Dexmedetomidine Combined with General Anesthesia Provides Similar Intraoperative Stress Response Reduction When Compared with a Combined General and Epidural Anesthetic Technique

Impact of a high inspired oxygen fraction on oxidative stress in pediatric patients: reassuring results based on a randomized trial

High-concentration oxygen inhalation is the primary intervention to prevent perioperative hypoxemia. However, there are concerns that this may induce an imbalance in oxidation‒reduction processes, particularly in pediatric patients with compromised antioxidant defenses. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of varying intraoperative concentrations of oxygen inhalation on oxidative stress in children by analyzing plasma biomarkers, oxygenation indices, and the duration of surgery and oxygen inhalation. Forty-five children scheduled for laparoscopic pyeloplasty under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to three groups, each receiving different fractions of inspired oxygen during surgery: 30%, 50%, or 80%. The primary outcome was the plasma concentration of oxidative stress markers, and the other measurements included the surgical duration and duration of oxygen exposure. Thirty-five children completed the study, with 11 in the low group, 12 in the medium group and 12 in the high group. The levels of superoxide dismutase at immediately post-tracheal intubation, hydrogen peroxide at 1 hour post-intubation, and 8-isoprostane at immediately post-surgical procedure were significantly higher in the high group than in the low group. The S100B levels at immediately post-surgical procedure were higher than those at immediately post-tracheal intubation and 1 hour post-intubation within the low group. Therefore, we conclude that inhaling a high concentration of oxygen during laparoscopic pyeloplasty under general anesthesia, for a duration of less than 3 hours, does not significantly increase oxidative stress in pediatric patients. This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration No. ChiCTR2400083143).

Dexmedetomidine administration reduced mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a propensity score-matched cohort analysis

Background

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) continues to pose significant difficulties due to the scarcity of successful preventative and therapeutic measures. Recent clinical trials and experimental research have confirmed the lung-protective and anti-inflammatory properties of dexmedetomidine. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between the use of dexmedetomidine and mortality outcomes in ICU patients with ARDS.

Methods

This study retrospectively examined data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) IV, focusing on individuals diagnosed with ARDS. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of death within 28 days after entering the ICU. To ensure a balanced cohort, we applied propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio. Additionally, multivariable analysis was performed to mitigate the effects of confounding factors.

Results

In this study, a cohort comprising 612 patients diagnosed with ARDS was investigated. Analysis using both univariate and multivariate Cox regression indicated significantly reduced 28-day and 90-day mortality rates in patients administered dexmedetomidine compared to those who were not given this treatment. Following adjustments for potential confounders using propensity score matching, these results were confirmed to be robust.

Conclusion

The results indicate an association between the administration of dexmedetomidine and lower mortality rates among severely ill ARDS patients. However, this result should be interpreted with cause because of a lot of missing data of potential risk factors for clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, it is imperative to perform further randomized controlled trials to corroborate this finding.

Impact of perioperative dexmedetomidine on long-term outcomes in older patients following cardiac surgery: follow-up of a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Perioperative dexmedetomidine is reported to reduce complications and even in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery. We therefore tested the hypothesis that perioperative dexmedetomidine may improve long-term outcomes after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

This was long-term follow-up of a randomized trial. We enrolled 285 patients aged 60 years or older who were scheduled for elective cardiac surgery. Patients were randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine or placebo (normal saline) during and early after surgery. Follow-up was conducted for up to 6 years post-surgery. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-free and hospital-free survivals, as well as cognitive function and quality of life in 6-year survivors.

RESULTS

All 285 patients were included in final analysis. Median follow-up duration was 80 months (interquartile range 30 to 80). Overall survival did not differ between the two groups: there were 18 deaths (12.6%) with placebo versus 22 deaths (15.5%) with dexmedetomidine; hazard ratio (HR) 1.22, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.27, p = 0.418. MACE-free survival was 23 (16.1%) with placebo versus 24 (16.9%) with dexmedetomidine; HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.83, P = 0.911. Hospital-free survival was 39 (27.3%) with placebo versus 42 (29.6%) with dexmedetomidine; HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.61, P = 0.853. Among 6-year survivors, the scores of cognitive function and quality of life were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that, for older patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery, dexmedetomidine administered during and early after surgery did not alter overall and MACE-free survivals, as well as long-term cognitive function and quality of life. However, considering the underpowered sample size and non-negligible loss to follow-up rate, our results need further confirmation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03289325 (September 20, 2017).

Roles of epidural block in combination with general anesthesia in stress response and immune function of patients after surgery for cervical cancer

We aimed to explore the roles of epidural block in combination with general anesthesia in the stress response and immune function of patients after surgery for cervical cancer. A total of 108 patients undergoing radical surgery of cervical cancer were randomly assigned into a general anesthesia combined with epidural block (observation) group and a general anesthesia (control) group. Peripheral blood was collected before anesthesia (t0), during anesthesia maintenance, as well as 10 min, 1 d, 2 d and 7 d after surgery. The levels of cytokines interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin-4 (IL-4) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) were detected by ELISA, and IFN-γ/IL-4 ratio was calculated. Compared with the control group, the observation group had significantly lower levels of GH, PRL and Cor, proportions of Th2 and Treg cells, and levels of IL-4 and TGF-β1 during anesthesia maintenance and at each time point after surgery (P < 0.05), but higher proportion of Th1 cells, Th1/Th2 cell ratio, IFN-γ level and IFN-γ/IL-4 ratio (P < 0.05). General anesthesia in combination with epidural block can work better in mitigating the stress response and protecting the immune function of patients after cervical cancer surgery.

Perioperative complications of middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats alleviated by human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells

For acute ischemic stroke treatment, the limitations of treatment methods and the high incidence of perioperative complications seriously affect the survival rate and postoperative recovery of patients. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hucMSCs) have multi-directional differentiation potential and immune regulation function, which is a potential cell therapy. The present investigation involved developing a model of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by thrombectomy after middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) for 90 min in rats and utilizing comprehensive multi-system evaluation methods, including the detection of brain tissue ischemia, postoperative survival rate, neurological score, anesthesia recovery monitoring, pain evaluation, stress response, and postoperative pulmonary complications, to elucidate the curative effect of tail vein injection of hucMSCs on MCAO's perioperative complications. Based on our research, it has been determined that hucMSCs treatment can reduce the volume of brain tissue ischemia, promote the recovery of neurological function, and improve the postoperative survival rate of MCAO in rats. At the same time, hucMSCs treatment can prolong the time of anesthesia recovery, relieve the occurrence of delirium during anesthesia recovery, and also have a good control effect on postoperative weight loss, facial pain expression, and lung injury. It can also reduce postoperative stress response by regulating blood glucose and serum levels of stress-related proteins including TNF-α, IL-6, CRP, NE, cortisol, β-endorphin, and IL-10, and ultimately promote the recovery of MCAO's perioperative complications.

A prospective cohort study comparing monitored anesthesia care and intubated general anesthesia in cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and safety of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) versus intubated general anesthesia (IGA) for patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

METHODS

This prospective observational study included patients scheduled for cardiac surgery involving CPB at our institution between April 2012 and February 2017. The enrolled patients were categorized into MAC and IGA groups. MAC involved local anesthesia at the sternotomy site, sedation with dexmedetomidine, analgesia with remifentanil/sufentanil, and electroacupuncture (EA). Eleven patients underwent MAC, and 13 patients received IGA. There were no instances of conversion from MAC to IGA, and both groups exhibited no major complications. The demographic characteristics, baseline parameters, and operative variables were comparable between the two groups.

RESULTS

Intraoperative opioid consumption was significantly lower in the MAC group compared to the IGA group (P < 0.001). The time to oral intake of liquids was significantly shorter in the MAC group (2.14 ± 0.90 h) compared to the IGA group (22.31 ± 3.33 h) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS) and perioperative vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) were significantly reduced in the MAC group compared to the IGA group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

MAC emerges as a safe and viable alternative to general anesthesia for specific patient groups undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Furthermore, it may enhance postoperative recovery and minimize postoperative complications compared to IGA.

Neuraxial Analgesia for Scoliosis Correction: A Case Series in a Specialised Children's Centre

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction of spinal deformities in children presents a challenge to the anaesthetist due to the extensive nature of the surgery, the co-morbidities of the patients and the constraints on aesthetic techniques of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord. Patients undergoing scoliosis surgery are considered to suffer severe pain, which may lead to a negative impact on patient psychology and physical well-being. By using effective postoperative pain regimens to enhance recovery after surgery, pain can be significantly reduced, leading to patient satisfaction, facilitating early mobilisation, promoting oral intake, lowering postoperative pain and shortening the length of hospital stay. Thus, the primary objectives of this study were to assess the postoperative pain management and first rescue analgesic medications, by using preservative-free morphine 50 mcg/kg and dexmedetomidine 4 mcg along with normal saline 0.5 ml kg caudally, as well as to look for the secondary objectives side effects, including respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting and pruritis, timing of postoperative ambulation and length of hospital stay.  Methods: In this study, we retrospectively included children under 14 years of age and above three years who underwent scoliosis surgery under a caudal epidural-general anaesthesia using caudal morphine and the dexmedetomidine technique in the period from January to May 2023 at the National Guard Health Affairs Hospital (NGHA), Riyadh. We collected the data of seven cases using the electronic chart system of the Best Care database to extract the specific cases that meet the inclusion criteria for the study, which are idiopathic scoliosis patients, aged 3-14 years, and primary correction procedures.  Results: The pain-free duration was between seven hours and 48 hours (about two days). There were four female cases (57.14%), and three cases were male (42.85%). The patients' American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status were II to III. In all the cases, there was no documentation of any episodes of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), respiratory distress or pruritus, except for one case where the patient had an episode of PONV.  Conclusion: In this study, our aim was to present our experience with dexmedetomidine as an efficient medication when coadministered with morphine to be used in the operating room. We found a high level of reliability in prolonging analgesia time and delaying the usage of rescue medication. We encourage more studies on caudal dexmedetomidine for patients undergoing scoliosis surgery.

