Compliance with national immunization guidelines for children younger than 2 years, 1996-1999

Effect of stepwise perinatal immunization education: A cluster-randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Perinatal immunization education is important for improving the immunization outcomes of infants; however, the content of educational materials used at each perinatal period has not been carefully evaluated. We hypothesized that stepwise education offered at different perinatal periods would improve infant immunization status and enhance maternal immunization knowledge.

METHODS

In this cluster-randomized controlled trial, pregnant women were recruited from nine obstetric sites in Niigata, Japan. The intervention group received a stepwise, interactive education intervention (prenatally, postnatally, and 1month after birth). The control group received a leaflet containing general information on immunization. Infant immunization status was evaluated at 6months of age, and maternal immunization knowledge was evaluated by a written survey after each intervention.

RESULTS

Among 188 study participants, 151 (80.3%) replied to the final post-intervention survey. At 6months of age, the percentage of children who completed three doses of inactivated polio, diphtheria, tetanus toxoid, and acellular pertussis (DTaP-IPV) vaccine was higher in the intervention group than in the control (p=0.04); however, no differences between groups were observed for the Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) (p=0.67) or 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13) vaccines (p=0.20). The duration to the completion of the third dose of the DTaP-IPV, Hib, and PCV13 vaccines was shorter in the intervention group than in the control (p=0.03, p<0.01, and p<0.01, respectively). Furthermore, maternal knowledge scores exhibited significantly greater improvement in the intervention group over time compared with those of the control group (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Stepwise perinatal immunization education improved immunization schedule adherence for required vaccines and improved maternal immunization knowledge.

Frequent vaccination missed opportunities at primary care encounters contribute to underimmunization

OBJECTIVE

To examine missed opportunities to administer an eligible vaccination (MOs) and their contribution to underimmunization in contemporary pediatric practices.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a retrospective analysis from 42 diverse pediatric practices located throughout the US. Medical records of 50 randomly selected children 3-18 months of age per practice were reviewed in Spring 2013. Immunization status for age and MOs were assessed as of each encounter and as of March 1, 2013.

RESULTS

Of 2076 eligible patients, 72.7% (95% CI 67.6-77.9) were up-to-date with receipt of standard vaccines. Most children (82.4%; 95% CI 78.3-85.9) had at least 1 MO, and 37.8% (95% CI 30.0-46.2) had at least one MO to administer an overdue vaccination. After adjustment, risk of underimmunization was 3.5 times greater for patients who had ever experienced an MO for an overdue vaccination compared with those who had not (adjusted relative risk = 3.5; 95% CI 2.8-4.3). If all age-appropriate vaccinations had been administered at the last recorded encounter, 45.5% (95% CI 36.8-54.5) of the underimmunized patients would have been up to date at the time of assessment.

CONCLUSION

MOs were common and contributed substantially to underimmunization in this contemporary sample of diverse primary care practice settings.

Vaccination guidelines after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: practitioners' knowledge, attitudes, and gap between guidelines and clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients are more susceptible to infections from vaccine-preventable diseases than the general population. Despite the development of international consensus guidelines addressing immunization after HCT, studies have shown that deviations from recommended immunization practices commonly occur.

METHODS

An anonymous survey aimed at determining awareness of the guidelines and attitudes toward vaccination was distributed to our HCT clinicians. In parallel, we retrospectively evaluated patients' characteristics and post-HCT vaccine administration practices from 2010 to 2013.

RESULTS

The majority of survey respondents (96%) were familiar with post-HCT vaccination protocols. Seventy-four percent of respondents reported that influenza vaccines were given to >70% of their patients, and 41% stated that they prescribed live vaccines to eligible patients. However, our pharmacy database review revealed that 38% of patients received the first series of vaccinations by the recommended 6 months post HCT, and 60% received them by 1 year after HCT. Most patients who had their vaccines withheld had relapsed disease or were undergoing treatment for graft-versus-host disease. Furthermore, we identified lower immunization rates in non-English speaking individuals, African-Americans, and Hispanic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Survey respondents reported being aware of current guidelines; however, adherence to the recommendations varied, likely connected to conflicting data on vaccine effectiveness and a lack of clear recommendations in complex clinical scenarios. Similar to the general population, patient barriers also could have contributed to lower vaccination rates in some cases. To decrease the large gap between the post-HCT vaccination guidelines and clinical practice, further studies on vaccine effectiveness and specific populations are warranted.

