Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Previously Treated Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Updated Efficacy and Safety From the Randomized Phase III Study 309/KEYNOTE-775

Immune microenvironment and molecular mechanisms in endometrial cancer: implications for resistance and innovative treatments

This review provides a systematic overview of the molecular mechanisms of endometrial cancer and its drug resistance, particularly involving the aberrant activation of some key signaling pathways. These molecular mechanisms significantly affect the therapeutic outcome of endometrial cancer by promoting tumor cell proliferation, anti-apoptosis, and drug resistance. The article also analyzes the critical role of the immune microenvironment in cancer drug resistance, focusing on the impact of immune cells, immune checkpoints, and hypoxic metabolic reprogramming on anticancer therapies. In recent years, immunotherapy and individualized therapy have shown promising clinical outcomes, especially in advanced endometrial cancer. This article summarizes recent advances in related therapeutic strategies and proposes emerging therapeutic strategies by targeting key pathways and modulating the immune microenvironment to overcome drug resistance and improve patient prognosis.

Genomic alterations, molecularly targeted therapy, and survival: a real-world Endometrial Cancer Molecularly Targeted Therapy Consortium cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Next-generation sequencing and tumor testing to direct therapy in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer are frequently used, but the impact of this approach is unclear. We sought to confirm the proportion of patients with at least 1 actionable alteration and whether the use of molecularly targeted therapy was associated with improved survival in metastatic endometrial cancer.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary consortium was formed to study tumor testing and treatment with targeted therapies in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer. Tumor testing and therapeutic decisions were physician's recommendations. The abstracted data included age, stage, grade, histology, race, ethnicity, treatment, genomic alterations, protein expression for Her2, p53, mismatch repair, estrogen and progesterone receptors, and survival. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS v9.4.

RESULTS

A total of 967 patients from 12 centers were included. The median age was 64 years (range; 22-93 years). Of the participants, 68.5% were White, 24.0% were Black, 2.0% were Asian, and 92.7% were non-Hispanic. A total of 656 (67.8%) patients had recurrent/persistent disease and received a median of two (range; 0-9) therapies. 902 (93.3%) underwent tumor testing. Overall, 576 (94.0%) patients with next-generation sequencing testing had at least 1 genomic alteration in 11 pre-specified genes. The most frequent alterations were PI3K (35.8%), TP53 (34.7%), and PTEN (26.5%) mutations, respectively. A subset of 233 patients received 292 matched biologic therapies, and the median follow-up was 29.7 months, while the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.9 and 20.5 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The consortium facilitated the development of real-world data on the patterns of genomic testing and molecularly targeted therapy used in a racially and geographically diverse patient cohort with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer. Survival improved for those receiving matched biologic therapies compared to chemotherapy.

Long term treatment of advanced endometrial cancer with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab

Objective

To describe a case of sustained disease control for over five years in a patient with recurrent, advanced endometrial cancer treated with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab, despite significant treatment-related toxicities.

Methods

We present a 49-year-old patient with grade 3, stage IVB endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. After cytoreductive surgery, carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, the patient experienced progression with widespread metastases. She was then treated with lenvatinib (20 mg daily) and pembrolizumab (200 mg every three weeks). The patient experienced multiple treatment-related adverse events, including hypertension, colitis, hypothyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, and ocular toxicity, requiring dose adjustments and treatment interruptions.

Results

Despite frequent toxicities, the patient achieved a durable response to lenvatinib and pembrolizumab. Five years after treatment initiation, imaging showed no metabolically active disease, with only minimal stable residual lesions. Careful management of adverse effects, including supportive care, dose modifications, and temporary treatment pauses, enabled continued therapy.

Conclusion

This case underscores the potential for long-term disease control with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in advanced endometrial cancer, even in patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) and low tumor mutational burden. Although toxicities can require treatment adjustments, they can often be effectively managed, allowing for prolonged therapy. Further research is needed to determine the optimal treatment duration and strategies to mitigate long-term side effects.

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer re-challenged with platinum-based chemotherapy in Europe

OBJECTIVE

Although platinum re-challenge is a treatment option for patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer, real-world outcomes for these patients in Europe are not well-documented. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for platinum re-challenge in patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Endometrial Cancer Health Outcomes-Europe (ECHO-EU) is a multi-center, retrospective, medical record review conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, evaluating treatment patterns and outcomes. Patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer treated with first-line systemic therapy and experiencing disease progression between July 2016 and June 2019 were eligible for inclusion in ECHO-EU. This analysis used data from a subset of patients, the platinum re-challenge cohort, who received platinum-based chemotherapy as second-line therapy after previous adjuvant/neoadjuvant and/or first-line platinum therapy. Kaplan-Meier analyses since initiation of second-line therapy estimated real-world progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the 475 ECHO-EU patients, 70 patients (15%) were platinum re-challenged and had a median age of 67 years (range; 44-81). The platinum-free interval (PFI) was <6 months for 27 patients (38.6%) and >6 months for 43 patients (61.4%). Complete or partial response to second-line therapy were achieved in 37.1% of patients, with similar overall response rates reported for patients with PFI <6 months (33.3%) and PFI ≥6 months (39.5%). The median (95% CI) overall survival from second-line therapy was 12 months (11-not estimable [NE]) overall and 14.1 (8.7-NE) and 12.0 (10.5-NE) months for patients with PFI <6 months and PFI >6 months, respectively. The median real-world progression-free survival from initiation of second-line therapy was 8.1 months (95% CI 7.6 to 10.0) overall and 7.6 (95% CI 5.3 to 19.8) and 8.5 (95% CI 7.9 to 12.0) months for patients with PFI <6 months and PFI ≥6 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer who were re-challenged with a platinum-based therapy had similar outcomes, irrespective of their PFI, indicating that further research is needed to assess the value of PFI in endometrial cancer. The findings also suggest an unmet medical need and scope for novel treatments that may improve the overall survival for these patients.

First-Line Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy for Advanced Endometrial Cancer: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial

PURPOSE

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (len + pembro) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in previously treated advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (aEC) in the phase III Study 309/KEYNOTE-775. We report results from the phase III, randomized, open-label European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial-en9/LEAP-001 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03884101) that evaluated len + pembro versus chemotherapy in first-line aEC.

METHODS

Patients with stage III to IV or recurrent, radiographically apparent EC and no previous chemotherapy or disease progression ≥6 months after neo/adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL/min once every 3 weeks. Primary end points were PFS and OS, evaluated in the mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) and all-comers populations. Noninferiority was assessed for OS at final analysis (FA) for len + pembro versus chemotherapy (multiplicity-adjusted, one-sided nominal alpha, .0159; null hypothesis-tested hazard ratio [HR], 1.1).

RESULTS

Eight hundred forty-two patients were randomly assigned (len + pembro, n = 420 [pMMR population, n = 320]; chemotherapy, n = 422 [pMMR population, n = 322]). At FA (data cutoff, October 2, 2023), median PFS (95% CI) in the pMMR population was 9.6 (8.2 to 11.9) versus 10.2 (8.4 to 10.5) months with len + pembro versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.82 to 1.21]) and among all-comers was 12.5 (10.3 to 15.1) versus 10.2 (8.4 to 10.4) months (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.09]; descriptive analyses). Median OS (95% CI) in the pMMR population was 30.9 (25.4 to 37.7) versus 29.4 (26.2 to 35.4) months with len + pembro versus chemotherapy (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.26]; noninferiority P = .246, not statistically significant per multiplicity control strategy) and among all-comers was 37.7 (32.2 to 43.6) versus 32.1 (27.2 to 35.7) months (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.12]). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 331/420 (79%) versus 274/411 (67%) treated patients.

