Adherence to antihypertensive agents after ischemic stroke and risk of cardiovascular outcomes

Suboptimal medication possession ratio is associated with recurrent ischemic stroke in a veteran population

OBJECTIVES

Recurrent stroke results in higher disability and mortality but might be mitigated through interventions that improve medication adherence. The medication possession ratio (MPR) is an objective proxy for adherence that may provide an individualized risk assessment for recurrent stroke.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study of patients with recent ischemic stroke or TIA referred to a Veterans Affairs vascular neurology outpatient clinic between 2010 and 2016. We calculated average MPR quartile for four medication classes used for secondary stroke prevention by reviewing pharmacy and medical records following an incident cerebral ischemic event. Traditional stroke risk factors were quantified using the Framingham Stroke Risk Profile (FSRP) score. We hypothesized that lower average MPR would relate to higher recurrent stroke risk more than FSRP or stroke etiological classification.

RESULTS

For 255 patients with stroke or TIA, 57 (22.4 %) patients had recurrent stroke during a median follow-up period of 5.0 years (IQR 2.0). Compared to optimal average MPR, each quartile lower average MPR was associated with higher cumulative incidence of recurrent stroke (subhazard ratio 1.63, 95 %CI: 1.24 to 2.14, p<0.001) while accounting for the competing risk of death and covarying for FSRP. Neither FSRP nor stroke etiology were associated with recurrent stroke. However, higher baseline systolic blood pressure starting at 132 mm Hg was independently associated with stroke recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

MPR is an effective proxy measurement to assess risk of recurrent stroke. Systems-based and individualized interventions to improve medication adherence are needed to reduce recurrent stroke rates in VA populations.

Level of medication adherence and its determinants of cardiovascular disease patients attending at specialized teaching hospitals of Amhara regional state, Ethiopia: a multicenter cross-sectional study

Background

Non-adherence to medication in patients with cardiovascular disease continues to be a main cause of suboptimal management, increased morbidity and mortality, and increased healthcare expenses. The present study assessed the level of medication adherence and its determinants of cardiovascular disease patients.

Methods

An institutional-based multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted with patients with cardiovascular disease in Northwest Ethiopian teaching hospitals. The level of medication adherence was evaluated using a standardized questionnaire of the Adherence in Chronic Disease Scale (ACDS). To find determinants of the level of medication adherence, an ordinal logistic regression model was employed. Statistics were significant when P ≤ 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

In the end, 336 participants were included in the research. According to this study, one-third of patients had low medication adherence, half had medium adherence, and one-fifth had high medication adherence. Elderly patients [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.691; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.704-4.251; P < 0.000], marital status (AOR = 1.921; 95% CI, 1.214-3.039; P = 0.005), alcoholic patients (AOR = 2.782; 95% CI, 1.745-4.435; P < 0.000), Patients without physical activity (AOR = 1.987; 95% CI 1.251-3.156; P = 0.004), non health insurances (AOR = 1.593; 95% CI 1.003-2.529; P = 0.049), sever Charles comorbidity index (AOR = 2.486; 95% CI 1.103-5.604; P = 0.028), patients with polypharmacy (AOR = 2.998 (1.817-4.947) P < 0.000) and, manypolypharmacy (AOR = 3.031 (1.331-6.898) P = 0.008) were more likely to have low medication adherence.

Conclusion

The current study concluded that one-third of study participants had low medication adherence. Older age, marital status, drinker, physical inactivity, drug source, comorbidity, and polypharmacy all contributed to the low level of medication adherence. To improve patients with cardiovascular disease's adherence to their medications, intervention is necessary.

Thematic Analysis of Alzheimer's Medication Management Discussion in a Non-Moderated Online Forum

BACKGROUND

Managing medications for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias is challenging for caregivers. Information about caregivers' strategies to manage these challenges is needed to inform intervention development.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to understand caregivers' medication management experiences by analyzing online community discussions.

METHODS

Posts were extracted from the ALZConnected® Forum using keywords "medication" and "drug" via web scraping. The researchers applied thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four major themes emerged: (1) role transition of medication management responsibilities, (2) caregivers' uncertainty about medication purpose and values, (3) conflicts between the care recipients and caregivers, and (4) difficulty accessing and affording medications.

CONCLUSIONS

The experiences shared on a non-moderated, unstructured online forum indicate that medication management is challenging and overwhelming for caregivers of people living with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Since this is a progressive disease with various stages and changing needs, caregivers' strategies vary and are often limited by available resources and support. Health care providers should offer training and support for caregivers to navigate the transfer of medication management responsibilities and changing care needs as the disease progresses.

The role of adherence in patients with chronic diseases

In the long-term management of chronic diseases, adherence and persistence to prescribed medications are continuous challenges in order to obtain all the potential benefits of drug therapies. Suboptimal drug adherence and discontinuations of therapies remain the most frequent reasons why several diseases are poorly controlled in the population. One the main issue is that physicians are relatively limited in time and tools to detect patients with a poor adherence. The present review discusses present and future strategies that are now available or are being developed to detect and to support adherence in patients with chronic diseases and provides some simple clues to identify patients at high risk of discontinuation in the clinic.

Antihypertensive Medication Adherence and the Risk of Vascular Events and Falls After Stroke: A Real-World Effectiveness Study Using Linked Registry Data

BACKGROUND

Real-world evidence is limited on whether antihypertensive medications help avert major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after stroke without increasing the risk of falls. We investigated the association of adherence to antihypertensive medications on the incidence of MACE and falls requiring hospitalization after stroke.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of adults who were newly dispensed antihypertensive medications after an acute stroke (Australian Stroke Clinical Registry 2012-2016; Queensland and Victoria). Pharmaceutical dispensing records were used to determine medication adherence according to the proportion of days covered in the first 6 months poststroke. Outcomes between 6 and 18 months postdischarge included: (i) MACE, a composite outcome of all-cause death, recurrent stroke or acute coronary syndrome; and (ii) falls requiring hospitalization. Estimates were derived using Cox models, adjusted for >30 confounders using inverse probability treatment weights.

RESULTS

Among 4076 eligible participants (median age 68 years; 37% women), 55% had a proportion of days covered ≥80% within 6 months postdischarge. In the subsequent 12 months, 360 (9%) participants experienced a MACE and 337 (8%) experienced a fall requiring hospitalization. After achieving balance between groups, participants with a proportion of days covered ≥80% had a reduced risk of MACE (hazard ratio: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.54-0.84) and falls requiring hospitalization (subdistribution hazard ratio: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62-0.98) than those with a proportion of days covered <80%.

CONCLUSIONS

High adherence to antihypertensive medications within 6 months poststroke was associated with reduced risks of both MACE and falls requiring hospitalization. Patients should be encouraged to adhere to their antihypertensive medications to maximize poststroke outcomes.

