Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation under General Anaesthesia for Parkinson's Disease: Institutional Experience and Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Direct targeting in deep brain stimulation (DBS) has remarkably impacted the patient's experience throughout the surgery and the overall logistics of the procedure. When the individualised plan is co-registered with a 3D image acquired intraoperatively, the electrodes can be safely placed under general anaesthesia. How this applies to a general practice scenery (outside clinical trials and in a moderate caseload centre) has been scarcely reported.

METHODS

Prospective single-centre study of patients treated with asleep subthalamic DBS for Parkinson's disease between January 2021 and December 2022. Clinical, motor, medication-dependence, and quality-of-life outcomes were evaluated after optimal programming (6 months). Wilcoxon test was used to compare pre- versus post-repeated measures. Surgical-related parameters were also analysed.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients primarily operated for DBS were included in the study. Intraoperative electrode replacement was not necessary. Mean surgical duration was 217 (SD 44) minutes, including the implantation of the generator; and mean length of stay was 3 (SD 1) days. There was one surgical-related complication (delayed infection). Significant and clinically relevant improvement was seen in UPRS III (mean decrease 62%) (p < 0.001) and PDQ-8 (50% increase) (p < 0.001) after 6 months. Daily doses of medication were decreased by a mean of 68%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

DBS can be safely performed under general anaesthesia in a pragmatic clinical environment, provided a multidisciplinary committee for patient selection and a dedicated surgical and anaesthetic team are available. The effectiveness in ameliorating motor symptoms, the ability to reduce the drug load, and the improvement in quality of life demonstrated in clinical trials could be reproduced under more generalised conditions as in our centre. The need for a team learning curve and the progressive evolution in, and adaptation to, trajectory planning software, anaesthetic management, intraoperative imaging, DBS device upgrades, and programming schemes should be contemplated in the transition process to direct targeting.

INTRODUCTION

Direct targeting in deep brain stimulation (DBS) has remarkably impacted the patient's experience throughout the surgery and the overall logistics of the procedure. When the individualised plan is co-registered with a 3D image acquired intraoperatively, the electrodes can be safely placed under general anaesthesia. How this applies to a general practice scenery (outside clinical trials and in a moderate caseload centre) has been scarcely reported.

METHODS

Prospective single-centre study of patients treated with asleep subthalamic DBS for Parkinson's disease between January 2021 and December 2022. Clinical, motor, medication-dependence, and quality-of-life outcomes were evaluated after optimal programming (6 months). Wilcoxon test was used to compare pre- versus post-repeated measures. Surgical-related parameters were also analysed.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients primarily operated for DBS were included in the study. Intraoperative electrode replacement was not necessary. Mean surgical duration was 217 (SD 44) minutes, including the implantation of the generator; and mean length of stay was 3 (SD 1) days. There was one surgical-related complication (delayed infection). Significant and clinically relevant improvement was seen in UPRS III (mean decrease 62%) (p < 0.001) and PDQ-8 (50% increase) (p < 0.001) after 6 months. Daily doses of medication were decreased by a mean of 68%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

DBS can be safely performed under general anaesthesia in a pragmatic clinical environment, provided a multidisciplinary committee for patient selection and a dedicated surgical and anaesthetic team are available. The effectiveness in ameliorating motor symptoms, the ability to reduce the drug load, and the improvement in quality of life demonstrated in clinical trials could be reproduced under more generalised conditions as in our centre. The need for a team learning curve and the progressive evolution in, and adaptation to, trajectory planning software, anaesthetic management, intraoperative imaging, DBS device upgrades, and programming schemes should be contemplated in the transition process to direct targeting.

Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring determines the final electrode position for pallidal stimulation in dystonia patients

Background

Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is an effective treatment for refractory dystonia. Neuroradiological target and stimulation electrode trajectory planning with intraoperative microelectrode recordings (MER) and stimulation are used. With improving neuroradiological techniques, the need for MER is in dispute mainly because of the suspected risk of hemorrhage and the impact on clinical post DBS outcome.

Objective

The aim of the study is to compare the preplanned GPi electrode trajectories with final trajectories selected for electrode implantation after electrophysiological monitoring and to discuss the factors potentially responsible for differences between preplanned and final trajectories. Finally, the potential association between the final trajectory selected for electrode implantation and clinical outcome will be analyzed.

