Octreotide as primary therapy for acromegaly

Development and assessment of machine learning algorithms for predicting remission after transsphenoidal surgery among patients with acromegaly

PURPOSE

Preoperative prediction of transsphenoidal surgical (TSS) response is important for determining individual treatment strategies for acromegaly. There is currently no accurate predictive model for TSS response for acromegaly. The current study sought to develop and validate machine learning (ML)-based models for preoperative prediction of TSS response for acromegaly.

METHODS

Six hundred sixty-eight patients with acromegaly were enrolled and divided into training (n = 534) and text datasets (n = 134) in this retrospective, data mining and ML study. The forward search algorithm was used to select features, and six ML algorithms were applied to construct TSS response prediction models. The performance of these ML models was validated using receiver operating characteristics analysis. Model calibration, discrimination ability, and clinical usefulness were also assessed.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty-nine (52.2%) patients achieved postoperative remission criteria and exhibited good TSS response. A univariate analysis was conducted and eight features, including age, hypertension, ophthalmic disorders, GH, IGF-1, nadir GH, maximal tumor diameter, and Knosp grade, were significantly associated with the TSS response in patients with acromegaly. After feature selection, the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), which was constructed with the eight significant features showed the best favorable discriminatory ability both the training (AUC = 0.8555) and validation (AUC = 0.8178) cohorts. The GBDT model showed good discrimination ability and calibration, with the highest levels of accuracy and specificity, and provided better estimates of TTS responses of patients with acromegaly compared with using only the Knosp grade. Decision curve analysis confirmed that the model was clinically useful.

CONCLUSIONS

ML-based models could aid neurosurgeons in the preoperative prediction of TTS response for patients with acromegaly, and could contribute to determining individual treatment strategies.

Association between dopamine and somatostatin receptor expression and pharmacological response to somatostatin analogues in acromegaly

Acromegaly is a hormonal disorder resulting from excessive growth hormone (GH) secretion frequently produced by pituitary adenomas and consequent increase in insulin‐like growth factor 1 (IGF‐I). Elevated GH and IGF‐I levels result in a wide range of somatic, cardiovascular, endocrine, metabolic and gastrointestinal morbidities. Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) form the basis of medical therapy for acromegaly and are currently used as first‐line treatment or as second‐line therapy in patients undergoing unsuccessful surgery. However, a considerable percentage of patients do not respond to SSAs treatment. Somatostatin receptors (SSTR1‐5) and dopamine receptors (DRD1‐5) subtypes play critical roles in the regulation of hormone secretion. These receptors are considered important pharmacological targets to inhibit hormone oversecretion. It has been proposed that decreased expression of SSTRs may be associated with poor response to SSAs. Here, we systematically examine SSTRs and DRDs expression in human somatotroph adenomas by quantitative PCR. We observed an association between the response to SSAs treatment and DRD4, DRD5, SSTR1 and SSTR2 expression. We also examined SSTR expression by immunohistochemistry and found that the immunohistochemical detection of SSTR2 in particular might be a good predictor of response to SSAs.

Prolonged preoperative treatment of acromegaly with Somatostatin analogs may improve surgical outcome in patients with invasive pituitary macroadenoma (Knosp grades 1-3): a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single center

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate preoperative somatostatin analogs (SSAs) treatment on the surgical outcome in patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

An analysis of 358 patients with acromegaly was conducted. The preoperative medical therapy group (81 patients) received SSA treatment for at least 3 months prior to surgery, while the primary surgery group (277 patients) underwent transsphenoidal surgery directly. Follow-up duration was ≥3 months. Tumor invasion was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and classified according to the Knosp grading system.

RESULTS

Most patients were diagnosed with macroadenoma. Among all patients (Knosp grades 0-4), preoperative SSA therapy did not significantly improve the curative effect of surgery, according to the levels of growth hormone (GH) and/or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) markers. In patients with macroadenoma (Knosp grades 1-3), the remission rates were significantly higher in the SSA group compared to the surgery group when considering GH (56.4% vs. 37.3%, P = 0.048) and IGF-1 (43.2% vs. 17.6%, P = 0.004). In the preoperative medical therapy group, long-term use of SSAs (>6 months) led to higher remission rates (GH, 72.2% vs. 51.0%; and IGF-1, 61.1% vs. 29.8%; P = 0.12 and 0.02, respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term preoperative SSAs treatment may improve the surgical curative rate in acromegalic patients with invasive macroadenomas (Knosp grades 1-3).

Medical Treatment of Acromegaly with Dopamine Agonists or Somatostatin Analogs

Treatment of acromegaly aims to correct (or prevent) tumor compression of surrounding tissues by excising the disease-causing lesion and reduce growth hormone (GH) and IGF-1 levels to normal values. When surgery (the usual first-line treatment) fails to correct GH/IGF-1 hypersecretion, medical treatment with dopamine agonists (DAs; particularly cabergoline) or somatostatin analogs (SAs) can be used. The GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant is helpful in patients who are totally or partially resistant to SAs and can be given in association with both SAs and/or DAs. Thanks to this multistep therapeutic strategy, adequate hormonal disease control is achieved in most patients, giving them normal life expectancy. Comorbidities associated with acromegaly generally improve after treatment, but persistent sequelae may nonetheless impair quality of life.

Surgical interventions and medical treatments in treatment-naïve patients with acromegaly: systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Acromegaly is usually treated with surgery as a first-line treatment, although medical therapy has also been used as an alternative primary treatment.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the existing evidence comparing these two approaches in treatment-naïve patients with acromegaly.

DATA SOURCES

This study performed a comprehensive search in multiple databases, including Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus from early inception through April 2014.

STUDY SELECTION

The study used original controlled and uncontrolled studies that enrolled patients with acromegaly to receive either surgical treatment or medical treatment as their first-line treatment.

