Safety and convenience of once-weekly somapacitan in adult GH deficiency: a 26-week randomized, controlled trial

Efficacy of Somapacitan in Treatment-Fatigue Adult Patients With Growth Hormone Deficiency Previously Treated With Once-Daily Growth Hormone Injections: A 24-Week Randomized Active-Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the efficacy of somapacitan in a 24-week, randomized, active-controlled study in patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) who experienced fatigue from daily growth hormone (GH) injections.

METHODS

Twenty-nine adult patients with GHD, pretreated with daily GH for ≥5 years, who had reported treatment-related fatigue, were randomized to somapacitan or daily GH. Outcome measures were changes in treatment satisfaction assessed by Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) standard deviation score, glucose and lipid parameters, body composition, bone mineral density (BMD), carotid intima media thickness, and reactive hyperaemia index, from baseline to week 24.

RESULTS

The difference in change in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 score for convenience was significant, in favor of somapacitan (estimated difference, somapacitan-daily GH [95% CI]:23.2 [7.9; 38.4] points, P = .004). No differences between treatment arms in estimated changes from baseline to study-end were observed for IGF-1 levels, glucose and lipid profile, visceral adipose tissue, fat mass (%), lean body mass, and vascular parameters. There was significant difference in BMD of the lumbar spine (estimated difference, somapacitan-daily GH [95% CI] -0.036 (-0.064, -0.009) gr/cm2, P = .011).

CONCLUSION

In AGHD patients who were fatigued from the long-term daily GH injections, somapacitan was reported to be more convenient than daily GH. It was effective in maintaining IGF-1 levels and body composition, glucose, lipids, and vascular parameters, comparable to daily GH. Nonsignificant decrease in BMD with somapacitan could reflect a favorable increase in bone metabolic units, as previously observed in naïve patients with GHD during the initial 6-month period of GH therapy.

Systematic Literature Review of Outcomes Associated With Adherence to Haemophilia Drug Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Prophylactic therapy improves clinical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes in patients with haemophilia; however, this effect could be influenced by the degree of treatment adherence. Adherence to therapy may be difficult due to the administration mode and the frequency of self-infusions. There is a need to investigate the effect of treatment adherence on clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes in a real-world setting.

AIM

A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to describe the impact of adherence to haemophilia drug therapies on clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes.

METHODS

Embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched for English language articles published after 22 June 2013; the search was conducted on 22 June 2023. No geographic limits were applied. Twenty articles met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The studies investigated associations between treatment adherence and bleeding, joint health, inhibitor development, pain, QoL, daily activity/work productivity (WP), cognitive function and healthcare resource use. Fifteen studies reported that better adherence to drug therapy in patients with haemophilia is associated with better outcomes, including a reduction in bleeding risk, improved joint structure and function, less chronic pain, better health-related QoL (HRQoL), lower activity impairment (AI), less school/work absenteeism, higher WP and better cognitive function. Two studies reported mixed results, with adherence being associated with some outcomes but not others. Five studies reported no association.

CONCLUSION

This SLR found associations between greater adherence to haemophilia drug therapies and better results on clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes, indicating that patients with haemophilia would benefit from improvements in treatments that promote adherence.

Efficacy in Japanese adults with growth hormone deficiency receiving weekly somapacitan or daily growth hormone: results from phase 3 REAL 1 trial

Introduction

Somapacitan is a long-acting growth hormone (GH) derivative approved for once-weekly treatment of adult GH deficiency (AGHD). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of somapacitan and daily GH in Japanese individuals with AGHD.

Methods

This subgroup study included the 34-week main period of the multinational, randomized, parallel-group, phase 3 trial, REAL 1 (NCT02229851). Participants received once-weekly somapacitan or daily GH (Norditropin®), both administered subcutaneously. Investigators and trial sites were blinded. A total of 36 Japanese GH-naïve individuals with AGHD were allocated to somapacitan or daily GH (excluding the placebo group of the global trial). Endpoints included change in truncal fat percentage to week 34 measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, as well as other body composition measures. Insulin-like growth factor I standard deviation score values were used for dose titration.

Results

In total, 36 Japanese individuals were included (18 and 18 in the somapacitan and daily GH group, respectively). 35 completed the main period (34 weeks). Mean (SD) change from baseline to week 34 in truncal fat percentage was -2.23 (2.50) %-points in the somapacitan group and -2.12 (4.21) %-points in the daily GH group. Other body composition measures also improved in both groups, including reduced visceral fat and increased lean body mass. Somapacitan was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to daily GH.

Conclusions

In Japanese treatment-naïve individuals with AGHD, once-weekly somapacitan demonstrated similar efficacy and safety to daily GH after 34 weeks of treatment. Somapacitan provides an effective alternative to daily GH in AGHD.

Clinical trial registration

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02229851.

Utilizing Somapacitan, a Long-acting Growth Hormone Formulation, for the Treatment of Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency: A Guide for Clinicians

OBJECTIVE

Somapacitan is the first approved and currently the only long-acting growth hormone (GH) formulation in the United States for treatment of adults with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). The aim of this review was to provide a practical approach for clinicians on how to utilize somapacitan in the treatment of adults with GHD.

METHODS

Literature search was performed on PubMed using key words, including adult GHD, long-acting growth hormone, somapacitan, treatment, and management. The discussion of treatment aspects utilizing somapacitan was based on evidence from previous clinical studies and personal experience.

RESULTS

Clinical trial data demonstrated that somapacitan, a once-weekly reversible albumin-binding GH derivative, decreased truncal fat, improved visceral fat and lean body mass, increased insulin-like growth factor-I standard deviation score and exerted neutral effects on glucose metabolism. Overall, somapacitan was well-tolerated, adverse event rates were comparable with daily GH, antisomapacitan or anti-GH antibodies were not detected, and treatment satisfaction was in favor of somapacitan vs daily GH.

CONCLUSION

Somapacitan is an efficacious, safe, convenient and well-tolerated once-weekly long-acting GH formulation that reduces the treatment burden of once-daily GH injections for adults with GHD. This article provides a review of the pharmacology of somapacitan and offers practical recommendations based on previous clinical trial data on how to initiate, dose titration, monitoring and dose adjustments whilst on therapy in adults with GHD. Timing of measurement of serum insulin-like growth factor-I levels, information on administration, recommendations on missed doses, and clinical recommendations on dosing in certain sub-population of patients are also discussed.

Somapacitan-induced reversible lipoatrophy in an adult woman with hypopituitarism

BACKGROUND

Lipoatrophy is rare adverse event (AE) in daily recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH). Data on lipoatrophy in newly developed long-acting GH (LAGH) are scarce. We report the first case of lipoatrophy in adult patient treated with LAGH somapacitan.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 38-year-old woman with congenital panhypopituitarism was transitioned from daily rhGH 0.4 mg QD to somapacitan dose 4 mg QW due to non-adherence to daily rhGH. Despite adequate education and regular changing of injection sites, the patient reported reduced subcutaneous tissue at all four injection sites, after the 4th application of somapacitan. Somapacitan was discontinued at patient preference and lipoatrophy completely reversed after 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Lipoatrophy caused by somapacitan was completely reversible. We speculate that high initial dose and volume of somapacitan caused delayed diffusion and a direct local lipolytic effect in our patient. Although, titration of somapacitan was initiated as previously reported in REAL2 study protocol, recent clinical guidelines advise more gradual increase of somapacitan dose also in women on oral estogens that are switched from daily rhGH. Importantly, our case and the two previously described cases in children in the REAL 3 study showed that lipoatrophy caused by somapacitan was transient and completely reversible, and that discontinuation of the drug is not always mandatory.

Efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of norditropin and sogroya in patients with growth hormone deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Growth hormone deficiency occurs when the pituitary gland does not produce enough growth hormone. Norditropin®, a recombinant human growth hormone, and Sogroya®, an albumin-binding growth hormone derivative, are prescribed for patients with growth hormone deficiency. This systematic review assesses the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with Norditropin and Sogroya.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to identify eligible comparative studies. All studies published until June 2023 were included in our analysis. Our outcomes for children included height velocity and height velocity standard deviation score. In contrast, adult outcomes included adverse events, insulin-like growth factor 1-standard deviation score (IGF-1 SDS), and the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9). Results are reported as odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 1058 participants (665 children and 393 adults) were included in the meta-analysis. In children, Norditropin at doses of 0.034 and 0.067 mg/kg/day was compared to Sogroya at doses of 0.04, 0.08, 0.16, and 0.24 mg/kg/week. The results showed that 0.034 mg/kg/day Norditropin had a favorable impact on height velocity (MD -2.01, 95% CI -3.7 to -2.12, p < 0.00001) and height velocity standard deviation score (Mean Difference -3.61, 95% CI -5.06 to -2.16, p < 0.00001) when compared to Sogroya 0.04 mg/kg/day. Other doses showed comparable results. In adults, the only significant side effect noted was rash, which favored Sogroya (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.04-0.27, p < 0.00001). Additionally, IGF-1 SDS was significantly higher in the Sogroya group than in the Norditropin group (MD 0.25, 95% CI 0.02-0.48, p = 0.03). Furthermore, the overall score of the TSQM-9 questionnaire, which includes three domains: convenience, effectiveness, and satisfaction, was significantly higher in the Sogroya group compared to the Norditropin group (OR 6.36, 95% CI 3.92-8.8, p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Norditropin and Sogroya showed comparable efficacy and safety profiles, except for the prevalence of rash in the Norditropin group, and Sogroya has higher satisfaction among adults. More high-quality studies with more patients are required to confirm these results.

