Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales

The accuracy of the risk assessment scale for pressure ulcers in adult surgical patients: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aims to synthesize existing evidence regarding the accuracy of different scales to assess the risk of intraoperative acquired pressure injury (IAPI), thus providing guidance for the accurate clinical screening of IAPI risk and helping to prevent and reduce the occurrence of IAPI.

METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases to identify relevant studies on scales to assess the risk of IAPIs among adults: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, the WanFang Database, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. Two authors independently screened the literature, evaluated the quality of the included studies, and extracted the data. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to rate the quality of evidence. ANOVA was performed via Stata and R software to implement diagnostic network meta-analysis via the Bayesian method to evaluate the predictive power of the dominance index.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies (6721 patients) were included, and the incidence of IAPIs was 12.30% (827/6721). Six IAPI risk assessment tools were used, and their rankings on the basis of the Bayesian dominance index were as follows: the ELPO Scale, 3.12 (95% CI: 0.14, 9); the Norton Scale, 2.63 (95% CI: 0.14, 11); the Waterlow Scale, 2.44 (95% CI: 0.14, 7); the Munro Scale, 2.39 (95% CI: 0.20, 7); the Scott Triggers tool, 1.55 (95% CI: 0.11, 5); and the Braden Scale, 0.36 (95% CI: 0.09, 3).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the ELPO Scale has good diagnostic test accuracy, and it is recommended that clinical workers prioritize the use of this scale in assessing the risk of pressure injuries among surgical patients, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of risk assessment for pressure injuries among surgical patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023470664).

The Use of a Single Risk Assessment Tool for Mortality and Numerous Hospital-Acquired Conditions

ABSTRACT

Quality assessment organizations leverage numerous patient safety measures to evaluate hospital performance, resulting in significant financial, administrative, and operational burdens on health systems. Low-intensity approaches that allow for reliable risk stratification of patients can reduce the required investment. The Braden score is a routinely performed bedside nursing evaluation validated to assess risk for hospital-acquired pressure injury. We hypothesized that the tool can be used to evaluate risk for other hospital-related adverse outcomes, including mortality, catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). We found that abnormal Braden scores have significant association with numerous adverse outcome measures, including mortality, CLABSI, CAUTI, and iatrogenic hypoglycemia. Because of its frequency of reevaluation, we have found preliminary evidence that leveraging this tool can reduce harm by quickly identifying the most at-risk patients for various types of iatrogenic harm. We conclude that in the face of increasing automation and technical applications, for example, artificial intelligence-driven tools, highly reliable clinician bedside physical examination and evaluation can still have significant, low-cost, and high-value impact in improving patient safety.

Nomogram for intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries in children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting the risk of intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries (IAPIs) in children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

METHODS

This study retrospectively included 208 children aged 21 days to 8 years who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB in a tertiary hospital in China between January 2020 and October 2023. All patients' data were collected from the hospital's medical record system and randomly divided into the training (n = 146) and validation (n = 62) cohorts by a ratio of 7:3. Logistic regression analysis was conducted in the training cohort to identify independent risk factors and establish the nomogram. Finally, calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed in both cohorts to validate the predictive ability of the nomogram.

RESULTS

43 (14.7%) children developed IAPIs. Multivariate analysis showed that low Braden Q scores, use of steroids, skin abnormalities, and low intraoperative SpO2 were independent risk factors for IAPIs. A nomogram integrating the 4 factors was established. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of the nomogram were 0.836 and 0.903 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, calibration curves and DCA demonstrated good calibration and clinical applicability of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

We constructed a reliable nomogram based on specific risk factors for children undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB, which could be used as an effective and convenient tool for prevention of IAPIs.

Comparison of the Predictive Validity of Norton and Braden Scales in Determining the Risk of Pressure Injury in Elderly Patients

AIM

To compare the reliability and predictive validity of Norton and Braden scales in determining the risk of pressure injury in elderly patients.

DESIGN

This research used a comparative design. One hundred thirty elderly patients participated in the study.