DATA EXTRACTION

Reviewers extracted data independently and in duplicates. Because of the noncomparative nature of the available studies, we modified the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess the quality of included studies. Outcomes evaluated were biochemical remission and change in IGF-1 or GH levels. We pooled outcomes using the random-effects model.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The final search yielded 35 studies enrolling 2629 patients. Studies were noncomparative series with a follow-up range of 6-360 months. Compared with medical therapy, surgery was associated with a higher remission rate (67% vs 45%; P = .02). Surgery had higher remission rates at longer follow-up periods (≥ 24 mo) (66% vs 44%; P = .04) but not the shorter follow-up periods (≤ 6 mo) (37% vs 26%; P = .22) [Corrected].Surgery had higher remission rates in the follow-up levels of GH (65% vs 46%; P = .05). In one study, the IGF-1 level was reduced more with surgery compared with medical treatment (-731 μg/L vs -251 μg/L; P = .04). Studies in which surgery was performed by a single operator reported a higher remission rate than those with multiple operators (71% vs 47%; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery may be associated with higher remission rate; however, the confidence in such evidence is very low due to the noncomparative nature of the studies, high heterogeneity, and imprecision.

Repeat endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: remission and complications

Reported biochemical remission rates following surgical intervention for acromegaly range from 38 to 83%. In patients not achieving surgical remission, few options remain, mostly limited to medical management and radiation therapy. There is debate over whether or not to offer reoperation to patients in whom surgical remission is not achieved with initial resection. Retrospective chart review was undertaken to determine all patients having acromegaly with persistently elevated GH and/or IGF-1 levels after initial pituitary adenoma resection, and who underwent reoperation using endoscopic endonasal approach at a single institution. Biochemical remission was defined as a postoperative GH level <1 ng/mL and a normal postoperative IGF-1 level in the absence of any medical therapy. In total, 14 patients underwent repeat surgical intervention for acromegaly via endoscopic transsphenoidal approach. Of the 14 patients, 8 (57%) achieved biochemical remission following repeat surgical intervention. Lower preoperative GH levels were associated with greater chance of biochemical remission (P = 0.048). New endocrinopathies were seen in 2 patients (14%), and both were transient diabetes insipidus. Meningitis occurred in 2 patients (14%); both were aseptic meningitis with no sequelae. No mortality was encountered. Repeat surgical intervention for acromegaly via endoscopic transsphenoidal approach appears safe and effective. With no mortality and minimal morbidity, repeat surgical intervention via endoscopic transsphenoidal approach appears a reasonable option for these hard-to-treat patients and should be considered for patients in whom surgical remission is not achieved with initial surgery.

Acromegaly: Beyond surgery

Acromegaly is characterized by chronic, excess secretion of growth hormone (GH) from a pituitary adenoma, and elevated hepatic insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels. Significant progress has been made in the development of medical therapies to achieve biochemical and symptomatic control in acromegaly. In this review we discuss the three currently available medical therapies, which include somatostatin analogs, dopamine agonists and pegvisomant. We describe a step-wise approach in which a somatostatin analog is followed by the addition of a dopamine agonist, and then if required the addition of or replacement by pegvisomant. New somatostatin agonists such as pasireotide, and the introduction of new orally-acting somatostatin agonists, should increase the therapeutic choices available in the near future.

Meta-analysis on the effects of octreotide on tumor mass in acromegaly

BACKGROUND

The long-acting somatostatin analogue octreotide is used either as an adjuvant or primary therapy to lower growth hormone (GH) levels in patients with acromegaly and may also induce pituitary tumor shrinkage.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a meta-analysis to accurately assess the effect of octreotide on pituitary tumor shrinkage.

DATA SOURCES

A computerized Medline and Embase search was undertaken to identify potentially eligible studies.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Eligibility criteria included treatment with octreotide, availability of numerical metrics on tumor shrinkage and clear definition of a clinically relevant reduction in tumor size. Primary endpoints included the proportion of patients with tumor shrinkage and mean percentage reduction in tumor volume.

DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS

The electronic search identified 2202 articles. Of these, 41 studies fulfilling the eligibility criteria were selected for data extraction and analysis. In total, 1685 patients were included, ranging from 6 to 189 patients per trial. For the analysis of the effect of octreotide on pituitary tumor shrinkage a random effect model was used to account for differences in both effect size and sampling error.

RESULTS

Octreotide was shown to induce tumor shrinkage in 53.0% [95% CI: 45.0%-61.0%] of treated patients. In patients treated with the LAR formulation of octreotide, this increased to 66.0%, [95% CI: 57.0%-74.0%). In the nine studies in which tumor shrinkage was quantified, the overall weighted mean percentage reduction in tumor size was 37.4% [95% CI: 22.4%-52.4%], rising to 50.6% [95% CI: 42.7%-58.4%] with octreotide LAR.

LIMITATIONS

Most trials examined were open-label and had no control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide LAR induces clinically relevant tumor shrinkage in more than half of patients with acromegaly.

The efficacy of octreotide LAR in acromegalic patients as primary or secondary therapy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of octreotide therapy in acromegalic patients as primary or secondary therapy.

METHODS

Ten acromegalic patients diagnosed at the Endocrinology Clinic in Sarajevo (seven females and three males, mean age 55.2 ± 7.2 years, age range 40-65 years, five patients with microadenoma and five patients with macroadenoma) were treated with octreotide. Among them, 60% of patients were operated on and the majority of the procedures were performed transnasaly (90%). That group of patients had recidivism of disease (pituitary adenoma and acromegaly). The concentration of human growth hormone (HGH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) was evaluated at 0, 6 and 12 months, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was taken before the treatment and 12 months after. Eight patients received octreotide 30 mg/28 days, one patient received a dose of 20 mg and the other received 60 mg/28 days.

RESULTS

Before treatment growth hormone (GH) levels were 50.87 ± 10.56 ng/ml (range: 26-64.9), IGF-1 were 776.66 ± 118.40 ng/ml (range: 526-934). Four patients (40%) were treated with primary octreotide treatment and six patients (60%) with secondary somatostatin analog treatment. At the beginning of therapy, there were no differences in terms of age, HGH levels and IGF-1 levels between primary and secondary treatment groups (p > 0.05). The difference between groups was only in regard to the size of tumors (p = 0.01). After 6 and 12 months the GH levels decreased to 1.61 ± 0.86 ng/ml (range: 0.7-2.65) and 1.85 ± 2.40 ng/ml (range: 0.0-8.3), respectively, while the IGF-1 became 305.90 ± 43.19 ng/ml after 6 months of treatment (range: 240-376) and 256.99 ± 71.43 ng/ml after 12 months of octreotide treatment (range: 126-325), respectively. The pituitary adenomas size prior to treatment was 9.57 mm, while after 12 months of treatment, the size decreased to 8.0 mm. After therapy, a GH decrease to less than 2.5 ng/ml was achieved in 90% of cases; tumor size decrease was achieved in 60% while normalization of IGF-1 was achieved in 100% of the patients, respectively. All differences about HGH and IGF-1 in each group were statistically significant (p < 0.05). In the group of acromegalic patients treated with octreotide LAR as primary therapy, the difference was more significant for GH and IGF-1 than for adenomas size.