Investigating the Bioavailability and Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Release of Two Different Strengths of Somapacitan: A Randomised, Double-Blind Crossover Trial

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVE

Randomised, double-blind, crossover trial to confirm bioequivalence of somapacitan, a long-acting growth hormone (GH), in 5 mg/1.5 mL and 10 mg/1.5 mL strengths in equimolar doses.

METHODS

Healthy participants were randomised (1:1:1) to subcutaneous somapacitan treatment in one dosing period with 5 mg/1.5 mL and two periods with 10 mg/1.5 mL. Eligibility criteria included age 18-45 years and body mass index 18.5-24.9 kg/m2. Exclusion criteria included history of GH deficiency, previous GH treatment, weight > 100.0 kg and participation in any clinical trial of an investigational medicinal product within 45 days or five times the half-life of the previous investigational product before screening. Area under the curve from time 0 until last quantifiable observation (AUC0-t), maximum serum concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax and terminal half-life of somapacitan and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 33 participants were randomised. For AUC0-t, estimated treatment ratio (ETR) (5 mg/1.5 mL versus 10 mg/1.5 mL) was 0.95 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.01). Point estimate and 90% CIs were within the acceptance range (0.80-1.25). For Cmax, ETR was 0.77 (90% CI 0.68-0.89). Point estimate and 90% CIs were outside the acceptance range (0.80-1.25). Mean insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-I standard deviation score concentration-time curves for each strength were almost identical. No new safety issues were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Bioequivalence criterion for somapacitan 5 mg/1.5 mL and 10 mg/1.5 mL was met for AUC0-t but not for Cmax. The two strengths had equivalent IGF-I responses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03905850 (3 April 2019).

Hypopituitarism

Partial or complete deficiency of anterior or posterior pituitary hormone production leads to central hypoadrenalism, central hypothyroidism, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, growth hormone deficiency, or arginine vasopressin deficiency depending on the hormones affected. Hypopituitarism is rare and likely to be underdiagnosed, with an unknown but rising incidence and prevalence. The most common cause is compressive growth or ablation of a pituitary or hypothalamic mass. Less common causes include genetic mutations, hypophysitis (especially in the context of cancer immunotherapy), infiltrative and infectious disease, and traumatic brain injury. Clinical features vary with timing of onset, cause, and number of pituitary axes disrupted. Diagnosis requires measurement of basal circulating hormone concentrations and confirmatory hormone stimulation testing as needed. Treatment is aimed at replacement of deficient hormones. Increased mortality might persist despite treatment, particularly in younger patients, females, and those with arginine vasopressin deficiency. Patients with complex diagnoses, pregnant patients, and adolescent pituitary-deficient patients transitioning to adulthood should ideally be managed at a pituitary tumour centre of excellence.

Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Thyroid Hormone Replacement Therapy for Subclinical Hypothyroidism in Older Adults: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data from Two Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: The benefit of levothyroxine treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is subject to debate. This study compared treatment satisfaction between older adults with SCH using levothyroxine or placebo. Methods: We analyzed pooled individual participant data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials investigating the effects of levothyroxine treatment in older adults with SCH. Community-dwelling participants aged ≥65 years, with SCH (persistent thyrotropin levels 4.60-19.99 mIU/L for >3 months and normal free T4 level), were included. Intervention dose titration until thyrotropin levels normalized, with a mock dose adjustment of placebo. Treatment satisfaction was determined during the final study visit using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), encompassing perceived effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction, along with the participants' desire to continue study medication after the trial. Results: We included 536 participants. At baseline, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 74.9 (69.7-81.4) years, and 292 (55%) were women. The median (IQR) thyrotropin levels were 5.80 (5.10-7.00) mIU/L at baseline in both groups; at final visit, 4.97 (3.90-6.35) mIU/L in the placebo and 3.24 (2.49-4.41) mIU/L in the levothyroxine group. After treatment, the groups did not differ significantly in global satisfaction (mean difference [CI] -1.1 [-4.5 to 2.1], p = 0.48), nor in any other domain of treatment satisfaction. These results held true regardless of baseline thyrotropin levels or symptom burden. No major differences were found in the numbers of participants who wished to continue medication after the trial (levothyroxine 35% vs. placebo 27%), did not wish to continue (levothyroxine 27% vs. placebo 30%), or did not know (levothyroxine 37% vs. placebo 42%) (p = 0.14). In a subpopulation with high symptom burden from hypothyroid symptoms at baseline, those using levothyroxine more often desired to continue the medication after the trial than those using placebo (mean difference [CI]: -21.1% [-35.6% to -6.5%]). Conclusion: These pooled data from two RCTs showed no major differences in treatment satisfaction between older adults receiving levothyroxine or placebo. This finding has important implications for decision-making regarding initiating levothyroxine treatment for SCH. Our findings generally support refraining from routinely prescribing levothyroxine in older adults with SCH.

Developments in the Management of Growth Hormone Deficiency: Clinical Utility of Somapacitan

Growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy for growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children and adults has for over 25 years, until recently, been administered as daily injections. This daily treatment regimen often incurs a burden to patients and caregivers, leading to high rates of non-adherence and, consequently, decreased treatment efficacy outcomes. To address this shortcoming, long-acting growth hormones (LAGHs) have been developed with the aim of reducing the burden of daily injections, thereby potentially improving treatment adherence and outcomes. Somapacitan (Sogroya®) (Novo Nordisk, Bagsværd, Denmark) is a LAGH currently approved for the treatment of adult and childhood GHD (AGHD and CGHD, respectively) in several countries. Other LAGHs, such as somatrogon (Ngenla®) (Pfizer, New York, United States) and lonapegsomatropin/TransCon GH (Skytrofa®) (Ascendis Pharma, Copenhagen, Denmark), are also currently approved and available for the treatment of CGHD in several countries. In this review, we will consider the method of protraction, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), efficacy, and safety results of somapacitan in adult and pediatric trials and how these characteristics differ from those of the other aforementioned LAGHs. Additionally, the administration of somapacitan and timing of measurement of serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels are summarized. Information on administration, advice on missed doses, and clinical guidelines are discussed, as well as identifying which patients are suitable for somapacitan therapy, and how to monitor and adjust dosing whilst on therapy.

Safety of long-term use of daily and long-acting growth hormone in growth hormone-deficient adults on cancer risk

Daily injections of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) have been used in clinical practice for almost four decades as a replacement therapy in adult patients with GH deficiency (GHD). Long-term adherence to daily injections of rhGH is a clinical concern that may result in reduced therapeutic efficacy, and long-acting GH (LAGH) formulations have been developed in an attempt of overcoming this problem. Long-term safety issues of rhGH are the other side of the coin that has been carefully monitored over the years, particularly related to the proliferative actions of GH that could increase the risk of tumor recurrence or induce the development of new benign and malignant tumors. In this review, we present what is currently known about the cancer risk in GHD adults treated with daily rhGH injections and we discuss the major concerns and responses needed from future surveillance studies regarding the safety of LAGH preparations.

Impact of long-acting growth hormone replacement therapy in adult growth hormone deficiency: Comparison between adolescent, adult, and elderly patients

The predominant features of the adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) syndrome may vary between patients of different age and age of onset of GHD. Evidence from clinical trials and long-term observational studies has informed our ability to understand the unique considerations regarding risks and benefits of daily growth hormone replacement therapy (GHRT) and specific dosing and monitoring strategies for these patient subgroups. High rates of nonadherence with daily GHRT presents a challenge to achieving optimal treatment outcomes and long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) formulations have been developed with the promise of improving treatment adherence resulting in improved therapeutic outcomes. While existing data from short-term studies have demonstrated noninferiority of efficacy and safety of LAGH compared to daily GHRT, long-term studies are needed to assess the full spectrum of outcomes of interest and long-term safety considerations specific to patients in adolescence, adulthood and the elderly GHD population. Since each LAGH formulation has a unique pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile optimal dosing and monitoring strategies will need to be developed to allow for the provision of individualized patient treatment.