Methods

Forty patients underwent bilateral GPi DBS (right-sided implants first) for refractory dystonia. The relationship between preplanned and final trajectories (MicroDrive system) was correlated with patient (gender, age, dystonia type and duration) and surgery characteristics (anesthesia type, postoperative pneumocephalus) and clinical outcome measured using CGI (Clinical Global Impression parameter). The correlation between the preplanned and final trajectories together with CGI was compared between patients 1-20 and 21-40 for the learning curve effect.

Results

The trajectory selected for definitive electrode implantation matched the preplanned trajectory in 72.5% and 70% on the right and left side respectively; 55% had bilateral definitive electrodes implanted along the preplanned trajectories. Statistical analysis did not confirm any of the studied factors as predictor of the difference between the preplanned and final trajectories. Also no association between CGI and final trajectory selected for electrode implantation in the right/left hemisphere has been proven. The percentages of final electrodes implanted along the preplanned trajectory (the correlation between anatomical planning and intraoperative electrophysiology results) did not differ between patients 1-20 and 21-40. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in CGI (clinical outcome) between patients 1-20 and 21-40.

Conclusion

The final trajectory selected after electrophysiological study differed from the preplanned trajectory in a significant percentage of patients. No predictor of this difference was identified. The anatomo-electrophysiological difference was not predictive of the clinical outcome (as measured using CGI parameter).

The efficacy and safety of asleep and awake subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease patients: A 1-year follow-up

Introduction

Traditional DBS is usually conducted under local anesthesia (LA) which is intolerable to some patients, DBS under general anesthesia (GA) was opted to extended surgical indication. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) under asleep and awake anesthesia state in 1-year postoperative follow-up.

Methods

Twenty-one PD patients were assigned to asleep group and 25 patients to awake group. Patients received bilateral STN-DBS under different anesthesia state. The PD participants were interviewed and assessed preoperatively and at 1-year postoperative follow-up.

Results

At 1-year follow-up, compared surgical coordinate in two groups, the left-side Y of asleep group showed more posterior than awake group (Y was-2.39 ± 0.23 in asleep group, -1.46 ± 0.22 in awake group, p = 0.007). Compared with preoperative OFF MED state, MDS-UPDRS III scores in OFF MED/OFF STIM state remained unchanged, while in OFF MED/ON STIM state were significantly improved in awake and asleep groups, yet without significant difference. Compared with preoperative ON MED state, MDS-UPDRS III scores in ON MED/OFF STIM, and ON MED/ON STIM state remained unchanged in both groups. In non-motor outcomes, PSQI, HAMD, and HAMA score significantly improved in asleep group compared to awake group at 1-year follow-up (PSQI, HAMD, and HAMA score in 1-year follow-up were 9.81 ± 4.43; 10.00 ± 5.80; 5.71 ± 4.75 in awake group, 6.64 ± 4.14; 5.32 ± 3.78; 3.76 ± 3.87 in asleep group, p = 0.009; 0.008; 0.015, respectively), while there was no significant difference in PDQ-39, NMSS, ESS, PDSS score, and cognitive function. Anesthesia methods was significantly associated with improvement of HAMA and HAMD score (p = 0.029; 0.002, respectively). No difference in LEDD, stimulation parameters and adverse events was observed between two groups.

Discussion

Asleep STN-DBS may be considered a good alternative method for PD patients. It is largely consistent with awake STN-DBS in motor symptoms and safety. Yet, it showed higher improvement in terms of mood and sleep compared to awake group at 1-year follow-up.