Antithrombotics prescription and adherence among stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the prescription of antithrombotic drugs (including anticoagulants and antiplatelets) and medication adherence after stroke.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search across MEDLINE and Embase, from January 1, 2015, to February 17, 2022, to identify studies reporting antithrombotic medications (anticoagulants and antiplatelets) post stroke. Two people independently identified reports to include, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Where possible, data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We included 453,625 stroke patients from 46 studies. The pooled proportion of prescribed antiplatelets and anticoagulants among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) was 62% (95% CI: 57%-68%), and 68% (95% CI: 58%-79%), respectively. The pooled proportion of patients who were treated according to the recommendation of guidelines of antithrombotic medications from four studies was 67% (95% CI: 41%-93%). It was reported that 11% (95% CI: 2%-19%) of patients did not receive antithrombotic medications. Good adherence to antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and antithrombotic medications was 78% (95% CI: 67%-89%), 71% (95% CI: 57%-84%), and 73% (95% CI: 59%-86%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we found that less than 70% of patients were prescribed and treated according to the recommended guidelines of antithrombotic medications, and good adherence to antithrombotic medications is only 73%. Prescription rate and good adherence to antithrombotic medications still need to be improved among stroke survivors.

Multiprofessional intervention to improve adherence to medication in stroke patients: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ADMED AVC study)

INTRODUCTION

Adherence to secondary preventive medications is often suboptimal in patients with stroke, exposing them to an increased risk of recurrent cerebral and/or cardiovascular events. Effective actions in the long term to improve adherence to medication are needed. The study will evaluate the efficacy of a collaborative multiprofessional patient-centred intervention conducted by a pharmacist on adherence to secondary preventive medication in stroke survivors.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a multicentre cluster-randomised controlled trial. Two groups of 91 patients (intervention vs standard care) will be recruited. The clinical pharmacist intervention targeting secondary preventive medication will consist of three parts over 1 year: (1) an individual semi-structured interview at hospital discharge; (2) follow-up telephone interviews at 3, 6 and 9 months after discharge; and (3) a final individual semi-structured interview 1 year after discharge. Information on patient follow-up will be shared with the general practitioner and the community pharmacist by sending a report of each interview. The primary outcome is adherence to medication during the 12 months after hospital discharge, assessed using a composite endpoint: the medication possession ratio associated with a self-administered questionnaire.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The local ethics committee, the national committee for use of personal data in medical research and the national data protection agency approved the study. The sponsor has no role in study design; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; or report writing.

DISCUSSION

This pharmacist-led educational programme has the potential to significantly improve adherence to medication in stroke survivors which could lead to a decrease in recurrent cerebral and/or cardiovascular events.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02611440.

Long-Term Secondary Prevention: Management of Blood Pressure After a Transient Ischemic Attack or Stroke

Reducing blood pressure (BP) is a highly effective strategy for long-term stroke prevention. Despite overwhelmingly clear evidence from randomized trials that antihypertensive therapy substantially reduces the risk of stroke in primary prevention, uncertainty still surrounds the issue of BP lowering after cerebrovascular events, and the risk of recurrent stroke, coronary events, and vascular death remains significant. Important questions in a secondary prevention setting include should everyone be treated regardless of their poststroke BP, how soon after a stroke should BP-lowering treatment be commenced, how intensively should BP be lowered, what drugs are best, and how should long-term BP control be optimized and monitored. We review the evidence on BP control after a transient ischemic attack or stroke to address these unanswered questions and draw attention to some recent developments that hold promise to improve management of BP in current practice.

Greater Adherence to Secondary Prevention Medications Improves Survival After Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Linked Registry Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although a target of 80% medication adherence is commonly cited, it is unclear whether greater adherence improves survival after stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). We investigated associations between medication adherence during the first year postdischarge, and mortality up to 3 years, to provide evidence-based targets for medication adherence.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 1-year survivors of first-ever stroke or TIA, aged ≥18 years, from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (July 2010-June 2014) linked with nationwide prescription refill and mortality data (until August 2017). Adherence to antihypertensive agents, statins, and nonaspirin antithrombotic medications was based on the proportion of days covered from discharge until 1 year. Cox regression with restricted cubic splines was used to investigate nonlinear relationships between medication adherence and all-cause mortality (to 3 years postdischarge). Models were adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic position, stroke factors, primary care factors, and concomitant medication use.

RESULTS

Among 8363 one-year survivors of first-ever stroke or TIA (44% aged ≥75 years, 44% female, 18% TIA), 75% were supplied antihypertensive agents. In patients without intracerebral hemorrhage (N=7446), 84% were supplied statins, and 65% were supplied nonaspirin antithrombotic medications. Median adherence was ≈90% for each medication group. Between 1% and 100% adherence, greater adherence to statins or antihypertensive agents, but not nonaspirin antithrombotic agents, was associated with improved survival. When restricted to linear regions above 60% adherence, each 10% increase in adherence was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality of 13% for antihypertensive agents (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81-0.95]), 13% for statins (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.80-0.95]), and 15% for nonaspirin antithrombotic agents (hazard ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.79-0.93]).

CONCLUSIONS

Greater levels of medication adherence after stroke or TIA are associated with improved survival, even among patients with near-perfect adherence. Interventions to improve medication adherence are needed to maximize survival poststroke.

Facilitators and barriers to medication adherence among stroke survivors in India

Strict compliance with medication and life style modification are integral to secondary stroke prevention. This study was undertaken to find out medication adherence among stroke survivors and factors associated with it. Cross sectional survey among stroke survivors was conducted. Interview based self-reported medication adherence was defined as consumption at least >80% of their medications for last two weeks, based on last prescription. Structured interview using pretested interview schedule was done to collect other data. Sequential step wise logistic regression analysis was done to find out the facilitators and barriers to medication adherence. Two hundred and forty stroke survivors (mean age 58.64 ± 10.96 years; 25.4% females) with a mean post-stroke period of 6.65 ± 3.36 months were participated. Overall medication adherence was 43.8% (n = 105). Medication adherence was 34.3% (n = 134), 52.6% (n = 190) and 56.7% (n = 224) for antidiabetics, antihypertensives and statins respectively and was associated with risk factor control (Diabetes: Odds Ratio (OR) = 4.85; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.12-11.08, Hypertension: OR = 3.42; 95% CI 1.83-6.4, Dyslipidaemia: OR = 3.88; 95% CI 1.96-4.04). Having daily routine (OR = 2.82; 95% CI 1.52-5.25), perceived need of medication (OR = 2.33; 95% CI 1.04-5.2) and perceived poor state of health (OR = 2.65; 95% CI 1.30-5.40) were facilitators. Memory issues (OR = 0.34; 95% CI 0.16-0.71), side effects (OR = 0.24; 95% CI 0.11-0.42) and financial constraints (OR = 0.46; 95% CI 0.24-0.91) were barriers to medication adherence. Establishing daily routines, periodic reminders, financial supports to buy medicines and patient education can enhance medication adherence to prevent future strokes.

