Effect of combination therapy with alogliptin and lansoprazole on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes

Association Between Clinical Use of Lansoprazole and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: A Nationwide Pharmacoepidemiological Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed for gastrointestinal disorders. Lansoprazole, a PPI, has been recognized for its potential effects of improving insulin resistance, reduction of oxidative stress, and improvement in atherosclerosis through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) induction. This study aims to investigate whether lansoprazole poses a distinct risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) compared to other PPIs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study utilized data from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan spanning from 2000 to 2013. The exposed cohort included 1666 patients with lansoprazole use, while the comparison cohort comprised 6664 patients using other PPIs. The primary outcome was incident CHD. Cox regression models were employed to assess the association between lansoprazole use and CHD risk, presenting hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Patients prescribed lansoprazole demonstrated a significantly reduced risk of CHD compared to those undergoing other PPI treatments in individuals without a history of CHD. Lansoprazole users exhibited a 25% lower risk of developing CHD compared to other PPI users (adjusted HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.65-0.87). Intriguingly, this inverse association between lansoprazole use and CHD risk was consistent across genders and various age groups.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that lansoprazole is associated with a decreased risk of CHD in comparison to other PPIs in patients without a history of CHD. Further research is warranted to elucidate the clinical implications of these findings.

A comprehensive review on potential drug-drug interactions of proton pump inhibitors with antidiabetic drugs metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors

A drug interaction is a condition in which two or more drugs are taken at the same time. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a significant contributor to polypharmacy. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often prescribed in combination with metformin or DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, and alogliptin) or a combined dose of metformin and DPP-4 inhibitor to treat gastritis in diabetic patients. This review article mainly focused on evaluating the potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between PPIs (i.e. esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole) with metformin and PPIs with DPP-4 inhibitors. The findings demonstrated the existence of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic DDIs between the aforementioned PPIs with metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors, which could impact the biological activities (i.e., hypoglycemia) of these drugs. Moreover, this review suggested that esomeprazole could be the best drug in the PPI group to be prescribed simultaneously with metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors, as most of the antidiabetic drugs of this study did not show any interaction with esomeprazole. The findings of this study also revealed that both antidiabetic drugs and PPIs could have positive interactions as PPIs have the potential to lessen the gastrointestinal side effects of metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors. To achieve the greatest therapeutic impact with the fewest side effects, careful dose control of these drugs is required. So, more extensive research on both human and animal subjects are needed to ascertain the veracity of this hypothesis.

Clinical Use of Lansoprazole and the Risk of Osteoporosis: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) lansoprazole acts as a liver X receptor agonist, which plays a crucial role in the crosstalk of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in vitro and during bone turnover in vivo. However, epidemiological studies on the association between the use of lansoprazole and osteoporosis risk are limited. We aimed to determine the risk of developing osteoporosis in patients with lansoprazole use.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan dated from 2000 to 2013. The study includes 655 patients with lansoprazole use (the exposed cohort) and 2620 patients with other PPI use (the comparison cohort). The main outcome was the primary diagnosis of osteoporosis. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the association between the use of lansoprazole and risk of osteoporosis.

RESULTS

Patients receiving lansoprazole treatment had a reduced risk of osteoporosis as compared with those undergoing other PPI therapy (adjusted HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46-0.68). Moreover, this inverse association is evident in both sexes and in various age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based cohort study demonstrated that lansoprazole use was associated with a reduced risk of osteoporosis. The clinical implications of the present study need further investigations.

Effects of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Glycemic Control and Incident Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Whether proton pump inhibitors (PPI) can improve glycemic control among individuals with diabetes or decrease the risk of incident diabetes in the general population is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of PPI therapy on glycemic control among individuals with diabetes and the risk of diabetes among those without diabetes.

RESULTS

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to November 21, 2020. We included studies comparing glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) or fasting blood glucose (FBG) among individuals with diabetes treated with and without PPI therapy as an add-on to standard therapy. Studies evaluating the risk of incident diabetes among individuals taking PPI were assessed. We performed dual independent review, data extraction, and quality assessment. Weighted mean differences between groups or relative risks were imputed using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Seven studies (n = 342) for glycemic control and 5 studies (n = 244 439) for risk of incident diabetes were included. Compared with standard therapy, add-on PPI was associated with a significant decrease in HbA1c (WMD, -0.36 %; 95% CI, -0.68 to -0.05; P = 0.025) and FBG (WMD, -10.0 mg/dL; 95% CI, -19.4 to -0.6; P = 0.037). PPI use did not reduce the risk of incident diabetes (pooled RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.34; P = 0.385).

