Detecting Legionella pneumophila in water systems: a comparison of various dental units

Legionella pneumophila Presence in Dental Unit Waterlines: A Cultural and Molecular Investigation in the West Bank, Palestine

A Legionella pneumophila bacterium is ubiquitous in water distribution systems, including dental unit waterlines (DUWLs). Legionellosis is atypical pneumonia, including Legionnaires' disease (LD) and the less acute form of Pontiac fever. Legionellosis occurs as a result of inhalation/aspiration of aerosolized Legionella-contaminated water by susceptible patients, health workers, and dentists. In this study, we undertook to determine the prevalence of Legionella in water and biofilm samples from Tap and DUWLs collected from five sites of dental clinics and faculties across the West Bank. Water samples were tested for physical and chemical parameters. The study samples included 185 samples, 89 (48%) water samples, and 96 (52%) biofilm swabs, which were analyzed by cultivation-dependent analysis (CDA) and by the cultivation-independent technique (CIA). Also, partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene for fifteen L. pneumophila isolates was performed for quality assurance and identification. L. pneumophila was isolated from 28 (15%) of 185 samples using CDA and was detected in 142 (77%) of 185 samples using CIA. The abundance of culturable L. pneumophila was low in DUWL of the sampling sites (range: 27-115 CFU/Liter). PCR was 5× more sensitive than the culture technique. L. pneumophila Sg 1 was detected in (75%) of the isolates, while (25%) isolates were L. pneumophila Sg 2-14. All fifteen sequenced Legionella isolates were identified as L. pneumophila ≥ 94.5%. The analysis of phylogenetic tree showed that L. pneumophila branch clearly identified and distinguished from other branches. These results show that DUWLs of the examined dental clinics and faculties are contaminated with L. pneumophila. This finding reveals a serious potential health risk for infection of immunocompromised patients and dentists' post-exposure.

Microbiological Evaluation of Water Used in Dental Units

In modern dentistry, dental units are used for the treatment of patients’ teeth, and they need water to operate. Water circulates in a closed vessel system and finally reaches the mucous membranes of the patient as well as the dentist themselves. Therefore, the microbiological safety of this water should be a priority for physicians. This study aims to identify and determine the microbial count, expressed in CFU/mL, in water samples from various parts of the dental unit that are in direct contact with the patient. Thirty-four dental units located in dentistry rooms were analysed. The dentistry rooms were divided into three categories: surgical, conservative, and periodontal. It was found that in surgical rooms, the bacterial count was 1464.76 CFU/mL, and the most common bacterium was Staphylococcus pasteuri—23.88% of the total bacteria identified. In dentistry rooms where conservative treatments were applied, the average bacterial concentration was 8208.35 CFU/mL, and the most common bacterium was Ralsonia pickettii (26.31%). The periodontal rooms were also dominated by R. pickettii (45.13%), and the average bacterial concentration was 8743.08 CFU/mL. Fungi were also detected. Rhodotorula spp., Alternaria spp., and Candida parapsilosis were found to be the most common bacteria which are potentially harmful. This study indicates the need for effective decontamination of the water that is used in dental units and for constant monitoring of the level of contaminants present in the closed vessel system.

Legionnaires' disease in dental offices: Quantifying aerosol risks to dental workers and patients

Legionella pneumophila is an opportunistic bacterial respiratory pathogen that is one of the leading causes of drinking water outbreaks in the United States. Dental offices pose a potential risk for inhalation or aspiration of L. pneumophila due to the high surface area to volume ratio of dental unit water lines-a feature that is conducive to biofilm growth. This is coupled with the use of high-pressure water devices (e.g., ultrasonic scalers) that produce fine aerosols within the breathing zone. Prior research confirms that L. pneumophila occurs in dental unit water lines, but the associated human health risks have not been assessed. We aimed to: (1) synthesize the evidence for transmission and management of Legionnaires' disease in dental offices; (2) create a quantitative modeling framework for predicting associated L. pneumophila infection risk; and (3) highlight influential parameters and research gaps requiring further study. We reviewed outbreaks, management guidance, and exposure studies and used these data to parameterize a quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) model for L. pneumophila in dental applications. Probabilities of infection for dental hygienists and patients were assessed on a per-exposure and annual basis. We also assessed the impact of varying ventilation rates and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Following an instrument purge (i.e., flush) and with a ventilation rate of 1.2 air changes per hour, the median per-exposure probability of infection for dental hygienists and patients exceeded a 1-in-10,000 infection risk benchmark. Per-exposure risks for workers during a purge and annual risks for workers wearing N95 masks did not exceed the benchmark. Increasing air change rates in the treatment room from 1.2 to 10 would achieve an ∼85% risk reduction, while utilization of N95 respirators would reduce risks by ∼95%. The concentration of L. pneumophila in dental unit water lines was a dominant parameter in the model and driver of risk. Future risk assessment efforts and refinement of microbiological control protocols would benefit from expanded occurrence datasets for L. pneumophila in dental applications.

Bacterial and fungal ecology on air conditioning cooling coils is influenced by climate and building factors

The presence of biofilms on the cooling coils of commercial air conditioning (AC) units can significantly reduce the heat transfer efficiency of the coils and may lead to the aerosolization of microbes into occupied spaces of a building. We investigated how climate and AC operation influence the ecology of microbial communities on AC coils. Forty large-scale commercial ACs were considered with representation from warm-humid and hot-dry climates. Both bacterial and fungal ecologies, including richness and taxa, on the cooling coil surfaces were significantly impacted by outdoor climate, through differences in dew point that result in increased moisture (condensate) on coils, and by the minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV 8 vs MERV 14) of building air filters. Based on targeted qPCR and sequence analysis, low efficiency upstream filters (MERV 8) were associated with a greater abundance of pathogenic bacteria and medically relevant fungi. As the implementation of air conditioning continues to grow worldwide, better understanding of the factors impacting microbial growth and ecology on cooling coils should enable more rational approaches for biofilm control and ultimately result in reduced energy consumption and healthier buildings.

Healthcare-associated viral and bacterial infections in dentistry

Infection prevention in dentistry is an important topic that has gained more interest in recent years and guidelines for the prevention of cross-transmission are common practice in many countries. However, little is known about the real risks of cross-transmission, specifically in the dental healthcare setting. This paper evaluated the literature to determine the risk of cross-transmission and infection of viruses and bacteria that are of particular relevance in the dental practice environment. Facts from the literature on HSV, VZV, HIV, Hepatitis B, C and D viruses, Mycobacterium spp., Pseudomonas spp., Legionella spp. and multi-resistant bacteria are presented. There is evidence that Hepatitis B virus is a real threat for cross-infection in dentistry. Data for the transmission of, and infection with, other viruses or bacteria in dental practice are scarce. However, a number of cases are probably not acknowledged by patients, healthcare workers and authorities. Furthermore, cross-transmission in dentistry is under-reported in the literature. For the above reasons, the real risks of cross-transmission are likely to be higher. There is therefore a need for prospective longitudinal research in this area, to determine the real risks of cross-infection in dentistry. This will assist the adoption of effective hygiene procedures in dental practice.

Evaluation of gram negative bacterial contamination in dental unit water supplies in a university clinic in tabriz, iran

Background and aims

Bacterial contamination of dental unit water supplies (DUWS) has attracted a lot of attention in recent years due to the emergence of serious infectionsin susceptible dental patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the presence of gram-negative bacterial contamination in DUWS at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Faculty of Dentistry.

