Association of race and ethnicity with management of abdominal pain in the emergency department

Triage Discordance in an Academic Pediatric Emergency Department and Disparities by Race, Ethnicity, and Language for Care

BACKGROUND

Minoritized patients are disproportionately represented in low-acuity emergency department (ED) visits in the United States in part caused by lack of timely access to primary and urgent care. However, there is also the possibility that implicit bias during triage could contribute to disproportionate representation of minority groups in low-acuity ED visits. Triage discordance, defined as when ED resources used are different from initial triage score predictions, can be used as a proxy for triage accuracy. Recent data suggest that discordant triage may be common, although little is known about the interaction with race, ethnicity, and language for care.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to determine the prevalence of discordant triage among moderate- and low-acuity pediatric ED encounters and the interaction with patient race, ethnicity, and language for care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of pediatric ED encounters from 2019 with Emergency Severity Index (ESI) scores of 3, 4, or 5 at an academic referral hospital. The primary outcome was triage discordance, encompassing overtriage (ESI 3 and 4) and undertriage (ESI 4 and 5). Logistic and multinomial regressions were used to assess discordant triage by race, ethnicity, and language group.

RESULTS

Triage discordance occurred in 47% (n = 18,040) of encounters. Black and Hispanic patients had higher likelihood of undertriage for ESI 5 (adjusted odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.46 and 1.27, 95% CI 1.07-1.52, respectively), and Black patients were more likely to be overtriaged in ESI 3 (1.18, 95% CI 1.09-1.27). Those with a language other than English for care had higher proportions of overtriage for ESI 3 (1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.12) and undertriage for ESI 5 (1.23, 95% CI 1.11-1.37).

CONCLUSIONS

We found high rates of triage discordance in our pediatric ED, with significant associations with race, ethnicity, and language for care. Future research should evaluate the source of triage discordance and develop quality improvement efforts to improve equitable care.

Antibiotic Overtreatment of Presumed Urinary Tract Infection Among Children with Spina Bifida

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with overtreatment of presumed urinary tract infection (UTI) among children with spina bifida using such criteria.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of children with spina bifida (age <21 years) evaluated in the Emergency Department (ED) at a single institution was performed. Patients with a urinalysis (UA) performed who were reliant on assisted bladder emptying were included. The primary outcome was overtreatment, defined as receiving antibiotics for presumed UTI but ultimately not meeting spina bifida UTI criteria (≥2 urologic symptoms plus pyuria and urine culture growing >100k CFU/mL). The primary exposure was whether the components of the criteria available at the time of the ED visit (≥2 urologic symptoms plus pyuria) were met when antibiotics were initiated.

RESULTS

Among 236 ED encounters, overtreatment occurred in 80% of cases in which antibiotics were initiated (47% of the entire cohort). Pyuria with <2 urologic symptoms was the most important factor associated with overtreatment (OR 9.6). Non-Hispanic White race was associated with decreased odds of overtreatment (OR 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Overtreatment of presumed UTI among patients with spina bifida was common. Pyuria, which is not specific to UTI in this population, was the main driver of overtreatment. Symptoms are a cornerstone of UTI diagnosis among children with spina bifida, should be collected in a standardized manner, and considered in a decision to treat.

Delayed diagnosis of serious paediatric conditions in 13 regional emergency departments

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate rates, risk factors and outcomes of delayed diagnosis of seven serious paediatric conditions.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of children under 21 years old visiting 13 community and tertiary emergency departments (EDs) with appendicitis, bacterial meningitis, intussusception, mastoiditis, ovarian torsion, sepsis or testicular torsion. Delayed diagnosis was defined as having a previous ED encounter within 1 week in which the condition was present per case review. Patients with delayed diagnosis were each matched to four control patients without delay by condition, facility and age. Conditional logistic regression models evaluated risk factors of delay. Complications were compared between by delayed diagnosis status.

RESULTS

Among 14 972 children, delayed diagnosis occurred in 1.1% (range 0.3% for sepsis to 2.6% for ovarian torsion). Hispanic (matched OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.69 to 4.35) and non-Hispanic black (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.21 to 4.79) race/ethnicity were associated with delayed diagnosis, whereas Asian and other race/ethnicity were not. Public (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.42 to 3.44) and other (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.50 to 3.93) insurance were also associated with delay. Non-English language was associated with delay (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.69). Abnormal vital signs were associated with a lower likelihood of delay (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.25). In an adjusted model, Hispanic race/ethnicity, other insurance, abnormal vital signs and complex chronic conditions (CCCs) were associated with delay. The odds of a complication were 2.5-fold (95% CI 1.6 to 3.8) higher among patients with a delay.

CONCLUSION

Delayed diagnosis was uncommon across 13 regional EDs but was more likely among children with Hispanic ethnicity, CCCs or normal vital signs. Delays were associated with a higher risk of complications.

Adultification: risk factors, harmful effects and implications for nursing practice

Adultification, whereby children and young people are perceived as older or more mature than they actually are, disproportionately affects those from minority ethnic backgrounds. It can also occur in other contexts, for example when children and young people are placed in a position of adult responsibility. Nurses have a duty to support and protect children and young people, which includes protecting them from adultification and the negative effects it can have on health and well-being. This article discusses strategies nurses can use to prevent adultification - such as developing awareness, avoiding adultifying language and listening to children and young people - and actions to take when suspecting adultification from colleagues.

Analgesia Administration by Sex Among Pediatric Emergency Department Patients with Abdominal Pain

Background

There is conflicting data about sex-based differences in the treatment of acute pain in the ED. Little is known about sex-based disparities in analgesia in pediatric ED patients.

Objectives

Our objective was to determine whether analgesic administration rates differ between female and male pediatric patients presenting to the ED with abdominal pain.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ED patients 5-21 years old with abdominal pain between 6/1/19 and 6/30/21. The primary outcome was receipt of any analgesia, and secondary outcomes were receipt of opioid analgesia and time to receipt of analgesia. Multivariable regression models were fitted for each outcome.

Results

We studied 1,087 patients; 681 (63%) were female with a median age of 17 years (IQR 13, 19) and 406 (37%) were male with a median age of 14 years (IQR 9, 18). 371 female patients (55%) and 180 male patients (44%) received any analgesia. 132 female patients (19%) and 83 male patients (20%) received opioid analgesia. In multivariate analyses, female patients were equally likely to receive any analgesia (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.97 - 1.74, p = 0.07), but time to analgesia was 14% longer (GMR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.29, p = 0.04). Non-White patients were 32% less likely to receive opioids (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47 - 0.97, p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Female pediatric ED patients were equally likely to receive any analgesia as male patients, but their time to analgesia was longer. Non-White patients were less likely to receive opioid analgesia than White patients.

Racial Disparities in Opioid Administration Practices Among Undifferentiated Abdominal Pain Patients in the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine racial disparities in opioid prescribing practices for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a common chief complaint of abdominal pain.

METHODS

Treatment outcomes were compared for non-Hispanic White (NH White), non-Hispanic Black (NH Black), and Hispanic patients seen over 12 months in three emergency departments in the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to measure the associations between race/ethnicity and outcomes of opioid administration during ED visits and discharge opioid prescriptions.

