Prognostic factors for return to work and work disability among colorectal cancer survivors; A systematic review

Protocol of a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PLACES intervention: a supported employment intervention aimed at enhancing work participation of unemployed and/or work-disabled cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Approximately onethird of cancer survivors encounter challenges reintegrating into the workforce, often experiencing involuntary unemployment and/or partial or full work disability following diagnosis and treatment. Returning to paid employment presents evident challenges due to uncertainties regarding work ability, perceived employer discrimination, and a lack of support, thereby risking social exclusion. However, interventions addressing return to paid employment among unemployed and/or work-disabled cancer survivors are scarce. Here, we describe the protocol of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), including a process and economic evaluation, evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the PLACES (unemPLoyed cAnCEr survivors Support) intervention aimed at supporting unemployed and/or work-disabled cancer survivors returning to paid employment.

METHODS

A two-armed RCT with a 12-month follow-up period will be conducted. Eligible participants: (1) are of working age (18-65 years), (2) are diagnosed with cancer between 6 months and 10 years ago, (3) are unemployed and/or partially or fully work-disabled, (4) have completed cancer treatment, and (5) are seeking paid employment and are motivated to initiate work immediately. Participants will primarily be identified through the Dutch Social Security Agency and the Netherlands Cancer Registry and recruited via healthcare professionals. Participants randomly allocated to the intervention group (n = 82) will receive the PLACES intervention: a tailored supported employment intervention based on the principles of Individual Placement and Support (IPS). This includes support in seeking, returning to, and maintaining paid employment. Participants allocated to the control group (n = 82) will receive care as usual. All participants will be asked to complete questionnaires, at baseline (T0), and after 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 (T3) months of follow-up. The primary outcome is paid employment [yes/no]. Secondary outcomes are time until paid employment, change in working hours, work ability, quality of (working) life, and self-efficacy regarding return to work. Additionally, process and economic evaluations will be conducted.

DISCUSSION

We hypothesize that the PLACES intervention will be effective in obtaining paid employment, enhancing work ability, and improving quality of life. In addition, we expect the intervention to be cost-effective. If proven effective and cost-effective, actions should be taken to implement the intervention in usual care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT06028048.

[Return to Work after Cancer - a Systematic Review of Predictors in Germany]

INTRODUCTION

More than one third of cancer survivors are of working age. Return to work (RTW) with and after cancer treatment is therefore an important issue for this group - but this is often accompanied with many challenges. The aim of this systematic review was to identify predictors of RTW after cancer from the literature specifically for Germany and to place these factors chronologically in the oncological course of treatment.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed using PubMed in June 2022. Included were all papers original published in German or English between 2000 and 2022 and referring to a German sample, regardless of study design.

RESULTS

From a total of 8,381 hits in the meta-database, 30 publications were finally considered in the synthesis of results. Higher age, lower education, lower socioeconomic status, higher disease stage, more progressive disease course, more severe side effects of treatment, (more severe) fatigue, higher psychological distress, worse health status, occupational status as a blue collar worker and manual labor, unemployment prior to diagnosis, more negative perceptions of the work(place) environment, and lower intention to work and lower work ability/ subjective prognosis of employability were associated with lower likelihood of RTW after cancer in the literature. Treatment type and use of rehabilitation were also found to be associated with RTW.

DISCUSSION

Sociodemographic, disease-related, psychosocial, and work-related predictors of RTW after cancer in Germany were identified. The results may help to develop targeted support measures that can be applied in specific phases of treatment. The comparability of the literature on predictors for RTW is limited due to a high heterogeneity in the operationalization of RTW and methodological approaches. There is need for further standardization in this area.

Predictors of return to work among postoperative patients with colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To describe the status of return to work and identify predictors of return to work among Chinese postoperative patients with colorectal cancer.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Conducted in two tertiary hospitals in China.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 210 postoperative patients with colorectal cancer were included in the study.

MAIN MEASURES

Two hundred and ten postoperative patients with colorectal cancer who were working at the time of their diagnosis were assessed with the Perceived Social Support Scale, the Return-To-Work Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, Cancer Fatigue Scale, and Social Impact Scale. Descriptive statistics, univariate logistic regression analysis, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used for data analysis in SPSS 26.0.

RESULTS

Around a third of participants (n = 74, 35.2%) returned to work after surgery. Multiple stepwise regression analysis indicated that more family income (odds ratio (OR) = 5.769, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.666-19.972), time span after surgery 5-10 months, and ≥10 months (OR = 3.546, 95% CI = 1.084-11.598; OR = 3.077, 95% CI = 1.074-8.818), with a stoma (OR = 0.221, 95% CI = 0.075-0.653), psychological distress (OR = 0.912, 95% CI = 0.843-0.987), cancer fatigue (OR = 0.924, 95% CI = 0.872-0.978), and stigma (OR = 0.928, 95% CI = 0.886-0.971) were significantly associated with return to work.

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of patients with colorectal cancer did not return to work within 1 year after diagnosis. Those with shorter postoperative time, lower family income, stoma, greater psychological stress, higher level of cancer fatigue, and more stigma may have a higher risk in delayed work resumption.

Disclosing the 'Big C': what does cancer survivorship signal to employers?

To study hiring discrimination against cancer survivors, we conduct a vignette experiment in which American and British professionals recruited via Prolific evaluate fictitious job candidates. Candidates differed by periods of non-employment in their career, including non-employment due to suffering from cancer. We study the effect of cancer experiences on professionals' hirability ratings, as well as its effect on underlying candidate perceptions, related to various potential forms of stigma identified in the literature. We find that employment opportunities are lower for candidates with a history of cancer, compared to candidates without such a gap. This penalty is particularly explained by perceptions that these candidates will have higher sick leave probabilities and create additional costs. However, relative to candidates with a comparable gap due to depression or personal reasons, former cancer patients are less stigmatised, with relatively favourable assessments of their emotional abilities, social abilities, motivation and positive impact on workplace culture.

Perioperative Rehabilitation in Collaboration with the Department of Occupational Medicine for Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Although the number of cancer survivors has increased, the role of physical therapy in return to work (RTW) for employed patients with cancer remains unclear.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient is a 50-year-old man diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma who worked as a liquefied petroleum gas station filler. He started perioperative rehabilitation and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for cholangiocarcinoma. He developed a postoperative pancreatic fistula, which improved with conservative treatment over 40 days. Although he achieved independence regarding day-to-day activities, his physical condition and workability worsened, as his skeletal muscle index decreased from 8.7 to 7.7, 6-min walk distance from 518 to 460 m, and work ability index (WAI) from 37 to 20 points. His physical therapist was concerned about his RTW and recommended that he receive RTW support from the Department of Occupational Medicine (DOM). The DOM employed a team approach for the RTW strategy, and the primary physician, occupational physician, and company collaborated to support the patient. After the outpatient treatment protocol and RTW support plans were formulated, the patient was discharged. The physical therapist reported declining physical performance and WAI at the DOM's multidisciplinary conference. After consulting with multiple professionals, the team recommended work resumption in stages: part-time for three months and full-time for four months after surgery while undergoing oral adjuvant chemotherapy. The WAI improved to 35 points after RTW.

CONCLUSION

This case report suggests that physical therapists are vital in providing continuous patient support, from perioperative rehabilitation to DOM intervention, to build physical strength for return to work.

Employment status in cancer patients the first five years after diagnosis-a register-based study

PURPOSE

Work is important for identity formation, social status, and economic independency. Although some evidence within the field of work and cancer survivorship exists, no study has so far investigated employment status across all cancer diagnoses. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of all cancer diagnoses on employment status.