Clinical Analysis of Different Anesthesia and Analgesia Methods for Patients Undergoing Uniportal Video-assisted Lung Surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare 3 intraoperative modalities to determine the best and most convenient one for pain control for uniportal lung surgery. This study compared general anesthesia with serratus plane block, general anesthesia with epidural, and general anesthesia alone to examine postoperative pain scores in patients.

METHODS

Eighty patients were enrolled and statistically analyzed. Three interventions were studied: general anesthesia with serratus plane block (group S), general anesthesia with thoracic epidural (group E), and general anesthesia only (group G). Outcome measures compared among the 3 groups included demographic characteristics; surgical types; anesthesia and operative time; postoperative pain scores; vital signs; morphine consumption at 0, 2, and 6 hours and day 1 and day 2 after surgery; incidence of opioid-related adverse events and chronic pain; hospital length of stay (LOS); and overall expenses. The numerical rating scale was used to assess the degree of pain on the first and second postoperative days. Postoperative morphine consumption, incidence of opioid-related side effects, hospital LOS, and overall hospital expenses were documented, as well as incidence of chronic postoperative pain.

FINDINGS

There was no difference in the incidence of opioid-related adverse events and chronic pain, hospital LOS, and overall expenses among the 3 groups. After investigating factors that may influence hospital LOS and overall expenses, the multivariable analysis indicated that only longer operative time was associated with longer hospital stay and more hospital expenses.

IMPLICATIONS

This prospective study found that general anesthesia alone offers an easy and efficient approach resulting in similar postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption compared with nerve block and epidural. Longer operative time was associated with longer hospital stay and more hospital expenses.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier: NCT03839160. (Clin Ther. 2024;XX:XXX-XXX) © 2024 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.

Effect of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on recovery of gastrointestinal function after caesarean section undergoing spinal and epidural anesthesia: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Gastrointestinal dysfunction after cesarean section negatively affects postoperative recovery. Dexmedetomidine has been shown to improve postoperative gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery and laparoscopic gastrectomy, but its role in cesarean section has not been fully elucidated. The study aimed to investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on gastrointestinal function after cesarean section.

STUDY DESIGN

220 pregnant women who underwent elective cesarean section were randomized into group D and group S. Group D patients received a loading dose of 0.5 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine for 10 mins followed by a maintenance dose of 0.5 μg/kg/h intravenously immediately after the umbilical cord was cut intraoperatively, whereas the other group (group S) received an equivalent quantity of normal saline as loading and maintenance dose IV by infusion pump. The primary outcome was time to first flatus after surgery (hours). Secondary outcomes included time to first feces and first bowel sounds (hours), incidence rates of postoperative gastrointestinal complications, and the length of postoperative hospital stay (days).

RESULTS

Modified intention-to-treat analysis showed that patients in Group D had a significantly shorter time to first flatus (21 [16 to 28.25] vs. 25 [18 to 32.25] h; P = 0.014), time to first feces (45.5 [35.75 to 55.25] vs. 53 [40 to 60] h; P = 0.019), and time to first bowel sounds (P = 0.010), a lower incidence of abdominal distension (21[20.6 %] vs. 36[34.3 %], P = 0.027), shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.010) compared to patients in Group S.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion reduces the time to first flatus, the incidence of abdominal distension, and shortens the length of hospital stay, promoting gastrointestinal function after cesarean section.

Impact of the addition of dexmedetomidine to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain-sleep interaction cycle and delirium: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The reciprocal nexus between sleep and pain is well-documented, with the deleterious impact of operative trauma potentially playing a pivotal role in the dysregulation of this interplay, which could significantly contribute to the manifestation of postoperative delirium (POD). Studies have investigated the effect of adding dexmedetomidine (DEX) to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pumps on postoperative pain-sleep interaction cycle and POD, but conclusions remained uncertain. The objective of this investigation is to perform a meta-analysis that thoroughly assesses the impact of integrating DEX into PCIA, focusing on analgesic effectiveness, sleep quality, and the incidence of delirium in postoperative patients.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform were searched, for publications in any language, from database inception to September 2023. Our analysis encompassed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examine the therapeutic efficacy and risk profile of adding DEX to the PCIA on the postoperative pain-sleep interaction cycle, by focusing on changes in postoperative analgesia (Visual analog scale (VAS) score), sleep efficiency, sleep structure, subjective sleep score (Assen insomnia scale and numerical rating scale) and adverse event rate.

Results

34 RCTs (4324 patients) were analyzed. This study shows DEX improved analgesia and reduced VAS scores at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Sleep efficiency was enhanced on the 1st and 2nd postoperative night. DEX improved sleep structure at the 1st postoperative night by reducing non-rapid eye movement stage 1 (N1) sleep and increasing non-rapid eye movement stage 2 (N2) and non-rapid eye movement stage 3 (N3) sleep. At the 2nd night, DEX reduced N1 sleep and increased N2 sleep, but not N3 sleep. Data from AIS and NRS showed improvement in subjective sleep scores on the 1st postoperative night and 2nd night. Additionally, DEX decreased the occurrence of POD on the 24 h and first-three days.

Conclusion

This study shows that the typical DEX doses added to PCIA with sufentanil were 2-5 μg/kg or approximately 200-250 μg, and the addition of DEX to PCIA can improve pain-sleep interaction cycle from multiple perspectives, and further decrease the occurrence of POD.

Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Pain Relief After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

To compare the efficacies of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) and opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Patients and Methods

A total of 150 patients who underwent 3-port LC procedures were randomly divided into an OFA group with esketamine, dexmedetomidine and lidocaine intravenous combined with local anesthetic incision infiltration or an OBA group with remifentanil combined with local anesthetic incision infiltration. The primary outcome was the consumption of rescue analgesics within 24 hrs after surgery. Secondary outcomes included time to LMA removal, time to orientation recovery, time to unassisted walking, sleep quality on the night of surgery, time to first flatus, hemodynamics during induction of general anesthesia, postoperative pain level on the visual analog scale (VAS), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and global satisfaction score (GSS) within 24 hrs after surgery.

Results

Both the consumption of rescue analgesics and the time to first flatus in the OFA group were significantly lower than those in the OBA group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.029, respectively). However, the time to LMA removal and the time to orientation recovery were significantly longer in the OFA group than in the OBA group (P < 0.001). In addition, the VAS scores at 2 hrs and 8 hrs after surgery and HR at laryngeal mask airway insertion in the OFA group were significantly lower than those in the OBA group (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, and P =0.016, respectively).

Conclusion

OFA may be beneficial for patients undergoing LC in that it could decrease the dosage of postoperative analgesics and pain intensity and even shorten the time to first flatus after surgery.

Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain in Elderly Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

Dexmedetomidine exerts a neuroprotective effect, however, the mechanism underlying this effect remains unclear. This study aimed to explore whether dexmedetomidine can reduce the increase in neurofilament light chain (NfL) protein concentration to play a neuroprotective role during thoracoscopic surgery.

Patients and Methods

Patients aged ≥60 years undergoing general anesthesia for thoracoscopic surgery were randomly assigned to receive dexmedetomidine (group D) or not receive dexmedetomidine (group C). Patients in group D received a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg before anesthesia induction and a continuous infusion at 0.5 μg·kg-1·h-1 until the end of the surgery. Dexmedetomidine was not administered in group C. The primary outcome was the NfL concentration on postoperative day 1. The concentrations of procalcitonin (PCT), serum amyloid A (SAA), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were detected preoperatively and on postoperative day 1. In addition, the numerical rating scale (NRS) and quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) scores were evaluated.

Results

A total of 38 patients in group D and 37 in group C were included in the analysis. No differences were observed between the groups in terms of the plasma concentration of NfL preoperatively and on postoperative day 1 (11.17 [8.86, 13.93] vs 13.15 [10.76, 15.56] pg/mL, P > 0.05; 16.70 [12.23, 21.15] vs 19.48 [15.25, 22.85] pg/mL, P > 0.05, respectively). However, the postoperative plasma NfL concentration was significantly higher than the preoperative value in both groups (both P < 0.001). The groups exhibited no differences in PCT, SAA, hs-CRP, NRS, and QoR-40 (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Intraoperative administration of dexmedetomidine at a conventional dose does not appear to significantly reduce the increase in postoperative plasma NfL concentration in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. This finding suggests that the neuroprotective effect of dexmedetomidine at a conventional dose was not obvious during general anesthesia.

