Cemented vs. cementless fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Utilization of Press-Fit Total Knee Arthroplasty is Not Evenly Distributed: A National Registry Review

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates trends of cemented versus press-fit total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We hypothesized that press-fit TKA is more common in younger and obese patients. There may also be racial, geographic, and institutional variation.

METHODS

The American Joint Replacement Registry was used to conduct a retrospective review of primary TKA procedures for osteoarthritis in the United States between January 2019 and March 2022. The objective was to identify differences in incidence, demographics, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and institutional teaching status (teaching vs. non-teaching) between press-fit and cemented TKAs.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-seven thousand four hundred two patients (61% female, average age 68 years, 88.3% White) underwent cemented TKA versus 50,880 patients (52% female, average age 65 years, 89% White) underwent press-fit TKA. Overall, 20.8% of press-fit versus 19.9% of cemented TKA had a BMI of 35 to 39.9 and 15.2% of press-fit versus 12.5% of cemented TKA had BMI >40 ( P < 0.001). Patients undergoing press-fit TKA were less likely Black (OR = 0.727; P < 0.0001), Asian (OR = 0.651, P < 0.0001), and Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander (OR = 0.705, P < 0.02) with White as the reference group. Northeastern and Southern United States were more likely to use press-fit TKA than the Midwest (OR = 1.89 and OR = 1.87, P < 0.0001) and West (OR = 1.67; and OR = 1.65; P < 0.0001). Press-fit TKA incidence in 2019 was 9.9% versus 20.6% in 2022 ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Press-fit TKA is increasingly more common in Northeastern and Southern United States, and patients are older than expected. Patients with BMI >35 had a slightly higher rate of undergoing press-fit than cemented TKA. Notable racial differences also exist. Additional research addressing racial disparities and evaluating longevity of press-fit designs is needed.

The Effect of Cemented Implants Placed During Initial TKA on Surgical Time and Expenses in Revision TKA

INTRODUCTION

Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a complex procedure that often requires the removal of previous implants. There is little information evaluating the difference between removing cemented or noncemented knee prostheses in revision surgeries. The purpose of this study was to determine whether removing cemented or noncemented implants would affect surgical time and expenses incurred during revision procedures.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used a single-institution database to identify 300 patients who underwent femoral and tibial implant rTKA from 2016 to 2022 because of mechanical complications (infection cases excluded). Radiographs and surgical reports were used to confirm whether the fixation technique was cemented (N = 243) or noncemented (N = 57). The primary outcomes were surgical time and surgery costs. Secondary outcomes included readmission rates, revision implants used, stem usage, and insurance type.

RESULTS

The average surgical time was 121 minutes for noncemented and 128 minutes for cemented procedures (P = 0.118). The 90-day readmission rates for each group were similar at 7.00% for the cemented cohort and 8.77% for the noncemented cohort (P = 0.643). For patients with Medicare Advantage, the respective surgery costs were $1,966 for noncemented and $1,968 for cemented TKA (P = 0.988). For patients with commercial insurance, the respective surgery costs were $4,854 for noncemented and $5,660 for cemented TKA (P = 0.330).

CONCLUSION

Primary knee fixation type, cemented or noncemented, did not appear to influence the surgical duration or surgical costs of both-implant revision knee surgery indicated for mechanical complications.

Cementless and Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasties Have Similar Outcomes but Cementless Patellar Component Migration was Observed in a Paired Randomized Control Trial

BACKGROUND

Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become increasingly popular. Some surgeons are concerned about pain, implant stability, and metal-backed patellar component survivorship. This study investigated the outcomes of cementless compared with cemented TKA in bilateral cases.

METHODS

We randomized 80 knees in 40 osteoarthritic knee patients who underwent bilateral TKA with patellar resurfacing under one anesthesia. All participants received cementless prostheses in one knee and cemented prostheses in the other. The outcomes were knee function measured by the forgotten joint scores, modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, knee ranges of motion, pain levels, operative times, radiographic outcomes, and complications. All knees were followed for a minimum of 2 years (2 to 3 years).

RESULTS

Cementless and cemented TKA had similar functional outcomes in forgotten joint score (97 ± 5 versus 98 ± 3 points, P = .52), modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (3 ± 4 versus 3 ± 2 points, P = .96), and ranges of motion (134 ± 7° versus 134 ± 7°, P = .16). The postoperative pain was also similar (P > .05). There were 4 cementless patellar components had superior migration for an average of 3.5 mm (range, 1.77 to 4.16) without loosening. The mean time of migration was 4 (range, 2 to 6) weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Cementless TKA had similar functional outcomes and recovery patterns compared with cemented TKA. However, there was concern of cementless component migration at patellae.

Four-Year Outcomes of Cementless Versus Cemented Fixation of a Newly Introduced Total Knee Arthroplasty Design

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening continues to be a major cause of failure of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although cemented fixation remains the gold standard, there is renewed interest in cementless fixation as a means of decreasing this risk via biologic fixation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of cemented and cementless versions of a newly introduced TKA design at an average of 4 years postoperatively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study of 100 primary TKAs comparing cementless vs cemented TKAs using the same cruciate-retaining implant design (ATTUNE Knee System; DePuy Synthes). Fifty patients undergoing cementless TKA with a mean age of 60.8 years (range, 48-71 years) and body mass index (BMI) of 31.6 kg/m2 (range, 23.7-41.9 kg/m2) were matched to 50 patients undergoing primary cemented TKA with a mean age of 62.7 years (range, 51-73 years) and BMI of 30.1 kg/m2 (range, 24.6-43.9 kg/m2). The mean follow-up was 4.2 years (range, 4.0-4.4 years) in the cementless group and 7.6 years (range, 7.5-7.7 years) in the cemented group. Complications, clinical outcomes using the Knee Society Score (KSS), and radiographic analyses were evaluated at final follow-up. Student's t tests were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in age, BMI, and preoperative KSS between the two groups (P=.12, P=.15, and P=.55, respectively). There were no complications or reoperations in either cohort. There were no statistical differences in range of motion and total KSS at final follow-up between the two groups. Final total KSS had a mean of 91.1 for the cementless group and 93.7 for the cemented group. There was no radiographic evidence of component subsidence or loosening in either cohort.