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide treatment of acromegaly not only decreases GH and IGF-1 concentrations, but also appears to diminish the size of the tumor in about 60% of cases. The somatostatin analogs are more efficient in the primary treatment of acromegalic patients, due to the fact that primary therapy is as effective as secondary therapy but primary therapy has small advantages when compared with secondary octreotide therapy because no surgical treatment is required before.

Medical therapy of acromegaly

This paper outlines the present status of medical therapy of acromegaly. Indications for permanent postoperative treatment, postirradiation treamtent to bridge the interval until remission as well as primary medical therapy are elaborated. Therapeutic efficacy of the different available drugs-somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), dopamine agonists, and the GH antagonist Pegvisomant-is discussed, as are the indications for and efficacy of their respective combinations. Information on their mechanism of action, and some pharmakokinetic data are included. Special emphasis is given to the difficulties to define remission criteria of acromegaly due to technical assay problems. An algorithm for medical therapy in acromegaly is provided.

Effectiveness of self- or partner-administration of an extended-release aqueous-gel formulation of lanreotide in lanreotide-naïve patients with acromegaly

Surgical resection is often not curative in patients with acromegaly and long-acting somatostatin analogues (lanreotide or octreotide) are often needed. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of self- or partner-administration of lanreotide in patients with acromegaly. This was a six-month, single-arm, open-label study conducted at 13 endocrinology clinics. Fifty-nine patients received deep subcutaneous lanreotide injections every 28 days. Twelve patients started on 120 mg lanreotide and forty-seven started on 90 mg lanreotide. At week 16, the dose was adjusted to 60, 90 or 120 mg based on insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels at week 12. Fifty-nine patients with acromegaly either switched from long-acting octreotide (switch; n = 33) or were somatostatin analogue treatment-naïve or not currently taking long-acting octreotide ("other"; n = 26). The key endpoints included the percentage of patients/partners able to self- or partner-inject lanreotide and those with normal IGF-1 or growth hormone (GH) levels at week 24/early termination. 100% of patients/partners correctly self- (n = 41) or partner-injected (n = 18) lanreotide by week 4. By week 24/early termination, IGF-1 levels were controlled in 93.7% of switch and 46.2% of "other" patients, while GH levels were controlled in 76.9% and 39.1% of patients, respectively. Both IGF-1 and GH were controlled in 73.1% of switch and 30.4% of "other" patients. Most switch patients (81%) reported they preferred lanreotide over long-acting octreotide for future use (P = 0.0001). Self- or partner-administration of lanreotide is generally well tolerated and associated with IGF-1 and GH control in many lanreotide-naïve patients with acromegaly.

Prolactinomas, Cushing's disease and acromegaly: debating the role of medical therapy for secretory pituitary adenomas

Pituitary adenomas are associated with a variety of clinical manifestations resulting from excessive hormone secretion and tumor mass effects, and require a multidisciplinary management approach. This article discusses the treatment modalities for the management of patients with a prolactinoma, Cushing's disease and acromegaly, and summarizes the options for medical therapy in these patients.First-line treatment of prolactinomas is pharmacotherapy with dopamine agonists; recent reports of cardiac valve abnormalities associated with this class of medication in Parkinson's disease has prompted study in hyperprolactinemic populations. Patients with resistance to dopamine agonists may require other treatment.First-line treatment of Cushing's disease is pituitary surgery by a surgeon with experience in this condition. Current medical options for Cushing's disease block adrenal cortisol production, but do not treat the underlying disease. Pituitary-directed medical therapies are now being explored. In several small studies, the dopamine agonist cabergoline normalized urinary free cortisol in some patients. The multi-receptor targeted somatostatin analogue pasireotide (SOM230) shows promise as a pituitary-directed medical therapy in Cushing's disease; further studies will determine its efficacy and safety. Radiation therapy, with medical adrenal blockade while awaiting the effects of radiation, and bilateral adrenalectomy remain standard treatment options for patients not cured with pituitary surgery.In patients with acromegaly, surgery remains the first-line treatment option when the tumor is likely to be completely resected, or for debulking, especially when the tumor is compressing neurovisual structures. Primary therapy with somatostatin analogues has been used in some patients with large extrasellar tumors not amenable to surgical cure, patients at high surgical risk and patients who decline surgery. Pegvisomant is indicated in patients who have not responded to surgery and other medical therapy, although there are regional differences in when it is prescribed.In conclusion, the treatment of patients with pituitary adenomas requires a multidisciplinary approach. Dopamine agonists are an effective first-line medical therapy in most patients with a prolactinoma, and somatostatin analogues can be used as first-line therapy in selected patients with acromegaly. Current medical therapies for Cushing's disease primarily focus on adrenal blockade of cortisol production, although pasireotide and cabergoline show promise as pituitary-directed medical therapy for Cushing's disease; further long-term evaluation of efficacy and safety is important.