RESULTS

A total of 7309 encounters were included in the analysis. NH Black (n = 1988) and Hispanic patients (n = 602) were more likely than NH White patients (n = 4179) to be in the 18-39 age group (p < 0. 001). NH Black patients were more likely to report public insurance than NH White or Hispanic patients (p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, patients who identified as NH Black (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.56-0.74) or Hispanic (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.61-0.98) were less likely to be given opioids during their ED encounter when compared to NH White patients. Similarly, NH Black patients (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.52-0.75) and Hispanic patients (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49-0.88) were less likely to receive a discharge opioid prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that racial disparities exist in the ED opioid administration within the department as well as at discharge. Future studies should continue to examine systemic racism as well as interventions to alleviate these health inequities.

Median arcuate ligament syndrome: a cost analysis to determine the economic burden of a rarely diagnosed disease

Background

Chronic abdominal pain (CAP) is a medical condition resulting in enormous economic burden and healthcare utilization costs. One understudied source of CAP is the median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS). MALS is often not diagnosed and treated for a variety of reasons, including the fact that MALS is highly comorbid with psychological symptoms and psychiatric disorders similar to CAP. To better inform future work on the study of MALS, we undertook a pilot study to estimate the economic impact and public health burden of this condition. We hypothesized that MALS imposes a significant public health burden.

Methods

Pediatric and adult patients enrolled in a prospective study undergoing multidisciplinary evaluation and treatment for MALS at a tertiary care facility were invited to participate in a brief self-report survey, the Direct and Indirect Medical Care Impact of MALS Form, to capture health care resources including procedures, surgeries, health care visits, and absenteeism (school and work). To estimate costs from the Direct and Indirect Medical Care Impact of MALS Form, the medical care usage data self-reported by patients were converted to dollar value utilizing FSC-93 billing data and corresponding current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for procedures and provider visits one year prior to surgery and then following surgery. Descriptive analyses were conducted to characterize the sample in terms of demographics and reported absences from school and work.

Results

One hundred and nineteen patients (mean age = 30.9 ± 13.0) completed the questionnaires, yielding a 57% response rate. 82.4% (n = 98) of the participants were female and 90.8% (n = 108) were non-Hispanic/Latine white. The mean and median surgical follow-up periods were 5.3 and 5.4 years, respectively. Overall, median cost of provider and ancillary healthcare provider visits for each patient was (US)$19,119 including the pre-operative and post-operative visits. The mean cost for providers alone was (US)$28,908. Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests indicated that the postoperative missed number of days of school were significantly lower than the pre-surgical number of missed school days (Z = -3.36, p = 0.001). Similarly, there were significantly less missed work-days following surgery than before for the entire sample (Z = -2.86, p = 0.004).

Conclusion

Median arcuate ligament syndrome imposes a large economic burden on patients and the healthcare system. The current findings, although reflective of a homogenous population, are adding to a growing body of literature suggesting that healthcare disparities play a role in the low rates of diagnosis and treatment of MALS.

Pilot Evaluation of the Family Bridge Program: A Communication- and Culture-Focused Inpatient Patient Navigation Program

OBJECTIVE

Children with low income and minority race and ethnicity have worse hospital outcomes due partly to systemic and interpersonal racism causing communication and system barriers. We tested the feasibility and acceptability of a novel inpatient communication-focused navigation program.

METHODS

Multilingual design workshops with parents, providers, and staff created the Family Bridge Program. Delivered by a trained navigator, it included 1) hospital orientation; 2) social needs screening and response; 3) communication preference assessment; 4) communication coaching; 5) emotional support; and 6) a post-discharge phone call. We enrolled families of hospitalized children with public or no insurance, minority race or ethnicity, and preferred language of English, Spanish, or Somali in a single-arm trial. We surveyed parents at enrollment and 2 to 4 weeks post-discharge, and providers 2 to 3 days post-discharge. Survey measures were analyzed with paired t tests.

RESULTS

Of 60 families enrolled, 57 (95%) completed the follow-up survey. Most parents were born outside the United States (60%) with a high school degree or less (60%). Also, 63% preferred English, 33% Spanish, and 3% Somali. The program was feasible: families received an average of 5.3 of 6 components; all received >2. Most caregivers (92%) and providers (81% [30/37]) were "very satisfied." Parent-reported system navigation improved from enrollment to follow-up (+8.2 [95% confidence interval 2.9, 13.6], P = .003; scale 0-100). Spanish-speaking parents reported decreased skills-related barriers (-18.4 [95% confidence interval -1.8, -34.9], P = .03; scale 0-100).

CONCLUSIONS

The Family Bridge Program was feasible, acceptable, and may have potential for overcoming barriers for hospitalized children at risk for disparities.

Inequities in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Appendicitis in Tertiary Children's Hospitals and the Consequences of Delayed Diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

Missed diagnosis (MD) of acute appendicitis is associated with increased risk of appendiceal perforation. This study aimed to investigate whether racial/ethnic disparities exist in the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis by comparing rates of MD versus single-encounter diagnosis (SED) between racial/ethnic groups.

METHODS

Patients 0-18 y-old admitted for acute appendicitis from February 2017 to December 2021 were identified in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS). International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for Emergency Department visits within 7 d prior to diagnosis were evaluated to determine whether the encounter represented MD. Generalized mixed models were used to assess the association between MD and patient characteristics. A similar model assessed independent predictors of perforation.

RESULTS

51,164 patients admitted for acute appendicitis were included; 50,239 (98.2%) had SED and 925 (1.8%) had MD. Compared to non-Hispanic White patients, patients of non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio 2.5, 95% confidence interval 2.0-3.1), Hispanic (2.1, 1.8-2.5), and other race/ethnicity (1.6, 1.2-2.1) had higher odds of MD. There was a significant interaction between race/ethnicity and imaging (P < 0.0001). Among patients with imaging, race/ethnicity was not significantly associated with MD. Among patients without imaging, there was an increase in strength of association between race/ethnicity and MD (non-Hispanic Black 3.6, 2.7-4.9; Hispanic 3.3, 2.6-4.1; other 2.0, 1.4-2.8). MD was associated with increased risk of perforation (2.5, 2.2-2.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Minority children were more likely to have MD. Future efforts should aim to mitigate the risk of MD, including implementation of algorithms to standardize the workup of abdominal pain to reduce potential consequences of implicit bias.

Research Priorities for Pediatric Emergency Care to Address Disparities by Race, Ethnicity, and Language

Importance

Health care disparities are well-documented among children based on race, ethnicity, and language for care. An agenda that outlines research priorities for disparities in pediatric emergency care (PEC) is lacking.

Objective

To investigate research priorities for disparities in PEC among medical personnel, researchers, and health care-affiliated community organizations.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this survey study, a modified Delphi approach was used to investigate research priorities for disparities in PEC. An initial list of research priorities was developed by a group of experienced PEC investigators in 2021. Partners iteratively assessed the list through 2 rounds of electronic surveys using Likert-type responses in late 2021 and early 2022. Priorities were defined as achieving consensus if they received a score of highest priority or priority by at least 60% of respondents. Asynchronous engagement of participants via online web-conferencing platforms and email correspondence with electronic survey administration was used. Partners were individuals and groups involved in PEC. Participants represented interest groups, research and medical personnel organizations, health care partners, and laypersons with roles in community and family hospital advisory councils. Participants were largely from the US, with input from international PEC research networks.