CONCLUSION

When compared with its cemented counterpart, the newly introduced cementless TKA design had similar excellent clinical improvements and radiologic results at an average of 4 years of follow-up. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(3):161-166.].

Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Age Affect Survivorship and Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Despite the growing popularity of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in younger patients, the outcomes are unclear in the elderly population. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and survivorship of cementless TKA between different age groups.

METHODS

Utilizing our prospectively collected institutional database, we retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing primary cementless TKAs at a tertiary care institute. We identified 347 TKA, which were divided into 3 groups based on age at the time of surgery. Group A was ≤ 60 years, Group B was 60 to ≤ 70 years, and Group C was > 70 years. We compared clinical outcomes (Knee Society Clinical Rating System [KSCRS], Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], and Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey [VR-12]) and survivorship between the groups.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, range of motion, KSCRS, WOMAC, and VR-12 physical score were comparable (P > .05). The VR-12 Mental score was higher in Group B and Group C than in Group A (P = .003). Compared to preoperative scores, the change in KSCRS, WOMAC, and VR-12 physical and mental scores was comparable at the final follow-up (P > .05). No patient underwent revision for aseptic loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no cases of revision surgery for aseptic loosening in our cohort of 347 cementless TKAs. Patients > 70 years of age undergoing cementless TKA can achieve clinical scores equivalent to those of younger patients at short term (2-year) follow-up. Longer-term survivorship is still required, but based on early data, cementless TKA can be a safe option for older patients.

Cemented vs. Cementless Fixation in Primary Knee Replacement: A Narrative Review

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the leading causes of disability around the globe. Osteoarthritis is mainly considered a disease affecting the elderly. However, more and more studies show that sports overuse, obesity, or congenital disorders can initiate a pathologic cascade that leads to OA changes in the younger population. Nevertheless, OA mostly affects the elderly, and with increasing life expectancy, the disease will develop in more and more individuals. To date, the golden standard in the treatment of the end-stage of the disease is total joint replacement (TJR), which restores painless knee motion and function. One of the weakest elements in TJR is its bonding with the bone, which can be achieved by bonding material, such as poly methyl-methacrylate (PMMA), or by cementless fixation supported by bone ingrowth onto the endoprosthesis surface. Each technique has its advantages; however, the most important factor is the revision rate and survivor time. In the past, numerous articles were published regarding TJR revision rate, but no consensus has been established yet. In this review, we focused on a comparison of cemented and cementless total knee replacement surgeries. We introduced PICO rules, including population, intervention, comparison and outcomes of TJR in a PubMed search. We identified 783 articles published between 2010 and 2023, out of which we included 14 in our review. Our review reveals that there is no universally prescribed approach to fixate knee prostheses. The determination of the most suitable method necessitates an individualized decision-making process involving the active participation and informed consent of each patient.

Short-Term (6 Months or Less) Pain in Cemented versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has increased in popularity to potentially improve survivorship. Radiostereometric studies demonstrate increased component migration during the first 3 to 6 months in cementless constructs, generating concern for increased postoperative pain during early osseointegration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate short-term (≤ 6 months) pain and function in cemented versus cementless TKA. We hypothesized that cementless TKA patients report increased pain during the short-term (≤ 6 months) postoperative period.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Libraries were searched for studies evaluating short-term (≤ 6 months) outcomes of cemented versus cementless primary TKA. Studies involving hybrid fixation were excluded. A meta-analysis was performed using standardized mean difference for primary outcomes (early postoperative pain) and weighted mean difference (WMD) for secondary outcomes (early postoperative function).

RESULTS

There were eleven studies included. There was no significant difference in acute postoperative pain between cemented and cementless TKA within 6 months of index TKA (standardized mean difference 0.08 in favor of cemented TKA; P = .10). Early postoperative forgotten joint scores (WMD 0.81; P = .81) and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome scores for joint replacement (WMD 0.80 in favor of cemented TKA; P = .14) were also similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in short-term (≤ 6 months) pain or early function between patients receiving cemented and cementless TKA. This suggests that surgeons may utilize cementless TKA without fear of increased pain due to micromotion within 6 months of index arthroplasty. However, additional studies with uniform assessment methods are needed to further inform differences in short-term pain and early functional outcomes between cemented and cementless TKA.

Cemented total knee arthroplasty provides greater knee range of motion at 2 years than cementless technique

INTRODUCTION

Optimal fixation method between cemented, cementless, and hybrid techniques for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still debated. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing cemented versus cementless TKA.

METHODS

We reviewed 168 patients who underwent a primary TKA at a single academic institution between January 2015 and June 2017. Patients were categorized into cemented (n = 80) or cementless (n = 88) groups. Only patients with greater than or equal to 2-year follow-up were included in the study. Multivariate regressions were performed to analyze the relationship between the surgical fixation technique and the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

There were no differences in demographics or baseline operative characteristics between the two groups. The cemented group had fewer manipulations under anesthesia (MUA) (4 vs. 15, p = 0.01), longer intraoperative tourniquet times (101.30 vs. 93.55 min, p = 0.02), and increased knee range of motion (ROM) at final follow-up (111.48 vs. 103.75°, p = 0.02) compared to the cementless group.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Both cemented and cementless component fixation are viable options for (TKA). This study found that patients who underwent a cemented TKA required fewer MUA's and had greater final ROM compared to patients undergoing cementless TKA. Additional research is required regarding cementless and cemented fixation. We believe that the choice of which fixation technique to use ultimately comes down to patient characteristics and surgeon preference.