Effects of lanreotide SR and Autogel on tumor mass in patients with acromegaly: a systematic review

Long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSA) are widely used for the treatment of acromegaly achieving biochemical control of the disease in 50-75% of the patients. One of the goals of the treatment of acromegaly is the control of tumor growth, especially in patients in whom SSAs are used as first-line therapy. Over the recent years, there has been growing evidence that SSAs are able to induce tumor shrinkage in patients with acromegaly. However, most of the data are from patients under treatment with octreotide, either subcutaneously or intramuscularly with long-acting formulation, whereas the data on lanreotide SR or Autogel are very few. Indeed, octreotide and lanreotide, i.e. the two commercially available SSAs, show slight differences in pharmacokinetics and patterns of receptor affinities with potentially different therapeutic effects. We aimed to perform a systematic review of literature data concerning the shrinkage effects of long-acting lanreotide in patients with acromegaly. The analysis was focused on the following issues: differences in shrinkage effects between primary and secondary medical treatment, predictive value of baseline tumor volume and correlation between biochemical control and shrinkage effects. The peer-reviewed medical literature was searched to identify clinical trials studying the effects of lanreotide SR or Autogel on adenoma size in acromegaly. To be included in this analysis, studies had one of the following designs: randomized controlled trial; prospective, nonrandomized trial; retrospective study. Twenty-two studies were found to be eligible for the final analysis, in which tumor size was measured as an end-point for lanreotide treatment. Overall a total of 32.8% of patients experienced a variable degree (from 10 to 77%) of tumor shrinkage during lanreotide SR or Autogel treatment. The analysis showed that tumor shrinkage was more frequent in naïve patients as compared with those previously treated by radiotherapy, surgery or drugs other than lanreotide. The data on the correlation between tumor shrinkage and baseline tumor size were discordant, but when baseline tumor size was specified, more than 80% of patients undergoing shrinkage under lanreotide Autogel had macroadenomas. Finally, with lanreotide Autogel there was no evident correlation between biochemical response and tumor shrinkage. Our systematic review of the literature shows that lanreotide particularly when used as first-line therapy is able to quite frequently induce tumor shrinkage in patients with acromegaly. This finding suggests that this drug may have a role in the primary treatment of acromegaly.

Medical therapy of acromegaly: efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogues

Acromegaly is a chronic disease with signs and symptoms due to growth hormone (GH) excess. The most frequent cause of acromegaly is a GH-producing pituitary adenoma. Chronic GH excess is accompanied by long-term complications of the locomotor (arthrosis) and cardiovascular (atherosclerosis, cardiomyopathy) systems and is, when untreated, associated with an increased mortality. The aim of treatment of acromegaly is to improve symptoms, to achieve local tumour mass control, and to decrease morbidity and mortality. Treatment options include surgery, medical therapy and radiotherapy. Transsphenoidal surgery is the first choice of treatment when a definitive cure can be achieved, particularly in the case of microadenomas and when decompression of surrounding structures (optic chiasm, ophthalmic motor nerves) is indicated. Primary medical therapy has been increasingly applied in recent years, especially when a priori chances of surgical cure are low (because of adenoma size and localization) and in patients with advanced age and/or serious co-morbidity. In addition, preoperative primary medical therapy may result in tumour shrinkage, facilitating tumour resection, and may reduce perioperative complications due to GH excess. Within the spectrum of medical therapy, long-acting somatostatin analogues (somatostatins) are considered as first-line treatment. Treatment with somatostatin analogues results in GH control in approximately 60% of patients. In addition, somatostatin analogues induce tumour shrinkage in 30-50% of patients, particularly when applied as primary therapy. Prolonged treatment with somatostatin analogues appears to be safe and is usually well tolerated. The currently available somatostatin analogues, octreotide and lanreotide, seem to be equally effective; however, this should still be evaluated in prospective, randomized trials evaluating efficacy with respect to GH control and tumour shrinkage. In patients with an insufficient clinical and biochemical response to somatostatin analogues, combination therapy with dopamine receptor agonists or the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant usually leads to disease control. New developments in the medical therapy of acromegaly include the universal somatostatin receptor agonist pasireotide, which has a broader affinity for all somatostatin receptor (sst) subtypes compared with the currently available somatostatin analogues with preferential affinity for the sst2 receptor, and chimeric compounds that interact with both somatostatin and dopamine receptors with synergizing effects on GH secretion.

Acromegaly: correlation between expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes and response to octreotide-lar treatment

About one-third of acromegalics are resistant to the clinically available somatostatin analogs (SA). The resistance is related to density reduction or different expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTR). This study analyzes SSTR's expression in somatotrophinomas, comparing to SA response, hormonal levels, and tumor volume. We analyzed 39 somatotrophinomas; 49% were treated with SA. The most expressed SSTR was SSTR5, SSTR3, SSTR2, SSTR1, and SSTR4, respectively. SSTR1 and SSTR2 had higher expression in patients that had normalized GH and IGF-I. SSTR3 was more expressed in patients with tumor reduction. There was a positive correlation between the percentage of tumor reduction and SSTR1, SSTR2 and SSTR3 expression. Also, a positive correlation between SSTR2 mRNA expression and the immunohistochemical reactivity of SSTR2 was found. Our study confirmed the association between the SA response to GH and IGF-I and the SSTR2. Additionally, this finding was also demonstrated in relation to SSTR1.

Acromegaly

Acromegaly is an acquired disorder related to excessive production of growth hormone (GH) and characterized by progressive somatic disfigurement (mainly involving the face and extremities) and systemic manifestations. The prevalence is estimated at 1:140,000-250,000. It is most often diagnosed in middle-aged adults (average age 40 years, men and women equally affected). Due to insidious onset and slow progression, acromegaly is often diagnosed four to more than ten years after its onset. The main clinical features are broadened extremities (hands and feet), widened thickened and stubby fingers, and thickened soft tissue. The facial aspect is characteristic and includes a widened and thickened nose, prominent cheekbones, forehead bulges, thick lips and marked facial lines. The forehead and overlying skin is thickened, sometimes leading to frontal bossing. There is a tendency towards mandibular overgrowth with prognathism, maxillary widening, tooth separation and jaw malocclusion. The disease also has rheumatologic, cardiovascular, respiratory and metabolic consequences which determine its prognosis. In the majority of cases, acromegaly is related to a pituitary adenoma, either purely GH-secreting (60%) or mixed. In very rare cases, acromegaly is due to ectopic secretion of growth-hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) responsible for pituitary hyperplasia. The clinical diagnosis is confirmed biochemically by an increased serum GH concentration following an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and by detection of increased levels of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I). Assessment of tumor volume and extension is based on imaging studies. Echocardiography and sleep apnea testing are used to determine the clinical impact of acromegaly. Treatment is aimed at correcting (or preventing) tumor compression by excising the disease-causing lesion, and at reducing GH and IGF-I levels to normal values. Transsphenoidal surgery is often the first-line treatment. When surgery fails to correct GH/IGF-I hypersecretion, medical treatment with somatostatin analogs and/or radiotherapy can be used. The GH antagonist (pegvisomant) is used in patients that are resistant to somatostatin analogs. Adequate hormonal disease control is achieved in most cases, allowing a life expectancy similar to that of the general population. However, even if patients are cured or well-controlled, sequelae (joint pain, deformities and altered quality of life) often remain.

