1
|
Nägler F, Vorbach S, Mohamed AA, Thaqi S, Adebahr S, Ehret F, Kraft J, Fabian A, Weissmann T, Kaufmann J, Drabke S, Looman EL, Waltenberger M, Kraus KM, Grohmann M, Dehl K, Rogers S, Gawish A, Becker JN, Klement RJ, Partl R, Trommer M, Grosu AL, Rimner A, Gkika E, Riesterer O, Putz F, Ganswindt U, Moustakis C, Nicolay NH, Brunner TB, Blanck O, Wittig-Sauerwein A, Balermpas P, Rühle A. Pulmonary Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Oligometastatic Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025; 122:140-149. [PMID: 39761798 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2024] [Revised: 12/16/2024] [Accepted: 12/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE The value of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with oligometastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains unclear, as existing evidence is primarily derived from retrospective single-center analyses with small patient cohorts. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of pulmonary SBRT in patients with oligometastatic HNSCC and to identify factors associated with survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS This trinational multicenter cohort study, including 16 centers from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, retrospectively analyzed patients with oligometastatic HNSCC undergoing SBRT for pulmonary metastases between 2010 and 2023. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and incidence of local failures. RESULTS A total of 178 patients with 284 irradiated lung metastases were analyzed. The most common primary HNSCC subsites were oropharyngeal (n = 71), laryngeal (n = 37), and hypopharyngeal (n = 31). Lung metastases were treated with a median biologically effective dose (BEDα/β=10 Gy) of 105 Gy (IQR, 84-113) at the planning target volume periphery. After a median follow-up of 40 months (95% CI, 34-46), the median OS and progression-free survival were 33 months (95% CI, 26-40) and 9 months (95% CI, 7-11), respectively. The 1-year cumulative incidence of local failures was 5.5% (95% CI, 3.2-8.8). One patient (0.6%) developed acute grade 3 dysphagia, and among 146 patients assessed for chronic toxicities, 2 (1.4%) experienced grade 3 events, with no grade 4-5 toxicities. On multivariable analysis, older (>65 years) patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.59; 95% CI, 1.02-2.49; P = .040) and females (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.04-2.99; P = .035) exhibited worse OS, whereas longer time between HNSCC diagnosis and first SBRT was associated with longer OS (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00; P = .045). CONCLUSION SBRT for pulmonary metastases achieves excellent local control with minimal toxicity in patients with oligometastatic HNSCC. Prospective trials are needed to determine the optimal timing for integrating SBRT with systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Nägler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Samuel Vorbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ahmed Allam Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Saranda Thaqi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK-Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sonja Adebahr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK-Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, a partnership between DKFZ and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes Kraft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximilians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Fabian
- Saphir Radiosurgery Center Frankfurt and Northern Germany, Kiel, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thomas Weissmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Justus Kaufmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sophia Drabke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Maria Waltenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Kim Melanie Kraus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU) GmbH German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; Partner Site Munich, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Grohmann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kaja Dehl
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Rogers
- Radiation Oncology Center Mittelland, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Ahmed Gawish
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jan-Niklas Becker
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Rainer J Klement
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - Richard Partl
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University Graz, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Maike Trommer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK-Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK-Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Oliver Riesterer
- Radiation Oncology Center Mittelland, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Florian Putz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christos Moustakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Thomas B Brunner
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University Graz, Comprehensive Cancer Center Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Saphir Radiosurgery Center Frankfurt and Northern Germany, Kiel, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Andrea Wittig-Sauerwein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximilians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany, Partner Site Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK-Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rida H, Zaine H, Jouhadi H, Benider A, Samlali H, Samlali R. Stereotactic body irradiation for metastasis from renal carcinoma: A retrospective study. Curr Urol 2025; 19:187-191. [PMID: 40376474 PMCID: PMC12076341 DOI: 10.1097/cu9.0000000000000191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has traditionally been considered to be radioresistant. Response rates are believed to be improved by a high dose of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients treated with SBRT for metastatic disease from RCC. Material and methods We reviewed records from 20 patients who underwent SBRT for a total of 30 RCC metastases from 2015 to 2020. Patients were included who had a confirmed primary RCC and radiographic evidence of metastasis, either synchronous or metachronous. The most common SBRT fractionation was 30 Gy in 3 fractions. Results Median age was 60 years (range, 40-77 years) and 60% were male. After a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 3-36 months), overall survival was estimated to be 85% and 70%, at 1 and 2 years, respectively, and local control at 2 years was 83.33%. Only 5 patients had documented progression of disease, all of whom received biologically effective dose inferior to 100 Gy, and no patients treated with a higher biologically effective dose had disease, which progressed. The most common acute toxicity was grade 1 fatigue (20%). No grade 3 or higher acute toxicity occurred. Conclusions Treatment with SBRT in patients with RCC metastases yielded a high local control rate, promising survival rate, and low toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanan Rida
- Department of Oncology-Radiotherapy, University Hospital Ibn Roch, Casablanca, Morocco
| | - Hind Zaine
- Department of Oncology-Radiotherapy, University Hospital Ibn Roch, Casablanca, Morocco
| | - Hassan Jouhadi
- Department of Oncology-Radiotherapy, University Hospital Ibn Roch, Casablanca, Morocco
| | - Abdellatif Benider
- Department of Oncology-Radiotherapy, University Hospital Ibn Roch, Casablanca, Morocco
| | - Hamza Samlali
- Clinique d’oncologie le Littoral, Casablanca, Morocco
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jahraus CD, Wallner PE, Heron DE, Crook W, Finkelstein SE, Harris AA, Kestin L, Landau E, Rivera D, Thomas TO, Koontz BF. ACROPath Oligometastases: The American College of Radiation Oncology Clinical Pathway. Cureus 2024; 16:e74098. [PMID: 39575357 PMCID: PMC11580758 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2024] [Accepted: 11/20/2024] [Indexed: 11/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiation oncology is among the most data-driven specialties in medicine. Recently, a wealth of peer-reviewed data has been published supporting the treatment of oligometastatic malignancies, demonstrating improved survival with metastasis-directed therapy, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), when combined with appropriate patient selection and treatment. However, there are currently few, if any, established guidelines that synthesize the abundance of data specific to radiotherapy into a single, easily accessed resource for clinicians. ACROPath® is a major initiative of the American College of Radiation Oncology (ACRO) that aims to present aggregated clinical pathway data in a highly usable format that is readily accessible to clinicians at the point of care in real time. The oligometastases pathway is the first published algorithm in this collection, with additional pathways anticipated in future publications. Clinical radiation oncologists with expertise in the treatment and management of oligometastatic disease were recruited from across ACRO's diverse membership, including both academic and private practice physicians, to ensure a broad-based experience and insight. Individual participants were assigned subsections of the pathway for guideline development, and then, each subsection was presented to the full group for evaluation and consensus development based on published data. Rather than presenting an unstructured set of treatment options, as is common in other treatment guidelines, this initiative aimed to categorize appropriate treatments based on published clinical evidence in a hierarchy further ranked by efficacy, toxicity, and cost. Based on these strata, treatment recommendations were collated and grouped into three rank categories (gold, silver, or bronze) to denote the degree of applicability. The team assembled an interactive document that will eventually be available online, and it is summarized in detail here. Recommendations are grouped both by the anatomic site of metastasis and by the primary tumor type, recognizing that original histology might impact the treatment differently in different anatomic locations. After a review of available published clinical evidence, the committee reached a consensus on all recommendations presented, categorizing each option as gold, silver, or bronze to guide clinicians appropriately. This first iteration of ACROPath® Oligometastases represents one of the few comprehensive clinical decision support tools available for managing patients with limited metastatic disease. It presents available data in a highly accessible, easily used reference, which will be formally reviewed and updated by the committee as frequently as emerging data requires, likely at six- to 12-month intervals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher D Jahraus