Association Between Surface Modifications for Biologic Fixation and Aseptic Loosening of Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

Various surface modifications are used in uncemented total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) to enhance bony ingrowth and longevity of implants. This study aimed to identify which surface modifications are used, whether they are associated with different revision rates for aseptic loosening, and which are underperforming compared to cemented implants.

METHODS

Data on all cemented and uncemented TKAs used between 2007 and 2021 were obtained from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Uncemented TKAs were divided into groups based on their surface modifications. Revision rates for aseptic loosening and major revisions were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier, Competing-Risk, Log-rank tests, and Cox regression analyses were used. In total, 235,500 cemented and 10,749 uncemented primary TKAs were included. The different uncemented TKA groups included the following: 1,140 porous-hydroxyapatite (HA); 8,450 Porous-uncoated; 702 Grit-blasted-uncoated; and 172 Grit-blasted-Titanium-nitride (TiN) implants.

RESULTS

The 10-year revision rates for aseptic loosening and major revision of the cemented TKAs were 1.3 and 3.1%, and for uncemented TKAs 0.2 and 2.3% (porous-HA), 1.3 and 2.9% (porous-uncoated), 2.8 and 4.0% (grit-blasted-uncoated), and 7.9% and 17.4% (grit-blasted-TiN), respectively. Both type of revision rates varied significantly between the uncemented groups (log-rank tests, P < .001, P < .001). All grit-blasted implants had a significantly higher risk of aseptic loosening (P < .01), and porous-uncoated implants had a significantly lower risk of aseptic loosening than cemented implants (P = .03) after 10 years.

CONCLUSION

There were 4 main uncemented surface modifications identified, with different revision rates for aseptic loosening. Implants with porous-HA and porous-uncoated had the best revision rates, at least equal to cemented TKAs. Grit-blasted implants with and without TiN underperformed, possibly due to the interaction of other factors.

6-month migration sufficient for evaluation of total knee replacements: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This updated meta-analysis evaluates the migration pattern of the tibial component of primary total knee replacements measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). We aimed to evaluate whether 6-month maximum total point motion (MTPM) values could be used instead of 1-year MTPM for RSA threshold testing and to present the pooled migration patterns for different implant designs that can be used as a benchmark.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The search included all published RSA studies on migration patterns of tibial components until 2023. Study groups were classified according to their prosthesis brand, fixation, and insert (PFI). Sub-analyses were performed to compare the mean tibial component migration patterns of different implant variables, stratified according to fixation.

RESULTS

96 studies (43 new studies), including 197 study groups and 4,706 knees, were included. Most migration occurred within the first 6 postoperative months (126 study groups: mean 0.58 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.65), followed by minimal migration between 6 and 12 months (197 study groups: mean 0.04 mm, CI 0.03-0.06), irrespective of the fixation method used. Distinct migration patterns were observed among the different fixation methods. No differences were found in migration patterns among cemented components in any of the sub-group analyses conducted. For uncemented implants, trabecular metal surfaced components seemed to migrate less than porous-coated or uncoated components Conclusion: Based on the small difference between MTPM values at 6 months and 1 year, MTPM at 6 months could be used instead of MTPM at 1 year for RSA threshold testing. The pooled migration patterns can be used as benchmark for evaluation of new implants by defining fixation-specific RSA thresholds when combined with implant survival.

Fostering Excellence in Knee Arthroplasty: Developing Optimal Patient Care Pathways and Inspiring Knowledge Transfer of Advanced Surgical Techniques

Osteoarthritis of the knee is common. Early sports trauma or cartilage defects are risk factors for osteoarthritis. If conservative treatment fails, partial or total joint replacement is often performed. A joint replacement aims to restore physiological biomechanics and the quality of life of affected patients. Total knee arthroplasty is one of the most performed surgeries in musculoskeletal medicine. Several developments have taken place over the last decades that have truly altered the way we look at knee arthroplasty today. Some of the fascinating aspects will be presented and discussed in the present narrative review.

International primary knee arthroplasty registry review: findings from current reports

INTRODUCTION

International joint registries provide high volumes of information in relation to the performance of total knee arthroplasty on a global scale. Distillation of this data can be challenging, particularly with the establishment of more arthroplasty registries on a yearly basis. We therefore aim to present key information from these registries in relation to primary total knee arthroplasty. The specific questions of interest include: Which fixation type is superior in TKA? Does the level of constraint impact on clinical performance? How do partial knee replacements perform in the registries? Does patellar resurfacing lead to superior results? Are there any specific implants which perform particularly well or poorly?

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the major English-speaking knee arthroplasty registries across the globe was performed. Given the expanding large number of registries worldwide, it was not possible to perform a comprehensive review of all registries and so, a detailed review of the major English-speaking knee arthroplasty registries was included. Key trends and developments in implant performance were identified and presented in the current article.

RESULTS

Total knee replacements have lower revision rates than both unicompartmental and patellofemoral joint replacement procedures. Patellofemoral joint replacements have the highest failure rate of all knee replacement procedures. Cruciate-Retaining (CR) TKR designs have superior outcomes to Posterior-Stabilized (PS) designs across all registries. Patellar resurfacing appears to confer an advantage over non-resurfaced patellas in primary TKR.

CONCLUSION

We present current global trends in the utility and performance of TKA based on data from English-speaking arthroplasty registries.

