotherapy.

A Bayesian network meta-analysis of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Background

To date, no direct comparisons have been performed to compare the effectiveness of all epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) against EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Methods

We conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing osimertinib, lazertinib, aumolertinib, befotertinib, furmonertinib, dacomitinib, afatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, icotinib, and chemotherapy. Pooled estimations of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and toxicity (grade ≥ 3 adverse events) were performed within the Bayesian framework.

Results

Twenty-three trials involving 11 treatments were included. All EGFR-TKIs improved PFS relative to chemotherapy, except for icotinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.44). All EGFR-TKIs demonstrated significant ORR benefits over chemotherapy. Osimertinib seemed to prolong PFS compared with icotinib (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.1-0.86), gefitinib (HR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.21-0.74), and erlotinib (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-1.0). In addition, osimertinib showed favorable superiority in improving OS compared with chemotherapy (HR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.43-0.82), gefitinib (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.45-0.83), erlotinib (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.48-0.89), and afatinib (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94). Among these regimens, afatinib showed the highest ORR (cumulative probability: 96.96%). Icotinib was associated with minimal toxicity among the EGFR-TKIs, followed by furmonertinib and osimertinib. Moreover, the toxicity spectra differed among the EGFR-TKIs. Subgroup analyses of patients with two common types of EGFR mutations indicated that furmonertinib possessed the greatest PFS benefit in patients with exon 19 deletion, and lazertinib showed the greatest PFS benefit in patients with Leu858Arg mutation. We also identified differences between EGFR-TKIs in prolonging PFS in patients with brain metastasis.

Conclusions

Osimertinib is the first choice of treatment with considerable efficacy and safety for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. The treatments associated with the best PFS in patients with exon 19 deletions and Leu858Arg mutations were furmonertinib and lazertinib, respectively.

Highly Optimized CNS Penetrant Inhibitors of EGFR Exon20 Insertion Mutations

Despite recent advances in the inhibition of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), there remains a clinical need for new EGFR Exon20 insertion (Ex20Ins) inhibitors that spare EGFR WT. Herein, we report the discovery and optimization of two chemical series leading to ether 23 and biaryl 36 as potent, selective, and brain-penetrant inhibitors of Ex20Ins mutants. Building on our earlier discovery of alkyne 5 which allowed access to CNS property space for an Ex20Ins inhibitor, we utilized structure-based design to move to lower lipophilicity and lower CLint compounds while maintaining a WT selectivity margin. During optimization, aldehyde oxidase (AO) metabolism was identified as a human clearance risk, and through SAR exploration, lower AO metabolism was achieved. Potency and WT margin were optimized across a range of Ex20Ins mutants including the potential acquired resistance T790M mutant and efficacy demonstrated in an LXF2478 Ex20Ins ASV model with margin to EGFR WT in vivo.

Brain metastases from lung cancer: recent advances and novel therapeutic opportunities

Metastatic intracranial progression drastically impacts prognosis, therapeutic considerations and quality of life. The increasing incidence of lung cancer patients developing brain metastases (BM) parallels the incorporation of more effective systemic agents and improved surveillance. Our evolving knowledge of BM pathophysiology, along with advancements in surgical, radiotherapy and systemic therapy options, is rapidly changing prognostication and treatment paradigms. Optimal management of BM in the modern era is patient-specific, dependent on performance status, comorbidities, intracranial and extracranial disease burden, leptomeningeal disease, and the presence of targetable mutations. The purpose of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the detection, prognostication, and multidisciplinary, management of BM arising from non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. We discuss contemporary evidence and active clinical trials supporting a wide array of treatment options, including surgery, radiosurgery, memory-avoidance whole brain radiation, craniospinal irradiation, chemotherapy, targeted agents and immunotherapy. Multidisciplinary paradigms will continue to evolve as currently accruing randomized trials evaluating these promising treatments options mature.