Circulating biomarkers in perioperative management of cancer patients

Owing to the advances in surgical technology, most solid tumours can be controlled by surgical excision. The priority should be tumour control, while some routine perioperative management might influence cancer progression in an unnoticed way. Moreover, it is increasingly recognized that effective perioperative management should include techniques to improve postoperative outcomes. These influences are elucidated by the different functions of circulating biomarkers in cancer patients. Here, circulating biomarkers with two types of clinical functions were reviewed: (i) circulating biomarkers for cancer progression monitoring, for instance, those related to cancer cell malignancy, tumour microenvironment formation, and early metastasis, and (ii) circulating biomarkers with relevance to postoperative outcomes, including systemic inflammation, immunosuppression, cognitive dysfunction, and pain management. This review aimed to provide new perspectives for the perioperative management of patients with cancer and highlight the potential clinical translation value of circulating biomarkers in improving outcomes.

Effects of dexmedetomidine on A549 non-small cell lung cancer growth in a clinically relevant surgical xenograft model

The perioperative milieu following curative lung cancer surgery is accompanied by a stress response. Inflammasomes mediate inflammation resulting in the unfavorable immunomodulation of natural killer (NK) cell activity, thus promoting cancer progression. This study aimed to investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on the innate immune system, chronic inflammation, and lung cancer progression in a clinically relevant human-to-mouse xenograft model. The human lung cancer cell line A549-luc was subcutaneously injected into BALB/c nude mice. Saline or dexmedetomidine was administered for 2 weeks via an implanted osmotic minipump. After 4 weeks, the tumor size and weight were measured. NK cell activity, serum interferon-γ, interleukin (IL)-1β and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels were also measured. IL-10, IL-18, and inflammasome expression levels were assessed in the tumor tissues. DEX caused a decrease in tumor size, tumor weight, and IL-1β and TNF-α levels and an increase in NK cell activity and IFN-γ level. IL-10 and IL-18 expression was significantly decreased in the DEX-treated group. NLRP3, CTP1A, TXNIP, ASC, IL-1β, and caspase-1 protein levels were decreased in the DEX-treated group. In conclusion, the use of DEX for 2 weeks inhibited lung cancer progression by suppressing inflammasome- and IL-1β signaling-induced inflammation and enhancing NK cell activity.

Effects of dexmedetomidine at different dosages on perioperative haemodynamics and postoperative recovery quality in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement surgery under general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine could provide some advantages to prevent postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing under general anaesthesia. However, dexmedetomidine inhibits haemodynamics to some extent due to its sympathetic inhibition.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on haemodynamics during surgery and recovery after general anaesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomly allocated into comparative groups (normal saline (NS) and midazolam (MD), n = 30) and dexmedetomidine groups at different doses (D0.25/D0.5/D0.75, n = 30). In the D0.25/D0.5/D0.75 groups, dexmedetomidine was administered at different initial loading doses (0.25/0.5/0.75 μg/kg for 15 min) following 0.5 μg/kg/h continuous infusion until the end of the operation. In the MD group, patients were administered 0.03 mg/kg midazolam at the beginning of anaesthesia induction.

RESULTS

Compared to the MD and NS groups, there were significant decreases in MAP in the D0.5 and D0.75 groups at many time points, such as skin incision, end of operation, and from extubation until 30 min after extubation (P < 0.05); there were also significant decreases in HR in the D0.5 and D0.75 groups at time points including anaesthesia induction, end of operation, and from extubation to 2 h after operation (P < 0.05). In the D0.25 group, there were few differences in the changes in MAP and HR compared to the MD and NS groups during the entire perioperative period (P > 0.05). Moreover, the percentage of patients whose MAP and HR decreased > 20% of baseline was higher in the D0.75 and D0.5 groups than that in all other groups. Compared to the NS group, from the beginning to the end of the operation, the 95% confidence interval (CI) of RR for MAP below > 20% of baseline in the D0.5 and D0.75 groups was greater than 1. In particular, the CI of the RR in the D0.75 group was greater than 1 until the patient awoke from general anaesthesia (P < 0.05). In addition, the CI of the RR for HR below > 20% of baseline in the D0.5 group was greater than 1 compared to the NS group at the time of induction and extubation (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the possibility of developing hypotension or bradycardia in the MD or D0.25 groups compared to the NS group (P > 0.05). The recovery quality of patients during the post-anaesthesia period was also observed. No differences were observed among all the groups in the time to awakening or extubation after general anaesthesia (P > 0.05). According to the Riker Sedation-agitated Scale, dexmedetomidine significantly alleviated emergency agitation or delirium compared to NS (P < 0.05). In addition, the scores in the D0.5 and D0.75 groups were lower than those in the D0.25 group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine could alleviate the agitation of elderly patients undergoing hip replacement after intravenous general anaesthesia combined with inhaled sevoflurane without delayed recovery. However, it is necessary to be vigilant about the haemodynamic inhibition of the drug at high dosages throughout the perioperative period. Dexmedetomidine 0.25-0.5 μg/kg as the initial loading dose followed by 0.5 μg/kg/h continuous infusion might provide comfortable recovery after general anaesthesia with slight haemodynamic inhibition.

TRAIL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov, No. NCT05567523. Registered 05 October 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05567523?term=NCT05567523&draw=2&rank=1 .

Effect of Different Administration Routes of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Undergoing Elective Spinal Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Intravenous dexmedetomidine has been reported to decrease the occurrence of postoperative delirium (POD) in elderly patients. Nevertheless, some previous studies have indicated that intratracheal dexmedetomidine and intranasal dexmedetomidine are also effective and convenient. The current study aimed to compare the effect of different administration routes of dexmedetomidine on POD in elderly patients.

METHODS

We randomly allocated 150 patients (aged 60 years or more) scheduled for spinal surgery to receive intravenous dexmedetomidine (0.6 μg/kg), intranasal dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) before anesthesia induction, or intratracheal dexmedetomidine (0.6 µg/kg) after anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was the frequency of delirium during the first 3 postoperative days. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative sore throat (POST) and sleep quality. Adverse events were recorded, and routine treatment was performed.

RESULTS

Compared with the intranasal group, the intravenous group had a significantly lower occurrence of POD within 3 days (3 of 49 [6.1%] vs 14 of 50 [28.0%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 0.05-0.63; P < .017). Meanwhile, patients in the intratracheal group had a lower incidence of POD than those in the intranasal group (5 of 49 [10.2%] vs 14 of 50 [28.0%]; OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10-0.89; P < .017). Whereas, there was no difference between the intratracheal and intravenous groups (5 of 49 [10.2%] vs 3 of 49 [6.1%]; OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.40-7.73; P > .017). The rate of POST was lower in the intratracheal group than that in the other 2 groups at 2 hours after surgery (7 of 49 [14.3%] vs 12 of 49 [24.5%] vs 18 of 50 [36.0%], P < .017, respectively). Intravenous dexmedetomidine had the lowest Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score on the second morning after surgery (median [interquartile range {IQR}]: 4 [3-5] vs 6 [4-7] vs 6 [4-7], P < .017, respectively). Compared with the intranasal group, the intravenous group had a higher rate of bradycardia and a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting ( P < .017). The intranasal group was associated with the highest incidence of hypertension ( P < .017).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients aged ≥60 years undergoing spinal surgery, compared with the intranasal route of dexmedetomidine, intravenous and intratracheal dexmedetomidine reduced the incidence of early POD. Meanwhile, intravenous dexmedetomidine was associated with better sleep quality after surgery, and intratracheal dexmedetomidine resulted in a lower incidence of POST. Adverse events were mild in all 3 administration routes of dexmedetomidine.

Comparison of Caudal Block and Dexmedetomidine Infusion in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hypospadias Repair Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded Clinical Study

Background

Many parents continue to reject caudal block since they worry about a rare neurological consequence that may happen. A parenteral surrogate is sought because it can induce recovery with features such as local analgesia.

Objectives

To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous dexmedetomidine versus caudal and general anesthesia (GA) in children undergoing hypospadias surgery repair.

Methods

A randomized prospective study was conducted on 135 pediatric patients scheduled for hypospadias repair surgery in the hospital affiliated to Tanta University. The participants were divided into a control group (Group C) receiving GA, a caudal group receiving caudal block after GA, and a dexmedetomidine group (Group D) receiving intravenous dexmedetomidine after GA. The postoperative modified objective pain score (MOPS), the total pethidine received in the first 24 h postoperatively, and complications were recorded.

Results

The patients receiving GA required a significantly higher pethidine dose than the other two groups without a significant difference between caudal and dexmedetomidine. The patients receiving dexmedetomidine were extubated significantly later than patients in the other two groups. Regarding the MOPS score, there was a significant difference between Group C and the other two groups 30 minutes and one hour after operation regarding movements, posture, and agitation. Moreover, a significantly larger number of patients developed tachycardia in Group C compared to the other groups.

Conclusions

With the caudal block, the benefits of smooth emergency can be obtained by intravenous dexmedetomidine; however, it had less analgesic efficacy in the pediatric patients undergoing hypospadias repair surgery.

Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine vs. Remifentanil for Postoperative Analgesia and Opioid-Related Side Effects after Gynecological Laparoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Remifentanil is widely used for intraoperative analgesia, but often causes remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia (RIH) and related side effects. Dexmedetomidine, a non-opioid analgesic, has been used as an alternative to remifentanil to prevent RIH. We aimed to investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative recovery after gynecological laparoscopy. Ninety-six adult patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopy were randomly assigned to the dexmedetomidine or remifentanil groups. The primary outcome was the pain score at 30 min after surgery. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative adverse events (hypotension and bradycardia) and postoperative opioid-related side effects (nausea, vomiting, requirement for rescue analgesics, and shivering). We also performed an ancillary cytokine study to evaluate oxidative stress, one of the causes of RIH. Compared with the remifentanil group, the dexmedetomidine group had lower pain scores at 30 min after surgery (4.0 ± 1.9 vs. 6.1 ± 2.0, mean ± SD, p < 0.001) and lower incidence of intraoperative hypotension and postoperative nausea, vomiting, and shivering. Furthermore, the proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesics was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine than in the remifentanil group (25% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.001). Cytokine levels did not differ between the groups. Dexmedetomidine showed a better analgesic effect with minimal opioid-related side effects and is considered superior to remifentanil for intraoperative analgesia.

Dexmedetomidine postconditioning provides renal protection in patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A randomized controlled trial

Background: For localized disease, partial nephrectomy of small tumors continues to be the gold-standard treatment. However, temporary clamping is routinely performed during this process to control renal blood flow, which can cause renal ischemic/reperfusion injury. We evaluated whether dexmedetomidine postconditioning (DPOC) can reduce renal ischemic/reperfusion injury for patients receiving laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).

Methods: This randomized double-blind controlled trial included 77 patients who were scheduled for LPN at our hospital. Patients were randomly allocated to the DPOC or control group. DPOC was performed via intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine at 0.6 μg kg−1 for 10 min immediately after unclamping the renal artery. In the control group, saline was administered in place of dexmedetomidine under the same protocol. All participants underwent a 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome were the values of 99mTc-DTPA-GFR in the affected kidney at one and 6 months post-LPN.

Result: The GFR values in the DPOC group (35.65 ± 4.89 ml min−1.1.73 m−2) were significantly higher than those the control group (33.10 ± 5.41 ml min−1.1.73 m−2; p = 0.022) at 1 month after LPN. There was no statistically significant difference in GFR value between the two groups at 6 months after LPN.

Conclusion: DPOC provides therapeutic benefits to LPN patients, at least on a short-term basis, by alleviating renal ischemic/reperfusion injury.

Clinical Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier [ChiCTR-TRC-14004766].

The Effect of Opioid-Free Anesthesia on the Quality of Recovery After Gynecological Laparoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is an emerging technique that eliminates intraoperative use of opioids and is associated with lower postoperative opioid consumption and reduced adverse postoperative events. The present study investigated the effect of OFA on the quality of recovery in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy.

Patients and Methods

Seventy-five adult patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopy were randomly assigned to the OFA group with dexmedetomidine and lidocaine or the remifentanil-based anesthesia (RA) group with remifentanil. Patients, surgeons, and medical staff members providing postoperative care and assessing outcomes were blinded to group allocation. The anesthesiologist performing general anesthesia could not be blinded due to the different drug administration protocols by groups. The primary outcome was the quality of recovery measured using the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain score, intraoperative and postoperative adverse events, and stress hormones levels.

Results

The patients in both groups had comparable baseline characteristics. The QoR-40 score on postoperative day 1 was significantly higher in the OFA group than in the RA group (155.9 ± 21.2 in the RA group vs 166.9 ± 17.8 in the OFA group; mean difference: −11.0, 95% confidence interval: −20.0, −2.0; p = 0.018). The visual analog scale score at 30 min after surgery was significantly lower in the OFA group than in the RA group (6.3 ± 2.3 in the RA group vs 4.1 ± 2.1 in the OFA group; p < 0.001). The incidences of nausea and shivering in the post-anesthetic care unit were also significantly lower in the OFA group (p = 0.014 and 0.025; respectively). Epinephrine levels were significantly lower in the OFA group (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

OFA significantly improved the quality of recovery in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy.

Dexmedetomidine infusion for emergence coughing prevention in patients undergoing an endovascular interventional procedure: A randomized dose-finding trial

OBJECTIVE

Dexmedetomidine has been introduced in emergence coughing, agitation, and shivering prevention. This study aimed to investigate the optimal dose of dexmedetomidine for emergence cough prophylaxis.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blinded, and prospective trial, 356 patients scheduled for an endovascular interventional procedure were randomly assigned to 0.3 (D 0.3), 0.4 (D 0.4), 0.5 (D 0.5), and 0.6 (D 0.6) μg·kg^-1·h^-1 dexmedetomidine rate, or saline control (C), from anesthesia induction until the end of surgery. The primary outcomes measured were cough grade and frequency. Additionally, groups were compared according to mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, agitation, shivering, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), extubation time, sedation scores, and postoperative first night sleep quality (secondary outcomes).

RESULTS

A total of 351 patients were included in the analysis. The respective incidences of D 0.3, D 0.4, and D 0.5 versus C group were: 78.6%, 68.6%, 53.4% and 42.9% vs 89.7% for cough (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001 between group D 0.4, D 0.5 and D 0.6 vs C, respectively); 30%, 27.1%, 20.5%, 15.7% vs 44.1% for agitation (p = 0.04, p = 0.003, and p < 0.001 between group D 0.4, D 0.5 and D 0.6 vs C, respectively); 8.6%, 7.1%, 6.8%, 5.7% vs 22.1% for shivering (p = 0.027, p = 0.013, p = 0.01, and p = 0.01 between D 0.3, D 0.4, D 0.5 and D 0.6 vs C, respectively); and 52.9%, 57.1%, 42.5%, 44.3% vs 61.8% for poor sleep quality (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04 between group D 0.5 and D 0.6 vs C, respectively). D 0.4, D 0.5 and D 0.6 showed lower MAP during extubation, compared with the C group. Also, D 0.5 and D 0.6 presented a slight delay in extubation (3.1 and 3.3 min longer than C; p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). Meanwhile, the frequency of atropine, vasopressor administration, PONV and dizziness were similar to the control.

CONCLUSIONS

Both 0.5 and 0.6 μg·kg^-1·h^-1 dexmedetomidine infusion rates effectively mitigated emergence coughing with prolonged extubation time, besides sleep disturbance. D 0.4, D 0.5, and D 0.6 reduced agitation and sustained hemodynamic stability. Finally, the four doses applied were effective in shivering attenuation.

Non-diabetic euglycaemic ketoacidosis and rapid weight loss in a post-traumatic surgical patient: is the outré preventable?

To highlight the implications of the metabolic stress response and the role of anaesthesia in attenuating its deleterious effects, we present this extremely rare case of non-diabetic euglycaemic ketoacidosis with rapid weight loss in a post-traumatic surgical patient. Ketoacidosis is the accumulation of ketone bodies in blood and is generally associated with relative or absolute insulin deficiency secondary to diabetes mellitus, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and extensive fasting. The stress of systemic disease, trauma or surgery in such predisposed patients could precipitate ketoacidosis. Our patient developed high anion gap metabolic acidosis intraoperatively due to ketosis, a potentially life-threatening complication, without any predisposing factors as a result of metabolic stress of major trauma and surgery. Aiding the interpretation, he lost 15 kg weight perioperatively, suggesting his body was in a hypercatabolic state. This report emphasises the value of anaesthetic techniques to prevent such rare complications.

Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Immune Cells: A Narrative Review

As we all know, dexmedetomidine (DEX), as a highly selective α₂ adrenergic receptor agonist, exerts sedative, anti-anxiety and hypnotic effects by inhibiting the discharge of norepinephrine neurons in locus coeruleus and GABA-related hypnotic pathways. However, the role of DEX in anti-inflammatory and immune regulation has gradually attracted the attention of researchers in recent years. The α₂ adrenergic receptor is one of the members of the adrenergic receptor family, which is widely present in a variety of immune cells and mediates the biological behavior of the inflammatory immune system. At present, there have been more and more studies on the effects of DEX on immune cells and inflammatory responses, but few studies have systematically explored the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of DEX. Here, we comprehensively review the published human and animal studies related to DEX, summarize the effects of DEX on immune cells and its role in related diseases, and propose potential research direction.

Dexmedetomidine Combined with Femoral Nerve Block Provides Effective Analgesia Similar to Femoral Nerve Combined with Sciatic Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a severe traumatic procedure, and femoral nerve block (FNB) combined with a sciatic nerve block (SNB) is widely used in TKA. However, injury of the sciatic nerve is clinically reported. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) could reduce stress and inflammation, as well as improve pain in TKA. This study aims to observe the analgesic impact of DEX combined with FNB in TKA.

Methods

Eighty-eight patients undergoing TKA were included and randomly divided into two groups: DF group (FNB combined with DEX 0.6μg/kg before surgery, followed by DEX 0.2–0.4μg/kg/h until articular closure) and SF group (FNB combined with SNB). Each nerve was blocked with 0.375% ropivacaine 20mL, and all patients received general anesthesia routinely. The primary endpoint was the pain visual analog scale (VAS) score during activities at postoperative 24 hours.

Results

There was no statistical difference in the pain VAS scores at any time point. The mean duration of analgesia for patients with rescue analgesic requests was comparable between the two groups: 25.4 ± 6.3 hours in the DF group vs 24.8 ± 6.4 hours in the SF group (two-sample t-test, p=0.738). The total dose of sufentanil was similar between groups (P=0.355). The maintenance dose of propofol and dose of rescue analgesics were comparable (all P>0.05). There were no statistical differences in the incidence of adverse events. However, the time to extubate in the DF group was significantly longer than those in the SF group (P<0.001).

