Pulmonary metastasectomy in the era of targeted therapy and immunotherapy

Workup, Indications, and Guiding Principles of Selection for Pulmonary Metastasectomy

Pulmonary metastasectomy is a potentially curative intervention for many different and distinct primary malignancies. It is safe in a diverse patient population. A short disease-free interval, multiple metastases, large metastases, and incomplete resection are all poor prognostic indicators for survival. Patients should be approached as any lung resection patient would, including a full history and physical, and a thorough review of their imaging, labs, medications, previous surgeries, and pulmonary function tests. All patients should be discussed at a multidisciplinary tumor board, and a formal and united plan with input from all specialties should be developed before offering surgical intervention.

Deficiency of myeloid discoidin domain receptor 2 aggravates melanoma lung and bone metastasis

Melanoma, one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide, frequently metastasizes to the lung and bones. Tumor-associated macrophages play essential roles in melanoma metastasis but the underlying mechanism remains obscure. We previously demonstrated that specific knockout of Ddr2, a receptor tyrosine kinase, exacerbates systemic inflammation via modulating macrophage repolarization. To investigate whether myeloid Ddr2 regulates melanoma growth and metastasis, we injected B16BL6 melanoma cells into Ddr2LysM (cKO) mice via subcutaneous neck, tail vein, and left ventricle, respectively. We found that the growth of melanoma cells in cKO mice was significantly retarded, as demonstrated by the subcutaneous transplantation tumor model. Unexpectedly, the melanoma metastasis to the lung or bone was significantly stimulated in cKO mice, indicating the complicated role of Ddr2 in macrophages in melanoma development. Furthermore, Ddr2 in macrophages regulated the migration of B16BL6 cells in the co-culture system. Bioinformatics analysis showed that Ddr2 expression correlates with improved prognostic outcomes in melanoma, and high expression of Ddr2 is protective in melanoma metastasis. Our results enrich the current knowledge of Ddr2 in tumor biology and indicate that more consideration should be taken when applying Ddr2 inhibition as a melanoma treatment strategy.

Contemporary trends in utilization of metastasectomy in the era of targeted and immunotherapies

BACKGROUND

Metastasectomy is a useful adjunct in the management of metastatic cancer. Widespread adoption of novel targeted and immunotherapies has improved the survival profiles of multiple malignancies, which has potentially altered the role of metastasectomy. This study aimed to characterize trends in metastasectomy across five primary cancers eligible for these therapies.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients who underwent metastasectomy in the United States (2016-2021). Patients with procedure codes for resection of the lung, liver, adrenal gland, brain, or small bowel and concurrent diagnosis codes for secondary malignant neoplasm of that site were included. Subjects were subcategorized by primary malignancy: colorectal cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, or renal cancer. Sample weights were used to produce national estimates, which were incidence adjusted by primary malignancy. Trends in utilization were calculated with average annual percent change (AAPC) and linear regression coefficients.

RESULTS

Colorectal cancer was the most frequent indication for metastasectomy (n = 57,644 cases), followed by lung cancer (n = 55,090 cases), breast cancer (n = 12,616 cases), renal cancer (n = 8427 cases), and melanoma (n = 5658 cases). Utilization of metastasectomy increased over the study period for breast cancer (AAPC, +10.6%; p = .013) and melanoma (AAPC, +8.3%; p = .040) but did not change for lung cancer (AAPC, -1.6%; p = .26), colorectal cancer (AAPC, +0.3%; p = .83), or renal cancer (AAPC, +2.3%; p = .36).

CONCLUSIONS

Between 2016 and 2021, utilization of metastasectomy increased significantly for melanoma and breast cancer. The role of metastasectomy will likely continue to develop as new treatment protocols improve survival profiles for patients with metastatic disease.

The Role of Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Non-Primary Lung Cancer: Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Due to heterogeneous characteristics of primary cancers, the efficacy of pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) in nonprimary lung cancers has not been investigated. This study aims to investigate the clinical outcomes of PM for non-primary lung cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search for meta-analyses on PM for nonprimary lung cancers was conducted, encompassing publications up to January 3, 2024. This included seven primary cancers: renal cell, breast, adrenocortical, head and neck cancers, melanoma, germ cell tumors, and sarcoma. Overall survival and recurrence rates post-PM were assessed using random-effect models.

RESULTS

This study included 16 systematic-review articles and 101 individual studies, involving 10 277 patients who underwent PM for nonprimary lung cancer. About half of the patients (47.1%) presented with multiple metastasis, and complete resection achieved in 87.2% [95% CI: 83.0-90.8]. The pooled 5-year overall survival rate post-PM was 41.2% [95%CI: 37.1%-45.4%]. Patients with germ cell tumors demonstrated higher survival rate (p < 0.05), while melanoma exhibited the worst outcome (p < 0.05). During follow-up, 57.6% [95% CI: 46.4-68.1] had recurrence; 48% of them had intrathoracic-only recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the survival benefits associated with PM. Overall survival rates following PM did not differ based on primary cancer types. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing and incorporating PM into clinical practice when appropriate.