CONCLUSION

First-line len + pembro did not meet prespecified statistical criteria for PFS or OS versus chemotherapy in pMMR aEC.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Lenvatinib Based Nano Formulations and Cutting-Edge Scale-Up Technologies in revolutionizing Cancer Therapy

Lenvatinib (LEN), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has emerged as a promising therapeutic agent for various solid tumors. Nevertheless, a number of constraints, including diminished bioavailability, incapacity to elicit localized inflammation, and inability to selectively accumulate at the tumor site, may impede the comprehensive exploitation of its versatile tyrosine kinase inhibitory capabilities. In order to achieve targeted delivery of LEN while also reducing its high dose used in conventional therapeutics, nanoformulation approaches can be adopted. The integration of LEN into various nanoformulations, such as nanoparticles, nanocrystals, high density lipoproteins (HDLs), liposomes, and micelles, is discussed, highlighting the advantages of these innovative approaches in a comparative manner; however, given that the current methods of nanoformulation synthesis employ toxic organic solvents and chemicals, there is an imperative need for exploring alternative, environmentally friendly approaches. The multifaceted effects of nanocarriers have rendered them profoundly applicable within the biomedical domain, serving as instrumental entities in various capacities such as vehicles for drug delivery and genetic material, diagnostic agents, facilitators of photothermal therapy, and radiotherapy. However, the scalability of these nanotechnological methodologies must be rigorously investigated and addressed to refine drug delivery mechanisms. This endeavor offers promising prospects for revolutionizing strategies in cancer therapeutics, thereby laying the foundation for future research in scale-up techniques in the pursuit of more effective and less toxic therapies for cancer.

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab compared to carboplatin plus paclitaxel for carboplatin and paclitaxel pretreated, recurrent, or advanced endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab has demonstrated improved survival compared with doxorubicin or paclitaxel monotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancers (ECs). However, response rates to monotherapy are poor in recurrent settings. Herein, we performed a retrospective analysis using real-world data to compare the outcomes of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, carboplatin plus paclitaxel (PT), and doxorubicin for patients with PT-pretreated, advanced, or recurrent ECs.

METHODS

We performed a multi-institutional retrospective analysis using de-identified electronic health record database (TriNetX) to compare lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, carboplatin plus paclitaxel (PT), and doxorubicin outcomes in patients with PT-pretreated, advanced, or recurrent ECs. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted. The primary outcome was the overall survival (OS) among treatment groups. The secondary outcome was the adverse event profile.

RESULTS

Between January 2012 and September 2023, we identified 397 patients with PT-treated, advanced, or recurrent ECs who received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, and 469 patients receiving PT at a platinum-free interval of over 6 months. Following PSM, no significant difference in median OS was observed between the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and re-challenge PT groups (19.1 vs. 18.5 months, p = 0.60; hazard ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.81-1.46). However, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab provided better survival benefits than doxorubicin. Adverse event analysis showed more hypothyroidism, hypertension, and proteinuria with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, and more hematologic toxicities in both chemotherapy groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was not associated with improved survival when compared with re-challenge PT in patients with a platinum-free interval of over 6 months. Re-challenge PT remains a valid option for PT-treated, recurrent, or advanced ECs, especially in patients with a substantially long platinum-free interval.

The potential impact of RNA splicing abnormalities on immune regulation in endometrial cancer

RNA splicing controls the post-transcriptional level of gene expression, allowing for the synthesis of many transcripts with various configurations and roles. Variations in RNA splicing regulatory factors, including splicing factors, signaling pathways, epigenetic modifications, and environmental factors, are typically the origin of tumor-associated splicing anomalies. Furthermore, thorough literature assessments on the intricate connection between tumor-related splicing dysregulation and tumor immunity are currently lacking. Therefore, we also thoroughly discuss putative targets associated with RNA splicing in endometrial cancer (EC) and the possible impacts of aberrant RNA splicing on the immune control of tumor cells and tumor microenvironment (TME), which contributes to enhancing the utilization of immunotherapy in the management of EC and offers an alternative viewpoint for the exploration of cancer therapies and plausible prognostic indicators.

Efficacy comparison of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy and combination with PARPis or antiangiogenic agents in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The network meta-analysis (NMA) was aimed to compare and assess the effectiveness of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/ programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor monotherapy or combination therapy with other agents for individuals with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS

The NMA was registered on the PROSPERO website (ID: CRD42024545968) and multiple databases were queried to retrieve the articles. It assessed the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of persons with advanced or recurrent EC, as well as those with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) in terms of PFS.

RESULTS

The NMA included 12 studies involving a total of 4,515 patients. Compared to chemotherapy, the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.78) in PFS, combination therapy with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) (HR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.32-0.89) or with antiangiogenic agents (HR, 0.48; 95% CI: 0.25-0.83) all showed significant improvements in PFS. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy resulted in a significantly higher OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI: 0.37-0.97) compared to chemotherapy. Combination therapy with antiangiogenic agents demonstrated the highest efficacy in extending PFS, while the combination with PARPis had the best performance in extending OS. Patients with dMMR and pMMR subtypes derive greater benefits from PD-1/ PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with PARPis respectively.

CONCLUSION

Monotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and combination therapies with PARPis or antiangiogenic agents demonstrate significant potential for individuals with advanced or recurrent EC.

Evaluation of the role of liver metastasectomy in the treatment of stage IV endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

Hepatic metastasectomy for gynecologic cancers remains controversial. Management of advanced endometrial cancer (EC) is complex. The purpose of this study is to analyze the efficacy of liver metastasectomy (LM) in the treatment of metastatic EC.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to create a retrospective cohort of adult women with EC metastatic to the liver between 2010 and 2016. Overall survival and all-cause mortality were estimated with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) curves and IPTW Cox proportional hazard regression, respectively.

RESULTS

Among 999 EC patients with oligometastatic disease to the liver, 162 (16.2%) underwent LM, 614 (61.5%) received chemotherapy, and 129 (12.9%) had chemotherapy and LM. Those who underwent chemotherapy, 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival for chemotherapy + LM versus chemotherapy alone were 67.8 versus 56.5%, 44.9 versus 33.4%, and 35.1 versus 23.1%, respectively. In unadjusted analysis, chemotherapy + LM group had reduced mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR]=0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.54-0.86) with longer median survival time (20.1 vs. 14.6 months, p=0.011) compared to chemotherapy alone. Adjusting for demographics and treatment characteristics, a possible reduction in mortality was associated with chemotherapy + LM (HR=0.74; 95% CI=0.55-1.01) compared to chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSION

This study of LM for EC suggests LM in addition to chemotherapy may be associated with improved outcomes for patients with EC.

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

This meta-analysis evaluated pembrolizumab monotherapy and combination therapy's efficacy and safety in recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer (EC).

Methods

We utilized PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to identify clinical trials that were used to search literature from July 2013 to July 2023 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced EC. Eight studies with 2,742 patients were included. Outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), complete remission (CR), and adverse events (AEs); a subgroup analysis was carried out based on combination treatment regimens. Quality assessment of the included studies was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist.

Results

Pembrolizumab reduced progression risk [hazard ratio (HR): 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44, 0.63; p < 0.00001] and death risk when combined with lenvatinib (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.76; p < 0.00001). Pembrolizumab monotherapy and lenvatinib combination achieved higher ORR (OR: 3.61; 95% CI: 2.12, 6.13; p < 0.00001) and CR rates (OR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.59, 4.57; p < 0.05) than controls. Single-arm studies: 8% CR and 4% PR in pembrolizumab-treated patients. Pooled AE incidence: 86%, with 43% grade 3/4. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found that the pembrolizumab group had a higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 AEs compared to the control group (OR: 2.23; 95% CI: 1.23, 4.04; p = 0.008).

Conclusion

Pembrolizumab monotherapy or combination significantly improves survival in recurrent or advanced EC and has manageable toxicity albeit with a relatively high incidence of treatment-related AEs.

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibition for the treatment of patients with primary advanced or recurrent dMMR/MSI high endometrial cancer in 2025

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The Cancer Genome Atlas identified four distinct molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer (EC): POLE mutated, mismatch repair deficient (dMMR), copy number low, and copy number high. The goal of this review is to summarize the profound clinical implications of molecular subtyping, particularly in guiding treatment decisions for dMMR and microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) EC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical trials have demonstrated the remarkable efficacy of immunotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H EC tumors. Trials including GARNET, KEYNOTE-158, NRG GY-018, and RUBY have shown significant improvements in clinical outcomes for patients with advanced and recurrent disease, leading to FDA approvals for immunotherapy in both frontline and recurrent EC treatment settings.Building on these successes, recent studies, including DUO-E, are exploring combination therapies to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy in EC. Simultaneously, trials including NRG GY-020, are investigating the potential benefits of immunotherapy in early-stage disease.

SUMMARY

Immunotherapy therapy has revolutionized the treatment of endometrial cancer in both upfront and recurrent settings, with molecular subtyping identifying patients most likely to benefit, especially those with dMMR/MSI-H tumors.