Secondary prevention medication persistence and prognosis of acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack

Introduction

The risk of disability and mortality is high among recurrent stroke, which highlights the importance of secondary prevention measures. We aim to evaluate medication persistence for secondary prevention and the prognosis of acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in China.

Methods

Patients with acute ischaemic stroke or TIA from the China National Stroke Registry II were divided into 3 groups based on the percentage of persistence in secondary prevention medication classes from discharge to 3 months after onset (level I: persistence=0%, level II: 0%<persistence<100%, level III: persistence=100%). The primary outcome was recurrent stroke. The secondary outcomes included composite events (stroke, myocardial infarction or death from cardiovascular cause), all-cause death and disability (modified Rankin Scale score=3–5) from 3 months to 1 year after onset. Recurrent stroke, composite events and all-cause death were performed using Cox regression model, and disability was identified through logistic regression model using the generalised estimating equation method.

Results

18 344 patients with acute ischaemic stroke or TIA were included, 315 (1.7%) of whom experienced recurrent strokes. Compared with level I, the adjusted HR of recurrent stroke for level II was 0.41 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.54) and level III 0.37 (0.28 to 0.48); composite events for level II 0.41 (0.32 to 0.53) and level III 0.38 (0.30 to 0.49); all-cause death for level II 0.28 (0.23 to 0.35) and level III 0.20 (0.16–0.24). Compared with level I, the adjusted OR of disability for level II was 0.89 (0.77 to 1.03) and level III 0.82 (0.72 to 0.93).

Conclusions

Persistence in secondary prevention medications, especially in all classes of medications prescribed by the physician, was associated with lower hazard of recurrent stroke, composite events, all-cause death and lower odds of disability in patients with acute ischaemic stroke or TIA.

Stroke patients' support: evaluation of knowledge, practices and training needs of French community pharmacists

Background Stroke represents a major Public Health issue in industrialized countries because of its frequency and severity. In secondary stroke prevention, treatment efficacy is correlated to medication adherence. However, it remains suboptimal in stroke patients. Community pharmacists, in light of their positioning in the care pathway and proximity to patients, can play an essential role in patient support and improving treatment adherence. However, it is currently unknown whether pharmacists are ready to perform this task. Objective Evaluate knowledge, practices and training needs for community pharmacists in therapeutic stroke management to improve long term care for stroke patients. Setting Community pharmacies in the Rhone Alpes region (France). Method We conducted a cross sectional study via a standardized self-assessment questionnaire consisting of 40 questions divided into three parts. The latter was designed by a multidisciplinary team and distributed electronically to community pharmacists of the Rhône-Alpes region (France). Main outcome measure (a) global knowledge score on the pathology, risk factors and clinical care management, (b) description of the support practices for stroke patients, (c) training needs for pharmacists. Results The 104 participants presented a moderate level of knowledge (global score: 12/20 ± 3). Topics best mastered were: pathophysiology, target blood pressure and place of antiplatelets in the therapeutic strategy. Knowledge items that needed improvement were: warning signs correctly identified by 44% of participants, time delay for thrombolysis for which 14% answered correctly, target glycated hemoglobin levels were correct for 41%, and the 3 recommended antihypertensive drug classes were only identified by 5% of participants. Patient education received from pharmacists concerned dosage (89%), treatment adherence (88%), benefits (66%) and administration modalities of medicines (64%), management of risk factors (75% for diet, 73% for physical activity, 70% for smoking and 53% for alcohol). All pharmacists wanted additional training on risk factors and clinical management guidelines. Conclusion Based on this small study, the fragmented knowledge and varied practices promote the need for further training for pharmacists to optimize support of stroke patients. This study promotes the elaboration of training systems adapted to pharmacists' needs. This will help support the development of a targeted pharmaceutical care approach for stroke patients.

[Hospital medication adherence scale development in cardiovascular disorders]

OBJECTIVES

The consequences of non-adherence to prescribed cardiovascular drugs can be serious, with cardiovascular complications having been reported in both secondary and primary prevention. The objective of this study was to develop a new scale to assess medication adherence in patients with cardiovascular diseases during their hospitalization.

METHODS

A cohort of 219 high risk cardiovascular patients was evaluated for this study. Data on reasons for non-adherence were collected using the newly developed Medication Adherence Scale in Cardiovascular disorders (Mascard) and compared with physician assessment during medical consultations and the control of their cardiovascular risk factors.

RESULTS

The Mascard consists of 5 items has good psychometric properties and validity and correlated with physician assessment and control of cardiovascular risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

This rapid and easy to use scale may be useful for health care practitioners in their assessment of medication adherence in inpatients with cardiovascular disorders.

Agreement Between Administrative Database and Medical Chart Review for the Prediction of Chronic Kidney Disease G category

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major health issue and cardiovascular risk factor. Validity assessment of administrative data for the detection of CKD in research for drug benefit and risk using real-world data is important. Existing algorithms have limitations and we need to develop new algorithms using administrative data, giving the importance of drug benefit/risk ratio in real world.

Objective

The aim of this study was to validate a predictive algorithm for CKD GFR category 4-5 (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m² but not receiving dialysis or CKD G4-5ND) using the administrative databases of the province of Quebec relative to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as a reference standard.

Design

This is a retrospective cohort study using chart collection and administrative databases.

Setting

The study was conducted in a community outpatient medical clinic and pre-dialysis outpatient clinic in downtown Montreal and rural area.

Patients

Patient medical files with at least 2 serum creatinine measures (up to 1 year apart) between September 1, 2013, and June 30, 2015, were reviewed consecutively (going back in time from the day we started the study). We excluded patients with end-stage renal disease on dialysis. The study was started in September 2013.

Measurement

Glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the CKD Epidemiological Collaboration (CKD-EPI) from each patient's file. Several algorithms were developed using 3 administrative databases with different combinations of physician claims (diagnostics and number of visits) and hospital discharge data in the 5 years prior to the cohort entry, as well as specific drug use and medical intervention in preparation for dialysis in the 2 years prior to the cohort entry.

