Utilization and trends in palliative therapy for stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients: a U.S. population-based study

Extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and palliative care disparities: a national cancer database study

OBJECTIVES

Literature on disparities in palliative care receipt among extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients is scarce. The purpose of this study was to examine disparities in palliative care receipt among ES-SCLC patients.

METHODS

Patients aged 40 years or older diagnosed with ES-SCLC between 2004 and 2015 in the National Cancer DataBase (NCDB) were eligible. Two palliative care variables were created: (1) no receipt of any palliative care and (2) no receipt of pain management-palliative care. The latter variable indicated pain management receipt among those who received any palliative care. Log binomial regression models were constructed to calculate risk ratios by covariates. Unadjusted and mutually adjusted models were created for both variables.

RESULTS

Among 83 175 patients, the risk of no palliative care receipt was higher among Blacks compared with Whites in unadjusted and adjusted models (both model HRs 1.02; 95% CIs 1.00 to 1.03, p<0.05). Patients older than 59 years were at a higher risk of not receiving palliative care than younger patients (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03 for 59-66, HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.05 for 66-74, HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.08 for >74). Among 19 931 patients, the risk of no pain management-palliative care was higher among black patients on unadjusted analysis (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03, p<0.05). Patients between 66 and 74 years were at a higher risk of not receiving pain management-palliative care than patients younger than 59 years (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant disparities exist in palliative care receipt among ES-SCLC patients.

Impact of Order Set on Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency in Chronic Pancreatitis, Pancreatic Cancer, and Pancreatic Resection

Background and Aims

Enzyme insufficiency (EPI) is common in chronic pancreatitis (CP), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and after pancreatic resection. 40%-50% of CP patients and 70%-80% of PDAC patients develop EPI. 1/3rd of these patients are prescribed Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT), often at an inadequate dose, with evidence that this leads to increased morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to develop and implement an EPIC-based best practice alert (BPA) and smart set to improve the management of EPI.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of all patients with International Classification of Diseases codes for EPI, CP, and PDAC or CPT code for pancreatic resection from Feb-2018 to Feb-2021. Appropriate use of PERT was defined as ≥ 40,000 units of lipase with each meal. The BPA and smart set were implemented into the electronic medical record in Feb-2020. The BPA fired if the patient was already on PERT or if an order for PERT was placed and directed the clinician to the smart set which provided PERT formulations each prefilled to the minimum therapeutic dose of 40,000 units of lipase.

Results

A significant increase in the proportion of patients on minimum therapeutic dose of PERT from 61.9% to 72.9% (P ≤ .001). Ordering of pancreatic elastase, A1c, vitamin D, and dual X-ray absorptiometry increased from 20.4% to 29.9% (P < .001), 54.7%-62.1% (P = .001), 30.9%-48.1% (P < .001) and 10%-18% (P < .001), respectively. The BPA triggered a total of 30,838 times resulting in the smart being opened a total of 624 (2.02%) times over 24 months.

Conclusion

The BPA and smart set were associated with an improvement in the diagnosis and management of EPI and related complications in CP, PDAC, and s/p pancreatic resection.

Palliative Therapies in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Does Medicaid Expansion Make a Difference?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of medicaid expansion (ME) on receipt of palliative therapies in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A difference-in-differences (DID) approach was used to analyze patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer identified from the National Cancer Database diagnosed during two time periods: pre-expansion (2010-2012) and post-expansion (2014-2016). Patients diagnosed while residing in ME states were compared with those in non-ME states. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of receipt of palliative therapies.

RESULTS

Of 87,738 patients overall, 7483(18.1%) received palliative therapies in the pre-expansion, while 10,211(21.5%) received palliative therapies in the post-expansion period. In the pre-expansion period, treatment at a high-volume facility (HVF) (odds ratio [OR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.18) and non-west geographic location were predictive of increased palliative therapies. In the post-expansion period, treatment at an HVF (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16), geographic location, and living in an ME state at the time of diagnosis (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.22) were predictive of increased palliative therapies. Older age, highest quartile median income (zip-code based), and treatment at a nonacademic facility were independently associated with decreased palliative therapies in both periods. DID analysis demonstrated that patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer living in ME states had increased receipt of palliative therapies relative to those in non-ME states (DID = 2.68, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall utilization of palliative therapies in metastatic pancreatic cancer is low. Multiple sociodemographic disparities exist in the receipt of palliative therapies. ME is associated with increased receipt of palliative therapies in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Trends in utilization of first-line palliative treatments for anal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Anal squamous cell carcinoma patients often present with significant symptoms, including pain, bleeding, and obstructive symptoms. This requires palliation-directed therapy as a first-line treatment to alleviate symptoms. The proportion of patients receiving first-line palliative treatments is unknown. We aimed to study the factors associated with the use of first-line palliative treatments in stage II-IV anal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

