1
|
Sanchez-Martinez P, Martius LR, Bittencourt P, Silva M, Binks O, Coughlin I, Negrão-Rodrigues V, Athaydes Silva J, Da Costa ACL, Selman R, Rifai S, Rowland L, Mencuccini M, Meir P. Amazon rainforest adjusts to long-term experimental drought. Nat Ecol Evol 2025; 9:970-979. [PMID: 40374804 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-025-02702-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2025] [Indexed: 05/18/2025]
Abstract
Drought-induced mortality is expected to cause substantial biomass loss in the Amazon basin. However, rainforest responses to prolonged drought are largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate that an Amazonian rainforest plot subjected to more than two decades of large-scale experimental drought reached eco-hydrological stability. After elevated tree mortality during the first 15 years, ecosystem-level structural changes resulted in the remaining trees no longer experiencing drought stress. The loss of the largest trees led to increasing water availability for the remaining trees, stabilizing biomass in the last 7 years of the experiment. Hydraulic variables linked to physiological stress, such as leaf water potential, sap flow and tissue water content, converged to the values observed in a corresponding non-droughted control forest, indicating hydraulic homeostasis. While it prevented drought-induced collapse, eco-hydrological stabilization resulted in a forest with reduced biomass and carbon accumulation in wood. These findings show how tropical rainforests may be resilient to persistent soil drought.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lion R Martius
- School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Paulo Bittencourt
- Department of Geography, Faculty of Environment Society and Economy, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mateus Silva
- Department of Geography, Faculty of Environment Society and Economy, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Ingrid Coughlin
- Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Vanessa Negrão-Rodrigues
- Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Botânica Tropical, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi and Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Belém, Brazil
| | - João Athaydes Silva
- Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil
- Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, Brazil
| | - Antonio Carlos Lola Da Costa
- Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil
- Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, Brazil
| | - Rachel Selman
- School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sami Rifai
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lucy Rowland
- Department of Geography, Faculty of Environment Society and Economy, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Patrick Meir
- School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thayamkottu S, Masta M, Skeeter J, Pärn J, Knox SH, Smallman TL, Mander Ü. Dual controls of vapour pressure deficit and soil moisture on photosynthesis in a restored temperate bog. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2025; 963:178366. [PMID: 39824090 PMCID: PMC11772154 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2024] [Revised: 12/30/2024] [Accepted: 12/31/2024] [Indexed: 01/20/2025]
Abstract
Despite only covering ~3 % of the land mass, peatlands store more carbon (C) per unit area than any other ecosystem. This is due to the discrepancy between C fixed by the plants (Gross primary productivity (GPP)) and decomposition. However, this C is vulnerable to frequent, severe droughts and changes in the peatland microclimate. Plants play a vital role in ecosystem C dynamics under drought by mediating water loss to the atmosphere (surface water vapour conductance) and GPP by the presence/absence of stomatal regulation. This is dependent on soil moisture, air temperature, and vapour pressure deficit (VPD). Although there is ample evidence of the role of VPD on stomatal regulation and GPP, the impact of soil moisture is still debated. We addressed this knowledge gap by investigating the role of bulk surface conductance of water vapour in shifts between climatic (Air temperature (Tair), incoming shortwave radiation (SWR) and VPD) and water limitation of GPP in a peat bog in Canada. A causal analysis process was used to investigate how environmental factors influenced GPP. The results suggested that stomatal regulation in response to increased VPD caused the reduction in GPP in 2016 (~2.5 gC m-2 day-1 as opposed to ~3 gC m-2 day-1 in 2018). In contrast, GPP was limited again in 2019 due to the dry surface. This was driven by the relaxed stomatal regulation adopted by the ecosystem following the initial drought to maximise C assimilation. We found the threshold at which surface water decline limited GPP was at about -8 cm water table depth (82.5 % soil moisture). The causal inference corroborated our findings. The temporal variations of water and energy limitation seen in this study could increasingly restrict GPP due to the projected climate warming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep Thayamkottu
- Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise Street. 46, 51003 Tartu, Estonia.
| | - Mohit Masta
- Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise Street. 46, 51003 Tartu, Estonia.
| | - June Skeeter
- Department of Geography, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Jaan Pärn
- Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise Street. 46, 51003 Tartu, Estonia.
| | - Sara H Knox
- Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Geography, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - T Luke Smallman
- School of GeoSciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FF, United Kingdom; National Centre for Earth Observation, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FF, United Kingdom.
| | - Ülo Mander
- Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise Street. 46, 51003 Tartu, Estonia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beauclaire Q, Vanden Brande F, Longdoz B. Key role played by mesophyll conductance in limiting carbon assimilation and transpiration of potato under soil water stress. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2024; 15:1500624. [PMID: 39717725 PMCID: PMC11664552 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1500624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2024] [Accepted: 11/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/25/2024]
Abstract
Introduction The identification of the physiological processes limiting carbon assimilation under water stress is crucial for improving model predictions and selecting drought-tolerant varieties. However, the influence of soil water availability on photosynthesis-limiting processes is still not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the origins of photosynthesis limitations on potato (Solanum tuberosum) during a field drought experiment. Methods Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements were performed at the leaf level to determine the response of photosynthesis-limiting factors to the decrease in the relative extractable water (REW) in the soil. Results Drought induced a two-stage response with first a restriction of CO2 diffusion to chloroplasts induced by stomatal closure and a decrease in mesophyll conductance, followed by a decrease in photosynthetic capacities under severe soil water restrictions. Limitation analysis equations were revisited and showed that mesophyll conductance was the most important constraint on carbon and water exchanges regardless of soil water conditions. Discussion We provide a calibration of the response of stomatal and non-stomatal factors to REW to improve the representation of drought effects in models. These results emphasize the need to revisit the partitioning methods to unravel the physiological controls on photosynthesis and stomatal conductance under water stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quentin Beauclaire
- BIODYNE Biosystems Dynamics and Exchanges, TERRA Teaching and Research Center, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Gembloux, Belgium
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu J, Ryu Y, Luo X, Dechant B, Stocker BD, Keenan TF, Gentine P, Li X, Li B, Harrison SP, Prentice IC. Evidence for widespread thermal acclimation of canopy photosynthesis. NATURE PLANTS 2024; 10:1919-1927. [PMID: 39516387 DOI: 10.1038/s41477-024-01846-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 10/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
Plants acclimate to temperature by adjusting their photosynthetic capacity over weeks to months. However, most evidence for photosynthetic acclimation derives from leaf-scale experiments. Here we address the scarcity of evidence for canopy-scale photosynthetic acclimation by examining the correlation between maximum photosynthetic rates (Amax,2,000) and growth temperature (T air ¯ ) across a range of concurrent temperatures and canopy foliage quantity, using data from >200 eddy covariance sites. We detect widespread thermal acclimation of canopy-scale photosynthesis, demonstrated by enhanced Amax,2,000 under higherT air ¯ , across flux sites with adequate water availability. A 14-day period is identified as the most relevant timescale for acclimation across all sites, with a range of 12-25 days for different plant functional types. The mean apparent thermal acclimation rate across all ecosystems is 0.41 (-0.38-1.04 for 5th-95th percentile range) µmol m-2 s-1 °C-1, with croplands showing the largest acclimation rates and grasslands the lowest. Incorporating an optimality-based prediction of leaf photosynthetic capacities into a biochemical photosynthesis model is shown to improve the representation of thermal acclimation. Our results underscore the critical need for enhanced understanding and modelling of canopy-scale photosynthetic capacity to accurately predict plant responses to warmer growing seasons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiangong Liu
- Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Youngryel Ryu
- Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Landscape Architecture and Rural Systems Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Xiangzhong Luo
- Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Benjamin Dechant
- Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Benjamin D Stocker
- Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Trevor F Keenan
- Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Pierre Gentine
- Earth and Environmental Engineering Department, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Climate School, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xing Li
- Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Bolun Li
- Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
| | - Sandy P Harrison
- School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science (SAGES), University of Reading, Reading, UK
- Department of Earth System Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Institute for Global Change Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Iain Colin Prentice
- Department of Earth System Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Institute for Global Change Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang C, Huang J, Xiao J, Li X, He HS, Liang Y, Chen F, Tian H. Global convergence in terrestrial gross primary production response to atmospheric vapor pressure deficit. SCIENCE CHINA. LIFE SCIENCES 2024; 67:2016-2025. [PMID: 38733513 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-023-2475-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
Atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (VPD) increases with climate warming and may limit plant growth. However, gross primary production (GPP) responses to VPD remain a mystery, offering a significant source of uncertainty in the estimation of global terrestrial ecosystems carbon dynamics. In this study, in-situ measurements, satellite-derived data, and Earth System Models (ESMs) simulations were analysed to show that the GPP of most ecosystems has a similar threshold in response to VPD: first increasing and then declining. When VPD exceeds these thresholds, atmospheric drought stress reduces soil moisture and stomatal conductance, thereby decreasing the productivity of terrestrial ecosystems. Current ESMs underscore CO2 fertilization effects but predict significant GPP decline in low-latitude ecosystems when VPD exceeds the thresholds. These results emphasize the impacts of climate warming on VPD and propose limitations to future ecosystems productivity caused by increased atmospheric water demand. Incorporating VPD, soil moisture, and canopy conductance interactions into ESMs enhances the prediction of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Huang
- Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Forest Ecosystem Protection and Restoration of Poyang Lake Watershed, College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, China
- CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China
| | - Jingfeng Huang
- Institute of Applied Remote Sensing & Information Technology, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Remote Sensing and Information Systems, Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
| | - Jingfeng Xiao
- Earth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA
| | - Xing Li
- Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, South Korea
| | - Hong S He
- School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, 203 ABNR Building, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA
| | - Yu Liang
- CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China
| | - Fusheng Chen
- Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Forest Ecosystem Protection and Restoration of Poyang Lake Watershed, College of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, China.
| | - Hanqin Tian
- Schiller Institute for Integrated Science and Society, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Whippo CW, Saliendra NZ, Liebig MA. Cover crop inclusion and residue retention improves soybean production and physiology in drought conditions. Heliyon 2024; 10:e29838. [PMID: 38699707 PMCID: PMC11063448 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) planting has increased in central and western North Dakota despite frequent drought occurrences that limit productivity. Soybean plants need high photosynthetic and transpiration rates to be productive, but they also need high water use efficiency when water is limited. Crop residues and cover crops in crop rotations may improve soybean drought tolerance in northern Great Plains. We aimed to examine how a management practice that included cover crops and residue retention impacts agronomic, ecosystem water and carbon dioxide flux, and canopy-scale physiological attributes of soybeans in the northern Great Plains under drought conditions. The experiment consisted of two soybean fields over two years with business-as-usual (no-cover crops and spring wheat residue removal) and aspirational management (cover crops and spring wheat residue retention) during a drought year. We compared yield; aboveground biomass; green chromatic coordinates, and CO2 and H2O fluxes from eddy covariance, Phenocam images, and ancillary micrometeorological measurements. These measurements were used to derive ecosystem-scale physical, and physiological attributes with the 'big leaf' framework to diagnose underlying processes. Soybean yields were 29 % higher under drought conditions in the field managed in a system that included cover crops and residue retention. This yield increase was associated with a 5 day increase in the green-chromatic-coordinate defined maturity phenophase, increasing agronomic and intrinsic water use efficiency by 27 % and 33 %, respectively, increasing water uptake, and increasing the rubisco-limited photosynthetic capacity (Vcmax25) by 42 %. The inclusion of cover crops and residue retention into a cropping system improved soybean productivity because of differences in water use, phenology timing, and photosynthetic capacity. These results suggest that farmers can improve soybean productivity and yield stability by incorporating cover crops and residue retention into their management suite because these practices to facilitate more aggressive water uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig W. Whippo
- USDA-ARS, Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 459, Mandan, ND, 58554, USA
| | - Nicanor Z. Saliendra
- USDA-ARS, Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 459, Mandan, ND, 58554, USA
| | - Mark A. Liebig
- USDA-ARS, Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 459, Mandan, ND, 58554, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Giardina F, Gentine P, Konings AG, Seneviratne SI, Stocker BD. Diagnosing evapotranspiration responses to water deficit across biomes using deep learning. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2023; 240:968-983. [PMID: 37621238 DOI: 10.1111/nph.19197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Accounting for water limitation is key to determining vegetation sensitivity to drought. Quantifying water limitation effects on evapotranspiration (ET) is challenged by the heterogeneity of vegetation types, climate zones and vertically along the rooting zone. Here, we train deep neural networks using flux measurements to study ET responses to progressing drought conditions. We determine a water stress factor (fET) that isolates ET reductions from effects of atmospheric aridity and other covarying drivers. We regress fET against the cumulative water deficit, which reveals the control of whole-column moisture availability. We find a variety of ET responses to water stress. Responses range from rapid declines of fET to 10% of its water-unlimited rate at several savannah and grassland sites, to mild fET reductions in most forests, despite substantial water deficits. Most sensitive responses are found at the most arid and warm sites. A combination of regulation of stomatal and hydraulic conductance and access to belowground water reservoirs, whether in groundwater or deep soil moisture, could explain the different behaviors observed across sites. This variety of responses is not captured by a standard land surface model, likely reflecting simplifications in its representation of belowground water storage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Giardina
- Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, CH-8092, Switzerland
- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, CH-8903, Switzerland
| | - Pierre Gentine
- Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
- Center for Learning the Earth with Artificial Intelligence and Physics (LEAP), Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