Comparing treatment with daily and long-acting growth hormone formulations in adults with growth hormone deficiency: Challenging issues, benefits, and risks

Daily administration of growth hormone (GH) treatment has been in clinical use for treatment for GH deficiency (GHD) in adults for more than 30 years. Numerous studies have demonstrated evidence that GH treatment improves body composition, cardiovascular risk factors and quality of life with few side effects. Less frequent GH injections are hypothesized to improve adherence and several long-acting GH (LAGH) formulations have been developed and a few have been approved and marketed. Different pharmacological modifications have been applied and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of LAGH are different to each other and to those of daily injections and require different dosing and monitoring specific for each LAGH. Studies have shown improved adherence with LAGH, and short-term efficacy and side effects are comparable between daily GH injections and LAGHs. Long-term treatment with daily GH injections is effective and safe, while long-term studies for LAGHs are awaited. In this review challenges, benefits, and risks of treatment with daily and long-acting GH preparations will be compared.

Effective GH Replacement With Somapacitan in Children With GHD: REAL4 2-year Results and After Switch From Daily GH

CONTEXT

Somapacitan is a long-acting GH derivative for treatment of GH deficiency (GHD).

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of somapacitan in children with GHD after 2 years of treatment and after the switch from daily GH.

DESIGN

A randomized, multinational, open-labelled, controlled parallel group phase 3 trial, comprising a 52-week main phase and 3-year safety extension (NCT03811535).

SETTING

Eighty-five sites across 20 countries.

PATIENTS

A total of 200 treatment-naïve prepubertal patients were randomized and exposed; 194 completed the 2-year period.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to somapacitan (0.16 mg/kg/wk) or daily GH (0.034 mg/kg/d) during the first year, after which all patients received somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/wk.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Height velocity (HV; cm/year) at week 104. Additional assessments included HV SD score (SDS), height SDS, IGF-I SDS, and observer-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

HV was sustained in both groups between 52 and 104 weeks. At week 104, mean (SD) for HV between weeks 52 and 104 was 8.4 (1.5) cm/year after continuous somapacitan treatment and 8.7 (1.8) cm/year after 1 year of somapacitan treatment following switch from daily GH. Secondary height-related endpoints also supported sustained growth. Mean IGF-I SDS during year 2 was similar between groups and within normal range (-2 to +2). Somapacitan was well tolerated, with no safety or tolerability issues identified. GH patient preference questionnaire results show that most patients and their caregivers (90%) who switched treatment at year 2 preferred once-weekly somapacitan over daily GH treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Somapacitan in children with GHD showed sustained efficacy and tolerability for 2 years, and after switching from daily GH. Patients/caregivers switching from daily GH expressed a preference for somapacitan.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03811535.

Engineered therapeutic proteins for sustained-release drug delivery systems

Proteins play a vital role in diverse biological processes in the human body, and protein therapeutics have been applied to treat different diseases such as cancers, genetic disorders, autoimmunity, and inflammation. Protein therapeutics have demonstrated their advantages, such as specific pharmaceutical effects, low toxicity, and strong solubility. However, several disadvantages arise in clinical applications, including short half-life, immunogenicity, and low permeation, leading to reduced drug effectiveness. The structure of protein therapeutics can be modified to increase molecular size, leading to prolonged stability and increased plasma half-life. Notably, the controlled-release delivery systems for the sustained release of protein drugs and preserving the stability of cargo proteins are envisioned as a potential approach to overcome these challenges. In this review, we summarize recent research progress related to structural modifications (PEGylation, glycosylation, poly amino acid modification, and molecular biology-based strategies) and promising long-term delivery systems, such as polymer-based systems (injectable gel/implants, microparticles, nanoparticles, micro/nanogels, functional polymers), lipid-based systems (liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, nanostructured lipid carriers), and inorganic nanoparticles exploited for protein therapeutics. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: In this review, we highlight recent advances concerning modifying proteins directly to enhance their stability and functionality and discuss state-of-the-art methods for the delivery and controlled long-term release of active protein therapeutics to their target site. In terms of drug modifications, four widely used strategies, including PEGylation, poly amino acid modification, glycosylation, and genetic, are discussed. As for drug delivery systems, we emphasize recent progress relating to polymer-based systems, lipid-based systems developed, and inorganic nanoparticles for protein sustained-release delivery. This review points out the areas requiring focused research attention before the full potential of protein therapeutics for human health and disease can be realized.

Approach to the Patient: Case Studies in Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency and Their Management

CONTEXT

Pathologies attributed to perturbations of the GH/IGF-I axis are among the most common referrals received by pediatric endocrinologists.

AIM

In this article, distinctive cased-based presentations are used to provide a practical and pragmatic approach to the management of pediatric growth hormone deficiency (GHD).

CASES

We present 4 case vignettes based on actual patients that illustrate (1) congenital GHD, (2) childhood GHD presenting as failure to thrive, (3) childhood GHD presenting in adolescence as growth deceleration, and (4) childhood-onset GHD manifesting as metabolic complications in adolescence. We review patient presentation and a management approach that aims to highlight diagnostic considerations for treatment based on current clinical guidelines, with mention of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities being used in the field.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric GHD is diverse in etiology and clinical presentation. Timely management has the potential not only to improve growth but can also ameliorate or even mitigate adverse metabolic outcomes, which can be directly attributed to a GH deficient state.

Long acting growth hormone (LAGH), an update

In 1957, Maurice Raben at Yale was able to isolate and purify growth hormone from cadaveric pituitary glands. Pituitary growth hormone was the only way to treat children with growth hormone (GH) deficiency, until 1985 when recombinant GH became available for daily subcutaneous injection. For many years, the pediatric endocrine community longed for a long-acting recombinant GH formulation that would decrease the inconvenience of daily injections. Several mechanisms were employed to develop a GH that is rapidly absorbed into the blood stream after subcutaneous injection, but provides slow removal from the circulatory system to potentially optimize patient adherence to GH therapy. Four long-acting growth hormones are currently available in the world, or are close to regulatory approval. They are: (1) Pegylated formulations, (2) Prodrug formulations which are converted into active drug, (3) Nonvalent transient albumin binding GH compounds and (4) GH fusion proteins where a protein si fused with GH. All four formulations have undergone detailed phase 3 studies and were found to show non-inferiority in these clinical studies. All four demonstrate a safety and tolerability profile that is comparable to that of daily somatropin with an excellent adherence profile.

Investigation of the metabolic and endocrinological differences between daily and weekly growth hormone replacement therapy, somapacitan, in patients with adult growth hormone deficiency: A real-world pilot study

In this real-world pilot study, we evaluated the metabolic and endocrinological effects in patients with adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) who switched from daily growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy to weekly GH replacement therapy using somapacitan. Eleven patients with AGHD, whose medical treatment aside from GH replacement therapy did not change, were enrolled. We investigated the metabolic and endocrinological parameters between at switching and 6 months after switching from daily GH formulation to somapacitan. The results showed that body mass index (BMI), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and liver functions were significantly improved 6 months after switching compared to those at switching (each P < .05). Besides, the improvement in HOMA-IR was significantly associated with the period of daily GH replacement therapy before switching (P = .048), while age, sex, improvement in BMI or liver functions, presence of any hormonal deficiency, and the existence of any hormonal replacement therapy significantly associated (P > .05). In addition, switching to GH replacement therapy did not affect endocrinological parameters. In conclusion, this study might indicate that weekly GH replacement therapy with somapacitan could have more beneficial points than daily GH replacement therapy. Considering the cohort of this study was small, future studies with larger cohorts should be necessary to confirm the results of this study.

Growth hormone receptor agonists and antagonists: From protein expression and purification to long-acting formulations

Recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) and GH receptor antagonists (GHAs) are used clinically to treat a range of disorders associated with GH deficiency or hypersecretion, respectively. However, these biotherapeutics can be difficult and expensive to manufacture with multiple challenges from recombinant protein generation through to the development of long-acting formulations required to improve the circulating half-life of the drug. In this review, we summarize methodologies and approaches used for making and purifying recombinant GH and GHA proteins, and strategies to improve pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, including PEGylation and fusion proteins. Therapeutics that are in clinical use or are currently under development are also discussed.