Optimized Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery to Avoid Vascular Damage: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Path Planning for Various Deep Targets by MRI Image Fusion

Co-registration of stereotactic and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images can serve as an alternative for trajectory planning. However, the role of this strategy has not yet been proven by any control studies, and the trajectories of commonly used targets have not been systematically studied. The purpose of this study was to analyze the trajectories for various targets, and to assess the role of trajectories realized on fused images in preventing intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Data from 1019 patients who underwent electrode placement for deep brain stimulation were acquired. Electrode trajectories were not planned for 396 patients, whereas trajectories were planned for 623 patients. Preoperative various MRI sequences and frame-placed MRI images were fused for trajectory planning. The patients’ clinical characteristics, the stereotactic systems, intracranial hemorrhage cases, and trajectory angles were recorded and analyzed. No statistically significant differences in the proportions of male patients, patients receiving local anesthesia, and diseases or target distributions (p > 0.05) were found between the trajectory planning group and the non-trajectory planning group, but statistically significant differences were observed in the numbers of both patients and leads associated with symptomatic ICH (p < 0.05). Regarding the ring and arc angle values, statistically significant differences were found among various target groups (p < 0.05). The anatomic structures through which leads passed were found to be diverse. Trajectory planning based on MRI fusion is a safe technique for lead placement. The electrode for each given target has its own relatively constant trajectory.

The risk factors of intracerebral hemorrhage in deep brain stimulation: does target matter?

BACKGROUND

Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a relatively safe and effective surgery compared with ablative surgeries, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a serious complication during DBS that could result in a fatal prognosis. We retrospectively investigated whether ICH incidence differed between patients who underwent DBS in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and in the globus pallidus interna (GPi), together with previously identified risk factors for ICH.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 275 patients (527 DBS targets) who received DBS for Parkinson's disease or dystonia from April 2001 to December 2020. In cases that developed intra- or postoperative ICH, patients were classified as asymptomatic, symptomatic with temporary neurological deficit or symptomatic with permanent neurological deficit, according to patient clinical status.

RESULTS

ICH occurred in 12 procedures (2.3%) among the 527 DBS procedures (275 patients) evaluated. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the risk factor for all cases of ICH was systolic blood pressure (BP) during surgery (cut-off value 129.4 mmHg) (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01-1.09, P = 0.023). In addition, for ICH with permanent neurological deficit, STN target site (P = 0.024) and systolic BP during surgery (cut-off value: 148.3 mmHg) (P = 0.004) were identified as risk factors in univariable analyses.

CONCLUSION

Even though the risk factor for all ICH in DBS was BP during surgery, when focused on ICH evoking permanent neurological deficit, the target location as well as systolic BP during surgery proved to be related.

Towards unambiguous reporting of complications related to deep brain stimulation surgery: A retrospective single-center analysis and systematic review of the literature

Background and objective

To determine rates of adverse events (AEs) related to deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery or implanted devices from a large series from a single institution. Sound comparisons with the literature require the definition of unambiguous categories, since there is no consensus on the reporting of such AEs.

Patients and methods

123 consecutive patients (median age 63 yrs; female 45.5%) treated with DBS in the subthalamic nucleus (78 patients), ventrolateral thalamus (24), internal pallidum (20), and centre médian-parafascicular nucleus (1) were analyzed retrospectively. Both mean and median follow-up time was 4.7 years (578 patient-years). AEs were assessed according to three unambiguous categories: (i) hemorrhages including other intracranial complications because these might lead to neurological deficits or death, (ii) infections and similar AEs necessitating the explantation of hardware components as this results in the interruption of DBS therapy, and (iii) lead revisions for various reasons since this involves an additional intracranial procedure. For a systematic review of the literature AE rates were calculated based on primary data presented in 103 publications. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with the I² statistic and analyzed further by a random effects meta-regression. Publication bias was analyzed with funnel plots.

Results

Surgery- or hardware-related AEs (23) affected 18 of 123 patients (14.6%) and resolved without permanent sequelae in all instances. In 2 patients (1.6%), small hemorrhages in the striatum were associated with transient neurological deficits. In 4 patients (3.3%; 0.7% per patient-year) impulse generators were removed due to infection. In 2 patients electrodes were revised (1.6%; 0.3% per patient-year). There was no lead migration or surgical revision because of lead misplacement. Age was not statistically significant different (p>0.05) between patients affected by AEs or not. AE rates did not decline over time and similar incidences were found among all patients (423) implanted with DBS systems at our institution until December 2016. A systematic literature review revealed that exact AE rates could not be determined from many studies, which could not be attributed to study designs. Average rates for intracranial complications were 3.8% among studies (per-study analysis) and 3.4% for pooled analysis of patients from different studies (per-patient analysis). Annual hardware removal rates were 3.6 and 2.4% for per-study and per-patient analysis, respectively, and lead revision rates were 4.1 and 2.6%, respectively. There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I² ranged between 77% and 91% for the three categories; p< 0.0001). For hardware removal heterogeneity (I² = 87.4%) was reduced by taking study size (p< 0.0001) and publication year (p< 0.01) into account, although a significant degree of heterogeneity remained (I² = 80.0%; p< 0.0001). Based on comparisons with health care-related databases there appears to be publication bias with lower rates for hardware-related AEs in published patient cohorts.