Targeting PD-1/PD-L1 in tumor immunotherapy: Mechanisms and interactions with host growth regulatory pathways

Tumor immunotherapy has garnered considerable attention, emerging as a new standard of care in cancer treatment. The conventional targets, such as VEGF and EGFR, have been extended to others including BRAF and PD-1/PD-L1, which have shown significant potential in recent cancer treatments. This review aims to succinctly overview the impact and mechanisms of therapies that modulate PD-1/PD-L1 expression by targeting VEGF, EGFR, LAG-3, CTLA-4 and BRAF. We investigated how modulation of PD-1/PD-L1 expression impacts growth factor signaling, shedding light on the interplay between immunomodulatory pathways and growth factor networks within the tumor microenvironment. By elucidating these interactions, we aim to provide insights into novel potential synergistic therapeutic strategies for cancer immunotherapy.

[Construction and Validation of Prediction Models of Risk Factors for Early Death in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma]

Objective

To construct nomogram models to predict the risk factors for early death in patients with metastatic melanoma (MM).

Methods

The study covered 2138 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database and all these patients were diagnosed with MM between 2010 and 2015. Logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors affecting early death in MM patients. These risk factors were then used to construct nomograms of all-cause early death and cancer-specific early death. The efficacy of the model was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). In addition, external validation of the model was performed with clinicopathologic data of 105 patients diagnosed with MM at Sichuan Cancer Hospital between January 2015 and January 2020.

Results

According to the results of logistic regression, marital status, the primary site, N staging, surgery, chemotherapy, bone metastases, liver metastases, lung metastases, and brain metastases could be defined as independent predictive factors for early death. Based on these factors, 2 nomograms were plotted to predict the risks of all-cause early death and cancer-specific early death, respectively. For the models for all-cause and cancer-specific early death, the areas under the curve (AUCs) for the training group were 0.751 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.726-0.776) and 0.740 (95% CI: 0.714-0.765), respectively. The AUCs for the internal validation group were 0.759 (95% CI: 0.722-0.797) and 0.757 (95% CI: 0.718-0.780), respectively, while the AUCs for the external validation group were 0.750 (95% CI: 0.649-0.850) and 0.741 (95% CI: 0.644-0.838), respectively. The calibration curves showed high agreement between the predicted and the observed probabilities. DCA analysis indicated high clinical application value of the models.

Conclusion

The nomogram models demonstrated good performance in predicting early death in MM patients and can be used to help clinical oncologists develop more individualized treatment strategies.

Role of Surgery in Metastatic Melanoma and Review of Melanoma Molecular Characteristics

We aimed to review the molecular characteristics of metastatic melanoma and the role of surgery in metastasectomy for metastatic melanoma. We performed a systematic literature search on PubMed to identify relevant studies focusing on several mutations, including NRAS, BRAF, NF1, MITF, PTEN, TP53, CDKN2A, TERT, TMB, EGFR, and c-KIT. This was performed in the context of metastatic melanoma and the role of metastasectomy in the metastatic melanoma population. A comprehensive review of these molecular characteristics is presented with a focus on their prognosis and role in surgical metastasectomy.

Lung surveillance following colorectal cancer pulmonary metastasectomy: Utilization of clinicopathologic risk factors to guide strategy

BACKGROUND

Appropriately selected patients clearly benefit from resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) pulmonary metastases (PMs). However, there remains equipoise surrounding optimal chest surveillance strategies following pulmonary metastasectomy. We aimed to identify risk factors that may inform chest surveillance in this population.

METHODS

Patients who underwent CRC pulmonary metastasectomy were identified from a single institution's prospectively maintained surgical database. Clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics were collected. Patients were stratified by diagnosis of subsequent PM within 6 months of the index lung resection. Multivariate modeling was used to evaluate risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients met the study's inclusion criteria, of whom 52.3% (n = 103) developed subsequent PM, at a median of 9.51 months following the index metastasectomy. Patients with KRAS alterations (odds ratio [OR], 3.073; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.363-6.926; P = .007), TP53 alterations (OR, 3.109; 95% CI, 1.318-7.341; P = .010) were found to be at risk of PM diagnosis within 6 months of the index metastasectomy, while those with an APC alteration (OR, .218; 95% CI, 0.080-0.598; P = .003) were protected. Moreover, patients who received systemic therapy within 3 months of the initial PM diagnosis also were more likely to develop early lung recurrence (OR, 2.105; 95% CI, 0.971-4.563; P = .059).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with KRAS alterations, TP53 alterations, and no APC alterations developed early recurrence in the lung following pulmonary metastasectomy, as did those who received chemotherapy after their initial PM diagnosis. As such, these groups benefit from early lung imaging after metastasectomy, as chest surveillance protocols should be based on patient-centered clinicopathologic and genomic risk factors.