Racial and ethnic enrollment disparities in clinical trials leading to Food and Drug Administration approvals for gynecologic malignancies

BACKGROUND

Compared to White women, Black women and other minority groups have a higher age-adjusted incidence risk of cervical and endometrial cancer. However, the extent of racial and ethnic disparities in clinical trial enrollment among studies performed mainly in North America and Europe for gynecologic malignancy is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study analyzed enrollment rates by race/ethnicity in trials that led to Food and Drug Administration approvals for gynecological cancers from 2010 to 2024.

STUDY DESIGN

This cross-sectional study examined clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov that resulted in new Food and Drug Administration approvals for gynecologic malignancies between 2010 and 2024. Exclusion criteria were studies not conducted in North America or Europe. Enrollment fractions were obtained by dividing the number of trial participants segregated by the racial/ethnic group by the corresponding U.S. cancer prevalence (uterine, ovarian, and cervical cancer) for 2016 to 2020 for each racial/ethnic group. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated to compare enrollment fractions of minority groups to non-Hispanic Whites.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 21 reporting race/ethnicity data. Three (3/21) studies dichotomized race as non-Hispanic White and non-White and 7 (7/21) reported ethnicity. The median number of participants was 494 [interquartile range 150-674]. Fifteen studies were phase III, and 6 were phase IB/II trials. Treatments included immune checkpoint inhibitors (7 studies), poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (5), vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (4), antibody-drug conjugates (4), and an imaging marker (1). Across all studies, 11,258 patients were included, 5563 (49.4%) in ovarian cancer studies, 2963 (26.3%) in endometrial cancer studies, and 2732 (24.3%) in cervical cancer studies. Three studies (n=1734) dichotomized participants into non-Hispanic White and non-White; non-Hispanic White 1291 [74.4%] and non-White 443 [25.6%], and enrollment fractions were 0.51% for non-Hispanic White and 0.43% for no-White, with non-White being underrepresented odds ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval [0.76-0.95], P=.004. In an Analysis of 18 studies reporting race categories, non-Hispanic Black patients were significantly underrepresented (odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval [0.45-0.54], P<.001), while Asian patients were overrepresented (odds ratio 2.81, 95% confidence interval [2.64-2.99], P<.001). In the 4 studies reporting ethnicity, Hispanic patients were also significantly underrepresented (odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval [0.61-0.78], P<.001).

CONCLUSION

In clinical trials, performed in North America and Europe mainly, leading to Food and Drug Administration approvals for gynecologic malignancies, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients are significantly underrepresented compared to non-Hispanic White participants when enrollment is benchmarked to the U.S. female population with gynecological cancer. These trials do not adequately reflect the U.S. populations diagnosed with these malignancies. Enrollment strategies to increase diversity are urgently needed to ensure clinical trial results are equitable and applicable across all populations. Efforts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the Association of Community Cancer Centers, and the Gynecologic Oncologic Group/Society of Gynecologic Oncology Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Access initiative provide a comprehensive framework for achieving this goal.

Predicting immunotherapy efficacy in endometrial cancer: focus on the tumor microenvironment

Immunotherapy represents a groundbreaking therapeutic approach, based on the immune system's intrinsic capacity to interfere with tumor progression, that opens the horizons in the treatment of endometrial cancer. However, the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy is hampered by the development of resistance in patients. The resistance to immunotherapy is multifactorial mechanism, encompassed genetic and epigenetic alterations in tumor cells modulating immune checkpoint molecules, resulted in escaping immune surveillance. The tumor microenvironment can orchestrate an immunosuppressive milieu, attenuating the immune response and facilitating tumor progression. To overcome immunotherapeutic resistance in endometrial cancer we must bring to light the mechanisms of intricate interplay between neoplastic cells, the host immune system, and the tumor microenvironment. The identification of predictive biomarkers for immunotherapeutic response and the innovative agents capable of reversing resistance pathways must be developed. Our review summarizes accumulated data on the role of cells of the tumor microenvironment and their regulatory molecules in the mechanisms underlying therapeutic effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors, including resistance to therapy. Major question we raise here - which group of patients is the most favorable to achieve durable immunotherapy response in endometrial cancer?

Treatment for low-grade and high-grade endometrial carcinoma after recurrence/relapse before the molecular targeted therapy era: A retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study

AIM

To compare the prognosis of low-grade endometrial carcinoma (LG-EC) with that of high-grade endometrial carcinoma (HG-EC) after first recurrence/relapse before the molecular targeted therapy era.

METHODS

Recurrent/relapsed endometrial cancer was diagnosed in 155 women at our hospital between January 26, 1999 and February 26, 2019. Fifty of these women received paclitaxel-carboplatin, two received doxorubicin-cisplatin, and one received docetaxel-carboplatin as postoperative chemotherapy. Two women who did not receive postoperative chemotherapy received paclitaxel-carboplatin for their first recurrence/relapse. The prognosis in these 55 women was retrospectively investigated using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Twenty-five women had LG-EC and 30 had HG-EC. Cox proportional hazards analysis identified response to chemotherapy for the first recurrence/relapse to be a statistically significant determinant of progression-free survival and HG-EC to be a significant determinant of overall survival. After propensity score matching, median overall survival was better in women with LG-EC than in those with HG-EC (82 months [95% CI 27-not reached] vs. 31 months [95% CI 2-47], p = 0.0127). Three women survived for at least 10 years without recurrence after completion of treatment. The interval between postoperative chemotherapy and first recurrence was more than 6 months. The recurrences resolved after multimodal treatment or aggressive chemotherapy followed by 5-12 cycles of chemotherapy other than paclitaxel-carboplatin if received postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis was poorer in patients with recurrent/relapsed HG-EC than in those with recurrent/relapsed LG-EC before the molecular targeted therapy era. There were no long-term recurrence-free survivors after repeat paclitaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy.

Evaluation of Lung Adverse Events Associated With Lenvatinib: A Post-marketing Surveillance Study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Despite the seriousness of lung adverse events (AEs) associated with lenvatinib, comprehensive data on these events remain limited. This study was conducted to examine the disproportionality, time to onset, incidence rates, and outcomes of lenvatinib-associated lung AEs using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analysed data for the period from April 2004 to May 2023. Data on lung AEs were extracted and the relative disproportionality of AEs was estimated using reporting odds ratios (RORs). Weibull distribution parameters were also calculated.

RESULTS

Among the 2,230,863 reports analysed, 7,684 reports of AEs associated with lenvatinib were identified, including 380 lung AEs. Signals were detected for three lung AEs: tracheal fistula, tracheo-oesophageal fistula, and tracheal haemorrhage. Fatal outcomes were observed for tracheal fistula and tracheal haemorrhage. A histogram of median times to onset indicated that lung AEs associated with lenvatinib occurred 15-111 days after administration. Weibull distributions showed that the incidence of these AEs remained constant throughout the exposure period (random failure type).

CONCLUSION

The present study highlights post-marketing AEs associated with lenvatinib, with a particular focus on lung AEs. Tracheal fistula and tracheal haemorrhage were identified as AEs with potentially serious outcomes following lenvatinib administration. Monitoring patients for early signs of these AEs is important not only at treatment initiation, but also throughout the entire course of therapy.

Pathologically Complete Response to Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Advanced Cervical Cancer with PTEN, PIK3CA, MTOR, and ARID1A Mutations: A Case Report

Introduction

Limited treatment options are available for residual locally advanced cervical cancer after concurrent radio-chemotherapy. Pembrolizumab has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat patients with persistent, recurrent, and metastatic cervical cancer. However, it is expensive and not covered by medical insurance in China.

Case Description

A patient presented with stage IIIC1 cervical cancer characterized by PTEN, PIK3CA, MTOR, and ARID1A mutations, accompanied by low programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression (tumor cell proportion score 1% and combined positive score 1). The patient exhibited a residual cervical lesion after concurrent radio-chemotherapy but eventually achieved a pathologically complete response through a combination of the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor camrelizumab with the antiangiogenic drug apatinib (two medicines produced by Chinese Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co.). Surgical intervention confirmed the lack of residual tumor cells in the cervix. Regular follow-up confirmed that disease-free survival time was 41 months and overall survival time was 51 months. Adverse events, including cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation, hepatic insufficiency, hemorrhoidal hemorrhage, and neutropenia, were manageable during treatment with camrelizumab and apatinib.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the combination of camrelizumab and apatinib could offer a valuable therapeutic option for residual advanced cervical cancer patients after concurrent radio-chemotherapy. Camrelizumab is affordable, at just 10% of the price of pembrolizumab, although it is similarly not covered by medical insurance for cervical cancer in China. The PTEN, PIK3CA, MTOR, and ARID1A gene mutations hold the potential to serve as predictive biomarkers for cervical cancer patients treated by PD-1 inhibitors.

Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma patients: real-world experience in Japan

BACKGROUND

Combined treatment with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab is currently regarded as one of the standard first-line therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) patients. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of this combined regimen in treatment-naïve Japanese aRCC patients.

METHODS

This study included a total of 50 consecutive aRCC patients receiving combined lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in routine clinical practice in Japan, and comprehensively analyzed clinical outcomes of this treatment.

RESULTS

Of these 50, 7 (14.0%), 23 (46.0%) and 20 (40.0%) were classified into favorable, intermediate and poor risk groups, respectively, according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) system. Responses to this combined therapy in the 50 patients were as follows: complete response, 7 (14.0%); partial response, 26 (52.0%); stable disease, 15 (30%) and progressive disease, 2 (4%); thus, the objective response rate (ORR) was 66%. ORRs in favorable, intermediate and poor risk groups were 57.1, 69.6 and 65.0%, respectively. During the observation period, disease progression and death occurred in 14 (28.0%) and 6 (12.0%) patients, respectively, and neither the median PFS nor OS was reached. Adverse events and those corresponding to grade ≥ 3 were observed in all (100%) and 33 (66.0%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study focusing on real-world outcomes of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab for treatment-naïve aRCC patients, showing that the efficacy and safety of this combined regimen are similar to those noted in randomized clinical trial.

Disproportionality analysis of cardiac adverse events associated with lenvatinib using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database

AIMS

This study was conducted to examine disproportionality, times to onset, incidence rates and outcomes of lenvatinib-associated cardiac adverse events (AEs) using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.

METHODS

We analysed data for the period between April 2004 and May 2023. Data on cardiac AEs were extracted and the relative disproportionality of AEs was estimated using reporting odds ratios (RORs). Furthermore, Weibull distribution parameters were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 2 230 863 reports analysed, we identified 7684 reports of AEs associated with lenvatinib, including 317 cardiac AEs. Signals were detected for eight cardiac AEs: hypertension, cardiac failure, myocarditis, myocardial infarction, immune-mediated myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, angina unstable and cardiotoxicity. Among these, fatal outcomes were observed for cardiac failure, myocarditis and myocardial infarction. Histograms of median times to onset for the eight detected cardiac AE signals showed that AEs occurred at a median of 3.5-134.5 days after lenvatinib administration. The Weibull distributions showed that cardiac failure occurred early after administration (early failure type), myocarditis occurred in a dose-dependent manner (wearout failure type), and myocardial infarction occurred constantly throughout the exposure period (random failure type).

CONCLUSIONS

We focused on cardiac AEs associated with lenvatinib as post-marketing AEs. Serious outcomes can arise after lenvatinib administration. Patients should be monitored for signs of onset of these AEs not only at the start of administration, but also over an extended period.

A Narrative Review of the Clinical, Humanistic, and Economic Value of Pembrolizumab-Based Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Breast and Gynecologic Cancers

Breast and gynecologic cancers are common across the world and are associated with substantial societal and economic burden. Pembrolizumab was among the first immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death protein 1 to be approved for the treatment of patients with triple-negative breast cancer, cervical cancer, and endometrial cancer. Recent clinical trials have established pembrolizumab regimens as a standard of care treatment for these tumor types. Clinical data are further supported by patient-reported outcome, cost-effectiveness, and real-world evidence. Pembrolizumab monotherapy and combination regimens do not negatively influence health-related quality of life and are cost-effective relative to comparators. Ongoing phase 3 studies with pembrolizumab will expand the current understanding of its use in breast and gynecologic cancers. Several of these studies are in patients with early-stage disease with the hope of curing patients. The main objective of this review is to summarize the clinical, humanistic, and economic value of pembrolizumab in these settings and to describe the future challenges for patients, caregivers, clinicians, and payers.

Reserpine, a novel N6-methyladenosine regulator, reverses Lenvatinib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive malignancy and a growing global health problem. Reserpine (Res), a plant-derived hypertension drug, has been reported to possess anti-tumor efficacy. However, the role and function of Res in N6-methyladenosine (m6A) regulation and Lenvatinib (Len) resistance in HCC have not been clarified.

PURPOSE

To verify whether Res can be used as a natural small-molecule regulator of m6A to reverse Len resistance in HCC.

METHODS

Dot blotting, Western blotting and m6A quantification were used to compare and analyze the differential expression of m6A and its methyltransferase METTL3. Western blotting, Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR), cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA) and molecular docking were used to explore the mechanism of interaction between Res and m6A. The effects of Res on the biological characteristics of Lenvatinib-resistant HCC cells were investigated through CCK-8, clone formation, and Transwell assays. Cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models were used to assess the ability of Res to reverse Len resistance in vivo. MeRIP m6A sequencing, PATHWAY analysis and Western blotting were used to analyze the downstream signaling pathways and genes involved in Res-mediated reversal of Len resistance.

RESULTS

Len resistance in HCC is related to the increased m6A level and the high expression of METTL3. Res affects the activity of METTL3 protein by binding to it, thereby downregulating the level of m6A. In vitro study showed that Res can sensitize HCC cells to the anti-tumor effects of Len treatment, including blocking proliferation, inhibiting migration, and inducing apoptosis. Len-resistant CDX and PDX models revealed that Res can reverse the resistant phenotype, with the tumor inhibition rates of 77.46 % and 62.1 %, respectively, when combined with Len treatment. Analysis of xenograft tissues showed that the combination of Res and Len down-regulates the m6A level, reduces proliferation biomarkers, and induces apoptosis, which is consistent with the in vitro data. Mechanistically, our preliminary results indicate that Res can up-regulate the SMAD3 level by down-regulating m6A in Len-resistant cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Reserpine, a small-molecule regulator of m6A, reverses Lenvatinib-resistant phenotypes, including proliferation, migration and anti-apoptosis, in vitro and in vivo by targeting SMAD3 and down-regulating the m6A level in HCC.

The oncogenic role of EIF4A3/CDC20 axis in the endometrial cancer

Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-3 (EIF4A3) is a key component of the exon junction complex (EJC) and is extensively involved in RNA splicing, inducing mRNA decay, and regulating the cell cycle and apoptosis. However, the potential role of EIF4A3 in EC has not been comprehensively investigated and remains unknown. Here, we report that the expression level of EIF4A3 is dramatically elevated in endometrial cancer (EC) samples compared with normal EC samples via bioinformatics analysis and immunohistochemistry analysis, and that high expression of EIF4A3 promotes the proliferation, migration, and invasion of EC cells. Mechanistically, we found that high EIF4A3 expression stabilized cell division cyclin 20 (CDC20) mRNA, and high EIF4A3 expression induced pro-carcinogenic effects in EC cells that were efficiently antagonized upon knockdown of CDC20, as well as Apcin, an inhibitor of CDC20. These findings reveal a novel mechanism by which high expression of EIF4A3 induces CDC20 upregulation, thus leading to EC tumorigenesis and metastasis, indicating a potential treatment strategy for EC patients with high EIF4A3 expression using Apcin. KEY MESSAGES: The expression level of EIF4A3 was dramatically elevated in endometrial cancer (EC) samples compared with normal endometrial cancer samples. High EIF4A3 expression stabilized CDC20 mRNA, and high EIF4A3 expression induced pro-carcinogenic effect in EC cells which was efficiently antagonized upon knockdown of CDC20. Apcin, an inhibitor of CDC20, could effectively counteract high expression of EIF4A3 inducing EC tumourigenesis and metastasis, indicating the potential treatment strategy for EC patients with EIF4A3 high expression by using Apcin.

ENGOT-en11/GOG-3053/KEYNOTE-B21: a randomised, double-blind, phase III study of pembrolizumab or placebo plus adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy provides clinically meaningful benefit as first-line therapy for advanced (locoregional extension and residual disease after surgery)/metastatic/recurrent mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) and mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancer, with greater magnitude of benefit in the dMMR phenotype. We evaluated the addition of pembrolizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy (with/without radiation therapy) among patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk endometrial cancer without any residual macroscopic disease following curative-intent surgery.

