Childhood acromegaly: successful therapy with conventional radiation and effects of chlorpromazine on growth hormone and prolactin secretion

X-linked acrogigantism syndrome: clinical profile and therapeutic responses

X-linked acrogigantism (X-LAG) is a new syndrome of pituitary gigantism, caused by microduplications on chromosome Xq26.3, encompassing the gene GPR101, which is highly upregulated in pituitary tumors. We conducted this study to explore the clinical, radiological, and hormonal phenotype and responses to therapy in patients with X-LAG syndrome. The study included 18 patients (13 sporadic) with X-LAG and microduplication of chromosome Xq26.3. All sporadic cases had unique duplications and the inheritance pattern in two families was dominant, with all Xq26.3 duplication carriers being affected. Patients began to grow rapidly as early as 2-3 months of age (median 12 months). At diagnosis (median delay 27 months), patients had a median height and weight standard deviation scores (SDS) of >+3.9 SDS. Apart from the increased overall body size, the children had acromegalic symptoms including acral enlargement and facial coarsening. More than a third of cases had increased appetite. Patients had marked hypersecretion of GH/IGF1 and usually prolactin, due to a pituitary macroadenoma or hyperplasia. Primary neurosurgical control was achieved with extensive anterior pituitary resection, but postoperative hypopituitarism was frequent. Control with somatostatin analogs was not readily achieved despite moderate to high levels of expression of somatostatin receptor subtype-2 in tumor tissue. Postoperative use of adjuvant pegvisomant resulted in control of IGF1 in all five cases where it was employed. X-LAG is a new infant-onset gigantism syndrome that has a severe clinical phenotype leading to challenging disease management.

Long-term follow-up of radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma: the absence of late recurrence after greater than or equal to 4500 cGy

Recent literature has suggested that late recurrence of pituitary adenoma after radiotherapy is common. We hypothesized that late failures might be a result of inadequate dose (less than 4500 cGy). To investigate, we analyzed 105 patients treated at our institution between 1965 and 1986 (analysis, 2/89). The minimum observation time was greater than or equal to 5 years in 58% and greater than or equal to 10 years in 30% of the patients. All patients received megavoltage radiotherapy (range, 4200-5500 cGy; mean, 4821 cGy) at a mean dose per fraction of 172 cGy; 100 patients received greater than or equal to 4500 cGy tumor dose. Twenty-nine patients received radiotherapy alone, and 76 had postoperative radiotherapy after frontal craniotomy (20 patients) or transsphenoidal hypophysectomy (56 patients). At presentation, 71% of patients had extrasellar disease, 57% had visual field deficits, and 50% had endocrinopathy. Of patients treated postoperatively, 74% had gross residual disease. Four local failures occurred at 13, 16, 57, and 64 months after postoperative radiotherapy, all within the irradiated volume (tumor doses of 4700, 4715, 5000, and 5100 cGy). All four patients had presented with moderate to extensive extrasellar disease with visual field defects. Two of the four remain free of second recurrence at 7 and 13 years after salvage transsphenoidal hypophysectomy. The local control rate with radiotherapy (product-limit method) at 10 years was 100% in the radiotherapy-alone group and 92% in the postoperative radiotherapy group (95% for all patients). To prevent bias, seven patients who received bromocriptine, none of whom demonstrated a recurrence, were censored from the local control analysis at the initiation of the drug. No patient in this study suffered recurrence greater than 64 months after radiotherapy, with 31 patients (none with bromocriptine) observed 10 to 21 years. We conclude that treatment of pituitary adenoma with greater than or equal to 4500 cGy in 25 fractions can result in a high (greater than or equal to 90%) probability of stable long-term control.