Medical therapy: options and uses

Since the initial use of medical treatment for acromegaly, several advances have been made in the understanding of the pathophysiology of growth hormone producing tumors, resulting in the development of multiple medical options and novel treatments. Currently there are three major classes of medication available for the treatment of acromegaly: somatostatin receptor ligands, growth hormone receptor antagonists, and dopamine agonists. Somatostatin receptor ligands are the treatment of choice for acromegaly due to their effectiveness in controlling growth hormone excess in approximately 60% of patients and their beneficial effects on tumor volume. Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy of pegvisomant in up to 97% of patients, but long term data and safety have yet to be established. Dopamine agonists are inexpensive, but their use is hampered by their lack of efficacy compared to other medications. Medical therapy has an established role as adjuvant therapy after non-curative surgery, as well as primary therapy for selected patients unsuitable for surgical resection. Medical treatment to control growth hormone hypersecretion is often needed after radiation therapy until the effects are evident. Preliminary data suggest a potential role for medical treatment prior to surgical resection, surgical debulking to improve medical efficacy, and combination therapy with multiple medications from the three classes. More studies are required, however, to validate the utility of these approaches in treating acromegaly. With the available therapies, disease control can be achieved in nearly all patients with acromegaly.

An audit of treatment outcome in acromegalic patients attending our center at Bergamo, Italy

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly is a chronic disease impacting on morbidity and mortality. Increased mortality is reverted after the achievement of hormonal targets. The relative role of treatment options is still matter of debate.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on all the acromegalic patients attending our center along the last 20 years.

RESULTS

Data about 159 patients (83 F) were retrieved and analyzed: 18% had been lost to follow-up, while follow-up was >5 years in 79%. Growth hormone (GH) at diagnosis was 24 microg/L (median, range 3-239). Pituitary MRI showed a macro-, micro-adenoma or no lesion in 73.6, 22.9, and 3.5%, respectively. Hyperprolactinemia (hyperPRL) was present in 20.8%. Ninety-six and 29 patients had been treated by neurosurgery (NS) and irradiated (RT), respectively. Drugs had been employed in 149 patients (in 58 as the only treatment). At the last evaluation, 22% of patients were cured (hypopituitarism and GH deficiency in 6.3%), 37.1% were controlled by ongoing pharmacological treatment, 22.6% had discordant GH and Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) values, and 18.2% had still active disease (median follow-up in this last group was 9 months). By evaluating the outcome with a multimodal approach, safe GH and normal IGF-I had been achieved in 78 and 63.5% of the whole series, 80.5 and 59.7% in patients submitted to NS (and adjuvantly treated with drugs), 95.8 and 91.7% in those submitted to NS + RT (and drugs as well), 70.2 and 55.2% in those treated only with drugs (increased to 82.2 and 60.9% if considering only patients treated with modern long-acting drugs). Hypopituitarism had occurred in 25, 66.6, and 13.8% in the three groups, respectively. At multivariate analysis, previous RT and NS were significant positive predictors of cure, whereas previous NS, follow-up, and year of diagnosis were significant positive predictors of control. Diabetes was a negative predictor both of cure and control. Sex, age, baseline GH levels, hyperPRL, tumor size, extrasellar extension, and invasiveness were not independent predictors of either cure or control.

CONCLUSION

This series seems to indicate that a multimodal approach can achieve control of disease in most patients.

Growth hormone and its disorders

Growth hormone (GH) is synthesised and secreted by the somatotroph cells of the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland. Its actions involve multiple organs and systems, affecting postnatal longitudinal growth as well as protein, lipid, and carbohydrate metabolism. GH hypersecretion results in gigantism or acromegaly, a condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality, while GH deficiency results in growth retardation in children and the GH deficiency syndrome in adults. This article, aimed at non-paediatric physicians, examines the clinical features, diagnosis, and current concepts in the management of these conditions.

Resistance to somatostatin analogs in acromegaly: an evolving concept?

The aim of acromegaly treatment is to control the disease by suppressing GH hyperactivity and reducing the size or impeding the growth of the pituitary GH secreting mass. Over recent years, many studies have emphasized the role of SS analogs in the treatment of acromegaly. In fact, SS analogs have been demonstrated to be an effective tool not only in the control of GH hypersecretion but also more recently in the control of tumor growth, in a relevant number of acromegalic patients both as primary or adjunctive treatment. In this context, the therapeutic failure of medical treatment with SS analogs needs to be accurately defined particularly when they are used as primary treatment but also when they are given to patients previously operated upon, since other effective therapeutic options are nowadays available. Current definition of resistance to SS analogs is based on their efficacy to control GH and IGF-I. However, due to the emerging significance of the shrinkage effect of SS analogs on pituitary adenomas as well as to the apparent dissociation between this effect and the biochemical effects of treatment with these analogs, an evolution in the concept of SS resistance is likely to be occurring. In this review, we will discuss the biological basis of the discordance between biochemical and volumetric effects of SS analogs, and we will address the intriguing clinical and therapeutic aspects related to a possible redefinition of the resistance to SS analogs.

Outcome of surgery for acromegaly performed by different surgeons: importance of surgical experience

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate transsphenoidal surgery results in acromegalic patients which were performed not by a single surgeon but by different surgeons.

METHODS

The study included 30 (M/F: 13/17) patients whose follow-up data were available. Basal or nadir postglucose growth hormone levels of less than 2 ng/ml were accepted as cure criteria. Six of them underwent a further operation due to previous surgical failure.

RESULTS

Cure was achieved in 33% of patients while hypopituitarism was observed in 10% (3/30) of patients after the first operation. The cure rates were 63% and 15% in patients with microadenomas (n = 11) and macroadenomas (n = 19) respectively (p = 0.042). Only one of the patients (16%) who underwent a second operation achieved remission, while hypopituitarism was observed in five of them (83%). There was no significant difference in the cure rates between the first and second operation, but the risk of hypopituitarism was significantly higher in patients who underwent further surgery (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

The cure rate following surgery is significantly lower in acromegalic patients with macroadenomas than in patients with microadenomas. Cure probability decreases with a further operation, while complication risk increases significantly. Octreotide therapy, which could be used as an alternative therapy to the surgery, revealed high success rates in both microadenomas and macroadenomas. The low cure rates found in this study compared with published series could be attributed to the fact that operations were performed by inexperienced surgeons.

