HEMO Revisited: Why Kt/Vurea Only Tells Part of the Story

A Historical Perspective on Uremia and Uremic Toxins

Uremia, also known as uremic syndrome, refers to the clinical symptoms in the final stage of renal failure. The definition of the term has changed over time due to an improved comprehension of the kidney's function and the advancement of dialysis technology. Here, we aim to present an overview of the various concepts that have developed regarding uremia throughout the years. We provide a comprehensive review of the historical progression starting from the early days of Kolff and his predecessors, continuing with the initial research conducted by Niwa et al., and culminating in the remote sensing hypothesis of Nigam. Additionally, we explore the subsequent investigation into the function of these toxins as signaling molecules in various somatic cells.

Update on Pediatric Hemodialysis Adequacy

The use of high reflux dialyzers to achieve a Kt/V_urea above 1.2 did not improve patient survival in most literature reports. After an electronic search in many sites, guidelines, systematic reviews, and review articles (cited references): We recommend (1) using the equilibrated double-pool, weekly rather than per session, Kt/V_urea, (2) Use of UF-dry weight to avoid V changes, (3) consider protein catabolic Rate (4) Use of double pool to avoid urea generation rebound effect. Beyond the urea model, other recommended parameters include the middle molecule clearance and patient clinical data as blood pressure control, normal ventricular morphology, and function, absence of anemia, bone mineral disease, vascular calcifications, good nutrition and growth, long-lasting vascular access, less intra-dialysis hypotension, fewer hospitalizations related to complications as infection, long-term patient survival with better life quality. All mentioned parameters are the good markers for adequate dialysis. Since (1) frequent short and (or) slow long dialysis sessions show better solute clearance and hemodynamic stability associated with better control of cardiovascular and bone disease, anemia, nutrition, and growth with better quality of life and survival. (2) The spare in the cost of the antihypertensive medications, erythroid-stimulating drugs, phosphate binders, and frequent hospitalization, compensates for the high dialysis cost. (3) The use of some advisable techniques can minimize access trauma; therefore, HD Model can be changeable according to each patient's clinical and biochemical follow-up dialysis adequacy progress pattern.

Neuropathy - Exponent of Accelerated Involution in Uremia: The Role of Carbamylation

Premature loss of functional integrity of the nervous system in chronic renal failure (CRF) as a consequence of persistent biological activities of the general uremic milieu is almost identical to its structural and functional involution during the process of physiological ageing, but disproportionate and independent of chronological age. In the hyperuremic status of CRF (urea - carbamide), forced carbamylation, as a non-enzymatic post-translational modification (NEPTM) of proteins and amino acids, by changing their biological properties and decreasing proteolysis capacity, represents pathogenetic potential of intensified molecular ageing and accelerated, pathological involution. Physiological predisposition and the exposure of neuropathy before complications of other organs and organ systems in CRF, due to the simultaneous and mutually pathogenetically related uremic lesion and the tissue and vascular segment of the nervous system, direct interest towards proteomic analytical techniques of quantification of carbamylated products as biomarkers of uremic neurotoxicity. Hypothetically, identical to the already established applications of other NEPTM products in practice, they have the potential of clinical methodology in the evaluation of uremic neuropathy and its contribution to the general prediction, but also to the change of the conventional CRF classification. In addition, the identification and therapeutic control of the substrate of accelerated involution, responsible for the amplification of not only neurological but also general degenerative processes in CRF, is attractive in the context of the well-known attitude towards aging.

Efficacy of Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer and Comparison with Standard High-Flux Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

A new medium cut-off (MCO) membranes has been designed to achieve better removal capacities for middle and large middle molecules in hemodialysis (HD) treatment.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the removal efficacy of Theranova® in standard HD in comparison with standard high-flux HD.

METHODS

Four HD patients (M/F 1/4) were included in 12-week observational pilot study in HD with Theranova® 400 and Theranova® 500 dialyzers. Each patient was assessed 4 times, T0 with high-flux dialyzers, T1 at 1 month, T2 at second month, and T3 at third month, by measuring pre- and post-HD samples of urea, Cr, β2-microglobilin (β2M), myoglobin, albumin, free light chains kappa (FLC-k), and free light chains lambda (FLC-λ).