Comparing Dose-dependent Outcomes of Weekly and Daily Growth Hormone Therapy in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3123741/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Background Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is a condition impacting children and adults, leading to low height and other health issues. The primary treatment is daily injections of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH), though they can be inconvenient and costly. These injections may also negatively impact treatment adherence and outcomes. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly growth hormone treatment vs daily growth hormone therapy in children with growth hormone insufficiency. Methods To examine the efficacy and safety of once-weekly and once-daily growth hormone treatment for children with growth hormone insufficiency, this meta-analysis followed PRISMA and Cochrane standards. RCTs and prospective cohort studies with children aged 0–18 diagnosed with GHD were considered eligible. We used the risk of bias 2 and the certainty of evidence using the Cochrane tools. Two authors independently assessed papers for eligibility and extracted data after conducting a thorough search of electronic resources. Height velocity, height standard deviation score, insulin-like growth factor 1 levels, and the incidence of adverse events were the primary outcomes. The Revman software version 5.4 was used for data synthesis, and heterogeneity was determined by I-squares greater than 60%. Results This meta-analysis and comprehensive review includes 14 randomized clinical trials and one study was cohort, including 1,322 children with growth hormone insufficiency. Weekly growth hormone treatment at dosages ranging from 0.11 to 0.25 mg enhanced a variety of growth outcomes, including increased height velocity dose (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI, 0.23–0.51; P < 0.001), height standard deviation scores chronological age (SMD= -0.10, 95% CI, -0.13–0.07; P < 0.001), and insulin-like growth factor 1 standard deviation score (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI, 0.40–0.42; P < 0.001). The dosage range of 0.26 to 0.50 mg also improved insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 significantly (SMD= -0.63, 95% CI, -0.90 – -0.37; P < 0.001). Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of adverse events through the dosage levels (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.40; P = 0.32). Conclusions In children with growth hormone deficit, weekly growth hormone treatment, particularly in the 0.11 to 0.25 mg dose range, can function as a viable alternative to daily growth hormone therapy.

Sex Differences in Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of GH Replacement Therapy in GH Deficient Adults

CONTEXT

Previous studies report that outcomes of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy (GHRT) might be less beneficial in growth hormone deficient (GHD) women compared with men.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated possible contributing factors regarding this previously found sex difference.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study, conducted at a nationwide outpatient clinic (the Dutch National Registry of GH Treatment in Adults), included Dutch adult GHD men (n = 1335) and women (n = 1251) treated with GHRT. The patients' baseline characteristics, details of GHRT, and the tolerability and long-term safety of GHRT were measured.

RESULTS

During treatment, sensitivity analysis showed that insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) SD scores remained subnormal more often in women (P < 0.001), while scores above normal were more frequent in men (P < 0.001). Women reported more adverse events (P < 0.001), especially symptoms related to fluid retention, and more often needed a dose reduction or temporary stop of GHRT (P = 0.001). In percentages, both sexes equally discontinued GHRT, as was also true for the risk in developing type 2 diabetes mellitus, benign neoplasms, and tumor recurrence. The risk of developing malignant neoplasms was higher in men (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Data obtained from the Dutch National Registry of GH Treatment in Adults indicate that GHD women might be treated suboptimally, reflected as lower IGF-1 status and lower GHRT tolerability, leading to more frequent changes in treatment regimen but not discontinuation of GHRT. Regarding long-term safety, we found a higher risk for development of malignancies in GHD men.

Weekly somapacitan had no adverse effects on glucose metabolism in adults with growth hormone deficiency

PURPOSE

The long-term effects of long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) analogues on glucose metabolism in adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) are not known. We investigated the impact of LAGH somapacitan, administered once-weekly, on glucose metabolism in patients with AGHD.

METHODS

In post hoc-defined analyses, we compared the effects of somapacitan with daily growth hormone (GH) and placebo on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-β) in patients with AGHD across a unique data set from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials (REAL 1, REAL 2 and REAL Japan).

RESULTS

No new cases of diabetes mellitus were reported with somapacitan. Among GH-naïve patients (n = 120 somapacitan, n = 119 daily GH), higher changes from baseline in FPG, HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels were observed with daily GH versus somapacitan at 34 weeks, but not at 86 weeks. HbA1c and HOMA-β did not differ between groups at either timepoint. Among treatment-naïve patients, sex, age, fasting insulin, glucose tolerance status and body mass index did not influence changes in glucose metabolism. In previously treated patients (REAL 1 extension: n = 51 somapacitan, n = 52 daily GH; REAL 2: n = 61 and n = 31, respectively; REAL Japan: n = 46 and n = 16, respectively), the difference in changes from baseline were not statistically significant between somapacitan and daily GH for any glucose metabolism parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Somapacitan, compared with daily GH, did not adversely affect glucose metabolism up to 86 weeks in a large cohort of treatment-naïve or previously treated patients with AGHD. Trial registrations (date of registration): NCT02229851 (2 September 2014), NCT02382939 (3 March 2015), NCT03075644 (7 March 2017).

Somapacitan in children born small for gestational age: a multi-centre, open-label, controlled phase 2 study

OBJECTIVE

Investigate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 3 once-weekly somapacitan doses compared with daily growth hormone (GH) administration in short children born small for gestational age (SGA).

DESIGN

Randomised, multi-centre, open-label, controlled phase 2 study comprising a 26-week main phase and a 4-year extension (NCT03878446). The study was conducted at 38 sites across 12 countries. 26-week main phase results are presented here.Sixty-two GH treatment-naïve, prepubertal short children born SGA were randomised and exposed; 61 completed the main phase. Three somapacitan doses (0.16 [n = 12], 0.20 [n = 13], 0.24 [n = 12] mg/kg/week) and 2 daily GH doses (0.035 [n = 12], 0.067 [n = 13] mg/kg/day) were administered subcutaneously.

RESULTS

After 26 weeks of treatment, the estimated mean annualised height velocity (HV) was 8.9, 11.0, and 11.3 cm/year for somapacitan 0.16, 0.20, and 0.24 mg/kg/week, respectively, compared to 10.3 and 11.9 cm/year for daily GH 0.035 and 0.067 mg/kg/day. Changes from baseline in HV standard deviation score (SDS), height SDS, and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) SDS showed similar dose-dependent responses. Exposure-response modelling indicated the greatest efficacy correlated with the highest somapacitan exposure. Similar safety and tolerability were demonstrated for all weekly somapacitan and daily GH doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the totality of data on improvements in height-based parameters combined with exposure-response analyses, somapacitan 0.24 mg/kg/week appears most efficacious, providing similar efficacy, safety, and tolerability as daily GH 0.067 mg/kg/day in short children born SGA after 26 weeks of treatment.

Experience of switching from a daily to a less frequent administration of injection treatments

BACKGROUND

Daily injections of recombinant human growth hormone are the standard of care to treat growth failure due to pediatric growth hormone deficiency (GHD). While effective, daily injections are burdensome and can compromise adherence. In recent years, novel injection treatments requiring less frequent administration for growth hormone deficiency (GHD) have been developed. A targeted, pragmatic literature review was conducted to summarize and document the patient experience of moving from daily to less frequent injections, with a specific focus on changing from daily to weekly injection treatments in pediatric GHD (pGHD).

OBJECTIVE

Explore and describe the patient experience when switching from a daily to a less frequent injection schedule for GHD.

METHODS

Targeted literature searches were conducted to identify literature describing the patient experience of moving from a daily to weekly injection in GHD. Supplementary searches were conducted to identify literature describing the patient experience of moving from daily to less frequent injection regimens in other medical conditions.

RESULTS

Across searches, 1,691 abstracts were reviewed and 13 articles were included in the final analysis. These publications reported that patients moving to less frequent injections across a variety of conditions, including GHD, experienced increased convenience and satisfaction, higher adherence rates, fewer adverse events, and improved quality of life. Less frequent injections were also reported to be at least as efficacious as daily treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Less frequent injections in GHD and as other conditions are less burdensome, positively benefit patients, and result in improved adherence that may lead to improved clinical outcomes. Clinicians may consider weekly regimens as an effective alternative for patients, in particular in pGHD, especially when missed injections can negatively impact treatment outcomes. More research is needed to better understand the real-world benefits of injectable therapies that require less frequent administration (e.g., weekly versus daily).

Weekly Somapacitan is Effective and Well Tolerated in Children With GH Deficiency: The Randomized Phase 3 REAL4 Trial

CONTEXT

Somapacitan, a once-weekly reversible albumin-binding GH derivative, is evaluated in children with GH deficiency (GHD).

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate efficacy and safety of somapacitan vs daily GH.

METHODS

REAL4 is a randomised, multinational, open-labeled, active-controlled parallel group phase 3 trial, comprising a 52-week main trial and 3-year extension (NCT03811535).

SETTING

Eighty-six sites across 20 countries.

PATIENTS

200 treatment-naïve patients were randomized and exposed.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to somapacitan (0.16 mg/kg/wk) or daily GH (Norditropin; 0.034 mg/kg/d), administered subcutaneously.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was annualized height velocity (HV; cm/y) at week 52. Additional assessments included HV SD score (SDS), height SDS, bone age, IGF-I SDS, patient-reported outcomes, and safety measures.

RESULTS

Estimated mean HV at week 52 was 11.2 and 11.7 cm/y for somapacitan and daily GH, respectively. Noninferiority was confirmed. Changes in HV SDS, height SDS, bone age, and IGF-I SDS from baseline to week 52 were similar between treatment groups. At week 52, mean IGF-I SDS values were similar between treatment groups and within normal range (-2 to +2). Safety of somapacitan was consistent with the well-known daily GH profile. Low proportions of injection-site reactions were reported for somapacitan (5.3%) and daily GH (5.9%). Both treatments similarly reduced disease burden from baseline to week 52, whereas a greater treatment burden reduction was observed for somapacitan.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar efficacy for somapacitan compared to daily GH was demonstrated over 52 weeks of treatment with comparable safety and mean IGF-I SDS levels in treatment-naïve children with GHD.