Conclusion

DEX combined with FNB could provide effective analgesia similar to SNB combined with FNB in TKA.

Clinical Trial Registration

The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on November 17, 2019 (identifier: ChiCTR1900027552).

The influence of anesthesia and surgery on fear extinction

Accumulating evidence has demonstrated significant clinical post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms after anesthesia or surgery. Fear extinction dysfunction is a notable feature of PTSD. Although anesthetics and surgery profoundly affect memory processes, their designated effects on fear extinction have not been dissertated. Previous studies have suggested that innate immune system activation disrupts fear extinction, and surgery has been shown to increase the inflammatory response. Thus, in the current study, we examined the effects of propofol, sevoflurane, dexmedetomidine and surgery on fear extinction in adolescent mice, and further tested whether dexmedetomidine could reverse the injury effect of surgery on fear extinction through its anti-inflammatory effects. Our results showed that propofol (200 mg/kg) impaired the acquisition and recall of cued fear extinction, and surgery disrupted cued fear extinction acquisition/recall and consolidation. In contrast to cued fear extinction, contextual fear extinction was not affected by propofol or surgery. Moreover, dexmedetomidine prevented surgery-induced impairment of cued extinction acquisition and recall but not consolidation. Finally, TNF-α and IL-6 levels in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex were not necessary for the dexmedetomidine treatment effect of surgery-induced fear extinction dysfunction. The study results showed that propofol and surgery selective impaired the cued fear extinction stage in adolescent mice, and dexmedetomidine may unleash a protective effect in preventing postoperative PTSD.

Effect of Different Modes of Administration of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Nerve Block on Postoperative Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) as a nerve block adjuvant can significantly prolong analgesia. However, whether perineural or systemic administration of DEX is more beneficial in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been thoroughly investigated. To this end, we evaluated the effects of perineural and systemic DEX administration on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing TKA surgery.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients undergoing TKA under general anesthesia combined with femoral nerve block and sciatic nerve block to one of three groups: (1) ropivacaine plus perineural dexmedetomidine (DP): 0.25% ropivacaine 40 mL plus 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine; (2) ropivacaine plus systemic dexmedetomidine (DS): 0.25% ropivacaine 40 mL plus systemic 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine; (3) control group (C): 0.25% ropivacaine 40 mL.

RESULTS

The average length of time until patients first experienced postoperative pain was significantly longer in the DP group (26.0 h [22.0-30.0 h]) than in the DS group (22.4 h [18-26.8 h]) and the control group (22.9 h [19.5-26.3 h], P = 0.001). For this result there was no significant difference between the DS and the control group. Compared with the DS and control groups, patients in the DP group had lower resting visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery (P < 0.05). VAS activity scores at 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery in the DP group were lower than those in the DS and control groups, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Compared with the DS and control groups, the amount of postoperative opioids in the DP group was also significantly reduced, and the number of people needing postoperative rescue analgesia was significantly lower, with a statistical difference (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the sleep satisfaction of patients in the DP group on the first night after surgery and the satisfaction with pain control at 72 h after surgery were both higher than those in the DS group and control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Perineural administration of DEX can significantly prolong the interval until patients report pain for the first time after TKA, relieve postoperative pain, reduce postoperative opioid dosage, and improve postoperative sleep quality and satisfaction with pain control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier ChiCTR1900025808.

Effects of dexmedetomidine on glucose-related hormones and lactate in non-diabetic patients under general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

To explore the effects of dexmedetomidine on glucose-related hormones and lactate levels in non-diabetic patients undergoing malignant gastrointestinal tumor radical resection.

METHODS

Groups D1 and D2 received dexmedetomidine loading dose 1 μg/kg and maintenance dose 0.25 and 0.5 μg/kg/h, respectively. Group C received saline solution. Glucose, lactate, insulin, glucagon, cortisol, epinephrine, norepinephrine and dopamine levels were measured before dexmedetomidine infusion (T1), 1 h after surgery beginning (T2), at surgery ending (T3), and 1 h after transfer to the post-anesthesia care unit (T4).

RESULTS

Compared with group C, glucose levels increased in group D2 at T2 and reduced in groups D1 and D2 at T4. Lactate levels reduced in groups D1 and D2 at T4. A positive correlation between glucose and lactate levels was found in all groups. Compared with group C, insulin level reduced in group D2 at T2; glucagon levels reduced in groups D1 and D2 at T4; cortisol levels reduced in group D1 at T4 and in group D2 at T3 and T4; epinephrine and norepinephrine levels reduced in group D1 at T4 and in group D2 at T2 and T4; and dopamine level reduced in group D2 at T4.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine loading dose 1 μg/kg and maintenance dose 0.25 μg/kg/h produces a stable insulin level and significant postoperative decreases in glucagon, cortisol, epinephrine and norepinephrine secretion with stable maintenance of intraoperative and postoperative blood glucose levels and decreased postoperative lactate levels in non-diabetic patients under general anesthesia.

Immunomodulatory Effects of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine in Ovarian Cancer: An In Vitro and Xenograft Mouse Model Study

Background

The surgical stress response (SSR) causes immunosuppression which may cause residual tumor growth and micrometastasis after cancer surgery. We investigated whether dexmedetomidine affects cancer cell behavior and immune function in an ovarian cancer xenograft mouse model.

Methods

The effect of dexmedetomidine on cell viability and cell cycle was assessed using SK-OV-3 cells at drug concentrations of 0.5, 0.1, 5, and 10 µg mL^-1. BALB/c nude mice were used for the ovarian cancer model with the Dexmedetomidine group (n=6) undergoing surgery with dexmedetomidine infusion and the Control group (n=6) with saline infusion for 4 weeks. Natural killer (NK) cell activity, serum proinflammatory cytokines, and cortisol were measured at predetermined time points and tumor burden was assessed 4 weeks after surgery.

Results

Dexmedetomidine had no effect on cell viability or cell cycle. Following a sharp decrease on postoperative day (POD) 1, NK cell activity recovered faster in the Dexmedetomidine group with significant difference vs. the Control group on POD 3 (P=0.028). In the Dexmedetomidine group, cortisol levels were lower on POD 3 (P=0.004) and TNF-α levels were lower at 4 weeks after surgery (P<0.001) compared to the Control group. The Dexmedetomidine group showed lower tumor burden at 4 weeks vs. the Control group as observed by both tumor weight (P<0.001) and the in vivo imaging system (P=0.03).

Conclusions

Dexmedetomidine infusion may improve ovarian cancer surgery outcome by suppressing the SSR and stress mediator release. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which dexmedetomidine acts on cancer and immune cells.

Effect of Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine on Recovery of Gastrointestinal Function After Abdominal Surgery in Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Postoperative ileus is common after abdominal surgery, and small clinical studies have reported that intraoperative administration of dexmedetomidine may be associated with improvements in postoperative gastrointestinal function. However, findings have been inconsistent and study samples have been small. Further examination of the effects of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on postoperative gastrointestinal function is needed.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of intraoperative intravenous dexmedetomidine vs placebo on postoperative gastrointestinal function among older patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University in Hefei, China (lead site), and 12 other tertiary hospitals in Anhui Province, China. A total of 808 participants aged 60 years or older who were scheduled to receive abdominal surgery with an expected surgical duration of 1 to 6 hours were enrolled. The study was conducted from August 21, 2018, to December 9, 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Dexmedetomidine infusion (a loading dose of 0.5 μg/kg over 15 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 0.2 μg/kg per hour) or placebo infusion (normal saline) during surgery.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was time to first flatus. Secondary outcomes were postoperative gastrointestinal function measured by the I-FEED (intake, feeling nauseated, emesis, physical examination, and duration of symptoms) scoring system, time to first feces, time to first oral feeding, incidence of delirium, pain scores, sleep quality, postoperative nausea and vomiting, hospital costs, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Among 808 patients enrolled, 404 were randomized to receive intraoperative dexmedetomidine, and 404 were randomized to receive placebo. In total, 133 patients (60 in the dexmedetomidine group and 73 in the placebo group) were excluded because of protocol deviations, and 675 patients (344 in the dexmedetomidine group and 331 in the placebo group; mean [SD] age, 70.2 [6.1] years; 445 men [65.9%]) were included in the per-protocol analysis. The dexmedetomidine group had a significantly shorter time to first flatus (median, 65 hours [IQR, 48-78 hours] vs 78 hours [62-93 hours], respectively; P < .001), time to first feces (median, 85 hours [IQR, 68-115 hours] vs 98 hours [IQR, 74-121 hours]; P = .001), and hospital length of stay (median, 13 days [IQR, 10-17 days] vs 15 days [IQR, 11-18 days]; P = .005) than the control group. Postoperative gastrointestinal function (as measured by the I-FEED score) and delirium incidence were similar in the dexmedetomidine and control groups (eg, 248 patients [72.1%] vs 254 patients [76.7%], respectively, had I-FEED scores indicating normal postoperative gastrointestinal function; 18 patients [5.2%] vs 12 patients [3.6%] had delirium on postoperative day 3).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, the administration of intraoperative dexmedetomidine reduced the time to first flatus, time to first feces, and length of stay after abdominal surgery. These results suggest that this therapy may be a viable strategy to enhance postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function among older adults.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1800017232.