| | - Alexandra G Konings
- Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Sonia I Seneviratne
- Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zürich, CH-8092, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin D Stocker
- Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, CH-8092, Switzerland
- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, CH-8903, Switzerland
- Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Hallerstrasse 12, Bern, 3012, Switzerland
- Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Falkenplatz 16, Bern, 3012, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wei S, Chu X, Sun B, Yuan W, Song W, Zhao M, Wang X, Li P, Han G. Climate warming negatively affects plant water-use efficiency in a seasonal hydroperiod wetland. WATER RESEARCH 2023; 242:120246. [PMID: 37348421 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
Climate warming has substantial influences on plant water-use efficiency (PWUE), which is defined as the ratio of plant CO2 uptake to water loss and is central to the cycles of carbon and water in ecosystems. However, it remains uncertain how does climate warming affect PWUE in wetland ecosystems, especially those with seasonally alternating water availability during the growing season. In this study, we used a continuous 10-year (2011-2020) eddy covariance (EC) dataset from a seasonal hydroperiod wetland coupled with a 15-year (2003-2017) satellite-based dataset (called PML-V2) and an in situ warming experiment to examine the climate warming impacts on wetland PWUE. The 10-year EC observational results revealed that rising temperatures had significant negative impacts on the interannual variations in wetland PWUE, and increased transpiration (Et) rather than changes in gross primary productivity (GPP) dominated these negative impacts. Furthermore, the 15-year satellite-based evidence confirmed that, in the study region, climate warming had significant negative consequences for the interannual variations in wetland PWUE by enhancing wetland Et. Lastly, at the leaf-scale, the light response curves of leaf photosynthesis, leaf Et, and leaf-scale PWUE indicated that wetland plants need to consume more water during the photosynthesis process under warmer conditions. These findings provide a fresh perspective on how climate warming influences carbon and water cycles in wetland ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyu Wei
- Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, Shandong, China; Yellow River Delta Field Observation and Research Station of Coastal Wetland Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dongying, Shandong, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaojing Chu
- Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, Shandong, China; Yellow River Delta Field Observation and Research Station of Coastal Wetland Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dongying, Shandong, China
| | - Baoyu Sun
- Yellow River Delta Field Observation and Research Station of Coastal Wetland Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dongying, Shandong, China; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenping Yuan
- School of Atmospheric Sciences, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, Zhuhai Key Laboratory of Dynamics Urban Climate and Ecology, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China; Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
| | - Weimin Song
- Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, Shandong, China; Yellow River Delta Field Observation and Research Station of Coastal Wetland Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dongying, Shandong, China
| | - Mingliang Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, Shandong, China; Yellow River Delta Field Observation and Research Station of Coastal Wetland Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dongying, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaojie Wang
- Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, Shandong, China; Yellow River Delta Field Observation and Research Station of Coastal Wetland Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dongying, Shandong, China
| | - Peiguang Li
- Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, Shandong, China; Yellow River Delta Field Observation and Research Station of Coastal Wetland Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dongying, Shandong, China
| | - Guangxuan Han
- Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, Shandong, China; Yellow River Delta Field Observation and Research Station of Coastal Wetland Ecosystem, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dongying, Shandong, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gomarasca U, Migliavacca M, Kattge J, Nelson JA, Niinemets Ü, Wirth C, Cescatti A, Bahn M, Nair R, Acosta ATR, Arain MA, Beloiu M, Black TA, Bruun HH, Bucher SF, Buchmann N, Byun C, Carrara A, Conte A, da Silva AC, Duveiller G, Fares S, Ibrom A, Knohl A, Komac B, Limousin JM, Lusk CH, Mahecha MD, Martini D, Minden V, Montagnani L, Mori AS, Onoda Y, Peñuelas J, Perez-Priego O, Poschlod P, Powell TL, Reich PB, Šigut L, van Bodegom PM, Walther S, Wohlfahrt G, Wright IJ, Reichstein M. Leaf-level coordination principles propagate to the ecosystem scale. Nat Commun 2023; 14:3948. [PMID: 37402725 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39572-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Fundamental axes of variation in plant traits result from trade-offs between costs and benefits of resource-use strategies at the leaf scale. However, it is unclear whether similar trade-offs propagate to the ecosystem level. Here, we test whether trait correlation patterns predicted by three well-known leaf- and plant-level coordination theories - the leaf economics spectrum, the global spectrum of plant form and function, and the least-cost hypothesis - are also observed between community mean traits and ecosystem processes. We combined ecosystem functional properties from FLUXNET sites, vegetation properties, and community mean plant traits into three corresponding principal component analyses. We find that the leaf economics spectrum (90 sites), the global spectrum of plant form and function (89 sites), and the least-cost hypothesis (82 sites) all propagate at the ecosystem level. However, we also find evidence of additional scale-emergent properties. Evaluating the coordination of ecosystem functional properties may aid the development of more realistic global dynamic vegetation models with critical empirical data, reducing the uncertainty of climate change projections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulisse Gomarasca
- Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany.
| | | | - Jens Kattge
- Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany
| | - Jacob A Nelson
- Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany
| | - Ülo Niinemets
- Chair of Plant and Crop Science, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Christian Wirth
- Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Michael Bahn
- Universität Innsbruck, Institut für Ökologie, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Richard Nair
- Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany
- Discipline of Botany, School of Natural Sciences Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Alicia T R Acosta
- Dipartimento di Scienze - Università Roma TRE - V.le Marconi 446, 00146, Roma, Italy
| | - M Altaf Arain
- School of Earth, Environment & Society and McMaster Centre for Climate Change, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mirela Beloiu
- Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - T Andrew Black
- Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Hans Henrik Bruun
- Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Solveig Franziska Bucher
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Institute of Ecology and Evolution - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Philosophenweg 16, 07743, Jena, Germany
| | - Nina Buchmann
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Chaeho Byun
- Department of Biological Sciences, Andong National University, Andong, 36729, Republic of Korea
| | - Arnaud Carrara
- Fundación Centro de Estudios Ambientales del Mediterráneo (CEAM), Paterna, Spain
| | - Adriano Conte
- National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP), Metaponto, 75012, Italy
| | - Ana C da Silva
- Santa Catarina State University, Agroveterinary Center, Forestry Department, Av Luiz de Camões, 2090, Conta Dinheiro, 88.520-000, Lages, SC, Brazil
| | - Gregory Duveiller
- Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany
| | - Silvano Fares
- National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Institute for Agriculture and Forestry Systems in the Mediterranean (ISAFOM), Naples, 80055, Italy
| | - Andreas Ibrom
- Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Environmental Engineering and Resource Management, Bygningstorvet 115, 2800 Kgs., Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Alexander Knohl
- Bioclimatology, University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 2, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Benjamin Komac
- Andorra Research + Innovation; Avinguda Rocafort 21-23, Edifici Molí, 3r pis, AD600, Sant Julià de Lòria, Andorra
| | | | - Christopher H Lusk
