Diagnostic value of GATA-3 in cytological identification of parathyroid tissues

Proposal for Clinical Management of Nodules Diagnosed as Atypia of Undetermined Significance via Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Absence of Molecular Testing

OBJECTIVE

Molecular testing is recommended for risk stratification of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) nodules in the USA; however, it is not routinely performed in some countries owing to limited availability and affordability. Here, we propose a risk stratification algorithm for AUS nodules when molecular testing is unavailable.

METHODS

We examined 304 (4.3%) AUS nodules among 7073 thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology specimens examined at Kuma Hospital from January 2020 to December 2020. Clinical data were obtained from the medical records of Kuma Hospital.

RESULTS

AUS with nuclear atypia and AUS-other each accounted for half of the total AUS nodules. The repeat aspiration rate was 19.7%; 61.7% of the nodules were reclassified as benign or malignant upon repeat aspiration. Resection rate and overall risk of malignancy (ROM) were 32.6% and 12.8%, respectively. Architectural atypia showed the lowest (1.1%) overall ROM in the AUS nodules. For AUS with nuclear atypia, nodules ≤ 10 mm in size showed significantly lower overall ROM than those of > 10 mm, and nodules with ultrasonographically low suspicion showed significantly lower overall ROM than those with intermediate to high suspicion. AUS nodules with atypical lymphoid cells, possible medullary thyroid carcinoma, or possible parathyroid lesion were confirmed using flow cytometry, biochemical testing using needle washout fluid or immunocytochemistry, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our proposed clinical management algorithm for each subdivision according to cytological findings, based on repeat aspiration rates, ROM, ultrasound findings and results of ancillary tests except for molecular testing, should be useful for the clinical management of AUS nodules.

"Immunocytochemistry in Cytology: Myth or Reality": Unraveling the Myth - Immunocytochemistry Applications in Thyroid Lesions

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration cytology serves as an important preoperative diagnostic tool for thyroid nodules. Despite its excellent diagnostic accuracy, diagnoses based solely on morphological observation can be challenging. Therefore, various ancillary diagnostic techniques have been applied, including immunocytochemistry (ICC). This review discusses the application and evaluation of ICC in thyroid fine needle aspiration.

SUMMARY

Currently, three immunostaining preparation methods are available for cytological materials: liquid-based cytology, cell block, and cell transfer. ICC proves valuable in scenarios such as tumour diagnosis, assessment of differentiation and grading of carcinomas, estimation of primary organs in metastatic carcinomas, and detection of gene abnormalities. However, ICC, while useful, is not as accurate as immunohistochemistry and is more difficult to evaluate.

KEY MESSAGES

If the pitfalls and limitations are understood and effectively navigated, ICC could play a significant role in decreasing the non-diagnostic rate, thus leading to more accurate and valuable diagnoses and reductions in the re-aspiration rate.

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration cytology serves as an important preoperative diagnostic tool for thyroid nodules. Despite its excellent diagnostic accuracy, diagnoses based solely on morphological observation can be challenging. Therefore, various ancillary diagnostic techniques have been applied, including immunocytochemistry (ICC). This review discusses the application and evaluation of ICC in thyroid fine needle aspiration.

SUMMARY

Currently, three immunostaining preparation methods are available for cytological materials: liquid-based cytology, cell block, and cell transfer. ICC proves valuable in scenarios such as tumour diagnosis, assessment of differentiation and grading of carcinomas, estimation of primary organs in metastatic carcinomas, and detection of gene abnormalities. However, ICC, while useful, is not as accurate as immunohistochemistry and is more difficult to evaluate.

KEY MESSAGES

If the pitfalls and limitations are understood and effectively navigated, ICC could play a significant role in decreasing the non-diagnostic rate, thus leading to more accurate and valuable diagnoses and reductions in the re-aspiration rate.

Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Parathyroid Pathology: Clinical Pathologic Collaboration for Optimal Patient Management

Parathyroid disease typically presents with parathyroid hyperfunction as result of neoplasia or a consequence of non-neoplastic systemic disease. Given the parathyroid gland is a hormonally active organ with broad physiologic implications and serologically accessible markers for monitoring, the diagnosis of parathyroid disease is predominantly a clinical pathologic correlation. We provide the current pathological correlates of parathyroid disease and discuss preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pathology consultative practice for optimal patient care.