Organoids in lung cancer brain metastasis: Foundational research, clinical translation, and prospective outlooks

Brain metastasis stands as a leading contributor to mortality in lung cancer patients, yet the intricate mechanism underlying this phenomenon remains elusive. This underscores the need for robust preclinical models and effective treatment strategies. Emerging as viable in vitro models that closely replicate actual tumors, three-dimensional culture systems, particularly organoids derived from non-malignant cells or cancer organoids, have emerged as promising avenues. This review delves into the forefronts of fundamental research and clinical applications focused on lung cancer brain metastasis-derived organoids, highlighting current challenges and delineating prospects. These studies offer tremendous potential for clinical application despite being in nascent status.

CT and MRI bimodal radiomics for predicting EGFR status in NSCLC patients with brain metastases: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Leveraging the radiomics information from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) primary lesion and brain metastasis (BM) to develop and validate a bimodal radiomics nomogram that can accurately predict epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status.

METHODS

A total of 309 NSCLC patients with BM from three independent centers were recruited. Among them, the patients of Center I were randomly allocated into the training and internal test cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. Meanwhile, the patients from Center Ⅱ and Center Ⅲ collectively constitute the external test cohort. All chest CT and brain MRI images of each patient were obtained for image registration and sequence combination within a single modality. After image preprocessing, 1037 radiomics features were extracted from each single sequence. Six machine learning algorithms were used to construct radiomics signatures for CT and MRI respectively. The best CT and MRI radiomics signatures were fitted to establish the bimodal radiomics nomogram for predicting the EGFR status.

RESULTS

The contrast-enhanced (CE) eXtreme gradient boosting (XG Boost) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) + T1-weighted contrast-enhanced imaging (T1CE) random forest models were chosen as the radiomics signature representing primary lesion and BM. Both models were found to be independent predictors of EGFR mutation. The bimodal radiomics nomogram, which incorporated CT radiomics signature and MRI radiomics signature, demonstrated a good calibration and discrimination in the internal test cohort [area under curve (AUC), 0.866; 95 % confidence intervals (CI), 0.778-0.950) and the external test cohort (AUC, 0.818; 95 % CI, 0.691-0.938).

CONCLUSIONS

Our CT and MRI bimodal radiomics nomogram could timely and accurately evaluate the likelihood of EGFR mutation in patients with limited access to necessary materials, thus making up for the shortcoming of plasma sequencing and promoting the advancement of precision medicine.

Optimizing Osimertinib for NSCLC: Targeting Resistance and Exploring Combination Therapeutics

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations present in a substantial proportion of patients. Third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKI), exemplified by osimertinib, have dramatically improved outcomes by effectively targeting the T790M mutation-a primary driver of acquired resistance to earlier-generation EGFR TKI. Despite these successes, resistance to third-generation EGFR TKIs inevitably emerges. Mechanisms include on-target mutations such as C797S, activation of alternative pathways like MET amplification, histologic transformations, and intricate tumor microenvironment (TME) alterations. These resistance pathways are compounded by challenges in tolerability, adverse events, and tumor heterogeneity. In light of these hurdles, this review examines the evolving landscape of combination therapies designed to enhance or prolong the effectiveness of third-generation EGFR TKIs. We explore key strategies that pair osimertinib with radiotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and other molecularly targeted drugs, and we discuss the biological rationale, preclinical evidence, and clinical trial data supporting these approaches. Emphasis is placed on how these combinations may circumvent diverse resistance mechanisms, improve survival, and maintain a favorable safety profile. By integrating the latest findings, this review aims to guide clinicians and researchers toward more individualized and durable treatment options, ultimately enhancing both survival and quality of life for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

First-line zorifertinib for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with central nervous system metastases: The phase 3 EVEREST trial

BACKGROUND

Zorifertinib (AZD3759), an epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) with high blood-brain barrier penetration capability, demonstrated promising intracranial and systemic antitumor activity in phase 1 and 2 studies in central nervous system (CNS)-metastatic patients.

METHODS

In this phase 3 EVEREST trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03653546), patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations, advanced treatment-naive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and non-irradiated symptomatic or asymptomatic CNS metastases were randomized (1:1) to zorifertinib or first-generation EGFR-TKI (gefitinib or erlotinib; control). The primary endpoint was blinded independent central review (BICR)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST1.1.