A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Patients With Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Cemented, Uncemented, or Hybrid Techniques

In this study, we aim to explore the differences among the three types of fixation methods for the components of the knee joint in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These methods are cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation. Cemented fixation means that a special type of grout is used to attach the components to the bone. Uncemented fixation means that the components are designed to fit tightly into the bone and allow new bone growth to secure them. Hybrid fixation means that a combination of cemented and uncemented fixation is used for different components. We searched four online databases to find studies relevant to our research question. We use the R program (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) for network meta-analysis (NMA) to analyze the data from the studies. We calculate the mean difference (MD) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome, which are statistical measures of the difference and the uncertainty between methods. We use these measures for continuous outcomes, meaning they can have any value. For dichotomous outcomes, meaning they can only have two values, we use the risk ratio (RR) and the 95% CI, which are statistical measures of the relative risk and the uncertainty between methods. We assess the quality of randomized controlled trials, which are studies that randomly assign participants to different methods, using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool 1, a tool that evaluates the potential biases in the studies. We include 21 studies, and our analysis shows that cemented TKA reveals a statistically significant decrease in pain with hybrid TKA (MD = -2.82). That said, we find no significant differences between uncemented and cemented or hybrid (MD = -0.80 and -2.02, respectively). The results show that there is no significant difference between uncemented TKA and cemented TKA or hybrid technique (RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.35-2.14; RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.22-2.39, respectively). Also, we find no significant difference between cemented TKA and hybrid TKA (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.24-2.93). Cemented TKA is associated with a lower risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) incidence rate. Moreover, it shows a significant decrease in pain compared to hybrid TKA. Future research is needed to compare among the three interventions.

Cementless Versus Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: Concise Midterm Results of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

We previously reported the 2-year results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants of the same design. The purpose of the present study was to provide concise results at intermediate-term follow-up.

METHODS

The original study included 141 TKAs (76 performed without cement and 65 performed with cement). Since then, 8 patients died and 4 withdrew. Of the remaining 129 patients, 127 (98%) were available for analysis. Survivorship analysis was performed; Oxford Knee, Knee Society, and Forgotten Joint Scores were calculated; and radiographs reviewed. Mean follow-up was 6 years.

RESULTS

The survivorship free of any revision was 100% in both groups. There were no differences between the groups in any patient-reported functional outcome measure (p = 0.2 to 0.5). However, a higher percentage of patients in the cementless TKA group were either extremely or very satisfied with their overall function (p = 0.01). Radiographically, there was no evidence of implant loosening in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

At 6 years, there were no differences between cementless and cemented TKA implants of the same design in terms of survivorship, clinical, or radiographic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Highlighting the Advantages and Benefits of Non-NSAID Treatment After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Osteoarthritis is one of the most common degenerative conditions that causes pain, stiffness, and decreased functionality. The management of knee osteoarthritis necessitates collaboration among specialists from different disciplines, considering the primary clinical manifestations and functional level of the disease. The aim of this study was to highlight the disparities in postoperative outcomes between knee arthroplasty procedures with and without non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The study specifically focuses on the immediate advantages and outcomes observed at the 6-month milestone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study followed 713 patients who were randomly divided into two groups: a group that did not receive non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (N-NSAIDs) consisting of 394 patients, and a group that received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) comprising 319 patients. The study spanned a duration of 5 years (2018-2022), with patients being followed and evaluated for up to 6 months after the surgery.

RESULTS

It was observed that, from a therapeutic standpoint, the use of injectable treatments decreased. Significantly better differences were recorded in the N-NSAIDs group regarding return to pre-osteoarthritis activities at 6 months and reduced or absent night pain at 3 months (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Statistically significant improvements were observed in the N-NSAIDs group concerning the ability to resume pre-osteoarthritis activities within 6 months, as well as a reduction or absence of nighttime pain within 3 months.

Cementless Compared to Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With More Revisions Within 1 Year of Index Surgery

Background

Cementless total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) have gained renewed interest due to improved implant designs and lower rates of revision than its cemented counterparts. The purpose of this study was to compare revision rates between cemented vs cementless TKAs within 1 year of primary arthroplasty.

Methods

This was a retrospective review from the PearlDiver Patient Record Database. International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients who had undergone cemented and cementless TKAs and subsequent surgical revisions. An unadjusted univariate analysis of patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and surgical revisions at 90 days and 1 year after TKA was performed using chi-squared testing. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were subsequently performed for 1-year surgical complications requiring revision.

Results

Of 324,508 patients, 312,988 (96.45%) underwent cemented TKAs, and 11,520 (3.55%) underwent cementless TKAs. Patients undergoing cementless TKA tended to be younger than patients undergoing cemented TKA (63.67 ± 9.15 cementless vs 66.22 ± 8.85 cemented, P < .001). Univariate chi-squared testing showed that cementless patients were more likely to require 1-component femoral or tibial revision at 90 days and 1 year, irrigation and debridement at 90 days and 1 year, and arthroscopy with lysis of adhesions at 1 year only. Similar findings were observed for these 3 revision procedures at 1 year after correcting for age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score using multivariate logistic regression analysis as cementless TKA patients had higher odds ratios for each of the revisions.

Conclusions

Small but significant differences were found in surgical revisions among cementless TKAs when compared to cemented TKAs within 1 year of the index procedure.

Cementless Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty: 10 Years Follow-Up

Background Although most TKR surgeries are cemented, the interest in cementless TKR has increased dramatically during the last few years because of the new generation of cementless prostheses and the increased number of young patients who need TKR. Methods Ten years of retrospective reviews of 80 patients who had cementless, complete rotating platform TKR (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, Indiana) were performed. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age (above and below 70 years old). Functional outcomes at the final follow-up were evaluated clinically by filling out a satisfaction form, and the Oxford Knee Score as well as all medical and surgical complications were recorded for each patient. Results The 10-year cumulative implant survival rate was 100%, i.e. no patients had revision surgeries with no significant statistical difference between the two age groups. The 10-year evaluation rate was 90%. Conclusion The use of cementless TKA exhibited good survivability, long-term clinical and functional results, and no implant revision in various age groups, as well as a high satisfaction rate. There was no statistically significant difference between the results of different age groups.