- Radiation Oncology, ACROPath Project, American College of Radiation Oncology, Alabaster, USA
- Radiation Oncology, Generations Radiotherapy & Oncology PC, Alabaster, USA
| | - Paul E Wallner
- Radiation Oncology, American College of Radiation Oncology, Moorestown, USA
| | - Dwight E Heron
- Radiation Oncology, Mercy Health, Youngstown, USA
- Radiation Oncology, American College of Radiation Oncology, Youngstown, USA
| | | | | | | | - Larry Kestin
- Radiation Oncology, Michigan Healthcare Professionals (MHP) Radiation Oncology Institute, Farmington Hills, USA
| | - Evan Landau
- Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare, Fort Lauderdale, USA
| | - Douglas Rivera
- Radiation Oncology, Austin Cyberknife, Austin, USA
- Radiation Oncology, Central Texas Cancer Centers, Georgetown, USA
| | - Tarita O Thomas
- Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lin WC, Chen PJ, Yim S, Wang HH, Liao PA, Tai CY, Yen MH. The safety and response of CT guided percutaneous cryoablation for lung nodules by 17-gauge needles. BMC Med Imaging 2023; 23:151. [PMID: 37814246 PMCID: PMC10561456 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-023-01110-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety and efficacy of 17-gauge needles used in CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation for lung nodules were explored in this study. The purpose of the study was to compare the findings with earlier research and multi-center clinical trials that used various needle sizes. METHODS Between 2016 and 2020, a retrospective study was conducted with approval from the institutional review board. A total of 41 patients were enrolled, and 71 lung nodules were treated in 63 cryoablation procedures using local anesthesia. Complication rates were recorded, and overall survival rates as well as tumor progression-free rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Self-limited hemoptysis was caused by 12.9% of the procedures, and drainage was required for pneumothoraces resulting from 11.3% of them. The overall survival rates at one, two, three, and four years were 97%, 94%, 82%, and 67%, respectively. The tumor progression-free rates at one, two, three, and four years were 86.2%, 77%, 74%, and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSION Cryoablation for lung nodules using 17-Gauge needles can achieve similar rates of survival and tumor control rates, similar or even lower complication rates as compared with other studies and multi-center trials using mixed sized needles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Chan Lin
- School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, 24205, Taiwan.
- Department of Radiology, Cathay General Hospital, No.280 Sec 4 Ren-Ai Rd, Taipei, 10630, Taiwan.
| | - Po-Ju Chen
- School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, 24205, Taiwan
- Department of Chest Surgery, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei City, 10630, Taiwan
| | - Shelly Yim
- School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, 24205, Taiwan
- Department of Chest Surgery, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei City, 10630, Taiwan
| | - Hsueh-Han Wang
- School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, 24205, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, Cathay General Hospital, No.280 Sec 4 Ren-Ai Rd, Taipei, 10630, Taiwan
| | - Pen-An Liao
- School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, 24205, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, Cathay General Hospital, No.280 Sec 4 Ren-Ai Rd, Taipei, 10630, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Yu Tai
- School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, 24205, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, Cathay General Hospital, No.280 Sec 4 Ren-Ai Rd, Taipei, 10630, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Hong Yen
- School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, 24205, Taiwan
- Department of Chest Surgery, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei City, 10630, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sosa-Fajardo P, Blanco-Suarez JM, Pineda-Munguía Á, Rubí-Olea L, Peleteiro-Higuero P, Gajate P, Zafra-Martín J, Siva S, Bossi A, López-Campos F, Couñago F. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for kidney cancer. Where do we stand? Int J Urol 2023; 30:437-445. [PMID: 36746747 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
At present, surgery is still the gold standard for the local treatment of renal cancer. Nonetheless, in several clinical scenarios, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) also known as stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is emerging as a highly effective ablative technique in fragile patients and those with significant comorbidities, as well as in cases where percutaneous therapy (cryoablation or radiofrequency) is not viable. However, considering the intrinsic radioresistance of renal tumors, the optimal treatment schemes have not been established. In oligometastatic patients, it has been reported that the control of the oligometastases can be a potentially curable approach. Being a technique than can be administered exclusively or in combination with systemic therapy, treatment individualization based on patient characteristics is key. Another scenario under investigation is oligoprogression, where SBRT offers the possibility of delaying further lines of systemic therapy by eliminating subclones of resistant tumor with ablative doses, with the additional opportunity of stimulating the immune system (immunomodulatory role). In this review, we have conducted an analysis of recently published studies that test the role of this technique in different clinical scenarios of this disease. We have found promising results that make SBRT a potent therapeutic approach with low toxicity. We also comment on ongoing studies that will generate the necessary evidence needed for the implementation of this technique in our daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paloma Sosa-Fajardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS/CSIC/CIBERONC), University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Jesús M Blanco-Suarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS/CSIC/CIBERONC), University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Luz Rubí-Olea
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Regional Hospital, Málaga, Spain
| | - Paula Peleteiro-Higuero
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Pablo Gajate
- Medical Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal Hospital, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Zafra-Martín
- Group of Translational Research in Cancer Immunotherapy, Health and Medical Research Centre (CIMES), Institute of Biomedical Research in Malaga (IBIMA), University of Malaga (UMA), Malaga, Spain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, Malaga, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaga (UMA), Malaga, Spain
| | - Shankar Siva
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Felipe Couñago
- Radiation Oncology Department, GenesisCare Madrid Clinical Director, San Francisco de Asis and La Milagrosa Hospitals, National Chair of Research and Clinical Trials, GenesisCare, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dason S, Lacuna K, Hannan R, Singer EA, Runcie K. State of the Art: Multidisciplinary Management of Oligometastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43:e390038. [PMID: 37253211 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_390038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (OM-RCC) refers to patients who have limited (typically up to 5) metastatic lesions. Although management principles may overlap, OM-RCC is distinguishable from oligoprogressive RCC, which describes progression of disease to a limited number of sites while receiving systemic therapy. Cytoreductive nephrectomy and metastasectomy are common surgical considerations in OM-RCC, and indications are discussed in this review. It is evident that stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is effective in RCC and is being applied increasingly in the oligometastatic setting. Finally, we will review advances in systemic therapy and the role of active surveillance before the initiation of systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Dason
- Division of Urologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Kristine Lacuna
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Eric A. Singer
- Division of Urologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Karie Runcie
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rühle A, Kirste S. [SBRT for primary renal cell carcinoma-long-term results from the IROCK database]. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:330-332. [PMID: 36746794 PMCID: PMC9938033 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02050-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Rühle