METHODS

We used the National Cancer Database to identify adult patients diagnosed with stage II-IV anal squamous cell carcinoma between 2004 and 2016. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine the clinical and sociodemographic variables associated with the utilization of palliative treatment in the first-line setting, including palliative radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, and pain management.

RESULTS

Among 16,944 patients diagnosed with stage II-IV anal squamous cell carcinoma, only a small proportion of 492 (2.9%) required first-line palliative treatments to control symptoms. The majority of these patients received palliative radiotherapy (32%), followed by palliative surgery (25%), palliative chemotherapy (19%), combination therapies (14%), and pain management (10%). On multivariable analysis, higher stage disease, lower income, Medicare and Medicaid insurance, and life expectancy <6 months were associated with higher odds of use of first-line palliative therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line use of palliative treatments to control symptoms is needed in a small proportion of anal squamous cell cancer patients. It was utilized in all stages, but it was most frequently observed in patients with stage IV disease and patients with <6 months life expectancy. First-line palliative therapy was also more frequent in lower-income patients and patients with Medicare and Medicaid insurance which highlights the disparities in anal cancer management.

Use of Palliative Interventions at End of Life for Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite the well-established benefits of palliative care, little is known about the use of palliative interventions among patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer near the end of life (EOL).

METHODS

A national cohort study analyzed 142,304 patients with advanced GI cancers (stage 3 or 4) near EOL (death within 1 year of diagnosis) in the National Cancer Database (2004-2014) who received palliative interventions (defined as treatment to relieve symptoms: surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and/or pain management). The study used multivariable hierarchical regression evaluate the association between the use of palliative interventions, temporal trends, and patient and hospital factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 16.5% of the patients were treated with a palliative intervention, and use increased over time (13.4% in 2004 vs 19.8% in 2014; trend test, p < 0.001). Palliative interventions were used most frequently for esophageal cancer (20.6%) and least frequently for gallbladder cancer (13.3%). Palliative interventions were associated with younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-0.99), recent diagnosis year (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.06), black race (white [ref]; OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12), insurance status (no insurance [ref]; private: OR, 0.92; 95% CI ,0.95-0.99), hospital type (community cancer program [ref]; integrated network cancer programs: OR, 1.37; 95% CI ,1.07-1.75), and stage 4 disease (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 2.07-2.27). Patients in southern and western regions were less likely to receive palliative intervention (Northeast [ref]; OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.94 and OR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.57, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Increased palliative intervention use over time suggests ongoing changes in how care is delivered to GI cancer patients toward EOL. However, sociodemographic and geographic variation suggests opportunities to address barriers to optimal EOL care.

Disparities in Access to Oncologic Care in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer care is complex, and multiple disparities in receipt of therapies have been documented. The authors aimed to conduct a systematic review of the literature to critically assess and summarize disparities in access to oncologic therapies for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were performed for studies reporting disparities in access to oncologic care for pancreatic cancer. Primary research articles published in the United States from 2000 to 2020 were included. Data were independently extracted, and risk of bias was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 47 studies. All the studies used retrospective data, with 70 % involving national database studies, 41 assessing the impact of race/ethnicity, 22 assessing the impact of socioeconomic status, 18 assessing the impact of insurance status, 23 assessing the impact of gender, 26 assessing the impact of age, and 3 assessing the impact of location on the delivery of cancer-directed therapies. Race, socioeconomic status, insurance status, gender, and age- based disparities in receipt of surgical resection, treatment at high-volume facilities and multimodal therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer, receipt of systemic chemotherapy for metastatic cancer, and receipt of expected standard-of-care treatment are reported.