METHODS

We included patients with histologically confirmed high-risk [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I/II of non-endometrioid histology or endometrioid histology with p53/TP53 abnormality, or stage III/IVA of any histology] endometrial cancer following surgery with curative intent and no evidence of disease postoperatively, with no prior radiotherapy or systemic therapy. Patients were randomised to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks (Q3W) for six cycles added to carboplatin-paclitaxel followed by pembrolizumab 400 mg or placebo every 6 weeks (Q6W) for six cycles per treatment assignment. Radiotherapy was at the investigator's discretion. The primary endpoints were investigator-assessed disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population.

RESULTS

A total of 1095 patients were randomised (pembrolizumab, n = 545; placebo, n = 550). At this interim analysis (data cut-off, 4 March 2024), 119 (22%) DFS events occurred in the pembrolizumab group and 121 (22%) occurred in the placebo group [hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.32; P = 0.570]. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 2-year DFS rates were 75% and 76% in the pembrolizumab and placebo groups, respectively. The hazard ratio for DFS was 0.31 (95% CI 0.14-0.69) in the dMMR population (n = 281) and 1.20 (95% CI 0.91-1.57) in the pMMR population (n = 814). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 386 of 543 (71%) and 348 of 549 (63%) patients in the pembrolizumab and placebo groups, respectively. No treatment-related grade 5 AEs occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy did not improve DFS in patients with newly diagnosed, high-risk, all-comer endometrial cancer. Preplanned subgroup analyses for stratification factors suggest that pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved DFS in patients with dMMR tumours. Safety was manageable.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04634877; EudraCT, 2020-003424-17.

RESEARCH SUPPORT

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Unraveling the Heterogeneity of Deficiency of Mismatch Repair Proteins in Endometrial Cancer: Predictive Biomarkers and Assessment Challenges

Endometrial cancer (EC) poses a significant global health challenge, with increasing prevalence in 26 of 43 countries and over 13,000 deaths projected in the United States by 2024. This rise correlates with aging populations, the obesity epidemic, and changing reproductive patterns, including delayed childbearing. Despite the early diagnosis in 67% of cases, approximately 30% of cases present with regional or distant spread, leading to nearly 20% mortality rates. Unlike many cancers, EC mortality rates are escalating, outpacing therapeutic advancements until recently. One of the reasons for this was the lack of effective therapeutic options for advanced disease until recently. The introduction of immunotherapy has marked a turning point in EC treatment, particularly benefiting patients with defects in mismatch repair proteins (dMMRs). However, dMMR status alone does not ensure a favorable response, underscoring the need for precise patient selection. This review explores the pivotal role of mismatch repair proteins in EC, emphasizing their heterogeneity, the challenges in their assessment, and their potential as predictive biomarkers.

The efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab therapy in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (LP) therapy is currently used in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. However, patients with uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) were not included in the KEYNOTE-775, and the efficacy of LP therapy for patients with UCS in clinical practice remains unclear. We administered LP therapy to five patients with UCS. We aimed to report our clinical experience with LP therapy in these patients and investigate the genomic characteristics of those who responded to LP therapy. We retrospectively reviewed patients with UCS (n = 5) who underwent LP therapy at our hospital from January 2019 to December 2023. Efficacy was assessed using the response rate according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Safety was evaluated in terms of adverse events. The median age was 65 (55-78) years, and the mismatch repair status was proficient in all of the patients. One patient had stage II disease, and four had stage III. The median number of LP therapy courses was 8 (1-35). The overall response rate was 40%. None of the patients experienced adverse events that were grade 3 or higher. The median follow-up duration was 9 (1-26) months, median progression-free survival was 9.1 (0.16 to NA) months, and median overall survival was 10.2 (1.41 to NA) months. LP therapy may be effective for patients with UCS. As this report was based on a limited number of patients, more cases are required to investigate the efficacy of LP therapy in patients with UCS.

Re-administration of platinum-based chemotherapy for recurrent endometrial cancer: an ancillary analysis of the SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study

BACKGROUND

We previously demonstrated the applicability of the concept of "platinum sensitivity" in recurrent endometrial cancer. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors have been widely incorporated into endometrial cancer treatment, the debate continues regarding treatment options in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer who have previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. In this study, we assessed the duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment using pooled data from the SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study.

METHODS

Among the 279 participants in the SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study wherein platinum-based chemotherapy was re-administered for managing recurrent endometrial cancer between January 2005 and December 2009, 130 (47%) responded to chemotherapy. We compared the relationship between platinum-free interval and duration of secondary platinum-based treatment using pooled data.

RESULTS

In 40 patients (31%), the duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment exceeded the platinum-free interval. The duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment exceeded 12 months in 51 patients (39%) [platinum-free interval: < 12 months, 14/48 (29%); 12-23 months, 18/43 (42%); 24-35 months, 8/19 (42%); ≥ 36 months, 11/20 (55%)]. In particular, in eight patients (6%), the duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment exceeded 36 months [platinum-free interval: < 12 months, 3/48 (6%); 12-23 months, 0/19 (0%); 24-35 months, 2/19 (11%); ≥ 36 months, 3/20 (15%)].

CONCLUSIONS

Re-administration of platinum-based chemotherapy for recurrent endometrial cancer may result in a long-term response exceeding the platinum-free interval in some patients. Even in the current situation, where immune checkpoint inhibitors have been introduced, re-administration of platinum-based chemotherapy is worth considering.

Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab versus Doxorubicin for Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer with Short Treatment-Free Intervals Following First-Line Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel

Background: The treatment-free interval is a significant predictor of worse prognosis and poor response rates of the second-line treatment in patients with carboplatin and paclitaxel (PT)-pretreated, advanced, or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). Whether lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab still confers a survival benefit compared with doxorubicin in patients with platinum-free intervals of <6 months remains unclear. Methods: This multi-institutional retrospective analysis was performed using de-identified electronic health records from the TriNetX Research Network. Patients with advanced or recurrent ECs who received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab or doxorubicin within six months of first-line PT were identified. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to control for potential confounding variables. Overall survival (OS) and adverse event profile were the primary and secondary outcomes. Results: Between January 2018 and February 2024, 130 patients with PT-treated, advanced, or recurrent ECs who received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and 122 patients who received doxorubicin at a platinum-free interval of <6 months were identified across 31 healthcare organizations. In the balanced cohort following PSM with 117 patients in each group, treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was associated with improved OS compared with treatment with doxorubicin (12.8 vs. 8.2 months, p = 0.012, hazard ratio: 0.65, 95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.91). Regarding adverse event analysis, a higher incidence of hypothyroidism and proteinuria was observed with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, and more hematological toxicities were observed with doxorubicin. Conclusions: in patients with treatment-free intervals of <6 months, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab still confers improved survival compared with doxorubicin in PT-treated, advanced, or recurrent ECs.

Clinical characteristics and genomic profiling of outpatients with endometrial cancer at a Chinese tertiary cancer center

OBJECTIVE

Endometrial cancer is stepping into the era of precision therapy. Genomic test is recommended for newly diagnostic patients. However, outpatients displayed more complex characteristics. Here, we elucidated the clinical characteristics and genomic profiling of outpatients with endometrial cancer at our institution.

METHODS

Between 2018 and 2023, 68 endometrial cancer received genomic tests at outpatient department of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Data, including age, pathological histology, FIGO stage and treatment strategy were collected. Germline mutations, molecular subtypes and other somatic mutations were also summarized.

RESULTS

Overall, 72.1% (49/68) of patients receive genomic tests at primary diagnosis, while 27.9% (19/68) of patients received tests at recurrence. Nine patients had deleterious germline mutations, including BRCA1(2), MLH1(1), MSH2(2, including one with co-mutation of RAD50), MSH6(2), FANCA(1), MUTYH(1). Molecular subtypes were recognized among 62 patients, as POLE super-mutation(4, 6.5%), MSI-H(7, 11.3%), CN-Low(36, 58.1%) and CN-High(15, 24.2%). Ten patients received anti-PD1 monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy or anti-angiogenic therapy, with the duration of disease control of 1 to 35 months. The ORR rate was 30%, and six patients had stable disease. The median (range) follow-up time was 18(2-160) months. 23(33.8%) relapses were recorded, and CN-High subtype displayed worst PFS compared with other subtypes (P < 0.01). 6 deaths were reported including 2(5.6%) of CN-Low and 4(26.7%) of CN-High.

CONCLUSION

Outpatients department gathered a considerable proportion of recurrent patients with complex genomic features. Patients with worse prognosis could be well studied, and anti-PD1 therapy was a promising salvage therapy in the real world.

