Lung volume reduction followed by lung transplantation-considerations on selection criteria and outcome

[Lung Volume Reduction Surgery - an Alternative or a Bridge to Transplantation]

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and lung transplantation (LuTX) are established therapeutic options for patients with advanced pulmonary emphysema. This review analyses both procedures with respect to indications, surgical techniques, outcomes, and complications. Special attention is given to the controversial sequential application as a bridge to transplantation. Evidence shows that both procedures can significantly improve lung function, quality of life, and survival when patients are carefully selected. Despite some overlap in indication criteria, most patients qualify for only one of the procedures as based on their specific clinical constellation. Recent research has challenged traditional contraindications such as pulmonary hypertension or homogeneous emphysema, and consequently, the indication spectrum for LVRS has been expanded. Contrary to earlier assumptions, current multicentre studies demonstrate that prior LVRS has no negative impact on subsequent transplantation outcomes, provided minimally invasive surgical techniques and modern perioperative management are employed. LVRS can delay the need for transplantation, which is a significant advantage given the shortage of donor organs. The key to success lies in interdisciplinary evaluation and personalized treatment planning. Both procedures should be understood as complementary rather than competing options. Future research should focus on predictive biomarkers, optimal timing, and combined patient-centred endpoints.

Bilateral lung volume reduction surgery outperforms the unilateral approach in functional improvement

OBJECTIVES

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is an established treatment approach for patients with severe pulmonary emphysema, enhancing lung function and quality of life in selected patients. Functional benefits and outcomes after uni- versus bilateral lung volume reduction remain a topic of debate.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing LVRS from January 2018 to October 2022 was conducted. After encouraging initial results, the standard unilateral LVRS approach was switched to bilateral. The goal of this study was to assess the impact on functional outcomes at 3 and 6 months post-surgery compared to preoperative levels for the uni- versus the bilateral approach.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were included (43 bilateral, 40 unilateral). Baseline demographic and functional parameters were comparable between groups. The most common complication was prolonged air leak in 19 patients (11 in the unilateral group, 8 in the bilateral group). Two patients died perioperatively (2.4%). Overall, LVRS improved forced expiratory volume in 1 s by 8.3% after 3 and 12.5% after 6 months postoperatively compared to baseline. Bilateral surgery presented significantly superior forced expiratory volume in 1 s improvement than unilateral approach at both 3 (29.2% versus 2.9%; P = 0.0010) and 6 months (21.5% versus 3%; P = 0.0310) postoperatively. Additionally, it reduced hyperinflation (residual volume) by 23.1% after 3 months and by 17.5% after 6 months, compared to reductions of 16% and 9.1% in the unilateral group.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral approach resulted in better functional outcomes 3 and 6 months postoperatively compared to unilateral surgery.

Concomitant Heart and Lung Surgery During Lung Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

There is limited data concerning concomitant cardiac and lung surgery outcomes during lung transplantation (LTx). While some evidence suggests that cardiac surgery during LTx has no significant impact on surgical outcomes, scarce data examines the role of concomitant lung surgery (CLS). This study compares the survival outcomes of concomitant cardiac and lung surgeries during LTx.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all single and double LTx patients from March 2012 to June 2023 at a single center was performed (n = 1099). Patients were stratified into three concomitant surgical groups: concomitant cardiac surgery (CCS), CLS, and no concomitant surgeries. Groups were compared on recipient demographics, diagnosis, and surgical intervention using analysis of variance and chi-square tests. Survival (5 y) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and univariable Cox proportional hazard model where P value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

In total, 1099 patients were analyzed in this study; 965 had no concomitant surgery, 100 had CCS (mode: coronary artery bypass grafting, n = 75), and 34 had CLS (mode: lung volume reduction surgery, n = 14). Between the three surgical groups, there was no significant difference in body mass index (P = 0.091), total ischemic time (P = 0.194), induction (P = 0.140), or cause of death (P = 0.240). Lung allocation score and length of stay were significantly higher in the concomitant surgical groups, especially the CLS group when compared to the no concomitant surgery group (P = 0.002, P = 004). Patients with no concomitant surgery had a higher incidence of single LTx and off-pump utilization than concomitant surgical groups (P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests found no significant difference in survival between groups (P = 0.849). This result is supported by Cox proportional hazard model with no significant difference in mortality risk between the CCS group (P = 0.522) and CLS group (P = 0.936) compared to no concomitant surgery during LTx.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides promising data indicating that individuals undergoing concomitant heart or lung surgery during LTx have similar survival outcomes to those exclusively undergoing LTx. These results highlight the potential advantages of utilizing LTx to address concurrent thoracic surgical needs, such as coronary revascularization. This holds implications for optimizing patient care and decision-making when complex thoracic interventions are necessary.