Materials and methods

This descriptive study was carried out on 51 active dental units in different departments. Con-tamination was determined by taking samples from the unit's water supply before dental procedures and the use of specific culture media. The cultures were evaluated after 48 hours.

Results

Gram-negative bacterial contamination was identical in all the departments. In the departments on the ground floor, namely Departments of Periodontics and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Pseudomonas contamination was observed in 71% of units; in the departments on the first floor, namely Departments of Prosthodontics, Orthodontics and Pedodon-tics, 46.8% of the units had Pseudomonas contamination; and in the departments on the second floor, namely Departments of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, 37.7% of the units demonstrated Pseudomonas contamination.

Conclusion

Gram-negative bacterial contamination was evident in the evaluated DUWS. The contamination type was identical but the number of contaminated units decreased with the increase in the height of the floors.

A pilot study of bioaerosol reduction using an air cleaning system during dental procedures

Dental procedures create bioaerosols that are a potential vector for transmission of infection in the dental surgery.

The use of an air cleaning system both before and during dental treatment can reduce the size of bioaerosols and therefore reduce the risk of spread of infection.

Air cleaning systems may have a useful role to play in the treatment of patients, in particular those who may be immune-compromised.

Background Bioaerosols are defined as airborne particles of liquid or volatile compounds that contain living organisms or have been released from living organisms. The creation of bioaerosols is a recognized consequence of certain types of dental treatment and represents a potential mechanism for the spread of infection.

Objectives The aims of the present study were to assess the bioaerosols generated by certain dental procedures and to evaluate the efficiency of a commercially available Air Cleaning System (ACS) designed to reduce bioaerosol levels.

Methods Bioaerosol sampling was undertaken in the absence of clinical activity (baseline) and also during treatment procedures (cavity preparation using an air rotor, history and oral examination, ultrasonic scaling and tooth extraction under local anaesthesia). For each treatment, bioaerosols were measured for two patient episodes (with and without ACS operation) and between five and nine bioaerosol samples were collected. For baseline measurements, 15 bioaerosol samples were obtained. For bioaerosol sampling, environmental air was drawn on to blood agar plates using a bioaerosol sampling pump placed in a standard position 20 cm from the dental chair. Plates were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 48 hours and resulting growth quantified as colony forming units (cfu/m³). Distinct colony types were identified using standard methods. Results were analysed statistically using SPSS 12 and Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

Results The ACS resulted in a significant reduction (p = 0.001) in the mean bioaerosols (cfu/m³) of all three clinics compared with baseline measurements. The mean level of bioaerosols recorded during the procedures, with or without the ACS activated respectively, was 23.9 cfu/m³ and 105.1 cfu/m³ (p = 0.02) for cavity preparation, 23.9 cfu/m³ and 62.2 cfu/m³ (p = 0.04) for history and oral examination; 41.9 cfu/m³ and 70.9 cfu/m³ (p = 0.01) for ultrasonic scaling and 9.1 cfu/m³ and 66.1 cfu/m³ (p = 0.01) for extraction. The predominant microorganisms isolated were Staphylococcus species and Micrococcus species.

Conclusion These findings indicate potentially hazardous bioaerosols created during dental procedures can be significantly reduced using an air cleaning system.

An audit improves the quality of water within the dental unit water lines of general dental practices across the East of England

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and improve upon the quality of water emanating from the dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) which supply irrigation for dental handpieces and triple spray syringes in general practice.

DESIGN

A prospective clinical audit.

SETTING

Seventy-two general dental practices in the East of England.

METHODS

In 2006, 124 dentists initially registered to participate in the audit. By 2007, 72 had begun and by 2008, 68 had completed the project. This involved collecting samples of water discharged from the DUWLs in the dental practices both before the start and mid-way through a morning session. These were tested microbiologically at a United Kingdom Accreditation Service testing laboratory.

INTERVENTIONS

Before the audit, 56% of the DUWLs were reportedly flushed through for 2 minutes at the start of the day, 29% were purged for 20 seconds in between each patient, 50% were treated with a wide range of different disinfectant solutions, 44% were drained down dry at the end of the day and 9% had no cross-infection control measures applied to them at all. In the audit, 100% used a disinfectant solution alone, predominantly either Alpron or Sterilox.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The minimum audit standard set was for the water samples to meet the United States' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guideline on the quality of DUWL water, namely that the United States' Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulatory standards for drinking water be adopted, in that no more than 5% of water samples should be contaminated with total coliforms and that they should not have more than 500 colony forming units per ml (cfu/ml) of heterotrophic water bacteria. However, the participating dentists were encouraged to try and achieve the more stringent European Union (EU) standards for potable (drinking) water, namely for the water samples to have neither Escherichia coli nor any other faecal coliforms present and for the aerobic colony count to be less than 100 cfu/ml at 22°C after 72 hours of culturing.

RESULTS

In the pre-audit survey, none of the 72 DUWL water samples were contaminated with E. coli but in five of them (7%) coliforms were recovered. Only 25% reached the EU potable water standard, of which 11% had zero planktonic bacterial contamination. Three percent were above the EU standard but below the CDC guideline/EPA regulatory drinking water standard, while alarmingly, 72% of them failed to reach this minimum audit standard altogether. However, after the application of a suitable disinfectant for at least a month, the audit revealed that E. coli still remained absent in the water samples taken from the 68 DUWLs that completed the project and in only one (1.5%) were coliforms recovered. Remarkably, nearly 81% reached the EU potable water standard, of which 54% had zero planktonic bacterial contamination, with nearly an additional 6% reaching the American CDC/EPA standard and with only 13% failing outright.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical audit using appropriate DUWL disinfectants can result in the improvement of the quality of water that is discharged through DUWLs, thereby minimising both the risk of cross-infection to vulnerable patients as well as to dental staff chronically exposed to contaminated aerosols.

Workplace determinants of endotoxin exposure in dental healthcare facilities in South Africa

OBJECTIVES

Aerosols generated during dental procedures have been reported to contain endotoxin as a result of bacterial contamination of dental unit water lines. This study investigated the determinants of airborne endotoxin exposure in dental healthcare settings.

METHODS

The study population included dental personnel (n = 454) from five academic dental institutions in South Africa. Personal air samples (n = 413) in various dental jobs and water samples (n = 403) from dental handpieces and basin taps were collected. The chromogenic-1000 limulus amebocyte lysate assay was used to determine endotoxin levels. Exposure metrics were developed on the basis of individually measured exposures and average levels within each job category. Analysis of variance and multivariate linear regression models were constructed to ascertain the determinants of exposure in the dental group.

RESULTS

There was a 2-fold variation in personal airborne endotoxin from the least exposed (administration) to the most exposed (laboratory) jobs (geometric mean levels: 2.38 versus 5.63 EU m(-3)). Three percent of personal samples were above DECOS recommended exposure limit (50 EU m(-3)). In the univariate linear models, the age of the dental units explained the most variability observed in the personal air samples (R(2) = 0.20, P < 0.001), followed by the season of the year (R(2) = 0.11, P < 0.001). Other variables such as institution and total number of dental units per institution also explained a modest degree of variability. A multivariate model explaining the greatest variability (adjusted R(2) = 0.40, P < 0.001) included: the age of institution buildings, total number of dental units per institution, ambient temperature, ambient air velocity, endotoxin levels in water, job category (staff versus students), dental unit model type and age of dental unit.