METHODS

Danish cancer patients aged 20-60 years, diagnosed between 2000 and 2015, were identified through Danish registers and matched 1:5 with cancer-free controls. Logistic and linear regression was performed separately in 11 cancer types to assess and compare work status and work participation between cancer patients and cancer-free controls one, three, and five years after diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 111,770 cancer patients and 507,003 cancer-free controls were included. All cancer types had lower chances of working one year after diagnosis (ORs between 0.05 and 0.76), with lung, colorectal, upper gastrointestinal, and blood cancer patients having the lowest chances. After three years, 10 of 11 cancer types had lower chances (ORs between 0.39 and 0.84). After five years, there were minimal differences between cancer patients and controls among most cancer types (ORs between 0.75 and 1.36).

CONCLUSION

Most cancer patients had lower chances of working compared with the general population until five years after diagnosis. However, patients with certain cancer types experienced lower chances of working all years, despite improvement over time.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

The knowledge will help increase awareness on challenges regarding work-life after cancer. Furthermore, the distinguishing between diagnoses can inform to more targeted vocational rehabilitation.

Long-term prescribed drug use in stage I-III rectal cancer patients in Sweden, with a focus on bowel-regulating drugs after surgical and oncological treatment

PURPOSE

To describe long-term prescribed drug use after rectal cancer treatment.

METHODS

We identified 12,871 rectal cancer patients without distant metastasis between 2005 and 2016 and 64,341 matched population comparators using CRCBaSe (a Swedish nationwide register linkage of colorectal cancer patients). Mean defined daily doses (DDDs) of drug dispensing during relapse-free follow-up were calculated by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical drug categories. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from negative binomial regression were used to compare drug dispensing between patients and comparators.

RESULTS

The overall pattern of drug dispensing was similar among cancer survivors and comparators, although patients had higher mean DDDs of drugs regulating the digestive system. Excess dispensing of drugs for constipation (IRR, 3.35; 95% CI, 3.12-3.61), diarrhea (IRR, 6.43; 95% CI, 5.72-7.22), functional gastrointestinal disorders (IRR, 3.78; 95% CI, 3.15-4.54), and vitamin and mineral supplements (IRR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.24-1.50) was observed up to 10 years after surgery. Treatment with Hartmann's procedure was associated with higher dispensing rates of digestive drugs compared to surgery with anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection but the association was attributed to higher use of diabetic drugs. Additionally, excess digestive drug dispensing was associated with more advanced cancer stage but not with (chemo)radiotherapy treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Excess drug use after rectal cancer is primarily driven by bowel-regulating drugs and is not modified by surgical or oncological treatment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

The excess use of bowel-regulating drugs after rectal cancer indicated long-standing postsurgical gastrointestinal morbidity and need of prophylaxis. Reassuringly, no excess use of other drug classes was noted long term.

The unmet rehabilitation needs of colorectal cancer survivors after surgery: A qualitative meta-synthesis

AIM

To systematically review and synthesize the findings of qualitative research on the unmet rehabilitation needs of colorectal cancer survivors (CRC) after surgery.

DESIGN

A qualitative meta-synthesis registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022368837).

METHODS

CNKI, Wanfang Data, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Medline, PsychINFO and CINAHL were systematically searched for qualitative studies on the rehabilitation needs of CRC survivors after surgery from the inception of each database to September 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 917 relevant reports were initially collected and 14 studies were finally included. A total of 49 needs were extracted and divided into 15 categories in 6 integrated findings: (1) the need to adopt healthy eating habits; (2) the need for exercise motivation and exercise guidance; (3) the conflicting needs to return to work; (4) unaddressed physiological needs; (5) spiritual needs; (6) the need for multi-dimensional social support.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Not applicable.

Colon Cancer Survivorship in Patients Who Have Received Adjuvant Chemotherapy

The number of colon cancer survivors in the United States is increasing due to improved early detection, better treatments that extend survival, and the growing aging population who are at high risk for cancer. Following initial active treatment, colon cancer survivors experience a wide range of long-term physical, psychological, and socio-economic effects that impact their overall well-being. Healthcare providers caring for survivors need to prioritize not only monitoring for cancer recurrence but also optimizing their overall health through addressing these long-term effects; managing their comorbidities; promoting healthy behaviors (like exercise, nutrition, and weight loss); and screening for a second primary cancer depending on their risk. Personalized survivorship care plans should be formulated clearly outlining the roles of various healthcare providers involved in their care. Our review article focuses on these various aspects of colon cancer survivorship, including surveillance for cancer recurrence specific to those who received adjuvant chemotherapy with curative intent.

Employment Status of Patients With Colorectal Cancer After Surgery: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Because of improved survival rates, patients with colorectal cancer may try to return to work. Many countries, however, have limited knowledge of the employment status of these patients.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the employment status of patients with colorectal cancer after surgery in Japan and the risk factors affecting the same.

DESIGN

This is a prospective multicenter cohort study that used self-administered questionnaires. Patients were recruited from June 2019 to August 2020 and were followed up for 12 months after surgery.

SETTING

Six community hospitals and 1 university hospital in Japan.

PATIENTS

Patients with clinical stages I to III colorectal cancer, employed at the time of diagnosis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients who underwent surgical resection between June 2019 and August 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The time it takes patients to return to work after surgery and the proportion of working patients 12 months after surgery were collected using self-administered questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients were included in the analyses. The median time to return-to-work was 1.1 months, and the proportion of working patients at 12 months after surgery was 79%. Risk factors for delayed return-to-work after surgery were an advanced tumor stage, stoma, severe postoperative complications, shorter years of service at the workplace, and lower willingness to return-to-work. Risk factors for not working 12 months after surgery were stoma, lower willingness to return-to-work, nonregular employee status, lower income, national health insurance, and no private medical insurance.

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by its short-term follow-up and small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that Japanese patients with stages I to III colorectal cancer found favorable employment outcomes in the 12 months after surgery. These results may help health care providers better understand the employment status of patients with colorectal cancer and encourage them to consider returning to work after surgery.

SITUACIN LABORAL DE LOS PACIENTES CON CNCER COLORRECTAL DESPUS DE LA CIRUGA UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE PROSPECTIVO MULTICNTRICO EN JAPN

ANTECEDENTES:Debido a las mejores tasas de supervivencia, los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal pueden intentar volver al trabajo. Muchos países, sin embargo, tienen un conocimiento limitado de su situación laboral.OBJETIVO:Explorar la situación laboral de los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal después de la cirugía en Japón y los factores de riesgo que afectan a la misma.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio prospectivo de cohortes multicéntrico que utiliza cuestionarios autoadministrados. Los pacientes fueron reclutados desde junio de 2019 hasta agosto de 2020 y fueron seguidos durante 12 meses después de la cirugía.ENTORNO CLINICO:Seis hospitales comunitarios y un hospital universitario en Japón.PACIENTES:Pacientes con estadios clínicos I-III de cáncer colorrectal, trabajando en el momento del diagnóstico.INTERVENCIONES:Pacientes que recibieron resección quirúrgica desde junio de 2019 hasta agosto de 2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El tiempo que tardan los pacientes en volver al trabajo después de la cirugía y la proporción de pacientes que trabajan 12 meses después de la cirugía se recogieron mediante cuestionarios autoadministrados.RESULTADOS:Un total de 129 pacientes fueron incluidos en los análisis. La mediana de tiempo de reincorporación al trabajo fue de 1,1 meses y la proporción de pacientes que trabajaban a los 12 meses de la cirugía fue del 79%. Los factores de riesgo para el retraso en el regreso al trabajo después de la cirugía fueron un estadio avanzado del tumor, estoma, complicaciones postoperatorias graves, menos años de servicio en el lugar de trabajo y menor disposición para volver al trabajo. Los factores de riesgo para no trabajar 12 meses después de la cirugía fueron estoma, menor voluntad de volver al trabajo, condición de empleado no regular, ingresos más bajos, seguro nacional de salud y la falta de seguro médico privado.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio está limitado por su seguimiento a corto plazo y tamaño de muestra pequeño.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio reveló que los pacientes japoneses con cáncer colorrectal en estadios I-III obtuvieron resultados laborales favorables en los 12 meses posteriores a la cirugía. Estos resultados pueden ayudar a los proveedores de atención médica a comprender mejor la situación laboral de los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal y alentarlos a considerar regresar al trabajo después de la cirugía. (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Predicting work disability among people with chronic conditions: a prospective cohort study