- Environmenal Research Institute, University of Waikato, Private Bag, 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Miguel D Mahecha
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Remote Sensing Centre for Earth System Research, Leipzig University, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - David Martini
- Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany
| | - Vanessa Minden
- Department of Biology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Leonardo Montagnani
- Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Akira S Mori
- Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, the University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro, Tokyo, 153-8904, Japan
| | - Yusuke Onoda
- Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Oiwake, Kitashirakawa, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan
| | - Josep Peñuelas
- CSIC, Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona, 08193, Catalonia, Spain
- CREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, 08193, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Oscar Perez-Priego
- Department of Forestry Engineering, University of Córdoba, Edif. Leonardo da Vinci, Campus de Rabanales s/n, 14071, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Peter Poschlod
- Ecology and Conservation Biology, Institute of Plant Sciences - Faculty of Biology and Preclinical Medicine - University of Regensburg, Universitaetsstrasse 31, D-93053, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Thomas L Powell
- The Department of Earth and Environmental Systems, The University of the South, Sewanee, TN, USA
| | - Peter B Reich
- Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA
- Institute for Global Change Biology, and School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, 2753, Australia
| | - Ladislav Šigut
- Department of Matter and Energy Fluxes, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Bělidla 986/4a, 603 00, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Peter M van Bodegom
- Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 2, 2333 CC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sophia Walther
- Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany
| | - Georg Wohlfahrt
- Universität Innsbruck, Institut für Ökologie, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ian J Wright
- Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, 2753, Australia
- School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Markus Reichstein
- Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McCalmont J, Kho LK, Teh YA, Chocholek M, Rumpang E, Rowland L, Basri MHA, Hill T. Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) plantation on tropical peatland in South East Asia: Photosynthetic response to soil drainage level for mitigation of soil carbon emissions. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2023; 858:159356. [PMID: 36270353 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
While existing moratoria in Indonesia and Malaysia should preclude continued large-scale expansion of palm oil production into new areas of South-East Asian tropical peatland, existing plantations in the region remain a globally significant source of atmospheric carbon due to drainage driven decomposition of peatland soils. Previous studies have made clear the direct link between drainage depth and peat carbon decomposition and significant reductions in the emission rate of CO2 can be made by raising water tables nearer to the soil surface. However, the impact of such changes on palm fruit yield is not well understood and will be a critical consideration for plantation managers. Here we take advantage of very high frequency, long-term monitoring of canopy-scale carbon exchange at a mature oil palm plantation in Malaysian Borneo to investigate the relationship between drainage level and photosynthetic uptake and consider the confounding effects of light quality and atmospheric vapour pressure deficit. Canopy modelling from our dataset demonstrated that palms were exerting significantly greater stomatal control at deeper water table depths (WTD) and the optimum WTD for photosynthesis was found to be between 0.3 and 0.4 m below the soil surface. Raising WTD to this level, from the industry typical drainage level of 0.6 m, could increase photosynthetic uptake by 3.6 % and reduce soil surface emission of CO2 by 11 %. Our study site further showed that despite being poorly drained compared to other planting blocks at the same plantation, monthly fruit bunch yield was, on average, 14 % greater. While these results are encouraging, and at least suggest that raising WTD closer to the soil surface to reduce emissions is unlikely to produce significant yield penalties, our results are limited to a single study site and more work is urgently needed to confirm these results at other plantations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon McCalmont
- College of Life and Environmental Science, University of Exeter, Streatham Campus, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK; School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK.
| | - Lip Khoon Kho
- Peat Ecosystem and Biodiversity Unit, Biology and Sustainability Research Division, Malaysian Palm Oil Board, 6, Persiaran Institusi, Bandar Baru Bangi, 43000 Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia; Economic Planning Unit, Sarawak Chief Minister's Dept., 93502 Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
| | - Yit Arn Teh
- School of Natural and Environmental Science, Newcastle University, Drummond Building, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
| | - Melanie Chocholek
- Dept. Earth and Environmental Science, University of St. Andrews, Irvine Building, North Street, St. Andrews KY16 9AL, UK
| | - Elisa Rumpang
- Peat Ecosystem and Biodiversity Unit, Biology and Sustainability Research Division, Malaysian Palm Oil Board, 6, Persiaran Institusi, Bandar Baru Bangi, 43000 Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Lucy Rowland
- College of Life and Environmental Science, University of Exeter, Streatham Campus, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK
| | - Mohd Hadi Akbar Basri
- College of Life and Environmental Science, University of Exeter, Streatham Campus, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK; Dept. of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Tim Hill
- College of Life and Environmental Science, University of Exeter, Streatham Campus, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu Y, Wang X, Fan D, Lai J. The use of R in photosynthesis research. FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY : FPB 2022; 49:565-572. [PMID: 34635202 DOI: 10.1071/fp21102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
R is one of the most commonly used analytical tools in the plant sciences. To identify key trends in general reported R use and patterns in photosynthesis research, we explored the frequency of R use in 2966 articles published in the 377 journals with 'photosynthesis' in the title from 2010 to 2019 using the Web of Science search. Solutions provided by each R package cited in the articles or online sources was recorded and classified. The percentage of research articles reporting R use increased linearly from 3.6% in 2010 to 12.5% in 2019. The three main categories of R package solutions were 'general statistical calculations and graph packages' (G); 'photosynthesis special-purpose packages' (S); and 'genetic and evolutionary packages' (E). The top five R packages cited were nlme (G), lme4 (G), multcomp (G), plantecophys (S), and ape (E). The increasing popularity of R use in photosynthesis research is due to its user-friendly and abundant open-source codes online for handling specific issues, particularly in fitting photosynthesis models. These findings are limited by the number of articles and online sources, but they reveal a significant increase in usage in photosynthesis research over the past decade and have a bright prospect in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasi Liu
- School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
| | - Xiangping Wang
- School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
| | - Dayong Fan
- College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
| | - Jiangshan Lai
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China; and University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Launiainen S, Katul GG, Leppä K, Kolari P, Aslan T, Grönholm T, Korhonen L, Mammarella I, Vesala T. Does growing atmospheric CO 2 explain increasing carbon sink in a boreal coniferous forest? GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2022; 28:2910-2929. [PMID: 35112446 PMCID: PMC9544622 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
