Divergence between growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-i concentrations in the follow-up of acromegaly

Surveillance Imaging Strategies for Pituitary Adenomas: When, How Frequent, and When to Stop

OBJECTIVE

To describe a practical approach of when and how often to perform imaging, and when to stop imaging pituitary adenomas (PAs).

METHODS

A literature review was carried out and recommendations provided are derived largely from personal experience.

RESULTS

Magnetic resonance imaging is the mainstay imaging modality of choice in the assessment, treatment planning, and follow-up of PAs. These adenomas are discovered incidentally during imaging for a variety of unrelated conditions, because of clinical symptoms related to mass effects on the adjacent structures, or during workup for functional alterations of the adenoma. Imaging is also used in the preoperative and postoperative phases of assessment of PAs, for surgical and radiotherapy planning, for postoperative surveillance to assess for adenoma stability and detection of adenoma recurrence, and for surveillance to monitor for adenoma growth in unoperated PAs. Currently, because there are no evidence-based consensus recommendations, the optimal strategy for surveillance imaging of PAs is not clearly established. Younger age, initial adenoma size, extrasellar extension, mass effect, cavernous sinus invasion, functional status, histopathologic characteristics, cost considerations, imaging accessibility, patient preference, and patient contraindications (eg, implanted metallic devices and patient claustrophobia) are all important factors that influence the strategy for surveillance imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides a practical approach of performing surveillance imaging strategies for PAs that should be individualized based on clinical presentation, history, adenoma morphology on imaging, and histopathologic characteristics.

Interpreting growth hormone and IGF-I results using modern assays and reference ranges for the monitoring of treatment effectiveness in acromegaly

Standard treatment for acromegaly focuses on the achievement of target absolute levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I). The appropriateness of these targets when measured using modern assay methods is not well defined. This paper reviews biochemical status assessed using methods available at the time and associated clinical outcomes. GH measurements were shown to provide an indication of changes in tumor size, and failure of GH suppression after glucose stimulation is associated with tumor recurrence. IGF-I levels were more closely associated with changes in symptoms and signs. Reduced GH and IGF-I concentrations were shown to be associated with increased longevity, although the degree of increase has only been analyzed for GH. Lowering of GH and IGF-I has consistently been associated with improved outcomes; however, absolute levels reported in previous studies were based on results from methods and reference ranges that are now obsolete. Applying previously described absolute thresholds as targets (e.g. "normal" IGF-I level) when using current methods is best applied to those with active acromegaly symptoms who could benefit from further lowering of biochemical markers. In asymptomatic individuals with mild IGF-I or GH elevations, targeting biochemical "normalization" would result in the need for combination pharmacotherapy in many patients without proven benefit. Measurement of both GH and IGF-I remains an essential component of diagnosis and monitoring the effectiveness of treatment in acromegaly; however, treatment goals based only on previously identified absolute thresholds are not appropriate without taking into account the assay and reference ranges being employed. Treatment goals should be individualized considering biochemical improvement from an untreated baseline, symptoms of disease, risks, burdens and costs of complex treatment regimens, comorbidities, and quality of life.

Discordant biochemical parameters of acromegaly remission do not influence the prevalence or aggressiveness of metabolic comorbidities: a single-center study

Purpose

The discrepancy between the biomarkers of disease's activity in acromegalic patients (GH and IGF-1) is almost frequent representing a challenge for the development of comorbidities in the long term. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and severity of metabolic comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) in surgically treated acromegalic patients with disease control and discordant GH and/or IGF-1 levels compared with those with concordant values.

Patients and methods

Retrospective monocentric observational study on acromegalic surgically treated patients with biochemical remission (group A) or mild discordant GH or IGF-1 levels (group B). Metabolic complications and medical therapy were assessed at diagnosis and at the last follow-up visit. Severity of the disease was set for drug titration or shift to another molecule or more than before.

Results

There were 18 patients that met the inclusion criteria [group A: nine patients; group B: nine patients, follow-up 7 years (IQR 5.0;11.25)]. The prevalence of female patients was significantly higher in the remission group compared with the discordant group (p < 0.02). Considering metabolic complications, at the last follow-up, 61.1% was affected by hypertension, 33.3% by diabetes, and 61.1% by dyslipidemia, without differences between groups. Drug characteristics (dose, shift, number) during the follow-up did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusion

Metabolic complications, mainly dyslipidemia, are frequent in cured acromegalic patients, but GH/IGF-1 discrepancy does not seem to represent a risk factor for their presence or persistence. More extended studies are needed to confirm our results in a long-term period.

Sex difference in patients with controlled acromegaly-A multicentre survey

OBJECTIVE

Active acromegaly is subject to sex differences in growth hormone (GH) and Insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) patterns as well as clinical features but whether this also pertains to controlled disease is unclear.

DESIGN

In a cross-sectional, multi-centre study, 84 patients with acromegaly (F = 43, M = 41), who were considered controlled after surgery alone (n = 23) or during continued somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) treatment (n = 61), were examined.

METHODS

Serum concentrations of GH, insulin, glucose and free fatty acid (FFA) were measured during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) together with baseline serum IGF-I and completion of two HR-Qol questionnaires (acromegaly quality of life questionnaire [AcroQol] and Patient-assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire [PASQ]).

RESULTS

The mean age at the time of the study was 57 (±1.1) years and the majority of females (were postmenopausal. Females had significantly higher fasting GH but comparable IGF-I standard deviation scores (SDS). Using fasting GH < 1.0 µg/L as cut off, disease control was less prevalent in females (F: 56% vs. M: 83%, p = .007) whereas a comparable figure was observed using IGF-I SDS < 2 (F:79% vs. M:76%, p = .71). Compared with males, female patients showed impaired AcroQol physical score (p = .05), higher fasting FFA (p = .03) and insulin concentrations during the OGTT (p = .04).

CONCLUSION

In patients with acromegaly considered controlled, postmenopausal females exhibited higher GH levels than males despite comparable IGF-I levels, which also translated into impaired metabolic health and well-being. Our findings point to the relevance of including GH measurements in the assessment of disease control and suggest that disease-specific sex differences prevail after treatment.

Mean GH profile is more accurate than single fasting GH in the evaluation of acromegaly disease control during somatostatin receptor ligands therapy

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare the accuracy of mean GH profile (GHP) < 2.5 ng/ml and single fasting GH (SGH) < 1 ng/ml in the evaluation of disease control in acromegaly patients during somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 100 acromegaly patients, 68 responder, and 32 partial responder to SRLs. Controlled disease has been defined as IGF-I levels within age-related normal limits, while partial response as pathological IGF-I values despite a reduction ≥ 50%. In all patients, GHP, SGH, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 were evaluated.

RESULTS

Median GHP levels (1.2 ng/ml, IQR 0.5-2.3 ng/ml) were lower (p = 0.001) than SGH (1.9 ng/ml, IQR 1.0-3.6 ng/ml). Accuracy of GHP was 81%, whereas that of SGH was 55%, with a Kappa index of 0.520 and 0.237, respectively. In multivariable analysis GHP (p = 0.002) and IGFBP-3 (p = 0.004), but not SGH, were independently associated with normal IGF-I levels. At receiver-operator characteristic curve (ROC) analysis GHP cut-off sensitivity and specificity were 94.1% and 50.0%, respectively, while SGH sensitivity and specificity were 35.3% and 93.7%, respectively. Finally, in obese patients the GH cut-off level (both as SGH and GHP) associated to good disease control was significantly different with respect to not obese ones.

CONCLUSIONS

GHP associates with IGF-I (and therefore with appropriate control of disease) with higher accuracy than SGH. When GH evaluation is needed, the measurement of mean GHP should be preferred and use of BMI-related cut-offs is suggested.

Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 in the Early Postoperative Assessment of Acromegaly

OBJECTIVES

Assessment of surgical outcome in acromegaly is typically recommended at 3 to 6 months following surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine if insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) concentrations at 6 weeks were equally predictive of surgical outcomes compared with IGF-1 concentrations at 3 to 6 months postoperatively applying newer IGF-1 assays.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with newly diagnosed acromegaly who had surgery between 2013 and 2020 and had postoperative IGF-1 measured by 6 weeks and 3 to 6 months.

RESULTS

At 6 weeks, 20 (35%) of the total 57 had normal IGF-1 and became abnormal in 1 at 3 to 6 months, whereas 37 (65%) of 57 had abnormal IGF-1 concentrations at 6 weeks, which normalized in 1 patient by 3 to 6 months. In patients who changed clinical status, IGF-1 at 6 weeks was within ±0.1-fold of normal. Although a difference was seen between median IGF-1 concentrations (286 vs 267 ng/mL, P = .009) at 6 weeks and 3 to 6 months, the mean reduction was small (-19.9 ng/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with 3 to 6 months, use of IGF-1 at 6 weeks was associated with a change in clinical status in 3.5% of patients. Therefore, in most patients, IGF-1 at 6 weeks can be used to assess clinical outcome via newer assays.

