Ghrelin attenuates the growth of HO-8910 ovarian cancer cells through the ERK pathway

Objective and Subjective Appetite Assessment in Patients with Gynecological Cancer: A Pre- and Post-Operative Pilot Study

Although appetite and its disorders have been implicated in disease progression and outcomes, ghrelin concentrations, an objective appetite measure, are rarely assessed in patients with gynecological malignancies. The present study aimed to assess changes in post-operative versus pre-operative appetite levels in patients with gynecological cancers scheduled for tumor removal surgery (N = 53). Acylated ghrelin concentrations were assessed as an objective appetite proxy, whereas the Council of Nutrition appetite questionnaire (CNAQ) was employed as a subjective appetite measure. Ghrelin concentrations were increased post-operatively (median: 12.1 pg/mL, IQR: 0.67 to 23.5, p-value = 0.001) but the perceived appetite of patients (CNAQ) remained unchanged (median: -1, IQR: -3 to 1). Tumor removal surgery decreased all anthropometric indices (body weight, body mass index, waist and hips circumferences, triceps skinfolds, body fat, fat mass and fat mass index, p-value ≤ 0.001 for all) and doubled the risk of malnutrition among patients. No difference was recorded in the change in participants' objective and subjective appetite when they were classified according to the tumor type. No correlation was observed between ghrelin concentrations and CNAQ score pre-operatively (Spearman's rho correlation coefficient = -0.181, p-value = 0.298) or post-operatively (Spearman's rho correlation coefficient = 0.071, p-value = 0.684). The observed post-operative rise in ghrelin concentrations is associated with body weight loss and consists of a possible defense mechanism of the human body, aiming to prolong survival.

Multiple roles of ghrelin in breast cancer

Breast cancer is one of the most threatening malignant tumors in women worldwide; hence, investigators are continually performing novel research in this field. However, an accurate prediction of its prognosis and postoperative recovery remains difficult. The severity of breast cancer is patient-specific and affected by several health factors; thus, unknown mechanisms may affect its progression. This article analyzes existing literature on breast cancer, ranging from the discovery of ghrelin to its present use, and aims to provide a reference for future research into breast cancer mechanisms and treatment-plan improvement. Various parts of ghrelin have been associated with breast cancer by direct or indirect evidence. The ghrelin system may encompass the direction of expanding breast cancer treatment methods and prognostic indicators. Therefore, we compiled almost all studies on the relationship between the ghrelin system and breast cancer, including unacylated ghrelin, its GHRL gene, ghrelin O-acyltransferase, the receptor growth hormone secretagogue receptor, and several splice variants of ghrelin to lay the foundation for future research.

Ghrelin and Cancer: Examining the Roles of the Ghrelin Axis in Tumor Growth and Progression

Ghrelin, a hormone produced and secreted from the stomach, is prim arily known as an appetite stimulant. Recently, it has emerged as a potential regulator/biomarker of cancer progression. Inconsistent results on this subject make this body of literature difficult to interpret. Here, we attempt to identify commonalities in the relationships between ghrelin and various cancers, and summarize important considerations for future research. The main players in the ghrelin family axis are unacylated ghrelin (UAG), acylated ghrelin (AG), the enzyme ghrelin O-acyltransferase (GOAT), and the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR). GOAT is responsible for the acylation of ghrelin, after which ghrelin can bind to the functional ghrelin receptor GHSR-1a to initiate the activation cascade. Splice variants of ghrelin also exist, with the most prominent being In1-ghrelin. In this review, we focus primarily on the potential of In1-ghrelin as a biomarker for cancer progression, the unique characteristics of UAG and AG, the importance of the two known receptor variants GHSR-1a and 1b, as well as the possible mechanisms through which the ghrelin axis acts. Further understanding of the role of the ghrelin axis in tumor cell proliferation could lead to the development of novel therapeutic approaches for various cancers.

Ghrelin enhances cisplatin sensitivity in HO-8910 PM human ovarian cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy is one of the crucial problems in ovarian cancer treatment. Ghrelin, a widely distributed peptide hormone, participates in a series of cancer progression. The aim of this study is to determine whether ghrelin influences the sensitivity of ovarian cancer to cisplatin, and to demonstrate the underlying mechanism.

METHODS

The anti-tumor effects of ghrelin and cisplatin were evaluated with human ovarian cancer cells HO-8910 PM in vitro or in vivo. Cell apoptosis and cell cycle were analyzed via flow cytometry assay. The signaling pathway and the expression of cell cycle protein were analyzed with Western Blot.