The terrestrial net ecosystem productivity (NEP) has increased during the past three decades, but the mechanisms responsible are still unclear. We analyzed 17 years (2001-2017) of eddy-covariance measurements of NEP, evapotranspiration (ET) and light and water use efficiency from a boreal coniferous forest in Southern Finland for trends and inter-annual variability (IAV). The forest was a mean annual carbon sink (252 [ ± 42] gC m-2a-1 ), and NEP increased at rate +6.4-7.0 gC m-2a-1 (or ca. +2.5% a-1 ) during the period. This was attributed to the increasing gross-primary productivity GPP and occurred without detectable change in ET. The start of annual carbon uptake period was advanced by 0.7 d a-1 , and increase in GPP and NEP outside the main growing season contributed ca. one-third and one-fourth of the annual trend, respectively. Meteorological factors were responsible for the IAV of fluxes but did not explain the long-term trends. The growing season GPP trend was strongest in ample light during the peak growing season. Using a multi-layer ecosystem model, we showed that direct CO2 fertilization effect diminishes when moving from leaf to ecosystem, and only 30-40% of the observed ecosystem GPP increase could be attributed to CO2 . The increasing trend in leaf-area index (LAI), stimulated by forest thinning in 2002, was the main driver of the enhanced GPP and NEP of the mid-rotation managed forest. It also compensated for the decrease of mean leaf stomatal conductance with increasing CO2 and LAI, explaining the apparent proportionality between observed GPP and CO2 trends. The results emphasize that attributing trends to their physical and physiological drivers is challenged by strong IAV, and uncertainty of LAI and species composition changes due to the dynamic flux footprint. The results enlighten the underlying mechanisms responsible for the increasing terrestrial carbon uptake in the boreal zone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabriel G. Katul
- Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringDuke UniversityDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Kersti Leppä
- Natural Resources Institute FinlandHelsinkiFinland
| | - Pasi Kolari
- Faculty of ScienceInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/PhysicsUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | - Toprak Aslan
- Faculty of ScienceInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/PhysicsUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | | | | | - Ivan Mammarella
- Faculty of ScienceInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/PhysicsUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | - Timo Vesala
- Faculty of ScienceInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/PhysicsUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
- Faculty of Agriculture and ForestryInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Forest SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
- Yugra State UniversityKhanty‐MansiyskRussia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Martini D, Sakowska K, Wohlfahrt G, Pacheco-Labrador J, van der Tol C, Porcar-Castell A, Magney TS, Carrara A, Colombo R, El-Madany TS, Gonzalez-Cascon R, Martín MP, Julitta T, Moreno G, Rascher U, Reichstein M, Rossini M, Migliavacca M. Heatwave breaks down the linearity between sun-induced fluorescence and gross primary production. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2022; 233:2415-2428. [PMID: 34921419 DOI: 10.1111/nph.17920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Sun-induced fluorescence in the far-red region (SIF) is increasingly used as a remote and proximal-sensing tool capable of tracking vegetation gross primary production (GPP). However, the use of SIF to probe changes in GPP is challenged during extreme climatic events, such as heatwaves. Here, we examined how the 2018 European heatwave (HW) affected the GPP-SIF relationship in evergreen broadleaved trees with a relatively invariant canopy structure. To do so, we combined canopy-scale SIF measurements, GPP estimated from an eddy covariance tower, and active pulse amplitude modulation fluorescence. The HW caused an inversion of the photosynthesis-fluorescence relationship at both the canopy and leaf scales. The highly nonlinear relationship was strongly shaped by nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ), that is, a dissipation mechanism to protect from the adverse effects of high light intensity. During the extreme heat stress, plants experienced a saturation of NPQ, causing a change in the allocation of energy dissipation pathways towards SIF. Our results show the complex modulation of the NPQ-SIF-GPP relationship at an extreme level of heat stress, which is not completely represented in state-of-the-art coupled radiative transfer and photosynthesis models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Martini
- Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, 07745, Jena, Germany
| | - Karolina Sakowska
- Institute of BioEconomy, National Research Council (IBE-CNR), 38010, San Michele all'Adige (TN), Italy
| | - Georg Wohlfahrt
- Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestrasse 15, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Christiaan van der Tol
- Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, 7500 AE, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Albert Porcar-Castell
- Optics of Photosynthesis Laboratory, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR/Forest Sciences) and Viikki Plant Science Center, University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Troy S Magney
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - Arnaud Carrara
- Centro De Estudios Ambientales Del Mediterráneo, 46980, Valencia, Spain
| | - Roberto Colombo
- Earth and Environmental Sciences Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Rosario Gonzalez-Cascon
- Department of Environment, National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (INIA), 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Pilar Martín
- Environmental Remote Sensing and Spectroscopy Laboratory (SpecLab), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), 28037, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Uwe Rascher
- Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | | | - Micol Rossini
- Earth and Environmental Sciences Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Mirco Migliavacca
- Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, 07745, Jena, Germany
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra (VA), 21027, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Migliavacca M, Musavi T, Mahecha MD, Nelson JA, Knauer J, Baldocchi DD, Perez-Priego O, Christiansen R, Peters J, Anderson K, Bahn M, Black TA, Blanken PD, Bonal D, Buchmann N, Caldararu S, Carrara A, Carvalhais N, Cescatti A, Chen J, Cleverly J, Cremonese E, Desai AR, El-Madany TS, Farella MM, Fernández-Martínez M, Filippa G, Forkel M, Galvagno M, Gomarasca U, Gough CM, Göckede M, Ibrom A, Ikawa H, Janssens IA, Jung M, Kattge J, Keenan TF, Knohl A, Kobayashi H, Kraemer G, Law BE, Liddell MJ, Ma X, Mammarella I, Martini D, Macfarlane C, Matteucci G, Montagnani L, Pabon-Moreno DE, Panigada C, Papale D, Pendall E, Penuelas J, Phillips RP, Reich PB, Rossini M, Rotenberg E, Scott RL, Stahl C, Weber U, Wohlfahrt G, Wolf S, Wright IJ, Yakir D, Zaehle S, Reichstein M. The three major axes of terrestrial ecosystem function. Nature 2021; 598:468-472. [PMID: 34552242 PMCID: PMC8528706 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03939-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The leaf economics spectrum1,2 and the global spectrum of plant forms and functions3 revealed fundamental axes of variation in plant traits, which represent different ecological strategies that are shaped by the evolutionary development of plant species2. Ecosystem functions depend on environmental conditions and the traits of species that comprise the ecological communities4. However, the axes of variation of ecosystem functions are largely unknown, which limits our understanding of how ecosystems respond as a whole to anthropogenic drivers, climate and environmental variability4,5. Here we derive a set of ecosystem functions6 from a dataset of surface gas exchange measurements across major terrestrial biomes. We find that most of the variability within ecosystem functions (71.8%) is captured by three key axes. The first axis reflects maximum ecosystem productivity and is mostly explained by vegetation structure. The second axis reflects ecosystem water-use strategies and is jointly explained by variation in vegetation height and climate. The third axis, which represents ecosystem carbon-use efficiency, features a gradient related to aridity, and is explained primarily by variation in vegetation structure. We show that two state-of-the-art land surface models reproduce the first and most important axis of ecosystem functions. However, the models tend to simulate more strongly correlated functions than those observed, which limits their ability to accurately predict the full range of responses to environmental changes in carbon, water and energy cycling in terrestrial ecosystems7,8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirco Migliavacca
- grid.419500.90000 0004 0491 7318Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany ,grid.9647.c0000 0004 7669 9786German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany ,grid.434554.70000 0004 1758 4137Present Address: European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | - Talie Musavi
- grid.419500.90000 0004 0491 7318Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
| | - Miguel D. Mahecha
- grid.419500.90000 0004 0491 7318Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany ,grid.9647.c0000 0004 7669 9786German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany ,grid.9647.c0000 0004 7669 9786Remote Sensing Center for Earth System Research, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany ,grid.7492.80000 0004 0492 3830Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jacob A. Nelson
- grid.419500.90000 0004 0491 7318Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
