Corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii and its relationship to postactivation potentiation of the elbow flexors

Increased corticospinal inhibition following brief maximal and submaximal contractions in humans

A potentiating conditioning contraction (CC) has been shown to increase silent period duration, an index of corticospinal inhibition; however, it is unknown if the CC must induce potentiation for corticospinal inhibition to increase. Ten healthy, young adults (four females) completed this study to assess potentiation and silent period (SP) duration before and after four types of CCs: voluntary and electrically evoked maximal CCs to optimize potentiation, and voluntary and electrically evoked submaximal CCs (∼40% of maximal voluntary force) that induced minimal potentiation. Stimulation was applied to the ulnar nerve to evoke twitches for the assessment of potentiation and to evoke tetanic CCs of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. The SP was elicited by applying transcranial magnetic stimulation to the motor cortex during brief contractions at 25% of maximal voluntary force. Changes to twitch force and SP duration were not different for voluntary and tetanic contractions, so data were pooled. Twitch force increased by 81.2 ± 35.7% (P < 0.001) and 3.2 ± 6.5% (P = 0.039) following maximal and submaximal CCs, respectively. The SP was prolonged following maximal (12.6 ± 6.3%; P < 0.001) and submaximal (4.8 ± 4.9%; P < 0.001) CCs. Correlations between post-CC twitch force and SP duration were not significant for maximal or submaximal conditions (r = -0.068; r = 0.067; P ≥ 0.780, respectively). Duration of the SP increased not only following maximal-intensity CCs but also after submaximal-intensity CCs that induced virtually no potentiation (∼3%). Thus, we suggest that corticospinal inhibition is not directly related to mechanisms of muscle potentiation per se, but, rather, the level of muscle contraction likely mediates feedback from large diameter afferents that affect the SP.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced silent period reflects a transient state of corticospinal inhibition that is influenced by recent history of muscle activation, which may include an effect of potentiation. We demonstrate that silent period duration increases following both voluntary and electrically evoked maximal and submaximal conditioning contractions, even though the latter intensity produced virtually no muscle potentiation. Feedback from group Ia and Ib muscle afferents is proposed as the cause of the increased corticospinal inhibition.

Pairing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Loud Sounds Produces Plastic Changes in Motor Output

Most current methods for neuromodulation target the cortex. Approaches for inducing plasticity in subcortical motor pathways, such as the reticulospinal tract, could help to boost recovery after damage (e.g., stroke). In this study, we paired loud acoustic stimulation (LAS) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the motor cortex in male and female healthy humans. LAS activates the reticular formation; TMS activates descending systems, including corticoreticular fibers. Two hundred paired stimuli were used, with 50 ms interstimulus interval at which LAS suppresses TMS responses. Before and after stimulus pairing, responses in the contralateral biceps muscle to TMS alone were measured. Ten, 20, and 30 min after stimulus pairing ended, TMS responses were enhanced, indicating the induction of LTP. No long-term changes were seen in control experiments which used 200 unpaired TMS or LAS, indicating the importance of associative stimulation. Following paired stimulation, no changes were seen in responses to direct corticospinal stimulation at the level of the medulla, or in the extent of reaction time shortening by a loud sound (StartReact effect), suggesting that plasticity did not occur in corticospinal or reticulospinal synapses. Direct measurements in female monkeys undergoing a similar paired protocol revealed no enhancement of corticospinal volleys after paired stimulation, suggesting no changes occurred in intracortical connections. The most likely substrate for the plastic changes, consistent with all our measurements, is an increase in the efficacy of corticoreticular connections. This new protocol may find utility, as it seems to target different motor circuits compared with other available paradigms.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Induction of plasticity by neurostimulation protocols may be promising to enhance functional recovery after damage such as following stroke, but current protocols mainly target cortical circuits. In this study, we developed a novel paradigm which may generate long-term changes in connections between cortex and brainstem. This could provide an additional tool to modulate and improve recovery.

Mouth rinsing and ingesting salty or bitter solutions does not influence corticomotor excitability or neuromuscular function

PURPOSE

To explore the effect of tasting unpleasant salty or bitter solutions on lower limb corticomotor excitability and neuromuscular function.

METHODS

Nine females and eleven males participated (age: 27 ± 7 years, BMI: 25.3 ± 4.0 kg m^-2). Unpleasant salty (1 M) and bitter (2 mM quinine) solutions were compared to water, sweetened water, and no solution, which functioned as control conditions. In a non-blinded randomized cross-over order, each solution was mouth rinsed (10 s) and ingested before perceptual responses, instantaneous heart rate (a marker of autonomic nervous system activation), quadricep corticomotor excitability (motor-evoked potential amplitude) and neuromuscular function during a maximal voluntary contraction (maximum voluntary force, resting twitch force, voluntary activation, 0-50 ms impulse, 0-100 impulse, 100-200 ms impulse) were measured.