Identification of an m6A Natural Inhibitor, Lobeline, That Reverses Lenvatinib Resistance in Hepatocellular Tumors

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive cancer that has an effect on human health. As a first-line drug for HCC, despite its excellent efficacy, lenvatinib (Len) is prone to developing drug resistance in HCC patients. The N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification is not only related to the development of HCC but also shows great potential in overcoming HCC resistance. Using Dot Blot, our group first screened a small molecule m6A regulator, lobeline (Lob), from a library of 390 compounds (mostly natural products). In vitro experiments demonstrated that Lob could significantly enhance the sensitivity to Len of Len-resistant HCC (HCC/Len) and inhibit migration of resistant cells. In Len-resistant cell-derived and patient-derived xenograft models, Lob could reverse the resistant phenotype, with reductions in tumor volume of 68% and 60%, respectively. Furthermore, MeRIP-m6A sequencing results indicated that the underlying molecular mechanism of Lob reversal of HCC drug resistance was related to UBE3B. Taken together, this study highlighted that Lob, a plant derived natural product, could reverse the resistance of HCC to Len by regulating the m6A levels. It is hoped that this will provide a pharmacological research basis for the clinical treatment of HCC patients.

Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Various trials have demonstrated the clinical benefits of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, regardless of mismatch repair (MMR) status or histologic subtype. The majority of the previously published trials had small sample sizes. Here, we aimed to assess the reported efficacy and safety profile of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer.

Methods

We utilized the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases to identify clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. The outcomes analyzed were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR) and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Subgroup analysis was conducted on the basis of MMR status (deficient, dMMR or proficient, pMMR).

Results

Four trials (582 patients) were included. The pooled ORR was 32.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 28.9-36.5]. Subgroup analysis revealed an ORR of 48.1% (95% CI: 26.1-70.2) for dMMR group and 33.1% (95% CI: 25.7-40.6) for pMMR group. The pooled DCR was 74.9% (95% CI: 71.3-78.4%). Subgroup analysis revealed a DCR of 81.0% (95% CI: 64.5-97.6) for the dMMR group and 76.3% (95% CI: 66.3-86.3) for the pMMR group. Follow-up was reported in all included studies. The median range time of PFS and OS was 5.3 months-258 days and 17.2 months-not reached, respectively. Regarding safety, the overall pooled proportions of any-grade AE and AEs ≥ grade 3 were 95.8% (95% CI: 89.5-100.0) and 80.2% (95% CI: 59.9-100.0), respectively.

Conclusion

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showed a relevant clinical benefit and significant toxicity in patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. Further studies encompassing long-term outcomes are warranted.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=522160/, identifier CRD42024522160.

Immune predictors of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) endometrial cancer (EC) can derive great benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However not all responses and predictors of primary resistance are lacking.

METHODS

We compared the immune tumor microenvironment of MMRd EC ICI-responders (Rs) and ICI non-responders (NRs), using spatial multiplexed immune profiling and unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, NRs exhibited drastically lower CD8+, absent terminally differentiated T cells, lack of mature tertiary lymphoid structures and dendritic cells, as well as loss of human leukocyte antigen class I. However, no single marker could predict R versus NR with confidence. Clustering analysis identified a combination of four immune features that demonstrated that accurately predicted ICI response, with a discriminative power of 92%. Finally, 80% of NRs lacked programmed death-ligand 1, however, 60% exhibited another actionable immune checkpoint (T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin containing protein-3, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1, or lymphocyte activation gene 3).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings underscore the potential of immune tumor microenvironment features for identifying patients with MMRd EC and primary resistance to ICI who should be oriented towards trials testing novel immunotherapeutic combinations.

The evolving role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cervical and endometrial cancer

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment landscape for numerous tumor types, including cervical and endometrial cancers. Multiple ICIs against programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have demonstrated encouraging outcomes in controlled clinical studies for advanced cervical and endometrial cancers. For advanced cervical cancer, approved ICIs as second-line treatment include cemiplimab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab as single agents. In the first-line treatment setting, options include pembrolizumab alone or in combination with bevacizumab, as well as atezolizumab combined with a backbone platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Additionally, for locally advanced cervical cancer, pembrolizumab is recommended alongside concurrent chemoradiotherapy. For endometrial cancer, pembrolizumab monotherapy, pembrolizumab in combination with lenvatinib, and dostarlimab are currently approved as second-line treatment options. Moreover, either dostarlimab or pembrolizumab can be added to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy for mismatch repair deficient malignancies. Although the inclusion of these agents in clinical practice has led to improved overall response rates and survival outcomes, many patients still lack benefits, possibly due to multiple intrinsic and adaptive resistance mechanisms to immunotherapy. This review aims to highlight the rationale for utilizing ICIs and their current role, while also delineating the proposed mechanisms of resistance to ICIs in cervical and endometrial cancer.

Long-term follow-up of efficacy and safety of selinexor maintenance treatment in patients with TP53wt advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: A subgroup analysis of the ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055/SIENDO study

OBJECTIVE

To report long-term efficacy and safety of selinexor maintenance therapy in adults with TP53 wild-type (TP53wt) stage IV or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) who achieved partial remission (PR) or complete remission (CR) following chemotherapy.

METHODS

Analysis of the prespecified, exploratory subgroup of patients with TP53wt EC from the phase 3 SIENDO study was performed. Progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in patients with TP53wt EC and across other patient subgroups were exploratory endpoints. Safety and tolerability were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 263 patients enrolled in the SIENDO trial, 113 patients had TP53wt EC; 70/113 (61.9%) had TP53wt/proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) EC, and 29/113 (25.7%) had TP53wt/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) EC. As of April 1, 2024, the median PFS (mPFS) for TP53wt patients who received selinexor compared with placebo was 28.4 versus 5.2 months (36.8-month follow-up, HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.27-0.73). A benefit in mPFS was seen with selinexor versus placebo regardless of MMR status (patients with TP53wt/pMMR EC: 39.5 vs 4.9 months, HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.19-0.71; patients with TP53wt/dMMR EC: 13.1 vs 3.7 months, HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.18-1.34). Selinexor treatment was generally manageable, with no new safety signals identified.

CONCLUSION

In the phase 3 SIENDO study, selinexor maintenance therapy showed a promising efficacy signal and a manageable safety profile in the prespecified subgroup of patients with TP53wt EC who achieved a PR or CR following chemotherapy. These results are being further evaluated in an ongoing randomized phase 3 trial (NCT05611931).

Milestones in tumor vascularization and its therapeutic targeting

Research into the mechanisms and manifestations of solid tumor vascularization was launched more than 50 years ago with the proposition and experimental demonstrations that angiogenesis is instrumental for tumor growth and was, therefore, a promising therapeutic target. The biological knowledge and therapeutic insights forthcoming have been remarkable, punctuated by new concepts, many of which were not foreseen in the early decades. This article presents a perspective on tumor vascularization and its therapeutic targeting but does not portray a historical timeline. Rather, we highlight eight conceptual milestones, integrating initial discoveries and recent progress and posing open questions for the future.

Old Issues and New Perspectives on Endometrial Cancer Therapy: How Molecular Characteristics Are Changing the Therapeutic Pathway

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) has radically changed the history of endometrial cancer by outlining a new classification, based on its molecular characteristics. In the field of oncology, we are approaching the new era of molecular biology, particularly regarding endometrial cancer, with the increasing importance of targeted therapy. This paper is a review of phase III randomized controlled trials published in English between January 2019 and December 2023, comparing drugs of interest with standard adjuvant treatment and molecular subtypes in endometrial cancer. The use of immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy as therapy in patients with recurrent or advanced primary or metastatic endometrial cancer significantly improves the prognosis of these patients. The results show greater efficacy of all proposed treatments for mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR/MSI-H) patients compared to mismatch repair proficiency (pMMR) patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are better in dMMR patients in all studies analysed. Immunotherapy has the potential to revolutionize the gynaecological cancer treatment landscape, offering a new pathway and new hope for endometrial cancer patients, improving their outcomes in the future. Given the exciting results obtained in dMMR/MSI-H patients, MMR status should be investigated in every patient with advanced endometrial cancer at the time of diagnosis.

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in the patients with advanced previously treated endometrial cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis in the United States and in China

PURPOSE

To investigate the cost-effectiveness of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (LP) compared to chemotherapy as a second-line treatment for advanced endometrial cancer (EC) from the United States and Chinese payers' perspective.

