Performance of an affordable urine self-sampling method for human papillomavirus detection in Mexican women

The current state of DNA methylation biomarkers in self-collected liquid biopsies for the early detection of cervical cancer: a literature review

Cervical cancer (CC) is a preventable disease and treatable cancer. Most of the new cases and deaths from CC occur in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) due to cultural and systematic barriers leading to low CC screening uptake. In recent years, self-sampling has been proposed as a method to increase CC screening uptake and is slowly being implemented into screening programmes worldwide. Simultaneously, DNA methylation has been proposed as a novel biomarker that could be used for the triage of self-collected samples that test positive for high-risk types of Human Papillomavirus (HPV). In this paper, we conducted a literature review of studies assessing the efficacy of DNA methylation markers to detect Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) in self-collected cervicovaginal swabs or urine (2019-2024). Our review showed that, of the available data, DNA methylation together with self-sampling could perform as well as cytology in the detection of CIN as well as improve uptake of CC screening and reduce loss to follow up, especially in LMICs. However, more data is still needed to understand which methylation tests are most efficacious. Future studies should assess the full potential of DNA methylation and self-sampling in large, diverse screening cohorts.

A review of urinary HPV testing for cervical cancer management and HPV vaccine surveillance: rationale, strategies, and limitations

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are the leading cause of cervical cancer, the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide. Despite concerted efforts to combat this preventable disease through HPV vaccination and cancer screening have helped reduce morbidity and mortality levels, the burden persists in both developing and developed countries due to insufficient vaccination and screening coverage. Urinary HPV testing has emerged as a noninvasive detection method, offering significant advantages in cervical cancer management and vaccine surveillance. Notably, it boasts high acceptance rates, ease of self-collection, user-friendly implementation, and relatively low cost. Various urinary HPV detection methods have been explored, predominantly relying on nucleic acid amplification and signal amplification, targeting a variety of biomarkers in urine, such as HPV DNA, RNA, and oncoproteins. Existing literature underscores urine as a promising specimen for HPV testing, demonstrating comparable detection performance to cervical and vaginal samples in several studies. However, the lack of standardized and authoritative protocols in sample collection, storage, preparation, DNA extraction, and amplification necessitates further evaluation for the comprehensive utilization of urinary HPV testing in clinical and epidemiological settings. This study aims to review pertinent publications and offer insights into the rationale, common strategies, and limitations of urinary HPV testing, with the ultimate goal of maximizing its utility in practice.

Performance of urine samples compared to cervical samples for detection of precancer lesions among HPV-positive women attending colposcopy clinic in Mexico City

BACKGROUND

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) detection in self-collected urine samples (SeCUS) may be a promising alternative for cervical cancer screening because of its greater acceptability, as long as it can offer comparable sensitivity to clinician-collected cervical samples (CCoS) for detecting precancer lesions.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of the SeCUS compared to that of the CCoS for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) detection among hrHPV-positive women receiving colposcopy in Mexico City using different specific extended HPV typing procedures: HPV16/18, HPV16/18/35/39/68 or HPV16/18/35/39/68/31.

METHODS

From March 2017 to August 2018, 4,158 female users of the cervical cancer screening program at Tlalpan Sanitary Jurisdiction in Mexico City were invited to participate in the FRIDA-Tlalpan study. All participants provided ≥ 30 mL of SeCUS, and then a CCoS was obtained with Cervex-Brush®, which was used for hrHPV typing. Participants who tested positive for hrHPV in CCoS were referred for colposcopy for diagnostic confirmation, and all SeCUS of these women were also tested for hrHPV typing.

RESULTS

In total, 561 hrHPV-positive women were identified by CCoS via colposcopy, and 82.2% of the SeCUS of these women were also hrHPV positive. From both CCoS and SeCUS, 7 cases of CIN3 were detected. Considering HPV16/18 typing, CCoS and SeCUS detected 4 cases of CIN3, but after HPV16/18/35/39/68/31 extension typing, both CCoS and SeCUS detected all 7 of the CIN3 cases among the hrHPV-positive women.

CONCLUSIONS

Using extended hrHPV typing based on HPV16/18/35/39/68/31, our results suggest that the performance of SeCUS may be equivalent to that of CCoS for detecting CIN3 lesions. Although our results are inconclusive, they support the hypothesis that SeCUS may be an attractive alternative worthy of further research.