RESULTS

Our results showed that treatment with ghrelin specifically inhibited cell proliferation of HO-8910 PM and sensitized these cells to cisplatin via S phase cell cycle arrest, and enhanced the inhibitory effect of cisplatin on tumor growth of HO-8910 PM derived xenografts in vivo. Treatment with ghrelin inhibited the expression of p-Erk1/2 and p-p38, which was opposite the effect of cisplatin. However, under the treatment of ghrelin, cisplatin treatment exhibited a stronger effect on inhibiting P21 expression, upregulating p-CDK1 and cyclin B1 expression, and blocking cell cycle progression. Mechanistically, ghrelin promoted S phase cell cycle arrest and upregulated p-CDK1 and cyclin B1 expression induced by cisplatin via inhibition of p38.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed a specifically inhibitory effect of ghrelin on platinum-resistance via suppressing p-P38 and subsequently promoting p-CDK1 mediated cell cycle arrest in HO-8910 PM.

GHSR methylation-dependent expression of a variant ligand and receptor of the ghrelin system induces thymoma tumorigenesis

Our previous study reported that the DNA methylation of growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR) was significantly higher in thymoma or thymic carcinoma (TC) than in normal thymic tissue samples. Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) with higher GHSR DNA methylation were associated with significantly worse prognosis than those with lower levels of DNA methylation. Diversified components of the ghrelin-GHSR axis may exert opposing effects in cancer progression, depending on the cancer type in question. However, the precise function of the axis remains unclear. In the present study, the mRNA expression of five key components of the ghrelin system [native ligand ghrelin, variant ligand In-1 ghrelin, native receptor GHSR1a, variant receptor GHSR1b and acylation enzyme ghrelin O-acyltransferase (GOAT)] were examined in 58 TET samples by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR, and protein expression of GHSR1a and GHSR1b was assessed in 20 TETs using immunohistochemistry. The results revealed that In-1 ghrelin, GHSR1b (variant forms) and GOAT were more strongly expressed in thymoma compared with thymic-adjacent tissue. By contrast, no significant differences were observed in the expression of ghrelin and GHSR1a (native forms) between thymoma and thymic tissue. The mRNA expression of In-1 ghrelin and GHSR1b (variant forms) was positively associated with GHSR methylation in thymoma tissue samples. However, a relationship was not found between ghrelin, GHSR1a or GOAT expression (native forms) and GHSR methylation in thymoma. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that mRNA expression of GHSR1a and GHSR1b generally correlated with expression of the corresponding protein, and that the expression of GHSR1b was increased in advanced-stage TETs. These results indicate that the DNA methylation of GHSR is associated with a shift from native expression (ghrelin and GHSR1a) to variant expression (In-1 ghrelin and GHSR1b), which induces the tumorigenesis of thymoma, but not TC.

Protective and Healing Effects of Ghrelin and Risk of Cancer in the Digestive System

Ghrelin is an endogenous ligand for the ghrelin receptor, previously known as the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. This hormone is mainly produced by endocrine cells present in the gastric mucosa. The ghrelin-producing cells are also present in other organs of the body, mainly in the digestive system, but in much smaller amount. Ghrelin exhibits a broad spectrum of physiological effects, such as stimulation of growth hormone secretion, gastric secretion, gastrointestinal motility, and food intake, as well as regulation of glucose homeostasis and bone formation, and inhibition of inflammatory processes. This review summarizes the recent findings concerning animal and human data showing protective and therapeutic effects of ghrelin in the gut, and also presents the role of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 in these effects. In addition, the current data on the possible influence of ghrelin on the carcinogenesis, its importance in predicting the risk of developing gastrointestinal malignances, as well as the potential usefulness of ghrelin in the treatment of cancer, have been presented.