METHODS

The daily pressure injury risk of participants was evaluated by a researcher using both the Norton and Braden scales in a consecutive manner.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 75.1 ± 8.5 years, and that for those without and with pressure injury development was 75.0 ± 8.3 years and 76.1 ± 9.7 years (P < .001), respectively. The reliability coefficients of the Norton and Braden scales were .82 and .89, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Norton Scale were 100%, 40.7%, 20.2%, and 100%, and those of the Braden Scale were 100%, 32.7%, 18.3%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The reliability of both scales for elderly patients was found to be high, and their ability to differentiate patients at risk was comparable. However, both scales had low specificity. Further research is needed to develop scales that have higher predictive validity for the elderly population, taking into account other risk factors that influence total scale scores.

Operating room nurse's awareness and implementation status of the prevention of patient's intraoperative acquired pressure injuries: design and validation of a questionnaire

Aim

To compile the awareness and implementation status of patients with intraoperative acquired pressure injuries prevention by operating room nurses and to test its reliability and validity.

Design

This is an equipment development research based on recommendations for developing a reliable and valid questionnaire.

Methods

The research was carried out in two phases from February to November 2022. Through a panel discussion, expert consultation, and literature review, the questionnaire for operating room nurses on the current status of awareness and implementation of the prevention of intraoperative acquired pressure injuries was preliminarily formulated. The formal questionnaire was developed through validity analysis, reliability analysis and item analysis, and reliability and validity tests were conducted. Moreover, according to the questionnaire survey results, confirmatory factor analysis was carried out to construct the structural equation model.

Results

The initial questionnaire consisted of five dimensions with 48 items, which was finalized to five dimensions with 38 items after reliability and validity testing and analysis. The five dimensions included implementation of intraoperative acquired pressure injuries prevention, intraoperative acquired pressure injuries preventing cognitive conditions, preoperative intraoperative acquired pressure injuries preventing cognitive conditions, basic knowledge of pressure injuries, and implementation of intraoperative acquired pressure injuries prevention in special patients. Cronbach's α of the overall questionnaire was 0.969 while that of each dimension was 0.846-0.959. The KMO value of structural validity was 0.945 (P < 0.001), and the contribution rate of cumulative variance was 70.694%. The fitting of confirmatory factor analysis was found to be generally ideal: χ2/df = 2.382, RMR = 0.027, TLI = 0.894, RMSEA = 0.072, IFI = 0.905, CFI = 0.904.

Conclusions

The study and design of the questionnaire for operating room nurses on the current status of awareness and implementation of the prevention of intraoperative acquired pressure injuries are scientific and rational, providing a scientific basis for the standardized reform of hospitals and the optimization of the intraoperative acquired pressure injuries management system of the operating room.

Prediction Pressure Ulcers in High Care Unit Patients: Evaluating Risk Factors and Predictive Scale Using a Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

Background  The incidence of ulcer pressure in the high care unit (HCU) was relatively high and could be reliably predicted using tools such as the Norton and Jackson/Cubbin scales. However, other risk factors, such as age, gender, consciousness, systemic condition, duration of treatment, and use of restraint, may contribute to the occurrence of ulcer pressure. This study was conducted to analyze the relationship of various risk factors for pressure ulcers and prediction of ulcer pressure, using Norton and Jackson/Cubbin scale, to incident pressure ulcers in HCU patient. Methods  This study utilized a prospective cross-sectional study design to analyze various risk factors for ulcer pressure development in a patient admitted to the HCU, including age, gender, blood profile, consciousness, duration of treatment, and use of restraint. The Norton and Jackson/Cubbin scale was employed to predict pressure ulcers. The relationship between the risk factors and the prediction of pressure ulcer incidents was evaluated using multiple logistic binary regression analysis. Result  Both the Norton and Jackson/Cubbin scales predicted a lower risk of pressure ulcer development (60.98 and 99.02%, respectively). This prediction is consistent with the low incidence of pressure injuries found, which is only 4.39%. Furthermore, the relationship between the identified risk factor (gender, duration of treatment in HCU and use of restraint) and the prediction and incident of pressure ulcer was not significant ( p  > 0.05). Thus, it is suggested that these risk factors may not strong predictors of pressure ulcer development. Conclusion  This study's result indicated no significant relationship exists between possible identified risk factors and the development of pressure ulcers in HCU patients. However, the Norton and Jackson/Cubbin scales were reliable predictors of pressure ulcer occurrence, with both scales predicting a lower risk of pressure ulcer development.