Few risk prediction scores are available to identify people at increased risk of work disability, particularly for those with an existing morbidity. We examined the predictive performance of disability risk scores for employees with chronic disease. We used prospective data from 88,521 employed participants (mean age 43.1) in the Finnish Public Sector Study including people with chronic disorders: musculoskeletal disorder, depression, migraine, respiratory disease, hypertension, cancer, coronary heart disease, diabetes, comorbid depression and cardiometabolic disease. A total of 105 predictors were assessed at baseline. During a mean follow-up of 8.6 years, 6836 (7.7%) participants were granted a disability pension. C-statistics for the 8-item Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH) risk score, comprising age, self-rated health, number of sickness absences, socioeconomic position, number of chronic illnesses, sleep problems, BMI, and smoking at baseline, exceeded 0.72 for all disease groups and was 0.80 (95% CI 0.80-0.81) for participants with musculoskeletal disorders, 0.83 (0.82-0.84) for those with migraine, and 0.82 (0.81-0.83) for individuals with respiratory disease. Predictive performance was not significantly improved in models with re-estimated coefficients or a new set of predictors. These findings suggest that the 8-item FIOH work disability risk score may serve as a scalable screening tool in identifying individuals with increased risk for work disability.

Depression symptoms reducing return to work: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

Objectives. This study was conducted to estimate the risk of return to work for people who experience symptoms of depression based on the pool of prospective data. Methods. All online articles in PubMed and Scopus which were accessible before November 2019 were searched. The odds ratios of each of the studies were pooled together to obtain an overall odds ratio. The pool of studies was with random effects. The analysis was performed based on the depression symptoms scale, type of disease and duration of follow-up. Two other aspects were examined in the analysis, one being the bias in the publication of studies and the other being the level of heterogeneity that was examined. Results. Thirty-five studies were selected for the meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio indicates that the odds of return to work in people with depressive symptoms is 31% lower than in those without depressive symptoms. The funnel plot shows that there is asymmetry. The Egger test result was significant (p < 0.001) and there is publication bias. Conclusion. Depression symptoms after sick leave due to physical illness is a risk factor for not returning to work.

Unemployment Status Subsequent to Cancer Diagnosis and Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The purpose of our study is to examine whether cancer and treatments are associated with job loss or changes in employment status. Eight prospective studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, with a population aged 18-65 years, analyzing treatment regimen and psychophysical and social status in post-cancer follow-up of at least 2 years. In the meta-analysis, a comparison was made between recovered unemployed cases and cases from a standard reference population. Results are summarized graphically using a forest plot. We showed that cancer and subsequent treatment are risk factors for unemployment with an overall relative risk of 7.24 (lnRR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.32-2.63) or for change in employment status. Individuals undergoing chemotherapy and/or radiation treatment and those with brain and colorectal cancers are more likely to develop disabilities that negatively affect the risk of unemployment. Finally, variables such as low level education, female sex, older age, and being overweight before starting therapy are associated with higher risk of unemployment. In the future, it will be necessary for people with cancer to have access to specific health, social welfare, and employment support programs. In addition, it is desirable that they become more involved in their choice of therapeutic treatment.

Risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients: a meta- and network analysis

Understanding the most relevant hematological/biochemical characteristics, pre-existing health conditions and complications in survivors and non-survivor will aid in predicting COVID-19 patient mortality, as well as intensive care unit (ICU) referral and death. A literature review was conducted for COVID-19 mortality in PubMed, Scopus, and various preprint servers (bioRxiv, medRxiv and SSRN), with 97 observational studies and preprints, consisting of survivor and non-survivor sub-populations. This meta/network analysis comprised 19,014 COVID-19 patients, consisting of 14,359 survivors and 4655 non-survivors. Meta and network analyses were performed using META-MAR V2.7.0 and PAST software. The study revealed that non-survivors of COVID-19 had elevated levels of gamma-glutamyl transferase and creatinine, as well as a higher number of neutrophils. Non-survivors had fewer lymphocytes and platelets, as well as lower hemoglobin and albumin concentrations. Age, hypertension, and cerebrovascular disease were shown to be the most influential risk factors among non-survivors. The most common complication among non-survivors was heart failure, followed by septic shock and respiratory failure. Platelet counts, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin, and blood urea nitrogen levels were all linked to ICU admission. Hemoglobin levels preferred non-ICU patients. Lower levels of hemoglobin, lymphocytes, and albumin were associated with increased mortality in ICU patients. This meta-analysis showed that inexpensive and fast biochemical and hematological tests, as well as pre-existing conditions and complications, can be used to estimate the risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients.

The Effect of Macular Hole Duration on Surgical Outcomes: An Individual Participant Data Study of Randomized Controlled Trials

TOPIC

To define the effect of symptom duration on outcomes in people undergoing surgery for idiopathic full-thickness macular holes (iFTMHs) by means of an individual participant data (IPD) study of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The outcomes assessed were primary iFTMH closure and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Idiopathic full-thickness macular holes are visually disabling with a prevalence of up to 0.5%. Untreated BCVA is typically reduced to 20/200. Surgery can close holes and improve vision. Symptom duration is thought to affect outcomes with surgery, but the effect is unclear.

METHODS

A systematic review identified eligible RCTs that included adults with iFTMH undergoing vitrectomy with gas tamponade in which symptom duration, primary iFTMH closure, and postoperative BCVA were recorded. Bibliographic databases were searched for articles published between 2000 and 2020. Individual participant data were requested from eligible studies.

RESULTS

Twenty eligible RCTs were identified. Data were requested from all studies and obtained from 12, representing 940 eyes in total. Median symptom duration was 6 months (interquartile range, 3-10). Primary closure was achieved in 81.5% of eyes. There was a linear relationship between predicted probability of closure and symptom duration. Multilevel logistic regression showed each additional month of duration was associated with 0.965 times lower odds of closure (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.935-0.996, P = 0.026). Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, ILM flap use, better preoperative BCVA, face-down positioning, and smaller iFTMH size were associated with increased odds of primary closure. Median postoperative BCVA in eyes achieving primary closure was 0.48 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (20/60). Multilevel logistic regression showed for eyes achieving primary iFTMH closure, each additional month of symptom duration was associated with worsening BCVA by 0.008 logMAR units (95% CI, 0.005-0.011, P < 0.001) (i.e., ∼1 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter loss per 2 months). ILM flaps, intraocular tamponade using long-acting gas, better preoperative BCVA, smaller iFTMH size, and phakic status were also associated with improved postoperative BCVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptom duration was independently associated with both anatomic and visual outcomes in persons undergoing surgery for iFTMH. Time to surgery should be minimized and care pathways designed to enable this.

Work Ability in Patients With Stage I to IV Colon Cancer: Results of the Dutch Prospective Colorectal Cancer Cohort

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer affects a patient's ability to work. Many patients who have colon cancer are employed at the time of diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated work ability during the first 2 years after colon cancer diagnosis.

DESIGN

This study is a national prospective study, the Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort, including clinical data and patient-reported outcomes.

SETTINGS

Data were collected in 59 medical centers in the Netherlands.

PATIENTS

Patients <67 years of age with stage I to IV colon cancer and who completed Work Ability Index questionnaires were selected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Work ability was assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The Work Ability Index (range, 0 to 49) was evaluated using linear mixed models. Outcomes were matched to population controls without cancer.