Current status and novel insights into the role of metastasectomy in the era of immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

New perspectives on the role of metastasectomy have emerged along with the advances in cancer immunotherapy. Despite accumulating evidence that encourages the use of immunotherapy in the metastatic setting, current data regarding its combination with surgical resection of secondary lesions, as well as the best timeline and sequence of such a therapeutic approach is limited.

AREAS COVERED

We review the currently available literature on the role of metastasectomy in the era of novel immunotherapeutic agents and provide comprehensive evidence from ongoing trials about the available treatment strategies. In metastatic melanoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a key role both in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting to achieve long-term disease control. In metastatic renal cell carcinoma, investigation is ongoing regarding the emerging role of ICIs before metastasectomy. ICIs have improved outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal and head and neck cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

In the neoadjuvant setting, the high response rates and the durability of responses to immunotherapy may enable the resectability of metastatic lesions. In the adjuvant setting post metastasectomy, immunotherapy constitutes a safe and efficacious approach to support immune tumor surveillance and delay or even prevent disease relapse. Patient participation in relevant clinical trials should be encouraged.

Discrimination Between Primary Lung Cancer and Lung Metastases by Genomic Profiling

Introduction

In cases of lung tumors that occur after treatment for malignancies in other organs, the tumor may represent either a primary lung cancer or a solitary pulmonary metastasis from the other tumor. Because some lung tumors are difficult to differentiate on the basis of imaging and pathologic findings, treatment selection is often difficult. In this study, we attempted to make a genomic diagnosis of primary and metastatic lung tumors by analyzing tumor samples using next-generation sequencing and evaluated the efficacy and validity of the genomic diagnosis.

Methods

A total of 24 patients with a solitary lung nodule and a history of other malignancies were enrolled in this study. Tumor cells were selected from tissue samples using laser capture microdissection. DNA was extracted from those cells and subjected to targeted deep sequencing of 53 genes.

Results

The driver mutation profiles of the primary lung tumors were discordant from those of the primary tumors in other sites, whereas the mutation profiles of pulmonary metastases and previous malignancies were concordant. In all 24 patients, we could diagnose either primary lung cancer (six patients) or lung metastases (18 patients) on the basis of whether gene mutation profiles were concordant or discordant. In 12 patients (50.0%), discrepancies were observed between the genomic and clinical or histopathologic diagnoses.

Conclusions

In patients with a solitary lung lesion and a history of cancer, tumor-specific mutations can serve as clonal markers, affording a more accurate understanding of the pathological condition and thus possibly improving both treatment selection and patient outcome.

Treatment beyond progression and locoregional approaches in selected patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma

The clinical management of BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma had an important turning point after the introduction of the targeted therapy. Despite the efficacy and good tolerability of this treatment, the development of resistance mechanisms causes disease progression. The aim of this review is to investigate the role of treatment beyond progression and locoregional approaches in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma and provide oncologists dealing with this malignancy a useful road map on when and why to choose this strategy.

The article is structured in the form of a narrative review reporting the most significant studies on the subject. Most of the available articles are represented by retrospective studies and case reports, leading to limitations in the final interpretations. Nevertheless, a correct analysis of the selected studies allows the drawing of some conclusions. In well-selected cases, treatment beyond progression could play an important role in the treatment sequence of patients with BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma and would seem to produce good disease control rates and positive survival outcomes. A careful evaluation of the radiological examinations and laboratory tests, based on the clinical conditions, allows the identification of which patients can benefit from this strategy. Such patients are those who, at the time of progression, have favourable features such as a lower performance status according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG-PS), normal lactate dehydrogenase levels and lower disease burden. The clinical benefit is also consolidated by the addition of locoregional approaches. Locoregional approaches can include electrochemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery, and their use provides local disease control and a better quality of life for patients.

Enhancement of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Mediated Anti-Cancer Immunity by Intranasal Treatment of Ecklonia cava Fucoidan against Metastatic Lung Cancer

Although fucoidan, a well-studied seaweed-extracted polysaccharide, has shown immune stimulatory effects that elicit anticancer immunity, mucosal adjuvant effects via intranasal administration have not been studied. In this study, the effect of Ecklonia cava-extracted fucoidan (ECF) on the induction of anti-cancer immunity in the lung was examined by intranasal administration. In C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice, intranasal administration of ECF promoted the activation of dendritic cells (DCs), natural killer (NK) cells, and T cells in the mediastinal lymph node (mLN). The ECF-induced NK and T cell activation was mediated by DCs. In addition, intranasal injection with ECF enhanced the anti-PD-L1 antibody-mediated anti-cancer activities against B16 melanoma and CT-26 carcinoma tumor growth in the lungs, which were required cytotoxic T lymphocytes and NK cells. Thus, these data demonstrated that ECF functioned as a mucosal adjuvant that enhanced the immunotherapeutic effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors against metastatic lung cancer.