Post-treatment heterogeneity of cardiometabolic risk in patients with acromegaly: The impact of GH and IGF-1

BACKGROUND

Metabolic abnormalities are frequently seen in patients with acromegaly. However, it is not clear to what extent growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 (GH/IGF-1) contributes to the development of these abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the impact of postoperative GH/IGF-1 on different aspects of metabolic abnormalities in patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

This retrospective, registry-based study conducted on 102 patients with acromegaly. The impact of GH/IGF-1 on the cardiometabolic risk factors at 3-12 months after surgery has been investigated using linear and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

In this study, each 1 ng/ml increase in the level of GH was significantly associated with a 2 mg/dl increase in the level of fasting blood glucose (FBG), a 0.5 mmHg increase in the level of systolic blood pressure (SBP), and a 0.9 mmHg increase in the level of diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Upon multivariate analysis, GH, but not IGF-1, significantly increased the odds of diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR; 1.2, 95% CI; 1.0-1.4, p = .025).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicated at early postoperative stage, GH is significantly associated with the levels of FBG, SBP, and DBP. Moreover, GH, but not IGF-1, appears as a predictive factor for the presence of DM. However, neither GH nor IGF-1 could predict the presence of hypertension HTN, or dyslipidemia in this study.

ABBREVIATIONS

CVD: Cardiovascular disease; GH: Growth hormone; IGF-1: Insulin-like growth factor 1; BMI: Body mass index; HTN: hypertension; IPTR: Iran Pituitary Tumor Registry; WC: Waist circumference; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; FBG: Fasting blood glucose; HbA1C: Glycated hemoglobin; TG: Triglyceride; LDL: Low density lipoprotein; HDL: High density lipoprotein; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure.

[Discordant parameters of insulin-like growth factor 1 and growth hormone in the diagnosis and monitoring of acromegaly]

Acromegaly is a rare endocrine disorder associated with multiple complications and increased mortality. Timely diagnosis and adequate treatment can bring the life expectancy of patients with acromegaly closer to the general population level. The tests for the diagnosis of acromegaly are measurement of both serum GH, and GH after oral glucose administration; serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). However, in clinical practice, up to 39% of patients with discordant results are found. The patients with discordant GH and IGF-1levels, are the most difficult to manage. This review discusses the prevalence of discordant GH and IGF-1 outcomes in patients with acromegaly; factors causing this discrepancy; the impact of hormone levels on treatment outcomes. Although endocrinologists are used to dealing with this discrepancy in clinical practice for many years, discordant patients'outcome remains uncertain and undefined The optimal treatment should be individually tailored for each patient, taking into account all clinical parameters.

Course and outcomes of pregnancy in women treated for acromegaly: Discerning a contemporary cohort

OBJECTIVE

To analyze pregnancy course and outcomes in women treated for acromegaly and compare outcomes based on disease activity at the time of conception.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENTS

Women with acromegaly diagnosed prior to or during pregnancy from 2010 to 2019, representing cases (14 pregnancies in 12 cases), were later stratified based on active (n = 5) or controlled disease (n = 9) at time of conception. Female acromegalic patients over the same period constituted the 'acromegaly cohort' (AC) (n = 75).

RESULTS

All cases had macroadenomas with nadir GH of 15.06 ng/ml (IQR 9-30), IGF-I index of 3.04 (1.96-3.82), for which they had undergone pituitary surgery; except two patients diagnosed during pregnancy, who received pharmacotherapy followed by surgery 4 months postpartum. Adjuvant pharmacotherapy was required in 71.4% patients and radiotherapy in 35.7%. Pregnancy occurred at a median of 2 (0.8-5.1) years after surgery and 21.4% required assisted reproduction. All had term delivery with normal APGAR except one case with gestational hypertension, who delivered a preterm baby. None had congenital malformations. Despite higher baseline IGF-I, GH and tumor volume in those with pre-conceptional active acromegaly, materno-fetal outcomes were not different from those with controlled disease (p > 0.05). Similar or greater proportion of cases had normal GH and no residual tumor postpartum, even in those with pre-conceptional active acromegaly.

CONCLUSION

The current study showed conducive outcomes of gestation in women treated for acromegaly and no higher rates of pregnancy parameters or complications than non-acromegaly pregnancies in the same population. Active acromegaly does not seem to have an adverse bearing on outcomes.

GH and IGF-I levels and tumor shrinkage in response to first generation somatostatin receptor ligands in acromegaly: a comparative study between two reference centers for pituitary diseases in Brazil

PURPOSE

To compare biochemical and tumor response rates between two reference centers for pituitary diseases in Brazil after primary and adjuvant therapy with somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) in acromegaly.

METHODS

Patients were classified as non-responders (NR), partial responders (PR), and full responders (FR) to 12-month SRL therapy according to: [criteria A] normal IGF-I and random GH (rGH) < 1 ng/mL (FR); ≥ 50% decrease of IGF-I and/or rGH (PR); < 50% decrease of IGF-I and rGH (NR); [criteria B] normal IGF-I (FR); ≥ 50% decrease of IGF-I (PR); < 50% decrease of IGF-I (NR). Tumor shrinkage <20% defined poor responders (tPR) and ≥ 20% good responders (tGR).

RESULTS

We studied 219 acromegaly patients (59% women, age 43.1 ± 13.9 years; 73 from Center I and 146 from Center II). After SRL therapy, the proportion of FR, PR, and NR by criteria A and B was 30.2 vs 49.1%, 52.8 vs 21.2% and 17 vs 29.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). Considering criteria A or B separately, there was no difference in the proportion of FR, PR and NR between two centers. However, when comparing criteria A and B, the Center I showed a difference of 30.9% in classification of FR in relation to 13.2% observed in Center II (p = 0.006). tGR were 51.4% of patients, with no differences between the centers.

CONCLUSIONS

IGF-I alone significantly increased positive response rates to SRLs, whereas the inclusion of rGH levels into therapeutic decision might lead to a significant increment on the costs of acromegaly management.

Treatment of acromegaly by rosiglitazone via upregulating 15-PGDH in both pituitary adenoma and liver

Rosiglitazone, a synthetic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) ligand, has been reported to reduce growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in 10 patients with acromegaly. However, the mechanisms remain unknown. Here, we reveal that PPARγ directly enhances 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) expression, whose expression is decreased and negatively correlates with tumor size in acromegaly. Rosiglitazone decreases GH production and promotes apoptosis and autophagy in GH3 and primary somatotroph adenoma cells and suppresses hepatic GH receptor (GHR) expression and IGF-1 secretion in HepG2 cells. Activating the PGE2/cAMP/PKA pathway directly increases GHR expression. Rosiglitazone suppresses tumor growth and decreases GH and IGF-1 levels in mice inoculated subcutaneously with GH3 cells. The above effects are all dependent on 15-PGDH expression. Rosiglitazone as monotherapy effectively decreases GH and IGF-1 levels in all nineteen patients with active acromegaly. Evidence suggests that rosiglitazone may be an alternative pharmacological approach for acromegaly by targeting both pituitary adenomas and liver.

Early postoperative prediction of both disease remission and long-term disease control in acromegaly using the oral glucose tolerance test

PURPOSE

Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) is the cornerstone of acromegaly treatment. Two biochemical parameters, growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, sometimes diverge postoperatively; however, it is important to maintain disease control without further treatment, regardless of whether these parameters converge. This study investigated whether remission and long-term disease control could be predicted using early postoperative GH and IGF-1 levels.

METHODS

We reviewed 36 consecutive surgically treated patients with acromegaly. IGF-1 levels and minimum GH levels during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were evaluated at 2 weeks, as well as at 3 months postoperatively. After comparison between the remission and nonremission groups, we analyzed whether early postoperative parameters could predict remission and long-term disease control.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (69.4%, Group A) achieved remission within 1 year postoperatively. Of the remaining patients (median follow-up period, 53 months), seven (19.5%, Group B) maintained normal IGF-1 levels without treatment, whereas four (11.1%, Group C) required additional treatment. GH levels <1.5 ng/mL measured on the morning after surgery and nadir GH levels <0.7 ng/mL during the OGTT conducted at 2 weeks postoperatively were predictive of remission, with the latter demonstrating 95.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity. All group C patients had nadir GH levels ≥0.7 ng/mL during the OGTT and IGF-1 levels ≥SD +3 at 2 weeks postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Early postoperative nadir GH levels during the OGTT and IGF-1 levels at 2 weeks postoperatively demonstrated excellent predictive value for both endocrinological remission and the necessity for additional treatment.

Soluble Alpha Klotho in Acromegaly: Comparison With Traditional Markers of Disease Activity

CONTEXT

Soluble alpha klotho (sαKL) has been linked to growth hormone (GH) action, but systematic evaluation and comparisons with traditional biomarkers in acromegaly are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential of sαKL to aid classification of disease activity.