CONCLUSION

Add-on PPI improved glycemic indices among individuals with diabetes but did not alter the risk of incident diabetes. The effects of PPI on glycemic control should be considered when prescribing antacids to patients with diabetes.

Effect of Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor Use on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type Two Diabetes Mellitus

There have been conflicting results regarding the effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as an adjunctive therapy to oral antidiabetic medication (OAM) in those with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). PPIs increase gastrin levels, causing a rise in insulin. No studies have evaluated the duration of PPI therapy and its effect on glycemic control. Medical records across 8 hospitals between 2007 and 2016 were reviewed for 14,602 patients with T2DM (not on insulin therapy) taking PPIs. Values of HbA1c (baseline, follow-up, and the difference between the two) in those prescribed with PPIs and years of therapy were compared to HbA1c values of those who had no record of PPI use. Baseline and follow-up HbA1c for patients on PPIs were 6.8 and 7.0, respectively, compared to 7.1 and 7.2 in their untreated counterparts (p < 0.001 in both comparisons). For both groups, an increase in baseline HbA1c was seen with time. Those on PPI had an increase in HbA1c of 0.16 compared to 0.08 in those not prescribed PPI. Our results show no relationship between the length of PPI therapy and HbA1c reduction.

Short-Term Effect of Hypergastrinemia Following Esomeprazole Treatment On Well-Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Study

Objective:

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) drugs reduce gastric acid secretion and lead to an increase in serum gastrin levels. Many preclinical and some clinical researches have established some positive effects of gastrin or PPI therapy on glucose regulation. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the short term effects of esomeprazole on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In addition, the presence of an association between this effect and gastrin levels was evaluated.

Methods:

Thirty-two subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus were enrolled and grouped as intervention (n=16) and control (n=16). The participants in the intervention group were prescribed 40 mg of esomeprazole treatment for three months. At the beginning of the study and at the 3rd month, HbA1c level (%) and gastrin levels (pmol/L) of participants were assessed. Then, the groups were compared in terms of their baseline and 3rd month values.

Results:

In the intervention group, the mean gastrin level increased significantly from 34.3±14.4 pmol/L to 87.4±43.6 pmol/L (p<0.001). The mean HbA1c level was similar to the pre-treatment level (6.3±0.7% vs. 6.4±0.9%, p=0.441). There were no statistically significant differences in all parameters of the control group. The majority of individuals were on metformin monotherapy (65.6 %). The subgroup analysis of metformin monotherapy revealed that, in intervention group, there was a significant increase in gastrin levels (39.9±12.6 vs. 95.5±52.5, p=0.026), but the HbA1c levels did not change (6.0±0.4 % vs. 5.9±0.6 %, p=0.288); and in control group, gastrin levels did not change (37.5 ± 26.7 vs. 36.1 ±23.3, p=0.367), but there was an increase in HbA1c levels (6.1 ± 0.50 vs. 6.4 ± 0.60, p=0.01).

Conclusion:

Our study demonstrates that esomeprazole has no extra benefit for the controlled diabetic patient in three months. However, in only the metformin-treated subgroup, esomeprazole may prevent the rise in HbA1c level.

Effect of Proton-Pump Inhibitors on Glucose and Insulin Metabolism on Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Some studies have revealed an improvement in glucose metabolism after proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) therapy; however, this evidence is inconclusive and limited.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to examine the effect of PPI on glucose and insulin metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Only randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of PPI on glucose or insulin concentrations in type 2 diabetes were searched in PubMed-Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model and generic inverse variance method. Sensitivity analysis was performed using the leave-one-out method.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis revealed no significant effect of PPI intervention on fasting glucose (mean difference [MD] -11.42 [95% CI, -29.68 to 6.83], I2 = 80%, p = 0.22), fasting insulin (MD 1.51 [95% CI, -0.36 to 3.37], I2 = 32%, p = 0.11), HOMA-IR (MD -0.16 [-0.98 to 0.65], I2 = 0%, p = 0.70), HOMA-β (MD 19.97 [-21.59 to 61.52], I2 = 71%, p = 0.35), and HbA1c concentrations (MD -0.34 [-0.99 to 0.31], I2 = 89%, p = 0.30).