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from job type, dental unit characteristics are important predictors of airborne endotoxin levels in this setting.

Control of microbial contamination in dental unit water systems using tetra-sodium EDTA

AIM

To examine the efficacy of tetra-sodium EDTA in controlling microbial contamination of dental unit water systems (DUWS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ten dental units were treated once a week with either 4% or 8% tetra-sodium EDTA for four or two consecutive weeks, respectively. Before treatment, 43% and 60% of the water samples from the air/water triple syringe and high-speed hand-pieces, respectively, exceeded the American Dental Association (ADA) guidelines of 200 CFU ml(-1) water during a 6-week baseline period. After each weekend treatment, the levels of microbial contamination in all DUWS fell significantly (P < 0.001) to below the ADA guideline. By the end of the week, microbial counts in the outflowing water had returned to baseline levels indicating a transient effect of single doses of tetra-sodium EDTA, and the need for multiple applications. The biofilms were virtually eliminated after a single weekend treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Tetra-sodium EDTA is effective in controlling microbial contamination in DUWS.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

Inexpensive, effective and safe products for reducing the microbial load of water from DUWS are needed to meet ADA and other national guidelines. Tetra-sodium EDTA can significantly reduce microbial biofilms and bacterial counts in outflowing water, and is compatible for use in DUWS.

Measurement of airborne bacteria and endotoxin generated during dental cleaning

Dynamic dental instruments generate abundant aerosols in the work environment. Dental unit waterlines (DUWL) support a large microbial population and can be a significant source of bioaerosols generated during dental treatments. This study was conducted to characterize bioaerosol generation during dental treatments performed in standardized conditions. Culture-based method (R2A, and blood agar with and without O2) and fluorescence microscopy were used. Dental cleaning procedures were performed in an isolated treatment room with controlled ventilation rate. Andersen microbial samplers were used to collect culturable bioaerosols generated before (baseline), during, and after 2 hr of dental treatments. Inhalable dust samplers were used to measure total bioaerosols content in dental hygienist's and patients' breathing zones. AGI-30 were used for the collection of the endotoxin. The use of fluorescence microscopy in combination with culture demonstrated that dental staff and patients were exposed to up to 1.86 E+05 bacteria/m(3) generated during treatments. Fortunately, bioaerosols returned to baseline within 2 hr after the dental procedures. The small diameter of the aerosols generated (< 1 microm) suggests that the risk of contact between the aerosolized bacteria and the respiratory system of exposed individuals is likely to occur.

Prevalence of anti-legionella antibodies among Italian hospital workers

This study evaluated the prevalence of anti-legionella antibodies in workers at hospitals with a long-term history of legionella contamination. The hospitals are located in Milan and Turin, northern Italy, and in Naples and Bari, southern Italy. Antibody prevalence and titres of healthcare workers, medical and dental students and blood donors were assessed. In total 28.5% of subjects were antibody positive, most frequently to L. pneumophila serogroups 7-14. Major differences were observed in seroprevalence and type of legionella antibody in persons from different geographic areas. Healthcare workers had a significantly higher frequency of antibodies compared with blood donors in Milan (35.4 vs 15.9%, P<0.001), whereas in Naples both groups exhibited high antibody frequency (48.8 vs 44.0%) and had a higher proportion of antibodies to legionella serogroups 1-6. Dental workers had a higher seroprevalence than office staff in Bari, but not in Turin, where daily disinfecting procedures had been adopted to avoid contamination of dental unit water. No association was found between the presence of antibodies and the presence of risk factors for legionellosis, nor with the occurrence of pneumonia and/or flu-like symptoms. In conclusion, the presence of legionella antibodies may be associated with occupational exposure in the hospital environment, but there was no evidence of any association with disease.

Microbiological evaluation and antibiotic susceptibility of dental unit water systems in general dental practice

OBJECTIVE

The microbial quality of water in a dental unit water systems (DUWS) is of considerable importance because patients and dental staff are regularly exposed to water and aerosol generated from the dental units. The objective of this study was to evaluate the 20 DUWS in general dental practices and to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of the colonizing bacteria.

METHODS

Three water and one biofilm samples from each DUWS were investigated for total viable count (TVC), oral streptococci, Pseudomonas spp., Enterobacteria, Candida albicans and Legionella pneumophila.

RESULTS

A total of 44 morphologically different colonies were obtained from water samples and 20 types of colonies (45.5%) could be identified using API test strips. The mean TVC values were 4.36 log CFU ml(-1) for source waters, 4.95 log CFU ml(-1) for 3-in-1 syringe samples, 4.91 log CFU ml(-1) for air rotor samples and 3.66 log CFU cm(-2) for biofilm samples. Susceptibilities of the isolates were tested against piperacillin, ampicillin, ceftazidime, meropenem, gentamicin, tetracycline, ofloxacin and chloramphenicol by using microdilution method according to NCCLS. The meropenem and ofloxacin have shown the broadest spectrum against to the tested isolates.

CONCLUSION

The study emphasizes the need for effective mechanisms to reduce the microbial contamination in DUWS, and highlights the risk for cross-infection in general dental practice.

Occupational hazards in orthodontics: A review of risks and associated pathology

The purpose of this article was to review the occupational hazards related to the practice of orthodontics. A systematic approach was used to include all risks involved in an orthodontic practice. The classification of hazards was based on major sources of risks by system or tissue and by orthodontic office area (dental chair, laboratory, sterilization area, x-ray developing area). Potentially hazardous factors relate to the general practice setting; to specific materials and tools that expose the operator to vision and hearing risks; to chemical substances with known allergenic, toxic, or irritating actions; to increased microbial counts and silica particles of the aerosols produced during debonding; to ergonomic considerations that might have an impact on the provider's muscoleskeletal system; and to psychological stress with proven undesirable sequelae. The identification and elimination of these risk factors should be incorporated into a standard practice management program as an integral part of orthodontic education. Professional organizations can also assist in informing practitioners of potential hazards and methods to deal with them.

Do contaminated dental unit waterlines pose a risk of infection?

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence that the dental unit waterlines are a source of occupational and healthcare acquired infection in the dental surgery.

DATA

Transmission of infection from contaminated dental unit waterlines (DUWL) is by aerosol droplet inhalation or rarely imbibing or wound contamination in susceptible individuals. Most of the organisms isolated from DUWL are of low pathogenicity. However, data from a small number of studies described infection or colonisation in susceptible hosts with Legionella spp., Pseudomonas spp. and environmental mycobacteria isolated from DUWL. The reported prevalence of legionellae in DUWL varies widely from 0 to 68%. The risk from prolonged occupational exposure to legionellae has been evaluated. Earlier studies measuring surrogate evidence of exposure to legionellae in dental personnel found a significant increase in legionella antibody levels but in recent multicentre studies undertaken in primary dental care legionellae were isolated at very low rate and the corresponding serological titres were not above background levels. Whereas, a case of fatal Legionellosis in a dental surgeon concluded that the DUWL was the likely source of the infection. The dominant species isolated from dental unit waterlines (DUWL) are Gram-negative bacteria, which are a potent source of cell wall endotoxin. A consequence of indoor endotoxin exposure is the triggering or exacerbation of asthma. Data from a single large practice-based cross-sectional study reported a temporal association between occupational exposure to contaminated DUWL with aerobic counts of >200cfu/mL at 37 degrees C and development of asthma in the sub-group of dentists in whom asthma arose following the commencement of dental training.