METHODS

This retrospective study at 2 academic centers included acromegaly patients before surgery (A, n = 29); after surgery (controlled, discordant, or uncontrolled) without (B1, B2, B3, n = 28, 11, 8); or with somatostatin analogue treatment (C1, C2, C3, n = 17, 11, 5); nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (n = 20); and healthy controls (n = 31). sαKL was measured by immunoassay and compared with traditional biomarkers (random and nadir GH, insulin-like growth factor I [IGF-I], IGF binding protein 3). Associations with disease activity were assessed.

RESULTS

sαKL was correlated to traditional biomarkers, particularly IGF-I (rs=0.80, P <0.0001). High concentrations before treatment (A, median, interquartile range: 4.04 × upper limit of normal [2.26-8.08]) dropped to normal after treatment in controlled and in most discordant patients. A cutoff of 1548 pg/mL for sαKL discriminated controlled (B1, C1) and uncontrolled (B3, C3) patients with 97.8% (88.4%-99.9%) sensitivity and 100% (77.1%-100%) specificity. sαKL was below the cutoff in 84% of the discordant subjects. In the remaining 16%, elevated sαKL and IGF-I persisted, despite normal random GH. Sex, age, body mass index, and markers of bone and calcium metabolism did not significantly affect sαKL concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Our data support sαKL as a biomarker to assess disease activity in acromegaly. sαKL exhibits close association with GH secretory status, large dynamic range, and robustness toward biological confounders. Its measurement could be helpful particularly when GH and IGF-I provide discrepant information.

Prognostic value of nadir GH levels for long-term biochemical remission or recurrence in surgically treated acromegaly

CONTEXT

Outcome of acromegaly surgery is assessed by IGF-1 and glucose-suppressed GH, but whether the latter provides additional clinically relevant information when IGF-1 is normal is unclear. The role of GH suppression testing after surgery requires clarification.

METHODS

We studied 97 acromegaly patients with normal IGF-1 after surgery by measuring GH after oral glucose longitudinally, initially at ≥ 3 months after surgery and repeated one or more times ≥ 1 year later. Nadir GH was categorized as normal or abnormal relative to the 97.5th percentile of nadir GH in 100 healthy subjects, which were ≤ 0.14 µg/L (DSL IRMA) or ≤ 0.15 µg/L(IDS iSYS). Signs and symptoms scores and insulin resistance were followed longitudinally.

RESULTS

Of 68 patients with initial normal GH suppression 63 (93%) remained in remission and of 29 with initial abnormal GH suppression, 9 (31%) recurred. Recurrence was more common in patients with abnormal suppression (P < 0.001). A total of 14 patients recurred, including 5 with normal GH suppression progressing to abnormal and then recurrence. Overall, serial signs and symptoms and insulin resistance assessments did not identify patients with abnormal suppression or recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Risk of recurrence after surgery is increased for patients with a normal IGF-1 level, but abnormal GH suppression. We newly find, using both our and others' cut-offs, that while normal suppression predicts long-term remission in most patients, some can progress from normal to abnormal suppression and then recurrence after many years of follow up. Nadir GH levels are of prognostic value in acromegaly patients with normal IGF-1 levels after surgery.

Discordant GH and IGF-1 Results in Treated Acromegaly: Impact of GH Cutoffs and Mean Values Assessment

CONTEXT

Discordant growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) values are frequent in acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of different GH cutoffs on discordance rate. To investigate whether the mean of consecutive GH measurements impacts discordance rate when matched to the last available IGF-1 value.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Referral center for pituitary diseases.

PATIENTS

Ninety acromegaly patients with at least 3 consecutive evaluations for GH and IGF-1 using the same assay in the same laboratory (median follow-up 13 years).

INTERVENTIONS

Multimodal treatment of acromegaly.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Single fasting GH (GHf) and IGF-1 (IGF-1f). Mean of 3 GH measurements (GHm), collected during consecutive routine patients' evaluations.

RESULTS

At last evaluation GHf values were 1.99 ± 2.79 µg/L and age-adjusted IGF-1f was 0.86 ± 0.44 × upper limit of normality (mean ± SD). The discordance rate using GHf was 52.2% (cutoff 1 µg/L) and 35.6% (cutoff 2.5 µg/L) (P = 0.025). "High GH" discordance was more common for GHf <1.0 µg/L, while "high IGF-1" was predominant for GHf <2.5 µg/L (P < 0.0001). Using GHm mitigated the impact of GH cutoffs on discordance (GHm <1.0 µg/L: 43.3%; GHm <2.5 µg/L: 38.9%; P = 0.265). At receiver-operator characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, both GHf and GHm were poor predictors of IGF-1f normalization (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.611 and AUC = 0.645, respectively). The prevalence of disease-related comorbidities did not significantly differ between controlled, discordant, and active disease patients.

DISCUSSION

GH/IGF-1 discordance strongly depends on GH cutoffs. The use of GHm lessen the impact of GH cutoffs. Measurement of fasting GH levels (both GHf and GHm) is a poor predictor of IGF-1f normalization in our cohort.

Discordant biological parameters of remission in acromegaly do not increase the risk of hypertension or diabetes: a study with the Liege Acromegaly Survey database

PURPOSE

Acromegaly is a rare disease due to growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma. GH and IGF-1 levels are usually congruent, indicating either remission or active disease; however, a discrepancy between GH and IGF-1 may occur. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HT) in acromegalic patients with congruent GH and/or IGF-1 levels vs. discordant biochemical parameters.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the data of 3173 patients from the Liege Acromegaly Survey (LAS) allowed us to include 190 patients from 8 tertiary referral centers across Europe, treated by surgery, with available data concerning DM and HT both at diagnosis and at the last follow-up (LFU). We recorded the number of anti-HT and anti-DM drugs used at the first evaluation and at LFU for every patient.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients belonged to the REM group (concordant parameters), 65 patients were considered as GH_dis (high random GH/controlled IGF-1), and 26 patients were considered as IGF-1_dis (high IGF-1/controlled random GH). At diagnosis, 72 patients (37.8%) had HT and 54 patients had DM (28.4%). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of the number of anti-HT and anti-DM drugs at diagnosis versus LFU (mean duration: 7.3 ± 4.5 years) between all three groups.

CONCLUSION

The long-term outcome of DM and HT in acromegaly does not tend to be more severe in patients with biochemical discordance in comparison with patients considered as in remission on the basis of concordant biological parameters, suggesting that patients with biochemical discordance do not require a closer follow-up.

Prognostic factors of biochemical remission after transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: a structured review

PURPOSE

Biochemical control is the main determinant of survival, clinical manifestations and comorbidities in acromegaly. Transsphenoidal selective adenomectomy (TSA) is the initial treatment of choice with reported biochemical remission rates varying between 32 and 85%. Understanding the limiting factors is essential for identification of patients who require medical treatment.

METHODS

We reviewed the English literature published in Medline/Pubmed until Dec 31, 2019 to identify eligible studies that described outcomes of TSA as primary therapy and performed analyses to determine the main predictors of remission.

RESULTS

Most publications reported single-institution, retrospective studies. The following preoperative parameters were consistently associated with lower remission rates: cavernous sinus invasion by imaging, larger tumor size and higher GH levels. Young age and preoperative IGF-1 levels were predictive in some studies. When controlled for covariates, the best single preoperative predictor was cavernous sinus invasion, followed by preoperative GH levels. Conversely, low GH level in the first few days postoperatively was a robust predictor of durable remission. The influence of tumor histology (sparsely granular pattern, co-expression of prolactin and proliferation markers) on surgical remission remains to be established. Few studies developed predictive models that yielded much higher predictive values than individual parameters.

CONCLUSION

Surgical outcome prognostication systems could be further generated by machine learning algorithms in order to support development and implementation of personalized care in patients with acromegaly.

ACROMEGALY AND A GIANT RETROPERITONEAL LIPOSARCOMA PRODUCING IGF-1

Objective

Liposarcoma is the most common histotype of retroperitoneal sarcomas, representing up to 45% of all cases. We report a rare combination of acromegaly and liposarcoma in the same individual.

Methods

Laboratory and imaging studies including an oral glucose tolerance test, measurements of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), and a computed tomography scan were performed.

Results

The patient was a 60-year-old male with a history of acromegaly diagnosed on the basis of elevated IGF-1 at 1,373 ng/mL (age-appropriate reference range is 87 to 225 ng/mL) and macroadenoma treated with transsphenoidal surgery. He presented 8 years later with a history of abdominal distension and weight loss. Physical examination was notable for a right-sided abdominal mass that was tense and non-fluctuant. Two years earlier, he had a post oral glucose tolerance test GH level <0.25 ng/mL and IGF-1 level of 256 ng/mL (age-appropriate reference range is 55 to 206 ng/mL). Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging reported a 3.7 × 2.0-mm left-sided parasagittal lesion. Computed tomography scan showed a 25.0 × 22.0 × 32.3-cm heterogeneous giant mass in the right abdomen corresponding to a liposarcoma causing displacement of kidney, liver, and bowel loops. The patient was treated with a complete en bloc resection of the liposarcoma with the right kidney (45 × 33 × 17 cm) and tumor (9,400 g). Immunohistochemical examination revealed positive IGF-1 and GH staining. The patient suffered postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding that resulted in hemorrhagic shock and died on the 29th postoperative day after a cardiorespiratory arrest.