CONCLUSION

The treatment with PPI, in the short term, had no significant effects on glucose and insulin metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Inhibition of monoglyceride lipase by proton pump inhibitors: investigation using docking and in vitro experiments

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is overwhelming evidence linking elevated plasma free fatty acids with insulin resistance and inflammation. Monoglyceride lipase (MGL) plays a crucial metabolic role in lipolysis by mediating the release of fatty acids. Therefore, inhibiting MGL should be a promising pharmacological approach for treating type 2 diabetes and inflammatory disorders. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been reported to improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes albeit via largely unknown mechanism.

METHODS

The anti-MGL bioactivities of three PPIs, namely, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, and pantoprazole, were investigated using docking experiments and in vitro bioassay.

RESULTS

The three PPIs inhibited MGL in low micromolar range with rabeprazole exhibiting the best IC50 at 4.2 µM. Docking experiments showed several binding interactions anchoring PPIs within MGL catalytic site.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides evidence for a new mechanism by which PPIs improve insulin sensitivity independent of serum gastrin. The three PPIs effectively inhibit MGL and, therefore, serve as promising leads for the development of new clinical MGL inhibitors.

Regulation of adipocyte differentiation and metabolism by lansoprazole

AIMS

Lansoprazole (LPZ) is one of the most commonly prescribed drugs for treatment of acid-related diseases, and it is increasingly recognized for its potential application as an anti-diabetic therapy. Although LPZ target tissues remain poorly understood, possible sites of action include adipose tissue. In this study, we assessed effects of LPZ on adipocyte differentiation and function by using 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and HFD-induced obesity mice as an in vitro and in vivo model, respectively.

MAIN METHODS

Oil red O staining and intracellular triacylglycerol content were used to determine lipid accumulation. Glucose uptake was performed to measure mature adipocyte function. Expression of adipocyte genes was determined by qRT-PCR and immunoblotting.

KEY FINDINGS

LPZ has dual effects on differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells. At low concentrations, LPZ enhanced adipocyte differentiation via induction of PPARγ and C/EBPα, two master adipogenic transcription factors, as well as lipogenic proteins, ACC1 and FASN. Increasing of adipocyte number subsequently increased basal and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake, and expression of Glut4 mRNA. Conversely, high concentrations of LPZ strongly inhibited differentiation and expression of PPARγ and C/EBPα, and maintained expression of preadipocytes markers, β-catenin and Pref-1. Inhibition of adipogenesis by LPZ reduced mature adipocyte number, Glut4 mRNA expression and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. In addition, treatment with LPZ at 200 mg/kg significantly reduced body weight gain and total fat mass in HFD-induced obese mice.

SIGNIFICANCE

These results indicate that effects of LPZ on adipocyte differentiation are dependent on concentration and are correlated with PPARγ and C/EBPα.

Effect of canagliflozin on circulating active GLP-1 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial

Canagliflozin has a robust inhibitory effect on sodium glucose transporter (SGLT)-2 and a mild inhibitory effect on SGLT1. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of canagliflozin on circulating active glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients were randomly divided into a control group (n =15) and a canagliflozin-treated group (n =15). After hospitalization, the canagliflozin-treated group took 100 mg/day canagliflozin for the entire study, and after 3 days both groups took 20 mg/day teneligliptin for an additional 3 days. In a meal test, canagliflozin significantly decreased the area under curve (AUC) (0-120 min) for plasma glucose (PG) after 3 days when compared with that at baseline, and addition of teneligliptin to the canagliflozin-treated group further decreased it. A significant decrease in the AUC (0-120 min) for serum insulin by canagliflozin was obtained, but the addition of teneligliptin elevated the AUC, and thus abolished the significant difference from baseline. A significant increase in the AUC (0-120 min) of plasma active GLP-1 by canagliflozin-treatment compared with that at baseline was observed, and the addition of teneligliptin resulted in a further increase. However, canagliflozin-treatment did not change the AUC (0-120 min) of plasma active glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP). In conclusions, canagliflozin-administration before meals decreased PG and serum insulin, and increased plasma active GLP-1 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. Canagliflozin did not greatly influence plasma active GIP levels.

