Diagnostic yield of commercial immunodots to diagnose paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes

Central nervous system adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may trigger immune-related adverse events which rarely affect the central nervous system (CNS-irAEs). Over the past few years, cumulative data have led to the characterization of well defined syndromes with distinct cancer and antibody associations as well as different outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most frequent CNS-irAE is encephalitis, which includes three main groups: meningoencephalitis, a nonfocal syndrome usually responsive to corticosteroids; limbic encephalitis, associated with high-risk paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) antibodies (e.g. anti-Hu, anti-Ma2) and neuroendocrine cancers, characterized by poor treatment response and outcomes; and cerebellar ataxia, with variable outcomes (worse when high-risk PNS antibodies are detected). Additionally, a diffuse encephalopathy without inflammatory findings, with poor response to corticosteroids and high mortality has been described. The spectrum of CNS-irAEs also includes meningitis, myelitis, and rarer presentations. A subset of CNS-irAEs (i.e. limbic encephalitis and/or rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia) is undistinguishable from ICI-naïve PNS.

SUMMARY

The clinical and outcomes diversity of CNS-irAEs suggests different pathogenic mechanisms, which need to be understood to establish more effective and specific treatment modalities. It is crucial to identify biomarkers able to predict which patients will experience severe CNS-irAEs, to anticipate their diagnosis, and to predict long-term outcomes.

Progressive Encephalomyelopathy in an Older Man: A Case Report From the National Multiple Sclerosis Society Case Conference Proceedings

We present a case of subacute onset progressive encephalomyelopathy in a 77-year-old man with symmetric lateral column signal abnormalities on spinal MRI. We discuss the differential and presumptive final diagnosis along with a review of the postulated disease immunopathogenesis.

Comparative Study of Paraneoplastic and Nonparaneoplastic Autoimmune Encephalitis With GABABR Antibodies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

While patients with paraneoplastic autoimmune encephalitis (AE) with gamma-aminobutyric-acid B receptor antibodies (GABABR-AE) have poor functional outcomes and high mortality, the prognosis of nonparaneoplastic cases has not been well studied.

METHODS

Patients with GABABR-AE from the French and the Dutch Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes Reference Centers databases were retrospectively included and their data collected; the neurologic outcomes of paraneoplastic and nonparaneoplastic cases were compared. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotyping and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotyping were performed in patients with available samples.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients (44/111 [40%] women) were enrolled, including 84 of 111 (76%) paraneoplastic and 18 of 111 (16%) nonparaneoplastic cases (cancer status was undetermined for 9 patients). Patients presented with seizures (88/111 [79%]), cognitive impairment (54/111 [49%]), and/or behavioral disorders (34/111 [31%]), and 54 of 111 (50%) were admitted in intensive care unit (ICU). Nonparaneoplastic patients were significantly younger (median age 54 years [range 19-88] vs 67 years [range 50-85] for paraneoplastic cases, p < 0.001) and showed a different demographic distribution. Nonparaneoplastic patients more often had CSF pleocytosis (17/17 [100%] vs 58/78 [74%], p = 0.02), were almost never associated with KTCD16-abs (1/16 [6%] vs 61/70 [87%], p < 0.001), and were more frequently treated with second-line immunotherapy (11/18 [61%] vs 18/82 [22%], p = 0.003). However, no difference of IgG subclass or HLA association was observed, although sample size was small (10 and 26 patients, respectively). After treatment, neurologic outcome was favorable (mRS ≤2) for 13 of 16 (81%) nonparaneoplastic and 37 of 84 (48%) paraneoplastic cases (p = 0.03), while 3 of 18 (17%) and 42 of 83 (51%) patients had died at last follow-up (p = 0.008), respectively. Neurologic outcome no longer differed after adjustment for confounding factors but seemed to be negatively associated with increased age and ICU admission. A better survival was associated with nonparaneoplastic cases, a younger age, and the use of immunosuppressive drugs.

DISCUSSION

Nonparaneoplastic GABABR-AE involved younger patients without associated KCTD16-abs and carried better neurologic and vital prognoses than paraneoplastic GABABR-AE, which might be due to a more intensive treatment strategy. A better understanding of immunologic mechanisms underlying both forms is needed.

[Clinical characteristics of seizure-predominant autoimmune encephalitis and utility of anti-neuronal antibody scores for early treatment]

We analyzed 20 patients diagnosed with autoimmune neurological diseases with seizure predominance. In these patients, we examined the usefulness of Antibody Prevalence in Epilepsy and Encephalopathy (APE2) score and Antibodies Contributing to Focal Epilepsy Signs and Symptoms (ACES) score in autoimmune encephalitis (AE) for facilitating early treatment. APE2 score was positive in 19 of 20 patients. ACES score was positive in 15 of 20 patients, and 4 of 5 of the patients with negative ACES score did not have AE. Comprehensive assessment including the use of the above scores is desirable in the early stage of AE.

Neurological Adverse Events Related to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Practical Review

The increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in cancer therapy has brought attention to their associated neurotoxicities, termed neurological immune-related adverse events (n-irAEs). Despite their relatively rare incidence, n-irAEs pose a significant risk, potentially leading to severe, long-lasting disabilities or even fatal outcomes. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of n-irAEs, focusing on their recognition and management. The review addresses a spectrum of n-irAEs, encompassing myositis, myasthenia gravis, various neuropathies, and central nervous system complications, such as encephalitis, meningitis, and demyelinating diseases. The key features of n-irAEs are emphasized in this review, including their early onset after initiation of ICIs, potential association with non-neurological irAEs and/or concurrent oncological response, the significance of ruling out other etiologies, and the expected improvement upon discontinuation of ICIs and/or immunosuppression. Furthermore, this review delves into considerations for ICI re-challenge and the intricate nature of n-irAEs within the context of pre-existing autoimmune and paraneoplastic syndromes. It underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment, highlighting the pivotal role of severity grading in guiding treatment decisions.

Seroprevalence of neuronal antibodies in diseases mimicking autoimmune encephalitis

Detection of neuronal antibodies for autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes relies on commercially available cell-based assays and lineblots. However, lineblots may reveal the presence of neuronal antibodies in patients with various non-autoimmune etiologies. Herein we describe patients with non-autoimmune etiologies (cohort B) and detectable neuronal antibodies and compare them to definite cases of autoimmune encephalitis (cohort A) for differences in clinical data. All patients positive for at least one neuronal antibody were retrospectively evaluated for autoimmune encephalitis and/or paraneoplastic neurological syndrome between 2016 and 2022. 39 cases in cohort B and 23 in cohort A were identified. In cohort B, most common diagnoses were neurodegenerative disorders in 9/39 (23.1%), brain tumors in 6/39 (15.4%) while most common detected antibodies were anti-titin (N10), anti-recoverin (N11), anti-Yo (N8) and all were detected in serum only. Differential aspects between cohort A and B were CSF pleocytosis (14/23 (60.8%) vs 11/35 (31.4%), p = 0.042, respectively), MRI features suggestive of encephalitis (6/23 (26.1%) vs 0 (0%), p = 0.002, respectively) and epilepsy restricted to temporal lobes (14/23 (60.9%) vs 2/30 (6.7%), p = 0.0003, respectively). A large proportion of lineblot results were non-specific when only serum was tested and were frequently found in non-autoimmune neurological conditions.