Immunization practices of pediatricians for children younger than five years in coastal South India

CONTEXT

Immunization helps in controlling infectious diseases. Child immunization is an important component of child survival programs in India, which mainly follows the National Immunization Schedule. Also, many of the injection practices followed are not safe.

AIMS

To study the practices of pediatricians toward the immunization of children younger than 5 years and injection-related waste management.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Cross-sectional study carried out in the city of Mangalore, a rapidly developing city in southern India.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

All the practicing pediatricians were included in the study and an interview was done on prior appointment using pretested interview schedule in March 2012, after obtaining clearance from the institutional ethics committee. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 11.5.

RESULTS

Among the 54 practicing pediatricians in Mangalore, 42 were included in this study after exclusion criteria were applied. Among them, 71.4% were following the National Immunization Schedule, 5% did not prefer to give combination vaccines, 17% reported vaccine failure at least once in their practice, and 85.7% motivated the parents for future doses. Distance to the clinic and affordability were the major reasons for loss of follow-up. Only 38.1% used auto-disabled syringes, 11.9% did not observe the children following the immunization, and 45.2% did not use color coding for disposal of injection-related wastes. Mechanical hub cutters were preferred by 41% of the respondents.

CONCLUSION

The study showed the diversity in immunization practices. The National Immunization Schedule is the most commonly followed schedule. However, the safety of the injection practices was limited.

Improving immunization delivery using an electronic health record: the ImmProve project

OBJECTIVE

Though an essential pediatric preventive service, immunizations are challenging to deliver reliably. Our objective was to measure the impact on pediatric immunization rates of providing clinicians with electronic health record-derived immunization prompting.

METHODS

Operating in a large, urban, hospital-based pediatric primary care clinic, we evaluated 2 interventions to improve immunization delivery to children ages 2, 6, and 13 years: point-of-care, patient-specific electronic clinical decision support (CDS) when children overdue for immunizations presented for care, and provider-specific bulletins listing children overdue for immunizations.

RESULTS

Overall, the proportion of children up to date for a composite of recommended immunizations at ages 2, 6, and 13 years was not different in the intervention (CDS active) and historical control (CDS not active) periods; historical immunization rates were high. The proportion of children receiving 2 doses of hepatitis A immunization before their second birthday was significantly improved during the intervention period. Human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization delivery was low during both control and intervention periods and was unchanged for 13-year-olds. For 14-year-olds, however, 4 of the 5 highest quarterly rates of complete HPV immunization occurred in the final year of the intervention. Provider-specific bulletins listing children overdue for immunizations increased the likelihood of identified children receiving catch-up hepatitis A immunizations (hazard ratio 1.32; 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.56); results for HPV and the composite of recommended immunizations were of a similar magnitude but not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In our patient population, with high baseline uptake of recommended immunizations, electronic health record-derived immunization prompting had a limited effect on immunization delivery. Benefit was more clearly demonstrated for newer immunizations with lower baseline uptake.

Influence of health providers on pediatrics' immunization rate

To identify the immunization providers' characteristics associated with immunization rate in children younger than 2 years. A cohort and a cluster sampling design were implemented; 528 children between 18 and 70 months of age were sampled in five public health clinics in Mosul-Iraq. Providers' characterizations were obtained. Immunization rate for the children was assessed. Risk factors for partial immunization were explored using both bivariate analyses and multi-level logistic regression models. Less than half of the children had one or more than one missed dose, considered as partial immunization cases. The study found significant association of immunization rate with provider's type. Two factors were found that strongly impacted on immunization rate in the presence of other factors: birthplace and immunization providers' type.

Rotavirus vaccine series completion and adherence to vaccination schedules among infants in managed care in the United States

BACKGROUND

Two rotavirus vaccines are currently approved in the United States: 3-dose RotaTeq (RV5; Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA) is administered at ages 2, 4, and 6 months; and 2-dose Rotarix (RV1; GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) is administered at ages 2 and 4 months. Our objective was to compare rotavirus vaccine series completion and dosing schedule compliance between cohorts of infants who received these vaccines.