Methods

Chart data were used to assess eGFR. The validity of various algorithms for detection of CKD groups was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results

A total of 434 medical files were reviewed; mean age of patients was 74.2 ± 10.6 years, and 83% were older than 65 years. Sensitivity of algorithm #3 (diagnosis within 2-5 years and/or specific drug use within 2 years and nephrologist visit ≥4 within 2-5 years) in identification of CKD G4-5ND ranged from 82.5% to 89.0%, specificity from 97.1% to 98.9% with PPV and NPV ranging from 94.5% to 97.7% and 91.1% to 94.2%, respectively. The subsequent subgroup analysis (diabetes, hypertension, and <65 and ≥65 years) and also the comparisons of predicted prevalence in a cohort of older adults relative to published data emphasized the accuracy of our algorithm for patients with severe CKD (CKD G4-5ND).

Limitations

Our cohort comprised mostly older adults, and results may not be generalizable to all adults. Participants with CKD without 2 serum creatinine measurements up to 1 year apart were excluded.

Conclusions

The case definition of severe CKD G4-5ND derived from an algorithm using diagnosis code, drug use, and nephrologist visits from administrative databases is a valid algorithm compared with medical chart reviews in older adults.

A Qualitative Study of Barriers and Facilitators to Adherence to Secondary Prevention Medications Among French Patients Suffering from Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack

PURPOSE

Secondary prevention medications (SPM) reduce the risk of ischemic stroke (IS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) recurrence. However, approximately one-third of patients are estimated to be non-adherent. This qualitative study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to adherence to SPM after IS or TIA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-six face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 TIA patients and 22 IS patients who self-administered their treatment 12 months after IS/TIA. A thematic analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Major facilitators to good adherence to SPM were the fear of stroke recurrence and the high level of trust in the prescribing physician. Barriers included a perceived lack and/or inappropriate timing of information about SPM, practical difficulties of taking some SPM (eg, inadequate packaging) and of implementing routines into their daily life.

CONCLUSION

Information on SPM is inadequate in terms of quantity and timing both during the acute IS/TIA period and over the long term. Providing more tailor-made information at an opportune moment, in particular by promoting discussion with their general practitioner (GP) throughout the course of illness and recovery, is essential to ensure that patients are not left alone in the decision-making process regarding adherence to SPM.

Secondary Prevention by Structured Semi-Interactive Stroke Prevention Package in India (SPRINT INDIA) study protocol

RATIONALE

Recurrent stroke, cardiovascular morbidity, and mortality are important causes of poor outcome in patients with index stroke. Despite the availability of best medical management recurrent stroke occur in up to 15-20% of patients with stroke in India. Education for stroke prevention could be a strategy to prevent recurrent strokes.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesize that a structured semi-interactive stroke prevention package can reduce the risk of recurrent strokes, acute coronary artery syndrome, and death in patients with sub-acute stroke at the end of one year.

DESIGN

Secondary Prevention by Structured Semi-Interactive Stroke Prevention Package in INDIA (SPRINT INDIA) is a multi-center stroke trial involving 25 centers under the Indian Stroke Clinical Trial Network. Patients with first ever sub-acute stroke within two days to three months of onset, age 18-85 years, mRS <5, showing recent stroke in imaging are included. Participants or caregivers able to read and complete tasks suggested in a stroke prevention workbook and have a cellular device for receiving short message service and watching videos. A total of 5830 stroke patients speaking 11 different languages are being randomized to intervention or control arm. Patients in the intervention arm are receiving a stroke prevention workbook, regular educational short messages, and videos. All patients in the control arm are receiving standard of care management.

SUMMARY

Structured semi-interactive stroke prevention package may reduce the risk of recurrent strokes, acute coronary artery syndrome, and death in patients with sub-acute stroke.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03228979) and CTRI (Clinical Trial Registry India; CTRI/2017/09/009600).

Post-stroke medication adherence and persistence rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Following a doctor's prescribed medication regimen is the key to prevent recurrent stroke and adverse outcomes. Many studies have investigated post-stroke drug adherence and persistence in patients. However, a comprehensive analysis of the data is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

A meta-analysis of published literature was conducted to summarize the ratio of medication adherence and persistence in patients after stroke.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified by conducting a literature search using PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science up to April 2019. We also reviewed the reference list of the retrieved articles to identify additional studies. We included observational studies that reported data on patients' medication adherence or persistence status, or the rate of medication adherence or persistence among patients with stroke could be calculated based on the information provided.

RESULTS

The overall high medication adherence rate of patients with stroke was 64.1% (95% CI: 57.4%-70.8%), and the persistence rate of patients with stroke was 72.2% (95% CI: 69.1%-75.3%). The highest persistence rate was observed in cohort studies which was 80.1% (95% CI: 76.7%-83.4%). The medication adherence rate was the highest in cases where the rates were assessed through interviews or self-reports (77.7% (95% CI: 71.3%-84.1%)).

CONCLUSIONS

Medication adherence and persistence rates are low in patients after suffering a stroke. Patient medication adherence or persistence and their influencing factors should be considered for the treatment of stroke patients. More detailed disease prevention and management strategies need to be developed for stroke patients with different comorbidities.

The association between medication non-adherence and adverse health outcomes in ageing populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesise the evidence relating to medication non-adherence and its association with health outcomes in people aged ≥50 years.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched up to February 2019 for observational studies that measured medication (non-)adherence as a predictor of the following health outcomes in adults aged ≥50 years: healthcare utilisation (hospitalisation, emergency department visits, outpatient visits and general practitioner visits), mortality, adverse clinical events and quality of life. Screening and quality assessment using validated criteria were completed by 2 reviewers independently. Random effects models were used to generate pooled estimates of association using adjusted study results. The full methodological approach was published on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42017077264).

RESULTS

Sixty-six studies were identified for qualitative synthesis, with 11 of these studies eligible for meta-analyses. A meta-analysis including 3 studies measuring medication non-adherence in adults aged ≥55 years showed a significant association with all-cause hospitalisation (adjusted odds ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12, 1.21). A meta-analysis including 2 studies showed that medication non-adherence was not significantly associated with an emergency department visit (adjusted odds ratio 1.05, 95% CI 0.90, 1.22). Good adherence was associated with a 21% reduction in long-term mortality risk in comparison to medication non-adherence (adjusted hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.63, 0.98).

CONCLUSION

Medication non-adherence may be significantly associated with all-cause hospitalisation and mortality in older people. Medication adherence should be monitored and addressed in this cohort to minimise hospitalisation, improve clinical outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

Temporal Trends and Predictors of Drug Utilization and Outcomes in First-Ever Stroke Patients: A Population-Based Study Using the Singapore Stroke Registry

INTRODUCTION

Drug utilization and outcomes research in multi-ethnic Asian stroke populations is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to examine temporal trends and predictors of drug utilization and outcomes in a multi-ethnic Asian stroke population.