| | - Jürgen Knauer
- grid.492990.f0000 0004 0402 7163CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory Australia ,grid.1029.a0000 0000 9939 5719Present Address: Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales Australia
| | - Dennis D. Baldocchi
- grid.47840.3f0000 0001 2181 7878Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA
| | - Oscar Perez-Priego
- grid.411901.c0000 0001 2183 9102Department of Forest Engineering, ERSAF Research Group, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Rune Christiansen
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jonas Peters
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karen Anderson
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK
| | - Michael Bahn
- grid.5771.40000 0001 2151 8122Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - T. Andrew Black
- Faculty of Land and Food Systems, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
| | - Peter D. Blanken
- grid.266190.a0000000096214564Department of Geography, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO USA
| | - Damien Bonal
- grid.29172.3f0000 0001 2194 6418Université de Lorraine, AgroParisTech, INRAE, UMR Silva, Nancy, France
| | - Nina Buchmann
- grid.5801.c0000 0001 2156 2780Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Caldararu
- grid.419500.90000 0004 0491 7318Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
| | - Arnaud Carrara
- grid.17095.3a0000 0000 8717 7992Fundación Centro de Estudios Ambientales del Mediterráneo (CEAM), Paterna, Spain
| | - Nuno Carvalhais
- grid.419500.90000 0004 0491 7318Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany ,grid.10772.330000000121511713Departamento de Ciências e Engenharia do Ambiente, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal
| | - Alessandro Cescatti
- grid.434554.70000 0004 1758 4137European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | - Jiquan Chen
- grid.17088.360000 0001 2150 1785Landscape Ecology & Ecosystem Science (LEES) Lab, Center for Global Change and Earth Observations, and Department of Geography, Environmental and Spatial Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI USA
| | - Jamie Cleverly
- grid.117476.20000 0004 1936 7611School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales Australia ,grid.1011.10000 0004 0474 1797Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland Australia
| | - Edoardo Cremonese
- Climate Change Unit, Environmental Protection Agency of Aosta Valley, Aosta, Italy
| | - Ankur R. Desai
- grid.14003.360000 0001 2167 3675Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA
| | - Tarek S. El-Madany
- grid.419500.90000 0004 0491 7318Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
| | - Martha M. Farella
- grid.411377.70000 0001 0790 959XO’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN USA
| | - Marcos Fernández-Martínez
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Research Group Plant and Ecosystems (PLECO), Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Gianluca Filippa
- Climate Change Unit, Environmental Protection Agency of Aosta Valley, Aosta, Italy
| | - Matthias Forkel
- grid.4488.00000 0001 2111 7257Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marta Galvagno
- Climate Change Unit, Environmental Protection Agency of Aosta Valley, Aosta, Italy
| | - Ulisse Gomarasca
- grid.419500.90000 0004 0491 7318Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
| | - Christopher M. Gough
- grid.224260.00000 0004 0458 8737Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA USA
| | - Mathias Göckede
- grid.419500.90000 0004 0491 7318Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
| | - Andreas Ibrom
- grid.5170.30000 0001 2181 8870Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Hiroki Ikawa
- grid.416835.d0000 0001 2222 0432Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Ivan A. Janssens
- grid.5284.b0000 0001 0790 3681Research Group Plant and Ecosystems (PLECO), Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Martin Jung
- grid.419500.90000 0004 0491 7318Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
| | - Jens Kattge
- grid.419500.90000 0004 0491 7318Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany ,grid.9647.c0000 0004 7669 9786German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany
| | - Trevor F. Keenan
- grid.47840.3f0000 0001 2181 7878Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA ,grid.184769.50000 0001 2231 4551Earth and Environmental Science Area, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA USA
| | - Alexander Knohl
- grid.7450.60000 0001 2364 4210Bioclimatology, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany ,grid.7450.60000 0001 2364 4210Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use (CBL), University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Hideki Kobayashi
- grid.410588.00000 0001 2191 0132Research Institute for Global Change, Institute of Arctic Climate and Environment Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan
| | - Guido Kraemer
- grid.9647.c0000 0004 7669 9786Remote Sensing Center for Earth System Research, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany ,grid.5338.d0000 0001 2173 938XImage Processing Laboratory (IPL), Universitat de València, València, Spain
| | - Beverly E. Law
- grid.4391.f0000 0001 2112 1969Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR USA
| | - Michael J. Liddell
- grid.1011.10000 0004 0474 1797Centre for Tropical, Environmental, and Sustainability Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland Australia
| | - Xuanlong Ma
- grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ivan Mammarella
- grid.7737.40000 0004 0410 2071Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - David Martini
- grid.419500.90000 0004 0491 7318Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
| | - Craig Macfarlane
- grid.469914.70000 0004 0385 5215CSIRO Land and Water, Floreat, Western Australia Australia
| | - Giorgio Matteucci
- grid.5326.20000 0001 1940 4177Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la BioEconomia (CNR – IBE), Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - Leonardo Montagnani
- grid.34988.3e0000 0001 1482 2038Facoltà di Scienze e Tecnologie, Libera Universita’ di Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy ,Forest Services of the Autonomous Province of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy
| | | | - Cinzia Panigada
- grid.7563.70000 0001 2174 1754Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences (DISAT), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Papale
- grid.12597.380000 0001 2298 9743Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forest Systems (DIBAF), University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Elise Pendall
- grid.1029.a0000 0000 9939 5719Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales Australia
| | - Josep Penuelas
- grid.4711.30000 0001 2183 4846CSIC, Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Barcelona, Spain ,grid.452388.00000 0001 0722 403XCREAF, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Richard P. Phillips
- grid.411377.70000 0001 0790 959XDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN USA
| | - Peter B. Reich
- grid.1029.a0000 0000 9939 5719Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales Australia ,grid.17635.360000000419368657Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN USA ,grid.214458.e0000000086837370Institute for Global Change Biology and School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Micol Rossini
- grid.7563.70000 0001 2174 1754Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences (DISAT), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Eyal Rotenberg
- grid.13992.300000 0004 0604 7563Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Russell L. Scott
- grid.463419.d0000 0001 0946 3608Southwest Watershed Research Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Tucson, AZ USA
| | - Clement Stahl
- INRAE, UMR EcoFoG, CNRS, Cirad, AgroParisTech, Université des Antilles, Université de Guyane, Kourou, France
| | - Ulrich Weber
- grid.419500.90000 0004 0491 7318Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
| | - Georg Wohlfahrt
- grid.5771.40000 0001 2151 8122Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Sebastian Wolf
- grid.5801.c0000 0001 2156 2780Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ian J. Wright
- grid.1029.a0000 0000 9939 5719Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales Australia ,grid.1004.50000 0001 2158 5405Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales Australia
| | - Dan Yakir
- grid.13992.300000 0004 0604 7563Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Sönke Zaehle
- grid.419500.90000 0004 0491 7318Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
| | - Markus Reichstein