METHODS

In this economic evaluation, a partitioned survival model was constructed from the perspective of the United States and Chinese payers. The survival data were derived from the clinical trial (309-KEYNOTE-775), while costs and utility values were sourced from databases and published literature. Total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were estimated. The robustness of the model was evaluated through sensitivity analyses, and price adjustment scenario analyses was also performed.

RESULTS

Base-case analysis indicated that LP wouldn't be cost-effective in the United States at the WTP threshold of $200 000, with improved effectiveness of 0.75 QALYs and an additional cost of $398596.81 (ICER $531392.20). While LP was cost-effective in China, with improved effectiveness of 0.75 QALYs and an increased overall cost of $62270.44 (ICER $83016.29). Sensitivity analyses revealed that the above results were stable. The scenario analyses results indicated that LP was cost-effective in the United States when the prices of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab were simultaneously reduced by 61.95% ($26.5361/mg for lenvatinib and $19.1532/mg for pembrolizumab).

CONCLUSION

LP isn't cost-effective in the patients with advanced previously treated endometrial cancer in the United States, whereas it is cost-effective in China. The evidence-based pricing strategy provided by this study could benefit decision-makers in making optimal decisions and clinicians in general clinical practice. More evidence about budget impact and affordability for patients is needed.

Discovery of the potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of endometrial cancer via integrating metabolomics and transcriptomics

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in women, and the increasing incidence and mortality pose a serious threat to the public health. Early diagnosis of EC could prolong the survival period and optimize the survivorship, greatly alleviating patients' suffering and social medical pressure. In this study, we collected urine and serum samples from the recruited patients, analyzed the samples using LC-MS approach, and identified the differential metabolites through metabolomic analysis. Then, the differentially expressed genes were identified through the systematic transcriptomic analysis of EC-related dataset from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), followed by network profiling of metabolic-reaction-enzyme-gene. In this experiment, a total of 83 differential metabolites and 19 hub genes were discovered, of which 10 different metabolites and 3 hub genes were further evaluated as more potential biomarkers based on network analysis. According to the KEGG enrichment analysis, the potential biomarkers and gene-encoded proteins were found to be involved in the arginine and proline metabolism, histidine metabolism, and pyrimidine metabolism, which was of significance for the early diagnosis of EC. In particular, the combination of metabolites (histamine, 1-methylhistamine, and methylimidazole acetaldehyde) as well as the combination of RRM2, TYMS and TK1 exerted more accurate discrimination abilities between EC and healthy groups, providing more criteria for the early diagnosis of EC.

Adding immunotherapy to first-line treatment of advanced and metastatic endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy has transformed the endometrial cancer treatment landscape, particularly for those exhibiting mismatch repair deficiency [MMRd/microsatellite instability-hypermutated (MSI-H)]. A growing body of evidence supports the integration of immunotherapy with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment strategy. Recently, findings from ongoing trials such as RUBY (NCT03981796), NRG-GY018 (NCT03914612), AtTEnd (NCT03603184), and DUO-E (NCT04269200) have been disclosed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This paper constitutes a review and meta-analysis of phase III trials investigating the role of immunotherapy in the first-line setting for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

RESULTS

The pooled data from 2320 patients across these trials substantiate the adoption of chemotherapy alongside immunotherapy, revealing a significant improvement in progression-free survival compared to chemotherapy alone [hazard ratio (HR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.79] across all patient groups. Progression-free survival benefits are more pronounced in MMRd/MSI-H tumors (n = 563; HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.43). This benefit, albeit less robust, persists in the MMR-proficient/microsatellite stable group (n = 1757; HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.91). Pooled data further indicate that chemotherapy plus immunotherapy enhances overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone in all patients (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.89). However, overall survival data maturity remains low.

CONCLUSIONS

The incorporation of immunotherapy into the initial treatment for advanced and metastatic endometrial cancer brings about a substantial improvement in oncologic outcomes, especially within the MMRd/MSI-H subset. This specific subgroup is currently a focal point of investigation for evaluating the potential of chemotherapy-free regimens. Ongoing exploratory analyses aim to identify non-responding patients eligible for inclusion in clinical trials.

Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Sunitinib in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Final Prespecified Overall Survival Analysis of CLEAR, a Phase III Study

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.We present the final prespecified overall survival (OS) analysis of the open-label, phase III CLEAR study in treatment-naïve patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). With an additional follow-up of 23 months from the primary analysis, we report results from the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib comparison of CLEAR. Treatment-naïve patients with aRCC were randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib (20 mg orally once daily in 21-day cycles) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks) or sunitinib (50 mg orally once daily [4 weeks on/2 weeks off]). At this data cutoff date (July 31, 2022), the OS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.99). The median OS (95% CI) was 53.7 months (95% CI, 48.7 to not estimable [NE]) with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus 54.3 months (95% CI, 40.9 to NE) with sunitinib; 36-month OS rates (95% CI) were 66.4% (95% CI, 61.1 to 71.2) and 60.2% (95% CI, 54.6 to 65.2), respectively. The median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 23.9 months (95% CI, 20.8 to 27.7) with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and 9.2 months (95% CI, 6.0 to 11.0) with sunitinib (HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.57]). Objective response rate also favored the combination over sunitinib (71.3% v 36.7%; relative risk 1.94 [95% CI, 1.67 to 2.26]). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in >90% of patients who received either treatment. In conclusion, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab achieved consistent, durable benefit with a manageable safety profile in treatment-naïve patients with aRCC.

Novel Molecular Targets in Endometrial Cancer: Mechanisms and Perspectives for Therapy

Endometrial cancer (EC) has a high epidemiological impact with incidence and mortality rising worldwide. In recent years, the integration of the pathologic and molecular classification has provided relevant information to understand the heterogeneity in the biology of EC, which led to the evolution in the management of patients. Currently, therapeutic breakthroughs have been made in advanced EC to improve oncologic outcomes, with efforts to include patient reported outcomes. Precision and personalized medicine are under way in EC exploring different combination approaches to target cross-talk pathways, cancer cell microenvironment, and metabolic vulnerabilities and improve drug delivery. Yet, collaborative efforts are needed to face the challenges in practice by refining patient selection, ideal biomarker identification, and de-escalation of therapies according to emerging molecular and genomic features of EC.

Impact of programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor therapy on the survival of patients with advanced or recurrent uterine cancers: a meta-analysis

Introduction

No prior meta-analysis has investigated the impact of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor therapy on survival outcomes in patients with advanced or recurrent uterine cancers (including both corpus and cervical cancers).

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted, covering the past 10 years (up to August 2023) and encompassing all clinical research related to uterine cancer. Five randomized controlled trials and one cohort study met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and survival outcomes were extracted. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as the relative risk of grade 3 or higher adverse events, were pooled using random-effects models.

Results

Patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors had better OS (HR, 0.65, 95% CI, 0.59-0.72; P<.001) and PFS (HR, 0.59, 95% CI, 0.49-0.70; P<.001) than those receiving variable non-PD-1 inhibitor therapies among 3452 uterine cancer patients. The leave-one-out meta-analysis of the HR of OS showed no individual study impact on the estimation of the overall effect size. Subgroup analysis revealed better OS in the PD-1 inhibitors use than the controls in cervical cancer (HR, 0.68, 95% CI, 0.59-0.79), endometrial cancer (HR, 0.62, 95% CI, 0.54-0.72), and pembrolizumab use (HR, 0.66, 95% CI, 0.57-0.75) subgroups. Patients with advanced cervical cancer, who had CPS > 1, receiving PD-1 inhibitors have statistically significant benefits in OS compared to controls (HR, 0.65, 95% CI, 0.53-0.80). The pooled HR for overall survival was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.60-0.82; P<.001) in patients who received PD-1 inhibitors as compared to those who did not receive PD-1 inhibitors in proficient mismatch repair (MMR) endometrial cancer patients. However, in deficient MMR patients, the HR was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.13-0.70). The relative risk of grade 3 or higher adverse events was not higher in the PD-1 inhibitor group (relative risk, 1.12, 95% CI, 0.98-1.27).

Conclusion

Survival was significantly better using PD-1 inhibitor therapy than variable non-PD-1 inhibitor chemotherapies among patients with advanced or recurrent uterine cancers.

Case report: Isolated axillary lymph node metastasis in high-risk endometrial cancer

Introduction

There are risks of developing distant metastases over time for both early- and advanced-stage endometrial cancer. Axillary lymph node metastasis as the first site of recurrence, whether isolated or non-isolated, is uncommon, and there are currently no established treatment guidelines for such cases. This study highlights four cases of recurrent endometrial cancer that manifested axillary lymph node metastasis, providing a comprehensive review of their distinctive clinical behavior and the treatment strategies employed.