METHODS

This registry-based study included ischemic and hemorrhagic first-ever stroke patients hospitalized between 2009 and 2016. Utilization of medications included in-hospital thrombolytic agents, early antithrombotics (antiplatelets, anticoagulants) within 48 h of admission, and antithrombotics and statins at discharge. Outcomes analyzed were in-hospital all-cause mortality; 28-day, 90-day, and 1-year case fatality (CF); and discharge destination.

RESULTS

Of the 36,615 included patients, 81.6% had ischemic stroke and 18.4% had hemorrhagic stroke (15.5% intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH] and 2.8% subarachnoid hemorrhage [SAH]). For ischemic stroke, the combined use of all three guideline medications (in-hospital thrombolytic therapy, as well as antithrombotics and statins at discharge) increased (P = 0.006). Being on the stroke pathway was associated with prescription of all three guideline medications in ischemic stroke. Decreasing trends for in-hospital mortality, 28-day, 90-day, and 1-year CF and proportion of patients discharged home without rehabilitation appointment were observed in ischemic stroke (P < 0.05) but not in ICH or SAH (apart from 28-day CF). Ischemic stroke patients who received guideline medications were less likely to die or be discharged to nursing homes and chronic sick hospitals. Hemorrhagic stroke patients prescribed statins at discharge were less likely to have 28-day and 1-year CF.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescription of secondary stroke preventive medications (particularly in ischemic stroke) was associated with more favorable outcomes, highlighting the importance of physician adherence to evidence-based pharmacotherapy.

Association between adherence to antihypertensive medications and health outcomes in middle and older aged community dwelling adults; results from the Irish longitudinal study on ageing

PURPOSE

To examine the association between antihypertensive medication (AHTM) implementation adherence and healthcare utilisation in community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 50 years in Ireland.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study. The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) was linked to pharmacy claims data for participants aged ≥ 50 years. Participants were included if they had ≥ 3 pharmacy claims for one or more AHTM (ATC codes 'C02', 'C03', 'C07', 'C08' or 'C09') within the year preceding the year of self-reported healthcare utilisation outcome occurrence. Outcomes included self-reported general practitioner (GP), emergency department (ED), outpatient department visits and hospital admissions. Implementation adherence was measured using proportion of days covered (PDC), with participants classified as adherent if the average PDC ≥ 0.8. Negative binomial models were used to analyse the association between AHTM adherence and number of GP, ED, outpatient visits and hospitalisations (adjusted IRR and 95% CI are presented).

RESULTS

One thousand four hundred thirty-one participants were included. The majority of participants (72.6%) were considered adherent. Good implementation adherence to AHTM was associated with a significant decrease in self-reported GP visits (adjusted IRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99). Adherence had no significant impact on the number of ED visits, outpatient visits or hospitalisations reported by TILDA participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Good adherence to AHTM was associated with less self-reported GP visits in this population, suggesting improved overall health status. However, the impact of medication non-adherence on the other self-reported healthcare utilisation outcomes (ED, outpatient visits and hospitalisations) was not evident in this study.

Farmalarm

Background and Purpose- Risk factor control and treatment compliance in the following months after stroke are poor. We aim to validate a digital platform for smartphones to raise awareness among patients about the need to adopt healthy lifestyle, improve communication with medical staff, and treatment compliance. Methods- Farmalarm is an application (app) for smartphones designed to increase stroke awareness by medication alerts and compliance control, chat communication with medical staff, didactic video files, exercise monitoring. Patients with stroke discharged home were screened for participation and divided into groups: to follow the FARMALARM program for 3 to 4 weeks or standard of care follow-up. We determined achievement of risk factor control goals at 90 days. Results- From August 2015 to December 2016, from the 457 patients discharged home, 159 (34.8%) were included: Farmalarm (n=107); age 57±12, Control (n=52), age 59±10; without significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. At 90 days, knowledge of vascular risk factors was higher in FARMALARM group (86.0% versus 69.2%, P<0.01). The rate of patients with diabetes mellitus (83.2% versus 63.5%, P<0.01) and hypercholesterolemia (80.3% versus 63.5%, P=0.03) under control and the rate of patients with 4 out of 4 risk factors under control was higher in FARMALARM group (50.4% versus 30.7%, P=0.02). A regression model showed that the use of Farmalarm was independently associated with all risk factors under control at 90 days (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.14-4.6; P=0.02). Conclusions- In patients with stroke discharged home, the use of mobile apps to monitor medication compliance and increase stroke awareness is feasible and seems to improve the control of vascular risk factors.

Is There a Threshold for Medication Adherence? Lessons Learnt From Electronic Monitoring of Drug Adherence

Medication adherence is a well-recognized problem in the management of patients with chronic diseases needing a long-term pharmacotherapy. While fighting against non-adherence, an important question frequently arises, i.e., how much adherence is enough to obtain the full treatment benefits? Most studies having attempted to answer this question have used large pharmacy records and health care databases to quantify the percentage of days covered by the prescribed treatment and hence deduce a threshold below which there appears to be fewer benefits from therapy. In the present paper, the use of data obtained using electronic monitoring of adherence is discussed as another means to assess adherence thresholds with a particular emphasis on hypertension. The data show that even with the use of electronic monitoring of adherence, which provides a comprehensive dosing history, it is extremely difficult to define an adherence threshold in hypertension. This is due to many factors that need to be taken into account, including not only the pattern of patients’ adherence and their clinical and environmental characteristics, but also the pharmacological characteristics of the prescribed drugs, the severity of the disease and many others. To determine adherence cut-offs more precisely, specific protocols should be designed to answer the question in various clinical conditions. These protocols should be conducted in well-defined patients’ groups, they should use the most reliable methods to measure adherence providing if possible a detailed dosing history perhaps combined with drugs levels in blood or urine. These studies should also choose the best methods to measure clinical endpoints, such as ambulatory blood pressure monitoring or home blood pressure in the case of hypertension. One important aspect is that datasets should be solid and large enough to be able to analyze adherence data as a continuous variable using newly developed mathematical models including new metrics catching the complexity of adherence. The rapid development of new technologies like devices, connectivity, and analytics, will probably provide new solutions to improve our ability to define valid and clinically useful adherence thresholds in various therapeutic areas.

Interventions for improving modifiable risk factor control in the secondary prevention of stroke

BACKGROUND

People with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) are at increased risk of future stroke and other cardiovascular events. Stroke services need to be configured to maximise the adoption of evidence-based strategies for secondary stroke prevention. Smoking-related interventions were examined in a separate review so were not considered in this review. This is an update of our 2014 review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of stroke service interventions for implementing secondary stroke prevention strategies on modifiable risk factor control, including patient adherence to prescribed medications, and the occurrence of secondary cardiovascular events.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (April 2017), the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group Trials Register (April 2017), CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library 2017, issue 3), MEDLINE (1950 to April 2017), Embase (1981 to April 2017) and 10 additional databases including clinical trials registers. We located further studies by searching reference lists of articles and contacting authors of included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of organisational or educational and behavioural interventions (compared with usual care) on modifiable risk factor control for secondary stroke prevention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four review authors selected studies for inclusion and independently extracted data. The quality of the evidence as 'high', 'moderate', 'low' or 'very low' according to the GRADE approach (GRADEpro GDT).Three review authors assessed the risk of bias for the included studies. We sought missing data from trialists.The results are presented in 'Summary of findings' tables.