Conclusions

The proposed categories are suited for an unequivocal assessment of AEs even in a retrospective manner and useful for benchmarking. AE rates in the present cohorts from our institution compare favorable with the literature.

Experience Reduces Surgical and Hardware-Related Complications of Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: A Single-Center Study of 181 Patients Operated in Six Years

Objective

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery has increasingly been performed for the treatment of movement disorders and is associated with a wide array of complications. We aimed to present our experience and discuss strategies to minimize adverse events in light of this contemporary series and others in the literature.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted to collect data on age, sex, indication, operation date, surgical technique, and perioperative and late complications.

Results

A total of 181 patients (113 males, 68 females) underwent DBS implantation surgery (359 leads) in the past six years. Indications and targets were as follows: Parkinson's disease (STN) (n=159), dystonia (GPi) (n=13), and essential tremor (Vim) (n=9). Mean age was 55.2 ± 11.7 (range 9-74) years. Mean follow-up duration was 3.4 ± 1.6 years. No mortality or permanent morbidity was observed. Major perioperative complications were confusion (6.6%), intracerebral hemorrhage (2.2%), stroke (1.1%), and seizures (1.1%). Long-term adverse events included wound (7.2%), mostly infection, and hardware-related (5.5%) complications. Among several factors, only surgical experience was found to be related with overall complication rates (early period: 31% versus late period: 10%; p=0.001).

Conclusion

The rates of both early and late complications of DBS surgery are acceptably low and decrease significantly with cumulative experience.

Does the Use of Intraoperative Microelectrode Recording Influence the Final Location of Lead Implants in the Ventral Intermediate Nucleus for Deep Brain Stimulation?

To determine if the use of intraoperative microelectrode recording (MER) influences the final location of lead implant in deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM), and to evaluate the incidence of associated complications. The usefulness of intraoperative MER in DBS is debated, some centers suggesting it increases complications without additional benefit. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent VIM DBS with MER at the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston from June 1, 2009 to October 1, 2013. Initial (MRI determined) and final (intraoperative MER determined) coordinates of implant were compared. To assess incidences of hemorrhagic and infectious complications, we reviewed postoperative CT scans and follow-up notes. Forty-five lead implants on 24 patients were reviewed. The mean age at implantation was 62.42 years (range 18-83). The average duration from diagnosis to surgery was 21.5 years (range 1-52). A statistically significant mean difference was observed in the superior-inferior plane (0.52 ± 0.80 mm inferiorly, p < 0.05) and the anterior-posterior plane (0.45 ± 0.86 mm posteriorly, p < 0.05). A non-statistically significant difference was also observed in the medial-lateral plane (0.02± 0.15 mm, p > 0.05). One patient developed an infectious complication (4.2 %) that required removal of leads; two patients had minimal asymptomatic intra-ventricular bleeding (8.3 %). In our DBS center, intraoperative MER in VIM DBS implant does not seem to have a higher rate of surgical complications compared to historical series not using MER, and might also be useful in determining the final lead location.

Anesthetic challenges for deep brain stimulation: a systematic approach

Ablative intracranial surgery for Parkinson's disease has advanced to embedding electrodes into precise areas of the basal ganglia. Electrode implantation surgery, referred to as deep brain stimulation (DBS), is preferred in view of its reversibility, adjustability, and capability to be safely performed bilaterally. DBS is been increasingly used for other movement disorders, intractable tremors epilepsy, and sometimes chronic pain. Anesthesiologists need to amalgamate the knowledge of neuroanatomical structures and surgical techniques involved in placement of microelectrodes in defined cerebral target areas. Perioperative verbal communication with the patient during the procedure is quintessential and may attenuate the need for pharmacological agents. This review will endeavor to assimilate the present knowledge regarding the patient selection, available/practiced anesthesia regimens, and perioperative complications after our thorough search for literature published between 1991 and 2013.