Outcome

Consensus agenda of research priorities to identify and address health care disparities in PEC.

Results

PEC investigators generated an initial list of 27 potential priorities. Surveys were completed by 38 of 47 partners (80.6%) and 30 of 38 partners (81.1%) in rounds 1 and 2, respectively. Among 30 respondents who completed both rounds, there were 7 family or community partners and 23 medical or research partners, including 4 international PEC research networks. A total of 12 research priorities achieved the predetermined consensus threshold: (1) systematic efforts to reduce disparities; (2) race, ethnicity, and language data collection and reporting; (3) recognizing and mitigating clinician implicit bias; (4) mental health disparities; (5) social determinants of health; (6) language and literacy; (7) acute pain-management disparities; (8) quality of care equity metrics; (9) shared decision-making; (10) patient experience; (11) triage and acuity score assignment; and (12) inclusive research participation.

Conclusions and Relevance

These results suggest a research priority agenda that may be used as a guide for investigators, research networks, organizations, and funding agencies to engage in and support high-priority disparities research topics in PEC.

Prescription Opioid Use for Adolescents With Neurocognitive Disability Undergoing Surgery: A Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

Parents frequently report retaining unused opioid pills following their child's surgery due to fear of untreated postoperative pain. Assessment of pain in adolescents with neurocognitive disability is challenging. We hypothesized that parents of adolescents with neurocognitive disability may report less opioid use and higher opioid pill retention.

METHODS

Adolescents (13-20 y) undergoing elective surgery (posterior spinal fusion, hip reconstruction, arthroscopy, tonsillectomy) were prospectively enrolled from a tertiary children's hospital from 2019 to 2020. Only adolescents prescribed opioids at discharge were included. Parents completed a preoperative survey collecting sociodemographic characteristics and two postoperative surveys at 30- and 90-d. Neurocognitive disability was determined at time of enrollment by caregiver report, and included adolescents with cerebral palsy, severe autism spectrum disorder, and discrete syndromes with severe neurocognitive disability.

RESULTS

Of 125 parent-adolescent dyads enrolled, 14 had neurocognitive disability. The median number of opioid pills prescribed at discharge did not differ by neurocognitive disability (29, interquartile range {IQR}: 20.0-33.3 versus 30, IQR: 25.0-40.0, P = 0.180). Parents of both groups reported similar cumulative days of opioid use (7.0, IQR: 3.0-21.0 versus 6.0, IQR:3.0-10.0, P = 0.515) and similar number of opioid pills used (4, IQR: 2.0-4.5 versus 12, IQR: 3.5-22.5, P = 0.083). Parents of both groups reported similar numbers of unused opioid pills (17, IQR: 12.5-22.5 versus 19, IQR: 8.0-29.0, P = 0.905) and rates of retention of unused opioids (15.4% versus 23.8%, P = 0.730).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of opioid pills prescribed did not differ by neurocognitive disability and parents reported similar opioid use and retention of unused opioid pills. Larger studies are needed to identify opportunities to improve postoperative pain control for children with neurocognitive disability.

Racial/Ethnic Patterns in Opioid Dispensing among Medicaid-Funded Young Children

Racial differences in opioid dispensing for diseases of the respiratory system (RESP) and injury (INJURY) outpatient visits among patients ≤ 3 years old were examined. Outpatient claims data of South Carolina Medicaid children were analyzed over three three-year periods. The variable of interest was the triennial rate of dispensed opioid prescriptions per 1000 visits for RESP and INJURY diagnoses across racial/ethnic groups. Overall, dispensed opioid prescription rates related to RESP declined for all racial/ethnic categories. White children had the highest dispensing rate for RESP indications in the first period (5.6), followed by Black (4.5), and Hispanic (4.1). The likelihood of White children being prescribed opioids was higher than Blacks, and this was persistent over the studied time (rate ratios from 1.24 to 1.22, respectively). Overall opioid dispensing rates related to injury declined during the studied time. Hispanics had the highest dispensing rate for INJURY (20.1 to 14.8 to 16.1, respectively) followed by White (16.1 to 13.1 to 10.4, respectively). Relative differences in the dispensing rates across groups increased over time (Hispanics vs. White: rate ratios from 1.25 to 1.55, Hispanics vs. Black: from 1.52 to 2.24, and White vs. Black: from 1.24 to 1.44, respectively). There are considerable differences in the dispensing rates across racial/ethnic groups, especially in injury-related prescribing.

Disparities in Pain Management

Health disparities in pain management remain a pervasive public health crisis. Racial and ethnic disparities have been identified in all aspects of pain management from acute, chronic, pediatric, obstetric, and advanced pain procedures. Disparities in pain management are not limited to race and ethnicity, and have been identified in multiple other vulnerable populations. This review targets health care disparities in the management of pain, focusing on steps health care providers and organizations can take to promote health care equity. A multifaceted plan of action with a focus on research, advocacy, policy changes, structural changes, and targeted interventions is recommended.

Association Between Race and Usage of Pain Medications in Children With Long Bone Fractures in US Emergency Departments, 2011-2019

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the association between race and analgesic administration for children with long bone fracture (LBF) in US emergency departments. Previous studies have shown conflicting results regarding association between race and analgesic administration for pediatric LBFs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of pediatric emergency department visits for LBF using the 2011-2019 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey-Emergency Department. We investigated the diagnostic workup and analgesic prescription rate among White, Black, and other pediatric emergency department visits for LBF.

RESULTS

Of the estimated 292 million pediatric visits to US emergency departments from 2011 to 2019, 3.1% were LBFs. Black children were less likely to be seen for a LBF than White or other children (1.8% vs 3.6% and 3.1%, P < 0.001). There was no association between race and subjective pain scale ( P = 0.998), triage severity ( P = 0.980), imaging (x-ray, P = 0.612; computed tomography scan, P = 0.291), or analgesic administration (opioids, P = 0.068; nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs/acetaminophen, P = 0.750). Trend analysis showed a significant decrease in opioid administration for pediatric LBF from 2011 to 2019 ( P < 0.001), with 33.0% receiving opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no association between race and analgesic administration, including opioids, or diagnostic workup in pediatric LBF. In addition, there was a significant downtrend in opioid administration for pediatric LBF from 2011 to 2019.

Trauma-informed and family-centered paediatric resuscitation: Defining domains and practices

Aim

For paediatric patients and families, resuscitation can be an extremely stressful experience with significant medical and psychological consequences. Psychological sequelae may be reduced when healthcare teams apply patient- and family-centered care and trauma-informed care, yet there are few specific instructions for effective family-centered or trauma-informed behaviours that are observable and teachable. We aimed to develop a framework and tools to address this gap.

Methods

We reviewed relevant policy statements, guidelines, and research to define core domains of family-centered and trauma-informed care, and identified observable evidence-based practices in each domain. We refined this list of practices via review of provider/team behaviours in simulated paediatric resuscitation scenarios, then developed and piloted an observational checklist.