CONCLUSION

Significant sociodemographic disparities in access to equitable oncologic care exist along the continuum of pancreatic cancer care. Multiple patient, provider, and systemic factors contribute to these disparities. The ongoing study of these disparities is important to elucidate processes that may be targeted to improve access to equitable oncologic care for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Simple prognostic markers for optimal treatment of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer

Most patients with pancreatic cancer are ineligible for curative resection at diagnosis, resulting in poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.We retrospectively collected clinical data from 196 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who received palliative chemotherapy (N = 153) or palliative care alone (N = 43) from January 2011 to December 2013. Patients' background data and overall survival were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model.In patients receiving palliative chemotherapy (gemcitabine-based regimen, 88.2%) and palliative care alone, the median (range) ages were 68 (43-91) and 78 (53-90) years, and metastatic diseases were present in 80% (N = 123) and 86% (N = 37), respectively. Multivariate analysis in the palliative chemotherapy patients showed that liver metastasis (hazard ratio [HR] 2.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-3.20, P < .001), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (>4.5 vs ≤4.5; HR 3.45, 95% CI 2.22-5.36, P < .001), and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) (≥900 vs <900 U/mL; HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.02-2.05, P = .036) were independent prognostic factors. In those receiving palliative care alone, lung (HR 3.27, 95% Cl 1.46-7.35, p = 0.004) and peritoneum (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.20-5.18, P = .014) metastases and the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (≥1.3 vs <1.3; HR 3.33, 95% Cl 1.51-7.35, P = .003) were independent prognostic factors. Furthermore, patients with multiple factors had worse prognosis in both groups. Median survival time of palliative chemotherapy patients with risk factors 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 13.1 (95% CI 8.0-16.9), 9.4 (95% CI 7.9-10.1), 6.6 (95% CI 4.9-7.8), and 2.5 (95% CI 1.7-4.0) months, respectively. Similarly, median survival time was 5.7 (95% CI 1.3 -8.0), 2.1 (95% CI 1.5-3.9), and 1.3 (95% CI 0.6-1.7) months, respectively, for palliative care alone patients with risk factor 0, 1, and 2 to 3.Prognostic markers for pancreatic cancer were neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, liver metastasis, and CA19-9 in patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and lung/peritoneum metastases in patients undergoing palliative care alone. These simple markers should be considered when explaining the prognosis and therapeutic options to patients.

Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Patients Undergoing First-Line Gemcitabine Plus nab-paclitaxel for Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The clinical consequences of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and its treatment in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are poorly investigated. This retrospective study aims at investigating the pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) use and its impact on survival and maldigestion-related symptoms in advanced PDAC patients undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on advanced PDAC patients, treated with first-line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel at two academic institutions (March 2015-October 2018). Data were correlated with overall survival (OS) using Cox regression model. Kaplan-Meier curves were compared using Log-Rank test.

RESULTS

Data from 110 patients were gathered. PERT was administered in 55 patients (50%). No significant differences in baseline characteristics with those who did not receive PERT were found. Median OS for the entire group was 12 months (95% CI 9-15). At multivariate analysis, previous surgical resection of the primary tumor, (HR 2.67, p=0.11), weight gain after 3 months (HR 1.68, p=0.07) and PERT (HR 2.85, p ≤ 0.001) were independent predictors of OS. Patients who received PERT reported an improvement of maldigestion-related symptoms at 3 months more frequently than patients who did not (85.2% vs 14.8%, p ≤ 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

PERT is associated with significantly prolonged survival and maldigestion-related symptoms alleviation in advanced PDAC patients.

Evaluation of palliative treatments in unresectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents as unresectable disease in 80% of patients. Limited Australian data exists regarding management and outcome of palliative management for PDAC. This study aims to: (i) identify patients with PDAC being managed with palliative intent; (ii) assess the type of palliative management being used.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained pancreatic database at Western Health (2015-2017) was used to identify patient demographics; stage and multidisciplinary decision regarding resectability and operative interventions; palliative care; use of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and; management of exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. Data on chemotherapy use, number of hospital admissions, emergency department attendances and intensive care unit admissions 30 days prior to death were recorded.

RESULTS

One-hundred and eleven patients had diagnosis of PDAC, 15% with locally advanced and 45% with metastatic PDAC. Among the locally advanced and metastatic PDAC, 48% received biliary stent insertions, 93% had palliative care referral, 45% received palliative chemotherapy and 10% received radiotherapy. Dietitian referral occurred in 79% and 36% were prescribed with a pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. Diabetes mellitus was present in 52% of which 31% was new onset. Within 30 days prior to death, 11% patients received palliative chemotherapy, 32% were hospitalized and 11% visited an emergency department more than once. Sixty-five percent died in hospital.