RESULTS

The data showed a higher average removal rate for all the uremic toxins with Theranova® dialyzers for β2M, myoglobin, FLC-k, and FLC-λ (62.7, 56.9, 63.5, and 54.6%, respectively) during the 3 months. Albumin retention was observed and did not change between T0 and T3 (p = 0.379).

CONCLUSION

Compared to high-flux membranes, MCO membranes show greater permeability for middle molecules in midterm report.

A swan song for Kt/Vurea

Dialyzer clearance of urea multiplied by dialysis time and normalized for urea distribution volume (Kt/V_urea or simply Kt/V) has been used as an index of dialysis adequacy since more than 30 years. This article reviews the flaws of Kt/V, starting with a lack of proof of concept in three randomized controlled hard outcome trials (RCTs), and continuing with a long list of conditions where the concept of Kt/V was shown to be flawed. This information leaves little room for any conclusion other than that Kt/V, as an indicator of dialysis adequacy, is obsolete. The dialysis patient might benefit more if, instead, the nephrology community concentrates in the future on pursuing the optimal dialysis dose that conforms with adequate quality of life and on factors that are likely to affect outcomes more than Kt/V. These include residual renal function, volume status, dialysis length, ultrafiltration rate, the number of intra-dialytic hypotensive episodes, interdialytic blood pressure, serum potassium and phosphate, serum albumin, and C reactive protein.

Urea and chronic kidney disease: the comeback of the century? (in uraemia research)

Urea, a marker of uraemic retention in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and of adequacy of intradialytic solute removal, has traditionally been considered to be biologically inert. However, a number of recent experimental data suggest that urea is toxic at concentrations representative for CKD. First of all, at least five studies indicate that urea itself induces molecular changes related to insulin resistance, free radical production, apoptosis and disruption of the protective intestinal barrier. Second, urea is at the origin of the generation of cyanate, ammonia and carbamylated compounds, which as such all have been linked to biological changes. Especially carbamylation has been held responsible for post-translational protein modifications that are involved in atherogenesis and other functional changes. In observational clinical studies, these carbamylated compounds were associated with cardiovascular and overall morbidity and mortality. These findings shed new light on the validity of Kt/Vurea as a marker of dialysis adequacy. Yet, also the views that the kinetics of urea are not representative of the kinetics of several other uraemic retention solutes, and that urea cannot be held responsible for all complex metabolic and clinical changes responsible for the uraemic syndrome, still remain valid. Future efforts to improve the outcome of patients with CKD might be directed at further improving removal of solutes implied in the uraemic syndrome, including but not restricted to urea, also taking into account the impact of the intestine and (residual) renal function on solute concentration.

Generation, clearance, toxicity, and monitoring possibilities of unaccounted uremic toxins for improved dialysis prescriptions

Current dialysis-dosing calculations provide an incomplete assessment of blood purification. They exclude clearances of protein-bound uremic toxins (PB-UTs), such as polyamines, p-cresol sulfate, and indoxyl sulfate, relying solely on the clearance of urea as a surrogate for all molecules accumulating in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). PB-UTs clear differently in dialysis but also during normal renal function. The kidney clears PB toxins via the process of secretion, whereas it clears urea through filtration. Herein, we review the clearance, accumulation, and toxicity of various UTs. We also suggest possible methods for their monitoring toward the ultimate goal of a more comprehensive dialysis prescription. A more inclusive dialysis prescription would retain the kidney-filtration surrogate, urea, and consider at least one PB toxin as a surrogate for UTs cleared through cellular secretion. A more comprehensive assessment of UTs that includes both secretion and filtration is expected to result in a better understanding of ESRD toxicity and consequently, to reduce ESRD mortality.

