Swing-out of the β3 hybrid domain is required for αIIbβ3 priming and normal cytoskeletal reorganization, but not adhesion to immobilized fibrinogen

Novel GPIb-independent platelet aggregation induced by botrocetin: implications for diagnosis and antithrombotic therapy

BACKGROUND

Snake venom botrocetin facilitates von Willebrand factor (VWF) binding to platelet GPIbα and has been widely used for the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease and GPIb-related disorders. Botrocetin is also commonly employed for the development/characterization of antithrombotics targeting the GPIb-VWF axis.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the alternative receptor(s)/mechanisms that participate in botrocetin-induced platelet aggregation.

METHODS

The effects of botrocetin on platelet aggregation were examined using platelets from wild-type, VWF- and fibrinogen-deficient, GPIbα-deficient, IL4Rα/GPIbα-transgenic, ITGA2B and ITGB3-deficient mice, and Bernard-Soulier syndrome and healthy human samples. Platelet-fibrinogen and platelet-VWF interaction were measured using flow cytometry. GPIbα-VWF binding was evaluated utilizing enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Botrocetin-αIIbβ3 and botrocetin-GPIbα interactions were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and fluorescence anisotropy assays. Heparinized whole blood from healthy donors was examined for thrombus formation and growth in a perfusion chamber.

RESULTS

Botrocetin could induce aggregation of platelets from a Bernard-Soulier syndrome patient and GPIbα-deficient mice as well as platelets lacking the N-terminal extracellular domain of GPIbα. Botrocetin could interact with αIIbβ3 and facilitated αIIbβ3-VWF interaction independent of GPIb. Botrocetin competitively bound to the ligand-binding domain of activated rather than resting αIIbβ3. Although botrocetin-induced platelet aggregation requires VWF, strikingly, in the absence of VWF, botrocetin blocked fibrinogen and other ligand binding to αIIbβ3 and inhibited platelet aggregation and thrombus formation. Consistently, recombinant botrocetin defective in VWF binding inhibited αIIbβ3- and GPIb-mediated platelet aggregation, spreading, and thrombus formation.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides insights into avoiding the misdiagnosis of GPIb-related disorders and developing botrocetin mutants as potential new antithrombotics that may simultaneously target both αIIbβ3 and GPIbα.

An αIIbβ3 monoclonal antibody traps a semiextended conformation and allosterically inhibits large ligand binding

ABSTRACT

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have provided valuable information regarding the structure and function of platelet αIIbβ3. Protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) has been implicated in αIIbβ3 activation and binds to thrombin-activated αIIbβ3. Using human platelets as the immunogen, we identified a new mAb (R21D10) that inhibits the binding of PDI to platelets activated with thrombin receptor-activating peptide (T6). R21D10 also partially inhibited T6-induced fibrinogen and PAC-1 binding to platelets, as well as T6- and adenosine 5'-diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation. Mutual competition experiments showed that R21D10 does not inhibit the binding of mAbs 10E5 (anti-αIIb cap domain) or 7E3 (anti-β3 β-I domain), and immunoblot studies indicated that R21D10 binds to β3. The dissociation of αIIbβ3 by EDTA had a minimal effect on R21D10 binding. Cryogenic electron microscopy of the αIIbβ3-R21D10 Fab complex revealed that R21D10 binds to the β3 integrin-epidermal growth factor 1 (I-EGF1) domain and traps an intermediate conformation of αIIbβ3 with semiextended leg domains. The binding of R21D10 produces a major structural change in the β3 I-EGF2 domain associated with a new interaction between the β3 I-EGF2 and αIIb thigh domains, which may prevent the swing-out motion of the β3 hybrid domain required for high-affinity ligand binding and protect αIIbβ3 from EDTA-induced dissociation. R21D10 partially reversed the ligand binding priming effect of eptifibatide, suggesting that it could convert the swung-out conformation into a semiextended conformation. We concluded that R21D10 inhibits ligand binding to αIIbβ3 via a unique allosteric mechanism, which may or may not be related to its inhibition of PDI binding.