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland. .,Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (dkfz), Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partnerstandort Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
| | - Simon Kirste
- Klinik für Strahlenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland.,Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (dkfz), Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partnerstandort Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Carrasco-Esteban E, Barrionuevo-Castillo P, Domínguez-Rullán J, Gómez-Aparicio MA, Ferri-Molina M, Sáez-Bueno P, Zalabarría-Zarrabeitia Z, Scorsetti M, Arcangeli S, López-Campos F, Couñago F. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Kidney Cancer: Ready for Prime Time? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:163-176. [PMID: 36443137 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is surgery. However, a number of patients will not be candidates for surgical treatment or will reject this therapeutic approach. Therefore, alternative approaches are required. Historically, radiotherapy has been considered an ineffective treatment for RCC due to the radioresistance of renal tumour cells to conventional fractionation and the increased rate of toxicity. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a radiotherapy technique that provides a non-invasive ablative treatment with remarkable rates of local control in both primary tumours and metastases in several locations, with a low associated morbidity due to the highly conformal dose and the use of image-guided techniques. Current evidence shows that a higher dose per fraction, achieving a higher biological effective dose, can overcome the radioresistance of RCC cells. Therefore, SBRT, as well as the combination of SBRT and new emerging immune therapies, has a potential role in the local treatment of primary RCC and oligometastatic RCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Carrasco-Esteban
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - J Domínguez-Rullán
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - M A Gómez-Aparicio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - M Ferri-Molina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - P Sáez-Bueno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - M Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - S Arcangeli
- UOC Radioterapia ASST Monza, Università di Milano, Bicocca, Italy
| | - F López-Campos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
| | - F Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Pozuelo, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Europea de Madrid (UEM), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Allen AJ, Labella DA, Kowalchuk RO, Waters MR, Kersh CR. Effect of histology on stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer oligometastatic pulmonary lesions. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2023; 12:66-78. [PMID: 36762063 PMCID: PMC9903091 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-22-538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is commonly used to provide targeted treatment to metastatic lung disease. Investigation is needed to understand the influence of histology on treatment outcomes. We report how tumor histology affects local control (LC) in a cohort of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving SBRT for oligometastatic and recurrent pulmonary lesions. Methods Patients who received SBRT to recurrent or oligometastatic NSCLC pulmonary lesions from 2015-2019 at our institution were included in this retrospective cohort study. Minimum follow-up was 2 months. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis was performed to assess local progression-free survival (LPFS). Local failure cumulative incidence curves using death as a competing risk factor were also generated. Results A total of 147 treated lesions from 83 patients were included: 95 lesions from 51 patients with lung adenocarcinoma and 52 lesions from 32 patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC). Median follow-up was 23 [interquartile range (IQR): 9.5-44.5] months for adenocarcinoma, and 11.5 (6-32.25) months for SqCC. Two-year LC was 89% for adenocarcinoma and 77% for SqCC (P=0.04). Median overall survival (OS) was 24.5 (10-46.25) months for adenocarcinoma and 14.5 (7.75-23.25) months for SqCC. Adenocarcinoma had improved LPFS over SqCC (P=0.014). SqCC was associated with increased local failure risk that approached statistical significance (P=0.061) with death as a competing risk. Overall toxicity incidence was 8.2% with no G3+ toxicities. Conclusions For SBRT-treated oligometastatic or recurrent NSCLC pulmonary lesions, adenocarcinoma histology is associated with improved 2-year LC and LPFS compared to SqCC and reduced incidence of local recurrence (LR) with death as a competing risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J. Allen
- Chesapeake Regional, Riverside & University of Virginia Radiosurgery Center, Riverside Regional Medical Center, Newport News, VA, USA
| | - Dominic A. Labella
- Chesapeake Regional, Riverside & University of Virginia Radiosurgery Center, Riverside Regional Medical Center, Newport News, VA, USA
| | | | - Michael R. Waters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Charles R. Kersh
- Chesapeake Regional, Riverside & University of Virginia Radiosurgery Center, Riverside Regional Medical Center, Newport News, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Le Guevelou J, Sargos P, Siva S, Ploussard G, Ost P, Gillessen S, Zilli T. The Emerging Role of Extracranial Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:114-124. [PMID: 36151031 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Although the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been revolutionized by the advent of new systemic agents, still few patients experience a long-term durable response. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is nowadays commonly used as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), but limited data exist on how best to implement this strategy as part of a multimodal approach. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the potential role of extracranial SABR in mRCC and to identify future therapeutic developments of SABR in different disease settings. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review was conducted in May 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement on the PubMed database. Thirty-four studies were selected for inclusion in this systematic review. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS SABR has been used with four main goals: (1) eradication of the whole metastatic burden in synchronous and metachronous oligometastatic patients, resulting in a long-term local control (LC) rate of >90% and median progression-free survival (PFS) ranging between 8 and 15 mo; (2) eradication of oligoprogressive lesions, enabling an extension of the duration of the systemic therapy by approximately 9 mo; (3) improvement of the response to systemic therapy in polymetastatic patients, resulting in an overall response rate ranging from 17% to 56%; and (4) cytoreduction in polymetastatic mRCC patients, with LC rates ranging between 71% and 100%, and preservation of the renal function, but unclear PFS and overall survival impact. Overall, the combination of SABR and systemic agents has been associated with overall good tolerance, with grade ≥3 toxicity ranging from 0% to 13%. CONCLUSIONS Current data highlight the role of SABR as an emerging MDT treatment option in both oligometastatic and oligoprogressive extracranial mRCC, able to ensure long-term disease control and delay the use of next-line systemic therapies. The use of SABR for cytoreduction in the de novo metastatic disease and as an immunological booster in the polymetastatic setting remains investigational and warrants further investigations. PATIENT SUMMARY Radiotherapy delivered with ablative doses (>6 Gy per fraction) is a promising treatment strategy for patients diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Excellent outcome results have been observed in patients with a limited number of metastases, improving metastasis-free survival by several months. For patients with a few metastases progressing under systemic therapy, radiotherapy allows an extension of the duration of the ongoing therapy by several months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Le Guevelou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Shankar Siva
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Piet Ost
- Iridium Network, Radiation Oncology, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Onal C, Hurmuz P, Guler OC, Yavas G, Tilki B, Oymak E, Yavas C, Ozyigit G. The role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in switching systemic therapy for patients with extracranial oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin Transl Oncol 2022; 24:1533-1541. [PMID: 35119653 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02793-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeting oligometastatic lesions with metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) using stereotactic-body radiotherapy (SBRT) may improve treatment outcomes and postpone the need for second-line systemic therapy (NEST). We looked at the results of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients who had five or fewer lesions and were treated with SBRT. METHODS We examined the treatment outcomes of 70 extracranial metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients treated at two oncology centers between 2011 and 2020. The clinical parameters of patients with and without NEST changes were compared. The prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and NEST-free survival were evaluated. RESULTS Median age was 67 years (range 31-83 years). Lung and bone metastasis were found in 78.4% and 12.6% of patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 21.1 months, median OS was 49.1 months and the median PFS was 18.3 months. Histology was a prognostic factor for OS, BED, and treatment switch for PFS in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, the significant predictor of poor OS was clear cell histology, and a lower BED for PFS. Following SBRT for oligometastatic lesions, 19 patients (27.2%) had a median NEST change of 15.2 months after MDT completion. There were no significant differences in median OS or PFS between patients who had NEST changes and those who did not. No patient experienced grade ≥ 3 acute and late toxicities. CONCLUSIONS The SBRT to oligometastatic sites is an effective and safe treatment option for ≤ 5 metastases in RCC patients by providing favorable survival and delaying NEST change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cem Onal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, 01120, Adana, Turkey.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Pervin Hurmuz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozan Cem Guler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, 01120, Adana, Turkey