Results

Six domains were identified: (1) Sharing information with patient and family; (2) Promoting family involvement in care and decisions; (3) Addressing family needs and distress; (4) Addressing child distress; (5) Promoting effective emotional support for child; (6) Practicing developmental and cultural competence. A 71-item observational checklist assessing these domains was feasible for use during video review of paediatric resuscitation.

Conclusion

This framework can guide future research and provide tools for training and implementation efforts to improve patient outcomes through patient- and family-centered and trauma-informed care.

Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Patient-Level Emergency Department Workload

BACKGROUND

Work Relative Value Units (wRVUs) are a component of many compensation models, and a proxy for the effort required to care for a patient. Accurate prediction of wRVUs generated per patient at triage could facilitate real-time load balancing between physicians and provide many practical operational and clinical benefits.

OBJECTIVE

We examined whether deep-learning approaches could predict the wRVUs generated by a patient's visit using data commonly available at triage.

METHODS

Adult patients presenting to an urban, academic emergency department from July 1, 2016-March 1, 2020 were included. Deidentified triage information included structured data (age, sex, vital signs, Emergency Severity Index score, language, race, standardized chief complaint) and unstructured data (free-text chief complaint) with wRVUs as outcome. Five models were examined: average wRVUs per chief complaint, linear regression, neural network and gradient-boosted tree on structured data, and neural network on unstructured textual data. Models were evaluated using mean absolute error.

RESULTS

We analyzed 204,064 visits between July 1, 2016 and March 1, 2020. The median wRVUs were 3.80 (interquartile range 2.56-4.21), with significant effects of age, gender, and race. Models demonstrated lower error as complexity increased. Predictions using averages from chief complaints alone demonstrated a mean error of 2.17 predicted wRVUs per visit (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.07-2.27), the linear regression model: 1.00 wRVUs (95% CI 0.97-1.04), gradient-boosted tree: 0.85 wRVUs (95% CI 0.84-0.86), neural network with structured data: 0.86 wRVUs (95% CI 0.85-0.87), and neural network with unstructured data: 0.78 wRVUs (95% CI 0.76-0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Chief complaints are a poor predictor of the effort needed to evaluate a patient; however, deep-learning techniques show promise. These algorithms have the potential to provide many practical applications, including balancing workloads and compensation between emergency physicians, quantify crowding and mobilizing resources, and reducing bias in the triage process.

Optimizing Pediatric Patient Safety in the Emergency Care Setting

Patient safety is the foundation of high-quality health care and remains a critical priority for all clinicians caring for children. There are numerous aspects of pediatric care that increase the risk of patient harm, including but not limited to risk from medication errors attributable to weight-dependent dosing and need for appropriate equipment and training. Of note, the majority of children who are ill and injured are brought to community hospital emergency departments. It is, therefore, imperative that all emergency departments practice patient safety principles, support a culture of safety, and adopt best practices to improve safety for all children seeking emergency care. This technical report outlined the challenges and resources necessary to minimize pediatric medical errors and to provide safe medical care for children of all ages in emergency care settings.

Factors Associated With Safe Prescription Opioid Disposal After Surgery in Adolescents

INTRODUCTION

Unused prescription opioids contribute to diversion, unintended exposure, and poisonings in adolescents. Factors associated with safe prescription opioid disposal for adolescents undergoing surgery are unknown.

METHODS

Parents of adolescents (13-20 y) undergoing surgery associated with an opioid prescription were enrolled preoperatively. Parents completed a baseline survey measuring sociodemographics and family history of substance abuse and two postoperative surveys capturing opioid use and disposal at 30 and 90 d. Safe disposal was defined as returning opioids to a healthcare facility, pharmacy, take-back event, or a police station. Factors associated with safe opioid disposal were assessed using bivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of 119 parent-adolescent dyads, 90 (76%) reported unused opioids after surgery. The majority of parents reporting unused opioids completed the surveys in English (80%), although many (44%) spoke another language at home. Most reported income levels <$60,000 (54%), did not attend college (69%), and had adequate health literacy (66%). Most parents (78%) did not report safe opioid disposal. Safe opioid disposal was associated with younger patient age, (median 14 y, IQR 13-16.5 versus median 15.5 y, IQR 14-17, P = 0.031), fewer days taking opioids (median 5, IQR 2-6 versus median 7, IQR 4-14, P = 0.048), and more leftover pills (median 20, IQR 10-35 versus median 10, IQR 5-22, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Most parents fail to safely dispose of unused opioids after their adolescent's surgery. Younger patient age, shorter duration of opioid use, and higher number of unused pills were associated with safe disposal. Interventions to optimize prescribing and educate parents about safe opioid disposal are warranted.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Management of Pediatric Acute Pancreatitis Across Children's Hospitals

OBJECTIVES

Racial or ethnic disparities in health care delivery and resource utilization have been reported in a variety of pediatric diseases. In acute pancreatitis (AP), there is an association between Black race and increased inpatient mortality. Data on the association of race and ethnicity and resource use for managing pediatric AP are lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate this potential association in pediatric AP.

METHODS

Retrospective study of children 0-18 years diagnosed with AP in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database from 2012 to 2018. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize cohort characteristics. Race/ethnicity classifications included non-Hispanic Black (NHB), non-Hispanic White (NHW, used as reference), Hispanic, and "Other." Associations between patient characteristics and race/ethnicity were determined using χ2 tests. Generalized linear mixed regression model was used to determine the association of race/ethnicity with odds of resource utilization, costs, and length of hospital stay after adjusting for covariates with a random intercept for site.

RESULTS

Five thousand nine hundred sixty-three patients from 50 hospitals were included. Adjusted analysis showed that NHB children hospitalized with AP were at lower odds of receiving opioids in the first 24 hours [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.70-0.98] and receiving intravenous fluids during the hospitalization (aOR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.43-0.96) when compared with NHW children. Additionally, NHB and Hispanic children had a prolonged adjusted mean length of hospital stay and higher hospital costs when compared with NHW children. Although there was no significant association between race/ethnicity and diagnosis of pancreatic necrosis or sepsis, Hispanic and "Other" children were at higher odds of receiving antibiotics during hospitalization for AP (aOR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.13-1.57 and aOR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.09-1.73, respectively) than NHW children.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities exist in utilization of health care interventions for pediatric AP patients by race/ethnicity. Future studies should investigate why these disparities exist and if these disparities affect outcomes.

Optimizing Pediatric Patient Safety in the Emergency Care Setting

This is a revision of the previous American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement titled "Patient Safety in the Emergency Care Setting," and is the first joint policy statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Emergency Physicians, and the Emergency Nurses Association to address pediatric patient safety in the emergency care setting. Caring for children in the emergency setting can be prone to medical errors because of a number of environmental and human factors. The emergency department (ED) has frequent workflow interruptions, multiple care transitions, and barriers to effective communication. In addition, the high volume of patients, high-decision density under time pressure, diagnostic uncertainty, and limited knowledge of patients' history and preexisting conditions make the safe care of critically ill and injured patients even more challenging. It is critical that all EDs, including general EDs who care for the majority of ill and injured children, understand the unique safety issues related to children. Furthermore, it is imperative that all EDs practice patient safety principles, support a culture of safety, and adopt best practices to improve safety for all children seeking emergency care. This policy statement outlines the recommendations necessary for EDs to minimize pediatric medical errors and to provide safe care for children of all ages.