MAIN RESULTS

The updated review included 16 new studies involving 25,819 participants, resulting in a total of 42 studies including 33,840 participants. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool and assessed three studies at high risk of bias; the remainder were considered to have a low risk of bias. We included 26 studies that predominantly evaluated organisational interventions and 16 that evaluated educational and behavioural interventions for participants. We pooled results where appropriate, although some clinical and methodological heterogeneity was present.Educational and behavioural interventions showed no clear differences on any of the review outcomes, which include mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean body mass index, achievement of HbA1c target, lipid profile, mean HbA1c level, medication adherence, or recurrent cardiovascular events. There was moderate-quality evidence that organisational interventions resulted in improved blood pressure control, in particular an improvement in achieving target blood pressure (odds ratio (OR) 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09 to1.90; 13 studies; 23,631 participants). However, there were no significant changes in mean systolic blood pressure (mean difference (MD), -1.58 mmHg 95% CI -4.66 to 1.51; 16 studies; 17,490 participants) and mean diastolic blood pressure (MD -0.91 mmHg 95% CI -2.75 to 0.93; 14 studies; 17,178 participants). There were no significant changes in the remaining review outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that organisational interventions may be associated with an improvement in achieving blood pressure target but we did not find any clear evidence that these interventions improve other modifiable risk factors (lipid profile, HbA1c, medication adherence) or reduce the incidence of recurrent cardiovascular events. Interventions, including patient education alone, did not lead to improvements in modifiable risk factor control or the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular events.

Effects of Statin Intensity and Adherence on the Long-Term Prognosis After Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Statin is an established treatment for secondary prevention after ischemic stroke. However, the effects of statin intensity and adherence on the long-term prognosis after acute stroke are not well known.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study using a nationwide health insurance claim data in South Korea included patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke between 2002 and 2012. Statin adherence and intensity were determined from the prescription data for a period of 1 year after the index stroke. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. We performed multivariate Cox proportional regression analyses.

RESULTS

We included 8001 patients with acute ischemic stroke. During the mean follow-up period of 4.69±2.72 years, 2284 patients developed a primary outcome. Compared with patients with no statin, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 0.74 (0.64-0.84) for good adherence, 0.93 (0.79-1.09) for intermediate adherence, and 1.07 (0.95-1.20) for poor adherence to statin. Among the 1712 patients with good adherence, risk of adverse events was lower in patients with high-intensity statin (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.48 [0.24-0.96]) compared with those with low-intensity statin. Neither good adherence nor high intensity of statin was associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

After acute ischemic stroke, high-intensity statin therapy with good adherence was significantly associated with a lower risk of adverse events.

Adherence to Antihypertensive Medications and Stroke Risk: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis

Background

Inconsistent findings have been obtained for previous studies evaluating the association between antihypertensive medication (AHM) adherence and the risk of stroke. This dose‐response meta‐analysis was designed to investigate the association between AHM adherence and stroke risk.

Methods and Results

MEDLINE and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. The quantification of adherence to AHM was calculated as the percentage of the sum of days with AHM actually taken divided by the total number of days in a specific period. Summary relative risks (RR) and 95% CIs were estimated using a random‐effects model. Stratified and dose‐response analyses were also performed. A total of 18 studies with 1 356 188 participants were included. The summary RR of stroke for the highest compared with the lowest AHM adherence level was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.67–0.79). Stratified by stroke subtype, a higher AHM adherence was associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.69–0.79) and hemorrhagic stroke (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.42–0.72). Moreover, both fatal (RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36–0.73) and nonfatal stroke (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28–0.94) were lower in participants with higher AHM adherence. The results of a dose‐response analysis indicated that a 20% increment in AHM adherence level was associated with a 9% lower risk of stroke (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86–0.96).

Conclusions

Higher AHM adherence is dose‐dependently associated with a lower risk of stroke in patients with hypertension.

Effect of adherence to antihypertensive medication on stroke incidence in patients with hypertension: a population-based retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

High blood pressure is a modifiable risk factor for stroke, but non-adherence to antihypertensive medication is a growing concern for healthcare providers in controlling blood pressure. This study aimed to investigate the effect of adherence to antihypertensive medication on stroke incidence.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

We analysed National Health Insurance claim data and check-up data from 2009 to 2013.

PARTICIPANTS

38520patients with hypertension were defined as those diagnosed with hypertension and prescribed antihypertensive medication.

INTERVENTIONS

No interventions were made.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Poisson regression analysis using generalised estimating equations models was performed to examine the association between adherence to antihypertensive medication and stroke incidence.

RESULTS

Among 38 520 patients with hypertension, 957 (2.5%) strokes occurred during the study period. Non-adherence to medication was significantly associated with a higher risk of stroke (intermediate adherence: adjusted relative risk (aRR)=1.13, 95% CI=1.06 to 1.21; poor adherence: aRR=1.27, 95% CI=1.17 to 1.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-adherence to antihypertensive medication in patients with hypertension was associated with an increased risk of stroke. Therefore, healthcare providers need to focus on interventional strategies to ensure that these patients adhere to medication therapy and to provide continuing support to achieve long-term adherence, ultimately minimising negative health outcomes.

Improving medication adherence among community-dwelling seniors with cognitive impairment: a systematic review of interventions

Background Medication non-adherence may lead to poor therapeutic outcomes. Cognitive functions deteriorate with age, contributing to decreased adherence. Interventions have been tested to improve adherence in seniors with cognitive impairment or Alzheimer disease (AD), but high-quality systematic reviews are lacking. It remains unclear which interventions are promising. Objectives We conducted a systematic review to identify, describe, and evaluate interventions aimed at improving medication adherence among seniors with any type of cognitive impairment. Methods Following NICE guidance, databases and websites were searched using combinations of controlled and free vocabulary. All adherence-enhancing interventions and study designs were considered. Studies had to include community dwelling seniors, aged 65 years or older, with cognitive impairment, receiving at least one medication for a chronic condition, and an adherence measure. Study characteristics and methodological quality were assessed. Results We identified 13 interventions, including six RCTs. Two studies were of poor, nine of low/medium and two of high quality. Seven studies had sample sizes below 50 and six interventions focused on adherence to AD medication. Six interventions tested a behavioral, four a medication oriented, two an educational and one a multi-faceted approach. Studies rarely assessed therapeutic outcomes. All but one intervention showed improved adherence. Conclusion Three medium quality studies showed better adherence with patches than with pills for AD treatment. Promising interventions used educational or reminding strategies, including one high quality RCT. Nine studies were of low/moderate quality. High quality RCTs using a theoretical framework for intervention selection are needed to identify strategies for improved adherence in these seniors.