| | - Guler Yavas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burak Tilki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ezgi Oymak
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Iskenderun Gelisim Hospital, Hatay, Turkey
| | - Cagdas Yavas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Ozyigit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
[Stereotactic body radiotherapy as "first-line treatment" for oligometastatic renal cell cancer]. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:497-499. [PMID: 35278095 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01920-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
13
|
Vošmik M, Banni MA, Hruška L. The role of radiotherapy in renal cell carcinoma and the potential of its combination with immunotherapy. ONKOLOGIE 2022; 16:16-19. [DOI: 10.36290/xon.2022.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
|
14
|
Antonoff MB, Sofocleous CT, Callstrom MR, Nguyen QN. The roles of surgery, stereotactic radiation, and ablation for treatment of pulmonary metastases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 163:495-502. [PMID: 33838914 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.01.143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mara B Antonoff
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.
| | | | | | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Thoracic Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Regnery S, Buchele C, Weykamp F, Pohl M, Hoegen P, Eichkorn T, Held T, Ristau J, Rippke C, König L, Thomas M, Winter H, Adeberg S, Debus J, Klüter S, Hörner-Rieber J. Adaptive MR-Guided Stereotactic Radiotherapy is Beneficial for Ablative Treatment of Lung Tumors in High-Risk Locations. Front Oncol 2022; 11:757031. [PMID: 35087746 PMCID: PMC8789303 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.757031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the benefit of adaptive magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (MRgSBRT) for treatment of lung tumors in different locations with a focus on ultracentral lung tumors (ULT). PATIENTS & METHODS A prospective cohort of 21 patients with 23 primary and secondary lung tumors was analyzed. Tumors were located peripherally (N = 10), centrally (N = 2) and ultracentrally (N = 11, planning target volume (PTV) overlap with proximal bronchi, esophagus and/or pulmonary artery). All patients received MRgSBRT with gated dose delivery and risk-adapted fractionation. Before each fraction, the baseline plan was recalculated on the anatomy of the day (predicted plan). Plan adaptation was performed in 154/165 fractions (93.3%). Comparison of dose characteristics between predicted and adapted plans employed descriptive statistics and Bayesian linear multilevel models. The posterior distributions resulting from the Bayesian models are presented by the mean together with the corresponding 95% compatibility interval (CI). RESULTS Plan adaptation decreased the proportion of fractions with violated planning objectives from 94% (predicted plans) to 17% (adapted plans). In most cases, inadequate PTV coverage was remedied (predicted: 86%, adapted: 13%), corresponding to a moderate increase of PTV coverage (mean +6.3%, 95% CI: [5.3-7.4%]) and biologically effective PTV doses (BED10) (BEDmin: +9.0 Gy [6.7-11.3 Gy], BEDmean: +1.4 Gy [0.8-2.1 Gy]). This benefit was smaller in larger tumors (-0.1%/10 cm³ PTV [-0.2 to -0.02%/10 cm³ PTV]) and ULT (-2.0% [-3.1 to -0.9%]). Occurrence of exceeded maximum doses inside the PTV (predicted: 21%, adapted: 4%) and violations of OAR constraints (predicted: 12%, adapted: 1%, OR: 0.14 [0.04-0.44]) was effectively reduced. OAR constraint violations almost exclusively occurred if the PTV had touched the corresponding OAR in the baseline plan (18/19, 95%). CONCLUSION Adaptive MRgSBRT is highly recommendable for ablative treatment of lung tumors whose PTV initially contacts a sensitive OAR, such as ULT. Here, plan adaptation protects the OAR while maintaining best-possible PTV coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Moritz Pohl
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonas Ristau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Thomas
- National Center for Tumor diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hauke Winter
- National Center for Tumor diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rodler S, Götz M, Mumm JN, Buchner A, Graser A, Casuscelli J, Stief C, Fürweger C, Muacevic A, Staehler M. Image-Guided Robotic Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Lung Metastases of Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Retrospective, Single Center Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:356. [PMID: 35053519 PMCID: PMC8774253 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Pulmonary metastases are the most frequent site of metastases in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Metastases directed treatment remains an important treatment option despite advances in systemic therapies. However, the safety and efficacy of robotic radiosurgery (RRS) for the treatment of lung metastases of RCC remains unclear. Patients with metastatic RCC and lung metastases treated by RRS were retrospectively analyzed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS) and adverse events. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE; Version 5.0) classification for assessment of adverse events. A total of 50 patients were included in this study. Median age was 64 (range 45-92) years at the time of RRS. Prior to RRS, 20 patients (40.0%) had received either tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immunotherapy and 27 patients (54.0%) were treatment naïve. In our patient cohort, the median PFS was 13 months (range: 2-93). LRFS was 96.7% after two years with only one patient revealing progressive disease of the treated metastases 13 months after RRS. Median OS was 35 months (range 2-94). Adverse events were documented in six patients (12%) and were limited to grade 2. Fatigue (n = 4) and pneumonitis (n = 2) were observed within 3 months after RRS. In conclusion, RRS is safe and effective for patients with metastatic RCC and pulmonary metastases. Radiation induced pneumonitis is specific in the treatment of pulmonary lesions, but not clinically relevant and survival rates seem favorable in this highly selected patient cohort. Future directions are the implementation of RRS in multimodal treatment approaches for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Severin Rodler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Melanie Götz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Jan-Niclas Mumm
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Annabel Graser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Jozefina Casuscelli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| | | | | | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.G.); (J.-N.M.); (A.B.); (A.G.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy and its integration with systemic therapies in metastatic kidney cancer: a multicenter study on behalf of the AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) genitourinary study group. Clin Exp Metastasis 2021; 38:527-537. [PMID: 34748125 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-021-10131-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Although systemic therapy represents the standard of care for polymetastatic kidney cancer, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may play a relevant role in the oligometastatic setting. We conducted a multicenter study including oligometastatic kidney cancer treated with SBRT. We retrospectively analyzed 207 patients who underwent 245 SBRT treatments on 385 lesions, including 165 (42.9%) oligorecurrent (OR) and 220 (57.1%) oligoprogressive (OP) lesions. Most common sites were lung (30.9%) for OR group, and bone (32.7%) for OP group. Among 78 (31.8%) patients receiving concomitant systemic therapy, sunitinib (61.5%) and pazopanib (15.4%) were the most common for OR patients, while sunitinib (49.2%) and nivolumab (20.0%) for OP patients. End points were local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to next systemic therapy (TTNS) and toxicity. Median follow-up was 18.6 months. 1, 2 and 3-year LC rates were 89.4%, 80.1% and 76.6% in OR patients, and 82.7%, 76.9% and 64.3% in those with OP, respectively. LC for OP group was influenced by clear cell histology (p = 0.000), total number of lesions (p = 0.004), systemic therapy during SBRT (p = 0.012), and SBRT dose (p = 0.012). Median PFS was 37.9 months. 1, 2- and 3-year OS was 92.7%, 86.4% and 81.8%, respectively. Median TTNS was 15.8 months for OR patients, and 13.9 months for OP patients. No grade 3 or higher toxicities were reported for both groups. SBRT may be considered an effective safe option in the multidisciplinary management of both OR and OP metastases from kidney cancer.