Developing Interventions for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an incurable, progressive respiratory disease that may have a significant negative impact on the morbidity and mortality of affected patients. A substantial portion of the world's population is affected by COPD, and despite optimal medical management with medications, supplemental oxygen, and pulmonary rehabilitation, many patients are left debilitated because of this disease. Bronchoscopic treatment modalities offer a less-invasive method for the treatment of refractory COPD compared to surgical interventions and have expanded the potential therapeutic options for these patients. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction is aimed at decreasing the hyperinflation and air trapping that occur in emphysema, and the most studied and successful intervention is endobronchial valve placement. Endobronchial coils, polymeric sealants, and thermal ablation are other researched alternatives. Additional interventional procedures are being investigated for the treatment of the mucus hypersecretion and cough that are associated with the chronic bronchitis phenotype of COPD and include targeted lung denervation, metered dose spray cryotherapy, deobstruction balloon, and bronchial rheoplasty. This review summarizes the most recent evidence pertaining to available therapies for the management of COPD, including chronic bronchitis, with a particular focus on bronchoscopic interventions.

Surgical and Interventional Approaches in COPD

Many patients suffer from complaints of dyspnea, cough, and sputum production, clinical symptoms that hallmark the structural abnormalities that are present in patients with COPD. Although pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic medical therapies help reduce these symptoms, many of these symptoms, especially dyspnea, remain unchecked and contribute to the burden of disease in patients with COPD. Over the last 3 decades, several surgical and interventional treatments delivered via a bronchoscopic approach have been developed to complement medical therapies and show promise to improve patient outcomes. Surgical and interventional treatments target structural abnormalities of the airway and lung parenchyma that can be identified with a combination of imaging and physiological testing, factors that are key to select patients most likely to benefit from these treatments. This paper reviews surgical and bronchoscopic interventional treatment options for patients with emphysema and airways disorders.

[Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema]

We summarized the available data on therapeutic, surgical and endoscopic treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema that may be used like a bridge to lung transplantation. Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema is expensive. Certain limitations in lung transplantation make to create new methods of treatment of severe emphysema. However, one should be ready for possible complications and carefully select patients for certain treatment to avoid false negative results. Reducing costs or developing cheaper treatments is important for the future and availability of care. The risks and complications associated with surgical treatment of emphysema can make endoscopic surgery preferable for these patients, and this undoubtedly requires further research.

Knowledge and awareness of chronic bronchitis and its oral manifestation among dental students and practitioners

Chronic bronchitis (CB) is an inflammatory disease and is characterized by bronchial tube irritation. The bronchial tube irritation can result in the accumulation of mucus. CB is a part of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, causing blockage of airflow and thereby problems in breathing. Cigarette smoking is of utmost importance in causing CB. Besides pollution of air and the working environment can also play a key role. The study aimed to assess and create the awareness about CB among dental students and practitioners. A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted among dental students utilizing an online review entry called "Google forms." A total of 100 people were assessed using a structured questionnaire comprising 15 questions. The analysis of the result was done using the SPSS software of version 23. It has been shown that 78% of them are aware of CB. 75% of them responded that passive smokers were mostly affected by CB. Within the study limits, it was found that males who participated had increased awareness when compared to the females. The survey results showed that most of the participants were aware about CB but not its clinical features, oral manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment.

Lung Volume Reduction Followed by Lung Transplantation in Emphysema-A Multicenter Matched Analysis

Objective: The impact of previous lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) or endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) on lung transplantation (LuTX) remains unclear. This study assesses the risk of previous lung volume reduction on the outcome of a later LuTX.