METHODS

Infants aged less than 1 year who initiated a rotavirus vaccine series between 01 January 2009 and 30 June 2009 were identified in US health insurance claims data. Cohorts were formed based on vaccine brand use. Series completion and compliance with the FDA-approved and ACIP-recommended harmonized schedules were analyzed descriptively and a log binomial model was used to estimate the difference in series completion by vaccine brand while adjusting for demographic variables.

RESULTS

Among infants in the RV1 and RV5 cohorts (N=55,584), 84.3% completed a full series. A greater proportion of the RV1 cohort than the RV5 cohort completed their series (91.0% vs. 83.4%; P<0.001; multivariate-adjusted relative risk 1.07; 95% CI 1.06-1.08). In the RV1 and RV5 cohorts, respectively, 75.0% and 59.5% of infants were fully compliant with the FDA-approved administration schedule for their vaccine (P<0.001); 83.3% and 76.4% of infants were fully compliant with the harmonized schedule (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of infants that completed the series was greater and compliance with respective FDA-approved and harmonized dosing schedules was higher among infants vaccinated with RV1 than among infants who received RV5.

Evaluation of immunization rates and safety among children with inborn errors of metabolism

BACKGROUND

Children with inherited metabolic disorders are a potential high-risk group for vaccine-preventable diseases, yet information regarding immunization rates and vaccine safety within this population is limited.

METHODS

Using Northern California Kaiser Permanente's electronic medical record, we identified children with inborn errors of metabolism from 1990 to 2007. We assessed immunization rates among infants with inborn errors of metabolism born at Northern California Kaiser Permanente matched to healthy infants (1 to 20), comparing both vaccines received by 2 years of age and age at vaccination. We assessed postvaccination adverse events among children up to 18 years old with inborn errors of metabolism, separately comparing emergency-department visits and hospitalizations during postvaccine days 0 to 30 (primary) and days 0 to 14 (secondary).

RESULTS

Comparing infants with inborn errors of metabolism (n = 77) versus matched control subjects (n = 1540), similar proportions were up to date for vaccines at 2 years of age, and there was no evidence of delay in receipt of recommended vaccines during the first year. Vaccination of children with inborn errors of metabolism (n = 271) was not associated with any significant increase in emergency-department visits or hospitalizations during the 30 days after vaccination. Secondary analyses suggested that there may be increased rates of hospitalizations 2 weeks after vaccination for the sickest 1- to 4-year-old children.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with inborn errors of metabolism at Northern California Kaiser Permanente received vaccines on the same immunization schedule as healthy infants. Immunization was not associated with increased risk for serious adverse events during the month after vaccination, providing overall reassurance that routine vaccination of children with inborn errors of metabolism does not result in adverse effects.

Related factors of age-appropriate immunization among urban-rural children aged 24-35 months in a 2005 population-based survey in Nonsan, Korea

PURPOSE

This study was aimed to determine the status and related factors of age-appropriate immunization among urban-rural children aged 24-35 months in a 2005 population-based survey in Nonsan, Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted household survey and provider check using questionnaire and checklist to obtain data on immunization status for children, aged 24-35 months. Age-appropriate immunization was defined as status of receiving the fourth diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (4 DTP), 3 Polio, the first measles-mumps-rubella (1 MMR) doses, and the 4 : 3 : 1 series.

RESULTS

Age-appropriate immunization rates were 51.7% for 4 DPT, 88.0% for 3 Polio, 87.9% for 1 MMR, and 50.3% for the 4 : 3 : 1 series. First-born children, lower perceived barrier scores, and higher perception of immunization data were significantly related to age-appropriate immunization.

CONCLUSION

The findings indicated that age-appropriate immunization rate could be improved by implementing reminder/recall service and providing the knowledge about immunization. Identification and consideration related factors would improve immunization rate and age-appropriate immunization.

Utilizing an electronic health record system to improve vaccination coverage in children

BACKGROUND

Electronic Health Records (EHR) are widely believed to improve quality of care and effectiveness of service delivery. Use of EHR to improve childhood immunization rates has not been fully explored in an ambulatory setting.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a pediatric practice's use of Electronic Health Records (EHR) in improving childhood immunization.

METHODS

A multi-faceted EHR-based quality improvement initiative used electronic templates with pre-loaded immunization records, automatic diagnosis coding, and EHR alerts of missing or delayed vaccinations. An electronic patient tracking system was created to identify patients with missing vaccines. Barcode scanning technology was introduced to aid speed and accuracy of documentation of administered vaccines. Electronic reporting to a local health department immunization registry facilitated ordering of vaccines.