Conclusion

Acromegalic patients are at increased risk of developing various types of neoplasms. This is the first documented coexistence of liposarcoma and history of acromegaly.

Serum phosphate: Does it more closely reflect the true state of acromegaly?

An increased serum phosphate (P) level is common in acromegaly patients, however, the relationships among P, growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and disease status remain unknown. To reveal these relationships, we examined the association of P with comprehensive clinical data. We measured the serum P, calcium, GH, oral glucose tolerance test-GH (OGTT-GH), IGF-1, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGBP-3) levels in 103 acromegaly patients. SAGIT® was used to assess the disease status comprehensively. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was obtained to evaluate the associations among the above parameters. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate factors independently associated factors with the SAGIT scores. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC) was used to evaluate the efficacy of the percentage change in the serum phosphate level in predicting remission in patients with postoperatively discordant GH and IGF-1 levels. Hyperphosphatemia was found in 68.9% of patients at baseline. The serum P level was higher in the non-remission group, but no correlation was found between hyperphosphatemia and remission. We revealed a significant correlation between the P level and SAGIT® score in patients both preoperatively (r = 0.659, p = 0.000) and 1-year postoperatively without remission patients (r = 0.534, p = 0.027). All biochemical levels decreased significantly postoperatively, and the GH and OGTT-GH levels achieved early stability (1 month); however, the P, IGF-1 and IGBP-3 levels showed a gradual decline. A percentage change in P of -8.12% is recommended as a cut-off value for predicting remission in patients with postoperatively discordant GH and IGF-1 levels. As a metabolic product which affected by the GH/IGF-1 axis, serum P appears to more closely reflect the comprehensive disease status in acromegaly. When the GH and IGF-1 levels are discordant during follow-up, perioperative change in the P level may be a potential predictor of remission.

Staging and managing patients with acromegaly in clinical practice: baseline data from the SAGIT® validation study

PURPOSE

The SAGIT® instrument, designed to assist clinicians to stage acromegaly, assess treatment response and adapt patient management, was well received by endocrinologists in a pilot study. We report an interim analysis of baseline data from the validation phase.

METHODS

The SAGIT® validation study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02539927) is an international, non-interventional study. Data collection included: demographic/disease characteristics; medical/surgical histories; concomitant acromegaly treatments; investigators' subjective evaluation of disease-control status (clinical global evaluation of disease control [CGE-DC]; controlled/not controlled/yet to be clarified) and clinical disease activity (active/not active); growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels; investigators' therapeutic decision.

RESULTS

Of 228 patients enrolled, investigators considered disease to be controlled in 110 (48.2%), not controlled in 105 (46.1%), and yet to be clarified in 13 (5.7%) according to CGE-DC. Thirty-three patients were treatment-naïve (not controlled, n = 31; yet to be clarified, n = 2). Investigators considered 48.2% patients in the controlled and 95.2% in the not-controlled groups to have clinically active disease. In the controlled group, 29.7% of patients did not exhibit hormonal control (GH ≤ 2.5 µg/L; normalized IGF-1) and 47.3% did not have rigorous hormonal control (GH < 1.0 µg/L; normalized IGF-1) by contemporary consensus. Current acromegaly treatment was continued with no change for 91.8% of patients in the controlled and 40.0% in the not-controlled groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data highlight discrepancies between investigator-evaluated disease-control status, disease activity, hormonal control, and treatment decisions in acromegaly. Once validated, the SAGIT® instrument may assist clinicians in making active management decisions for patients with acromegaly.

[Not Available]

Acromegaly is characterized by increased release of growth hormone (GH) and, consequently, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I), most often by a pituitary adenoma. Prolonged exposure to excess hormone leads to progressive somatic disfigurement and a wide range of systemic manifestations that are associated with increased mortality. Transsphenoidal adenomectomy is the treatment of choice of GH-secreting pituitary tumors but surgical cure is not achieved in around 50% of patients, then adjuvant treatment is necessary. Mortality in acromegaly is normalized with biochemical control and has decreased in the last decade with the increased use of adjuvant therapy. Both GH and IGF-I are currently biomarkers for assessing disease activity in patients with acromegaly. However, discordance between GH and IGF-I results is encountered in a quarter of treated patients. The impacts of such a discrepancy over mortality and morbidity and the risk of biochemical and/or clinical recurrence are unclear. Moreover, despite a good biochemical control, some symptoms persist, leading to a decreased quality of life. Back pain due to vertebral fractures seem to be frequent in these patients and underdiagnosed. In patients with acromegaly, bone mineral density is not a reliable predictor of fracture risk. A more accurate evaluation of bone microstructural alterations associated with GH hypersecretion and vertebral fractures may be provided by new radiological devices analyzing alteration of trabecular microarchitecture, leading to a better prevention. © 2019 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Cet article fait partie du numéro supplément Les Must de l'Endocrinologie 2019 réalisé avec le soutien institutionnel de Ipsen-Pharma.

Current perspectives on the impact of clinical disease and biochemical control on comorbidities and quality of life in acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare chronic, systemic disorder caused by excessive growth hormone (GH) secretion from a somatotroph pituitary adenoma. GH hypersecretion leads to overproduction of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), which contributes to the somatic overgrowth, physical disfigurement, onset of multiple systemic comorbidities, reduced quality of life (QoL) and premature mortality of uncontrolled patients. Somatostatin receptor ligands, dopamine agonists and a GH receptor antagonist are currently available for medical therapy of acromegaly. The main aim of treatment is biochemical normalisation, defined as age-normalised serum IGF-1 values and random GH levels <1.0 μg/L. However, there is an increasing evidence suggesting that achieving biochemical control does not always decrease the burden of disease-related comorbidities and/or improve patients' QoL. This lack of correlation between biochemical and clinical control can be due to both disease duration (late diagnosis) or to the peculiarity of a given comorbidity. Herein we conducted ad hoc literature searches in order to find the most recent and relevant reports on biochemical and clinical disease control during medical treatment of acromegaly. Particularly, we analyse and describe the relationship between biochemical, as well as clinical disease control in patients with acromegaly receiving medical therapy, with a focus on comorbidities and QoL. In conclusion, we found that current literature data seem to indicate that clinical disease control (besides biochemical control), encompassing clinical signs and symptoms, comorbidities and QoL, emerge as a primary focus of acromegaly patient management.

Efficacy and safety of fractionated conformal radiation therapy in acromegaly: a long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Conformal, fractionated radiation therapy (XRT) is variably used as a treatment alternative for active acromegaly patients, usually, after failed pituitary surgery. Our objective was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of XRT using strict criteria of biochemical control.

SETTING, DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 94 patients (73 women, mean age at radiation 53.16 ± 12.9 years) attending a specialized multidisciplinary clinic between 1998 and 2014 with a mean duration of follow-up of 12.9 ± 7.3 years.

RESULTS

A basal growth hormone < 1 ng/mL and an IGF-1 < 1.2 × the upper limit of normal was achieved by 41% and 50.8%, respectively, at 5 years of follow-up, and by 44% and 66%, respectively, 10 years after XRT. Median tumor volume decreased significantly from 904 mm³ at baseline to 424 mm³ upon last follow-up (p = 0.01). The prevalence of central hypogonadism, central hypocortisolism, and central hypothyroidism increased from 18%, 35%, and 35% at baseline, to 38%, 53%, and 64%, respectively, after 10 years of follow-up. One patient was diagnosed with a meningioma and another one developed optic neuritis. No cerebrovascular events were recorded, and all patients are currently alive.

CONCLUSION

XRT is an effective and reasonably safe means of controlling acromegalic activity. Its main disadvantages are the time required to achieve biochemical control and the development of anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies.

Primary versus postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for acromegaly: a multicenter matched cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The role of primary stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with medically refractory acromegaly who are not operative candidates or who refuse resection is poorly understood. The aim of this multicenter, matched cohort study was to compare the outcomes of primary versus postoperative SRS for acromegaly.