Ghrelin Affects Gastric Cancer Progression by Activating AMPK Signaling Pathway

As the endogenous ligand for the GH secretagogue receptor (GHSR), Ghrelin is aberrant expressed in multiple malignant carcinoma, and involved in regulating a number of progression of cancer, especially in metastasis and proliferation. However, the precise role of Ghrelin in tumorigenesis of gastric cancer (GC) is still poorly understood. In this study, we extensively investigated the roles and mechanisms of Ghrelin in human gastric cancer. Ghrelin levels in cancer tissues and cell lines were analyzed by immunohistochemistry, qRT-PCR, and Western blot. Functional studies were performed after Ghrelin overexpressed or knockdown in AGS cell line. Cell proliferation was evaluated in by MTT and clone formation assays. The wound healing and Transwell system were used to assess the cell migration and invasive ability of GC cells. Cell apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry, and metabolic assays were performed to reveal the function of Warburg effect in the process. Ghrelin was lowly expressed in gastric cancer tissues and cell lines. Overexpression of Ghrelin inhibited gastric cancer cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and promoted apoptosis by activating the AMPK pathway, while D-[lys3]-GHRP-6 (a GHSR agonist) treatment relieved the effect, promoting tumorigenesis. Ghrelin knockdown increased the glucose uptake and lactic acid release, suggesting that Ghrelin elicited an anti-Warburg effect via AMPK pathway to inhibit gastric tumorigenesis. Ghrelin inhibits cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by eliciting an anti-Warburg effect via AMPK signaling pathway in gastric cancer cells.

Can Estradiol and Ghrelin Play a Protective Role in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Incidence in Postmenopausal Women?

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to investigate the association between estradiol, n-octanoylated, des-octanoylated, total ghrelin, and ghrelin/des-octanoylated ghrelin ratio levels along with pathological parameters and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) odds in postmenopausal women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A case-control study was carried out on 45 patients with EOC and 33 age-matched postmenopausal women as the control group. Plasma levels of estradiol, n-octanoylated, des-octanoylated, and total ghrelin were measured by ELISA method.

RESULTS

Estradiol's plasma levels were significantly higher in patients with EOC than in control women (p <0.001). Although the ratio levels of n-octanoylated, des-octanoylated, total ghrelin, and ghrelin/des-octanoylated ghrelin were not associated with EOC in logistic regression models, estradiol levels were significantly related to the increase in EOC odds (OR: 1.083, 95% CI: 1.037-1.13, p <0.001). However, estradiol levels in the two first quartiles (Q₁, Q₂) were associated with decreased odds of EOC (OR: 0.011, 95% CI: 0.001-0.118, p <0.001, and OR: 0.030, 95% CI: 0.003-0.284, p = 0.002, respectively). For those patients in the third quartile of plasma des-octanoylated and total ghrelin compared to those in the highest (Q4), the multivariate odds ratios of EOC were respectively 0.192 and 0.25.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, higher concentrations of des-octanoylated and total ghrelin might be associated with the decreased EOC odds. Furthermore, the findings suggest that high levels of estradiol might be a potential odds factor in EOC, however, lower estradiol levels may have a protective effect on EOC development.

High expression of ghrelin and obestatin prepropeptide in tumor tissues predicted adverse overall survival in gastric carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is the most prevailing digestive tract malignant tumor worldwide with high mortality and recurrence rates. However, its potential molecular mechanism and prognostic biomarkers are still not fully understood. We aim to screen novel prognostic biomarkers related to GC prognosis using comprehensive bioinformatic tools.

METHODS

Four gene expression microarray data were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (GSE26942, GSE33335, GSE63089, and GSE79973). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between gastric carcinoma and normal gastric tissue samples were identified by an integrated bioinformatic analysis. Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were performed using statistical software R. STRING and Cytoscape software were employed to construct protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. Hub genes with a high score of connectivity identified from the PPI network were identified. Prognostic values of hub genes were evaluated in GSE15459 dataset. Hub genes related to GC overall survival were further validated in GEPIA (Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis) online tool.

RESULTS

A total of 12 upregulated DEGs and 59 downregulated DEGs were identified when the 4 microarray data overlapped. Among them, 10 hub genes with a high score of connectivity were identified. High expression of ghrelin and obestatin prepropeptide (GHRL), BGN, TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1, thrombospondin 2, secreted phosphoprotein 1, and low expression of CHGA were associated with a poor overall survival of gastric cancer (all log rank P < .05). After validation in GEPIA database, only GHRL was confirmed associated with a poor overall survival of gastric cancer (log rank P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

GHRL could be used as a novel biomarker for the prediction of a poor overall survival of gastric cancer, and could be a novel therapeutic target for gastric cancer treatment. However, future experimental studies are still required to validate these findings.