FINDINGS

Overall, 439 patients were randomized (zorifertinib n = 220; control n = 219). Most patients had the EGFR L858R mutation (55%) or >3 CNS lesions (54%). Median PFS was significantly longer with zorifertinib versus control (9.6 versus 6.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.719; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.580-0.893; p = 0.0024). Zorifertinib significantly prolonged intracranial PFS versus control (BICR per modified RECIST1.1: HR, 0.467; 95% CI, 0.352-0.619; investigator per RANO-BM: HR, 0.627; 95% CI, 0.466-0.844). Overall survival (OS) was immature; the estimated median OS was 37.3 months with zorifertinib and 31.8 months with control (HR, 0.833; 95% CI, 0.524-1.283) in patients subsequently treated with third-generation EGFR-TKIs. Safety profiles were consistent with previously reported data for zorifertinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Zorifertinib significantly improved systemic and intracranial PFS versus first-generation EGFR-TKIs; adverse events were manageable. Sequential use of zorifertinib and third-generation EGFR-TKIs showed the potential to prolong patients' survival. The results favor zorifertinib as a novel, well-validated first-line option for CNS-metastatic patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

FUNDING

This work was funded by Alpha Biopharma (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd., China.

The climb toward intracranial efficacy: Zorifertinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC with CNS metastases in the EVEREST trial

The phase III EVEREST trial evaluating zorifertinib in the treatment of metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC was groundbreaking in its specific inclusion of patients with brain metastases.1 Zorifertinib prolonged systemic and intracranial progression-free survival compared with first-generation EGFR inhibitors, yet questions remain about its efficacy and toxicity compared with osimertinib.

Rebiopsy Enhances Survival with Afatinib vs. Osimertinib in EGFR Exon 19 Deletion Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Afatinib and Osimertinib are first-line treatments for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but their comparative efficacies and the patient groups that benefit the most remain unclear. This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of first-line Afatinib and Osimertinib in NSCLC patients with EGFR 19del and no brain metastases at diagnosis.

METHODS

The primary endpoints were time on treatment (ToT) and overall survival (OS). Survival analyses were performed for three groups: Afatinib followed by Osimertinib, Afatinib followed by other therapies, and Osimertinib (alone or followed by other therapies). Rebiopsy practices, including T790M mutation detection, were also analyzed in patients with disease progression on Afatinib.

RESULTS

Among 97 Afatinib-treated and 60 Osimertinib-treated patients, Osimertinib showed a significantly longer ToT (23.3 vs. 16.5 months; p = 0.007). Median OS was numerically higher for Afatinib with sequential Osimertinib (40.5 vs. 34.6 months for Osimertinib; p = 0.473). Osimertinib demonstrated advantages, with fewer brain metastases upon progression and fewer adverse effects. In the Afatinib group, 64% of patients with disease progression underwent rebiopsy, with 39% testing positive for T790M mutation and subsequently receiving Osimertinib. Rebiopsy was most frequently performed on the lung parenchyma using non-surgical methods.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study, Osimertinib achieved a significantly longer ToT compared to Afatinib in NSCLC patients with EGFR 19del and no brain metastases. The sequential use of Afatinib followed by Osimertinib showed a trend toward improved OS, highlighting the importance of rebiopsy for identifying T790M mutations to guide subsequent therapy.

Effects of EGFR-TKIs combined with intracranial radiotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a retrospective multi-institutional analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are prone to developing brain metastases (BMs), particularly those with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. In clinical practice, treatment-naïve EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with asymptomatic BMs tend to choose EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line therapy and defer intracranial radiotherapy (RT). However, the effectiveness of upfront intracranial RT remains unclear.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study including 217 patients from two institutions between January 2018 and December 2022. Clinical data of NSCLC patients with BMs who received EGFR-TKIs were collected. The patients were assigned to one of the three groups according to the therapeutic modality used: the upfront TKI + stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) / fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRS) group (upfront TKI + SRS/fSRS ), the upfront TKI + whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) group (upfront TKI + WBRT) and the upfront TKI group.

