A genetic variant controls interferon-β gene expression in human myeloid cells by preventing C/EBP-β binding on a conserved enhancer

Immune regulation by the SUMO family

Post-translational protein modifications by the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) family have been shown to regulate immune cells in the context of infection, autoimmunity and, more recently, cancer. Recent clinical trials investigating sumoylation inhibition as a therapeutic approach for cancer have established that sumoylation has important immune modulatory effects. Sumoylation suppresses transcription factors in innate immune cells and in cytotoxic T cells through the direct modification of these factors, which leads to the recruitment of transcriptional repressor complexes containing histone deacetylases. By contrast, in regulatory T cells and T helper 17 cells, sumoylation of transcription factors can enhance transcriptional activity by recruiting transcriptional coactivators. Sumoylation is also involved in the repression of IFNB1 and endogenous retroviruses and is therefore important for regulating interferon expression. A central theme from literature is that the sumoylation of a group of proteins, instead of a single target, collectively contributes to the regulation of various immune processes. In this Review, we consider how these studies provide scientific basis for future exploration of SUMO-mediated immune modulation for the treatment of cancers and autoimmune disorders.

The SP140-RESIST pathway regulates interferon mRNA stability and antiviral immunity

Type I interferons (IFN-Is) are essential for antiviral immunity but must be tightly regulated1-3. The conserved transcriptional repressor SP140 inhibits interferon beta (Ifnb1) expression via an unknown mechanism4,5. Here we report that SP140 does not directly repress Ifnb1 transcription. Instead, SP140 negatively regulates Ifnb1 mRNA stability by directly repressing the expression of a previously uncharacterized regulator we call RESIST (REgulated Stimulator of Interferon via Stabilization of Transcript, previously annotated as Annexin-2 Receptor). RESIST promotes Ifnb1 mRNA stability by counteracting Ifnb1 mRNA destabilization mediated by the Tristetraprolin (TTP) family of RNA-binding proteins and the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex. SP140 localizes within nuclear bodies, punctate structures that play important roles in silencing DNA virus gene expression in the nucleus4. Consistent with this observation, we found that SP140 inhibits replication of the gammaherpesvirus MHV68. The antiviral activity of SP140 was independent of its ability to regulate Ifnb1. Our results establish dual antiviral and interferon regulatory functions for SP140. We propose that SP140 and RESIST participate in antiviral effector-triggered immunity6,7.

Deleting Trim33 in Myeloid Cells Improves the Efficiency of Radiotherapy through an IFNβ-Dependent Antitumor Immune Response

Radiotherapy (RT) triggers an immune response that contributes to antitumor effects. Induction of IFNβ is a key event in this immunogenicity of RT. We have previously shown that TRIM33, a chromatin reader, restrains IFNβ expression in Toll-like receptor-activated myeloid cells. In this study, we explored whether deleting Trim33 in myeloid cells might improve the radio-induced immune response and subsequent efficiency of RT. We first established that Trim33-/- bone marrow-derived macrophages showed increased expression of IFNβ in response to direct irradiation, or to treatment with irradiated cancer cells, further supporting our hypothesis. We then tested the efficiency of a single-dose RT in three subcutaneous tumor models and one orthotopic tumor model. In all models, myeloid deletion of Trim33 led to a significantly improved response after RT, leading to a complete and durable response in most of the treated mice bearing orthotopic oral tumors. This effect required the involvement of the type I IFN pathway and the presence of CD8+ T lymphocytes but not NK cells. In addition, cured mice were capable of rejecting a secondary tumor challenge, demonstrating an in situ vaccination effect. We conclude that deleting Trim33 in myeloid cells improves RT efficiency, through a mechanism involving the type I IFN pathway and the immune response. Our work suggests that myeloid Trim33 is a host factor affecting the tumor response to RT, thus representing a new potential therapeutic target for modifying RT responses.

Genome-wide screening identifies Trim33 as an essential regulator of dendritic cell differentiation

The development of dendritic cells (DCs), including antigen-presenting conventional DCs (cDCs) and cytokine-producing plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs), is controlled by the growth factor Flt3 ligand (Flt3L) and its receptor Flt3. We genetically dissected Flt3L-driven DC differentiation using CRISPR-Cas9-based screening. Genome-wide screening identified multiple regulators of DC differentiation including subunits of TSC and GATOR1 complexes, which restricted progenitor growth but enabled DC differentiation by inhibiting mTOR signaling. An orthogonal screen identified the transcriptional repressor Trim33 (TIF-1γ) as a regulator of DC differentiation. Conditional targeting in vivo revealed an essential role of Trim33 in the development of all DCs, but not of monocytes or granulocytes. In particular, deletion of Trim33 caused rapid loss of DC progenitors, pDCs, and the cross-presenting cDC1 subset. Trim33-deficient Flt3+ progenitors up-regulated pro-inflammatory and macrophage-specific genes but failed to induce the DC differentiation program. Collectively, these data elucidate mechanisms that control Flt3L-driven differentiation of the entire DC lineage and identify Trim33 as its essential regulator.

The relationship between extreme inter-individual variation in macrophage gene expression and genetic susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease

The differentiation of resident intestinal macrophages from blood monocytes depends upon signals from the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor (CSF1R). Analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) indicates that dysregulation of macrophage differentiation and response to microorganisms contributes to susceptibility to chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Here, we analyzed transcriptomic variation in monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) from affected and unaffected sib pairs/trios from 22 IBD families and 6 healthy controls. Transcriptional network analysis of the data revealed no overall or inter-sib distinction between affected and unaffected individuals in basal gene expression or the temporal response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). However, the basal or LPS-inducible expression of individual genes varied independently by as much as 100-fold between subjects. Extreme independent variation in the expression of pairs of HLA-associated transcripts (HLA-B/C, HLA-A/F and HLA-DRB1/DRB5) in macrophages was associated with HLA genotype. Correlation analysis indicated the downstream impacts of variation in the immediate early response to LPS. For example, variation in early expression of IL1B was significantly associated with local SNV genotype and with subsequent peak expression of target genes including IL23A, CXCL1, CXCL3, CXCL8 and NLRP3. Similarly, variation in early IFNB1 expression was correlated with subsequent expression of IFN target genes. Our results support the view that gene-specific dysregulation in macrophage adaptation to the intestinal milieu is associated with genetic susceptibility to IBD.

Regulation of IFNβ expression: focusing on the role of its promoter and transcription regulators

IFNβ is a single-copy gene without an intron. Under normal circumstances, it shows low or no expression in cells. It is upregulated only when the body needs it or is stimulated. Stimuli bind to the pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and pass via various signaling pathways to several basic transcriptional regulators, such as IRFs, NF-кB, and AP-1. Subsequently, the transcriptional regulators enter the nucleus and bind to regulatory elements of the IFNβ promoter. After various modifications, the position of the nucleosome is altered and the complex is assembled to activate the IFNβ expression. However, IFNβ regulation involves a complex network. For the study of immunity and diseases, it is important to understand how transcription factors bind to regulatory elements through specific forms, which elements in cells are involved in regulation, what regulation occurs during the assembly of enhancers and transcription complexes, and the possible regulatory mechanisms after transcription. Thus, this review focuses on the various regulatory mechanisms and elements involved in the activation of IFNβ expression. In addition, we discuss the impact of this regulation in biology.