RESULTS

Immunization completion rates captured in monthly patient reports showed a rise in the percentage of children receiving the recommended series of vaccination (65% to 76%) (p<0.000). Barcode technology reduced the time of immunization documentation (86 seconds to 26 seconds) (p<0.000). Use of barcode scanning showed increased accuracy of documentation of vaccine lot numbers (from 95% to 100%) (p<0.000).

CONCLUSION

EHR-based quality improvement interventions were successfully implemented at a community health center. EHR systems have versatility in their ability to track patients in need of vaccines, identify patients who are delayed, facilitate ordering and coding of multiple vaccines and promote interdisciplinary communication among personnel involved in the vaccination process. EHR systems can be used to improve childhood vaccination rates.

On-time vaccine receipt in the first year does not adversely affect neuropsychological outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether children who received recommended vaccines on time during the first year of life had different neuropsychological outcomes at 7 to 10 years of age as compared with children with delayed receipt or nonreceipt of these vaccines.

METHODS

Publicly available data, including age at vaccination, from a previous VaccineSafety Datalink study of thimerosal exposure and 42 neuropsychological outcomes were analyzed. Vaccine receipt was defined as timely when each vaccine was received within 30 days of the recommended age. Associations between timeliness and each outcome were tested in univariate analyses. Multivariable regression models were constructed for further assessment of the impact of timeliness on neuropsychological outcomes after adjustment for potential confounders. Secondary analyses were performed on a subset of children with the highest and lowest vaccine exposures during the first 7 months of life.

RESULTS

Timely vaccination was associated with better performance on 12 outcomes in univariate testing and remained associated with better performance for 2 outcomes in multivariable analyses. No statistically significant differences favored delayed receipt. In secondary analyses, children with the greatest vaccine exposure during the first 7 months of life performed better than children with the least vaccine exposure on 15 outcomes in univariate testing; these differences did not persist in multivariable analyses. No statistically significant differences favored the less vaccinated children.

CONCLUSIONS

Timely vaccination during infancy has no adverse effect on neuropsychological outcomes 7 to 10 years later. These data may reassure parents who are concerned that children receive too many vaccines too soon.

Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997-2002

Universal hepatitis B vaccination was recommended for U.S. newborns in 1991; however, safety findings are mixed. The association between hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and parental report of autism diagnosis was determined. This cross-sectional study used weighted probability samples obtained from National Health Interview Survey 1997-2002 data sets. Vaccination status was determined from the vaccination record. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds for autism diagnosis associated with neonatal hepatitis B vaccination among boys age 3-17 years, born before 1999, adjusted for race, maternal education, and two-parent household. Boys vaccinated as neonates had threefold greater odds for autism diagnosis compared to boys never vaccinated or vaccinated after the first month of life. Non-Hispanic white boys were 64% less likely to have autism diagnosis relative to nonwhite boys. Findings suggest that U.S. male neonates vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine prior to 1999 (from vaccination record) had a threefold higher risk for parental report of autism diagnosis compared to boys not vaccinated as neonates during that same time period. Nonwhite boys bore a greater risk.

Screening for conditions that do not meet the Wilson and Jungner criteria: the case of Duchenne muscular dystrophy

In this manuscript, I examine four overlapping policy and ethical issues regarding screening newborns (and infants) for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). First, what are the risks and benefits of expanding newborn screening (NBS) to include DMD? Second, if NBS were to expand to include DMD, should it require informed consent? Third, should NBS for DMD be limited to boys? Why or why not? Fourth, when is the ideal timing for screening (prenatal, newborn, or later in infancy) and what factors influence this determination? I argue that decisions about when, how, and whom to test reflect a tension between maximizing uptake and diagnosis versus maximizing autonomy and choice with respect to genetic information. I conclude that screening for DMD is a valid moral option, but not as part of the mandatory NBS population program. Rather, I propose that screening for DMD should be offered only on a voluntary basis beyond the newborn period. I support offering this screening to families of young boys and girls to ensure that all children and their families can benefit from early diagnosis and its reproductive implications. A rigorous consent process will be necessary to ensure that the decision whether or not to test is a voluntary and informed choice.