Effects of Three Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine and Ropivacaine on Analgesia and the Stress Response in Hypospadias Surgery: A Randomized Trial

Objective: This study was designed to investigate the effects of three different doses of dexmedetomidine in caudal blocks on postoperative stress and pain after pediatric urethroplasty. Methods: A total of 160 children who underwent elective urethroplasty were enrolled in this study. They were randomly divided into four groups: groups D1, D2, and D3, in which the patients were injected respectively with a mixed solution of 1, 1.5, or 2 μg kg^-1 of dexmedetomidine and 0.25% ropivacaine into the sacral canal; and group R, in which the patients were injected with 0.25% ropivacaine into the sacral canal. Cortisol and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels within 24 h, the incidence of adverse events in the circulatory system during surgery, onset time of the caudal block, duration of postoperative analgesia, the incidence of agitation during recovery, and other anesthetic adverse reactions were observed and recorded. Results: Compared with group R, cortisol and IL-6 levels in groups D1, D2, and D3 decreased within 24 h after the operation (T2-T6). The incidence of intraoperative hypertension, tachycardia, and shivering during the recovery period decreased, the onset time of the caudal block decreased, and the duration of postoperative analgesia increased (p < 0.01). Compared with group D1, the duration of postoperative analgesia increased in groups D2 and D3 (p < 0.01). Compared with groups D1 and D2, the incidence of excessive sedation and bradycardia in group D3 increased (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The administration of 1.5 μg kg^-1 of dexmedetomidine appears to be most feasible in accelerating the onset of the caudal block, reducing stress and inflammation, stabilizing the circulation, increasing the duration of postoperative analgesia, and reducing anesthesia- and operation-associated adverse events.

Dexmedetomidine for prevention of postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing oesophagectomy with total intravenous anaesthesia: A double-blind, randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine is known to be a sedative. Recent studies suggest that administration of dexmedetomidine can prevent postoperative delirium (POD) which has been confirmed as a common complication after major surgery. However, its effects in patients undergoing oesophagectomy are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine in reducing POD in elderly patients after transthoracic oesophagectomy with total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA).

DESIGN

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Single-centre, tertiary care hospital, November 2016 to September 2018.

PATIENTS

Eligible patients (n = 177) undergoing transthoracic oesophagectomy were randomly assigned to receive total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA, n = 87) or dexmedetomidine with TIVA (DEX-TIVA, n = 90).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients receiving DEX-TIVA received a loading dose of dexmedetomidine (0.4 μg kg-1), over 15 min, followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 0.1 μg kg-1 h-1 until 1 h before the end of surgery. Patients receiving TIVA received physiological saline with a similar infusion rate protocol.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the incidence of POD. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of emergence agitation, serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels and haemodynamic profile.

RESULTS

All randomised patients were included with planned intention-to-treat analyses for POD. Delirium occurred in 15 (16.7%) of 90 cases given dexmedetomidine, and in 32 (36.8%) of 87 cases given saline (P = 0.0036). The DEX-TIVA group showed less frequent emergence agitation than the TIVA group (22.1 vs. 48.0%, P = 0.0058). The incremental change in surgery-induced IL-6 levels was greater in the TIVA group than DEX-TIVA group (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Adding peri-operative dexmedetomidine to a total intravenous anaesthetic safely reduces POD and emergence agitation in elderly patients undergoing open transthoracic oesophagectomy. These benefits were associated with a postoperative reduction in circulating levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and stabilisation of the haemodynamic profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trials Register Identifier: ChiCTR-IPR-17010881.

The effect of opioid-free anesthesia on the quality of recovery after gynecological laparoscopy: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Because of the indiscriminate use of opioids during the perioperative period, opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) has been increasingly required. Nevertheless, the studies on the detailed techniques and effects of OFA are not sufficient. The Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire is a validated assessment tool for measuring recovery from general anesthesia. However, no study has used the QoR-40 to determine if OFA leads to better recovery than standard general anesthesia. Therefore, we aim to perform this study to determine the effects of OFA using dexmedetomidine and lidocaine on the quality of recovery as well as the various postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

The participants (n = 78) will be allocated to one of the two groups; the study group will receive bolus and infusion of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine, and the control group will receive remifentanil infusion during general anesthesia for gynecological laparoscopy. The other processes including anesthetic and postoperative care will be performed similarly in the two groups. Intraoperative hemodynamic, anesthetic, and nociceptive variables will be recorded. Postoperative outcomes such as QoR-40, pain severity, and opioid-related side effects will be assessed. Additionally, an ancillary cytokine study (inflammatory cytokine, stress hormone, and reactive oxygen species) will be performed during the study period.

DISCUSSION

This will be the first study to determine the effect of OFA, using the combination of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine, on the quality of recovery after gynecological laparoscopy compared with standard general anesthesia using remifentanil. The findings from this study will provide scientific and clinical evidence on the efficacy of OFA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04409964 . Registered on 28 May 2020.

Dexmedetomidine reduces postoperative cognitive and behavioral dysfunction in adults submitted to general anesthesia for non-cardiac surgery: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Introduction and objectives

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been associated with a decrease in postoperative cognitive and behavioral dysfunction in patients submitted to general anesthesia, whether inhalation or total intravenous anesthesia. Consequently, the DEX effects on postoperative agitation and delirium in patients submitted to general anesthesia for non-cardiac surgery have been investigated.

Method

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and double-blind clinical trials (RCTs) was undertaken assessing adults submitted to elective procedures under general anesthesia receiving DEX or placebo. The search included articles published in English in the Pubmed and Web of Science databases using keywords such as dexmedetomidine, delirium, and agitation. Duplicate publications, studies involving cardiac surgery or using active control (other than saline solution) were included. A random effects model was adopted using the DerSimonian-Laird method and estimate of Odds Ratio (OR) for dichotomous variables, and weighted mean difference for continuous variables, with their respective 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI).

Results

Of the 484 articles identified, 15 were selected comprising 2,183 patients (1,079 and 1,104 patients in the DEX and control group, respectively). The administration of DEX was considered a protective factor for postoperative cognitive and behavioral dysfunction (OR = 0.36; 95% CI 0.23–0.57 and p < 0.001), regardless of the anesthesia technique used.

Conclusion

Dexmedetomidine administration reduced by at least 43% the likelihood of postoperative cognitive and behavioral dysfunction in adult patients submitted to general anesthesia for non-cardiac surgery.

Adult Emergence Agitation: A Veteran-Focused Narrative Review

Emergence agitation (EA) is a self-limited state of psychomotor excitement during awakening from general anesthesia. EA is confined to the emergence period as consciousness is restored, which sharply distinguishes it from other postoperative delirium states. Sporadic episodes of EA may become violent with the potential for harm to both patients and caregivers, but the long-term consequences of such events are not fully understood. Current literature on EA in adults is limited to small-scale studies with inconsistent nomenclature, variable time periods that define emergence, a host of different surgical populations, and conflicting diagnostic criteria. Therefore, true incidence rates and risk factors are unknown. In adult noncardiac surgery, the incidence of EA is approximately 19%. Limited data suggest that young adults undergoing otolaryngology operations with volatile anesthetic maintenance may be at the highest risk for EA. Currently suggested EA mechanisms are theoretical but might reflect underblunted sympathetic activation in response to various internal (eg, flashbacks or anxiety) or external (eg, surgical pain) stimuli as consciousness returns. Supplemental dexmedetomidine and ketamine may be utilized for EA prevention. Compared to the civilian population, military veterans may be more vulnerable to EA due to high rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) manifesting as violent flashbacks; however, confirmatory data are limited. Nonetheless, expert military medical providers suggest that use of patient-centered rapport tactics, PTSD trigger identification and avoidance, and grounding measures may alleviate hyperactive emergence phenomena. Future research is needed to better characterize EA in veterans and validate prophylactic measures to optimize care for these patients. This narrative review provides readers with an important framework to distinguish EA from delirium. Furthermore, we summarize current knowledge of EA risk factors, mechanisms, and adult management strategies and specifically revisit them in the context of veteran perioperative health. The anesthesiology care team is ideally positioned to further explore EA and develop effective prevention and treatment protocols.

Perioperative Glucocorticoids are Associated with Improved Recurrence-Free Survival After Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Propensity Score-Matching

Purpose

Perioperative anesthetic management may affect long-term outcome after cancer surgery. This study investigated the effect of perioperative glucocorticoids on long-term survival in patients after radical resection for pancreatic cancer.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study with propensity score-matching, patients who underwent radical resection for pancreatic cancer from January 2005 to December 2016 were recruited. Baseline and perioperative data including use of glucocorticoids for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting were collected. Patients were followed up by qualified personnel for cancer recurrence and survival. The primary outcome was the recurrence-free survival. Outcomes were compared before and after propensity matching. The association between perioperative glucocorticoid use and recurrence-free survival was analyzed with multivariable regression models.

Results

A total of 215 patients were included in the study; of these, 112 received perioperative glucocorticoids and 103 did not. Patients were followed up for a median of 74.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 68.3–79.7). After propensity score-matching, 64 patients remained in each group. The recurrence-free survivals were significantly longer in patients with glucocorticoids than in those without (full cohort: median 12.0 months [95% CI 6.0–28.0] vs 6.9 months [4.2–17.0], P<0.001; matched cohort: median 12.0 months [95% CI 5.8–26.3] vs 8.3 months [4.3–18.2], P=0.015). After correction for confounding factors, perioperative glucocorticoids were significantly associated with prolonged recurrence-free survivals (full cohort: HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48–0.92, P=0.015; matched cohort: HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35–0.84, P=0.007).