Differences in the distribution of insulin-like growth-factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations between European and US populations

Context

Method-specific reference intervals (RIs) determine utility of IGF-I as a biomarker in growth hormone-related diseases. Differences between populations might affect applicability of RIs.

Objective

To compare population-specific RIs derived from IGF-I routine testing in laboratories in the US and Europe using the same assay.

Design and setting

Uncensored routine IGF-I testing results generated over 5 years in four accredited laboratories (US, n=778,173 males/710,752 females; Europe, n=23,220 males/40,183 females).

Main outcome measures

Construction of RIs by indirect statistical methods designed to utilize routine testing data (modified Hoffmann approach). Comparison to published RIs, between the US and Europe, and between regions in the US with lower and higher mean body mass indexes (BMIs).

Results

Lower limits (LLs) of RIs calculated from all routine data sets do not differ from the published LLs. The same is true for Upper limits (ULs) calculated from European routine data. ULs derived from US routine data are significantly higher (children (10–18 years [mean, %]: boys +149.3 ng/mL [+34.6%]; girls +94.9 ng/mL [+19.8%]); adults (19–95 years: males +45 ng/mL [+20.3%]; females +29.7 ng/mL [+13.8%])). Average IGF-I is higher in samples from Colorado (lower mean BMI) compared with Alabama (p &lt;0.0001), although the difference is smaller than between each of them and Europe.

Conclusions

We provide evidence that in large datasets from the same population, direct sampling and the indirect Hoffmann approach provide comparable RIs. While LLs are comparable between Europe and the US, the UL is significantly higher in the US. We suggest use of adapted RIs for the US.

Dose-exposure-IGF-I response of once-weekly somapacitan in adults with GH deficiency

OBJECTIVE

Growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in patients with adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) is individually titrated due to variable dose-responses among patients. The aim of this study was to provide clinical guidance on dosing and titration of the novel long-acting GH derivative somapacitan based on analyses of somapacitan dose-insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) responses in AGHD patients.

DESIGN

Analyses of dosing information, 4364 somapacitan concentration samples and 4880 IGF-I samples from 330 AGHD patients treated with somapacitan in three phase 3 trials.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling was used to evaluate starting dose groups by age and oral oestrogen therapy, characterise the dose-IGF-I response in the overall AGHD population and patient subgroups, predict the IGF-I response to dose changes and simulate missed dosing.

RESULTS

The analyses supported the clinical recommendations of higher starting doses for younger patients and women on oral oestrogen replacement therapy. For patients switching from daily GH treatment, the mean maintenance dose ratio between somapacitan (mg/week) and somatropin (mg/day) was predicted to be 8.2 (observed interquartile range of 6.7-9.1). Simulations of IGF-I SDS profiles confirmed the appropriate time for IGF-I sampling to be 3-4 days after somapacitan dosing and supported somapacitan administration with up to 3 days delay in case of missed dosing. Subgroup analyses characterised the dose-exposure-IGF-I response in patient subgroups and indicated that dose requirements are mainly influenced by sex and oral oestrogen treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study extends the knowledge of the somapacitan dose-IGF-I response and provides information on clinical dosing of once-weekly somapacitan in patients with AGHD.

Effective GH Replacement With Once-weekly Somapacitan vs Daily GH in Children with GHD: 3-year Results From REAL 3

CONTEXT

Current GH therapy requires daily injections, which can be burdensome. Somapacitan is a long-acting GH derivative in development for treatment of GH deficiency (GHD).

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-weekly somapacitan after 3 years of treatment.

DESIGN

A multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase 2 study comparing somapacitan and once-daily GH for 156 weeks (NCT02616562).

SETTING

Twenty-nine sites in 11 countries.

PATIENTS

Fifty-nine children with GHD randomized (1:1:1:1) and exposed to treatment. Fifty-three children completed the 3-year period.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received somapacitan (0.04 [n = 14], 0.08 [n = 15], or 0.16 [n = 14] mg/kg/wk) or daily GH (n = 14) (0.034 mg/kg/d, equivalent to 0.238 mg/kg/wk) subcutaneously during the first year, after which all patients on somapacitan received 0.16 mg/kg/wk.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Height velocity (HV) at year 3; changes from baseline in height SD score (HSDS), HVSDS, and IGF-I SDS.

RESULTS

The estimated treatment difference (95% CI) in HV for somapacitan 0.16/0.16 mg/kg/wk vs daily GH at year 3 was 0.8 cm/y (-0.4 to 2.1). Change in HVSDS from baseline to year 3 was comparable between somapacitan 0.16/0.16 mg/kg/wk, the pooled somapacitan groups, and daily GH. A gradual increase in HSDS from baseline was observed for all groups. At year 3, mean HSDS was similar for the pooled somapacitan groups and daily GH. Change from baseline to year 3 in mean IGF-I SDS was similar across treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-weekly somapacitan in children with GHD showed sustained efficacy over 3 years in all assessed height-based outcomes with similar safety and tolerability to daily GH. A plain language summary (1) is available for this study.

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02616562 (REAL 3).

Therapeutic peptides: current applications and future directions

Peptide drug development has made great progress in the last decade thanks to new production, modification, and analytic technologies. Peptides have been produced and modified using both chemical and biological methods, together with novel design and delivery strategies, which have helped to overcome the inherent drawbacks of peptides and have allowed the continued advancement of this field. A wide variety of natural and modified peptides have been obtained and studied, covering multiple therapeutic areas. This review summarizes the efforts and achievements in peptide drug discovery, production, and modification, and their current applications. We also discuss the value and challenges associated with future developments in therapeutic peptides.

Efficacy and safety of long-acting growth hormone in adult growth hormone deficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

No meta-analysis has analysed efficacy and safety of long-acting growth hormone (GH) therapy in adult GH deficiency. We undertook this meta-analysis to address this gap in knowledge METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for RCTs involving adult GH deficiency patients receiving weekly long-acting GH as compared to daily GH/placebo controls. Primary outcome was to evaluate changes in body-composition parameters. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate alterations in glycaemia and adverse-events.

RESULTS

Data from 5 studies involving 648 patients were analysed (4 studies having daily GH as active controls; 1 study having placebo as passive controls). Over 24-34 weeks clinical use, patients receiving long-acting GH had comparable change in lean mass [MD-0.28 kg (95%CI: 0.94 - 0.38); P = 0.41; I² = 29% (low heterogeneity)] and fat mass [MD-0.10 kg (95%CI: 1.97-1.78); P = 0.92; I² = 77%(considerable heterogeneity)] as compared to daily GH injections. Long-acting GH use was associated with significantly lower visceral adipose tissue [MD-1.75 cm²(95%CI: 2.14 to -1.35); P < 0.01; I² = 0% (low heterogeneity)] and higher gynoid fat-mass [MD 0.14 kg(95%CI:0.02-0.26); P = 0.03] compared to daily GH injections. Total adverse events [Risk ratio (RR) 1.65 (95% CI: 0.83-3.29); P = 0.15; I² = 68%] and severe adverse events [RR 0.60 (95% CI: 0.30-1.19); P = 0.14; I² = 0%] were not significantly different in long-acting GH group compared to controls. Occurrence of headache, arthralgia, nasopharyngitis, new onset diabetes, anti-GH antibodies were comparable among groups. Long-acting GH users had significantly higher treatment adherence compared to controls [OR 4.80 (95%CI:3.58-6.02); P < 0.01; I² = 0%].

CONCLUSION

Long-acting GH has comparable beneficial impact on body composition parameters in adult GH deficiency, is well tolerated without any increased adverse events.

Structure identification of circulating metabolites from somapacitan, a long-acting growth hormone derivative, and pharmacokinetics after single and multiple subcutaneous dosing in rats

Somapacitan is a growth hormone derivative approved for once-weekly treatment of growth hormone deficiency in adults and currently in clinical development for once-weekly dosing in children. The purpose of this study was to obtain non-clinical data from rats to support the safety evaluation of the most abundant metabolites of somapacitan in humans. The aims were to identify somapacitan metabolites and their relative proportions in rat plasma, identify the structure of abundant metabolites and measure the systemic metabolite exposure at the no-observed-adverse-effect level in the rat. After a single dose of radiolabelled somapacitan and analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography with radiochemical detection, seven somapacitan-related metabolites were detected in plasma from male rats, of which six were seen in plasma from female rats. The three most abundant metabolites (M1, M2 and M3) were structurally identified from liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry data, and a fourth metabolite (P1) was characterised from its specific retention time (lacking retention to the stationary phase) in plasma analysis with reversed-phase liquid chromatography and radiochemical detection. The metabolites were products from proteolysis of the peptide backbone in somapacitan. A deamidation product of the M1 metabolite (M1B) was also identified. Following multiple, twice-weekly dosing for 4 weeks, somapacitan was the principal plasma component up to 36 h after dosing. After 36 h, metabolites M1+M1B were the most abundant plasma components. Pharmacokinetic models were developed for somapacitan and metabolite P1 and used for steady-state assessment in the rat. Comparison of our data generated from rats with data from the parallel human study demonstrated that the most abundant metabolites were present in rats at higher levels than in humans. This study has provided non-clinical safety data that contribute to an overall safety assessment of somapacitan.