Cytoplasmic VDR expression as an independent risk factor for ovarian cancer

The vitamin D receptor (VDR), primarily known as a crucial mediator of calcium homeostasis and metabolism, has been shown to play a significant role in various cancer entities. Previous studies have focused on vitamin D and its receptor in gynecological cancers, noting that the receptor is upregulated in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The aim of this study is to analyze the prognostic impact of VDR and its functional significance in ovarian cancer. Through immunohistochemistry, VDR staining was examined in 156 ovarian cancer samples. Evaluation of VDR staining was conducted in the nucleus and the cytoplasm using the semi-quantitative immunoreactive score, and the scores were classified into high- and low-level expressions. Expression levels were correlated with clinical and pathological parameters as well as with overall survival to assess for prognostic impact. Differences in cytoplasmic VDR expression were identified between the histological subtypes (p = 0.001). Serous, clear cell, and endometrioid subtypes showed the highest staining, while the mucinous subtype showed the lowest. Cytoplasmic VDR correlated with higher FIGO stage (p = 0.013; Cc = 0.203), positive lymph node status (p = 0.023; Cc = 0.236), high-grade serous histology (p = 0.000; Cc = 0.298) and grading from the distinct histological subtypes (p = 0.006; Cc = − 0.225). Nuclear VDR did not correlate with clinicopathological data. High cytoplasmic expression of VDR was associated with impaired overall survival (HR 2.218, 32.5 months vs. median not reached; p < 0.001) and was confirmed as a statistically independent prognostic factor in the Cox regression multivariate analysis. Additional knowledge of VDR as a biomarker and its interactions within the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway could potentially improve the prognosis of therapeutic approaches for specific subgroups in EOC.

Expression of the ghrelin/growth hormone secretagogue receptor axis and its functional role in promoting tumor growth in primary central nervous system lymphomas

Ghrelin and its receptor, growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R), have been found in a variety of malignant tumor tissues, suggesting a biological function of the ghrelin/GHS-R axis in tumor growth and progression. Among central nervous system tumors, primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs) are relatively rare and characterized by a rapid progression and poor prognosis. In order to clarify ghrelin expression and its functional role in promoting tumor growth and progression in PCNSLs, we undertook an immunohistochemical investigation for ghrelin and GHS-R expression in 43 patients and tested the effect of ghrelin inhibition on lymphoma cells. Furthermore, we investigated the expression of CD105, a marker for tumor angiogenesis, to explore its association with the ghrelin/GHS-R axis. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox's proportional hazards regression model were used to determine the association of ghrelin/GHS-R expression with overall survival rate. The immunohistochemical study showed moderate/strong immunostaining of cells for ghrelin and GHS-R in 40 patients (93.0%) and 39 patients (90.7%), respectively. A ghrelin inhibitor did not affect tumor cell proliferation in vitro. Expression levels of ghrelin and GHS-R were divided into high and low groups by the rate of moderate-strong staining cells to tumor cells. The survival rate was significantly lower in patients with high GHS-R expression (P = 0.0368 by log-rank test; P = 0.0219 by Wilcoxon test). In addition, multivariate analysis of overall survival using Cox's proportional hazards regression model indicated that GHS-R was a significant independent prognostic factor (P = 0.0426). CD105 expression on tumor vessels was positive in 33 patients (33/37, 89.2%). There was a positive correlation between the moderate-strong staining rate of ghrelin and CD105-positive vessel count. These results indicated that the ghrelin/GHS-R axis plays a potential role in promoting tumor growth and progression through neoangiogenesis, rather than the proliferation of tumor cells.

Ghrelin inhibits cisplatin-induced MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell apoptosis via PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling

Ghrelin is a multi-functional peptide, its role on cancer cell apoptosis remains controversial. The present study examined the effects and mechanisms of ghrelin on cisplatin-induced apoptosis in human breast cancer cells. It was identified that ghrelin inhibited apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 cells in vitro and reversed the expression of B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl2) and Bcl2-associated X, and cleaved caspase-3 induced by cisplatin. Furthermore, ghrelin activated the phosphoinositide 3-kinases/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) signaling pathway after cisplatin treatment. The effects of ghrelin on the cisplatin-induced apoptosis and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling were reversed by the growth hormone secretagogue receptor small interfering RNA. The present study suggests that ghrelin may serve as a novel target for cisplatin resistance and a potential indicator of cisplatin sensitivity in breast cancer treatment.