SOURCES

Medline 1966 to February 2007 was used to identify studies for this paper.

STUDY SELECTION

Design criteria included randomised control trials, cohort, and observational studies in English.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the number of published cases of infection or respiratory symptoms resulting from exposure to water from contaminated DUWL is limited, there is a medico-legal requirement to comply with potable water standards and to conform to public perceptions on water safety.

Competency assessment for infection control in the undergraduate dental curriculum

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed at investigating the introduction of an infection control competency assessment on undergraduate dental student's awareness and knowledge of infection control.

METHOD

A short course, including an introductory lecture and a three component competency based assessment exercise testing student's knowledge and ability in infection control measures was incorporated into the previously established training programme. The assessment exercises included a written test of students' knowledge of the Infection Control Policy, a unit management exercise and a hand hygiene assessment. The infection control competency was initially incorporated into the final term of the second year in 2004 and is now an established part of the 5-year dental undergraduate degree programme. Re-assessments were scheduled (at the start of third year) for students failing to meet the required standard as successful completion of this course was compulsory prior to students being allowed to treat their first patients. Student performance over the last 2 years on this course and during their first year on clinic were analysed to determine potential improvements in student knowledge and application in infection control. Examination results from the year 3, infection control spot test were compared with those of earlier years. In addition, the opinions, as assessed by questionnaire analysis, of dental staff and students on the infection control competency were obtained.

RESULTS

All students successfully completed the infection control competency (either at first or second attempt) and were subsequently allowed to enter clinical training in year 3. Significant improvements were seen in students passing the course at their initial attempt, 42% and 78%, in the 2004 and 2005 academic years, respectively. Also subsequent testing of these students during their first year on clinic showed marked increases in awareness and knowledge of the infection control protocols. Staff and student feedback on this course was also found to be highly supportive of the introduction of the infection control competency.

CONCLUSION

Incorporation of additional formal pre-clinical teaching and introduction of an infection competency potentially provides enduring knowledge and clinical application benefits.

Legionella in the dental office

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the microbiology of dental unit water and municipal water in terms of Legionella species and total bacteria levels.

METHODS

The presence of Legionella species was investigated using the culture method, direct fluorescent antibody and polymerase chain reaction techniques in collected dental unit water and municipal water samples from 71 dental offices in Ankara, Turkey. In addition, total bacterial counts were assessed using the culture method.

RESULTS

In 27% of the dental unit water samples and in 13% of municipal water samples, the number of colony-forming units (cfu ml(-1)) significantly exceeded acceptable values for high-risk group patients. No Legionella spp. was found in the dental unit water samples. Legionella SG3 was found in only one municipal water sample.

CONCLUSION

The dental unit water systems examined in this study did not include Legionella spp., but other bacteria at high numbers were determined. This is a potential threat, especially for elderly people, the medically compromised patients receiving regular dental treatment and the dental clinic staff.

An audit improves the quality of water within the dental unit water lines of three separate facilities of a United Kingdom NHS Trust

OBJECTIVE

To improve the quality of water emanating from dental unit waterlines (DUWLs).

DESIGN

A prospective clinical audit.

SETTING

Three geographically separate district dental facilities of a United Kingdom NHS Trust, involving two community clinics and one hospital orthodontic department, which were evaluated between 2002 and 2004.

METHODS

Samples of water discharged from the DUWLs were collected prior to the start and midway through a morning session. These were tested microbiologically at a United Kingdom Accreditation Service testing laboratory within six hours of sampling.

INTERVENTIONS

One of the clinics followed the contemporaneous BDA advice of flushing water through its DUWLs while the other two clinics used separate intermittent disinfection purging regimes instead. One of them used a two stage protocol of Ethylene Diamine Tetra-Acetic acid followed by hydrogen peroxide, while the other used Bio 2000 as a single agent, which was subsequently superseded by the continuous use of super-oxidised water (Sterilox).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

To assess whether the samples either met the American Dental Association's guideline on the quality of DUWL water, or the more stringent European Union standards for potable (drinking) water.

RESULTS

The two units which used a disinfection regime both complied with the ADA guideline and the EU potable water standard. However, the unit which only flushed through its DUWLs without using a disinfectant failed to comply with either of them. After all three dental facilities subsequently standardised their DUWL disinfection regimes by using Bio 2000, the colony counts from all of the water samples thereafter remained well below the EU recommended level. The unit which progressed to using Sterilox as a continuous disinfectant achieved and maintained zero readings from its water samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical audit can result in the improvement of the quality of water that is discharged through DUWLs, thereby minimising both the risk of cross infection to vulnerable patients, as well as to dental staff chronically exposed to contaminated aerosols.

The presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the dental unit waterline systems of teaching clinics

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the extent of Pseudomonas aeruginosa contamination of Dental Unit Water (DUW) at a Dental Teaching Center in Jordan.

METHODS

Water samples were collected from 30 dental units, 10 from each of three teaching clinics, namely conservative dentistry, periodontology, and prosthodontics. Samples were collected from the outlet of the air/water syringe, high-speed handpiece and water cup filler, at the beginning of the working day (before use), after 2 min flushing, and at midday.

RESULTS

P. aeruginosa was detected in 86.7% (26/30) of the dental units at the beginning of the working day, and in 73.3% (22/30) after 2 min of flushing and at midday. Conservative dentistry units had the highest counts, followed by periodontology and prosthodontics (P<0.05). Overall, the highest counts (log10 count CFU ml-1) were at the beginning of the working day (1.38+/-1.05), and the lowest counts after flushing for 2 min (1.10+/-1.03), and higher numbers were seen again at midday (1.15+/-1.04) (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

86.7% of the dental units were contaminated with P. aeruginosa, the conservative dentistry units had the highest amount of contamination. Flushing the DUW for 2 min significantly reduced the counts of P. aeruginosa.

A novel automated waterline cleaning system that facilitates effective and consistent control of microbial biofilm contamination of dental chair unit waterlines: A one-year study

Microbial contamination of dental chair unit (DCU) output water caused by biofilm growth in dental unit waterlines (DUWs) is a universal problem and a potentially significant source of cross-infection. The microbial quality of output water from a Planmeca Compact i DCU equipped with the novel Water Management System (WMS), an integrated and automated DUW cleaning system, was investigated over a 12-month period with the hydrogen peroxide- and silver ion-containing disinfectants Planosil and Planosil Forte. Four weeks after connection to the potable-water quality mains supply the density of aerobic heterotrophic bacteria, rose from the low levels consistently found in the supply water throughout this study (mean average 77 cfu/mL) to 15,400 cfu/mL. Disinfection of DUWs once weekly with Planosil for 10 weeks resulted in a dramatic reduction in bacterial density immediately following disinfection (mean average 26 cfu/mL). Bacterial density rose steadily between disinfections and by 7 days post-disinfection, water quality failed (mean average 384 cfu/mL) the American Dental Association DCU water quality standard of <or=200 cfu/mL. The DCU was then disinfected once weekly for 40 weeks with Planosil Forte. The average bacterial density immediately post-disinfection was 20 cfu/mL and 7 days post-disinfection was 113 cfu/mL. Electron microscopy showed that improved output water quality following disinfection with both disinfectants was associated with marked elimination of DUW biofilm, but deterioration of water quality following disinfection was associated with its regrowth. The most common bacterial species cultured from the mains water and the DCU output water were Microcococcus luteus and Sphingomonas spp., respectively, the latter of which are known opportunistic pathogens. The findings of this study show that the Planmeca Compact i DCU equipped with the easy to use and automated WMS, that requires minimal effort on the part of the operator, consistently provides output water that passes the ADA quality standard of <or=200 cfu/mL for up to 7 days following once-weekly disinfection with Planosil Forte.