Management of pituitary gigantism. The role of bromocriptine and radiotherapy

True gigantism with overproduction of growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) was diagnosed in two boys, aged 13 years (case I) and 7 1/2 years (case II). Both had shown increased growth rates since early childhood (from 4 years and 1 1/2 years, respectively), but no skeletal acromegalic features were noted. However, both showed increased sweating and both had advanced pubic hair relative to testis volume. No other pituitary dysfunction was recorded. Case I underwent transsphenoidal surgery with only incomplete and temporary suppression of GH and PRL levels. However, in both patients bromocriptine administration promptly suppressed PRL levels. Following combined irradiation and bromocriptine treatment, GH also gradually normalized over a period of 2 years. Both boys are still on treatment, and both showed an increase in plasma GH concentrations when the dose of bromocriptine was reduced or discontinued, indicating that even 3 1/2-5 years after irradiation therapy (and during continuous treatment with bromocriptine) the disease was controlled but not cured. However, in these two boys bromocriptine has proved effective in controlling the PRL/GH oversecretion.

The acromegaly--gigantism syndrome. Report of four cases treated surgically

Four cases of growth-hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma, with associated aspects of acromegaly and gigantism, are reported in patients aged 12-26. All of the patients had macroadenomas and were treated surgically, three by the transsphenoidal approach and one with a transfrontal craniotomy. Histologic examination revealed eosinophilic adenomas in three of the cases and a mixed eosinophilic--chromophobe adenoma in one, all with cellular irregularities (mitosis and cellular and nuclear polymorphism), local invasivity, or both. Because surgical treatment did not produce complete normalization of growth hormone levels, radiotherapy followed the operations in all four cases. In our opinion, the treatment of acromegalic gigantism poses more therapeutic problems than that of simple acromegaly, with combined treatment (surgical, radiation, and medical) often being necessary.

Pituitary gigantism in a 31 month old girl: endocrine studies and successful response to hypophysectomy

A case of pituitary gigantism occurring in a 31 month old female child is reported. Growth records indicate that the disorder began early in the second yr of life. Apart from her size and history of excessive sweating, there were no characteristic clinical features of endocrinopathy. Elevated and autonomous secretion of GH (60-109 microgram/l) and prolactin were corrected by the removal of an eosinophilic pituitary adenoma. In the subsequent 6 yr, despite the presence of immunoreactive GH (4.6-17.3 microgram/l), plasma somatomedin was subnormal and the patient showed growth failure which responded normally to exogenous GH therapy. This case, which appears to be the youngest example of verified pituitary gigantism on record, illustrates that a successful outcome can be achieved by surgical ablative therapy.

Metabolic and clinical studies on patients with acromegaly treated with bromocriptine over 22 months

In twenty-two patients with active acromegaly who were untreated or unsuccessfully operated or irradiated (mean growth hormone (GH) values greater than 4 ng/ml) the following investigations were performed: routine laboratory tests, tomography of pituitary fossa, oral glucose tolerance tests, TRH and other pituitary function tests and GH profiles over 5-10 h before and during bromocriptine treatment with daily doses between 7.5 and 50 mg. In seventeen patients GH was suppressed to less than 50% by bromocriptine, in thirteen of them it was normalized on at least one occasion. A TRH induced GH release was observed in all but two responders to bromocriptine before therapy. This effect of TRH was not blunted during treatment with bromocriptine and also in the two patients with negative tests before therapy a significant GH increase was observed. In no non-responder to bromocriptine was a significant increase of GH after TRH observed. One patient showed a secondary resistance to bromocriptine during a period of treatment with griseofulvin. In the remaining sixteen patients the GH suppression has been consistent for between 3 and 22 months. A single dose of pimozide abolished the bromocriptine effect on GH totally in one patient; in others a slight or no significant effect was observed. Tissue swelling and sweating decreased in all bromocriptine responders and glucose tolerance improved in five patients. In four diabetic patients a partial or full remission of diabetes occurred. Apart from postural hypotension after the first administration in two patients no other severe side effects have been observed. Sella size and the other pituitary functions did not change during the time of the study. It seems that a high percentage of acromegalics may be successfully treated with bromocriptine.