Safety and immunogenicity of a pentavalent vaccine compared with separate administration of licensed equivalent vaccines in US infants and toddlers and persistence of antibodies before a preschool booster dose: a randomized, clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to compare the safety and immunogenicity of a combination vaccine (DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib; Pentacel) with that of its separately administered, US-licensed equivalent vaccines (diphtheria, tetanus, 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine [DTaP(5); Daptacel], inactivated poliovirus vaccine [IPV; IPOL], and Haemophilus influenzae type b [Hib] vaccine [ActHIB]), when administered to infants and toddlers concomitantly with other routinely recommended vaccines and to assess antibody persistence from the fourth dose in toddlers to the fifth (preschool) DTaP(5) dose.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In this randomized, multicenter study, 1939 healthy infants were immunized at 2, 4, and 6 months of age with 1 of 3 lots of DTaP(5) coadministered with IPV and Hib vaccines or 1 lot of DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib combination vaccine. Subsequently, 849 of these study participants were given a fourth dose of DTaP(5) and Hib vaccines or a fourth dose of DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib at 1 to 16 months of age. Safety was monitored throughout the study, and blood specimens were obtained to assess antibody responses.

RESULTS

DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib elicited similar or fewer solicited injection-site and systemic reactions as compared with the separate administration of US-licensed DTaP(5), IPV, and Hib vaccines. Seroresponse and seroprotection rates elicited by DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib were noninferior to US-licensed equivalent vaccines after the infant series and after the fourth dose. Children immunized with DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib had higher antibody geometric mean concentrations to pertussis toxoid and filamentous hemagglutinin; children immunized with the separate vaccines had higher responses to pertactin. Hib antibody responses to Hib polysaccharide were nearly identical in the DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib and separate-vaccine groups. Persistence of antibodies to the fifth (preschool) dose was also similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib combination vaccine was shown to be immunogenic and well tolerated. No clinically important differences in the safety or immunologic profiles were noted for DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib versus the separately administered, US-licensed equivalent vaccines. DTaP(5)-IPV-Hib is a suitable replacement for separately administered DTaP, IPV, and Hib vaccines.

Utilizing Peer Academic Detailing to Improve Childhood Immunization Coverage Levels

Interventions that utilize academic detailing to improve childhood immunization have been implemented across the country. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an academic detailing intervention to increase childhood immunization rates in pediatric and family medicine practices in a major metropolitan area. Educational teams of one physician, nurse, and office manager delivered 83 peer education sessions at practices in the intervention group. Postintervention immunization rates for children 12-23 months of age increased 1% in the intervention group and decreased 3% in the control group. Postintervention coverage levels for children 12-23 months of age did not differ between the intervention and control groups. Results indicated this office-based intervention was not sufficient to effect measurable changes in immunization coverage levels after 1 year of participation. Future interventions need to provide initial feedback regarding practice immunization coverage levels prior to the educational interventions and include multiple encounters.

Improvement in provider immunization knowledge and behaviors following a peer education intervention

Provider education programs that use academic detailing to improve childhood immunization have been implemented in several states. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of these types of programs to improve immunization-related behaviors in private provider offices. The intervention included peer-based academic detailing in which teams of 1 physician, 1 nurse, and 1 office manager visited pediatric and family practices to deliver an educational presentation and develop practice-specific action plans. Comparison of pre-post intervention surveys showed that providers' willingness to give the maximum number of immunizations due at 1 visit (P < .001) increased. More providers reported routinely screening immunization records at sickness or injury visits (P < .05) and using minimum intervals (P < .001) postintervention. Mean change in baseline and postintervention overall scores was significant for pediatric practices (0.40, P < .05), small practices (0.64, P < .01), Vaccines for Children (VFC) practices (0.74, P < .05), and non-VFC provider practices (0.67, P < .01) but not for family or large practices.