Attitudes of general dental practitioners in Europe to the microbial risk associated with dental unit water systems

Dental Unit Water Systems (DUWS) are used in dental practices to provide water for cooling of dental equipment and irrigation of the oral cavity. However, they have been demonstrated to be contaminated with micro-organisms. There are currently no European Union (EU) Commission guidelines for the microbial quality of water discharged by DUWS. This study was part of an EU research programme to investigate the microbial contamination of DUWS in general dental practice (GDP) in the UK, Denmark, Germany, The Netherlands, Ireland, Greece and Spain.

OBJECTIVE

To undertake a questionnaire survey on the type of DUWS in use and determine the attitude of GDPs to the risk of microbial infection from DUWS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The questionnaire was written and translated into the language of each country before being posted to each participating dentist. Dentists were asked to complete the questionnaire survey and return it by post.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The major findings were that the majority of dentists did not clean, disinfect or determine the microbial load of their DUWS, and that dentists would welcome regular monitoring and advice on maintaining their DUWS; the introduction of guidelines; and recommendations on controlling the microbial load of DUWS.

Detection of Legionella spp. by fluorescent in situ hybridization in dental unit waterlines

AIMS

To confirm the presence of viable Legionella spp. in dental unit waterlines (DUWL) using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and compare this method with culture approach and also to validate the utility of an enrichment to increase FISH sensitivity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Water samples from 40 dental units were analysed. Three different techniques for detecting Legionella spp. were compared: (i) culture approach, (ii) direct FISH and (iii) FISH with a previous R2A medium enrichment (R2A/FISH). The FISH detection was confirmed by PCR. The use of the direct FISH does not improve significantly the detection of legionellae when compared with the culture. On the contrary, when R2A/FISH was performed, sensitivity was, respectively, two- and threefold higher than that with the direct FISH and culture approach. Using R2A/FISH, 63% of water samples analysed showed a contamination by legionellae.

CONCLUSIONS

Legionellae detection by direct FISH and R2A/FISH in dental unit water is possible but is more rapid and more sensitive (R2A/FISH) than the culture approach.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

R2A/FISH showed that several pathogens present in DUWL are viable but may not be culturable. Unlike PCR, R2A/FISH is designed to detect only metabolically active cells and therefore provides more pertinent information on infectious risk.

Comparison of the efficacies of disinfectants to control microbial contamination in dental unit water systems in general dental practices across the European Union

Water delivered by dental unit water systems (DUWS) in general dental practices can harbor high numbers of bacteria, including opportunistic pathogens. Biofilms on tubing within DUWS provide a reservoir for microorganisms and should be controlled. This study compared disinfection products for their ability to meet the American Dental Association's guideline of <200 CFU x ml(-1) for DUWS water. Alpron, BioBlue, Dentosept, Oxygenal, Sanosil, Sterilex Ultra, and Ster4Spray were tested in DUWS (n = 134) in Denmark, Germany, Greece, Ireland, The Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Weekly water samples were tested for total viable counts (TVCs) on yeast extract agar, and, where possible, the effects of products on established biofilm (TVCs) were measured. A 4- to 5-week baseline measurement period was followed by 6 to 8 weeks of disinfection (intermittent or continuous product application). DUWS water TVCs before disinfection ranged from 0 to 5.41 log CFU x ml(-1). Disinfectants achieved reductions in the median water TVC ranging from 0.69 (Ster4Spray) to 3.11 (Dentosept) log CFU x ml(-1), although occasional high values (up to 4.88 log CFU x ml(-1)) occurred with all products. Before treatment, 64% of all baseline samples exceeded American Dental Association guidelines, compared to only 17% following commencement of treatment; where tested, biofilm TVCs were reduced to below detectable levels. The antimicrobial efficacies of products varied (e.g., 91% of water samples from DUWS treated with Dentosept or Oxygenal met American Dental Association guidelines, compared to 60% of those treated with Ster4Spray). Overall, the continuously applied products performed better than those applied intermittently. The most effective products were Dentosept and Oxygenal, although Dentosept gave the most consistent and sustained antimicrobial effect over time.

Isolation of pathogenic Legionella species and legionella-laden amoebae in dental unit waterlines

Legionella released into the air during treatment are a potential source of infection. Water stagnation in dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) creates biofilms and promotes the proliferation of these micro-organisms. This study investigated the presence of amoeba infected with legionella, L. pneumophila and other pathogenic Legionella species in a dental teaching hospital. Water samples were collected in the morning and afternoon from 99 dental units and 16 taps connected to the municipal water supply. Samples were plated on selective media and tested for legionella using the direct immunofluorescent antibody technique and the latex agglutination test. Legionella were found in 33% of the DUWLs and in 47% of the mains taps supplying these units. Legionella-laden amoebae occurred in one mains tap sample and in 20% of DUWLs in a clinic of the teaching hospital. L. micdadei was the predominant species isolated from this clinic. L. pneumophila serogroups 2-14 predominated in the mains water, whereas L. pneumophila serogroup 1 was found in approximately half of the contaminated DUWLs and mains taps irrespective of the time of sampling. Pathogenic Legionella species seeded by municipal water into DUWLs is a potential source of legionella infection for both dental personnel and patients during prolonged dental treatment. This problem is compounded by the presence of legionella-laden amoebae which may contain levels of organism well within the infective dose. The interaction of legionella with amoebae is an important ecological factor that may significantly increase the risk of legionellosis, and thus should be given further consideration in the refinement of risk assessment models.

The Use of Ozone in Dentistry and Medicine

There is growing interest in the use of ozone in oral healthcare and the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) is at present reviewing the evidence for its effectiveness in the management of occlusal and plain surface caries. These are only two of the clinical problems for which ozone can, and has, been used; it has also been employed for a wide variety of other purposes in both dentistry and medicine. This pale blue-coloured gas plays an important role as a natural constituent in the higher layer of the Earth's atmosphere. There is growing evidence that it can be employed as a useful therapeutic agent. This paper reviews its therapeutic uses to date and suggests its possible future clinical applications. Consumer demands for this strong oxidant may increase as the general public becomes increasingly aware of its therapeutic capacity and the non-invasive manner in which it can be administered.