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of patients diagnosed with locally advanced and metastatic PDAC received palliative care referrals and appropriate level of end-of-life care. Further prospective studies are necessary, examining the management and impacts of pancreatic insufficiency in this group.

Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality. Most patients are diagnosed with advanced pancreatic cancer, either at locally advanced or metastatic stages, and have a high rate of malnutrition and weight loss which are associated with poor outcomes. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency is one of the causes of malnutrition and weight loss in these patients. The prevalence and clinical consequences of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in advanced pancreatic cancer are poorly investigated with heterogeneous results. We sought to determine the prevalence and clinical consequences of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and the effect of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer by systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Scopus, Medline, and Embase were searched for cohort studies or randomised clinical trials reporting pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and/or the effect of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. We considered pancreatic exocrine insufficiency as an abnormal result on direct and/or indirect pancreatic exocrine function tests. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy was evaluated by its effect on survival and quality of life in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were included; seven studies reported the prevalence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and seven the effect of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer. The pooled prevalence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in advanced pancreatic cancer was 72% (95% confidence interval: 55-86%), being significantly higher when tumours were located in the pancreatic head (relative risk = 3.36, 1.07-10.54; p = 0.04) six studies investigated the impact of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy on survival/quality of life. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy was associated with 3.8 months (95% confidence interval: 1.37-6.19) survival benefit. Patients receiving pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy had a trend towards a better quality of life.Conclusions The prevalence of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in advanced pancreatic cancer is substantial and its treatment can improve the outcomes of these patients.

Traveling for Pancreatic Cancer Care Is Worth the Trip

BACKGROUND

Centralized care for patients with pancreatic cancer is associated with longer survival. We hypothesized that increased travel distance from home is associated with increased survival for pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database user file for all pancreatic cancer patients was investigated from 2004 through 2015. Distance from the patients' zip code to the treating facility was determined. Survival was investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox hazard ratios (CoxHRs) were determined based on stage of disease, distance traveled for care, and clinical factors.

RESULTS

340 780 patients were identified. In the average age of 68 ± 12 years, 51% were male and 83% were Caucasian. For all stages of cancer, longer survival was associated with traveling farther (P < .001). The survival advantage was longer for Caucasians than African Americans (3.7 months vs. 2.6 months, P < .001) Travel was associated with a 13% decrease in risk of death (P < .001). Even controlling for the pathologic stage, traveling farther was associated with decreased risk of death (CoxHR = .91, P < .001).

DISCUSSION

Traveling for care is associated with improved survival for pancreatic cancer patients. While a selection bias may exist, the fact that all stages of patients investigated benefited suggests that this is a real phenomenon.

Real-world use of sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma patients with cardiovascular disease: nationwide survey in Japan

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether the clinical outcome of advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with sorafenib, in real-world conditions, differs in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD).

METHODS

mRCC patients (n = 2256 before matching) were matched by propensity score into CVD (n = 560) and non-CVD groups (n = 560), followed by safety and effectiveness analyzes.

RESULTS

After matching, patients' features used for matching were balanced between the CVD and non-CVD groups, except for age (p = 0.0049). Renal comorbidity occurred more frequently in the CVD group. Exposure to sorafenib and objective response rate (25.4% [CVD], 28.5% [non-CVD]) were comparable in both groups. Median progression-free survival (PFS; 7.1 months, 95% CI: 6.4-8.6 [CVD]; 6.7 months, 6.3-8.3 [non-CVD]), and hazard ratios for PFS (0.954, 0.821-1.108) and overall survival (0.889, 0.683-1.156), were similar in the matched population. The incidences of adverse drug reactions (ADR, ≥10%) were generally similar between groups, although hypertension (42.1% vs 34.5%), diarrhea (26.3% vs 19.6%), decreased appetite (11.3% vs 7.5%), and non-serious and serious renal failure/dysfunction (3.6% vs 1.4% and 1.8% vs 0.4%), occurred more frequently in the CVD group.

CONCLUSION

This analyzes suggests that sorafenib has clinical benefit for mRCC patients regardless of baseline CVD. Serious ADRs increased for renal dysfunction.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT01411423.