Characteristics and risk factors of facial pressure injuries in acute inpatients using noninvasive positive pressure ventilation: A retrospective case control study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the characteristics and risk factors of facial pressure injuries in patients using noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.

SETTING AND SAMPLE

Patients who developed facial pressure injuries due to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation at a teaching hospital in Taiwan from January 2016 to December 2021 were selected, resulting in a total of 108 patients in our case group. A control group was formed by matching each case by age and gender to three acute inpatients who had used non-invasive ventilation but had not developed facial pressure injuries, resulting in 324 patients in the control group.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This study was a retrospective case-control study. The characteristics of the patients who developed pressure injuries at different stages in the case group were compared, and the risk factors of non-invasive ventilation-related facial pressure injuries were then determined.

RESULTS

Higher duration of non-invasive ventilation usage, higher length of hospital stay, lower Braden scale score, and lower albumin levels in the former group. The results of multivariate analysis from binary logistic regression involving the duration of non-invasive ventilation usage demonstrated that the patients who used this device for 4-9 days and 16 days were at greater risk of facial pressure injuries than those who used it for 3 days; in terms of the Braden scale score, higher Braden scale scores were correlated with a higher risk of facial pressure injuries. In addition, albumin levels lower than the normal range were correlated with a higher risk of facial pressure injuries.

CONCLUSION

Patients with pressure injuries at higher stages had a higher duration of non-invasive ventilation usage, higher length of hospital stay, lower Braden scale scores, and lower albumin levels. Thus, a longer duration of non-invasive ventilation use, lower Braden scale scores, and lower albumin levels were also risk factors for non-invasive ventilation-related facial pressure injuries.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Our results serve as a useful reference for hospitals, both in creating training programs for their medical teams to prevent and treat facial pressure injuries and in drafting guidelines for assessing risk in order to prevent facial pressure injuries caused by non-invasive ventilation. The duration of device usage, Braden scale scores, and albumin levels in particular should be seriously monitored to reduce the occurrence of facial pressure injuries in acute inpatients treated with non-invasive ventilation.

Strategies to preventing pressure injuries among intensive care unit patients mechanically ventilated in prone position: a systematic review and a Delphi study

Background

Although the incidence of pressure injury in the prone position is high for the mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit, evidence-based strategies are still lacking.

Propose

To conduct a systematic review of current evidence, and to propose a series of strategies to prevent pressure injuries among mechanically ventilated patients with prone position in the intensive care unit.

Methods

The study was guided by the Medical Research Council framework. After a systematic review of current evidence of original articles, guidelines, expert consensus and theories, a strategy draft was developed. Then we invited 20 experts to modify and refine these strategies through two rounds of Delphi consensus method.

Results

After two rounds of Delphi process, the importance of coefficient of variation (Cv) and Kendall's coefficient of concordance in the strategies repository were 0.067 and 0.311, respectively. And the operability of Cv and Kendall's coefficient of concordance in the strategy draft was 0.055 and 0.294, respectively. Ultimately, we established 31 strategies for including 7 themes (assess risk factors, assess skin and tissue, body position management, skin care, nutrition, preventing medical device-related pressure injuries, education and supervision). In addition, we also developed a strategy framework to clarify our strategies.

Conclusion

According to the Medical Research Council framework, we developed 7 themes and 31 strategies to prevention prone-position pressure injuries among the intensive care unit mechanically ventilated patients. This study was considered to improve the clinical management of pressure injuries among prone position patients in the intensive care unit settings.