RESULTS

Hedonic value (water: 47 ± 8%, sweet: 23 ± 17%, salt: 71 ± 8%, bitter: 80 ± 10%), taste intensity, unpleasantness and increases in heart rate (no solution: 14 ± 5 bpm, water: 18 ± 5 bpm, sweet: 20 ± 5 bpm, salt: 24 ± 7 bpm, bitter: 23 ± 6 bpm) were significantly higher in the salty and bitter conditions compared to control conditions. Nausea was low in all conditions (< 15%) but was significantly higher in salty and bitter conditions compared to water (water: 3 ± 5%, sweet: 6 ± 13%, salt: 7 ± 9%, bitter: 14 ± 16%). There was no significant difference between conditions in neuromuscular function or corticomotor excitability variables.

CONCLUSION

At rest, unpleasant tastes appear to have no influence on quadricep corticomotor excitability or neuromuscular function. These data question the mechanisms via which unpleasant tastes are proposed to influence exercise performance.

Firing rate trajectories of human motor units during activity-dependent muscle potentiation

During activity-dependent potentiation (ADP) motor unit firing rates (MUFRs) are lower, however, the mechanism for this response is not known. During increasing torque isometric contractions at low contraction intensities, MUFR trajectories initially accelerate and saturate demonstrating a non-linear response due to the activation of persistent inward currents (PICs) at the motoneuron. The purpose was to assess whether PICs are a factor in the reduction of MUFRs during ADP. To assess this, MUFR trajectories were fit with competing functions of linear regression and a rising exponential (i.e., acceleration and saturation). Using fine-wire electrodes, discrete MU potential trains were recorded in the tibialis anterior during slowly increasing dorsiflexion contractions to 10% of maximal voluntary contraction following both voluntary (post-activation potentiation; PAP) and evoked (post-tetanic potentiation; PTP) contractions. In 8 participants, 25 MUs were recorded across both ADP conditions and compared to the control with no ADP effect. During PAP and PTP, the average MUFRs were 16.4% and 9.2% lower (both P≤ 0.001), respectively. More MUFR trajectories were better fit to the rising exponential during control (16/25) compared to PAP (4/25, P<0.001) and PTP (8/25, P=0.03). The MU samples that had a rising exponential MUFR trajectory during PAP and PTP displayed an ~11% lower initial acceleration compared to control (P<0.05). Thus, synaptic amplification and MUFR saturation due to PIC properties are attenuated during ADP regardless of the type of conditioning contraction. This response may contribute to lower MUFRs and likely occurred because synaptic input is reduced when contractile function is enhanced.

Muscle activation and biceps brachii strength under manual fixation of the scapula and different loading conditions

BACKGROUND: Few studies have reported the contribution of isometric-specific exercise of the biceps brachii muscle to increased strength under manual fixation of the scapula. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the activation amplitude of the biceps brachii (BB), serratus anterior (SA), and upper trapezius (UT) in a supine lying posture based on various exercise conditions. METHODS: The EMG activity of BB, SA, and UT was measured in 25 healthy adults while performing maximal elbow flexion exercise with or without manual stabilization of the scapula in two different loading conditions. RESULTS: Muscle activation of the BB was significantly greater when performed with manual fixation of the scapula under the wrist-loading exercise condition (p< 0.05) but manual fixation of the scapula or absence thereof did not have an effect. Elbow flexion force was significantly increased when applying manual fixation to the scapula in both the hand and wrist-loading exercise conditions (p< 0.05). There were no interaction effects between exercise conditions and manual fixation (with or without) in any of the EMG activation values (p> 0.05). CONCLUSION: Manual stabilization of the scapula is a useful therapeutic technique to increase BB strength. Such an intervention may also be indicated for accurate strength measurement of this muscle.

Reliability of corticospinal excitability estimates for the vastus lateralis: Practical considerations for lower limb TMS task selection

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly used to examine lower extremity corticospinal excitability (CSE) in clinical and sports research. Because CSE is task-specific, there is growing emphasis on the use of ecological tasks. Nevertheless, the comparative reliability of CSE measurements during established (e.g. knee extensions; KE) and more recent ecological (e.g. squats; SQT) lower extremity tasks has received less attention. The aim of this study was to compare the test-retest reliability of CSE, force, and muscle activity (EMG) during isometric SQT and KE. 19 right-footed men (age: 25 ± 5 yrs) with similar fitness and body composition performed SQT (N = 7) or KE (N = 12) on two consecutive days. Force and EMG were recorded during maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVC). Corticospinal excitability was determined in the dominant leg during light (15% MVC) contractions based on motor evoked potential (MEP) stimulus-response-curves (SRC). Test-retest reliability, absolute agreement, and consistency were determined for force, EMG, and SRC MEP maximum (MEPMAX) and rising phase midpoint (V50). As a secondary analysis, all outcomes were compared between groups with mixed-methods ANCOVAs (Task × Time, covariate: body-fat-percentage). Compared with SQT, KE displayed better test-retest reliability and agreement for MEPMAX whereas V50, force, and EMG were similarly reliable. Force (p = 0.01) and MEPMAX (p = 0.02) were also greater during KE despite a similar V50 (p = 0.11). Differences in test-retest reliability, absolute agreement, and between-group comparisons highlight the need to carefully select lower limb TMS assessment tasks and encourage future efforts to balance ecological validity with statistical sensitivity.