METHODS

The authors reviewed an International Radiosurgery Research Foundation database of 398 patients with acromegaly who underwent SRS and categorized them into primary or postoperative cohorts. Patients in the primary SRS cohort were matched, in a 1:2 ratio, to those in the postoperative SRS cohort, and the outcomes of the 2 matched cohorts were compared.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 78 patients (median follow-up 66.4 months), including 26 and 52 in the matched primary and postoperative SRS cohorts, respectively. In the primary SRS cohort, the actuarial endocrine remission rates at 2 and 5 years were 20% and 42%, respectively. The Cox proportional hazards model showed that a lower pre-SRS insulin-like growth factor-1 level was predictive of initial endocrine remission (p = 0.03), whereas a lower SRS margin dose was predictive of biochemical recurrence after initial remission (p = 0.01). There were no differences in the rates of radiological tumor control (p = 0.34), initial endocrine remission (p = 0.23), biochemical recurrence after initial remission (p = 0.33), recurrence-free survival (p = 0.32), or hypopituitarism (p = 0.67) between the 2 matched cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary SRS has a reasonable benefit-to-risk profile for patients with acromegaly in whom resection is not possible, and it has similar outcomes to endocrinologically comparable patients who undergo postoperative SRS. SRS with medical therapy in the latent period can be used as an alternative to surgery in selected patients who cannot or do not wish to undergo resection.

Correlation analysis between short-term insulin-like growth factor-I and glucose intolerance status after transsphenoidal adenomectomy in acromegalic patients: a large retrospective study from a single center in China

OBJECTIVES

Our study aimed to investigate the associations of glucose tolerance status with insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and other clinical laboratory parameters of acromegalic patients before and after the patients underwent transsphenoidal adenomectomy (TSA) by conducting a single-center, retrospective study.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 218 patients with acromegaly who had undergone TSA as the first treatment were retrospectively analyzed. Serum IGF-I, growth hormone (GH) and glucose levels were measured before and after surgery.

RESULTS

The follow-up levels for random GH, GH nadir, and the percentage of the upper limit of normal IGF-I (%ULN IGF-I) were decreased significantly. The percentages of normal (39.0%), early carbohydrate metabolism disorders (33.0%) and diabetes mellitus (28.0%) changed to 70.2%, 16.5% and 13.3%, respectively, after TSA. %ULN IGF-I at baseline was higher in the diabetes mellitus (DM) group than in the normal glucose tolerance group and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) /impaired fasting glucose (IFG) groups before TSA, and the DM group exhibited a greater reduction in %ULN IGF-I value after surgery. The follow-up %ULN IGF-I value after surgery was significantly lower in the improved group, and Pearson's correlation analysis revealed that the reductions in %ULN IGF-I corresponded with the reductions in glucose level.

CONCLUSION

This study examined the largest reported sample with complete preoperative and follow-up data. The results suggest that the age- and sex-adjusted IGF-I level, which reflects altered glucose metabolism, and the change of it are associated with improved glucose tolerance in acromegalic patients both before and after TSA.

Surgical-pharmacological interactions in the treatment of acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly requires a multimodal treatment approach that includes surgery by an expert pituitary neurosurgeon, pharmacological treatment with one or more of the available drugs and radiation therapy. These treatment alternatives are not mutually exclusive but rather complement each other when properly indicated in the individual patient. In this review, we summarize and analyze the available data concerning the choice of the surgical approach (microscopy vs. endoscopy) and the interactions between medical treatment with somatostatin analogs and pituitary surgery.

AREAS COVERED

Technical aspects, complications and outcome of transsphenoidal surgery (TSS); Advantages and disadvantages of the microscopic and endoscopic approaches; Safety and efficacy of somatostatin analogs (SSA); Primary pharmacological therapy versus primary TSS; Benefits of the preoperative treatment with SSA; and the effect of surgical tumor debulking in the therapeutic response to SSA.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Continuing efforts at improving surgical techniques and at generating more efficacious pharmacological therapies for acromegaly are likely to improve the outcome of these patients. However, an integral approach of the patient aimed not only at achieving biochemical criteria of cure but also at treating the individual comorbidities is mandatory to improve the quality of life of these patients and to reduce their mortality rate.

Malaysian Consensus Statement for the Diagnosis and Management of Acromegaly

In Malaysia, acromegaly is under-recognised with only 10-15% of the expected number of cases from prevalence estimates, having been diagnosed and managed in established endocrine centres with access to multidisciplinary care. This is mainly due to lack of awareness and standardised approach in diagnosing this disease resulting in delay in diagnosis and management with suboptimal treatment outcomes. This first Malaysian consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of acromegaly addresses these issues and is based on current best practices and latest available evidence so as to reduce the disease burden on acromegaly patients managed in the Malaysian healthcare system.

Preoperative Fasting C-Peptide Acts as a Promising Predictor of Improved Glucose Tolerance in Patients With Acromegaly After Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 64 Cases From a Large Pituitary Center in China

Purpose: Abnormal glucose metabolism is one of the most frequent acromegaly complications. Improvement of glucose metabolism can be observed only in half of acromegaly patients after surgery. We aimed to investigate the risk factors for determining abnormal glucose metabolism before surgery in patients with acromegaly, and to explore the predictors of improved preoperative glucose intolerance after surgery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 64 patients who received transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly. Growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and glucose metabolism were assessed before, immediately after, and 3 months after surgery. Glucose metabolic parameters included glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), plasma glucose (PG), C-peptide (CP), insulin (INS), and the indices of β-cell function, insulin sensitivity, and insulin resistance (IR). Results: Preoperatively, 18 patients (28.1%) had diabetes (DM), 34 (53.1%) had prediabetes (PreDM), and 12 (18.8%) had normal glucose tolerance (NGT). All the indices of pancreatic β-cell function were significantly lower in patients with DM than those with PreDM and NGT (all P < 0.005). IGF-1 was significantly positively correlated with insulin sensitivity and IR (P < 0.05), while GH was not. Postoperatively, glucose tolerance was improved in 71.2% of patients (37/52) with preoperative glucose intolerance. Insulin sensitivity was increased, while β-cell function and IR were decreased in most patients after surgery, regardless of whether their acromegaly achieved remission. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative fasting C-peptide (FCP, OR = 2.639, P = 0.022), disposition index (DI, OR = 1.397, P = 0.043) and Predictor-2 (OR = 0.578, P = 0.035) were determined to be the predictors for improved glucose tolerance status after surgery. Afterwards, through Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, FCP >2.445 ng/ml was the best independent predictor, with an 86.6% PPV (positive predictive value) and a 74.5% NPV (negative predictive value). Conclusions: Preoperative high FCP is a promising postsurgical predictor of improved glucose tolerance in patients with acromegaly. Oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) and HbA1c should be monitored regularly after surgery, and diabetes management should be adjusted based on the patient's latest glucose tolerance status.

Persistence of Diabetes and Hypertension After Multimodal Treatment of Acromegaly

CONTEXT

Diabetes and hypertension are frequent comorbidities of acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the course of diabetes and hypertension at diagnosis and after multimodal therapy in a large cohort of patients with acromegaly.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective study at a tertiary care center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 522 patients with acromegaly treated according to a preestablished protocol.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of diabetes and hypertension and its relationship with biochemical indices of acromegalic control.

RESULTS

The cohort was stratified according to disease activity upon last visit to clinic: (1) surgical remission (n = 122), (2) pharmacologically controlled (n = 92), (3) active disease (n = 148), (4) insulinlike growth factor (IGF)-1 discordance (n = 64), and (5) growth hormone (GH) discordance (n = 96). The prevalence of diabetes and hypertension at diagnosis was 30% and 37%, respectively, and did not change upon the last visit (30.6% and 38%). Both comorbidities were more prevalent at diagnosis and on the last visit than in the general population. Diabetes was less prevalent on the last visit in patients who achieved surgical remission than in those who persisted with active disease (25% vs 40%, P = 0.01). Upon multivariate analysis, diabetes was associated with an IGF-1 at diagnosis >2× upper limit of normal, with the persistence of active acromegaly, the presence of hypertension upon the last visit, with the presence of a macroadenoma, and with female sex.

CONCLUSION

Our findings underscore the importance of an integral approach when managing these patients, focusing not only on the control of GH and IGF-1 levels but also on the timely diagnosis and the specific treatment of each comorbidity.

The efficacy of medical treatment in patients with acromegaly in clinical practice

Although somatostatin analogues (SSAs) are recommended as the first-line medical therapy for acromegaly, dopamine agonists (DAs) are also a therapeutic option for treatment. We aimed to assess and compare the efficacies of DAs and SSAs in treating acromegaly in clinical practice. We included 89 patients with acromegaly who took DAs (bromocriptine [BCT], n = 63; cabergoline [CAB], n = 11) or SSAs (n = 15) as a primary medical therapy for more than 3 months in the Seoul National University Hospital. The CAB (45.5%) and SSA (33.3%) groups achieved random GH levels of <2.5 ng/mL and the normal IGF-1 levels were significantly higher than in the BCT group (11.1%) (p = 0.009). We further included all the patients with acromegaly (n = 132) who had taken CAB, BCT, and SSAs as first- or second-line medical therapy. The CAB group showed similar efficacy as the SSA group in terms of the GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels (57.6% for random GH level <2.5 ng/mL, 42.4% for normal IGF-1 levels, 36.4% for both). Logistic regression analysis revealed that medications, age, GH level, or IGF-1 level before medication, hyperprolactinemia, and prior gamma-knife surgery or radiation therapy, did not affect the therapeutic response. High pretreatment GH levels predicted poor treatment outcomes (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.95 [0.90-0.99]). CAB was effective in treating acromegaly at a relatively lower cost in patients with low pretreatment GH levels.