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
A significant proportion of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients present with oligometastatic disease. Retrospective and limited prospective data suggests that a subgroup of patients with oligometastatic mRCC benefits from aggressive local therapy. With the emerging data of high local control efficacy with low toxicity of stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) for both CNS and extra-cranial mRCC, SAbR may play a critical role in the multi-modality management of mRCC patients with oligometastatic disease. In addition to local control benefit, the benefit of SAbR in this patient population can range from longitudinal disease control, maintaining quality of life, deferring systemic therapy, immune-modulation and even improving survival. A review of the retrospective data suggests that SAbR benefits oligometastatic mRCC patients with metachronous metastases, and perhaps those with indolent biology. Large prospective trials are indicated to successfully integrate SAbR of oligometastatic mRCC with the available systemic therapies to harness the optimal benefit of SAbR for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean All
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas at Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Aurelie Garant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas at Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas at Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Seitlinger J, Prieto M, Siat J, Renaud S. Pulmonary metastasectomy in renal cell carcinoma: a mainstay of multidisciplinary treatment. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:2636-2642. [PMID: 34012612 PMCID: PMC8107562 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2019-pm-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains a public health issue and seems to be increasing. A significant proportion of RCC patients will develop pulmonary metastasis at some point in their evolution. In this review, we aimed to update the surgical management of pulmonary metastases as well as systemic therapy, including targeted therapies, according to recent data in the literature. We retrospectively reviewed studies evaluating the benefit of pulmonary metastasectomy in RCC patients and evaluating the place of different chemotherapies, targeted therapies and immunotherapies through November 1, 2019. Several retrospective studies have shown the benefit of pulmonary metastasectomy in metastatic RCC (mRCC), most in a situation with only pulmonary metastases. According to the prognostic criteria of the IMDC risk model, the patient is classified into a prognostic group to identify the best systemic treatment. With the development of targeted therapies, the modalities are multiple and may involve tyrosine kinase inhibitors/checkpoint inhibitors and soon vaccine therapy or CAR-T cells. At the local level, in patients who cannot benefit from surgery, stereotactic radiotherapy or radiofrequency has a place to be considered. Although there is a lack of a randomized study, pulmonary metastasectomy appears to be feasible and effective. The place and modalities of systemic therapies in the era of targeted therapies remain to be more clearly defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Seitlinger
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nancy Regional University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - Mathilde Prieto
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nancy Regional University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - Joelle Siat
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nancy Regional University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - Stéphane Renaud
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nancy Regional University Hospital, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liu Y, Zhang Z, Han H, Guo S, Liu Z, Liu M, Zhou F, Dong P, He L. Survival After Combining Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:607595. [PMID: 33692951 PMCID: PMC7937906 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.607595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, but data on combining these two modalities are scarce. We aimed to investigate the survival outcomes of SBRT plus TKIs. Methods Data of patients treated with TKIs from December 2007 to June 2019 were collected. Patients received SBRT plus TKIs (TKI + SBRT group) or TKIs alone (TKI alone group). Local control (LC), time to change of systemic therapy (TTS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Results A total of 190 patients were included, and 85 patients received TKI + SBRT. The 2-year LC rate was 92.8%. The median OS in the TKI + SBRT group was significantly longer than that of the TKI alone group (63.2 vs 29.8 months; P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, IMDC intermediate (HR 1.96; 95% CI 1.10-3.48; P = 0.022) and poor risk (HR 2.43; 95% CI 1.25-4.75; P = 0.009), oligometastasis (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.26-0.65; P < 0.001), and the addition of SBRT (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.31-0.75; P = 0.001) were prognostic factors for OS. Patients with oligometastasis (P = 0.009) and those with IMDC favorable (P = 0.044) or intermediate (P = 0.002) risk had significantly longer OS with TKI + SBRT. The median TTS were 21.5, 6.4, and 9.0 months in patients receiving SBRT before first-line TKI failure, SBRT after first-line TKI failure, and first-line TKI alone (P < 0.001). Five patients (5.9%) experienced SBRT-related grade 3 toxicities. Conclusions Combining SBRT with TKIs is tolerable and associated with longer OS in selected patients, such as those with oligometastasis and favorable or intermediate risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuowei Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mengzhong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liru He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kroeze SGC, Fritz C, Schaule J, Siva S, Kahl KH, Sundahl N, Blanck O, Kaul D, Adebahr S, Verhoeff JJC, Skazikis G, Roeder F, Geier M, Eckert F, Guckenberger M. Stereotactic radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy or targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2020; 127:703-711. [PMID: 33113260 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) concurrently receiving targeted therapy (TT) or immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data on patients with mRCC were extracted from a retrospective international multicentre register study (TOaSTT), investigating SRT concurrent (≤30 days) with TT/immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local metastasis control (LC) and time to systemic therapy switch were analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank testing. Clinical and treatment factors influencing survival were analysed using multivariate Cox regression. Acute and late SRT-induced toxicity were defined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.03. RESULTS Fifty-three patients who underwent 128 sessions of SRT were included, of whom 58% presented with oligometastatic disease (OMD). ICIs and TT were received by 32% and 68% of patients, respectively. Twenty patients (37%) paused TT for a median (range) of 14 (2-21) days. ICI therapy was not paused in any patient. A median (range) of 1 (1-5) metastatic tumour was treated per patient, with a median (range) SRT dose of 65 (40-129.4) Gy (biologically effective dose). The OS, LC and PFS rates at 1 year were 71%, 75% and 25%, respectively. The median OS and PFS were not significantly different among patients receiving TT vs those receiving ICIs (P = 0.329). New lesions were treated with a repeat radiotherapy course in 46% of patients. After 1 year, 62% of patients remained on the same systemic therapy as at the time of SRT; this was more frequent for ICI therapy compared to TT (83% vs 36%; P = 0.035). OMD was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.004, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.035-0.528) and PFS (P = 0.004; 95% CI 0.165-0.717) in multivariate analysis. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) was the other independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.001, 95% CI 0.001-0.351). Acute grade 3 toxicity was observed in two patients, and late grade 3 toxicity in one patient. No grade 4 or 5 toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION Combined treatment with TT or immunotherapy and concurrent SRT was safe, without signals of increased severe toxicity. As we observed no signal of excess toxicity, full-dose SRT should be considered to achieve optimal metastasis control in patients receiving TT or immunotherapy. Favourable PFS and OS were observed for patients with oligometastatic RCC with a good ECOG-PS, which should form the basis for prospective testing of this treatment strategy in properly designed clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Corinna Fritz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jana Schaule