Muscarinic receptor blockade causes postcontraction enhancement in corticospinal excitability following maximal contractions

Although synaptic transmission in motor pathways can be regulated by neuromodulators, such as acetylcholine, few studies have examined how cholinergic activity affects cortical and spinal motor circuits following muscle contractions of varying intensities. This was a human, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Participants attended two sessions where they were administered either a placebo or 25 mg of promethazine. Electromyography of the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) was measured for all conditions. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained via motor cortical transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and F waves were obtained via ulnar nerve electrical stimulation. MEPs and F waves were examined: 1) when the muscle was at rest; 2) after the muscle had been active; and 3) after the muscle had been fatigued. MEPs were unaffected by muscarinic receptor blockade when measurements were recorded from resting muscle or following a 50% isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). However, muscarinic receptor blockade increased MEP area following a 10-s MVC (P = 0.019) and following a fatiguing 60-s MVC (P = 0.040). F wave area and persistence were not affected by promethazine for any muscle contraction condition. Corticospinal excitability was influenced by cholinergic effects when voluntary drive to the muscle was high. Given that spinal motoneurone excitability remained unaffected, it is likely that cholinergic effects are influential within the motor cortex during strong muscle contractions. Future research should evaluate how cholinergic effects alter the relationship between subcortical structures and the motor cortex, as well as brainstem neuromodulatory pathways and spinal motoneurons.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The relationship between motor function and cholinergic circuitry in the central nervous system is complex. Although many studies have approached this issue at the cellular level, few studies have examined cholinergic mechanisms in humans performing muscle contractions. This study demonstrates that blockade of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors enhances motor evoked potentials (elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation) following strong muscle contractions, but not weak muscle contractions.

Post-activation Potentiation Versus Post-activation Performance Enhancement in Humans: Historical Perspective, Underlying Mechanisms, and Current Issues

Post-activation potentiation (PAP) is a well-described phenomenon with a short half-life (~28 s) that enhances muscle force production at submaximal levels of calcium saturation (i.e., submaximal levels of muscle activation). It has been largely explained by an increased myosin light chain phosphorylation occurring in type II muscle fibers, and its effects have been quantified in humans by measuring muscle twitch force responses to a bout of muscular activity. However, enhancements in (sometimes maximal) voluntary force production detected several minutes after high-intensity muscle contractions are also observed, which are also most prominent in muscles with a high proportion of type II fibers. This effect has been considered to reflect PAP. Nonetheless, the time course of myosin light chain phosphorylation (underpinning “classic” PAP) rarely matches that of voluntary force enhancement and, unlike PAP, changes in muscle temperature, muscle/cellular water content, and muscle activation may at least partly underpin voluntary force enhancement; this enhancement has thus recently been called post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) to distinguish it from “classical” PAP. In fact, since PAPE is often undetectable at time points where PAP is maximal (or substantial), some researchers have questioned whether PAP contributes to PAPE under most conditions in vivo in humans. Equally, minimal evidence has been presented that PAP is of significant practical importance in cases where multiple physiological processes have already been upregulated by a preceding, comprehensive, active muscle warm-up. Given that confusion exists with respect to the mechanisms leading to acute enhancement of both electrically evoked (twitch force; PAP) and voluntary (PAPE) muscle function in humans after acute muscle activity, the first purpose of the present narrative review is to recount the history of PAP/PAPE research to locate definitions and determine whether they are the same phenomena. To further investigate the possibility of these phenomena being distinct as well as to better understand their potential functional benefits, possible mechanisms underpinning their effects will be examined in detail. Finally, research design issues will be addressed which might contribute to confusion relating to PAP/PAPE effects, before the contexts in which these phenomena may (or may not) benefit voluntary muscle function are considered.