Microbiological evaluation of dental unit water systems in general dental practice in Europe

A range of opportunistic pathogens have been associated with dental unit water systems (DUWS), particularly in the biofilms that can line the tubing. This study therefore aimed to assess the microbiology of DUWS and biofilms in general dental practices across seven European countries, including the United Kingdom (UK), Ireland (IRL), Greece (GR), Spain (ES), Germany (D), Denmark (DK) and the Netherlands (NL). Water supplied by 51% of 237 dental unit water lines exceeded current American Dental Association recommendations of < or = 200 colony-forming units (CFU) ml(-1). Microbiological loading of the source waters was between 0 (Denmark, the Netherlands and Spain) and 4.67 (IRL) log CFU ml(-1); water line samples from the DUWS ranged from 1.52 (ES) to 2.79 (GR) log CFU ml(-1); and biofilm counts ranged from 1.49 (GR) to 3.22 (DK) log CFU.cm(-2). Opportunistic pathogens such as legionellae (DK and ES), including Legionella pneumophila SG1 (DK and GR), and Mycobacterium spp. (DK, NL, GR, D and ES) were recovered occasionally. Presumptive oral streptococci (ES and NL), oral anaerobes (GR), Candida spp. (UK, NL and ES) and blood (GR and IRL) were detected at relatively low frequencies, but their presence indicated a failure of the 3-in-1 antiretraction valve, leading to back siphonage of oral fluids into the water and biofilm phase. These findings confirm that a substantial proportion of DUWS have high levels of microbial contamination, irrespective of country, type of equipment and source water. The study emphasizes the need for effective mechanisms to reduce the microbial burden within DUWS, and highlights the risk of occupational exposure and cross-infection in general dental practice.

Prevalence of legionella waterline contamination and Legionella pneumophila antibodies in general dental practitioners in London and rural Northern Ireland

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of legionellae in dental unit waterlines (DUWL) in general dental practices in London and rural Northern Ireland and whether the organism occurs at a high enough frequency and magnitude in DUWL to represent a threat to dentists' health.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Two hundred and sixty six (166 London, 100 Northern Ireland) randomly selected dental surgeries were recruited. Standardised 250 ml water samples were taken from the DUWL and 1 litre samples from the surgery cold water tap to measure the prevalence of legionellae. The dentists provided a blood sample for legionella serology.

RESULTS

The prevalence of legionellae was very low (0.37%). Legionellae were not isolated from DUWL or surgery basin taps in Northern Ireland. Legionella spp were isolated from the DUWL and surgery basin of one practice in London and from the cold water supply of a further three practices. The prevalence of Legionella pneumophila antibodies was less than that seen in a comparable group of London blood donors.

CONCLUSION

The risk to dentists' health from potential exposure to legionellae in this cohort of dentists was very low and this was confirmed by the very low seroprevalence and antibody titres to legionella detected in the dentists.

Formation and Decontamination of Biofilms in Dental Unit Waterlines

BACKGROUND

Biofilms are a natural occurrence in aquatic environments, including community drinking water systems. The interior of small-diameter tubings in dental unit waterlines (DUWL) are also sites of biofilm formation. In the lumen of the tubings, the flow is minimal, and the water becomes stagnant when the units are not in use. Molecules precipitate from the water onto the interior wall and promote the adherence of planktonic microorganisms from the water. Once they become sessile, the microorganisms change their phenotype. After adherence, there is a so-called surface-associated lag time, and the organisms then enter a growth phase and produce exopolysaccharides that coat the organisms in a slime layer. Within the biofilm, the microorganisms can signal one another, transfer nutrients, and exchange genetic material. The insoluble exopolysaccharides shield the microorganisms from displacement and from penetration by predator organisms, antibiotics, and disinfectants. The external surface layer of microorganisms is faster growing and may detach as "swarmer" cells. Detachment of microorganisms from dental unit biofilm flushed into the oral cavity could theoretically infect the patient. Splatter and aerosols from dental procedures may possibly infect health care personnel.

METHODS

This study compared three DUWL cleaners (an alkaline peroxide product, a freshly mixed chlorine dioxide product, and a buffer-stabilized chlorine dioxide product) in 16 dental units with self-contained water systems, 6 months after installation in a periodontal teaching clinic. One unit treated by flushing and drying served as a control. Units were sampled daily for 10 days with heterotrophic plate count (HPC) sampler plates. The plates were incubated for 7 days at room temperature, and colonies were counted at 10.5x magnification. Samples of internal water tubing before and after the use of waterline cleaners were processed and examined by scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

The estimated mean HPC was derived from original and replicate independent counts of two investigators of undiluted and diluted samples, reported as colony forming units (CFU)/ml. Shock treatments with the alkaline peroxide product (n = 5) reduced the HPC from baseline, but in the ratio of daily counts to control, there was a large variance and a trend to return of high counts as days passed. The mean daily HPC was significantly better than the control for only 3 of the 9 days of treatment and exceeded the goal of 200 on 3 days. Freshly mixed chlorine dioxide (n = 4) and the buffer-stabilized chlorine dioxide (n = 5) both reduced HPC to near 0 on all days. Their ratios of daily estimated means to that of the control were significantly (P < 0.001) better at all times. In comparing treatments, the freshly mixed chlorine dioxide was better (P < 0.001) than the alkaline peroxide on 8 of 9 days. The buffered chlorine dioxide treatment was better than the alkaline peroxide at all times. The two chlorine dioxide treatments each had so many HPC counts of 0 that a meaningful statistical difference between them was not calculated. Scanning electron microscopy of plastic waterline tubing samples taken before and after treatments showed reductions in biofilm coverage, but the differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Chlorine dioxide waterline cleaners are effective in decontaminating DUWL biofilm. Chlorine dioxide has advantages over other chlorine products. Controlling DUWL biofilm may have beneficial effects on nosocomial infections.

Waterborne pathogens and dental waterlines

Humans, like every other living thing on Earth, have evolved in a world dominated by many billions of microscopic life forms. Most of the time, we live in a state of harmony (or even mutualism) with our invisible coinhabitants. When this balance becomes disturbed however, the consequences can be devastating. Infectious diseases including malaria, tuberculosis, and AIDS remain the world's greatest mass murderers. Dental workers strive to reduce infection risks for their patients through infection control measures that reduce or eliminate potentially pathogenic agents in the clinical environment. As increasing numbers of patients with varying degrees of immune suppression present for dental treatment, the need to ensure an aseptic treatment environment will become a higher priority for the dental profession. The possibility that exposure to aerosols contaminated with endotoxin might exacerbate asthma or cause chronic respiratory problems in dental health care workers should be investigated. Although direct evidence of widespread complications among patients or occupationally acquired illness among dental workers is presently lacking, reducing the numbers of microorganisms present in dental treatment water is consistent with other empiric measures that form the basis of infection-control practice.

Microbiological evaluation of a range of disinfectant products to control mixed-species biofilm contamination in a laboratory model of a dental unit water system

Dental unit water system (DUWS) tubing harbors complex multispecies biofilms that are responsible for high microbial levels at the distal outlet. The aim of this study was to use an established biofilm laboratory model to simulate biofouling of DUWS to evaluate practical, cost-effective, and evidence-based methods of microbial decontamination. Reproducible biofilms were developed in the model over 14 days; decontamination was assessed using total viable counts (TVC) and microscopic-image analysis techniques to view the inner surface of tubing. Flushing did not reduce the biofilm coverage or TVC. Combizyme and ozone did not completely eliminate the viable bacteria (70 and 65% reduction in biofilm TVC, respectively), nor did they remove the biofilm (45 and 57% reduction in biofilm coverage, respectively). Chlorhexidine and Bio2000 (active agent: ethanol and chlorhexidine), Tegodor and Gigasept Rapid (aldehyde based), and Grotanol (hydroxide based) completely eliminated the TVC but did not completely remove biofilm (31, 53 33, 34, and 64.9% reduction of biofilm coverage, respectively). Other products including Grotanol Flussig (phenol based), Betadine (povidone-iodine based), Alpron (chlorite based), and the hydroxide-containing products Sporklenz, Sterilex Ultra, Dialox, Sterilox, Sanosil, Oxigenal, and Grotanat Bohrerbad resulted in a 100% reduction in the biofilm TVC and a >95% reduction in biofilm coverage. The study demonstrated that while many disinfectants achieve a sufficient reduction in TVC they may not necessarily remove unwanted biofilm from the tubing surfaces as tested in this laboratory-controlled biofilm model.