Dramatic volume reduction of a large GH/TSH secreting pituitary tumor with short term Octreotide therapy

A case is presented of a huge GH/TSH secreting tumor and marked volumetric reduction in size with only one week of Octreotide therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of such a dramatic volumetric response to short-term Octreotide therapy.

Central and peripheral actions of somatostatin on the growth hormone-IGF-I axis

Somatostatin (SRIF) analogs provide safe and effective therapy for acromegaly. In a proportion of patients, however, SRIF analogs may lead to discordant growth hormone (GH) and IGF-I suppression, which suggests a more complex mechanism than attributable to inhibition of GH release alone. To elucidate whether SRIF acts peripherally on the GH-IGF-I axis, we showed that rat hepatocytes express somatostatin receptor subtypes-2 and -3 and that IGF-I mRNA and protein levels were suppressed in a dose-dependent manner by administration of octreotide. The inhibitory effect of SRIF was not apparent without added GH and in the presence of GH was specific for IGF-I induction and did not inhibit GH-induced c-myc or extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation. Pertussis toxin treatment of hepatocytes incubated with GH and SRIF, or with GH and octreotide, abrogated the inhibitory effect on GH-induced IGF-I, which confirms the requirement for the inhibitory G-protein. Treatment with SRIF and GH increased protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) activity and inhibited signal transducer and activator of transcription-5b (STAT5b) phosphorylation and nuclear localization. Octreotide also inhibited GH-stimulated IGF-I protein content of ex vivo-perfused rat livers. The results demonstrate that SRIF acts both centrally and peripherally to control the GH-IGF-I axis, providing a mechanistic explanation for SRIF analog action in treating patients with GH-secreting pituitary adenomas.

[82-year old patient with hyperostosis frontalis, prognathism, makroglossia and cutis gyrata. Acromegaly]

We present a 82 year old female patient with typical acral enlargement. There were no signs of visceromegaly. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pituitary region showed a macroadenoma. Oral glucose tolerance test revealed missing suppression of the Human Growth Hormone (HGH), which could be achieved with a long acting somatostatin analog. A HGH suppressive therapy with a long acting dopamine agonist (Cabergolin) was induced. The patient died one year later following cardiovascular complications.

The association between calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance P and headache in pituitary tumours

OBJECTIVES

To determine if the differential expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or substance P (SP) in a range of pituitary tumours was related to the presence or absence of headache.

METHODS

Using recognised immunohistochemical techniques we examined twenty-six consecutive pituitary adenoma specimens for the presence of CGRP and SP. We included one normal post mortem pituitary specimen for comparison. A separate observer divided the patients into two groups: headache and non-headache. The association between the presence of CGRP, SP and headache was observed.

RESULTS

We observed CGRP in seven specimens (27%) and SP in six tumour specimens (23%), with cytoplasmic staining being the predominant morphological picture. CGRP and SP were co-expressed in the same tumour specimen in five cases. There was no significant association between the presence of CGRP and headache (chi(2) 0.86; P = 0.35). We did not observe CGRP or SP in the control specimen. There was no correlation between tumour subtype and the presence of CGRP or SP.

CONCLUSIONS

The mechanism of pituitary tumour-associated headache remains undetermined. The significance of the presence of CGRP and SP in pituitary tumours is unknown but does not appear to be related to headache or endocrine activity of the tumour.

Somatostatin analogs as primary medical therapy for acromegaly

Acromegaly is a debilitating disease usually caused by a growth-hormone secreting pituitary adenoma. Therapeutic goals include improvement of symptoms, reduction in tumor mass, biochemical normalization, and preservation of pituitary function. Treatment options include transsphenoidal surgery, radiation, and pharmacotherapy. In view of the good cure rate, surgery remains the therapeutic modality of choice for most patients with microadenomas or well-circumscribed macroadenomas. In contrast, >40% of patients with invasive macroadenomas (who make up the majority of patients with acromegaly) will have residual disease following surgery, and require additional therapeutic intervention. Somatostatin analogs result in biochemical normalization in >60% of non-operated patients, and are well tolerated. Therefore, somatostatin analogs have emerged as a rational first-line treatment for the appropriately selected patient with acromegaly.

Modern treatment of acromegaly

Acromegaly is an endocrine disorder characterised by increased morbidity and mortality. It is usually caused by a growth hormone secreting pituitary adenoma and is manifested by a variety of clinical features. Surgery is usually the treatment of choice, however over the last few years, several new methods of treatment have been developed. A recent consensus on the targets for treatment has led to multiple studies being conducted to assess the efficacy of the currently available options. This review examines the evidence for and against these treatments.

The treatment of de novo acromegalic patients with octreotide-LAR: efficacy, tolerability and cardiovascular effects

AIM

Somatostatin analogues are normally used as adjunctive therapy to surgery and radiotherapy in management of acromegaly. We studied the effects of de novo OCT-LAR treatment on growth hormone (GH) suppression, tumour size, cardiovascular function, clinical symptoms, signs and quality of life in 9 newly diagnosed acromegalic patients.

METHODS

Patients commenced OCT-LAR 20 mg IM monthly for 2 months. Dose increased to 30 mg monthly if mean serum GH (MGH) > 5 mU/l (2 microg/litre) (7 patients). Treatment continued for 6 months. Cardiac function assessed by echocardiography at baseline and day 169. Left ventricular (LV) mass and ejection fraction (EF) calculated from 2D M-mode studies.

RESULTS

Serum GH demonstrated suppression in 8/9 patients (mean suppression 64.9% +/- 29.7%, range; 4-95.2%). MGH suppressed < 5 mU/ (2 microg/litre) in 3 (33%) patients. IGF-I and IGFBP3 normalised in 1 (12.5%) and 3 (38%) patients respectively. Tumour shrinkage seen in 30% patients. Eight patients were assessed by echocardiography. At baseline, 7 patients demonstrated abnormalities in LV mass and EF. At day 169, 6 patients demonstrated a fall and 1 an increase in LV mass. Overall there was no significant change in LV mass. A significant increase in EF was observed (p = 0.02). There were significant improvements in health perception (p = 0.01), fatigue (p < 0.05) and perspiration (p = 0.0039).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate OCT-LAR provides adequate control of acromegaly in a proportion of patients treated over 6 months. This is associated with improved LV function, evidenced by increased EF. Improved results are expected with longer-term treatment. OCT-LAR may be considered as primary treatment for acromegaly in selected patients.