RESULTS

As of March 8, 2023, the median follow-up duration was 37.3 months (95% CI, 32.5-42.1). The median overall survival (OS) for the upfront TKI + SRS/fSRS, upfront TKI + WBRT, and upfront TKI groups were 37.8, 20.7, and 24.1 months, respectively (p = 0.015). In subgroup analysis, the upfront TKI + SRS/fSRS group demonstrated longer OS compared to the upfront TKI + WBRT and upfront TKI groups in patients treated with first or second-generation EGFR-TKIs (p = 0.021) and patients with L858R mutation (p = 0.017), whereas no survival benefit was observed in three-generation EGFR-TKIs or 19del subgroup. In the multivariable analysis, metachronous BMs, EGFR L858R mutation and nonclassic EGFR mutation were identified as independent risk factors for OS, while a DS-GPA score of 2.0-4.0 was the only independent protective factor.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that upfront addition of SRS/fSRS to EGFR-TKIs was associated with longer OS compared to upfront WBRT or upfront TKI alone in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with BMs. This improvement was more significant in patients with L858R mutation and those treated with first or second-generation EGFR-TKIs. Further research with a larger sample size is warranted.

Successful osimertinib treatment for Meckel's cave metastasis: a case report

Osimertinib has emerged as the standard first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations, offering improved tolerability and demonstrating superior efficacy against brain metastases in comparison with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The Meckel's cave is a dural recess in the posteromedial part of the middle cranial fossa that acts as a conduit for the trigeminal nerve between the anterior pontine cisterna and the cavernous sinus, and houses the Gasserian ganglion and proximal radicle of the trigeminal nerve. Trigeminal neuropathy, characterized by numbness and dysesthesia of the skin and mucous membranes of the face, poses diagnostic challenges and often requires differentiation from conditions, such as compression neuropathy, inflammation, and drug-induced reactions. Here, we report the case of Meckel's cave metastasis. She presented headache, anorexia, left facial numbness, and pain indicative of trigeminal neuropathy. Imaging revealed metastasis to Meckel's cave, consistent with her clinical symptoms. EGFR L858R mutation was detected by primary lesion of the lung DNA analysis. Treatment with osimertinib led to regression of the primary tumor and improvement of the trigeminal neuropathy within 3 months. Importantly, our review of the relevant literature identified only two similar cases with metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma to Meckel's cave. Ours was the only case in which symptom resolution was achieved. We underscore the utility of MRI and PET/CT studies in evaluating trigeminal-related symptoms and discuss imaging characteristics that may aid in their differentiation.

Changing Treatment and Metastatic Disease Patterns in Patients with EGFR Mutated NSCLC: An Academic Thoracic Medical Investigator's Consortium Registry Analysis

Introduction

Osimertinib is now a standard first-line (1L) therapy for EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) advanced NSCLC. We aimed to characterize patterns of therapy and longitudinal risk of brain and liver metastasis in a cohort of EGFRm NSCLC.

Methods

Patients with metastatic EGFRm NSCLC who received 1L systemic therapy at sites within the Academic Thoracic Medical Investigator's Consortium were included; demographic and clinical data including treatment patterns were described. Analyses of overall survival, time to next treatment, and incident brain and liver metastasis were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression, and cumulative incidence functions on patients who started 1L therapy in 2015 or later.

Results

The full cohort included 1132 patients and the mean age of the participants was 63.4 years; among the participants, 53% were White individuals, 68% were female individuals, and 67% were nonsmokers. Among the participants, 830 patients received 1L systemic therapy in 2015 or later. The predominant first EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor was erlotinib (65%) before 2018 and osimertinib (81%) after 2018. The median time to the next treatment after the start of 1L therapy was 13.9 months overall and the longest in patients receiving 1L osimertinib (28 months). In the post-2015 cohort, the baseline prevalence of brain metastasis (BM) was 54% and among patients without baseline brain metastasis, the probability of incident BM at 12, 24, and 48 months was 8%, 22%, and 44%, respectively. Development of an on-treatment brain metastasis among patients without baseline brain metastasis was associated with a 3.2 times higher risk of death.

Conclusion

Even in a contemporary era with prevalent osimertinib use, the baseline and longitudinal risk of BM development was high. The ongoing risk of developing BM, together with the associated survival detriment, argues for routine surveillance of the brain through magnetic resonance imaging for patients with EGFRm NSCLC, which is not currently included in the guidelines.