Single Amino Acid Replacement in G-7039 Leads to a 70-fold Increase in Binding toward GHS-R1a

The growth hormone secretagogue receptor type 1a (GHS-R1a) is a class A rhodopsin-like G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that is expressed in a variety of human tissues and is differentially expressed in benign and malignant prostate cancer. Previously, the peptidomimetic [1-Nal⁴ ,Lys⁵ (4-fluorobenzoyl)]G-7039 was designed as a molecular imaging tool for positron emission tomography (PET). However, this candidate was a poor binder (IC₅₀ =69 nm), required a lengthy four-step radiosynthesis, and had a cLogP above 8. To address these challenges, we now report on changes targeted at the 4^th position of G-7039. A 2-fluoropropionic acid (2-FPA) group was added on to Lys⁵ to determine the potential binding affinity of the [¹⁸ F]-2-FP radiolabeled analogue, which could be prepared by simplified radiochemistry. Lead candidate [Tyr⁴ ,Lys⁵ (2-fluoropropionyl)]G-7039 exhibited an IC₅₀ of 0.28 nm and low picomolar activity toward GHS-R1a. Molecular docking revealed a molecular basis for this picomolar affinity.

Attribution of Ghrelin to Cancer; Attempts to Unravel an Apparent Controversy

Ghrelin is an endogenous peptide hormone mainly produced in the stomach. It has been known to regulate energy homeostasis, stimulate secretion of growth hormone, and mediate many other physiologic effects. Various effects attributed to ghrelin contribute to many aspects of cancer development and progression. Accordingly, a large body of evidence has emerged about the association of ghrelin with several types of cancer in scales of cell-line, animal, and human studies. However, existing data are controversial. This controversy occurs in two main domains: one is the controversial results in local effects of ghrelin on different types of human cancer cell-lines; the second is the apparent disagreement in the results of in-vitro and clinical studies that investigated ghrelin association to one type of cancer. These inconsistencies have hampered the indications to consider ghrelin as a potential tumor biomarker or therapeutic agent in cancer patients. Previous studies have reviewed different parts of current literature about the ghrelin-cancer relationship. Although they have highlighted these controversial results in various ways, no specific recommendations have been given to address it. In this study, we comprehensively reviewed in-vitro, in-vivo, and clinical studies and attempted to use the following approaches to unravel the inconsistencies detected: (a) to distinguish local and systemic effects of ghrelin in interpreting its summary clinical role in each cancer; (b) scrutinizing factors that regulate local effects of ghrelin and could justify different effects of ghrelin on different cancer cell-lines. These approaches could have notable implications for future in-vitro and clinical studies.

Acylated Ghrelin Renders Chemosensitive Ovarian Cancer Cells Resistant to Cisplatin Chemotherapy via Activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR Survival Pathway

This study investigated the effect of acylated synthetic ghrelin (AG) on the survival and proliferation of human chemosensitive ovarian cancer cells (A2780) and explored some mechanisms of action with a focus on the p53 apoptotic pathway and PI3K/Akt and NF-κB survival pathways. Human A2780 ovarian cancer cells were cultured with or without AG treatment in the presence or absence of cisplatin. In some cases, cisplatin+AG-treated cells were pre-incubated either with [D-Lys3]-GHRP-6, a ghrelin receptor antagonist, or with LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor. mRNA of ghrelin receptors(GHS-R1a and GHS-R1b), as well as, protein levels of GHS-R1a, were expressed abundantly in A2780 cells. AG treatment did not affect the mRNA and protein levels of GHS-R1a and GHS-R1b in both control and Cis-treated cells. However, while AG treatment had no effect on control cell viability, it significantly increased cell viability and proliferation and inhibited cell death in Cis-treated cells. In both control and Cis-treated cells, AG treatment significantly increased PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling and enhanced the nuclear accumulation of NF-κB. Concomitantly, in both control and Cis-treated cells, AG significantly lowered the protein levels of p53, p-p53 (Ser16), PUMA, cytochrome C, and cleaved caspase-3. Interestingly, pre-incubating the cells with either [D-Lys3]-GHRP-6 or LY294002 completely abolished the above-mentioned effect of AG in both control and Cis-treated cells. In conclusion, the findings of this study show that AG promotes cell survival of the OC cells and renders them resistat to Cis therapy, an effect that is mediated by the activation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR and activation of NF-κB, and requires GHS-R1a.