- grid.419500.90000 0004 0491 7318Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany ,grid.9647.c0000 0004 7669 9786German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany ,grid.9613.d0000 0001 1939 2794Michael-Stifel-Center Jena for Data-driven and Simulation Science, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Burnett AC, Serbin SP, Lamour J, Anderson J, Davidson KJ, Yang D, Rogers A. Seasonal trends in photosynthesis and leaf traits in scarlet oak. TREE PHYSIOLOGY 2021; 41:1413-1424. [PMID: 33611562 DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpab015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Understanding seasonal variation in photosynthesis is important for understanding and modeling plant productivity. Here, we used shotgun sampling to examine physiological, structural and spectral leaf traits of upper canopy, sun-exposed leaves in Quercus coccinea Münchh (scarlet oak) across the growing season in order to understand seasonal trends, explore the mechanisms underpinning physiological change and investigate the impact of extrapolating measurements from a single date to the whole season. We tested the hypothesis that photosynthetic rates and capacities would peak at the summer solstice, i.e., at the time of peak photoperiod. Contrary to expectations, our results reveal a late-season peak in both photosynthetic capacity and rate before the expected sharp decrease at the start of senescence. This late-season maximum occurred after the higher summer temperatures and vapor pressure deficit and was correlated with the recovery of leaf water content and increased stomatal conductance. We modeled photosynthesis at the top of the canopy and found that the simulated results closely tracked the maximum carboxylation capacity of Rubisco. For both photosynthetic capacity and modeled top-of-canopy photosynthesis, the maximum value was therefore not observed at the summer solstice. Rather, in each case, the measurements at and around the solstice were close to the overall seasonal mean, with values later in the season leading to deviations from the mean by up to 41 and 52%, respectively. Overall, we found that the expected Gaussian pattern of photosynthesis was not observed. We conclude that an understanding of species- and environment-specific changes in photosynthesis across the season is essential for correct estimation of seasonal photosynthetic capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela C Burnett
- Environmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK
| | - Shawn P Serbin
- Environmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - Julien Lamour
- Environmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - Jeremiah Anderson
- Environmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - Kenneth J Davidson
- Environmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - Dedi Yang
- Environmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - Alistair Rogers
- Environmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Still CJ, Rastogi B, Page GFM, Griffith DM, Sibley A, Schulze M, Hawkins L, Pau S, Detto M, Helliker BR. Imaging canopy temperature: shedding (thermal) light on ecosystem processes. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2021; 230:1746-1753. [PMID: 33666251 DOI: 10.1111/nph.17321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Canopy temperature Tcan is a key driver of plant function that emerges as a result of interacting biotic and abiotic processes and properties. However, understanding controls on Tcan and forecasting canopy responses to weather extremes and climate change are difficult due to sparse measurements of Tcan at appropriate spatial and temporal scales. Burgeoning observations of Tcan from thermal cameras enable evaluation of energy budget theory and better understanding of how environmental controls, leaf traits and canopy structure influence temperature patterns. The canopy scale is relevant for connecting to remote sensing and testing biosphere model predictions. We anticipate that future breakthroughs in understanding of ecosystem responses to climate change will result from multiscale observations of Tcan across a range of ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Still
- Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA
| | - Bharat Rastogi
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA
- Global Monitoring Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA
| | - Gerald F M Page
- Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA
| | - Dan M Griffith
- Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA
| | - Adam Sibley
- Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA
| | - Mark Schulze
- H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon State University, Blue River, OR, 97413, USA
| | - Linnia Hawkins
- Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA
| | - Stephanie Pau
- Department of Geography, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32304, USA
| | - Matteo Detto
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama
| | - Brent R Helliker
- Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, 433 S. University Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Robertson JK, Mastromonaco GF, Burness G. Social hierarchy reveals thermoregulatory trade-offs in response to repeated stressors. J Exp Biol 2020; 223:jeb229047. [PMID: 32967999 DOI: 10.1242/jeb.229047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Coping with stressors can require substantial energetic investment, and when resources are limited, such investment can preclude simultaneous expenditure on other biological processes. Among endotherms, energetic demands of thermoregulation can also be immense, yet our understanding of whether a stress response is sufficient to induce changes in thermoregulatory investment is limited. Using the black-capped chickadee as a model species, we tested a hypothesis that stress-induced changes in surface temperature (Ts), a well-documented phenomenon across vertebrates, stem from trade-offs between thermoregulation and stress responsiveness. Because social subordination is known to constrain access to resources in this species, we predicted that Ts and dry heat loss of social subordinates, but not social dominants, would fall under stress exposure at low ambient temperatures (Ta), and rise under stress exposure at high Ta, thus permitting a reduction in total energetic expenditure toward thermoregulation. To test our predictions, we exposed four social groups of chickadees to repeated stressors and control conditions across a Ta gradient (n=30 days/treatment/group), whilst remotely monitoring social interactions and Ts Supporting our hypothesis, we show that: (1) social subordinates (n=12), who fed less than social dominants and alone experienced stress-induced mass-loss, displayed significantly larger changes in Ts following stress exposure than social dominants (n=8), and (2) stress-induced changes in Ts significantly increased heat conservation at low Ta and heat dissipation at high Ta among social subordinates alone. These results suggest that chickadees adjust their thermoregulatory strategies during stress exposure when resources are limited by ecologically relevant processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua K Robertson
- Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program, Trent University, Peterborough, ON, Canada K9L 0G2
- Department of Wildlife and Science, Toronto Zoo, Scarborough, ON, Canada M1B 5K7
| | | | - Gary Burness
- Department of Biology, Trent University, Peterborough, ON, Canada K9L 0G2
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Maffia J, Balsari P, Padoan E, Ajmone-Marsan F, Ricauda Aimonino D, Dinuccio E. Evaluation of particulate matter (PM 10) emissions and its chemical characteristics during rotary harrowing operations at different forward speeds and levelling bar heights. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION (BARKING, ESSEX : 1987) 2020; 265:115041. [PMID: 32593925 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Particulate matter (PM) is an air pollutant which poses a considerable risk to human health. The agricultural sector is responsible of the 15% of the total anthropogenic emissions of PM10 (PM fraction with aerodynamic diameter below 10 μm) and soil preparation activities have been recognized as one of the main drivers of this contribution. The emission factors (EF) proposed by European environmental agency (EEA) for tilling operations are based on very few studies, none of which has been made in Italy. Moreover, few studies have considered the influence of operative parameters on PM10 emissions during tilling. The aim of this work was to assess PM10 emission and dispersion during rotary harrowing and to understand how operative parameters, such as forward speed and implement choice may affect PM release. A further objective was to assess the near field dispersion of PM10 to address exposure risks. Emission factors (EFs) were determined during two different trials (T1 and T2). During T1, the effect of tractor speeds (0.6, 1.1 and 1.7 m s-1) on PM10 emissions was investigated, while in T2 a comparative essay was made to study the influence of levelling bar height on emissions. The average ground level downwind concentrations of PM10 during harrowing operation was estimated through dispersion modelling. The observed PM10 EFs for rotary harrowing were 8.9 ± 2.0 mg m-2 and 9.5 ± 2.5 mg m-2 on T1 and T2, respectively. The heavy metal content of soil-generated PM10 was also assessed. In the generated PM, the elemental concentrations were higher than ones in soil. As, Cd and Ni concentration levels, determined in PM10 near to the tractor path, were also high, being several times higher than the annual average regulatory threshold levels in ambient air, as defined by the European regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Maffia
- Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari, Università di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy.