Role of osimertinib plus brain radiotherapy versus osimertinib single therapy in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer with brain metastases: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Single-agent osimertinib has improved outcomes in EGFR-mutated lung cancer patients with brain metastases (BMs), but still, 40 % of them will experience an intracranial progression. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the role of brain radiotherapy upfront plus osimertinib. We evaluated articles comparing the use of osimertinib versus osimertinib plus brain radiotherapy. We included 897 patients from nine retrospective studies. Patients treated with combination therapy had an improvement in intracranial progression-free survival (HR 0.76; 95 % CI 0.61-0.94) and overall survival (HR 0.56; 95 % CI 0.36-0.87) with an acceptable safety profile. Osimertinib with upfront brain radiotherapy may be a suitable first-line treatment option for EGFR mutated patients with BMs at diagnosis. The main limitations of this analysis are the retrospective nature and the inability to control for a single variable of interest. Despite that, the combination of osimertinib and upfront brain radiotherapy is a treatment strategy that deserves further prospective trials.

Targeting CNS Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Evolving Approaches Using Molecular Markers: A Review

Importance

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases presenting as either brain parenchymal metastases or leptomeningeal metastases are diagnosed in up to 50% of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer during their disease course. While historically associated with a poor prognosis due to limited treatment options, the availability of an increasing number of targeted therapies with good CNS penetration has significantly improved clinical outcomes for these patients. This has occurred in parallel with a more nuanced understanding of prognostic factors.

Observations

Multiple clinical trials have reported that disease control can be observed with targeted therapies with adequate CNS penetration, particularly for patients with molecular alterations in EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and RET. For these tumors, systemic targeted therapy may be used first for the management of CNS metastases, prior to considering radiation therapy (RT). At the time of isolated progression in the CNS, RT may be considered for the progressing lesions with continuation of the same systemic therapy. For other molecular alterations as well as for patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors, data are not yet clear if systemic therapy is sufficient for untreated CNS metastases, and early RT may need to be integrated into the treatment planning. An increasing number of studies investigate the role that emerging techniques, such as the sequencing of tumor DNA from resected brain metastases tissue or cerebrospinal fluid or radiomics-based analysis of CNS imaging, can play in guiding treatment approaches.

Conclusions and Relevance

With multiple generations of targeted therapies now available, the treatment for CNS metastases should be tailored to the patients with consideration given to molecular testing results, CNS penetrance of systemic therapy, patient characteristics, and multidisciplinary review. More research is needed in understanding the clonal evolution of CNS metastases, and the development of novel therapeutics with CNS efficacy.

The efficacy of continuing osimertinib with platinum pemetrexed chemotherapy upon progression in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations

INTRODUCTION

For patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC who progress on osimertinib, the clinical benefit of continuing osimertinib with next line platinum pemetrexed chemotherapy remains unknown.

METHODS

In this international, multi-center, retrospective cohort study, a total of 159 patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC who progressed on osimertinib and received platinum-pemetrexed therapy on progression from 2013 to 2023 were included. The data cutoff was December 31, 2023. Data analysis was conducted from January 2024 to June 2024. The primary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariable Cox regression adjusting for patient-specific and cancer-specific factors was performed.