Guidance for the treatment of adult growth hormone deficiency with somapacitan, a long-acting growth hormone preparation

Adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) is a rare endocrine disorder characterized by an abnormal body composition, metabolic abnormalities associated with increased cardiovascular diseases, bone loss, and impaired quality of life. Daily subcutaneous injections with recombinant growth hormone (GH) can alleviate the abnormalities associated with AGHD. Several long-acting GH (LAGH) preparations are currently in development that aim to reduce treatment burden for patients receiving daily GH injections. Somapacitan (Sogroya^®; Novo Nordisk, Denmark) is the first LAGH preparation that has been approved for treatment of AGHD in the United States, Europe, and Japan. The recent approval of somapacitan and anticipated approval of other LAGH molecules presents new questions for physicians planning to treat AGHD with LAGH in the future. Differences in the technologies used to prolong the half-life of recombinant GH are expected to result in variations in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles between preparations. Therefore, it is essential that physicians understand and consider such variations when treating patients with these novel GH replacement therapies. Here, we present a set of treatment recommendations that have been created to guide physicians initiating therapy with somapacitan in patients with AGHD who are eligible for GH replacement. Furthermore, we will review the published data that underlie these recommendations to explain the rationale for the treatment and monitoring advice provided.

Absorption, metabolism and excretion of once-weekly somapacitan, a long-acting growth hormone derivative, after single subcutaneous dosing in human subjects

Somapacitan is a reversible albumin-binding growth hormone (GH) derivative in clinical development for once-weekly administration in patients with adult GH deficiency (AGHD) and children with GH deficiency (GHD). To date, the use of somapacitan in AGHD or severe AGHD has been approved in the USA and Japan, respectively. This study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02962440) investigated the absorption, metabolism and excretion, as well as the pharmacokinetics (PK), of tritium-labelled somapacitan ([³H]-somapacitan). Seven healthy males received a single subcutaneous dose of 6 mg somapacitan containing [³H]-somapacitan 20 MBq. Blood, serum, plasma, urine, faeces, and expired air were collected for radioactivity assessment. Metabolites were identified and quantified in plasma and urine collected. The PK of plasma components were determined, and the radioactive peaks of the most abundant plasma metabolites and urine metabolites were selected for analysis. Twenty-eight days after dosing, 94.0% of the administered dose was recovered as [³H]-somapacitan-related material, most of which was excreted in urine (80.9%); 12.9% was excreted in faeces, and an insignificant amount (0.2%) was exhaled in expired air. PK properties of [³H]-somapacitan-related material appeared to be consistent across plasma, serum and blood. Three abundant plasma metabolites (P1, M1 and M1B) and two abundant urine metabolites (M4 and M5) were identified. The total exposure of intact somapacitan accounted for 59% of the total exposure of all somapacitan-related material, P1 accounted for 21% and M1 plus M1B accounted for 12%. M4 and M5 were the most abundant urine metabolites and accounted for 37% and 8% of the dosed [³H]-somapacitan radioactivity, respectively. No intact somapacitan was found in excreta. Two subjects had six adverse events (AEs); all were mild in severity and unlikely to be related to trial product. The majority of dosed [³H]-somapacitan (94%) was recovered as excreted metabolites. Urine was the major route for excretion of somapacitan metabolites, followed by faeces, and exhalation in expired air was negligible. The low molecular weights of identified urine metabolites demonstrate that somapacitan was extensively degraded to small residual fragments that were excreted (fully biodegradable). The extensive metabolic degradation and full elimination of metabolites in excreta were the major clearance pathways of somapacitan and the key elements in its biological fate. A single dose of 6 mg somapacitan (containing [³H]-somapacitan) in healthy male subjects was well tolerated with no unexpected safety issues identified.

Long-Lasting Growth Hormone Regulated by the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System

To increase the half-life of growth hormones, we proposed its long-lasting regulation through the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). We identified lysine residues (K67, K141, and K166) that are involved in the ubiquitination of human growth hormone (hGH) using ubiquitination site prediction programs to validate the ubiquitination sites, and then substituted these lysine residues with arginine residues. We identified the most effective substituent (K141R) to prevent ubiquitination and named it AUT-hGH. hGH was expressed and purified in the form of hGH-His, and ubiquitination was first verified at sites containing K141 in the blood stream. Through the study, we propose that AUT-hGH with an increased half-life could be used as a long-lasting hGH in the blood stream.

Growth hormone deficiency in adults with Cushing's disease

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) generally occurs in patients with Cushing's disease (CD) as a consequence of cortisol excess. Mass effect may contribute to the development of GHD in the minority of patients with CD due to corticotroph macroadenomas. Patients with CD in remission are at considerable risk of GH deficiency as a consequence of pituitary surgery or radiation therapy. The purpose of the present review is to summarize data on GH deficiency in adults with CD. Untreated GH deficiency is associated with increased visceral adiposity, decreased lean mass, bone mass, and exercise capacity, impaired linear growth (in children), dyslipidemia, insulin resistance and impaired quality of life. Evaluation and treatment of GHD should be considered in patients with CD in remission. Serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) can be helpful in the diagnosis of GHD among patients with multiple additional pituitary hormone deficiencies. The diagnosis of GHD generally requires dynamic testing, including insulin, glucagon or macimorelin stimulation. Growth hormone replacement may improve body composition, bone density, linear growth (in children), exercise capacity, dyslipidemia and quality of life. While generally safe, GH replacement requires careful monitoring to assure effectiveness and tolerance in treated patients.

Optimal Monitoring of Weekly IGF-I Levels During Growth Hormone Therapy With Once-Weekly Somapacitan

CONTEXT

Somapacitan is a long-acting growth hormone (GH) in development for once-weekly treatment of GH deficiency (GHD). Optimal monitoring of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels must account for weekly IGF-I fluctuations following somapacitan administration.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and assess the reliability of linear models for predicting mean and peak IGF-I levels from samples taken on different days after dosing.

DESIGN

A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was used to simulate IGF-I data in adults and children following weekly somapacitan treatment of GHD.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

39 200 IGF-I profiles were simulated with reference to data from 26 adults and 23 children with GHD.

INTERVENTION(S)

The simulated dose range was 0.02 to 0.12 mg/kg for adults and 0.02 to 0.16 mg/kg for children. Simulated data with >4 average standard deviation score were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Linear models for predicting mean and peak IGF-I levels based on IGF-I samples from different days after somapacitan dose.

RESULTS

Robust linear relationships were found between IGF-I sampled on any day after somapacitan dose and the weekly mean (R2 > 0.94) and peak (R2 > 0.84). Prediction uncertainties were generally low when predicting mean from samples taken on any day (residual standard deviation [RSD] ≤ 0.36) and peak from samples taken on day 1 to 4 (RSD ≤ 0.34). IGF-I monitoring on day 4 and day 2 after dose provided the most accurate estimate of IGF-I mean (RSD < 0.2) and peak (RSD < 0.1), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Linear models provided a simple and reliable tool to aid optimal monitoring of IGF-I by predicting mean and peak IGF-I levels based on an IGF-I sample following dosing of somapacitan. A short visual summary of our work is available (1).

Usefulness and Potential Pitfalls of Long-Acting Growth Hormone Analogs

Daily recombinant human GH (rhGH) is currently approved for use in children and adults with GH deficiency (GHD) in many countries with relatively few side-effects. Nevertheless, daily injections can be painful and distressing for some patients, often resulting in non-adherence and reduction of treatment outcomes. This has prompted the development of numerous long-acting GH (LAGH) analogs that allow for decreased injection frequency, ranging from weekly, bi-weekly to monthly. These LAGH analogs are attractive as they may theoretically offer increased patient acceptance, tolerability, and therapeutic flexibility. Conversely, there may also be pitfalls to these LAGH analogs, including an unphysiological GH profile and differing molecular structures that pose potential clinical issues in terms of dose initiation, therapeutic monitoring, incidence and duration of side-effects, and long-term safety. Furthermore, fluctuations of peak and trough serum GH and IGF-I levels and variations in therapeutic efficacy may depend on the technology used to prolong GH action. Previous studies of some LAGH analogs have demonstrated non-inferiority compared to daily rhGH in terms of increased growth velocity and improved body composition in children and adults with GHD, respectively, with no significant unanticipated adverse events. Currently, two LAGH analogs are marketed in Asia, one recently approved in the United States, another previously approved but not marketed in Europe, and several others proceeding through various stages of clinical development. Nevertheless, several practical questions still remain, including possible differences in dose initiation between naïve and switch-over patients, methodology of dose adjustment/s, timing of measuring serum IGF-I levels, safety, durability of efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Long-term surveillance of safety and efficacy of LAGH analogs are needed to answer these important questions.