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Klaus H Kahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Nora Sundahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department or Radiation Oncology, Charité-University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sonja Adebahr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Joost J C Verhoeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Georgios Skazikis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Schwarzwald-Baar Klinikum, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
| | - Falk Roeder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Geier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Franziska Eckert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chai G, Yin Y, Zhou X, Hu Q, Lv B, Li Z, Shi M, Zhao L. Pulmonary oligometastases treated by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): a single institution's experience. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2020; 9:1496-1506. [PMID: 32953521 PMCID: PMC7481615 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background To investigate the effect of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on pulmonary oligometastases and to analyze the clinical factors and dose parameters affecting local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods This study retrospectively enrolled a total of 84 patients (148 lesions) treated in our department from May 2015 to November 2018. Pulmonary oligometastases was defined as up to 5 metastatic lesions in the lung and with both the primary tumor and any extra-thoracic metastases being controlled. Patients receiving a BED10 (biological effective dose, α/β =10) of SBRT ≥75 Gy and a dose/fraction ≥4 Gy were enrolled. The patient group consisted of 52 men (61.9%) and 32 women (38.1%), with a median age 56 years (range, 29-80 years). Median tumor diameter was 1.71cm (range, 1.2-5.0 cm). The BED10 was 75-119 Gy in 4-15 fractions. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed on factors predicting the outcomes. Results All patients completed the treatment as planned, and the median follow-up time was 20.3 months. The median OS for the entire group was 34.3 months, with an actuarial 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year OS of 74.7%, 59.4%, 49.7%, and 36.8%, respectively. Among the 148 lesions in the whole group, 19 (12.8%) lesions had local recurrence (LR). The median LRFS time for all patients was 56.9 months. The LRFS rate was 93.6%, 83.5%, 81.4%, and 76.6% at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, respectively. No patient developed acute grade 3 or 4 toxicity. On univariate analysis, age ≥63 years old, primary site of colorectal cancer, BED10 <85.2 Gy, pathological type of adenocarcinoma, planning target volume (PTV) min BED10 <76.6 Gy, and gross tumor volume (GTV) ≥8.8 cc, were significantly associated with poorer LRFS. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥63 years old, primary site of colorectal cancer, and PTV min BED10 <76.6 Gy were significant risk factors affecting LRFS. Conclusions SBRT is feasible for pulmonary oligometastasis with favorable local control and minimal toxicity. Multiple dose parameters, instead of a prescription dose only, in combination with clinical parameters, should be considered for optimal local control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangjin Chai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Yutian Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xiaoying Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Qilong Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Bo Lv
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zhaohui Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Mei Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Lina Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
The Reintroduction of Radiotherapy Into the Integrated Management of Kidney Cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 26:448-459. [PMID: 32947313 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been increasing, with a moderate subgroup of individuals who later develop metastatic disease. Historically, metastatic RCC has been managed with systemic therapy because RCC was believed to be radioresistant. Local therapies, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, also known as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, which utilize focused high-dose-rate radiation delivered over a limited number of treatments, have been successful in controlling local disease and, in some cases, extending survival in patients with intracranial and extracranial metastatic RCC. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is highly effective in treating intact disease when patients are not surgical candidates. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is well tolerated when used in conjunction with systemic therapy such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. These successes have prompted investigators to evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy in novel settings such as neoadjuvant treatment of advanced RCC with tumor thrombus and oligometastatic/oligoprogressive disease states.
Collapse
|
24
|
Yamamoto T, Niibe Y, Yamada K, Aoki M, Onishi H, Katsui K, Dekura Y, Nishikawa A, Manabe Y, Yamashita H, Jingu K. Significant reduction of oncologic pulmonary death by local control for pulmonary oligometastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2020; 147:86-91. [PMID: 32247205 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The rate of oncologic pulmonary death after stereotactic body radiotherapy for pulmonary oligometastases has never been reported. The purpose of current study was to investigate the rate of freedom from oncologic pulmonary death (FOPD) and to analyze factors affecting for FOPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS The inclusion criteria for this retrospective study were that SBRT was performed between 2004 and 2015, the number of metastases was 5 or less, the primary lesion and extrathoracic metastases needed to be controlled before SBRT and a biological effective dose (BED10) of 75 Gy or more was needed. The Kaplan-Meier estimator and the log-rank test were used to calculate and compare the stratified rates of FOPD. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analyses (MVA). Primary disease death from a non-oncologic pulmonary cause was censored in model 1 and was excluded in model 2. RESULTS A total of 1172 patients with 1315 tumors were enrolled. During a median follow-up period of 24.5 months, oncologic pulmonary deaths accounted for 101 of 221 primary disease deaths. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year FOPD rates in model 1 were 98.2%, 89.4% and 84.0%, respectively. MVA for FOPD revealed that local failure of the irradiated tumor, squamous cell carcinoma pathology, and chemotherapy after SBRT had significant relationships with lower FOPD rates in both model 1 and model 2. CONCLUSIONS Successful local control of pulmonary oligometastases by SBRT contributed to a higher FOPD rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaya Yamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
| | - Yuzuru Niibe
- Department of Radiology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Primary Care and Medical Education, Okayama University, Japan
| | - Kazunari Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Masahiko Aoki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University, Japan
| | | | - Kuniaki Katsui
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, Okayama University, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Dekura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keiyu-kai Sapporo Hospital, Japan
| | - Atsushi Nishikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shikoku Cancer Center, Ehime, Japan
| | | | | | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Singh R, Ansinelli H, Sharma D, Jenkins J, Davis J, Sharma S, Vargo JA. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A multi-institutional experience. JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT 2020; 7:29-37. [PMID: 32802576 PMCID: PMC7406342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: Examine local control(LC), overall survival(OS), and toxicity following stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT) for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma(mRCC). Methods: A multi-institutional registry was queried. Potential predictive factors of LC and OS were evaluated with a Cox-proportional hazards model for multivariate analysis(MVA). Results: We identified 115 mRCC patients with 181 lesions. Median biologically effective dose (BED7) was 72.9 Gy7 (range: 42.9-231.4 Gy7) with a median dose/fraction of 10 Gy (range: 5-24 Gy). Utilizing both Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) and presence of osseous metastatic disease as prognostic indicators, estimated 2-year OS rates were 67.7% (95% CI: 49.9-89.5%), 31.8% (95% CI: 19.0-45.3%), and 20% (95% CI: 1.4-54.7%; p=0.0012). One- and 2-year LC rates were 88.2% and 82.7%, respectively, with no prognostic factors identified. Roughly 13% of patients reported toxicities with one Grade 3-5 toxicity. Conclusion: SBRT was well-tolerated with promising LC. Both KPS and osseous metastatic disease should be considered in determining which patients with mRCC may preferentially benefit from SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raj Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV 25701, USA