Low prevalence of neural autoantibodies in perioperative cerebrospinal fluid samples of epilepsy surgery patients: A multicenter prospective study

OBJECTIVE

Refractory epilepsy may have an underlying autoimmune etiology. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of neural autoantibodies in a multicenter national prospective cohort of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing epilepsy surgery utilizing comprehensive clinical, serologic, and histopathological analyses.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited patients undergoing epilepsy surgery for refractory focal epilepsy not caused by a brain tumor from epilepsy surgery centers in the Czech Republic. Perioperatively, we collected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and/or serum samples and performed comprehensive commercial and in-house assays for neural autoantibodies. Clinical data were obtained from the patients' medical records, and histopathological analysis of resected brain tissue was performed.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were included, mostly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-lesional cases (74%). Mean time from diagnosis to surgery was 21 ± 13 years. Only one patient (1.3%) had antibodies in the CSF and serum (antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase 65) in relevant titers; histology revealed focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) III (FCD associated with hippocampal sclerosis [HS]). Five patients' samples displayed CSF-restricted oligoclonal bands (OCBs; 6.6%): three cases with FCD (one with FCD II and two with FCD I), one with HS, and one with negative histology. Importantly, eight patients (one of them with CSF-restricted OCBs) had findings on antibody testing in individual serum and/or CSF tests that could not be confirmed by complementary tests and were thus classified as nonspecific, yet could have been considered specific without confirmatory testing. Of these, two had FCD, two gliosis, and four HS. No inflammatory changes or lymphocyte cuffing was observed histopathologically in any of the 76 patients.

SIGNIFICANCE

Neural autoantibodies are a rare finding in perioperatively collected serum and CSF of our cohort of mostly MRI-lesional epilepsy surgery patients. Confirmatory testing is essential to avoid overinterpretation of autoantibody-positive findings.

Canadian Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Autoimmune Encephalitis in Adults

Autoimmune encephalitis is increasingly recognized as a neurologic cause of acute mental status changes with similar prevalence to infectious encephalitis. Despite rising awareness, approaches to diagnosis remain inconsistent and evidence for optimal treatment is limited. The following Canadian guidelines represent a consensus and evidence (where available) based approach to both the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with autoimmune encephalitis. The guidelines were developed using a modified RAND process and included input from specialists in autoimmune neurology, neuropsychiatry and infectious diseases. These guidelines are targeted at front line clinicians and were created to provide a pragmatic and practical approach to managing such patients in the acute setting.

Neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the development of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, a class of oncological treatments that enhance antitumour immunity, can trigger neurological adverse events closely resembling paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Unlike other neurological adverse events caused by these drugs, post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes predominantly affect the CNS and are associated with neural antibodies and cancer types commonly found also in spontaneous paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Furthermore, post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes have poorer neurological outcomes than other neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Early diagnosis and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy are likely to be crucial in preventing the accumulation of neurological disability. Importantly, the neural antibodies found in patients with post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes are sometimes detected before treatment, indicating that these antibodies might help to predict the development of neurological adverse events. Experimental and clinical evidence suggests that post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes probably share immunological features with spontaneous paraneoplastic syndromes. Hence, the study of post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes can help in deciphering the immunopathogenesis of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and in identifying novel therapeutic targets.

Clinical approach to diagnosis of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes

The correct diagnosis of a paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome (PNS) first requires the identification of the syndrome as one of those defined as high-risk (previously called classical) or intermediate-risk for cancer in the 2021 PNS diagnostic criteria. Testing for neuronal antibodies should be restricted to these syndromes as indiscriminate request decreases the diagnostic value of the antibodies. Identifying onconeural (high-risk for cancer) or intermediate-risk for cancer antibodies supports the paraneoplastic diagnosis and mandates the search for an underlying cancer. Tumor screening must follow the published guidelines. Repeated screening is indicated in neurologic syndromes with onconeural antibodies and patients with high-risk for cancer neurologic syndromes unless they present neuronal antibodies which are not associated with cancer. Neuronal antibodies should be screened by immunohistochemistry and confirmed by immunoblot (intracellular antigens) or cell-based assay (CBA) (surface antigens). Positive results only by immunoblot or CBA should be taken with caution. Although the 2021 diagnostic criteria for PNS do not capture all PNS, as they do not allow to diagnose definite PNS neurologic syndromes without neuronal antibodies, the updated criteria represent a step forward to differentiate true PNS from neurologic syndromes that coincide in time with cancer diagnosis without having a pathogenic link.

Optimizing the diagnostic performance of neural antibody testing for paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis in clinical practice

The detection of neural antibodies in patients with paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis has majorly advanced the diagnosis and management of neural antibody-associated diseases. Although testing for these antibodies has historically been restricted to specialized centers, assay commercialization has made this testing available to clinical chemistry laboratories worldwide. This improved test accessibility has led to reduced turnaround time and expedited diagnosis, which are beneficial to patient care. However, as the utilization of these assays has increased, so too has the need to evaluate how they perform in the clinical setting. In this chapter, we discuss assays for neural antibody detection that are in routine use, draw attention to their limitations and provide strategies to help clinicians and laboratorians overcome them, all with the aim of optimizing neural antibody testing for paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis in clinical practice.

Paraneoplastic neuropathies and peripheral nerve hyperexcitability disorders

Peripheral neuropathy is a common referral for patients to the neurologic clinics. Paraneoplastic neuropathies account for a small but high morbidity and mortality subgroup. Symptoms include weakness, sensory loss, sweating irregularity, blood pressure instability, severe constipation, and neuropathic pain. Neuropathy is the first presenting symptom of malignancy among many patients. The molecular and cellular oncogenic immune targets reside within cell bodies, axons, cytoplasms, or surface membranes of neural tissues. A more favorable immune treatment outcome occurs in those where the targets reside on the cell surface. Patients with antibodies binding cell surface antigens commonly have neural hyperexcitability with pain, cramps, fasciculations, and hyperhidrotic attacks (CASPR2, LGI1, and others). The antigenic targets are also commonly expressed in the central nervous system, with presenting symptoms being myelopathy, encephalopathy, and seizures with neuropathy, often masked. Pain and autonomic components typically relate to small nerve fiber involvement (nociceptive, adrenergic, enteric, and sudomotor), sometimes without nerve fiber loss but rather hyperexcitability. The specific antibodies discovered help direct cancer investigations. Among the primary axonal paraneoplastic neuropathies, pathognomonic clinical features do not exist, and testing for multiple antibodies simultaneously provides the best sensitivity in testing (AGNA1-SOX1; amphiphysin; ANNA-1-HU; ANNA-3-DACH1; CASPR2; CRMP5; LGI1; PCA2-MAP1B, and others). Performing confirmatory antibody testing using adjunct methods improves specificity. Antibody-mediated demyelinating paraneoplastic neuropathies are limited to MAG-IgM (IgM-MGUS, Waldenström's, and myeloma), with the others associated with cytokine elevations (VEGF, IL6) caused by osteosclerotic myeloma, plasmacytoma (POEMS), and rarely angiofollicular lymphoma (Castleman's). Paraneoplastic disorders have clinical overlap with other idiopathic antibody disorders, including IgG4 demyelinating nodopathies (NF155 and Contactin-1). This review summarizes the paraneoplastic neuropathies, including those with peripheral nerve hyperexcitability.

Evolution of methods to detect paraneoplastic antibodies

An adaptive immune response in less than 1% of people who develop cancer produces antibodies against neuronal proteins. These antibodies can be associated with paraneoplastic syndromes, and their accurate detection should instigate a search for a specific cancer. Over the years, multiple systems, from indirect immunofluorescence to live cell-based assays, have been developed to identify these antibodies. As the specific antigens were identified, high throughput, multi-antigen substrates such as line blots and ELISAs were developed for clinical laboratories. However, the evolution of assays required to identify antibodies to membrane targets has shone a light on the importance of antigen conformation for antibody detection. This chapter discusses the early antibody assays used to detect antibodies to nuclear and cytosolic targets and how new approaches are required to detect antibodies to membrane targets. The chapter presents recent data that support international recommendations against the sole use of line blots for antibody detection and highlights a new antigen-specific approach that appears promising for the detection of submembrane targets.