GATA3 Expression in Human Tumors: A Tissue Microarray Study on 16,557 Tumors

INTRODUCTION

GATA3 is a transcription factor involved in epithelial cell differentiation. GATA3 immunostaining is used as a diagnostic marker for breast and urothelial cancer but can also occur in other neoplasms.

METHODS

To evaluate GATA3 in normal and tumor tissues, a tissue microarray containing 16,557 samples from 131 different tumor types and subtypes and 608 samples of 76 different normal tissue types was analyzed by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

GATA3 positivity was found in 69 different tumor types including 23 types (18%) with at least one strongly positive tumor. Highest positivity rates occurred in noninvasive papillary urothelial carcinoma (92-99%), lobular carcinoma (98%), carcinoma of no special type of the breast (92%), basal cell carcinoma of the skin (97%), invasive urothelial carcinoma (73%), T-cell lymphoma (23%), adenocarcinoma of the salivary gland (16%), squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (16%), and colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma (12%). In breast cancer, low GATA3 staining was linked to high pT stage (p = 0.03), high BRE grade (p < 0.0001), HER2 overexpression (p = 0.0085), estrogen and progesterone receptor negativity (p < 0.0001 each), and reduced survival (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that GATA3 positivity can occur in various tumor entities. Low levels of GATA3 reflect cancer progression and poor patient prognosis in breast cancer.

A pilot study: Comparison of TRPS1 and GATA3 immunoperoxidase staining using cytologic smears in entities reportedly positive for GATA3

BACKGROUND

Metastatic breast carcinoma (mBC) is frequently encountered and may be challenging to diagnose as the tumor cells can morphologically resemble carcinomas of other primary origins. An additional challenge is that direct smears are often the only sample type available for immunostaining studies in cytology. Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome GATA-binding type 1 1 (TRPS1) is a highly sensitive marker for BC compared to the commonly used marker GATA3, especially in triple-negative BC (TNBC), in histologic samples. However, its sensitivity and specificity in mBC and other GATA3-positive tumors have not been studied.

METHODS

The authors identified the following cytology cases: 37 GATA3-positive mBC cases and 19 available cases that were deemed mBC but were GATA3-negative during the original case workup and five cases of each of eight epithelioid entities known to have high rates of GATA3 positivity and commonly seen in cytology practice. Immunostainings of TRPS1 and GATA3 were performed on the chosen smears following standard protocols.

RESULTS

TRPS1 was positive in all 37 GATA3-positive mBC cases and in 18 of the 19 GATA3-negative mBC cases. TRPS1 was negative in all five of the seven frequently GATA3-positive epithelioid entities, with the exception of salivary duct carcinomas where GATA3 was positive in a rate ranging 60%-100% among them.

CONCLUSIONS

TRPS1 is as sensitive as GATA3 in GATA3-positive mBC and is more sensitive than GATA3 in TNBC. TRPS1 is negative in most GATA3-positive nonbreast tumors. Thus, the combination of TRPS1 and GATA3 could be used to differentiate breast primary from others in most situations.

Giant parathyroid tumours in primary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Giant parathyroid adenoma (GPA) can present with severe biochemical derangement similar to the clinical presentation of parathyroid carcinoma (PC). This study aims to present the current evidence on surgical management of GPAs in primary hyperparathyroidism.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature on GPAs was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Data on clinical, biochemical, preoperative diagnostic, and surgical methods were analysed.

RESULTS

Sixty-one eligible studies were included reporting on 65 GPAs in eutopic, ectopic mediastinal, and intrathyroidal locations (61.5%, 30.8%, and 7.7%, respectively). A palpable neck mass was present in 58% of GPAs. A total of 90% of patients had symptoms including fatigue, skeletal pain, pathological fracture, nausea, and abdominal pain. Ninety percent of patients had significant hypercalcaemia (mean 3.51 mmol/L; range: 2.59-5.74 mmol/L) and hyperparathyroidism with PTH levels on average 14 times above the upper limit of the normal reference. There was no correlation between the reported GPA size and PTH nor between GPA weight and PTH (p = 0.892 and p = 0.363, respectively). Twenty-four percent had a concurrent thyroidectomy for suspicious features, intrathyroidal location of GPA, or large goitre. Immunohistochemistry such as Ki-67, parafibromin, and galectin-3 was used in 18.5% of cases with equivocal histology. Ninety-five percent of GPAs were benign with 5% reported as atypical adenomas.