A cross sectional study of water quality from dental unit water lines in dental practices in the West of Scotland

OBJECTIVE

To determine the microbiological quality of water from dental units in a general practice setting and current practice for disinfection of units.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study of the water quality from 40 dental units in 39 general practices and a questionnaire of the disinfection protocols used in those practices.

SETTING

NHS practices in primarydental care.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-nine general practices from the West of Scotland.

METHODS

Water samples were collected on two separate occasions from dental units and analysed for microbiological quality by the total viable count (TVC) method. Water specimens were collected from the triple syringe, high speed outlet, cup filler and surgery tap. Each participating practitioner was asked to complete a questionnaire. Results Microbial contamination was highest from the high speed outlet followed by the triple syringe and cup filler. On average, the TVC counts from the high speed water lines at 37 degrees C and for the high speed lines, triple syringe and cup filler at 22 degrees C were significantly higher than that from the control tap water specimens. The study included units from 11 different manufacturers with ages ranging from under one year to over eight years. The age of the dental unit analysed did not appear to influence the level of microbial contamination. Five of the practices surveyed used disinfectants to clean the dental units but these had no significant effect on the microbiological quality of the water. The majority of dental units (25 out of 40) were never flushed with water between patients. A number of different non-sterile irrigants were used for surgical procedures.

CONCLUSION

The microbiological quality of water from dental units in general dental practice is poor compared with that from drinking water sources. Suitable sterile irrigants should be used for surgical procedures in dental practice. Further work is required for pragmatic decontamination regimens of dental unit water lines in a general dental practice setting

Evaluation of the efficacy of Alpron disinfectant for dental unit water lines

AIMS

To assess the efficacy of a disinfectant, Alpron, for controlling microbial contamination within dental unit water lines.

METHODS

The microbiological quality of water emerging from the triple syringe, high speed handpiece, cup filler and surgery hand wash basin from six dental units was assessed for microbiological total viable counts at 22 degrees C and 37 degrees C before and after treatment with Alpron solutions.

RESULTS

The study found that the use of Alpron disinfectant solutions could reduce microbial counts in dental unit water lines to similar levels for drinking water. This effect was maintained in all units for up to six weeks following one course of treatment. In four out of six units the low microbial counts were maintained for 13 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Disinfectants may have a short term role to play in controlling microbial contamination of dental unit water lines to drinking water quality. However, in the longer term attention must be paid to redesigning dental units to discourage the build up of microbial biofilms.

Effective control of dental chair unit waterline biofilm and marked reduction of bacterial contamination of output water using two peroxide-based disinfectants

Bacterial biofilm in dental unit waterlines (DUWs) is a widespread problem, and poses a potentially significant risk of infection to dental staff and patients, particularly those who are medically compromised or immunocompromised. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the level of bacterial contamination of dental chair unit output water in the Dublin Dental Hospital, and to investigate the efficacy of two hydrogen peroxide-based disinfectants in reducing bacterial loads to < or =200 cfu/mL as recommended by the American Dental Association. The chemical quality of dental chair unit input and output water was well within the limits recommended for potable water. Water supplied to the units yielded an average aerobic heterotrophic bacterial cell density of 184 cfu/mL. However, the corresponding density in output water was considerably higher; the average cell density in water from the three-in-one air/water syringes and cup fillers in 12 chairs was 8200 and 4300 cfu/mL, respectively. Dental unit water obtained from 18 separate reservoir-supplied units in general practices in the Dublin area yielded an average of 66000 cfu/mL. The bacterial species found were predominantly environmental organisms, which were also present at low levels in the input water. Some of the species identified (e.g., Burkholderia cepacia and Pseudomonas fluorescens) are known opportunistic pathogens. The capacity of two disinfectants, Sterilex Ultra and Sanosil, to reduce bacterial contamination to safe levels was compared. In a controlled study, once weekly overnight (15 h) disinfection using either agent reduced the bacterial density to below the American Dental Association recommended level of 200 cfu/mL. However, once disinfection ceased the bacterial loads increased to unacceptably high levels within three weeks. Electron microscopic analysis showed that both disinfectants markedly reduced biofilm in the DUWs, but the biofilm rapidly became extensive again when once weekly disinfection ceased. While both disinfectants were equally effective in lowering the bacterial counts to acceptable levels, Sterilex Ultra was associated with clogging of DUWs in some dental chair units after repeated usage, suggesting that Sanosil is a more suitable agent for routine use.

The effect of a disinfectant/coolant irrigant on microbes isolated from dental unit water lines

The purpose of this study was to assess water samples from a hospital dental clinic to determine whether a disinfectant/coolant irrigant containing chlorhexidine (Lines, Micrylium Laboratories) affects the presence of microbial organisms in dental unit waterlines. Water samples from three hospital dental operatories were collected at baseline and after overnight treatment with a disinfectant-containing irrigant followed by sterile water irrigation. Saliva of treated patients and sterile water rinse specimens were collected from the waterlines of these operatories for three consecutive days, then weekly for eight weeks after treatment. Specimens were cultured to identify total heterotrophic plate counts as well as presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida species. Baseline organism counts varied from 10(3) to 10(5) colony-forming units per milliliter. After treatment, no organisms were detected in waterline discharge. Decontamination of dental unit waterlines is possible using a disinfectant/irrigant followed by sterile water irrigation. The potential for contamination of the lines from patients' saliva may have been reduced due to use of anti-retraction valves and the disinfectant/sterile water irrigation, as conducted in this study.

Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms

Though biofilms were first described by Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, the theory describing the biofilm process was not developed until 1978. We now understand that biofilms are universal, occurring in aquatic and industrial water systems as well as a large number of environments and medical devices relevant for public health. Using tools such as the scanning electron microscope and, more recently, the confocal laser scanning microscope, biofilm researchers now understand that biofilms are not unstructured, homogeneous deposits of cells and accumulated slime, but complex communities of surface-associated cells enclosed in a polymer matrix containing open water channels. Further studies have shown that the biofilm phenotype can be described in terms of the genes expressed by biofilm-associated cells. Microorganisms growing in a biofilm are highly resistant to antimicrobial agents by one or more mechanisms. Biofilm-associated microorganisms have been shown to be associated with several human diseases, such as native valve endocarditis and cystic fibrosis, and to colonize a wide variety of medical devices. Though epidemiologic evidence points to biofilms as a source of several infectious diseases, the exact mechanisms by which biofilm-associated microorganisms elicit disease are poorly understood. Detachment of cells or cell aggregates, production of endotoxin, increased resistance to the host immune system, and provision of a niche for the generation of resistant organisms are all biofilm processes which could initiate the disease process. Effective strategies to prevent or control biofilms on medical devices must take into consideration the unique and tenacious nature of biofilms. Current intervention strategies are designed to prevent initial device colonization, minimize microbial cell attachment to the device, penetrate the biofilm matrix and kill the associated cells, or remove the device from the patient. In the future, treatments may be based on inhibition of genes involved in cell attachment and biofilm formation.