Medication Adherence Affects Risk of New Diabetes Complications

Background: Previous outcomes-based studies of adherence to diabetes medications have focused on glycemic control and are limited by questions of temporality and uncontrolled confounding. Objective: This retrospective cohort study of new oral antidiabetic medication users examined the effect of adherence on risk of incident macrovascular and microvascular complications. Methods: A nationwide integrated insurance claims and laboratory database was used to identify new oral antidiabetic medication users between January 2004 and December 2009. People with preexisting complications were excluded and the remaining cohort was followed until development of a new diabetes complication or December 2010. Medication adherence was calculated at 3-month intervals and entered as a time-dependent variable in a Cox proportional hazards model. Covariables entered in the model included patient demographics, clinical laboratory data, a medical frailty indicator and a mortality risk score from the Johns Hopkins adjusted clinical groups system, and medication use at baseline. Results: Among the 54 505 included patients, the median age was 60 years, 28 125 (52%) were men, 1447 (3%) were considered frail, the mean mortality risk score was 33.7 (±11.1), and 9793 (18%) developed a new diabetes complication. Good adherence (medication possession ratio ≥0.8) was associated with a lower risk of a new microvascular or macrovascular diabetes complication (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.92-1.00; P = 0.05). Conclusions: This study design addresses limitations of previous studies and found a small but significantly lower risk of new diabetes complications associated with good adherence to oral antidiabetic medications.

Predictive factors of non-adherence to secondary preventative medication after stroke or transient ischaemic attack: A systematic review and meta-analyses

Purpose

Non-adherence to secondary preventative medications after stroke is relatively common and associated with poorer outcomes. Non-adherence can be due to a number of patient, disease, medication or institutional factors. The aim of this review was to identify factors associated with non-adherence after stroke.

Method

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting factors associated with medication adherence after stroke. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL and Web of Knowledge. We followed PRISMA guidance. We assessed risk of bias of included studies using a pre-specified tool based on Cochrane guidance and the Newcastle–Ottawa scales. Where data allowed, we evaluated summary prevalence of non-adherence and association of factors commonly reported with medication adherence in included studies using random-effects model meta-analysis.

Findings

From 12,237 titles, we included 29 studies in our review. These included 69,137 patients. The majority of included studies (27/29) were considered to be at high risk of bias mainly due to performance bias. Non-adherence rate to secondary preventative medication reported by included studies was 30.9% (95% CI 26.8%–35.3%). Although many factors were reported as related to adherence in individual studies, on meta-analysis, absent history of atrial fibrillation (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.72–1.5), disability (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.93–1.72), polypharmacy (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.9–1.9) and age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96–1.14) were not associated with adherence.

Discussion

This review identified many factors related to adherence to preventative medications after stroke of which many are modifiable. Commonly reported factors included concerns about treatment, lack of support with medication intake, polypharmacy, increased disability and having more severe stroke.

Conclusion

Understanding factors associated with medication taking could inform strategies to improve adherence. Further research should assess whether interventions to promote adherence also improve outcomes.

A practical approach for measurement of antihypertensive medication adherence in patients with resistant hypertension

Confirmation of medication adherence is a challenge in clinical practice and essential for the accurate diagnosis of resistant hypertension. Although it is well established that drug adherence is critical for controlling blood pressure, there are still difficulties applying a simple, inexpensive, and reliable assessment of adherence in the clinical setting. We aimed to test a simple method to assess adherence in resistant hypertensive (RH) patients. A pilot study with normotensives or mild/moderate hypertensive subjects was performed to provide a fluorescence cutoff point for adherence. After that, 21 patients referred to the Resistant Hypertension Clinic had triamterene prescribed and were monitored for a 30-day period. We conducted two unannounced randomly selected home visits for urine collection to test drug intake that day. Office, home and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, biochemical data, and the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) were systematically acquired. According to adherence indicated by urine fluorescence, subjects were divided into adherent and nonadherent groups. We found 57% of nonadherence. No differences were found between groups regarding baseline characteristics or prescribed medications; Kappa's test showed concordance between adherence through MMAS-8 items and fluorescence (kappa = 0.61; 95% confidence interval: 0.28-0.94; P = .005). Nonadherent patients had higher office (81 ± 11 vs. 73 ± 6 mm Hg, P = .03), 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (75 ± 9 vs. 66 ± 7 mm Hg, P = .01), and home blood pressure measurement (77 ± 9 vs. 67 ± 8 mm Hg, P = .01) diastolic blood pressure than their counterparts. Nonadherence to antihypertensive therapy is high in patients with RH, even when assessed in clinics specialized in this condition. Fluorometry to detect a drug in the urine of RH patients is safe, easy, and reliable method to assess adherence.

Personalized medicine and stroke prevention: where are we?

There are many recommended pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies for the prevention of stroke, and an ongoing challenge is to improve their uptake. Personalized medicine is seen as a possible solution to this challenge. Although the use of genetic information to guide health care could be considered as the apex of personalized medicine, genetics is not yet routinely used to guide prevention of stroke. Currently personalized aspects of prevention of stroke include tailoring interventions based on global risk, the utilization of individualized management plans within a model of organized care, and patient education. In this review we discuss the progress made in these aspects of prevention of stroke and present a case study to illustrate the issues faced by health care providers and patients with stroke that could be overcome with a personalized approach to the prevention of stroke.

Barriers and facilitators for medication adherence in stroke patients: a qualitative study conducted in French neurological rehabilitation units

OBJECTIVE

To describe the perceptions of French patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals on stroke and secondary preventive medications.

METHOD

A qualitative study was conducted, based on four predetermined topics: stroke, secondary prevention medications, patient's experience, relationship between patient/caregiver and healthcare team.

RESULTS

Twenty-six interviews were conducted. Difficulties in taking medications, lack of knowledge on stroke and medication benefits, fear of over medication were identified as barriers for adherence in patients. Doubts about generic drugs were expressed by caregivers. Healthcare professionals reported lack of knowledge and absence of clinical symptoms as barriers. On the other hand, support from caregivers and healthcare professional support is essential for compliance in all participants. Patients and caregivers expressed that fear of recurrence was a facilitator for treatment compliance.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the barriers and facilitators for stroke treatment adherence and underlines the similarities and differences between the perceptions of patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals. These results must be integrated into the future French educational programs to improve medication adherence.