CONCLUSION

The reported data on GPAs are sparse and heterogeneous. In GPAs with suspicious features for malignancy, en bloc resection with concurrent thyroidectomy may be considered. In the presence of equivocal histological features, ancillary immunohistochemistry is advocated to differentiate GPAs from atypical adenomas and PCs.

Role of GATA3 in tumor diagnosis: A review

GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) belongs to a family of transcription factors comprising six members. These proteins identify G-A-T-A containing sequences in the target gene and bind to DNA target via two zinc-finger domains. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of GATA3 in the diagnosis of tumors and its value as a prognostic marker. To perform this review, a comprehensive search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases from 1985 to 2020. Articles were considered thoroughly by independent reviewers and data were extracted in predefined forms. Final synthesis was conducted by using appropriate data from included articles in each topic. Studies have shown that GATA3 has a critical role in the development of epithelial structures in both embryonic and adult tissues. The majority of studies regarding GATA3 expression in tumor evaluation focused on breast and urothelial neoplasms, whether primary or metastatic. Its sensitivity in these neoplasms has been reported to be high and made this marker more valuable than other available immunohistochemistry markers. However, GATA3 expression was not restricted to these tumors. Studies have shown that GATA3 immunostaining could be a useful tool in various tumors in kidney, salivary gland, endocrine system, hematopoietic system, and skin. GATA3 can also be used as a useful prognostic tool. Although GATA3 is a multi-specific immunohistochemical stain, it is a valuable marker in the panel for confirming many epithelial or mesenchymal neoplasms as both a diagnostic and prognostic tool.

Monoclonal/polyclonal PAX-8, PTH and GATA3 immunohistochemistry in parathyroid lesions

BACKGROUND

Parathyroid gland (PG) is an endocrine organ which may display different immunohistochemical stainings with chief cells and oxyphilic cells in normal as well as hyperplasic/tumoral lesions.

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to identify the demographic properties and diagnostic value of the GATA3 antibody, which is a transcription factor in addition to PTH, and of PAX-8 (monoclonal and polyclonal) antibody.

METHODS

We have analyzed in detail the cellular components and staining intensities of 46 adenomas all of which contained parathyroid rims, 12 hyperplasia and 5 adjacent non-neoplastic thyroidectomy materials (63 patients, 114 tissues).

RESULTS

While no staining was identified in the thyroid tissue, cytoplasmic PTH immunoreactivity was observed in all (100%) normal parathyroid tissues, rim of PGs and hyperplasia, and in 43/46 cases (93.4%) of adenomas. Adenoma and hyperplasia were less stained than normal PG (p < 0.05). We detected GATA3 staining in all cases except for the thyroid (100%). Weak positivity (1+) was most apparent in adenoma cases (p < 0.05). Monoclonal PAX-8 immunoreactivity was not identified in any normal parathyroid tissue and rim of PG but positive immunoreactivity was detected in 83.3% of hyperplasia cases (10/12), 84.8% of adenoma (39/46) and 100% of thyroid tissues (5/5) (p < 0.05). However, polyclonal PAX-8 immunoreactivity was detected in one normal parathyroid tissue (1/5) and seven (7/46) rim of PGs. In cases of hyperplasia and adenoma, positive immunoreactivity was 75% (9/12) and 74% (34/46), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we have observed that PTH and GATA3 constitute a much more reliable and sensitive marker for parathyroid and are stained less in adenomas. While monoclonal PAX-8 (MRQ-50) never stains normal parathyroid and rim of PGs, it may help in the differential diagnosis of proliferated parathyroid lesions as a considerably sensitive and relatively specific marker by staining hyperplasic parathyroid, adenomas and the thyroid.

The input of GATA-3 in the identification of parathyroid carcinoma diagnosis: Case report with review of literature

Introduction

and Importance: Parathyroid carcinoma is an exceptional cancer, with significant morbidity and mortality, associated with parathyroid hormone (PTH) mediated hypercalcemia.

Case presentation

We report a case of parathyroid carcinoma with a difficult histological diagnosis. This case illustrates the usefulness of the immunohistochemical marker “GATA-3” in parathyroid differentiation especially in tumours.