RESULTS

Of 390 patients, 84% had paid employment. Work ability of patients with stage I to IV colon cancer was significantly lower at the time of diagnosis than in matched population controls (31 ± 8.2 and 41 ± 5.6). Patients with stage I to III disease receiving surgery only regained Work Ability Index scores comparable to matched population controls at 18 months. Patients receiving adjuvant systemic treatment initially demonstrated a decrease in work ability with improvements from 6 months onward and normalization at 24 months. Patients with stage IV disease did not demonstrate improvements in work ability outcomes over time. Work ability scores were negatively influenced by the administration of systemic treatment and ≥1 comorbidities.

LIMITATIONS

Only patients with patient-reported outcomes and work at baseline were included in this analysis. Also, questionnaire response rates decreased over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Work ability in patients with colon cancer is decreased for a prolonged time. Recovery depends on disease stage, type of treatment, and comorbidities. Patients with stage I to III disease treated with curative surgery alone were the first to regain work ability, followed by patients who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with stage IV disease did not regain work ability. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B759 .

CAPACIDAD LABORAL EN PACIENTES CON CNCER DE COLON EN ESTADIO IIV RESULTADOS PROSPECTIVOS DE CNCER COLORECTAL EN UNA COHORTE HOLANDESA

ANTECEDENTES:El cáncer de colon afecta la capacidad de trabajo en un paciente. Muchos pacientes con cáncer de colon están empleados en el momento del diagnóstico.OBJETIVO:Evaluamos la capacidad laboral durante los dos primeros años posteriores al diagnóstico de cáncer de colon.DISEÑO:Es un estudio prospectivo nacional, la cohorte de cáncer colorrectal holandés, incluye datos clínicos y resultados informados por los pacientes.ENTORNO CLINICO:Se recopilaron datos de 59 centros médicos en los Países Bajos.PACIENTES:Se seleccionaron pacientes < 67 años, con cáncer de colon en estadio I-IV, que completaron los cuestionarios de índice de capacidad para el trabajo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:La capacidad para el trabajo se evaluó al inicio, a los 3, 6, 12, 18 y 24 meses. El índice de capacidad para el trabajo (que va de 0 a 49) se evaluó mediante modelos lineales mixtos. Los resultados fueron comparados con el grupo control sin cáncer.RESULTADOS:De 390 pacientes, el 84% tenía un empleo remunerado. La capacidad de trabajo de los pacientes en estadio I-IV fue significativamente menor en el momento del diagnóstico en comparación con el grupo control (31 ± 8,2 y 41 ± 5,6, respectivamente). Los pacientes con enfermedad en estadio I-III que recibieron cirugía lograron recuperar puntajes del índice de capacidad laboral comparables a los controles a los 18 meses. Los pacientes que recibieron tratamiento sistémico adyuvante inicialmente demostraron una disminución en la capacidad de trabajo con mejoras a partir de los 6 meses en adelante y una normalización a los 24 meses. Los pacientes en estadio IV no demostraron mejoras en los resultados de la capacidad laboral a lo largo del tiempo. Las puntuaciones de capacidad para el trabajo se vieron influidas negativamente por la administración del tratamiento sistémico y la existencia de ≥1 comorbilidades.LIMITACIONES:En este análisis solo se incluyeron los pacientes con resultados y trabajo desde el inicio del estudio. Además, las tasas de respuesta al cuestionario disminuyeron con el tiempo.CONCLUSIONES:La capacidad de trabajo en pacientes con cáncer de colon se reduce durante un tiempo prolongado. La recuperación depende del estadio de la enfermedad, el tipo de tratamiento y la comorbilidad. Los pacientes con enfermedad en estadio I-III tratados con cirugía curativa exclusivamente, son los primeros en recuperar la capacidad para trabajar, seguidos de los pacientes que reciben quimioterapia adyuvante. Los pacientes con enfermedad en estadio IV no recuperan la capacidad para trabajar. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B759 . (Traducción- Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Cancer survivors and adverse work outcomes: associated factors and supportive interventions

INTRODUCTION

The number of cancer survivors in a working age is rising. An awareness of factors associated with adverse work outcomes, and of supportive interventions, is needed.

SOURCES OF DATA

A narrative review of research obtained via several databases, including Medline and PsycINFO, was conducted.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

A range of factors is associated with adverse work outcomes such as prolonged sick leave, delayed return to work, disability pension and unemployment in cancer survivors. They include the cancer type and treatment, fatigue, cognitive functioning, work factors and elements of health care systems. Effective supportive interventions encompass physical and multicomponent interventions.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

The role of behaviour determinants and legislative and insurance systems is unclear. It is furthermore uncertain what the optimal timing of delivering supportive interventions is.

GROWING POINTS

Further focus on vulnerable groups, including specific cancer types and those with lower income, lower educational level and in precarious employment, is needed.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Recent developments are tailored and timely interventions.

Establishment of a nurse-led clinic for late complications after colorectal and anal cancer surgery: a descriptive study

Purpose

Survival rates after colorectal and anal cancer are increasing and more patients have late complications to treatment. This represents a clinical field under development, and we have established a specialized clinic for late complications after colorectal and anal cancer. With this paper, we want to give our experiences and present the organizational setup with a nurse as the primary contact person.

Methods

We have established a multidisciplinary clinic for the treatment of late complications and the clinic is organized with specialized nurses as the front persons. The structure includes a stepwise increase in expertise level when needed, and the patient has one common entry regardless of symptoms. Initial screening is performed by an electronic questionnaire which is followed up by a consultation with the nurse. The nurse can provide primary treatment according to local algorithms developed in the clinic and refer the patient to more specialized care if needed.

Results

Experiences from the first year of service show that more than half of the patients needs this and wants consultation in the late complication clinic. We also found that most of the consultations were performed successfully by phone instead of by physical visits, and the most common clinical problem was bowel symptoms including diarrhea and urge.

Conclusion

We have established a nurse-led clinic for late complications after colorectal and anal cancer. There seems to be a high need for this function in a department taking care of colorectal and anal cancer.

Labor Market Attachment 2 Years After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Population-based Study

Objectives

To investigate the association between clinical/sociodemographic factors and labor market attachment, and to estimate employment probability 2 years after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.

Background

A rising prevalence of younger CRC survivors commands a stronger focus on labor market attachment. The association between clinical factors like type of surgery and CRC survivors' labor market attachment remains poorly investigated.

Methods

National registries provided information on employment status and clinical/sociodemographic variables for all 20- to 60-year-old CRC patients without previous cancer diagnosed in Denmark from 2001 to 2014, undergoing surgery and being attached to the labor market. Associations between clinical/sociodemographic factors and labor market attachment were investigated in multiple logistic regression analyses.

Results

A total of 5755 CRC patients were included. Two years after surgery, 59.7% were working. Factors significantly associated with a higher probability of working were being in the 46 to 50 years age group, male gender, higher educational level, no comorbidity, working at the time of diagnosis, lower Union for International Cancer Control stage, and undergoing surgery in the most recent of four time-periods. Two years after undergoing surgery, the probability of working was significantly higher for left-sided than for right-sided colon resections, higher for low anterior resection (LAR)/high tumor than for LAR/low tumor, and higher for abdominoperineal resection than for Hartmann's procedure. Of the 4798 (86.8%) patients alive 2 years after surgery, 68.8% were working, 7.8% had retired, whereas 23.4% were on temporary benefits, sick leave, or disability pension.

Conclusions

Clinical/sociodemographic factors were associated with the probability of working 2 years after surgery. This knowledge can be used to inform patients and target interventions towards patients with low post-CRC probability of working.