General features, pathogenesis, and laboratory diagnostics of autoimmune encephalitis

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a group of inflammatory conditions that can associate with the presence of antibodies directed to neuronal intracellular, or cell surface antigens. These disorders are increasingly recognized as an important differential diagnosis of infectious encephalitis and of other common neuropsychiatric conditions. Autoantibody diagnostics plays a pivotal role for accurate diagnosis of AE, which is of utmost importance for the prompt recognition and early treatment. Several AE subgroups can be identified, either according to the prominent clinical phenotype, presence of a concomitant tumor, or type of neuronal autoantibody, and recent diagnostic criteria have provided important insights into AE classification. Antibodies to neuronal intracellular antigens typically associate with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and poor prognosis, whereas antibodies to synaptic/neuronal cell surface antigens characterize many AE subtypes that associate with tumors less frequently, and that are often immunotherapy-responsive. In addition to the general features of AE, we review current knowledge on the pathogenic mechanisms underlying these disorders, focusing mainly on the potential role of neuronal antibodies in the most frequent conditions, and highlight current theories and controversies. Then, we dissect the crucial aspects of the laboratory diagnostics of neuronal antibodies, which represents an actual challenge for both pathologists and neurologists. Indeed, this diagnostics entails technical difficulties, along with particularly interesting novel features and pitfalls. The novelties especially apply to the wide range of assays used, including specific tissue-based and cell-based assays. These assays can be developed in-house, usually in specialized laboratories, or are commercially available. They are widely used in clinical immunology and in clinical chemistry laboratories, with relevant differences in analytic performance. Indeed, several data indicate that in-house assays could perform better than commercial kits, notwithstanding that the former are based on non-standardized protocols. Moreover, they need expertise and laboratory facilities usually unavailable in clinical chemistry laboratories. Together with the data of the literature, we critically evaluate the analytical performance of the in-house vs commercial kit-based approach. Finally, we propose an algorithm aimed at integrating the present strategies of the laboratory diagnostics in AE for the best clinical management of patients with these disorders.

Clinical Impact of Pre-Existing Autoantibodies in Patients With SCLC Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study

Introduction

Although pretreatment autoantibodies have been associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment efficacy in some types of cancer, their importance has not been evaluated in patients with SCLC.

Methods

A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted on a total of 52 patients with extensive-disease SCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment at either of the six participating centers in Japan. Pretreatment serum samples were collected and analyzed for autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid). Moreover, 12 antineuronal antibodies (AMPH, CV2, PNMA2, Ri, Yo, Hu, Recoverin, SOX1, Titin, Zic4, GAD65, and Tr) were analyzed using immunoblot assays. The primary end point was the incidence of irAEs with or without autoantibodies. The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on the basis of the presence or absence of autoantibodies.

Results

PFS and OS were 4.4 and 25.3 months, respectively. Autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid antibodies) were detected in 29 patients (56%). In total, irAEs were observed in 18 patients (35%); irAE incidence was 48% in the autoantibody-positive group and 17% in the autoantibody-negative group (p = 0.039). There was no difference in PFS or OS between patients with and without autoantibodies (4.4 mo versus 4.6 mo, p = 0.36; 15.3 mo versus 18.2 mo, p = 0.36). Antineuronal antibodies were detected in 16 patients (31%). However, the development of neurologic irAEs was not observed in both groups.

Conclusions

Vigilance is required against the development of irAEs in pretreatment antibody-positive patients.

Antibody-Negative Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) refers to a heterogenous group of inflammatory CNS diseases. Subgroups with specified neural autoantibodies are more homogeneous in presentation, trigger factors, outcome, and response to therapy. However, a considerable fraction of patients has AE features but does not harbor detectable autoantibodies and is referred to as antibody-negative AE. Our aim was to describe clinical features, trigger factors, treatments, and outcome of a cohort of comprehensively tested antibody-negative AE patients.

METHODS

This retrospective monocentric study recruited adult patients whose serum and/or CSF was sent to our tertiary center for neural antibody testing between 2011 and 2020, who entered the diagnostic algorithm as possible antibody-negative AE and had the following: (1) probable antibody-negative AE, definite antibody-negative acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), or definite autoimmune limbic encephalitis (LE) according to diagnostic criteria; (2) available data on MRI of the brain, CSF, and EEG; and (3) stored serum and/or CSF samples. These samples were reanalyzed using a comprehensive combination of cell-based and tissue-based assays.

RESULTS

Of 2,250 patients tested, 33 (1.5%) were classified as possible antibody-negative AE. Of these, 5 were found to have antibodies by comprehensive testing, 5 fulfilled the criteria of probable AE (3F:2M, median age 67, range 42-67), 4 of definite autoimmune LE (2F:2M, median age 45.5, range 27-60 years), one of definite antibody-negative ADEM, 2 of Hashimoto encephalopathy, one had no samples available for additional testing, and 15 had no further categorization. Of 10 probable/definite AE/LE/ADEM, one had a malignancy and none of them received an alternative diagnosis until the end of follow-up (median 18 months). In total, 80% (8/10) of patients received immunotherapy including corticosteroids, and 6/10 (60%) patients received rituximab, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange, or IV immunoglobulins. Five (50%) patients improved, one (10%) stabilized, one (10%) worsened, and 3 (30%) died. All deaths were considered to be related to encephalitis. We did not observe differences of immunotherapy-treated patients in likelihood of improvement with or without nonsteroidal immunotherapy (with 2/6, without 1/2).

DISCUSSION

Antibody-negative AE should be diagnosed only after comprehensive testing. Diagnostic effort is important because many patients benefit from immunotherapy and some have malignancies.

Searching for Neuronal Antibodies in Psychiatric Diseases: Uncertain Findings and Implications

In recent years, neurology and psychiatry journals have been inundated with reports on individual symptoms of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) that are described as distinct entities such as autoimmune psychosis, obsessive-compulsive disorders, or depression. It is unquestionable that for AE the demonstration of antibodies against neuronal-surface proteins is intrinsically linked to distinct disorders (some defining new diseases) that are usually treatment-responsive and associate with comorbidities that vary according to the antigen. By contrast, for psychiatric diseases, the apparent detection of antibodies has not defined any disorder or affected the diagnosis and treatment of patients. Although these studies frequently use anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis to rationalize the findings, they rarely adopt the same rigorous investigations or address the clinical and pathogenic significance of the antibodies or discuss the limitations related to the biological sample or antibody-testing techniques. It is imperative to consider (1) some antibodies (GAD65, TPO) occur in serum of 8%-13% of healthy people; (2) VGKC antibodies are not useful unless LGI1 or CASPR2 are investigated; (3) commercial-clinical testing for Ma2, Zic4, and SOX1 antibodies causes a high number of false-positive results; (4) GlyR antibodies have unclear disease specificity when examined only in serum; and (5) the significance of antibodies against unknown antigens of endothelium, astrocytes, myelin fibers, or granule cells of hippocampus and cerebellum is questioned by the lack of disease specificity and appropriate controls. These limitations and problems are a frequent cause of neurologic consultations. Here we discuss some of these problems, emphasizing the importance of clinical judgment over antibody findings.

CDR2 and CDR2L line blot performance in PCA-1/anti-Yo paraneoplastic autoimmunity

Background

Purkinje cytoplasmic autoantibody type 1 (PCA-1)/anti-Yo autoimmunity is a common high-risk paraneoplastic neurological disorder, traditionally attributed antigenically to cerebellar degeneration-related protein 2 (CDR2), predominantly affecting women with gynecologic or breast adenocarcinoma. Single-modality CDR2 testing may produce false-positive results. We assessed the performance characteristics of the more recently purported major PCA-1/Yo antigen, CDR2-like (CDR2L), side by side with CDR2, in a line blot format.