Targeting either GH or IGF-I during somatostatin analogue treatment in patients with acromegaly: a randomized multicentre study

CONTEXT

Discordant GH and IGF-I values are frequent in acromegaly. The clinical significance and its dependence on treatment modality and of glucose-suppressed GH (GH_nadir) measurements remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of targeting either IGF-I or GH during somatostatin analogue (SA) treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

84 patients with controlled acromegaly after surgery (n = 23) or SA (n = 61) underwent a GH profile including an OGTT, at baseline and after 12 months. SA patients were randomized to monitoring according to either IGF-I (n = 33) or GH_nadir (n = 28). SA dose escalation was allowed at baseline and 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

GH_nadir and IGF-I at baseline and 12 months, and disease-specific Quality of Life (QoL).

RESULTS

IGF-I and fasting GH levels were comparable between the surgery and the SA group, whereas GH_nadir (µg/L) was lower in the surgery group (GH_nadir 0.7 ± 0.1 vs 0.3 ± 0.1, P < 0.01). SA dose increase was performed in 20 patients in the GH group and in 8 patients in the IGF-I group (P = 0.02), which increased the number of concordantly controlled patients (P = 0.01). QoL was only mildly affected at baseline in all groups and did not changed consistently during the study.

CONCLUSION

(1) Discordant values in terms of high GH levels are prevalent in SA patients and more so if applying glucose-suppressed GH_nadir; (2) targeting discordant levels of either GH or IGF-I translates into SA dose increase and improved biochemical control; (3) even though QoL was not improved in this study, we suggest biochemical assessment of disease activity to include glucose-suppressed GH_nadir also in SA patients.

A multicenter, observational study of lanreotide depot/autogel (LAN) in patients with acromegaly in the United States: 2-year experience from the SODA registry

PURPOSE

This analysis evaluates the 2-year effectiveness and safety of lanreotide depot/autogel (LAN), as well as treatment convenience and acromegaly symptom relief, from the Somatuline^® Depot for Acromegaly (SODA) registry, a post-marketing, open-label, observational, multicenter, United States registry study.

METHODS

Patients with acromegaly treated with LAN were eligible for enrollment. Demographics, LAN dose, extended dosing interval (EDI) (interval of injections ≥42 days), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), growth hormone (GH), glycated hemoglobin, adverse events (AEs), injection convenience, and symptom data were collected.

RESULTS

As of September 29, 2014, 241 patients were enrolled in SODA. IGF-1 levels below age- and gender-adjusted upper normal limit (ULN) were achieved in 71.2% at month (M) 12 and 74.4% at M24; GH ≤2.5 µg/L in 83.3% at M12 and 80.0% at M24; GH <1.0 µg/L in 61.7% at M12 and 61.4% at M24. Both IGF-1 < ULN and GH ≤2.5 µg/L were achieved in 65.0% at M12 and 54.8% at M24; both IGF-1 < ULN and GH < 1.0 µg/L were achieved in 51.7 and 42.9% at M12 and M24, respectively. EDI regimen was 5.0% at baseline and 12.0% at M24. At M24, acromegaly symptoms appeared stable or improved. The most common AE was arthralgia (25.7%). Among 106 serious AEs reported by 42 patients, 10 were deemed related to therapy in 9 patients. At M24, 73.1% of patients rated LAN as convenient.

CONCLUSIONS

SODA indicates 2-year biochemical control with majority of patients achieving both IGF-1 < ULN and GH ≤2.5 µg/L. LAN was generally well tolerated with no new or unexpected safety signals reported during the observation period. clinicaltrials.gov Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT00686348.

Pitfalls in early biochemical evaluation after transsphenoidal surgery in patients with acromegaly

Although the current remission criteria for acromegaly are clear and concise, some pitfalls have been reported in early endocrinological evaluation after surgery. To evaluate the long-term (>4 year) outcome and to detect the pitfalls in early evaluation, we retrospectively reviewed 128 patients with acromegaly who underwent primary transsphenoidal surgery during 2011 and 2012. These included 66 men and 62 women, aged from 7 to 76 (mean 46) years old. 49 patients (38.3%) were preoperatively treated with somatostatin analog (SSA). Follow-up period ranged from 52 to 75 (63) months. Long-term remission using the current consensus criteria was achieved in 107 patients (83.6%), 105 of which patient had achieved remission in early evaluation. In 5 patients with preoperative SSA treatment, IGF-1 levels re-elevated more than one year after surgery. Five female patients without pretreatment with SSA showed delayed normalization of IGF-1 between 13 to 27 months postoperatively, two of which patients satisfied the remission criteria. In conclusion, the long-term results can be reliably predicted by the remission criteria early after surgery in most patients with acromegaly. For the accurate evaluation within a year after surgery, however, influence of preoperative treatment with SSA, delayed normalization of IGF-1, and poor GH suppression due to low insulin resistance must be considered, particularly in women.

Acromegaly at diagnosis in 3173 patients from the Liège Acromegaly Survey (LAS) Database

Acromegaly is a rare disorder caused by chronic growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion. While diagnostic and therapeutic methods have advanced, little information exists on trends in acromegaly characteristics over time. The Liège Acromegaly Survey (LAS) Database, a relational database, is designed to assess the profile of acromegaly patients at diagnosis and during long-term follow-up at multiple treatment centers. The following results were obtained at diagnosis. The study population consisted of 3173 acromegaly patients from ten countries; 54.5% were female. Males were significantly younger at diagnosis than females (43.5 vs 46.4 years; P < 0.001). The median delay from first symptoms to diagnosis was 2 years longer in females (P = 0.015). Ages at diagnosis and first symptoms increased significantly over time (P < 0.001). Tumors were larger in males than females (P < 0.001); tumor size and invasion were inversely related to patient age (P < 0.001). Random GH at diagnosis correlated with nadir GH levels during OGTT (P < 0.001). GH was inversely related to age in both sexes (P < 0.001). Diabetes mellitus was present in 27.5%, hypertension in 28.8%, sleep apnea syndrome in 25.5% and cardiac hypertrophy in 15.5%. Serious cardiovascular outcomes like stroke, heart failure and myocardial infarction were present in <5% at diagnosis. Erythrocyte levels were increased and correlated with IGF-1 values. Thyroid nodules were frequent (34.0%); 820 patients had colonoscopy at diagnosis and 13% had polyps. Osteoporosis was present at diagnosis in 12.3% and 0.6-4.4% had experienced a fracture. In conclusion, this study of >3100 patients is the largest international acromegaly database and shows clinically relevant trends in the characteristics of acromegaly at diagnosis.

High-Dose and High-Frequency Lanreotide Autogel in Acromegaly: A Randomized, Multicenter Study

CONTEXT

Increase in drug frequency or dose is recommended for acromegaly patients with partial response to long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs). However, the efficacy and safety data with lanreotide (LAN) Autogel (LAN-ATG) at high dose (HD) or high frequency (HF) are still scanty.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the biochemical efficacy and safety of HF and HD LAN-ATG in patients with active acromegaly.

DESIGN

Twenty-four-week prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Thirty patients with active acromegaly, partial responders to SRLs, were randomized to HF (120 mg/21 days; 15 patients) or HD (180 mg/28 days; 15 patients) LAN-ATG.

OUTCOMES

Normalization of serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and reduction in random growth hormone (GH) values < 1.0 µg/L, reduction in serum IGF-I and GH from baseline, differences in biochemical response between HF and HD LAN-ATG, adverse events.

RESULTS

IGF-I decreased significantly (P = 0.007) during the 24-week treatment, with greater decrease in HD (P = 0.03) vs HF group (P = 0.08). Normalization in IGF-I values occurred in 27.6% of patients (P = 0.016 vs baseline), without a significant difference between HF and HD groups (P = 0.59). The decrease in serum IGF-I significantly correlated with serum LAN values (P = 0.04), and normalization of IGF-I was predicted by baseline IGF-I values (P = 0.02). Serum GH values did not change significantly (P = 0.22). Overall, 19 patients (63.3%) experienced adverse events, all being mild to moderate and transient, without differences between the two therapeutic arms.

CONCLUSION

HF and HD LAN-ATG regimens are effective in normalizing IGF-I values in about one-third of patients with active acromegaly inadequately controlled by long-term conventional SRLs therapy.

Biochemical assessment of disease control in acromegaly: reappraisal of the glucose suppression test in somatostatin analogue (SA) treated patients

BACKGROUND

It is recommended not to measure growth hormone during oral glucose suppression (oral glucose tolerance test) during somatostatin analog treatment in acromegaly. However, we have observed that failure to suppress growth hormone in response to oral glucose tolerance test during somatostatin analog unmasks insufficient disease control and hypothesize that somatostatin analog also induces insufficient growth hormone suppression to mixed meals.