Monitoring quality of care for patients with pancreatic cancer: a modified Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND

Best practise care optimises survival and quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC), but there is evidence of variability in management and suboptimal care for some patients. Monitoring practise is necessary to underpin improvement initiatives. We aimed to develop a core set of quality indicators that measure quality of care across the disease trajectory.

METHODS

A modified, three-round Delphi survey was performed among experts with wide experience in PC care across three states in Australia. A total of 107 potential quality indicators were identified from the literature and divided into five areas: diagnosis and staging, surgery, other treatment, patient management and outcomes. A further six indicators were added by the panel, increasing potential quality indicators to 113. Rated on a scale of 1-9, indicators with high median importance and feasibility (score 7-9) and low disagreement (<1) were considered in the candidate set.

RESULTS

From 113 potential quality indicators, 34 indicators met the inclusion criteria and 27 (7 diagnosis and staging, 5 surgical, 4 other treatment, 5 patient management, 6 outcome) were included in the final set.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed indicator set can be applied as a tool for internal quality improvement, comparative quality reporting, public reporting and research in PC care.

Trends in the Utilization of Life-Sustaining Procedures and Palliative Care Consultation Among Dying Patients With Advanced Chronic Pancreas Illnesses in US Hospitals: 2005 to 2014

AIM

Pancreas cancer continues to carry a poor prognosis. Hospitalized patients with advanced chronic pancreatic illnesses increasingly receive palliative care due to its perceived clinical benefits. Meanwhile, a growing proportion of elderly patients are reportedly receiving life-sustaining procedures. Temporal trends in the utilization of life-sustaining procedures and palliative care consultation among dying patients with advanced chronic pancreatic illnesses in US hospitals were examined.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A serial, cross-sectional analysis was carried out using the National Inpatient Sample Database. Decedents 18 years and older with a principal diagnosis of pancreas cancer or other advanced chronic pancreatic illnesses from 2005 through 2014. The compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) and Cochrane-Armitage correction of χ² statistic were used. The receipt of life-sustaining systemic procedures, intra-abdominal local procedures and surgeries, and palliative care consultation were examined. Multilevel multivariate logistic regressions were performed to examine the association of various procedures with the utilization of palliative care consultation.

RESULTS

Among 77 394 183 hospitalizations, 29 515 patients were examined. The CAGRs of systemic procedures, intra-abdominal procedures, surgeries, and palliative care were -4.19% (P = .008), 2.17%, -1.40%, and 14.03% (P < .001), respectively. The receipt of systemic procedures (odds ratio [OR] = 2.40, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.08-2.74), local intra-abdominal procedures (OR = 1.46, 95% CI, 1.27-1.70), and surgeries (OR = 2.51, 95% CI, 2.07-3.05) was associated with palliative care consultation (Ps < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among adults with pancreatic cancer or other advanced chronic pancreatic illnesses in the US hospitals from 2005 to 2014, the utilization of life-sustaining systemic procedures decreased while the prevalence of palliative care consultation increased.

Regional Differences in Palliative Care Utilization Among Geriatric Colorectal Cancer Patients Needing Emergent Surgery

BACKGROUND

The benefits of palliative care (PC) in critical illness are validated across a range of diseases, yet it remains underutilized in surgical patients. This study analyzed patient and hospital factors predictive of PC utilization for elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) requiring emergent surgery.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample was queried for patients aged ≥ 65 years admitted emergently with CRC from 2009 to 2014. Patients undergoing colectomy, enterectomy, or ostomy formation were included and stratified according to documentation of PC consultation during admission. Chi-squared testing identified unadjusted group differences, and multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of PC.

RESULTS

Of 86,573 discharges meeting inclusion criteria, only 3598 (4.2%) had PC consultation. Colectomy (86.6%) and ostomy formation (30.4%) accounted for the operative majority. PC frequency increased over time (2.9% in 2009 to 6.2% in 2014, P < 0.001) and was nearly twice as likely to occur in the West compared with the Northeast (5.7 vs. 3.3%, P < 0.001) and in not-for-profit compared with proprietary hospitals (4.5 vs. 2.3%, P < 0.001). PC patients were more likely to have metastases (60.1 vs. 39.9%, P < 0.001) and die during admission (41.5 vs. 6.4%, P < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, PC predictors (P < 0.05) included region outside the Northeast, increasing age, more recent year, and metastatic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In the USA, PC consultation for geriatric patients with surgically managed complicated CRC is low. Regional variation appears to play an important role. With mounting evidence that PC improves quality of life and outcomes, understanding the barriers associated with its provision to surgical patients is paramount.