Long-Term Effect of Alogliptin on Glycemic Control in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A 3.5-Year Observational Study

Background

The goal of the current study was to investigate the long-term effects (after 3 years or more) of alogliptin on glycemic control in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

We retrospectively studied the effect of alogliptin on glycemic control in the patients with type 2 diabetes who had participated in our previous 3-month study and who continued to take alogliptin for at least 36 months.

Results

The mean duration of alogliptin treatment was 42.8 ± 2.2 months. In all 39 patients, a significant reduction in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels was noted between the baseline and final visit: 7.8±0.6% to 7.2±1.0% (P = 0.0001). A significant reduction in HbA1c levels was found in a subgroup of patients who did not change their anti-diabetic drugs or did decrease the dose of their sulfonylureas (SUs) or did change to a lower strength repaglinide (n = 32): 7.7±0.6% to 7.2±1.0% (P = 0.0005). A significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels was observed in all of the patients that had LDL-C levels determined (P = 0.0406) (n = 37), and in a subgroup of patients who had not taken either statins, fibrates, or pioglitazone, or who had taken one or more of these drugs but the doses were not changed during the observation period (P = 0.0250) (n = 27).

Conclusion

The current study found that alogliptin performed well for glycemic control when evaluated by HbA1c levels in a long-term observation period exceeding 3 years in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Alogliptin may also decrease circulating LDL-C levels with long-term use.

The Influence of Proton-Pump Inhibitors on Glycemic Control: A Systematic Review of the Literature and a Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) have shown antihyperglycemic effects by stimulating insulin secretion. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of PPIs on glucose metabolism in general and any potential antidiabetes effects in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and PubMed. Studies using PPIs as interventions and reporting glucose levels, glycated hemoglobin (A1C) levels and insulin levels were selected. Weighted-mean differences (WMDs) were calculated for all outcomes. A random-effects model was used for moderate and high heterogeneity and a fixed-effects model for low heterogeneity data.

RESULTS

The research included 9 studies have involving 320 patients in total. Among patients with type 2 diabetes, those exposed to PPIs did not see significant reductions in A1C levels; WMD -0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.87, 0.15; p=0.17. Pantoprazole resulted in a statistically significant reduction in A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes when compared to control interventions; WMD -0.93, 95% CI -1.49, -0.37; p=0.001. There was no statistically significant difference in other outcomes (p≥0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that PPIs, in general, do not decrease A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, pantoprazole produced significant reductions in A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. Given the limitations and the presence of bias in the primary studies, larger and better-quality studies are warranted.

Therapy with proton pump inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes is independently associated with improved glycometabolic control

AIMS

Experimental data demonstrated that gastrin has incretin-like stimulating actions on β-cells, resulting in a promotion of glucose-induced insulin secretion. As proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) consistently increase plasma gastrin levels, a possible effect of this treatment on glucose-insulin homeostasis may be hypothesized. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of chronic PPIs treatment on glycemic control in patients affected by type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

This is an observational, retrospective study. A total of 548 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age ± SD: 67.1 ± 10.9 years, M/F: 309/239, diabetes duration: 12.4 ± 9.8 years) referring to our diabetes outpatient clinics were enrolled; among them, 45 %were treated with PPIs longer than 2 years for preventive/therapeutic purposes. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum lipids and transaminases were measured by standard laboratory methods. Major cardiovascular events and concomitant medications were recorded in all participants, and daily insulin requirement was calculated in insulin-treated subjects.

RESULTS

PPIs-treated patients had significantly lower HbA1c (7.1 ± 1.07 %-54.1 ± 12 vs 7.4 ± 1.4 %-57.4 ± 8 mmol/mol, p = 0.011) and FPG (127 ± 36.9 vs 147.6 ± 49.4 mg/dl, p < 0.001) levels than those untreated. These differences increased in patients under insulin therapy and in those with concomitant PPIs + GLP-1-based therapy. The multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the association between chronic PPIs treatment and HbA1c was independent from possible confounders (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PPIs treatment is associated with greater glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly in those on insulin- or GLP-1-based therapy. Our results suggest a role for PPIs in glucose-insulin homeostasis and may open a new scenario for diabetes therapy.