Race and the emergency department management of febrile seizures

To determine if racial disparities exist in the management of febrile seizures in a large pediatric emergency department (ED), We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of children 6 months to 6 years-old who presented to the ED with a febrile seizure over a 4-year period. Multivariate logistic regression models were built to examine the association between race and the primary outcome of neuroimaging, and secondary outcomes of hospital admission and abortive anticonvulsant prescription at ED discharge. There were 980 ED visits during the study period. Overall, 4.0% of children underwent neuroimaging and 11.1% were admitted. Of the 871 children discharged from the ED, 9.4% were prescribed an abortive anticonvulsant. There were no differences by race in neuroimaging or hospital admission. However, black children were less likely to be prescribed abortive anticonvulsants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.96) compared to non-black peers, when adjusting for demographic and clinical confounders. Stratification by insurance revealed that this disparity existed in Medicaid-insured patients (aOR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14-0.78) but not in privately-insured patients. We found no racial disparities in neuroimaging or hospital admission among ED patients with febrile seizures. We did find racial disparities in our secondary outcome of abortive anticonvulsant prescription, driven primarily by individuals on Medicaid insurance. This pattern of findings may reflect the lack of standardized recommendations regarding anticonvulsant prescription, in contrast to the guidelines issued for other ED management decisions. Further investigation into the potential for treatment guidelines to reduce racial disparities is needed.

Disparities and implicit bias in the management of low-risk febrile infants: a mixed methods study protocol

INTRODUCTION

The management of low-risk febrile infants presents a model population for exploring how implicit racial bias promotes inequitable emergency care for children who belong to racial, ethnic and language minority groups. Although widely used clinical standards guide the clinical care of febrile infants, there remains substantial variability in management strategies. Deviations from recommended care may be informed by the physician's assessment of the family's values, risk tolerance and access to supportive resources. However, in the fast-paced emergency setting, such assessments may be influenced by implicit racial bias. Despite significant research to inform the clinical care of febrile infants, there is a dearth of knowledge regarding health disparities and clinical guideline implementation. The proposed mixed methods approach will (1) quantify the extent of disparities by race, ethnicity and language proficiency and (2) explore the role of implicit bias in physician-patient communication when caring for this population.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

With 42 participating sites from the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee, we will conduct a multicenter, cross-sectional study of low-risk febrile infants treated in the emergency department (ED) and apply multivariable logistic regression to assess the association between (1) race and ethnicity and (2) limited English proficiency with the primary outcome, discharge to home without lumbar puncture or antibiotics. We will concurrently perform an interpretive study using purposive sampling to conduct individual semistructured interviews with (1) minority parents of febrile infants and (2) paediatric ED physicians. We will triangulate or compare perspectives to better elucidate disparities and bias in communication and medical decision-making.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the University of Florida Institutional Review Board. All participating sites in the multicenter analysis will obtain local institutional review board approval. The results of this study will be presented at academic conferences and in peer-reviewed publications.

Impact of Race, Gender, and Socioeconomic Status on Symptom Severity at Time of Urologic Referral

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Dysfunctional Voiding and Incontinence Scoring System (DVISS) is a validated tool to evaluate lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) severity in children. DVISS provides a quantitative score (0-35) including a quality-of-life measure, with higher values indicating more/worse symptoms. Clinically, variability exists in symptom severity when patients present to pediatric urology with LUTD. We hypothesized that symptom severity at consultation varied based on race, gender, and/or socioeconomic status.

METHODS

All urology encounters at a single institution with completed modified DVISS scores 6/2015-3/2018 were reviewed. Initial visits for patients 5-21 years old with non-neurogenic LUTD were included. Patients with neurologic disorders or genitourinary tract anomalies were excluded. Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared scores between White and Black patients and between male and female patients. Multiple regression models examined relationships among race, gender, estimated median household income, and insurance payor type. All statistics were performed using Stata 15.

RESULTS

In total, 4086 initial patient visits for non-neurogenic LUTD were identified. Median DVISS scores were higher in Black (10) versus White (8) patients (p < 0.001). Symptom severity was higher in females (9) versus males (8) (p < 0.001). When estimated median income and insurance payer types were introduced into a multiple regression model, race, gender, and insurance payer type were significantly associated with symptom severity at presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Race, gender, and socioeconomic status significantly impact LUTS severity at the time of urologic consultation. Future studies are needed to clarify the etiologies of these disparities and to determine their clinical significance.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hospitalization and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients with COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

The recent spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disproportionately impacted racial and ethnic minority groups; however, the impact of healthcare utilization on outcome disparities remains unexplored. Our study examines racial and ethnic disparities in hospitalization, medication usage, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and in-hospital mortality for COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data for adult patients within an integrated healthcare system in New York City between February 28-August 28, 2020, who had a lab-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. Primary outcome was likelihood of inpatient admission. Secondary outcomes were differences in medication administration, ICU admission, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Of 4717 adult patients evaluated in the emergency department (ED), 3219 (68.2%) were admitted to an inpatient setting. Black patients were the largest group (29.1%), followed by Hispanic/Latinx (29.0%), White (22.9%), Asian (3.86%), and patients who reported "other" race-ethnicity (19.0%). After adjusting for demographic, clinical factors, time, and hospital site, Hispanic/Latinx patients had a significantly lower adjusted rate of admission compared to White patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.76). Black (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.43-0.84) and Asian patients (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.25 - 0.89) were less likely to be admitted to the ICU. We observed higher rates of ICU admission (OR 2.96; 95% CI 1.43-6.15, and OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.26-2.65) and in-hospital mortality (OR 4.38; 95% CI 2.66-7.24; and OR 2.96; 95% CI 2.12-4.14) at two community-based academic affiliate sites relative to the primary academic site.

CONCLUSION

Non-White patients accounted for a disproportionate share of COVID-19 patients seeking care in the ED but were less likely to be admitted. Hospitals serving the highest proportion of minority patients experienced the worst outcomes, even within an integrated health system with shared resources. Limited capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic likely exacerbated pre-existing health disparities across racial and ethnic minority groups.

Postoperative Opioid Prescribing, Use, and Disposal in Children

This article provides an overview of postoperative opioid prescribing, use, and disposal patterns in children and also identifies gaps in knowledge and areas for improvement. We present evidence that there is a need to tailor prescriptions to specific procedures to reduce the number of excess, unused prescription opioid pills in the home. We also explain the need to provide culturally competent care when managing a child's pain after surgery. Finally, we discuss the need for widespread provider and caregiver education about safe prescription opioid use, storage, and disposal.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Ondansetron Use for Acute Gastroenteritis in Children

OBJECTIVES

There is limited research examining racial/ethnic disparities in antiemetic use for acute gastroenteritis (AGE). We assessed racial/ethnic differences in the care of children with AGE.