Application of Funnel Metadynamics to the Platelet Integrin αIIbβ3 in Complex with an RGD Peptide

Integrin αIIbβ3 mediates platelet aggregation by binding the Arginyl-Glycyl-Aspartic acid (RGD) sequence of fibrinogen. RGD binding occurs at a site topographically proximal to the αIIb and β3 subunits, promoting the conformational activation of the receptor from bent to extended states. While several experimental approaches have characterized RGD binding to αIIbβ3 integrin, applying computational methods has been significantly more challenging due to limited sampling and the need for a priori information regarding the interactions between the RGD peptide and integrin. In this study, we employed all-atom simulations using funnel metadynamics (FM) to evaluate the interactions of an RGD peptide with the αIIb and β3 subunits of integrin. FM incorporates an external history-dependent potential on selected degrees of freedom while applying a funnel-shaped restraint potential to limit RGD exploration of the unbound state. Furthermore, it does not require a priori information about the interactions, enhancing the sampling at a low computational cost. Our FM simulations reveal significant molecular changes in the β3 subunit of integrin upon RGD binding and provide a free-energy landscape with a low-energy binding mode surrounded by higher-energy prebinding states. The strong agreement between previous experimental and computational data and our results highlights the reliability of FM as a method for studying dynamic interactions of complex systems such as integrin.

Structure, signal transduction, activation, and inhibition of integrin αIIbβ3

Integrins are heterodimeric receptors comprising α and β subunits. They are expressed on the cell surface and play key roles in cell adhesion, migration, and growth. Several types of integrins are expressed on the platelets, including αvβ3, αIIbβ3, α2β1, α5β1, and α6β1. Among these, physically αIIbβ3 is exclusively expressed on the platelet surface and their precursor cells, megakaryocytes. αIIbβ3 adopts at least three conformations: i) bent-closed, ii) extended-closed, and iii) extended-open. The transition from conformation i) to iii) occurs when αIIbβ3 is activated by stimulants. Conformation iii) possesses a high ligand affinity, which triggers integrin clustering and platelet aggregation. Platelets are indispensable for maintaining vascular system integrity and preventing bleeding. However, excessive platelet activation can result in myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Therefore, finding a novel strategy to stop bleeding without accelerating the risk of thrombosis is important. Regulation of αIIbβ3 activation is vital for this strategy. There are a large number of molecules that facilitate or inhibit αIIbβ3 activation. The interference of these molecules can accurately control the balance between hemostasis and thrombosis. This review describes the structure and signal transduction of αIIbβ3, summarizes the molecules that directly or indirectly affect integrin αIIbβ3 activation, and discusses some novel antiαIIbβ3 drugs. This will advance our understanding of the activation of αIIbβ3 and its essential role in platelet function and tumor development.

Integrin Conformational Dynamics and Mechanotransduction

The function of the integrin family of receptors as central mediators of cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) and cell-cell adhesion requires a remarkable convergence of interactions and influences. Integrins must be anchored to the cytoskeleton and bound to extracellular ligands in order to provide firm adhesion, with force transmission across this linkage conferring tissue integrity. Integrin affinity to ligands is highly regulated by cell signaling pathways, altering affinity constants by 1000-fold or more, via a series of long-range conformational transitions. In this review, we first summarize basic, well-known features of integrin conformational states and then focus on new information concerning the impact of mechanical forces on these states and interstate transitions. We also discuss how these effects may impact mechansensitive cell functions and identify unanswered questions for future studies.

Electron microscopy shows that binding of monoclonal antibody PT25-2 primes integrin αIIbβ3 for ligand binding

The murine monoclonal antibody (mAb) PT25-2 induces αIIbβ3 to bind ligand and initiate platelet aggregation. The underlying mechanism is unclear, because previous mutagenesis studies suggested that PT25-2 binds to the αIIb β propeller, a site distant from the Arg-Gly-Asp-binding pocket. To elucidate the mechanism, we studied the αIIbβ3-PT25-2 Fab complex by negative-stain and cryo-electron microscopy (EM). We found that PT25-2 binding results in αIIbβ3 partially exposing multiple ligand-induced binding site epitopes and adopting extended conformations without swing-out of the β3 hybrid domain. The cryo-EM structure showed PT25-2 binding to the αIIb residues identified by mutagenesis but also to 2 additional regions. Overlay of the cryo-EM structure with the bent αIIbβ3 crystal structure showed that binding of PT25-2 creates clashes with the αIIb calf-1/calf-2 domains, suggesting that PT25-2 selectively binds to partially or fully extended receptor conformations and prevents a return to its bent conformation. Kinetic studies of the binding of PT25-2 compared with mAbs 10E5 and 7E3 support this hypothesis. We conclude that PT25-2 induces αIIbβ3 ligand binding by binding to extended conformations and by preventing the interactions between the αIIb and β3 leg domains and subsequently the βI and β3 leg domains required for the bent-closed conformation.