Methods

CDR2 and CDR2L were tested in six specimen groups (serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)). Group 1, PCA-1/Yo mouse brain indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) positives; Group 2, PCA-1/Yo IFA mimics; Group 3, suspected CDR2 line blot false positives; Group 4, consecutive patient samples tested for neural antibodies over 1 year; Group 5, healthy subject serums; and Group 6, polyclonal (non-specific) immunoglobulin G (IgG)-positive serums.

Results

Group 1: Of 64 samples tested, all but two were CDR2 positive (both CSF samples) and all were CDR2L positive. In individual patients, CDR2L values were always higher than CDR2. The two "CDR2L-only" positives were CSF samples with low titer PCA-1/Yo by IFA with serum negativity but with typical clinical phenotype. Group 2: All 51 PCA-1/Yo mimics were CDR2/CDR2L negative. Group 3: Nine samples [six of 1289 (0.47%) serums and three of 700 CSF samples (0.43%) were PCA-1/Yo IFA negative/CDR2 positive; two of the six available (serums from the same patient) were also CDR2L positive; the other four CDR2L negative had low CDR2 values (17-22). Group 4: Twenty-two patients had unexpected CDR2 or CDR2L positivity; none had tissue IFA positivity. Eleven of the 2,132 serum (0.5%) and three of the 677 CSF (0.4%) samples were CDR2 positive; median value was 19 (range, 11-48). Seven of the 2,132 serum (0.3%) and three of the 677 CSF (0.4%) samples were CDR2L positive; median value was 18 (range, 11-96). Group 5: All 151 healthy serum samples were negative. Group 6: One of the 46 polyclonal serum samples was CDR2L positive. Optimum overall performance was accomplished by requiring both CDR2 and CDR2L positivity in serum (sensitivity, 100%; and specificity, 99.9%) and positivity for CDR2L in CSF (sensitivity, 100%; and specificity, 99.6%).

Conclusion

CDR2L provides additional PCA-1/anti-Yo sensitivity in CSF, and dual positivity with CDR2 provides additional specificity assurance in serum. Combining antigen-specific and tissue-based assays optimizes PCA-1/anti-Yo testing.

Antibodies Associated With Autoimmune Encephalitis in Patients With Presumed Neurodegenerative Dementia

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) may present with prominent cognitive disturbances without overt inflammatory changes in MRI and CSF. Identification of these neurodegenerative dementia diagnosis mimics is important because patients generally respond to immunotherapy. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of neuronal antibodies in patients with presumed neurodegenerative dementia and describe the clinical characteristics of the patients with neuronal antibodies.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 920 patients were included with neurodegenerative dementia diagnosis from established cohorts at 2 large Dutch academic memory clinics. In total, 1,398 samples were tested (both CSF and serum in 478 patients) using immunohistochemistry (IHC), cell-based assays (CBA), and live hippocampal cell cultures (LN). To ascertain specificity and prevent false positive results, samples had to test positive by at least 2 different research techniques. Clinical data were retrieved from patient files.

RESULTS

Neuronal antibodies were detected in 7 patients (0.8%), including anti-IgLON5 (n = 3), anti-LGI1 (n = 2), anti-DPPX, and anti-NMDAR. Clinical symptoms atypical for neurodegenerative diseases were identified in all 7 and included subacute deterioration (n = 3), myoclonus (n = 2), a history of autoimmune disease (n = 2), a fluctuating disease course (n = 1), and epileptic seizures (n = 1). In this cohort, no patients with antibodies fulfilled the criteria for rapidly progressive dementia (RPD), yet a subacute deterioration was reported in 3 patients later in the disease course. Brain MRI of none of the patients demonstrated abnormalities suggestive for AIE. CSF pleocytosis was found in 1 patient, considered as an atypical sign for neurodegenerative diseases. Compared with patients without neuronal antibodies (4 per antibody-positive patient), atypical clinical signs for neurodegenerative diseases were seen more frequently among the patients with antibodies (100% vs 21%, p = 0.0003), especially a subacute deterioration or fluctuating course (57% vs 7%, p = 0.009).

DISCUSSION

A small, but clinically relevant proportion of patients suspected to have neurodegenerative dementias have neuronal antibodies indicative of AIE and might benefit from immunotherapy. In patients with atypical signs for neurodegenerative diseases, clinicians should consider neuronal antibody testing. Physicians should keep in mind the clinical phenotype and confirmation of positive test results to avoid false positive results and administration of potential harmful therapy for the wrong indication.

Presence of neural surface and onconeural autoantibodies in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in neurological diseases presents a potential risk for misdiagnosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Autoantibodies have been found to contribute to pathology and are used in the diagnosis of some neurological diseases. We examined the prevalence of autoantibodies in patients with various neurological diseases and whether patients who had autoantibodies differed in age, sex, or disability from those who did not.

METHODS

We examined the prevalence of neural surface and onconeural autoantibodies in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum from patients with multiple sclerosis (n = 64), Parkinson disease plus atypical parkinsonism (n = 150), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (n = 43), or autoimmune encephalitis (positive control; n = 7) and a healthy control group (n = 37). A total of 12 onconeural autoantibodies and six neural surface autoantibodies were tested in all participants.

RESULTS

Autoantibodies were present in all cohorts. The prevalence of autoantibodies was high (>80%) in the autoimmune encephalitis cohort but low (<20%) in all other cohorts. When comparing patients within cohorts who were positive for autoantibodies to patients who were not, there was no difference in age, sex, and disability. This was apart from the multiple sclerosis and Parkinson disease plus atypical parkinsonism cohorts, where those with positivity for autoantibodies in the CSF were significantly older.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of the autoantibodies examined does not appear to have a substantial clinical impact within the diseases examined in this study. The presence of autoantibodies in all cohorts presents a risk for misdiagnosis when the method is used incorrectly on patients with atypical clinical presentation.

Anti-LGI1 Encephalitis With Co-occurring IgLON5 Antibodies: Clinical Features and Human Leukocyte Antigen Haplotypes

OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) with antibodies against LGI1 and IgLON5 are clinically distinctive but share some particularities such as a strong association with specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II alleles.

METHODS

We clinically describe a patient with double positivity for LGI1 and IgLON5 antibodies. In addition, we conducted specific immunodepletion with the patient's serum and HLA typing and investigated the presence of serum IgLON5 antibodies in a cohort of 23 anti-LGI1 patients carrying the HLA predisposing for anti-IgLON5 encephalitis.

RESULTS

A 70-year-old woman with a history of lymphoepithelial thymoma presented with subacute cognitive impairment and seizures. Investigations included MRI and EEG showing medial temporal involvement, increased CSF protein content, and polysomnography with REM and non-REM motor activity, along with obstructive apnea. Neural antibody testing revealed both LGI1 and IgLON5 antibodies in serum and CSF, and serum immunodepletion ruled out cross-reactivity. The patient carried DRB1*07:01 and DQA1*01:01∼DQB1*05:01, but no other IgLON5-positive case was identified in a cohort of anti-LGI1 patients carrying DQA1*01∼DQB1*05. Nearly full therapeutic response was obtained after intensified immunosuppressive treatment.

DISCUSSION

We present a case of anti-LGI1 encephalitis with concomitant IgLON5 antibodies. Co-occurring IgLON5 antibodies in anti-LGI1 encephalitis are exceptional, but may appear in genetically predisposed individuals.