Cementless and Cemented Dual-pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Comparison with a Minimum Two-year Follow-up

INTRODUCTION

With the use of newer biomaterials, many authors have reported similar results between cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of cementless and cemented TKA using the same dual-pivot articulation.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 806 TKAs were implanted by a single surgeon using the same dual-pivot articulation. There were 634 TKAs (79%) cemented and 172 (21%) uncemented. One patient in the cementless group was lost before two years. The remaining 171 cementless TKAs were matched 1:1 with cemented TKAs with respect to age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). All patients were followed for a minimum of two years (range, 24 to 66 months) using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), and Knee Society clinical and radiographic evaluation. The average follow-up was 3.8 years (range, 24-66 months) in the cemented group and 3.4 years (range,24-56 months) in the cementless group.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, the average KOOS-JR score was higher in the cementless group (86 points (range, 64-100) vs. 80 points (range, 57-100). Post-op Knee Society scores (including pain and function) were similar. There was one deep infection (cemented TKA). The manipulation rate was 1.2% in the cementless group and 2.4% in the cemented TKA group. Excluding infection, two knees (1.2%) were revised in each group. No cases of femoral or tibial component loosening were identified.

CONCLUSION

Patients implanted with either a cemented or cementless TKA using the same conforming dual-pivot articulation design had similar early outcomes and functional improvements. The type of fixation did not appear to influence the early clinical results.

Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty Over the Past Decade: Excellent Survivorship in Contemporary Designs

BACKGROUND

Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is re-emerging due to improvements in biomaterials, surgical technique, and implant design. Albeit rare, failure of osseointegration typically occurs within the first 2 years, and limited data exist on survivorship of the modern cementless TKA designs. This study evaluated clinical survivorship of 2 contemporary cementless TKA designs at minimum 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 627 cementless TKAs were performed up to July 2022. Three hundred thirty-nine cases were eligible for 2-year follow-up. Indications centered around bone quality and involved predominantly younger patients. The 2 designs consisted of tibial components with a highly porous titanium ingrowth surface, a central keel, and peripheral cruciform pegs with a porous cobalt-chromium femur. Survivorship estimates were calculated using right-censored non-parametric Kaplan-Meier methodologies. A total of 226 TKAs obtained minimum 2-year follow-up with a mean of 3.6 years (range, 2 to 10).

RESULTS

The all-cause revision rate was 2.4% (8 of 339). The revision rate due to aseptic loosening was 0.6% (2 of 339) consisting of 2 femoral components. No tibial components were revised for aseptic loosening. Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from aseptic loosening was 99% (95% confidence interval 98 to 100) at a maximum of 10 years.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate encouraging survivorship of cementless fixation in primary TKA with use of contemporary ingrowth biomaterials and modern implant designs. This particular tibial implant design with a highly porous titanium fixation surface, central keel, and peripheral cruciform pegs demonstrated excellent clinical survivorship without failure which may portend superior fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV-case series, no control group/historical control group.

Does Body Mass Index Influence the Outcomes and Survivorship of Modern Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Higher body mass index (BMI) has been associated with higher rates of aseptic loosening following cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is a paucity of evidence on the effect of BMI on the durability of modern cementless TKA. We aimed to assess the association between BMI and clinical outcomes following cementless TKA and to determine if there was a BMI threshold beyond which the risk of revision significantly increased.

METHODS

We identified 1,408 cementless TKAs of a modern design from an institutional registry. Patients were classified into BMI categories: normal (n = 136), overweight (n = 476), obese class I (n = 423), II (n = 258), and III (n = 115). The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and 12-item Short Form Health Survey scores were collected preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Survivorship was recorded at minimum 2 years (range, 24 to 88 months). BMI was analyzed as a continuous and categorical variable.

RESULTS

The improvement in patient-reported outcomes was similar across the groups. Thirty four knees (2.4%) were revised and 14 (1.0%) were for aseptic failure. Mean time-to-revision was 1.2 ± 1.3 years and did not differ across BMI categories (P = .455). Survivorship free from all-cause and aseptic revision was 97.1% and 99.0% at mean 4 years, respectively. Using Cox regression to control for demographics and bilateral procedures, BMI had no association with all-cause revision (P = .612) or aseptic revision (P = .186). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis found no relationship between BMI and revision risk (c-statistic = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

BMI did not influence functional outcomes and survivorship of modern cementless TKA, possibly due to improved biological fixation at the bone-implant interface. Longer follow-up is necessary to confirm these findings.

Patient-reported outcomes following cemented versus cementless primary total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis based on propensity score matching

Background

Existing studies of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on fixation methods (cemented vs cementless) are limited to single centers with small sample sizes. Using multicentered data,, we compared baseline and early post-operative global and condition-specific PROs between patients undergoing cemented versus cementless TKA.

Methods

With PROs prospectively collected through Comparative Effectiveness Pulmonary Embolism Prevention After Hip and Knee Replacement (PEPPER) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02810704), we examined pre- and post-operative (1, 3, and 6-months) outcomes in 5,961 patients undergoing primary TKA enrolled by 28 medical centers between December 2016 and August 2021. Outcomes included the short-form of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-Jr.), the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Health (PROMIS-PH), and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). To minimize selection bias, we performed a 1-to-1 propensity score matched analysis to assess relative pre- to post-operative change in outcomes within and between cemented and cementless TKA groups.

Results

With greater than 90% follow-up, significant pre to- post-operative improvements were observed in both groups. At 6 months, the cemented TKA group achieved a 3.3 point (55% of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference) greater improvement in the mean KOOS-Jr. (95%CI: 0.36, 6.30; P = 0.028) than did the cementless group with no significant between-group differences in PROMIS-PH and NPRS.

Conclusions

In a large cohort of primary TKAs, patients with cemented fixation reported early incremental benefit in KOOS-Jr. over those with cementless TKA. Future studies are warranted to capture longer follow-up of PROs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05899-1.