Conclusion

Perioperative use of low-dose glucocorticoids is associated with improved recurrence-free survival in patients following radical surgery for pancreatic cancer.

Effects of intravenous lidocaine, dexmedetomidine, and their combination on IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Surgical-related inflammatory responses have negative effects on postoperative recovery. Intravenous (IV) lidocaine and dexmedetomidine inhibits the inflammatory response. We investigated whether the co-administration of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine could further alleviate inflammatory responses compared with lidocaine or dexmedetomidine alone during laparoscopic hysterectomy.

METHODS

A total of 160 patients were randomly allocated into four groups following laparoscopic hysterectomy: the control group (group C) received normal saline, the lidocaine group (group L) received lidocaine (bolus infusion of 1.5 mg/kg over 10 min, 1.5 mg/kg/h continuous infusion), the dexmedetomidine group (group D) received dexmedetomidine (bolus infusion of 0.5 μg/kg over 10 min, 0.4 μg/kg/h continuous infusion), and the lidocaine plus dexmedetomidine group (group LD) received a combination of lidocaine (bolus infusion of 1.5 mg/kg over 10 min, 1.5 mg/kg/h continuous infusion) and dexmedetomidine (bolus infusion of 0.5 μg/kg over 10 min, 0.4 μg/kg/h continuous infusion). The levels of plasma interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) at different time points were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic variables, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, time to first flatus, and incidence of nausea and vomiting after surgery.

RESULTS

The levels of plasma IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α were lower in groups D and LD than in group C and were lowest in group LD at the end of the procedure and 2 h after the operation (P < 0.05). The VAS scores were decreased in groups D and LD compared with group C (P < 0.05). The heart rate (HR) was decreased at the end of the procedure and 2 h after the operation in groups D and LD compared to groups C and L (P < 0.001). The mean blood pressure (MBP) was lower at 2 h after the operation in groups L, D, and LD than in group C (P < 0.001). There was a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in group LD than in group C (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine significantly alleviated the inflammatory responses, decreased postoperative pain, and led to fewer PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03276533 ), registered on August 23, 2017.

Intraoperative dexmedetomidine for prevention of postoperative delirium in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment

OBJECTIVES

Delirium is the most common postoperative neurological complication and some evidence suggests that dexmedetomidine is associated with a decreased incidence of delirium. This study is designed to assess the effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium (POD) in elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

METHODS

Sixty geriatric patients with MCI were enrolled and ramdomly divided into two groups by a computer-generated randomisation sequence: dexmedetomidine group (D group) and normal saline group (C group). Patients in D group received a loading dose of 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine over 10 minutes before anesthesia induction, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.4 μg·kg^-1·h^-1 until 30 minutes before the end of surgery; equal volume of normal saline was given in C group. Blood samples were extracted to detect the concentration of cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-10 (IL-10), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) before anesthesia induction (T₁), before suture (T₂), and 30 minutes after surgery (T₃). Postoperative recovery times were recorded. Delirium was assessed with the 3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for confusion assessment method during the first 7 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

POD occurred in 10 (33.3%) of 30 patients in C group, and in 3 (10%) of 30 patients given dexmedetomidine (odds ratio [OR] 0.222, 95% CI 0.054-0.914; P = 0.028). The serum concentrations of TNF-α, MMP-9, and GFAP were significantly increased and IL-10 was decreased in the C group than in the D group at T₂ and T₃. No differences were observed between groups in the level of HO-1. Analysis using random-effect multivariable logistic regression indicated that POD was associated with GFAP (odds ratio [OR] 16.691, 95% CI 2.288-121.746; P = 0.005). The positive predictive ability of the multivariate logistic regression model tested by ROC analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.713 (95% CI, 0.584-0.842).

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine can alleviate POD in elderly patients with MCI and may be related to reduce the neuroinflammation by lowering the permeability of blood-brain barrier.

Combination of Dexmedetomidine and Tramadol in Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia Strengthens Sedative Effect in Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension

Objective: The aim of the present study is to explore the combination of dexmedetomidine (DXM) and tramadol (TMD) on sedative effect in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH). Methods: A total of 356 patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) were randomly divided into three groups: DXM, TMD and DXM + TMD groups. These patients were treated with different doses of DXM, TMD or combination of DXM and TMD by a patient-controlled intravenous injection device. The scores of static pain and dynamic pain, sedation degree, and adverse reaction were recorded. The plasma levels of inflammatory mediators IL-10 and C-reactive protein (CRP), and the serum level of p-p38-MAPK were evaluated. Results: It was found that administration with DXM 1.0 µg/kg/h + TMD 700 mg and DXM 2.0 µg/kg/h + TMD 600 mg result in stronger sedative effect than single administration with DXM or TMD. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of patients with PIH were decreased with the combinational treatment of DXM and TMD. Interestingly, the PIH patients injected with DXM 1.0 µg/kg/h + TMD 700 mg and DXM 2.0 µg/kg/h + TMD 600 mg showed stronger sedative effect. In addition, the plasma level of level of IL-10 was increased and CRP decreased. The serum level of p-p38/MAPK was decreased. Conclusion: Taken together, our study indicates that combination of DXM and TMD effectively lowers blood pressure and reduces inflammation through increasing the level of IL-10, reducing CRP and inhibiting p-p38/MAPK in patients with PIH. This study suggests that the combination of DXM and TMD could be an anesthetic choice in the management of PIH.

Dexmedetomidine: What's New for Pediatrics? A Narrative Review

Over the past few years, despite the lack of approved pediatric labelling, dexmedetomidine’s (DEX) use has become more prevalent in pediatric clinical practice as well as in research trials. Its respiratory-sparing effects and bioavailability by various routes are only some of the valued features of DEX. In recent years the potential organ-protective effects of DEX, with the possibility for preserving neurocognitive function, has put it in the forefront of clinical and bench research. This comprehensive review focused on the pediatric literature but presents relevant, supporting adult and animal studies in order to detail the recent growing body of literature around the pharmacology, end-organ effects, organ-protective effects, alternative routes of administration, synergetic effects, and clinical applications, with considerations for the future.

Ketorolac tromethamine pretreatment suppresses sufentanil-induced cough during general anesthesia induction: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

To observe the effect of pretreatment with ketorolac tromethamine on sufentanil-induced cough in general anesthesia patients.

Methods

A total of 102 patients were screened, and 90 patients were scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. The 90 patients were randomly divided into two groups: the control group (C group) and the observation group (KT group). Five minutes before anesthesia induction, the observation group was given ketorolac tromethamine 0.5 mg/kg intravenously within 3 s, while the control group was given the same amount of normal saline intravenously. All patients were given a sufentanil bolus of 0.5 μg/kg (within 3 s) intravenously. One minute later, propofol 2.5 mg/kg and vecuronium 0.15 mg/kg were injected intravenously, and endotracheal intubation was guided by laryngoscopy. The number of coughs that occurred within 1 min after sufentanil injection was recorded. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO₂) were recorded at T0 (immediately before pretreatment), T1 (5 min after pretreatment), T2 (before intubation), T3 (1 min after intubation) and T4 (5 min after intubation). The incidence of adverse reactions, including nausea and vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness, delay of recovery, restlessness in the recovery period, respiratory depression and postoperative incision pain, was analyzed.

Results

Within 1 min after sufentanil injection, the incidence and severity of cough in the KT group was significantly lower than that in the C group (P <  0.05). At T0, T1, T2, T3 and T4, there were no significant differences in MAP, HR and SpO2 between the two groups (P >  0.05). There was no significant difference in the dosage of sufentanil, propofol, remifentanil and vecuronium, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, the delay of recovery, dizziness, drowsiness or respiratory depression between the two groups (P >  0.05). However, the incidence of restlessness and the number of patients with VAS scores > 3 in the KT group were significantly lower than those in the C group (P <  0.05).

Conclusion

Pretreatment with intravenous ketorolac tromethamine can significantly reduce the incidence of sufentanil-induced cough during induction of general anesthesia, which can also significantly reduce postoperative incision pain and restlessness during the recovery period.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number# ChiCTR2000030287; date of registration: 27/02/2020).

The extended autonomic system, dyshomeostasis, and COVID-19

The pandemic viral illness COVID-19 is especially life-threatening in the elderly and in those with any of a variety of chronic medical conditions. This essay explores the possibility that the heightened risk may involve activation of the "extended autonomic system" (EAS). Traditionally, the autonomic nervous system has been viewed as consisting of the sympathetic nervous system, the parasympathetic nervous system, and the enteric nervous system. Over the past century, however, neuroendocrine and neuroimmune systems have come to the fore, justifying expansion of the meaning of "autonomic." Additional facets include the sympathetic adrenergic system, for which adrenaline is the key effector; the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis; arginine vasopressin (synonymous with anti-diuretic hormone); the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, with angiotensin II and aldosterone the main effectors; and cholinergic anti-inflammatory and sympathetic inflammasomal pathways. A hierarchical brain network-the "central autonomic network"-regulates these systems; embedded within it are components of the Chrousos/Gold "stress system." Acute, coordinated alterations in homeostatic settings (allostasis) can be crucial for surviving stressors such as traumatic hemorrhage, asphyxiation, and sepsis, which throughout human evolution have threatened homeostasis; however, intense or long-term EAS activation may cause harm. While required for appropriate responses in emergencies, EAS activation in the setting of chronically decreased homeostatic efficiencies (dyshomeostasis) may reduce thresholds for induction of destabilizing, lethal vicious cycles. Testable hypotheses derived from these concepts are that biomarkers of EAS activation correlate with clinical and pathophysiologic data and predict outcome in COVID-19 and that treatments targeting specific abnormalities identified in individual patients may be beneficial.