Paraneoplastic encephalitis: clinically based approach on diagnosis and management

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNSs) comprise a subset of immune-mediated nervous system diseases triggered by an underlying malignancy. Each syndrome usually shows a distinct clinical presentation and outcome according to the associated neural antibodies. PNSs generally have a subacute onset with rapid progression and severe neurological disability. However, some patients may have hyperacute onset or even show chronic progression mimicking neurodegenerative diseases. Updated diagnostic criteria for PNS have been recently established in order to increase diagnostic specificity and to encourage standardisation of research initiatives related to PNS. Treatment for PNS includes oncological therapy and immunomodulation to halt neurological deterioration although current treatment options are seldom effective in reversing disability. Nevertheless, growing knowledge and better understanding of PNS pathogenesis promise better recognition, earlier diagnosis and novel treatment strategies. Considering that PNSs provide a model of effective anticancer immunity, the impact of these studies will extend far beyond the field of neurology.

Case report: Reversible brain atrophy with low titer anti-amphiphysin antibodies related to gastric adenocarcinoma

Amphiphysin (AMPH) autoimmunity is associated with a variety of neurological complications, including encephalitis, peripheral neuropathy, myelopathy, and cerebellar syndrome. Its diagnosis is based on clinical neurological deficits and the presence of serum anti-AMPH antibodies. Active immunotherapy, such as intravenous immunoglobulins, steroids, and other immunosuppressive therapies, has been reported to be effective in most patients. However, the extent of recovery varies depending on the case. Herein, we report the case of a 75-year-old woman with semi-rapidly progressive systemic tremors, visual hallucinations, and irritability. Upon hospitalization, she developed a mild fever and cognitive impairment. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed semi-rapidly progressive diffuse cerebral atrophy (DCA) over 3 months, while no clear abnormal intensities were observed. The nerve conduction study revealed sensory and motor neuropathy in the limbs. The fixed tissue-based assay (TBA) failed to detect antineuronal antibodies; however, based on commercial immunoblots, the presence of anti-AMPH antibodies was suspected. Therefore, serum immunoprecipitation was performed, which confirmed the presence of anti-AMPH antibodies. The patient also had gastric adenocarcinoma. High-dose methylprednisolone, and intravenous immunoglobulin were administered and tumor resection was performed, resulting in resolution of the cognitive impairment and improvement in the DCA on the post-treatment MRI. After immunotherapy and tumor resection, the patient's serum was analyzed using immunoprecipitation, which showed a decrease in the level of anti-AMPH antibodies. This case is noteworthy because the DCA showed improvement after immunotherapy and tumor resection. Additionally, this case demonstrates that negative TBA with positive commercial immunoblots do not necessarily indicate false positive results.

SOX1 antibody-related paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: clinical correlates and assessment of laboratory diagnostic techniques

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical associations of SOX1 antibodies (SOX1-Abs), determine the accuracy of various detection techniques, and propose laboratory criteria to identify definite paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) associated with SOX1-Abs.

METHODS

Single-center, retrospective study of patients referred to the French Reference Center between 2009 and 2019 for confirmation of SOX1-Ab positivity, without concurrent neural antibodies. Patients were classified according to the updated diagnostic PNS criteria; biological samples were systematically retested with three distinct techniques (line blot, cell-based assay, indirect immunofluorescence).

RESULTS

Among 77 patients with isolated SOX1-Ab positivity, 23 (29.9%) fulfilled the criteria for definite PNS; all of them had lung cancer (mostly small-cell) and presented mainly with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (10/23) and rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia (6/23). SOX1-Ab positivity varied depending on the laboratory methods which were used, and a single technique was not sufficient to draw conclusions about the PNS diagnosis. The combination of an antigen-specific test (line blot and/or cell-based assay) and immunofluorescence showed the highest accuracy (81.5%, 95% CI 70.0-90.1) in identifying definite PNS. Moreover, when the PNS-Care score was recalculated assigning three points at the laboratory-level only to patients with positive "antigenic-specific test + immunofluorescence" and 0 points to the remaining cases, a higher certainty for definite and non-PNS was achieved (from 41/77, 53.2%, to 60/77, 77.9%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SOX1-Abs should be considered high-risk antibodies only when detected with a positive antigenic-specific test and immunofluorescence. Other laboratory results and clinical associations different from Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome and rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia should be carefully reassessed to rule out false positivity and alternative diagnoses.

Anti-kelchlike protein 11 antibody-associated encephalitis: Two case reports and review of the literature

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Kelchlike protein 11 antibodies (KLHL11-IgGs) were first described in 2019 as a marker of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNSs). They have mostly been associated with testicular germ cell tumors (tGCTs).

METHODS

Two patients with KLHL11-IgG encephalitis are reported, and the literature is comprehensively reviewed.

RESULTS

Patient 1 had been in remission from a tGCT 10 years prior. He developed episodic vertigo and diplopia progressing over a few days. Treatment with corticosteroids (CSs) was started a few days after symptom onset. Patient 2 had transient diplopia, which resolved spontaneously. Visual problems persisted for 7 months, when he additionally developed a progressive cerebellar syndrome. One year after onset, CS treatment was started. Initial magnetic resonance imaging was unremarkable in both patients, but analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) revealed chronic inflammation. KLHL11-IgG was positive in both patients (Patient 1 only in CSF, Patient 2 in serum). Neoplastic screening has so far not revealed any signs of active underlying malignancy. We found 15 publications of 112 patients in total with KLHL11-IgG encephalitis. Most patients (n = 82) had a cerebellar syndrome with or without signs of rhombencephalitis. The most common symptoms were ataxia (n = 82) and vertigo (n = 47), followed by oculomotor disturbances (n = 35) and hearing disorders (n = 31). Eighty of 84 patients had a GCT as an underlying tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Our cases demonstrate classical symptoms of KLHL11-IgG encephalitis. Early diagnosis and therapy are imperative. As with other PNSs, clinical awareness is needed and further studies are required especially in regard to therapeutic management.

Algorithm to improve the diagnosis of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes associated with SOX1 antibodies

SOX1 antibodies (SOX1-abs) are associated with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In many clinical laboratories SOX1-abs are determined by commercial line blots without confirmation by cell-based assay (CBA) with HEK293 cells expressing SOX1. However, the diagnostic yield of commercial line blots is low and the accessibility to the CBA, that is not commercially available, limited. Here, we evaluated if the addition of the band intensity data of the line blot and the immunoreactivity in a tissue-based assay (TBA) improve the diagnostic performance of the line blot. We examined serum of 34 consecutive patients with adequate clinical information that tested positive for SOX1-abs in a commercial line blot. Samples were also assessed by TBA and CBA. SOX1-abs were confirmed by CBA in 17 (50%) patients, all (100%) had lung cancer (SCLC in 16) and 15/17 (88%) had a PNS. In the remaining 17 patients the CBA was negative and none had PNS associated with lung cancer. TBA was assessable in 30/34 patients and SOX1-abs reactivity was detected in 15/17 (88%) with positive and in 0/13 (0%) with negative CBA. Only 2 (13%) of the 15 TBA-negative patients were CBA-positive. The frequency of TBA-negative but CBA-positive increased from 10% (1/10) when the band intensity of the line blot was weak to 20% (1/5) in patients with a moderate or strong intensity band. Confirmation by CBA should be mandatory for samples (56% in this series) not assessable (4/34; 12%) or negative in the TBA (15/34; 44%).

Autoimmune Encephalitis Misdiagnosis in Adults

Importance

Autoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosis can lead to harm.

Objective

To determine the diseases misdiagnosed as autoimmune encephalitis and potential reasons for misdiagnosis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective multicenter study took place from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, at autoimmune encephalitis subspecialty outpatient clinics including Mayo Clinic (n = 44), University of Oxford (n = 18), University of Texas Southwestern (n = 18), University of California, San Francisco (n = 17), University of Washington in St Louis (n = 6), and University of Utah (n = 4). Inclusion criteria were adults (age ≥18 years) with a prior autoimmune encephalitis diagnosis at a participating center or other medical facility and a subsequent alternative diagnosis at a participating center. A total of 393 patients were referred with an autoimmune encephalitis diagnosis, and of those, 286 patients with true autoimmune encephalitis were excluded.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Data were collected on clinical features, investigations, fulfillment of autoimmune encephalitis criteria, alternative diagnoses, potential contributors to misdiagnosis, and immunotherapy adverse reactions.