METHODS

We therefore compared serum growth hormone levels during two mixed meals in patients with controlled insulin-like growth factor-I levels after either surgery alone (n = 9) or somatostatin analog treatment (n = 9). The patients were unbiasedly matched for gender and insulin-like growth factor-I and studied twice in the following order: (1) during a 6 h growth hormone day curve including two mixed meals and (2) during a 3 h growth hormone profile including 60 min fasting followed by a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test.

RESULTS

During the day curve growth hormone levels were elevated in the somatostatin analog group (P = 0.008) and growth hormone levels 1 h after each meal declined significantly only in the surgery group (P = 0.02). During the oral glucose tolerance test the two groups had similar growth hormone levels prior to the glucose load (P = 0.6), whereas a significant 66% suppression was observed after glucose only in the surgery group (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Patients controlled by somatostatin analog fail to suppress growth hormone in response to both mixed meals and oral glucose tolerance test (2) This phenomenon is likely to result in elevated serum growth hormone levels during everyday life in somatostatin analog-treated patients, (3) We postulate that measuring growth hormone levels during oral glucose tolerance test is useful to unmask potential somatostatin analog under-treatment in the presence of 'safe' insulin-like growth factor-I levels.

SOCS2 polymorphisms are not associated with clinical and biochemical phenotypes in acromegalic patients

PURPOSE

Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 (SOCS2) is a STAT5b-regulated gene and one of its functions is to influence growth and development through negative regulatory effects on GH/IGF-1 pathway. So, we evaluate the potential influence of SOCS2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on clinical and laboratorial characteristics of a large cohort of Brazilian patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

Four SOCS2 SNPs (rs3782415, rs3816997, rs3825199 and rs11107116) were selected and genotyped by real-time PCR using specific Taqman probe assays. A total of 186 patients (116 women, age range 26-88 years) were evaluated.

RESULTS

No association of SOCS2 genotypes was observed with none of the following clinical and laboratorial characteristics: age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, basal GH, oral glucose tolerance test GH nadir, IGF-I, ULNR-IGF-I.

CONCLUSION

Despite of the key role of SOCS2 in the regulation of GH receptor signaling, we did not find any significant association between SOCS2 polymorphisms and acromegaly.

Daily life reflections of acromegaly guidelines

PURPOSE

To determine the differences in acromegaly diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up among Turkish endocrinologists, and to investigate how the published guidelines are applied in clinical practice.

METHODS

The questionnaire was formatted as an electronic survey, conducted between November and December 2015, and sent weekly for 6 weeks via e-mail to 528 endocrinologists in Turkey.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was answered by 37.4 % of endocrinologists. Insulin-like growth factor-1 and nadir growth hormone level after 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (nadir GH-OGTT) were the most commonly preferred methods for the initial diagnosis. A total of 49.5 % of the participants reported using preoperative medical therapy (MT) either routinely or on a case-to-case basis. Somatostatin analogs were the most commonly used drugs, both in pre- and postoperative MT. Disease activity following surgery was assessed in the 3rd postoperative month using IGF-1 levels. Similarly, IGF-1 monitoring was preferred in the follow-up period. Monitoring nadir GH-OGTT levels was the most commonly used method in the assessment of discordant test results. The dose titration was done at month 3 after the start of MT. Resistance to SRLs was considered after using the maximal dose for at least 6 months. Pegvisomant was generally used in second- and third-line therapy. Similarly, cabergoline was not preferred in monotherapy by the majority of participants. Radiotherapy was considered in patients with incomplete response to surgery and medical treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there were subtle differences, clinical practice guidelines were usually followed among Turkish endocrinologists.

Biochemical investigations in diagnosis and follow up of acromegaly

Measurements of human growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth-factor I (IGF-I) are cornerstones in the diagnosis of acromegaly. Both hormones are also used as biochemical markers in the evaluation of disease activity during treatment. Management of acromegaly is particularly challenging in cases where discordant information is obtained from measurement of GH concentrations following oral glucose load and from measurement of IGF-I. While in some patients biological factors can explain the discrepancy, in many cases issues with the analytical methods seem to be responsible. Assays used by endocrine laboratories to determine concentrations of GH and IGF-I underwent significant changes during the last decades. While generally leading to more sensitive and reproducible methods, these changes also had considerable impact on absolute concentrations measured. This must be reflected by updated decision limits, cut-offs and reference intervals. Since different commercially available assays do not agree very well, method specific interpretation of GH and IGF-I concentrations is required. This complexity in the interpretation of hormone concentrations is not always appropriately reflected in laboratory reports, but also not in clinical guidelines reporting decision limits not related to a specific analytical method. The present review provides an overview about methodological and biological variables affecting the biochemical assessment of acromegaly in diagnosis and follow up.

Diabetes in Patients With Acromegaly

Acromegaly is a clinical syndrome which results from growth hormone excess. Uncontrolled acromegaly is associated with cardiovascular mortality, due to an excess of risk factors including diabetes mellitus, hypertension and cardiomegaly. Diabetes mellitus is a frequent complication of acromegaly with a prevalence of 12-37%. This review will provide an overview of a number of aspects of diabetes mellitus and glucose intolerance in acromegaly including the following: 1. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of abnormalities of glucose homeostasis 2. The impact of different management options for acromegaly on glucose homeostasis 3. The management options for diabetes mellitus in patients with acromegaly RECENT FINDINGS: Growth hormone and IGF-1 have complex effects on glucose metabolism. Insulin resistance, hyperinsulinaemia and increased gluconeogenesis combine to produce a metabolic milieu which leads to the development of diabetes in acromegaly. Treatment of acromegaly should ameliorate abnormalities of glucose metabolism, due to reversal of insulin resistance and a reduction in gluconeogenesis. Recent advances in medical therapy of acromegaly have varying impacts on glucose homeostasis. These adverse effects influence management choices in patients with acromegaly who also have diabetes mellitus or glucose intolerance. The underlying mechanisms of disorders of glucose metabolism in patients with acromegaly are complex. The aim of treatment of acromegaly is normalisation of GH/IGF-1 with reduction of co-morbidities. The choice of therapy for acromegaly should consider the impact of therapy on several factors including glucose metabolism.

Somatostatin analogues in acromegaly and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: past, present and future

Acromegaly is a hormonal disorder that arises when the pituitary gland secretes excess growth hormone (GH), which in turn stimulates a concomitant increase in serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) constitute a heterogeneous group of tumours that can secrete serotonin and a variety of peptide hormones that may cause characteristic symptoms known as carcinoid syndrome or other symptoms and hormonal hypersecretion syndromes depending on the tumour's site of origin. Current medical therapy for the treatment of acromegaly and GEP-NET involves the administration of somatostatin analogues that effectively suppress excess hormone secretion. After its discovery in 1979, octreotide became the first synthetic biologically stable somatostatin analogue with a short-acting formulation of octreotide introduced into clinical practice in the late 1980s. Lanreotide, another somatostatin analogue, became available in the mid-1990s initially as a prolonged-release formulation administered every 10 or 14 days. Long-acting release formulations of both octreotide (Sandostatin LAR and Novartis) and lanreotide (Somatuline Autogel, Ipsen), based on microparticle and nanoparticle drug-delivery technologies, respectively, were later developed, which allowed for once-monthly administration and improved convenience. First-generation somatostatin analogues remain one of the cornerstones of medical therapy in the management of pituitary and GEP-NET hormone hypersecretion, with octreotide having the longest established efficacy and safety profile of the somatostatin analogue class. More recently, pasireotide (Signifor), a next-generation multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analogue, has emerged as an alternative therapeutic option for the treatment of acromegaly. This review summarizes the development and clinical success of somatostatin analogues.

The Mexican Acromegaly Registry: Clinical and Biochemical Characteristics at Diagnosis and Therapeutic Outcomes

CONTEXT

Acromegaly is a systemic disorder caused by a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma. As with other rare diseases, acromegaly registries developed in various European countries have provided us with important information.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to analyze the epidemiological, clinical, biochemical, and therapeutic data from the Mexican Acromegaly Registry (MAR).

SETTING

The setting of the study was a nationwide patient registry.

DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY

The MAR was created in 2009. It gathers data from 24 participating centers belonging to three different institutions using a specifically designed on-line platform. Only patients diagnosed after 1990 were included in the program.

RESULTS

A total of 2057 patients (51% female, mean age at diagnosis 41.1 ± 24.5 y) have been registered for an estimated prevalence of 18 cases per 1 million inhabitants. Hypertension, glucose intolerance, diabetes, and dyslipidemia were present in 27%, 18.4%, 30%, and 24% of the patients, respectively. The IGF-1 level at diagnosis and the concomitant presence of hypertension were significantly associated with the development of diabetes. Transsphenoidal surgery was the primary treatment in 72% of the patients. Pharmacological treatment, mostly with somatostatin analogs, was administered primarily and adjunctively in 26% and 54% of the patients, respectively. Treatment choice varied among the three participating institutions, with the predominance of pharmacological therapy in two of them and of radiation therapy in the third. Therapeutic outcomes were similar to those reported in the European registries.