Clinical discussion

The diagnosis of parathyroid carcinoma is challenging without the knowledge of the clinical information, laboratory finding, and radiographic imaging studies. The immunohistochemistry is useful tool in these cases to identify the parathyroid origin of neoplasia. GATA-3 is a transcription factor that is involved in the embryonic development of the parathyroid glands and in adult parathyroid cell proliferation.

Conclusion

It is concluded that GATA-3 is a very sensitive and relatively specific immunohistochemical marker for parathyroid differentiation that can assist in the differential diagnosis of parathyroid tumours.

•

Input of GATA-3 in the identification of parathyroid carcinoma.

Immunocytochemistry for diagnostic cytopathology-A practical guide

Cytological specimens, which are obtained by minimally invasive methods, are an excellent source of diagnostic material. Sometimes they are the only material available for diagnosis as well as for prognostic/predictive markers. When cytomorphology is not straightforward, ancillary tests may be required for a definitive diagnosis to guide clinical management. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) is the most common and practical ancillary tool used to reach a diagnosis when cytomorphology is equivocal, to differentiate entities with overlapping morphological features, and to determine the cell lineage and the site of origin of a metastatic neoplasm. Numerous immunomarkers are available, and some are expressed in multiple neoplasms. To rule out entities within a differential diagnosis, the use of more than one marker, sometimes panels, is necessary. ICC panels for diagnostic purposes should be customised based on the clinical context and cytomorphology, and the markers should be used judiciously to preserve material for additional tests for targeted therapies in the appropriate setting. This review offers a practical guide for the use of ICC for diagnostic cytopathology, covering the most commonly encountered non-hematolymphoid diagnostic scenarios in various body sites.

Fine-needle aspiration of parathyroid adenomas: Indications as a diagnostic approach

Background

We aimed to determine the indication of fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) for parathyroid adenoma (PA)‐suspected nodules and the cytological features of PA, and to discuss the ancillary techniques for diagnostic confirmation.

Method

Clinical, cytological, and histological examinations of 15 PA patients (4.0% of all PA resected patients) were conducted through FNA on 16 nodules. We also examined the cytological preparations of 10 follicular neoplasms (FNs) and 10 poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas (PDTCs).

Results

FNA was performed to detect PA in nine (56.3%) nodules. The remaining seven (43.8%) nodules underwent FNA for lesions considered as thyroid nodules or lymph nodes. The levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the aspiration needle washout fluid were observably high, except for that from one nodule with unsatisfactory FNA. Cytologically, the incidences of wedge pattern (86.7%) and salt and pepper chromatin (86.7%) in PAs were significantly higher than in FNs and PDTCs. In contrast, the appearance of colloid globules and nuclear grooves was less frequent than that of FNs and PDTCs. GATA‐3 expression was intense in all PAs that immunocytochemistry were performed. Histologically, capsular invasion and/or laceration, tumor seeding, granulation tissue, and fibrosis were observed.

Conclusions

When PA localization is unusual or inconclusive despite extensive imaging, FNA may be performed. We asserted that wedge pattern, salt and pepper chromatin, and the absence of colloid globules and nuclear grooves are diagnostic cytological indicators of PA rather than of FN or PDTC. We recommend PTH measurements using needle washout fluid for PA‐suspected nodules, and immunocytochemistry with the GATA‐3 antibody for cytologically PA‐suspected nodules.

Application of GATA 3 and TTF-1 in differentiating parathyroid and thyroid nodules on cytology specimens

BACKGROUND

Differentiating parathyroid from thyroid lesions can be difficult on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) due to overlapping cytomorphologic features. While the traditional parathyroid hormone (PTH) assays can help in the distinction, these tests may be cumbersome, particularly when the lesion is unexpected clinically and a needle wash is not collected at the time of FNA. Therefore, we chose to investigate the application of immunohistochemical staining (IHC) with GATA 3 and thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) on air-dried cytology smears to distinguish parathyroid and thyroid lesions.

METHODS

Air-dried touch preparation (TP) slides were prepared from consecutively selected parathyroid and thyroid specimens. Thirteen FNA cases with the clinical concern for parathyroid lesions were also included in the study. IHC was performed on unstained and ultrafast Papanicolaou (UFP) stained air-dried slides.