RESULTS

421 patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC with progression on osimertinib were identified, of which159 patients who met pre-specified inclusion criteria were divided into two groups: Cohort 1 (osimertinib + platinum-pemetrexed) included 50 patients (median [IQR] age, 59 [30 - 83] years; 36 [72.0 %] female; 11 [22.4 %] Asian) and Cohort 2 (platinum-pemetrexed alone) included 109 patients (median [IQR] age, 54 [25 - 80] years; 62 [56.9 %] female; 74 [64.9 %] Asian). Most patients were never smokers (Cohort 1, 37 [74.0 %]; Cohort 2, 66 [60.6 %]). One third of patients had baseline brain metastases (Cohort 1, 19 [38.0 %]; Cohort 2, 36 [38.3 %]). Both cohorts had a median of two prior lines of anti-cancer therapy. The addition of bevacizumab or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) to next-line platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy was more common in Cohort 2 (bevacizumab use, 30.3 % vs 8.0 %, p = 0.002; ICI use, 33.0 % vs 2.0 %, p = 0.001). With a median duration of follow up of 30 months, there was a significant PFS benefit to continuing osimertinib with next line platinum pemetrexed chemotherapy (9.0 vs 4.5 months; HR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.32 - 0.74, p = 0.0032), also seen in subset analyses of patients who received first line osimertinib (n = 55, 11.0 vs 6.2 months; HR 0.41, 95 % CI 0.25 - 0.73, p = 0.002). Among patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC without brain metastases after progression on osimertinib, we found that continuing osimertinib with next line platinum pemetrexed significantly reduced the median time to CNS progression (n = 38; 7.0 vs 4.1 months; HR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.48 - 0.98, p = 0.01). After adjusted analysis, there was no significant OS difference between Cohorts 1 and 2 (19 months vs 13 months; HR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.60 - 1.39, p = 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

For patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC who progress on osimertinib, there is a significant PFS, but not OS, benefit to continuing osimertinib with next line platinum pemetrexed chemotherapy. The continuation of osimertinib with next line platinum pemetrexed chemotherapy appears to reduce the risk of CNS progression.

The Efficacy of Anlotinib Plus Whole Brain Radiotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Multiple Brain Metastases: A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of anlotinib plus whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with that of WBRT alone in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with multiple brain metastases (BMs).

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with NSCLC and multiple BMs who received WBRT between 2019 and 2022 were collected. The patients were assigned to anlotinib plus WBRT group and WBRT group according to the treatment used.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients were eligible for analysis; 21 were treated with anlotinib plus WBRT, and 43 were treated with WBRT. The anlotinib plus WBRT group had a greater proportion of patients who were young and had a better performance status and adenocarcinoma histology than did the WBRT group. The median follow-up time was 18.0 months. The median intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) was significantly longer in the anlotinib plus WBRT group than in the WBRT group (12.9 months vs. 7.4 months, p = 0.004). The median overall survival (OS) was 14.6 months in the anlotinib plus WBRT group and 9.4 months in the WBRT group (p = 0.039). Considering death as a competing risk to intracranial progression, the 1-year cumulative incidence of intracranial progression in the anlotinib plus WBRT group (26.7%) was significantly lower than that in the WBRT group (64.3%) (p = 0.021). There was no significant difference in treatment-related toxicity between the anlotinib plus WBRT group and the WBRT group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with WBRT alone, anlotinib plus WBRT might confer superior intracranial PFS for NSCLC patients with multiple BMs without increasing treatment-related toxicity.

Intrathecal pemetrexed for leptomeningeal metastases in a patient with ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma: a case report

Progressive leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are associated with intractable neurological symptoms and a poor prognosis, and effective treatment options are limited. Intrathecal (IT) pemetrexed has been shown to confer clinical benefit in lung adenocarcinoma, yet our understanding of the efficacy and safety of the treatment is limited. We report a patient with a long-standing history of leptomeningeal disease due to ALK-positive adenocarcinoma of the lung, previously controlled by increased doses of lorlatinib (125 mg/day). Rapid LM progression prompted the start of IT pemetrexed, after which the patient experienced immediate clinical improvement. The case provides additional support that IT pemetrexed can offer symptomatic relief and may be considered as a treatment option in advanced LM. Furthermore, the case illustrates that an increased dose of lorlatinib may efficiently control LM in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC, following progression on standard lorlatinib dosage.

Spotlight on the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with rare genetic alterations and brain metastasis: Current status and future perspectives

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), oncogenic variants present in <5% of cases are considered rare, the predominant of which include human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) mutations, mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) alterations, c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) rearrangements, rearrangement during transfection (RET) fusions, v-raf mouse sarcoma virus oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) mutations, and neurotrophic troponin receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions. Brain metastases (BMs) occur in approximately 10%-50% of patients with NSCLC harboring rare genetic variants. The recent advent of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors and macromolecular antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has conferred marked survival benefits to patients with NSCLC harboring rare driver alterations. Despite effective brain lesion control for most targeted agents and promising reports of intracranial remission associated with novel ADCs, BM continues to be a major therapeutic challenge. This review discusses the recent advances in the treatment of NSCLC with rare genetic variants and BM, with a particular focus on intracranial efficacy, and explores future perspectives on how best to treat these patients.