Enzyme replacement improves survival among patients with pancreatic cancer: Results of a population based study

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) and malnutrition are prevalent among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) can correct PEI but its use among patients with pancreatic cancer is unclear as are effects upon survival. This population-based study sought to address these issues METHODS: Subjects with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Propensity score matching generated matched pairs of subjects who did and did not receive PERT. Progression to all-cause mortality was compared using parametric survival models that included a range of relevant co-variables RESULTS: PERT use among the whole cohort (987/4554) was 21.7%. Some 1614 subjects generated 807 matched pairs. This resulted in a total, censored follow-up period of 1643 years. There were 1403 deaths in total, representing unadjusted mortality rates of 748 and 994 deaths per 1000 person-years for PERT-treated cases and their matched non-PERT-treated controls, respectively. With reference to the observed survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients, adjusted median survival time was 262% greater in PERT-treated cases (survival time ratio (STR) = 2.62, 95% CI 2.27-3.02) when compared with matched, non-PERT-treated controls. Survival remained significantly greater among subjects receiving PERT regardless of the studied subgroup with respect to use of surgery or chemotherapy CONCLUSIONS: This population based study observes that the majority of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma do not receive PERT. PERT is associated with increased survival among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma suggesting a lack of clinical awareness and potential benefit of addressing malnutrition among these patients.

Suicide rates among patients with cancers of the digestive system

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have suggested that suicide rates are elevated among cancer patients relative to the general population. In this analysis, we comprehensively evaluated characteristics associated with higher suicide rates among patients with cancers of the digestive system.

METHODS

Using the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified all patients diagnosed with digestive system cancers during 2000 to 2014. Patients were classified as having died of suicide if their cause of death in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results was listed as "suicide and self-inflicted injury." Suicide rates were compared to age-, sex-, and race-adjusted rates in the general population.

RESULTS

A total of 881 suicides were identified among 856 293 patients diagnosed with digestive system cancers. The suicide rate in this population was 32.8 per 100 000 person-years and was nearly twice that in the general population (standardized mortality ratio [SMR] = 1.91; 95% CI, 1.79-2.04). Suicide rates were significantly elevated for all cancer sites but were highest for esophageal (SMR = 5.03), pancreatic (SMR = 5.28), stomach (SMR = 2.84), and liver (SMR = 2.14) cancers. Standardized mortality ratios for suicide were highest within the first 5 years of diagnosis and increased with age at diagnosis for all sites except colon and stomach.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cancers of the digestive system have a higher incidence of suicide than the general population. Suicide rates among esophageal and pancreatic cancer patients are more than 5 times general population rates. The involvement of psychiatrists and other mental health professionals may be a critical component of cancer care for these high-risk patient subgroups.

Pain in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A multidisciplinary, International guideline for optimized management

Abdominal pain is an important symptom in most patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Adequate control of pain is often unsatisfactory due to limited treatment options and significant variation in local practice, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach. This review contends that improvement in the management of PDAC pain will result from a synthesis of best practice and evidence around the world in a multidisciplinary way. To improve clinical utility and evaluation, the evidence was rated according to the GRADE guidelines by a group of international experts. An algorithm is presented, which brings together all currently available treatment options. Pain is best treated early on with analgesics with most patients requiring opioids, but neurolytic procedures are often required later in the disease course. Celiac plexus neurolysis offers medium term relief in a substantial number of patients, but other procedures such as splanchnicectomy are also available. Palliative chemotherapy also provides pain relief as a collateral benefit. It is stressed that the assessment of pain must take into account the broader context of other physical and psychological symptoms. Adjunctive treatments for pain, depression and anxiety as well as radiotherapy, endoscopic therapy and neuromodulation may be required in selected patients. There are few comparative studies to help define which combination and order of these treatment options should be applied. New pain therapies are emerging and could for example target neural transmitters. However, until better methods are available, management of pain should be individualized in a multidisciplinary setting to ensure optimal care.