Similar safety and efficacy in previously treated adults with growth hormone deficiency randomized to once-weekly somapacitan or daily growth hormone

OBJECTIVE

Somapacitan is a long-acting, reversible albumin-binding growth hormone (GH) derivative in development. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-weekly somapacitan versus daily GH over 52 weeks in Japanese patients with adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD).

DESIGN

Phase 3, multicentre, randomized, parallel-group, open-label, active-controlled trial (NCT03075644).

PATIENTS

Previously GH-treated Japanese patients with AGHD were randomized 3:1 to somapacitan (n = 46) or daily GH (n = 16) for 20 weeks' dose titration and 32 weeks' fixed-dose treatment.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included change from baseline to week 52 in visceral, subcutaneous and total adipose tissue (VAT, SAT and TAT).

RESULTS

Mean (SD) prescribed doses after titration were 1.780 (1.058) mg/week for somapacitan and 0.197 (0.083) mg/day for daily GH. Rate of AEs per 100 patient-years was similar between arms (somapacitan, 312.7; daily GH, 309.8). Four AEs in the somapacitan arm were serious; none were considered treatment-related. Mean insulin-like growth factor-I standard deviation score (IGF-I SDS) was maintained from baseline in both arms. No significant differences were observed between arms for change from baseline to week 52 in VAT, SAT or TAT (estimated difference, somapacitan - daily GH [95% CI]: -1.74 [-18.13; 14.66], -11.53 [-35.54; 12.48] and - 12.85 [-47.31; 21.62] cm² , respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment in both groups was well tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings. Impact on adipose tissue was similar to somapacitan and daily GH in patients with AGHD. A short visual summary of our work is available at https://bit.ly/3946YNF.

Long-Acting Growth Hormone Preparations - Current Status and Future Considerations

CONTEXT

Long-acting GH (LAGH) preparations are currently being developed in an attempt to improve adherence. The profile of GH action following administration of LAGH raises practical questions about clinical monitoring and long-term safety and efficacy of these new therapeutic agents.

METHODS

Recent literature and meeting proceedings regarding LAGH preparations are reviewed.

RESULTS

Multiple LAGH preparations are currently at various stages of development, allowing for decreased GH injection frequency from daily to weekly, biweekly, or monthly. Following administration of LAGH, the serum peak and trough GH and IGF-I levels vary depending upon the mechanism used to prolong GH action. Randomized, controlled clinical trials of some LAGH preparations have reported non-inferiority compared with daily recombinant human GH (rhGH) for improved growth velocity and body composition in children and adults with GH deficiency (GHD), respectively. No significant LAGH-related adverse events have been reported during short-term therapy.

CONCLUSION

Multiple LAGH preparations are proceeding through clinical development with some showing promising evidence of short-term clinical efficacy and safety in children and adults with GHD. The relationship of transient elevations of GH and IGF-I following administration of LAGH to efficacy and safety remain to be elucidated. For LAGH to replace daily rhGH in the treatment of individuals with GHD, a number of practical questions need to be addressed including methods of dose adjustment, timing of monitoring of IGF-I, safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness. Long-term surveillance of efficacy and safety of LAGH preparations will be needed to answer these clinically relevant questions.

Once-Weekly Somapacitan vs Daily GH in Children With GH Deficiency: Results From a Randomized Phase 2 Trial

CONTEXT

Daily growth hormone (GH) injections can be burdensome for patients and carers. Somapacitan is a long-acting, reversible albumin-binding GH derivative in development for once-weekly administration in patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-weekly somapacitan vs once-daily GH.

DESIGN

REAL 3 is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind (somapacitan doses), phase 2 study with a 26-week main and 26-week extension phase (NCT02616562).

SETTING

This study took place at 29 sites in 11 countries.

PATIENTS

Fifty-nine GH treatment-naive prepubertal children with GHD were randomly assigned; 58 completed the trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Interventions comprised 3 somapacitan doses (0.04 [n = 16], 0.08 [n = 15], or 0.16 mg/kg/wk [n = 14]) and daily GH (0.034 mg/kg/d [n = 14]), administered subcutaneously.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was height velocity (HV) at week 26. Secondary efficacy end points included HV SD score (SDS) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) SDS.

RESULTS

At week 26, mean (SD) annualized HV for the somapacitan groups was 8.0 (2.0), 10.9 (1.9), and 12.9 (3.5) cm/year, respectively, vs 11.4 (3.3) cm/year for daily GH; estimated treatment difference (somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/week-daily GH): 1.7 [95% CI -0.2 to 3.6] cm/year. HV was sustained at week 52, and significantly greater with somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/week vs daily GH. Mean (SD) change from baseline in HV SDS at week 52 was 4.72 (2.79), 6.14 (3.36), and 8.60 (3.15) for the somapacitan groups, respectively, vs 7.41 (4.08) for daily GH. Model-derived mean (SD) IGF-I SDS for the somapacitan groups was -1.62 (0.86), -1.09 (0.78), and 0.31 (1.06), respectively, vs -0.40 (1.50) observed for daily GH. Safety and tolerability were consistent with the profile of daily GH.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with GHD, once-weekly somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/week provided the closest efficacy match with similar safety and tolerability to daily GH after 26 and 52 weeks of treatment. A short visual summary of our work is available (1).

Once-weekly Somapacitan is Effective and Well Tolerated in Adults with GH Deficiency: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial

CONTEXT

Growth hormone (GH) replacement requires daily GH injections, which is burdensome for some adult patients with GH deficiency (AGHD).

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate efficacy and safety of somapacitan, a once-weekly reversible albumin-binding GH derivative, versus placebo in AGHD.

DESIGN

Randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled (double-blind) and active-controlled (open-label) phase 3 trial, REAL 1 (NCT02229851).

SETTING

Clinics in 17 countries.

PATIENTS

Treatment-naïve patients with AGHD (n = 301 main study period, 272 extension period); 257 patients completed the trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to once-weekly somapacitan, daily GH, or once-weekly placebo for 34 weeks (main period). During the 52-week extension period, patients continued treatment with somapacitan or daily GH.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Body composition measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The primary endpoint was change in truncal fat percentage to week 34. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) standard deviation score (SDS) values were used to dose titrate.

RESULTS

At 34 weeks, somapacitan significantly reduced truncal fat percentage (estimated difference: -1.53% [-2.68; -0.38]; P = 0.0090), demonstrating superiority compared with placebo, and it improved other body composition parameters (including visceral fat and lean body mass) and IGF-I SDS. At 86 weeks, improvements were maintained with both somapacitan and daily GH. Somapacitan was well tolerated, with similar adverse events (including injection-site reactions) compared with daily GH.

CONCLUSIONS

In AGHD patients, somapacitan administered once weekly demonstrated superiority over placebo, and the overall treatment effects and safety of somapacitan were in accordance with known effects and safety of GH replacement for up to 86 weeks of treatment. Somapacitan may provide an effective alternative to daily GH in AGHD. A short visual summary of our work is available (1).

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Once-Weekly Somapacitan in Children and Adults: Supporting Dosing Rationales with a Model-Based Analysis of Three Phase I Trials

Background

Somapacitan, a long-acting growth hormone (GH) derivative, has been well-tolerated in children with GH deficiency (GHD) and adults (healthy and adult GHD), in phase I, single- and multiple-dose trials, respectively, and has pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties supporting a once-weekly dosing regimen.

Objective

In the absence of a multiple-dose phase I trial in children with GHD, the aim was to develop a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to predict somapacitan exposure and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) response after once-weekly multiple doses in both children and adults with GHD.

Methods

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models were developed from pharmacokinetic and IGF-I profiles in three phase I trials of somapacitan (doses: healthy adults, 0.01–0.32 mg/kg; adult with GHD, 0.02−0.12 mg/kg; children with GHD, 0.02–0.16 mg/kg) using non-linear mixed-effects modeling. Pharmacokinetics were described using a non-linear one-compartment model with dual first- and zero-order absorption through a transit compartment, with saturable elimination. IGF-I profiles were described using an indirect response pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model, with sigmoidal-effect relationship.

Results

The non-linear pharmacokinetic and IGF-I data were well-described in order to confidently predict pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles after multiple doses in adults and children with GHD. Body weight was found to be a significant covariate, predictive of the differences observed in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics between children and adults. Weekly dosing of somapacitan provided elevated IGF-I levels throughout the week, despite little or no accumulation of somapacitan, in both adults and children with GHD.