Plasma NT-proBNP as predictor of change in functional status, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the oldest old: the Leiden 85-plus study

In the aging society, it is important to identify very old persons at high risk of functional decline, cardiovascular disease and mortality. However, traditional risk markers lose their predictive value with age. We investigated whether plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels predict change in functional status, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in very old age. Here we present an observational prospective cohort study (Leiden 85-plus Study, 1997-2004) in a population-based sample of 560 individuals aged 85 years with a 5-year complete follow-up for functional status, cardiovascular morbidity and cause-specific mortality. Median NT-proBNP for men was 351 pg/ml (cutoff values for low-medium tertiles 201 pg/ml and medium-high tertiles 649 pg/ml) and, for women, 297 pg/ml (cutoffs 204 and 519 pg/ml, respectively). During the 5-year follow-up, participants with high NT-proBNP had an accelerated cognitive decline and increase of activities of daily living (ADL) disability over time (all at p < 0.01) and an increased risk of incident heart failure [hazard ratio (HR) 3.3 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.8-6.1)], atrial fibrillation [HR 4.1 (2.0-8.7)], myocardial infarction [HR 2.1 (1.2-3.7)], stroke [HR 3.4 (1.9-6.3)], cardiovascular mortality [HR 5.5 (3.1-10)], non-cardiovascular mortality [HR 2.0 (1.4-3.0)] and all-cause mortality [HR 2.9 (2.1-4.0)], independent of other known risk markers. All results remained similar after exclusion of participants with heart failure at baseline. In very old age, high-NT-proBNP levels predict accelerated cognitive and functional decline, as well as cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Results suggest that NT-proBNP can help clinicians to identify very old people at high risk of functional impairment and incident cardiovascular morbidity.

High rates of non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment revealed by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HP LC-MS/MS) urine analysis

OBJECTIVES

Non-adherence to therapy is an important cause of suboptimal blood pressure control but few practical tools exist to accurately and routinely detect it. We used a simple urine-based assay to evaluate the prevalence of antihypertensive treatment non-adherence and its impact on blood pressure in a specialist hypertension centre.

METHODS

208 hypertensive patients (125 new referrals, 66 follow-up patients with inadequate blood pressure control and 17 renal denervation referrals) underwent assessment of antihypertensive drug intake using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HP LC-MS/MS) urine analysis at the time of clinical appointment. A total of 40 most commonly prescribed antihypertensive medications (or their metabolites) were screened for in spot urine samples.

RESULTS

Overall, 25% of patients were totally or partially non-adherent to antihypertensive treatment (total non-adherence 10.1%, partial non-adherence 14.9%). The highest prevalence of partial and total non-adherence was among follow-up patients with inadequate blood pressure control (28.8%) and those referred for consideration of renal denervation (23.5%), respectively. There was a linear relationship between blood pressure and the numerical difference in detected/prescribed antihypertensive medications-every unit increase in this difference was associated with 3.0 (1.1) mm Hg, 3.1 (0.7) mm Hg and 1.9 (0.7) mm Hg increase in adjusted clinic systolic blood pressure, clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and 24 h mean daytime DBP (p=0.0051, p=8.62 × 10(-6), p=0.0057), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-adherence to blood pressure lowering therapy is common, particularly in patients with suboptimal blood pressure control and those referred for renal denervation. HP LC-MS/MS urine analysis could be used to exclude non-adherence and better stratify further investigations and intervention.

Risk factor management for stroke prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the recommendations for management of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, diet, physical activity, and lifestyle choices commonly encountered in neurologic practice. Specific studies, including those relevant to lipid targets, blood pressure targets, and adherence to medications after stroke, are reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to traditional risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus, this review discusses sleep apnea, diet, physical activity, and other novel risk factors that are potentially modifiable. Recent studies confirm that pharmacologic strategies to achieve aggressive targets for lipid and blood pressure lowering have significant impact on recurrent stroke risk.

SUMMARY

Optimal secondary prevention strategies can prevent as much as 80% of all recurrent strokes.

Negative impact of physician prescribed drug dosing schedule requirements on patient adherence to cardiovascular drugs

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine whether dosing schedule requirements impair overall cardiovascular drug adherence.

METHODS

A cohort study was performed with hospitalized patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease between April and September 2011. Patients were asked whether the prescribed time for taking their statin and antiplatelet drugs created any inconvenience in their daily routine and, if so, were asked to describe the reasons. Patient adherence to treatment was assessed using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). A cohort of physicians was separately studied between June and September 2011. Physicians were interviewed to determine their dosing schedule preference when prescribing statin and anti-platelet drugs, and the rationale for choosing a specific dosing schedule.

RESULTS

In the study, 103 patients and 59 physicians were included. Statins were most frequently prescribed in the evening (90%). Thienopyridines were prescribed both at lunch time (41%) and in the morning (35%). Aspirin was most frequently (65.3%) prescribed at lunch time. In total, 24.3% of patients reported being inconvenienced by their drug dosing schedule, and these subjects were less adherent to their drug regimen than those who did not report inconvenience (46.2% versus 16.7%, p = 0.014). Our results also demonstrate that there is no pharmacologic rationale for prescribing a particular drug dosing schedule for statin or anti-platelet drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should assess patient convenience, when prescribing medication, to optimize treatment adherence.

Non-compliance and inertia in hypertensive Spaniards at high cardiovascular risk: CUMPLE study

OBJECTIVE

To assess non-compliance (NC) and therapeutic inertia (TI) after 6 months of follow-up in hypertensive patients with poorly controlled blood pressure and high cardiovascular risk.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Longitudinal, multicentre study; 3900 uncontrolled hypertensive patients were recruited from 585 primary healthcare centres. Tablets were counted during visits at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months. A tablet count between 80-100% was considered as compliant. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine variables associated with NC and TI.

RESULTS

A total of 3636 patients completed, mean age was 64.8 (SD 10.8) years, 53.7% being male. After one month, 61.8% (60.2-63.4) had uncontrolled blood pressure, 39.5% (37.9-41.1) were NC and 52.3% (50.2-54.4) had TI. At the end of follow-up, uncontrolled blood pressure was 34.6% (33.1-36.1) (p < 0.05), NC was 46.8% (45.2-48.4) (p < 0.05) and TI was 34.2% (31.6-36.8) (p < 0.05). The variable associated with NC was greatest number of antihypertensive treatments (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.13, p < 0.001), and variables associated with TI were least number of antihypertensive drugs (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.98, p < 0.001) and least number of diseases suffered (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, p = 0.002).

LIMITATIONS

Due to the complexity of measuring compliance, we have to assume measurement bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Among uncontrolled hypertensive patients, after completing 6 months follow-up, approximately one out of two patients were NC and one out of three physicians committed TI.