Delays in immunization have potentially serious health consequences

When children are not administered vaccinations according to the recommended schedule, they not only fail to receive timely protection from preventable diseases at a time when they are most vulnerable, but also increase their risk of never fully completing the vaccination course. Both outcomes compromise a successful childhood immunization program. Although current data suggest that vaccination rates are near 95% for school-aged children in the US, the rate of timely vaccination is much lower. A number of large studies have found that the majority of children are not currently vaccinated on schedule. Moreover, immunization levels for 2- to 3-year-old children have reached a plateau. It is essential to recognize that low overall rates of the targeted diseases mask the persistent threat they pose if adherence to vaccination schedules declines. A delay in one vaccine will produce a domino effect if catch-up adjustments in scheduled visits are not implemented aggressively. Published reports have demonstrated that failure to adhere to scheduled booster immunizations, not just the initial inoculation, results in resurgence of disease. Children fall off the vaccination schedule for a variety of reasons. Although many studies suggest that inadequate availability to healthcare is not a major determinant of delayed immunization, it still factors into parental decisions. Parents should be reminded of available healthcare options. From the clinician's end, computerization of healthcare records should allow for the generation of reminders. It is vital for clinicians to be aware that there are few contraindications to vaccination. They should also be prepared to address parental concerns regarding the safety of vaccines and should not hesitate to use topical analgesics or distraction techniques to facilitate inoculation. With the anticipation of several novel vaccines being added to the childhood and adolescent immunization schedule in the future, pediatricians face new challenges to not only provide every vaccination, but to do so in a timely manner. A lack of willingness on the part of the parent, or, occasionally, on the part of the clinician, to have multiple vaccines administered to the child during a single visit has been shown to be a significant cause of delayed vaccination. Since combination vaccines reduce the number of shots that need to be administered, the use of combination vaccines may provide the best opportunity to simplify the immunization schedule, increasing adherence in the process. Improved adherence to established schedules may present a major opportunity to further protect children from disease.

Immunization histories given by adult caregivers accompanying children 3-36 months to the emergency department: are their histories valid for the Haemophilus influenzae B and pneumococcal vaccines?

OBJECTIVE

To obtain immunization histories from adult caregivers accompanying children to the emergency department (ED), to determine the accuracy of the caregiver's report for the Haemophilus influenzae B (Hib)and 7-valent pneumococcal vaccine (PCV7).

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study of children age 3 to 36 months presenting to the Albert Einstein Medical Center ED during the period of November 1, 2004, through January 31, 2005. Caregivers were asked to complete a questionnaire about their child's immunization status and if the child's vaccinations were up-to-date. Immunization records were obtained from the child's most recent primary care physician (PCP) to determine whether the caregiver's report was correct for PCV7 and Hib. Children were considered delayed if they were more than 30 days past due date for one or both vaccines according to the PCP records.

RESULTS

Of 205 PCP offices contacted, we were able to obtain 173 immunization records for our analysis. Examination of vaccine records showed that 109 (63.0%) of the 173 children were up-to-date on both immunizations. When the child's caregiver was asked if shots were up-to-date, 159 (91.9%) of 173 said that all shots were given, and only 14 (8.1%) of 173 reported being behind schedule. Of the adults reporting the child up to date, 105 (66.0%) of the 159 children were confirmed to be up-to-date. Thus, 34.0% of caregivers were incorrect in stating that their child's immunization status was up-to-date for both these vaccines.

CONCLUSIONS

Caregiver report was determined to be inaccurate for Hib and PCV7. Despite 91.5% of caregivers stating that shots were up-to-date, only 66.0% were correct that their child was up-to-date with these 2 vaccines. The ED physician should use caution in making clinical decisions based on the history given by a caregiver regarding their child's immunization status.

Effects of maternal and provider characteristics on up-to-date immunization status of children aged 19 to 35 months

OBJECTIVES

We examined the effects of maternal and provider characteristics on the up-to-date immunization status of children.

METHODS

We used data from the 2003 National Immunization Survey to determine variations in children's up-to-date status in the 4:3:1:3 immunization series.

RESULTS

Low maternal educational levels and low socioeconomic status were associated with high 4:3:1:3 series completion rates. Also, completion rates were high in Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black families with low income-to-poverty ratios.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that children of less educated mothers and children in Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black families with low income-to-poverty ratios were more likely to have completed the 4:3:1:3 series. Although the reasons for these results need further exploration in other data sets, possible factors are Hispanics' positive cultural attitudes regarding the needs and importance of young children and provision of information on immunizations to low-income minority mothers who access government-subsidized health care programs.

Will pediatricians adopt the new rotavirus vaccine?