Conclusion

This analysis of somapacitan pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data supports once-weekly dosing in adults and children with GHD.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier numbers NCT01514500, NCT01706783, NCT01973244.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40262-018-0662-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Management of Hypopituitarism

Hypopituitarism includes all clinical conditions that result in partial or complete failure of the anterior and posterior lobe of the pituitary gland’s ability to secrete hormones. The aim of management is usually to replace the target-hormone of hypothalamo-pituitary-endocrine gland axis with the exceptions of secondary hypogonadism when fertility is required, and growth hormone deficiency (GHD), and to safely minimise both symptoms and clinical signs. Adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency replacement is best performed with the immediate-release oral glucocorticoid hydrocortisone (HC) in 2–3 divided doses. However, novel once-daily modified-release HC targets a more physiological exposure of glucocorticoids. GHD is treated currently with daily subcutaneous GH, but current research is focusing on the development of once-weekly administration of recombinant GH. Hypogonadism is targeted with testosterone replacement in men and on estrogen replacement therapy in women; when fertility is wanted, replacement targets secondary or tertiary levels of hormonal settings. Thyroid-stimulating hormone replacement therapy follows the rules of primary thyroid gland failure with L-thyroxine replacement. Central diabetes insipidus is nowadays replaced by desmopressin. Certain clinical scenarios may have to be promptly managed to avoid short-term or long-term sequelae such as pregnancy in patients with hypopituitarism, pituitary apoplexy, adrenal crisis, and pituitary metastases.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT OF GROWTH HORMONE DEFICIENCY IN ADULTS AND PATIENTS TRANSITIONING FROM PEDIATRIC TO ADULT CARE

Objective: The development of these guidelines is sponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent reviews of clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors, according to established AACE/ACE guidelines for guidelines protocols. Results: The Executive Summary of this 2019 updated guideline contains 58 numbered recommendations: 12 are Grade A (21%), 19 are Grade B (33%), 21 are Grade C (36%), and 6 are Grade D (10%). These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world care of patients. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for the Executive Summary recommendations. This update contains 357 citations of which 51 (14%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (strong), 168 (47%) are EL 2 (intermediate), 61 (17%) are EL 3 (weak), and 77 (22%) are EL 4 (no clinical evidence). Conclusion: This CPG is a practical tool that practicing endocrinologists and regulatory bodies can refer to regarding the identification, diagnosis, and treatment of adults and patients transitioning from pediatric to adult-care services with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). It provides guidelines on assessment, screening, diagnostic testing, and treatment recommendations for a range of individuals with various causes of adult GHD. The recommendations emphasize the importance of considering testing patients with a reasonable level of clinical suspicion of GHD using appropriate growth hormone (GH) cut-points for various GH-stimulation tests to accurately diagnose adult GHD, and to exercise caution interpreting serum GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, as various GH and IGF-1 assays are used to support treatment decisions. The intention to treat often requires sound clinical judgment and careful assessment of the benefits and risks specific to each individual patient. Unapproved uses of GH, long-term safety, and the current status of long-acting GH preparations are also discussed in this document. LAY ABSTRACT This updated guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the identification, screening, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment for a range of individuals with various causes of adult growth-hormone deficiency (GHD) and patients with childhood-onset GHD transitioning to adult care. The update summarizes the most current knowledge about the accuracy of available GH-stimulation tests, safety of recombinant human GH (rhGH) replacement, unapproved uses of rhGH related to sports and aging, and new developments such as long-acting GH preparations that use a variety of technologies to prolong GH action. Recommendations offer a framework for physicians to manage patients with GHD effectively during transition to adult care and adulthood. Establishing a correct diagnosis is essential before consideration of replacement therapy with rhGH. Since the diagnosis of GHD in adults can be challenging, GH-stimulation tests are recommended based on individual patient circumstances and use of appropriate GH cut-points. Available GH-stimulation tests are discussed regarding variability, accuracy, reproducibility, safety, and contraindications, among other factors. The regimen for starting and maintaining rhGH treatment now uses individualized dose adjustments, which has improved effectiveness and reduced reported side effects, dependent on age, gender, body mass index, and various other individual characteristics. With careful dosing of rhGH replacement, many features of adult GHD are reversible and side effects of therapy can be minimized. Scientific studies have consistently shown rhGH therapy to be beneficial for adults with GHD, including improvements in body composition and quality of life, and have demonstrated the safety of short- and long-term rhGH replacement. Abbreviations: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ACE = American College of Endocrinology; AHSG = alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein; AO-GHD = adult-onset growth hormone deficiency; ARG = arginine; BEL = best evidence level; BMD = bone mineral density; BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; CO-GHD = childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency; CPG = clinical practice guideline; CRP = C-reactive protein; DM = diabetes mellitus; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; EL = evidence level; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; FD-GST = fixed-dose glucagon stimulation test; GeNeSIS = Genetics and Neuroendocrinology of Short Stature International Study; GH = growth hormone; GHD = growth hormone deficiency; GHRH = growth hormone-releasing hormone; GST = glucagon stimulation test; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; HypoCCS = Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1; IGFBP = insulin-like growth factor-binding protein; IGHD = isolated growth hormone deficiency; ITT = insulin tolerance test; KIMS = Kabi International Metabolic Surveillance; LAGH = long-acting growth hormone; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LIF = leukemia inhibitory factor; MPHD = multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; P-III-NP = procollagen type-III amino-terminal pro-peptide; PHD = pituitary hormone deficiencies; QoL = quality of life; rhGH = recombinant human growth hormone; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; RR = relative risk; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; SDS = standard deviation score; SIR = standardized incidence ratio; SN = secondary neoplasms; T3 = triiodothyronine; TBI = traumatic brain injury; VDBP = vitamin D-binding protein; WADA = World Anti-Doping Agency; WB-GST = weight-based glucagon stimulation test.

Adult growth hormone deficiency: clinical advances and approaches to improve adherence

Introduction: There have been significant clinical advances in the understanding of the diagnosis and benefits of long-term recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) replacement in adults with GH deficiency (GHD) since its approval in 1996 by the United States Food and Drug Administration.Areas covered: We searched PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsychInfo databases between January 2000 and June 2019 for published studies evaluating adults with GHD. We reviewed the data of the oral macimorelin test compared to the GHRH plus arginine and the insulin tolerance tests that led to its approval by the United States FDA and European Medicines Agency for adult diagnostic testing. We summarize the clinical advances of long-term benefits of rhGH therapy and the potential effects of GH receptor polymorphisms on individual treatment responsiveness. We identify that non-adherence and discontinuation rates are high and recommend strategies to support patients to improve adherence. We also provide an overview of several long-acting GH (LAGH) preparations currently under development and their potential role in improving treatment adherence.Expert opinion: This article summarizes recent clinical advances in rhGH replacement therapy, the biological and molecular aspects that may influence rhGH action, and offers practical strategies to enhance adherence in adults with GHD.

Perspectives on long-acting growth hormone therapy in children and adults

Growth hormone therapy with daily injections of recombinant human growth hormone has been available since 1985, and is shown to be safe and effective treatment for short stature in children and for adult growth hormone deficiency. In an effort to produce a product that would improve patient adherence, there has been a strong effort from industry to create a long acting form of growth hormone to ease the burden of use. Technologies used to increase half-life include depot formulations, PEGylated formulations, pro-drug formulations, non-covalent albumin binding growth hormone and growth hormone fusion proteins. At present, two long acting formulations are on the market in China and South Korea, and several more promising agents are under clinical investigation at various stages of development throughout the world. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2019;63(6):601-7.

The Use and Abuse of Growth Hormone in Sports

GH is banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency as a performance-enhancing anabolic agent. Doping with GH likely began in the early 1980s and became more prevalent with the advent of recombinant technology well before any scientific evidence of benefit. The expectation that GH improves physical function stems from its anabolic and lipolytic properties. Athletic performance depends on muscle strength and the energy required to power muscle function. In recreational athletes, GH selectively improves anaerobic sprint capacity but has not been proven to significantly enhance muscle strength, power, or maximum rate of oxygen consumption. GH is secreted as a family of isoform peptides in a pulsatile manner reflecting intermittent secretion and rapid clearance. Its anabolic actions are largely mediated by IGF-I, which stimulates whole-body protein synthesis, including skeletal muscle and collagen proteins. Two methods have been validated for detecting GH abuse in athletes. The first (the isoform method) is based on distinguishing pure recombinant 22-kDa GH from the heterogeneous isoforms secreted from the pituitary. The second (the marker method) is based on measuring blood levels of GH-responsive proteins, specifically IGF-I and the N-terminal propeptide of type III collagen (P-III-NP). Only a handful of athletes have been caught since the implementation of GH doping tests in 2004. The low rate likely reflects the limitation of in-competition testing using current methods. Improved detection rates may be achieved by more out-of-competition testing, introducing athletes' biological passports, and the development of novel methods. Governance, operational, technical, and political factors influence the effectiveness of an anti-doping program.