Returning to work after a sickness absence due to cancer: a cohort study of salaried workers in Catalonia (Spain)

Cancer incidence and survival rates have increased in the last decades and as a result, the number of working age people diagnosed with cancer who return to work. In this study the probability of accumulating days of employment and employment participation trajectories (EPTs) in a sample of salaried workers in Catalonia (Spain) who had a sickness absence (SA) due to cancer were compared to salaried workers with SA due to other diagnoses or without SA. Each individual with SA due to cancer between 2012 and 2015 was matched by age, sex, and onset of time at risk to a worker with SA due to other diagnoses and another worker without SA. Accumulated days of employment were measured, and negative binomial models were applied to assess differences between comparison groups. Latent class models were applied to identify EPTs and multinomial regression models to analyse the probability of belonging to one EPT of each group. Men and women without SA or with SA due to other diagnoses had at least a 9% higher probability of continuing in employment compared to workers who had a SA due to cancer, especially among men without SA (adjusted IRR 1.27, 95% CI 1.06‒1.53). Men without SA had the highest probability of having high stable EPT compared to workers who had a SA due to cancer (adjusted RRR 3.21, 95% CI 1.87‒5.50). Even though workers with SA due to cancer continue working afterwards, they do it less often than matched controls and with a less stable employment trajectory. Health and social protection systems should guaranty cancer survivors the opportunity to continue voluntary participation in the labour market.

Prognostic Factors in Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative (HR+/HER2-) Advanced Breast Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review

PURPOSE

Advanced breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with several well-defined subtypes, among which, hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) is most prevalent. Determination of HR and HER2 status influences prognosis and, thus, disease management. Although literature on these prognostic factors exist, especially in the early breast cancer setting, it remains unclear to what extent these factors can guide clinical decision-making in the advanced disease setting. Therefore, we sought to identify the strength and consistency of evidence for prognostic factors in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR) of the major electronic databases was conducted in November 2018 for primary research studies published since 2010. Endpoints of interest were tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS).

RESULTS

Seventy-nine studies were included wherein all patients were diagnosed with advanced breast cancer and ≥50% of the population were HR+/HER2-. OS was the most commonly assessed endpoint (n=67) followed by PFS (n=33), BCSS (n=5) and tumor response (n=3). The prognostic factors with strongest evidence of association with worse OS were negative progesterone receptor status, higher tumor grade, higher circulating tumor cell (CTC) count and higher Ki67 level, number of metastatic sites (eg multiple vs single) and sites of metastases (eg presence of liver metastases vs absence), shorter time to recurrence or progression to advanced breast cancer, poor performance status, prior therapy attributes in the early or metastatic setting (type of therapy, treatment line, response of prior therapy), and race (black vs white). The prognostic factors that had strongest evidence of association with PFS included CTC count, number and sites of metastases, and absence of prior therapy or higher lines of therapy in the early or metastatic setting. The directionality of association was consistent for all prognostic factors except between lymph node and OS, and de novo metastatic breast cancer and PFS.

CONCLUSION

Multiple disease, treatment, and patient-related prognostic factors impact survival, particularly OS, in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. Treatment outcomes can vary considerably due to these factors. Understanding poorer prognostic factors for patients can result in improved clinical decision-making.

The feasibility of implementing an enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration

BACKGROUND

Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a complex operative procedure, reserved for patients with locally advanced and recurrent pelvic malignancies. PE is associated with a high index of post-operative morbidity. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programmes have been successful in improving postoperative outcomes, however, its application in PE has not been studied. The aim of our study is to assess the feasibility and short-term impact of ERAS on PE.

METHODS

A dedicated PE ERAS programme was developed reflecting the complexity of differing subtypes of PE. A prospective cohort study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of implementing our PE ERAS between 2016 and 2020. The primary endpoint of this study was overall compliance with the ERAS programme.

RESULTS

145 patients were enrolled into our PE ERAS programme, with 86 (56.2%) patients undergoing a soft tissue PE, 27 (17.6%) a vascular PE and 32 (20.9%) a bony PE. The median overall compliance to the PE ERAS programme was 70% (IQR 55.5-88.8). There were no observed differences between overall compliance to the PE ERAS programme between different subtypes of PE (p = 0.60). Patients with higher compliance with the PE ERAS programme had a shorter LoS (p < 0.001), less post-operative morbidity (p < 0.001), reduced severity of Clavien-Dindo grade of morbidity (p < 0.001) and fewer readmissions (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The principles of ERAS can be readily applied to patients undergoing PE, with high adherence to the ERAS programme associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Loss of Paid Employment up to 4 Years after Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis-A Nationwide Register-Based Study with a Population-Based Reference Group

Simple Summary

Previous research indicated that cancer survivors have a higher risk of loss of paid employment. This is unfortunate as work is important for cancer survivors because it contributes to financial independency and quality of life. Not much work has been done on patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer while it is one of the most common cancers in the working population. We compared a group of 12,007 colorectal cancer survivors up to four years after diagnosis with the general population. We found that colorectal cancer survivors had a 56% higher risk of loss of paid employment, mainly due to work disability. Within the group of colorectal cancer survivors, those being younger, having a higher cancer stage and receiving radiotherapy, had a higher risk of loss of paid employment. Colorectal cancer survivors at high risk of loss of paid employment may benefit from work support interventions as part of cancer survivorship care.

Abstract

Cancer survivors consider work as a key aspect of cancer survivorship while previous research indicated that cancer survivors have a higher risk of unemployment. The objectives were to assess: (1) whether colorectal cancer survivors less often have paid employment at diagnosis compared to a population-based reference group, (2) whether colorectal cancer survivors with paid work have a higher risk of loss of employment up to 4 years after diagnosis compared to a population-based reference group and (3) which colorectal cancer survivors are at highest risk of loss of paid employment. In a nationwide register-based study, persons diagnosed with colorectal cancer (N = 12,007) as registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry, were compared on loss of paid employment with a sex and age-matched population-based reference group (N = 48,028) from Statistics Netherlands. Cox regression analyses were conducted. Colorectal cancer survivors had a higher risk of loss of paid employment (HR 1.56 [1.42, 1.71]). Within the group of colorectal cancer survivors, risk of loss of paid employment was lower for older survivors (>60 vs. 45–55) (HR 0.64 [0.51, 0.81]) and higher for those with a more advanced cancer stage (IV vs. I) (HR 1.89 [1.33, 2.70]) and those receiving radiotherapy (HR 1.37 [1.15, 1.63]). Colorectal cancer survivors at high risk of loss of paid employment may benefit from work support interventions as part of cancer survivorship.

Risk factors for return to work in colorectal cancer survivors

Background: The increasing incidence of colorectal cancer among individuals in the productive age‐group has adversely affected the labor force and increased healthcare expenses in recent years. Return to work (RTW) is an important issue for these patients. In this study, we explored the factors that influence RTW and investigated the influence of RTW on survival outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods: Data of individuals (N = 4408) in active employment who were diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 2004 and 2010 were derived from 2 nationwide databases. Subjects were categorized into 2 groups according to their employment status at 5‐year follow‐up. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with RTW. Survivors were further followed up for another 8 years. Propensity score matching was applied to ensure comparability between the two groups, and survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results: In multivariable regression analysis for 5‐year RTW with different characteristics, older age (OR: 0.57 [95% CI, 0.48–0.69]; p < 0.001), treatment with radiotherapy (OR: 0.69 [95% CI, 0.57–0.83]; p < 0.001), higher income (OR: 0.39 [95% CI, 0.32–0.47]; p < 0.001), medium company size (OR: 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63–0.97]; p = 0.022), and advanced pathological staging (stage I, OR: 16.20 [95% CI, 12.48–21.03]; stage II, OR: 13.12 [95% CI, 10.43–16.50]; stage III, OR: 7.68 [95% CI, 6.17–9.56]; p < 0.001 for all) revealed negative correlations with RTW. In Cox proportional hazard regression for RTW and all‐cause mortality, HR was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.80–1.54; p = 0.543) in fully adjusted model.

Conclusion: Older age, treatment with radiotherapy, higher income, medium company size, and advanced pathological stage showed negative correlations with RTW. However, we observed no significant association between employment and all‐cause mortality. Further studies should include participants from different countries, ethnic groups, and patients with other cancers.