A pilot study of three methods for the reduction of bacterial contamination of dental unit water systems in routine use

Three different methods for minimizing the bacterial contamination of the water system in a SIRONA C2 type dental unit were investigated sequentially. Without any decontamination method, water from the hand piece, air-water-jet and mouthwash were continuously contaminated by 10(3) to 10(5) colony forming units (cfu) of aerobic mesophilic bacteria per milliliter. A reduction to below 100 cfu/ml was achieved by continuous adding of a chemical microbicide based on hydrogen peroxide and silver ions. However, this was only possible after rinsing the system thoroughly for at least two minutes after interruptions of the treatment. Long-lasting low counts of below 100/ml were obtained by means of an in-line bacteria filter, in connection with the provision of a thermo-chemical or thermal decontamination of the water pipes and hand pieces after the filter. The electrolyte release of chlorine from the dental unit tap water by anodic oxidation without addition of any chemical disinfectant also resulted in continuously low colony numbers of the water. In this case, regular decontamination of the end parts of the pipes and hand pieces was not necessary.

Evaluation of ultrasonic scaling unit waterline contamination after use of chlorine dioxide mouthrinse lavage

BACKGROUND

An infection control problem in dental operatories which is not fully controlled is waterline contamination by heterotrophic mesophilic bacteria. These bacteria are present in water supplies as a planktonic phase and adhere to the lumen of tubings as a biofilm comprised of their external cell surface glycocalyx and by production of extracellular carbohydrate polymers. The adherent film is most difficult to remove. The accumulated planktonic phase can be reduced significantly by flushing water from the lines before use in patient treatment, but will return when the equipment is idle through the accumulation of more planktonic phase and by slough of the biofilm surface-adsorbed phase not yet enmeshed in the carbohydrate matrix. Chlorine dioxide has antimicrobial activity against many bacteria, spores, and viruses. It is used in water supply treatment as a disinfectant and slime preventive and has an advantage over chlorine in that carcinogenic trihalomethanes are not generated.

METHODS

This study compared use of phosphate buffer-stabilized chlorine dioxide (0.1%) mouthrinse as a lavage in ultrasonic dental scaler units with the use of tap water as a control. Sterile water flushed through the units onto heterotrophic plate count (HPC) sampler plates was cultured 7 days at room temperature and colonies were counted at 12x. One test and one control unit were used for biopsy of internal tubing and scanning electron microscopy imaging.

RESULTS

The HPC counts, in colony forming units (CFU)/ml, were reduced 3- to 5-fold by flushing tap water through the units, but they returned after units were idle overnight. When phosphate-buffered chlorine dioxide mouthrinse was used as a lavage, CFU/ml were reduced 12- to 20-fold. Holding chlorine dioxide in waterlines overnight reduced recurrent buildup compared to water (P <0.05). Scanning electron microscopy images indicated a significant reduction of biofilm coverage by chlorine dioxide as compared to water (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Phosphate-buffered chlorine dioxide mouthrinse was effective in these short-term trials for control of waterline contamination in ultrasonic dental scaling units. It should prove as useful in dental professional waterline applications as it has in industrial uses for biofilm control.

Microbial biofilm formation and contamination of dental-unit water systems in general dental practice

Dental-unit water systems (DUWS) harbor bacterial biofilms, which may serve as a haven for pathogens. The aim of this study was to investigate the microbial load of water from DUWS in general dental practices and the biofouling of DUWS tubing. Water and tube samples were taken from 55 dental surgeries in southwestern England. Contamination was determined by viable counts on environmentally selective, clinically selective, and pathogen-selective media, and biofouling was determined by using microscopic and image analysis techniques. Microbial loading ranged from 500 to 10(5) CFU. ml(-1); in 95% of DUWS water samples, it exceeded European Union drinking water guidelines and in 83% it exceeded American Dental Association DUWS standards. Among visible bacteria, 68% were viable by BacLight staining, but only 5% of this "viable by BacLight" fraction produced colonies on agar plates. Legionella pneumophila, Mycobacterium spp., Candida spp., and Pseudomonas spp. were detected in one, five, two, and nine different surgeries, respectively. Presumptive oral streptococci and Fusobacterium spp. were detected in four and one surgeries, respectively, suggesting back siphonage and failure of antiretraction devices. Hepatitis B virus was never detected. Decontamination strategies (5 of 55 surgeries) significantly reduced biofilm coverage but significantly increased microbial numbers in the water phase (in both cases, P < 0.05). Microbial loads were not significantly different in DUWS fed with soft, hard, deionized, or distilled water or in different DUWS (main, tank, or bottle fed). Microbiologically, no DUWS can be considered "cleaner" than others. DUWS deliver water to patients with microbial levels exceeding those considered safe for drinking water.

Comamonas acidovorans contamination of dental unit waters

A study was carried out to evaluate the extent of the colonization of dental water systems by Comamonas acidovorans and to investigate how the occurrence of these bacteria is related to certain water characteristics. The 152 water samples were collected from the oral rinsing cup, air-water syringe, turbine and supply lines to dental units. Comamonas acidovorans was found most frequently and in greatest quantities in samples taken from water entering the units and in samples with a lower total bacterial count at 22 degrees C, higher temperature, lower content of organic matter and, in general, higher concentrations of residual chlorine.

Water, water everywhere but not a drop to drink?

Biofilms are emerging as an increasing problem as medical technology advances. Dental practice is no exception and interest in the role of biofilms within dental units as a possible source of cross-infection is intensifying. It is difficult to quantitate the risks associated with aerosolised bacteria for the majority of patients seen in general practice. However, it seems prudent to eliminate this source of infection during treatment of compromised patients. This article attempts to provide a brief overview of current concepts and problems in this area of infection control.

Improved compliance with recommended infection control practices in the dental office between 1994 and 1995

OBJECTIVE

To investigate changes in Ontario dentists' infection control practices between 1994 and 1995.

METHODS

Data from responses of 4003 dentists to a 1994 survey and responses of 987 dentists to a 1995 survey were compared by using descriptive statistics from all respondents and McNemar's test for paired data from those participating in both surveys.

RESULTS

Response rates were 70% (1994) and 62% (1995). There were improvements in reports of routine use of gloves (92% to 94%); masks (73% to 79%); and protective eyewear (83% to 84%); vaccination for hepatitis B virus (HBV) or naturally acquired immunity of dentists (93% to 94%); HBV vaccination of clinical staff (64% to 77%); heat sterilization of handpieces (83% to 95%); and no extra precautions for patients with HIV (13% to 48%). Pairwise comparison of data for 788 dentists participating in both surveys showed statistically significant increases in reports of all practices except use of protective eyewear. The 1995 follow-up data also indicated low compliance with handwashing (74% before treating each patient; 62% after removing gloves); flushing water lines after treating each patient (54%); and using postexposure protocol for needlesticks and cuts (36%).

CONCLUSIONS

Dentists' reports of compliance with recommended infection control practices and universal precautions against HBV and HIV infection increased between 1994 and 1995, but most dentists apparently have not adopted universal precautions. More education is needed to promote universal precautions, HBV vaccination for clinical staff, handwashing, and postexposure protocol.