Visualization of integrin molecules by fluorescence imaging and techniques

Integrin molecules are transmembrane αβ heterodimers involved in cell adhesion, trafficking, and signaling. Upon activation, integrins undergo dynamic conformational changes that regulate their affinity to ligands. The physiological functions and activation mechanisms of integrins have been heavily discussed in previous studies and reviews, but the fluorescence imaging techniques -which are powerful tools for biological studies- have not. Here we review the fluorescence labeling methods, imaging techniques, as well as Förster resonance energy transfer assays used to study integrin expression, localization, activation, and functions.

An integrin αIIbβ3 intermediate affinity state mediates biomechanical platelet aggregation

Integrins are membrane receptors that mediate cell adhesion and mechanosensing. The structure-function relationship of integrins remains incompletely understood, despite the extensive studies carried out because of its importance to basic cell biology and translational medicine. Using a fluorescence dual biomembrane force probe, microfluidics and cone-and-plate rheometry, we applied precisely controlled mechanical stimulations to platelets and identified an intermediate state of integrin α_IIbβ₃ that is characterized by an ectodomain conformation, ligand affinity and bond lifetimes that are all intermediate between the well-known inactive and active states. This intermediate state is induced by ligand engagement of glycoprotein (GP) Ibα via a mechanosignalling pathway and potentiates the outside-in mechanosignalling of α_IIbβ₃ for further transition to the active state during integrin mechanical affinity maturation. Our work reveals distinct α_IIbβ₃ state transitions in response to biomechanical and biochemical stimuli, and identifies a role for the α_IIbβ₃ intermediate state in promoting biomechanical platelet aggregation.

Receptor-mediated cell mechanosensing

Mechanosensing depicts the ability of a cell to sense mechanical cues, which under some circumstances is mediated by the surface receptors. In this review, a four-step model is described for receptor-mediated mechanosensing. Platelet GPIb, T-cell receptor, and integrins are used as examples to illustrate the key concepts and players in this process.

Mechanosensing describes the ability of a cell to sense mechanical cues of its microenvironment, including not only all components of force, stress, and strain but also substrate rigidity, topology, and adhesiveness. This ability is crucial for the cell to respond to the surrounding mechanical cues and adapt to the changing environment. Examples of responses and adaptation include (de)activation, proliferation/apoptosis, and (de)differentiation. Receptor-mediated cell mechanosensing is a multistep process that is initiated by binding of cell surface receptors to their ligands on the extracellular matrix or the surface of adjacent cells. Mechanical cues are presented by the ligand and received by the receptor at the binding interface; but their transmission over space and time and their conversion into biochemical signals may involve other domains and additional molecules. In this review, a four-step model is described for the receptor-mediated cell mechanosensing process. Platelet glycoprotein Ib, T-cell receptor, and integrins are used as examples to illustrate the key concepts and players in this process.

αIIbβ3 binding to a fibrinogen fragment lacking the γ-chain dodecapeptide is activation dependent and EDTA inducible

Platelet integrin receptor αIIbβ3 supports platelet aggregation by binding fibrinogen. The interaction between the fibrinogen C-terminal γ-chain peptide composed of residues γ-404-411 (GAKQAGDV) and the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) binding pocket on αIIbβ3 is required for fibrinogen-mediated platelet aggregation, but data suggest that other ancillary binding sites on both fibrinogen and αIIbβ3 may lead to higher-affinity fibrinogen binding and clot retraction. To identify additional sites, we analyzed the ability of platelets and cells expressing normal and mutant αIIbβ3 to adhere to an immobilized fibrinogen plasmin fragment that lacks intact γ-404-411 ('D98'). We found the following: (1) Activated, but not unactivated, platelets adhere well to immobilized 'D98.' (2) Cells expressing constitutively active αIIbβ3 mutants, but not cells expressing normal αIIbβ3 or αVβ3, adhere well to 'D98.' (3) Monoclonal antibodies 10E5 and 7E3 inhibit the adhesion to 'D98' of activated platelets and cells expressing constitutively active αIIbβ3, as do small-molecule inhibitors that bind to the RGD pocket. (4) EDTA paradoxically induces normal αIIbβ3 to interact with 'D98.' Because molecular modeling and molecular dynamics simulations suggested that the αIIb L151-D159 helix may contribute to the interaction with 'D98,' we studied an αIIbβ3 mutant in which the αIIb 148-166 loop was swapped with the corresponding αV loop; it failed to bind to fibrinogen or 'D98.' Our data support a model in which conformational changes in αIIbβ3 and/or fibrinogen after platelet activation and the interaction between γ-404-411 and the RGD binding pocket make new ancillary sites available that support higher-affinity fibrinogen binding and clot retraction.