Sustained improvement in vision in a recurrent growth hormone secreting macroadenoma during treatment with octreotide in the absence of marked tumour shrinkage

Visual improvement following octreotide for growth hormone secreting pituitary macroadenomas is uncommon without tumour shrinkage. A 45-year old lady presented with blurred vision for 12 months. Visual assessment revealed a bitemporal hemianopia and CT scan demonstrated a large pituitary tumour with lateral and suprasellar extension. Acromegaly was confirmed by 75 g glucose tolerance testing. Primary transsphenoidal surgery was performed with normalisation of visual acuity and fields of vision. Post-operatively she had anterior pituitary hormone deficiency. As GH and IGF-1 levels remained elevated she underwent external pituitary irradiation. CT scanning demonstrated tumour shrinkage associated with a modest fall in GH levels. IGF-1 levels remained elevated falling to the age-related upper limit of normal after 5 years. At regular review she had stable visual acuity and fields of vision. She presented as an emergency 7 years from presentation with reduced vision and recurrence of bitemporal hemianopia. An MRI demonstrated a large pituitary adenoma. We therefore undertook a carefully monitored trial of octreotide with great caution with daily reassessment of acuity and fields. A decision was made to proceed to surgery in the event of deterioration or lack of improvement after a short trial over 5-7 days. We observed normalisation of visual acuity and perimetry within 3 days. She then commenced long-acting octreotide (Sandostatin LAR) 20 mg every 28 days. MRI after 1 week showed shrinkage of the tumour by a few millimetres. Five months later repeat MRI failed to show any further improvement in tumour size. However she remains well 29 months from treatment with normal vision and is being monitored carefully as her chosen form of therapy. Somatostatin analogues may be effective as therapy in a selected group of patients with acromegaly and visual loss who are not suitable for pituitary surgery. If used in this way the drug must be given cautiously with frequent detailed ongoing visual assessments. In this present case there has been a restoration of vision but the long-term outlook remains guarded without significant tumor shrinkage.

Improvement of acromegaly after octreotide LAR treatment

Octreotide is a somatostatin analog that inhibits growth hormone release showing higher potency than natural somatostatin so it has proved to be effective in acromegaly treatment. The objective of present study was to establish the effects of octreotide LAR (long acting release) preparation in patients with active acromegaly. The following parameters were assessed: clinical response, safety of medication, GH and IGF-1 serum concentrations and pituitary tumor size. Eleven patients (6 men and 5 women) range 41.4 years old with diagnosis of active acromegaly were included. Octreotide was administered at 0.1 mg subcutaneusly dose three times daily for four weeks to test the drug tolerability. Afterwards patients received octreotide LAR 20 mg intramuscularly separated by 28 days periods with an option to continue for 8 months. Basal average GH serum concentrations was 27.6 ng/mL. After 6 months treatment reduction to 5.03 +/- 5.38 ng/mL in 9 patients (p < 0.001) was observed. Basal IGF-1 average serum concentration was 889.55 +/- 167.29 ng/mL with a reduction value to 483.00 +/- 239.71 ng/mL in 9 of 11 patients after 6 months treatment (p < 0.005). The drug was well tolerated with few adverse effects Diarrhea, flatulence and steatorrhea were observed during the administration of subcutaneous octreotide in 18.2% of patients. Two patients had symptomatic biliary lithiasis that was successfully removed by surgery. Clinical symptoms improved and some of them dissapeared such as headaches and sweatings. Tumor shrinkage was observed in 66.7% of cases. Monthly injections of 20 mg of octreotide LAR were effective to reduce GH and IGF-1 levels in patients with active acromegaly accompanied by improvement of clinical symptoms and significant tumor size reduction.

Medical management of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas

The primary treatment of acromegaly remains transsphenoidal adenomectomy, yet the tissue overgrowth of acromegaly often progresses following surgery, and responds to radiotherapy only after significant delay. Persistently elevated serum growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations can be normalized in about half of post-surgery acromegalics using the pharmacologic alternatives presently available, the dopamine agonists (DA) and somatostatin (SST) analogs. Cabergoline, the most efficacious DA, normalizes IGF-I in approximately 37% of patients, whereas the long-acting SST analogs, Octreotide LAR and Lanreotide SR, do so in 66%. Significant tumor shrinkage may be attained with SST analogs in particular, and when necessary, the primary medical treatment of acromegaly may be successfully addressed with this class of drugs. Greatly enhanced efficacy is expected from the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant, which is nearing market availability and will enable the normalization of serum IGF-I in virtually all patients treated. We review here the pharmacologic treatments of excessive GH secretion.

Acromegaly: historical perspectives and current therapy

Soon after the initial description of acromegaly in the late 19th century, neurosurgeons performed the first operative procedures for the disease. Transcranial procedures eventually yielded to the transsphenoidal approach. Reasonably effective medical therapy was introduced in the 1970s and pharmacological progress continues to be realized. It is now recognized that excess growth hormone is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and that biochemical remission improves outcome. Although medical and radiation treatments offer useful adjuncts, surgery provides optimal results.

Effectiveness of long-acting octreotide in suppressing hormonogenesis and tumor growth in thyrotropin-secreting pituitary adenomas: report of two cases

BACKGROUND

The subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of somatostatin analogs, such as octreotide acetate (SMS) and lanreotide, in patients with thyrotropin (TSH)-secreting pituitary adenomas (TSPA's)--thyrotropinomas with residual tumor after initial surgical therapy is effective in controlling hyperthyroidism, as well as curtailing tumor growth in the majority of patients. Long-acting preparations of the above agents, i.e. SMS-LAR and lanreotide-SR, have been synthesized and can be administered as depot injections intramuscularly (i.m.) at intervals of several weeks. Recent studies have reported on preliminary data regarding the use of such preparations in patients with TSPA's.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present two cases of TSPA's with residual tumor following transsphenoidal adenomectomy. Neither of the two patients underwent external beam pituitary irradiation. The presence and extent of tumoral TSH hypersecretion was assessed by standard biochemical and dynamic endocrine testing, while tumor size was evaluated by conventional radiographic techniques.