Neuromuscular fatigue during repeated sprint exercise: underlying physiology and methodological considerations

Neuromuscular fatigue occurs when an individual’s capacity to produce force or power is impaired. Repeated sprint exercise requires an individual to physically exert themselves at near-maximal to maximal capacity for multiple short-duration bouts, is extremely taxing on the neuromuscular system, and consequently leads to the rapid development of neuromuscular fatigue. During repeated sprint exercise the development of neuromuscular fatigue is underlined by a combination of central and peripheral fatigue. However, there are a number of methodological considerations that complicate the quantification of the development of neuromuscular fatigue. The main goal of this review is to synthesize the results from recent investigations on the development of neuromuscular fatigue during repeated sprint exercise. Hence, we summarize the overall development of neuromuscular fatigue, explain how recovery time may alter the development of neuromuscular fatigue, outline the contributions of peripheral and central fatigue to neuromuscular fatigue, and provide some methodological considerations for quantifying neuromuscular fatigue during repeated sprint exercise.

Corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii is shoulder position dependent

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of shoulder position on corticospinal excitability (CSE) of the biceps brachii during rest and a 10% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Participants ( n = 9) completed two experimental sessions with four conditions: 1) rest, 0° shoulder flexion; 2) 10% MVC, 0° shoulder flexion; 3) rest, 90° shoulder flexion; and 4) 10% MVC, 90° shoulder flexion. Transcranial magnetic, transmastoid electrical, and Erb’s point stimulation were used to induce motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), cervicomedullary MEPs (CMEPs), and maximal muscle compound potentials (Mmax), respectively, in the biceps brachii in each condition. At rest, MEP, CMEP, and Mmax amplitudes increased ( P < 0.01) by 509.7 ± 118.3%, 113.3 ± 28.3%, and 155.1 ± 47.9%, respectively, at 90° compared with 0°. At 10% MVC, MEP amplitudes did not differ ( P = 0.08), but CMEP and Mmax amplitudes increased ( P < 0.05) by 32.3 ± 10.5% and 127.9 ± 26.1%, respectively, at 90° compared with 0°. MEP/Mmax increased ( P < 0.01) by 224.0 ± 99.1% at rest and decreased ( P < 0.05) by 51.3 ± 6.7% at 10% MVC at 90° compared with 0°. CMEP/Mmax was not different ( P = 0.22) at rest but decreased ( P < 0.01) at 10% MVC by 33.6 ± 6.1% at 90° compared with 0°. EMG increased ( P < 0.001) by 8.3 ± 2.0% at rest and decreased ( P < 0.001) by 21.4 ± 4.4% at 10% MVC at 90° compared with 0°. In conclusion, CSE of the biceps brachii was dependent on shoulder position, and the pattern of change was altered within the state in which it was measured. The position-dependent changes in Mmax amplitude, EMG, and CSE itself all contribute to the overall change in CSE of the biceps brachii.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate that when the shoulder is placed into two common positions for determining elbow flexor force and activation, corticospinal excitability (CSE) of the biceps brachii is both shoulder position and state dependent. At rest, when the shoulder is flexed from 0° to 90°, supraspinal factors predominantly alter CSE, whereas during a slight contraction, spinal factors predominantly alter CSE. Finally, the normalization techniques frequently used by researchers to investigate CSE may under- and overestimate CSE when shoulder position is changed.

Corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii and its relationship to postactivation potentiation of the elbow flexors

We examined the effects of a submaximal voluntary elbow flexor contraction protocol on measures of corticospinal excitability and postactivation potentiation of evoked muscle forces and if these measures were state‐dependent (rest vs. voluntary muscle contraction). Participants completed four experimental sessions where they rested or performed a 5% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of the elbow flexors prior to, immediately, and 5 min following a submaximal contraction protocol. During rest or 5% MVC, transcranial magnetic stimulation, transmastoid electrical stimulation, electrical stimulation of biceps brachii motor point and Erb's point were elicited to induce motor‐evoked potentials (MEPs), cervicomedullary MEPs (CMEPs), potentiated twitch (PT) force, and maximal muscle compound action potential (M_max), respectively prior to, immediately, and 5 min postcontraction protocol. MEP amplitudes increased (215 and 165%M_max, P ≤ 0.03) only at 1 and 6s postcontraction protocol, respectively during rest but not 5% MVC. CMEP amplitudes decreased during rest and 5% MVC (range:21–58%M_max, P ≤ 0.04) for up to 81 sec postcontraction protocol. Peak twitch force increased immediately postcontraction protocol and remained elevated for 90 sec (range:122–147% increase, P < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between MEP and PT force during rest (r = 0.88, P = 0.01) and a negative correlation between CMEP and PT force during rest (r = −0.85, P < 0.02 and 5% MVC (r = −0.96, P < 0.01) immediately postcontraction protocol. In conclusion, the change in corticospinal and spinal excitability was state‐ and time‐dependent whereas spinal excitability and postactivation potentiation were time‐dependent following the contraction protocol. Changes in corticospinal excitability and postactivation potentiation correlated and were also state‐dependent.