Follow-up of humoral immune response after HPV vaccination using first-void urine: A longitudinal cohort study

Assessment of humoral immune responses following human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination currently relies on invasive blood sampling. This longitudinal cohort study explores the usability of first-void urine as a noninvasive alternative sample for antibody detection. In this study, 58 women receiving three doses of the 9vHPV vaccine within a Gardasil9 (9vHPV) Phase III randomized controlled trial were included. Participants provided paired first-void urine and blood samples before vaccination (M0), 1 month after the third dose (M7), and ~3 years after the third dose (M43). Type-specific antibody responses to the 9vHPV types were analyzed in 174 first-void urine and 172 serum samples using a virus-like particle-based IgG multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Additionally, total human IgG concentrations were determined using the BioPlex assay. At M7, 1 month after complete 9vHPV vaccination, 95%-100% of first-void urine and 100% of serum samples had detectable concentrations, varying by HPV type. At M43, 84%-100% of first-void urine and 98%-100% of serum samples had HPV-specific antibody concentrations. Results show significant Spearman rank correlations between type-specific HPV-antibody concentrations for paired first-void urine and serum at all time points. This study confirms the potential feasibility of utilizing first-void urine as a noninvasive immunological sample within HPV vaccine trials.

Urine biomarkers in cancer detection: A systematic review of preanalytical parameters and applied methods

The aim of this review was to explore the status of urine sampling as a liquid biopsy for noninvasive cancer research by reviewing used preanalytical parameters and protocols. We searched two main health sciences databases, PubMed and Web of Science. From all eligible publications (2010-2022), information was extracted regarding: (a) study population characteristics, (b) cancer type, (c) urine preanalytics, (d) analyte class, (e) isolation method, (f) detection method, (g) comparator used, (h) biomarker type, (i) conclusion and (j) sensitivity and specificity. The search query identified 7835 records, of which 924 unique publications remained after screening the title, abstract and full text. Our analysis demonstrated that many publications did not report information about the preanalytical parameters of their urine samples, even though several other studies have shown the importance of standardization of sample handling. Interestingly, it was noted that urine is used for many cancer types and not just cancers originating from the urogenital tract. Many different types of relevant analytes have been shown to be found in urine. Additionally, future considerations and recommendations are discussed: (a) the heterogeneous nature of urine, (b) the need for standardized practice protocols and (c) the road toward the clinic. Urine is an emerging liquid biopsy with broad applicability in different analytes and several cancer types. However, standard practice protocols for sample handling and processing would help to elaborate the clinical utility of urine in cancer research, detection and disease monitoring.

Urine-based detection of HPV for cervical cancer screening: Time for standardized tests

Cervical cancer is preventable because it has an established etiology, mainly attributed to a detectable pathogen, human papillomavirus (HPV). In 2018, the world health organization issued an unprecedented call for global action to eliminate cervical cancer by 2030. The adaptation of regular screening programs is fundamental to achieve the goal of cervical cancer elimination. However, it is still difficult to achieve satisfactory coverage rates of screening in developing countries as well as in developed countries because many women are reluctant to participate in gynecologic examination. HPV detection in urine is a convenient, widely acceptable by women and relatively affordable without the necessity for clinical visits to improve the coverage rates of cervical cancer screening. Unfortunately, the clinical implementation of urine-based tests for HPV detection has been hindered by the lack of standardized tests. Further optimization of protocols and standardization of urinary HPV detection are expected to be realized. With the advantages of urine sampling to overcome cost, personal, and cultural barriers, time has come for the standardized tests to facilitate a wide clinical implementation of urinary HPV detection that will significantly contribute to the WHO's goal, that is, to eliminate the cervical cancer globally.

Utilizing first void urine for high-risk HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in HIV-positive women in Katete, Zambia

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization targets to screen 70% of women worldwide twice for cervical cancer by the year 2030, first by age of 35, and again by the age of 45. However, with the current low screening coverage in many developing countries, this may not be achieved because the invasive sampling method is unacceptable to some. In Zambia, for instance, despite the availability of free cervical cancer screening through the establishment of the Cervical Cancer Prevention Programme, some women are still reluctant to go for screening. First void urine sampling is non-invasive and thus has the potential to increase screening coverage. We aimed to determine the performance of first void urine for high-risk human papillomavirus DNA detection, the prevalence of high-risk HPV, and the acceptability of first void urine sampling.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 HIV- infected women at St Francis' Hospital in Zambia, attending the routine HIV/AIDS services and cervical cancer screening. 17 mL of first void urine sample collected by each participant was immediately mixed with 3 mL of 0.5 M EDTA preservative solution before cervical sample collection by the clinician. For testing, 2 mL of first void urine and 1 mL of the cervical sample were tested using the GeneXpert platform. An interview-based questionnaire was used to gather data on the acceptability of first void urine sampling. Data was analyzed using Stata version 17.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 42.58 years (95% CI 40.98-44.19; SD 8.01). High-risk HPV prevalence was 34% (95% CI 24%-43.9%) in both cervical and first void urine samples. Sensitivity and specificity were 84.8% (95% CI 68.1%-94.9%) and 92.3% (83%-97.5%), respectively. There was 89.80% agreement between the samples (κ = 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.91). First void urine sampling was highly accepted.