RESULTS

On TP slides, GATA 3 expression was observed in all cases of parathyroid origin but no immunoreactivity was present in thyroid lesions. TTF-1 expression was observed in all cases of thyroid origin but not in parathyroid lesions. GATA 3 and TTF-1 expression of 13 FNA cases were consistent with the clinical impression or concurrent PTH tests.

CONCLUSIONS

IHC with GATA 3 and TTF-1 on air-dried cytology smears is a simple and effective way to differentiate parathyroid vs thyroid lesions on FNA. Air-dried unstained and UFP-stained slides perform equally well with IHC, but UFP-stained slides provide the added benefit of morphologic evaluation and assessment of smear cellularity prior to IHC.

GATA3 immunoreactivity expands the transcription factor profile of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

The modern classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors relies mainly on immunohistochemistry for pituitary transcription factors, hormones, and other biomarkers, including low molecular weight cytokeratins. The transcription factor GATA2 is required for development of gonadotrophs and thyrotrophs but has not been used for classification of pituitary tumors. Because of genomic paralogy of GATA2 and GATA3, we postulated that GATA3 immunohistochemistry may detect GATA2 in the adenohypophysis. We examined 151 tumors originating from Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey (n = 83) and University Health Network, Canada (n = 68). Initially, 83 tumors (26 gonadotroph, 24 somatotroph, 17 corticotroph, 12 lactotroph, 2 poorly differentiated Pit-1 lineage tumors that expressed TSH and 2 null cell tumors) from Ondokuz Mayis University were investigated with the GATA3 monoclonal antibody L50-823. Retrospective review of the files of University Health Network identified 68 tumors (43 gonadotroph, 3 somatotroph, 2 lactotroph, 1 mammosomatotroph, 9 corticotroph, 7 poorly differentiated Pit-1 lineage tumors with TSH expression, 2 plurihormonal tumors with TSH expression and 1 null cell tumor) that were examined with the same GATA3 antibody and served as a validation cohort. All somatotroph, lactotroph and mammosomatotroph tumors and the null cell tumors were negative for GATA3. Sixty-eight (98.5%) gonadotroph tumors were positive for GATA3; 64 had diffuse reactivity. Two plurihormonal tumors with TSH expression and eight (88.8%) poorly differentiated Pit-1 lineage tumors with variable TSH expression were positive for GATA3. One of 26 (3.8%) corticotroph tumors was diffusely positive for GATA3. This study shows that GATA3 immunoreactivity is characteristic of pituitary gonadotroph and TSH-producing tumors. This finding expands the pattern of transcription factors that are used to classify adenohypophysial tumors and is important in the differential diagnosis of sellar tumors, as GATA3 expression is also a feature of primary sellar paragangliomas as well as carcinomas that may metastasize to the sella.

Immunohistochemical Biomarkers in Thyroid Pathology

The application of immunohistochemistry to the diagnosis of thyroid lesions has increased as new biomarkers have emerged. In this review, we discuss the biomarkers that are critical for accurate diagnosis, prognosis, and management. Immunohistochemical markers are used to confirm that an unusual tumor in the thyroid is indeed of thyroid origin, either of follicular epithelial or C-cell differentiation; the various mimics include nonthyroidal lesions such as parathyroid tumors, paragangliomas, thymic neoplasms, and metastatic malignancies. Tumors of thyroid follicular epithelial cells can be further subclassified using a number of immunohistochemical biomarkers that can distinguish follicular-derived from C-cell lesions and others that support malignancy in borderline cases. The use of mutation-specific antibodies can distinguish papillary carcinomas harboring a BRAF^V600E mutation from RAS-like neoplasms. Immunostains have been developed to further identify molecular alterations underlying tumor development, including some rearrangements. Altered expression of several biomarkers that are known to be epigenetically modified in thyroid cancer can be used to assist in predicting more aggressive behavior such as a propensity to develop locoregional lymphatic spread. Immunohistochemistry can assist in identifying lymphatic and vascular invasion. Biomarkers can be applied to determine dedifferentiation and to further classify poorly differentiated and anaplastic carcinomas. The rare tumors associated with genetic predisposition to endocrine neoplasia can also be identified using some immunohistochemical stains. The application of these ancillary tools allows more accurate diagnosis and better understanding of pathogenesis while improving prediction and prognosis for patients with thyroid neoplasms.