Advance in topical biomaterials and mechanisms for the intervention of pressure injury

Pressure injuries (PIs) are localized tissue damage resulting from prolonged compression or shear forces on the skin or underlying tissue, or both. Different stages of PIs share common features include intense oxidative stress, abnormal inflammatory response, cell death, and subdued tissue remodeling. Despite various clinical interventions, stage 1 or stage 2 PIs are hard to monitor for the changes of skin or identify from other disease, whereas stage 3 or stage 4 PIs are challenging to heal, painful, expensive to manage, and have a negative impact on quality of life. Here, we review the underlying pathogenesis and the current advances of biochemicals in PIs. We first discuss the crucial events involved in the pathogenesis of PIs and key biochemical pathways lead to wound delay. Then, we examine the recent progress of biomaterials-assisted wound prevention and healing and their prospects.

AI-Assisted Assessment of Wound Tissue with Automatic Color and Measurement Calibration on Images Taken with a Smartphone

Wound assessment is essential for evaluating wound healing. One cornerstone of wound care practice is the use of clinical guidelines that mandate regular documentation, including wound size and wound tissue composition, to determine the rate of wound healing. The traditional method requires wound care professionals to manually measure the wound area and tissue composition, which is time-consuming, costly, and difficult to reproduce. In this work, we propose an approach for automatic wound assessment that incorporates automatic color and measurement calibration and artificial intelligence algorithms. Our approach enables the comparison of images taken at different times, even if they were taken under different lighting conditions, distances, lenses, and camera sensors. We designed a calibration chart and developed automatic algorithms for color and measurement calibration. The wound area and wound composition on the images were annotated by three physicians with more than ten years of experience. Deep learning models were then developed to mimic what the physicians did on the images. We examined two network variants, U-Net with EfficientNet and U-Net with MobileNetV2, on wound images with a size of 1024 × 1024 pixels. Our best-performing algorithm achieved a mean intersection over union (IoU) of 0.6964, 0.3957, 0.6421, and 0.1552 for segmenting a wound area, epithelialization area, granulation tissue, and necrotic tissue, respectively. Our approach was able to accurately segment the wound area and granulation tissue but was inconsistent with respect to the epithelialization area and necrotic tissue. The calibration chart, which helps calibrate colors and scales, improved the performance of the algorithm. The approach could provide a thorough assessment of the wound, which could help clinicians tailor treatment to the patient's condition.

Pre-operative Waterlow score and outcomes after kidney transplantation

Background

Waterlow scoring was introduced in the 1980s as a nursing tool to risk stratify for development of decubitus ulcers (pressure sores) and is commonly used in UK hospitals. Recent interest has focussed on its value as a pre-op surrogate marker for adverse surgical outcomes, but utility after kidney transplantation has never been explored.

Methods

In this single-centre observational study, data was extracted from hospital informatics systems for all kidney allograft recipients transplanted between 1^st January 2007 and 30^th June 2020. Waterlow scores were categorised as per national standards; 0–9 (low risk), 10–14 (at risk), 15–19 (high risk) and ≥ 20 (very high risk). Multiple imputation was used to replace missing data with substituted values. Primary outcomes of interest were post-operative length of stay, emergency re-admission within 90-days and mortality analysed by linear, logistic or Cox regression models respectively.

Results

Data was available for 2,041 kidney transplant patients, with baseline demographics significantly different across Waterlow categories. As a continuous variable, the median Waterlow score across the study cohort was 10 (interquartile range 8–13). As a categorical variable, Waterlow scores pre-operatively were classified as low risk (n = 557), at risk (n = 543), high risk (n = 120), very high risk (n = 27) and a large proportion of missing data (n = 794). Median length of stay in days varied significantly with pre-op Waterlow category scores, progressively getting longer with increasing severity of Waterlow category. However, no difference was observed in risk for emergency readmission within 90-days of surgery with severity of Waterlow category. Patients with ‘very high risk’ Waterlow scores had increased risk for mortality at 41.9% versus high risk (23.7%), at risk (17.4%) and low risk (13.4%). In adjusted analyses, ‘very high risk’ Waterlow group (as a categorical variable) or Waterlow score (as a continuous variable) had an independent association with increase length of stay after transplant surgery only. No association was observed between any Waterlow risk group/score with emergency 90-day readmission rates or post-transplant mortality after adjustment.

Conclusions

Pre-operative Waterlow scoring is a poor surrogate marker to identify kidney transplant patients at risk of emergency readmission or death and should not be utilised outside its intended use.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-022-02902-8.