CONCLUSION

High-risk HPV DNA can be detected in first void urine samples using the GeneXpert, with a substantial agreement with cervical samples. An affordable preservative such as Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid can prevent DNA degradation. With optimization, first void urine sampling has the potential to increase screening coverage.

The potential of urine for human papillomavirus-related cervical cancer prevention

Cervical cancer is one of the most preventable cancers. The introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines and the adaptation of regular screening programs are key actions that need to be generalized globally to achieve the goal of cervical cancer elimination. However, it is still challenging to achieve satisfactory coverage rate, and many women are reluctant to participate in gynecologic examination. In this article, we review the research on the application of HPV detection in urine samples for cervical cancer screening and vaccine monitoring, as well as discuss the technical challenges and new technological advancements in urine-based tests. HPV detection in urine is an excellent noninvasive alternative that is widely accepted by women, relatively affordable, and provides the potential to reach women without the necessity for clinical visits. Thus, it is an attractive tool for both cervical cancer screening and vaccine monitoring.

Experiences and preferences towards collecting a urine and cervicovaginal self-sample among women attending a colposcopy clinic

•

In a colposcopy referral population, the majority of women consider self-collection of a urine sample and a cervicovaginal self-sample acceptable and easy to collect in a home-based setting.

•

Urine collection is worth investigating as a potential screening method to possibly improve attendance rates in cervical cancer screening.

The effectiveness of cervical cancer screening is hampered by low attendance rates. The collection of a urine sample is hypothesized to engage non-attenders in cervical cancer screening. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to evaluate experiences of women on urine collection and cervicovaginal self-sampling in a home-based setting and preferences for future cervical cancer screening. This study included 140 women, with a median age of 40 years, who were planned for a large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) procedure. All women collected a urine sample using conventional urine cups and a cervicovaginal self-sample prior to the LLETZ in a home-based setting. Following sample collection, women filled in a questionnaire. Results showed that the instructions of urine collection and cervicovaginal self-sampling were considered clear (95%, 95%CI: 88–98; 92%, 95%CI: 83–96, respectively). Women considered urine collection compared to cervicovaginal self-sampling to be more acceptable (p < 0.001), and to provide more reliable results (p < 0.001). The three highest reported preferred sampling methods for future cervical cancer screening were: urine collection (n = 39, 28%, 95%CI: 19–39), clinician-taken cervical scrape (n = 32, 23%, 95%CI: 15–34), and equal preference for urine collection, clinician-taken cervical scrape and cervicovaginal self-sampling (n = 30, 21%, 95%CI: 14–32). In conclusion, urine collection and cervicovaginal self-sampling are acceptable sampling methods, considered easy to collect in a home-based setting, and moreover, considered trustworthy. Although these results are promising, more research is required to determine if urine collection also lowers the barrier for non-attendees and, thereby, increases the attendance rates of cervical cancer screening.

Clinical performance of methylation as a biomarker for cervical carcinoma in situ and cancer diagnosis: A worldwide study

The shift towards primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening has necessitated the search for a secondary triage test that provides sufficient sensitivity to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer, but also brings an improved specificity to avoid unnecessary clinical work and colposcopy referrals. We evaluated the performance of the previously described DNA-methylation test (S5) in detecting CIN3 and cancers from diverse geographic settings in high-, medium- and low-income countries, using the cut-off of 0.80 and exploratory cut-offs of 2.62 and 3.70. Assays were performed using exfoliated cervical specimens (n = 808) and formalin-fixed biopsies (n = 166) from women diagnosed with cytology-negative results (n = 220), CIN3 (n = 204) and cancer stages I (n = 245), II (n = 249), III (n = 28) and IV (n = 22). Methylation increased proportionally with disease severity (Cuzick test for trend, P < .0001). S5 accurately separated women with negative-histology from CIN3 or cancer (P < .0001). At the 0.80 cut-off, 543/544 cancers were correctly identified as S5 positive (99.81%). At cut-off 3.70, S5 showed a sensitivity of 95.77% with improved specificity. The S5 odds ratios of women negative for cervical disease vs CIN3+ were significantly higher than for HPV16/18 genotyping at all cut-offs (all P < .0001). At S5 cut-off 0.80, 96.15% of consistently high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-negative cancers (tested with multiple hrHPV-genotyping assay) were positive by S5. These cancers may have been missed in current primary hrHPV-screening programmes. The S5 test can accurately detect CIN3 and malignancy irrespective of geographic context and setting. The test can be used as a screening and triage tool. Adjustment of the S5 cut-off can be performed considering the relative importance given to sensitivity vs specificity.