- The Radiosurgery Society, Sunnyvale, CA 94402, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Mary's Medical Center, Huntington, WV 25701, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Hayden Ansinelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719, USA
| | - Dana Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV 25701, USA
| | - Jan Jenkins
- The Radiosurgery Society, Sunnyvale, CA 94402, USA
| | - Joanne Davis
- The Radiosurgery Society, Sunnyvale, CA 94402, USA
| | - Sanjeev Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV 25701, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Mary's Medical Center, Huntington, WV 25701, USA
| | - John Austin Vargo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Agolli L. Stereotactic body radiation therapy could improve disease control in oligometastatic patients with renal cell carcinoma: do we need more evidence? ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:S105. [PMID: 31576312 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.05.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Agolli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Buti S, Bersanelli M, Viansone A, Leonetti A, Masini C, Ratta R, Procopio G, Maines F, Iacovelli R, Ciccarese C, Vitale MG, De Giorgi U, Mucciarini C, Maruzzo M, Prati G, Lattanzi E, Ciammella P, Bruni A, Andreani S, D'Abbiero N. Treatment Outcome of metastatic lesions from renal cell carcinoma underGoing Extra-cranial stereotactic body radioTHERapy: The together retrospective study. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2019; 22:100161. [PMID: 31677494 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2019.100161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2019] [Revised: 08/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) use has increased overtime for the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients, with a likely good control of irradiated lesions. We planned a retrospective multicenter Italian study, with the aim of investigating the outcome of treatment with SBRT for non-brain secondary lesions in mRCC patients. METHODS all consecutive metastatic non-brain lesions from mRCC that underwent SBRT at nine Italian institutions from January 2015 to June 2017 were considered. The primary endpoint of the study was the lesion-PFS, calculated from SBRT initiation to the local progression of the irradiated lesion. RESULTS 57 extracranial metastatic lesions from 48 patients with primary mRCC were treated with SBRT. At the median follow-up of 26.4 months, the median lesion-PFS was not reached (43 censored); 72.4% of lesions were progression-free at 40 months, with significantly better lesion-PFS for small metastatic lesions (<14 mm). SBRT was safe and the 1-year local disease control was 87.7%. After SBRT, 18 patients (37.5%) permanently interrupted systemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS consistently with the previous literature, our findings support the use of SBRT in selected mRCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Buti
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Melissa Bersanelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy; Medicine and Surgery Department, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
| | | | | | - Cristina Masini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Centre, AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Raffaele Ratta
- SS Oncologia Genitourinaria Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- SS Oncologia Genitourinaria Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Francesca Maines
- Medical Oncology Department, Santa Chiara Hospital, Largo Medaglie d'Oro, Trento, Italy
| | - Roberto Iacovelli
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Chiara Ciccarese
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Giuseppa Vitale
- Department of Oncology and Haematology and Respiratory Disease, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Claudia Mucciarini
- Medical Oncology Department, Ramazzini Hospital - AUSL Modena, Carpi, Italy
| | - Marco Maruzzo
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Prati
- Day Hospital Oncology, Ospedale Civile di Guastalla, Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiotherapy Unit, Clinical Cancer Centre, AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Alessio Bruni
- Radiation Oncology Unit,University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rühle A, Andratschke N, Siva S, Guckenberger M. Is there a role for stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma? Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 18:104-112. [PMID: 31341985 PMCID: PMC6630187 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has traditionally been regarded as radioresistant tumor based on preclinical data and negative clinical trials using conventional fractionated radiotherapy. However, there is emerging evidence that radiotherapy delivered in few fractions with high single-fraction and total doses may overcome RCC s radioresistance. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has been successfully used in the treatment of intra- and extracranial RCC metastases showing high local control rates accompanied by low toxicity. Although surgery is standard of care for non-metastasized RCC, a significant number of patients is medically inoperable or refuse surgery. Alternative local approaches such as radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation are invasive and often restricted to small RCC, so that there is a need for alternative local therapies such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Recently, both retrospective and prospective trials demonstrated that SBRT is an attractive treatment alternative for localized RCC. Here, we present a comprehensive review of the published data regarding SBRT for primary RCC. The radiobiological rationale to use higher radiation doses in few fractions is discussed, and technical aspects enabling the safe delivery of SBRT despite intra- and inter-fraction motion and the proximity to organs at risk are outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
[Relevance of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with systemic metastasis]. Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 195:943-944. [PMID: 31410510 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01505-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
30
|
Buti S, Leonetti A, Lattanzi E, D’Abbiero N, Bersanelli M. Role of stereotactic body radiation therapy for the management of renal cell carcinoma: tailoring treatment in the era of the "embarrassment of riches". ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:S106. [PMID: 31576313 PMCID: PMC6685901 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.05.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Buti
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Melissa Bersanelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
- Medicine and Surgery Department, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Funayama S, Onishi H, Kuriyama K, Komiyama T, Marino K, Araya M, Saito R, Aoki S, Maehata Y, Nonaka H, Tominaga L, Muramatsu J, Nakagomi H, Kamiyama M, Takeda M. Renal Cancer is Not Radioresistant: Slowly but Continuing Shrinkage of the Tumor After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2019; 18:1533033818822329. [PMID: 30803362 PMCID: PMC6373992 DOI: 10.1177/1533033818822329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary lesion of renal cell carcinoma with long-term and regular follow-up of tumor size and renal function. Methods: This prospective study included 13 patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary lesion of stage I renal cell carcinoma between August 2007 and June 2016 in our institution. Diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma was made by 2 radiologists using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. A dosage of 60 Gy in 10 fractions or 70 Gy in 10 fractions was prescribed. The higher dose was selected if dose constraints were satisfied. Tumor response on imaging examination, local progression-free rate, overall survival, and toxicity were assessed. Results: The mean follow-up period was 48.3 months (range: 11-108 months). The tumors showed very slow but continuous response during long-term follow-up. Three cases (23.1%) showed transient progression during the short follow-up. The mean duration until the day on which partial response was confirmed among the partial or complete response cases was 22.6 months (95% confidence interval, 15.3-30.0 months). Local progression-free rate was 92.3% for 3 years and overall survival rate 91.7% for 2 years and 71.3% for 3 years. Twelve cases (92.3%) had impaired renal function at baseline. Renal function decreased slowly and mildly in most of the cases, but 2 cases of solitary kidney showed grade 4 or 5 renal dysfunction. Conclusion: All renal tumors decreased in size slowly but continuously for years after stereotactic body radiation therapy. Renal cancer can be treated radically with stereotactic body radiation therapy as a radiosensitive tumor, but careful attention should be given in cases with solitary kidney.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Funayama
- 1 Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Onishi