Limited short-term effects on human prostate cancer xenograft growth and epidermal growth factor receptor gene expression by the ghrelin receptor antagonist [D-Lys3]-GHRP-6

PURPOSE

The ghrelin axis regulates many physiological functions (including appetite, metabolism, and energy balance) and plays a role in disease processes. As ghrelin stimulates prostate cancer proliferation, the ghrelin receptor antagonist [D-Lys³]-GHRP-6 is a potential treatment for castrate-resistant prostate cancer and for preventing the metabolic consequences of androgen-targeted therapies. We therefore explored the effect of [D-Lys³]-GHRP-6 on PC3 prostate cancer xenograft growth.

METHODS

NOD/SCID mice with PC3 prostate cancer xenografts were administered 20 nmoles/mouse [D-Lys³]-GHRP-6 daily by intraperitoneal injection for 14 days and tumour volume and weight were measured. RNA sequencing of tumours was conducted to investigate expression changes following [D-Lys³]-GHRP-6 treatment. A second experiment, extending treatment time to 18 days and including a higher dose of [D-Lys³]-GHRP-6 (200 nmoles/mouse/day), was undertaken to ensure repeatability.

RESULTS

We demonstrate here that daily intraperitoneal injection of 20 nmoles/mouse [D-Lys³]-GHRP-6 reduces PC3 prostate cancer xenograft tumour volume and weight in NOD/SCID mice at two weeks post treatment initiation. RNA-sequencing revealed reduced expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in these tumours. Further experiments demonstrated that the effects of [D-Lys³]-GHRP-6 are transitory and lost after 18 days of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that [D-Lys³]-GHRP-6 has transitory effects on prostate xenograft tumours in mice, which rapidly develop an apparent resistance to the antagonist. Although further studies on [D-Lys³]-GHRP-6 are warranted, we suggest that daily treatment with the antagonist is not a suitable treatment for advanced prostate cancer.

Effects of Ghrelin on the Apoptosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis Fibroblast-Like Synoviocyte MH7A Cells

Ghrelin is a circulating peptide hormone, which involved in promoting feeding and regulating energy metabolism in human and rodents. Abnormal synovial hyperplasia is the most important pathologic hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), which is characterised by tumor-like expansion. Existing studies indicated that there may exist some relation between the decreased ghrelin and the abnormally proliferating synovial cells in RA. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the apoptotic effects of ghrelin on MH7A synovial cells in vitro. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to evaluate the effects of ghrelin on the viability of MH7A cells. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate-biotin nick-end labeling (TUNEL) and flow cytometry were used to test the apoptotic effects of ghrelin. At last, Western blot and real-time PCR were performed to explore the expression of caspases-8, -9, and -3 after the treatment of ghrelin. MTT experiments showed that ghrelin could inhibit viability of MH7A cells. The results of flow cytometry and TUNEL showed that ghrelin could induce apoptosis of MH7A synovial cells. Western blot showed that expression of cleaved-caspases-8, -9, and -3 were increased in ghrelin stimulation group compared with the control group, while expression of pro-caspases-8, -9, and -3 had no significant difference. In mRNA levels, ghrelin can decrease pro-caspases-8, -9, and -3 mRNA expression, which confirmed the results of protein levels. Then these apoptotic effects were significantly reversed by [D-Lys₃] GHRP-6 (ghrelin receptor antagonist). This study found that ghrelin can induce apoptosis of MH7A cells through caspase signaling pathways.

Ghrelin-O-Acyltransferase (GOAT) Enzyme as a Novel Potential Biomarker in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

OBJECTIVES

The association between the presence and alterations of the components of the ghrelin system and the development and progression of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is still controversial and remains unclear.

METHODS

Here, we systematically evaluated the expression levels (by quantitative-PCR) of key ghrelin system components of in gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NETs, as compared to non-tumor adjacent (NTA; n = 42) and normal tissues (NT; n = 14). Then, we analyzed their putative associations with clinical-histological characteristics.

RESULTS

The results indicate that ghrelin and its receptor GHSR1a are present in a high proportion of normal tissues, while the enzyme ghrelin-O-acyltransferase (GOAT) and the splicing variants In1-ghrelin and GHSR1b were present in a lower proportion of normal tissues. In contrast, all ghrelin system components were present in a high proportion of tumor and NTA tissues. GOAT was significantly overexpressed (by quantitative-PCR (qPCR)) in tumor samples compared to NTA, while a trend was found for ghrelin, In1-ghrelin and GHSR1a. In addition, expression of these components displayed significant correlations with key clinical parameters. The marked overexpression of GOAT in tumor samples compared to NTA regions was confirmed by IHC, revealing that this enzyme is particularly overexpressed in gastrointestinal NETs, where it is directly correlated with tumor diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide novel information on the presence and potential pathophysiological implications of the ghrelin system components in GEP-NETs, wherein GOAT might represent a novel diagnostic biomarker.