Biochemical and Clinical Impact of Organic Uremic Retention Solutes: A Comprehensive Update

In this narrative review, the biological/biochemical impact (toxicity) of a large array of known individual uremic retention solutes and groups of solutes is summarized. We classified these compounds along their physico-chemical characteristics as small water-soluble compounds or groups, protein bound compounds and middle molecules. All but one solute (glomerulopressin) affected at least one mechanism with the potential to contribute to the uremic syndrome. In general, several mechanisms were influenced for each individual solute or group of solutes, with some impacting up to 7 different biological systems of the 11 considered. The inflammatory, cardio-vascular and fibrogenic systems were those most frequently affected and they are one by one major actors in the high morbidity and mortality of CKD but also the mechanisms that have most frequently been studied. A scoring system was built with the intention to classify the reviewed compounds according to the experimental evidence of their toxicity (number of systems affected) and overall experimental and clinical evidence. Among the highest globally scoring solutes were 3 small water-soluble compounds [asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA); trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO); uric acid], 6 protein bound compounds or groups of protein bound compounds [advanced glycation end products (AGEs); p-cresyl sulfate; indoxyl sulfate; indole acetic acid; the kynurenines; phenyl acetic acid;] and 3 middle molecules [β₂-microglobulin; ghrelin; parathyroid hormone). In general, more experimental data were provided for the protein bound molecules but for almost half of them clinical evidence was missing in spite of robust experimental data. The picture emanating is one of a complex disorder, where multiple factors contribute to a multisystem complication profile, so that it seems of not much use to pursue a decrease of concentration of a single compound.

Quantification and Dosing of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury: A Reappraisal

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Delivered dialysis therapy is routinely measured in the management of patients with end-stage renal disease; yet, the quantification of renal replacement prescription and delivery in acute kidney injury (AKI) is less established. While continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is widely understood to have greater solute clearance capabilities relative to intermittent therapies, neither urea nor any other solute is specifically employed for CRRT dose assessments in clinical practice at present. Instead, the normalized effluent rate is the gold standard for CRRT dosing, although this parameter does not provide an accurate estimation of actual solute clearance for different modalities.

METHODS

Because this situation has created confusion among clinicians, we reappraise dose prescription and delivery for CRRT.

RESULTS

A critical review of RRT quantification in AKI is provided.

CONCLUSION

We propose an adaptation of a maintenance dialysis parameter (standard Kt/V) as a benchmark to supplement effluent-based dosing of CRRT. Video Journal Club "Cappuccino with Claudio Ronco" at http://www.karger.com/?doi=475457.

The Use of a Multidimensional Measure of Dialysis Adequacy-Moving beyond Small Solute Kinetics

Urea removal has become a key measure of the intensity of dialysis treatment for kidney failure. Small solute removal, exemplified by Kt/Vurea, has been broadly applied as a means to quantify the dose of thrice weekly hemodialysis. Yet, the reliance on small solute clearances alone as a measure of dialysis adequacy fails fully to quantify the intended clinical effects of dialysis therapy. This review aims to (1) understand the strengths and limitations of small solute kinetics as a surrogate marker of dialysis dose, and (2) present the prospect of a more comprehensive construct for dialysis dose, one that considers more broadly the goals of ESRD care to maximize both quality of life and survival. On behalf of the American Society of Nephrology Dialysis Advisory Group, we propose the need to ascertain the validity and utility of a multidimensional measure that moves beyond small solute kinetics alone to quantify optimal dialysis derived from both patient-reported and comprehensive clinical and dialysis-related measures.

The future of critical care: renal support in 2027

Since its inception four decades ago, both the clinical and technologic aspects of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) have evolved substantially. Devices now specifically designed for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury are widely available and the clinical challenges associated with treating this complex patient population continue to be addressed. However, several important questions remain unanswered, leaving doubts in the minds of many clinicians about therapy prescription/delivery and patient management. Specifically, questions surrounding therapy dosing, timing of initiation and termination, fluid management, anticoagulation, drug dosing, and data analytics may lead to inconsistent delivery of CRRT and even reluctance to prescribe it. In this review, we discuss current limitations of CRRT and potential solutions over the next decade from both a patient management and a technology perspective. We also address the issue of sustainability for CRRT and related therapies beyond 2027 and raise several points for consideration.