Methods: Patients suffering from emphysema who underwent bilateral LuTX were included in this multicenter analysis. Study groups were defined as: previous LVRS, previous ELVR, controls. Imbalances were corrected by coarsened exact matching for center, gender, age, diagnosis, and BMI. A comparative analysis of intraoperative characteristics, perioperative outcome and long-term survival was performed.

Results: 615 patients were included (LVRS = 26; ELVR = 60). Compared to controls, LVRS patients had a higher rate of postoperative ECMO (15.4 vs. 3.9%; p = 0.006), whereas ELVR patients suffered more often from wound infections (8.9% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.018). Perioperative outcome, duration of ventilation, ICU stay, and hospital stay were comparable between groups. Bacterial colonization of the airway differed significantly between both LVR groups and controls in pre- and post-LuTX cultures. Survival was not impacted (1-/3-/5-year survival for LVRS: 92.3%/85.7%/77.1%; controls: 91.3%/82.4%/76.3%; p = 0.58 | ELVR: 93.1%/91%/91%; controls 91.2%/81.7%/75.3%; p = 0.17).

Conclusion: Lung volume reduction does not impact short and long-time survival after bilateral LuTX. Due to differences in airway colonization after LVR, caution to prevent infectious complications is warranted.

Simultaneous single lobar lung transplantation and contralateral lung volume reduction

Lung transplantation (LTx) and lung volume reduction surgery are established therapies for end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Although native lung hyperinflation is a well-known complication of unilateral LTx for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the unilateral procedure continues to be performed because of severe shortages of cadaveric donors. As native lung hyperinflation can adversely affect the graft, all possible protection should be provided for patients with one-lobe transplantation. We report an emphysematous juvenile patient who successfully underwent simultaneous living-donor, single-lobe LTx and volume reduction in the contralateral lung.

Analysis of Recent Literature on Lung Volume Reduction Surgery

Publication of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial (NETT) in 2003 established lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) as a viable treatment of select patients with moderate to severe emphysema, and the only intervention since the availability of ambulatory supplemental oxygen to improve survival. Despite these findings, surgical treatment has been underused in part because of concern for high morbidity and mortality. This article reviews recent literature generated since the original NETT publication, focusing on physiologic implications of LVRS, recent data regarding the safety and durability of LVRS, and patient selection and extension of NETT criteria to other patient populations.

Nursing postoperative lung cancer patients using continuous positive airway pressure treatment

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the nursing of postoperative lung cancer patients treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).

METHODS

A total of 64 lung cancer patients in our hospital were recruited as the study cohort and randomly divided into a CPAP group and a control group. The patients in the CPAP group (n=30) were administered CPAP, while those in the control group (n=34) were given routine low flow oxygen inhalation, a respiratory stimulant, a bronchodilator, antibiotics, antitussives, anti-inflammatories (glucocorticoids), an apophlegmatisant (ambroxol), basic nutritional support, correcting acidosis, etc. Results: The patients in the CPAP group showed a more significant improvement in their blood gas analysis, and they also had better airway patency and secretion cleaning effects compared with those in the control group. One month after the treatment, the patients in the CPAP group had significantly less inappetence, weight loss, electrolyte disturbance, dyspnea, and pulmonary encephalopathy than the patients in the control group. One week after the treatment, the patients in the CPAP group had higher maximum ventilatory volumes (MVV), higher maximum mid-expiratory flows (MMF), higher forced expiratory volumes in 1s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), higher peak expiratory flows (PEF), and higher total lung capacity (TLC) than the patients in the control group.

CONCLUSION

CPAP can significantly improve postoperative dyspnea in lung cancer patients.

Lobectomy as lung volume reduction surgery in a patient with previous contralateral bilobectomy

Lung-volume-reduction-surgery is a well-stablished treatment for pulmonary emphysema; however, lobectomy is performed unfrequently in this indication. In a 48-years-old female with COPD stage GOLD IIIC with previous lower bilobectomy due to severe poststenotic pneumonia and multiple ineffective endobronchial-valves placements lower lobe lobectomy as LVRS was performed via anterolateral thoracotomy. FEV1 increased from 0,9l (31%) preoperative to 1,74l (59%) postoperative. This case demonstrates that in well selected patients, lobar resection for emphysema is feasible with good functional outcome even in patients after previous contralateral anatomic resection.