Osimertinib-induced DNA resistance mutations in cerebrospinal fluid of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients developing leptomeningeal metastases: Osimertinib Resistance Analysis-leptomeningeal metastases study

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm +) non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is challenging. We aimed to identify resistance mechanisms (RM) to osimertinib in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma.

METHODS

EGFRm + patients with new or progressive LM during osimertinib were enrolled. NGS Ampliseq was performed on DNA isolated from CSF. Patients were prescribed osimertinib dose escalation (DE, 160 mg QD) following lumbar puncture. Clinical and radiological response was evaluated 4 weeks after osimertinib DE.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were included. The driver mutation was identified in 93% of CSF samples (n = 26). Seven (27%) harbored ≥1 RM. Twenty-five patients (89%) were prescribed osimertinib DE. Four weeks afterwards, symptoms improved in 5 patients, stabilized in 9 and worsened in 11 patients. Twenty-one (84%) patients underwent MR imaging. Four showed radiological improvement, 14 stabilization, and 3 worsening.

CONCLUSIONS

In 27% of patients, an RM was found in CSF ctDNA, none of which are targetable at the time of writing, and the clinical efficacy of osimertinib DE seems limited. There is much to gain in diagnostic as well as therapeutic strategies in EGFRm + NSCLC LM.

BMScope: A scoping review to chart the evolving clinical study landscape in brain and leptomeningeal metastasis

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have challenged the notion that patients with brain metastasis (BM) or leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) should be excluded from systemic therapy clinical trials. This scoping study summarizes the BM/LM clinical studies published between 2010 and 2023.

METHODS

MEDLINE, CINAHL, CAB Abstracts, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, HINARI, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE electronic databases were searched on June 21, 2021. An updated search was performed on February 21, 2023. Eligible studies investigated a therapeutic intervention in solid tumor patients with BM and/or LM and reported a patient outcome. Extracted study-level data, including study type, publication date, geographical location, number of BM/LM patients in the study, primary tumor type, and type of therapeutic intervention, were collected.

RESULTS

4921 unique studies were eligible for analysis. The key finding is that BM/LM clinical research is expanding globally, both in observational studies and clinical trials. Despite the shift over time toward a higher proportion of systemic therapy trials, the majority still do not include patients with symptomatic disease and lack reporting of BM/LM-specific endpoints. Globally, there has been a trend to more international collaboration in BM/LM clinical studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis of the BM/LM literature charts the evolving landscape of studies involving this previously excluded population. Given the increasing clinical research activity, particularly involving late-stage systemic therapy trials, it is imperative that due consideration is given to the intracranial activity of new investigational agents. Wider adoption of standardized reporting of intracranial-specific endpoints will facilitate the evaluation of relative intracranial efficacy.

Lung Cancer with Brain Metastasis-Treatment Strategies and Molecular Characteristics

Lung cancer is a leading cause of brain metastases (BMs), with 10-20% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presenting with BMs at diagnosis and 25-50% developing them over the course of their disease. Historically, BMs have posed significant therapeutic challenges, partly due to the blood brain barrier (BBB), which restricts drug penetration to the central nervous system. Consequently, BMs were initially managed with local treatments, including surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery, and whole brain radiation therapy. In recent years, however, systemic treatments for BMs have advanced significantly, particularly with the development of molecularly-targeted therapies and immunotherapies. The discovery of driver mutations and the development of novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have yielded encouraging intracranial responses in NSCLC patients with actionable genetic alterations (e.g., EGFR, ALK, ROS1). Genomic profiling has also suggested genetic heterogeneity between BMs and primary sites. Immunotherapies, alone or in combination with other treatments, have demonstrated promising results in NSCLC with BMs, although most clinical trials have included only selected patients with asymptomatic or previously treated BMs. In this review, we discuss the molecular and immune characteristics of NSCLC with BMs, analyze intracranial efficacy findings from clinical trials, and explore treatment strategies for lung cancer patients with BMs.