METHODS

The Pediatric Health Information System was used to conduct a retrospective cohort study of children 6 months to 6 years old with AGE seen in participating emergency departments from 2016 to 2018. Cases were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. The primary outcome was administration of ondansetron, secondary outcomes were administration of intravenous (IV) fluids and hospitalization, and primary predictor was race/ethnicity. Multivariable logistic regression followed by a mixed model adjusted for sex, age, insurance, and hospital to examine the association of race/ethnicity with each outcome.

RESULTS

There were 78,019 encounters included; 24.8% of patients were non-Hispanic White (NHW), 29.0% non-Hispanic Black (NHB), 37.3% Hispanic, and 8.9% other non-Hispanic (NH) race/ethnicity. Compared with NHW patients, minority children were more likely to receive ondansetron (NHB: adjusted odds ratio, 1.36 [95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.55]; Hispanic: 1.26 [1.1-1.44]; other NH: 1.22 [1.07-1.4]). However, minority children were less likely to receive IV fluids (NHB: 0.38 [0.33-0.43]; Hispanic: 0.44 [0.36-0.53]; other NH: 0.51 [0.44-0.61]) or hospital admission (NHB: 0.37 [0.29-0.48]; Hispanic: 0.41 [0.33-0.5]; other NH: 0.52 [0.41-0.66]). Ondansetron use by hospital ranged from 73% to 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

This large database analysis of emergency departments around the nation found that NHW patients were less likely to receive ondansetron but more likely to receive IV fluids and hospital admission than minority patients. These findings are likely multifactorial and may represent bias, social determinants of health, access to care, or illness severity among other possible causes.

How Can We Get to Equitable and Effective Postpartum Pain Control?

Postpartum pain is common, yet patient experiences and clinical management varies greatly. In the United States, pain-related expectations and principles of adequate pain management have been framed within established norms of Western clinical medicine and a biomedical understanding of disease processes. Unfortunately, this positioning of postpartum pain and the corresponding coping strategies and pain treatments is situated within cultural biases and systemic racism. This paper summarizes the history and existing literature that examines racial inequities in pain management to propose guiding themes and suggestions for innovation. This work is critical for advancing ethical practice and establishing more effective care for all patients.

Inequities in Pain Assessment and Care of Hospitalized Children With Limited English Proficiency

OBJECTIVES

To examine inequities in pain assessment and management of hospitalized children with limited English proficiency (LEP) as assessed by (1) self-reported pain prevalence and intensity, and (2) nurse-documented pain assessments and analgesia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of hospitalized children and parent proxies examined preferred language and pain prevalence, intensity, and etiology; subsequent electronic medical record chart review examined demographics, nurse-documented pain scores, and analgesia prescribed for children aged ≤21 years at a tertiary care children's hospital. The primary outcome was a difference of ≥3 points between self-reported and nurse-documented worst pain scores. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact tests, and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify differences in outcomes between children with and without LEP.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients (50% children and 50% parental proxies) were interviewed (96% response rate). Of those, 60% (n = 93) reported pain in the previous 24 hours, most frequently because of acute illnesses. Of patients reporting pain, 65% (n = 60) reported a worst pain score of ≥3 points higher than nurse-documented scores; this discrepancy affected more patients with LEP (82%, n = 27) than English-proficient patients (55%, n = 33) (P = .01) with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.2 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-10.31). Patients with LEP were also less likely than English-proficient patients to receive medications at the time of their worst pain (60% vs 82%, P = .03), particularly opioid analgesia (9% vs 22%, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with LEP were more likely to self-report pain scores that exceeded nurse-documented scores and received less medications, particularly opiates. This population may be particularly vulnerable to underassessment and inadequate management of pain.

Analysis of Racial and Ethnic Diversity of Population Served and Imaging Used in US Children's Hospital Emergency Departments

Importance

Lower rates of diagnostic imaging have been observed among Black children compared with White children in pediatric emergency departments. Although the racial composition of the pediatric population served by each hospital differs, it is unclear whether this is associated with overall imaging rates at the hospital level, and in particular how it may be associated with the difference in imaging rates between Black and White children at a given hospital.

Objective

To examine the association between the diversity of the pediatric population seen at each pediatric ED and variation in diagnostic imaging.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Cross-sectional analysis of ED visits by patients younger than 18 years at 38 children's hospitals from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2019, using data from the Pediatric Health Information System. Data were analyzed from April to September 2021.

Exposures

Proportion of patients from minoritized groups cared for at each hospital.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was receipt of an imaging test defined as radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging; adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated to measure differences in imaging by race and ethnicity by hospital, and the correlation between the proportion of patients from minoritized groups cared for at each hospital and the aOR for receipt of diagnostic imaging by race and ethnicity was examined.

Results

There were 12 310 344 ED visits (3 477 674 [28.3%] among Hispanic patients; 3 212 915 [26.1%] among non-Hispanic Black patients; 4 415 747 [35.9%] among non-Hispanic White patients; 6 487 660 [52.7%] among female patients) by 5 883 664 pediatric patients (mean [SD] age, 5.84 [5.23] years) to the 38 hospitals during the study period, of which 3 527 866 visits (28.7%) involved at least 1 diagnostic imaging test. Diagnostic imaging was performed in 1 508 382 visits (34.2%) for non-Hispanic White children, 790 961 (24.6%) for non-Hispanic Black children, and 907 222 (26.1%) for Hispanic children (P < .001). Non-Hispanic Black patients were consistently less likely to receive diagnostic imaging than non-Hispanic White patients at each hospital, and for all imaging modalities. There was a significant correlation between the proportion of patients from minoritized groups cared for at the hospital and greater imaging difference between non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black patients (correlation coefficient, -0.37; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.07; P = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study, hospitals with a higher percentage of pediatric patients from minoritized groups had larger differences in imaging between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White patients, with non-Hispanic White patients consistently more likely to receive diagnostic imaging. These findings emphasize the urgent need for interventions at the hospital level to improve equity in imaging in pediatric emergency medicine.

Adultification of Black children negatively impacts their health: Recommendations for health care providers

Adultification is the term used to define how Black children are viewed as older than they are. Systemic racism has forced Black children into social, emotional, and physical adult roles before they are adults, contributing to adultification. Pediatric and family health care providers must be knowledgable of the harms of adultification bias and that the factor of intersectionality, for example, children who are Black and female, or Black with a disability, enhances bias. Recognition of adultification by health care providers may improve the health and wellness of Black children.

Dispensed Opioid Prescription Patterns, by Racial/Ethnic Groups, Among South Carolina Medicaid-Funded Children Experiencing Limb Fracture Injuries

OBJECTIVE

To examine dispensed opioid prescription patterns for limb fractures across racial/ethnic groups in a pediatric population.

METHODS

We used South Carolina's Medicaid claims data 2000 to 2018 for pediatric limb fracture cases (under age 19) discharged from the emergency department. The key independent variable was the child's race/ethnicity. The outcomes were: 1) whether the patient had a dispensed opioid prescription; and 2) whether dispensed opioid supply was longer than 5 days among cases with any dispensed opioid prescriptions. Logistic regression models were used to test the association between race/ethnicity and the outcomes. Covariates included age-at-service, gender, service year, and having multiple fracture injuries.