Long-Term Clinical Performance of an Uncemented, Mobile Bearing, Anterior Stabilized Knee System and the Impact of Previous Knee Surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to report long-term survival and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the uncemented low contact stress total knee system and explore the potential association between prior knee surgery and outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 1,289 procedures in 1,068 patients performed between 2000 and 2010 (mean follow-up 11.1 years) were retrospectively identified. All patients received an uncemented, mobile bearing, anterior stabilized (cruciate sacrificing) knee implant with a porous coating on the bone-prosthesis surface. Implant survival was calculated using competing risk analyses at 5, 10, and 15 years. PROMs include the Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score (domain function), EuroQol 5D-3L, and Numeric Rating Scale for pain during rest and activity, and for overall satisfaction. The association between previous surgery (no surgery versus meniscectomy versus arthroscopy versus corrective osteotomies) and implant survival was assessed with multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis; the association with PROMs was assessed with multivariable linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

Survival after 5, 10, and 15 years was 97.0% (95% CI 96.0-98.0), 96.3% (95% CI 95.3-97.3), and 96.0% (95% CI 94.8-97.2), respectively. The most common reason for revision was aseptic loosening of the tibial tray (23/49 revisions, 47%). All PROMs were comparable with the reference values of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. History of knee surgery prior to TKA was not associated with survival or PROMs.

CONCLUSION

The low contact stress uncemented mobile bearing knee implant provides excellent survival and patient satisfaction in our cohort. Previous surgery does not seem to compromise results in our population.

Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Shows Less Blood Loss but a Higher Rate of Aseptic Loosening Compared With Cementless Fixation: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to update the current evidence on functional outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates between cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by evaluating comparative studies published over the past 15 years.

METHODS

The PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central databases were used to search keywords and a total of 18 studies were included. Random and fixed effect models were used for the meta-analysis of pooled mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

A total of 5,222 patients were identified with a mean age of 64.4 ± 9.4 and 63 ± 8.6 years for the cemented and cementless TKA groups, respectively. The mean follow-up was 107.9 ± 30 and 104.3 ± 10 months for the cemented and cementless TKA groups, respectively. Cemented TKA showed a significantly greater postoperative Knee Society Score (MD = -0.95, 95% CI [-1.57, 0.33], P = .003) and range of motion (MD = -1.09, 95% CI [-1.88, -0.29], P = .0007), but no differences in other outcome scores were found. The incidence of periprosthetic joint infection, radiolucent lines, instability, and polyethylene wear was also comparable. Cemented TKA showed less perioperative blood loss (SMD = -438.41, 95% CI [-541.69, -35.14], P < .0001) but a higher rate of manipulation under anesthesia (OR = 3.39, 95% CI [1.64, 6.99], P = .001) and aseptic loosening (OR = 1.62, 95% CI [1.09, 2.41], P = .02) than cementless TKA. No differences were found in terms of the reoperation rate.

CONCLUSION

When cemented and cementless fixations are compared in primary TKA, comparable functional outcomes and reoperation rates can be achieved. Cemented TKA showed less blood loss but a higher rate of manipulation under anesthesia and aseptic loosening.

Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty in Obese Patients With Body Mass Index ≥35 kg/m2: A Contemporary Analysis of 812 Patients

BACKGROUND

Cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to have higher failure rates in obese patients, and cementless TKA may provide more durable fixation. This study compared outcomes and survivorship of obese patients undergoing cemented and cementless TKA of the same modern design.

METHODS

We identified a consecutive series of 406 primary cementless TKA performed in obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m² in 2013-2018. Each case was matched 1:1 with 406 cemented TKA based on age, sex, BMI, bearing surface, and year of surgery. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and Short Form-12 were collected preoperatively, at 6 months and 2 years. Implant survivorship was recorded at mean 4.0 years (range 2.0-7.8).

RESULTS

There was no difference in mean BMI between the cemented (38.6 ± 3.4 kg/m²; range, 35-60) and cementless cohorts (38.7 ± 3.3 kg/m²; range, 35-54; P = .706). Both groups had similar final postoperative scores and improvement in scores at 2 years. Furthermore, a similar percentage met the minimal clinically important difference (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, 70.0% vs 71.2%, P = .700; Short Form-12 Physical, 74.1% vs 70.4%, P = .240). Both groups demonstrated high 7-year survivorship free from aseptic revision (99.0% vs 99.5%, P = .665).

CONCLUSION

Obese patients with BMI ≥35 kg/m² undergoing cementless and cemented TKA of the same modern design had similar outcomes and survivorship at early to mid-term follow-up. Continued surveillance of this high-risk population is necessary.

Clinical Results in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty with Cementless Tibial Component in Porous Tantalum: Comparison between Monoblock and Two Pegs vs. Modular and Three Pegs

Nowadays, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is widely considered to be the gold standard for treatment of end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Although the optimal mode of fixation in TKA continues to be an important area of investigation, cementless fixation offers the possibility to gain biologic fixation, preserve bone stock and mineral density, and potentially improve survivorship. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical results of a posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty with cementless tibial component in porous tantalum, comparing two groups: Group A (30 patients), TKA with a monoblock component and two pegs, and Group B (22 patients), with a modular component and three pegs. Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were submitted to the patients, and radiographs were collected at the last follow-up. The mean follow-up was 26.32 (20–40) months. Significant differences were not detected between the postoperative KSS values in the two groups (p = 0.44). Evaluating KOOS outcomes, we found in Group A that the rating system showed a statistically significant improvement from a preoperative average rating of 51.4 (SD ± 15) to an average of 72.66 (SD ± 19) at final follow-up (p < 0.05). In Group B, the KOOS rating system showed a statistically significant improvement from a preoperative average rating of 48.3 (SD ± 18) to an average of 79.54 (SD ± 17) postoperatively (p < 0.05). Comparing KOOS final outcomes between groups, we found no statistically significant difference at the mean final follow-up (p = 0.20), with the exception of the sport-related section (p < 0.05). Radiological evaluation at the final follow-up did not show any sign of polyethylene wear, radiolucency, septic or aseptic loosening, or change in alignment in either group. The current study demonstrates an excellent survivorship of cementless tibial components in porous tantalum and the possibility of osseous integration, without significant differences between the two groups under investigation.

Cemented Versus Noncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Aseptic loosening remains one of the most common indications for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Given the demographic shift to a younger and more active TKA patient population, some surgeons have revisited noncemented fixation given its potential for lower rates of long-term aseptic loosening. The purpose of this study was to compare the demographics and complications between patients undergoing noncemented and cemented TKA.