RESULTS

In both patients, TSH secretion was effectively suppressed by SMS-LAR. Moreover, administration of this compound halted further tumor growth, as well as resulted in improved patient comfort, for 12 and 10 months respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our date corroborate earlier reports on the usefulness of SMS-LAR in the medical management of patients with TSPA's who have residual disease after initial pituitary surgery and/or irradiation.

Minor tumour shrinkage in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas by long-term treatment with the dopamine agonist cabergoline

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to define safety and efficacy of medical therapy in the treatment of nonfunctioning pituitary tumours.

DESIGN

We studied thirteen patients with a clinically nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma for response to cabergoline treatment for 1 year. Twelve/13 patients were already operated and had residual or recurrent tumours.

METHODS

We determined the outcome of treatment by visual perimetry, computed tumour size measurement in MRI and hormonal response (changes in pituitary function, reduction of alpha-subunit).

RESULTS

Seven/13 patients on cabergoline had a tumour shrinkage above 10% of the initial tumour volume. In 4 patients, this tumour shrinkage was correlated to an increasing distance of the tumour to the optic chiasm. Only 2/9 patients with visual field defects before therapy showed improvements in visual acuity under cabergoline. No significant side effects of the therapeutical regimens were observed. Neither LH and/or FSH expression in the tumour cells nor the reduction of the alpha-subunit serum levels by medical therapy was correlated to tumour shrinkage.

CONCLUSION

Given that these patients had advanced disease which makes it difficult to find significant therapeutic effects, medical therapy with potent dopamine agonists such as cabergoline may evolve as a novel therapeutic option in a subgroup of patients with clinically nonfunctioning tumours declining operation and radiotherapy.

Lanreotide 60 mg, a longer-acting somatostatin analog: tumor shrinkage and hormonal normalization in acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogues are nowadays the milestone in the medical treatment of acromegaly. We evaluated the effects of a new 60 mg longer-acting formulation of lanreotide (LAN60) on GH/IGF-I levels and tumor size.

PATIENTS

Twenty-one acromegalics entered a prospective monocentric open study. Eight were consecutive "de novo" patients (group I). Thirteen patients sensitive to SA (GH levels < 2.5 [mgr]g/l and/or IGF-I normalization on chronic LAN 30 mg (LAN30) treatment) were switched to LAN60 (group II).

PROTOCOL

LAN60 was administered IM for 6 cycles at 28 day intervals. In group I when GH/IGF-I remained pathological, the intervals were shortened to 21 days for the last three cycles.

CONTROLS

GH/IGF-I at the end of the 1st, 3rd and 6th cycle; MRI at the end of the study in all patients in group I bearing an adenoma.

RESULTS

Group I. GH (p = 0.00638, below 2.5 [mgr]g/l in two patients) and IGF-I (p = 0.0289, normalized in 5) significantly decreased. In one of two patients shortening the LAN60 schedule was more effective in suppressing GH/IGF-I. Group II. No change in GH and IGF-I levels was observed with the administration of LAN60, instead of LAN30. On LAN60 GH remained below 2.5 [mgr]g/l in 8/10 patients and IGF-I normal in 11/11 patients that had attained those values on LAN30. Tumor markedly shrank (23% to 64% vs basal), from 1400 (664-1680) mm3 to 520 (500-960) mm3 (median, interquartile, p = 0.0218) in all the 5 evaluable patients.

CONCLUSION

LAN60 is a very effective and longer-lasting formulation for the treatment of acromegaly. A closer administration schedule might achieve greater efficacy. Its effectiveness in shrinking tumor opens new perspectives in the therapy of acromegaly.

Long-acting octreotide LAR compared with lanreotide SR in the treatment of acromegaly

The use of somatostatin analogues for the treatment of acromegaly is now well established. Recently long-acting preparations of octreotide and lanreotide have been introduced. In this study we have assessed the efficacy and tolerability of the long acting somatostatin analogue octreotide LAR in patients with acromegaly, and compared it with lanreotide SR. Five patients with active acromegaly were recruited; they were treated with lanreotide SR for 6 months and then, following a wash-out period, received octreotide LAR for 6 months. They were assessed at baseline, 3- and 6-months, by clinical score, GH and IGF1. Adverse effects were carefully monitored. Both treatments effectively reduced GH and IGF1 levels. Four of five patients achieved a mean GH level of < 2.5 ng/ml with both drugs; with octreotide LAR only, these patients also had GH < 1 ng/ml after oral glucose loading. The clinical symptoms score improved significantly with octreotide LAR, as did the ring size; the clinical score correlated significantly with GH. Blood glucose was not adversely affected. All patients experienced minor GI symptoms with lanreotide SR, but less frequently with octreotide LAR. Both drugs caused biliary stasis and had a tendency to form biliary sludge. Octreotide LAR proved effective for the treatment of acromegaly and was well tolerated. Octreotide LAR had some advantages over lanreotide SR, although the differences were not great.

Role of gamma knife radiosurgery in acromegaly

Stereotactic radiosurgery with the Gamma Knife allows the delivery of focused radiation in a single session from a Cobalt-60 source to a pituitary tumor with little radiation to surrounding normal brain tissue. At this time the major role for Gamma Knife radiosurgery in acromegaly is for the treatment of failed pituitary surgery although it may also by used as primary treatment for patients unwilling or unsuitable, for medical reasons, to undergo transsphenoidal surgery. The major risk from Gamma Knife radiosurgery appears to be radiation damage to the visual pathways, but this can be obviated by limiting the radiation dose to the optic chiasm under 10 Gy. In contrast, the neuronal and vascular structures running in the cavernous sinus are much less radiosensitive allowing an ablative dose to be administered to tumors showing lateral invasion and impinging on cranial nerves III, IV, V and VI. Gamma Knife radiosurgery appears to produce effects in GH secreting tumors faster than with fractionated radiotherapy without the potential long-term risk of developing a second extrapituitary brain tumor as well as the neuropsychiatric effects associated with conventional radiation administration.