Health-Related Quality of Life among Cancer Survivors Depending on the Occupational Status

The study aimed to identify and compare the factors affecting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) depending on the occupational status of cancer survivors. This study was a secondary data analysis from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) from 2014 to 2018. Hierarchical multivariate linear regression was used to investigate the factors affecting the HRQoL of each group. Non-working cancer survivors had significantly lower HRQoL than working cancer survivors (p < 0.001). A hierarchical multiple regression model showed that demographic, health-related, and psychological characteristics explained 62.0% of non-working cancer survivors' HRQoL (F = 4.29, p < 0.001). Among the input variables, health-related characteristics were the most influential factors (ΔR² = 0.274, F = 9.84, p < 0.001). For working cancer survivors, health-related characteristics were the only variable that was statistically associated with HRQoL (F = 5.556, p < 0.001). It is important to enhance physical activities and manage the chronic disease to improve the HRQoL of working cancer survivors. Further, managing health-related characteristics, including depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation, is necessary for non-working cancer survivors. Regarding working survivors, psychological factors such as depressive symptoms and suicidal tendencies did not affect HRQoL. Therefore, an early and effective return to work program should be developed for the improvement of their HRQoL.

Differences in work participation between incident colon and rectal cancer patients-a 10-year follow-up study with matched controls

PURPOSE

Work-related issues have become increasingly relevant for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, since the cancer is detected at an earlier age due to screening. The aim was to evaluate work participation up to 10 years after colon or rectal cancer diagnosis compared between diagnosis and to a matched cancer-free population.

METHODS

In this national register-based cohort study, all first-time CRC patients in the period 2000-2015 with no previous cancer, between 20 and 60 years, were identified in the Danish Cancer Registry. A control group with no previous cancer was matched on gender, age, education, and income. For each year a mean Work Participation Score (WPS) was calculated (a percentage of weeks working) for individuals part of the labour market.

RESULTS

A total of 5625 colon cancer patients and 3856 rectal cancer patients and 25,341 and 17,256 matched controls were included in the study, respectively. The WPS increased for colon cancer patients from 45.69% after 1 year to 83.94% after 4 years, while rectal cancer patients had a score of 38.07% after 1 year and 80.07% after 4 years. The WPS was lower for cancer patients compared with controls, but the difference decreased after 4 years.

CONCLUSION

CRC patients had a lower work participation up to 10 years after diagnosis compared with controls, while rectal cancer patients had a lower participation the first 7 years after diagnosis compared with colon cancer patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Work-related issues should be considered in the early stage of rehabilitation to increase work participation and thereby improve quality of life.

Overall and diagnosis-specific sickness absence and disability pension in colorectal cancer survivors and references in Sweden

Purpose

To longitudinally investigate overall and diagnosis-specific sickness absence (SA) and disability pension (DP) in colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors and references and to identify potential risk factors.

Methods

This longitudinal register-based cohort study included all patients living in Sweden, diagnosed with a first primary CRC in 2008–2011 when aged 18–62 (n=6679), and their matched references (n=26 716). Net days of SA (in SA spells >14 days) and DP were analyzed from 2 years before through 5 years after diagnosis, overall and by specific diagnoses. Among survivors, risk factors for future SADP were explored using logistic regression.

Results

In survivors, SA peaked in year 1 postdiagnosis, with 62.5% having at least some SA, and then gradually decreased to 20.1% in year 5. In the 2 years after diagnosis, CRC was the most common SA diagnosis in survivors, while SA due to mental diagnoses remained similar to the references. Notable risk factors for postdiagnostic SA or DP were rectal cancer diagnosis, advanced cancer stage at diagnosis, lower educational level, born outside of Sweden, and pre-diagnostic SA, mental morbidity, and comorbidities.

Conclusion

During 5 years after a CRC diagnosis, CRC survivors had higher levels of postdiagnostic SA and DP than the references, which was mostly due to CRC diagnoses. Although their SA lowered gradually, it did not return to pre-diagnostic levels.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Our results provide valuable information for patients with CRC diagnosis, especially that most have none or low levels of SA/DP after a few years.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11764-021-01017-7.

Trajectories of sickness absence and disability pension before and after colorectal cancer: A Swedish longitudinal population-based matched cohort study

Objectives

Working-aged colorectal cancer (CRC) patients have a much better survival, indicating the importance of their future work situation. We investigated trajectories of sickness absence and disability pension (SADP) days before and after CRC diagnosis, and risk factors associated with different trajectories.

Methods

A longitudinal, population-based matched cohort study of 4735 CRC survivors in Sweden aged 19–62 when first diagnosed with CRC in 2008–2011, and 18,230 matched references was conducted, using microdata linked from several nationwide registers. The annual SADP net days for 2 years before through 5 years after diagnosis date were computed. A group-based trajectory model was used to depict SADP trajectories. Associations between trajectory membership, and sociodemographic and clinical variables were tested by chi² test and multinomial logistic regression.

Results

Four trajectories of SADP days/year for CRC survivors were identified: “only increase around diagnosis” (52% of all), “slight increase after diagnosis” (27%), “high then decrease moderately after diagnosis” (13%), and “constantly very high” (8%). Educational level, Charlson’s Comorbidity Index, and prediagnostic mental disorders were the strongest factors determining the SADP trajectory groups. In references, three trajectories (“constantly low” (80% of all), “constantly moderate and decrease gradually” (12%), and “very high then decrease overtime” (8%)) were identified.

Conclusion

Approximately 80% of CRC survivors return to a low level of SADP at 5 years postdiagnosis. Prediagnostic status of mental disorders, somatic comorbidity, and low educational level are good indicators of future high SADP levels for them. CRC survivors will benefit from early rehabilitation programs with identified risk factors.

The Predictive Value of Return to Work Self-efficacy for Return to Work Among Employees with Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy

Purpose The aim of the present study was to examine the predictive value of Return to Work Self-efficacy (RTWSE) on Return to Work (RTW) among employees undergoing chemotherapy for cancer and to examine the relative contribution of RTWSE as predictor variable compared to personal, health-related, illness- and treatment-related and work-related factors. Methods A sample of 114 sickness absent employees with various cancers (age 18-62) included in the study on average 33 days after initiating chemotherapy were followed for 15 months. Data sources included patient questionnaires (RTWSE, depression, fatigue, performance status), sociodemographic factors (age, sex, job type, and perceived support from the workplace), patient records (type of cancer, treatment intention, number of treatment modalities, time since diagnosis and time since initiation of chemotherapy), and Danish national registries (RTW and education). Associations between RTWSE at baseline and weeks until full RTW during 15-months follow-up were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results In the univariate analysis, high RTWSE was associated with shorter time to RTW (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-3.03). In the multivariate model, RTWSE failed to reach statistical significance (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.62-2.02), whereas female sex (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.60) and receiving palliative treatment (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.44) were significantly associated with later RTW. Conclusion Compared to other factors of significance, RTWSE was not the strongest predictor of RTW when examined among employees undergoing chemotherapy for cancer. Before using the RTWSE questionnaire to identify employees with cancer at risk of late RTW, it is important to recognize that the predictive value of RTWSE may be different for employees on sick leave due to cancer than for other sickness absence populations.

[Long-term occupational situation after cancer: A French registry-based study]

INTRODUCTION

Few studies have explored the long-term occupational situation after cancer. The aim of our study were to study the employment status among long-term cancer survivors and to compare it to cancer-free controls from the general population at 5, 10 or 15 years after cancer diagnosis.

METHODS

From data of a registry-based study, long-term survivors from breast,cervical and colorectal cancer, randomly selected from three tumor registries in France, were compared to cancer-free controls randomly selected from electoral lists. We selected active cancer survivors and cancer-free controls aged less than 60 at the time of the survey. We have studied the employment status of cases vs. controls and the factors associated with employment status.