Comparing remifentanil and sufentanil in stress reduction during neurosurgery: a randomised controlled trial

Background In most scenarios, anaesthesiologists titrate opioids to control nociceptive surgical stress based on intraoperative haemodynamic changes. Remifentanil was reported to cause more profound cardiovascular depression than sufentanil. A concern is that this direct cardiovascular depression might counteract the hypertension and tachycardia caused by surgical manipulation and mask inadequate analgesia. Objective To compare remifentanil and sufentanil, titrated to maintain a comparable haemodynamic range (within 20% of baseline) and combined with the same propofol regimen, in stress reduction measured as plasma levels of putative mediators of surgical stress. Setting Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Method Forty-five patients undergoing supratentorial glioma resection were randomised to the remifentanil group or the sufentanil group. Main outcome measures Plasma concentrations of cortisol, epinephrine, norepinephrine, interleukin-6, interleukin-10 and lymphocyte counts were analysed before anaesthesia, 1 h after incision, at the end of surgery and 24 h after incision using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and an automatic haematology analyser. Recovery profiles during emergence from anaesthesia were also compared. Results Except for a lower epinephrine concentration in the remifentanil group 24 h after incision (median [interquartile range], 4.2 [3.4-6.1] vs. 8.4 [4.8-12.5] ng/ml; P = 0.003), stress biomarkers were not significantly different between the two groups. Patients in the sufentanil group had lower grades in coughing, restlessness (P = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively) and a lower incidence of postoperative shivering (P = 0.007). Conclusion Compared to that of sufentanil, the direct cardiovascular depression of remifentanil does not mask the clinical manifestation of inadequate analgesia when both drugs are titrated according to haemodynamic variables in neurosurgery.

Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Combined with Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Block for Open Gastrectomy: a Prospective Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

To compare the incidences of positive hemodynamic response (HR > 100 beats min^-1 or SBP > 160 mmHg) during abdominal exploration and moderate pain after surgery, when using dexmedetomidine infusion and rectus sheath block.

METHODS

One hundred patients undergoing open gastrectomy were randomized to receive rectus sheath block with ropivacaine (Group B, n = 25), initial loading dose of 0.6 μg kg^-1 dexmedetomidine, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.2 μg kg^-1 h^-1 throughout surgery (Group D, n = 25), both rectus sheath block and dexmedetomidine (Group BD, n = 25), or neither rectus sheath block nor dexmedetomidine (Group C, n = 25). General anesthesia techniques were standardized. HR, SBP, and positive hemodynamic response at peritoneum incision (T_PI), 5 min (T_AE-5), 10 min (T_AE-10), and 15 min (T_AE-15) after the start of abdominal exploration, and incidences of moderate postoperative pain were recorded.

RESULTS

Positive hemodynamic responses during abdominal exploration were more common in Groups B (82%) and C (74%) than in Groups D (14%) and BD (9%) (all P = 0.000). HR and SBP were lower in Groups D and BD, compared with those in Groups C and B (all P < 0.05). Compared with T_PI, HR and SBP increased significantly in Groups B and C during abdominal exploration (all P < 0.05)_, but not in Group BD (except HR at T_AE-15). The incidences of moderate pain in Groups B and BD were noticeably lower than in Groups C and D at 1 h, 2 h, and 6 h after surgery (all P < 0.0083).

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine infusion combined with rectus sheath block provided more hemodynamic stability during abdominal exploration and better analgesia after surgery.

Randomized clinical trial of intraoperative dexmedetomidine to prevent delirium in the elderly undergoing major non-cardiac surgery

Background

Delirium is common in elderly patients after surgery and is associated with poor outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on the incidence of delirium in elderly patients undergoing major surgery.

Methods

This was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Elderly patients (aged 60 years or more) scheduled to undergo major non-cardiac surgery were randomized into two groups. Patients in the intervention group received a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 0·6 μg/kg 10 min before induction of anaesthesia followed by a continuous infusion (0·5 μg per kg per h) until 1 h before the end of surgery. Patients in the control group received volume-matched normal saline in the same schedule. The primary outcome was the incidence of delirium during the first 5 days after surgery. Delirium was assessed with the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) for non-ventilated patients and CAM for the Intensive Care Unit for ventilated patients.

Results

In total, 309 patients who received dexmedetomidine and 310 control patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The incidence of delirium within 5 days of surgery was lower with dexmedetomidine treatment: 5·5 per cent (17 of 309) versus 10·3 per cent (32 of 310) in the control group (relative risk (RR) 0·53, 95 per cent c.i. 0·30 to 0·94; P = 0·026). The overall incidence of complications at 30 days was also lower after dexmedetomidine (19·4 per cent (60 of 309) versus 26·1 per cent (81 of 310) for controls; RR 0·74, 0·55 to 0·99, P = 0·047).

Conclusion

Intraoperative dexmedetomidine halved the risk of delirium in the elderly after major non-cardiac surgery. Registration number: ChiCTR-IPR-15007654 (www.chictr.org.cn).

Clinical Analysis of the Effects of Different Anesthesia and Analgesia Methods on Chronic Postsurgical Pain in Patients With Uniportal Video-Assisted Lung Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To understand whether different anesthesia and analgesia methods affected the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) in patients who underwent uniportal video-assisted lung surgery and to explore the influence factors of CPSP.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 120 patients, who underwent selective uniportal video-assisted lung surgery at Zhongshan Hospital from March to June 2018, were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

The visual analog scale was used to assess the degree of pain on the first and second postoperative days. At the third and sixth months after surgery, the telephone follow-up was conducted for the survey of the numerical rating scale. The incidence of acute and chronic pain in different anesthesia methods was analyzed, and the relevant factors of CPSP were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 111 patients who completed follow-up, no significant difference was noted in the incidences of acute and chronic postsurgical pain between patients who received different anesthesia and analgesia methods (p > 0.05). The incidence of CPSP was 29.7% at 3 months after surgery and 9.0% at 6 months after surgery. The degree of pain within 48 hours after surgery was a risk factor for CPSP (odds ratio [OR] = 2.39, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CPSP accounted for a specific proportion of patients after uniportal video-assisted lung surgery; however, it was significantly lower than that of patients with conventional thoracotomy. The incidence did not differ significantly among anesthesia and analgesia methods. Active and effective control of acute postsurgical pain might reduce the incidence of CPSP.

Transversus abdominis plane block with general anesthesia blunts the perioperative stress response in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy

Background

Surgical stress induces the release of neuroendocrine mediators and cytokines during perioperative period, which may have adverse effects on cancer patients. While the surgical stress responsse can be affected by anesthetic technique. Therefore, we designed this study to assess whether subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block can affect perioperative neuroendocrine stress response, postoperative analgesia and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy under general anesthesia.

Methods

Sixty-five patients were recruited. Patients randomly received general anesthesia (control group), or general anesthesia combined with TAP block (40 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine) (TAP group). The primary outcome was neuroendocrine levels including norepinephrine (NE), epinephrine (E), cortisol (Cor), glucose (Glu), interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 during 48 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain score, hemodynamic variables and recovery characteristics.

Results

Data from 61 of 65 patients were analyzed. The levels of NE, E, Cor, and Glu were blunt by TAP block during perioperative period. The levels of IL-6 and IL-10 were significantly lower in TAP group than in control group. TAP block efficiently relieved postoperative acute pain up to 12 h postoperatively with more stable perioperative hemodynamics compared with control group.

Conclusions

Subcostal TAP block blunts perioperative stress response and provides efficient analgesia, with good hemodynamic stability and minimal adverse effects.

The impact of dexmedetomidine added to ropivicaine for transversus abdominis plane block on stress response in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Intravenous dexmedetomidine is known to attenuate stress response in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. We investigated whether the addition of the highly selective alpha-2 adrenergic agonist dexmedetomidine into ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block could inhibit stress response during laparoscopic surgery, and determined the optimal dose of dexmedetomidine in it.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-five patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery were included in this prospective and randomized double-blind study. Patients received general anesthesia with or without a total of 60 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine in combination with low (0.25 μg/kg), medium (0.50 μg/kg) or high dose (1.0 μg/kg) of dexmedetomidine for the four-quadrant transversus abdominis plane block (n = 25). The primary outcomes were stress marker levels during the operation.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty patients completed the study protocol. Dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine for transversus abdominis plane block significantly reduced serum levels of cortisol, norepinephrine, epinephrine, interleukin-6, blood glucose, mean arterial pressure and heart rate in a dose-dependent manner (P < 0.05), accompanied with decreased anesthetic and opioid consumption during the operation (P < 0.05), but the high dose of dexmedetomidine induced higher incidences of bradycardia than low or medium dose of dexmedetomidine (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The addition of dexmedetomidine at the dose of 0.5 μg/kg into ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block is the optimal dose to inhibit stress response with limited impact on blood pressure and heart rate in patients undergoing laparoscopy gynecological surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at www.chictr.org.cn on November 6th, 2016 (ChiCTR-IOR-16009753).