Molecular Basis of the Ligand Binding Specificity of αvβ8 Integrin

αvβ8 is an integrin that recognizes an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif and interacts with fibronectin, vitronectin, and latent TGF-β1. We comprehensively determined the binding activity of the αvβ8 integrin toward 25 secreted proteins having an RGD motif. The αvβ8 integrin strongly bound to latent TGF-β1 but showed marginal activity for other RGD-containing proteins, including fibronectin and vitronectin. Site-directed mutagenesis of latent TGF-β1 demonstrated that the high affinity binding of αvβ8 integrin to latent TGF-β1 was defined by Leu-218 immediately following the RGD motif within the latency-associated peptide of TGF-β1. Consistent with the critical role of Leu-218 in latent TGF-β1 recognition by αvβ8 integrin, a 9-mer synthetic peptide containing an RGDL sequence strongly inhibited interactions of latent TGF-β1 with αvβ8 integrin, whereas a 9-mer peptide with an RGDA sequence was ∼60-fold less inhibitory. Because αvβ3 integrin did not exhibit strong binding to latent TGF-β1 or distinguish between RGDL- and RGDA-containing peptides, we explored the mechanism by which the integrin β8 subunit defines the high affinity binding of latent TGF-β1 by αvβ8 integrin. Production of a series of swap mutants of integrin β8 and β3 subunits indicated that the high affinity binding of αvβ8 integrin with latent TGF-β1 was ensured by interactions between the Leu-218 residue and the β8 I-like domain, with the former serving as an auxiliary recognition residue defining the restricted ligand specificity of αvβ8 integrin toward latent TGF-β1. In support of this conclusion, high affinity binding toward the αvβ8 integrin was conferred on fibronectin by substitution of its RGDS motif with an RGDL sequence.

Inhibition of αIIbβ3 Ligand Binding by an αIIb Peptide that Clasps the Hybrid Domain to the βI Domain of β3

Agonist-stimulated platelet activation triggers conformational changes of integrin αIIbβ3, allowing fibrinogen binding and platelet aggregation. We have previously shown that an octapeptide, ^p1YMESRADR⁸, corresponding to amino acids 313–320 of the β-ribbon extending from the β-propeller domain of αIIb, acts as a potent inhibitor of platelet aggregation. Here we have performed in silico modelling analysis of the interaction of this peptide with αIIbβ3 in its bent and closed (not swing-out) conformation and show that the peptide is able to act as a substitute for the β-ribbon by forming a clasp restraining the β3 hybrid and βI domains in a closed conformation. The involvement of species-specific residues of the β3 hybrid domain (E356 and K384) and the β1 domain (E297) as well as an intrapeptide bond (^pE315-^pR317) were confirmed as important for this interaction by mutagenesis studies of αIIbβ3 expressed in CHO cells and native or substituted peptide inhibitory studies on platelet functions. Furthermore, NMR data corroborate the above results. Our findings provide insight into the important functional role of the αIIb β-ribbon in preventing integrin αIIbβ3 head piece opening, and highlight a potential new therapeutic approach to prevent integrin ligand binding.

Integrin function in vascular biology: a view from 2013

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review considers recent developments concerning the role of integrins in vascular biology with a specific emphasis on integrin activation, and the crosstalk between integrins and growth factor receptors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have shown leukocytes can mediate direct transfer of molecules into endothelial cells, how specific integrins can be used to transduce signaling events, in particular in vascular beds, and how endothelial cell integrins can be targeted with specific ligands for the delivery of therapeutics. Kindlin and talin are both essential for integrin activation based on in-vivo studies of mice and humans in which the genes encoding for these proteins have been inactivated. Recent studies have attempted to translate these in-vivo realities into in-vitro models with mixed results.

SUMMARY

Mechanisms and consequences of integrin-ligand interactions on blood and vascular cells remain a major topic of hematological research. Crucial to the ligand binding function of integrins are two intracellular binding partners, talin and kindlin. In seeking to define the molecular basis for 'integrin activation', a mechanism must be envisioned in which both proteins talin and kindlin are required to produce a productive functional response, be it platelet aggregation or leukocyte extravasation. On endothelial cells, integrins and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 influence the activation of one another by virtue of their direct physical interaction. It has been shown that this bidirectional communication is subject to regulation during angiogenesis.