RESULTS

At 5, 10 or 15 years after diagnosis, we did not observe any significant difference in employment status between cases and controls. Among cases, 17% had lost their jobs. Older age, lower incomes, lower education, a short-term employment contract, the presence of co-morbidities, fatigue and a worse quality of life were associated with job loss.

DISCUSSION

Although the employment status of the cases was comparable to that of the controls, efforts should be intensified to make it easier for patients diagnosed with cancer to return to work.

Patient-Reported Work Ability During the First Two Years After Rectal Cancer Diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Rectal cancer treatment is associated with substantial short- and longer-term morbidity that may affect patients' ability to work.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated patient-reported work ability during the first 2 years after rectal cancer diagnosis, relative to the Dutch general population. Also, we assessed the association between clinical factors and work ability.

DESIGN

This is a prospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at the Radiation-Oncology Department of a tertiary center.

PATIENTS

Patients with rectal cancer, <67 years of age, and treated with curative intent were selected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Work ability was assessed with the Work Ability Index before the start of treatment (baseline) and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after. The Work Ability Index scores of patients with paid employment were compared with the scores of matched population controls. Mixed models were used to estimate the impact of clinical factors on work ability.

RESULTS

Of the 230 eligible patients, 172 (75%) had paid employment. Work ability decreased at 3 and 6 months compared with baseline. At 12 months, work ability recovered to baseline level but remained significantly lower than in population controls up to 24 months. Fifty-four percent reported 100 to 365 days of sick leave during the first 12 months of treatment versus 2% in the general population. At 24 months, 32% needed substantial adaptations in work activities, worked reduced hours, or were unable to work due to the disease versus 6% in the general population. Female sex, multiple comorbidities, oligometastatic disease, chemoradiation, and abdominoperineal resection were associated with lower work ability.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by a decrease in questionnaire response rate from 83% to 64% over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-reported work ability deteriorates during rectal cancer treatment. Within 24 months after diagnosis, work ability returns to pretreatment level but remains lower than that of the general population. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B175. CAPACIDAD DE TRABAJO REPORTADO POR PACIENTES DURANTE LOS PRIMEROS DOS AÑOS DESPUÉS DEL DIAGNÓSTICO DE CÁNCER RECTAL: El tratamiento del cáncer rectal se asocia con una morbilidad significante a corto y largo plazo que puede afectar la capacidad de trabajo de pacientes.Evaluamos la capacidad de trabajo reportado por pacientes durante los primeros dos años después del diagnóstico de cáncer rectal, en relación con la población general holandesa. Además, evaluamos la asociación entre los factores clínicos y capacidad para trabajar.Estudio de cohorte prospectivo.Este estudio se realizó en el Departamento de Radiación Oncológica de en un centro de referencia de tercer nivel.Se seleccionaron pacientes con cáncer rectal, <67 años de edad, y tratados con intención curativa.La capacidad de trabajo se evaluó con el índice de capacidad de trabajo antes del inicio del tratamiento (línea de base) y a los 3, 6, 12, 18 y 24 meses después. Los puntajes de capacidad laboral de los pacientes con empleo remunerado se compararon con los puntajes de los controles de población pareados. Se utilizaron modelos mixtos para estimar el impacto de los factores clínicos en la capacidad laboral.De los 230 pacientes elegibles, 172 (75%) tenían empleo remunerado. La capacidad de trabajo disminuyó a los 3 y 6 meses en comparación con la línea de base. A los 12 meses, la capacidad de trabajo se recuperó al nivel de referencia, pero se mantuvo significativamente más baja que en los controles de la población hasta 24 meses. Durante los primeros 12 meses, el 54% reportó 100-365 días de baja por enfermedad versus el 2% en la población general. A los 24 meses, el 32% necesitaba adaptaciones sustanciales en las actividades laborales, trabajó horas reducidas o no pudo trabajar debido a la enfermedad frente al 6% en la población general. El sexo femenino, las comorbilidades múltiples, la enfermedad oligometastásica, la quimiorradiación y la resección abdominoperineal se asociaron con una menor capacidad de trabajo.El estudio estuvo limitado por una disminución en la tasa de respuesta al cuestionario del 83% al 64% a lo largo plazo.La capacidad laboral informada por el paciente se deteriora durante el tratamiento del cáncer rectal. Dentro de los 24 meses posteriores al diagnóstico, la capacidad laboral vuelve al nivel de pretratamiento, pero sigue siendo inferior a la de la población general. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B175. (Traducción-Dr. Adrian Ortega).

Long-term work retention after treatment for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Almost half of people diagnosed with cancer are working age. Survivors have increased risk of unemployment, but little is known about long-term work retention. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed work retention and associated factors in long-term cancer survivors.

METHODS

We searched Medline/Pubmed, Embase, PsychINFO, and CINAHL for studies published 01/01/2000-08/01/2019 reporting work retention in adult cancer survivors ≥ 2 years post-diagnosis. Survivors had to be in paid work at diagnosis. Pooled prevalence of long-term work retention was estimated. Factors associated with work retention from multivariate analysis were synthesized.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine articles, reporting 21 studies/datasets including 14,207 cancer survivors, were eligible. Work retention was assessed 2-14 years post-diagnosis. Fourteen studies were cross-sectional, five were prospective, and two contained both cross-sectional and prospective elements. No studies were scored as high quality. The pooled estimate of prevalence of long-term work retention in cancer survivors working at diagnosis was 0.73 (95%CI 0.69-0.77). The proportion working at 2-2.9 years was 0.72; at 3-3.9 years 0.80; at 4-4.9 years 0.75; at 5-5.9 years 0.74; and 6+ years 0.65. Pooled estimates did not differ by cancer site, geographical area, or study design. Seven studies assessed prognostic factors for work retention: older age, receiving chemotherapy, negative health outcomes, and lack of work adjustments were associated with not working.

CONCLUSION

Almost three-quarters of long-term cancer survivors working at diagnosis retain work.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

These findings are pertinent for guidelines on cancer survivorship care. Professionals could focus support on survivors most likely to have poor long-term work outcomes.

Work cessation after cancer diagnosis: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Long-term work maintenance among cancer survivors is important for patients, their families and society.

AIMS

To assess the risk of work cessation among workers at baseline in cancer survivors at 2 and 4 years after diagnosis compared with a matched cancer-free control group.

METHODS

Baseline measurements for this historical prospective study were drawn from the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics 1995 National Census, followed up until 2011. Patients who died before the end of 2011 were excluded from the study. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for the study outcome were assessed by binary logistic regression analyses, controlled for age, sex, ethnicity, years of education and socioeconomic position.

RESULTS

Cancer was associated with not working at 2 years after diagnosis (adjusted OR = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.59-1.84, P < 0.001), while only mild attenuation was seen at 4 years after diagnosis (adjusted OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.46-1.68, P < 0.001). Analysis by cancer type revealed that patients diagnosed with central nervous system (adjusted OR = 3.42, 95% CI 2.41-4.86, P < 0.001), renal (adjusted OR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.38-3.16, P < 0.001), breast (adjusted OR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.76-2.38, P < 0.001) and haematologic malignancies (adjusted OR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.59-2.61, P < 0.001) showed the greatest magnitude effect at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

These results emphasize the need for tailored interventions in order to enhance work maintenance, even among patients who are working at baseline and with very long-term survivors.

Inflammatory biomarkers in patients with sciatica: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

This systematic review focusses on inflammation as an underlying pathogenic mechanism in sciatica. We addressed two questions in particular: (1) what inflammatory biomarkers have been identified in patients with sciatica in the literature so far? 2) is there an association between the level of inflammatory activity and clinical symptoms?

METHODS

The search was conducted up to December 19th 2018 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Web of Science. The study selection criteria: (1) observational cohort studies, cross-sectional studies and randomized clinical trials (RCT), (2) adult population (≥ 18 years) population with sciatica, (3) concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers measured in serum, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or biopsies, and (4) evaluation of clinically relevant outcome measures (pain or functional status). Three reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data regarding the study characteristics and the outcomes. Risk of Bias was evaluated using an adjusted version of the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool.