| | - Paolo Balsari
- Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari, Università di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy
| | - Elio Padoan
- Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari, Università di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy
| | - Franco Ajmone-Marsan
- Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari, Università di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy
| | - Davide Ricauda Aimonino
- Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari, Università di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy
| | - Elio Dinuccio
- Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari, Università di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Széles B, Parajka J, Hogan P, Silasari R, Pavlin L, Strauss P, Blöschl G. The Added Value of Different Data Types for Calibrating and Testing a Hydrologic Model in a Small Catchment. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH 2020; 56:e2019WR026153. [PMID: 33149373 PMCID: PMC7594447 DOI: 10.1029/2019wr026153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
This study investigated the added value of different data for calibrating a runoff model for small basins. The analysis was performed in the 66 ha Hydrological Open Air Laboratory, in Austria. An Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) type, spatially lumped hydrologic model was parameterized following two approaches. First, the model was calibrated using only runoff data. Second, a step-by-step approach was followed, where the modules of the model (snow, soil moisture, and runoff generation) were calibrated using measurements of runoff and model state variables and output fluxes. These measurements comprised laser-based measurements of precipitation, satellite and camera observations of snow, ultrasonic measurements of snow depth, eddy covariance measurements of evapotranspiration, time domain transmissometry-based soil moisture measurements, time-lapse photography of overland flow, and groundwater level measurements by piezometers. The two model parameterizations were evaluated on annual, seasonal, and daily time scales, in terms of how well they simulated snow, soil moisture, evapotranspiration, overland flow, storage change in the saturated zone, and runoff. Using the proposed step-by-step approach, the relative runoff volume errors in the calibration and validation periods were 0.00 and -0.01, the monthly Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.92 and 0.82, and the daily logarithmic Nash Sutcliffe efficiencies were 0.59 and 0.18, respectively. By using different sources of data besides runoff, the overall process consistency improved, compared to the case when only runoff was used for calibration. Soil moisture and evapotranspiration observations had the largest influence on simulated runoff, while the parameterization of the snow and runoff generation modules had a smaller influence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. Széles
- Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources ManagementVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
| | - J. Parajka
- Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources ManagementVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
| | - P. Hogan
- Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources ManagementVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
| | - R. Silasari
- Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources ManagementVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
| | - L. Pavlin
- Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources ManagementVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
| | - P. Strauss
- Federal Agency of Water ManagementInstitute for Land and Water Management ResearchPetzenkirchenAustria
| | - G. Blöschl
- Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources ManagementVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gourlez de la Motte L, Beauclaire Q, Heinesch B, Cuntz M, Foltýnová L, Šigut L, Kowalska N, Manca G, Ballarin IG, Vincke C, Roland M, Ibrom A, Lousteau D, Siebicke L, Neiryink J, Longdoz B. Non-stomatal processes reduce gross primary productivity in temperate forest ecosystems during severe edaphic drought. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2020; 375:20190527. [PMID: 32892725 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe drought events are known to cause important reductions of gross primary productivity (GPP) in forest ecosystems. However, it is still unclear whether this reduction originates from stomatal closure (Stomatal Origin Limitation) and/or non-stomatal limitations (Non-SOL). In this study, we investigated the impact of edaphic drought in 2018 on GPP and its origin (SOL, NSOL) using a dataset of 10 European forest ecosystem flux towers. In all stations where GPP reductions were observed during the drought, these were largely explained by declines in the maximum apparent canopy scale carboxylation rate VCMAX,APP (NSOL) when the soil relative extractable water content dropped below around 0.4. Concurrently, we found that the stomatal slope parameter (G1, related to SOL) of the Medlyn et al. unified optimization model linking vegetation conductance and GPP remained relatively constant. These results strengthen the increasing evidence that NSOL should be included in stomatal conductance/photosynthesis models to faithfully simulate both GPP and water fluxes in forest ecosystems during severe drought. This article is part of the theme issue 'Impacts of the 2018 severe drought and heatwave in Europe: from site to continental scale'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Gourlez de la Motte
- Terra Teaching and Research Center, University of Liège - Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
| | - Quentin Beauclaire
- Terra Teaching and Research Center, University of Liège - Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
| | - Bernard Heinesch
- Terra Teaching and Research Center, University of Liège - Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
| | - Mathias Cuntz
- Université de Lorraine, AgroParisTech, INRA, UMR Silva, 54000 Nancy, France
| | | | - Ladislav Šigut
- Global Change Research Institute CAS, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | - Giovanni Manca
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | | | - Caroline Vincke
- Earth and Life Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Marilyn Roland
- Plants and Ecosystems, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Andreas Ibrom
- Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Bygningstorvet 115, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark
| | | | - Lukas Siebicke
- Bioclimatology, University of Goettingen, Büsgenweg 2, 37077 Goettingen, Germany
| | - Johan Neiryink
- Institute for Nature and Forest Research, INBO, Havenlaan 88 Box 73, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bernard Longdoz
- Terra Teaching and Research Center, University of Liège - Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lavergne A, Graven H, De Kauwe MG, Keenan TF, Medlyn BE, Prentice IC. Observed and modelled historical trends in the water-use efficiency of plants and ecosystems. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2019; 25:2242-2257. [PMID: 30933410 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Plant water-use efficiency (WUE, the carbon gained through photosynthesis per unit of water lost through transpiration) is a tracer of the plant physiological controls on the exchange of water and carbon dioxide between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere. At the leaf level, rising CO2 concentrations tend to increase carbon uptake (in the absence of other limitations) and to reduce stomatal conductance, both effects leading to an increase in leaf WUE. At the ecosystem level, indirect effects (e.g. increased leaf area index, soil water savings) may amplify or dampen the direct effect of CO2 . Thus, the extent to which changes in leaf WUE translate to changes at the ecosystem scale remains unclear. The differences in the magnitude of increase in leaf versus ecosystem WUE as reported by several studies are much larger than would be expected with current understanding of tree physiology and scaling, indicating unresolved issues. Moreover, current vegetation models produce inconsistent and often unrealistic magnitudes and patterns of variability in leaf and ecosystem WUE, calling for a better assessment of the underlying approaches. Here, we review the causes of variations in observed and modelled historical trends in WUE over the continuum of scales from leaf to ecosystem, including methodological issues, with the aim of elucidating the reasons for discrepancies observed within and across spatial scales. We emphasize that even though physiological responses to changing environmental drivers should be interpreted differently depending on the observational scale, there are large uncertainties in each data set which are often underestimated. Assumptions made by the vegetation models about the main processes influencing WUE strongly impact the modelled historical trends. We provide recommendations for improving long-term observation-based estimates of WUE that will better inform the representation of WUE in vegetation models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aliénor Lavergne
- Biosphere and Climate Impacts, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot, UK
| | - Heather Graven
- Department of Physics, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Grantham Institute - Climate Change and the Environment, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Martin G De Kauwe
- Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Trevor F Keenan
- Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California
| | - Belinda E Medlyn
- Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Iain Colin Prentice
- Biosphere and Climate Impacts, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot, UK
- Grantham Institute - Climate Change and the Environment, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|