Methods

We reviewed and compared four cases of recurrent endometrial cancer that developed axillary lymph node metastasis following adjuvant treatment. Patients' perspectives were also discussed.

Results

All four patients had aggressive endometrial histology, including high-grade serous carcinoma and carcinosarcoma. The stages at presentation were stages I and III, with laparotomy or laparoscopy used as the initial surgical approach. Axillary lymph node metastasis was the primary site of recurrence in three cases. Of the three patients with isolated axillary lymph node metastasis, two had long-term survival after aggressive locoregional treatment comprising surgery and radiation.

Conclusion

Axillary lymph node metastasis as the first site of recurrence is rare, even in high-risk endometrial cancer. In addition to systemic chemotherapy, aggressive locoregional treatment can potentially maximize the chance of long-term disease control.

Trends in survival of ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients from 2000 to 2015

Purpose

To analyze changes in survival outcomes in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) treated consecutively over a 16-year period using a population-based cohort.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of OCCC from 2000 to 2015 using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. The ovarian cancer-specific survival (OCSS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to the year of diagnosis. Joinpoint Regression Program, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used for statistical analysis.

Results

We included 4257 patients in the analysis. The analysis of annual percentage change in OCSS (P=0.014) and OS (P=0.006) showed that patients diagnosed in later years had significantly better outcomes compared to those diagnosed in early years. The results of the multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that the year of diagnosis was the independent prognostic factor associated with OCSS (P=0.004) and had a borderline effect on OS (P=0.060). Regarding the SEER staging, the OCSS (P=0.017) and OS (P=0.004) of patients with distant stage showed a significant trend toward increased, while no significant trends were found in the survival of patients with localized or regional stage diseases. Similar trends were found in those aged <65 years or those treated with surgery and chemotherapy. However, no statistically significant changes in the survival rate were found in those aged ≥65 years or those receiving surgery alone regardless of SEER stage during the study period.

Conclusions

Our study observed a significant increase in the survival outcomes in OCCC from 2000 to 2015, and patients aged <65 years and those with distant stage experienced a greater improvement in survival.

Analysis of East Asia subgroup in Study 309/KEYNOTE-775: lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician's choice chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

In the global phase 3 Study 309/KEYNOTE-775 (NCT03517449) at the first interim analysis, lenvatinib+pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) versus treatment of physician's choice chemotherapy (TPC) in patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). This exploratory analysis evaluated outcomes in patients enrolled in East Asia at the time of prespecified final analysis.

METHODS

Women ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced, recurrent, or metastatic EC with progressive disease after 1 platinum-based chemotherapy (2 if 1 given in neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting) were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks (≤35 cycles) or TPC (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). Primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS. No alpha was assigned for this subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Among 155 East Asian patients (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab, n=77; TPC, n=78), median follow-up time (data cutoff: March 1, 2022) was 34.3 (range, 25.1-43.0) months. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab vs. TPC) were 0.74 (0.49-1.10) and 0.64 (0.44-0.94) in the mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and all-comer populations, respectively. HRs (95% CI) for OS were 0.68 (0.45-1.02) and 0.61 (0.41-0.90), respectively. ORRs were 36% with lenvatinib+pembrolizumab and 22% with TPC (pMMR) and 39% and 21%, respectively (all-comers). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97% and 96% (grade 3-5, 74% and 72%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Lenvatinib+pembrolizumab provided clinically meaningful benefit with manageable safety compared with TPC, supporting its use in East Asian patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent EC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03517449.

Insights into lenvatinib resistance: mechanisms, potential biomarkers, and strategies to enhance sensitivity

Lenvatinib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor capable of promoting apoptosis, suppressing angiogenesis, inhibiting tumor cell proliferation, and modulating the immune response. In multiple cancer types, lenvatinib has presented manageable safety and is currently approved as an effective first-line therapy. However, with the gradual increase in lenvatinib application, the inevitable progression of resistance to lenvatinib is becoming more prevalent. A series of recent researches have reported the mechanisms underlying the development of lenvatinib resistance in tumor therapy, which are related to the regulation of cell death or proliferation, histological transformation, metabolism, transport processes, and epigenetics. In this review, we aim to outline recent discoveries achieved in terms of the mechanisms and potential predictive biomarkers of lenvatinib resistance as well as to summarize untapped approaches available for improving the therapeutic efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with various types of cancers.

Latest advances in immuno-oncology for endometrial cancer: single-agent and combination regimens

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The scope of immuno-oncology in endometrial cancer has changed rapidly in the last several years, requiring up-to-date knowledge for those who treat these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article will focus on molecular profiling, recent trials, and FDA approvals of targeted immuno-oncology medications in endometrial cancer. These include immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or with combination treatment.

SUMMARY

The publication of the TCGA has led to significant focus on molecular subgroupings into POLEm, MMRd, NSMP, and p53m groups. For those patients with MMRd vs. MMRp tumors, there are indications for single agent immune checkpoint inhibitors with dostarlimab or pembrolizumab. For those with MMRp tumors, the addition of lenvatinib to pembrolizumab has proven clinical benefit. The recent publication of the RUBY and NRG-GY018 trials have shown clinical benefit in both subgroups with addition of immune checkpoint inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy. Now there is approval for use of dostarlimab in frontline chemotherapy and maintenance for advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer. Several upcoming trials investigating molecular subgroups from the TCGA are eagerly anticipated.

Integrative Oncology Approaches to Supporting Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment of Solid Tumours

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review was to examine the role and practical applications of integrative oncology strategies in supporting immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment of adult solid tumours.

RECENT FINDINGS

Beyond tumour-intrinsic factors, several patient-associated factors affect ICI response, including germline genetics, systemic inflammation, the gut microbiota, and diet. Current promising supportive interventions include a Mediterranean-style diet with over 20 g of fibre, regular exercise, use of live biotherapeutics, minimisation of PPI and antibiotic use, and ensuring vitamin D repletion, with many other integrative oncology approaches under study. Caution around medical cannabis use in patients on ICIs is advised due to previously documented adverse impact on overall survival, while VAE (Viscum album extract) therapy studies have not highlighted any safety concerns so far. With expanding ICI use, it is important to investigate and apply low-cost integrative oncology strategies to support better treatment outcomes and minimise adverse events. Further research may lead to pre-treatment assessment of both tumour and patient-associated biomarkers and personalised multimodal prehabilitation care plans, as well as on-treatment support with targeted nutrition, physical activity, and supplementation regimes, including both systemic inflammation and gut microbiome modulating strategies. Given the emerging understanding of chronic stress impact on ICI treatment outcomes, mind-body approaches require further investigation.

Cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib compared with chemotherapy for treating previously treated advanced endometrial cancer in Sweden

OBJECTIVE

Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib was recently approved for the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with disease progression on or following prior treatment with a platinum‑containing therapy in any setting, and who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiation (KEYNOTE-775/Study-309; NCT03517449). The objective was to assess the cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib compared with chemotherapy from a Swedish healthcare perspective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A lifetime partitioned-survival model with three health states (progression free, progressed disease, death) was constructed. Chemotherapy was represented by paclitaxel or doxorubicin. Overall survival, progression-free survival, time on treatment, and utility data were obtained from KEYNOTE-775 (database lock: March 1, 2022). Costs (in 2020 Swedish Krona [SEK]) included drug acquisition and administration, health state, end of life, adverse event management, subsequent treatment, and societal (scenario analysis). Outcomes were calculated as quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and life-years. Model results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for all-comers, patients with proficient mismatch repair tumors, and deficient mismatch repair tumors. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib is a cost-effective treatment when compared with chemotherapy, with estimated deterministic and probabilistic incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of SEK 795,712 and 819,757 per QALY gained. Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib was associated with a large incremental QALY and life-year gain per person versus chemotherapy over the model time horizon (1.49 and 1.76).

LIMITATIONS

Time-to-event data were incomplete and semiparametric and parametric curves were utilized for lifetime extrapolation. Willingness-to-pay thresholds, costs, and utility weights vary by country, which would vary the treatment's cost effectiveness in different countries.

CONCLUSIONS

This partitioned survival analysis suggests that pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib is cost effective compared with chemotherapy in Sweden for women with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma following previous systemic therapy. Results were robust to mismatch repair status and to changes in parameters/assumptions.