Results

A total of 107 patients were misdiagnosed with autoimmune encephalitis, and 77 (72%) did not fulfill diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis. The median (IQR) age was 48 (35.5-60.5) years and 65 (61%) were female. Correct diagnoses included functional neurologic disorder (27 [25%]), neurodegenerative disease (22 [20.5%]), primary psychiatric disease (19 [18%]), cognitive deficits from comorbidities (11 [10%]), cerebral neoplasm (10 [9.5%]), and other (18 [17%]). Onset was acute/subacute in 56 (52%) or insidious (>3 months) in 51 (48%). Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was suggestive of encephalitis in 19 of 104 patients (18%) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis occurred in 16 of 84 patients (19%). Thyroid peroxidase antibodies were elevated in 24 of 62 patients (39%). Positive neural autoantibodies were more frequent in serum than CSF (48 of 105 [46%] vs 7 of 91 [8%]) and included 1 or more of GAD65 (n = 14), voltage-gated potassium channel complex (LGI1 and CASPR2 negative) (n = 10), N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor by cell-based assay only (n = 10; 6 negative in CSF), and other (n = 18). Adverse reactions from immunotherapies occurred in 17 of 84 patients (20%). Potential contributors to misdiagnosis included overinterpretation of positive serum antibodies (53 [50%]), misinterpretation of functional/psychiatric, or nonspecific cognitive dysfunction as encephalopathy (41 [38%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

When evaluating for autoimmune encephalitis, a broad differential diagnosis should be considered and misdiagnosis occurs in many settings including at specialized centers. In this study, red flags suggesting alternative diagnoses included an insidious onset, positive nonspecific serum antibody, and failure to fulfill autoimmune encephalitis diagnostic criteria. Autoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosis leads to morbidity from unnecessary immunotherapies and delayed treatment of the correct diagnosis.

Biomarkers of neurodegeneration in neural autoantibody-associated psychiatric syndromes: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Autoantibody-associated psychiatric syndromes are a novel disease entity that is not fully understood. Several lines of evidence suggest that neurodegenerative processes are involved here. We are investigating whether autoantibody-positive psychiatric syndromes differ from those that are autoantibody-negative in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurodegeneration markers.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from 167 psychiatric patients at the University Medical Center Göttingen from 2017 to 2020. We divided this patient cohort into two, namely antibody-positive and antibody-negative. We compared various clinical features, neurodegeneration markers, and their autoantibody status in CSF and serum. We then compared both cohorts' neurodegeneration markers to a representative Alzheimer cohort. We subdivided the patients into their diverse psychiatric syndromes according to the manual to assess and document psychopathology in psychiatry (the AMDP), and compared the neurodegeneration markers.

Results

Antibody-associated psychiatric syndromes do not appear to reveal significantly greater neurodegeneration than their antibody-negative psychiatric syndromes. 71% of antibody-positive patients fulfilled the criteria for a possible and 22% for a definitive autoimmune encephalitis. Our autoantibody-positive patient cohort's relative risk to develop an possible autoimmune encephalitis was 9%. We also noted that phosphorylated tau protein 181 (ptau 181) did not significantly differ between antibody-associated psychiatric syndromes and our Alzheimer cohort. The psycho-organic syndrome usually exhibits the most prominent neurodegeneration markers, both in antibody-positive and antibody-negative psychiatric patients.

Discussion

We did not find hints for neurodegenerative processes in our antibody-positive versus AD cohort considering total tau or amyloid markers. However, our findings indicate that the neurodegeneration marker ptau181 does not differ significantly between antibody-positive and Alzheimer cohorts, further suggesting axonal neurodegeneration in antibody-positive patients as AD patients have an elevated ptau181. The evidence we uncovered thus suggests that axonal neurodegeneration might affect patients suffering from autoantibody-associated psychiatric syndromes.

Novelties in Autoimmune and Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Ataxias: Twenty Years of Progresses

Major advances in our knowledge concerning autoimmune and paraneoplastic cerebellar ataxias have occurred in the last 20 years. The discovery of several neural antibodies represents an undeniable contribution to this field, especially those serving as good biomarkers of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and those showing direct pathogenic effects. Yet, many patients still lack detectable or known antibodies, and also many antibodies have only been reported in few patients, which makes it difficult to define in detail their clinical value. Nevertheless, a notable progress has additionally been made in the clinical characterization of patients with the main neural antibodies, which, although typically present with a subacute pancerebellar syndrome, may also show either hyperacute or chronic onsets that complicate the differential diagnoses. However, prodromal and transient features could be useful clues for an early recognition, and extracerebellar involvement may also be highly indicative of the associated antibody. Moreover, important advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of cerebellar ataxias include the description of antibody effects, especially those targeting cell-surface antigens, and first attempts to isolate antigen-specific T-cells. Furthermore, genetic predisposition seems relevant, although differently involved according to cancer association, with particular HLA observed in non-paraneoplastic cases and genetic abnormalities in the tumor cells in paraneoplastic ones. Finally, immune checkpoint inhibitors used as cancer immunotherapy may rarely induce cerebellar ataxias, but even this undesirable effect may in turn serve to shed some light on their physiopathology. Herein, we review the principal novelties of the last 20 years regarding autoimmune and paraneoplastic cerebellar ataxias.

Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes: Transitioning Between the Old and the New

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) are caused by nervous system-targeting aberrant anti-tumoral immune responses. We review the updated criteria for PNS diagnosis, incorporating novel information on clinical phenotypes, neuronal autoantibodies (Nabs), and tumors. The impact of the oncologic use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) on PNS occurrence is also addressed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical phenotypes and Nabs are redefined as "high/intermediate/low" risk, following the frequency of cancer association. Nabs, the diagnostic hallmark of PNS, can target intracellular or surface neuronal proteins, with important prognostic and pathogenic implications. Many novel assays have been incorporated into laboratory diagnostics, that is becoming increasingly complex. ICI fight tumors, but favor autoimmunity, thus increasing the incidence of PNS-like disorders. Overcoming the old PNS criteria, the new ones are centered around the presence of tumor. Clinical presentation, Nabs, and tumor findings are translated in diagnostic scores, providing a useful tool for PNS diagnosis and management.

"Obvious" indications for Neural antibody testing in Epilepsy or Seizures: The ONES checklist

OBJECTIVE

Numerous predictive scores have been developed to help determine which patients with epilepsy or seizures of unknown etiology should undergo neural antibody testing. However, their diagnostic advantage compared to only performing testing in patients with "obvious" indications (e.g. broader features of autoimmune encephalitis, characteristic seizure semiologies) requires further study. We aimed to develop a checklist that identifies patients who have "obvious" indications for neural antibody testing, and compare its diagnostic performance to predictive scores.

METHODS

We developed the "Obvious" indications for Neural antibody testing in Epilepsy or Seizures (ONES) checklist through literature review. We then retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent neural antibody testing for epilepsy or seizures at our center between March 2019 and January 2021, to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the ONES checklist to the recently-proposed Antibody Prevalence in Epilepsy and Encephalopathy (APE2)/Antibodies Contributing to Focal Epilepsy Signs and Symptoms (ACES) reflex score.

RESULTS

One-hundred-seventy patients who underwent neural antibody testing for epilepsy or seizures were identified. Seventy-four of 170 (43.5%) with a known etiology were excluded from sensitivity/specificity analyses; none had a true-positive neural antibody. Of the 96 patients with an unknown etiology, fourteen (15%) had a true-positive neural antibody. The proportion of false-positives was significantly higher among patients with a known etiology (3/3, 100%) compared to an unknown etiology (2/16, 13%) (P = .01). There was no significant difference of the APE2/ACES reflex score compared to the ONES checklist with regard to sensitivity (93% for both, P > .99) or specificity (71% versus 78%, P = .18) for true-positive neural antibodies.