METHODS

Using the MKnee subset of the PearlDiver database, diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify patients who had undergone cemented or noncemented TKA for osteoarthritis with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Propensity score matching was done to compare risk-adjusted medical and surgical complication profiles at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years.

RESULTS

Of 203,574 patients identified, 3.2% underwent noncemented TKA and 96.8% underwent cemented TKA. Using propensity-matched analysis, there was no difference in 90-day medical complications. Noncemented TKA was associated with a greater risk of periprosthetic joint infection throughout the study (90-day odds ratio [OR] 1.34, 1-year OR 1.27, 2-year OR 1.27, P < 0.05). Noncemented TKA was associated with a greater risk of periprosthetic fracture at 1 year and 2 years (1 year OR 2.19, 2 years OR 1.89, P < 0.05). No notable difference was observed in risk of aseptic loosening between the two groups.

DISCUSSION

Noncemented TKA is associated with a higher rate of periprosthetic joint infection and periprosthetic fracture. Additional studies are needed to compare long-term rates of aseptic loosening between noncemented and cemented TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Redefining Indications for Modern Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship in Patients >75 Years Old

BACKGROUND

Most studies on cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have excluded patients >75 years due to concerns that older patients have poorer bone mineral density and osteogenic activity. This study compared the midterm outcomes and survivorship of cemented and cementless TKA of the same modern design performed in patients >75 years.

METHODS

We identified a consecutive series of 120 primary cementless TKA performed in patients >75 years. Each case was propensity score matched 1:3 with 360 cemented TKA of the same modern design based on age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, bilateral procedures, liner type, and year of surgery. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and Short Form-12 (SF-12) were collected preoperatively, at 6 months and 2 years. Implant survivorship was recorded at mean 4.2 years (range, 2.0-7.9).

RESULTS

Mean age was 79.0 ± 3.4 years (range, 75-92) in the cemented cohort and 78.9 ± 3.5 (range, 75-91) in the cementless cohort (P = .769). There was no difference in final postoperative scores or improvement in scores at 2 years. The percentage of patients that met the minimal clinically important difference was also similar (KOOS-JR, 68.9% vs 69.2%, P = .955; SF-12 Physical, 71.7% vs 66.7%, P = .299). Seven-year survivorship free from aseptic revision was 99.4% for cemented knees and 100% for cementless knees (log-rank, P = .453).

CONCLUSION

Patients over 75 years undergoing cementless or cemented TKA of the same modern design had comparable outcomes and survivorship in the midterm. The theoretical risks of cementless fixation in this age group were not realized in this study.

A matched comparison of the patient-reported outcome measures of cemented and cementless total knee replacements, based on the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and Isle of Man and England's National PROM collection programme

Background and purpose - Total knee replacement (TKR) can be implanted with or without bone cement. It is currently unknown how the functional outcomes compare. Therefore, we compared the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) of both fixation methods. Patients and methods - We performed a propensitymatched comparison of 14,404 TKRs (7,202 cemented and 7,202 cementless) enrolled in the National Joint Registry and the English National PROMs collection programme. Subgroup analyses were performed in different age groups (1) < 55 years; (2) 55-64 years; (3) 65-74 years; (4) ≥ 75 years. Results - The 6-month postoperative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was significantly (p < 0.001) higher for cemented TKR (35, SD 9.7) than cementless TKR (34, SD 9.9). The OKS was also significantly higher for the cemented TKR in all age groups, except the 55-64-year group. A significantly higher proportion of cemented TKRs had an excellent OKS (≥ 41) compared with cementless (32% vs. 28%, p < 0.001) and a lower proportion of poor (< 27) scores (19% vs. 22%, p = 0.001). This was also observed for all age subgroups. There were no significant differences in EQ-5D points gained postoperatively between the groups respectively (0.31 vs. 0.30, p = 0.1). Interpretation - Cemented TKRs had a greater proportion of excellent OKS scores and lower proportion of poor scores both overall and across all age groups. However, the absolute differences are small and below the minimally clinically important difference, making both fixation types acceptable. Currently the vast majority of TKRs are cemented and the results from this study suggest that this is appropriate.

Highlighting the advantages and benefits of cementless total knee arthroplasty (Review)

In the field of orthopedic surgery, cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered to be one of the gold standards. However, there are categories of patients (i.e., obese and morbidly obese patients, younger than 65 years old) among whom cemented TKA has however a high failure rate. Moreover, the frequency of using uncemented TKA is increasing due to the potential benefits of long-term biological fixation, being an innovative field that addresses a new generation orthopedic surgical treatment which is more suitable for young patients who have good bone quality (good to very good, in terms of density). The survival rates and functional results of the latest generation of cementless TKAs may be similar to functional results and survival rates of cemented prosthesis. In conclusion, this review-type article can be considered a powerful database, extremely informative, dense, and focused on the topic mentioned above, in the interest of all medical professionals and all interested individuals.

A Matched Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacements: An Analysis from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man

BACKGROUND

Total knee replacements (TKRs) can be implanted with or without the use of cement. It is currently uncertain how cemented and cementless TKRs compare overall and in different age groups of the population in the long term.

METHODS

The National Joint Registry collects information on knee replacements inserted in England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man and was linked for multiple confounders to the National Health Service Hospital Episode Statistics database. With use of propensity score matching techniques, 44,954 cemented and cementless TKRs were compared. Regression models were used to compare the outcomes of revision, reoperation, and mortality both overall and in different age strata.