Neural stimulators: a guide to imaging and postoperative appearances

Implantable neural stimulators have been developed to aid patients with debilitating neurological conditions that are not amenable to other therapies. The aim of this article is to improve understanding of correct anatomical placement as well as the relevant imaging methods used to assess these devices. Potential complications following their insertion and an overview of the current indications and potential mechanism of action of these devices is provided.

The influence of intraoperative microelectrode recordings and clinical testing on the location of final stimulation sites in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

The goal of our study was to investigate the influence of intraoperative microelectrode recordings and clinical testing on the location of the final stimulation site in deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

METHODS

In 22 patients with Parkinson's disease we compared magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based and atlas-based targets with the adjusted stimulation sites after intraoperative, multitrack microelectrode recording (MER) and intraoperative and postoperative clinical testing. The investigation included 176 target/stimulation sites in 44 subthalamic nuclei (STNs), which were related to a standardised three-dimensional, MRI-defined STN.

RESULTS

Atlas-based targets were positioned more superior and more medial than the MRI-based targets, which were located in the centre of the MRI-STN. The optimal stimulation sites, found intraoperatively after MER and clinical testing, were located more lateral and slightly more superior than both planned targets. In the majority of the cases the location of the active contact was the most superior and most lateral of all target sites. The differences in the distributions of those four targets reached statistical significance. However, final active contacts were distributed throughout the MRI-defined STN and its immediate surroundings.

CONCLUSIONS

The adoption of microelectrode recordings and extensive clinical testing allows the adjustment of anatomical targeting even to unexpected stimulation sites in and around the MRI-defined STN.

Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: efficacy and safety

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery has become increasingly utilized in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease. Over the past decade, a number of studies have demonstrated that DBS is superior to best medical management in appropriately selected patients. The primary targets for DBS in Parkinson's disease include the subthalamic nucleus and the internal segment of the globus pallidus, both of which improve the cardinal motor features in Parkinson's disease. Recent randomized studies have revealed that both targets are similarly effective in treating the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, but emerging evidence suggests that the globus pallidus may be the preferred target in many patients, based on differences in nonmotor outcomes. Here, we review appropriate patient selection, and the efficacy and safety of DBS therapy in Parkinson's disease. Best outcomes are achieved if the problems of the individual patient are considered when evaluating surgical candidates and considering whether the subthalamic nucleus or the globus pallidus internus should be targeted.

Discrepancies between the MRI- and the electrophysiologically defined subthalamic nucleus

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to evaluate discrepancies between the electrophysiologically and MRI-defined subthalamic nucleus (STN) in order to contribute to the ongoing debate of whether or not microelectrode recording (MER) provides additional information to image-guided targeting in deep brain stimulation.

METHODS

Forty-four STNs in 22 patients with Parkinson's disease were investigated. The three-dimensional MRI-defined STN was derived from segmentations of axial and coronal T2-weighted images. The electrophysiological STNs were generated from intraoperative MERs in 1,487 locations. The stereotactical coordinates of positive and negative STN recordings were re-imported to the planning software, where a three-dimensional reconstruction of the electrophysiological STN was performed and fused to the MRI data set. The estimated borders of the MRI- and MER-STN were compared. For statistical analysis Student's t, Mann-Whitney rank sum and Fisher's exact tests were used.

RESULTS

MER-STN volumes, which were found outside the MRI-STN, ranged from 0 mm(3) to 87 mm(3) (mean: 45 mm(3)). A mean of 44% of the MER-STN volumes exceeded the MRI-STN (maximum: 85.1%; minimum: 15.1 %); 53.4% (n = 793) of the microelectrode recordings were concordant and 46.6% (n = 694) discordant with the MRI-defined anatomical STN. Regarding the dorsal borders, we found discrepancies between the MER- and MRI-STN of 0.27 mm (= mean; SD: 0.51 mm) on the first operated side and 1.51 mm (SD: 1.5 mm) on the second (p = 0.010, t-test).

CONCLUSIONS

MER provides additional information to high-resolution anatomical MR images and may help to detect the amount and direction of brain shift.