RESULTS

Compared with non-Hispanic White cases (NHW), the odds of receiving dispensed opioid prescriptions were lower for cases of non-Hispanic Black (NHB) (OR = 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71, 0.75), Asian (OR = 0.69; CI: 0.53, 0.90), Other/Unknown (OR = 0.86; CI: 0.80, 0.92), and Hispanic (OR = 0.84; CI: 0.79, 0.90) race/ethnicity. The odds of receiving >5 days of dispensed opioid prescription supply did not differ significantly among race/ethnic categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms previous findings that as compared to NHW, the NHB children were less likely to receive dispensed opioid prescriptions. Also, it reveals that the different minority race/ethnic groups are not homogenous in their likelihoods of receiving dispensed opioid prescriptions after a limb fracture compared to NHW, findings underreported in previous studies. Children in the Other/Unknown race/ethnicity category have prescribing patterns different from those of other minority race/ethnic groups and should be analyzed separately.

Outpatient Opioid Prescribing Habits in Pediatric Patients With Bone Sarcomas After Undergoing Primary Tumor Resection

BACKGROUND

The majority of children with bone sarcomas experience pain. Opioids remain the mainstay treatment of cancer-related pain in children. The patterns of outpatient opioid prescription after surgery for primary bone sarcomas remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the patterns of outpatient opioid prescription in patients with bone sarcomas after resection of the primary tumor, and to assess for factors that may lead to increased opioid dosing in these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 28 patients with bone sarcomas undergoing primary tumor resection was performed. Demographic, medical, surgical, and pharmacological data was collected from all patients. The total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed after patient discharge were compared at 30-day intervals. The MMEs were then stratified by tumor location, presence of metastasis at time of surgery, and preoperative opioid use. Independent predictors of increased 30-day and total 120-day opioid utilization were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients with preoperative opioid use were prescribed significantly more opioids in every 30-day postoperative interval and for the 120-day total. When stratified by tumor location, patients with primary tumors in the pelvis had significantly greater postoperative opioid utilization when compared with patients with tumors located in the lower and upper extremities during postoperative days 61 to 90 (5970 vs. 1060.4 and 0 MMEs, respectively, P=0.048) and during postoperative days 91 to 120 (6450 vs. 829.6 and 0 MMEs, respectively, P=0.015). Older age, diagnosis of osteosarcoma, increased length of stay postoperatively and presence of metastases were associated with a higher 30-day postoperative opioid utilization.

CONCLUSION

Multiple factors were associated with increased opioid use including preoperative opioid use, longer postoperative stay in the hospital, metastatic disease, and primary sarcomas in the pelvis. The patient's sex, body mass index, race, type of insurance, type of surgery performed, reoperation during the same admission and use of nonopioid adjuvants had no effect on opioid use. The results of this study can be used to stratify the average opioid requirement of pediatric patients undergoing primary bone sarcoma resection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Addressing bias and disparities in periviable counseling and care

Addressing bias and disparities in counseling and care requires that we contend with dehumanizing attitudes, stereotypes, and beliefs that our society and profession holds towards people of color, broadly, and Black birthing people in particular. It also necessitates an accounting of the historically informed, racist ideologies that shape present-day implicit biases. These biases operate in a distinctly complex and damaging manner in the context of end-of-life care, which centers around questions related to human pain, suffering, and value. Therefore, this paper aims to trace biases and disparities that operate in periviable care, where end-of-life decisions are made at the very beginning of life. We start from a historical context to situate racist ideologies into present day stereotypes and tropes that dehumanize and disadvantage Black birthing people and Black neonates in perinatal care. Here, we review the literature, address historical incidents and consider their impact on our ability to deliver patient-centered periviable care.

Disparities in Pediatric Emergency Department Length of Stay and Utilization Associated With Primary Language

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate the association between primary language and length of stay (LOS) in the pediatric emergency department (ED) within the context of known disparities impacting healthcare experiences and outcomes for patients with language barriers.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive encounters of patients presenting to, and discharged from, an urban pediatric ED from May 2015 through April 2018. Encounters were grouped into English primary language (EPL), Spanish (SPL), and other (OPL). Mean LOS comparisons were stratified by Emergency Severity Index (ESI). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine the relationship between LOS and variables, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, and time of presentation.

RESULTS

A total of 139,163 encounters were included. A higher proportion of SPL and OPL encounters were characterized as lower ESI acuity compared with EPL. Significantly longer LOS for SPL and OPL encounters was observed in the 2 lower acuity strata. The ESI 4-5 stratum demonstrated the greatest LOS disparity between EPL, SPL, and OPL (94 vs 103 vs 103 minutes, respectively, P < 0.001). In the highest acuity stratum, ESI 1-2, there was a nonsignificant trend toward longer LOS among EPL encounters (P = 0.08). The multivariate model accounted for 24% of LOS variance, but effect sizes were small for all variables except for ESI and age.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Spanish or other non-EPL who were triaged to lower acuity ESI levels experienced longer LOS in the pediatric ED than English-speaking counterparts. They also used the ED more frequently for low acuity issues, possibly reflecting disparities in access to primary care.

Antiracism, Black Lives Matter, and Critical Race Theory: The ABCs of Promoting Racial Equity in Pediatric Practice

Police shootings of unarmed Black men, women, and children at the intersection of disparities in the setting of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic have resulted in a long overdue national awakening regarding race and racism in society. This article defines some of the key terms, providing a foundation to help promote equity in pediatric practice. Although no single article can result in full competency regarding such complex issues, it is meant to provide a foundation for pediatricians on a journey to deepen their knowledge and understanding toward a path to action. [Pediatr Ann. 2022;51(3):e95-e106.].

All Quality Improvement Is Health Equity Work: Designing Improvement to Reduce Disparities

Quality improvement (QI) can be a critical means by which to achieve equity in health and health care. QI efforts, however, often fail to be designed and implemented through the lens of health equity. In this article, we will discuss the current state of the intersection between QI and health equity, then lay out specific steps researchers and practitioners can take to ensure that their QI work reduces, rather than increases or maintains, existing disparities. These steps include first, understanding existing disparities and, second, utilizing community engagement to ensure that QI enhances health equity. Before embarking on QI work, QI practitioners should first examine their metric of interest by patient characteristics, starting with race and ethnicity, language, and markers of access to care and socioeconomic status. Developing an understanding of existing disparities relevant to the QI project will ensure that the QI interventions can be designed to be most effective in the disadvantaged populations, thus increasing the likelihood that the intervention reduces existing disparities. In designing QI interventions, practitioners must also plan engagement with stakeholder populations ahead of time, to carefully understand their needs and priorities and how best to address them through QI efforts.

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Pediatric Emergency Department Wait Times

OBJECTIVES

Wait time for emergency care is a quality measure that affects clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. It is unknown if there is racial/ethnic variability in this quality measure in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs). We aim to determine whether racial/ethnic differences exist in wait times for children presenting to PEDs and examine between-site and within-site differences.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study for PED encounters in 2016 using the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Registry, an aggregated deidentified electronic health registry comprising 7 PEDs. Patient encounters were included among all patients 18 years or younger at the time of the ED visit. We evaluated differences in emergency department wait time (time from arrival to first medical evaluation) considering patient race/ethnicity as the exposure.