SIGNIFICANCE

Compared to only performing neural antibody testing in patients with epilepsy or seizures of unknown etiology who have "obvious" indications, predictive scores confer no clear diagnostic advantage. Pre-specified definitions of what constitutes a true-positive neural antibody is required in future studies to avoid false-positives that can confound results.

Movement Disorders in Oncology: From Clinical Features to Biomarkers

Background: the study of movement disorders associated with oncological diseases and anticancer treatments highlights the wide range of differential diagnoses that need to be considered. In this context, the role of immune-mediated conditions is increasingly recognized and relevant, as they represent treatable disorders. Methods: we reappraise the phenomenology, pathophysiology, diagnostic testing, and treatment of movement disorders observed in the context of brain tumors, paraneoplastic conditions, and cancer immunotherapy, such as immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Results: movement disorders secondary to brain tumors are rare and may manifest with both hyper-/hypokinetic conditions. Paraneoplastic movement disorders are caused by antineuronal antibodies targeting intracellular or neuronal surface antigens, with variable prognosis and response to treatment. ICIs promote antitumor response by the inhibition of the immune checkpoints. They are effective treatments for several malignancies, but they may cause movement disorders through an unchecked immune response. Conclusions: movement disorders due to focal neoplastic brain lesions are rare but should not be missed. Paraneoplastic movement disorders are even rarer, and their clinical-laboratory findings require focused expertise. In addition to their desired effects in cancer treatment, ICIs can induce specific neurological adverse events, sometimes manifesting with movement disorders, which often require a case-by-case, multidisciplinary, approach.

Dysfunctional Learning and Verbal Memory in Patients with Elevated Tau Protein Levels and Serum Recoverin Autoantibodies—Case Series and Review

Recoverin-antibody-related disease is currently restricted to late-onset ataxia and autoimmune retinopathy, which can be paraneoplastic or not. However, cognitive dysfunction associated with recoverin antibodies has not been reported so far in a homogeneous patient group. Our case series is dedicated to describing the novel phenotype of cognitive impairment associated with recoverin antibodies. We included five patients with cognitive impairment who presented serum recoverin autoantibodies detected by immunoblots in our case series investigation. We also analyzed their psychopathology, clinical data, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and neuroimaging data. Five patients with cognitive impairment associated with serum recoverin antibodies exhibited profound dysfunctional learning and verbal memory. In the CSF of 40% of them, we also diagnosed axonal neurodegeneration entailing elevated tau and phosphorylated tau protein levels. Psychopathologies such as affective symptoms (restlessness, depressive mood, anxiety, complaintiveness) and formal thought disorder, such as rumination, were detected in 25–75% of the patients. We hypothesized a role of recoverin autoimmunity in the pineal gland involving consecutive modulation of hippocampus-based memory caused by an altered release of melatonin. We describe a novel phenotype of possible recoverin autoimmunity in patients with cognitive impairment. However, no clear diagnostic clues can be extracted because of the low diagnostic validity of the testing strategies applied. The possibility of recoverin antibody autoimmunity in the pineal gland correlating with a modulation of hippocampus-based memory should be further investigated.

How to diagnose and manage neurological toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors: an update

As the use of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is expanding rapidly for the treatment of many tumor types, it is crucial that both neurologists and oncologists become familiar with the diagnosis and treatment of neurological immune-related adverse events (n-irAEs). These are rare complications, developing in their severe forms in only 1-3% of the patients, but are highly relevant due to their mortality and morbidity burden. The diagnosis of n-irAEs is-however-challenging, as many alternative diagnoses need to be considered in the complex scenario of a patient with advanced cancer developing neurological problems. A tailored diagnostic approach is advisable according to the presentation, clinical history, and known specificities of n-irAEs. Several patterns characterized by distinct clinical, immunological, and prognostic characteristics are beginning to emerge. For example, myasthenia gravis is more likely to develop after anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) treatment, while meningitis appears more frequently after anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) therapy. Also, peripheral neuropathy and Guillain-Barré syndrome seem to be more common in patients with an underlying melanoma. Central nervous system disorders (CNS) are less frequent and are more often associated with lung cancer, and some of them (especially those with limbic encephalitis and positive onconeural antibodies) have a poor prognosis. Herein, we provide an update of the recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of neurological toxicities related to ICI use, focusing on the exclusion of alternative diagnoses, diagnostic specificities, and treatment of n-irAEs.

CRMP5 Antibodies-Diagnostic Challenges

CRMP5-associated paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) are rare, and only few studies describe larger cohorts of patients with CRMP5 antibodies. We have included 24 patients with CRMP5 antibodies and compared clinical findings with diagnostic findings from two different line assays (Ravo and Euroimmun), staining of cerebellar sections and results of a newly developed cell-based assay for detection of CRMP5 antibodies, CRMP5-CBA. We found that peripheral neuropathy and cerebellar ataxia together with lung cancer were the most common diagnoses associated with CRMP5 antibodies. CRMP5-CBA was easy to perform, identified all relevant cases for CRMP5-associated PNS and is therefore a valuable add-on for verification of CRMP5 positivity in diagnosis of PNS.

Immunopathogenesis and proposed clinical score for identifying Kelch-like protein-11 encephalitis

In this study, we report the clinical features of Kelch-like protein 11 antibody-associated paraneoplastic neurological syndrome, design and validate a clinical score to facilitate the identification of patients that should be tested for Kelch-like protein 11 antibodies, and examine in detail the nature of the immune response in both the brain and the tumour samples for a better characterization of the immunopathogenesis of this condition. The presence of Kelch-like protein 11 antibodies was retrospectively assessed in patients referred to the French Reference Center for paraneoplastic neurological syndrome and autoimmune encephalitis with (i) antibody-negative paraneoplastic neurological syndrome [limbic encephalitis (n = 105), cerebellar degeneration (n = 33)] and (ii) antibody-positive paraneoplastic neurological syndrome [Ma2-Ab encephalitis (n = 34), antibodies targeting N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis with teratoma (n = 49)]. Additionally, since 1 January 2020, patients were prospectively screened for Kelch-like protein 11 antibodies as new usual clinical practice. Overall, Kelch-like protein 11 antibodies were detected in 11 patients [11/11, 100% were male; their median (range) age was 44 (35-79) years], 9 of them from the antibody-negative paraneoplastic neurological syndrome cohort, 1 from the antibody-positive (Ma2-Ab) cohort and 1 additional prospectively detected patient. All patients manifested a cerebellar syndrome, either isolated (4/11, 36%) or part of a multi-system neurological disorder (7/11, 64%). Additional core syndromes were limbic encephalitis (5/11, 45%) and myelitis (2/11, 18%). Severe weight loss (7/11, 64%) and hearing loss/tinnitus (5/11, 45%) were common. Rarer neurologic manifestations included hypersomnia and seizures (2/11, 18%). Two patients presented phenotypes resembling primary neurodegenerative disorders (progressive supranuclear palsy and flail arm syndrome, respectively). An associated cancer was found in 9/11 (82%) patients; it was most commonly (7/9, 78%) a spontaneously regressed ('burned-out') testicular germ cell tumour. A newly designed clinical score (MATCH score: male, ataxia, testicular cancer, hearing alterations) with a cut-off ≥4 successfully identified patients with Kelch-like protein 11 antibodies (sensitivity 78%, specificity 99%). Pathological findings (three testicular tumours, three lymph node metastases of testicular tumours, one brain biopsy) showed the presence of a T-cell inflammation with resulting anti-tumour immunity in the testis and one chronic, exhausted immune response-demonstrated by immune checkpoint expression-in the metastases and the brain. In conclusion, these findings suggest that Kelch-like protein 11 antibody paraneoplastic neurological syndrome is a homogeneous clinical syndrome and its detection can be facilitated using the MATCH score. The pathogenesis is probably T-cell mediated, but the stages of inflammation are different in the testis, metastases and the brain.