RESULTS

In total 16 articles fulfilled the criteria for inclusion: 7 cross sectional observational studies and 9 prospective cohort studies that included a total of 1212 patients. With regard to question 1) the following markers were identified: interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, IL-21, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), phospholipase A2, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), C-X-C motif chemokine 5 (CXCM5), CX3CL1, CCL2, epidermal growth factor (EGF), and monocyte chemotactic protein 4 (MCP-4). With regard to question 2) several positive correlations were found in longitudinal studies: a strong positive correlation between inflammatory mediators or byproducts and pain (measured by visual analogue scale, VAS) was found for IL-21 in two studies (r > 0,8), and moderate positive correlations for TNF-a in both serum (r = 0,629) and biopsy (r = 0.65); severe pain (VAS > 4) is associated with increased hsCRP levels among patients with sciatica (adjusted OR = 3.4 (95% CI, 1.1 to 10).

CONCLUSION

In this systematic review there was considerable heterogeneity in the type of biomarkers and in the clinical measurements in the included studies. Taking into account the overall risk of bias of the included studies there is insufficient evidence to draw firm conclusions regarding the relationship between inflammation and clinical symptoms in patients with sciatica.

Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

People with coronary heart disease (CHD) often require prolonged absences from work to convalesce after acute disease events like myocardial infarctions (MI) or revascularisation procedures such as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Reduced functional capacity and anxiety due to CHD may further delay or prevent return to work.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of person- and work-directed interventions aimed at enhancing return to work in patients with coronary heart disease compared to usual care or no intervention.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the databases CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, NIOSHTIC, NIOSHTIC-2, HSELINE, CISDOC, and LILACS through 11 October 2018. We also searched the US National Library of Medicine registry, clinicaltrials.gov, to identify ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining return to work among people with CHD who were provided either an intervention or usual care. Selected studies included only people treated for MI or who had undergone either a CABG or PCI. At least 80% of the study population should have been working prior to the CHD and not at the time of the trial, or study authors had to have considered a return-to-work subgroup. We included studies in all languages. Two review authors independently selected the studies and consulted a third review author to resolve disagreements.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data and independently assessed the risk of bias. We conducted meta-analyses of rates of return to work and time until return to work. We considered the secondary outcomes, health-related quality of life and adverse events among studies where at least 80% of study participants were eligible to return to work.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 39 RCTs (including one cluster- and four three-armed RCTs). We included the return-to-work results of 34 studies in the meta-analyses.Person-directed, psychological counselling versus usual careWe included 11 studies considering return to work following psychological interventions among a subgroup of 615 participants in the meta-analysis. Most interventions used some form of counselling to address participants' disease-related anxieties and provided information on the causes and course of CHD to dispel misconceptions. We do not know if these interventions increase return to work up to six months (risk ratio (RR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.40; six studies; very low-certainty evidence) or at six to 12 months (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.63; seven studies; very low-certainty evidence). We also do not know if psychological interventions shorten the time until return to work. Psychological interventions may have little or no effect on the proportion of participants working between one and five years (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.34; three studies; low-certainty evidence).Person-directed, work-directed counselling versus usual careFour studies examined work-directed counselling. These counselling interventions included advising patients when to return to work based on treadmill testing or extended counselling to include co-workers' fears and misconceptions regarding CHD. Work-directed counselling may result in little to no difference in the mean difference (MD) in days until return to work (MD -7.52 days, 95% CI -20.07 to 5.03 days; four studies; low-certainty evidence). Work-directed counselling probably results in little to no difference in cardiac deaths (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.19 to 5.39; two studies; moderate-certainty evidence).Person-directed, physical conditioning interventions versus usual careNine studies examined the impact of exercise programmes. Compared to usual care, we do not know if physical interventions increase return to work up to six months (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.41; four studies; very low-certainty evidence). Physical conditioning interventions may result in little to no difference in return-to-work rates at six to 12 months (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.20; five studies; low-certainty evidence), and may also result in little to no difference on the rates of patients working after one year (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.30; two studies; low-certainty evidence). Physical conditioning interventions may result in little to no difference in the time needed to return to work (MD -7.86 days, 95% CI -29.46 to 13.74 days; four studies; low-certainty evidence). Physical conditioning interventions probably do not increase cardiac death rates (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.80; two studies; moderate-certainty evidence).Person-directed, combined interventions versus usual careWe included 13 studies considering return to work following combined interventions in the meta-analysis. Combined cardiac rehabilitation programmes may have increased return to work up to six months (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.98; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 5; four studies; low-certainty evidence), and may have little to no difference on return-to-work rates at six to 12 months' follow-up (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.13; 10 studies; low-certainty evidence). We do not know if combined interventions increased the proportions of participants working between one and five years (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.37; six studies; very low-certainty evidence) or at five years (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.38; four studies; very low-certainty evidence). Combined interventions probably shortened the time needed until return to work (MD -40.77, 95% CI -67.19 to -14.35; two studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Combining interventions probably results in little to no difference in reinfarctions (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.40; three studies; moderate-certainty evidence).Work-directed, interventionsWe found no studies exclusively examining strictly work-directed interventions at the workplace.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Combined interventions may increase return to work up to six months and probably reduce the time away from work. Otherwise, we found no evidence of either a beneficial or harmful effect of person-directed interventions. The certainty of the evidence for the various interventions and outcomes ranged from very low to moderate. Return to work was typically a secondary outcome of the studies, and as such, the results pertaining to return to work were often poorly reported. Adhering to RCT reporting guidelines could greatly improve the evidence of future research. A research gap exists regarding controlled trials of work-directed interventions, health-related quality of life within the return-to-work process, and adverse effects.

Elaborating on the assessment of the risk of bias in prognostic studies in pain rehabilitation using QUIPS-aspects of interrater agreement

BACKGROUND

Many studies have been performed to identify important prognostic factors for outcomes after rehabilitation of patients with chronic pain, and there is a need to synthesize them through systematic review. In this process, it is important to assess the study quality and risk of bias. The "Quality In Prognosis Studies" (QUIPS) tool has been developed for this purpose and consists of several prompting items categorized into six domains, and each domain is judged on a three-grade scale (low, moderate or high risk of bias). The aim of the present study was to determine the interrater agreement of the risk of bias assessment in prognostic studies of patients with chronic pain using QUIPS and to elaborate on the use of this instrument.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of prognostic factors for long-term outcomes after multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic pain. Two researchers rated the risk of bias in 43 published papers in two rounds (15 and 28 papers, respectively). The interrater agreement and Cohen's quadratic weighted kappa coefficient (κ) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated in all domains and separately for the first and second rounds.

RESULTS

The raters agreed in 61% of the domains (157 out of 258), with similar interrater agreement in the first (59%, 53/90) and second rounds (62%, 104/168). The overall weighted kappa coefficient (kappa for all domains and all papers) was weak: κ = 0.475 (95%CI = 0.358-0.601). A "minimal agreement" between the raters was found in the first round, κ = 0.323 (95%CI = 0.129-0.517), but increased to "weak agreement" in the second round, κ = 0.536 (95%CI = 0.390-0.682).

CONCLUSION

Despite a relatively low interrater agreement, QUIPS proved to be a useful tool in assessing the risk of bias when performing a meta-analysis of prognostic studies in pain rehabilitation, since it demands of raters to discuss and investigate important aspects of study quality. Some items were particularly hard to differentiate in-between, and a learning phase was required to increase the interrater agreement. This paper highlights several aspects of the tool that should be kept in mind when rating the risk of bias in prognostic studies, and provides some suggestions on common pitfalls to avoid during this process.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42016025339; registered 05 February 2016.