RESULTS

Of 448,563 visits, median wait time was 35 minutes (interquartile range, 17-71 minutes). Compared with non-Hispanic White (NHW) children, non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, and other race children waited 27%, 33%, and 12% longer, respectively. These differences were attenuated after adjusting for triage acuity level, mode of arrival, sex, age, insurance, time of day, and month [adjusted median wait time ratios (95% confidence intervals): 1.11 (1.10-1.12) for NHB, 1.12 (1.11-1.13) for Hispanic, and 1.05 (1.03-1.06) for other race children compared with NHW children]. Differences in wait time for NHB and other race children were no longer significant after adjusting for clinical site. Fully adjusted median wait times among Hispanic children were longer compared with NHW children [1.04 (1.03-1.05)].

CONCLUSIONS

In unadjusted analyses, non-White children experienced longer PED wait times than NHW children. After adjusting for illness severity, patient demographics, and overcrowding measures, wait times for NHB and other race children were largely determined by site of care. Hispanic children experienced longer within-site and between-site wait times compared with NHW children. Additional research is needed to understand structures and processes of care contributing to wait time differences between sites that disproportionately impact non-White patients.

Equitable and Timely Care of Febrile Neonates: A Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVES

In pediatric emergency departments (EDs), racial/ethnic minorities are less likely to receive needed and timely care; however, clinical protocols have the potential to mitigate disparities. Neonatal fever management is protocolized in many EDs, but the timeliness to antibiotic administration is likely variable. We investigated the timeliness of antibiotic administration for febrile neonates and whether timeliness was associated with patients' race/ethnicity.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional study of febrile neonates evaluated in one pediatric ED that uses an evidence-based guideline for the management of neonatal fever between March 2010 and December 2015. Primary outcome was time from ED arrival to antibiotic administration. Analysis of variance tests compared mean time with antibiotic administration across race/ethnicity. Multivariable linear regression investigated racial/ethnic differences in time to antibiotic administration after adjusting for patient demographics, timing of visit, the number of physicians involved, and ED census.

RESULTS

We evaluated 317 febrile neonates. Of the 269 patients with racial/ethnic data (84.9%), 54% were white non-Hispanic, 13% were black non-Hispanic, and 23% were Hispanic. The mean time to antibiotic administration was 204 minutes (range = 51-601 minutes). There was no significant association between patient race/ethnicity and time to first antibiotic administration. Emergency department census was significantly associated with timeliness.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a 10-hour range in the time to antibiotic administration for febrile neonates; however, variability in timeliness did not differ by race or ethnicity. This study demonstrates the need to further examine the role of protocols in mitigating disparities as well as factors that influence timeliness in antibiotic administration to febrile neonates.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Triage Scores Among Pediatric Emergency Department Fever Patients

OBJECTIVES

Emergency department (ED) triage scores are assigned to patients in a short period based on assessment of need for lifesaving measures, risk and pain levels, resource needs, and vital signs. Racial/ethnic disparities have been found across a number of outcomes but are not consistent across all studies. This study examines pediatric ED cases reporting fever, a commonly reported triage symptom, to explore racial/ethnic and age disparities in triage score assignment.

METHODS

This study uses the 2009-2015 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual national sample of ED visits in the United States. Pediatric cases where fever is the sole reported reason for visit are analyzed for racial/ethnic disparities, controlling for sex, age, insurance status, body temperature, region, and hospital type.

RESULTS

Among all pediatric fever cases, temperature is the sole significant predictor of triage scores. However, non-Hispanic (NH) black pediatric patients older than 1 year have approximately 22% greater risk of being given a less urgent triage score relative to NH white patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest racial disparities in the triage of NH black pediatric patients older than 1 year for fever. Although fever is a single and often non-life-threatening condition, especially after infancy, findings of racial disparities in triage scores suggests a need for further evaluation of the assignment of patient urgency in emergency medicine.

Addressing Adultification of Black Pediatric Patients in the Emergency Department: A Framework to Decrease Disparities

Systematic racism and structural discrimination in the United States are factors that have negatively affected the health of Black individuals and families. One form of racism that often goes unrecognized and yet has a profound negative impact on the health and safety of Black children is adultification. Adultification occurs when children are perceived, or treated, as being older than they are. We implemented the Racism as a Root Cause framework to identify ways health care providers and health care systems can work to dismantle inequities and address the adultification of Black children in the emergency department (ED). A shift to change policies, systems, and environments in the ED begins with recognition of blind spots through training, communication, and reflection. Utilizing methods to identify adultification and racism, such as the ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code Z60.5 Target of (perceived) adverse discrimination and persecution, can assist providers in recognizing the prevalence of racism and discrimination. To reduce the harms of inequities, injustice, and impacts of racism on Black children in the ED, it is essential to use trauma-informed care in all interactions. It is crucial for all employees of the ED to understand that adultification is extremely prevalent, hard to recognize, and causes harm to the health of Black children and their families. Without conscious efforts to decrease the pervasiveness and detriment of adultification bias, the repercussions of such racism will continue to perpetuate medical mistrust and negative health care experiences for Black children and families.

Association Between English Proficiency and Timing of Analgesia Administration After Surgery

BACKGROUND

Pediatric patients from families with limited English proficiency (LEP) are at risk for health care disparities. We examined timeliness of analgesic administration in pediatric postoperative patients with a limb fracture from LEP versus non-LEP families.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of children aged 1 year to <18 years of age, hospitalized to the general inpatient floor after surgical correction of single limb fractures between July 2016 and July 2019 were eligible. Patients whose consent was in a non-English language or for whom an interpreter was used were classified as from LEP families. The primary outcome was time to first analgesia. Secondary outcomes included time to first opioid, proportion with any analgesia and opioid analgesia, and number of pain assessments. Associations between LEP and outcomes were tested by using χ² tests, Kaplan-Meier plots, and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

We examined 306 patients, of whom 59 (19%) were from LEP families. Children in LEP families were significantly less likely to receive any analgesia (86.4% vs 96.8%, P ≤ .01) and experienced longer time to first analgesia in unadjusted (hazard ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.92) and adjusted analyses (hazard ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.94). There was no significant association between LEP and time to first opioid, proportion given opioid analgesia, or number of pain assessments.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalized children from LEP families experience a longer time to analgesia administration after surgery. The mechanisms that lead to these differences in care must be identified so that interventions can be designed to address them.

Implicit Bias and Caring for Diverse Populations: Pediatric Trainee Attitudes and Gaps in Training

The objective of this study was to determine the attitudes, skill level, and preferred educational interventions of pediatric residents related to implicit bias and caring for diverse patient populations. A cross-sectional survey of pediatric residents at a single, large urban residency program was utilized. Surveys were completed by 88 (55%) residents who were 69% female and 35% non-White or mixed race. Almost all residents felt that it was very or extremely important to receive training on health disparities, diverse patient populations, and implicit bias. Self-assessment of skill level revealed that residents felt confident in areas often covered by cultural competency curricula, such as interpreter use, but were less confident in other areas. The top 3 areas identified for further training included implicit bias, working with transgender and gender nonconforming patients, and weight bias. For the majority of diversity and bias-related skills, prior training was significantly correlated with higher skill level (P < .05).