- 1 Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Kengo Kuriyama
- 2 Department of Radiology, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takafumi Komiyama
- 1 Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Kan Marino
- 1 Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Masayuki Araya
- 3 Department of Radiology, Center of Proton Therapy, Aizawa Hospital, Nagano, Japan
| | - Ryo Saito
- 1 Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Shinichi Aoki
- 1 Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Yoshiyasu Maehata
- 1 Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Hotaka Nonaka
- 4 Department of Radiology, Fujiyoshida Municipal Medical Center, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Licht Tominaga
- 5 Department of Radiology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Juria Muramatsu
- 1 Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Nakagomi
- 6 Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Manabu Kamiyama
- 6 Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Masayuki Takeda
- 6 Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Satyanarayan A, Mooney R, Bhanvadia RR, Iyengar P, Margulis V, Desai NB, Bagrodia A. Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SAbR) in the Setting of Metastatic Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor of Testis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17:e768-e771. [PMID: 31109801 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Revised: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Arthi Satyanarayan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Ryan Mooney
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Raj R Bhanvadia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Puneeth Iyengar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Neil B Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mohindra P, Sawant A, Griffin RJ, Lamichhane N, Vlashi E, Xu‐Welliver M, Dominello M, Joiner MC, Burmeister J. Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: I would treat all early-stage NSCLC patients with SBRT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:7-13. [PMID: 30793828 PMCID: PMC6414141 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pranshu Mohindra
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Amit Sawant
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Robert J. Griffin
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesLittle RockARUSA
| | - Narottam Lamichhane
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Erina Vlashi
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of California‐Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Meng Xu‐Welliver
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe James Cancer CenterOhio State UniversityColumbusOHUSA
| | - Michael Dominello
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
| | - Michael C. Joiner
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
| | - Jay Burmeister
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
- Gershenson Radiation Oncology CenterBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMIUSA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Freifeld Y, Margulis V, Woldu SL, Timmerman R, Brugarolas J, Hannan R. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma with Inferior Vena Cava Thrombus – Initial Experience Report and Literature Review. KIDNEY CANCER 2019. [DOI: 10.3233/kca-180044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yuval Freifeld
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Solomon L. Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - James Brugarolas
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
New developments in cross-sectional imaging, including contrast-enhanced ultrasound, dual-energy computed tomography, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography, and positron emission tomography, together with novel application of existing and novel radiotracers, have changed the landscape of renal mass characterization (ie, virtual biopsy) as well as the detection of metastatic disease, prognostication, and response assessment in patients with advanced kidney cancer. A host of imaging response criteria have been developed to characterize the response to targeted and immune therapies and correlate with patient outcomes, each with strengths and limitations. Recent efforts to advance the field are aimed at increasing objectivity with quantitative techniques and the use of banks of imaging data to match the vast genomic data that are becoming available. The emerging field of radiogenomics has the potential to transform further the role of imaging in kidney cancer management through eventual noninvasive characterization of the tumor histology and genetic microenvironment in single renal masses and/or metastatic disease. We review of the effect of currently available imaging techniques in the management of patients with kidney cancer, including localized, locally advanced, and metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine M. Krajewski
- Katherine M. Krajewski, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and Ivan Pedrosa, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- Katherine M. Krajewski, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and Ivan Pedrosa, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung oligometastases impacts on systemic treatment-free survival: a cohort study. Med Oncol 2018; 35:121. [PMID: 30076479 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-018-1190-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
To analyze the impact of SBRT on systemic treatment-free survival in patients affected by lung oligometastases. Inclusion criteria of the study were (a) KPS > 70, (b) 1-5 lung oligometastases underwent SBRT with a BED ≥ 100 Gy, (c) absence of extra-thoracic disease, (d) controlled primary tumor, (e) metachronous oligorecurrences for whom SBRT was adopted as primary treatment option, (f) oligoprogressive lung metastases who progressed following a disease remission after a first-line therapy, (g) oligopersistent disease after systemic therapy, and (h) at least 6 months of follow-up post-SBRT. Primary study endpoint was the systemic treatment-free survival for each group, whereas distant progression-free survival (DPFS), local failure-free survival (LFFS), and overall survival (OS) were the secondary endpoints. Seventy-eight patients and 114 lung metastases were analyzed. Of these, 32 patients were treated with SBRT in the oligorecurrence group, whereas the remaining patients underwent SBRT for oligoprogressive disease (n = 35) oligopersistent disease (n = 11). In the whole cohort of patients, the median systemic treatment-free survival was 16 months (3-46 months), the median LFFS was 18 months (12-46 months), the median DPFS was 14 months (3-43 months), and the median OS was 19.6 months (12-47 months). Oligorecurrence group had better clinical outcomes in terms of systemic treatment-free survival (log-rank test p = 0.0035) and DPFS (log-rank test p = 0.0017) compared to the other groups. In the present experience, SBRT allowed to delay the administration of systemic treatments in several settings of lung oligometastasis.
Collapse
|
37
|
Maund I, Bowzyk Al-Naeeb A, Welsh SJ, Eisen T, Fife K. Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy is a Well-Tolerated and Effective Treatment for the Long-Term Control of Intra-Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Oligometastatic Renal Cell Cancer. KIDNEY CANCER 2018. [DOI: 10.3233/kca-170025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Maund
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Sarah J. Welsh
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tim Eisen
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kate Fife
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Overall survival after stereotactic radiotherapy or surgical metastasectomy in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated at two Swedish centres 2005–2014. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127:501-506. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Revised: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
39
|
Klement R, Hoerner-Rieber J, Adebahr S, Andratschke N, Blanck O, Boda-Heggemann J, Duma M, Eble M, Eich H, Flentje M, Gerum S, Hass P, Henkenberens C, Hildebrandt G, Imhoff D, Kahl K, Klass N, Krempien R, Lohaus F, Petersen C, Schrade E, Wendt T, Wittig A, Guckenberger M. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for multiple pulmonary oligometastases: Analysis of number and timing of repeat SBRT as impact factors on treatment safety and efficacy. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127:246-252. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Revised: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
40
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has a propensity to metastasize to the chest, with the lungs being the most common distant metastatic site. The histologic subtype of RCC has implications for prognosis. CONCLUSION Significant advances have been made in the management of metastatic RCC, both in systemic and locoregional therapies. The aim of this article is to review appearances of intrathoracic metastases from RCC and to discuss treatment considerations.
Collapse
|