Extracorporeal Shock Waves Increase Markers of Cellular Proliferation in Bronchial Epithelium and in Primary Bronchial Fibroblasts of COPD Patients

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is due to structural changes and narrowing of small airways and parenchymal destruction (loss of the alveolar attachment as a result of pulmonary emphysema), which all lead to airflow limitation. Extracorporeal shock waves (ESW) increase cell proliferation and differentiation of connective tissue fibroblasts. To date no studies are available on ESW treatment of human bronchial fibroblasts and epithelial cells from COPD and control subjects. We obtained primary bronchial fibroblasts from bronchial biopsies of 3 patients with mild/moderate COPD and 3 control smokers with normal lung function. 16HBE cells were also studied. Cells were treated with a piezoelectric shock wave generator at low energy (0.3 mJ/mm², 500 pulses). After treatment, viability was evaluated and cells were recultured and followed up for 4, 24, 48, and 72 h. Cell growth (WST-1 test) was assessed, and proliferation markers were analyzed by qRT-PCR in cell lysates and by ELISA tests in cell supernatants and cell lysates. After ESW treatment, we observed a significant increase of cell proliferation in all cell types. C-Kit (CD117) mRNA was significantly increased in 16HBE cells at 4 h. Protein levels were significantly increased for c-Kit (CD117) at 4 h in 16HBE (p < 0.0001) and at 24 h in COPD-fibroblasts (p = 0.037); for PCNA at 4 h in 16HBE (p = 0.046); for Thy1 (CD90) at 24 and 72 h in CS-fibroblasts (p = 0.031 and p = 0.041); for TGFβ1 at 72 h in CS-fibroblasts (p = 0.038); for procollagen-1 at 4 h in COPD-fibroblasts (p = 0.020); and for NF-κB-p65 at 4 and 24 h in 16HBE (p = 0.015 and p = 0.0002). In the peripheral lung tissue of a representative COPD patient, alveolar type II epithelial cells (TTF‐1+) coexpressing c-Kit (CD117) and PCNA were occasionally observed. These data show an increase of cell proliferation induced by a low dosage of extracorporeal shock waves in 16HBE cells and primary bronchial fibroblasts of COPD and control smoking subjects.

Pre-operative optimisation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a narrative review

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a condition commonly present in older people undergoing surgery and confers an increased risk of postoperative complications and mortality. Although predominantly a respiratory disease, it frequently has extra-pulmonary manifestations and typically occurs in the context of other long-term conditions. Patients experience a range of symptoms that affect their quality of life, functional ability and clinical outcomes. In this review, we discuss the evidence for techniques to optimise the care of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the peri-operative period, and address potential new interventions to improve outcomes. The article centres on pulmonary rehabilitation, widely available for the treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, but less often used in a peri-operative setting. Current evidence is largely at high risk of bias, however. Before surgery it is important to ensure that what have been called the 'five fundamentals' of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment are achieved: smoking cessation; pulmonary rehabilitation; vaccination; self-management; and identification and optimisation of co-morbidities. Pharmacological treatment should also be optimised, and some patients may benefit from lung volume reduction surgery. Psychological and behavioural factors are important, but are currently poorly understood in the peri-operative period. Considerations of the risk and benefits of delaying surgery to ensure the recommended measures are delivered depends on patient characteristics and the nature and urgency of the planned intervention.

Noteworthy Literature Published in 2018 for Thoracic Organ Transplantation

Publications of note from 2018 are reviewed for the cardiothoracic transplant anesthesiologist. Strategies to expand the availability of donor organs were highlighted, including improved donor management, accumulating experience with increased-risk donors, ex vivo perfusion techniques, and donation after cardiac death. A number of reports examined posttransplant outcomes, including outcomes other than mortality, with new data-driven risk models. Use of extracorporeal support in cardiothoracic transplantation was a prominent theme. Major changes in adult heart allocation criteria were implemented, aiming to improve objectivity and transparency in the listing process. Frailty and prehabilitation emerged as targets of comprehensive perioperative risk mitigation programs.