A model of antibiotic resistance genes accumulation through lifetime exposure from food intake and antibiotic treatment

The epidemiology of antibiotic-resistant clinical pathogens in Uganda

Background

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) is a global challenge, and its control depends on robust evidence primarily derived from surveillance systems.

Methods

We utilised a national surveillance data set to demonstrate how such evidence can be systematically generated. In doing so, we characterised the ABR profiles of priority clinical pathogens, identified associated factors, and drew inferences on antibiotic usage in Uganda.

Results

Of the 12 262 samples collected between 2019-21, we analysed 9033 with complete metadata. ABR was steadily increasing at a rate of 0.5% per year, with a surge in 2021 and the highest and lowest levels of penicillin and carbapenems detected in the northern (odds ratio (OR) = 2.26; P < 0.001) and the northeast (OR = 0.28; P < 0.001) regions of Uganda respectively. ABR was commonly observed with Escherichia coli (OR = 1.18; P < 0.001) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (OR = 1.25; P < 0.001) among older and male patients (61-70 years old) (OR = 1.88; P = 0.005). Multi-drug resistance (MDR) and ABR were disproportionately higher among bloodstream infections than respiratory tract infections and urinary tract infections, often caused by Acinetobacter baumannii. Co-occurrence of ABR suggests that cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone are in high use all over Uganda.

Conclusions

ABR is indeed a silent pandemic, and our results suggest it is increasing at 0.5% per year, with a notable surge in 2021 likely due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Of concern, ABR and MDR are mainly associated with bloodstream and surgical wound infections, with a gender and age dimension. However, it is encouraging that carbapenem resistance remains relatively low. Such evidence is critical for contextualising the implementation and evaluation of national action plans.

The One Health Concept

The concept of One Health has been developed as the appreciation that human health is intricately connected to those of other animals and the environment that they inhabit. In recent years, the COVID-19 pandemic and noticeable effects of climate change have encouraged national and international cooperation to apply One Health strategies to address key issues of health and welfare. The United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals have established targets for health and wellbeing, clean water and sanitation, climate action, as well as sustainability in marine and terrestrial ecosystems. The One Health Quadripartite comprises the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH-formerly OIE), the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). There are six areas of focus which are Laboratory services, Control of zoonotic diseases, Neglected tropical diseases, Antimicrobial resistance, Food safety and Environmental health. This article discusses the concept of One Health by considering examples of infectious diseases and environmental issues under each of those six headings. Biomedical Scientists, Clinical Scientists and their colleagues working in diagnostic and research laboratories have a key role to play in applying the One Health approach to key areas of healthcare in the 21st Century.