A natural ent‑kaurane diterpenoid induces antiproliferation in ovarian cancer cells via ERK1/2 regulation and inhibition of cellular migration and invasion

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common causes of female mortalities from gynecological tumors. An ent‑kaurane diterpenoid compound CRT1 (ent‑18‑acetoxy‑7β‑hydroxy kaur‑15‑oxo‑16‑ene), mainly isolated from the Vietnamese herb Croton tonkinesis has been used in folk medicine in Vietnam for cancer treatment. However, the effect of this compound on human ovarian cancer cells has not yet been reported. The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of CRT1 on the cell viability, apoptosis and metastasis of SKOV3 human ovarian cancer cells using a Cell Counting Kit‑8 assay, flow cytometric analysis of Annexin V‑fluorescein isothiocyanate/propidium iodide staining, western blot analysis, soft agar colony forming assay, wound healing assay and Matrigel invasion assay. The results revealed that CRT1 possessed significant anti‑proliferative effects on SKOV3 cells. CRT1 treatment at 25 and 50 µM induced apoptosis, enhanced the percentage of Annexin V‑positive cells, increased the expression of pro‑apoptotic protein B‑cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl‑2)‑associated X protein, cytochrome c release from the mitochondria to the cytosol, cleaved caspase‑3, caspase‑7, caspase‑9, and poly (adenosine diphosphate‑ribose) polymerase. However, it decreased the expression of Bcl‑2 in a dose‑dependent manner. The percentage of necrotic cells increased following CRT1 treatment at <10 µM. CRT1 at 50 µM significantly induced the phosphorylation of extracellular signal‑regulated kinase (ERK). Growth inhibition and the apoptotic effects of CRT1 could be reversed by PD98059, an ERK inhibitor. Additionally, CRT1 inhibited cell migration and invasion via ERK1/2 activation in SKOV3 cells. These results indicated that CRT1, an ent‑kaurane diterpenoid, may be a potential inhibitor of ovarian cancer by the activating ERK1/2/p90 ribosomal S6 kinase signaling pathway.

SPARCL1 suppresses the proliferation and migration of human ovarian cancer cells via the MEK/ERK signaling

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy worldwide and is one of the five leading causes of cancer-associated mortality in women. There is an urgent requirement to obtain a greater understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying ovarian cancer progression in order to identify novel drug targets and biomarkers. Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine-like protein 1 (SPARCL1) has been suggested as a candidate tumor suppressor in various types of human cancers. However, the potential role of SPARCL1 for ovarian cancer has not yet been clearly established. In the present study, lower protein expression levels of SPARCL1 were detected in ovarian cancer tissues when compared with adjacent normal tissues. Overexpression of SPARCL1 significantly suppressed the proliferation and migration of cells from the ovarian cancer cell line SKOV-3, whereas knockdown of SPARCL1 significantly increased cell growth and migration. Furthermore, the results revealed that SPARCL1 overexpression significantly suppressed the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) signaling pathway. Collectively, these results indicated that SPARCL1 may suppress the proliferation and migration of ovarian cancer cells by downregulating signaling via the MEK/ERK pathway.

Ghrelin promotes human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cell proliferation through PI3K/Akt/mTOR/P70S6K and ERK signaling pathways

Ghrelin is a gastric acyl-peptide that plays an important role in cell proliferation. In the present study, we explored the role of ghrelin in A549 cell proliferation and the possible molecular mechanisms. We found that ghrelin promotes A549 cell proliferation, knockdown of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR) attenuated A549 cell proliferation caused by ghrelin. Ghrelin induced the rapid phosphorylation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), Akt, ERK, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and P70S6K. PI3K inhibitor (LY 294002), ERK inhibitor (PD98059) and mTOR inhibitor (Rapamycin) inhibited ghrelin-induced A549 cell proliferation. Moreover, GHSR siRNA inhibited phosphorylation of PI3K, Akt, ERK, mTOR and P70S6K induced by ghrelin. Akt and mTOR/P70S6K phosphorylation was inhibited by LY 294002 but not by PD98059. These results indicate that ghrelin promotes A549 cell proliferation via GHSR-dependent PI3K/Akt/mTOR/P70S6K and ERK signaling pathways.