CONCLUSIONS

The MAR is the largest and first non-European registry of the disease. Our findings highlight important within-country differences in treatment choice due to variations in the availability of resources.

Surgical treatment of acromegaly according to the 2010 remission criteria: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In 2010, the Acromegaly Consensus Group revised the criteria for cure of acromegaly and thus rates of surgical remission need to be revised in light of these new thresholds. Two subgroups consisted of patients with discordant GH and IGF-1 levels and patients in remission according to the 2000 criteria, but not to the 2010 criteria, have been reported after adenomectomy and for these subgroups the precise incidence and management has not been established. The objective of the study was to update rates of surgical remission and complications and to evaluate the incidence, management, and long-term outcome of the two previously described subgroups of patients.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical series that defined remission according to the 2010 biochemical criteria.

RESULTS

We included 13 studies (1105 patients). The pooled rate of overall surgical remission was 54.8 % (95 % CI 44.4-65.2 %), and 72.2 % with previous criteria. Remission was achieved in 77.9 % (95 % CI 68.1-87.6 %) of microadenomas; 52.7 % (95 % CI 41-64.4 %) of macroadenomas; 29 % (95 % CI 20.1-37.8 %) of invasive and 68.8 % (95 % CI 60-77.6 %) of non-invasive adenomas. Complication rates were 1.2 % (95 % CI 0.6-1.9 %) for CSF leak, 1.3 % (95 % CI 0.6-2.1 %) for permanent diabetes insipidus, 8.7 % (95 % CI 4.8-12.5 %) for new anterior pituitary dysfunction and 0.6 % (95 % CI 0.1-1.1 %) for severe intraoperative hemorrhage. We identified an intermediate group of patients, defined as: (1) Remission according to one, but not the other biochemical criteria (GH or IGF-1) or 2010 criteria (14.3 % and 47.1 % cases), (2) Remission according to 2000, but not 2010 criteria (13.2-58.8 % cases). Two studies reported a remission rate of 56.5 % and 100 %, in the two subgroups respectively, in a long-term outcome without adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall remission with transsphenoidal surgery is achieved in ∼55 % of patients. For the intermediate group of patients, future prospective studies with long-term follow-up are required to determine the long-term biochemical remission rates and clinical implications.

The ongoing challenge of discrepant growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I results in the evaluation of treated acromegalic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) are the principal biomarkers used to assess disease activity in acromegaly, and any discrepancy between them renders interpretation of results inconclusive. Purpose of this study was to assess the frequency of this discrepancy and identify parameters that might affect its occurrence.

DESIGN

A systematic review of MEDLINE and Scopus was performed (1987-2013) followed by a meta-analysis to address the frequency of discrepant results between GH and IGF-I levels. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed assessing the effects of the year of publication, the different types of GH testing and GH assays used, as well as the impact of treatment with somatostatin analogues (SSAs) on the occurrence of this discrepancy.

RESULTS

The analysis retrieved 39 eligible studies totalling 7071 patients. The pooled discordance rate between GH and IGF-I was 25·7% (95% CI: 22·3-29·4), and the predominant format was that of elevated IGF-I with normal GH levels (15·3%, 95% CI: 12·5-18·7). No significant correlation between the discordance rate and the year of publication was shown; whereas, the use of ultrasensitive GH assays resulted in higher discordance rates (30·7%, 95% CI: 25·9-35·9 vs 19·8%, 95% CI: 14·1-27·2, P = 0·04) as did treatment with SSAs (32·5%, 95% CI: 27·8-37·4) vs (21·6%, 95% CI: 17·8-25·6, P = 0·001).

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancy between GH and IGF-I results is encountered in a quarter of treated patients with acromegaly, especially when using ultrasensitive GH assays or in patients receiving SSAs, a fact that the clinician should take into consideration when making clinical decisions.

DISCORDANCE BETWEEN GH AND IGF-1 LEVELS IN TURKISH ACROMEGALIC PATIENTS

OBJECTIVE

Discordance between insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH) levels is an important problem in the follow-up of patients diagnosed with acromegaly. Our aims were to evaluate the discordance between IGF-1 and GH levels and compare the performance of different cut-off levels for the nadir in GH (GHn) in acromegalic patients.

METHODS

The study included 63 acromegalic patients in a follow-up at a tertiary care university hospital facility. Levels of IGF-1, IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and GH were investigated. The baseline GH and GHn levels were evaluated after an oral glucose tolerance test (cut-offs of 0.4 and 1 ng/mL, respectively). The discordance rates between GHn and IGF-1 levels, and IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratios were determined.

RESULTS

We first adopted a GHn cut-off value of 1 ng/mL and found that 27 patients (42.9%) exhibited biochemical remission (BR) (IGF-1 <95^th percentile, GH <1), and 25 patients (39.7%) had no BR (NBR) (IGF-1 ≥95^th percentile, GH >1). Discordance in the presence of normal IGF-1 and nonsuppressed GH (DC1) occurred in 2 of 63 (3.2%) patients; discordance in the presence of high IGF-1 and suppressed GH (DC2) occurred in 9 of 63 (14.3%) patients. If the GHn cut-off value adopted was 0.4 ng/mL, the distributions were 17 of 63 (27.0%) patients in BR, 29 of 63 (46.0%) patients in NBR, 12 of 63 (19.0%) in DC1, and 5 of 63 (7.9%) patients in DC2. If only the baseline GH values were considered, the distributions were very similar to those with a GHn cut-off value of 0.4 ng/mL. The IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratio was lowest in the BR group.

CONCLUSION

Adopting a GHn cut-off value of 0.4 ng/mL did not increase the test performance compared with baseline GH only. In contrast, in the follow-up of acromegalic patients, the IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratio might be a useful measurement when discordance between IGF-1 and GH levels occurs. We propose that these values be considered in clinical practice.

ABBREVIATIONS

BR = biochemical remission DC1 = discordance group 1 DC2 = discordance group 2 DM = diabetes mellitus GH = growth hormone GHn = nadir in GH IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1 IGFBP-3 = IGF binding protein-3 LAR = long-acting release NBR = not in biochemical remission OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test.

SAGIT®: clinician-reported outcome instrument for managing acromegaly in clinical practice--development and results from a pilot study

PURPOSE

The SAGIT instrument is a comprehensive clinician-reported outcome instrument assessing key features of acromegaly: signs and symptoms, associated comorbidities; growth hormone levels; insulin-like growth factor-1 levels; and tumor profile. The SAGIT instrument has been designed to assist endocrinologists managing acromegaly in practice. Here, we report on pre-testing (to assess ease of understanding and acceptability) and a pilot study (to assess relevance, ease of use, and utility in real-life conditions) (NCT02231593).

METHODS

For pre-testing, 11 endocrinologists completed the SAGIT instrument using patient medical records and were also interviewed. They subsequently completed a PRAgmatic Content and face validity Test (PRAC-Test(©)) to report their experiences using SAGIT, and feedback was used to revise the instrument. In the pilot study, nine endocrinologists completed the SAGIT instrument in real-time with patients belonging to three different categories (stable/controlled, active/uncontrolled acromegaly, treatment-naïve), while four completed the instrument based on medical-record review. All participants then completed the PRAC-Test(©) and their feedback was used to update the instrument.

RESULTS

The SAGIT instrument was well accepted by endocrinologists, with most indicating that it was concise, practical, easy to understand, useful for assessing treatment response, and valuable as a component of the patient's medical record. The pilot study confirmed the instrument's acceptability, utility, and ease of use, and indicated its potential for distinguishing acromegaly clinical stages.

CONCLUSIONS

The SAGIT instrument is promising as a tool for use by endocrinologists in everyday practice to assess the status and evolution of disease in patients with acromegaly and to guide treatment decision-making.

Medical Treatment of Acromegaly with Dopamine Agonists or Somatostatin Analogs

Treatment of acromegaly aims to correct (or prevent) tumor compression of surrounding tissues by excising the disease-causing lesion and reduce growth hormone (GH) and IGF-1 levels to normal values. When surgery (the usual first-line treatment) fails to correct GH/IGF-1 hypersecretion, medical treatment with dopamine agonists (DAs; particularly cabergoline) or somatostatin analogs (SAs) can be used. The GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant is helpful in patients who are totally or partially resistant to SAs and can be given in association with both SAs and/or DAs. Thanks to this multistep therapeutic strategy, adequate hormonal disease control is achieved in most patients, giving them normal life expectancy. Comorbidities associated with acromegaly generally improve after treatment, but persistent sequelae may nonetheless impair quality of life.