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to determine the following among US pediatricians: (1) perceptions regarding burden of rotavirus disease and need for a vaccine; (2) intentions for recommending a newly licensed rotavirus vaccine; (3) perceived barriers to implementation; and (4) factors associated with plans for vaccine adoption.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A network of 431 pediatricians was recruited from a random sample of American Academy of Pediatrics' members. The network was designed to be representative of the American Academy of Pediatrics with respect to region of the country, practice type, and practice setting. During January and February 2006, physicians were surveyed by Internet or mail. The survey contained a paragraph summarizing results of the new rotavirus vaccine trial. Respondents were asked about intentions to use the vaccine and anticipated barriers.

RESULTS

The survey response rate was 71%. Of the respondents, 52% strongly agreed and 37% somewhat agreed with the need for a rotavirus vaccine. If recommended for routine use, 50% would strongly recommend and 34% would recommend but not strongly; 52% would begin to use within 6 months and 27% from 6 months to 1 year. The top 3 "definite" barriers to implementation included concerns about uniform coverage of vaccine by insurers, lack of adequate reimbursement, and parental reluctance because of withdrawal of previous rotavirus vaccine. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with very likely adoption of the vaccine included perception of a high burden of rotavirus disease and a high level of confidence in prelicensure studies of vaccine safety. The presence of physician concerns about safety of the new vaccine and the perception of parental concerns about vaccine safety in general were negatively associated with adoption.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of pediatricians reported willingness to implement the new rotavirus vaccine, most within 6 months. Major barriers to optimal implementation included provider concerns about reimbursement issues and parental acceptance of the vaccine.

Immunisation status of children in Germany: temporal trends and regional differences

In Germany, a low coverage with hepatitis B and measles vaccines and a considerable delay in administration of all recommended vaccines were previously apparent. Whether there have been improvements and whether there are regional differences within Germany is not known. Using representative nationwide telephone interviews on 2,701 children born 1996-2003, we assessed vaccination coverage for the first dose or full primary series (2/3 doses, depending on vaccine used) at 24 months of age. The proportions vaccinated with the first dose, full priming and full immunisation (2/3 doses plus booster in the 2nd year of life) until the end of the recommended age (3, 5 and 15 months, respectively, for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and hepatitis B vaccines (DTPPolioHibHep), and 15 for the first measles, mumps and rubella dose (MMR) were used as indicators of compliance with national guidelines. Coverage for polio, Hib and hepatitis B vaccines increased, while coverage for the first MMR dose remained constantly low at about 70%. Vaccination coverage differed substantially among the German states and was highest for the new states. Compliance with national guidelines increased from 2.5% to 15% for the full primary DTPPolioHibHep series, from 16.2% to 44.7% for the first MMR dose and from 1.0% to 19.3% for the full immunisation with all recommended vaccines (DTPPolioHibHepMMR).

CONCLUSION

Vaccination coverage at 24 months and compliance with national guidelines has improved for most vaccines in Germany. However, improving coverage for measles, mumps, rubella and eliminating the regional disparities remain a major challenge for the public health sector.

Immunizations, neonatal jaundice, and animal-induced injuries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To concisely review data published over the past year on three topics pertinent to the practicing pediatrician: immunizations, neonatal jaundice, and animal-induced injuries.

RECENT FINDINGS

Updates on immunizations, including varicella and pneumococcus in the post-vaccine era, use of a polyvalent conjugated meningococcal vaccine, and influenza vaccination during a vaccine shortage are discussed. Mortality and morbidity from varicella, and risk of invasive disease from pneumococcal infections have declined. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released guidelines for the use of a tetravalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine in adolescents 11 years and older. Infants at younger gestational age are at higher risk for developing hyperbilirubinemia. The American Academy of Pediatrics has released new guidelines emphasizing breastfeeding, systematic pre-discharge assessment for risk factors, early follow-up and intervention. Use of home nursing services in the postnatal period is cost-effective. Although the incidence of rabies is low, many receive postexposure prophylaxis. Spider bites cause fewer systemic effects in children than adults. Pet reptile carriage of salmonella necessitates handwashing after handling of animals.

SUMMARY

Recommendations for adolescent meningococcal vaccination, and the impact of varicella and pneumococcal immunization on our communities reflect an evolution in our management of infectious diseases. The latest practice guidelines on hyperbilirubinemia emphasize close follow-up of all newborns after postpartum discharge and even more careful evaluation of those infants near term. Education on rabies prophylaxis, spider bites, and salmonella from pet reptiles should focus on judicious use of resources and the proper handling of pets.