RESULTS

The 10-year implant survival rate with revision as the end point for cemented and cementless TKRs was 96.0% and 95.5%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.14; p = 0.01). The 10-year survival rate with reoperation as the end point was 82.7% and 81.4%, respectively (HR = 1.08; p = 0.001). The rate of revision for pain was higher for cementless TKRs (0.5% [cemented] compared with 0.7% [cementless]; p = 0.002), but the rate of revision for infection was lower (0.7% [cemented] compared with 0.5% [cementless]; p = 0.003). No significant interactions with age existed for the outcomes of revision (p = 0.24), reoperation (p = 0.30), or mortality (p = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that matched cemented and cementless TKRs both have 10-year implant survival rates of >95%. Cementless TKRs had a higher revision rate (absolute difference, 0.5%) and reoperation rate (absolute difference, 1.3%). The rate of revision for infection was lower in the cementless group, although the rate of revision for pain was higher. Age did not significantly affect the relative performances.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Potential New Treatments for Knee OA: A Prospective Review of Registered Trials

We aimed to evaluate potential new treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA). The National Institute of Health ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched for “Osteoarthritis, Knee”. We found 565 ongoing interventional studies with a total planned enrollment of 111,276 subjects. Ongoing studies for knee OA represent a very small fraction of the registered clinical trials, but they are over a quarter of all knee trials and over two thirds of all OA studies. The most researched topic was arthroplasty, with aspects such as implant design changes, cementless fixation, robotic guidance, pain management, and fast track recovery. Intraarticular injections focused on cell therapies with mesenchymal stem cells sourced from adipose tissue, bone marrow, or umbilical cord. We could see the introduction of the first disease modifying drugs with an impact on knee OA, as well as new procedures such as geniculate artery embolization and geniculate nerve ablation.

Long-term effects of cemented and cementless fixations of total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

To determine the long-term effects (a minimum follow-up time 8.8 years) of cemented and cementless fixations used for total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and China Wangfang database were interrogated for appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through July 2020. Data were extracted and assessed for accuracy by 2 of the authors acting independently. Any controversial discrepancies were resolved after discussion with a third author.

RESULT

Eight RCTs were included with low to moderate bias risks. The cemented fixation of TKA was comparable to cementless fixation in terms of implant survival (relative risk, 1.016; 95% CI 0.978 to 1.056; P = 0.417), Knee Society (KS) knee score (standardized mean difference (SMD), - 0.107; 95% CI - 0.259 to 0.045; P = 0.168), KS function score (SMD - 0.065; 95% CI - 0.238 to 0.109; P = 0.463), KS pain score (SMD - 0.300; 95% CI - 0.641 to 0.042; P = 0.085), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score (SMD - 0.117; 95% CI - 0.307 to 0.073; P = 0.227), HSS score (SMD - 0.027; 95% CI - 0.270 to 0.217; P = 0.829), range of motion (SMD 0.061; 95% CI - 0.205 to 0.327; P = 0.652) at ≥ 8.8 years of follow-up. In terms of radiographic outcomes at ≥ 8.8 years of follow-up, the incidence of a radiolucent line in the cementless group was lower than for the cemented group (SMD 3.828; 95% CI 2.228 to 6.576; P < 0.001). However, the maximum total point motion (MTPM) of the cementless group was greater than for the cemented group (SMD - 0.739; 95% CI - 1.474 to - 0.005; P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow-up verified that cementless and cemented fixation have similar prosthesis survival rates, clinical scores and mobility. However, radiography suggested that each technique had an advantage with regard to the radiolucent line and MTPM.

The Impact of the Largest National Joint Registry on Current Knee Replacement Longevity Estimates: An Analysis and Review of Knee Prosthesis Brand and Fixation Technique

BACKGROUND

The UK National Joint Registry is the single largest joint registry in the world enrolling 1.3 million patients and recently reaching 17 years of follow-up data. Current knee prosthesis longevity estimates are based off smaller sized international registries and the impact of fixation type on prosthesis survival remains unclear.

METHODS

We used the UK National Joint Registry 17th annual report to calculate pooled mean survival estimates of total knee replacements (TKRs), unicondylar knee replacements (UKRs), and patellofemoral knee replacements at 10 and 15 years based on both construct brand and fixation technique (cemented vs uncemented). Independent t-testing was performed for significance.

RESULTS

All-cause survivorship of TKRs at 10 and 15 years is 96.7% and 95.4%, respectively. For UKRs it is 89.8% and 80.7% and for patellofemoral knee replacements it is 81.6% and 76.5%. In regard to fixation technique, cemented and uncemented TKRs show similar survivorship at both time points. For UKRs uncemented constructs showed improved survivorship compared to cemented at 10 years (92.7% vs 88.2%, P < .001). This was greatest among those <65 years of age. In fact, all construct types regardless of fixation showed increased rate of revision in those <65 years vs those ≥65 years.

CONCLUSION

We provide more accurate estimations for knee prosthesis survival and highlight that younger patients, particularly those receiving UKRs, are prone to greater revision risks. This data also suggests that uncemented fixation may offer improved joint survival in these patients.

A new robotically assisted system for total knee arthroplasty: A sheep model study

BACKGROUND

We investigated the accuracy and safety of a new HURWA robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system in a sheep model.

METHODS

Ten male small-tailed Han sheep were used in this study. Sheep were imaged by computed tomography scan before and after bone resection and the cutting errors between actual bone preparation and preoperative planning of the femur and tibia in three dimensions were measured.

RESULTS

The overall accuracies after surgery compared with that from preoperative surgical planning of the left and right femurs were 1.93 ± 1.02° and 1.93 ± 1.23°, respectively. Additionally, similarly high overall accuracies for the left and right tibia of 1.26 ± 1.04 and 1.68 ± 0.92°, respectively, were obtained. The gap distances of the distal cut, anterior chamfer, anterior cut, posterior chamfer and posterior cut on the medial side were 0.47 ± 0.35 mm, 0.41 ± 0.37 mm, 0.12 ± 0.26 mm, 0.41 ± 0.44 mm and 0.12 ± 0.23 mm, respectively. No intraoperative complications, such as intraoperative fracture, massive bleeding or death, occurred.

CONCLUSION

This new HURWA robotic-assisted TKA system is an accurate and safe tool for TKA surgery based on the sheep model.