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: a practical approach to diagnosis and management

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) are the immune-mediated effects of a remote cancer and are characterised by an autoantibody response against antigens expressed by the tumour. Classically, well-characterised 'onconeuronal' antibodies target intracellular antigens and hence cannot access their antigens across intact cell membranes. The pathogenic mediators are likely to be neuronal-specific T cells. There is a variable response to immunotherapies and the clinical syndrome helps to direct the search for a specific set of tumours. By contrast, many newly emerging autoantibodies with oncological associations target cell surface epitopes and can exert direct pathogenic effects on both the central and peripheral nervous systems. Patients with these cell-surface directed autoantibodies often clearly respond to immunotherapies. Overall, the clinical, serological and oncological features in an individual patient helps determine the clinical relevance of the syndrome and hence guide its management. We summarise current knowledge and a practical approach to the investigation, diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of patients with suspected PNS.

Discordant SOX-1 antibodies results in paraneoplastic Lambert-Eaton syndrome diagnosis by the clinical laboratory

BACKGROUND

Anti-Sry-like high mobility group box 1 (anti SOX-1) proteins are rare onconeural antibodies associated with paraneoplastic Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). Few patients with anti-SOX-1 antibodies and negative anti-glial nuclear antibody reactivity have been described to date.

CASE SUBJECT AND METHODS

Our case involves a 72-year-old female patient with progressive girdle weakness, sensation of heaviness in the lower limbs, predominantly distal and associated with circulatory problems together with instability when walking, with a high suspicion of an autoimmune myopathic disorder. Immunoblot test for autoimmune myopathies antibodies detection were all negative. Onconeuronal antibodies were determined in serum by indirect immunofluorescence being negative as well. Given the high suspicion, we also checked for the presence of other antineuronal antibodies whose patterns are not visible by IIF.

RESULTS

Onconeuronal antibodies by immunoblot for the following antibodies: Hu, Ri, Yo, Zic4, Tr, PCA-2, MA-TA, CV2, GAD65, Zic4, Titin, SOX1, Recoverin and Amp, revealed an unexpected clear band in SOX-1, which are highly suggestive of paraneoplastic LEMS.

DISCUSSION

We hypothesize that discordant onconeuronal antibodies results were due to the fact that positivity in IIF is associated with other SOX-B group proteins (normally related to cases of non-paraneoplastic neuropathy), while negativity in IIF and subsequent confirmed presence of specific SOX1 antibody by immunoblot could indicate an underlying tumor.

Scrub typhus meningoencephalitis presenting as opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome: A video-based case

Opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome secondary to scrub typhus infection is a rare clinical entity. Hence, it is important to know its clinical manifestations and complications, so that it can be properly managed. We report a 28-year-old female whose initial manifestation was only fever, which subsided in four days. Two days later, she developed opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome. This was managed with doxycycline and clonazepam, but as it persisted, intravenous immunoglobulin was added. She showed excellent response to treatment.

Current Nosology of Neural Autoantibody-Associated Dementia

Background

The detection of neural autoantibodies in patients with cognitive decline is an increasingly frequent phenomenon in memory clinics, and demanding as it does a specific diagnostic approach and therapeutic management, it deserves greater attention. It is this review’s aim to present the latest nosology of neural autoantibody-associated dementia.

Methods

A specific literature research via PubMed was conducted to describe the nosology of neural autoantibody-associated dementia.

Results

An autoimmune dementia comprises with an early onset, atypical clinical presentation and rapid progression in conjunction with neural antibodies, signs of inflammation in the cerebrospinal fluid, and a non-neurodegenerative pattern in neuroimaging. An autoimmune dementia is probably present if the patient responds to immunotherapy. Atypical dementia involving neural autoantibodies with mostly N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibodies might not fulfill all the autoimmune-dementia criteria, thus it may constitute an independent disease entity. Finally, a neurodegenerative dementia such as the frontotemporal type also coincides with neural autoantibodies such as the subunit ionotropic glutamate receptors 3 of amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor antibodies, dementia with Lewy bodies with myelin oligodendrocytic protein, myelin basic protein antibodies, or Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease with Zic4 or voltage gated potassium channel antibodies. These dementia entities may well overlap in their clinical features and biomarkers, i.e., their neural autoantibodies or neuroimaging patterns.

Conclusion

There are three main forms of neural autoantibody-associated dementia we can distinguish that might also share certain features in their clinical and laboratory presentation. More research is urgently necessary to improve the diagnosis and therapy of these patients, as the progression of their dementia might thus be improved or even reversed.

Antibody-Mediated Autoimmune Diseases of the CNS: Challenges and Approaches to Diagnosis and Management

Antibody-mediated disorders of the central nervous system (CNS) are increasingly recognized as neurologic disorders that can be severe and even life-threatening but with the potential for reversibility with appropriate treatment. The expanding spectrum of newly identified autoantibodies targeting glial or neuronal (neural) antigens and associated clinical syndromes (ranging from autoimmune encephalitis to CNS demyelination) has increased diagnostic precision, and allowed critical reinterpretation of non-specific neurological syndromes historically associated with systemic disorders (e.g., Hashimoto encephalopathy). The intracellular vs. cell-surface or synaptic location of the different neural autoantibody targets often helps to predict the clinical characteristics, potential cancer association, and treatment response of the associated syndromes. In particular, autoantibodies targeting intracellular antigens (traditionally termed onconeural autoantibodies) are often associated with cancers, rarely respond well to immunosuppression and have a poor outcome, although exceptions exist. Detection of neural autoantibodies with accurate laboratory assays in patients with compatible clinical-MRI phenotypes allows a definite diagnosis of antibody-mediated CNS disorders, with important therapeutic and prognostic implications. Antibody-mediated CNS disorders are rare, and reliable autoantibody identification is highly dependent on the technique used for detection and pre-test probability. As a consequence, indiscriminate neural autoantibody testing among patients with more common neurologic disorders (e.g., epilepsy, dementia) will necessarily increase the risk of false positivity, so that recognition of high-risk clinical-MRI phenotypes is crucial. A number of emerging clinical settings have recently been recognized to favor development of CNS autoimmunity. These include antibody-mediated CNS disorders following herpes simplex virus encephalitis or occurring in a post-transplant setting, and neurological autoimmunity triggered by TNFα inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment. Awareness of the range of clinical and radiological manifestations associated with different neural autoantibodies, and the specific settings where autoimmune CNS disorders may occur is crucial to allow rapid diagnosis and early initiation of treatment.

Paraneoplastic disorders of the nervous system

This article on paraneoplastic neurologic disorders provides an update on the diagnostic approach, utility and pitfalls of autoantibody testing and emerging settings in which these disorders are encountered. Recognition of the clinical and neuroimaging features accompanying paraneoplastic neurologic disorders is crucial to select those at highest risk who need neural antibody testing and screening for cancer. Cursory knowledge of the antibody assay methodology being ordered is important as the false positive rate varies by the technique utilized for detection. Antibodies can generally be stratified by the location of the target antigen (intraceullar versus cell-surface/synaptic) which informs frequency of cancer association, treatment response and prognosis. The therapeutic approach generally involves detection of the underlying cancer and combinations of oncologic treatments and immunosuppressant medications. The occurrence of paraneoplastic autoimmune neurologic disorders in novel settings, such as with immune checkpoint inhibitor use, has improved understanding of their pathogenesis and increased the likelihood neurologists will encounter such patients in their practice.